Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1984 Dec;200(6):759–763. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198412000-00015

The frequency of local recurrence and microsatellites as a guide to reexcision margins for cutaneous malignant melanoma.

J W Kelly, R W Sagebiel, W Calderon, L Murillo, R L Dakin, M S Blois
PMCID: PMC1250595  PMID: 6508406

Abstract

A retrospective study was undertaken of local, regional, and distant recurrences in 346 patients with primary melanomas of tumor thickness less than 1.0 mm that were excised with margins of normal skin varying between 0.1 cm and 5.0 cm or more. Prospective histopathologic examination of 284 melanomas for the presence of microsatellites was also performed and their effect upon the frequency of local recurrence was studied. Margins of excision did not influence the frequency of local, regional, or distant metastases. Four recurrences of in situ superficial spreading melanoma occurred, however, when very narrow margins of excision (0.5 cm or less) were employed. Microsatellites were uncommon with tumors less than 3.0 mm in thickness (2.8% of all tumors of less than 3.0 mm in thickness, taken together), but relatively frequent in association with thicker tumors (37%). Melanomas with microsatellites were associated with a greater frequency of local clinical metastasis than those without (14% vs. 3%). Removal of more than 1.0 cm of normal skin around a melanoma of less than 1.0 mm in thickness does not further reduce rates of recurrence of any type. The use of margins of 0.5 cm or less for melanomas with a radial growth phase does appear to result in an increased frequency of local recurrence of the primary melanoma with an epidermal in situ component. These recurrences can be prevented by the removal of 1.0 cm of normal skin around such a melanoma. Microsatellites constitute a risk factor for local recurrence, but are a relatively uncommon phenomenon at tumor thickness less than 3.0 mm.

Full text

PDF
761

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ackerman A. B., Scheiner A. M. How wide and deep is wide and deep enough? A critique of surgical practice in excisions of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Hum Pathol. 1983 Sep;14(9):743–744. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(83)80298-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitken D. R., Clausen K., Klein J. P., James A. G. The extent of primary melanoma excision. A re-evaluation--how wide is wide? Ann Surg. 1983 Nov;198(5):634–641. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198311000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagley F. H., Cady B., Lee A., Legg M. A. Changes in clinical presentation and management of malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1981 May 1;47(9):2126–2134. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2126::aid-cncr2820470904>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Balch C. M., Murad T. M., Soong S. J., Ingalls A. L., Richards P. C., Maddox W. A. Tumor thickness as a guide to surgical management of clinical stage I melanoma patients. Cancer. 1979 Mar;43(3):883–888. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197903)43:3<883::aid-cncr2820430316>3.0.co;2-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blois M. S., Sagebiel R. W., Abarbanel R. M., Caldwell T. M., Tuttle M. S. Malignant melanoma of the skin. I. The association of tumor depth and type, and patient sex, age, and site with survival. Cancer. 1983 Oct 1;52(7):1330–1341. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1330::aid-cncr2820520732>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blois M. S., Sagebiel R. W., Tuttle M. S., Caldwell T. M., Taylor H. W. Judging prognosis in malignant melanoma of the skin. A problem of inference over small data sets. Ann Surg. 1983 Aug;198(2):200–206. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198308000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breslow A., Macht S. D. Optimal size of resection margin for thin cutaneous melanoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977 Nov;145(5):691–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassileth B. R., Lusk E. J., Tenaglia A. N. Patients' perceptions of the cosmetic impact of melanoma resection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Jan;71(1):73–75. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198301000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Day C. L., Jr, Harrist T. J., Gorstein F., Sober A. J., Lew R. A., Friedman R. J., Pasternack B. S., Kopf A. W., Fitzpatrick T. B., Mihm M. C., Jr Malignant melanoma. Prognostic significance of "microscopic satellites" in the reticular dermis and subcutaneous fat. Ann Surg. 1981 Jul;194(1):108–112. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Day C. L., Jr, Lew R. A. Malignant melanoma prognostic factors 3: surgical margins. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1983 Oct;9(10):797–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1983.tb00733.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Day C. L., Jr, Mihm M. C., Jr, Sober A. J., Fitzpatrick T. B., Malt R. A. Narrower margins for clinical stage I malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 25;306(8):479–482. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202253060810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elder D. E., Guerry D., 4th, Heiberger R. M., LaRossa D., Goldman L. I., Clark W. H., Jr, Thompson C. J., Matozzo I., Van Horn M. Optimal resection margin for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Jan;71(1):66–72. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198301000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta T. K. Results of treatment of 269 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: a five-year prospective study. Ann Surg. 1977 Aug;186(2):201–209. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197708000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGovern V. J., Shaw H. M., Milton G. W., Farago G. A. Prognostic significance of the histological features of malignant melanoma. Histopathology. 1979 Sep;3(5):385–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1979.tb03020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pitt T. T. Aspects of surgical treatment for malignant melanoma: the place of biopsy and wide excision. Aust N Z J Surg. 1977 Dec;47(6):757–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1977.tb06619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES