Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Hematol. 2025 Jul 11;150:104857. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2025.104857

Neutrophil Death-More Than Meets The Eye

Alan Y Hsu 1,3, Qingxiang Huang 2,3, Fei Liu 1, Arumugam Balasubramanian 1, Hongbo R Luo 1,*
PMCID: PMC12376072  NIHMSID: NIHMS2104185  PMID: 40653261

Abstract

Neutrophils play an indispensable role in the innate immune system as the body’s first line of defense against pathogens. These highly specialized cells are rapidly recruited to infection sites, where they execute a variety of critical functions essential for pathogen clearance. These functions include phagocytosis, degranulation, the release of antimicrobial peptides and reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which serve to directly neutralize pathogens or restrict their spread. Despite their abundance—accounting for 40-70% of total white blood cells in human circulation, neutrophils have a relatively short lifespan. To maintain immune homeostasis, approximately 1 billion neutrophils per kilogram of body weight are produced and cleared each day, a highly regulated and energy-intensive process. Neutrophil death is a highly heterogeneous process, with neutrophils undergoing different forms of cell death depending on the stimuli, signaling, and microenvironment. Even during aging or cell death, neutrophils continue to exert significant effects on the immune landscape. In this review, we discuss the dynamics of neutrophil turnover during homeostasis and inflammation, the diversity of mechanisms governing their death, and the multifaceted roles of neutrophils in modulating the immune environment both during and after their demise.

Keywords: Neutrophils, cell death, cell aging, netosis, pyroptosis, apoptosis, efferocytosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, inflammation

Short-lived but adaptable: the regulation of neutrophil lifespan

Neutrophil half-life under homeostatic conditions

The lifespan of circulating neutrophils is generally believed to be quite short, typically ranging from 7 to 24 hours. Early studies used DFP32 to label blood cells isolated from volunteers1. DFP32 irreversibly bound intracellular serine proteases, demonstrating relative specificity for neutrophils while binding minimally, if at all, to lymphocytes and monocytes. The labeled blood cells were then reinfused into the volunteers, and by detecting the radioactive decay of DFP32 in white blood cells, researchers calculated the half-life of reinfused neutrophils to be approximately 4 to 9 hours2. Subsequent studies using 51Cr3 and 3HTdr4 produced similar findings, with granulocyte half-lives ranging from 5 to 17.5 hours in peripheral blood. While this form of ex vivo labeling provided valuable insights, the method had limitations, including the inadvertent activation of neutrophils5 and alterations to their migratory characteristics6, which influenced half-life calculations.

To improve accuracy, direct in vivo labeling methods were utilized, such as the intravenous injection of DFP32 into volunteers7. Using a mathematical model to analyze the radioactivity in neutrophils isolated from bone marrow and peripheral blood, Cartwright et al., estimated the half-life of neutrophils to be 7.2 hours7. In another study, Pillay et al. administered low doses of heavy water to volunteers over nine weeks, measured radioactivity in peripheral blood neutrophils, and estimated a lifespan of 5.4 days in humans and 12.5 hours in mice8. Later, Lahoz-Beneytez et al. conducted a similar study using both heavy water and deuterium-labeled glucose, developing a refined mechanistic model applied to their own data as well as Pillay et al.’s data9. Due to a difference in the estimated neutrophil precursor-to-mature neutrophil ratio, the human peripheral blood neutrophil half-life was determined to be less than one day9.

Mice models are widely used in immunological research, making an understanding of neutrophil dynamics crucial. Through BrdU tracing or in vivo radioactive labeling, researchers have demonstrated that the half-life of circulating neutrophils in mice is shorter, estimated to be 10.7 to 12.5 hours to that of humans8,10. Ballesteros et al. utilized a parabiosis model to demonstrate that the lifespan of neutrophils in most mice tissues are less than 24 hours11. However, surgical separation in parabiosis experiments might inadvertently extend neutrophil lifespan12. To address this, they employed a tamoxifen-induced model expressing transient expression of tdTomato specifically in neutrophils, enabling the tracking of individual fluorescent waves. Their findings revealed that neutrophil half-life varied across tissues, with a lifespan of less than 10 hours in blood in contrast to 18.8 hours in the skin11.

Neutrophil life span is altered during inflammation

During inflammation, neutrophils exhibit an extended lifespan, a phenomenon particularly evident in certain inflammatory diseases such as cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis1315. In these cases, neutrophils demonstrate delayed apoptosis, which is associated with significantly lower levels of Bax, a protein that promotes cell death16. Furthermore, under the hypoxic conditions often associated with inflammation, neutrophils can extend their half-life through activation of HIF-2α pathways, in addition to the downregulation of MCL-1, an important anti-apoptotic protein, which leads to a prolonged neutrophil lifespan 17,18. The same extension of neutrophil half-life has been reported during treatment with various inflammatory cytokine stimulations, such as IL-1β, IFN-γ, exposing to bacterial products such as LPS, or streptococci, where activated neutrophils stabilize Mcl-1 thereby inhibiting apoptosis19. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) which is a potent pro-inflammatory activator of neutrophils has been shown to have a dual effect on neutrophil apoptosis. TNF-α has been shown to accelerated apoptosis via TNFR55 /TNFR75 signaling and caspase induced MCL-1 turnover20,21. Conversely TNF-α treatment for prolonged periods or with a lower concentration lead to decreased apoptosis levels via IL-8 autocrine signaling or expression of the antiapoptotic molecule, BFL-121-23.

There is currently a challenge in precisely calculating neutrophil lifespans under inflammatory conditions due to alterations in systemic factors, granulopoiesis, microenvironmental cues, and apoptotic clearance. Under inflammatory conditions, granulopoiesis is markedly upregulated, resulting in heterogeneous and dynamic neutrophil kinetics. G-CSF, a cytokine that promotes granulopoiesis, has also been shown to strongly upregulate PI3K/Akt pro-survival signal and inhibit the activation of calcium-dependent cysteine proteases, calpains, which act upstream of caspase-3 activation24,25. Additionally, neutrophil recruitment to inflamed tissues can modify their lifespan through interactions with the local microenvironment, exposure to specific regional cytokine signals, and the efficiency of apoptotic cell clearance mechanisms. This complexity, in addition to varying stages of neutrophil maturation, survival, and function, poses significant challenges for accurate in vivo modeling of neutrophil lifespan during inflammation.

Prolonged neutrophil lifespan in tumors

Neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment have been shown to survive significantly longer than the less-than-24-hour lifespan of circulating neutrophils, suggesting that the tumor provides conditions that extend their longevity to more than 96 hours26. In a recent study, Ng et al. employed BrdU tracing in tumor-bearing mice, demonstrating that the half-life of neutrophils is significantly prolonged not only in the tumor microenvironment but also in the bloodstream27. Specifically, circulating neutrophils in tumor bearing mice exhibited a half-life of 31.4 hours, indicating an increased lifespan compared to previously predicted values for wild-type neutrophils11. Remarkably, neutrophils residing in tumors displayed an even longer half-life of 41.8 hours, with a predicted lifespan of 135 hours (up to 5.625 days). Similarly, in human cancer patients, both peripheral and tumor-infiltrating neutrophils demonstrate reduced apoptosis rates and extended persistence28,29.

The extended lifespan of neutrophils has been suggested to result from intrinsic signals, such as cytosolic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which inhibits caspase activation29, or from extrinsic pro-survival factors like G-CSF or IFN-β, which are produced by nearby tumors or other immune cells30. Further investigations are required to define the biological significance of altered neutrophil apoptosis and its potential influence on cancer progression and therapeutic responses.

The modes of neutrophil death

Apoptosis

Apoptosis is a fundamental mechanism for maintaining neutrophil homeostasis, which can be initiated through intrinsic or extrinsic pathways12,31. The intrinsic pathway is triggered by intracellular stress signals, leading to the activation of caspase-9, whereas the extrinsic pathway is mediated by membrane-bound death receptors, which activate caspase-8. Both pathways converge upon the cleavage and activation of caspase-3 which in turn triggers cellular events such as DNA fragmentation, chromatin condensation, cytoskeletal disruption, nuclear envelope breakdown, cell shrinkage, and apoptotic body formation, ensuring programmed cell death occurs with minimal damage to surrounding tissues32,33. Under physiological conditions and during inflammation resolution, neutrophil turnover predominantly occurs through apoptosis, though variations exist in morphology and regulatory mechanisms31,34. Neutrophil apoptosis shares key features of classical apoptosis, including cytoplasmic vacuolation and the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS) from the inner to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane35.

Many classical pro-survival and pro-apoptotic pathways regulate neutrophil survival and death34. For instance, the pro-survival PtdIns(3,4,5)P3/Akt signaling pathway also plays a key role in neutrophil death36,37. In PTEN-deficient neutrophils, enhanced PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 signaling prolongs survival and improves host outcomes during E. coli-induced pneumonia38. Conversely, disruption of the focal adhesion complex significantly downregulates the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3/Akt pro-survival pathway, leading to increased neutrophil death39. An extended neutrophil lifespan can contribute to tissue damage, as seen when cigarette smoke extract and nicotine reduce InsP7 levels, thereby increasing Akt activity and promoting lung neutrophil accumulation and damage. Neutrophil death can be restored by overexpressing InsP6K1 to elevate InsP7 levels or by inhibiting Akt activity40.

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also key mediators of neutrophil apoptosis which accumulate intracellularly in aging neutrophils36. In apoptotic neutrophils, ROS accumulation disrupts actin-mediated positive feedback loops, acting as a negative regulator of PI3Kγ36. In addition, ROS can directly oxidize and damage granules, causing serine proteases or other enzymes to leak into the cytosol, which results in damage and ultimately leads to cell death, a process known as lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) 41,42. Proteinase 3 which is typically stored in granules is released into the cytosol during aging through LMP. This release facilitates the cleavage of procaspase-3, thereby inducing caspase activation and apoptosis in a caspase-8/9-independent manner43. The primary anti-apoptotic protein in neutrophils is Mcl-1, in contrast to the more commonly expressed Bcl-2 and Bcl-X40. Mcl-1 levels directly correlate with neutrophil survival, declining as neutrophils undergo apoptosis to facilitate the apoptotic process44,45. Conversely, factors such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-1β, sodium butyrate, and lipopolysaccharide can upregulate Mcl-1 expression, thereby enhancing neutrophil survival45.

Unlike most other cell types, neutrophils do not rely on mitochondria for energy production but primarily depend on glycolysis. They have relatively low mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Throughout neutrophil differentiation, they continuously lose cytochrome c and other mitochondrial proteins, leaving only trace amounts in mature neutrophils 46,47. Despite this loss, neutrophils still exhibit significant caspase-9 activation during apoptosis, a process attributed to their elevated levels of apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1).46,47. The extrinsic apoptotic pathway in neutrophils is activated upon engagement of surface death receptors such as FAS, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNF-R1), and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors. In addition to these classical death receptors, neutrophil apoptosis can also be triggered by interactions with pathogens. The phagocytosis of pathogenic bacteria, including B.cepacia, S.aureus, and S.pyogenes, has been shown to accelerate apoptosis in neutrophils34,48. Furthermore, a separate study demonstrated that the digestion of E. coli induces apoptosis through an oxygen-dependent mechanism49. Additionally, the toxic metabolite pyocyanin, produced by P.aeruginosa, directly promotes neutrophil apoptosis by inducing early lysosomal dysfunction, followed by mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and downstream caspase activation50.

Apoptotic neutrophils are rapidly cleared by macrophages through efferocytosis, a process mediated by the recognition of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of dying cells35,51. This interaction stimulates the release of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) from macrophages, playing a crucial role in promoting the resolution of acute inflammation by suppressing immune activation35,51-54.

Pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is a specialized, inflammatory form of programmed cell death mediated by inflammatory caspases, playing a critical role in host defense and the propagation of inflammation. Inflammatory caspases such as CASP1, CASP4, CASP5, and CASP11 can cleave full-length GSDMD into an active, pore-forming N-terminal fragment. This fragment then translocates to the plasma membrane via palmitoylation5558, where it forms pores, leading to cell swelling and eventual rupture, thereby facilitating the release of cytokines like IL-1β59,60.

Neutrophil pyroptosis is generally considered a pro-inflammatory mode of cell death, leading to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), IL-1β, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Therefore, the regulation of upstream pyroptotic mediators, including inflammasomes, caspases, and proteases, as well as functional GSDMs, must be tightly controlled to fine-tune the downstream inflammatory response. These regulatory mechanisms were recently reviewed in detail by Dubyak et al.61. Pyroptosis in neutrophils extends beyond its well-established pro-inflammatory roles62,63. Ma et al. identified gasdermin E (GSDME) as a key regulator of lytic cell death during spontaneous neutrophil aging in murine models. The controlled cleavage and activation of GSDME are mediated by proteinase-3 and caspase-3, leading to pyroptotic cell death. Interestingly, GSDME deficiency does not affect overall neutrophil lifespan but specifically inhibits the pyroptotic pathway of spontaneous death, shifting the mode of death toward apoptosis. This apoptotic skewing enhances macrophage-mediated efferocytosis, thereby reducing inflammatory responses62. Furthermore, Zhu et al. demonstrated that GSDME cleavage in murine neutrophils facilitates peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) activation, promoting the extrusion of neutrophil DNA into the extracellular space63.

Despite extensive research on GSDMD and GSDME in neutrophil pyroptosis, the upstream signaling events that initiate this process remain poorly understood. Specifically, the molecular cues that regulate the translocation of cleaved GSDMD fragments to distinct cellular membranes are unclear. While some stimuli direct these fragments to the plasma membrane, inducing pore formation, lysis, and cytokine release, others promote their trafficking to intracellular granules, preventing pyroptosis. This differential localization suggests the involvement of regulatory mechanisms such as post-translational modifications, adaptor protein interactions, or variations in proteolytic processing. Further investigation is needed to elucidate these upstream pathways and assess the role of other pore-forming proteins, such as NINJ1, in neutrophil pyroptosis. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms could uncover new strategies for modulating inflammation and developing targeted therapies for inflammatory diseases.

Necrosis

Neutrophil necrosis frequently occurs under inflammatory conditions, including hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, elevated temperatures, exposure to toxic compounds, and mechanical stress, all of which can trigger necrotic cell death64,65. Similar to other cell types, neutrophil necrosis is characterized by organelle swelling, plasma membrane rupture, and eventual cell lysis, leading to the release of intracellular contents into the surrounding tissue and contributing to tissue damage64,65. Primary necrosis, in contrast to secondary necrosis-the final phase of apoptosis is distinguished by increased cell volume (oncosis), plasma membrane rupture, and the uncontrolled release of intracellular material into the extracellular environment66,67. Like other forms of lytic cell death, neutrophil necrosis can actively contribute to a pro-inflammatory microenvironment by promoting the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α by neighboring cells through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from dying neutrophils68. It is worth noting that the definition of necrosis has mostly been based on lytic morphology and may overlap with other, more well-defined lytic forms of cell death.

Necroptosis

Described first in 2005, necroptosis was identified as a TNF-α-triggered, non-apoptotic form of lytic cell death occurring independent of caspase-8 and when apoptotic caspases are blocked69. It shares key necrotic features like organelle swelling, plasma membrane rupture, and intracellular leakage top other forms of lytic cell death70. Mechanistically, necroptosis is driven by the necrosome, comprising of MLKL, RIPK1, and RIPK3 signaling in an intracellular ROS dependent fasion7173. Neutrophils can undergo necroptosis during TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) stimulation74, after GM-CSF priming followed by cell adhesion73, activation by MSU crystals or PMA75, or phagocytosis of S. aureus76. Neutrophil necroptosis can often lead to DAMP release 77,78, proinflammatory cytokine production, and formation of NETs79,80, fueling inflammation. However there have been reports suggesting that the rapid lysis of cells during necroptosis may lead to an earlier resolution of inflammation via early shut down of TNF/TLR-induced inflammatory cytokine production. RIPK3 can also exert anti-inflammatory function independent of necroptosis8184.

Ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is a form of lytic cell death characterized by lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), neutrophils are shown to undergo ferroptosis, triggered by autoantibodies (IgE) and interferon-alpha (IFN-α), which suppress the activity of GPX4, highlighting how immune dysregulation can drive ferroptotic cell death in SLE neutrophils85. Similarly, in the subcutaneous tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) are prone to ferroptosis, which may contribute to immune suppression and tumor progression86. These tumor-associated neutrophils are particularly sensitive to ferroptosis induced by agents like RSL3. Importantly, when ferroptosis is inhibited in TINs, T-cell proliferation is enhanced, suggesting that TIN ferroptosis plays a role in suppressing anti-tumor immunity86. TINs can evade ferroptosis through GM-CSF signaling in the mammary TME. GM-CSF upregulates Acod1, leading to increased itaconate production, which inhibits Keap1, a negative regulator of Nrf287. This activation enhances GPX4 expression, suppressing ferroptosis in TINs and ultimately promoting tumor growth and metastasis87. In both scenarios, the TME modulates TIN ferroptosis to drive tumor progression, with the key difference lying in the tumor models used and the specific phases of tumor development.

NETosis

Neutrophils possess a broad array of antimicrobial defense mechanisms. In addition to their traditional responses, recent research has highlighted the formation of unique fibrous, web-like chromatin structures known as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). These structures were first observed in neutrophils challenged with S.aureus and have since been noted in response to protozoal infections as well88,89. NETs were later defined as extracellular strands of decondensed neutrophil DNA complexed with histones and granule proteins. Their formation during neutrophil stimulation is dependent on the citrullination of histones by peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), which leads to DNA decondensation9093. The classical pathway of NET formation, also known as lytic NETosis (suicidal NETs), is triggered by various stimuli, including bacterial and fungal infections, cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). This process is largely dependent on ROS production by NADPH oxidase, which activates PAD4 to citrullinated histone H3 along with CDK4/6 activation leading to chromatin decondensation and release9092,94. In contrast, non-lytic NETosis (Vital NETs) allows neutrophils to extrude NETs without compromising their viability, enabling them to continue performing immune functions95,96. It is worth noting that in some cases the DNA released during vital NETosis is of mitochondrial origin, allowing unimpaired neutrophil function97,98. The mechanistic regulation between lytic and vital forms of NETs is still not fully understood. NETs have also been associated with other forms of lytic neutrophil death such as pyroptosis and necroptosis 79,99. Mechanistically, whether NETosis constitutes a distinct form of cell death featuring PAD4-mediated chromatin recondensation or simply represents a natural consequence of neutrophils undergoing lytic cell death remains elusive. It has been reported that neutrophil NETosis can occur independently of PAD4 and histone citrullination in models of K. pneumoniae pneumonia100 or when neutrophils are stimulated with PMA101.

Metabolic changes in neutrophil death

Neutrophils primarily rely on glycolysis for metabolic energy to carry out their effector functions, despite possessing functional mitochondria and internal glycogen stores102104. During apoptosis, their glycolytic activity diminishes due to the downregulation of key glycolytic enzymes or reduced glucose uptake leading to decreased energy production105,106. To counteract this, glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) can transfer electrons to complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain via ubiquinol, helping maintain mitochondrial membrane potential in turn, preventing cytochrome c release and delay the onset of apoptosis46. In addition to serving as a source of ATP and pro-survival functions, glucose can also be diverted into the parallel pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which plays a critical role in supporting ROS production, NET formation, and death receptor expression, processes that collectively contribute to neutrophil death103,107. These observations suggest that the routing of glucose into distinct metabolic pathways can influence neutrophil fate.

Glutamine metabolism also plays a dual role in regulating neutrophil lifespan. On one hand, glutamine serves as a precursor for the synthesis of antioxidants such as glutathione, which protects against oxidative damage. Exogenous glutathione supplementation has been shown to delay neutrophil death and can also act as a metabolic fuel under inflammatory conditions108,109. On the other hand, glutamine can be converted to malate through glutaminolysis, generating NADPH to support ROS production and NET formation which can contribute to neutrophil death110,111.

Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is a key metabolic pathway that generates acetyl-CoA through the breakdown of fatty acids. During differentiation, neutrophils rely heavily on lipophagy-mediated FAO. However, upon maturation, they shift their metabolic program toward glycolysis103,112. Short-chain fatty acids and oxidative stress resulting from FAO can reduce neutrophil viability113. In contrast, fatty acid synthase–mediated lipogenesis supports neutrophil survival by promoting ether lipid synthesis, which helps maintain membrane integrity114.

In summary, there is a need for further investigation into how neutrophils selectively utilize metabolic precursors in distinct pathways in response to external stimulus or internal “aging” signaling, ultimately influencing their function, survival, or death.

Summary

Neutrophil death is a highly heterogeneous process, encompassing multiple forms that are differentially regulated by various triggers31 (Table 1) These processes are governed by complex regulatory mechanisms that control the balance between distinct cellular fates, especially within the context of programmed cell death. This variability expands the functional plasticity of neutrophils, allowing them to adapt to diverse signals that vary in duration and intensity. It remains unclear whether neutrophils are intrinsically preprogrammed to undergo a specific type of cell death in response to a given cue or if they rely on rapid stimuli-triggered de novo transcription and translation to determine their fate. With various neutrophil death mechanisms being revealed, several strategies have been developed to extend their lifespan. CLON-G treatment, a combination of caspase inhibition, lysosomal membrane permeabilization prevention, oxidant suppression, necroptosis inhibition, and G-CSF, can prolong neutrophil survival for up to five days. Notably, neutrophils treated with CLON-G retain their infection-clearing capacity upon transfer into neutropenic mice, comparable to freshly isolated neutrophils25.

Table 1.

Summary of modes of neutrophil death in response to stimulation

Simulation/mode of death Apoptosis Pyroptosis Necroptosis Ferroptosis NETosis
Adhesion Focal adhesion kinase engagement 39
Type 1-fimbriated Escherichia coli Cathepsin mediated Bid cleavage41
Phagocytosis of pathogens ROS dependent upregulation of proapoptotic proteins42,48
Protease proteinase 3 Caspase-9 activation43 Caspase-3 activation cleaves GSDME62
Cytochrome c/ Apaf-1 Apoptotic Caspase activation46,47
Fas ligand Fas162,163
TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand TRAIL-R2 and R3 receptors163,164
TNF-a (high doses) mitoROS production165,166 RIPK3 (when apoptosis was blocked)74
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)+ Nigericin GSDMD localization to primary granlues60 Cytosolic LPS-GSDMD167
Pseudomonas aeruginosa NLRC4/NLRP3-GSDMD168,169
Burkholderia thailandensis NLRC4-GSDMD170
Leishmania mexicana NLRP1-GSDMD171
Aspergillus fumigatus NLRP3- GSDM-D172
Cell adhesion molecule ligation ROS-RIPK373
Birinapant+z-VAD-fmk RIPK3 (when apoptosis was blocked)79
SLE IgG/ IFN-α Gpx4 down-regulation85
RSL3 Gpx4 inhibition 86
PMA PKC activation88,101
Ionomycin Calcium influx-PAD4 activation101,173
Various Bacteria ROS-PKC (PAD4?) activation90,101,174
Candida albicans β-glucan, PKC acivation89,96,101
Platelets Neutrophil-platelet aggregation98
IgG Immune complex Fc receptor signlaing175,176

Neutrophil function after death

Neutrophil aging and clearance via efferocytosis

As neutrophils age, they undergo a series of transformations, including changes in cell marker expression. These changes are characterized by increased levels of CXCR4 and CD18, alongside decreased levels of CD62L115117. Functionally, they show a heightened tendency to migrate to inflamed tissue, an accumulation of intracellular ROS but decreased ROS production in response to extracellular stimuli, and improved phagocytic capabilities116,118. While aged neutrophils are thought to provide better protection against infections, they might cause more severe tissue damage in sterile injuries119. The primary factors driving neutrophil aging remain largely unknown, but some reports suggest links to spontaneous neutrophil activation, circadian rhythms, or the microbiome 119,120. Mechanistically, the CXCL2-CXCR2 axis has been implicated in driving aging, whereas CXCR4 antagonizes it119. While the elevated CXCR4 would guide the aged neutrophil back to the bone marrow where their altered apoptotic regulatory factors accelerate their progression toward terminal apoptosis115. Subsequently, the aging neutrophil exhibits a downregulation of “don’t eat me” signals, while “find-me” and “eat-me” signals are enhanced121. This promotes engulfment by resident or circulating macrophages, ensuring clearance and completing the cycle to maintain homeostasis 12,34,122. The efferocytosis of dying neutrophils or apoptotic bodies induces an immunosuppressive signaling via TGF-β and IL-10 secretion123,124. Given the transformations observed during neutrophil aging, it is plausible that aged neutrophils may acquire novel roles or functions.

NETs

The short lifespan and rapid clearance of neutrophils have prompted speculation about their extended functions beyond their expected duration of life. The concept of neutrophil functions during aging or even after death was first highlighted with the discovery of NETs 88. In this process, activated neutrophils discharge a combination of chromatin, granule proteins, and histones, forming a web-like structure to trap and kill bacteria, thus prolonging the functionality of neutrophils even after their death. Since this revelation, the field of NETs has seen expansive growth, with a multitude of NET variants being characterized 92,95,101,125. Beyond their primary role in anti-microbial defense, NETs have been implicated in a range of pathophysiological scenarios, including autoimmune diseases such as SLE and RA 126128, gallstone formation 129, vasculitis, vaso-occlusion, diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout 92,130,131, and thombosis132. Furthermore, NET DNA or protein components can lead to regional inflammation and by increasing its immunogenicity leading to autoantibody production133,134. Depending on the context, NETs can have either pro-tumor or anti-tumor function. NETs can exert cytotoxic effects, directly targeting tumor cells or indirectly via other cells. However, they can form a physical barrier to shield tumor mass or serve as a direct chemoattractant for tumor metastasis Furthermore, their inflammatory, matrix-degrading, and angiogenic properties often support tumor progression135139.

DAMP release

Following neutrophil lytic cell death, cellular contents, known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), are released into the extracellular space to augment host immune response140. These DAMPs contribute to harmful pro-inflammatory responses and localized tissue damage, potentially leading to end-organ failure, the onset of chronic autoimmune diseases like SLE and rheumatoid arthritis, or even fatal outcomes141143.

Many intracellular molecules, including alarmins, ATP, uric acid, yest-to be secreted cytokines, and even F-actin, can be released into the extracellular space, acting as DAMPs and further driving inflammation143,144. Protein DAMPs, such as HMGB1, have been shown to stimulate TNF-α secretion by monocytes144,145. Extracellular RNA can also promote inflammation via TLR3 signaling and is speculated to be released alongside other DAMPs during neutrophil lytic death. Histones and DNA from NETs are also released as DAMPs during neutrophil cell death. Upon neutrophil activation, peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) catalyzes histone citrullination, weakening DNA-histone interactions. This process drives chromatin depolymerization, leading to the release of histones and other cellular components88. Once in circulation, free histones exert cytotoxic effects by inducing membrane bending, leading to rupture, and contribute to inflammation through the activation of PRRs 146,147. Additionally, granule proteins such as MPO, neutrophil elastase, and MMP9 contribute to tissue damage by degrading and remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM)148150. Presumably, intact granules may also be released during neutrophil cell death, from which highly reactive granule proteins disperse in a more prolonged fashion. Finally, many components released during the death of other cell types may also act as DAMPs in neutrophils. For instance, during cell activation or death, mitochondria can release DAMPs (mitoDAMPs), including proteins, mtDNA, and lipids, into the extracellular space. These mitoDAMPs initiate inflammatory responses by activating pathways such as TLR and MAP and contribute to inflammasome activation151, playing a role in diseases such as sepsis, ischemic stroke, and neurological pathologies152155. During cell death, ER components such as calreticulin have been shown to be expressed on the cell surface, facilitating immunogenicity and promoting the phagocytosis of tumor cells156. Interestingly, calreticulin has also been shown to be expressed on the neutrophil surface, and when neutrophils are activated, they shed calreticulin into the extracellular space, where it binds to C1q and activates the complement pathway157.

Of note, some studies suggest that aging or dying neutrophils also release lipoxins and resolvins, which promote tissue repair and homeostasis. These molecules may enhance neutrophil efferocytosis by macrophages and facilitate NET clearance via AMPK signaling158160.

LAND-Vs

We have recently characterized a novel class of vesicles, designated Large Aging Neutrophil-Derived Vesicles (LAND-Vs), which are formed during neutrophil spontaneous death. These vesicles diverged from conventional vesicle classifications due to their unique size, structure, and biogenesis pathway. LAND-Vs are equipped with surface “don’t eat-me” signals, which effectively prevent efferocytotic clearance by phagocytes, facilitating their accumulation during the resolution phase of neutrophilic inflammation. Notably, CD55 on the surface of LAND-Vs elicits potent anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the complement activation cascade. This modulation not only diminishes neutrophil recruitment but also alleviates tissue damage, underscoring their potential in regulating inflammation resolution after facilitating inflammation and host defense161. This finding exhibits an active anti-inflammatory function of neutrophils during aging which is distinct from the passive functions of neutrophil death and transcends the short lifespan of these cells. The functions of LAND-Vs could extend beyond regulating inflammation, potentially modulate other neutrophil-mediated immune responses such as tissue repair, coagulation, or angiogenesis. LAND-Vs may also interact with the surrounding cells and tissue during inflammation or tumorous conditions.

Outlook

Although neutrophil aging ultimately leads to cell death, it involves distinct transcriptional and protein regulation, resulting in biological functions that differ from those of fresh neutrophils. This suggests that neutrophils could retain functional capacity during their terminal stages, contributing to regulatory processes beyond their immediate demise. While neutrophil death is governed by distinct triggers and mechanisms, it is plausible that throughout the process of aging, after neutrophils are committed to die, they may continue to perform active functions rather than merely preparing for clearance or death. Therefore, it is essential to define the characteristics of neutrophil aging and identify the internal and external triggers of this process. Establishing a clear definition of the stages of neutrophil aging at the molecular level, beyond mere phenotypical changes, will provide deeper insights into the mechanisms and functions of neutrophil aging, rather than viewing it solely as a transition to cell death.

Figure 1. Immune modulation by aging and dying neutrophils.

Figure 1.

This schematic illustrates the transition from fresh to aged neutrophils and their functional outcomes after cell death. Fresh neutrophils undergo changes in surface protein expression, including increased CXCR4 and CD18 and decreased CD62L, with the CXCL2-CXCR2 axis intrinsically driving their aging. As neutrophils age, they can undergo different post-mortem fates. One pathway is neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation (NETosis), in which aged neutrophils release antimicrobial chromatin structures that aid in pathogen clearance but also contribute to tissue damage, vascular occlusion, tumor metastasis, and autoimmunity. Alternatively, apoptotic neutrophils can be cleared via efferocytosis by macrophages, a process associated with the release of immunosuppressive cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10, which help resolve inflammation. Additionally, neutrophil lytic death leads to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including RNA, DNA, proteins (e.g., high-mobility group box 1 protein [HMGB1]), mitochondria, cytokines, and granules, all of which modulate immune responses and inflammation. Neutrophil aging is also linked to the release of large aging neutrophil-derived vesicles (LAND-Vs), which regulate inflammation and promote homeostasis.

Highlights:

  • Neutrophils are the most abundant but short-lived immune cells, with their lifespan extendable under inflammatory or tumor conditions.

  • Neutrophil death occurs through diverse pathways, depending on the type of stimulation, leading to distinct inflammatory outcomes.

  • Neutrophil aging is not merely a step toward death but may also impart additional functions, such as LAND-Vs.

  • Even after death, neutrophils continue to influence their surrounding environment, facilitating various biological processes.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References:

  • 1.Athens JW, Mauer AM, Ashenbrucker H, Cartwright GE, Wintrobe MM. Leukokinetic studies. I. A method for labeling leukocytes with diisopropyl-fluorophosphate (DFP32). Blood. Apr 1959;14(4):303–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mauer AM, Athens JW, Ashenbrucker H, Cartwright GE, Wintrobe MM. LEUKOKINETIC STUDIES. II. A METHOD FOR LABELING GRANULOCYTES IN VITRO WITH RADIOACTIVE DIISOPROPYLFLUOROPHOSPHATE (DFP). J Clin Invest. Sep 1960;39(9):1481–6. doi: 10.1172/jci104167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dresch C, Najean Y, Beauchet J. In vitro 51Cr and 32P-DFP labeling of granulocytes in man. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. Dec 1971;12(12):774–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dancey JT, Deubelbeiss KA, Harker LA, Finch CA. Neutrophil kinetics in man. J Clin Invest. Sep 1976;58(3):705–15. doi: 10.1172/jci108517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tak T, Tesselaar K, Pillay J, Borghans JA, Koenderman L. What’s your age again? Determination of human neutrophil half-lives revisited. J Leukoc Biol. Oct 2013;94(4):595–601. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1112571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Watson F, Robinson JJ, Edwards SW. Neutrophil function in whole blood and after purification: changes in receptor expression, oxidase activity and responsiveness to cytokines. Bioscience reports. Apr 1992;12(2):123–33. doi: 10.1007/bf02351217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cartwright GE, Athens JW, Wintrobe MM. THE KINETICS OF GRANULOPOIESIS IN NORMAL MAN. Blood. Dec 1964;24:780–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pillay J, den Braber I, Vrisekoop N, et al. In vivo labeling with 2H2O reveals a human neutrophil lifespan of 5.4 days. Blood. Jul 29 2010;116(4):625–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-259028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lahoz-Beneytez J, Elemans M, Zhang Y, et al. Human neutrophil kinetics: modeling of stable isotope labeling data supports short blood neutrophil half-lives. Blood. Jun 30 2016;127(26):3431–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-700336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Basu S, Hodgson G, Katz M, Dunn AR. Evaluation of role of G-CSF in the production, survival, and release of neutrophils from bone marrow into circulation. Blood. Aug 1 2002;100(3):854–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ballesteros I, Rubio-Ponce A, Genua M, et al. Co-option of Neutrophil Fates by Tissue Environments. Cell. Nov 25 2020;183(5):1282–1297.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Summers C, Rankin SM, Condliffe AM, Singh N, Peters AM, Chilvers ER. Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease. Trends Immunol. Aug 2010;31(8):318–24. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weinmann P, Moura RA, Caetano-Lopes JR, et al. Delayed neutrophil apoptosis in very early rheumatoid arthritis patients is abrogated by methotrexate therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. Nov-Dec 2007;25(6):885–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gray RD, Hardisty G, Regan KH, et al. Delayed neutrophil apoptosis enhances NET formation in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. Feb 2018;73(2):134–144. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu XT, Shi ZR, Lu SY, et al. Enhanced Migratory Ability of Neutrophils Toward Epidermis Contributes to the Development of Psoriasis via Crosstalk With Keratinocytes by Releasing IL-17A. Front Immunol. 2022;13:817040. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.817040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dibbert B, Weber M, Nikolaizik WH, et al. Cytokine-mediated Bax deficiency and consequent delayed neutrophil apoptosis: a general mechanism to accumulate effector cells in inflammation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Nov 9 1999;96(23):13330–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Colotta F, Re F, Polentarutti N, Sozzani S, Mantovani A. Modulation of granulocyte survival and programmed cell death by cytokines and bacterial products. Blood. Oct 15 1992;80(8):2012–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thompson AA, Elks PM, Marriott HM, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2α regulates key neutrophil functions in humans, mice, and zebrafish. Blood. Jan 16 2014;123(3):366–76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-500207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murphy MP, Caraher E. Mcl-1 is vital for neutrophil survival. Immunologic research. Jun 2015;62(2):225–33. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8655-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cross A, Moots RJ, Edwards SW. The dual effects of TNFalpha on neutrophil apoptosis are mediated via differential effects on expression of Mcl-1 and Bfl-1. Blood. Jan 15 2008;111(2):878–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-087833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cowburn AS, Deighton J, Walmsley SR, Chilvers ER. The survival effect of TNF-alpha in human neutrophils is mediated via NF-kappa B-dependent IL-8 release. Eur J Immunol. Jun 2004;34(6):1733–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murray J, Barbara JA, Dunkley SA, et al. Regulation of neutrophil apoptosis by tumor necrosis factor-alpha: requirement for TNFR55 and TNFR75 for induction of apoptosis in vitro. Blood. Oct 1 1997;90(7):2772–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kettritz R, Gaido ML, Haller H, Luft FC, Jennette CJ, Falk RJ. Interleukin-8 delays spontaneous and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated apoptosis of human neutrophils. Kidney Int. Jan 1998;53(1):84–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00741.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van Raam BJ, Drewniak A, Groenewold V, van den Berg TK, Kuijpers TW. Granulocyte colonystimulating factor delays neutrophil apoptosis by inhibition of calpains upstream of caspase-3. Blood. Sep 1 2008;112(5):2046–54. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-149575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fan Y, Teng Y, Loison F, et al. Targeting multiple cell death pathways extends the shelf life and preserves the function of human and mouse neutrophils for transfusion. Sci Transl Med. Jul 28 2021;13(604)doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sawanobori Y, Ueha S, Kurachi M, et al. Chemokine-mediated rapid turnover of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. Blood. Jun 15 2008;111(12):5457–66. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-136895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ng MSF, Kwok I, Tan L, et al. Deterministic reprogramming of neutrophils within tumors. Science. Jan 12 2024;383(6679):eadf6493. doi: 10.1126/science.adf6493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wislez M, Fleury-Feith J, Rabbe N, et al. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prolong the survival of neutrophils infiltrating bronchoalveolar subtype pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The American journal of pathology. Oct 2001;159(4):1423–33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62529-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG. Cancer-related circulating and tumor-associated neutrophils - subtypes, sources and function. FEBS J. Dec 2018;285(23):4316–4342. doi: 10.1111/febs.14524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soehnlein O, Lindbom L. Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. Jun 2010;10(6):427–39. doi: 10.1038/nri2779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Teng Y, Luo HR, Kambara H. Heterogeneity of neutrophil spontaneous death. Am J Hematol. Aug 2017;92(8):E156–E159. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yuan J, Ofengeim D. A guide to cell death pathways. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. May 2024;25(5):379–395. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00689-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Elmore S Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. Jun 2007;35(4):495– 516. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luo HR, Loison F. Constitutive neutrophil apoptosis: mechanisms and regulation. Am J Hematol. Apr 2008;83(4):288–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Savill JS, Wyllie AH, Henson JE, Walport MJ, Henson PM, Haslett C. Macrophage phagocytosis of aging neutrophils in inflammation. Programmed cell death in the neutrophil leads to its recognition by macrophages. J Clin Invest. Mar 1989;83(3):865–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu Y, Loison F, Luo HR. Neutrophil spontaneous death is mediated by down-regulation of autocrine signaling through GPCR, PI3Kgamma, ROS, and actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb 16 2010;107(7):2950–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu D, Hattori H, Jo H, et al. Deactivation of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate/Akt signaling mediates neutrophil spontaneous death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 3 2006;103(40):14836–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y, Jia Y, Pichavant M, et al. Targeted deletion of tumor suppressor PTEN augments neutrophil function and enhances host defense in neutropenia-associated pneumonia. Blood. May 14 2009;113(20):4930–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kasorn A, Alcaide P, Jia Y, et al. Focal adhesion kinase regulates pathogen-killing capability and life span of neutrophils via mediating both adhesion-dependent and -independent cellular signals. J Immunol. Jul 15 2009;183(2):1032–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu Y, Li H, Bajrami B, et al. Cigarette smoke (CS) and nicotine delay neutrophil spontaneous death via suppressing production of diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr 22 2013;110(19):7726–31. doi:1302906110 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1302906110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Blomgran R, Zheng L, Stendahl O. Cathepsin-cleaved Bid promotes apoptosis in human neutrophils via oxidative stress-induced lysosomal membrane permeabilization. J Leukoc Biol. May 2007;81(5):1213–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yamamoto A, Taniuchi S, Tsuji S, Hasui M, Kobayashi Y. Role of reactive oxygen species in neutrophil apoptosis following ingestion of heat-killed Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Exp Immunol. Sep 2002;129(3):479–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Loison F, Zhu H, Karatepe K, et al. Proteinase 3-dependent caspase-3 cleavage modulates neutrophil death and inflammation. J Clin Invest. Oct 2014;124(10):4445–58. doi: 10.1172/JCI76246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moulding DA, Akgul C, Derouet M, White MR, Edwards SW. BCL-2 family expression in human neutrophils during delayed and accelerated apoptosis. J Leukoc Biol. Nov 2001;70(5):783–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moulding DA, Quayle JA, Hart CA, Edwards SW. Mcl-1 expression in human neutrophils: regulation by cytokines and correlation with cell survival. Blood. Oct 1 1998;92(7):2495–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maianski NA, Geissler J, Srinivasula SM, Alnemri ES, Roos D, Kuijpers TW. Functional characterization of mitochondria in neutrophils: a role restricted to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. Feb 2004;11(2):143–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Murphy BM, O’Neill AJ, Adrain C, Watson RW, Martin SJ. The apoptosome pathway to caspase activation in primary human neutrophils exhibits dramatically reduced requirements for cytochrome C. J Exp Med. Mar 3 2003;197(5):625–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kobayashi SD, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, et al. Bacterial pathogens modulate an apoptosis differentiation program in human neutrophils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 16 2003;100(19):10948–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Watson RW, Redmond HP, Wang JH, Condron C, Bouchier-Hayes D. Neutrophils undergo apoptosis following ingestion of Escherichia coli. J Immunol. May 15 1996;156(10):3986–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prince LR, Bianchi SM, Vaughan KM, et al. Subversion of a lysosomal pathway regulating neutrophil apoptosis by a major bacterial toxin, pyocyanin. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). Mar 1 2008;180(5):3502–11. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huynh ML, Fadok VA, Henson PM. Phosphatidylserine-dependent ingestion of apoptotic cells promotes TGF-beta1 secretion and the resolution of inflammation. The Journal of clinical investigation. Jan 2002;109(1):41–50. doi: 10.1172/jci11638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morioka S, Maueröder C, Ravichandran KS. Living on the Edge: Efferocytosis at the Interface of Homeostasis and Pathology. Immunity. May 21 2019;50(5):1149–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.De Maeyer RPH, van de Merwe RC, Louie R, et al. Blocking elevated p38 MAPK restores efferocytosis and inflammatory resolution in the elderly. Nat Immunol. Jun 2020;21(6):615–625. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0646-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chung EY, Liu J, Homma Y, et al. Interleukin-10 expression in macrophages during phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is mediated by homeodomain proteins Pbx1 and Prep-1. Immunity. Dec 2007;27(6):952–64. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Balasubramanian A, Hsu AY, Ghimire L, et al. The palmitoylation of gasdermin D directs its membrane translocation and pore formation during pyroptosis. Sci Immunol. Apr 12 2024;9(94):eadn1452. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adn1452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Du G, Healy LB, David L, et al. ROS-dependent S-palmitoylation activates cleaved and intact gasdermin D. Nature. Jun 2024;630(8016):437–446. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07373-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang N, Zhang J, Yang Y, et al. A palmitoylation-depalmitoylation relay spatiotemporally controls GSDMD activation in pyroptosis. Nat Cell Biol. May 2024;26(5):757–769. doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01397-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liu Z, Li S, Wang C, et al. Palmitoylation at a conserved cysteine residue facilitates gasdermin D-mediated pyroptosis and cytokine release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul 16 2024;121(29):e2400883121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400883121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. Oct 29 2015;526(7575):660–5. doi: 10.1038/nature15514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kayagaki N, Stowe IB, Lee BL, et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature. Oct 29 2015;526(7575):666–71. doi: 10.1038/nature15541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dubyak GR, Miller BA, Pearlman E. Pyroptosis in neutrophils: Multimodal integration of inflammasome and regulated cell death signaling pathways. Immunol Rev. Mar 2023;314(1):229–249. doi: 10.1111/imr.13186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ma F, Ghimire L, Ren Q, et al. Gasdermin E dictates inflammatory responses by controlling the mode of neutrophil death. Nat Commun. Jan 9 2024;15(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44669-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhu YP, Speir M, Tan Z, et al. NET formation is a default epigenetic program controlled by PAD4 in apoptotic neutrophils. Sci Adv. Dec 22 2023;9(51):eadj1397. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj1397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Festjens N, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Necrosis, a well-orchestrated form of cell demise: signalling cascades, important mediators and concomitant immune response. Biochim Biophys Acta. Sep-Oct 2006;1757(9–10):1371–87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ruffolo PR. The Pathogenesis of Necrosis. I. Correlated Light and Electron Microscopic Observations of the Myocardial Necrosis Induced by the Intravenous Injection of Papain. Am J Pathol. Nov 1964;45(5):741–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rydell-Tormanen K, Uller L, Erjefalt JS. Direct evidence of secondary necrosis of neutrophils during intense lung inflammation. Eur Respir J. Aug 2006;28(2):268–74. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00126905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Silva MT. Secondary necrosis: the natural outcome of the complete apoptotic program. FEBS Lett. Nov 19 2010;584(22):4491–9. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Huebener P, Pradere JP, Hernandez C, et al. The HMGB1/RAGE axis triggers neutrophil-mediated injury amplification following necrosis. J Clin Invest. Mar 4 2019;130(4):1802. doi: 10.1172/JCI126976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Degterev A, Huang Z, Boyce M, et al. Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat Chem Biol. Jul 2005;1(2):112–9. doi: 10.1038/nchembio711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Seo J, Nam YW, Kim S, Oh DB, Song J. Necroptosis molecular mechanisms: Recent findings regarding novel necroptosis regulators. Exp Mol Med. Jun 2021;53(6):1007–1017. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00634-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Annibaldi A, Wicky John S, Vanden Berghe T, et al. Ubiquitin-Mediated Regulation of RIPK1 Kinase Activity Independent of IKK and MK2. Mol Cell. Feb 15 2018;69(4):566–580 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.He S, Wang L, Miao L, et al. Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell. Jun 12 2009;137(6):1100–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wang X, He Z, Liu H, Yousefi S, Simon HU. Neutrophil Necroptosis Is Triggered by Ligation of Adhesion Molecules following GM-CSF Priming. J Immunol. Nov 15 2016;197(10):4090–4100. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wicki S, Gurzeler U, Wei-Lynn Wong W, Jost PJ, Bachmann D, Kaufmann T. Loss of XIAP facilitates switch to TNFalpha-induced necroptosis in mouse neutrophils. Cell Death Dis. Oct 13 2016;7(10):e2422. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Desai J, Kumar SV, Mulay SR, et al. PMA and crystal-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation involves RIPK1-RIPK3-MLKL signaling. Eur J Immunol. Jan 2016;46(1):223–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Greenlee-Wacker MC, Kremserova S, Nauseef WM. Lysis of human neutrophils by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Blood. Jun 15 2017;129(24):3237–3244. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-766253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. Feb 21 2013;38(2):209–23. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jiao Y, Li Z, Loughran PA, et al. Frontline Science: Macrophage-derived exosomes promote neutrophil necroptosis following hemorrhagic shock. J Leukoc Biol. Feb 2018;103(2):175–183. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3HI0517-173R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.D’Cruz AA, Speir M, Bliss-Moreau M, et al. The pseudokinase MLKL activates PAD4-dependent NET formation in necroptotic neutrophils. Sci Signal. Sep 4 2018;11(546)doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao1716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schreiber A, Rousselle A, Becker JU, von Massenhausen A, Linkermann A, Kettritz R. Necroptosis controls NET generation and mediates complement activation, endothelial damage, and autoimmune vasculitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov 7 2017;114(45):E9618–E9625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708247114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kearney CJ, Cullen SP, Tynan GA, et al. Necroptosis suppresses inflammation via termination of TNF- or LPS-induced cytokine and chemokine production. Cell Death Differ. Aug 2015;22(8):1313–27. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kitur K, Wachtel S, Brown A, et al. Necroptosis Promotes Staphylococcus aureus Clearance by Inhibiting Excessive Inflammatory Signaling. Cell Rep. Aug 23 2016;16(8):2219–2230. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Alvarez-Diaz S, Dillon CP, Lalaoui N, et al. The Pseudokinase MLKL and the Kinase RIPK3 Have Distinct Roles in Autoimmune Disease Caused by Loss of Death-Receptor-Induced Apoptosis. Immunity. Sep 20 2016;45(3):513–526. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Newton K, Dugger DL, Maltzman A, et al. RIPK3 deficiency or catalytically inactive RIPK1 provides greater benefit than MLKL deficiency in mouse models of inflammation and tissue injury. Cell Death Differ. Sep 1 2016;23(9):1565–76. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Li P, Jiang M, Li K, et al. Glutathione peroxidase 4-regulated neutrophil ferroptosis induces systemic autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. Sep 2021;22(9):1107–1117. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00993-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kim R, Hashimoto A, Markosyan N, et al. Ferroptosis of tumour neutrophils causes immune suppression in cancer. Nature. Dec 2022;612(7939):338–346. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05443-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhao Y, Liu Z, Liu G, et al. Neutrophils resist ferroptosis and promote breast cancer metastasis through aconitate decarboxylase 1. Cell Metab. Oct 3 2023;35(10):1688–1703 e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. Mar 5 2004;303(5663):1532–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol. Apr 2006;8(4):668–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hidalgo A, Libby P, Soehnlein O, Aramburu IV, Papayannopoulos V, Silvestre-Roig C. Neutrophil extracellular traps: from physiology to pathology. Cardiovasc Res. Oct 21 2022;118(13):2737–2753. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sorensen OE, Borregaard N. Neutrophil extracellular traps - the dark side of neutrophils. J Clin Invest. May 2 2016;126(5):1612–20. doi: 10.1172/JCI84538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Papayannopoulos V Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. Feb 2018;18(2):134–147. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Thiam HR, Wong SL, Qiu R, et al. NETosis proceeds by cytoskeleton and endomembrane disassembly and PAD4-mediated chromatin decondensation and nuclear envelope rupture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar 31 2020;117(13):7326–7337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909546117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Amulic B, Knackstedt SL, Abu Abed U, et al. Cell-Cycle Proteins Control Production of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Dev Cell. Nov 20 2017;43(4):449–462 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yipp BG, Petri B, Salina D, et al. Infection-induced NETosis is a dynamic process involving neutrophil multitasking in vivo. Nat Med. Sep 2012;18(9):1386–93. doi: 10.1038/nm.2847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Byrd AS, O’Brien XM, Johnson CM, Lavigne LM, Reichner JS. An extracellular matrix-based mechanism of rapid neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Candida albicans. J Immunol. Apr 15 2013;190(8):4136–48. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yousefi S, Mihalache C, Kozlowski E, Schmid I, Simon HU. Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Death Differ. Nov 2009;16(11):1438–44. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Clark SR, Ma AC, Tavener SA, et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat Med. Apr 2007;13(4):463–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tall AR, Westerterp M. Inflammasomes, neutrophil extracellular traps, and cholesterol. J Lipid Res. Apr 2019;60(4):721–727. doi: 10.1194/jlr.S091280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Claushuis TAM, van der Donk LEH, Luitse AL, et al. Role of Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 in Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation and Host Defense during Klebsiella pneumoniae-Induced Pneumonia-Derived Sepsis. J Immunol. Aug 15 2018;201(4):1241–1252. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kenny EF, Herzig A, Kruger R, et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. Elife. Jun 2 2017;6doi: 10.7554/eLife.24437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Dunham-Snary KJ, Surewaard BG, Mewburn JD, et al. Mitochondria in human neutrophils mediate killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Redox Biol. Feb 2022;49:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jeon JH, Hong CW, Kim EY, Lee JM. Current Understanding on the Metabolism of Neutrophils. Immune Netw. Dec 2020;20(6):e46. doi: 10.4110/in.2020.20.e46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Geering B, Simon HU. Peculiarities of cell death mechanisms in neutrophils. Cell Death Differ. Sep 2011;18(9):1457–69. doi:cdd201175 10.1038/cdd.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Savill J, Fadok V, Henson P, Haslett C. Phagocyte recognition of cells undergoing apoptosis. Immunol Today. Mar 1993;14(3):131–6. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90215-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Savill J, Haslett C. Granulocyte clearance by apoptosis in the resolution of inflammation. Semin Cell Biol. Dec 1995;6(6):385–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Britt EC, Lika J, Giese MA, et al. Switching to the cyclic pentose phosphate pathway powers the oxidative burst in activated neutrophils. Nat Metab. Mar 2022;4(3):389–403. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Pithon-Curi TC, Schumacher RI, Freitas JJ, et al. Glutamine delays spontaneous apoptosis in neutrophils. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. Jun 2003;284(6):C1355–61. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00224.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lagranha CJ, Levada-Pires AC, Sellitti DF, Procopio J, Curi R, Pithon-Curi TC. The effect of glutamine supplementation and physical exercise on neutrophil function. Amino Acids. Apr 2008;34(3):337–46. doi: 10.1007/s00726-007-0560-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pithon-Curi TC, Levada AC, Lopes LR, Doi SQ, Curi R. Glutamine plays a role in superoxide production and the expression of p47phox, p22phox and gp91phox in rat neutrophils. Clin Sci (Lond). Oct 2002;103(4):403–8. doi: 10.1042/cs1030403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Furukawa S, Saito H, Matsuda T, et al. Relative effects of glucose and glutamine on reactive oxygen intermediate production by neutrophils. Shock. 2000;13(4):274–8. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200004000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ettel P, Weichhart T. Not just sugar: metabolic control of neutrophil development and effector functions. J Leukoc Biol. Sep 2 2024;116(3):487–510. doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiae057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Aoyama M, Kotani J, Usami M. Butyrate and propionate induced activated or non-activated neutrophil apoptosis via HDAC inhibitor activity but without activating GPR-41/GPR-43 pathways. Nutrition. Jun 2010;26(6):653–61. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lodhi IJ, Wei X, Yin L, et al. Peroxisomal lipid synthesis regulates inflammation by sustaining neutrophil membrane phospholipid composition and viability. Cell Metab. Jan 6 2015;21(1):51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Martin C, Burdon PC, Bridger G, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Williams TJ, Rankin SM. Chemokines acting via CXCR2 and CXCR4 control the release of neutrophils from the bone marrow and their return following senescence. Immunity. Oct 2003;19(4):583–93. doi:S1074761303002632 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Uhl B, Vadlau Y, Zuchtriegel G, et al. Aged neutrophils contribute to the first line of defense in the acute inflammatory response. Blood. Nov 10 2016;128(19):2327–2337. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-718999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Adrover JM, Nicolas-Avila JA, Hidalgo A. Aging: A Temporal Dimension for Neutrophils. Trends Immunol. May 2016;37(5):334–345. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Tanji-Matsuba K, van Eeden SF, Saito Y, et al. Functional changes in aging polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Circulation. Jan 6-13 1998;97(1):91–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.1.91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Adrover JM, Del Fresno C, Crainiciuc G, et al. A Neutrophil Timer Coordinates Immune Defense and Vascular Protection. Immunity. Nov 19 2019;51(5):966–967. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang D, Chen G, Manwani D, et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature. Sep 24 2015;525(7570):528–32. doi: 10.1038/nature15367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bratton DL, Henson PM. Neutrophil clearance: when the party is over, clean-up begins. Trends Immunol. Aug 2011;32(8):350–7. doi:S1471-4906(11)00077-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.it.2011.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Nicolas-Avila JA, Adrover JM, Hidalgo A. Neutrophils in Homeostasis, Immunity, and Cancer. Immunity. Jan 17 2017;46(1):15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Greenlee-Wacker MC. Clearance of apoptotic neutrophils and resolution of inflammation. Immunol Rev. Sep 2016;273(1):357–70. doi: 10.1111/imr.12453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Brostjan C, Oehler R. The role of neutrophil death in chronic inflammation and cancer. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6:26. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-0255-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Saunders CA, Parent CA. Emerging roles for the nucleus during neutrophil signal relay and NETosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. Feb 2020;62:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lee KH, Kronbichler A, Park DD, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review. Autoimmun Rev. Nov 2017;16(11):1160–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Petretto A, Bruschi M, Pratesi F, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) induced by different stimuli: A comparative proteomic analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0218946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Carmona-Rivera C, Carlucci PM, Moore E, et al. Synovial fibroblast-neutrophil interactions promote pathogenic adaptive immunity in rheumatoid arthritis. Science immunology. Apr 2017;2(10)doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag3358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Munoz LE, Boeltz S, Bilyy R, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Initiate Gallstone Formation. Immunity. Sep 17 2019;51(3):443–450 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Jorch SK, Kubes P. An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat Med. Mar 7 2017;23(3):279–287. doi: 10.1038/nm.4294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wigerblad G, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophil extracellular traps in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. May 2023;23(5):274–288. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00787-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 7 2010;107(36):15880–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Carmona-Rivera C, Carlucci PM, Goel RR, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate articular cartilage damage and enhance cartilage component immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis. JCI Insight. Jul 9 2020;5(13)doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.139388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Gestermann N, Di Domizio J, Lande R, et al. Netting Neutrophils Activate Autoreactive B Cells in Lupus. J Immunol. May 15 2018;200(10):3364–3371. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Yang L, Liu Q, Zhang X, et al. DNA of neutrophil extracellular traps promotes cancer metastasis via CCDC25. Nature. Jul 2020;583(7814):133–138. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2394-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Chen S, Zhang Q, Lu L, et al. Heterogeneity of neutrophils in cancer: one size does not fit all. Cancer Biol Med. Dec 12 2022;19(12):1629–48. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Xia X, Zhang Z, Zhu C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote metastasis in gastric cancer patients with postoperative abdominal infectious complications. Nat Commun. Feb 23 2022;13(1):1017. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28492-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Bordon Y NETs awaken sleeping cancer cells. Nat Rev Immunol. Nov 2018;18(11):665. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0081-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Demkow U Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Cancer Invasion, Evasion and Metastasis. Cancers (Basel). Sep 6 2021;13(17)doi: 10.3390/cancers13174495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Pan Z, Dumas EK, Lawrence C, et al. Bacillus anthracis Edema Toxin Inhibits Efferocytosis in Human Macrophages and Alters Efferocytic Receptor Signaling. Int J Mol Sci. Mar 7 2019;20(5)doi: 10.3390/ijms20051167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Villanueva E, Yalavarthi S, Berthier CC, et al. Netting neutrophils induce endothelial damage, infiltrate tissues, and expose immunostimulatory molecules in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. Jul 1 2011;187(1):538–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.O’Neil LJ, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophils in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Breaking Immune Tolerance and Fueling Disease. Trends Mol Med. Mar 2019;25(3):215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Thieblemont N, Witko-Sarsat V, Ariel A. Regulation of macrophage activation by proteins expressed on apoptotic neutrophils: Subversion towards autoimmunity by proteinase 3. Eur J Clin Invest. Nov 2018;48 Suppl 2:e12990. doi: 10.1111/eci.12990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Scaffidi P, Misteli T, Bianchi ME. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature. Jul 11 2002;418(6894):191–5. doi: 10.1038/nature00858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kim SW, Lee JK. Role of HMGB1 in the Interplay between NETosis and Thrombosis in Ischemic Stroke: A Review. Cells. Jul 28 2020;9(8)doi: 10.3390/cells9081794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Silvestre-Roig C, Braster Q, Wichapong K, et al. Externalized histone H4 orchestrates chronic inflammation by inducing lytic cell death. Nature. May 2019;569(7755):236–240. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1167-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Westman J, Papareddy P, Dahlgren MW, et al. Extracellular Histones Induce Chemokine Production in Whole Blood Ex Vivo and Leukocyte Recruitment In Vivo. PLoS Pathog. Dec 2015;11(12):e1005319. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Lindsey M, Wedin K, Brown MD, et al. Matrix-dependent mechanism of neutrophil-mediated release and activation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. May 1 2001;103(17):2181–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.17.2181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Odobasic D, Kitching AR, Yang Y, et al. Neutrophil myeloperoxidase regulates T-cell-driven tissue inflammation in mice by inhibiting dendritic cell function. Blood. May 16 2013;121(20):4195– 204. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Chalmers JD, Moffitt KL, Suarez-Cuartin G, et al. Neutrophil Elastase Activity Is Associated with Exacerbations and Lung Function Decline in Bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. May 15 2017;195(10):1384–1393. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1027OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Caicedo A, Zambrano K, Sanon S, et al. The diversity and coexistence of extracellular mitochondria in circulation: A friend or foe of the immune system. Mitochondrion. May 2021;58:270–284. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2021.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Schaefer L Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. Dec 19 2014;289(51):35237–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.619304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Nakahira K, Hisata S, Choi AM. The Roles of Mitochondrial Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal. Dec 10 2015;23(17):1329–50. doi: 10.1089/ars.2015.6407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Lin MM, Liu N, Qin ZH, Wang Y. Mitochondrial-derived damage-associated molecular patterns amplify neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. Oct 2022;43(10):2439–2447. doi: 10.1038/s41401-022-00879-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. Mar 4 2010;464(7285):104–7. doi: 10.1038/nature08780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Obeid M, Tesniere A, Ghiringhelli F, et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat Med. Jan 2007;13(1):54–61. doi: 10.1038/nm1523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Eggleton P, Lieu TS, Zappi EG, et al. Calreticulin is released from activated neutrophils and binds to C1q and mannan-binding protein. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. Sep 1994;72(3):405–9. doi: 10.1006/clin.1994.1160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Libreros S, Nshimiyimana R, Lee B, Serhan CN. Infectious neutrophil deployment is regulated by resolvin D4. Blood. Aug 10 2023;142(6):589–606. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022019145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Chiang N, Sakuma M, Rodriguez AR, Spur BW, Irimia D, Serhan CN. Resolvin T-series reduce neutrophil extracellular traps. Blood. Feb 24 2022;139(8):1222–1233. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.El Kebir D, Gjorstrup P, Filep JG. Resolvin E1 promotes phagocytosis-induced neutrophil apoptosis and accelerates resolution of pulmonary inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 11 2012;109(37):14983–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206641109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Hsu AY, Huang Q, Pi X, et al. Neutrophil-derived vesicles control complement activation to facilitate inflammation resolution. Cell. Feb 3 2025;doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Liles WC, Kiener PA, Ledbetter JA, Aruffo A, Klebanoff SJ. Differential expression of Fas (CD95) and Fas ligand on normal human phagocytes: implications for the regulation of apoptosis in neutrophils. J Exp Med. Aug 1 1996;184(2):429–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Koga Y, Matsuzaki A, Suminoe A, Hattori H, Hara T. Neutrophil-derived TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL): a novel mechanism of antitumor effect by neutrophils. Cancer Res. Feb 1 2004;64(3):1037–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kamohara H, Matsuyama W, Shimozato O, et al. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and TRAIL receptor expression in human neutrophils. Immunology. Feb 2004;111(2):186–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.van den Berg JM, Weyer S, Weening JJ, Roos D, Kuijpers TW. Divergent effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on apoptosis of human neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. Mar 2001;69(3):467–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Maianski NA, Roos D, Kuijpers TW. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces a caspase-independent death pathway in human neutrophils. Blood. Mar 1 2003;101(5):1987–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Chen KW, Monteleone M, Boucher D, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D-dependent neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. Aug 24 2018;3(26)doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Minns MS, Liboro K, Lima TS, et al. NLRP3 selectively drives IL-1β secretion by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected neutrophils and regulates corneal disease severity. Nat Commun. Sep 20 2023;14(1):5832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41391-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Santoni K, Pericat D, Gorse L, et al. Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis and its role in host susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. Jul 2022;18(7):e1010305. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Kovacs SB, Oh C, Maltez VI, et al. Neutrophil Caspase-11 Is Essential to Defend against a Cytosol-Invasive Bacterium. Cell Rep. Jul 28 2020;32(4):107967. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Goris M, Passelli K, Peyvandi S, et al. NLRP1-dependent activation of Gasdermin D in neutrophils controls cutaneous leishmaniasis. PLoS Pathog. Sep 2024;20(9):e1012527. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Sun Y, Abbondante S, Karmakar M, et al. Neutrophil Caspase-11 Is Required for Cleavage of Caspase-1 and Secretion of IL-1β in Aspergillus fumigatus Infection. J Immunol. Nov 1 2018;201(9):2767–2775. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Sorvillo N, Cherpokova D, Martinod K, Wagner DD. Extracellular DNA NET-Works With Dire Consequences for Health. Circ Res. Aug 2 2019;125(4):470–488. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.119.314581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR, Kennett MJ, Xiong N, Wang Y. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. Aug 30 2010;207(9):1853–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Behnen M, Leschczyk C, Möller S, et al. Immobilized immune complexes induce neutrophil extracellular trap release by human neutrophil granulocytes via FcγRIIIB and Mac-1. J Immunol. Aug 15 2014;193(4):1954–65. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Van Avondt K, Fritsch-Stork R, Derksen RH, Meyaard L. Ligation of signal inhibitory receptor on leukocytes-1 suppresses the release of neutrophil extracellular traps in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES