Skip to main content
BMC Microbiology logoLink to BMC Microbiology
. 2025 Nov 14;25:741. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04477-4

Antimicrobial resistance patterns and molecular characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in non-COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units during the pandemic: a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran

Mahsa Ghamari 1, Fereshteh Jabalameli 1, Mohammad Emaneini 1,✉,#, Reza Beigverdi 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC12619513  PMID: 41239232

Abstract

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most common causes of healthcare-acquired infections, particularly among the critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Its multidrug‐resistance (MDR) nature is a major factor contributing to treatment difficulties, and ultimately increased patient mortality. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and molecular characteristics of A. baumannii strains isolated from ICU patients (non-COVID-19) in Tehran, Iran.

Results

The infection rate of A. baumannii among ICU patients was 2.25% (75/3340). More than 90% of isolates showed resistance to key antibiotics including imipenem, meropenem, cefotaxime, and ciprofloxacin. Colistin was the most effective drug, with a susceptibility rate of 61.3%. The majority of the isolates (92%) were categorized as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and harbored multiple antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Among carbapenem resistance genes, blaOXA-23-like was the most prevalent, detected in 72% (54/75) of isolates, followed by blaOXA-24-like in 49.3% (37/75). Regarding aminoglycoside resistance, the genes aac(6')-Ib and ant(2')-Ia were identified in 66.6% (50/75) and 32% (24/75) of the isolates, respectively. Genotyping by multiplex PCR revealed that most of isolates (85.3%) belonged to GC2. Furthermore, REP-PCR genotyping identified eight different genotypes, with one dominant genotype accounting for 81% (51/63) of isolates.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the predominance of XDR A. baumannii strains carrying diverse ARGs in our ICU setting. These findings raise concern, as such strains complicate treatment, limit therapeutic options, and may contribute to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Mortality was high and appeared more associated with extensive resistance than with comorbidities. The clonal dissemination of these strains further emphasizes the need for robust infection control measures. Implementation of strict infection control measures and robust antibiotic stewardship programs remains essential to limit the spread of these highly resistant pathogens.

Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, Healthcare-acquired infections, ICU, COVID-19 pandemic, Antibiotic resistance genes, Global clones, Genetic diversity

Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii, an opportunistic pathogen and member of the ESKAPE group (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.), has rapidly emerged as a major global concern in healthcare settings [1]. It is a leading cause of severe healthcare-acquired infections, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and wound and urinary tract infections, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) [2, 3]. A. baumannii is especially prevalent in lower- and middle-income countries, where ICU infections account for up to 20.9% of nosocomial cases and as much as 42% of ventilator-associated pneumonia cases [4]. In recent years, clinical isolates have shown rising resistance to a wide spectrum of antibiotics, including cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB poses a particularly severe challenge due to its extensive resistance profile and has been designated a critical priority pathogen by the World Health Organization [5]. The pathogen's remarkable ability to persist and spread in hospital environments, including on mucosal surfaces and healthcare equipment, facilitates its transmission, especially in ICU settings and among healthcare personnel [6]. Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii, particularly CRAB associated with prolonged hospital stays, elevated mortality and morbidity rates especially in ICU patients and a significant economic burden on healthcare systems [7]. Consequently, considerable attention has been directed toward understanding its outbreak potential and its escalating resistance to antibiotics [8]. Addressing these challenges requires rapid diagnostic tools, novel effective antimicrobials, and stringent infection control practices. Moreover, molecular typing of clinical A. baumannii isolates is essential for identifying the sources and transmission pathways of epidemic strains. Although the molecular epidemiology of A. baumannii in Iran has been widely studied, limited data exist on isolates recovered specifically from non-COVID ICU patients during the pandemic period. To address this gap, we aimed to characterize the phenotypic and genotypic features of A. baumannii isolates in a tertiary care hospital in Tehran.

Results

Incidence of A. baumannii infections in patients admitted to ICU

During the study period (April—November 2021), 3,340 patients were admitted to ICUs, of whom 75 (2.25%) were infected with A. baumannii. All isolates were confirmed as A. baumannii through amplification of the gltA gene. The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection, 66.6% (50/75), followed by 18.6% (14/74) from blood, 8.2% (6/75) from urine and Central Venous Catheter (CVC), and 6.6% (5/75) from wound samples. The majority of A. baumannii isolates were obtained from male patients (45/75). Patient ages ranged from 1 to 89 years, with a mean age of 58.3 years. Comorbidities were present in 92% of the patient population, with hypertension (30.4%), autoimmune diseases (26%), and cardiovascular diseases (23.1%) being the most prevalent conditions. Among the 75 patients with A. baumannii infections, 63 (84%) died during hospitalization, with a median ICU stay of 15.5 days (Table 1). To further assess factors associated with patient outcomes, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, antimicrobial resistance profiles, resistance genes, and global clone distribution were compared between expired and discharged patients (Table 2). The analysis showed that comorbidities were not significantly associated with outcome (p > 0.05), consistent with the univariate analysis. However, resistance to several key antibiotics, including imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and piperacillin-tazobactam, was significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05). Among resistance genes, only the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene aac(6′)-Ib demonstrated a significant association with fatal outcome. All patients received meropenem as part of their treatment regimen, and 86.6% also received colistin in combination therapy.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and laboratory findings of patients (n = 75) with A. baumannii infections admitted in ICU

Parameters (Mean ± SD)
Age 58.43 ± 18.97
Duration of Hospital Stay 15.5 ± 17.4
Laboratory findings on admission CRP (mg/L) 110 ± 42.6
ESR 89 ± 36.3
WBC 11800 ± 19591
Platelet count 164 ± 102
Parameters n (%)
Gender Male 45 (60)
Female 30 (40)
Outcome Expired 63 (84)
Discharged 12 (16)
Sample source Respiratory tract samples 50 (66.6)
Blood 14 (18.6)
Wound 5 (6.6)
Other 6 (8.2)
Comorbidities Hypertension 21 (30.4)
Autoimmunity 18 (26)
Cardiovascular disease 16 (23.1)
Diabetes 15 (21.7)
Cancer 15 (21.7)
addiction 6 (8.7)
Chronic kidney disease 6 (8.7)
Chronic respiratory disease 5 (7.2)
Trauma 4 (5.8)

Table 2.

Comparison of demographic, clinical characteristics, antibiotic resistance, resistance genes, and global clones between expired and discharged ICU patients infected with A. baumannii

Variable Expired Discharged p value
n (%)
Gender Male 37 (49.3) 4 (5.3) 0.818
Female 26 (34.6) 8 (10.6)
Comorbidities Hypertension 18 (24) 3 (4) 0.801
Autoimmunity 17 (22.7) 1 (1.3) 0.166
Cardiovascular disease 15 (20) 1 (1.3) 0.230
Diabetes 13 (17.3) 2 (2.6) 0.753
Cancer 15 (20) 0 0.059
addiction 7 (9.3) 0 0.225
Chronic kidney disease 6 (8) 0 0.265
Chronic respiratory disease 5 (6.67) 0 0.312
Trauma 3 (4) 1 (1.33) 0.614
Antibiotic resistance Imipenem 63 (84) 11 (14.6) 0.021
Meropenem 63 (84) 11 (14.6) 0.021
Ciprofloxacin 62 (82.6) 10 (13.3) 0.015
Gentamicin 60 (80) 10 (13.3) 0.130
Amikacin 61 (81.3) 10 (13.3) 0.057
Ceftazidime 58 (77.3) 9 (12) 0.079
Cefotaxime 62 (82.6) 10 (13.3) 0.015
Cefepime 61 (81.3) 11 (14.6) 0.403
Ampicillin-sulbactam 54 (72) 11 (14.6) 0.578
Piperacillin-tazobactam 62 (82.6) 10 (13.3) 0.015
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 54 (72) 10 (13.3) 0.831
Colistin 25 (33.3) 4 (5.3) 0.679
Antibiotic resistance genes blaOXA-23-like 47 (62.6) 7 (9.3) 0.250
blaOXA-24-like 31 (41.3) 6 (8) 0.960
blaOXA-58-like 3 (4) 2 (2.6) 0.130
blaNDM 16 (21.3) 2 (2.6) 0.516
blaVIM-1 9 (12) 2 (2.6) 0.831
blaTEM 29 (38.6) 4 (5.3) 0.417
blaKPC 4 (5.3) 0 0.370
aac(6′)-Ib 45 (60) 5 (6.6) 0.045
ant(2″)-Ia 23 (30.6) 1 (1.3) 0.055
aph(3′)-Ia 20 (26.6) 3 (4) 0.642
aac(3)-Ia 1 (1.3) 0 0.660
Global clones 1 53 (70.6) 11 (14.6) 0.769
2 9 (12) 1 (1.3)
3 1 (1.3) 0

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

Resistance rates were extremely high, with imipenem and meropenem showing the highest (98.7%). Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin each exhibited 96% resistance, followed by amikacin (94.7%), gentamicin (93.3%), and ceftazidime (89.3%). Ampicillin-sulbactam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole also showed high resistance (86.7% and 85.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). In contrast, colistin remained the most effective drug, with 61.3% of isolates susceptible. Overall, the majority of isolates (92%) were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR), while five (7%) exhibited multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes. Notably, one isolate (AB117) was resistant exclusively to colistin but susceptible to all other tested antibiotics; according to standard definitions, this isolate does not meet MDR or XDR criteria and was therefore categorized as non-MDR/XDR.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The demographic, molecular characteristics and antimicrobial resistance profile of 75 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates obtained from patients admitted in ICU

Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs)

The overall prevalence ARGs ranged from 0% (blaIMP) to 72% (blaOXA-23-like) (Fig. 1). More than half of the isolates carried blaOXA-23-like, blaTEM, and aac(6′)-Ib genes. blaOXA-24-like, blaNDM, and blaVIM-1 were also frequently detected, whereas blaOXA-58-like, blaKPC, and aac(3)-Ia were less common. Additionally, the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes ant(2″)-Ia and aph(3′)-Ia were present in nearly one-third of the isolates.

GC lineages

Multiplex PCR for global clone (GC) identification showed that 85.3% (64/75) of A. baumannii isolates belonged to GC2, 13.3% (10/75) to GC1, and 1.3% (1/75) to GC3 (Fig. 1).

REP-PCR genotyping

REP-PCR analysis generated between 4 and 9 bands per isolate, with fragment sizes ranging from 200 base pairs to 1.3 kilobases. Using a similarity cutoff of ≥ 80%, eight distinct genotypes (designated A–H), were identified. Twelve isolates did not yield detectable bands and were therefore considered non-typeable. Among the 63 typeable isolates, genotype G predominated, accounting for 81% (51/63). Notably, four genotypes (B, C, F, and H) were represented by single isolates only. Further analysis of genotype G revealed significant heterogeneity in both ARGs and phenotypic resistance profiles. In addition, 90% (46/51) of genotype G isolates exhibited XDR phenotype. The REP-PCR dendrogram depicting the genetic relationships among the 63 typeable A. baumannii isolates is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dendrogram showing the genetic relatedness of 63 typeable strains of Acinetobacter baumannii determined by REP-PCR analysis using the Dice similarity coefficient. The vertical line displays the 80% similarity cut-off value. Based on a similarity index ≥ 80%, 8 genotypes were found. Each genotype were labelled A to H. Numbers at the terminal branches are strain names

Discussion

In this retrospective observational cohort study, the prevalence of A. baumannii infections in patients admitted to ICU was 2.25%, which was lower than other reports from Saudi Arabia (6.2%) [9], Nigeria (7%) [10], Morocco (8.4%) [11], Kenya (22.7%) [12] and Poland (31%) [13]. This variation in reports from different regions might be associated with several factors including: the dissimilarities in healthcare systems and infection control practices [14], study design and methodology [15], patient demographics [16], diagnostic methods and surveillance [17] and regional epidemiology [18]. Based on the demographic data of patients in present study, the number of male patients infected with A. baumannii in ICU was higher than the number of female patients. Our finding is in accordance with other studies [1922]. This may be attributed to immune responses because testosterone suppresses immune defenses in males, while estradiol enhances pro-inflammatory responses in females [9]. In present study, the mortality rate among patients infected with A. baumannii was 84%, which is higher than that reported rates from China (34.4%) [23], Ecuador (35%) [24], Turkey (58.5%) [25] and Egypt (50%) [26]. In the statistical analysis of outcome-associated factors (Table 2), comorbidities, although highly prevalent among the patients, did not demonstrate a significant association with mortality. Instead, resistance to several critical antibiotics including carbapenems, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with fatal outcomes. This finding suggests that limited therapeutic options and treatment failure due to extensive resistance may contribute more substantially to mortality than underlying health conditions. Notably, the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene aac(6′)-Ib also showed a significant association with mortality, highlighting the clinical relevance of genotypic resistance determinants in predicting poor outcomes. In this study, the median length of stay in the ICU was lower (15.5 days) compared with other study from Turkey (21 days) [20] but higher than a report from Lebanon (12.2 days) [27]. The difference in the median length of stay might be related to several factors, including differences in healthcare systems, the prevalence and resistance patterns of A. baumannii, treatment protocols, and patient demographics [28, 29]. In the present study, the majority of A. baumannii isolates were highly resistant to different antibiotic class including carbapenems, cephalosporins aminoglycosides, quinolones and 92% of the isolates were XDR. The high rate of antibiotic resistance observed in our hospital may be attributed to the overuse or misuse of antibiotics, which exerts selection pressure leading to the development of resistance [30]. Colistin is often regarded as one of the most effective antimicrobials against XDR A. baumannii infections [31]. Our study revealed that 38.7% A. baumannii isolates were colistin-resistant. Similar findings have been reported by Gerson et al. in Germany (48%) [32] and Papathanakos et al.in Greece (41%) [33]; however, a significantly higher resistance rate was reported by Al-Kadmy et al. in Iraq (76%) [34] and by Rahimzadeh et al. in Iran (84.2%) [35]. Lower rate of resistance (4.3%) was reported in Serbia [36] and Iran (0%) [37]. The high prevalence of resistance to colistin in the current study may be attributed to inappropriate use of bactericidal antibiotics in ICU and inadequate infection control practices in our hospital [38]. Despite high resistance rate to colistin, no isolates in the current study contained the mcr-1 gene, suggesting that other resistance mechanisms (mutations in the PmrAB system and loss of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production) may be responsible for colistin resistance, which were not investigated in current study [39, 40]. In this study, a range of ARGs were detected among A. baumannii isolates. The most commonly detected resistance genes among the isolates were the class D carbapenemase genes blaOXA-23-like (72%) and blaOXA-24-like (49.3%), the AME gene aac(6’)-Ib (66.6%), the class A beta-lactamase gene blaTEM (44%) and the MBL gene blaNDM (24%). The distribution of ARGs varies significantly across geographical regions. For instance, a study conducted in Egypt by Hassan et al. reported the presence of OXA−23-like (77.7%), blaNDM (11.7%), blaKPC (10.7%), and blaOXA-58-like (1.9%) among ICU-derived A. baumannii isolates [41]. Similarly, a study from Pakistan found high prevalence rates for blaOXA-23-like (73%), blaNDM (92.2%); however, blaOXA-24-like and blaOXA-58-like genes were not detected in that study [42]. Studies from Iran have reported varying prevalence rates of carbapenemase genes in A. baumannii. Vahhabi et al. identified blaOXA-23-like (82.1%), blaOXA-24-like (36.6%), blaNDM (6.2%), and blaIMP (4.4%) [43]. Farajzadeh et al. found blaOXA-23-like (65.7%), blaVIM (31.4%), and blaIMP (25.7%) [44]. Hashemizadeh et al. reported blaOXA-24-like (55.3%), blaOXA-23-like (41.7%), blaVIM (41.7%), and blaKPC (0.6%) [45]. Azimi et al. detected blaOXA-23-like (76.5%), blaOXA-24-like (65.8%), blaNDM (9.4%), blaVIM (2%), and blaIMP (0.3%), while blaOXA-58-like was not detected [46]. In Kuwait, the predominant carbapenemase genes identified were blaOXA-23-like (85.1%), blaIMP (13%), and blaOXA-58-like (0.7%), while blaNDM, blaKPC, and blaVIM were not found in any of the isolates studied [47]. In a study from Jordan, the most prevalent ARGs were blaOXA-23-like (96.7%), blaVIM (56.8%) and blaNDM (7.4%) [48]. Other study from Saudi Arabia, blaOXA-23-like, blaIMP, blaOXA-24-like and blaTEM were the most prevalent genes, in which detected in 100%, 76.1%, 64.1%, 25.3% of isolates, respectively [49]. As noted earlier, the prevalence of ARGs exhibited substantial variation across different countries. These discrepancies may be attributed to horizontal transmission of resistance determinants, diverse patterns of antimicrobial prescription, the dissemination of particular clones carrying distinct types of ARGs and varying numbers of isolates tested [50]. Overall, β-lactamase genes were identified in 98.6% of the isolates. In the single isolate lacking these genes, β-lactam resistance may be attributed to alternative mechanisms, such as the activation of efflux pumps or reduced outer membrane permeability, which were not investigated in this study. In line with previous reports from Iran and the region, our study confirms GC2 as the prevailing clone responsible for XDR A. baumannii infections. What our data add is a snapshot of the clonal structure and resistance gene distribution specifically among non-COVID ICU patients during the pandemic, thereby complementing earlier national studies [5153]. To further investigate the clonal relatedness of A. baumannii isolates, the REP-PCR typing method was employed. In this study, 75 isolates were analyzed, resulting in the identification of 8 distinct patterns among the 63 typeable isolates. A significant majority (80%) of these isolates grouped into a single clone (clone G) (Fig. 1), suggesting the presence of a dominant strain or a potential outbreak within the sample population. When compared to previous studies, these results reveal some differences in the genetic diversity among clinical isolates of A. baumannii. The study by Nogbou et al. from South Africa identified four clones among A. baumannii isolates, with clone A being the most prevalent, accounting for 69% of the cases [54]. In a study by Al Jabur et al. from Iran, REP-PCR results revealed 17 distinct clones, with clone A being the most prevalent, comprising 14% of the isolates [55]. In contrast, the current study shows a lower level of genetic diversity, with a significant proportion of isolates belonging to a single clone. Additionally, 90% (46/51) of genotype G isolates were XDR phenotype, underscoring the potential clinical importance of this clone. Interestingly, even though clonally related, genotype G isolates were highly heterogeneous in terms of ARGs as well as phenotypic resistance patterns. Intra-clonal heterogeneity could potentially represent horizontal transfer of genes, acquisition by plasmids, or selective pressure within the hospital, leading to genotypic and phenotypic diversification [56, 57]. It is worth noting that twelve isolates did not yield clear REP-PCR profiles, which should be considered when interpreting the observed patterns of clonal dominance. Despite this, REP-PCR successfully identified dominant profiles among the 63 typeable isolates. Consequently, conclusions regarding clonal dominance are based on these typeable isolates, and further confirmation using complementary methods, such as Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), would strengthen these findings. Despite of providing useful information regarding the prevalence, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of A. baumannii isolates, present study has several limitations. Although the study reflects the actual incidence of isolates during the investigation period, its single-center design and limited sample size (n = 75) inevitably reduce statistical power and restrict the generalizability of the findings. Consequently, the results should be interpreted with caution, as they may not fully represent the epidemiological situation in other hospitals or regions of Iran. In addition, the limited sample size and single-center design restricted the analyses to univariate tests; more robust multivariate or regression approaches were not feasible, limiting the ability to control for potential confounders. Second, the presence of other carbapenem resistance conferring mechanisms including efflux pumps and low outer membrane permeability and also colistin resistance mechanisms as mentioned earlier, were not investigated and should be considered in further researches. Third, since REP-PCR provides relatively low resolution, future studies should incorporate higher-resolution typing methods such as MLST or WGS for more precise genetic characterization of these isolates. In addition, band patterns were analyzed manually by two independent researchers to minimize bias; however, this approach may still introduce a degree of subjectivity that should be acknowledged.

Material and methods

Setting and sampling

This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Tehran, Iran, from April to November 2021. Patients were included based on a negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal swab and the absence of associated clinical symptoms. Hospital-acquired infections were defined as those diagnosed ≥ 48 h after ICU admission. Infections were confirmed in patients with positive cultures from clinically relevant sites (blood, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), urine, wounds) accompanied by clinical signs of infection (fever, respiratory distress, sepsis). Patients with positive cultures from non-infectious sites (throat, rectal swabs) without clinical symptoms were classified as colonized. Patient data were retrieved from the hospital's computerized databases and included clinical, demographic, and laboratory information, as well as underlying conditions, microbiological results, and ICU length of stay.

Isolate identification

A single isolate from each patient was included in the study. Isolate identification was performed using conventional microbiological and biochemical methods, including Gram staining, oxidase and catalase tests, oxidative/fermentative (O/F) reactions, motility testing, and assessment of growth at 42 °C [58]. Species-level identification was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the gltA gene, which encodes the species-specific citrate synthase, as described previously [59]. The A. baumannii isolates were stored at − 70 °C in trypticase soy broth supplemented with 20% glycerol until further analysis. Prior to testing, all isolates were subcultured to ensure viability and purity.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

The Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of A. baumannii isolates was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, following the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [60]. Eleven antibiotic disks (MAST, United Kingdom) were tested, including amikacin, gentamicin, cefepime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, and imipenem. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin was determined using the broth microdilution method in accordance with CLSI guidelines. Quality control was ensured using two standard reference strains, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. Isolates resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, excluding carbapenems, were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). MDR isolates exhibiting resistance to meropenem were further categorized as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) [61].

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from a 24-h A. baumannii cultures grown on blood agar using the boiling method, as described previously [6264]. Following extraction, the supernatant was stored at − 20 °C and subsequently utilized as the DNA template for PCR assays.

Detection of ARGs

Multiplex PCR was performed using previously reported primers to detect genes encoding class D carbapenemases (blaOXA−23−like, blaOXA−24−like, and blaOXA−58−like) [65]. In addition, single PCR assays were conducted to detect MBL genes (blaNDM, blaIMP, blaVIM), class A carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaTEM), aminoglycoside resistance genes (aac(6′)-Ib, aac(3)-Ia, ant(2″)-Ia, and aph(3')-Ia), and the colistin resistance gene (mcr-1), following previously studies [6670].

Identification of global clone (GC) lineages

Global clones (GCs)1, 2, and 3 of A. baumannii were identified using multiplex PCR targeting three alleles of ompA, csuE, and blaOXA-51-like, as previously described [71].

Repetitive extragenic palindromic element PCR (Rep-PCR) genotyping

To assess the genetic diversity of A. baumannii isolates, REP-PCR was performed using the primers REP1R-I (IIIICGICGICATCIGGC) and REP2-I (ICGICTTATCIGGCCTAC) [72]. PCR amplification was conducted in a thermal cycler under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 45 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 16 min. Due to the lack of appropriate software, REP-PCR band patterns were analyzed manually based on the presence or absence of bands. A dendrogram was subsequently generated using the online tool available at http://insilico.ehu.eus/dice_upgma/, which employs the Dice similarity coefficient and UPGMA clustering method. Isolates exhibiting ≥ 80% similarity were considered clonally related. REP-PCR banding patterns were independently evaluated by two experienced researchers using standardized criteria to ensure reproducibility and minimize analytical bias.

Statistical analysis

Data on microbial results, clinical parameters, and demographic characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics in IBM SPSS Version 26 (Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical analyses, including Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, were conducted to assess associations, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered indicative of statistical significance.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the predominance of XDR A. baumannii strains carrying diverse ARGs in our ICU setting. These findings raise concern, as such strains complicate treatment, limit therapeutic options, and may contribute to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Mortality was high and appeared more associated with extensive resistance than with comorbidities. The clonal dissemination of these strains further emphasizes the need for robust infection control measures. Implementation of strict infection control measures and robust antibiotic stewardship programs remains essential to limit the spread of these highly resistant pathogens.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

A. baumannii

Acinetobacter baumannii

CRAB

Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii

MDR

Multi-drug resistant

XDR

Extensively drug resistant

ICUs

Intensive care units

WHO

World health organization

MIC

Minimum inhibitory concentration

CLSI

Clinical laboratory standards institute

MHB

Mueller Hinton broth

AGRs

Antibiotic resistance genes

REP-PCR

Repetitive extragenic palindromic element PCR

GCs

Global clones

Authors’ contributions

R.B., F.J., and M.E. conceived and designed the experiment; M.GH. performed the experiments; M.GH., F.J., M.E. and R.B. analyzed and interpreted the data; M.GH and R.B. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences & health Services (grant code: 1400–2-101–54321).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included here and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate declaration

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (approval code: IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1400.912). Sampling and data collection were conducted in accordance with the committee’s regulations and ethical standards. The Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences reviewed the study and waived the requirement for informed consent, as it was a retrospective analysis involving only anonymized bacterial isolates and did not include any direct human participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mohammad Emaneini and Reza Beigverdi contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Mohammad Emaneini, Email: emaneini@tums.ac.ir.

Reza Beigverdi, Email: r-beigverdi@tums.ac.ir.

References

  • 1.Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom. 2019;5(10):e000306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ibrahim S, Al-Saryi N, Al-Kadmy IMS, Aziz SN. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii as an emerging concern in hospitals. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(10):6987–98. 10.1007/s11033-021-06690-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vázquez-López R, Solano-Gálvez SG, Juárez Vignon-Whaley JJ, Abello Vaamonde JA, Padró Alonzo LA, Rivera Reséndiz A, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii resistance: a real challenge for clinicians. Antibiotics. 2020. 10.3390/antibiotics9040205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ayobami O, Willrich N, Harder T, Okeke IN, Eckmanns T, Markwart R. The incidence and prevalence of hospital-acquired (carbapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter baumannii in Europe, Eastern Mediterranean and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):1747–59. 10.1080/22221751.2019.1698273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guidelines for the prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in health care facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [PubMed]
  • 6.Nocera FP, Attili AR, De Martino L. Acinetobacter baumannii: its clinical significance in human and veterinary medicine. Pathogens. 2021. 10.3390/pathogens10020127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thacharodi A, Vithlani A, Hassan S, Alqahtani A, Pugazhendhi A. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii raises global alarm for new antibiotic regimens. iScience. 2024;27(12):111367. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gong Y, Shen X, Huang G, Zhang C, Luo X, Yin S, et al. Epidemiology and resistance features of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from the ward environment and patients in the burn ICU of a Chinese hospital. J Microbiol. 2016;54(8):551–8. 10.1007/s12275-016-6146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hafiz TA, Alghamdi SS, Mubaraki MA, Alghamdi SSM, Alothaybi A, Aldawood E, et al. A two-year retrospective study of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii respiratory infections in critically ill patients: clinical and microbiological findings. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16(3):313–9. 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ogbonna O, Onuoha S, David I, Ogbu O. Prevalence and phenotypic characteristics of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from critically ill patients in two healthcare facilities in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2023;24(4):408–14. 10.4314/ajcem.v24i4.13. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Uwingabiye J, Lemnouer A, Baidoo S, Frikh M, Kasouati J, Maleb A, et al. Intensive care unit-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii infections in a Moroccan teaching hospital: epidemiology, risk factors and outcome. Germs. 2017;7(4):193–205. 10.18683/germs.2017.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kipsang F, Munyiva J, Menza N, Musyoki A. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: antimicrobial resistance patterns and risk factors for acquisition in a Kenyan intensive care unit. IJID Reg. 2023;9:111–6. 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Duszynska W, Litwin A, Rojek S, Szczesny A, Ciasullo A, Gozdzik W. Analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii hospital infections in patients treated at the intensive care unit of the University Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland: a 6-year, single-center, retrospective study. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:629–35. 10.2147/idr.S162232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Organization WH. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. 2016:91. [PubMed]
  • 15.Locey KJ, Webb TA, Weinstein RA, Hota B, Stein BD. Random variation drives a critical bias in the comparison of healthcare-associated infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(9):1396–402. 10.1017/ice.2022.288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574–81. 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prevention CCfDCa: 2019 Antibiotic resistance threats report. 2019.
  • 18.Sharma R, Lakhanpal D. Acinetobacter baumannii: a comprehensive review of global epidemiology, clinical implications, host interactions, mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance and mitigation strategies. Microb Pathog. 2025;204:107605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alotaibi T, Abuhaimed A, Alshahrani M, Albdelhady A, Almubarak Y, Almasari O. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a critical care setting: a tertiary teaching hospital experience. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211001144. 10.1177/20503121211001144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Arslan K, Şahin AS. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic resistance profiles, and factors affecting mortality in patients isolated acinetobacter baumannii in intensive care unit: retrospective tertiary center analysis. Compr Med. 2024;16(1):51–7. 10.14744/cm.2023.57338. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Foglia F, Ambrosino A, Bashir S, Finamore E, Zannella C, Donnarumma G, et al. Prevalence of acinetobacter baumannii multidrug resistance in university hospital environment. Antibiotics. 2025. 10.3390/antibiotics14050490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu X, Qin P, Wen H, Wang W, Huo Q, Li Q, Zhao J. Sex differences in Acinetobacter baumannii infections: a comprehensive analysis of antibiotic resistance patterns in Hebei Province, China. Am J Infect Control. 2025.10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Song H, Zhang H, Zhang D, Liu B, Wang P, Liu Y, et al. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii Infection: a retrospective study. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:7855–66. 10.2147/idr.S423969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abarca-Coloma L, Puga-Tejada M, Nuñez-Quezada T, Gómez-Cruz O, Mawyin-Muñoz C, Barungi S, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality in Acinetobacter baumannii infections: results of a prospective cohort study in a tertiary public hospital in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Antibiotics. 2024. 10.3390/antibiotics13030213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boral B, Unaldi Ö, Ergin A, Durmaz R, Eser ÖK, Zarakolu P, et al. A prospective multicenter study on the evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in intensive care units with clinical and environmental features. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18(1):19. 10.1186/s12941-019-0319-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sileem AE, Said AM, Meleha MS. Acinetobacter baumannii in ICU patients: a prospective study highlighting their incidence, antibiotic sensitivity pattern and impact on ICU stay and mortality. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2017;66(4):693–8. 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2017.01.003. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Itani R, Khojah HMJ, Karout S, Rahme D, Hammoud L, Awad R, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii: assessing susceptibility patterns, management practices, and mortality predictors in a tertiary teaching hospital in Lebanon. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):136. 10.1186/s13756-023-01343-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosenthal VD, Bat-Erdene I, Gupta D, Belkebir S, Rajhans P, Zand F, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 45 countries for 2012–2017: device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(4):423–32. 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–6. 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70061-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Salam MA, Al-Amin MY, Salam MT, Pawar JS, Akhter N, Rabaan AA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare. 2023. 10.3390/healthcare11131946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Novović K, Jovčić B. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: molecular mechanisms and epidemiology. Antibiotics. 2023. 10.3390/antibiotics12030516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gerson S, Lucaßen K, Wille J, Nodari CS, Stefanik D, Nowak J, et al. Diversity of amino acid substitutions in PmrCAB associated with colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(3):105862. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Papathanakos G, Andrianopoulos I, Papathanasiou A, Priavali E, Koulenti D, Koulouras V. Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia: a serious threat for critically ill patients. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Al-Kadmy IMS, Ibrahim SA, Al-Saryi N, Aziz SN, Besinis A, Hetta HF. Prevalence of genes involved in colistin resistance in acinetobacter baumannii: first report from Iraq. Microb Drug Resist. 2020;26(6):616–22. 10.1089/mdr.2019.0243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rahimzadeh G, Valadan R, Rezai S, Khosravi M, Vahedi Larijani L, Sheidaei S, et al. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance changes in Acinetobacter baumannii in the era of COVID-19 in Northern Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2024;16(3):314–22. 10.18502/ijm.v16i3.15762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lukovic B, Gajic I, Dimkic I, Kekic D, Zornic S, Pozder T, et al. The first nationwide multicenter study of Acinetobacter baumannii recovered in Serbia: emergence of OXA-72, OXA-23 and NDM-1-producing isolates. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):101. 10.1186/s13756-020-00769-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Maleki A, Kaviar VH, Koupaei M, Haddadi MH, Kalani BS, Valadbeigi H, et al. Molecular typing and antibiotic resistance patterns among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii recovered from burn patients in Tehran, Iran. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:994303. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.994303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Talebi Bezmin Abadi A, Rizvanov AA, Haertlé T, Blatt NL. World health organization report: current crisis of antibiotic resistance. BioNanoScience. 2019;9(4):778–88. 10.1007/s12668-019-00658-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Palmieri M, D’Andrea MM, Pelegrin AC, Perrot N, Mirande C, Blanc B, et al. Abundance of colistin-resistant, OXA-23- and ArmA-producing Acinetobacter baumannii belonging to international clone 2 in Greece. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:668. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zafer MM, Hussein AFA, Al-Agamy MH, Radwan HH, Hamed SM. Retained colistin susceptibility in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates with multiple mutations in pmrCAB and lpxACD operons. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1229473. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.12294738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hassan RM, Salem ST, Hassan SIM, Hegab AS, Elkholy YS. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from Egyptian patients. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0251508. 10.1371/journal.pone.0251508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zahra N, Zeshan B, Qadri MMA, Ishaq M, Afzal M, Ahmed N. Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteria isolated from surgical intensive care unit patients in Pakistan. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2021;14(4):e113008. 10.5812/jjm.113008. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vahhabi A, Hasani A, Rezaee MA, Baradaran B, Hasani A, Kafil HS, et al. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from northwest Iran: high prevalence of OXA genes in sync. Iran J Microbiol. 2021;13(3):282–93. 10.18502/ijm.v13i3.6388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Farajzadeh Sheikh A, Savari M, Abbasi Montazeri E, Khoshnood S. Genotyping and molecular characterization of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a single hospital in southwestern Iran. Pathog Glob Health. 2020;114(5):251–61. 10.1080/20477724.2020.1765124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hashemizadeh Z, Hatam G, Fathi J, Aminazadeh F, Hosseini-Nave H, Hadadi M, et al. The spread of insertion sequences element and transposons in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a hospital setting in southwestern Iran. Infect Chemother. 2022;54(2):275–86. 10.3947/ic.2022.0022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Azimi L, Fallah F, Karimi A, Shirdoust M, Azimi T, Sedighi I, et al. Survey of various carbapenem-resistant mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples in Iran. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2020;23(11):1396–400. 10.22038/ijbms.2020.44853.10463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Al-Hashem G, Rotimi VO, Albert MJ. Antimicrobial resistance of serial isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii colonizing the rectum of adult intensive care unit patients in a teaching hospital in Kuwait. Microb Drug Resist. 2021;27(1):64–72. 10.1089/mdr.2020.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ababneh Q, Aldaken N, Jaradat Z, Al-Rousan E, Inaya Z, Alsaleh D, et al. Predominance of extensively-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying bla OXA-23 in Jordanian patients admitted to the intensive care units. PLoS One. 2025;20(2):e0317798. 10.1371/journal.pone.0317798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Alanazi FA, Almaary KS, Dawoud TM, El-Tayeb MA, Elbadawi YB, Mubarak AS, et al. Molecular characterization of putative antibiotic resistance determinant and virulence factors genes of Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from intensive care unit patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2025;18(4):102695. 10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ghamari M, Beigverdi R, Jabalameli F, Emaneini M. Antimicrobial resistance pattern, virulence determinants and molecular analysis of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in Iran. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2022. 10.1093/femsle/fnac100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hojabri Z, Pajand O, Bonura C, Aleo A, Giammanco A, Mammina C. Molecular epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii in Iran: endemic and epidemic spread of multiresistant isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(9):2383–7. 10.1093/jac/dku045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mahdian S, Sadeghifard N, Pakzad I, Ghanbari F, Soroush S, Azimi L, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii clonal lineages I and II harboring different carbapenem-hydrolyzing-β-lactamase genes are widespread among hospitalized burn patients in Tehran. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(6):533–42. 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Naderi G, Talebi M, Gheybizadeh R, Seifi A, Ghourchian S, Rahbar M, et al. Mobile genetic elements carrying aminoglycoside resistance genes in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates belonging to global clone 2. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1172861. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1172861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nogbou ND, Phofa DT, Nchabeleng M, Musyoki AM. Investigating multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021;39(2):218–23. 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Al Jebur AA, Soleimani N, Hosseini SM. Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification, multiplex PCR, and REP- PCR techniques for identification of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. Iran J Microbiol. 2023;15(5):654–64. 10.18502/ijm.v15i5.13871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Biglari S, Hanafiah A, Mohd Puzi S, Ramli R, Rahman M, Lopes BS. Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a teaching hospital in Malaysia. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(5):545–55. 10.1089/mdr.2016.0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hamidian M, Hall RM. The abar antibiotic resistance islands found in Acinetobacter baumannii global clone 1 - structure, origin and evolution. Drug Resist Updat. 2018;41:26–39. 10.1016/j.drup.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Adeyemi FM, Akinlade EA, Yusuf-Omoloye NA, Ajigbewu OH, Dare AP, Wahab AA, et al. Carbapenem-resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: prevalence, antibiotic resistance profile and carbapenemase genes in clinical and hospital environmental strains. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):786. 10.1186/s12879-025-11169-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wong YP, Chua KH, Thong KL. One-step species-specific high resolution melting analysis for nosocomial bacteria detection. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;107:133–7. 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Weinstein MP LB, Patel J, Mathers A, Campeau S, Mazzulli T, et al. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 32rd edn. Philadelphia, United States; 2022.
  • 61.Kyriakidis I, Vasileiou E, Pana ZD, Tragiannidis A. Acinetobacter baumannii antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Pathogens. 2021;10(3):373. 10.3390/pathogens10030373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jian X, Li Y, Wang H, Li C, Li F, Li J, et al. A comparative study of genotyping and antimicrobial resistance between carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates at a tertiary pediatric hospital in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:2024. 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1298202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ahmadi N, Salimizand H, Zomorodi AR, Abbas JE, Ramazanzadeh R, Haghi F, et al. Genomic diversity of β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Iran; the impact of global high-risk clones. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024;23(1):5. 10.1186/s12941-024-00668-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Saraiva MMS, Rodrigues HLDS, Benevides VP, de Leon CMCG, Santos SCL, Stipp DT, et al. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of staphylococcus aureus cultured from the healthy horses’ nostrils sampled in distant regions of Brazil. Antibiotics. 2025;14(7):693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sánchez-Urtaza S, Alfonso-Alarcón L, Arazo Del Pino R, Burgwinkel T, Ocampo-Sosa A, Gonzalez R, et al. Genomic characterization of multidrug-resistant clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a hospital in Paraguay. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;15:1620479. 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1620479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pourajam S, Kalantari E, Talebzadeh H, Mellali H, Sami R, Soltaninejad F, et al. Secondary bacterial infection and clinical characteristics in patients with COVID-19 admitted to two intensive care units of an academic hospital in Iran during the first wave of the pandemic. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:784130. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.784130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mike-Ogburia MI, Monsi TP, Nwokah EG. Prevalence and determinants of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Klebsiella species and associated antimicrobial resistance genes in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):1036. 10.1186/s12879-025-11351-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sobieh SS, Mohamed SAH, El-Sayed MA, Abdallah SA. Molecular assessment of MCR-1 gene among pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol Res. 2023;14(3):1238–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ghamari M, Emaneini M, Hemmati S, Jabalameli F, Beigverdi R. Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of aminoglycoside resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with blood stream infections in Tehran. Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2024;16(2):187–92. 10.18502/ijm.v16i2.15351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Baral R, Tuladhar R, Manandhar S, Singh A, Sherchan S. Detection of blaKPC gene among carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical specimens at tertiary care hospital of Nepal. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(1):144. 10.1186/s12866-024-03301-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Novović K, Radovanović M, Gajić I, Vasiljević Z, Malešević M, Šapić K, et al. AdeABC, AdeFGH, and AdeIJK efflux pumps as key factors in tigecycline resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: a study from Western Balkan hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025;44(1):129–42. 10.1007/s10096-024-04974-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen CH, Huang CC. Molecular epidemiological study of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates: phenotype switching of antibiotic resistance. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:21. 10.1186/1476-0711-12-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included here and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES