Skip to main content
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open logoLink to Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
. 2025 Aug 19;6(5):100230. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100230

Virtual Observation Units: A Novel Disposition for Older Adults With Falls From the Emergency Department

Angel Li 1,, Scott A Goldberg 2, Maura Kennedy 3, Emily Hayden 3, Kara Mc Loughlin 4, Kei Ouchi 2, Kalpana Shankar 2, Anita Chary 5, Shan W Liu 3
PMCID: PMC12396014  PMID: 40894190

Abstract

Virtual observation units (VOUs) are being implemented across the country and serve as a model for patients to receive observational-level care at home. Falls are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits in the geriatric population and can cause substantial morbidity or mortality. Despite ED guidelines recommending fall-risk evaluation, the ED does not typically assess future fall risk given limited resources. We created a novel pilot VOU Falls Program that allows certain older ED fall patients to undergo fall-risk evaluation in their homes. In this concept paper, we discuss new care delivery models and how our VOU Falls Program integrates Mobile-Integrated Health paramedics, telemedicine emergency physicians, with fall-risk evaluation in the home. This novel VOU Falls Program includes home safety, functional testing, and fall-risk medication evaluations, components that are difficult to conduct in the ED, with the aim of reducing recurrent falls. It serves as an opportunity for emergency physicians to be at the forefront of a rapidly evolving area of care integrating Mobile-Integrated Health, telehealth for geriatric patients.

Keywords: virtual observation units, geriatrics, falls, fall prevention, emergency department, older adults, virtual visits

1. Background

Older adults make approximately 2.8 million emergency department (ED) visits annually.1 Falls are a leading cause of ED visits in the geriatric population with substantial associated morbidity or mortality,2,3 and over 30% of community dwellers aged >65 years fall at least once a year.4 Unintentional falls are the number one cause of death due to injury among older adults, with up to 20% of falls resulting in significant injury.5,6 Falls can lead to a decline in health, increased social isolation, nursing home admission, and loss of confidence.6 Further, over 1 in 5 patients may experience at least 1 subsequent fall within 6 months after a fall-related ED presentation.7

After a first fall, the ED encounter is an ideal opportunity to identify risk and limit the potential for future falls. However, despite ED guidelines recommending fall-risk evaluations,8 ED providers infrequently assess patients’ multifactorial risk for falls, in part because of time constraints9 and challenges in conducting assessments of mobility in the crowded ED environment. Therefore, the opportunity to identify patient risk and prevent future falls is missed.10,11

There has been a rapid growth of virtual home hospital services that maintain quality, safety, and patient experience,12, 13, 14, 15 catalyzed in part by a waiver from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services providing a mechanism for reimbursement of home hospital services issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.16,17 Identifying the lack of fall-risk assessments in the ED, and leveraging our Mass General Brigham’s healthcare system’s experience with a hospital-at-home program, our ED developed a novel ED Virtual Observation Unit (VOU) Falls Program intended to address this gap in care for older patients with falls. Eligible older patients presenting to the ED after a fall are admitted to the VOU Falls Program, supported by telehealth and in-home evaluation by Mobile-Integrated Health (MIH) paramedics, after initial identification, screening, and enrollment from the ED. In this concept paper, we aim to describe the components and implementation of this program to assist other EDs that may be considering developing a VOU Falls Program to conduct fall-risk assessment and amelioration for their geriatric patients who have sustained a fall.

1.1. Clinical Management and Disposition of Older Fall Patients

Our hospital is a large, tertiary care academic medical center with an ED caring for 120,000 patients annually. It has a hospital-at-home program12,14,16 that can provide acute hospital-level care in a patient’s home (including in-person or virtual physician evaluations and a range of in-home diagnostics), as well as a traditional observation unit in close physical proximity to the ED. Any fall patients with significant injury or identified as high-risk for conditions such as syncope in the ED are typically admitted for inpatient care. Falls patients for whom ED clinicians are concerned about safety at home, eg, unable to ambulate independently to the bathroom, are often admitted to the observation unit in our hospital to await physical therapy (PT) consultation; some subsequently received postacute (rehabilitation) care.

Developed in an interdisciplinary collaboration involving emergency medicine physicians, geriatricians, paramedics, pharmacists, patients, nurses, and caregivers, we implemented the VOU Falls Program protocol in July 2022. Inclusion criteria for the VOU Falls protocol were patients aged ≥65 years presenting to the ED following a fall, determined by a clinician as being at risk for a subsequent fall, hemodynamically stable, and otherwise eligible for observation-level care. Patients residing in assisted living or a nursing home were not eligible.

1.3. Fall-Risk Assessment Components

The protocol incorporated evidence-based international guidelines on multifactorial fall-risk assessment for patients seeking medical attention due to a fall or recurrent falls,18 and includes a home safety evaluation, patient functional testing, and medication review (Figure).

Figure.

Figure

A novel virtual observation unit program for falls. VOU, virtual observation unit; ED, emergency department.

1.3.1. Home Safety Evaluation

One important component of the VOU Falls Program is home safety evaluation, something that cannot be done when patients are admitted to the physical observation unit or even to the hospital. According to a Cochrane review by Gillespie,4 home safety assessment and modification interventions effectively reduced fall rates (risk ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.97; 6 trials; 4208 participants) as well as the risk of falling (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.96; 7 trials; 4051 participants). In our program, MIH paramedics conduct a home safety evaluation when visiting the patient (Supplementary Appendix 1). They will report any concerns to the patient and telemedicine physician.

1.3.2. Functional testing

Functional testing such as the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test predicts fall risk.19 Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries algorithm,20 MIH paramedics use 2 cones and a 10-foot string to measure landmarks for the patient. Specifically, the telemedicine physician recommends PT for patients with a TUG test time greater than or equal to 12 seconds.20

1.3.3. Medication review

Medication effects, side effects, and interactions are common causes of falls, and a number of fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) have been identified, including loop diuretics, opioids, antiepileptics, and benzodiazepines.21 A thorough medication review and reconciliation are recommended across fall prevention guidelines,22,23 and medication management and deprescribing are strongly recommended as a part of multifactorial fall-risk reduction intervention.20 Screening tools such as the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk21 and Screening Tool of Older Persons potentially inappropriate Prescriptions-Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment24 can aid clinicians in drug-optimization strategies.

1.4. The ED VOU Fall Program

Participation in the VOU Falls Program is voluntary and by active consent of the patient or a legally authorized representative. After agreement, care is transitioned from the ED to the VOU Falls team. The patient or caregiver is provided instructions on the use of equipment (eg, tablets and pulse oximeter).

The VOU Falls team consists of the following members and roles: (1) VOU emergency medicine physician trained in fall risk assessments who visits virtually, (2) VOU nurse who communicates with patients twice a day, and (3) VOU MIH paramedic trained to provide out-of-hospital care in a nontransport capacity and supported by medical direction through telehealth who conducts a home visit and evaluation. The VOU nurse communicates with patients at designated scheduled times (typically morning and evening) for patient assessments via the computer tablet or telephone. A MIH paramedic with additional training specific to the VOU Falls protocol visits the patient at home within 24 h of admission to (1) conduct a safety evaluation of the home using a standardized checklist including stairs, lighting, bathtub or shower grab bars, and rugs (Supplementary Appendix 1); (2) assess mobility using the TUG test19; and (3) facilitate a video-based evaluation of the patient with the VOU emergency medicine physician. Medications are reviewed, and FRIDs are referred to the patient’s primary care provider for recommended deprescribing. Safety concerns are addressed with the patient and caregivers, including the importance of grab bars, floor rugs, and any other identified risks. Patients with an abnormal TUG are referred to outpatient PT.

Patients typically participate in the VOU Falls Program for 1 day. Although virtually all VOU patients are determined to be sufficiently safe to remain in their home following their VOU stay, any patient requiring continued care can be admitted to the virtual hospital at home or returned to the ED. We report a vignette here to illustrate the program.

Potential Scenarios Following an Emergency Department Visit for a Fall

JW, an 80-year-old female with congestive heart failure, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, presented to the ED after a fall. She reported that while ambulating to her kitchen she tripped, landing on her outstretched left hand. In the ED, she had discomfort of her left wrist but denied a head strike or cervical spine discomfort. No injuries were identified on plain films of the left wrist.

Potential scenario 1: She was discharged home. Two weeks later, she returned to the ED after a recurrent fall and was found to have a fracture of the right femoral neck.

Potential scenario 2: She was transferred home to participate in the VOU Falls Program. A trained visiting paramedic identified fall risks including area rugs and lack of shower grab bars, conducted a TUG mobility assessment test, and made a community referral for grab bar installation. After a telehealth consultation, a physician discussed TUG results with her and referred her to PT. The physician also emailed her primary care physician about the possibility of deprescribing 2 identified fall-risk-increasing drugs. She subsequently attended PT and has no recurrent fall in the next 6 months.

1.5. Advantages of the VOU Fall Program

We have identified a number of advantages of the VOU Falls Program. The provision of care in the home allows for distinct advantages over traditional hospital-based ED and observation unit care for patients who otherwise do not require hospitalization. A VOU allows for earlier care transitions and improved opportunities for medication reconciliation and deprescribing in coordination with the patient’s care team. Although based on the hospital-at-home model, these patients otherwise would not qualify for hospital admission. Further, a VOU provides an opportunity for more patient-centered care, treating the patient in the comfort of their own home; patients also perceive VOU care to be of high quality.25 With specific regard to postfall care, a VOU allows a more holistic evaluation of patient needs, including mitigation of risks present in the patient’s home, that would not be possible with traditional observation unit care.

Because the entire care delivery model occurs in the home, care transitions happen earlier, and clinicians can visualize how older adults can undertake care management activities in their own homes. This model allows clinicians to better understand care preferences, patient engagement, safety in the home setting, patient’s self-monitoring, social supports, and caregiver needs. Additionally, the VOU is ideally suited for identification of FRIDs as the patient is able to directly collect their home medications for evaluation. Opportunities for an accurate evaluation of FRIDs are limited within the ED or hospital settings.

Finally, the VOU Falls Program takes advantage of a growing group of healthcare providers and MIH providers. The MIH paramedics are becoming an increasingly important component of acute care at home programs, complementing more traditional role groups such as physicians and nurses. MIH is the provision of healthcare using patient-centered, mobile resources in the out-of-hospital environment in a coordinated manner with physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare and public safety providers such as emergency medical service (EMS) personnel. Although MIH programs may leverage a variety of clinical role groups, most MIH programs use paramedics with advanced training and an expanded scope of practice to provide out-of-hospital care in a nontransport capacity, often supported by medical direction through telehealth. EMS scope of practice is defined by the National EMS Scope of Practice Model,26 yet with appropriate training, oversight, and regulatory authority, this scope of practice can and should be expanded to meet the unique needs of specific populations and communities. Such an expanded scope of practice is safe, effective, and may result in substantial cost savings.26, 27, 28

MIH programs have already started to address fall prevention, although not specifically acute postfall recovery. In 1 randomized trial investigating home hazard assessment and removal, older patients randomized to an MIH program achieved a 38% reduction in the risk of falling.29 In another study, transport was successfully avoided in 65% of ground-level falls using a paramedic protocol and safety assessment, with a very low risk (0.3%) of missed pathology.30 However, the impact of fall-risk mitigation on patient-centered outcomes is less clear. A recent large multicenter trial in the United Kingdom randomized paramedics to usual care or to management at home with referral to a community falls service.31 Although subsequent EMS calls decreased in the intervention group, there was no identified change in emergency admissions, ED attendances, emergency service calls, or death.

2. Discussion

In the development of a novel VOU Falls Program, we have identified numerous advantages over traditional hospital-based observation care. This unique subset of patients does not qualify for inpatient-level care and, as such, would not qualify for a traditional hospital-at-home program. Patients admitted to a VOU may not require the full capabilities or length of stay as a patient admitted to a hospital-at-home program, but nevertheless require additional care beyond the immediate capabilities of the ED. The specific focus on this population of older adults at higher risk for subsequent falls, coupled with the additional training and systematic approach of our protocol, differentiates this program from existing VOU programs. By providing an in-home evaluation in the patient’s native environment, the VOU Falls Program provides safer transitions of care than can be offered in a traditional ED-based observation unit. VOU paramedics are well suited to help the telemedicine physician evaluate not only the patient’s medications but also the environment in which the medications are administered. This can help with medication reconciliation and deprescription, both advantageous in mitigating the deleterious effects of certain medications. Our systematized approach to the TUG test ensures functional testing can be done, something often not practically done in the ED due to a lack of space.

2.1. Future Directions

Future larger, randomized studies determining if a decrease in falls and ED revisits as well as the cost-effectiveness of the VOU program are needed. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to determine if fall patients who may need rehabilitation and placement could instead be accommodated in a VOU Falls Program. This approach could potentially open up physical observation unit beds and, thereby, alleviate ED crowding.

3. Conclusion

Despite the cost, morbidity, and mortality associated with falls among older adults, fall screening in the ED is difficult to implement because of time and resource constraints, resulting in potentially avoidable inpatient or observation admissions. VOUs provide an opportunity for a multifactorial fall-risk assessment and implementation of a fall mitigation plan performed in the patient’s home, with potential benefits in healthcare expenditures, hospital throughput, patient satisfaction, and reduced risk of subsequent falls. Although further outcome data are needed, our novel VOU program might serve as a model for other hospitals to develop similar programs.

Funding and Support

By JACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have affirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Angel Li, MD and Scott A. Goldberg, MD, MPH are co-first authors in this study.

Supervising Editor: Henry Wang, MD, MS

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100230

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix 1
mmc1.pdf (160.8KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Shankar K.N., Liu S.W., Ganz D.A. Trends and characteristics of emergency department visits for fall-related injuries in older adults, 2003-2010. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5):785–793. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.33615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tinetti M.E., Speechley M., Ginter S.F. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(26):1701–1707. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Fatalities and injuries from falls among older adults—United States, 1993-2003 and 2001-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(45):1221–1224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gillespie L.D., Robertson M.C., Gillespie W.J., et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Libr. 2012;2021(6) doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007146.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burns E.R., Stevens J.A., Lee R. The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults—United States. J Safety Res. 2016;58:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tinetti M.E., Williams C.S. Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(18):1279–1284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710303371806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sri-On J., Tirrell G.P., Bean J.F., Lipsitz L.A., Liu S.W. Revisit, subsequent hospitalization, recurrent fall, and death within 6 months after a fall among elderly emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(4):516–521.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carpenter C.R., Bromley M., Caterino J.M., et al. Optimal older adult emergency care: introducing multidisciplinary geriatric emergency department guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(7):1360–1363. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davenport K., Cameron A., Samson M., Sri-On J., Liu S.W. Fall prevention knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a survey of emergency providers. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(4):826–830. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.43387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davenport K., Alazemi M., Sri-On J., Liu S. Missed opportunities to diagnose and intervene in modifiable risk factors for older emergency department patients presenting after a fall. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(6):730–738. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carpenter C.R., Lo A.X. Falling behind? Understanding implementation science in future emergency department management strategies for geriatric fall prevention. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(4):478–480. doi: 10.1111/acem.12628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levine D.M., Ouchi K., Blanchfield B., et al. Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(5):729–736. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4307-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shepperd S., Iliffe S. The effectiveness of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care: a systematic review. J Public Health Med. 1998;20(3):344–350. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levine D.M., Ouchi K., Blanchfield B., et al. Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(2):77–85. doi: 10.7326/M19-0600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qaddoura A., Yazdan-Ashoori P., Kabali C., et al. Efficacy of hospital at home in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ouchi K., Liu S., Tonellato D., Keschner Y.G., Kennedy M., Levine D.M. Home hospital as a disposition for older adults from the emergency department: benefits and opportunities. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021;2(4) doi: 10.1002/emp2.12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leff B, Milstein A. What we learned from the acute hospital care at home waiver-and what we still don’t know. Health Aff Forefr. https://doi.org/10.1377/forefront.20220623.684203.
  • 18.Falls in older people: assessing risk and prevention |Guidance | NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg161/resources/2019-surveillance-of-falls-
  • 19.Podsiadlo D., Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STEADI algorithm for fall risk screening, assessment, and intervention. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/media/pdfs/STEADI-Algorithm-508.pdf
  • 21.Seppala L.J., Petrovic M., Ryg J. STOPPFall (screening tool of older persons prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk): a Delphi study by the EuGMS task and Finish group on fall-risk-increasing drugs. Age Ageing. 2021;50(4):1189–1199. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Geriatric emergency department guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(5):e7–e25. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johnson T.M., II, Vincenzo J.L., De Lima B., et al. Updating STEADI for primary care: Recommendations from the American Geriatrics Society workgroup. J Am Geriatr Soc. Published online January 29, 2025 doi: 10.1111/jgs.19378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Omahony D., Cherubini A., Guiteras A.R. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023;14(4):625–632. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hayden E.M., Nentwich L.M., Jung O.S., Zheng H., White B.A. Patient perceptions of emergency department observation care at home. Telemed J E Health. 2024;30(7):1874–1879. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xie F., Yan J., Agarwal G., Ferron R. Economic analysis of mobile integrated health care delivered by emergency medical services paramedic teams. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Agarwal G., Angeles R., Pirrie M., et al. Effectiveness of a community paramedic-led health assessment and education initiative in a seniors’ residence building: the Community Health Assessment Program through Emergency Medical Services (CHAP-EMS) BMC Emerg Med. 2016;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0119-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.National Association of State EMS Officials. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration National EMS scope of practice model 2019: including change notices 1.0 and 2.0. DOT HS 813 151. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation. August 1, 2021. https://www.ems.gov/assets/National_EMS_Scope_of_Practice_Model_2019.pdf Available at:
  • 29.Stark S., Keglovits M., Somerville E., et al. Home hazard removal to reduce falls among community-dwelling older adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Williams J.G., Bachman M.W., Lyons M.D., et al. Improving decisions about transport to the emergency department for assisted living residents who fall. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(3):179–186. doi: 10.7326/M17-0969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Snooks H.A., Anthony R., Chatters R., et al. Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(13):1–218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix 1
mmc1.pdf (160.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open are provided here courtesy of American College of Emergency Physicians

RESOURCES