Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1994 Jun;44(383):277–280.

Lay evaluation of health and healthy lifestyles: evidence from three studies.

K Backett 1, C Davison 1, K Mullen 1
PMCID: PMC1238902  PMID: 8037984

Abstract

The maintenance of good health in the well population is an important goal of modern general practice. This often takes the form of encouraging patients to lead healthier lives, particularly where diet, exercise, alcohol and smoking are concerned. The fact that many people appear not to follow 'healthy lifestyle' advice suggests that more needs to be known about how relatively simple health promotion messages are understood and evaluated by the lay public. In this paper, findings from three independent qualitative social research projects in Scotland and Wales are analysed together. As qualitative social research is usually carried out with small numbers of informants, the work reported here represents an unusual opportunity for a large amount of interview and observational data to be analysed. The findings indicate that lay evaluation processes use subtle ideas of balance to weigh up the desirability of behaviour change, and that the practice of 'trading-off' positive and negative aspects of health-related behaviour is widespread. Conclusions for health promotion in the general practice setting are drawn. In particular it is suggested that the local knowledge held by the primary care team, and the opportunities for one-to-one interaction which exist in the general practice setting, are extremely important resources, given the highly personal nature of public evaluations of lifestyle change.

Full text

PDF
277

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Backett K. The construction of health knowledge in middle class families. Health Educ Res. 1992 Dec;7(4):497–507. doi: 10.1093/her/7.4.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaxter M. The causes of disease. Women talking. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(2):59–69. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90356-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davison C., Frankel S., Smith G. D. The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing 'fatalism' in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(6):675–685. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90195-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frankel S., Davison C., Smith G. D. Lay epidemiology and the rationality of responses to health education. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Oct;41(351):428–430. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunt S. M., Macleod M. Health and behavioural change: some lay perspectives. Community Med. 1987 Feb;9(1):68–76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kelly M. P., Charlton B. G. Health promotion: time for a new philosophy? Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jun;42(359):223–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES