Abstract
» Disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections, though rare, present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, affecting both immunocompromised and previously healthy individuals.
» Ubiquitous species (spp.) such as Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus contrast with dimorphic fungi, including Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces spp., and Coccidioides spp., which are endemic to specific regions.
» These infections typically present insidiously, with non-specific symptoms such as fever, joint pain, and swelling that mimic autoimmune, bacterial, or viral diseases, often leading to delayed diagnosis.
» Initial evaluation often includes radiographs, which may reveal lytic bone lesions, particularly in the metaphyses of long bones, as well as in less conspicuous sites such as the talus and cuboid. Even with this information, a definitive diagnosis still requires histological or microbiological evidence prior to initiating some antifungal treatments.
» This review synthesizes current knowledge on disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections, emphasizing their epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic strategies, and treatment.
Introduction
Disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections are rare1. Their severity poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to patient care and treatment. These infections are traditionally thought to often occur in immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematological malignancies, solid organ transplants, or long-term corticosteroid use2,3. However, clinical experience and literature review demonstrate that previously healthy patients can be susceptible to disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections3,4. In late autumn at our institution in upstate New York, a previously healthy 9-year-old boy presented with numerous violaceous ulcerating skin lesions and subtle complaints of migratory joint pains without apparent arthritis on physical examination until the 2-week follow-up visit. The cutaneous findings, frequent summertime outdoor activities, known regional endemicity of local fungal pathogens, and concern for musculoskeletal dissemination prompted an investigation for endemic mycosis through multimodal diagnostics including cultures, serologies, and antigen testing as well as imaging which altogether revealed a diagnosis of disseminated blastomycosis due to Blastomyces dermatitidis. There are 7 species of Blastomyces: B. dermatitidis, B. gilchristii, B. percursus, B. helicus, B. parvus, B. silverae, and B. emzantsi. B. dermatitidis is the predominant species, followed by B. gilchristii and B. helicus, found in North America. Recently, we have seen several cases of blastomycosis from New York, indicating a possible regional environmental niche of this fungus.
Early recognition and intervention through a high index of clinical suspicion is important, as delayed treatment is associated with high morbidity and mortality3. Organisms involved in disseminated fungal musculoskeletal infections are diverse and vary by geographic region (e.g., endemic mycoses) as well as the host’s immune status. Common ubiquitously found species (spp.) include Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and Cryptococcus spp. Dimorphic fungi such as Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces spp., and Coccidioides spp. have restricted environmental niches and are endemic to specific regions. Opportunistic pathogens, such as the Mucorales order and Fusarium spp, have gained recognition in recent years, particularly in patients with profound immunosuppression5. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based assays and next-generation sequencing have improved pathogen identification. However, gaps remain in early and accurate diagnosis. This is true in resource-limited areas, which are the most susceptible population given their geographic location in rural settings closer to riverbeds and valleys that have fungi endemic to the soil6.
The nonspecific and indolent nature of clinical presentations poses a significant challenge in diagnosing disseminated musculoskeletal infections. Common symptoms such as fever, joint pain, and swelling can mimic numerous autoimmune conditions, viral, or bacterial infections. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scans, and computed tomography (CT) scans can be used to assess bone and joint involvement in fungal infections, but require confirmation through histology or microbiological evidence7. Therefore, understanding the host-pathogen interaction and the mechanism of fungal virulence is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and predicting disease outcomes8.
The complexity of disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infection management involves a combination of surgical intervention, effective antifungal therapy, and supportive care. Introducing antifungal agents such as echinocandins, azoles, and liposomal formulations of amphotericin B has significantly improved survival rates9. Unfortunately, treatment failure remains a concern due to drug resistance, host factors, or delayed diagnosis. Emerging therapies including immunomodulatory approaches and combination antifungal regimens hold promise but require validation through clinical trials10. This review synthesizes current knowledge on disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections, focusing on epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic strategies, and treatment.
Epidemiology
Disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections are relatively uncommon but are recognized in immunocompromised populations such as those with malignancy, undergoing chemotherapy, afflicted with HIV/AIDS, having solid organ transplantation, or using immunosuppressive or corticosteroid therapy11. Immunocompetent individuals with high-risk exposures, occupations, or outdoor activities in endemic areas can also have these infections; they arise from hematogenous spread of fungi to bones, joints, and soft tissues. Common organisms involved are Aspergillus, Candida, Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Blastomycosis, and Cryptococcus species, which vary in incidence and prevalence depending on geography and patient populations (Table I and Fig. 1)12. Invasive fungal infections are particularly concerning due to their high morbidity and mortality rates, which can exceed 50% in severely immunocompromised hosts13.
Fig. 1.

Map of common fungi in the United States. Reproduced, with permission, from: [Created in BioRender. Light, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/02tdu6r].
TABLE I.
Disseminated Musculoskeletal Fungal Infections Stratified by Geographical Region and Patient Population
| Region/Population | Pathogen | Incidence/Prevalence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwestern United States | Coccidioides | ∼100,000 infections/year; ∼1% (∼1,000 cases) disseminated, some to musculoskeletal sites | Endemic in Arizona, California; higher risk in immunocompromised and outdoor workers |
| Ohio/Mississippi River Valleys | Histoplasma | Millions infected/year; 0.05–0.1% (∼5,000-10,000 cases) disseminated globally, some musculoskeletal | Common in immunocompromised; underreported due to diagnostic challenges |
| Ohio/Mississippi River Valleys, Great Lakes, Southeastern United States | Blastomyces | <1 per 100,000 in endemic states; up to 40 per 100,000 in hyperendemic areas (e.g., Vilas County, Wisconsin) | Disseminated disease in 25%–30% of cases, including musculoskeletal involvement; higher incidence in males and outdoor workers |
| Diabetic patients | Mucor | ∼14 per 100,000 in India; increasing incidence throughout the world; can cause disseminated musculoskeletal infections in diabetics | Higher burden in developing countries |
| Solid organ transplant recipients | Candida, Aspergillus | Invasive fungal infections: 3.1–42%; osteomyelitis as a subset | Vertebral osteomyelitis common with Aspergillus |
| Hematological malignancies | Candida, Aspergillus | Invasive fungal infections: 3–8%; musculoskeletal involvement rare | Higher risk due to neutropenia |
| HIV/AIDS patients | Cryptococcus, Histoplasma | Disseminated infections common with musculoskeletal involvement in endemic areas | |
| Pediatric (Neonates) | Candida | 1%–2% in very low birth weight infants | Long bones (femur, humerus) commonly affected |
| General population | Various | 1–5 per 100,000 in developed countries; up to 20 per 100,000 in developing countries | Underreported due to diagnostic challenges |
The incidence of fungal musculoskeletal infections has increased as life expectancy for immunocompromised individuals has increased from advancements in medical care. Global estimates suggest 6.55 million invasive fungal infections annually, but the direct data on the incidence involving the musculoskeletal system are limited due to underdiagnosis and underreporting14,15. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or those receiving biologic therapies for autoimmune diseases are at elevated risk compared with the general population16. Candida and Aspergillus species account for a significant proportion of these infections, with Candida causing septic arthritis and osteomyelitis, and Aspergillus resulting in vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscesses10. In the United States, candidemia has an incidence of 7 per 100,000, with a portion involving the musculoskeletal system17. Musculoskeletal manifestations of Aspergillus are uncommon, with a systematic review reporting 310 cases from 1936 to 201018. Geographically, Coccidioides and Histoplasma are predominant in specific regions such as the southwestern United States and the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys, respectively19,20. These fungi can lead to disseminated disease, including musculoskeletal involvement. In the southwestern United States, Coccidioides causes around 100,000 yearly infections with around 1% of those cases disseminating15. Between 1938 through 2013, over 100 outbreaks involving approximately 3,000 cases of Histoplasma have been reported in 26 states and the territory of Puerto Rico, and around 0.05 to 0.1% of those cases caused disseminated disease21. Blastomyces, also endemic in the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys, Great Lakes region, and southeastern United States, has an annual incidence of less than 1 case per 100,000 in affected states (e.g., Wisconsin, Mississippi), with higher rates (up to 40 per 100,000) in hyperendemic areas such as Vilas County, Wisconsin; disseminated disease, which can include musculoskeletal involvement, occurs in 25% to 30% of cases, though specific musculoskeletal incidence is not well documented22,23. Factors, such as global warming, have expanded the geographical distribution of many endemic fungi, posing a risk to both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.4
Disseminated fungal infections are more common in men than women, possibly due to higher exposure risks in occupational settings or other environmental factors24. Outdoor occupations traditionally held by men such as construction, excavation, landscaping, hunting, or agricultural work could explain this trend as these occupations are more likely to have exposure to fungi endemic in the dust and soil where they work4. Older adults and young children are at increased risk, particularly those with congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies. In pediatric populations, Candida infections are seen in neonates with low birth weight or those undergoing invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care units25. Finally, increased global travel and the rising prevalence of invasive medical devices, such as central venous catheters and prosthetic joints, have contributed to the broader dissemination of fungal infections that are insidious and hard to diagnose26,27. Table I summarizes fungal epidemiology.
Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of fungal infections with a pattern of noncontiguous spread to 1 or more long bone or joint and spine (and ribs), as a general trend. Though direct inoculation is more common than disseminated fungal infections, common locations for disseminated fungal infections reflects that of bacterial hematogenous infections28. The metaphysis of long bones is a culprit for infection because of the enriched blood supply by the metaphyseal and nutrient arteries29. In adults, the pelvis is extremely rare (N = 0) according to some estimates28. The lower extremities (LE), particularly the knee (67.8%), are more common sites of infection (94.6% of fungal infections involved the LE) compared with upper extremity joints28. Generally, 1 joint involvement (78.8%) is more common than 2 (17.7%) or more (4%), but poly joint involvement can still occur in the immunocompromised host28.
Pathogenesis
Disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections are rare, but manifestations caused by the spread of fungal pathogens to bones, joints, and surrounding soft tissues can be devastating. The pathogenesis begins with fungal entry into the host through the respiratory or gastrointestinal tracts, directly through trauma or surgical procedures. Common causative agents include Aspergillus, Candida, Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Blastomycosis, and Cryptococcus. These pathogens can establish a localized infection and disseminate hematogenously to the musculoskeletal system in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals10.
Once these fungi disseminate through the bloodstream, they adhere to and penetrate the endothelium. In osteoarticular tissues, the fungi trigger an intense inflammatory response mediated by proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-8, and particularly IL-17, which either helps to eliminate fungal infection or potentiate bone and cartilage damage (Fig. 2). Cytokines and the proinflammatory state promote local osteolysis, joint destruction, and granulomatous tissue formation30. Bacterial osteomyelitis is frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus and is characterized by severe systemic symptoms such as high fevers, chills, rigors, and sweating from robust immune activation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns and endotoxins31. This is in contrast to fungal osteoarticular infections, which typically have a more localized inflammatory response with mild or absent constitutional symptoms due to lower levels of pyrogenic cytokines and a lack of endotoxins seen in bacterial infections32. The fungi modulate host immune responses by altering macrophages and dendritic cells, suppressing antigen presentation and T-cell activation and allowing for further fungal dissemination. In advanced cases, fungal invasion of the musculoskeletal system can cause extensive bone necrosis, fistula formation, and soft tissue abscesses. The immune system is usually unable to eliminate the infection completely, causing extensive complications such as amyloidosis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome33. Overall, this is less common and frequent than bacterial osteomyelitis34.
Fig. 2.
Fungal inflammatory effect of T-cell activation on bone and cartilage destruction. Reproduced, with permission, from: [Created in BioRender. Light, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/italuii]
Clinical Manifestations
Disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections are clinically significant due to their often aggressive nature and potential for widespread tissue damage. Initially, these infections may present as upper respiratory tract infections or pneumonia refractory to antibiotics4. From there, they can disseminate to involve the bones, joints, skin, and soft tissues in the musculoskeletal system. Symptoms of these disseminated cutaneous and osteoarticular infections include localized pain, swelling, and erythema. Endemic fungal infections can mimic bacterial infections or malignancies, which commonly confounds the clinical picture and delays diagnosis. As the infection disseminates hematogenously and results in musculoskeletal disease, fever and systemic signs of infection such as fatigue and weight loss are more commonly but not always seen (Table II).
TABLE II.
Diagnostic Test Performance Metrics
| Test | Sample Type | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-D-glucan | Serum | 81 | 61 | 19 | 97 |
| Galactomannan | Serum (cutoff 1.0) | 79 | 88 | - | - |
| Galactomannan | BAL (cutoff 1.0) | 90 | 94 | - | - |
| Aspergillus PCR | Blood/Serum (single +) | 80.5 | 78.5 | 28 | 98 |
| Aspergillus PCR | BAL | 90.2 | 96.4 | 62 | 98 |
| Histoplasma antigen | Urine/Serum | 81.4 | 98.3 | 84–94 | 94–98 |
| Blastomycosis urinary antigen | Urine | 92.9 | 79.3 | - | - |
| Coccidioides urine antigen | Urine | 70.8 | 97.8 | - | - |
| Coccidioides serology (EIA) | Serum | 81.6–100 | 96–100 | - | - |
| Histopathology | Tissue | ∼50–80 | 95–100 | - | - |
| Culture | Tissue/Fluid | ∼50–70 | ∼100 | - | - |
PCR = polymerase chain reaction.
Clinically, patients may exhibit localized tenderness, reduced range of motion in adjacent joints, and chronic, refractory bone pain. Radiological findings may reveal osteolytic lesions, periosteal reactions, and soft tissue swelling which can be mistaken for malignancies or bacterial osteomyelitis35. Joint involvement, or fungal septic arthritis, typically presents with monoarticular arthritis affecting large joints such as the knee or hip. Symptoms include joint pain, effusion, and warmth, with a reduced range of motion. Synovial fluid analysis shows elevated white blood cell counts with neutrophilic predominance, but cultures are required for definitive diagnosis. Candida species are a frequent cause of fungal arthritis, particularly in patients with prosthetic joints or those receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy36.
Soft tissue fungal infections can manifest as cellulitis, abscesses, or necrotizing fasciitis. These infections can often follow trauma or surgical procedures and rapidly progress once the patient is fungemic. Necrotizing infections may exhibit severe systemic toxicity, requiring prompt surgical debridement and antifungal therapy. Common pathogens such as Mucorales and Aspergillus species thrive in ischemic or necrotic tissue environments37.
Diagnosis
Establishing a diagnosis of a disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infection begins with a thorough history collection with special attention to outdoor activity and travel to endemic regions and any preceding history of respiratory infections. A detailed physical examination and laboratory findings may further support the diagnosis. Commonly abnormal laboratory results include elevated inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. A complete blood count can offer additional clues that an infectious process is involved if there is an observed increase in leukocytes38. Molecular tests can detect fungal antigens (e.g., galactomannan for Aspergillus) or fungal-specific antibodies to suggest presence or absence of a fungal organism, but can be nonspecific, confounded by receipt of other medical interventions, and exhibit cross-reactivity. Therefore, definitive diagnosis requires cultures and histopathology39. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is advised to assist in establishing a diagnosis and treatment plan.
Initial diagnosis can include radiographs to visualize bony abnormalities. If affecting the upper extremities, radiographs can show lytic lesions in the radius or ulna metaphysis. In the lower extremities, radiographs would show similar lytic lesions primarily affecting the distal metaphysis of femur, tibia or fibula. Along with lytic lesions, subtle lucency of the foot and ankle, including the talus and cuboid, and distal tibia can also be found in the lower extremities. Advanced imaging modalities such as MRI and CT are more sensitive, providing detailed information on the extent of pulmonary, bone, joint, and soft tissue involvement. MRI is an increasingly useful tool for detecting early bone marrow edema and soft tissue abscesses, suggestive features of osteomyelitis and cellulitis40. Soft-tissue enhancement on MRI would be indicative of abscess from fungal infections and can point to dissemination in the musculature. On MRI, the ankle can have destructive lytic lesions found in the distal tibial metaphysis violating the cortex and extending to the margin of the distal tibial physis, along with soft tissue edema and periostitis. The foot shows T2 hyperintense and slightly T1 hyperintense peripherally enhancing collections within the cuboid, severe marrow and soft tissue edema, calcaneocuboid joint effusions, and increased T2 signaling in the talar head with microabscesses in the subtalar head. In the upper extremity, the following can be seen on MRI: destructive lytic lesions in the distal ulnar metaphysis that erodes the cortex in multiple locations, a thick-walled T1 hyperintense solid capsule, edematous and enhancing surrounding soft tissues with overlying subcutaneous edema, and increased signal in the physis. These radiographic findings are further supported in Supplemental Figures 1 to 6. Newer nuclear medicine imaging techniques such as PET/CT and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)/CT are ways to diagnose musculoskeletal infections, potentially improving diagnostics for infection of bones and joints41.
To evaluate fungal etiology from these nonspecific history, physical examination, laboratory, and radiographic findings above, microbiological or serologic confirmation is required. Blood cultures are the gold standard for diagnosing fungemia, particularly in those caused by Candida or Cryptococcus. Note, however, that many environmental and dimorphic (endemic) fungal organisms do not grow on aerobic blood cultures and require invasive tissue sampling. Synovial fluid, tissue, and bone biopsies should be evaluated for bacterial and fungal cultures, histopathological examination through fungal-specific stains such as periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) or Gomori methenamine silver (GMS), and molecular testing such as fungal species-specific PCR can also aid in making a timely diagnosis, as cultures may require a prolonged incubation period to grow or may be too fastidious to grow at all42. Finally, urine antigen and blood serologic testing should be considered in discussion with an infectious diseases specialist. These techniques, when used in conjunction, are useful in identifying fungal pathogens and guiding targeted antifungal therapy (see Supplemental Tables 1 and 2).
Newer non–culture-based techniques have emerged, such as PCR and next-generation sequencing, which offer rapid and precise identification of fungal pathogen, contrary to the extensive length of time required for blood, tissue, or fluid cultures which may even fail to yield an organism. While PCR and NGS are limited to highly specialized laboratories, adding them to clinical practice can help improve the diagnosis and management of fungal infections by allowing for earlier and more accurate pathogen diagnosis43. These technologies can be used in patients with prior antifungal therapy or with polymicrobial infections, enhancing treatment specificity and improving the morbidity and mortality of disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections. Fungal osteomyelitis can be challenging to distinguish from bacterial osteomyelitis due to overlapping clinical presentations. However, fungal osteomyelitis typically presents with an indolent course, characterized by chronic, persistent pain and swelling, whereas bacterial osteomyelitis, often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, has an acute onset with severe systemic symptoms such as high fever, chills, and rigors31. Risk factors of fungal osteomyelitis include immunosuppression, intravenous drug use, prosthetic devices, or a history of fungal infections, while bacterial osteomyelitis is more commonly associated with trauma, surgery, or contiguous spread from soft tissue infections44. Radiologically, fungal osteomyelitis may show lytic lesions with sclerotic margins or multifocal involvement, reflecting its chronic nature, whereas bacterial osteomyelitis often presents with acute changes such as periosteal reaction or sequestrum formation45. When clinical and radiological features are inconclusive, definitive diagnosis relies on laboratory tests mentioned earlier and histopathological examination with stains such as PAS or GMS to reveal fungal elements42.
Fungal osteomyelitis must also be differentiated from granulomatous infections such as skeletal tuberculosis (TB) and syphilitic osteomyelitis. Thorough history-taking of possible infectious exposures including outdoor activity, travel to or residence in TB-endemic regions, and sexual history is critical. Skeletal tuberculosis, often manifesting as Potts disease when involving the spine, typically presents with chronic pain, weight loss, night sweats, and radiological findings of vertebral collapse or cold abscesses. Diagnosis is confirmed by acid-fast bacilli (AFB) stains, cultures, or PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis46. By contrast, fungal osteomyelitis may show noncaseating granulomas or fungal elements on histopathology and is more associated with immunosuppression or endemic fungal exposure47. Syphilitic osteomyelitis, seen in tertiary syphilis, presents with gummas, chronic bone pain, and swelling. Diagnosis is established through serological tests like VDRL or FTA-ABS, and histopathology showing granulomas with central necrosis48. While fungal osteomyelitis is granulomatous, it can be distinguished from syphilis by fungal organisms on culture or histopathology using PAS and GMS stains along with a lack of syphilis-specific serological markers. Other granulomatous lesions, such as actinomycosis, may mimic fungal osteomyelitis but are identified by sulfur granules on histopathology and anaerobic bacterial cultures49.
Treatment
The treatment of disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections is multifaceted and involves antifungal therapy, surgical intervention, and management of conditions that predispose patients to infection. Initiation of antifungal therapy on suspicion has been shown to reduce mortality risk by up to 43%50. In patients with candidemia, delaying fluconazole therapy has been shown to increase mortality by 42% per day with each day in the delay of treatment51. Empiric broad-spectrum antifungal therapy is often initiated until culture data are available when there is suspicion of disseminated fungal infection10.
Disseminated Candida species infections are often treated with first-line echinocandin agents such as caspofungin or micafungin due to their excellent pharmacokinetics52. Azoles, such as fluconazole, are used for susceptible strains and in step-down therapy following clinical improvement. Fluconazole is particularly helpful in fungal periprosthetic infections and has shown to have significant clinical improvement when given for an average of 12.8 weeks53. Liposomal amphotericin B, with its broad-spectrum activity, is reserved for severe or refractory cases. In cases of aspergillosis, voriconazole is used as the first-line therapy. Liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole can sometimes be used as alternatives in cases of drug intolerance or fungal resistance. However, major side effects can occur from the administration of these medications. Long-term use of azoles can cause hepatotoxicity, hormone-related effects, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and rarely adrenal insufficiency54. Amphotericin B, a widely used antifungal for disseminated infections, can cause severe nephrotoxicity55. Monitoring for changes in electrolytes and overall patient health using these antifungal therapies is paramount to prevent further decline in patient health.
Surgical intervention is often necessary to achieve control of disseminated fungal infections, especially if cases involve abscesses, necrotizing soft tissue infections, or prosthetic joint infections, and should be pursued early. This not only allows for achievement of source control but also procurement of additional fluid and tissue specimens to establish diagnostic closure. Thorough and extensive debridement of infected bone and soft tissue reduces fungal load, enhances the effectiveness of antifungal therapy, and prevents further spread of infection. Antifungal beads, often made of polymethylmethacrylate or calcium sulfate, are placed in the debrided cavity to deliver high concentrations of antimicrobial agents directly to the infection site. These beads are effective in areas with poor vascularity and can be absorbable or require removal after infection control. While primarily studied for bacterial infections, antifungal bead use in fungal osteomyelitis is also possible as well, especially in cases of aspergillosis and candidiasis56.
In severe cases, excision of the infected bone segment may be necessary, particularly if the infection is localized and the bone is not critical for structural integrity. Excision is followed by reconstruction using bone grafts or other techniques to restore stability57. For large bone defects resulting from extensive debridement or excision, bone transport techniques, such as the Ilizarov method, are used. This involves gradually moving a healthy bone segment to fill the defect through distraction osteogenesis, promoting new bone formation. Bone transport is particularly useful in postinfectious tibial defects and has shown success in achieving bone union58. Significant soft tissue defects require coverage with vascularized tissue, such as muscle flaps with the gastrocnemius and soleus or free flaps with the latissimus dorsi. Flaps are critical in complex cases involving both bone and soft tissue loss because they provide blood supply to promote healing, fill dead space, and prevent further infection59. Intraoperative wound irrigation with saline or antiseptic solutions (e.g., povidone-iodine) is commonly performed during debridement to reduce microbial load and remove debris. While evidence specific to fungal osteomyelitis is limited, this practice is standard in orthopaedic infections to enhance surgical outcomes60.
In fungal prosthetic joint infections, two-stage exchange is the most common approach and has a recurrence rate of 47.7% compared with 81.4% for debridement with implant retention and 30.0% for three-stage exchange, allowing for an overall treatment success rate of 60.2%53. Knee prosthetic joint infections are associated with lower recurrence rates at 18.3% compared with hip prosthetic joint infections, having a recurrence rate of 29.6%53. Complete synovectomy and implant removal are also typically required in fungal prosthetic joint infections as well53,61. In all cases of surgical treatment, postoperative antifungal therapy is critical to prevent recurrence and should be guided by microbiological findings and clinical, and response to treatment.62 A treatment algorithm can help provide a systematic approach for fungal infections and approach the care of patients in a multidisciplinary manner (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Treatment algorithm for disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections. Reproduced, with permission, from: [Created in BioRender. Light, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/1z12pjb].
Adjuvant therapies involving immunomodulation can be used as well. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or interferon-gamma may be considered in highly immunocompromised patients to enhance the host’s defense mechanisms63. Preexisting conditions such as diabetes should be addressed, along with tapering immunosuppressive treatment in patients with conditions such as lupus or those receiving organ transplant. In these patients with immunosuppression, long-term antifungal prophylaxis will be necessary to prevent recurrence of the disseminated infection64. An understanding of the risk factors for recurrence is essential, which includes Candida albicans infection, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3, and elevated C-reactive protein. Protective factors include antifungal-loaded spacers and knee joint involvement53,61.
Despite advances in antifungal therapy in disseminated infections, outcomes can vary and are sometimes suboptimal secondary to delayed diagnosis, fungal resistance, and the immunocompromised status of patients. Recurrence rates range from 18.3% to as high as 81.4%53,61. Newer treatments such as rezafungin and ibrexafungerp, along with combination therapy strategies, are under investigation to improve outcomes in fungal infections65. Advances in diagnostic techniques and personalized therapies tailored to each patient can help improve issues with delayed diagnosis and suboptimal outcomes, giving hope of better outcomes in patients with disseminated musculoskeletal fungal infections.
Appendix
Supporting material provided by the authors is posted with the online version of this article as a data supplement at jbjs.org (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A904). This content was not copyedited or verified by JBJS.
Footnotes
Investigation performed at Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A903).
Contributor Information
Akash Koul, Email: koula1@amc.edu.
John Traversone, Email: traverj@amc.edu.
Sudha Chaturvedi, Email: sudha.chaturvedi@health.ny.gov.
Jency Daniel, Email: danielj7@amc.edu.
Andrew Rosenbaum, Email: RosenbA4@amc.edu.
References
- 1.Henry MW, Miller AO, Walsh TJ, Brause BD. Fungal musculoskeletal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31(2):353-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perfect JR. The impact of the host on fungal infections. Am J Med. 2012;125(1):S39-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gamaletsou MN, Walsh TJ, Sipsas NV. Epidemiology of fungal osteomyelitis. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2014;8(4):262-70. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smith DJ, Williams SL, Benedict KM, Jackson BR, Toda M, Adame G, Rothfeldt L, Cooksey GS, Rios K, Austin C, Steppig ME, Tubach S, Christophe N, Lunquest K, Reik R, Ireland M, Power D, Bridges D, Cronquist L, Cibulskas K, Cieslak P, Warren K, Gosciminski M, Ortbahn D, Osborn B, Oltean H, Gibbons-Burgener S. Surveillance for coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis—United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022;71(7):1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Asperges E, Albi G, Truffelli F, Salvaderi A, Puci F, Sangani A, Zuccaro V, Scotti V, Orsolini P, Brunetti E, Bruno R. Fungal osteomyelitis: a systematic review of reported cases. Microorganisms. 2023;11(7):1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Springer J, Lackner M, Ensinger C, Risslegger B, Morton CO, Nachbaur D, Lass-Flörl C, Einsele H, Heinz WJ, Loeffler J. Clinical evaluation of a Mucorales-specific real-time PCR assay in tissue and serum samples. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65(12):1414-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gamaletsou MN, Kontoyiannis DP, Sipsas NV, Moriyama B, Alexander E, Roilides E, Brause B, Walsh TJ. Candida osteomyelitis: analysis of 207 pediatric and adult cases (1970-2011). Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(10):1338-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Patterson TF, Thompson GR, III, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young JAH, Bennett JE. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(4):e1-e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(3):327-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mei-Sheng Riley M. Invasive fungal infections among immunocompromised patients in critical care settings: infection prevention risk mitigation. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2021;33(4):395-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.More Information About the Estimated Areas with Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever), and Histoplasmosis in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/pdf/more-information-about-fungal-maps-508.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garnacho-Montero J, Barrero-García I, León-Moya C. Fungal infections in immunocompromised critically ill patients. J Intensive Med. 2024;4(3):299-306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Denning DW. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(7):e428-e438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gorris ME, Treseder KK, Zender CS, Randerson JT. Expansion of coccidioidomycosis endemic regions in the United States in response to climate change. Geohealth. 2019;3(10):308-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Biyun L, Yahui H, Yuanfang L, Xifeng G, Dao W. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30(5):601-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prevention CfDCa. Data and statistics on candidemia. Accessed June 21, 2025, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gamaletsou MN, Rammaert B, Bueno MA, Moriyama B, Sipsas NV, Kontoyiannis DP, Roilides E, Zeller V, Prinapori R, Taj-Aldeen SJ, Brause B, Lortholary O, Walsh TJ. Aspergillus osteomyelitis: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, management, and outcome. J Infect. 2014;68(5):478-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Azar MM, Loyd JL, Relich RF, Wheat LJ, Hage CA. Current concepts in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of histoplasmosis syndromes. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;41(01):013-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown J, Benedict K, Park BJ, Thompson GR, 3rd. Coccidioidomycosis: epidemiology. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:185-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Akram S, Koirala J. Histoplasmosis. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miceli A, Krishnamurthy K. Blastomycosis. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McBride JA, Gauthier GM, Klein BS. Clinical manifestations and treatment of blastomycosis. Clin Chest Med. 2017;38(3):435-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Webb BJ, Ferraro JP, Rea S, Kaufusi S, Goodman BE, Spalding J. Epidemiology and clinical features of invasive fungal infection in a US health care network. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(8):ofy187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benjamin DK, Jr., Stoll BJ, Gantz MG, Walsh MC, Sánchez PJ, Das A, Shankaran S, Higgins RD, Auten KJ, Miller NA, Walsh TJ, Laptook AR, Carlo WA, Kennedy KA, Finer NN, Duara S, Schibler K, Chapman RL, Van Meurs KP, Frantz ID, III, Phelps DL, Poindexter BB, Bell EF, O'Shea TM, Watterberg KL, Goldberg RN. Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e865-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cobo F, Rodríguez-Granger J, Sampedro A, Aliaga-Martínez L, Navarro-Marí JM. Candida prosthetic joint infection. A review of treatment methods. J Bone Joint Infect. 2017;2(2):114-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.von Eiff C, Jansen B, Kohnen W, Becker K. Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis. Drugs. 2005;65(2):179-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taj-Aldeen SJ, Rammaert B, Gamaletsou M, Sipsas NV, Zeller V, Roilides E, Kontoyiannis DP, Miller AO, Petraitis V, Walsh TJ, Lortholary O. Osteoarticular infections caused by non-aspergillus filamentous fungi in adult and pediatric patients: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(50):e2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Watson EC, Adams RH. Biology of bone: the vasculature of the skeletal system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(7):a031559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roilides E, Simitsopoulou M, Katragkou A, Walsh TJ. How biofilms evade host defenses. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(3):3.3.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fournier B, Philpott DJ. Recognition of Staphylococcus aureus by the innate immune system. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):521-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Romani L. Immunity to fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(4):275-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Robertson CM, Coopersmith CM. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Microbes Infect. 2006/04/01/2006;8(5):1382-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bariteau JT, Waryasz GR, McDonnell M, Fischer SA, Hayda RA, Born CT. Fungal osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(6):390-401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taj-Aldeen SJ, Rammaert B, Gamaletsou M, Sipsas NV, Zeller V, Roilides E, Kontoyiannis DP, Miller AO, Petraitis V, Walsh TJ, Lortholary O. Osteoarticular infections caused by non-aspergillus filamentous fungi in adult and pediatric patients: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(50):e2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dinh A, McNally M, D'Anglejan E, Mamona Kilu C, Lourtet J, Ho R, Scarborough M, Dudareva M, Jesuthasan G, Ronde Oustau C, Klein S, Escolà-Vergé L, Rodriguez Pardo D, Delobel P, Lora-Tamayo J, Mancheño-Losa M, Sorlí Redó ML, Barbero Allende JM, Arvieux C, Vaznaisiène D, Bauer T, Roux AL, Noussair L, Corvec S, Fernández-Sampedro M, Rossi N, Lemaignen A, Costa Salles MJ, Cunha Ribeiro T, Mazet J, Sasso M, Lavigne JP, Sotto A, Canouï E, Senneville É, Thill P, Lortholary O, Lanternier F, Morata L, Soriano A, Giordano G, Fourcade C, Frank BJH, Hofstaetter JG, Duran C, Bonnet E, Bauer T, Courboulès C, d'Anglejan E, Dinh A, Duran C, Kilu CM, Noussair L, Roux AL, Bonnet E, Fourcade C, Giordano G, Dudareva M, Ho R, Jesuthasan G, McNally M, Scarborough M, Frank BJH, Hofstaetter JG, Klein S, Oustau CR, Senneville É, Thill P, Escolà-Vergé L, Pardo DR, Morata L, Soriano A, Canouï E, Paugam A, Touanga G, Delobel P, Lora-Tamayo J, Mancheño-Losa M, Lavigne JP, Sasso M, Mazet J, Sotto A, Junyent JG, Redó MLS, Costa Salles MJ, Ribeiro TC, Allende JMB, Desoubeaux G, Lemaignen A, Porche C, Arvieux C, Méheut A, Gangneux JP, Couzigou C, Lourtet J, Pilmis B, Stucinskas J, Vaznaisiene D, Rossi N, Corvec S, Crenn V, Morio F, Fernández-Sampedro M, Lanternier F, Lortholary O. Prosthetic joint infections due to Candida species: a multicenter international study. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;80(2):347-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spellberg B, Edwards J, Jr., Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):556-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Strausbaugh LJ. Hematologic manifestations of bacterial and fungal infections. Hematology/Oncology Clin North America. 1987;1(2):185-206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Formanek PE, Dilling DF. Advances in the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal disease. Chest. 2019;156(5):834-42. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Math KR, Berkowitz JL, Paget SA, Endo Y. Imaging of musculoskeletal infection. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016;42(4):769-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mokoala KMG, Ndlovu H, Lawal I, Sathekge MM. PET/CT and SPECT/CT for infection in joints and bones: an overview and future directions. Semin Nucl Med. 2024/05/01/2024;54(3):394-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hage CA, Carmona EM, Epelbaum O, Evans SE, Gabe LM, Haydour Q, Knox KS, Kolls JK, Murad MH, Wengenack NL, Limper AH. Microbiological laboratory testing in the diagnosis of fungal infections in pulmonary and critical care practice. An official American thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(5):535-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tsang CC, Teng JLL, Lau SKP, Woo PCY. Rapid genomic diagnosis of fungal infections in the age of next-generation sequencing. J Fungi. 2021;7(8):636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Calhoun JH, Manring MM. Adult osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2005;19(4):765-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. Radiographic imaging in osteomyelitis: the role of plain radiography, computed tomography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(02):080-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jutte PC, Van Loenhout-Rooyackers JH. Routine surgery in addition to chemotherapy for treating spinal tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(5):Cd004532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen MH, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(3):291-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brown DL, Frank JE. Diagnosis and management of syphilis. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(2):283-90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, Karsenty J, Lustig S, Breton P, Gleizal A, Boussel L, Laurent F, Braun E, Chidiac C, Ader F, Ferry T. Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:183-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang MK, Rao ZG, Ma T, Tang M, Xu Tq, He Xx, Li Zp, Liu Y, Xu Qj, Yang Ky, Gong Yf, Xue J, Wu Mq, Xue Xy. Appropriate empirical antifungal therapy is associated with a reduced mortality rate in intensive care unit patients with invasive fungal infection: a real-world retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:952611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(1):25-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Perlin DS. Echinocandin resistance in candida. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(suppl 6):S612-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shang G, Zhao S, Yang S, Li J. The heavy burden and treatment challenges of fungal periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of 489 joints. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Benitez LL, Carver PL. Adverse effects associated with long-term administration of Azole antifungal agents. Drugs. 2019;79(8):833-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laniado-Laborín R, Cabrales-Vargas MN. Amphotericin B: side effects and toxicity. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2009;26(4):223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hotchkiss CE, Jeffery DA, Vogel KW. Use of fluconazole-impregnated beads to treat osteomyelitis caused by coccidioides in a pigtailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina). Comp Med. 2022;72(4):273-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 2004;364(9431):369-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yin P, Ji Q, Li T, Li J, Li Z, Liu J, Wang G, Wang S, Zhang L, Mao Z, Tang P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ilizarov methods in the treatment of infected nonunion of tibia and femur. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0141973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Alpert BS. The muscle flap in the treatment of chronic lower extremity osteomyelitis: results in patients over 5 years after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(2):311-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goswami K, Austin MS. Intraoperative povidone-iodine irrigation for infection prevention. Arthroplasty Today. 2019;5(3):306-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gonzalez MR, Bedi ADS, Karczewski D, Lozano-Calderon SA. Treatment and outcomes of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a systematic review of 225 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(11):2464-71.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gamaletsou MN, Rammaert B, Brause B, Bueno MA, Dadwal SS, Henry MW, Katragkou A, Kontoyiannis DP, McCarthy MW, Miller AO, Moriyama B, Pana ZD, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Roilides E, Sarkis JP, Simitsopoulou M, Sipsas NV, Taj-Aldeen SJ, Zeller V, Lortholary O, Walsh TJ. Osteoarticular mycoses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022;35(4):e00086-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kasahara S, Jhingran A, Dhingra S, Salem A, Cramer RA, Hohl TM. Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor signaling in regulating neutrophil antifungal activity and the oxidative burst during respiratory fungal challenge. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(8):1289-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Spellberg B, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP, Edwards Jr J, Ibrahim AS. Recent advances in the management of mucormycosis: from bench to bedside. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(12):1743-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hoenigl M, Sprute R, Egger M, Arastehfar A, Cornely OA, Krause R, Lass-Flörl C, Prattes J, Spec A, Thompson GR, III, Wiederhold N, Jenks JD. The antifungal pipeline: fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, olorofim, opelconazole, and rezafungin. Drugs. 2021;81(15):1703-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


