Abstract
Six agglutination and two complement fixation tests were compared with respect to specificity, sensitivity and relative sensitivity for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Based on 1051 sera from brucellosis free herds, the specificity of the tests was 98.9% for the buffered plate antigen test (BPAT), 99.2% and 99.3% for the standard tube and plate agglutination tests (STAT and SPAT), respectively, and 99.8% for the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2MET). On this small sample, the rose bengal plate test (RBPT), card test (CARD) and the complement fixation test (CFT) correctly classed all sera as negative. On a sample of 167 culture positive cattle, the sensitivities of the tests were CFT: 79.0%, BPAT: 75.4, RBPT: 74.9%, CARD: 74.3%, SPAT: 73.1%, STAT: 68.9%, and 2MET: 59.9%. All tests combined detected only 82% of these infected cattle. Analysis of the relative sensitivity of the six agglutination tests gave the following ranking: BPAT greater than RBPT greater than CARD greater than SPAT greater than STAT. The 2MET ranked between the BPAT and RBPT or between the RBPT and CARD depending on the analysis used. The use of the BPAT as a screening test is recommended provided that a test of high specificity and sensitivity such as the CFT is used to confirm screening test reactions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alton G. G., Maw J., Rogerson B. A., McPherson G. G. The serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: an evaluation of the complement fixation, serum agglutination and rose bengal tests. Aust Vet J. 1975 Feb;51(2):57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1975.tb09404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JONES L. M., HENDRICKS J. B., BERMAN D. T. THE STANDARDIZATION AND USE OF THE COMPLEMENT- FIXATION TEST FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS, WITH A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Am J Vet Res. 1963 Nov;24:1143–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malkin K. L., Tailyour J. M., Bhatia T. R., Archibald R. M., Dorward W. J. A serological survey for brucellosis in Canadian swine. Can J Comp Med. 1968 Oct;32(4):598–599. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin S. W. The evaluation of tests. Can J Comp Med. 1977 Jan;41(1):19–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan W. J., MacKinnon D. J., Lawson J. R., Cullen G. A. The rose bengal plate agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Vet Rec. 1969 Dec 6;85(23):636–641. doi: 10.1136/vr.85.23.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mylrea P. J. The diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy herds. Aust Vet J. 1972 Jul;48(7):369–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1972.tb05167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoletti P. Further evaluations of serologic test procedures used to diagnose brucellosis. Am J Vet Res. 1969 Oct;30(10):1811–1816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoletti P., Muraschi T. F. Bacteriologic evaluation of serologic test procedures for the diagnosis of brucellosis in problem cattle herds. Am J Vet Res. 1966 May;27(118):689–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stemshorn B. W., Nielsen K. H., Samagh B. S., Forbes L. B., Ingram D. G. Evaluation of an enzyme-labeled antiglobulin test for anti-Brucella immunoglobulin G among 3 cattle populations. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Nov;41(11):1779–1784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stemshorn B., Nielsen K. The bovine immune response to Brucella abortus IV. Studies with a double immunodiffusion test for antibody against A2. Can J Comp Med. 1981 Apr;45(2):147–153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timbs D. V., Moxham J. W., Liberona H. E. The use of automated complement fixation techniques in the Brucellosis Eradication Scheme. N Z Vet J. 1978 Mar;26(3):52–56. doi: 10.1080/00480169.1978.34495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]