Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1994 Jan;219(1):46–50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199401000-00008

Study of donor-recipient liver size match for transplantation.

H S Xu 1, T L Pruett 1, R S Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1243089  PMID: 8297176

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This animal experiment investigated the donor-recipient liver size match for safe liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: In spite of refinements in surgical techniques in reduced liver transplantation, the liver size disparity remains one of the most common complications in pediatric patients. Optimal size matching remains unknown. METHODS: The experiment compared eight groups of liver-transplanted rats with designated ratios of donor and recipient liver weights. Donor livers harvested from rats weighing 420-520 g were reduced to the designated size by liver lobectomy and implanted in rats weighing 170-240 g. Bile secretion and serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities in groups 2, 4, and 6 were studied after surgery. RESULTS: Stepwise increase of the ratio of donor and recipient liver weights from 1.04:1 in group 4 to 1.26:1 in group 3, 1.56:1 in group 2, and 2.04:1 in group 1 caused stepwise decrease of survival rates from 83.3% to 66.7%, 16.7%, and 0%, respectively. Stepwise decrease of the ratio from 1.04:1 in group 4 to 0.79:1 in group 5, 0.53:1 in group 6, 0.35:1 in group 7, and 0.24:1 in group 8 also caused stepwise reduction of survival rates from 83.3% to 66.7%, 50%, 0%, and 0% in each group. CONCLUSION: The range of ratios of donor and recipient liver weights for successful rat liver transplantation is from 0.53:1 to 1.26:1. Increase and decrease of ratios of donor-recipient liver weights from equal size do not increase the recipient survival rates. Recipients of reduced donor liver weights tend to have a higher survival rate than recipients of increased donor liver weights.

Full text

PDF
49

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bismuth H., Houssin D. Reduced-sized orthotopic liver graft in hepatic transplantation in children. Surgery. 1984 Mar;95(3):367–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broelsch C. E., Emond J. C., Thistlethwaite J. R., Rouch D. A., Whitington P. F., Lichtor J. L. Liver transplantation with reduced-size donor organs. Transplantation. 1988 Mar;45(3):519–524. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198803000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broelsch C. E., Emond J. C., Thistlethwaite J. R., Whitington P. F., Zucker A. R., Baker A. L., Aran P. F., Rouch D. A., Lichtor J. L. Liver transplantation, including the concept of reduced-size liver transplants in children. Ann Surg. 1988 Oct;208(4):410–420. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198810000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broelsch C. E., Whitington P. F., Emond J. C., Heffron T. G., Thistlethwaite J. R., Stevens L., Piper J., Whitington S. H., Lichtor J. L. Liver transplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical techniques and results. Ann Surg. 1991 Oct;214(4):428–439. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199110000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Emond J. C., Whitington P. F., Thistlethwaite J. R., Cherqui D., Alonso E. A., Woodle I. S., Vogelbach P., Busse-Henry S. M., Zucker A. R., Broelsch C. E. Transplantation of two patients with one liver. Analysis of a preliminary experience with 'split-liver' grafting. Ann Surg. 1990 Jul;212(1):14–22. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Esquivel C. O., Nakazato P., Cox K., Concepcion W., Berquist W., Russell T. R. The impact of liver reductions in pediatric liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 1991 Oct;126(10):1278–1286. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410340120017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kamada N., Calne R. Y. A surgical experience with five hundred thirty liver transplants in the rat. Surgery. 1983 Jan;93(1 Pt 1):64–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Otte J. B., de Ville de Goyet J., Alberti D., Balladur P., de Hemptinne B. The concept and technique of the split liver in clinical transplantation. Surgery. 1990 Jun;107(6):605–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stratta R. J., Wood R. P., Langnas A. N., Marujo W., Duckworth R. M., Williams L., Saito S., Pillen T. J., Shaw B. W., Jr Effect of extended preservation and reduced-size grafting on organ availability in pediatric liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1990 Apr;22(2):482–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Turley S. D., Dietschy J. M. Re-evaluation of the 3 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase assay for total bile acids in bile. J Lipid Res. 1978 Sep;19(7):924–928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu H. S., Rosenlof L. K., Selby J. B., Jones R. S. A simple method for bile duct anastomosis and interval bile collection in the liver-transplanted rat. J Surg Res. 1992 Nov;53(5):520–523. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90100-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES