Abstract
BACKGROUND. It is now a requirement that patients' satisfaction with the services obtained from their general practitioner should be surveyed. AIM. The aim of the study was to produce a reliable and valid multidimensional patient satisfaction questionnaire that could be used in general practice. METHOD. Items were originally derived from patients' responses to open-ended questions. The resulting 148-item Likert-scale questionnaire was completed by 1193 patients. General satisfaction items were removed from the set, and responses to remaining items underwent factor analysis. Subscales were produced from items representing each factor. Reliability and validity of each subscale were examined. RESULTS. Five subscales with a total of 40 items resulted from the factor analysis: doctors, access, nurses, appointments and facilities. Each subscale was internally reliable (Cronbach's alpha coefficient between 0.73 and 0.95), and initial tests of validity suggested that all subscales were valid. CONCLUSION. The study has resulted in a 40-item scale that has been found to be reliable and valid after initial tests. Further work to test the reliability and validity of the final version of the patient satisfaction questionnaire is described.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen D., Leavey R., Marks B. Survey of patients' satisfaction with access to general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Apr;38(309):163–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker R. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Jun;8(2):171–177. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopton J. L., Howie J. G., Porter A. M. The need for another look at the patient in general practice satisfaction surveys. Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):82–87. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hulka B. S., Zyzanski S. J., Cassel J. C., Thompson S. J. Scale for the measurement of attitudes toward physicians and primary medical care. Med Care. 1970 Sep-Oct;8(5):429–436. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197009000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangelsdorff A. D. Patient satisfaction questionnaire. Med Care. 1979 Jan;17(1):86–90. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197901000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michie S., Kidd J. Happy ever after. Health Serv J. 1994 Feb 3;104(5388):27–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roghmann K. J., Hengst A., Zastowny T. R. Satisfaction with medical care: its measurement and relation to utilization. Med Care. 1979 May;17(5):461–479. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197905000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wensing M., Grol R., Smits A. Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509–516. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]