Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1994 Jan;44(378):25–29.

Musculoskeletal clinic in general practice: study of one year's referrals.

D Peters 1, P Davies 1, P Pietroni 1
PMCID: PMC1238758  PMID: 8312034

Abstract

BACKGROUND. A musculoskeletal clinic, staffed by a general practitioner trained in osteopathy, medical acupuncture and intralesional injections, was set up in an inner London general practice in 1987. AIM. A retrospective study was undertaken of one year's referrals to the clinic in 1989-90 to determine how general practitioners were using the clinic in terms of problems referred; consultation patterns of patients attending the clinic and 12 months after initially being seen; and how access to the clinic influenced referrals to relevant hospital departments. METHOD. Day sheets were studied which recorded information on demographic characteristics of patients referred to the clinic and their problems, diagnoses made, duration of symptoms, number and range of treatments given, and recurrence of problems. Use of secondary referral sources was also examined. RESULTS. During the study year 154 of 3264 practice patients were referred to the musculoskeletal clinic, and attended a mean of 3.5 times each. Of all the attenders 64% were women and 52% were 30-54 years old. Eighty one patients (53%) presented with neck, back or sciatic pain. A specific traumatic, inflammatory or other pathological process could be ascribed to only 19% of patients. Regarding treatment, 88% of patients received osteopathic manual treatment or acupuncture, or a combination of these treatments and 4% received intralesional injections. Nine patients from the clinic (6%) were referred to an orthopaedic specialist during the year, two with acute back pain. Referrals to orthopaedic specialists by the practice as a whole were not significantly lower than the national average, although the practice made fewer referrals to physiotherapy and rheumatology departments than national figures would have predicted. Seventeen patients (11%) returned to the clinic with a recurrence of their main complaint within a year of their initial appointment; second courses of treatment were usually brief. CONCLUSION. The clinic encouraged a relatively low referral rate to musculoskeletal specialists outside the practice. However, a need was identified for better communication about the potential of the approaches used in order that referrals to secondary specialists, particularly orthopaedic specialists, could be further reduced.

Full text

PDF
26

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akpala C. O., Curran A. P., Simpson J. Physiotherapy in general practice: patterns of utilisation. Public Health. 1988 May;102(3):263–268. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(88)80069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doran D. M., Newell D. J. Manipulation in treatment of low back pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J. 1975 Apr 26;2(5964):161–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5964.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Helliwell P. S., Wright V. Referrals to rheumatology. BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):304–305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6772.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koes B. W., Assendelft W. J., van der Heijden G. J., Bouter L. M., Knipschild P. G. Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991 Nov 23;303(6813):1298–1303. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6813.1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Koes B. W., Bouter L. M., van Mameren H., Essers A. H., Verstegen G. M., Hofhuizen D. M., Houben J. P., Knipschild P. G. Randomised clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow up. BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):601–605. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MacDonald R. S., Bell C. M. An open controlled assessment of osteopathic manipulation in nonspecific low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 May;15(5):364–370. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199005000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MacDonald R. S., Peters D. Osteopathy. Practitioner. 1986 Dec;230(1422):1073–1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meade T. W., Dyer S., Browne W., Townsend J., Frank A. O. Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Noone A., Goldacre M., Coulter A., Seagroatt V. Do referral rates vary widely between practices and does supply of services affect demand? A study in Milton Keynes and the Oxford region. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Oct;39(327):404–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roland M. O., Porter R. W., Matthews J. G., Redden J. F., Simonds G. W., Bewley B. Improving care: a study of orthopaedic outpatient referrals. BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1124–1128. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Samanta A., Roy S. Referrals from general practice to a rheumatology clinic. Br J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;27(1):74–76. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.1.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sims-Williams H., Jayson M. I., Young S. M., Baddeley H., Collins E. Controlled trial of mobilisation and manipulation for low back pain: hospital patients. Br Med J. 1979 Nov 24;2(6201):1318–1320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6201.1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sims-Williams H., Jayson M. I., Young S. M., Baddeley H., Collins E. Controlled trial of mobilisation and manipulation for patients with low back pain in general practice. Br Med J. 1978 Nov 11;2(6148):1338–1340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6148.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Slosberg M. Spinal learning: central modulation of pain processing and long-term alteration of interneuronal excitability as a result of nociceptive peripheral input. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Jul-Aug;13(6):326–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES