Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1986 May;203(5):474–480. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198605000-00005

Cost-effectiveness of fine needle biopsy of the breast.

D R Lannin, J F Silverman, C Walker, W J Pories
PMCID: PMC1251147  PMID: 3085603

Abstract

Although fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the breast has been shown to be a safe and accurate technique, many surgeons question whether it is reliable enough to replace excisional biopsy. If FNA biopsy is followed by excisional biopsy for confirmation, it would seem that the cost of diagnostic work-up would be increased. In this study, however, the authors show that the major economic benefit of FNA biopsy is not that it replaces excisional biopsy, but that it allows the surgeon to triage which patients should have a 1-stage inpatient procedure with frozen section and which patients should have an excisional biopsy as an outpatient under local anesthesia. Over the past 2 years, the average cost at the East Carolina University School of Medicine of excisional outpatient biopsy (negative) was +702 +/- 348; inpatient biopsy (negative) was +1410 +/- 262; inpatient 1-stage procedure (positive) was +4135 +/- 361; and outpatient biopsy (positive) followed by inpatient procedure was +4822 +/- 586. The authors' last 100 FNA biopsies were read as 23 positive, three suspicious, 65 negative, and nine insufficient. There were no false-positives and four false-negatives, for a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 96%. Using the above figures, it is possible to calculate the cost per case if all 100 cases had been biopsied by the 1-stage inpatient technique (+2227), by the 2-stage outpatient method (+1938), or guided by the FNA biopsy where positive and suspicious readings are followed by an inpatient 1-stage procedure and negative and insufficient readings followed by an outpatient 2-stage procedure (+1759). Since the FNA biopsy costs +75, it resulted in a savings per case of +393 over routine inpatient biopsy and +104 per case over routine outpatient biopsy. Computer analysis revealed that the FNA biopsy would still be economically favorable if the sensitivity of the test fell as low as 37%, the specificity as low as 80%, or if the percentage of cases of cancer in the population biopsied fell as low as 13%. Since FNA biopsy is cost effective even when followed by an excisional or frozen section biopsy for confirmation, it would be safe and reasonable to expand its use to smaller hospitals where the personnel may be initially less experienced with the technique.

Full text

PDF
478

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abele J. S., Miller T. R., Goodson W. H., 3rd, Hunt T. K., Hohn D. C. Fine-needle aspiration of palpable breast masses. A program for staged implementation. Arch Surg. 1983 Jul;118(7):859–863. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390070067013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beatty J. D., Robinson G. V., Zaia J. A., Benfield J. R., Kemeny M. M., Meguid M. M., Riihimaki D. U., Terz J. J., Lemmelin M. E. A prospective analysis of nosocomial wound infection after mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1983 Dec;118(12):1421–1424. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390120049013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell D. A., Hajdu S. I., Urban J. A., Gaston J. P. Role of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of mammary lesions in office practice. Cancer. 1983 Apr 1;51(7):1182–1189. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830401)51:7<1182::aid-cncr2820510703>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caffee H. H., Benfield J. R. Data favoring biopsy of the breast under local anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Jan;140(1):88–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doberneck R. C. Breast biopsy: a study of cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg. 1980 Aug;192(2):152–156. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198008000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher B. Reappraisal of breast biopsy prompted by the use of lumpectomy. Surgical strategy. JAMA. 1985 Jun 28;253(24):3585–3588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frable W. J. Needle aspiration of the breast. Cancer. 1984 Feb 1;53(3 Suppl):671–676. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<671::aid-cncr2820531313>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardecki T. I., Hogbin B. M., Melcher D. H., Smith R. S. Aspiration cytology in the preoperative management of breast cancer. Lancet. 1980 Oct 11;2(8198):790–792. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90396-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunt T. K., Crass R. A. Breast biopsies on outpatients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Oct;141(4):591–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kambouris A. A. The role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of solid breast tumors. Am Surg. 1983 Jun;49(6):310–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kline T. S., Joshi L. P., Neal H. S. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: diagnoses and pitfalls. A review of 3545 cases. Cancer. 1979 Oct;44(4):1458–1464. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197910)44:4<1458::aid-cncr2820440440>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyer J. S., Schechtman K., Valdes R., Jr Estrogen and progesterone receptor assays on breast carcinoma from mastectomy specimens. Cancer. 1983 Dec 1;52(11):2139–2143. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831201)52:11<2139::aid-cncr2820521127>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newsome J. F., Avis F. P., Hammond J. E., Sherwood S. Sampling procedures in estrogen receptor determinations. Ann Surg. 1981 May;193(5):549–554. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198105000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Norton L. W., Davis J. R., Wiens J. L., Trego D. C., Dunnington G. L. Accuracy of aspiration cytology in detecting breast cancer. Surgery. 1984 Oct;96(4):806–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Norton L. W., Davis J. R., Wiens J. L., Trego D. C., Dunnington G. L. Accuracy of aspiration cytology in detecting breast cancer. Surgery. 1984 Oct;96(4):806–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rimsten A., Stenkvist B., Johanson H., Lindgren A. The diagnostic accuracy of palpation and fine-needle biopsy and an evaluation of their combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions: report on a prospective study in 1244 women with symptoms. Ann Surg. 1975 Jul;182(1):1–8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197507000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Saltzstein E. C., Mann R. W., Chua T. Y., DeCosse J. J. Outpatient breast biopsy. Arch Surg. 1974 Aug;109(2):287–290. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1974.01360020147028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strawbridge H. T., Bassett A. A., Foldes I. Role of cytology in management of lesions of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Jan;152(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Teicher I., Tinker M. A., Auguste L. J., Laufer H., Stein T. A., Wise L. Effect of operative devascularization on estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in breast cancer specimens. Surgery. 1985 Oct;98(4):784–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ulanow R. M., Galblum L., Canter J. W. Fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and management of solid breast lesions. Am J Surg. 1984 Nov;148(5):653–657. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90345-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walker G. M., 2nd, Foster R. S., Jr, McKegney C. P., McKegney F. P. Breast biopsy. A comparison of outpatient and inpatient experience. Arch Surg. 1978 Aug;113(8):942–946. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370200036007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wanebo H. J., Feldman P. S., Wilhelm M. C., Covell J. L., Binns R. L. Fine needle aspiration cytology in lieu of open biopsy in management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):569–579. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198405000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES