Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330832

Comprehensive analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes in pulmonary hypertension through machine learning and immune infiltration: Spotlight on USP32 and ZNF655 as key regulators

Riken Chen 1,#, Dingyu Guo 2,#, Jiahua Pan 2,#, Lingpin Pang 2,#, Jie Sun 2, Qian Xian 2, Tao Huang 2, Junfen Cheng 1, Jihuang Huang 2, Xianbing Zeng 3, Guojun Yang 3, Shiyan Qi 3, Wenliang Chen 4,*, Xishi Sun 1,2,*
Editor: Mahdi Roozbeh5
PMCID: PMC12419597  PMID: 40924716

Abstract

Background

Disulfidptosis, a novel cellular death manner, has yet to be fully explored within the context of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study aims to identify genes implicated in PAH that are involved in disulfidptosis.

Method

Based on data from the GEO database, this study employed co-expression analysis, Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), hub gene identification, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to uncover genes associated with PAH and disulfidptosis. Subsequent machine learning validation and functional GSEA further refined the identification of pivotal genes. The investigation extended to examining immune cell involvement via immune infiltration techniques and elucidates the hub genes’ roles within ceRNA networks.

Result

The integrative approach of co-expression analysis and WGCNA identified genes at the intersection of PAH and disulfidptosis. GSEA revealed their roles in essential biological processes and pathways, such as mRNA processing and cytoplasmic DNA sensing pathway. Prominently, USP32 and ZNF655 were identified as significant hub genes through machine learning analysis, demonstrating notable diagnostic potential across various datasets. Further, immune infiltration studies and ceRNA regulatory network construction revealed the intricate association between these genes and differential immune cell expression, alongside miRNA and lncRNA regulatory networks.

Conclusions

This study elucidates the contributory role of USP32 and ZNF655 in the pathogenesis of PAH, making them as critical genes within the disulfidptosis pathway.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) stand as a leading cause of global mortality, prominently featuring idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) among its most critical concerns. PAH is a rare multifactorial disease characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling, progressive deterioration towards right heart failure, and an abnormal resistance to apoptosis [1]. Recent clinical delineations classify PAH within five subtypes of pulmonary hypertension (PH), identifying it as the most severe form, characterized by specific hemodynamic criteria including a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) exceeding 20 mmHg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) of 15 mmHg or less, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of 3 Wood units or more [2,3]. Patients with PAH typically undergo significant vascular remodeling, leading to vascular blockages [4]. Despite the identification of various biomarkers linked to vascular dysfunction, inflammation, myocardial stress, and tissue hypoxia, none have been specifically recognized as unique to PAH [1]. In genetics research, PH remains a challenging task despite its extensive study [5]. Current therapeutic strategies target three primary pathways: the nitric oxide (NO) pathway, the endothelin-1 (ET-1) pathway, and the prostacyclin (PGI) pathway, aiming to extend median survival time [6,7]. However, the overall patient survival rate after five years remains around only 57% to 59%, indicating the limited efficacy of existing treatments. Previous studies suggest immune disorders accounting for this gap in therapeutic outcomes, necessitating further investigations into PAH’s molecular mechanisms and immune disorders to advance treatment approaches.

Disulfide, a compound stabilizing proteins during oxidative stress reactions, plays a pivotal role in preserving protein structures and ensuring their stability [8]. The discovery of ‘disulfidptosis’, a novel cell death pathway described by Liu and colleagues, marks a departure from traditional forms of programmed cell death (apoptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis) [9]. Disulfidptosis primarily occurs under conditions of glucose starvation. Disulfidptosis arises when inhibited glucose metabolism leads to the upregulation of SLC7A11 facilitating increased cysteine uptake [10]. This, in turn, causes an excessive accumulation of disulfide in cells [11,12]. This accumulation precipitates a unique form of cell death, distinguished by its specific mechanism [9]. Given the potential link between genetic predispositions of vascular cells, inflammation, glycolysis metabolism alterations, and the pathogenesis of PAH [13], the exploration of disulfidptosis within PAH presents a novel investigative avenue. However, to date, no studies have explicitly addressed the role of disulfidptosis-related genes in PAH.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) represent a class of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), which are functional RNA molecules that are not translated into proteins [14]. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of transcripts exceeding 200 nucleotides in length that lack protein-coding capacity but play pivotal roles in gene regulation, biological processes, and diverse diseases [15]. Current research has established that both miRNAs and lncRNAs serve as critical regulators in PAH, modulating processes such as vascular remodeling, inflammation, and cellular proliferation through post-transcriptional gene silencing or competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanisms [16,17]. Recent studies have revealed their regulatory roles in core pathogenic mechanisms of PAH, including Wnt signaling pathway activation and immune dysregulation [18,19]. For instance, lncRNAs can function as ceRNA that sequester miRNAs, thereby relieving their inhibitory effects on PAH-associated mRNAs [17].

This study aimed to illustrate the role of disulfidptosis-related genes in PAH by analyzing gene expression profiles from GSE15197 and GSE113439 databases. Through WGCNA, and subsequent Pearson correlation analysis, we identified crucial gene modules and hub genes using LASSO, random forest, and SVM-RFE algorithms. The association between these genes and immune cell activity was further examined through GSEA and single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), culminating in the construction of a ceRNA network. This multifaceted approach not only aims to deepen our understanding of PAH at the molecular level but also to highlight potential therapeutic targets within its complex pathophysiological landscape.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. GEO dataset collection and data preprocessing

This study conducted data mining of PH and disulfidptosis-related genes using the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We retrieved two raw high-throughput functional genomics datasets (GSE15197 [20] and GSE113439 [21]) related to PH. The GSE15197 dataset (GPL6480 platform) served as the experimental cohort, containing 26 PH cases (18 patients with PAH and 8 with secondary PH along with 13 normal controls obtained from fresh-frozen lung tissue specimens. The validation cohort comprised the GSE113439 dataset (GPL6244 platform), which included 15 PH cases (6 idiopathic PAH, 4 PAH secondary to connective tissue disease [CTD], 4 PAH secondary to congenital heart disease [CHD], and 1 chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [CTEPH]) and 11 normal controls acquired from tumor-adjacent lung tissues during surgical resection. We identified 10 genes associated with disulfidptosis for analysis within the GSE15197 dataset, including GYS1, NDUFS1, OXSM, LRPPRC, NDUFA11, NUBPL, NCKAP1, RPN1, SLC3A2, SLC7A11 [9], for analysis within the GSE15197 dataset. Selection criteria included human samples, inclusion of both pulmonary hypertension and control lung tissues, a sample size exceeding 15, and publicly available data.

2.2. Co -expression analysis

Utilizing the “Limma” package within R software, we performed correlation tests between disulfidptosis genes and the GSE15197 dataset (COR > 0.4, P-VALUE < 0.001). This approach facilitated the identification of the mRNA gene expression spectrum relevant to both pulmonary hypertension and disulfidptosis, visually represented through Sankey diagrams.

2.3. WGCNA and hub genes identification

We employed “WGCNA,” an R software package, to construct a co-expression network for mRNA genes associated with pulmonary hypertension and disulfidptosis. Following the establishment of a scale-free network, optimal soft-thresholding, adjacency, and topological overlapping matrices (TOM) were determined. Dynamic module identification and Pearson correlation analyses were applied to discern module-gene relationships, with genes exhibiting a gene significance (GS) > 0.5 and module membership (MM) > 0.8 identified as core module genes.

2.4. Enrichment analysis

The “ClusterProfiler” package in R facilitated GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses for genes within significant modules, emphasizing biological processes (BP), molecular functions (MF), and cellular components (CC). Top results, based on the smallest P-values, were visually represented for both GO (top 10 results) and KEGG pathways (top 20 results with P < 0.05).

2.5. Machine learning (ML)-based hub gene screening and verification

The core genes were subjected to Lasso logistic regression, Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) analyses to identify hub genes. The effectiveness of these hub genes was quantitatively assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) using the PROC package in R. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was employed.

2.6. Single-based collection of rich set analysis (GSEA)

GSEA was conducted on individual hub genes to explore potential pathways and mechanisms implicated in pulmonary hypertension. Using the “ClusterProfiler” package in R, samples were divided into high- and low-expression groups based on median gene expression for comprehensive enrichment analysis.

2.7. Construction of the ceRNA regulatory network

To construct the ceRNA network for USP32 and ZNF655, we first predicted miRNA-target interactions using three bioinformatic algorithms: miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/), miRDB (http://mirdb.org/), and TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/). Stringent thresholds were applied (context score < −0.2 and conservation score > 0.8) to ensure prediction reliability. Subsequently, we identified lncRNAs capable of binding to these miRNAs using the spongeScan database (http://spongescan.rc.ufl.edu/), retaining only interactions with ≥2 predicted binding sites to ensure biological relevance. Finally, the ceRNA network was visualized using Cytoscape (v3.9.1), with nodes representing mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs, while edges denoted predicted interaction relationships.

3. Results

3.1. WGCNA analysis

Co-expression analysis identified 2,531 genes associated with pulmonary hypertension and disulfidptosis. Visualization using the ‘ggalluvial’ package in R software facilitated the creation of a Sankey diagram (Fig 1). These genes underwent WGCNA, setting a soft threshold of 19 to construct a weighted co-expression network, achieving an average connectivity near zero and an R2 value of 0.89 (Fig 2). Dynamic module identification isolated three significant modules—green, yellow, and gray. The green module comprises 1,271 genes, while the yellow module contains 950 genes. The gray module consists of 310 genes and is considered non-functional (The gray module typically includes genes that were not assigned to any other modules during WGCNA analysis. These genes may lack significant co-expression patterns or their expression profiles may differ from those in other modules). Hierarchical clustering further identified the green module as particularly relevant to disease pathology (Correlation = 0.6, p = 6e-05). Subsequently, using threshold criteria of Gene Significance (GS) > 0.5 and Module Membership (MM) > 0.8, we identified 246 highly connected hub genes exhibiting an inverse correlation with PAH within the green module.As shown in Fig 2E, there is a significant correlation(r = 0.31, p = 1e-29) between MM and GS, indicating a strong association between genes in the green module and gene significance.

Fig 1. Sankey Diagram in Co-expression Analysis.

Fig 1

Through co-expression analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) gene expression profiles, we identified genes associated with disulfidptosis. A total of 5,656 genes were screened, including:1,055 genes co-expressed with the disulfidptosis gene GYS1;1,105 genes co-expressed with LRPPRC;1,360 genes co-expressed with NCKAP1;1,577 genes co-expressed with NDUFA11;29 genes co-expressed with NDUFS1;158 genes co-expressed with NUBPL;8 genes co-expressed with OXSM;122 genes co-expressed with RPN1;155 genes co-expressed with SLC3A2;87 genes co-expressed with SLC7A11.

Fig 2. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and Hub Genes Identification.

Fig 2

(A)shows “Sample Dendrogram and Trait Heatmap”. This figure illustrates sample similarity and phenotypic classification. The dendrogram (generated via hierarchical clustering of gene expression data) reveals relationships among samples, with shorter branches indicating higher expression similarity. The trait heatmap uses color-coding: blue for the Control group and red for the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH/Treat) group. (B)shows “Scale Independence Plot and Mean Connectivity Plot”. The left panel displays the scale-free topology model fit (R²) across different soft-thresholding powers, while the right panel shows mean connectivity. The red line (R² = 0.89) indicates that a soft-thresholding power of 18 was selected as optimal for constructing a biologically relevant co-expression network. (C)shows “Heat Map of Module-Trait Relationships”. This heatmap depicts correlations between module eigengenes (y-axis: MEgreen, MEyellow, MEgrey) and phenotypic traits (x-axis: Control vs. PAH). Color intensity reflects correlation strength—dark yellow for strong positive, dark blue for strong negative—with p-values indicating significance. (D)shows “Gene Significance”. The histogram presents the distribution of gene significance values (x-axis) across genes (y-axis). The green module shows the highest significance, suggesting its strongest association with PAH. (G)shows “Gene Significance Scatter Plot of the Green Module”. This plot examines the relationship between module membership (x-axis) and gene significance (y-axis) in the green module, highlighting genes most strongly linked to PAH while maintaining high intramodular connectivity.

3.2. Enrichment analysis

GO and KEGG analyses of the green module’s core genes yielded significant insights (Fig 3). GO analysis (Fig 3A) highlighted enrichment in biological processes like mRNA processing and cell catabolism, and cellular components such as nuclear spots and protein complexes. Molecular functions showed enrichment in RNA binding and catalytic activities. KEGG pathway analysis (Fig 3B) revealed involvement in the cytoplasmic DNA sensing pathway, RNA degradation, and EB virus infection, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored biosynthesis, and splicing.

Fig 3. Enrichment Analysis Results.

Fig 3

Fig 3 presents the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses performed on the core genes identified in the green module. (A) shows the GO enrichment analysis, covering BP, CC, and MF. The bubble plot displays the top five significantly enriched terms, where the bubble size corresponds to the number of genes involved (larger bubbles represent higher gene counts) and the color gradient reflects the adjusted p-value significance (more intense red indicates greater statistical significance). (B) shows the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, featuring the top 20 enriched pathways in a similar bubble plot format. The visualization highlights the most relevant metabolic and signaling pathways, with bubble size and color coding maintaining the same representation as in panel A for consistent interpretation.

3.3. Hub genes identification and validation

Applying LASSO, Random Forest, and SVM-RFE algorithms to 246 potential genes from the green module identified significant hub genes (Fig 4). LASSO regression isolated eight genes, including AKR7A2P1, AKR7A3, ATG3, RANBP6, TRAPPC9, TTLL12, USP32 and ZNF655, after 10-fold cross-validation (Fig 4A and 4B). SVM-RFE selected 11 hub genes (USP32, ZNF655, AHR, PNRC2, ERBB2IP, ZNF687, ZC3H15, PSMD12, YTHDF3, CPNE8, and ALKBH4) for their minimal error rates and optimal accuracy (Fig 4C and 4D), while Random Forest highlighted five disease-related genes, including ZNF655, AKR7A2P1, USP32, YTHDF3, and PNRC2 (Fig 4E and 4F). The intersection of these analyses confirmed USP32 and ZNF655 as critical hub genes (Fig 4G). ROC analysis validated their diagnostic effectiveness, with USP32 and ZNF655 exhibiting ROC values above 0.75 in both the experimental and validation datasets, underscoring their significance in pulmonary hypertension diagnosis (Fig 5). Therefore, we selected these two genes for further analysis.

Fig 4. Hub Genes selection Results.

Fig 4

(A) and (B) show that the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator(LASSO) regression algorithm was applied for feature gene selection, with the regularization parameter λ used for covariate selection and dimensionality reduction. (C) and (D) show that feature genes were screened using the Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination(SVM-RFE) algorithm, an iterative approach that ranks and eliminates the least important features based on classifier performance. (E) and (F) show that the Random Forest(RF) algorithm was employed for feature gene selection, leveraging its built-in feature importance scoring to identify the most relevant genes. (G) shows a Venn diagram illustrating the overlapping key feature genes identified by LASSO, SVM-RFE, and RF, highlighting consensus biomarkers across different selection methods. The genes selected by Lasso include AKR7A2P1, AKR7A3, ATG3, RANBP6, TRAPPC9, TTLL1, USP32, and ZNF655. The genes selected by the SVM-RFE algorithm include USP32, ZNF655, AHR, PNRC2, ERBB2IP, ZNF687, ZC3H15, PSMD12, YTHDF3, CPNE8, and ALKBH4. The genes selected by the RF algorithm include ZNF655, AKR7A2P1, USP32, YTHDF3, and PNRC2.

Fig 5. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve(AUC-ROC) Results.

Fig 5

(A) shows the ROC curve of gene USP32 in the training set GSE15197 (GPL6480), demonstrating its diagnostic performance. (B) shows the ROC curve of gene USP32 in the independent validation set GSE113439 (GPL6244), confirming its robustness. (C) shows the ROC curve of gene ZNF655 in the training set GSE15197 (GPL6480), evaluating its classification efficacy. (D) shows the ROC curve of gene ZNF655 in the validation set GSE113439 (GPL6244), further validating its predictive capability.

3.4. Prediction of the potential pathway and mechanism function of hub genes

Finally, we used GSEA to predict the potential pathways and mechanism functions of the hub genes in the GSE15197 dataset. Fig 6 displays the top five most enriched GO functions and KEGG pathways in both the high-expression group (where hub genes are highly expressed in pulmonary hypertension patients from the GSE15197 dataset) and the low-expression group (where hub genes show low expression in pulmonary hypertension patients from the GSE15197 dataset).

Fig 6. GSEA Results.

Fig 6

Fig 6 shows the GSEA-predicted potential pathways and mechanistic functions of hub genes in the GSE15197 dataset. (A)and (B) show GO and KEGG enrichment analyses for the USP32 high-expression group, revealing its potential biological roles and associated pathways. (C) and (D) show GO and KEGG enrichment analyses for the USP32 low-expression group, highlighting distinct functional mechanisms compared to the high-expression group. (E) and (F) show GO and KEGG enrichment analyses for the ZNF655 high-expression group, identifying key biological processes and signaling pathways linked to its overexpression. (G) and (H) show GO and KEGG enrichment analyses for the ZNF655 low-expression group, uncovering differential pathway activities relative to high-expression conditions.

3.4.1. Top five most significantly enriched GO functions and KEGG pathways in the high-expression group.

In the high-expression group, USP32 was enriched in gene functions linked to cell response to biological stimulation, lymphocyte-mediated immunity, response to bacterial-derived molecules, chromosome region, and spindle (Fig 6A). USP32 was enriched in KEGG pathways including asthma, oocyte meiosis, p53 signaling pathway, terpenoid main chain biosynthesis, and tryptophan metabolism (Fig 6B). ZNF655 was enriched in axoneme assembly, cilium movement, cilium or flagellum-dependent cell motility, microtubule bundle formation, axoneme, and other gene functions (Fig 6C). ZNF655 was enriched in KEGG pathways including drug Metabolism of cytochrome p450, drug metabolism of other enzymes, oocyte Meiosis, p53 Signaling pathway, and retinol metabolism (Fig 6D).

3.4.2. Top five most significantly enriched GO functions and KEGG pathways in the low-expression group.

In the low-expression group, USP32 was enriched in gene functions such as anterior-posterior pattern specification, canonical Wnt signaling pathway, embryonic organ development, gland development, and pattern specification process (Fig 6E). USP32 was enriched in KEGG pathways including basal cell carcinoma, cardiac muscle contraction, focal adhesion, maturation-onset diabetes of the young, and Wnt signaling pathway (Fig 6F). ZNF655 was involved in anterior-posterior pattern specification, regulation of trans-synaptic signaling, G protein-coupled receptor activity, and peptide receptor activity (Fig 6G). ZNF655 was enriched in KEGG pathways including basal cell carcinoma, calcium signaling pathway, cardiac muscle contraction, juvenile diabetes mellitus, and neuroactive ligand receptor interaction (Fig 6H).

3.5. Immune infiltration analysis

For further study, ssGSEA was used to compare immune cell distributions between control and pulmonary hypertension samples within the GSE15197 dataset. In the heat map, the distribution of 28 immune cells in each sample of GSE15197 dataset was shown. The Fiddle diagram (Fig 7) revealled significant differences in several immune cell types, including activated CD4 T cells, CD56 bright natural killer cells, eosinophils, gamma delta T cells, immature dendritic cells, mast cells, natural killer T cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, regulatory T cells, T follicular helper cells, and effector memory CD8 T cells, suggesting their involvement in PAH progression. Immunocorrelation analysis indicated positive correlations of USP32 with dendritic cells and T cells (p < 0.001), memory B cell (p < 0.05), activated CD4 T cell (p < 0.05), and negative correlations with specific T helper cells (p < 0.05), central memory CD8 T cell (p < 0.05), and CD56dim natural killer cell (p < 0.05). ZNF655 showed similar immune correlations, emphasizing the genes’ roles in immune modulation in PAH.

Fig 7. The Violin Plot Obtained From Immune Infiltration Analysis.

Fig 7

(A) shows a heatmap depicting the differential distribution of 28 immune cell subtypes across study samples, highlighting distinct immune infiltration patterns between the PAH group and controls. (B) presents violin plots comparing the infiltration levels of 28 immune cell populations between control subjects and PAH patients, demonstrating significant differences in immune cell abundance between groups. (C) displays box plots illustrating the expression differences of hub genes (USP32 and ZNF655) between control and PAH groups, revealing their potential roles in disease pathogenesis.

3.6. Construction of a ceRNA regulatory network

We constructed ceRNA networks for USP32 (Fig 8) and ZNF655 (Fig 9), predicting related miRNAs and lncRNAs using databases like miRanda, miRDB, and TargetScan, obtaining 73 miRNAs. This approach yielded complex networks, illustrating the intricate regulatory relationships involving USP32 and ZNF655 within pulmonary hypertension pathology. Then, the above miRNA-related lncRNAs were predicted by spongScan database, and finally only 25 miRNAs predicted 70 related lncRNAs. Similarly, 59 miRNAs and 82 lncRNAs were predicted related to ZNF655. The lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network was then constructed using Cytoscape to obtain a visual map.

Fig 8. ceRNA regulatory network diagram——USP32.

Fig 8

Fig 8 shows the ceRNA regulatory network diagram of miRNA and lncRNA related to USP32.

Fig 9. ceRNA regulatory network diagram——ZNF655.

Fig 9

Fig 9 shows the ceRNA regulatory network diagram of miRNA and lncRNA related to ZNF655.

4. Discussion

PAH is a complex cardiovascular disorder characterized by progressive right heart failure and high mortality, with affected patients exhibiting significantly reduced life expectancy [22,23]. Despite the advent of numerous therapeutic strategies in recent years, contemporary treatments principally mitigate the consequences of disease rather than offering a cure [24,25]. Consequently, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying PAH progression, developing targeted therapies against novel pathways, and validating clinically actionable biomarkers represent urgent unmet needs to transform patient management. Recent studies have identified disulfide-dependent cell death, otherwise referred to as disulfide stress-induced cell death (DSCCD), as an additional factor contributing to pulmonary vascular remodeling in patients diagnosed with PAH. This form of cell death is iron-dependent, and it has been shown to play a significant role in the development of this condition [26,27]. The objective of this study is to methodically examine the mechanistic associations between disulfide-mediated protein folding and PAH by employing comprehensive bioinformatics methodologies. This investigation seeks to elucidate the pathophysiological underpinnings that contribute to the progression of these diseases.

In the present study, we initially identified USP32 and ZNF655 as hub genes that were significantly upregulated in patients with PAH through a combination of WGCNA and machine learning approaches. WGCNA, a systems biology method that has gained significant popularity among researchers, offers an effective approach to comprehensively characterize the gene-gene association patterns present in microarray datasets. This method has been extensively employed in the realm of bioinformatics research, as evidenced by its numerous applications [28]. The present analysis indicates that the aforementioned amplification strategy is indeed effective in network-based discovery. This finding serves as a validation of the strategy’s robustness and serves to substantiate the efficacy of the approach. ML is a pivotal subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that has been widely utilized in various disciplines, with particularly prominent applications in bioinformatics research [29]. In this study, we employed multiple machine learning approaches—including Lasso logistic regression, RF, and SVM-RFE—to analyze the green module identified through WGCNA, ultimately identifying hub genes with high network centrality. As demonstrated in previous studies, PAH is characterized by a multifactorial pathophysiology, which is typically accompanied by progressive right heart failure and abnormal pulmonary vascular remodeling [30]. Pulmonary vascular remodeling is a complex process influenced by multiple mechanisms, including excessive proliferation, apoptosis of vascular cells, and infiltration of inflammatory cells into the vasculature [31]. The broad category of cell death modalities comprises two primary forms: programmed cell death (PCD) and necrotic cell death, which includes the previously mentioned disulfide-dependent process. These mechanisms play pivotal roles in cellular homeostasis regulation [32,33]. USP32 encodes a member of the ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) family. Ubiquitination, a pivotal post-translational modification of intracellular proteins, plays a critical role in regulating their specific functions [34]. As indicated by the findings of preceding studies, USP32 functions as a pivotal regulator across a variety of pathways, thereby participating in diverse cellular biological processes. The present study demonstrates that the aforementioned pathway is functionally linked to a variety of biological processes, including cell cycle regulation, cell death, proliferation, invasion, migration, DNA replication, base excision repair, mismatch repair, and DNA damage response pathways. These processes are closely associated with the development of PAH [35,36]. ZNF655 is a member of the zinc-finger (ZNF) protein family. The ZNF protein family, the largest transcription factor family in the human genome, exhibits diverse molecular functions and participates in multiple cellular processes through distinct molecular mechanisms [37]. Distinct combinations of functional motifs within the ZNF protein regulate diverse biological processes, including development, differentiation, metabolism, and autophagy. These mechanisms correspond remarkably to the pathological vascular remodeling observed in PAH [38,39].

To further elucidate the gene expression data, we performed GSEA. This method entails the analysis of predefined gene sets to derive biologically relevant functions, a practice that has seen an uptick in recent studies [40]. In the USP32 high-expression group, the activation of lymphocyte-mediated immune responses has been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in the regulation of inflammation and the dysregulation of the cell cycle in patients with PAH. These mechanisms may be associated with the initiation and maintenance of immune-mediated inflammation during pulmonary vascular remodeling in patients with PAH [4144]. A body of research has demonstrated that the systemic administration of human endothelial cell-cultured modified monocytes can prevent the development of PAH by stimulating innate immune lymphocytes. This finding suggests the potential role of these immune cells in PAH pathophysiology [45]. The observed congruence between these well-established findings and the subsequent results offers independent validation of the conclusions drawn. In the USP32 low-expression group, the reduced levels of USP32 may result in the suppression of the Wnt signaling pathway, thereby impairing vascular development and endothelial function. These mechanisms may be associated with vascular remodeling in patients with PAH. The veracity of our findings was corroborated by the study of Yuan K., et al. Their research demonstrated that a pivotal factor in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway modulates pulmonary endothelial cell-pericyte interactions, and the absence of this factor promotes the development of PAH by diminishing the viability of new blood vessels [46]. The findings of this investigation align with those of previous studies, which also provide substantiating evidence for our research on ZNF655 [47,48]. Of particular interest is the finding that the p53 signaling pathway was found to be significantly enriched in both USP32 and ZNF655 analyses. As demonstrated in previous experimental studies, p53 inactivation has been shown to trigger pulmonary hypertension and vascular remodeling. p53 dysregulation has been found to induce the upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α), which in turn promotes endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). These processes have been identified as exacerbating factors in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension. These findings establish p53 as playing a pivotal role in PAH development [4951].

To further characterize the biological functions associated with this feature, we performed ssGSEA. A body of research has previously identified perivascular inflammation as a salient pathophysiological feature in PAH. A characteristic accumulation of diverse immune cells—including neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes—is observed around pulmonary vessels in patients with PAH. This accumulation represents nearly the complete spectrum of inflammatory cell lineages [31,52,53]. In this study, we observed a positive correlation between USP32 expression and the degree of dendritic cell infiltration, as well as the extent of T-cell activation and memory B-cell abundance in the tissue samples. These findings suggest a potential role for USP32 in regulating adaptive immune responses during the progression of PAH. In contrast, the ZNF655 high-expression group exhibited significant associations with neutrophil and natural killer cell infiltration, implicating innate immune pathways in vascular inflammation and remodeling. These findings demonstrate that differential immune cell expression patterns and their specific genetic correlations may contribute to the development and progression of PAH, providing critical insights for further investigation into immune-mediated mechanisms in PAH pathogenesis.

Consequently, a ceRNA network was constructed. The USP32-centered ceRNA network comprised 25 microRNAs (including hsa-let-7a-5p and hsa-miR-145-5p) and 70 long non-coding RNAs (such as RP11-10J21.4 and MUC19), revealing extensive post-transcriptional regulatory potential in the pathogenesis of PAH. As indicated by prior research, members of the let-7 family, such as hsa-let-7a-5p, have been observed to exhibit significant upregulation in lung tissues of patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). In these tissues, these molecules have been shown to promote vascular remodeling through the targeted regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [54]. The ZNF655-associated ceRNA network comprised 17 microRNAs (including hsa-miR-186-5p and hsa-miR-26b-3p) and 82 long non-coding RNAs (such as RP11-830F9.6 and SNHG14), underscoring its extensive regulatory potential in pulmonary vascular homeostasis. It has been demonstrated that has-miR-181a-5p expression is reduced in PAH, and that this reduction contributes to the attenuation of inflammatory responses and vascular remodeling by targeting genes such as TNF-α. This, in turn, contributes to the pathogenesis of PAH [55]. From a mechanistic perspective, it is hypothesized that hsa-miR-205-5p functions as a suppressant of proliferation in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) within the pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) context. This hypothesis posits that the suppression is achieved through the targeting of MICAL2, consequently impeding the downstream activation of ERK1/2 signaling [56]. These findings suggest that ZNF655 may regulate key PAH pathways through mechanisms involving microRNAs. The findings of the present study are consistent with those of previous research, which has demonstrated the critical role of non-coding RNA networks in pulmonary vascular remodeling.

5. Conclusion

In summary, our study demonstrates USP32 and ZNF655 as hub genes in the progression of PAH, involved in a variety of critical biological processes and signaling pathways, and closely related to the immune regulation in PAH. These findings not only deepen our understanding of the pathological mechanisms of PAH but may also shed a light for the development of new therapeutic targets and strategies. Future research should further investigate the specific mechanisms and roles of these hub genes in PAH pathogenesis, offering a promising direction for advancing our comprehension of PAH. While preliminary, the analysis presented here provides important clues for the ongoing study of PAH, potentially aiding in the development of more effective interventions for this challenging condition.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Code.

(ZIP)

pone.0330832.s001.zip (18.5KB, zip)
S2 Data. Data.

(ZIP)

pone.0330832.s002.zip (27.6MB, zip)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Health Development Promotion Project-Anesthesia and Critical Care Research Project (KM-20231120-01), Guangdong Medical Research Fund Project (A2024728, A2024723, B2025330, B2025378, B2025488), the Zhanjiang Science and Technology Research Project in 2022 (No: 2022A01197), the Science and Technology Development Special Fund Competitive Allocation Project of Zhanjiang City (No: 2021A05086), and the Guangdong Medical University Clinical and Basic Science Innovation Special Fund (No: GDMULCJC2024063, GDMULCJC2024064).

References

  • 1.Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(1):67–119. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cansu DÜ, Korkmaz C. Pulmonary hypertension in connective tissue diseases: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42(10):2601–10. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06446-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruopp NF, Cockrill BA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review. JAMA. 2022;327(14):1379–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sakao S, Tatsumi K, Voelkel NF. Reversible or irreversible remodeling in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;43(6):629–34. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0389TR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rai N, Shihan M, Seeger W, Schermuly RT, Novoyatleva T. Genetic Delivery and Gene Therapy in Pulmonary Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1179. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lau EMT, Giannoulatou E, Celermajer DS, Humbert M. Epidemiology and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(10):603–14. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McGoon MD, Miller DP. REVEAL: a contemporary US pulmonary arterial hypertension registry. Eur Respir Rev. 2012;21(123):8–18. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00008211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zheng T, Liu Q, Xing F, Zeng C, Wang W. Disulfidptosis: a new form of programmed cell death. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02712-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu X, Nie L, Zhang Y, Yan Y, Wang C, Colic M, et al. Actin cytoskeleton vulnerability to disulfide stress mediates disulfidptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25(3):404–14. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01091-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xia N, Guo X, Guo Q, Gupta N, Ji N, Shen B, et al. Metabolic flexibilities and vulnerabilities in the pentose phosphate pathway of the zoonotic pathogen Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(9):e1010864. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Machesky LM. Deadly actin collapse by disulfidptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25(3):375–6. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01100-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koppula P, Zhuang L, Gan B. Cystine transporter SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: ferroptosis, nutrient dependency, and cancer therapy. Protein Cell. 2021;12(8):599–620. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00789-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rabinovitch M, Guignabert C, Humbert M, Nicolls MR. Inflammation and immunity in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Res. 2014;115(1):165–75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsui M, Corey DR. Non-coding RNAs as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(3):167–79. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou Z, Ni H, Li Y, Jiang B. LncRNA XIST promotes inflammation by downregulating GRα expression in the adenoids of children with OSAHS. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(5):500. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhu X, Jiang L, Yang H, Chen T, Wu X, Lv K. Analyzing the lncRNA, miRNA, and mRNA-associated ceRNA networks to reveal potential prognostic biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:393. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01488-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146(3):353–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu J, Sun Y, Zhu B, Lin Y, Lin K, Sun Y, et al. Identification of a potentially novel LncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA network in pulmonary arterial hypertension via integrated bioinformatic analysis. Life Sci. 2021;277:119455. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.A Najafi SMA. The Canonical Wnt Signaling (Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway): A Potential Target for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Iran Biomed J. 2020;24(5):269–80. doi: 10.29252/ibj.24.5.264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rajkumar R, Konishi K, Richards TJ, Ishizawar DC, Wiechert AC, Kaminski N, et al. Genomewide RNA expression profiling in lung identifies distinct signatures in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;298(4):H1235-48. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00254.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mura M, Cecchini MJ, Joseph M, Granton JT. Osteopontin lung gene expression is a marker of disease severity in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respirology. 2019;24(11):1104–10. doi: 10.1111/resp.13557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tan X, Zhang N, Zhang G, Xu S, Zeng Y, Bian F, et al. Exploring the diagnostic and immune infiltration roles of disulfidptosis related genes in pulmonary hypertension. Respir Res. 2024;25(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02978-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoeper MM, Ghofrani H-A, Grünig E, Klose H, Olschewski H, Rosenkranz S. Pulmonary Hypertension. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(5):73–84. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kong D, Liu J, Lu J, Zeng C, Chen H, Duan Z, et al. HMGB2 Release Promotes Pulmonary Hypertension and Predicts Severity and Mortality of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024;44(6):e172–95. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.319916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lajoie AC, Lauzière G, Lega J-C, Lacasse Y, Martin S, Simard S, et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(4):291–305. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00027-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu X, Zhuang L, Gan B. Disulfidptosis: disulfide stress-induced cell death. Trends Cell Biol. 2024;34(4):327–37. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiao F, Li H-L, Yang B, Che H, Xu F, Li G, et al. Disulfidptosis: A new type of cell death. Apoptosis. 2024;29(9–10):1309–29. doi: 10.1007/s10495-024-01989-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moazemi S, Vahdati S, Li J, Kalkhoff S, Castano LJV, Dewitz B, et al. Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support for monitoring patients in cardiovascular ICUs: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1109411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1109411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wilkins MR. Pulmonary hypertension: the science behind the disease spectrum. Eur Respir Rev. 2012;21(123):19–26. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00008411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hu Y, Chi L, Kuebler WM, Goldenberg NM. Perivascular Inflammation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Cells. 2020;9(11):2338. doi: 10.3390/cells9112338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bertheloot D, Latz E, Franklin BS. Necroptosis, pyroptosis and apoptosis: an intricate game of cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(5):1106–21. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00630-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kesavardhana S, Malireddi RKS, Kanneganti T-D. Caspases in Cell Death, Inflammation, and Pyroptosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2020;38:567–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-073119-095439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Millar AH, Heazlewood JL, Giglione C, Holdsworth MJ, Bachmair A, Schulze WX. The Scope, Functions, and Dynamics of Posttranslational Protein Modifications. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:119–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li S, Song Y, Wang K, Liu G, Dong X, Yang F, et al. USP32 deubiquitinase: cellular functions, regulatory mechanisms, and potential as a cancer therapy target. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):338. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01629-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen S, Chen X, Li Z, Mao J, Jiang W, Zhu Z, et al. Identification of ubiquitin-specific protease 32 as an oncogene in glioblastoma and the underlying mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):6445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09497-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cassandri M, Smirnov A, Novelli F, Pitolli C, Agostini M, Malewicz M, et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17071. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Font J, Mackay JP. Beyond DNA: zinc finger domains as RNA-binding modules. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;649:479–91. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-753-2_29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brayer KJ, Kulshreshtha S, Segal DJ. The protein-binding potential of C2H2 zinc finger domains. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2008;51(1):9–19. doi: 10.1007/s12013-008-9007-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang R-R, Yuan T-Y, Wang J-M, Chen Y-C, Zhao J-L, Li M-T, et al. Immunity and inflammation in pulmonary arterial hypertension: From pathophysiology mechanisms to treatment perspective. Pharmacol Res. 2022;180:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin W, Tang Y, Zhang M, Liang B, Wang M, Zha L, et al. Integrated Bioinformatic Analysis Reveals TXNRD1 as a Novel Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:894584. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.894584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xiao G, Zhuang W, Wang T, Lian G, Luo L, Ye C, et al. Transcriptomic analysis identifies Toll-like and Nod-like pathways and necroptosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(19):11409–21. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhuang W, Lian G, Huang B, Du A, Gong J, Xiao G, et al. CPT1 regulates the proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells through the AMPK-p53-p21 pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Mol Cell Biochem. 2019;455(1–2):169–83. doi: 10.1007/s11010-018-3480-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ormiston ML, Deng Y, Rundle N, Bendjelloul F, Tsoporis JN, Parker TG, et al. A lymphocyte-dependent mode of action for imatinib mesylate in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(5):1541–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuan K, Shamskhou EA, Orcholski ME, Nathan A, Reddy S, Honda H, et al. Loss of Endothelium-Derived Wnt5a Is Associated With Reduced Pericyte Recruitment and Small Vessel Loss in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation. 2019;139(14):1710–24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Samuel B, Dinka H. In silico analysis of the promoter region of olfactory receptors in cattle (Bos indicus) to understand its gene regulation. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2020;39(6):853–65. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2020.1711524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ryter SW, Choi AMK. Autophagy in lung disease pathogenesis and therapeutics. Redox Biol. 2015;4:215–25. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen M, Chen Y. Bioinformatics Analysis of Common Genetic and Molecular Traits and Association of Portal Hypertension with Pulmonary Hypertension. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:9237701. doi: 10.1155/2022/9237701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jacquin S, Rincheval V, Mignotte B, Richard S, Humbert M, Mercier O, et al. Inactivation of p53 Is Sufficient to Induce Development of Pulmonary Hypertension in Rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0131940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mizuno S, Bogaard HJ, Kraskauskas D, Alhussaini A, Gomez-Arroyo J, Voelkel NF, et al. p53 Gene deficiency promotes hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension and vascular remodeling in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300(5):L753-61. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00286.2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Savai R, Pullamsetti SS, Kolbe J, Bieniek E, Voswinckel R, Fink L, et al. Immune and inflammatory cell involvement in the pathology of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(9):897–908. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0335OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stacher E, Graham BB, Hunt JM, Gandjeva A, Groshong SD, McLaughlin VV, et al. Modern age pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(3):261–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0164OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu D, Talbot CC Jr, Liu Q, Jing Z-C, Damico RL, Tuder R, et al. Identifying microRNAs targeting Wnt/β-catenin pathway in end-stage idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016;94(8):875–85. doi: 10.1007/s00109-016-1426-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sindi HA, Russomanno G, Satta S, Abdul-Salam VB, Jo KB, Qazi-Chaudhry B, et al. Therapeutic potential of KLF2-induced exosomal microRNAs in pulmonary hypertension. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1185. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14966-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tao W, Sun W, Zhu H, Zhang J. miR-205-5p suppresses pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by targeting MICAL2-mediated Erk1/2 signaling. Microvasc Res. 2019;124:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mahdi Roozbeh

23 Mar 2025

Dear Dr. Guo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

While the manuscript presents a valuable methodological contribution, both of the reviewers have suggested that a revision is needed to improve the visualization and enhance the practical impact of the work. Please revise the manuscript accordingly and incorporate the reviewers' suggestions.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 07 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mahdi Roozbeh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, we expect all author-generated code to be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

This study was supported by the Health Development Promotion Project-Anesthesia and Critical Care Research Project (KM-20231120-01), Guangdong Medical Research Fund Project (A2024728、A2024723), the Zhanjiang Science and Technology Research Project in 2022 (No: 2022A01197), and the Science and Technology Development Special Fund Competitive Allocation Project of Zhanjiang City (No: 2021A05086).

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The author reported an interesting study that utilized transcriptomic datasets to identify disulfidptosis-related genes involved in PAH. Below are my comments and suggestion for the manuscript:

1. For a better understanding of the study and datasets, I suggest providing a clear description and discussion of the nature of the datasets used.

2. The findings presented in Figure 1 require further elaboration.

3. Further elaboration is needed for each panel in Figure 2. What do the modules represent? Do they correspond to genes? How many genes are included in each panel? Why is the grey module considered insignificant?

4. Figure 3, Is there a correlation between the outcomes of GO enrichment analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis?

5. What criteria led to the selection of the green module over the yellow module for further analysis? Panel G, the list does not seem too extensive. Please provide the gene names instead of numbers.

6. Figure 5, please state the differences between (panel A & panel B) and (panel C & panel D).

7. The sentence on page 9/29, starting with “Figure 6 showed that the high...” until the end, is unclear. Please revise it for clarity.

8. Figure 7, the Fiddle diagram: What is the meaning of “Con” and “Treat”? What kind of differences exist between the cells? Are they related to cell number, gene expression, or other factors?

9. The discussion is lengthy and lacks a well-organized flow. I suggest focusing more on explaining the findings and linking them to the disease.

Reviewer #2: In this work, Chen and colleagues utilized GEO datasets to investigate the expression of disulfidptosis-related genes in arterial hypertension (PAH). After constructing gene modules with WGCNA, they performed GO and KEGG analyses of the module with increased significance to disease pathology. They applied LASSO, Random Forest, and SVM-RFE in parallel to narrow down the list of hub genes to a couple of overlapping genes (USP32 and ZNF655). They further used GSEA to determine potential pathways and mechanism functions of the hub genes, performed immune infiltration analysis to determine immune cell distributions between control and pulmonary hypertension groups, and built ceRNA regulatory network for USP32 and ZNF655 to predict related miRNA and lncRNA regulatory networks.

Major concerns:

The figures with higher resolution (text is not completely visible in figures 2, 6, 7, and 8, for example), and more detailed legends are necessary (including experiment descriptions, and how the graphs were generated). This is essential to fully visualize and understand the data, as well as follow the interpretation of the results.

The authors present interesting data produced through a well structured and logical analysis, yet limited by sample size and lack of experimental validation. USP32 and ZNF655 are involved in multiple cellular processes and allow for generating many hypotheses about their role in PAH, therefore, the relevance of their findings could be strengthen by focusing the discussion primarily on how the data connects with what is already well known about the cell and molecular biology of PAH (instead of tackling multiple connections not necessarily as robust).

Minor concerns:

In “Dynamic module identification isolated three significant modules—green, yellow, and gray—with the gray module deemed nonsignificant. Hierarchical clustering further identified the green module as particularly relevant to disease

pathology”, can you explain why gray module was deemed nonsignificant? And why is green module is relevant to disease pathology?

In Figure 2, groups are divided into ‘control’ and ‘treat’. Can you explain what “treat” means?

In Figure 4 legend, reference to C is missing.

In Figure 5, what is the difference between A and B, and C and D?

Duplicated sentences in discussion: “Furthermore, studies involving bovine subjects have revealed that the expression of olfactory receptors (ORs) is governed by MOR4, a member of the GPCR superfamily. MOR4 is primarily recognized as a binding site for the zinc finger (ZNF) transcription factor gene family, suggesting a link between GPCR activity and ZNF[41]. Furthermore, studies involving bovine subjects have revealed that the expression of olfactory receptors (ORs) is governed by MOR4, a member of the GPCR superfamily. MOR4 is primarily recognized as a binding site for the zinc finger (ZNF) transcription factor gene family, suggesting a link between GPCR activity and ZNF [42].”

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330832.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 May 2025

Hello, I'm glad you had a few times to review our work, and we've already made revisions to the manuscript and replied point by point. However, the raw data and code shares are not accessible to the website, so we've uploaded to "Other" and "Support Information" separately and asked you to let me know what to do next.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0330832.s004.docx (22.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Mahdi Roozbeh

8 Jun 2025

Dear Dr. Guo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 23 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mahdi Roozbeh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: All reviewer comments have been adequately addressed, and I am satisfied with the author's responses.

Reviewer #2: The authors have made efforts to address previous comments; however, I still recommend that they clarify the following key points to improve the clarity of their findings:

1. Please clarify whether p-values reported for enrichment analyses, correlation studies, and other statistical tests were adjusted for multiple comparisons (e.g., using FDR or Bonferroni correction).

2. While the construction of ceRNA networks for USP32 and ZNF655 is a potentially valuable addition, the analysis lacks prior introduction or justification for the relevance of miRNA/lncRNA in pulmonary hypertension. Please add a brief explanation and provide the methodological details for this analysis.

3. As noted previously, the discussion is overly broad and lacks a cohesive focus. It attempts to associate USP32 and ZNF655 with numerous biological pathways and mechanisms, many of which are tangential or speculative, and dilute the impact of their findings. Consider to streamline the discussion to emphasize a few well-supported, relevant pathways that directly connect their findings to pulmonary hypertension. This would be especially important given that there is no experimental validation of the involvement of USP32 or ZNF655 in pulmonary hypertension in this paper.

Other comments:

Figure 4G would be more informative if it contained the gene names instead of numbers.

Figures 6, 7a and 7c remain difficult to read. Please consider improving its resolution.

“Zinc lipoprotein (ZNF) family” appears to be a misstatement. Please revise for accuracy.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330832.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


25 Jul 2025

Responses to Editor and Reviewer

Dear Academic Editor and Reviewer:

Hello�

We are honored to receive your correspondence. We are grateful for the constructive comments and insightful recommendations provided on our manuscript, titled " Comprehensive analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes in pulmonary hypertension through machine learning and immune infiltration: spotlight on USP32 and ZNF655 as key regulators" We have meticulously revised the original manuscript and addressed each comment in detail. The following section will address each of these issues in turn. We are appreciative of the constructive feedback provided by the editors and reviewers, as it plays a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of our manuscripts. The following section presents a comprehensive, point-by-point response to all comments.

Academic Editor

We are very pleased to receive your positive feedback on our manuscript and your reminder for revisions. We have now completed the modifications to the manuscript as requested. In the revised version, we will submit it strictly according to your requirements. Thank you for your continued attention and help to our manuscript.

Reviewer #1

Thank you for your suggestions for improvements to our manuscript, and we are honored to have your suggestions along the way.

Reviewer #2

Comment 1:

Please clarify whether p-values reported for enrichment analyses, correlation studies, and other statistical tests were adjusted for multiple comparisons (e.g., using FDR or Bonferroni correction).

Response 1: It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. We clarify that the p-values reported in enrichment analyses, correlation studies, and other statistical tests are not corrected for multiple comparisons, so we did not specifically indicate this in the original text.

Comment 2:

While the construction of ceRNA networks for USP32 and ZNF655 is a potentially valuable addition, the analysis lacks prior introduction or justification for the relevance of miRNA/lncRNA in pulmonary hypertension. Please add a brief explanation and provide the methodological details for this analysis.

Response 2: It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. Based on your suggestion, we first added a description in the "Introduction" section, followed by a detailed methodological introduction in the "Methods and Results" section, which was also elaborated in the discussion.

Comment 3:

As noted previously, the discussion is overly broad and lacks a cohesive focus. It attempts to associate USP32 and ZNF655 with numerous biological pathways and mechanisms, many of which are tangential or speculative, and dilute the impact of their findings. Consider to streamline the discussion to emphasize a few well-supported, relevant pathways that directly connect their findings to pulmonary hypertension. This would be especially important given that there is no experimental validation of the involvement of USP32 or ZNF655 in pulmonary hypertension in this paper.

Response 3: It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. Based on your suggestions, we've overhauled and consolidated the original Tall & Thin discussion, highlighting a few of the issues you've highlighted.

Other comments

Comment 1:

Figure 4G would be more informative if it contained the gene names instead of numbers.

Response 1: It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. We have revised the content of Figure 4G.

Comment 2:

Figures 6, 7a and 7c remain difficult to read. Please consider improving its resolution.

Response2�It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. We've added clarity even further. To ensure clarity, we adjusted the clarity of these figures to 400dpi.

Comment 3:

“Zinc lipoprotein (ZNF) family” appears to be a misstatement. Please revise for accuracy.

Response3�It's great to receive your suggestions! Thank you for your attention to our manuscript. We're sorry for the inconvenience caused by our mistake, but our team took your suggestion very seriously, and we re-read the literature and found that the original text says "Zinc-finger proteins".The following is the relevant original image.

The following responses are intended to address the comments that have been submitted. We would like to express our gratitude once again for the time and effort that has been invested in the review of our work.

We extend our best wishes for the success of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Dingyu Guo

The Original Submitting Author

E-mail: 1743416277@qq.com

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0330832.s005.docx (154.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Mahdi Roozbeh

7 Aug 2025

Comprehensive analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes in pulmonary hypertension through machine learning and immune infiltration: spotlight on USP32 and ZNF655 as key regulators

PONE-D-25-07068R2

Dear Dr. Dingyu Guo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mahdi Roozbeh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: The authors' response addresses all previous concerns and suggestions - particularly, the discussion is now much more focused and objective.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mahdi Roozbeh

PONE-D-25-07068R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Guo,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mahdi Roozbeh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Code.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0330832.s001.zip (18.5KB, zip)
    S2 Data. Data.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0330832.s002.zip (27.6MB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0330832.s004.docx (22.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0330832.s005.docx (154.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES