Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 Oct 28;13:RP99502. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99502

Neuronal migration depends on blood flow in the adult mammalian brain

Takashi Ogino 1,, Akari Saito 1,, Masato Sawada 1,2, Shoko Takemura 1, Yuzuki Hara 1, Kanami Yoshimura 1, Jiro Nagase 1, Honomi Kawase 1, Takamasa Sato 1, Hiroyuki Inada 3, Vicente Herranz-Pérez 4,5, Yoh-suke Mukouyama 6, Masatsugu Ema 7, José Manuel García-Verdugo 4, Junichi Nabekura 1,3, Kazunobu Sawamoto 1,2,
Editors: Aya Ito-Ishida8, Jonathan A Cooper9
PMCID: PMC12563554  PMID: 41146614

Abstract

In animal tissues, several cell types migrate along blood vessels, raising the possibility that blood flow influences cell migration. Here, we show that blood flow promotes the migration of new olfactory-bulb neurons in the adult mammalian brain. Neuronal migration is facilitated by blood flow, leading to accumulation of new neurons near blood vessels with abundant blood flow. Blood flow inhibition attenuates blood vessel-guided neuronal migration, suggesting that blood contains factors beneficial to neuronal migration. We found that ghrelin, which is increased in blood by hunger, directly influences neuronal migration. Ghrelin signaling promotes somal translocation by activating actin cytoskeleton contraction at the rear of the cell soma. New neurons mature in the olfactory bulb and contribute to the olfactory function for sensing odorants from food. Finally, we show that neuronal migration is increased by calorie restriction, and that ghrelin signaling is involved in the process. This study suggests that blood flow promotes neuronal migration through blood-derived ghrelin signaling in the adult brain, which could be one of the mechanisms that improves the olfactory function for food-seeking behavior during starvation.

Research organism: Mouse, Common marmoset

Introduction

Blood vessel-guided cell migration has been reported in various types of cells, including lymphatic endothelial cells in the embryonic zebrafish trunk (Bussmann et al., 2010), Schwann cells, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, glioma cells, and astrocyte progenitors in rodent tissues (Cattin et al., 2015; Farin et al., 2006; Tabata et al., 2022; Tsai et al., 2016), suggesting that it is a common mechanism for efficient cell migration within complex animal tissues. Previous reports have extensively studied the role of blood vessels as a physical scaffold for migration of neurons produced in the postnatal brain tissues (Bovetti et al., 2007; Fujioka et al., 2017; Grade et al., 2013; Ohab et al., 2006; Snapyan et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2015; Thored et al., 2007; Whitman et al., 2009; Yamashita et al., 2006). New neurons generated in the postnatal ventricular–subventricular zone (V-SVZ) migrate to the olfactory bulb (OB) through the rostral migratory stream (RMS), forming elongated aggregates called chains (Doetsch and Alvarez-Buylla, 1996; Lois et al., 1996; Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1994). Within the OB, new neurons migrate individually and radially and terminate their migration in the granule cell layer (GCL) or glomerular layer (GL), where they are differentiated into GABAergic interneurons and incorporated into the OB neural circuit (Bressan and Saghatelyan, 2020; Kaneko et al., 2017). Previous studies have shown that both chain-forming and individually migrating neurons use blood vessels as physical scaffolds for their migration in the RMS and OB (Bovetti et al., 2007; Snapyan et al., 2009; Whitman et al., 2009). However, whether blood flow plays a role in blood vessel-guided cell migration has not been reported.

Ghrelin, a peripheral hormone produced in the stomach, is delivered to the brain through the bloodstream and accumulates in the brain parenchyma, especially at high levels in the OB (Rhea et al., 2018). The ghrelin concentration in blood has been reported to increase during fasting (Toshinai et al., 2001; Tschöp et al., 2000). In addition to its role in regulating metabolism (Al Massadi et al., 2017; Chopin et al., 2012; Soleyman-Jahi et al., 2019; Stoyanova and Lutz, 2021), ghrelin influences neurogenesis in the V-SVZ and subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (Hornsby et al., 2016; Kent et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2015; Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2013; Moon et al., 2009). However, its role in blood vessel-guided neuronal migration has not been studied.

To elucidate the effects of blood flow on blood vessel-guided cell migration, we focused on neuronal migration along blood vessels in the adult RMS and OB. The results showed that new neurons migrate along blood vessels with high blood flow and that their migration is affected by changes in blood flow. We also found that ghrelin promotes neuronal migration through activation of actin cytoskeleton contraction at the rear of the cell soma, indicating that blood flow influences neuronal migration via ghrelin signaling. Furthermore, we found that calorie restriction promotes the migration of OB neurons, suggesting that the blood flow-dependent mechanism of neuronal migration could be part of a system to improve sensory function in response to physiological change in the body.

Results

New neurons migrate along blood vessels with abundant blood flow

Previous studies have revealed that V-SVZ-derived new neurons migrate along blood vessels in the RMS and GCL (Bovetti et al., 2007; Snapyan et al., 2009; Whitman et al., 2009). However, the neuron–vessel interactions along the entire migration route remain unknown. Therefore, we first studied blood vessel-guided neuronal migration in the RMS and OB using three-dimensional imaging in 6- to 12-week-old adult mice, which enables analysis of the in vivo spatial relationship between new neurons and blood vessels. We measured the distance from the soma of new neurons, labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-encoding adenovirus, to the nearest blood vessel labeled with RITC-Dex-GMA. The results showed that GFP+ new neurons interact closely with blood vessels in the RMS, GCL, external plexiform layer, and GL (Figure 1A–D, Figure 1—video 2; Figure 1—videos 1). In particular, in the RMS and GL, the majority of cells were present within 5 µm of the inner surface of vessels (Figure 1D), suggesting that new neurons in these regions frequently use blood vessels as migration scaffolds. To visualize blood vessels, we also used Flt1-DsRed transgenic mice, in which vascular endothelial cells were specifically labeled with DsRed (Matsumoto et al., 2012). Using Dcx-EGFP/Flt1-DsRed double transgenic mice, we observed close spatial relationships between new neurons and blood vessels (Figure 1—videos 3 and 4). Transmission electron microscopy revealed direct attachment of migratory neurons, identified as cells with an elongated cell body, a dark cytoplasm with many free ribosomes, and an electron-dense nucleus with multiple nucleoli (Doetsch et al., 1997), to thin astrocytic endfeet enwrapping blood vessels (Figure 1E), as previously reported in the RMS and GCL (Bovetti et al., 2007; Whitman et al., 2009). These results indicate that new neurons migrate along blood vessels through their entire migration route, suggesting the possibility that their movement may be influenced by blood flow.

Figure 1. New neurons migrate along blood vessels with abundant flow in the adult brain.

(A) Experimental scheme. (B) Three-dimensional reconstructed images of a new neuron (green) and blood vessels (red) in the rostral migratory stream (RMS) (B) and glomerular layer (GL) (C) of 6- to 12-week-old adult mice. (D) Distance between new neurons and nearest vessels in the olfactory bulb (OB) and RMS (one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test; three and four mice for the analysis in the OB and RMS, respectively). (E) Transmission electron microscopy image of a new neuron (green) in close contact with a blood vessel (red) in the GL of a 6- to 12-week-old adult mouse. Astrocytes (clear arrowheads). (F) Time-lapse images of a migrating neuron (indicated by asterisks) in the GL of a 6- to 12-week-old Dcx-EGFP mouse. Red blood cell (RBC) flow is recorded as a two-photon line-scan image as shown in the right panel. Stationary cells are indicated by sequential numbers. (G) Average distance between migrating cells and nearest blood vessels (41 cells from 38 mice). (H) Density of perivascular migrating cells (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; 10 mice). (I) Average migration speed (Welch’s t-test; low, 19 cells, high, 25 cells from 39 mice). (J) Percentage of migratory period (Mann–Whitney U-test; low, 19 cells, high, 24 cells from 38 mice). (K) Maximum migration speed (unpaired t-test; low, 22 cells, high, 24 cells from 39 mice). (L) Fluorescent images in the NG2-DsRed mouse GL. Arterioles, capillaries, and venules were characterized by band-like smooth muscle cells (solid arrowhead), pericytes (arrows), and fenestrated smooth muscle cells (clear arrowhead), respectively. CD31 (blue), DsRed (red). (M) Fluorescent image of a Dcx+/BrdU+ new neuron (solid arrowhead) attached to a capillary. Dcx (green), BrdU (blue), CD31 (blue, tube-like structures), DsRed (red). (N) Density of BrdU+/Dcx+ cells in the perivascular region of arteriole- and venule-side capillaries (paired t-test; three mice). (O) Two-photon images of GABAergic neurons (white) and a blood vessel (red) in the VGAT-Venus mouse GL. Circles show positions of added (yellow) and lost (pink) Venus+ cells. Added and lost neurons are indicated by yellow and pink arrows, respectively. RBC flow on Day 21 is shown in the right panel. (P) Density of newly added neurons in the perivascular region (paired t-test; seven mice). Data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars: B, 30 μm; C, 40 μm; E, 1 μm; F, 10 μm; M, 20 μm; N, 20 μm; P, 10 μm. See also Figure 1—figure supplements 13.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Directional migration of new neurons relative to local blood flow.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

New neuron–vessel interactions were categorized into four groups according to the angle between the migration direction and vessel axis (small: 0°–45°, 135°–180°; large: 45°–135°), and whether the new neurons were migrating toward or away from the direction of higher red blood cell (RBC) flow. Percentages represent the proportions of total interactions (n = 39 from 26 mice).
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. New neurons migrate along endomucin-negative vessels.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A, B) Representative images of vasculature in the glomerular layer (GL) of the olfactory bulb (OB). Red blood cell (RBC) flow was recorded in a live animal (A), followed by immunostaining of endomucin/CD31 in a fixed brain section (B). Identical vessels are indicated by different numbers (endomucin-positive; 2, 6, 7, endomucin-negative; 1, 3, 4, 5). (C) Average RBC flow in endomucin-positive and endomucin-negative vessels (Mann–Whitney U-test; endomucin-negative, 24 vessels, endomucin-positive, 46 vessels). (D) Fluorescent image of new neurons distributed in the vasculature in the GL. BrdU+/Dcx+ cells are shown in the perivascular region of endomucin-negative vessels (white arrowheads), endomucin-positive vessels (clear arrowhead), and distant from vessels (arrow). CD31 (magenta), endomucin (green, tube-like structures), Dcx (green), and BrdU (red). (E-H) Density of BrdU+/Dcx+ cells in the vicinity of endomucin-positive and endomucin-negative vessels in the GL (E), granule cell layer (F), and rostral migratory stream (OB core) (G) (paired t-test; four mice). (H) Density of BrdU+ mature neurons at 28 days post injection (dpi) in the vicinity of endomucin-positive and endomucin-negative vessels in the GL (paired t-test; four mice). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005. Scale bars: 20 μm (A, B); 20 μm (D).
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. New neurons exhibit a preference for arteriole-side vessels.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Fluorescent image of immunostained tissue sections from the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb. Dcx (green), BrdU (deep blue), CD31 (red), and SLC16A1 (green, tube-like structures). (B) Density of perivascular new neurons in the vicinity of SLC16A1-positive and SLC16A1-negative vessels (paired t-test; four mice). (C) Schematic illustration of the distribution of new neurons and vessel identification. (D) Fluorescent images of the ventral striatum from a 4-month-old common marmoset. Immature neurons are indicated by solid arrowheads. Dcx (green), SLC16A1 (deep blue), CD31 (red). (E, F) Density of BrdU+/Dcx+ cells in the vicinity of SLC16A1-positive and SLC16A1-negative vessels in the ventral striatum (E) (paired t-test; five animals) and in the neocortex (F). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. Scale bars: 20 μm (A); 20 μm (D).
Figure 1—video 1. A three-dimensional image from the rostral migratory stream of a Dcx-EGFP (green) mouse infused with RITC-Dex-GMA (red).
Download video file (2.2MB, mp4)
Figure 1—video 2. High-magnification view extracted from Figure 1—video 1.
Download video file (809.4KB, mp4)
Arrows indicate EGFP+ cells interacting with blood vessels.
Figure 1—video 3. A three-dimensional image from the rostral migratory stream of a Dcx-EGFP/Flt1-DsRed mouse.
Download video file (1.3MB, mp4)
EGFP (green), DsRed (red).
Figure 1—video 4. A three-dimensional, high-magnification image of chain-forming new neurons in the rostral migratory stream.
Download video file (919.1KB, mp4)
Dcx-EGFP (green), Flt1-DsRed (red). Arrows indicate EGFP+ cells interacting with blood vessels.
Figure 1—video 5. A three-dimensional image of immature neurons leaving the ventral ventricular–subventricular zone in a 1-month-old common marmoset infused with RITC-Dex-GMA (red).
Download video file (401.2KB, mp4)
Dcx (green). Arrows indicate Dcx+ cells interacting with blood vessels.
Figure 1—video 6. A three-dimensional image of an immature neuron from the ventral striatum in a 1-month-old common marmoset infused with RITC-Dex-GMA (red).
Download video file (314.1KB, mp4)
Dcx (green). Arrows indicate Dcx+ cells interacting with blood vessels.

To examine the relationship between neuronal migration and blood flow, we recorded movement of new neurons and red blood cell (RBC) flow using two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Neuronal migration was recorded in the GL of Dcx-EGFP mice, in which new neurons were labeled with enhanced GFP (EGFP) (Figure 1F). RBC flow was also recorded in each vessel segment in the GL by line-scan measurements (Figure 1F). We identified migrating new neurons as EGFP+ cells whose position changed during the imaging period in Dcx-EGFP mice, in which the majority of EGFP+ cells are stationary. Most EGFP+ migrating cells (90.2%) were located within 10 µm of the nearest vessel (Figure 1G). To compare the blood vessel-guided migration of new neurons among blood vessels with different flows, we classified the vessels into two groups, high- and low-flow vessels, using the median RBC flow velocity as the criterion (Figure 1H). New neurons were more abundant near high-flow vessels than near low-flow vessels (Figure 1H). These cells migrated at a small angle to the longitudinal axis of blood vessels (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), indicating that new neurons use blood vessels as migration scaffolds. Next, we compared the migration speed of new neurons between the low- and high-flow perivascular region, the area within 10 µm from the nearest vessel. Migration speed, as measured by the migration distance of the cell soma, was significantly higher in the perivascular region of high-flow vessels than in that of low-flow vessels (Figure 1I). A previous study showed that new neurons undergo discontinuous migration, including migratory and stationary periods in the GL (Liang et al., 2016). The proportion of the migratory period of new neurons in the total imaging period was larger in high-flow perivascular regions than in low-flow regions (Figure 1J). Furthermore, the maximum migration speed, calculated from two consecutive imaging frames, was significantly higher for neurons migrating along high-flow vessels than for those migrating along low-flow vessels (Figure 1K). These results suggest that neuronal migration is promoted in perivascular regions with abundant blood flow.

To compare the distribution of new neurons in perivascular regions with different blood flows in deep brain regions, we used endomucin, which has been reported to be downregulated by shear stress on vascular endothelial cells in vitro (Zahr et al., 2016). Endomucin-negative vessels showed higher RBC flow than endomucin-positive vessels (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A–C), indicating that endomucin can be used as a marker for RBC flow velocity in vivo. The density of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-labeled doublecortin (Dcx)+ new neurons was higher in the perivascular region of endomucin-negative vessels than in that of endomucin-positive vessels in the GL, GCL, and RMS (Figure 1—figure supplement 2D–G), suggesting that new neurons migrate along vessels with faster blood flow throughout their migration route.

We next compared the distribution of new neurons near arteriole- and venule-side vessels identified using SLC16A1, which is expressed in venules and venule-side capillaries (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018). The density of perivascular Dcx+/BrdU+ new neurons was significantly higher in SLC16A1-negative perivascular areas than in SLC16A1-positive areas (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A, B), indicating that they actively migrate in the vicinity of arteriole-side vessels (Figure 1—figure supplement 3C). To further examine the localization of perivascular new neurons, we analyzed the cell distribution in NG2-DsRed mice (Zhu et al., 2008), in which we could identify arterioles, venules, and capillaries based on the morphological differences in NG2+ mural cells as performed previously (Hartmann et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2015). Arterioles, capillaries, and venules were characterized by band-like smooth muscle cells, pericytes, and fenestrated-shaped smooth muscle cells, respectively (Figure 1L). A large proportion of Dcx+/BrdU+ new neurons was observed near capillaries in the GL (arterioles; 11.8 ± 2.39%, venules; 4.34 ± 0.212%, capillaries; 83.8 ± 2.25%) (Figure 1M). The frequency of perivascular neuronal migration was compared in arteriole- and venule-side capillaries (defined as capillaries one to three order branches away from the nearest arterioles and venules, respectively). The density of Dcx+/BrdU+ cells was higher near arteriole-side capillaries than that near venule-side capillaries (Figure 1N). Taken together, these data suggest that most neuronal migration occurs near capillaries and that new neurons prefer capillaries on the arteriole side to those on the venule side (Figure 1—figure supplement 3C).

Because blood vessel-guided neuronal migration in the adult brain is a conserved phenomenon across species (Akter et al., 2020; Kishimoto et al., 2011; Shvedov et al., 2024), we hypothesized that blood flow may also influence neuronal migration in other brain regions of primates. The neocortex, which supports higher-order brain functions and has undergone evolutionary expansion in primates, was selected as a target region. In common marmosets, but not in mice, V-SVZ-derived new neurons migrate toward the neocortex and ventral striatum (Akter et al., 2020; Figure 1—videos 5 and 6). In the ventral striatum of 3- to 4-month-old common marmosets, Dcx+ immature neurons localized more frequently near SLC16A1-negative vessels than near SLC16A1-positive vessels, regardless of migration modes (Figure 1—figure supplement 3D, E). A similar tendency was also observed in the neocortex (Figure 1—figure supplement 3F). These results suggest that immature neurons prefer to migrate along arteriole-side vessels in the common marmoset brain, and this phenomenon is common between rodents and primates.

Finally, we examined whether new neurons mature near high-flow vessels following their migration along these blood vessels. Neuronal maturation and blood flow were recorded in VGAT-Venus mice, in which GABAergic neurons are labeled with Venus. Maturation of new neurons was confirmed by observation of the same regions with an interval of 21 days (Figure 1O). The density of newly added neurons was significantly higher near high-flow vessels than near low-flow vessels (Figure 1P). Consistently, BrdU-labeled mature neurons were frequently observed in the perivascular region of endomucin-negative vessels (Figure 1—figure supplement 2H). These results suggest that blood vessel-guided neuronal migration supplies new neurons in regions of high blood flow.

Decreases in blood flow affect neuronal migration

To investigate the effects of blood flow on neuronal migration, we performed bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS), which decreases blood flow in the anterior portion of the brain (Hattori et al., 2016; Shibata et al., 2004). Lentiviruses expressing Venus were injected into the V-SVZ to label new neurons migrating toward the OB (Figure 2A). The proportion of Dcx+/Venus+ cells in the OB was significantly lower in the BCAS group compared with the Sham-operated group at 5 days post injection (dpi) (Figure 2B, C), suggesting that blood flow reduction impairs the tangential migration of new neurons in the RMS. To evaluate whether the reduced number of new neurons in the OB following BCAS (Figure 2B, C) is solely due to impaired migration, we examined cell proliferation and survival in the V-SVZ and RMS. Specifically, we quantified the density of Ki67+ proliferating cells and cleaved caspase-3+ apoptotic cells in the sham and BCAS groups. BCAS significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased cell death in both the V-SVZ and RMS (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), suggesting that reduced neurogenesis and/or survival may contribute to the decreased distribution of new neurons in the OB. To further examine the influence of blood flow changes on neuronal migration, we induced photothrombotic clot formation to reduce blood flow in individual vessels (Figure 2D). Migration of EGFP+ cells along vessels in Dcx-EGFP mice was recorded using two-photon imaging (Figure 2E). To prevent effects other than blood flow inhibition, clot formation was induced in upstream vessel fragments distant from vessels close to migrating neurons (Figure 2D). For clot formation, a restricted area of selected vessels was irradiated by a two-photon laser immediately after intravenous injection of rose bengal. Clot formation resulted in blood flow termination in downstream vessels (Figure 2F), which was followed by a decrease in the migration speed of EGFP+ new neurons along downstream vessels (Figure 2E, H). Laser irradiation without rose bengal did not affect the speed of neuronal migration (Figure 2G), indicating that the inhibition of neuronal migration was not due to laser irradiation. These data suggest that blood flow facilitates neuronal migration in the RMS and OB and that blood contains factors influencing neuronal migration.

Figure 2. Blood flow inhibition attenuates neuronal migration.

(A, D) Experimental schemes. (B) Fluorescent images of Venus+ new neurons (green) in the rostral migratory stream and olfactory bulb (OB). (C) Proportion of Venus+ cells in the OB in the Sham and bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) groups (Mann–Whitney U-test; Sham, six mice, BCAS, five mice). (E) Two-photon images of neuronal migration (arrows) before and after photothrombotic clot formation in a Dcx-EGFP mouse. A new neuron (green), a blood vessel (red). (F) Line-scan images from a blood vessel shown in (E). Comparison of migration speed before and after laser irradiation in the control (G) (paired t-test; six cells from six mice) and photothrombosis groups (H) (paired t-test; four cells from four mice). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n.s., not significant. Scale bars: B, 100 μm; E, 10 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) affects cell proliferation and survival in the ventricular–subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and rostral migratory stream (RMS).

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A, B) Fluorescent images of immunostained RMS tissue sections showing Ki67 (green) (A) and cleaved caspase-3 (green) (B). (C, D) Density of Ki67+ cells (C) and cleaved caspase-3+ cells (D) in the RMS and V-SVZ (unpaired t-test; Sham, seven mice, BCAS, seven mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm (A, B).

Ghrelin increases neuronal migration speed by promoting somal translocation

We focused on ghrelin, which can be delivered from the bloodstream to the brain parenchyma, including the OB tissue, by transcytosis across vascular walls (Rhea et al., 2018). In addition, a previous study showed that newly generated neurons expressed growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a), a ghrelin receptor, in the V-SVZ, RMS, and OB (Li et al., 2014). Consistent with this report, we detected Ghsr1a mRNA in Dcx+ new neurons in the V-SVZ, RMS, and OB (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). A previous study showed that migration of V-SVZ-derived new neurons is attenuated in ghrelin knockout mice (Li et al., 2014), suggesting that ghrelin stimulates neuronal migration. At first, to examine transcytosis of ghrelin in the OB, we introduced fluorescently labeled ghrelin into the bloodstream. We found an accumulation of fluorescent ghrelin in the RMS and OB as reported previously (Rhea et al., 2018; Figure 3A, B, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Fluorescence signals were observed in vascular endothelial cells and parenchymal tissue in the RMS and OB (Figure 3B), indicating that blood-derived ghrelin crosses the vascular wall into the brain parenchyma and is delivered to new neurons. In addition, we observed high levels of fluorescent signal in vascular endothelial cells of endomucin-negative, high-flow vessels (Figure 3C, D), which suggests that transcytosis of blood-derived ghrelin may occur more frequently in these vessels, potentially due to increased endothelial endocytosis. We found that some, but not all, vessels showed particularly strong fluorescent signals in parenchymal regions adjacent to the abluminal side of vascular endothelial cells, as visualized by CD31 immunostaining (Feng et al., 2004; Figure 3A′, A″). To quantify this observation, we defined two regions of interest: Area I (perivascular area), within 10 μm of the abluminal surface of CD31-positive endothelium; and Area II (distant area), located 10–20 μm away (Figure 3E). Of note, Area I corresponds to the perivascular region where new neurons are frequently observed (Figure 1). To determine whether ghrelin transcytosis occurs more frequently in high-flow vessels, we quantified signal gradients in the extra-vessel regions as fold changes (Area I/Area II), as illustrated in Figure 3E. The proportion of vessel segments with >1.5-fold increases was significantly higher in endomucin-negative vessels than in endomucin-positive ones (Figure 3F). Furthermore, vessel segments with >2-fold increases were observed exclusively in the endomucin-negative group (6.48% ± 1.18%). These data suggest that, in high-flow vessels, blood-derived ghrelin accumulates more in the immediate perivascular region than more distant areas. This supports the possibility that elevated blood flow increases the delivery of ghrelin to the vascular endothelium, enhancing its transcytosis into adjacent brain parenchyma. This mechanism may underlie the preferential migration of new neurons along high-flow perivascular regions, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 3. Ghrelin is delivered from the bloodstream to the rostral migratory stream (RMS) and olfactory bulb (OB) in the adult brain.

(A) Representative images of the OB of a fluorescent ghrelin-infused mouse (6- to 12-week-old). CD31 (red), fluorescent ghrelin (green). (A′, A′′) High-magnification images of boxed areas in (A). Arrowheads indicate fluorescent signals in parenchymal areas adjacent to the vascular endothelium. (B) Fluorescent images of neuronal migration along blood vessels in the external plexiform layer (EPL) and the RMS. CD31 (red), Dcx (magenta), fluorescent ghrelin (green). (C) Fluorescent images of blood vessels in the glomerular layer (GL). CD31 (white), endomucin (red), fluorescent ghrelin (green). (D) Normalized fluorescence signal intensity in vascular endothelial cells (paired t-test; three mice). (E) Schematic diagram for analyzing signal gradients in extra-vascular areas. (F) Percentage of vessel segments with >1.5-fold increases in Area I relative to Area II (paired t-test; three mice). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. Scale bars: A, 50 μm; B, 20 μm (EPL), 10 μm (RMS); C, 20 μm. See also Figure 3—figure supplements 1 and 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. New neurons express Ghsr1a mRNA in the adult brain.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Fluorescent images from the ventricular–subventricular zone (V-SVZ), rostral migratory stream (RMS), and olfactory bulb (OB) showing Dcx (green) and Ghsr1a mRNA (red). Arrowheads indicate Dcx+ cells with Ghsr1a mRNA puncta. (B) Quantification of Ghsr1a mRNA puncta per Dcx+ cell in the OB of the ad libitum (AL) and calorie restriction (CR) mice (AL, 68 cells from 3 mice, CR, 68 cells from 3 mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s., not significant.Scale bars: 10 μm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Blood-derived ghrelin enters the rostral migratory stream (RMS) and olfactory bulb (OB).

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A) Representative images of the OB from mice with saline injection (A) and with fluorescent ghrelin injection (B). High-magnification images are shown in (A′) and (B′). It was found that the experimental process did not affect the brightness of sections. CD31 (red), fluorescence (647 nm) (green). (C) Representative images of the OB section showing ghrelin fluorescence (647 nm, green), CD31 (red), and Dcx (magenta), covering the RMS, granule cell layer (GCL), external plexiform layer (EPL), and glomerular layer (GL). Scale bars: 100 μm (A–C).

To assess the direct effect of ghrelin on neuronal migration, we applied recombinant ghrelin to V-SVZ cultures, in which new neurons emerge and migrate as chains (Figure 4A). Ghrelin significantly increased the migration distance of these neurons (Figure 4B), indicating enhanced chain migration. We then used super-resolution time-lapse imaging to examine individually migrating neurons with or without knockdown (KD) of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a), a ghrelin receptor expressed in V-SVZ-derived new neurons (Li et al., 2014; Figure 4C). Ghrelin enhanced the migration speed of control (lacZ-KD) cells, indicating that it also facilitates individual migration (Figure 4D). V-SVZ-derived new neurons exhibit saltatory migration consisting of a migratory phase and a resting phase (Ota et al., 2014). Ghrelin application increased the migratory phase proportion (Figure 4E) but not the length of the migration cycle (Figure 4F), suggesting that ghrelin signaling elongates the migratory phase of neuronal migration. Cultured new neurons alternate between leading process extension and somal translocation (Figure 4C). Ghrelin application did not affect the length or speed of leading process extensions (Figure 4G, H). In contrast, the somal translocation speed and somal stride length were significantly increased by ghrelin application (Figure 4I, J). No such effects were observed in Ghsr1a-KD cells (Figure 4D, E, I, J), suggesting that ghrelin promotes neuronal migration through ghsr1a. Taken together, these results suggest that ghrelin signaling promotes somal translocation and thus increases the efficacy of neuronal migration.

Figure 4. Ghrelin promotes neuronal migration by activation of actin cup formation.

(A) Fluorescent images of Matrigel culture. Dcx (white). (B) Percentage of Dcx+ cells >200 μm distant from the edge of pellets (unpaired t-test; three independent cultures prepared on different days). (C) Time-lapse images of cultured new neurons expressing DsRed (red). The number above each panel indicates minutes after initiation of migration. (D-J) Migration speed (D), percentage of migratory phase (E), migration cycle (F), length/speed of leading process extension (G, H), and stride/speed of somal translocation (I, J) in neuronal migration (one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey–Kramer test; D–F; control/Ghrelin (−), 15 cells, control/Ghrelin (+), 13 cells, KD/Ghrelin (−), 13 cells, KD/Ghrelin (+), 18 cells, I, J; control/Ghrelin (−), 17 events, control/Ghrelin (+), 18 events, KD/Ghrelin (−), 14 events, KD/Ghrelin (+), 23 events). (K) Time-lapse images of actin cup formation (arrowheads) in the cell soma of new neurons. EGFP-UtrCH (green). Condensed dots of F-actin were scattered throughout the elongated cell soma in a control cell with ghrelin application. (L, M) Average duration of actin cups (L) and migration distance during actin cup formation (M) in new neurons (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Steel–Dwass test; control/Ghrelin (−), 79 cells, control/Ghrelin (+), 31 cells, KD/Ghrelin (−), 39 cells, KD/Ghrelin (+), 44 cells). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. Scale bars: A, 100 μm; C, 5 μm; K, 5 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—video 1. Actin cup imaging in control cells.
Download video file (190.5KB, mp4)
EGFP-UtrCH (green).
Figure 4—video 2. Actin cup imaging in ghsr1a-knockdown cells.
Download video file (155.8KB, mp4)
EGFP-UtrCH (green).

Ghrelin signaling has been reported to regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics in astrocytoma cells (Dixit et al., 2006), which led us to examine whether a similar mechanism operates in migrating neurons. Somal translocation of migrating cortical interneurons is driven by formation of the actin cup, an accumulation of F-actin at the rear of the cell soma (Martini and Valdeolmillos, 2010). Time-lapse imaging of cultured new neurons expressing EGFP fused to the calponin homology domain of utrophin (EGFP-UtrCH), a fluorescent reporter for F-actin (Burkel et al., 2007), revealed discontinuous formation of the actin cup at the rear of the cell soma (Figure 4K). Ghrelin application extended the duration of actin cup formation (Figure 4L) and increased the migration distance during actin cup formation (Figure 4M, Figure 4—video 1). These effects were not observed in Ghsr1a-KD cells (Figure 4L, M, Figure 4—video 2), suggesting that GHSR1a-mediated ghrelin signaling promotes somal translocation of new neurons by activation of actin cup formation at the rear of the cell soma.

To investigate the effects of ghrelin signaling on neuronal migration in the OB in vivo, a mixture of lentiviruses encoding either Ghsr1a-KD or control shRNA was injected into the OB core of the same mouse (Figure 5A). Of the total labeled Dcx+ cells, the percentage of Dcx+ cells reaching the GL was significantly lower in the Ghsr1a-KD group than that in the control group (Figure 5B, C), suggesting that ghrelin enhances individual radial migration of new neurons in the OB. Coinjection of control and Ghsr1a-KD lentiviruses into the same site allowed us to directly compare their effects under identical conditions. However, this approach may allow reciprocal interactions between neurons infected with different constructs, potentially confounding cell-autonomous effects. To address this, we also performed separate injections of control and Ghsr1a-KD lentiviruses into different mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). Consistent with the coinjection results, Ghsr1a-KD cells showed reduced distribution in the GL compared with that in control cells (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B), which supports that ghrelin signaling enhances neuronal migration in a cell-autonomous manner. When lentiviruses were injected into the V-SVZ (Figure 5D), Ghsr1a-KD (DsRed+) cells exhibited decreased distribution in the GL (Figure 5E, F) and increased distribution in the RMS compared with control (EmGFP+) cells (Figure 5G, H). These data indicate that ghrelin signaling facilitates both individual migration in the OB and chain migration in the RMS.

Figure 5. Ghrelin signaling promotes neuronal migration in the adult brain.

(A, D) Experimental schemes. Lentivirus injection into the olfactory bulb (OB) core (A) and the ventricular–subventricular zone (V-SVZ) (D) was performed in 6- to 12-week-old adult mice. (B) Fluorescent images of new neurons in the OB in (A). (C) Proportion of labeled cells in the GL at 5 days post injection (dpi) in (A) (paired t-test; three mice). (E, G) Fluorescent images of new neurons in the GL (E) and rostral migratory stream (RMS) (G) for the experiments shown in (D). Control cells (white arrowheads), Ghsr1a-KD cells (clear arrowheads). (F, H) Proportion of labeled cells in the GL (F) and the RMS (H) at 10 dpi. in (D) (paired t-test; four mice). (I) Experimental scheme. (J, K) Proportion of labeled cells in the GL at 8 dpi in the ad libitum (J) and calorie restriction (K) groups (Control, unpaired t-test; AL, four mice, CR, three mice) (KD, unpaired t-test; AL, four mice, CR, three mice). Control (green), Ghsr1a-KD (red). GL (glomerular layer), EPL (external plexiform layer), MCL (mitral cell layer), IPL (internal plexiform layer), GCL (granule cell layer), RMS (rostral migratory stream), AL (ad libitum), CR (calorie restriction). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, n.s., not significant.Scale bars: B, 100 μm; E, 40 μm; G, 40 μm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Ghrelin signaling is required for neuronal migration in the adult olfactory bulb (OB).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) Experimental scheme. (B) Proportion of labeled cells in the glomerular layer (GL) at 5 days post injection (dpi) (Welch’s t-test; Control, four mice; Ghsr1a-KD, five mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Ghsr1a-KD does not affect cell proliferation of new neurons in the rostral migratory stream (RMS).

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A) Fluorescent image of immunostained RMS tissue sections showing Ki67 (red) and labeled cells (green). Ki67+ labeled cells are indicated by clear arrowheads. (B) Quantification of Ki67+ cells as a percentage of the total labeled cells in the RMS at 5 days post injection (dpi) (Control, five mice; Ghsr1a-KD, six mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s., not significant. Scale bars: 5 μm (A).
Figure 5—figure supplement 3. Ghsr1a-KD does not affect the influence of bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS) on neuronal migration.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

(A) Experimental timeline. (B) Proportion of Ghsr1a-KD cells in the olfactory bulb (OB) at 5 days post injection (dpi) (unpaired t-test; Control, five mice; Ghsr1a-KD, five mice). (C) Normalized density of labeled cells in perivascular regions of the rostral migratory stream (RMS) (paired t-test; Control + Sham, five mice; Control + BCAS, seven mice; Ghsr1a-KD+Sham, five mice; Ghsr1a-KD + BCAS, five mice). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4. Calorie restriction (CR) promotes neuronal maturation in the olfactory bulb (OB).

Figure 5—figure supplement 4.

(A) Experimental scheme. (B) Fluorescent images of new neurons in the OB. BrdU (green), NeuN (red), Dcx (magenta). A NeuN-/Dcx+ cell (white arrow), NeuN+/Dcx+ cells (white arrowheads), NeuN+/Dcx− cells (yellow arrowheads). (C) Proportion of NeuN+/Dcx− cells among total BrdU+ cells in the OB (KD, unpaired t-test; ad libitum [AL], three mice; CR, four mice). IPL (internal plexiform layer), GCL (granule cell layer). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. Scale bars: 50 μm (B).

To determine whether the altered distribution of new neurons after Ghsr1a-KD is due to impaired migration rather than changes in cell production or survival, we assessed the effects of Ghsr1a-KD on the proliferation and survival of new neurons and their progenitors, which express GHSR1a (Li et al., 2014). We quantified the proportion of cleaved caspase-3+ cells and Ki67+ cells from the total labeled cells in the V-SVZ and RMS in both control and Ghsr1a-KD groups. We found no significant difference in cleaved caspase-3+ cell proportions between the groups (Control: 874 cells from five mice; Ghsr1a-KD: 678 cells from seven mice), suggesting that ghrelin signaling does not influence the survival of new neurons and their progenitors. Similarly, the percentage of Ki67 + cells in the RMS was similar between the two groups (Figure 5—figure supplement 2), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not impair cell proliferation in the RMS. However, technical limitations prevented a reliable evaluation of proliferation in the V-SVZ, as lentivirus injection into this region may interfere with GHSR1a expression in not only neural progenitors and new neurons, but also other ghsr1a-expressing cell types (Zigman et al., 2006). Although ghrelin signaling has been reported to promote cell proliferation in the V-SVZ (Li et al., 2014), our complementary in vitro KD experiments (Figure 4C–J) and in vivo OB-core lentivirus injections (Figure 5A–C), which did not affect the V-SVZ, consistently demonstrated that Ghsr1a-KD reduces neuronal migration. Taken together, our results suggest that blood-derived ghrelin enhances neuronal migration in the RMS and OB by stimulating actin cytoskeleton contraction in the cell soma, rather than by altering cell proliferation or survival.

As shown in Figure 3, ghrelin transcytosis preferentially occurs in high-flow blood vessels, indicating that ghrelin contributes to blood flow-dependent neuronal migration. However, the extent to which this process depends on ghrelin signaling remained unclear. To investigate this, we combined Ghsr1a-KD with BCAS. We found that BCAS reduced the percentage of Ghsr1a-KD new neurons reaching the OB, similar to the effect seen in control neurons (Figure 5—figure supplement 3A, B, see also Figure 2A–C). This suggests that blood flow influences neuronal migration even under Ghsr1a-KD conditions. Furthermore, we analyzed the distribution of Ghsr1a-KD neurons with respect to vessel flow characteristics. Even under Ghsr1a-KD, a higher proportion of new neurons were located in the area of endomucin-negative (high-flow) vessels compared with endomucin-positive (low-flow) vessels (Figure 5—figure supplement 3C), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not abolish the preferential association of migrating neurons with high-flow vessels. These findings suggest that ghrelin signaling is involved, but is not essential, for the blood flow-dependent guidance of migrating neurons, and that additional blood-derived signals may contribute to this process.

Finally, we examined whether CR, which has been reported to increase blood ghrelin levels (Toshinai et al., 2001; Tschöp et al., 2000), affects neuronal migration. We used a 70% CR protocol, which was previously reported to enhance hippocampal neurogenesis over 14 days (Hornsby et al., 2016). In our study, mice were fed 70% of their daily ad libitum (AL) food intake levels for 5 days (Figure 5I, Figure 5—figure supplement 4A). The proportion of labeled cells in the GL (Figure 5J) and NeuN+/Dcx− cells among BrdU+ cells in the OB (Figure 5—figure supplement 4B, C) was larger in the CR group than in the AL group. However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of Ghsr1a-KD cells in the GL between the control and CR groups (Figure 5K). We found no significant difference in the Ghsr1a expression level in OB Dcx+ cells between the AL and CR groups (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B). Taken together, these data suggest that blood flow promotes the migration of OB neurons during starvation via ghrelin signaling and that promoted migration of new neurons increases the number of mature neurons in the OB.

Discussion

Previous studies have shown the role of blood vessels as physical scaffolds in the migratory routes of new neurons in various situations (Bovetti et al., 2007; Fujioka et al., 2017; Grade et al., 2013; Kojima et al., 2010; Ohab et al., 2006; Snapyan et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2015; Thored et al., 2007; Whitman et al., 2009; Yamashita et al., 2006). Proteins expressed by vascular cells have been reported to facilitate neuronal migration by binding to transmembrane receptors of new neurons (Fujioka et al., 2017; Grade et al., 2013; Ohab et al., 2006; Snapyan et al., 2009). However, whether neuronal migration is affected by blood flow remains unknown. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the specific feature of the vasculature as a pipeline for blood delivery. The effects of blood flow on neuronal migration are difficult to detect with previously used experimental procedures such as immunohistochemistry of vascular endothelial cell markers in fixed tissue sections and time-lapse live imaging of brain slice cultures. Therefore, we classified blood vessels using molecular markers that reflect blood flow properties and performed in vivo live imaging to record blood flow. This approach enabled us to reveal the effects of blood flow on neuronal migration.

Previous studies reported that new neurons migrate along blood vessels in the RMS and GCL of the OB (Bovetti et al., 2007; Snapyan et al., 2009; Whitman et al., 2009). In the present study, three-dimensional imaging was performed over a wide area across the entire migration route in transparent brains, where the positional relationship between new neurons and blood vessels can be observed. The results suggest that new neurons use blood vessels as migration scaffolds throughout their migration route (Figure 1A–D). The distance we found between new neurons and blood vessels was larger than that reported in a previous study (Snapyan et al., 2009). This might be due to our method of measuring the distance from the blood vessels to the cell soma of new neurons, rather than the distance to the entire new neurons. To investigate the effects of blood flow on blood vessel-guided neuronal migration, we used two-photon imaging to record neuronal migration and blood flow in vivo in the GL in the superficial area of the OB, which is a useful model for analyzing blood vessel-guided neuronal migration. The results suggest that new neurons migrate faster near blood vessels with high flow than in the areas of those with low flow. Neural stem cells have been reported to increase blood flow in the adult V-SVZ (Lacar et al., 2012), raising the possibility that new neurons may increase blood flow in the OB. However, our observation that inhibition of blood flow suppressed neuronal migration suggests that blood flow facilitates neuronal migration. New neurons terminated their migration and differentiated into mature interneurons in perivascular regions with abundant flow. Thus, the blood flow-dependent mechanism of neuronal migration may supply new neurons to areas appropriate for their function.

We found that the migration speed of new neurons was decreased by blood flow reduction, suggesting that neuronal migration depends on blood flow in the adult brain. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that BCAS alters the cell proliferation or survival of new neurons, our photothrombotic clot formation experiments are better suited to directly examine how acute reductions in blood flow influence neuronal migration. These experiments allowed us to assess the migration speed of new neurons shortly after inducing localized blood flow inhibition. Based on the finding that neuronal migration was attenuated in our BCAS and photothrombosis experiments, we hypothesized that a blood-derived factor facilitates neuronal migration. A previous study demonstrated that the migration of V-SVZ-derived new neurons was attenuated in ghrelin knockout mice (Li et al., 2014). In our study, we found that the migration of cultured new neurons was enhanced by the application of ghrelin to the culture medium, and this effect was abolished by Ghsr1a-KD. These findings suggest that ghrelin directly stimulates neuronal migration through its receptor, GHSR1a, on new neurons. A previous study showed that GHSR1a is expressed in various regions of the brain (Zigman et al., 2006). In our experiments, new neuron-specific KD of Ghsr1a indicated that ghrelin signaling acts in a cell-autonomous manner to regulate neuronal migration. Nevertheless, a recent study (Stark et al., 2024) showed that GHSR1a was expressed in various cell types, including glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, suggesting that ghrelin may also exert non-cell-autonomous effects on neuronal migration. Given the presence of diverse cell types—such as neurons, microglia, pericytes, and astrocytes—along the migratory route, it remains possible that GHSR1a activation in these neighboring cells contributes to the overall regulation of neuronal migration.

Furthermore, we identified the cellular and cytoskeletal mechanisms underlying this effect on migration. The results indicate that ghrelin enhances somal translocation during migration by activating actin cytoskeletal dynamics at the rear of the neuronal soma. We also found that ghrelin signaling increases the migration distance of cell soma, which increases the migratory phase duration. Further studies are needed to elucidate how ghrelin promotes actin cup formation in migrating neurons. Given that Rac, a Rho family GTPase, mediates actin remodeling downstream of ghrelin in astrocytoma cells (Dixit et al., 2006), it is possible that Rac may also be involved in ghrelin-induced cytoskeletal regulation in new neurons. In addition to actin remodeling, ghrelin may regulate microtubule dynamics. Ghrelin signaling was shown to modulate microtubules via SFK-dependent phosphorylation of α-tubulin (Slomiany and Slomiany, 2017), raising the possibility that ghrelin promotes somal translocation of new neurons through coordinated regulation of both actin and microtubule networks (Kaneko et al., 2017). These results suggest that ghrelin signaling promotes neuronal migration in the RMS and OB in vivo, which could further strengthen our finding that blood flow plays a role in neuronal migration.

Furthermore, we found that blood-derived ghrelin crosses the vascular wall into the RMS and OB. Although we could not exclude the possibility that ghrelin is produced in the brain parenchyma (Howick et al., 2017), these results suggest that blood-derived ghrelin is provided to new neurons and promotes somal translocation by activating actin cup formation. Our results indicate that higher blood flow delivers a larger amount of ghrelin to the vascular endothelium, resulting in increased ghrelin transcytosis across vascular walls. It is possible that high blood flow increases the amount of ghrelin reaching the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells, thereby increasing the possibility of ghrelin transcytosis into the brain parenchyma. Our findings suggest that blood-derived ghrelin contributes to the blood flow-dependent neuronal migration.

Because blood ghrelin levels increase during fasting (Toshinai et al., 2001; Tschöp et al., 2000), we examined the possibility that neurogenesis in the OB is affected by feeding conditions. We found that CR promoted the migration of OB neurons, an effect which was canceled by Ghsr1a-KD, suggesting that CR facilitates the OB neurogenesis through ghrelin signaling. A recent study demonstrated that fasting elevated Ghsr1a expression in the OB (Stark et al., 2024), raising the possibility that CR may have a similar effect. However, in our analysis, the number of Ghsr1 mRNA puncta in Dcx+ new neurons did not differ between the AL and CR groups (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B), suggesting that CR does not alter GHSR1a expression levels in new neurons. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that CR modulates GHSR1a expression in other OB cell types, our combined CR and Ghsr1a-KD experiments support a cell-autonomous contribution of ghrelin signaling to CR-induced enhancement of neuronal migration. Although our data indicate that ghrelin signaling is essential for fasting-induced acceleration of neuronal migration, CR may also alter the concentrations of other circulating factors (Alogaiel et al., 2025; Bonnet et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2024), which could independently influence the behavior of migrating neurons. Since the supply of new neurons to the OB has been suggested to improve olfactory function in food-seeking behavior (Lazarini and Lledo, 2011), increased neurogenesis caused by long-term CR may contribute to improved olfactory function for food seeking during starvation.

The increased speed of somal translocation and elongated duration of the migratory phase in cultured new neurons are in accord with the in vivo increase in migration speed and duration of the migratory period of new neurons around high-flow vessels, respectively. Effective somal translocation has been suggested to be advantageous for cell migration in densely packed tissues (Kengaku, 2018). It is possible that the promotion of somal translocation by ghrelin signaling and blood flow overcomes difficulties in smooth migration of new neurons in dense tissues of the adult brain.

Our data showed that new neurons preferentially migrate along arteriole-side vessels rather than venule-side vessels in both mouse and common marmoset brains, suggesting that the mechanism of blood flow-dependent neuronal migration is conserved across rodent and primate species, as well as across brain regions. A previous study identified a ghrelin homolog in the common marmoset with high sequence similarity to the murine version (Takemi et al., 2016). In addition, the marmoset GHSR1a homolog shares 95.36% amino acid identity with that of the mouse (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/380748978). These findings suggest that blood-derived ghrelin promotes neuronal migration in the common marmoset brain in a manner similar to that in mice. Previous reports have shown that new neurons migrate along blood vessels to damaged areas after brain injury (Fujioka et al., 2017; Grade et al., 2013; Kojima et al., 2010; Ohab et al., 2006; Thored et al., 2007; Yamashita et al., 2006). Neuronal migration may be influenced by blood flow under pathological conditions as well as during blood vessel-guided migration under the physiological conditions shown in this study. It is possible that blood contains factors in addition to ghrelin that regulate neuronal migration. Blood flow may coordinate biological events between different organs by sending beneficial factors produced outside the brain to influence regionally restricted neuronal migration. Further studies could identify unknown factors involved in the mechanism of blood flow-dependent cell migration, which could contribute to the development of blood flow-based therapies for neurological diseases.

Materials and methods

Animals

All in vivo experiments were performed on 6- to 12-week-old C57BL/6J male mice. Wild-type mice were purchased from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan). The following transgenic (Tg) mice were used: Dcx-EGFP BAC Tg mice (Dcx-EGFP) (Gong et al., 2003) provided by the Mutant Mouse Research Resource Center (MMRRC), VGAT-Venus BAC Tg line #39 (VGAT-Venus) (Wang et al., 2009), Flt1-tdsDsRed BAC Tg mice (Flt1-DsRed) (Matsumoto et al., 2012), and NG2-DsRed BAC Tg mice (NG2-DsRed) (Zhu et al., 2008). Cells were dissociated from postnatal day 0–1 (P0–P1) pups for in vitro experiments. Three- to four-month-old postnatal common marmosets were obtained from three mating pairs in a domestic animal colony and used for immunohistochemistry. All animals were housed under a 12-hr light/dark cycle with AL access to food and water. All experiments involving live animals were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of Nagoya City University and the National Institute for Physiological Sciences.

BrdU administration

BrdU (MilliporeSigma), dissolved in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), was intraperitoneally administered to mice (50 mg/kg) twice with an interval of 2 hr. Mice were fixed at 10 dpi to observe immature neurons or 28 dpi to observe mature olfactory neurons.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described for brain tissues of mice (Sawada et al., 2011) and common marmosets (Akter et al., 2020). Animals were transcardially perfused with PBS (pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB). The brains were removed from the skull and postfixed in the same fixative (24 hr for mice, 48 hr for common marmosets). Coronal sections were prepared using a vibratome (VT-1200S; Leica) (50 μm thick in mice, 60 μm thick in common marmosets). The sections were incubated with 10% normal donkey serum/0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS (blocking solution) for 30 min at room temperature (RT), the primary antibodies in blocking solution for 24 hr at 4°C, and AlexaFluor-/biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen) in the same solution for 2 hr at RT. For signal amplification, the sections were pretreated with 1% H2O2 in PBS for 40 min at RT before blocking. The signals were amplified with biotin-conjugated antibodies and a Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories) and visualized using Tyramide Signal Amplification (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For BrdU staining, sections were treated with 1 M HCl at 37°C for 30 min after 1% H2O2 treatment. After staining, the sections were mounted with aqueous mounting medium (PermaFluor, Lab Vision Corporation). Z-stack images were obtained using an LSM700 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 20× objective (512 × 512 pixels, 1.25 μm per pixel, 1 μm z-step size). For cell density analysis, the perivascular region was defined as the area within 10 μm of the edge of CD31+ vessels. BrdU administration was performed to identify relatively immature cells in the Dcx+ cell population including newly generated cells with different differentiation states.

The following primary antibodies were used: rat anti-GFP (1:500, 04404-84, Nacalai Tesque, Inc); rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, No. 598, Medical and Biological Laboratories Co, Ltd); rabbit anti-DsRed (1:2000, 632496, Clontech); guinea pig anti-doublecortin (Dcx) (1:400, ab2253, MilliporeSigma); rabbit anti-Dcx (1:500, #4604, Cell Signaling Technology); rat anti-CD31 (1:100, 550274, BD Biosciences); mouse anti-human CD31 (1:100, Dako); rat anti-endomucin (1:500, sc-65495, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); rat anti-BrdU (1:100, ab6326, Abcam); rabbit anti-NeuN (1:1000, ab177487, abcam); rabbit anti-SLC16A1 (1:500, TA321556, Origene); rat anti-Ki67 (1:500, #14-5698-82, eBioscience); and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:200, #9661, Cell Signaling Technology). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (1:5000, H1399, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Three-dimensional imaging

For obtaining three-dimensional images from the RMS, new neurons were visualized in Dcx-EGFP or Dcx-EGFP/Flt1-DsRed mice. Because the population of EGFP+ cells includes not only V-SVZ-derived migrating new neurons but also other types of cells in Dcx-EGFP, new neurons were labeled with adenoviruses encoding enhanced GFP (Ad-GFP, Vector Biolabs) for the analysis of new neuron–blood vessel interactions. Adenoviruses were stereotaxically injected into the V-SVZ (1.0 mm anterior, 1.1 mm lateral to bregma, and 1.6–2.0 mm deep) to label new neurons in the RMS and injected into the RMS (2.8 mm anterior, 0.82 mm lateral to bregma, and 2.8–3.0 mm deep) to label new neurons in the OB. The blood vessel lumen was visualized with RITC-Dex-GMA as previously reported with modifications (Miyawaki et al., 2020). At 5 dpi, mice were transcardially perfused with PBS and 4% PFA/0.1 M PB followed by RITC-Dex-GMA. Mouse bodies were incubated in a 37°C water bath for 3 hr for polymerization. The brains were postfixed with SHIELD solutions (Lifecanvas Technologies) as previously reported (Park et al., 2018). Then, they were cleared using SmartClear II Pro (Lifecanvas Technologies). For visualization of new neurons in the common marmoset brain, the brains were incubated in 10% normal donkey serum/0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min, the anti-Dcx primary antibody in blocking solution for 5 days, and the AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen) in the same solution for 3 days at 37°C. Refractive index matching was performed using EasyIndex (Lifecanvas Technologies) before imaging. Z-stack images were acquired with a light-sheet fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 5× and 20× objective (1216 × 1216 pixels, 1.3 μm per pixel, 1.2–1.4 μm z-step size). Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed using Imaris software (Oxford instruments) (https://imaris.oxinst.jp/). The three-dimensional distance was measured using ZEN software (Carl Zeiss) (https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/ja/products/software/zeiss-zen.html) in light-sheet Z-stack images containing all of the GFP-positive cells in the OB hemisphere per mouse.

Bilateral carotid artery stenosis

BCAS was performed as previously described with modifications (Hattori et al., 2016; Shibata et al., 2004). After midline incision of the mouse cervical region, microcoils with an inner diameter of 0.18 mm (Sawane Spring Co, Ltd) were wrapped around the common carotid arteries on both sides. Blood flow changes were confirmed by laser Doppler flowmetry in the anterior regions of brains (data not shown). A lentivirus encoding CSII-EF-Venus was stereotaxically injected into the V-SVZ to label new neurons. To analyze the cell distribution in the RMS and OB, mice were fixed at 5 dpi when glial activation is reported not to occur (Shibata et al., 2004).

Two-photon imaging

As described previously (Sawada et al., 2011), thinned-skull surgery was performed on wild-type mice for comparisons between RBC flow and endomucin expression in identical vessels and on Dcx-EGFP and VGAT-Venus mice for observation of neuronal migration and maturation, respectively. Blood vessels were visualized by intravenous injection of Rhodamine-B dextran (D1841, Invitrogen) or Fluorescein dextran (D1823, Invitrogen). Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane. The heads were immobilized with ear bars on a stereotactic stage before surgery. The skull over the OB was carefully thinned with a high-speed drill (MINITER Co, Ltd) and a surgical blade (Fine Science Tools). The thinned-skull window was observed under a two-photon laser scanning microscope (Nikon) and mode-locked system at 950 nm (Mai Tai HP, Spectra Physics) with a 25× water-immersion objective. Neuronal migration was recorded by identification of EGFP+ cells that changed their positions during the imaging period in the whole visible imaging field. During imaging, mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of a mixture of medetomidine (Meiji Seika Pharma Co, Ltd), midazolam (SANDOZ), and butorphanol (Meiji Seika Pharma Co, Ltd) (0.75, 4, and 5 mg/kg, respectively) and kept on a heating pad for maintenance of the body temperature at 37°C. Image stacks (2048 × 2048 pixels, 0.25 µm per pixel, 2 µm z-step size) were acquired every 30–60 min during 3 hr. RBC flow was recorded by serial line scans as previously reported (Kleinfeld et al., 1998). Line-shaped regions of interest were drawn along the longitudinal axis of each blood vessel. The RBC flow/s was calculated from repetitive scans obtained during 10 s at the beginning of the neuronal-migration recording. The median RBC flow velocity (38.4 RBCs/s) was used as a criterion for classification of vessels with different blood flows, whose distribution is not normal. Neuronal maturation was recorded as previously described with modifications (Sawada et al., 2011). After mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation, the thinned-skull window was observed to record positions of Venus+ cells and RBC flow from each vessel in square-shaped regions (512 × 512 pixels, 0.5 µm per pixel, 2 µm z-step size). The same region of the GL was observed with an interval of 21 days. Stationary cells were defined as cells that were observed in the same position at both time points. Maturation and cell death in the GL were identified as addition and loss of Venus+ cells at the second time point. Data analysis was performed using NIS Element software (Nikon) (https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/ja_JP/products/software/nis-elements).

Photothrombotic clot formation

Photothrombotic clot formation was performed as previously reported with modifications (Schaffer et al., 2006). After identification of a blood vessel close to migrating neurons, an upstream vessel fragment was surrounded by a rectangular region of interest. Mice were intravenously injected with 20 mg/ml rose bengal (330000, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS at concentration 0.05 mg/g. Immediately after injection, a selected fragment was irradiated using a two-photon laser at 950 nm. Irradiation by a 100-mW laser was performed for 5–10 s until the clot formed. The inner space of the vessel was equally irradiated by continuous movement of the imaging area. Ten minutes after the introduction of rose bengal, the RBC flow of a target vessel was recorded to confirm blood flow inhibition. The behavior of migrating neurons was observed for 3 hr after clot formation and compared with that before photothrombosis. As a control experiment, vessels without rose Bengal injection were irradiated with a two-photon laser. Samples were excluded if bleeding occurred or clots were dissolved during observation.

Transmission electron microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy analysis was performed as previously described with modifications (Matsumoto et al., 2019; Sawada et al., 2018). Brain was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% PFA in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) at 4°C, postfixed with 2% OsO4 in the same buffer at 4°C, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, placed in propylene oxide, and embedded in Durcupan resin for 72 hr at 60°C to ensure polymerization. Ultra-thin sections (60–70 nm) were cut using an ULTRACUT-E (Reichert-Jung) with a diamond knife, stained with 2% uranyl acetate in distilled water for 15 min, and stained with modified Sato’s lead solution for 5 min. Sections were analyzed with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1011J; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Migratory neurons were identified as cells with an elongated cell body, a dark cytoplasm with many free ribosomes, and an electron-dense nucleus with multiple nucleoli (Doetsch et al., 1997; Matsumoto et al., 2019; Sawada et al., 2018).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA scope)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed as previously described with modifications (Miyamoto et al., 2024) using the RNAscope multiplex assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Wang et al., 2012). After fixation with 4% PFA as described above, brains were postfixed for 4 hr at 4°C, incubated in 15% and 30% sucrose solutions in PBS, embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Japan), and frozen using dry ice and isopentane. Serial brain sections (10 μm) were cut using a cryostat (CryoStar NX70, Epredia). The sections were fixed again in 4% PFA at RT for 30 min, dehydrated in ethanol, treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide at RT for 30 min, and then boiled in RNAscope Target Retrieval Reagent (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) at 98°C for 15 min. Hybridization was performed using a probe targeting Ghsr1a mRNA (Mm-Ghsr-O2-C1, #241998, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) for 2 hr at 40°C. Following this, immunohistochemistry with rabbit anti-Dcx antibody and Hoechst staining was conducted.

Protein labeling

For observation of ghrelin transcytosis across the vascular wall, recombinant octanoylated ghrelin (Human, sc-364689, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was fluorescently labeled with Atto 647N NHS ester (18373, Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described with modifications (Yang et al., 2020). Ghrelin was dissolved in 0.1 M bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.3) at 2 mg/ml and reacted with Atto 647N NHS ester for 60 min at RT. After reactions, free label was removed by gel permeation chromatography with PD MiniTrap G-25 columns (28918007, Cytiva). Mice were fixed as described above at 1 hr after intravenous injection of fluorescently labeled ghrelin (0.02 mg/30 g). Fluorescence signal intensity was measured by ZEN software. The average intensity among all vessels in each mouse was normalized to 1.0. To quantify signal gradients in extra-vessel regions, two circular ROIs (10 μm in diameter) were defined as illustrated in Figure 3E. The centers of the ROIs were aligned along the long axis of each vessel. Mean fluorescence intensities were measured in Area I (0–10 μm from the abluminal surface) and Area II (10–20 μm away), and fold changes (Area I/Area II) were calculated for each vessel segment.

V-SVZ culture experiments

The V-SVZ was dissected from P0 to P1 mice, cut into blocks, and embedded in 60% Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in L-15 medium (Gibco). Cell aggregates were cultured in Neurobasal medium containing 2% NeuroBrew-21 (Invitrogen), 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), and 50 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C in a 5% incubation system (Tokai Hit). For migration distance analysis, octanoylated ghrelin (Human, Rat, 1-10, Peptides International) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 100 nM at 24 hr post-embedding (hpe). Then, cell aggregates were fixed in 4% PFA/0.1 M PB at 48 hpe. For immunocytochemistry, aggregates were incubated in blocking solution for 30 min at RT, treated with the primary antibodies in blocking solution for 24 hr at 4°C, and treated with AlexaFluor-secondary antibodies (1:1000) in the same solution for 2 hr at RT. The migration distance was analyzed in three independent cultures prepared on different days.

Viral vectors and plasmids

The pCSII lentiviral expression vectors were provided by Dr. Hiroyuki Miyoshi (RIKEN Tsukuba BioResource Center). The lacZ- and Ghsr1a-KD plasmids were generated as previously described (Ota et al., 2014; Sawada et al., 2018). The target sequences of lacZ mRNA and mouse Ghsr1a mRNA (Invitrogen) were inserted into modified Block-iT Poll II miR RNAi expression vectors containing EmGFP or DsRed-Express (Invitrogen). The Gateway System (Invitrogen) was used to generate pCSII-EF-Venus, pCSII-EF-Ghsr1a-IRES-Venus, pCSII-EF-EmGFP-express-miR-lacZ, pCSII-EF-DsRed-express-miR-Ghsr1a, pCAGGS-DsRed-express-miR-lacZ, and pCAGGS-DsRed-express-miR-Ghsr1a. For lentivirus production, the packaging vectors (pCAG-HIVgp, pCMV-VSV-G-RSV-Rev) and pCSII viral vectors were co-transfected into HEK-293T cells (RRID:CVCL_0063) to generate lentivirus particles. Then, the culture supernatants were concentrated by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 16 hr at 4°C in an MX-307 refrigerated microcentrifuge (Tomy).

Ghsr1a-KD experiments

The following sequence was inserted into siRNA expression vectors for targeting Ghsr1a mRNA (NM_177330.4): TGCTGAAGATGAGCAGATCGGAGAAGGTTTTGGCCACTGACTGACCTTCTCCGCTGCTCATCTTCAGG. For confirming efficacy of Ghsr1a-KD, pCSII-EF-Ghsr1a-IRES-Venus and/or pCSII-EF-DsRed-express-miR-Ghsr1a were co-transfected in HEK-293T cells. Venus signal was not observed in DsRed+ Ghsr1a-KD cells (data not shown).

For in vitro experiments, the dissected V-SVZ was dissociated with trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen). The pCS2-EGFP-UtrCH was provided by Dr William Bement (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and Dr David J. Solecki (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital). The cells were washed in L-15 medium with 40 μg/ml DNaseI (Roche) and transfected with 2 μg plasmid DNA using the 4D-Nucleofector (Lonza). The cells were recovered in RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and embedded in 60% Matrigel in L-15. After cultivation in Neurobasal medium for 48 hr, time-lapse imaging was performed using an LSM880 confocal laser scanning microscope with a 40× objective (Carl Zeiss). Time-lapse images were captured at 30 s (Figure 4C–J) and 20 s (Figure 4K–M) intervals. The migration distance of cultured new neurons was measured using ImageJ manual tracking tools. A migratory phase was defined as a phase in which the cell soma traveled ≥30 μm during 1 hr, and a resting phase was defined as a phase in which the cell soma migrated <30 μm. ZEN software (Carl Zeiss) was used to analyze actin cup formation. Actin cups were defined as over 4-μm-long continuous EGFP-UrtCH signals that were 1.3 times brighter than those in other cell soma regions.

For in vivo experiments, the lentiviral solution was stereotaxically injected into the V-SVZ and OB core of adult mice (V-SVZ: 1.0 mm anterior, 1.1 mm lateral to bregma, and 1.6–2.0 mm deep) (OB core: 4.6 mm anterior, 0.9 mm lateral to bregma, and 0.6–0.9 mm deep). The proportions of EmGFP+/DsRed− and EmGFP−/DsRed+ cells among total labeled Dcx + new neurons in the RMS and OB were analyzed using ZEN software (Carl Zeiss). Double-positive cells (EmGFP+/DsRed+) were excluded from all analyses to avoid confounding effects of coinfection. CR was performed as previously reported (Hornsby et al., 2016). In migration analysis, calorie-restricted animals were fed 70% of the total food consumed by animals fed AL daily for the last 5 days prior to fixation at 8 dpi. In maturation analysis, CR was performed from Day 3 to Day 8 after BrdU administration at Day 0, following fixation at Day 15.

Statistics

Sample sizes were not predetermined but were chosen based on previous studies. No specific strategy for randomization was employed, and no blinding was used. Statistical analysis was performed using EZR software (https://www.jichi.ac.jp/usr/hema/EZR/statmed.html) (Kanda, 2013). The normality of the data was analyzed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or Shapiro–Wilk test. The equality of variance was analyzed using an F test. Comparisons of data between two groups were performed with unpaired/paired t-tests or Welch’s t-test for normally distributed data and by Mann–Whitney U-tests/Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for abnormally distributed data. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed by one-way ANOVA/one-way repeated measures ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by a post hoc Tukey–Kramer test, Bonferroni test, or Steel–Dwass test. Numerical data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Significance is indicated in graphs as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, n.s., not significant.

Acknowledgements

We thank M Agetsuma, K Eto, T Kobayashi, Y Yanagawa, S Nonaka, Y Uchida, R Mitsui, K Nishimura, H Takase, T Fujioka, T Miyamoto, the Laboratory Animal Facility and the Research Equipment Sharing Center at the Nagoya City University for technical support; W Bement, D J Solecki, H Miyoshi, and the MMRRC for materials; L Kreiner and L McCollum from Edanz and E Nakajima for editing a draft of this manuscript, and the Sawamoto Laboratory members for helpful discussions. This work was supported by research grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (24gm1210007, 25ym0126807 [to KS]), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (25H01040, 25H02507, 24H02016, 24K22003, 23H04939, 20H05700, 19H04757, 18KK0213, 17H05750, JP22H04926, 26640046, 22122004 [to KS]), Core-to-core Program 'Neurogenesis Research & Innovation Center (NeuRIC)' (JPJSCCA20230007 [to KS]), Grant-in-Aid for Research at Nagoya City University (to KS), Cooperative Study Programs (22NIPS217) of the National Institute for Physiological Sciences (to KS), the Valencian Council for Innovation, Universities Science and Digital Society (PROMETEO/2019/075), the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PCI2018-093062), Grant-in-Aid for Promotion on Co-Creative Urban Development in Nagoya City University (2412145 [to KS]), Grant-in-Aid for Outstanding Research Group Support Program in Nagoya City University Grant Number (2401101 [to KS]), MEXT Project for promoting public utilization of advanced research infrastructure (JPMXS0441500024), the Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience (to KS), and the Takeda Science Foundation (to KS).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Kazunobu Sawamoto, Email: sawamoto@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.

Aya Ito-Ishida, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Japan.

Jonathan A Cooper, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 24gm1210007 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25H01040 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26640046 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Nagoya City University 2412145 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences 22NIPS217 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Valencian Council for Innovation, Universities Science and Digital Society to José Manuel García-Verdugo.

  • Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities PCI2018-093062 to José Manuel García-Verdugo.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JPMXS0441500024 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Takeda Science Foundation to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 25ym0126807 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25H02507 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24H02016 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K22003 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H04939 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H05700 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H04757 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18KK0213 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H05750 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22H04926 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22122004 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JPJSCCA20230007 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

  • Nagoya City University 2401101 to Kazunobu Sawamoto.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Supervision, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation, Methodology.

Resources, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Resources.

Investigation.

Supervision.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

All experimental procedures were approved by the guidelines and regulations of Nagoya City University (21-028, 21-030, 24-141, and 22-133) and the National Institute for Physiological Sciences (22A075, P08-044-A).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting files, and the datasets in Dryad.

The following dataset was generated:

Ogino T, Sawamoto K. 2025. Data from: Neuronal migration depends on blood flow in the adult mammalian brain. Dryad Digital Repository.

References

  1. Akter M, Kaneko N, Herranz-Pérez V, Nakamura S, Oishi H, García-Verdugo JM, Sawamoto K. Dynamic changes in the neurogenic potential in the ventricular-subventricular zone of common marmoset during postnatal brain development. Cerebral Cortex. 2020;30:4092–4109. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Massadi O, López M, Tschöp M, Diéguez C, Nogueiras R. Current understanding of the hypothalamic ghrelin pathways inducing appetite and adiposity. Trends in Neurosciences. 2017;40:167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alogaiel DM, Alsuwaylihi A, Alotaibi MS, Macdonald IA, Lobo DN. Effects of Ramadan intermittent fasting on hormones regulating appetite in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 2025;45:250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonnet JP, Cardel MI, Cellini J, Hu FB, Guasch-Ferré M. Breakfast skipping, body composition, and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obesity. 2020;28:1098–1109. doi: 10.1002/oby.22791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bovetti S, Hsieh YC, Bovolin P, Perroteau I, Kazunori T, Puche AC. Blood vessels form a scaffold for neuroblast migration in the adult olfactory bulb. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:5976–5980. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0678-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bressan C, Saghatelyan A. Intrinsic mechanisms regulating neuronal migration in the postnatal brain. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2020;14:620379. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.620379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkel BM, von Dassow G, Bement WM. Versatile fluorescent probes for actin filaments based on the actin-binding domain of utrophin. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2007;64:822–832. doi: 10.1002/cm.20226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bussmann J, Bos FL, Urasaki A, Kawakami K, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Arteries provide essential guidance cues for lymphatic endothelial cells in the zebrafish trunk. Development. 2010;137:2653–2657. doi: 10.1242/dev.048207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cattin AL, Burden JJ, Van Emmenis L, Mackenzie FE, Hoving JJA, Garcia Calavia N, Guo Y, McLaughlin M, Rosenberg LH, Quereda V, Jamecna D, Napoli I, Parrinello S, Enver T, Ruhrberg C, Lloyd AC. Macrophage-induced blood vessels guide schwann cell-mediated regeneration of peripheral nerves. Cell. 2015;162:1127–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chopin LK, Seim I, Walpole CM, Herington AC. The ghrelin axis--does it have an appetite for cancer progression? Endocrine Reviews. 2012;33:849–891. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dixit VD, Weeraratna AT, Yang H, Bertak D, Cooper-Jenkins A, Riggins GJ, Eberhart CG, Taub DD. Ghrelin and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor constitute a novel autocrine pathway in astrocytoma motility. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:16681–16690. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600223200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Doetsch F, Alvarez-Buylla A. Network of tangential pathways for neuronal migration in adult mammalian brain. PNAS. 1996;93:14895–14900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doetsch F, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A. Cellular composition and three-dimensional organization of the subventricular germinal zone in the adult mammalian brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:5046–5061. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-05046.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Farin A, Suzuki SO, Weiker M, Goldman JE, Bruce JN, Canoll P. Transplanted glioma cells migrate and proliferate on host brain vasculature: a dynamic analysis. Glia. 2006;53:799–808. doi: 10.1002/glia.20334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feng D, Nagy JA, Pyne K, Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM. Ultrastructural localization of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM-1, CD31) in vascular endothelium. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 2004;52:87–101. doi: 10.1177/002215540405200109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fujioka T, Kaneko N, Ajioka I, Nakaguchi K, Omata T, Ohba H, Fässler R, García-Verdugo JM, Sekiguchi K, Matsukawa N, Sawamoto K. β1 integrin signaling promotes neuronal migration along vascular scaffolds in the post-stroke brain. EBioMedicine. 2017;16:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong S, Zheng C, Doughty ML, Losos K, Didkovsky N, Schambra UB, Nowak NJ, Joyner A, Leblanc G, Hatten ME, Heintz N. A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature. 2003;425:917–925. doi: 10.1038/nature02033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grade S, Weng YC, Snapyan M, Kriz J, Malva JO, Saghatelyan A. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes vasculature-associated migration of neuronal precursors toward the ischemic striatum. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e55039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartmann DA, Underly RG, Grant RI, Watson AN, Lindner V, Shih AY. Pericyte structure and distribution in the cerebral cortex revealed by high-resolution imaging of transgenic mice. Neurophotonics. 2015;2:041402. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.2.4.041402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hattori Y, Enmi JI, Iguchi S, Saito S, Yamamoto Y, Nagatsuka K, Iida H, Ihara M. Substantial reduction of parenchymal cerebral blood flow in mice with bilateral common carotid artery stenosis. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:32179. doi: 10.1038/srep32179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill RA, Tong L, Yuan P, Murikinati S, Gupta S, Grutzendler J. Regional blood flow in the normal and ischemic brain is controlled by Arteriolar smooth muscle cell contractility and not by capillary pericytes. Neuron. 2015;87:95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hornsby AKE, Redhead YT, Rees DJ, Ratcliff MSG, Reichenbach A, Wells T, Francis L, Amstalden K, Andrews ZB, Davies JS. Short-term calorie restriction enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis and remote fear memory in a Ghsr-dependent manner. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Howick K, Griffin BT, Cryan JF, Schellekens H. From belly to brain: targeting the ghrelin receptor in appetite and food intake regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:273. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2013;48:452–458. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaneko N, Sawada M, Sawamoto K. Mechanisms of neuronal migration in the adult brain. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2017;141:835–847. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kengaku M. Cytoskeletal control of nuclear migration in neurons and non-neuronal cells. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B. 2018;94:337–349. doi: 10.2183/pjab.94.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kent BA, Beynon AL, Hornsby AKE, Bekinschtein P, Bussey TJ, Davies JS, Saksida LM. The orexigenic hormone acyl-ghrelin increases adult hippocampal neurogenesis and enhances pattern separation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;51:431–439. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim Y, Kim S, Kim C, Sato T, Kojima M, Park S. Ghrelin is required for dietary restriction-induced enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis: lessons from ghrelin knockout mice. Endocrine Journal. 2015;62:269–275. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kishimoto N, Alfaro-Cervello C, Shimizu K, Asakawa K, Urasaki A, Nonaka S, Kawakami K, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Sawamoto K. Migration of neuronal precursors from the telencephalic ventricular zone into the olfactory bulb in adult zebrafish. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2011;519:3549–3565. doi: 10.1002/cne.22722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kleinfeld D, Mitra PP, Helmchen F, Denk W. Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. PNAS. 1998;95:15741–15746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kojima T, Hirota Y, Ema M, Takahashi S, Miyoshi I, Okano H, Sawamoto K. Subventricular zone-derived neural progenitor cells migrate along a blood vessel scaffold toward the post-stroke striatum. Stem Cells. 2010;28:545–554. doi: 10.1002/stem.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lacar B, Herman P, Platel JC, Kubera C, Hyder F, Bordey A. Neural progenitor cells regulate capillary blood flow in the postnatal subventricular zone. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32:16435–16448. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1457-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lazarini F, Lledo PM. Is adult neurogenesis essential for olfaction? Trends in Neurosciences. 2011;34:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li E, Chung H, Kim Y, Kim DH, Ryu JH, Sato T, Kojima M, Park S. Ghrelin directly stimulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis: implications for learning and memory. Endocrine Journal. 2013;60:781–789. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej13-0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li E, Kim Y, Kim S, Sato T, Kojima M, Park S. Ghrelin stimulates proliferation, migration and differentiation of neural progenitors from the subventricular zone in the adult mice. Experimental Neurology. 2014;252:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liang Y, Li K, Riecken K, Maslyukov A, Gomez-Nicola D, Kovalchuk Y, Fehse B, Garaschuk O. Long-term in vivo single-cell tracking reveals the switch of migration patterns in adult-born juxtaglomerular cells of the mouse olfactory bulb. Cell Research. 2016;26:805–821. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A. Long-distance neuronal migration in the adult mammalian brain. Science. 1994;264:1145–1148. doi: 10.1126/science.8178174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lois C, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A. Chain migration of neuronal precursors. Science. 1996;271:978–981. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5251.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Martini FJ, Valdeolmillos M. Actomyosin contraction at the cell rear drives nuclear translocation in migrating cortical interneurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:8660–8670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1962-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Matsumoto K, Azami T, Otsu A, Takase H, Ishitobi H, Tanaka J, Miwa Y, Takahashi S, Ema M. Study of normal and pathological blood vessel morphogenesis in Flt1-tdsRed BAC Tg mice. Genesis. 2012;50:561–571. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Matsumoto M, Sawada M, García-González D, Herranz-Pérez V, Ogino T, Bang Nguyen H, Quynh Thai T, Narita K, Kumamoto N, Ugawa S, Saito Y, Takeda S, Kaneko N, Khodosevich K, Monyer H, García-Verdugo JM, Ohno N, Sawamoto K. Dynamic changes in ultrastructure of the primary cilium in migrating neuroblasts in the postnatal brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2019;39:9967–9988. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1503-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Miyamoto T, Kuboyama K, Honda M, Ohkawa Y, Oki S, Sawamoto K. High spatial resolution gene expression profiling and characterization of neuroblasts migrating in the peri-injured cortex using photo-isolation chemistry. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024;18:1504047. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1504047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miyawaki T, Morikawa S, Susaki EA, Nakashima A, Takeuchi H, Yamaguchi S, Ueda HR, Ikegaya Y. Visualization and molecular characterization of whole-brain vascular networks with capillary resolution. Nature Communications. 2020;11:1104. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14786-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moon M, Kim S, Hwang L, Park S. Ghrelin regulates hippocampal neurogenesis in adult mice. Endocrine Journal. 2009;56:525–531. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.k09e-089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ohab JJ, Fleming S, Blesch A, Carmichael ST. A neurovascular niche for neurogenesis after stroke. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:13007–13016. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4323-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ota H, Hikita T, Sawada M, Nishioka T, Matsumoto M, Komura M, Ohno A, Kamiya Y, Miyamoto T, Asai N, Enomoto A, Takahashi M, Kaibuchi K, Sobue K, Sawamoto K. Speed control for neuronal migration in the postnatal brain by Gmip-mediated local inactivation of RhoA. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4532. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Park YG, Sohn CH, Chen R, McCue M, Yun DH, Drummond GT, Ku T, Evans NB, Oak HC, Trieu W, Choi H, Jin X, Lilascharoen V, Wang J, Truttmann MC, Qi HW, Ploegh HL, Golub TR, Chen SC, Frosch MP, Kulik HJ, Lim BK, Chung K. Protection of tissue physicochemical properties using polyfunctional crosslinkers. Nature Biotechnology. 2018;01:4281. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rhea EM, Salameh TS, Gray S, Niu J, Banks WA, Tong J. Ghrelin transport across the blood-brain barrier can occur independently of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Molecular Metabolism. 2018;18:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sawada M, Kaneko N, Inada H, Wake H, Kato Y, Yanagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Nemoto T, Nabekura J, Sawamoto K. Sensory input regulates spatial and subtype-specific patterns of neuronal turnover in the adult olfactory bulb. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:11587–11596. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0614-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sawada M, Ohno N, Kawaguchi M, Huang SH, Hikita T, Sakurai Y, Bang Nguyen H, Quynh Thai T, Ishido Y, Yoshida Y, Nakagawa H, Uemura A, Sawamoto K. PlexinD1 signaling controls morphological changes and migration termination in newborn neurons. The EMBO Journal. 2018;37:e97404. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schaffer CB, Friedman B, Nishimura N, Schroeder LF, Tsai PS, Ebner FF, Lyden PD, Kleinfeld D. Two-photon imaging of cortical surface microvessels reveals a robust redistribution in blood flow after vascular occlusion. PLOS Biology. 2006;4:e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shibata M, Ohtani R, Ihara M, Tomimoto H. White matter lesions and glial activation in a novel mouse model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Stroke. 2004;35:2598–2603. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143725.19053.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shvedov NR, Analoui S, Dafalias T, Bedell BL, Gardner TJ, Scott BB. In vivo imaging in transgenic songbirds reveals superdiffusive neuron migration in the adult brain. Cell Reports. 2024;43:113759. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Slomiany BL, Slomiany A. Role of signal-regulated changes in microtubule stability dynamics through α-Tubulin Phosphorylation on Ser/Tyr in modulation of salivary gland matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) secretion in response to Porphyromonas gingivalis and Ghrelin. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2017;05:22–38. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2017.52003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Snapyan M, Lemasson M, Brill MS, Blais M, Massouh M, Ninkovic J, Gravel C, Berthod F, Götz M, Barker PA, Parent A, Saghatelyan A. Vasculature guides migrating neuronal precursors in the adult mammalian forebrain via brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:4172–4188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4956-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Soleyman-Jahi S, Sadeghi F, Pastaki Khoshbin A, Khani L, Roosta V, Zendehdel K. Attribution of ghrelin to cancer; attempts to unravel an apparent controversy. Frontiers in Oncology. 2019;9:1014. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Stark R, Dempsey H, Kleeman E, Sassi M, Osborne-Lawrence S, Sheybani-Deloui S, Rushby HJ, Mirth CK, Austin-Muttitt K, Mullins J, Zigman JM, Davies JS, Andrews ZB. Hunger signalling in the olfactory bulb primes exploration, food-seeking and peripheral metabolism. Molecular Metabolism. 2024;89:102025. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2024.102025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stoyanova I, Lutz D. Ghrelin-mediated regeneration and plasticity after nervous system injury. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9:595914. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.595914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sun GJ, Zhou Y, Stadel RP, Moss J, Yong JHA, Ito S, Kawasaki NK, Phan AT, Oh JH, Modak N, Reed RR, Toni N, Song H, Ming G. Tangential migration of neuronal precursors of glutamatergic neurons in the adult mammalian brain. PNAS. 2015;112:9484–9489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508545112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tabata H, Sasaki M, Agetsuma M, Sano H, Hirota Y, Miyajima M, Hayashi K, Honda T, Nishikawa M, Inaguma Y, Ito H, Takebayashi H, Ema M, Ikenaka K, Nabekura J, Nagata KI, Nakajima K. Erratic and blood vessel-guided migration of astrocyte progenitors in the cerebral cortex. Nature Communications. 2022;13:6571. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34184-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Takemi S, Sakata I, Apu AS, Tsukahara S, Yahashi S, Katsuura G, Iwashige F, Akune A, Inui A, Sakai T. Molecular cloning of ghrelin and characteristics of ghrelin-producing cells in the gastrointestinal tract of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Zoological Science. 2016;33:497–504. doi: 10.2108/zs160020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Thored P, Wood J, Arvidsson A, Cammenga J, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. Long-term neuroblast migration along blood vessels in an area with transient angiogenesis and increased vascularization after stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:3032–3039. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Toshinai K, Mondal MS, Nakazato M, Date Y, Murakami N, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. Upregulation of Ghrelin expression in the stomach upon fasting, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, and leptin administration. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2001;281:1220–1225. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tsai HH, Niu J, Munji R, Davalos D, Chang J, Zhang H, Tien AC, Kuo CJ, Chan JR, Daneman R, Fancy SPJ. Oligodendrocyte precursors migrate along vasculature in the developing nervous system. Science. 2016;351:379–384. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tschöp M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML. Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature. 2000;407:908–913. doi: 10.1038/35038090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vanlandewijck M, He L, Mäe MA, Andrae J, Ando K, Del Gaudio F, Nahar K, Lebouvier T, Laviña B, Gouveia L, Sun Y, Raschperger E, Räsänen M, Zarb Y, Mochizuki N, Keller A, Lendahl U, Betsholtz C. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature. 2018;554:475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature25739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang Y, Kakizaki T, Sakagami H, Saito K, Ebihara S, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Saito Y, Furuya N, Yanagawa Y. Fluorescent labeling of both GABAergic and glycinergic neurons in vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT)–Venus transgenic mouse. Neuroscience. 2009;164:1031–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N, Wang LC, Bui S, Nielson A, Wu X, Vo HT, Ma XJ, Luo Y. RNAscope. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 2012;14:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Whitman MC, Fan W, Rela L, Rodriguez-Gil DJ, Greer CA. Blood vessels form a migratory scaffold in the rostral migratory stream. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2009;516:94–104. doi: 10.1002/cne.22093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu YK, Watson HJ, Del Re AC, Finch JE, Hardin SL, Dumain AS, Brownley KA, Baker JH. Peripheral biomarkers of anorexia nervosa: A meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2024;16:2095. doi: 10.3390/nu16132095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yamashita T, Ninomiya M, Hernández Acosta P, García-Verdugo JM, Sunabori T, Sakaguchi M, Adachi K, Kojima T, Hirota Y, Kawase T, Araki N, Abe K, Okano H, Sawamoto K. Subventricular zone-derived neuroblasts migrate and differentiate into mature neurons in the post-stroke adult striatum. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:6627–6636. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0149-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang AC, Stevens MY, Chen MB, Lee DP, Stähli D, Gate D, Contrepois K, Chen W, Iram T, Zhang L, Vest RT, Chaney A, Lehallier B, Olsson N, du Bois H, Hsieh R, Cropper HC, Berdnik D, Li L, Wang EY, Traber GM, Bertozzi CR, Luo J, Snyder MP, Elias JE, Quake SR, James ML, Wyss-Coray T. Physiological blood-brain transport is impaired with age by a shift in transcytosis. Nature. 2020;583:425–430. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2453-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zahr A, Alcaide P, Yang J, Jones A, Gregory M, dela Paz NG, Patel-Hett S, Nevers T, Koirala A, Luscinskas FW, Saint-Geniez M, Ksander B, D’Amore PA, Argüeso P. Endomucin prevents leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and has a critical role under resting and inflammatory conditions. Nature Communications. 2016;7:10363. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu X, Bergles DE, Nishiyama A. NG2 cells generate both oligodendrocytes and gray matter astrocytes. Development. 2008;135:145–157. doi: 10.1242/dev.004895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zigman JM, Jones JE, Lee CE, Saper CB, Elmquist JK. Expression of ghrelin receptor mRNA in the rat and the mouse brain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2006;494:528–548. doi: 10.1002/cne.20823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Aya Ito-Ishida 1

This fundamental work provides novel insights into the blood flow-dependent mechanisms of neuronal migration and the role of Ghrelin signaling in the adult brain. The authors present convincing evidence that newborn rostral migratory stream (RMS) neurons are closely situated alongside blood vessels, preferentially along arterioles, and that migratory speed is correlated with blood flow. They also provide evidence (in vitro and some in vivo) that Ghrelin from blood is involved in augmenting RMS neuron migration speed.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This study provides compelling evidence suggesting that ghrelin, a molecule released in the surrounding of the major adult brain neurogenic niche (V-SVZ) by blood vessels with high blood flow controls the migration of newborn interneurons towards the olfactory bulbs.

Strengths:

This study is a tour de force as it provides a solid set of data obtained by time lapse recordings in vivo. The data demonstrate that the migration and guidance of newborn neurons relies on factors released by selective type of blood vessels.

Weaknesses:

Some intermediate conclusions are weak and may be reinforced by additional experiments.

Comments on revisions: The manuscript has improved.

eLife. 2025 Oct 28;13:RP99502. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99502.3.sa2

Author response

Takashi Ogino 1, Akari Saito 2, Masato Sawada 3, Shoko Takemura 4, Yuzuki Hara 5, Kanami Yoshimura 6, Jiro Nagase 7, Honomi Kawase 8, Takamasa Sato 9, Hiroyuki Inada 10, Vicente Herranz-Pérez 11, Yoh-Suke Mukouyama 12, Masatsugu Ema 13, Jose Manuel García-Verdugo 14, Junichi Nabekura 15, Kazunobu Sawamoto 16

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Summary:

This study provides compelling evidence suggesting that ghrelin, a molecule released in the surroundings of the major adult brain neurogenic niche (V-SVZ) by blood vessels with high blood flow, controls the migration of newborn interneurons towards the olfactory bulbs.

Strengths:

This study is a tour de force as it provides a solid set of data obtained by time-lapse recordings in vivo. The data demonstrate that the migration and guidance of newborn neurons rely on factors released by selective types of blood vessels.

Weaknesses:

Some intermediate conclusions are weak and may be reinforced by additional experiments.

We thank the reviewer for the thoughtful evaluation and constructive comments outlined in the “Recommendations for The Authors”. In response, we have incorporated additional data, revised relevant figures, and clarified explanations in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer #2 (Public review)

Summary:

The authors establish a close spatial relationship between RMS neurons and blood vessels. They demonstrated that high blood flow was correlated with migratory speed. In vitro, they demonstrate that Ghrelin functions as a motogen that increases migratory speed through augmentation of actin cup formation. The authors proceed to demonstrate through the knockdown of the Ghrelin receptor that fewer RMS neurons reach the OB.

They show the opposite is true when the animal is fasted.

Strengths:

Compelling evidence of close association of RMS neurons with blood vessels (tissue clearing 3D), preferentially arterioles. Good use of 2-photon imaging to demonstrate migratory speed and its correlation with blood flow. In vitro analysis of Ghrelin administration to cultured RMS neurons, actin visualization, Ghsr1KD, is solid and compelling.

We sincerely thank the reviewer for the encouraging comments and helpful suggestions. As noted, our original manuscript lacked sufficient in vivo evidence connecting blood flow with ghrelin signaling. To address this, we have added new data and revised the explanations throughout the manuscript as described below.

Weaknesses:

(1) Novelty of findings attenuated due to prior work, especially Li et al., Experimental Neurology 2014. Here, the authors demonstrated that Ghrelin enhances migration in adultborn neurons in the SVZ and RMS.

We agree with the reviewer that the idea that ghrelin enhances migration of new neurons is not entirely novel. The study by Li et al. (2014) provided critical insights that guided our investigation into ghrelin as a blood-derived factor promoting neuronal migration. However, our study expands on this by demonstrating that ghrelin directly stimulates migration via GHSR1a in cultured new neurons, and we further identified the cellular and cytoskeletal mechanisms involved. Specifically, we showed that ghrelin enhances somal translocation by activating actin dynamics at the rear of the cell soma. We have revised the Results and Discussion sections accordingly to emphasize these novel aspects as follows:

“A previous study demonstrated that the migration of V-SVZ-derived new neurons was attenuated in ghrelin knockout mice (Li et al., 2014). In our study, we found that the migration of cultured new neurons was enhanced by the application of ghrelin to the culture medium, and this effect was abolished by Ghsr1a knockdown (KD). These findings suggest that ghrelin directly stimulates neuronal migration through its receptor, GHSR1a, on new neurons. A previous study showed that GHSR1a is expressed in various regions of the brain (Zigman et al., 2006). In our experiments, new neuron-specific KD of Ghsr1a indicated that ghrelin signaling acts in a cell-autonomous manner to regulate neuronal migration.” (Discussion, page 13, lines 10–18)

“Furthermore, we identified the cellular and cytoskeletal mechanisms underlying this effect on migration. The results indicate that ghrelin enhances somal translocation during migration by activating actin cytoskeletal dynamics at the rear of the neuronal soma.” (Discussion, page 13, lines 24–26)

(2) The evidence for blood delivery of Ghrelin is not very convincing. Fluorescently-labeled Ghrelin appears to be found throughout the brain parenchyma, irrespective of the distance from vessels. It is also not clear from the data whether there is a link between increased blood flow and Ghrelin delivery.

We agree that the correlation between blood flow and ghrelin transcytosis is not very convincing in our study. As the reviewer pointed out, Figure 3A gives the impression that fluorescent-labeled ghrelin is uniformly distributed throughout the brain parenchyma. However, high-magnification images newly added in Figure 3 show that some, but not all, vessels have particularly strong fluorescent signals in the parenchymal area adjacent to the abluminal side of vascular endothelial cells, visualized by CD31 immunostaining (Feng et al., 2004) (Figure 3A′, A′′). To quantify these observations, we defined two regions: Area I (perivascular area), within 10 μm of the abluminal surface of CD31-positive endothelium; and Area II (distant area), located 10–20 μm away (Figure 3E). Of note, Area I corresponds to the perivascular region where new neurons are frequently observed (Figure 1).

Importantly, we found strong ghrelin signals in vascular endothelial cells of endomucin-negative high-flow vessels (Figure 3C, D). This suggests that transcytosis of blood-derived ghrelin may occur more frequently in high-flow vessels due to increased endocytosis at the endothelium. To test this, we quantified signal gradients in the extra-vessel regions as fold changes (Area I / Area II), as illustrated in Figure 3E. The proportion of vessel segments with >1.5-fold increases was significantly higher in endomucin-negative vessels than in endomucin-positive ones (Figure 3F). Furthermore, vessels with >2-fold increases were observed exclusively in the endomucinnegative group (6.48% ± 1.18%).

These data suggest that, in high-flow vessels, blood-derived ghrelin accumulates more in the immediate perivascular region than in areas further away. This supports the possibility that elevated blood flow delivers a larger amount of ghrelin to the vascular endothelium, enhancing its transcytosis into adjacent brain parenchyma. This mechanism may underlie the preferential migration of new neurons along perivascular regions with high blood flow, as shown in Figure 1. We have incorporated this new data in Figure 3 and corresponding explanations into the Results, Figure legend and Methods

(3) The in vivo link between Ghsr1KD and migratory speed is not established. Given the strong work to open the study on blood flow and migratory speed and the in vitro evidence that migratory speed is augmented by Ghrelin, the paper would be much stronger with direct measurement of migration speed upon Ghsr1KD. Indeed, blood flow should also be measured in this experiment since it would address concerns in 2. If blood flow and ghrelin delivery are linked, one would expect that Ghsr1KD neurons would not exhibit increased migratory speed when associated with slow or fast blood flow vessels.

In Figure 3, we showed that ghrelin transcytosis occurs preferentially in high-flow vessels, suggesting a role for ghrelin in mediating the effects of blood flow on neuronal migration. However, whether this dependence is solely attributable to ghrelin signaling remains unclear.

To address this, we tested whether Ghsr1a-KD modifies the impact of reduced blood flow on neuronal migration by combining Ghsr1a-KD with bilateral common carotid artery stenosis (BCAS), a chronic cerebral hypoperfusion model (Figure S9A). We found that BCAS decreased the percentage of Ghsr1a-KD new neurons reaching the OB, similar to the effect seen in control neurons (Figure S9B, see also Figure 2A–C). This suggests that blood flow influences neuronal migration even under Ghsr1a-KD conditions.

Furthermore, we analyzed the distribution of Ghsr1a-KD neurons with respect to vessel flow characteristics. Even under Ghsr1a-KD, a higher proportion of new neurons were located in the area of endomucin-negative (high-flow) vessels compared with endomucin-positive (low-flow) vessels (Figure S9C), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not abolish the preferential association of migrating neurons with high flow vessels. These findings suggest that although ghrelin signaling contributes to blood flow-dependent migration, it is not the sole factor. Other blood-derived signals may also mediate this effect. We have included these new data in Figure S9 and updated the corresponding sections in the Results

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors) :

Major

Page 6, Line 13. Please provide in the result section some explanation about how photothrombic clot is induced.

We added the following explanation to the Results section to clarify the method used to induce photothrombotic clot formation.

“For clot formation, a restricted area of selected vessels was irradiated by a two-photon laser immediately after intravenous injection of rose bengal.” (Results, Page 7, lines 27–28)

Page 6, Line 18. The authors use the marmoset as an additional experimental model. Here, V-SVZ-derived newborn neurons migrate in other brain regions as compared to rodents. Please provide a clear rationale for moving from rodents to "common marmosets" as an experiment model. And why use marmosets only for this set of experiments?

We clarified the rationale for using common marmosets in addition to mice as follows:

“Because blood vessel-guided neuronal migration in the adult brain is a conserved phenomenon across species (Kishimoto et al., 2011; Akter et al., 2021; Shvedov et al., 2024), we hypothesized that blood flow may also influence neuronal migration in other brain regions of primates. The neocortex, which supports higher-order brain functions and has undergone evolutionary expansion in primates, was selected as a target region. In common marmosets, but not in mice, V-SVZ-derived new neurons migrate toward the neocortex and ventral striatum (Akter et al., 2021) (Supplemental Movies S4 and S5).” (Results, Page 6, lines 19–25)

Figure 2B. The experimental setup is possibly problematic as the lentiviral tracing measurement does not take into consideration the rate of neurogenesis or newborn neuron survival. Can authors assess the rate of proliferation and survival in the VSVZ/RMS upon BCAS to decipher whether the reduced number of cells observed in the OB only results from migration changes? (comparable remark stands for Figure 5)

To evaluate whether the reduction in the number of new neurons observed in the OB after BCAS (Figure 2B, C) is due solely to impaired migration, we assessed cell proliferation and survival in the V-SVZ and RMS. Specifically, we quantified the density of Ki67+ proliferating cells and cleaved caspase-3+ apoptotic cells in the sham and BCAS groups. BCAS significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased cell death in both the V-SVZ and RMS (Figure S4), suggesting that reduced neurogenesis and/or survival may contribute to the decreased neuronal distribution in the OB.

Although we cannot exclude the possibility that changes in cell proliferation or survival contributed to this effect, our photothrombotic clot formation experiments are better suited to directly examine how acute reduction in blood flow affects neuronal migration. These experiments allowed us to measure the migration speed of new neurons shortly after inducing localized blood flow inhibition. We found that clot formation significantly reduced the migration speed of new neurons (Figure 2E, H), indicating that blood flow changes directly impair neuronal migration in the adult brain.

We have included these new data in Figure S4 and updated the corresponding text in the Results, Discussion, Figure legend, and Methods as follows:

Figure 3. About ghrelin signaling. It is unclear whether its transcytosis occurs in endomucin-negative because of the high bloodstream flow. How can this be explained? What happens upon BCAS, is there still a close relation between ghrelin transcytosis, blood flow, and neuron migration?

As correctly noted, our initial explanation and data did not provide sufficient evidence that higher blood flow delivers a larger amount of ghrelin into the brain parenchyma. We found that some vessels had particularly strong fluorescent signals in the parenchymal area adjacent to the abluminal surface of vascular endothelial cells, as visualized by CD31 immunostaining (Feng et al., 2004) (Figure 3A′, A′′). On the basis of our observation that strong fluorescent signals were detected in vascular endothelial cells of endomucin-negative (high-flow) vessels (Figure 3C, D), we hypothesized that ghrelin transcytosis may occur more frequently in high-flow vessels due to increased endocytosis at the vessel endothelium.

To test this hypothesis, we quantified signal gradients in the extra-vessel regions by calculating fold changes in fluorescent intensity between two zones: Area I (0–10 μm from the abluminal surface of the endothelium) and Area II (10–20 μm away), as illustrated in Figure 3E. Area I corresponds to the perivascular region where new neurons are frequently found (Figure 1). We found that the proportion of vessel segments with >1.5-fold signal increase in Area I relative to Area II was significantly higher in endomucin-negative vessels than endomucin-positive ones (Figure 3F). Furthermore, vessel segments with >2-fold increases were observed exclusively in the endomucin-negative group (6.48% ± 1.18%). These results support the idea that higher blood flow increases the amount of ghrelin that reaches the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells, thereby increasing the possibility of ghrelin transcytosis into the brain parenchyma.

We also examined whether blood flow inhibition–induced by BCAS or photothrombotic clot formation–affects the relationship between ghrelin transcytosis, blood flow, and neuronal migration. The above results suggest that blood flow reduction may decrease ghrelin transcytosis, thereby contributing to impaired neuronal migration. To further explore this, we analyzed the distribution of new neurons around high- versus low-flow vessels under BCAS conditions. In the BCAS group, we still observed a higher density of new neurons in the region of high-flow (endomucin-negative) vessels compared with in low-flow (endomucin-positive) ones (Figure S9C). This suggests that even under reduced blood flow, neuronal migration preferentially occurs near high-flow vessels. Taken together, these results suggest that ghrelin transcytosis, blood flow and neuronal migration are connected, and that this relationship persists under conditions of blood flow reduction.

Figure 4. Is ghrelin controlling both individual Dcx+ neuron migration as well as chain migration (cells moving more together)? This should be assessed and clarified.

How is ghrelin controlling actin dynamics in newborn migrating neurons? Since somal translocation speed and somal stride length are both modulated by ghrelin, this factor may also control MT remodeling, could that be checked?

We have revised the manuscript to better explain the role of ghrelin in both modes of neuronal migration–chain and individual. Initially, we demonstrated that ghrelin enhances the migration of new neurons in V-SVZ culture (Figure 4A, B), where these neurons migrate outward as chains, indicating that ghrelin facilitates chain migration. In subsequent in vitro experiments (Figure 4C–M), we showed that ghrelin also enhances the migration of individual neurons. To examine this in vivo, we injected Ghsr1a-KD and control lentiviruses into two different anatomical regions: the V-SVZ, where chain migration originates, and the OB core, where new neurons migrate individually. These experiments enabled us to assess the role of ghrelin signaling in each mode of migration independently. We found that ghrelin enhanced both chain migration in the RMS and individual migration in the OB. These results indicate that ghrelin signaling facilitates both forms of neuronal migration. We added the following text in the Results section:

“To assess the direct effect of ghrelin on neuronal migration, we applied recombinant ghrelin to V-SVZ cultures, in which new neurons emerge and migrate as chains (Figure 4A). Ghrelin significantly increased the migration distance of these neurons (Figure 4B), indicating enhanced chain migration. We then used super-resolution time-lapse imaging to examine individually migrating neurons with or without knockdown (KD) of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a), a ghrelin receptor expressed in V-SVZ-derived new neurons (Li et al., 2014) (Figure 4C). Ghrelin enhanced the migration speed of control cells (lacZ-KD) cells, indicating that it also facilitates individual migration (Figure 4D).” (Results, Page 9, lines 5–12)

“Of the total labeled Dcx+ cells, the percentage of Dcx+ cells reaching the GL was significantly lower in the Ghsr1a-KD group than in the control group (Figure 5B, C), suggesting that ghrelin enhances individual radial migration of new neurons in the OB.” (Results, Page 10, lines 5–8) “These data indicate that ghrelin signaling facilitates both individual migration in the OB and chain migration in the RMS.” (Results, Page 10, lines 17–18)

We also added discussion on how ghrelin may regulate cytoskeletal dynamics in migrating neurons. Ghrelin signaling has been reported to control actin cytoskeletal remodeling in astrocytoma cells (Dixit et al., 2006), which led us to investigate similar effects in migrating neurons. Rac, a member of the Rho GTPase family, was shown to mediate this actin remodeling in astrocytoma migration, suggesting it may also be involved in ghrelin-induced actin cup formation in new neurons. Furthermore, because somal translocation depends not only on actin but also on microtubule dynamics (Kaneko et al., 2017), it is possible that ghrelin influences both systems. Supporting this idea, ghrelin signaling was shown to modulate microtubule behavior via SFK-dependent phosphorylation of α-tubulin (Slomiany and Slomiany, 2017). These findings suggest that ghrelin may enhance somal translocation through coordinated regulation of both the actin and microtubule systems. We added following text in the Results and Discussion sections:

“Ghrelin signaling has been reported to regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics in astrocytoma cells (Dixit et al., 2006), which led us to examine whether a similar mechanism operates in migrating neurons.”(Results, Page 9, lines 23–25)

“Further studies are needed to elucidate how ghrelin promotes actin cup formation in migrating neurons. Given that Rac, a Rho family GTPase, mediates actin remodeling downstream of ghrelin in astrocytoma cells (Dixit et al., 2006), it is possible that Rac may also be involved in ghrelininduced cytoskeletal regulation in new neurons.” (Discussion, Page 13, lines 28–31)

“In addition to actin remodeling, ghrelin may regulate microtubule dynamics. Ghrelin signaling was shown to modulate microtubules via SFK-dependent phosphorylation of α-tubulin (Slomiany and Slomiany, 2017), raising the possibility that ghrelin promotes somal translocation of new neurons through coordinated regulation of both actin and microtubule networks (Kaneko et al., 2017).” (Discussion, Page 13, line 31–Page 14, line 2)

It would also be informative to provide immunolabeling of Ghsr1 in the V-SVZ / RMS/ OB to have a clear picture of the expression pattern of this receptor. Newborn neurons migrate along blood vessels, which are surrounded by astrocytes that have also been reported to express Ghsr1, thus could newborn neuron migration change may also arise from activation of Ghsr1 in their surrounding astrocytes?

A previous study reported that GHSR1a is expressed in DCX+ new neurons in the RMS and OB, and in V-SVZ neural progenitor cells (Li et al., 2014). To visualize the spatial expression pattern of Ghsr1a, we performed RNAscope in situ hybridization because specific anti-GHSR1a antibodies suitable for immunohistochemistry were not available. Consistent with the previous report, we detected Ghsr1a mRNA in DCX+ new neurons in the VSVZ, RMS, and OB (Figure S5A), indicating that new neurons directly receive ghrelin signaling.

Moreover, our KD experiments demonstrated that ghrelin enhanced the migration of new neurons in a cell-autonomous manner via GHSR1a (Figure 4, 5). Nevertheless, a recent study (Stark et al., 2024) showed that GHSR1a was expressed in various cell types, including glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, suggesting that ghrelin may also exert non-cellautonomous effects on neuronal migration. Given the presence of diverse cell types, including neurons, microglia, pericytes, and astrocytes, along the migratory route, it remains possible that GHSR1a activation in these neighboring cells contributes to the overall regulation of neuronal migration.

Figure 5. About the in vivo knockdown of Ghsr1a. The results section (page 9, line 3) mentioned that mice were either injected with one or the other construct but Figure 5 shows coincidence of GFP and dsRed positive cells. Were control and Ghsr1a shRNAs injected together into the same mouse? Could you quantify the number of cells in green (control), red (Ghsr1a KD), and yellow (both)? Won't they mostly be yellow? Have you tried injecting control and Ghsr1a separately? If yes, do you get the same result? Such analysis would be important to separate cell autonomous from noncell autonomous effects.

To minimize variability in injection conditions, we initially coinjected control and Ghsr1a-KD lentiviruses into the same mice and analyzed their migration using a paired design. As the reviewer correctly noted, some cells were coinfected and expressed both EmGFP and DsRed (18.7% ± 2.86% of EmGFP+ cells and 10.8% ± 0.533% of DsRed+ cells). To ensure that this overlap did not affect our analysis, we excluded EmGFP+/DsRed+ double-positive cells and focused solely on EmGFP+/DsRed− (control) and EmGFP−/DsRed+ (Ghsr1a-KD) single-positive cells.

We agree with the reviewer that coinjection could lead to reciprocal interactions between control and Ghsr1a-KD cells, potentially masking cell-autonomous effects. To address this, we performed an independent experiment in which control and Ghsr1a-KD lentiviruses were injected separately into different mice (Figure S7A), as suggested. Consistent with the results of the coinjection experiment, we found that the Ghsr1a-KD cells showed significantly reduced distribution in the GL compared with that in control cells (Figure S7B). Although we cannot exclude the possibility of a non-cell-autonomous effect of ghrelin, this result supports the conclusion that ghrelin signaling enhances neuronal migration in a cell-autonomous manner.

Who is expressing Ghsr1a, newborn neurons, and or their progenitors? The production and survival of newborn V-ZVS cells should be assessed upon knockdown of the ghrelin receptor too.

To determine whether the altered distribution of new neurons observed upon Ghsr1aKD is due to impaired migration rather than decreased cell production or survival, we examined the effects of Ghsr1a-KD on the proliferation and survival of new neurons and their progenitors, which express GHSR1a (Li et al., 2014).

We compared the proportion of cleaved caspase-3+ cells and Ki67+ cells from the total labeled cells in the V-SVZ and RMS between the control and Ghsr1a-KD groups. There was no significant difference in the proportion of cleaved caspase-3+ cells between the groups (Control: 874 cells from 5 mice; Ghsr1a-KD: 678 cells from 7 mice), suggesting that ghrelin signaling does not affect the survival of new neurons and their progenitors.

Similarly, the proportion of Ki67+ cells in the RMS did not differ significantly between the two groups (Figure S8), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not impair cell proliferation in the RMS. However, it remains technically difficult to evaluate whether Ghsr1a-KD affects proliferation in the VSVZ, because lentivirus injection into the VSVZ may interfere with GHSR1a expression not only in new neurons and neural progenitors, but also in other cell types known to express GHSR1a (Zigman et al., 2006). A previous study reported that ghrelin signaling promoted cell proliferation in the V-SVZ (Li et al., 2014), thus we cannot exclude the possibility that Ghsr1a-KD may affect V-SVZ proliferation.

To overcome this limitation, we assessed the effects of Ghsr1a-KD on neuronal migration using in vitro KD experiments (Figure 4C–J) and in vivo OB-core lentivirus injections (Figure 5A–C), both of which did not interfere with proliferation in the V-SVZ. These complementary approaches consistently demonstrated that Ghsr1a-KD reduces the migration speed of new neurons.

“To determine whether the altered distribution of new neurons after Ghsr1a-KD is due to impaired migration rather than changes in cell production or survival, we assessed the effects of Ghsr1aKD on the proliferation and survival of new neurons and their progenitors, which express GHSR1a (Li et al., 2014). We quantified the proportion of cleaved caspase-3+ cells and Ki67+ cells from the total labeled cells in the V-SVZ and RMS in both control and Ghsr1a-KD groups. We found no significant difference in cleaved caspase-3+ cell proportions between the groups (Control: 874 cells from 5 mice; Ghsr1a-KD: 678 cells from 7 mice), suggesting that ghrelin signaling does not influence the survival of new neurons and their progenitors. Similarly, the percentage of Ki67+ cells in the RMS was similar between the two groups (Figure S8), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not impair cell proliferation in the RMS. However, technical limitations prevented a reliable evaluation of proliferation in the V-SVZ, as lentivirus injection into this region may interfere with GHSR1a expression in not only neural progenitors and new neurons, but also other GHSR1aexpressing cell types (Zigman et al., 2006). Although ghrelin signaling has been reported to promote cell proliferation in the V-SVZ (Li et al., 2014), our complementary in vitro KD experiments (Figure 4C–J) and in vivo OB-core lentivirus injections (Figure 5A–C), which did not affect the V-SVZ, consistently demonstrated that Ghsr1a-KD reduces neuronal migration. Taken together, our results suggest that blood-derived ghrelin enhances neuronal migration in the RMS and OB by stimulating actin cytoskeleton contraction in the cell soma, rather than by altering cell proliferation or survival.” (Results, Page 10, line 19–Page 11, line 4)

“rat anti-Ki67 (1:500, #14-5698-82, eBioscience); and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:200, #9661, Cell Signaling Technology)” (Methods, Page 48, lines 14–16)

How much is ghrelin/Ghsr1 signaling conserved in marmosets?

How ghrelin signaling is conserved between mice and common marmosets is important to clarify. A previous study reported the existence of a ghrelin homolog in common marmoset, which shares high sequence similarity with that in mice (Takemi et al., 2016). Moreover, the GHSR1a homolog in the common marmoset (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/380748978) shares 95.36% amino acid identity with its mouse counterpart. These findings suggest that blood-derived ghrelin may similarly promote neuronal migration in the marmoset brain, as observed in mice.

We have added the following text in the Discussion section:

“Our data showed that new neurons preferentially migrate along arteriole-side vessels rather than venule-side vessels in both mouse and common marmoset brains, suggesting that the mechanism of blood flow-dependent neuronal migration is conserved across rodent and primate species, as well as across brain regions. A previous study identified a ghrelin homolog in the common marmoset with high sequence similarity to the murine version (Takemi et al., 2016). In addition, the marmoset GHSR1a homolog shares 95.36% amino acid identity with that of the mouse (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/380748978). These findings suggest that bloodderived ghrelin promotes neuronal migration in the common marmoset brain in a manner similar to that in mice.” (Discussion, Page 15, lines 8–16)

Page 9. Starvation has been shown to boost ghrelin blood levels. What is the exact protocol used in this experiment and is this indeed increasing Ghrelin release from blood vessels in the V-SVZ? What about Ghsr1 expression level in newborn neurons?

We have clarified the calorie restriction (CR) protocol used in our experiments. We adopted a 70% CR protocol, which was previously shown to enhance hippocampal neurogenesis when administered for 14 days (Hornsby et al., 2016). In our study, the daily food intake under ad libitum (AL) conditions was first measured, and CR mice were then fed 70% of that amount for 5 consecutive days (see Figure 5I and Figure S10A).

To assess whether CR enhances ghrelin transcytosis into the brain parenchyma, we performed ELISA to quantify ghrelin levels in the OB and RMS. However, ghrelin concentrations were below the detection limit in both groups, precluding a direct comparison.

We also considered whether CR modulates the expression level of the ghrelin receptor GHSR1a. A recent study reported that fasting increased GHSR1a expression in the OB (Stark et al., 2024), raising the possibility that CR may exert a similar effect. To test this, we performed in situ hybridization and quantified Ghsr1a mRNA puncta in Dcx+ cells in the OB. No significant difference was found between the AL and CR groups (Figure S5B), suggesting that CR does not alter GHSR1a expression levels in new neurons.

Although we cannot exclude the possibility that CR increases GHSR1a expression in other OB cell types, our combined CR and Ghsr1a-KD experiments strongly support a cellautonomous contribution of ghrelin signaling to the enhanced neuronal migration observed under CR conditions. Corresponding data and text have been added to Figure S5 and the Results, Discussion, and the Figure legend sections as follows:

Minor

Page 4

Line 19 In Supplemental movies 1 and 2, it is unclear where to see the GFP+ new neurons interact with BV. Can you add arrows as an indication for the readers? It will be better to add the anatomy term for orientation, caudal, or rostral in the video. (The same for Supplemental movies 3, 4, and 5).

To clarify the regions of interest in Supplemental Movies 1 and 2, where neuron–vessel interactions in the RMS are highlighted, we added dotted lines indicating the RMS boundaries. In addition, we created a new movie (Supplemental Movie S1′) showing a high-magnification view of Supplemental Movie S1, in which arrows mark EGFP+ new neurons interacting with blood vessels. We also added orientation indicators (e.g., caudal and rostral) and arrows to highlight new neuron–vessel interactions in Supplemental Movies S1–S5.

The following descriptions have been added to the Figure legends:

“Supplemental Movie S1′

High-magnification view extracted from Supplemental Movie S1. Arrows indicate EGFP+ cells interacting with blood vessels.” (Figure legend, Page 46, lines 6–8)

“Arrows indicate EGFP+ cells interacting with blood vessels.” (Figure legend, Supplemental Movie S3, Page 46, lines 16–17)

“Arrows indicate Dcx+ cells interacting with blood vessels.” (Figure legend, Supplemental Movies S4 and S5, Page 46, lines 21–22, 26–27)

Blood vessels are labeled in the Supplemental movies 2 and 3 by employing Flt1DsRed transgenic mice instead of RITC-Dex-GMA. However, Flt1-DsRed transgenic mice are not mentioned in the results section.

We have now included an explanation regarding the use of Flt1-DsRed mice, in which vascular endothelial cells were labeled with DsRed.

“To visualize blood vessels, we also used Flt1-DsRed transgenic mice, in which vascular endothelial cells were specifically labeled with DsRed (Matsumoto et al., 2012). Using DcxEGFP/Flt1-DsRed double transgenic mice, we observed close spatial relationships between new neurons and blood vessels (Supplemental Movies S2 and S3).” (Results, Page 4, lines 22– 26)

Figure 5. Can you indicate (in the figure legend and the result section) the stage of the adult brain used for this experiment?

We used 6- to 12-week-old adult male mice in all experiments in this study. To specify this, we have added the age of animals to both the Results and the relevant Figure legends as follows:

“Therefore, we first studied blood vessel-guided neuronal migration in the RMS and OB using three-dimensional imaging in 6- to 12-week-old adult mice, which enabled analysis of the in vivo spatial relationship between new neurons and blood vessels.” (Results, Page 4, lines 14–16)

“Figure 1 New neurons migrate along blood vessels with abundant flow in the adult brain.” (Figure legend, Page 25, line 4)

“(B, C) Three-dimensional reconstructed images of a new neuron (green) and blood vessels (red) in the rostral migratory stream (RMS) (B) and glomerular layer (GL) (C) of 6- to 12-weekold adult mice.” (Figure legend, Page 25, lines 6–8)

“(E) Transmission electron microscopy image of a new neuron (green) in close contact with a blood vessel (red) in the GL of a 6- to 12-week-old adult mouse.” (Figure legend, Page 26, lines 4–5)

“(F) Time-lapse images of a migrating neuron (indicated by asterisks) in the GL of a 6- to 12week-old Dcx-EGFP mouse.” (Figure legend, Page 26, lines 6–7)

“Figure 3 Ghrelin is delivered from the bloodstream to the RMS and OB in the adult brain (A) Representative images of the OB and cortex of a fluorescent ghrelin-infused mouse (6 to 12 weeks old).” (Figure legend, Page 30, lines 1–3)

“Lentivirus injection into the OB core (A) and the VSVZ (D) was performed in 6- to 12-week-old adult mice.” (Figure legend, Page 33, lines 3–4)

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for author):

Major:

Ghsr1KD and blood flow 2-photon experiments to directly measure migratory speed. Could also do the same with fasting with or without Ghsr1KD.

We thank the reviewer for the valuable suggestion to strengthen our study. As pointed out in the Public Review, we agree that direct in vivo measurement of neuronal migration speed under Ghsr1a-KD conditions is important to clarify the link between ghrelin signaling and blood flow.

Two-photon imaging is the most suitable method for this purpose. Although we attempted two-photon imaging of Ghsr1a-KD new neurons, the number of virus-infected cells observed in vivo was too low to yield reliable data. Therefore, we chose an alternative strategy, combining Ghsr1a-KD with blood flow reduction using the BCAS model (Figure S9A), in which migration speed can be quantified based on the percentage of labeled cells reaching the OB. As stated in the Public Review response, BCAS significantly decreased the migration speed of Ghsr1a-KD new neurons (Figure S9B), indicating that Ghsr1a-KD does not abolish the influence of blood flow reduction. These findings suggest that ghrelin signaling is involved, but is not essential, for blood flow-dependent neuronal migration.

As suggested by the reviewer, direct observation of migration dynamics (e.g., somal translocation, leading process extension, stationary and migratory phases) is needed, especially in calorie restriction experiments. Although our data indicate that ghrelin signaling is required for fasting-induced increases in migration speed of new neurons, calorie restriction could also change concentrations of other factors in blood (Bonnet et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2024; Alogaiel et al., 2025), which may independently affect behavior of migrating neurons. Given that ghrelin is not the sole factor contributing to blood flow-dependent neuronal migration, other circulating factors could affect behavior of migrating neurons in a different manner during fasting. In vivo twophoton imaging would be a powerful approach to determine whether fasting-induced neuronal migration is caused by upregulated somal translocation speed, which would further support a role for ghrelin in this process.

We have added the following text in the Discussion:

“Although our data indicate that ghrelin signaling is essential for fasting-induced acceleration of neuronal migration, calorie restriction may also alter the concentrations of other circulating factors (Bonnet et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2024; Alogaiel et al., 2025), which could independently influence the behavior of migrating neurons.” (Discussion, Page 14, lines 25–29)

Minor:

(1) Show fluorescent Ghreliin in Figure 3 for all brain areas measured in Figure 1 (GL, EPL, GCL, and RMS) for direct comparison.

To allow for direct comparison across brain regions, we added a new Supplemental figure showing the distribution of fluorescently labeled ghrelin in the OB, including the GL, EPL, GCL and RMS. This comprehensive view highlights ghrelin localization relative to vasculature and migrating neurons in the regions analyzed in Figure 1.

(1) Figure 1, panel I is presented in a confusing manner. High blood flow points to 0 degrees, low blood flow to 180 degrees. It implies (unintentionally, I am sure) that low blood flow results in migration away from OB. Maybe plot separately?

We agree that the original presentation of Figure 1I could be misinterpreted as referring to anatomical orientation (i.e., toward or away from the OB). To avoid confusion, we revised the figure to categorize new neuron–vessel interactions into four groups according to (1) the angle between the migration direction and vessel axis (small or large), and (2) whether the new neuron is migrating toward or away from the direction of higher blood flow. This new presentation avoids implying a fixed anatomical direction and better reflects the relationship between local blood flow and neuronal migration behavior. The revised figure is presented as Supplemental Figure S1.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Ogino T, Sawamoto K. 2025. Data from: Neuronal migration depends on blood flow in the adult mammalian brain. Dryad Digital Repository. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting files, and the datasets in Dryad.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Ogino T, Sawamoto K. 2025. Data from: Neuronal migration depends on blood flow in the adult mammalian brain. Dryad Digital Repository.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES