Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2025 Sep 15;21(9):e1013500. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013500

The fungal STRIPAK complex: Cellular conductor orchestrating growth and pathogenicity

Patricia P Peterson 1, Joseph Heitman 1,*
Editor: Teresa R O’Meara2
PMCID: PMC12435686  PMID: 40953055

The STRIPAK complex is a conserved signaling module in eukaryotes

The striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase (STRIPAK) complex is a highly conserved, multi-subunit signaling module present throughout the eukaryotic kingdom, from fungi to mammals. The core of STRIPAK is composed of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a serine/threonine phosphatase responsible for major cellular phosphatase activity, which typically functions as a heterotrimeric enzyme composed of a scaffold A subunit, a regulatory B subunit, and a catalytic C subunit. Among the four known classes of B subunits, the B″′ family, also known as striatins, serves as the hallmark STRIPAK component. When striatin functions as the regulatory subunit, additional interacting partners are recruited to form the larger, multi-modular STRIPAK complex [13].

STRIPAK was first discovered in mammalian cells by high-affinity purification approaches that mapped interactions between the PP2A A/C dimer with the striatin B subunit, Ste20-like kinases, and other regulatory components [2]. Subsequent studies revealed that STRIPAK controls a wide spectrum of signaling and developmental processes, including cell migration, polarity, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, neural and vascular development, and vesicular trafficking [37]. Homologous STRIPAK complexes have since been identified in diverse fungal organisms, including both saprophytic and pathogenic species, highlighting the deep evolutionary conservation of both its structure and function [811] (Fig 1). Despite organism-specific adaptations, the core components and their roles in phosphorylation-dependent signaling remain remarkably conserved, underscoring STRIPAK’s central role in coordinating cellular responses to environmental stimuli and developmental cues. This review summarizes our current knowledge of STRIPAK complexes in fungi, with a focus on their key roles in signaling networks that govern growth, differentiation, and pathogenesis.

Fig 1. Phylogenetic analysis of striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex subunits across fungi and humans reveals deep evolutionary conservation.

Fig 1

The STRIPAK complex is composed of conserved subunits, including the scaffold A subunit (Tpd3/PP2AA), regulatory B subunit (Far8/STRN), and catalytic C subunit (Pph22/PP2AC) of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), along with several associated proteins: a striatin-interacting protein (Far11/STRIP), a tail-anchored membrane protein (Far9/SLMAP), a Phocein subfamily protein (Mob3), a small coiled-coil protein (SIKE), and a GCK family kinase (Stk24). To assess conservation across species, maximum likelihood phylogenies were constructed for each subunit with homologs identified in Homo sapiens and nine fungal species. These fungi include representatives from both the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota phyla, enabling comparisons across the major Dikarya clade of the fungal kingdom. A species-level phylogeny, based on established taxonomy, is shown for reference. Terminal nodes are colored according to percent sequence similarity to the human homolog. For the PP2A catalytic subunit, some species contain two paralogs (for example, Pph21 and Ppg1), both of which may participate in the STRIPAK complex. In some cases, multiple homologs have been identified for a given component, or the component was not found [21]. These patterns reflect both conservation and diversification of STRIPAK complex composition across eukaryotes. Trees were generated from trimmed MAFFT alignments using RAxML with the LG substitution model, 1,000 bootstrap replicates, and an extended majority-rule consensus approach. Bootstrap values >75 are indicated. Scale bars represent the number of amino acid substitutions per site.

What roles does STRIPAK play in fungal development and morphogenesis?

Fungi serve as excellent models for studying developmental processes due to their distinct cell morphologies throughout sexual and asexual life cycles. Cellular fusion during mating, subsequent hyphal formation, and the production of mature sexual fruiting bodies are tightly coordinated processes during sexual development in most fungi. In filamentous fungi, following karyogamy (nuclear fusion) and meiosis, sexual spores are produced from highly complex multicellular structures. Studies in Sordaria macrospora and Neurospora crassa revealed that STRIPAK components are required for proper execution of these developmental events. Screens for mutants with defects in specific stages of the sexual cycle identified mutations in genes encoding STRIPAK complex subunits, highlighting the complex’s central role in sexual differentiation [11,12]. In several species of the plant pathogen Fusarium, mutations in the striatin homolog FSR1 also disrupt sexual reproduction [13].

In addition to STRIPAK’s role in sexual development, it is also important for vegetative growth and asexual reproduction. In Aspergillus nidulans, deletion of STRIPAK components results in defects in hyphal cell fusion, conidiophore formation, and conidial spore production [14]. STRIPAK is also involved in regulation of cell polarity, a key determinant of hyphal extension and directional growth. STRIPAK complex mutants display disorganized or hyperbranched hyphae, suggesting a role in spatial control [15]. Similar phenotypes have been observed in N. crassa and S. macrospora, where STRIPAK mutants show impaired hyphal elongation and defects in septation and cell fusion during vegetative growth [11,16,17]. In the basidiomycete human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, deletion mutants lacking STRIPAK complex subunits also exhibit defects in mating, hyphal formation and elongation, and sporulation [18]. A recent study has further revealed that disruption of STRIPAK alters the mode of sexual reproduction in C. neoformans [19]. Specifically, mutants in STRIPAK components PPH22, which encodes the catalytic subunit of PP2A, and FAR8, which encodes the regulatory B subunit (striatin), undergo pseudosexual reproduction [20], with progeny inheriting nuclear genomes exclusively from the wild-type parent, implicating STRIPAK in nuclear inheritance and meiotic progression. Notably, these mutants also exhibit widespread aneuploidy, suggesting that STRIPAK is required for genome stability [18]. These findings highlight the role of STRIPAK in maintaining genome integrity and coordinating nuclear dynamics during asexual and sexual reproduction. More broadly, STRIPAK integrates signaling pathways that govern multiple aspects of development across fungal lineages, from vegetative growth to the formation of reproductive structures.

How does STRIPAK regulate signaling pathways in fungi?

The STRIPAK complex acts as a critical regulatory hub that integrates kinase and phosphatase signaling to control myriad aspects of fungal growth, development, and proliferation [21] (Fig 2). STRIPAK has been shown to influence the activity of the highly conserved mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades that drive the pheromone response and cell wall integrity (CWI) pathways. In the unicellular yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the STRIPAK homolog factor arrest (FAR) complex is required after pheromone exposure for cell cycle arrest in preparation for mating. In this example, the FAR complex controls actin cytoskeleton formation through the target of rapamycin complex 2 (TORC2) pathway [2224]. The STRIPAK counterpart in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the SIN (septin initiation network) inhibitory PP2A (SIP) complex, is important for cytokinesis as part of the sexual cycle [25]. In the filamentous fungus N. crassa, which has long served as a model to study cell-cell fusion, STRIPAK localization to the nuclear envelope is required for activation of the MAP kinase in the CWI pathway [17]. Direct protein-protein interactions between STRIPAK components and MAP kinases have also been identified in S. macrospora, highlighting STRIPAK’s roles in linking signaling pathways during development [26]. Quantitative phospho-proteomic analyses have further revealed a broad set of proteins involved in growth and metabolism whose phosphorylation depends upon a functional STRIPAK complex, underscoring its influence on fungal signaling dynamics [27,28]. These findings suggest that STRIPAK orchestrates signaling from specific subcellular sites, enabling precise control of phosphorylation-dependent pathways involved in fungal development and stress responses.

Fig 2. Structural model and functional roles of the fungal striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex.

Fig 2

A schematic model illustrates the organization and interactions of conserved fungal STRIPAK subunits, based on AlphaFold-Multimer predictions and published literature [9,18]. The striatin subunit Far8 forms a homotetramer via coiled-coil domains (CC1–CC4), serving as a scaffold for complex assembly. The WD40 domains of Far8 extend outward to mediate substrate interactions. The membrane-anchored protein Far9 localizes the complex to organelle membranes, including the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and nuclear envelope. Additional interacting components, including the PP2A catalytic subunit (Pph22), scaffold subunit (Tpd3), STRIP homolog (Far11), Mob3, SIKE, and a GCK family kinase (Stk24), complete the core STRIPAK complex. STRIPAK carries out conserved functions across fungi, including regulation of sexual and asexual development, cell growth and proliferation, and virulence, by acting on key signaling pathways and substrates. Schematic was partially created with BioRender.com [38].

How does STRIPAK interact with other cellular complexes or pathways in fungi?

STRIPAK interacts with multiple cellular signaling pathways involved in fungal development, growth, and stress adaptation. A key function of STRIPAK across fungi is to control PP2A phosphatase activity by directing it to specific subcellular compartments. In S. cerevisiae, the STRIPAK complex homolog modulates TORC2 signaling at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to regulate actin cytoskeleton organization; at the mitochondrial membrane, STRIPAK suppresses mitophagy, the selective autophagic degradation of mitochondria, through direct interactions with autophagy machinery [23,24,29]. In S. pombe, the STRIPAK homolog localizes to the spindle pole bodies during mitosis, where it spatially restricts SIN activity to ensure proper cytokinesis [30]. In S. macrospora and N. crassa, STRIPAK components are enriched at the nuclear envelope and are important for nuclear positioning and cell-cell communication during sexual development, likely by directing signaling pathways that coordinate nuclear dynamics [17,31]. Similarly, in A. nidulans, STRIPAK is localized to the nuclear envelope and promotes mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation [14]. The conserved patterns of subcellular localization of STRIPAK to the ER, nuclear envelope, and mitochondria have also been observed in mammalian cells, suggesting that STRIPAK may coordinate similar cellular processes across eukaryotes [32]. These observations support the idea that STRIPAK functions as a scaffold that bridges organelles and integrates signaling between them, though the specific roles of its differential localization remain to be fully elucidated.

STRIPAK complex components also play critical roles in mediating responses to environmental and physiological stress. In A. nidulans, deletion mutations in STRIPAK components result in increased sensitivity to oxidative and cell wall stress [14]. In Fusarium species, disruption of STRIPAK alters colony morphology, pigmentation, and mycelial growth, particularly under nutrient-limiting conditions, suggesting a role in nutrient sensing and metabolic adaptation [33,34]. Similarly, in C. neoformans, STRIPAK mutants exhibit severe growth defects under nutrient stress and display increased sensitivity to elevated temperature, a key virulence-associated trait [18]. While in most fungi the loss of any STRIPAK component leads to similar phenotypes, the deletion of the MOB3 subunit conferred increased stress tolerance and enhanced vegetative growth in both C. neoformans and A. nidulans, suggesting that individual subunits may have specialized roles or participate in subcomplexes with specialized functions.

How does STRIPAK contribute to fungal virulence and host–pathogen interactions?

STRIPAK homologs have been directly implicated in fungal virulence and pathogenesis across diverse species. In the plant pathogens Fusarium and Colletotrichum graminocola, striatin orthologs are essential for host tissue penetration and colonization, which are important steps in establishing infection and promoting disease in the plant [13,35]. These effects are thought to involve formation of specialized infection structures and regulation of signaling pathways that coordinate hyphal growth and host recognition. STRIPAK also contributes to virulence-associated processes in the nematode trapping fungus Duddingtonia flagrans [36,37]. In these fungi, constricting rings, specialized structures dependent on hyphal fusion and intercellular communication, are formed in response to pheromone secreted by the nematodes. In D. flagrans, deletion of a STRIPAK component resulted in slow growth, abnormal hyphal morphology, and impaired trap formation. In the human pathogen C. neoformans, a functional STRIPAK complex has also been shown to be required for virulence. Strains carrying deletion mutations in PP2A B and C subunits exhibit defects in melaninization and polysaccharide capsule formation, two important virulence factors, and are attenuated for virulence in a murine inhalation model of infection [18]. In contrast, loss of the MOB3 subunit led to hypervirulence and increased tolerance to host-associated stresses such as elevated temperature and CO2, as well as increased melanin and capsule production, and higher fungal burden in infected tissues. STRIPAK similarly influences production of secondary metabolites that contribute to pathogenicity, such as mycotoxins, by modulating global regulators of these biosynthetic pathways [14,34]. Together, these findings suggest that while core STRIPAK components are generally required for pathogenicity, individual subunits can play unique and sometimes opposing roles in modulating virulence traits, potentially by influencing distinct downstream signaling effects within the broader STRIPAK network.

What makes STRIPAK a promising target for antifungal strategies or a model for understanding fungal pathogenesis?

STRIPAK represents a compelling target for antifungal strategies and a valuable model for dissecting fungal pathogenesis due to its unique combination of conservation and functional specificity. While STRIPAK is broadly conserved across eukaryotes, its roles in fungi are highly context-dependent, often regulating developmental processes, stress adaptation, and virulence in species-specific ways [10]. For example, in C. neoformans, STRIPAK promotes thermal tolerance and virulence factor production critical for mammalian infection, while in the plant pathogen F. graminearum, STRIPAK primarily controls hyphal development and sexual reproduction, highlighting species-specific roles linked to their distinct pathogenic lifestyles [18,34]. Furthermore, fungal STRIPAK subunits exhibit sequence and domain variation relative to their mammalian counterparts [21], and phylogenetic comparisons illustrate both conservation and divergence across fungal lineages and humans (Fig 1). This divergence suggests that fungal STRIPAK complexes may have evolved specialized signaling mechanisms that could be selectively targeted without perturbing the host counterpart. Moreover, structural differences in key STRIPAK subunits and interactions may provide unique interfaces for targeting. For example, species-specific protein-protein interactions, posttranslational modifications, or subcellular localizations of STRIPAK subunits offer potential entry points for the development of antifungal agents that minimize off-target effects and toxicity to the mammalian host. At present, no STRIPAK-specific inhibitors in fungi have been reported, nor structural analyses of subunits identifying druggable sites. Future high-throughput screens and structural studies will be essential for assessing STRIPAK’s therapeutic potential.

Conclusions and future directions

STRIPAK serves as a powerful model for understanding the integration of multiple signaling pathways that control fungal development. As a major conductor orchestrating developmental and stress-responsive networks, STRIPAK provides insight into how fungal pathogens coordinate complex cellular pathways. Ultimately, investigations on STRIPAK offer a broader framework for understanding the molecular basis of fungal growth, proliferation, and pathogenesis. Moving forward, elucidating the precise molecular mechanisms underlying fungal-specific STRIPAK functions and their interactions with other signaling modules will deepen our understanding of how this complex integrates environmental and developmental cues. Continued studies in fungal models will identify direct STRIPAK targets and regulatory dynamics, offering insights into conserved developmental processes across eukaryotes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ulrich Kück, Dr. Erica Washington, Dr. Vikas Yadav, and Dr. Sheng Sun for critical reading of this manuscript, and Dr. Marco Dias Coelho, along with Dr. Sun, for assistance with figure preparation.

Funding Statement

PPP is supported by NIH/NIAID T32 grant AI052080-21 as a Tri-I MMPTP fellow. This work is also supported by NIH/NIAID R01 grants AI039115-28, AI050113-20, and AI172451-03 awarded to JH. JH is a co-director and fellow of the CIFAR Fungal Kingdom: Threats and Opportunities program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Xu Y, Xing Y, Chen Y, Chao Y, Lin Z, Fan E, et al. Structure of the protein phosphatase 2A holoenzyme. Cell. 2006;127(6):1239–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goudreault M, D’Ambrosio LM, Kean MJ, Mullin MJ, Larsen BG, Sanchez A, et al. A PP2A phosphatase high density interaction network identifies a novel striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex linked to the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 (CCM3) protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8(1):157–71. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800266-MCP200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gordon J, Hwang J, Carrier KJ, Jones CA, Kern QL, Moreno CS, et al. Protein phosphatase 2a (PP2A) binds within the oligomerization domain of striatin and regulates the phosphorylation and activation of the mammalian Ste20-Like kinase Mst3. BMC Biochem. 2011;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-12-54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ribeiro PS, Josué F, Wepf A, Wehr MC, Rinner O, Kelly G, et al. Combined functional genomic and proteomic approaches identify a PP2A complex as a negative regulator of Hippo signaling. Mol Cell. 2010;39(4):521–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Couzens AL, Knight JDR, Kean MJ, Teo G, Weiss A, Dunham WH, et al. Protein interaction network of the mammalian Hippo pathway reveals mechanisms of kinase-phosphatase interactions. Sci Signal. 2013;6(302):rs15. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hwang J, Pallas DC. STRIPAK complexes: structure, biological function, and involvement in human diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;47:118–48. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shi Z, Jiao S, Zhou Z. STRIPAK complexes in cell signaling and cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35(35):4549–57. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pöggeler S, Kück U. A WD40 repeat protein regulates fungal cell differentiation and can be replaced functionally by the mammalian homologue striatin. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3(1):232–40. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.1.232-240.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kück U, Beier AM, Teichert I. The composition and function of the striatin-interacting phosphatases and kinases (STRIPAK) complex in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;90:31–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kück U, Stein V. STRIPAK, a key regulator of fungal development, operates as a multifunctional signaling hub. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(6):443. doi: 10.3390/jof7060443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bloemendal S, Bernhards Y, Bartho K, Dettmann A, Voigt O, Teichert I, et al. A homologue of the human STRIPAK complex controls sexual development in fungi. Mol Microbiol. 2012;84(2):310–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08024.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nowrousian M, Ringelberg C, Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, Kück U. Cross-species microarray hybridization to identify developmentally regulated genes in the filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;273(2):137–49. doi: 10.1007/s00438-005-1118-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shim W-B, Sagaram US, Choi Y-E, So J, Wilkinson HH, Lee Y-W. FSR1 is essential for virulence and female fertility in Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(7):725–33. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elramli N, Karahoda B, Sarikaya-Bayram Ö, Frawley D, Ulas M, Oakley CE, et al. Assembly of a heptameric STRIPAK complex is required for coordination of light-dependent multicellular fungal development with secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(3):e1008053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riquelme M, Aguirre J, Bartnicki-García S, Braus GH, Feldbrügge M, Fleig U, et al. Fungal morphogenesis, from the polarized growth of hyphae to complex reproduction and infection structures. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2018;82(2):e00068-17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00068-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fu C, Iyer P, Herkal A, Abdullah J, Stout A, Free SJ. Identification and characterization of genes required for cell-to-cell fusion in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10(8):1100–9. doi: 10.1128/EC.05003-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dettmann A, Heilig Y, Ludwig S, Schmitt K, Illgen J, Fleißner A, et al. HAM-2 and HAM-3 are central for the assembly of the Neurospora STRIPAK complex at the nuclear envelope and regulate nuclear accumulation of the MAP kinase MAK-1 in a MAK-2-dependent manner. Mol Microbiol. 2013;90(4):796–812. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peterson PP, Choi J-T, Fu C, Cowen LE, Sun S, Bahn Y-S, et al. The Cryptococcus neoformans STRIPAK complex controls genome stability, sexual development, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(11):e1012735. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peterson PP, Croog S, Choi Y, Sun S, Heitman J. STRIPAK complex defects result in pseudosexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Genet. 2025;21(6):e1011774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yadav V, Sun S, Heitman J. Uniparental nuclear inheritance following bisexual mating in fungi. Elife. 2021;10:e66234. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kück U, Pöggeler S. STRIPAK, a fundamental signaling hub of eukaryotic development. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024;88(4):e0020523. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00205-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kemp HA, Sprague GF Jr. Far3 and five interacting proteins prevent premature recovery from pheromone arrest in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(5):1750–63. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.5.1750-1763.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pracheil T, Thornton J, Liu Z. TORC2 signaling is antagonized by protein phosphatase 2A and the Far complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2012;190(4):1325–39. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.138305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pracheil T, Liu Z. Tiered assembly of the yeast Far3-7-8-9-10-11 complex at the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(23):16986–97. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.451674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singh NS, Shao N, McLean JR, Sevugan M, Ren L, Chew TG, et al. SIN-inhibitory phosphatase complex promotes Cdc11p dephosphorylation and propagates SIN asymmetry in fission yeast. Curr Biol. 2011;21(23):1968–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Teichert I, Steffens EK, Schnaß N, Fränzel B, Krisp C, Wolters DA, et al. PRO40 is a scaffold protein of the cell wall integrity pathway, linking the MAP kinase module to the upstream activator protein kinase C. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(9):e1004582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stein V, Blank-Landeshammer B, Märker R, Sickmann A, Kück U. Targeted quantification of phosphorylation sites identifies STRIPAK-dependent phosphorylation of the Hippo pathway-related kinase SmKIN3. mBio. 2021;12(3):e00658-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00658-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Märker R, Blank-Landeshammer B, Beier-Rosberger A, Sickmann A, Kück U. Phosphoproteomic analysis of STRIPAK mutants identifies a conserved serine phosphorylation site in PAK kinase CLA4 to be important in fungal sexual development and polarized growth. Mol Microbiol. 2020;113(6):1053–69. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Innokentev A, Furukawa K, Fukuda T, Saigusa T, Inoue K, Yamashita S-I, et al. Association and dissociation between the mitochondrial Far complex and Atg32 regulate mitophagy. Elife. 2020;9:e63694. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Willet AH, Ren L, Turner LA, Gould KL. Transient PP2A SIP complex localization to mitotic SPBs for SIN inhibition is mediated solely by the Csc1 FHA domain. Mol Biol Cell. 2024;35(8):br14. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E24-04-0196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.J Reschka E, Nordzieke S, Valerius O, Braus GH, Pöggeler S. A novel STRIPAK complex component mediates hyphal fusion and fruiting-body development in filamentous fungi. Mol Microbiol. 2018;110(4):513–32. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kück U, Radchenko D, Teichert I. STRIPAK, a highly conserved signaling complex, controls multiple eukaryotic cellular and developmental processes and is linked with human diseases. Biol Chem. 2019;400(8):1005–22. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2019-0173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Islam KT, Bond JP, Fakhoury AM. FvSTR1, a striatin orthologue in Fusarium virguliforme, is required for asexual development and virulence. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(16):6431–45. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8387-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen A, Liu N, Xu C, Wu S, Liu C, Qi H, et al. The STRIPAK complex orchestrates cell wall integrity signalling to govern the fungal development and virulence of Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2023;24(9):1139–53. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang C-L, Shim W-B, Shaw BD. The Colletotrichum graminicola striatin orthologue Str1 is necessary for anastomosis and is a virulence factor. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(6):931–42. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Youssar L, Wernet V, Hensel N, Yu X, Hildebrand H-G, Schreckenberger B, et al. Intercellular communication is required for trap formation in the nematode-trapping fungus Duddingtonia flagrans. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(3):e1008029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wernet V, Wäckerle J, Fischer R. The STRIPAK component SipC is involved in morphology and cell-fate determination in the nematode-trapping fungus Duddingtonia flagrans. Genetics. 2022;220(1):iyab153. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peterson P. Created in BioRender. 2025. Available from: https://BioRender.com/bq3zhpt

Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES