Abstract
Neutron reflectometry is a technique for measuring structure near planar interfaces that has been previously used to non-destructively characterize the polymer density of hydrated, dilute, and soft materials. Previous investigations have conducted neutron reflectometry measurements of liquids, gels, emulsion, and polymer solutions at rest, in compression, and subject to shear stress. However, correlating structure with tribological properties of soft materials presents significant experimental challenges for prior instruments due to wall slip, sample thickness, and structural heterogeneity (e.g., depth-wise gradients). A linear reciprocating tribometer offers several advantages for in situ neutron reflectometry studies, including uniform velocity profiles, constant shear stress over large regions of interest, and independent control of normal force and sliding velocity during measurements. This work outlines basic considerations for the design of a custom linear reciprocating tribometer that operates in a neutron beamline and includes commissioning measurements. The tribometer is designed to compress soft and hydrated materials against linearly reciprocating silicon disks. The three key design considerations for this tribometer are (1) safety, (2) neutron transmission, and (3) sample positioning. This instrument design will enable in situ studies of soft matter and illuminate the role of interfacial structure on tribological phenomena.
Keywords: Tribometer design, Neutron reflectometry, Soft matter
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction
Neutron reflectometry is an elastic scattering technique that has been used to characterize the interfacial structure of soft materials, from lipids to gels [1-10]. This technique is used to measure the depth resolved composition (e.g., polymer density) of samples averaged over a surface area on the order of square centimeters with nanoscale depth resolution, allowing detailed investigations of structure as a function of depth up to hundreds of nanometers into a sample. Neutrons are particularly well suited for investigating soft matter; a neutron beam is largely nondestructive compared to other probes (e.g., X-rays, electrons), which preserves the structural integrity of soft materials throughout experiments. Additionally, the neutron scattering signal does not scale in a simple way with atomic number as it does with X-rays; therefore, materials containing constituents with similar atomic numbers (e.g., H, C, N, O) or different isotopes (e.g., 1H vs. 2H) can have resolvable, unique signals in neutron reflectometry [11, 12].
Sample environments, or in situ devices, have been widely used to investigate both stationary and dynamic interfaces of soft materials with neutron reflectometry [13]. Among these are passive load chambers which have measured thermally fluctuating soft materials (e.g., hydrogels) at rest and in static compression [14, 15]. Flexible inflatable membranes have been used to investigate the structure of thin soft matter films and polymers under confinement [16]. Flow cells have been used to impose shear stress upon polymer solutions [17, 18], while Langmuir troughs have been commonly used to compress and deform monolayers and multilayers suspended on fluids [19]. Rheometers have been extensively used to investigate the structure of fluids, polymers, and suspensions under shear [20-23, 42] and the emergence of new tribolayers [24]. Recently, an innovative device in the style of a rolling pin was used to characterize the structure of solid–liquid interfaces under shear [25].
Linear reciprocating friction-measuring devices in a neutron reflectometer, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, are absent from the literature. A linear reciprocating tribometer designed for neutron reflectometry enables surface structure investigations during measurements of friction, deformation, and wear of surfaces sliding in relative motion. Linear reciprocating motion achieves uniform velocity profiles over large regions of interest (≈1500 mm2) averaged in neutron reflectivity data. Sliding velocity and normal force are independently controlled during friction measurements. This instrument could be used to investigate samples that have been investigated with rheometers, flow cells, Langmuir troughs, and rolling pin style tribometers (e.g., liquids, gels, emulsions, and solutions). In addition to these materials, this instrument could be used to examine samples that exhibit wall slip (e.g., lubricious interfaces) as well as samples that are thin, thick, and/or composed of depth-wise gradients. Measuring forces across surfaces in relative motion presents unique experimental challenges when coupled with neutron reflectivity. This paper outlines considerations for designing a linearly reciprocating tribometer for in situ neutron reflectivity studies, enabling future insights into the structure of dynamic soft matter interfaces.
2. Neutron Beamline Considerations
2.1. Safety
Special considerations must be taken in operating a tribometer within a neutron beamline. Most importantly, neutrons are a radiation hazard. Therefore, the operation of the tribometer must be done remotely to eliminate human exposure to the radiation fields. Due to this constraint, additional positioning stages beyond the tribometer motion are required to maneuver the sliding interface into the immovable neutron beam.
Neutron activation half-life of materials within the beamline determines how long they are considered hazardous following irradiation. For this reason, the tribometer is composed of materials with irradiated half-lives on the order of minutes, such as aluminum [26, 27], whenever possible.
2.2. Horizontal Beamline Configuration
Linearly reciprocating tribometers, particularly those used to investigate hydrated or submerged samples, are typically designed such that sliding interfaces are perpendicular to gravity. This operation is best suited for a horizontally configured liquids reflectometer. The tribometer described herein has thus been specifically designed for use with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) liquids reflectometer (LIQREF) at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS).
The LIQREF neutron beam path is schematically depicted in Fig. 1. Neutrons are produced by a pulsed spallation source, cooled in a liquid hydrogen moderator, and transported to the instrument using neutron guides. The neutron wavelength distribution is defined using choppers and frame overlap mirrors, and the beam dimensions are defined using a pair of absorbing slits. The incident beam propagates at an angle of 4° below the horizontal and enters the tribometer through the side of a single-crystal silicon disk whose upper polished surface translates relative to the sample material. The neutron beam is then projected on the silicon upper surface in an approximately 20 mm wide and 40 mm long footprint.
Fig. 1.

Schematic of the neutron beam path at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory liquids reflectometer interacting with the tribometer sample environment
Specular reflectivity is a specific type of elastic scattering, whereby the angle of incidence of neutrons on the sliding interface ( in) matches the angle of reflection of neutrons from the interface ( out). The neutron reflectivity is calculated as the reflected intensity divided by the incident intensity [28].
Neutron reflectivity is measured as a function of the momentum transfer vector, , perpendicular to the sliding interface. Momentum transfer depends on the angle between the neutron beam and the surface of interest, , and the wavelength of the neutron beam, (Eq. 1) [12].
| (1) |
The LIQREF operates on a pulsed spallation neutron source and uses the time-of-flight method to collect a range of neutron wavelengths from each neutron pulse. This allows space to be measured using both a range of and by manipulating the angle, . Precise positioning of the sample with respect to the neutron beam angle is achieved by tilting the tribometer during experiments between 0° and 4° below horizontal with respect to the neutron beam (4° to 8° with respect to gravity) using a goniometer (Fig. 1). To ensure that the sliding interface remains focused in the beam path during tilting, the sliding interface must be positioned within the goniometer’s center of rotation.
2.3. Materials for High Neutron Transmission to and from the Sliding Interface
When the neutron beam passes through materials to reach the sliding interface, the use of high transmission materials increases the neutron flux at the interface of interest. Silicon and aluminum have high neutron beam transmission due to low incoherent and absorption cross sections (Supplementary Table S1) [26, 29]. Because soft matter and hydrated samples typically contain large quantities of hydrogen which significantly scatters neutrons, the beam must pass through the silicon countersample to reach the sliding interface. In this tribometer design, the sample is loaded top-down onto the countersample and neutrons enter at shallow angles from below the sliding interface to avoid transmitting through the sample. To position neutrons below the sample for reflectivity measurements, the tribometer tilts from 4° to 8° below horizontal to position the beam and the detector below the sliding interface (Fig. 1). Countersamples, adapter plates, baths, and any other components located in the path of the neutron beam, excluding the sample of interest, are composed of high transmission materials to maximize flux to the sliding interface.
3. Tribometer Design
This tribometer is designed to provide linear reciprocating motions between a stationary soft material sample compressed against a moving silicon disk countersample in a hydrated environment during neutron reflectivity measurements (Fig. 2). The sample remains fixed with respect to the neutron beamline to ensure all reflectivity data gathered are from the sample–silicon interface. Material and stage selections are optimized for neutron beam transmission. Stage and force transducer specifications are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Fig. 2.

Tribometer schematic. A an isometric projection of the full instrument with all stages labeled. Tribometer stages necessary for compression and sliding are labeled with the axis of sliding and the letter ‘T’ subscript, while interface positioning stages are labeled with the letter ‘P’ subscript. The expected neutron beam path is modeled in translucent red. Direction of beam is indicated as in before neutrons interact with the sample and out after neutrons interact with the sample. B Inset of isometric projection in A) focused on the sliding interface. C Side and D front views of the sliding interface, shims not shown
3.1. The Sliding Interface
Soft and hydrated samples, especially those without clearly distinguishable structure at the interface, generally produce smaller, less resolvable, changes in reflectivity signal. To maximize the neutron signal intensity, the neutron beam footprint must be maximized. At the LIQREF, the beam footprint is about 20 × 40 mm and the contact area between the sample and countersample must exceed this size (Fig. 2C,D). This precaution ensures that signal reaching the detector originates from the sample interface and not the surrounding region (background). The large beam footprint is fortunately amenable to soft materials, which have low elastic moduli and thus large contact areas under load. Larger contact areas also permit greater tolerance in positional uncertainty with respect to beam alignment.
The sample holder (Al 6013) attaches the sample to the tribometer and is easily removed and swapped with identical components for sample exchanges (Fig. 2). The sample holder is fastened beneath a submersible six-channel force transducer (AMTI SF3-100), which measures normal (compressive) and tangential (frictional) forces reacting across the sample during contact and sliding against the countersample (Fig. 2B).
Single crystal silicon was selected as the countersample for its high neutron transmission and its low surface roughness. Custom silicon disks (Supplementary Fig. S1, 75 mm radius, 7 mm thickness, on top surface), purchased from Silicon Valley Microelectronic, Inc., were designed to accommodate up to an 80 mm sliding path and a 20 mm wide neutron beam (100 mm of travel, edge-to-edge), including a free sliding regime away from reversals. The silicon disk faces on the plane are flattened such that when the silicon disk reciprocates with respect to the neutron beamline, the beam path length through the silicon remains the same. The thickness of the silicon disk permits incoming neutrons to enter and exit through the flattened faces away from the bottom of the disk after alignment when the last defining beam slit is positioned less than 50 mm away from the bath wall.
The sample–silicon sliding interface is situated within a solvent bath to maintain hydrated samples. The bath is machined from aluminum (Al 6061) (Fig. 2), a material selected for its high neutron transmission, low post-neutron-irradiation half-life, and low density. The walls of the bath are about 60 mm in height from the surface of the silicon disk, which supports total submersion of thick hydrated samples (about 10 mm thickness) even at a 10° tilt, which exceeds the tilt required for neutron reflectivity studies. The bath’s interior footprint (about 200 × 125 mm) accommodates an inset for the silicon disk and shallow recesses along the disk perimeter for ease of handling. The exposed interface between the aluminum and the silicon on the plane (Supplementary Fig. S2) is minimized with the use of aluminum shims, compressing the Si wafer into place and preventing liquid from entering the gap, which would reduce transmittance of the neutron beam. During experiments, solvent evaporation from the bath and air currents are mitigated through the use of a flexible enclosure secured to the bath rim and to the adapter plate above the force transducer.
3.2. Tribometer Motion Control
Two motorized positioning stages, one -stage (Zaber LRQ300AL-DE51T10A) and one -stage (Physik Instrumente V-817.096211E0) (Fig. 2A), are used to control compression and sliding motions during experiments (Supplementary Fig. S3A). The ball and screw-driven -stage is attached to the force transducer which loads the sample onto the silicon disk countersample. Positioning lower on the -stage provides higher compressive forces on the sample. The -stage has < 5 μm backlash and 10 μm accuracy. The silicon disk inside the bath is mounted to a high-load, linear reciprocating, magnetic direct drive, -stage. Minimum incremental motion of 0.01 μm allows for a broad range of sliding speeds.
3.3. Positioning the Sample in the Neutron Beam
Because the neutron beam and the center of rotation for the goniometer are in a fixed position, the sliding interface must be aligned to meet these points with 10 μm accuracy. In order to meet this requirement, the sliding interface must be able to shift positions based on neutron beam signal feedback, after the instrument cave is closed to personnel access. Combined with several adapter plates, a ball and screw-driven vertical positioning -stage (Newport IDL280-Z20) raises the top surface of the silicon disk to the targeted 330 mm height from the goniometer to the center of rotation (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. S3B). The 20 mm travel range and 500 N load capacity of the stage allow the tribometer -stage, bath, and silicon disk raise and lower to precisely match the center of rotation. The goniometer in LIQREF can tilt in the direction as well as the orthogonal direction, allowing for initial alignment of the silicon surface plane with the neutron beam before experiments begin.
Because the sample remains stationary with respect to the neutron beam, the sample–countersample interface must be precisely aligned in x and y such that it completely covers the neutron beam window. Three ball and screw-driven sample positioning stages (Zaber LSQ300A-E01T3A), two -stages, and one -stage are mounted above the sliding interface (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. S3C). These stages work together to remotely guide the tribometer -stage and mounted sample to the beam window.
4. Contributions to Measurement Uncertainty
4.1. Misalignment-Induced Force Changes due to Tilt
Soft and hydrated materials (e.g., articular cartilage, hydrogels) often exhibit low friction and thus low forces are commonly encountered in tribological measurements [30-35]. Extensive work has been put forth by others to characterize the difficulties associated with low friction measurements and to define the sensitivity of force measurements due to misalignments between the force transducer and the sliding interface [36-38]. In this tribometer design, the entire apparatus must be tilted with respect to gravity to accommodate the neutron beam path (Supplementary Fig. S4). The influence of the force of gravity on normal load measurements due to a maximum 8° tilt is considered in the following simple analysis. The change in normal load, , measured by the force transducer due to tilting is a function of the combined mass of the sample and sample holder, , and the tilt angle with respect to gravity, , where is the acceleration due to gravity (Eq. 2).
| (2) |
Since the maximum tilt angle of the liquids reflectometer is , the change in normal force due to this tilt angle reduces to Eq. (3):
| (3) |
Assuming , the change in the measured normal force for this instrument configuration when tilted to is . Given a minimum applied normal force of , the change in force due to the maximum tilting angle accounts for less than 10% of the applied normal force.
4.2. Minimum Detectable Force Measurements
To characterize the minimum detectable forces during motion in this particular tribometer, the tribometer was configured with a sample (about 60 mm in length, 40 mm wide, and 10 mm in height) mounted to the sample holder and positioned 1 mm in height away from a silicon disk. The silicon disk was secured in a water-filled aluminum bath such that the depth of the liquid from the silicon surface to the air–liquid interface was about 25 mm. The tribometer’s -stage reciprocated the silicon disk beneath the suspended sample at a velocity of over a stroke length of for one reciprocating cycle. The sensitivity and calibration constants in the normal and tangential directions of the force transducer are reported in Supplementary Table S3, and the voltage range for the operation of the load cell was 0 to 10 V. The minimum detectable experimental noise in normal and friction force measurements, respectively, were and , based on the average of the 95% confidence interval for the forward and reverse directions (Fig. 3). This experiment was also conducted with the environmental enclosure (Supplementary Fig. S5) with negligible differences.
Fig. 3.

Fluctuations in (A, C) normal and (B, D) friction forces detected by the load cell due to 1 mm/s reciprocating motions with a sample holder submerged in D2O but out of sliding contact
4.3. Proof-of-Principle Neutron Reflectivity Measurements of D2O-Silicon Interfaces
The tribometer is designed for compression and sliding experiments. Like with most sample environments, compression environments in neutron reflectometry are stationary with respect to the beam; therefore, the beam is always passing through the same materials on the way to the interface. Sliding experiments, however, require stage motion relative to the beam, adding a potential source of error to neutron data averaged over time during motion as well as potential loss of alignment to the neutron beam.
To determine the extent to which neutron reflectivity measurements varied across the sliding path, neutron reflectivity data were collected from the D2O-silicon interface for three cases (Fig. 4A) after a single alignment with the LIQREF goniometer. In the first two cases, each of the two ends of the motion path (75 mm between the centers of positions 1 and 2) were observed at rest (Fig. 4Ai-ii), representing the most extreme differences in silicon alignment with respect to the neutron beam. In the third case, the D2O–silicon interface was probed while reciprocating at between positions 1 and 2 (Fig. 4Aiii). Representative motion profiles for the reciprocating case are shown in Supplementary Figures S6 and S7.
Fig. 4.

Reflectivity measurements of the D2O–silicon interface. A Schematic of the aluminum bath containing silicon disk and D2O with stationary neutron beam indicated by the pink box. The aluminum bath is positioned with respect to the neutron beam to probe two non-overlapping and stationary regions of interest: (i) ‘position 1,’ dashed blue region, and (ii) ‘position 2,’ dashed magenta region. The aluminum bath is depicted in (iii) during reciprocation motions at a constant sliding velocity, , while the neutron beam remains stationary, resulting in neutron reflectivity data collected over the dashed green region. B Log–log plot showing overlaid reflectivity curves (solid lines) fit from data points (solid circles) of position 1 (blue), position 2 (magenta), and linear reciprocating motions at (green). Error bars represent the error in reflectivity measurements. C Linear–linear plot showing scattering length density (SLD) profiles of the three reflectivity curves with uncertainty bands. Values for the SLD profiles can be found in Supplementary Table S4
Reflectivity, , was measured as a function of momentum transfer normal to the interface (Eq. 1). Here, a Å wavelength range and three incident angles (0.45°, 1.2°, 3.5°) were used to measure up to 0.3 Å−1 and reflectivity down to . The resulting overlapping neutron reflectivity curves demonstrate negligible differences in signal between the two stationary positions and during reciprocating motion (Fig. 4B), demonstrating sufficient alignment of the entire D2O–silicon interface with the neutron beam.
Reflectivity probes the in-plane averaged nuclear scattering length density (SLD) as a function of depth. The thickness, SLD, and roughness of a series of layers normal to the substrate were determined by minimizing the difference between the measured reflectivity and that obtained from a modeled SLD profile. Here, reflectivity data were modeled using the DREAM algorithm in REFL1D with the output parameters consistent with a D2O–silicon interface plus a thin, hydrogenous contaminant on the surface (Fig. 4C) [39, 40]. REFL1D is a Python package that uses the DREAM algorithm (which uses differential evolution to adapt the evolution of Markov chains) to infer the probability distribution of fit parameters and provides an error analysis that outputs uncertainty estimates for each fit parameter and a correlation plot between those parameters [41]. This proof-of-principle measurement holds promise for future tribological studies using this experimental configuration (Supplementary Fig. S8).
5. Limitations of the Current Tribometer Design
This tribometer is designed to measure low friction forces at relatively low contact pressures and sliding speeds. Such conditions are particularly relevant for investigations of soft and hydrated samples. Motorized stages were principally selected for smooth motions to mitigate noise in force measurements as well as for their low positional uncertainty, low backlash, and high repeatability. Stages were also selected for their ability to support the weight of several stacked components. As a result, the instrument in its current configuration cannot accommodate high-load sliding experiments without exceeding factor of safety requirements. The tribometer design can be modified such that stages are substituted with more robust, load-bearing alternatives, although this may compromise the desired qualities above.
6. Concluding Remarks
This work introduces a new sample environment designed to achieve in situ tribological measurements on the liquids reflectometer (LIQREF) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) using linear reciprocation. The neutron beamline environment mandates the modification of the familiar tribometer to accommodate the following unique considerations: safety, neutron transmission, and sample positioning. We demonstrate key capabilities of the tribometer and present proof-of-principle in situ neutron reflectivity measurements of a D2O–silicon interface during linear reciprocating motion. We envision this instrument will enable entirely new investigations into the structure–property relationships of soft matter interfaces during dynamic loading and sliding.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-025-02049-1.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. John Katsaras, Dr. Jim Browning, Candice Halbert, Dr. Helen Maynard-Casely, Dr. Anton Le Brun, Prof. Fyl Pincus, Prof. Matthew E. Helgeson, as well as the current and former members of the Interfacial Engineering Laboratory at UC Santa Barbara for helpful discussions. This work was primarily supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Science, Neutron Scattering and Instrumentation Sciences under Award # DE-SC0024149. This research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The beam time was allocated to the liquids reflectometer (LIQREF, BL-4B) on proposal number IPTS-34380.1. We gratefully acknowledge the UC Santa Barbara Pitenis Faculty Seed account for supporting instrument development. K.E.S. gratefully acknowledges funding support from the U.S. Department of Education GAANN fellowship. B.L.B., J.J.O., and A.A.P. gratefully acknowledge funding support from Award # DE-SC0024149. A.A.K. acknowledges funding support from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (Grant # EDUC4-12821) and training support from the National Institutes of Health, USA (NIH grant 1T32GM141846). A.R.R. acknowledges support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant # 2139319. J.M.U. acknowledges funding support from the BioPACIFIC Materials Innovation Platform of the National Science Foundation under Award # DMR-1933487.
Funding
This article was funded by U.S. Department of Education, GAANN, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Science, Neutron Scattering and Instrumentation Sciences, DE-SC0024149, DE-SC0024149, DE-SC0024149, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, EDUC4-12821, NIH T32 Training Grant in Quantitative Mechanobiology, Award #1T32GM141846, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, 2139319, BioPACIFIC Materials Innovation Platform of the National Science Foundation, DMR-1933487.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
The data supporting this manuscript are freely available at Dryad, an online data repository: https://doi.org//10.5061/dryad.bg79cnpnz
References
- 1.Russell TP: X-ray and neutron reflectivity for the investigation of polymers. Mater. Sci. Rep 5, 171–271 (1990). 10.1016/S0920-2307(05)80002-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krueger S.: Neutron reflection from interfaces with biological and biomimetic materials. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci 6, 111–117 (2001). 10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00073-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feng W, Nieh M-P, Zhu S, Harroun TA, Katsaras J, Brash JL: Characterization of protein resistant, grafted methacrylate polymer layers bearing oligo(ethylene glycol) and phosphorylcholine side chains by neutron reflectometry. Biointerphases 2, 34–43 (2007). 10.1116/1.2711705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pan J, Heberle FA, Carmichael JR, Ankner JF, Katsaras J: Time-of-flight Bragg scattering from aligned stacks of lipid bilayers using the Liquids Reflectometer at the Spallation Neutron Source. J Appl Cryst. 45, 1219–1227 (2012). 10.1107/S0021889812039945 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wiechert AI, Liao W-P, Hong E, Halbert CE, Yiacoumi S, Saito T, Tsouris C: Influence of hydrophilic groups and metalion adsorption on polymer-chain conformation of amidoxime-based uranium adsorbents. J. Colloid Interface Sci 524, 399–408 (2018). 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Watkins EB, Dennison AJC, Majewski J: Binding of cholera toxin B-subunit to a ganglioside GM1-functionalized PEG-tethered lipid membrane. Langmuir 38, 6959–6966 (2022). 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armanious A, Gerelli Y, Micciulla S, Pace HP, Welbourn RJL, Sjöberg M, Agnarsson B, Höök F: Probing the separation distance between biological nanoparticles and cell membrane mimics using neutron reflectometry with sub-nanometer accuracy. J. Am. Chem. Soc 144, 20726–20738 (2022). 10.1021/jacs.2c08456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen R, Wang H, Doucet M, Browning JF, Su X: Thermoelectro-responsive redox-copolymers for amplified solvation, morphological control, and tunable ion interactions. JACS Au. 3, 3333–3344 (2023). 10.1021/jacsau.3c00486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitchell ME, Heinrich F, Mihailescu E, Watkins E, Hoogerheide DP: BPS2025 - Modulating interactions between supported lipid bilayers and solid surfaces to study membrane active peptides by neutron reflectometry. Biophys. J 124, 528a–529a (2025). 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.2770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wanasingha N, Balu R, Gangadoo S, Abraham AN, Rekas A, Mata JP, Le Brun AP, Dutta NK, Choudhury NR: Nano-structured antibiofilm coatings based on recombinant resilin. Adv. Coll. Interface. Sci 342, 103530 (2025). 10.1016/j.cis.2025.103530 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boothroyd AT: Principles of neutron scattering from condensed matter. Oxford University Press, Oxford: (2020) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sivia DS: Elementary Scattering Theory: For X-ray and Neutron Users. Oxford University Press, Oxford: (2011) [Google Scholar]
- 13.Le Brun AP, Gilbert EP: Advances in sample environments for neutron scattering for colloid and interface science. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci 327, 103141 (2024). 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sudre G, Hourdet D, Cousin F, Creton C, Tran Y: Structure of surfaces and interfaces of poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) hydrogels. Langmuir 28, 12282–12287 (2012). 10.1021/la301417x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gombert Y, Simič R, Roncoroni F, Dübner M, Geue T, Spencer ND: Structuring hydrogel surfaces for tribology. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1901320 (2019). 10.1002/admi.201901320 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Vos WM, Mears LLE, Richardson RM, Cosgrove T, Dalgliesh RM, Prescott SW: Measuring the structure of thin soft matter films under confinement: A surface-force type apparatus for neutron reflection, based on a flexible membrane approach. Rev. Sci. Instrum 83, 113903 (2012). 10.1063/1.4767238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Penfold J, Staples E, Tucker I, Fragnetto G: The effect of shear on the adsorption of non-ionic surfactants at the liquid—solid interface. Physica B 221, 325–330 (1996). 10.1016/0921-4526(95)00945-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van der Grinten D, Wolff M, Zabel H, Magerl A: Flow cell for grazing incidence neutron scattering. Meas. Sci. Technol 19, 034016 (2008). 10.1088/0957-0233/19/3/034016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Campbell RA: Recent advances in resolving kinetic and dynamic processes at the air/water interface using specular neutron reflectometry. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci 37, 49–60 (2018). 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.06.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brooks CF, Fuller GG, Frank CW, Robertson CR: An interfacial stress rheometer to study rheological transitions in monolayers at the air-water interface. Langmuir 15, 2450–2459 (1999). 10.1021/la980465r [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wolff M, Kuhns P, Liesche G, Ankner JF, Browning JF, Gutfreund P: Combined neutron reflectometry and rheology. J Appl Cryst. 46, 1729–1733 (2013). 10.1107/S0021889813024059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Welbourn RJL, Bartholomew F, Gutfreund P, Clarke SM: Neutron reflectometry of an anionic surfactant at the solid-liquid interface under shear. Langmuir 33, 5982–5990 (2017). 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nemoto F, Yamada NL, Takabatake F, Seto H: Installation of a Rheometer on Neutron Reflectometer SOFIA at J-PARC toward Rheo-NR and Observation of the Crystallization Behavior of Cocoa Butter in Chocolate. In: Proceedings of the 3rd J-PARC Symposium (J-PARC2019). Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (2021). 10.7566/JPSCP.33.011077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yamashita N, Hirayama T, Hino M, Yamada NL: Neutron reflectometry under high shear in narrow gap for tribology study. Sci. Rep 13, 18268 (2023). 10.1038/s41598-023-45161-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Armstrong AJ, McCoy TM, Welbourn RJL, Barker R, Rawle JL, Cattoz B, Dowding PJ, Routh AF: Towards a neutron and X-ray reflectometry environment for the study of solid–liquid interfaces under shear. Sci. Rep 11, 9713 (2021). 10.1038/s41598-021-89189-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Neutron activation and scattering calculator. NIST Center for Neutron Research. https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/activation/. Accessed 06 June 2025
- 27.Shleien B, Malamud H: The Health Physics and Radiological Health Handbook: Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 19, 835 (1994). 10.1097/00003072-199409000-00028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pynn R.: Neutron scattering: a primer. Los Alamos Science, Los Alamos: (1990) [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prince E. (ed.): International Tables for Crystallography: Mathematical, physical and chemical tables. International Union of Crystallography, Chester: (2006) [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA: The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 1, 461–468 (2009). 10.1177/1941738109350438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dunn AC, Urueña JM, Huo Y, Perry SS, Angelini TE, Sawyer WG: Lubricity of surface hydrogel layers. Tribol. Lett 49, 371–378 (2013). 10.1007/s11249-012-0076-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pitenis AA, Urueña JM, Hormel TT, Bhattacharjee T, Niemi SR, Marshall SL, Hart SM, Schulze KD, Angelini TE, Sawyer WG: Corneal cell friction: survival, lubricity, tear films, and mucin production over extended duration in vitro studies. Biotribology. 11, 77–83 (2017). 10.1016/j.biotri.2017.04.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bansil R, Turner BS: The biology of mucus: composition, synthesis and organization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 124, 3–15 (2018). 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Johnson CL, Dunn AC: Tribological characterization of gradient-density polyacrylamide hydrogel surfaces. Exp. Mech 61, 829–842 (2021). 10.1007/s11340-021-00704-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chau AL, Edwards CER, Helgeson ME, Pitenis AA: Designing superlubricious hydrogels from spontaneous peroxidation gradients. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 43075–43086 (2023). 10.1021/acsami.3c04636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schmitz TL, Action JE, Burris DL, Ziegert JC, Sawyer WG: Wear-rate uncertainty analysis. J. Tribol 126, 802–808 (2004). 10.1115/1.1792675 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schmitz TL, Action JE, Ziegert, and John C, Sawyer WG: The difficulty of measuring low friction: uncertainty analysis for friction coefficient measurements. J. Tribol 127, 673–678 (2005). 10.1115/1.1843853 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Burris DL, Sawyer WG: Addressing practical challenges of low friction coefficient measurements. Tribol. Lett 35, 17–23 (2009). 10.1007/s11249-009-9438-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vrugt JA, ter Braak CJF, Diks CGH, Robinson BA, Hyman JM, Higdon D: Accelerating markov chain monte carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numerical Simulation. 10, 273–290 (2009). 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kienzle PA, Krycka JA, Patel N: Refl1D: Interactive depth profile modeler. can be found under https://refl1d.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#. Accessed 06 June 2025 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Doucet M, Ferraz Leal RM, Hobson TC: Web interface for reflectivity fitting. SoftwareX. 7, 287–293 (2018). 10.1016/j.softx.2018.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sasa Leslie A. Yearley Eric J. Welch Cynthia F. Taylor Mark A. Gilbertson Robert D. Hammeter Christopher Majewski Jaroslaw Hjelm Rex P. (2010) (2010) The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center neutron rheometer in the cone and plate geometry to examine tethered polymers/polymer melt interfaces via neutron reflectivity Review of Scientific Instruments 81(5) 10.1063/1.3381037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this manuscript are freely available at Dryad, an online data repository: https://doi.org//10.5061/dryad.bg79cnpnz
