Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research logoLink to Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
. 1989 Oct;53(4):497–499.

Comparative assessment of a double antibody enzyme immunoassay test kit and a triple antibody enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis spiralis and Trichinella spiralis nativa infections in swine.

H J Smith 1, K E Snowdon 1
PMCID: PMC1255584  PMID: 2686832

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays using the triple antibody enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with both Trichinella spiralis spiralis and T. spiralis nativa excretory-secretory (ES) antigens and a commercial Trichinella spiralis enzyme immunoassay test kit were carried out on sera from pigs that were infected with light, moderate and high doses of infective T. spiralis spiralis and T. spiralis nativa respectively. Seroconversion occurred in all pigs given infective Trichinella larvae although no trichinae were recovered from pigs given T. spiralis nativa larvae and examined between days 92 and 99 postinfection by pepsin digestion. Anti-Trichinella antibodies were detected in pigs infected with T. spiralis spiralis and T. spiralis nativa by ELISA using either the homologous or heterologous ES antigen. The commercial Trichinella spiralis enzyme immunoassay test kit also detected anti-Trichinella antibodies in both the T. spiralis spiralis and T. spiralis nativa infected pigs. The commercial test kit did not appear to be as sensitive as the triple antibody ELISA since it usually took two to three days longer for seroconversion to be detected by the former procedure. Finally seroconversion occurred more rapidly in swine infected with T. spiralis spiralis than with pigs receiving comparable doses of T. spiralis nativa.

Full text

PDF
499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gamble H. R., Anderson W. R., Graham C. E., Murrell K. D. Diagnosis of swine trichinosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an excretory--secretory antigen. Vet Parasitol. 1983 Nov;13(4):349–361. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(83)90051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kolata G. Testing for trichinosis. Science. 1985 Feb 8;227(4687):621–624. doi: 10.1126/science.3969551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meisinger D., Van Houweling C. D. Pork producers' points of view on residues and certain zoonoses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1986 Jan 15;188(2):134–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Murrell K. D., Anderson W. R., Schad G. A., Hanbury R. D., Kazacos K. R., Gamble H. R., Brown J. Field evaluation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for swine trichinosis: efficacy of the excretory-secretory antigen. Am J Vet Res. 1986 May;47(5):1046–1049. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith H. J. Comparison of pepsin-digestion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of trichinosis in swine. Can J Vet Res. 1988 Jan;52(1):63–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith H. J. Evaluation of the ELISA for the serological diagnosis of trichinosis in Canadian swine. Can J Vet Res. 1987 Apr;51(2):194–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith H. J., Snowdon K. E. Detection of Trichinella spiralis nativa antibodies in porcine sera by ELISA using T. spiralis spiralis excretory-secretory antigen. Can J Vet Res. 1987 Jul;51(3):413–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith H. J. Vaccination of rats and pigs against Trichinella spiralis spiralis using the subspecies, T. spiralis nativa. Can J Vet Res. 1987 Jul;51(3):370–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES