Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1991 Aug;60(2):433–439. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82069-0

Estimating the number of channels in patch recordings

Richard Horn 1
PMCID: PMC1260080  PMID: 19431799

Abstract

The estimation of the number of channels in a patch was assumed to be equivalent to the estimation of the binomial parameter n. Seven estimators were evaluated, using data sets simulated for a range of parameters appropriate for single channel recording experiments. No single estimator was best for all parameters; a combination of estimators is a possible option to avoid the biases of individual estimators. All estimators were highly accurate in estimating n in the case that n = 1. For n ≤ 4 the simplest estimator, the maximum number of simultaneously open channels, was the best, For larger values of n the best estimators were Bayesian.

Full text

PDF
438

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blatz A. L., Magleby K. L. Quantitative description of three modes of activity of fast chloride channels from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1986 Sep;378:141–174. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. Stochastic properties of ion channel openings and bursts in a membrane patch that contains two channels: evidence concerning the number of channels present when a record containing only single openings is observed. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Jun 22;240(1299):453–477. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glasbey C. A., Martin R. J. The distribution of numbers of open channels in multi-channel patches. J Neurosci Methods. 1988 Jul;24(3):283–287. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(88)90174-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hess P., Lansman J. B., Tsien R. W. Different modes of Ca channel gating behaviour favoured by dihydropyridine Ca agonists and antagonists. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):538–544. doi: 10.1038/311538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horn R., Vandenberg C. A., Lange K. Statistical analysis of single sodium channels. Effects of N-bromoacetamide. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):323–335. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84158-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson M. B. Stochastic behavior of a many-channel membrane system. Biophys J. 1985 Feb;47(2 Pt 1):129–137. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(85)83886-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liebovitch L. S., Fischbarg J. Determining the kinetics of membrane pores from patch clamp data without measuring the open and closed times. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985 Feb 28;813(1):132–136. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90353-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Patlak J., Horn R. Effect of N-bromoacetamide on single sodium channel currents in excised membrane patches. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Mar;79(3):333–351. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rösler K. M., Casanova G. A., Hess C. W., Meier C., Ludin H. P. Blasenstörungen bei jungen Erwachsenen mit Myelomeningocele: Ergebnisse urodynamisch-elektromyographischer Untersuchungen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Jul 28;120(30):1091–1097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yeramian E., Trautmann A., Claverie P. Acetylcholine receptors are not functionally independent. Biophys J. 1986 Aug;50(2):253–263. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83459-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES