Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2025 Nov 20;53(21):gkaf1122. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf1122

KlebPhaCol: a community-driven resource for Klebsiella research identified a novel phage family

Daniela Rothschild-Rodriguez 1, Kai S Lambon 2, Simran Krishnakant Kushwaha 3, Sofya K Garushyants 4, Moritz Ertelt 5,6, Agnieszka Latka 7,8, Ana Rita Costa 9, Anna Mantzouratou 10, Claire King 11, Dimitri Boeckaerts 12,13, Elizabeth Sheridan 14,15, Eugene V Koonin 16, Francesca Merrick 17, Francis Drobniewski 18,19, Ilaria De Angelis 20, Kordo Saeed 21, Macy Martin 22, J Mark Sutton 23,24, Matthew E Wand 25, Michael Andrew 26, Morgen Hedges 27, Stan J J Brouns 28, Pieter-Jan Haas 29, Sophie T Lawson 30,31, Stephen M E Fordham 32, Yan-Jiun Lee 33, Yi Wu 34, Yves Briers 35, Peter Braun 36,37, Peter R Weigele 38, Franklin L Nobrega 39,✉
PMCID: PMC12629751  PMID: 41261852

Abstract

The growing threat of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, coupled with its role in gut colonisation, has intensified the search for new treatments, including bacteriophage therapy. Despite increasing documentation of Klebsiella-targeting phages, clinical applications remain limited, with key phage–bacteria interactions still poorly understood. A major obstacle is fragmented access to well-characterised phage–bacteria pairings, restricting the collective advancement of therapeutic and mechanistic insights. To address this gap, we created the Klebsiella Phage Collection (KlebPhaCol), an open resource comprising 52 phages and 74 Klebsiella isolates, characterised at phenotypic and genomic levels. These phages span six families—including a novel family, Felixviridae, associated with the human gut—and target 20 sequence types (including ST258, ST11, and ST14) and 19 capsular-locus types (including KL1 and KL2), across 6 Klebsiella species. Freely accessible at www.klebphacol.org, KlebPhaCol invites the scientific community to both use and contribute to this resource, fostering collaborative research and a deeper understanding of Klebsiella-phage interactions beyond therapeutic use.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

The global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has prompted urgent action to develop new, effective therapies [1–6], with bacteriophage (phage) therapy emerging as a promising option [7, 8]. Phages, as natural predators of bacteria, can precisely target bacterial pathogens, but a reliable pipeline from phage isolation to clinical application remains elusive [9]. Key challenges include limited regulatory frameworks and gaps in understanding phage-bacteria and phage–host interactions, which are essential for developing safe and reliable therapies [10].

Klebsiella pneumoniae, a multidrug-resistant pathogen and one of the six “ESKAPE” organisms (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.), exemplifies these challenges. Known for causing severe infections, K. pneumoniae has developed resistance to last-resort antimicrobials [11], including carbapenems [12], making it a high priority target for new antimicrobials [13]. K. pneumoniae infections, including pneumonia, sepsis, and liver abscess, are often acquired in hospital settings but are also found in community-acquired cases, especially involving hypervirulent strains [14–20]. The role of this pathogen in chronic gut colonization has further implicated it in gut conditions like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [21, 22] and primary sclerosing cholangitis [23], establishing K. pneumoniae as a significant gut-associated pathobiont.

A major challenge in phage therapy against K. pneumoniae is its highly variable capsule polysaccharide (K-types), with over 180 distinct types now genomically identified [24–27] and associated with different species [28] and virulence traits [29]. The diversity complicates treatment because capsule-specific phages, which depend on capsule polysaccharides to bind and infect cells, often have limited host ranges [30–32]. While some phages can bind alternative receptors like the O-antigen [33], capsule diversity remains a critical barrier. Beyond receptor diversity, bacterial defence systems and mobile genetic elements can further restrict phage efficacy [34–37]. These multifaceted interactions highlight the need for well-characterised phage collections, which can enable researchers to systematically study and address obstacles to successful therapy. Several collections of Klebsiella phages have been reported in the literature [33, 34, 38–42]. While these mark milestones in the field, there remains a fundamental need for centralising and standardising resources to make them easily accessible for the academic and clinical communities. Standardised, referenced collections, such as the BASEL collection for Escherichia coli [43, 44] phages or the CEPEST collection for Pseudomonas putida phages [45], demonstrate how accessible resources can foster shared advancements. Addressing this need, we present the Klebsiella Phage Collection (KlebPhaCol), an open-source collection that contains 52 phages and 74 Klebsiella strains, each extensively characterised. The open-source nature of KlebPhaCol (available at klebphacol.org) invites the scientific and medical community to contribute additional isolates and data, fostering and evolving this community-driven platform. In addition to informing phage therapy, this collection can be utilised to study fundamental aspects of phage–bacteria interactions. By centralising and sharing these resources, KlebPhaCol aims to bridge current gaps, empowering the scientific community to collectively advance research on Klebsiella and its phages for both therapeutic and broader biological insights.

Materials and methods.

 .

Phage isolation and purification

Numbered phages (e.g. Roth01) were sourced from hospital wastewater effluent collected at the University Medical Centre Utrecht in the Netherlands in 2020 as previously described [46], while lettered phages (e.g. RothD) were sourced from effluent collected at Portswood in Southampton, United Kingdom in 2021. Thirty-two isolates with clinically relevant sequence types (ST) were used as isolation hosts (Supplementary Table S1). Based on ST grouping, seven enrichment cultures were produced: (i) ST11 (n = 5), (ii) ST101 (n = 5), (iii) ST15 (n = 4), (iv) ST258 (n = 5), (v) ST14 (n = 6), (vi) ST323 (n = 2), and (vii) the remaining ST-types [ST489 (n = 1), ST86 (n = 1), ST38 (n = 1), and ST23 (n = 2)]. Fifty microlitres of each overnight culture grown in Lysogeny Broth (LB; Formedium LB-Broth Lennox) were added to each respective enrichment containing 50 ml of LB and 50 µl of the phage source filtrate. Enrichments were incubated overnight at 37°C and shaking at 180 rpm, and then centrifuged (8000 × g, 20 min, 4°C) and filter-sterilized (0.45/0.22 µm PES). Five microlitres of the resulting supernatants were spot-tested for the detection of phage against all 32 isolates using a double-layer agar technique (top agar 0.6%) [47]. Susceptible isolates were subsequently plated with serially diluted phages to identify distinct plaque morphologies, which were then single picked with sterile toothpicks, dotted, and spread with sterile paper onto fresh bacterial lawns to purify the phages. This latter step was repeated twice to obtain a consistent plaque morphology. Individually purified phages were then propagated in LB with their respective host, centrifuged, filter-sterilized, and stored at 4°C.

 .

Phage host-range.

Five microlitres of undiluted phage lysates were first spotted onto double-layer agar plates for each of the 74 Klebsiella spp. strains tested. Phages that showed some form of lysis were then re-tested using 10-fold serial dilutions of stocks normalized at 108 PFU/ml. These were then spotted onto double-layer agar plates with respective bacterial lawns. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, and phage plaques were observed to distinguish between productive infection (lysis with individual plaques), no infection (lack of plaques), and undetermined lysis (opaque lysis without individual plaques). Assays were conducted in both LB and Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; Hach Bacto™ Tryptic Soy Broth) media. Unless otherwise stated, all other phage assays were done in LB.

 .

Plate reader liquid assays

Overnight bacterial cultures of strains susceptible to phages infecting strains of the ST323 sequence type (on solid agar) were diluted 1:100 in LB and incubated at 37°C at 180 rpm up to an OD600 of ∼0.3. Cultures were normalized to an OD600 of 0.1 and dispensed into a 96-well plate. Experimental wells had phage added at the desired high (Inline graphic1) or low (Inline graphic1) multiplicity of infection (MOI). Growth was monitored every 10 min for 900 min in a Spectrostar Nano (BMG Labtech, UK) plate reader at 37°C, non-shaking, in either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. To ensure the latter, all holes in the plate reader were plugged as specified by the manufacturer, and N2 gas was consistently pumped at a low rate to eliminate any oxygen for the entirety of the experiment. Growth curves were converted to area under the curve (AUC) using GraphPad Prism.

 .

Bacteriophage insensitive mutants

Bacteriophage insensitive mutants (BIMs) of capsule-deficient strain 51 851 were obtained after spot tests with different phages. A random selection of 17 BIMs from 51851 strain were cultured for sequencing and for phage re-testing. Strain DNA was extracted and sequenced as described below, and reads were mapped against the wild-type (WT) 51851 strain to confirm mutations. Phage susceptibility re-testing was performed in a 96-well plate by growth of the BIMs in LB broth at 37°C with the addition of phage. Growth of the bacterial isolate in the absence of phage was used as a positive control. OD600 readings were taken every hour up to 20 h using a CLARIOstar Plus plate reader (BMG Labtech, UK). Growth curves were analysed and, where there was no observable difference in the presence and absence of phage, the BIM was classified as resistant.

 .

Phage sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Phage DNA was extracted using phenol–chloroform as previously described [48]. DNA from 32 phages were sequenced by BMKGene (Germany). For this, sequencing libraries were prepared using the Reseq-M DNA kit and paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) were generated in the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina, USA). Approximately 3–4 Gb of clean sequencing data were produced for each sample, with sequencing depth >5000×. The remaining DNA was sequenced by the UKHSA-GSDU (UK health security agency Genomic Services and Development Unit) (see Supplementary Table S2). Libraries were prepared using the Nextera DNA flex library prep kit (Illumina, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions and reads (2 × 150 bp) were generated in the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, USA). A minimum of 150 Mb of Q30 quality data were obtained for each sample.

Unless otherwise stated, CLC Genomics Workbench v23.0.1 (Qiagen, Germany) was used for quality checks, sequence trimming (quality limit = 0.05) and genome assembly. Reads were subsampled then assembled with the de novo assembler tool (default parameters) on CLC. Sequencing reads for 13 phages (see Supplementary Table S2) were checked for quality using FastP [49] v.0.12.4 and Soapnuke [50] v2.1.7 with default parameters. For these specified phages, reads were sampled and trimmed using Seqtk v1.3.0 and then assembled using SPAdes [51] v3.13.0. All produced assemblies were manually inspected on Bandage v0.8.1 and Geneious Prime v11.0.18 + 10 (https://www.geneious.com/).

The phages’ closest relative was determined as the top hit according to the maximum score provided by BLASTn (March–June 2023 and February 2024, https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi [52]). Assemblies were mapped to fastq reads to check for irregularities using Qualimap2 v2.3 [53].

The start of the phage genome was adjusted to allow phage comparisons with canonical phages, by choosing a conserved feature to serve as gp1 or “start-site” for each of the families represented in the collection. These genome start-sites were chosen based on historical precedent and/or biology of infection and/or DNA packaging. For the Straboviridae, which includes the well-known Escherichia phage T4 (genus Tequatrovirus), and the genera Jiadodavirus and Slopekvirus, the rIIA gene was chosen, in accordance with NCBI record NC_000866.4 [54]. In cases where a landmark feature overlapped another gene, the nearest non-CDS region 5′ or 3′ to rIIA was chosen to avoid software artefacts. The Demercviridae contains a landmark member, Escherichia phage T5 (genus Tequintavirus, NC_005859.1) where the first-step-transfer region encoding dmp, a 5′-deoxyribonucleotidase, is first to enter the cell upon infection [55, 56]. The Drexlerviridae includes phage T1 (genus Tunavirus, NC_005833.1), which is known to have terminal repeats at the genome ends [57]. For Roth32, infection by coliphage T7 (NC_001604.1), a member of the genus Teseptimavirus of this family, an ∼850 bp segment of the virion DNA enters the cell first [58]. For phages from the Drulisvirus genus, the small terminase subunit was defined as the start of the genome, a convention built into some automated annotation pipelines [59]. For the novel Felixviridae family, the core region [genes gp1 (hypothetical protein) to gp24 (structural protein)] was defined as the start. Manual assignment of nucleotide start-site was accomplished using Geneious Prime v11.0.18 + 10 (https://www.geneious.com).

Final phage genome length and GC content were determined by EMBOSS v6.6.0.0 [60]. Phage sequences were then inputted to PhageTerm [61] via the Center for Phage Technology galaxy portal (https://phage.usegalaxy.eu/) to identify phage termini and packaging.

Phage coding sequences (CDS) were predicted with PHANOTATE v2019.08.09 [62] using translation table 11, then annotated using multiPHATE v2.0.2 [63] against the NCBI database selecting annotations with an Evalue threshold of 0.001. Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes were identified using tRNAscan-SE v2.0.12 [64] via multiPHATE and confirmed using ARAGORN v1.2.41 [65], although tRNAscan-SE findings were kept. Phages were also annotated with the Pharokka [59], Phold [66], and Domainator v0.7 [67] to highlight additional domain and gene functions (Domainator annotations are available on Figshare DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27794211). Default Pharokka annotations were manually curated using Geneious Prime v11.0.18 + 10 (https://www.geneious.com). In cases where Pharokka and Phold produced conflicting results, annotations were curated conservatively, either retaining the most likely hit or replacing the entry with “hypothetical protein.” Manual curation focused primarily on the conserved region of RothD (gp1-gp24) and on correctly clearly erroneous annotations, as previously recommended [68]. Anti-defence proteins were predicted using AntiDefenseFinder [69]. Potential AMR and virulence genes in the phages were predicted using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) [70] and the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) [71], respectively.

The lifestyle of the phages was predicted using Bacphlip [72]. Phage receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) and depolymerases were identified using RBPdetect v3.0.0 [73] and DepoScope v1.0.0 [74], respectively. Structures of the proteins from RothD’s core genome were predicted using Seq2symm [75] and ColabFold [76], and subsequently compared to existing structures using Foldseek search [77].

 .

Phage receptor-binding proteins

The symmetry of all RBPs identified by RBPdetect (n = 207) was predicted using Seq2Symm and then used to setup structure prediction with ColabFold. All resulting structures were clustered with Foldseek easy-cluster using default parameters. For each cluster, a representative was compared to the PDB [78] and AlphaFold2 [79] databases using Foldseek search. Only clusters with multiple members were retained for further analysis, except cluster 8 (a singleton with Roth44 gp50), which was included due to its high structural similarity to Roth47 gp52 from cluster 9, aside from its distinct “tip” - a feature that may account for their differing host ranges. Additionally, RBPs assigned with predicted depolymerase function by DepoScope were manually curated for depolymerase activity based on conserved structural elements according to the method described previously [80] (Supplementary Text). We used several structural prediction tools including (Phyre2 [81], HHpred [82], and AlphaFold) to increase confidence in RBP structures and interactions. When a RBP is not identified as a depolymerase, the RBP is presumed to be a tail fibre that binds to the bacterial receptor.

 .

Phage comparative genomics

To assign phage taxonomy, genomes were run on PhageGCN [83] web server and confirmed by clustering on vContact2 v0.11.3 [84], using the default database and visualised using Cytoscape v3.10.2 [85]. Intergenomic similarity was calculated using VIRIDIC [86] on the web server and similarity matrices were re-plotted using Pheatmap v1.0.12 [87]. Phylogenetic analyses were produced by the VICTOR web server with default settings, which employs the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny method adapted to bacteriophages [88]. Tree images were rendered and rooted at the midpoint using iTOL v6.1.1. (https://itol.embl.de/) [89] Synteny plots were produced by Clinker [90] on their web server.

 .

Bacterial DNA extraction and genome assembly

Seventy-four clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp. were used in this study. Sixty-five are K. pneumoniae, two K. oxytoca, two K. variicola, one K. aerogenes, one K. pneumoniae subsp. ozaenae, and three K. quasipneumoniae, see Supplementary Table S1 for isolate characteristics. Thirty-two strains were used for phage isolation enrichment cultures, but only seventeen continued as isolation hosts (Supplementary Table S1). Genomic DNA for the Klebsiella strains were extracted using the GeneJet Genomic DNA Kit (Thermo Scientific, UK) or the Wizard DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was quantified by a Qubit fluorometer using the high sensitivity dsDNA Kit (Invitrogen, UK) and Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, UK). DNA was prepped and sequenced by UKHSA-GSDU as described above. Fastq reads were quality trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 [91] and draft chromosome contigs were assembled using SPAdes v3.15.3 filtering out contigs <1 kb.

 .

Bacterial genome analyses

Genomes were annotated using Prokka v1.14.6 [92]. Strains were classified by their sequence (ST) and capsular locus (KL) types using the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) database (Center for Genomic Epidemiology, https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MLST/) and Kaptive v3.1.0 [26, 93, 94] using the K locus primary reference database, respectively. Strains from the K. pneumoniae species complex (KpSC) [19] were also classified by the cgMLST-based Life Identification Numbers (cgLIN codes) available via Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch/) [95] to provide a better phylogenetic resolution and precision at a nomenclature-based level [96] (Supplementary Table S1). Strains were run through the Kleborate [25] pipeline to obtain virulence and resistance scores, and outputs were visualized using the Kleborate-Viz platform online (https://usegalaxy.eu/root?tool_id=kleborate) (no markers were found for strain 163575R). The phylogeny of the strains was calculated via PopPUNK v2.5.0 [97] using the default fitted model for K. pneumoniae. The tree was rendered in iTOL v6.1.1 (https://itol.embl.de/) [89].

The bacterial virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, and stress resistance genes were identified using Abricate v1.0.1 against the CARD [70], NCBI AMRFinderPlus [98] and VFDB [71] databases. Prophage regions were identified using Phigaro v2.2.6 [99] on default mode. The defence systems in the genomes were identified using PADLOC v1.1.0 [100] and DefenseFinder v1.0.9. [101]. Incomplete defence systems, VSPR and PDC, were removed from quantification analyses but are included in Supplementary Table S1. Correlation analyses between encoding defence systems and host range outcomes were conducted with Spearman’s correlation and plotted in RStudio v2024.04.2 using the ggplot2 [102] package.

Bacterial capsule loci (defined as the genetic region from galF to uge) [103] were manually assembled for isolation hosts (17 strains). Assembly was conducted by first looking for the more conserved regions of galF and uge genes and then individually checking and annotating other genes in Seq Builder v14.0.0 (DNAstar Lasergene). In some cases, due to transposon insertions within the CPS locus, it was not possible to generate one contig containing the complete locus; for such cases a string of n’s was artificially added to represent a break in the contigs.

 .

Antibiotic susceptibility

For clinical isolates obtained at the University Medical Centre Utrecht (see Supplementary Table S1), antibiotic susceptibility was determined as previously described [46]. For the remaining clinical isolates, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for antibiotics and biocides were determined by UKHSA using a standard broth microdilution method at a starting inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/ml, Phoenix M50 system (BD Biosciences, USA) and EUCAST breakpoints, with the exception that 96-well polypropylene plates (Griener Bio-One, Ltd., Austria) were used instead of polystyrene plates to test colistin. Plates were scored by eye, looking for no visual growth and confirmed by OD600 measurement after 16–20 h with a 0.1 OD600 threshold using a CLARIOstar Plus plate reader (BMG Labtech, UK).

 .

Bacterial capsule characterisation

Isolation host strains (n = 17) were inoculated in LB or TSB broth and incubated overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm. Cultures were then spun at 3200 × g for 10 min and their pellets resuspended in 2 ml of 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The wash step was repeated once. Density gradients were prepared using Percoll® (P4937, Sigma–Aldrich) at 30%, 60%, and 80% v/v (diluted in 1× PBS) [104]. One millilitre of each gradient was gently dispensed into fresh 15 ml falcon tubes using a 1 ml syringe and 1.5-inch needle. The 30% layer was pipetted first, followed by the 60% layer beneath it, and finally the 80% layer at the bottom. Six hundred microlitres of the prepped cells were then gently layered at the top of the gradient and samples were spun at 3000 × g for 30 min. The tubes were then imaged against a black background to visualise the capsule deposition.

 .

Genomic comparisons of Felixviridae phages

RothD was taken as the representative phage of the Felixviridae family. To determine the prevalence of Felixviridae phages within bacterial genomes given their temperate lifestyle, the BV-BRC (https://www.bv-brc.org/) bacterial strain database (n = 64 364; 25 384 complete high-quality Klebsiella spp. and 38 980 complete high-quality non-Klebsiella bacterial genomes), and associated metadata were retrieved (accessed July 2024). The core region and the full genome of RothD were independently searched against the downloaded bacterial genomes using command line BLASTn v2.15.0 with an E-value threshold of 0.005 with a -max_target_seqs parameter of 100 000. All hits were extracted and searched for prophage regions using Phigaro v2.4.0 [99] with default settings. The ten upstream and ten downstream genes from the hit region were extracted for analysis.

To investigate the predominance of Felixviridae in the average human gut, we first looked at the GPD hits used in the taxonomic characterisation of RothD (see above) and matched them with the GPD’s available metadata. The produced dataset was then analysed. Taxonomic characterisation of RothD revealed several relatives assembled from a singular study by Tisza et al. [105]. Thus, we gathered all returned hits from the online BLASTn server and matched accession queries to those coming from the mentioned study. This resulted in a total of 229/406 total hits matching their chronic disease dataset, of which 205/229 (90%) were high-confidence hits with an E-value ≤1e-08. We then matched these to the study’s metadata and analysed the resulting dataset.

The relative abundance of Felixviridae phages was calculated as follows. The quality filtered reads from a subset of 117 “healthy” human stool metagenomes from the Human Microbiome Project [106, 107] were retrieved and aligned to a set of 21 Felixviridae phage genomes using the end-to-end alignment mode of Bowtie2 v2.5.4 [108]. Bacterial reads were identified using Kraken2 v2.1.3 [109]. A count table of reads aligned to contigs and total number of reads per metagenome was generated with Samtools v1.20 [110] and imported into Rstudio v2024.04.2 + 764 for analysis. Packages ggplot2 [102] and ggbreak [111] were used for plots.

To further assess the prevalence and genomic signatures of Felixviridae phages, the metagenomic and metavirome datasets from four previous studies [112–115] were retrieved (n = 826 gut metagenome samples). A set of 54 Felixviridae genomes were curated, quality-checked with CheckV v1.0.3 [116], and dereplicated using dRep v3.4.2 [117]. Metagenomic reads were quality-filtered using fastp v1.0.1 [49], and host contamination was removed using BBMap v35.85 [118] against the hg38 reference genome. Reads were mapped to the dereplicated Felixviridae genomes using minimap2 v2.30 [119], and coverage/breadth was assessed using samtools v1.22.1 [110]. Genome-level ANI and coverage were calculated using fastANI v1.34 [120] to avoid overinterpretation from short gene-level hits. Strain-level diversity and population variation were profiled using inStrain v1.3.1 [121]. To distinguish lytic versus lysogenic presence, we used paired metagenome–metavirome datasets and confirmed lysogeny markers with PHASTER v4.0.0 [122]. Abundance was analysed as specified above.

 .

PCR detection

Primers were designed to target gp7, a hypothetical protein (or putative virion structural protein by Phold) that maintains a high conservation across the Felixviridae: Forward 5′-ATGTTCCGTCAGGGGAAGTTC-3′, Reverse 5′-AAGCCTGGTTGTTAAAACTGG-3′. Primers were synthesized by IDT. Reactions were done with OneTaq quick load (NEB M0486) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, UK) and visualised on a 0.7% agarose gel. Positive control was RothD. Negative control was prepared using DNase-free water instead of template DNA. Specificity to Felixviridae phages was confirmed by also testing phages T4 (as a non-Klebsiella phage control) and Roth32 (as a Klebsiella phage control). The presence of Felixviridae phages in the environment was also tested by using filtered raw effluent from sewage plants in Southampton and Petersfield as well as ocean water from the Isle of Wight, UK (collected in the summer of 2024), filtered through a Vivaflow® 200 cassette recirculation system (Sartorius, UK) and then through a 0.45 µm PES membrane. All controls (except for the negative control) were first heated at 95°C for 5 min to break virion capsules before adding as template DNA to the reactions. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) products were cleaned and concentrated with the GeneJET PCR purification kit (Thermo Scientific, UK) and sent for sequencing at Plasmidsaurus (UK). Reads were trimmed and quality filtered using fastp v0.12.4 on the fastplong parameter and then mapped to RothD_gp7 using minimap2 v2.28-r1209. Coverage depth was obtained with Samtools v1.20 and Bedtools v2.30 [123] and results were imported in table format to RStudio v2024.04.2 + 764 and plotted using the ggplot2 [102] package.

 .

Lysogeny assays

Isolation strain 80 528 was grown in LB at 37°C, 180 rpm to an OD600 of 0.2. RothD was then added to an MOI of 1 and left to incubate overnight at 37°C. The following day, the cultures (80 528 + RothD, and 80 528 control) were spun down at 4000 × g for 10 min and washed with LB twice. The washed pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of LB and 10-fold dilutions were spotted onto LB agar plates and the plates incubated at 37°C. The remaining pellets were re-inoculated and re-infected with the same phage (except for the 80 528 control) and incubated overnight at 37°C, 180 rpm. This was repeated daily for a total of 5 days.

Five colonies of each sample per day were inoculated in 100 µl of sterile diH2O for PCR detection of TerL (Forward primer: 5′-GGCCGACATTTACCTACCCAC-3′, Reverse primer: 5′-TAGAGTGCGTCGCCGCTAC-3′) as described above. Colonies c2, c3, and c4 of each sample from day 1 were then inoculated overnight in LB, and bacterial DNA was extracted with the GeneJet Genomic DNA kit. DNA was sent for Illumina microbial sequencing at BMKGene (Germany). The produced raw reads were pre-processed with fastp v0.23.4 with default parameters to remove adapters and low-quality bases. Reads were aligned with bwa-mem2 v. 0.7.17-r1188 [124] to the combined K. pneumoniae 80 528 genome and RothD genome. To find the integration site in the bacterial genome and phage attachment site, discordant reads were extracted using samtools. Integration sites were identified where genomic regions presented high coverage of discordant reads (when mapped to the original 80 528 genome) in experimental samples (80 528 + RothD) compared to control samples (80 528). Similarly, the phage attachment site was determined as a peak of discordant reads coverage (when mapped to the RothD genome). The proportion of integrated phages was determined by dividing the number of discordant reads over the total coverage at the attachment site. Coverage plots were made using either the sorted bam files (samtools), or by obtaining coverage depth (bedtools); files were imported into Rstudio and plotted using Gviz [125] or ggplot2 [102], respectively.

To further confirm lysogeny, all five colonies per sample of day 1 and at least 2 colonies per sample of all other days, were grown in LB. RothD was 10-fold serially diluted, and spot tested on lawns made from each of the cultures following the double-layer agar assay described above. No plaques were expected in samples where the phage has integrated into the host genome.

Results

Overview of KlebPhaCol

KlebPhaCol is an open-source Klebsiella phage and strain collection comprising both biological materials (phages and strains) and associated data. The collection was designed to provide easy, cost-effective access to Klebsiella phages and strains to support collaborative research on phage–bacteria–host interactions and to facilitate the development of phage therapy. All data and access requests are managed through a dedicated platform, www.klebphacol.org, which allows users to explore the collection, download metadata tables (e.g. host range, capsule type, taxonomy, and isolation source), and request material via a simple online form.

The physical collection is hosted at the University of Southampton, where a curatorial team oversees sample storage, data curation and updates, and compliance with material sharing regulations. New phages and strains can be contributed by external researchers via the website; all submissions are manually reviewed to ensure metadata consistency and quality. The platform also includes a “board of discussions” feature (currently run via a mailing list), which facilitates community input on metadata standards, future features, and the integration of new tools or datasets.

KlebPhaCol includes 52 phages isolated using 32 clinically relevant Klebsiella spp. strains (Fig. 1A, and Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). These phages were characterised at genomic (phylogeny, synteny, and gene content), phenotypic (plaque morphology and TEM imaging), and behavioural (one-step growth curves and host range) level. Detailed descriptions of the characteristics of these phages, organised by genera, can be found in the Supplementary Text. The KlebPhaCol phages span 7 genera across five of the 13 reported Klebsiella phage families, and the newly proposed Nakavirus genus and Felixviridae family [126] (Fig. 1B and C). To facilitate reproducibility and shareability, we selected seven strains as production hosts for the entire collection (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overview of the Klebsiella Phage Collection (KlebPhaCol). (A) Phylogeny of the 52 phages of the collection and associated data. The phylogenetic tree was calculated using a Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny method and midpoint rooted. (B) Quantification of the phage taxa covered by the phages in KlebPhaCol. (C) Distribution of Klebsiella phages families in the ICTV taxonomy (as of March 2025). Bars show the number of exemplar Klebsiella phages reported for each family in ICTV. Red circles indicate the families represented in KlebPhaCol. (D) Phylogeny of the 74 strains of the collection and associated data. Phylogenetic tree was produced by PopPUNK and midpoint rooted. (E) Quantification of the species of Klebsiella, their sequence type (ST), and capsule locus type (KL), included in KlebPhaCol. All trees were rendered in iTOL.

Currently, the collection includes 74 Klebsiella strains, of which 69 are clinical isolates from different countries (Supplementary Table S1), while the remaining five are ATCC/NCTC-type strains. These 74 strains represent six Klebsiella species, 41 known sequence types (STs), 32 capsule locus (KL) types, and 11 O-antigen (O) types (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Table S1). The most prevalent ST-types in KlebPhaCol include clinically relevant types associated with AMR, ST258 (n = 8 strains), ST14 (n = 8), ST11 (n = 6), ST101 (n = 5), and ST15 (n = 4) (Fig. 1E). Regarding KL-type, KL2 is the most prevalent in the collection (n = 10 strains) and is highly clinically relevant due to its strong association with virulence traits [127, 128]. The other notoriously pathogenic KL-type, KL1, is covered by two of our strains [128–130]. Other common KL-types include KL24 (n = 6), KL106 (n = 5), and KL17 (n = 5) (Fig. 1E). Lastly, KlebPhaCol strains represent 10 of the 13 known O-antigens for Klebsiella [131] (Supplementary Table S1). One strain also has OL103, a currently unclassified O-antigen. The most represented O-antigen is O1ab (n = 23), followed by O2afg, O2a, and O3b (n = 10 for each). OL101 recently classified as a 13th class of O-antigen (O13) is found in four strains [131]. The strains were also characterized in terms of prophage, virulent factors, stress resistance, AMR, anti-phage defence systems, and capsular locus integrity. Regarding virulence, we identified 44 virulence genes, with an average of 14 ± 6 per strain (Fig. 2A). The most common virulence genes were entB, ompA, fepC, ykgk, and genes from the yag cluster (Supplementary Table S1), which contribute to enterobactin siderophore production [132], host immune evasion [133], and biofilm formation [134]. Stress resistance genes were prevalent in the KlebPhaCol collection, with strains encoding an average of 17 ± 6 genes (Fig. 2A). The most frequently found gene was fieF, present in 70 out of 74 strains, responsible for iron and zinc efflux [135]. Genomic analysis revealed the presence of genes potentially mediating resistance to 22 antibiotics, including 6 aminoglycosides, 2 amphenicols, and various others (Fig. 2A). On average, strains had resistance genes for 8 ± 4 antibiotics. High carriage of genes associated with resistance was observed for phenicols, quinolones, β-lactams (in general, including cephalosporins), and trimethoprim (Fig. 2A). These analyses do not necessarily predict phenotypic resistance, with the possibility of resistance being mediated by genes operating in a multifactorial manner and intrinsic resistance associated with poor cell penetration and/or efflux. Therefore, experimental validation of these predictions was carried out for a defined selection of clinically important antibiotics using MIC. Carbapenem resistance predictions were 100% accurate, but resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin was higher in laboratory conditions than predicted (28 versus 23 strains and 31 versus 22 strains, respectively), and amikacin resistance was slightly lower than anticipated (23 versus 25 strains, Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table S1). This demonstrates the difference between genotypic resistance predictions and phenotypic susceptibility determination. Finally, the strains in this collection encode a total of 93 distinct defence systems, with an average of 11 ± 4 systems per strain (Supplementary Fig. S1). Most systems were rare, with 54 out of 93 systems present in fewer than five strains. Only RM type IV and AbiE systems were found in ~85% of the strains. Other notable defence systems included Mok Hok Sok, RM types I and II, and SoFic, present in ≥50% of the strains (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Characteristics of the 74 strains in KlebPhaCol. (A) Phylogeny of the 74 strains matched with the number of stress resistance genes (out of a total of 51), virulence genes (out of a total of 44), prophage predictions, and presence/absence of AMR genes. The MIC of 13 antibiotics was also tested for each strain and resistance patterns are illustrated in the coloured heatmap. Virulence and resistance scores were calculated with Kleborate. (B) Kleborate predictions of strains with multidrug resistance (MDR) genes and genes conferring hypervirulence are organized by ST-type. *ST528 strain KLEB3 typed as ST716 by MLST CGE typer.

To facilitate access to the strains and their metadata and encourage comparisons to other Klebsiella strains, we have deposited the K. pneumoniae strains into a Pathogenwatch [95] collection (see Data availability).

Roth phages infect up to 19 KL-types

The Roth phages demonstrated a broad ability to infect a wide range of Klebsiella strains, with notable success across multiple ST, KL, and O-antigen types (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S2). Among the 74 strains tested, 36 (49%) were susceptible to the Roth phages, including 20/42 (48%) ST-types, 19/32 (59%) KL-types, and 7/11 (64%) O-antigen types. Among the representative phages shown in Fig. 3A, Roth16 from the Jiaodavirus genus was the most effective, infecting 18/74 strains (24%), including 12 ST-types, 12 KL-types, and 6 O-types (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S2). Slopekvirus Roth88 was the second most effective phage, infecting 16/74 (22%) strains (Fig. 3A), including 11 ST-types, 11 KL-types, and 7 O-types (Supplementary Fig. S2). Slopekvirus exhibited notable success against KL2 strains, infecting up to half of the strains tested (5/10). Interestingly, ST258 strains are resistant to Slopekvirus, but efficiently targeted by all Jiaodavirus, Sugarlandvirus, and Webervirus.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Klebsiella Phage Collection host range in LB broth. (A) The host range of representative phages (17/52 KlebPhaCol phages) against 74 strains in LB broth is shown as efficiency of plating (EOP) relative to the isolation strain (red boxes). An asterisk indicates undetermined lysis. (B) Quantification of each strain susceptibility to the complete collection of 52 KlebPhaCol phages.

Roth phages were able to infect strains associated with seven of the ten known O-antigen types in the KlebPhaCol collection, except for O2ac, O12, O13, and OL13 (Supplementary Fig. S2). Slopekvirus were most successful against strains with O-antigen O1ab, while Jiaodaviruses excelled at targeting O2afg.

Whereas K. pneumoniae is the most pathogenic species among Klebsiella spp., other species are emerging with serious pathogenic concerns [136, 137]. KlebPhaCol phages demonstrated lytic activity beyond K. pneumoniae, including K. oxytoca (164413U/2, KLEB11), K. quasipneumoniae (NCTC_13 368), and K. variicola (921530F) (Fig. 3). Together, these findings indicate that the KlebPhaCol collection could be expanded to study interactions across a broader range of Klebsiella species.

Capsule-independent phages dominate the KlebPhaCol collection

For most reported Klebsiella phages, the capsule is the primary surface receptor to which they attach [32, 34, 40, 46], although other surface receptors like O-antigen and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have also been shown to serve as primary receptors for some Klebsiella phages [33, 34, 138]. Therefore, phage host range in Klebsiella is largely dictated by the presence or absence of the capsular polysaccharide [33, 34]. We examined the capsule composition of the 17 strains used for phage isolation, using a combination of genomic and experimental approaches. Specifically, we analysed the capsule locus architecture (Supplementary Fig. S3), performed capsule typing with Kaptive [93] (Supplementary Fig. S3 and  Supplementary Table S1), and assessed capsule-associated density phenotypes using Percoll gradient centrifugation [104] (Fig. 4A). Based on these analyses, five of the isolation strains are likely capsule-null (CFI_134_NDMI, NCTC_7427, CFI_001_VIM1, NCTC_13 438, and 51851), with an additional strain (MDRT1) showing a low-capsule phenotype (Fig. 4A). The remaining strains either had intact capsule loci, lacked evidence of disrupted mutations or showed high buoyancy in the Percoll assay consistent with capsule production.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Capsule quantification and KlebPhaCol phage receptors. (A) Capsule quantification of 17 K. pneumoniae strains based on Percoll gradient centrifugation. Capsule layer(s) are highlighted with blue arrows. (B) Quantification of the number of targeted KL-types for phages isolated in capsulated strains (caps.) and non-capsulated strains (non-caps.). Statistical significance was assessed using an unpaired t-test (ns, non-significant, P = 0.2617). (C) Infectivity of the selected phages against the WT capsule-deficient strain 51851 and its BIM clones. (D) Interpretation of results from (C) indicating likely receptors for the representative phages. Roth32, RothG, and RothJ likely target capsule due to the presence of depolymerases in their genomes.

The strains with disrupted capsule production were used for the isolation of 23 of the 53 KlebPhaCol phages (Supplementary Table S2). Interestingly, these phages are not capable of infecting a significantly broader range of capsular types compared to phages isolated from capsulated strains (Fig. 4B). This observation suggests that using capsule-deficient strains did not inherently select for phages with broader capsular tropism, and therefore the broader host range of the KlebPhaCol phages is not simply due to the use of capsule-deficient hosts for phage isolation.

Since most phages display a broad host range, we hypothesised that they do not rely on the capsule as their primary receptor. Exceptions are phages Roth32 (Gajwadongvirus), and RothG, RothI, and RothJ (Drulisvirus), which exhibited narrow host ranges (1–2 KL-types) and were isolated on strains with intact capsule loci (80528, M6, and RSUH15; Figs 3 and 4A). Together with evidence that these phages encode capsule depolymerases (Supplementary Text), this suggests they likely target the capsule as their primary receptor.

For the remaining phage families, we further analysed BIMs that emerged after phage exposure on the capsule-deficient strain 51851. Culturing and sequencing these BIMs, followed by re-testing phage infectivity, revealed that KlebPhaCol phages from the Sugarlanvirus, Webervirus, Slopekvirus, and Jiaodavirus families use either the LPS O-antigen, the outer membrane protein FhuA, or both as receptors (Fig. 4C and D), confirming they are capsule-independent. Interestingly, these phages can still infect capsulated strains, suggesting that the capsule does not substantially interfere with their access to surface receptors.

KlebPhaCol phages encompass 14 different RBP structural clusters

To further investigate receptor–phage interactions, we analysed the 207 predicted RBPs of the phages (Supplementary Table S3). Structural modelling using AlphaFold2 [139] followed by clustering with Foldseek [77] revealed that the predicted RBPs are highly diverse, forming 14 distinct clusters ranging from singletons to groups with up to 23 members (Fig. 5A). The myo- and siphophages each had six different clusters of RBPs, whereas podophages represented two of the clusters. The predicted structures included long (Roth23 gp275, Roth01 gp268, Roth08 gp50, Roth10 gp54, Roth04 gp177, and Roth23 gp11) and short tail fibres (RothD gp33), tail spikes (RothI gp8), central tail fibres (Roth44 gp50, Roth47 gp52, and Roth37 gp176), and other unclassified RBP structures (Roth37 gp195 and RothG gp62) (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, three clusters (2, 7, and 8) included members with domains at the tip of tail fibres that are structurally similar to intramolecular chaperones [140] that undergo auto-proteolytic cleavage after aiding in protein folding. Cluster 6 consists of a single tail fibre protein (RothD gp33) that has a rare polyglycine rich domain consisting of a conserved sandwich fold with hypervariable loops known to target both protein and LPS targets [141]. The proteins in cluster 12 showed high structural similarity to the central tail fibre protein pb5 of phage T5, which is known to bind to FhuA [142]. Therefore, we sought to predict the interaction complex of Roth37 gp195 with FhuA (PDB: A0A483VTA4; Fig. 5B), which had little deviation from the pb5–FhuA complex (RMSD = 0.8Å; PDB: 8B14). As Roth37 was isolated against non-capsulated strain NCTC_7427, we also predicted its RBP (gp195) interaction to both NCTC_7427-encoded FhuAs with similar interaction scores (Fig. 5C and D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Structural predictions of KlebPhaCol RBPs. (A) Most (n = 135) RBPs predicted by RBPdetect, cluster into 14 groups following structural predictions and clustering with AlphaFold2 and Foldseek, respectively. Structures are coloured by pLDDT scores. (B–D) FhuA interactions with RBP gp195 from Roth37 (cluster 12; Sugarlandvirus). (E) FhuA interactions with RBP gp54 from Roth93 (Webervirus).

As our BIM data showed that several weberviruses (except Roth44) were sensitive to FhuA-associated mutations (Supplementary Fig. S3), we also searched for Webervirus protein(s) interacting with FhuA, in addition to those predicted by RBPdetect [73]. Comparisons of different Webervirus representatives revealed two proteins with interacting potential, gp53 and gp54 in Roth93, which are not present in the insensitive phage, Roth44. Structural prediction with FhuA from Roth93’s isolation strain showed that only gp54 was able to form a reliably predicted complex with this protein (Fig. 5E) (FhuA-Roth93_gp53 pTM = 0.83, iPTM = 0.45; FhuA-Roth93_gp54 pTM = 0.84, iPTM = 0.75).

Phage infectivity is influenced by bacterial growth media

The availability of surface receptors on the bacterial surface is strongly influenced by media composition [143], and as a result can affect phage infectivity. To assess possible influences of media in phage host range, we performed additional host range assays in TSB, a medium that is commonly used in Klebsiella research and with different nutritional composition to LB [33, 144].

The impact of media composition on phage infectivity was evident in the differential success rates observed between TSB and LB (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Fig. S4, Supplementary Table S4, and Supplementary Text). In TSB, 638 total phage infections were recorded, compared to 486 in LB, indicating higher infectivity overall in TSB. The media-specific differences were particularly pronounced for certain phages. For instance, Slopekvirus phages Roth88, Roth26, and Roth27 infected up to 25 strains in TSB; but in LB, Roth88 and Roth26 infected only 16 strains while Roth27 infected only 12. Moreover, some strains were only infected in one of the two media. For example, CFI_127_NDM1, 2619, and KLEB7 were only infected in LB by 1–4 phages, while strains K5962, ATCC_11 296, 46 704, KLEB2, 163895Q, 922221W, KLEB4, 163862E, and L1392 were exclusively infected in TSB (Figs 3B and 6A, and Supplementary Fig. S4).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Host range of representative phages in TSB versus LB media. (A) The heatmap represents lysis, undetermined lysis, and no lysis in a binary mode for each media type (see Supplementary Table S4 for complete host range), which is tallied up at the bottom. Markedly differential strains between the two media types are boxed in red. Only strains susceptible to at least one phage of the collection are shown (n = 43/74). (B) KL-type infectivity per phage genus in TSB versus LB. *Statistical significances (P < 0.05) were calculated for all genera (except Nakavirus and Gajwadongvirus, n = 1) with a non-parametric paired t-test. (C) Capsule quantification of strains with marked differences in phage susceptibility in TSB versus LB. Capsule layers in TSB and LB are highlighted with brown and yellow arrows, respectively.

Interestingly, phage infectivity varied by genus in response to media composition (Fig. 6B). Jiaodavirus and Slopekvirus showed higher success rates in TSB, with ∼1.2× and 1.6× more infections recorded in this medium, respectively. For example, Slopekvirus Roth26 and Roth27 can infect up to 19 different KL-types in TSB, whereas in LB they infect 9 and 10 different KL-types, respectively (Fig. 6B and Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, analysis revealed that capsule production in the three strains (K6500, MDRT11, and KLEB12) with the greatest medium-dependent differences in phage susceptibility was similar (Fig. 6C), suggesting that changes in phage host range between media are not attributable to capsule variation alone, but may also involve differences in the expression of other surface receptors and/or anti-phage defence systems.

Abundance of defence systems does not correlate with phage susceptibility

Anti-phage defence systems pose a barrier to phages once inside the cell [145–147]. We observed that some of the least susceptible strains like L1522 and L0738 harboured a disproportionately high number of defence systems compared to the rest of the strains (22 and 31, respectively, Supplementary Fig. S1A). To investigate whether phage susceptibility was associated with the number of defence systems in each strain, we calculated and visualised Spearman rank correlations between the number of defence systems and various infection outcomes, including productive infections, no infections, and undetermined infections (i.e. “lysis from without”) (Supplementary Fig. S1B). This analysis revealed that in the panel of phage and clinical isolates tested, there was no significant correlation between the number of encoded defence systems and phage susceptibility, regardless of the media type. The recently reported PhageHostLearn model for K. pneumoniae phages suggests that RBP variability accounts for most of the host spectrum diversity [148], hinting at a lesser role of phage defence systems in shaping host range. However, conflicting findings have been reported for non-capsulated species [149], and further investigation is needed. Specifically, future analysis of phage adsorption to strains without productive infection may provide new insights and uncover correlations not evident with the current dataset.

Additionally, we predicted the putative anti-defence proteins harboured by the Roth phages to explore whether these might influence phage infectivity. We identified three putative anti-defence genes in the Jiaodavirus and Slopekvirus phages (Supplementary Table S2). In Jiaodavirus, these included two anti-CBASS and one anti-TA, whereas the Slopekvirus encoded two anti-CBASS and one anti-RM proteins. We also identified an anti-RM gene in a subset of Webervirus phages, specifically those branching from the second clade within the Webervirus group (Fig. 1A).

Phage activity against gut-associated K. pneumoniae under aerobic and anaerobic conditions

Certain K. pneumoniae sequence types are commonly associated with specific host or disease contexts. For example, ST323 has been linked to enrichment in the gut microbiota of patients with IBD and shown to exacerbate inflammation in a mouse model [21]. Although the ST323 strains used in our study were not isolated from IBD patients, we aimed to assess whether KlebPhaCol includes phages capable to targeting this gut-associated lineage. Four phages—RothD, RothG, RothJ, and RothI—were found to infect two ST323 strains (RSUH15 and 80528, both KL21) as well as three non-ST323 strains (ST91, ST635, and ST1875) (Fig. 7A).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Infectivity of ST323-targeting Roth phages in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. (A) Heatmap of the infectivity patterns of the ST323-targeting Roth phages in LB medium represented as EOP compared to isolation strains (red box). The capsule locus (KL) type of susceptible strains is written above, and ST323 strains are marked with an asterisk. (B–F) Growth curves of the ST323-targeting phages against the susceptible strains in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, tested using two multiplicities of infection (MOI ≥ 1 and ≤ 1), and represented as AUC ratio compared to the uninfected bacterial control.

Given the relevance of oxygen availability in the gut environment, we evaluated the ability of these phages to inhibit bacterial growth under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Liquid infection assays were performed in both conditions, at two MOIs, and phage efficacy was quantified by comparing the area under the growth curve (AUC) relative to the no-phage control (Fig. 7B, and Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary Table S5). As expected, bacterial growth was limited under anaerobic conditions. Nonetheless, several Roth phages remained active: RothG, RothJ, and RothI retained activity against RSUH15, albeit at reduced levels, while all four phages inhibited strain 80528 at high MOI, with RothG showing activity even at lower MOI (Fig. 7B and C). Among the non-ST323 strains (L0240, 921530F, and ATCC_11 296), RothD showed the highest efficacy in anaerobic conditions, particularly against L0240 and 921530F, although none of the phages were active against strain ATCC_11 296 in anaerobic conditions (Fig. 7D–F). Overall, these findings suggest that some KlebPhaCol phages retain functional activity in gut-relevant, low-oxygen conditions, an important consideration for future therapeutic applications.

 .

Felixviridae are found in human gut metagenomes.

 .

Proposed new taxonomy for phage RothD

While most Roth phages could be classified into existing viral taxa, RothD could not be assigned to any existing viral family using standard classification tools like PhageGCN and vContact2. Therefore, we propose the establishment of a new family, Felixviridae (40–60 kb), and genus, Nakavirus, to accommodate these phages (see Supplementary Text).

Although RothD shares little overall similarity with its relatives, it encompasses a highly conserved region from gp1 to gp24 (1–20, 241 bp). Genomic synteny analysis of the proposed Felixviridae family revealed that the conserved region spanning the first 20,241 bp is shared across all members. Additional annotation by Phold, and comparison of the predicted structures with the PDB database, demonstrated that this core region is mostly composed of structural proteins (Supplementary Fig. S6). Most core proteins were associated with the phage capsule, neck, tube, or baseplate. The structural similarities to another myophage assembly [150] allowed for confident functional assignments of these proteins (i.e. major head protein, head-to-tail connector, neck collar protein, tail-sheath initiator, tail tube protein, and baseplate components). Interestingly, the two gene products gp9 and gp15 were annotated as hypothetical proteins by Phold and no similarities to functionally annotated proteins could be found with Foldseek, but homologs (80% and 67.3% sequence identity) were present in bacterial species associated with the human gut (i.e. Citrobacter spp. and Serratia marcescens, respectively). Outside this core region, gene conservation was minimal, further emphasising the uniqueness of these phages.

 .

Nakavirus phages of the Felixviridae family are associated with Enterobacteriaceae

Most Felixviridae phages have a predicted temperate lifestyle, and thus we wanted to assess the prevalence of the corresponding prophages in bacterial genomes. We analysed 64,364 complete bacterial genomes from the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC) database for homologues of RothD and found that all matches (n = 7605, Supplementary Table S6) were exclusive to the Enterobacteriaceae family.

Klebsiella species were the most common hosts (566/708; 80%), spanning eight species and 111 ST-types, with ST231 appearing most frequently (127 hits). The second most represented species was Salmonella enterica (66 hits, 9%). These phage–host associations were found across 67 countries, indicating a widespread global presence of these prophages. Host metadata revealed that most isolates (521) are derived from humans, although samples from other hosts including chickens (10), sea lions (10), pigs (7), birds (4), sheep (3), cattle (2), hedgehogs (2), and even termites (4), suggest a broader superhost range (Supplementary Table S6). However, the location of the isolate within these other organisms is unknown.

We also examined predicted prophages within these genomes to determine whether our identified hits were located within the respective genomic regions. Of these hits, only two were entirely within prophage regions. The majority were either outside predicted prophages (n = 431/708, 61%) or partially within one (n = 266/708, 36%). To further investigate the gene neighbourhood of hits outside prophage regions, we extracted the ten upstream and downstream genes from each hit. In 259/431 (60%) of the cases, a lysozyme gene was found within 10 CDS upstream of the hit region. Additionally, in seven of these 259 cases, an integrase gene was also identified within 10 CDS downstream of the hit region. These observations suggests that some hits may indeed reside within prophage regions that are not detected by the prophage identifier tool, possibly, because many of the felixvirus prophages could be deteriorating, highlighting the importance of examining gene neighbourhoods for more comprehensive analysis.

 .

Felixviridae phages are found in the gut

The taxonomic characterisation of the Felixviridae RothD, suggests that Felixviridae phages are present in the mammalian gut. Several groups of gut-related phages have been established, including the orders Crassvirales [151], as well as the familis Flandersviridae and Quimbyviridae [152], and the still unclassified Gubaphages [153]. The order Crassvirales includes the most abundant phages identified in the mammalian gut to date [151, 154]. Crassviruses have been shown to persist overtime, potentially via several specific adaptations to the gut environment [155, 156]. To determine the abundance of Felixviridae phages in the human gut, we examined their prevalence in the Gut Phage Database (GPD). We found 355 high-quality unique hits across 38 isolates and 317 metagenome-assembled genomes, corresponding to 0.86% of the high-quality phage genomes in the GPD (Supplementary Table S7). These phages appear globally widespread, with metagenomic samples collected from 15 different countries (Supplementary Table S7). Consistent with the analysis of the BV-BRC database above, analysis of GPD metadata confirmed that these phages are restricted to hosts of the Enterobacteriaceae family, with Klebsiella spp. being the most common (172/186 hits with available host-predicted data).

Felixviridae-related sequences were predominant in infant and adult cohorts, representing 82% of hits where data was available (Supplementary Table S8) and spanned both healthy and disease-associated microbiomes, highlighting their prevalence across ages and health statuses. In several (554/1345) metagenomes, multiple Felixviridae-related phages were present, suggesting that individuals could harbour diverse populations of these phages.

When examining disease associations, Felixviridae appeared in cohorts with chronic conditions like obesity, IBD, and rheumatoid arthritis (Supplementary Table S9) [105]. However, no significant associations were found, suggesting these phages persist in various gut environments without clear links to disease states.

 .

Felixviridae reside in the gut in both free phage and prophage form

To assess the abundance of Felixviridae phages in the human gut, we analysed 117 healthy stool samples from the Human Microbiome Project [157]. This analysis detected Felixviridae sequences in 89% of the samples (average Inline graphic SD abundance: 0.00014% Inline graphic 0.005%). These phages constituted a minor but consistent fraction of the gut microbiome (Fig. 8A). After removing bacterial reads, Felixviridae phages remained detectable in only 14% of samples, suggesting that they mainly reside as prophages in the gut.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Felixviridae detection. (A) Abundance per metagenome of Felixviridae-like phages from 117 healthy human metagenomes. (B) PCR detection of Felixviridae terL gene in colonies from cultures of strain 80528 exposed to RothD over five consecutive days. Yellow circles indicate colonies sent for Illumina sequencing to confirm lysogen presence. (C) Plaque forming units (PFU)/ mL of RothD spotted against selected colonies from (B) to confirm lysogen presence by the lack of infection. (D) Discordant read mappings to 80528 wildtype genome shows the region of insertion (represented by increased coverage) was the same in all three sequenced colonies. (E) Discordant read mappings to the RothD genome shows the site of lysogen insertion was the same in all three sequenced colonies, a few base pairs before the integrase gene. (F) Primers to the gp7 (putative virion structural protein) of the core region of RothD can detect related phages in environmental samples by PCR. (G) Positive PCR products from (F) sequenced by long-read sequencing and displayed as coverage depth when mapped to the gp7.

To extend this analysis, we examined 826 additional human gut metagenomes from previous studies [112–115]. After quality control, host read removal and read mapping against a curated and dereplicated genome dataset, only 7 samples (∼1%) exhibited ≥ 50% phage genome coverage (Supplementary Table S10), representing an average Inline graphic SD abundance per metagenome of 0.015% Inline graphic 0.006%. All 54 Felixviridae phages were represented in this dataset except for Pantoea phage PdC23 (NC_071008.1) and the most abundant phage genome was GPD phage uvig_371 030 at 20.9% average relative abundance. Although lower identity or partial matches were found in additional samples, genome-wide ANI analysis showed these did not meet thresholds for true presence (≥90% ANI, ≥50% coverage). Nevertheless, retaining these partial matches maintained a similar average abundance per metagenome to that of the ‘true’ matches (average Inline graphicSD: 0.016% Inline graphic 0.231%). Additionally, all of the detected phages encode lysogeny-associated genes (i.e. integrases or repressors), indicative of a temperate lifestyle and no high-confidence lytic Felixviridae-like signatures were observed. These phages were only detected in the metagenomic portion of paired metagenome-metavirome datasets, further supporting their temperate lifestyle (Supplementary Table S10). These findings suggest that Felixviridae are present in the human gut microbiome at low prevalence and exist primarily as integrated prophages.

Given the strong evidence of lysogeny for these phages, we sought to investigate if RothD could actively lysogenise the host. After five consecutive days of exposing the isolating host, 80528, to RothD at an MOI of 1, we analysed bacterial colonies recovered from each day for the presence of the terL gene via PCR. We were able to detect terL in all colonies from day 1 (Fig. 8B), suggesting RothD was able to integrate into 80528. To further confirm integration, we spotted RothD against these colonies, showing no infection by RothD, suggesting superinfection exclusion due to the integrated prophage (Fig. 8C). Additionally, we sent three colonies of each sample from day 1 for sequencing. Mapping of the sequencing reads to the host strain 80528, revealed that RothD always integrates at the same site within a 33 bp region in 80528. This site was located within the genomic positions 4,000,393–4,000,415 bp inside the coding open reading frame of a hypothetical protein (Fig. 8D; full reads coverage in Supplementary Fig. 7A). Additionally, mapping of reads to RothD revealed that the corresponding attachment site in the phage genome is located upstream of the integrase gene (gp34) at positions 26,519–26,542 bp (Fig. 8E; full reads coverage in Supplementary Fig. 7B). This integration structure is conserved in the two most closely related prophages (IMGVR_UViG_2571042619_000002 and IMGVR_UViG_2588254063_000001; Supplementary Text Fig. 7E), whereby the same integrase gene is inserted as the first gene of their lysogen versions in a Klebsiella host, and the last gene is a homolog of RothD_gp33 (Supplementary Fig. 7C). Additionally, read coverage analysis demonstrated that there is an integration rate of ∼40%, indicating that in these experiments ∼60% of virions remain as ‘free’, non-integrated phage (see methods).

 .

Felixviridae are detectable in the environment

To assess the feasibility of PCR detection of Felixviridae in environmental samples, we designed primers against the conserved predicted virion structural protein gp7 of the Felixviridae family. We screened for these phages in environmental samples collected from a wastewater facility in Portswood and Petersfield, and from the sea of the Isle of Wight (all UK-based). Felixviridae were present in the two sampled wastewater facilities but not in the sea water sample (Fig. 8F), which we confirmed by long-read sequencing of the PCR products (Fig. 8G). These preliminary results are consistent with a link between Felixviridae and human-associated environments, and demonstrate that PCR-based detection of these phages in environmental samples is feasible.

Together, these data suggest Felixviridae, particularly Nakavirus, are widely distributed across diverse human and animal hosts, persisting throughout life stages and health conditions. This broad host range, coupled with environmental presence, positions Felixviridae as integral, even if relatively minor, yet understudied components of the gut virome, meriting further exploration for their ecological and potential clinical impacts.

Discussion

Here we introduce KlebPhaCol, an open-source collection containing 52 phages targeting Klebsiella spp., covering seven genera, and 74 Klebsiella strains spanning 41 known ST-types and 32 K-types. By offering a centralised, no-cost, and well-documented collection, KlebPhaCol democratises access to essential resources for researchers worldwide.

KlebPhaCol includes strains from six different species of the Klebsiella genus including members of the K. pneumoniae species complex (KpSC), K. variicola and K. quasipneumoniae, that are emerging as public health concerns [136, 137]. Because K. pneumoniae is the most pathogenic and prevalent species of this genus [158], the collection includes 65 different isolates of this species. Although most isolates in the collection originate from Europe, they represent some of the most antimicrobial resistant clones circulating globally, including ST258, ST11, ST14 and ST15 [12, 19, 159]. Asymptomatic gut colonization of K. pneumoniae has been demonstrated to increase the susceptibility to subsequent infections in other tissues [160–162], and high abundance of K. pneumoniae has been linked with IBD exacerbation [21]. A particularly relevant ST type in this context is ST323, which is also present in the collection [21, 163]. With this in mind, KlebPhaCol phages were isolated using enrichment cultures of antimicrobial-resistant relevant clones and gut-relevant clone ST323. The resulting host range revealed high specificity of such clinically-relevant clones, positioning the collection – both phages and bacterial strains – for studying these interactions in classical tissue infections as well as in gut colonisation contexts that at present remain largely unexplored [164].

Although KlebPhaCol spans six of the 13 currently recognised Klebsiella phage families, several known families remain underrepresented or absent. This likely reflects methodological biases during phage isolation, including the use of standard laboratory media (e.g. LB), selective targeting of clinical ST-types, and the reliance on sewage as the main environmental source. Similar limitations have been noted in other phage studies [165, 166]. To improve phage diversity in future iterations of KlebPhaCol, we plan to broaden the range of host strains and vary isolation conditions, as well as continue to incorporate phages from external contributors. This amendment will help capture a more complete representation of the Klebsiella phageome and facilitate broader applications across ecological and clinical contexts.

Genomic analyses of the phages in KlebPhaCol revealed high intergenomic similarities among several phages. It has been shown that even small polymorphisms within phages can result in differences worth investigating, including differences in host-range. For instance, despite phages T2, T4 and T6 being highly similar, these phages have different DNA hypermodifications and different extents of genomic DNA modification [167], and can bind to different receptors [168]. Moreover, characterisation of other Klebsiella phages sharing high similarity (>97%) demonstrated small differences in behaviour that could be attributed to differences in their L-shaped tail fibres [169]. KlebPhaCol includes 17 representative phages, for most of which closely related phages are available to investigate nuances. The importance of studying a representative collection of phages is exemplified by the advances that followed the establishment of the T phages [170–173]. Although the remarkable diversity of phages is increasingly being explored, focusing on a representative set of phage-bacteria interactions could, in a therapeutic context, offer a more tractable path toward a deeper understanding of phage biology and practical application.

To support such efforts, we expanded our analysis of RBPs and identified 14 distinct structural clusters among the KlebPhaCol phages. These clusters include both predicted capsule depolymerases and alternative adhesin-like proteins, which could reflect differences in receptor usage. We also tested spontaneous Klebsiella mutants across all 17 representative phages, revealing patterns of receptor dependence consistent with RBP diversity. Together, these findings underscore the utility of the collection for dissecting structure-function relationships in phage infection.

Traditionally within the Klebsiella field, phage therapy has mainly been considered as an alternative treatment for tissue infections. However, given the relevance of Klebsiella as a gut colonising pathobiont and a driver of subsequent infections and disease, considering phage therapy applications for gut microbiome modulation is becoming more relevant [21, 174]. In this study we show how phage efficiency can differ when environmental conditions of testing are changed (e.g. media type, oxygen supply). Our results suggest that tailoring phage therapy to specific infection environments by taking into account nutrient availability and other site-relevant physiological conditions, could improve phage efficacy. Additionally, consistent with previous studies, we show that non-capsule targeting phages can have a broader host range [33, 34, 175]. This observation suggests that non-capsule targeting phages could offer versatile treatment options, especially when capsule types vary widely among infections. Indeed, Klebsiella phages encoding multiple depolymerases may also achieve a similar outcome [32], by being able to target multiple capsule types, albeit limited by the presence of these receptors in the bacterial strain. Multiple studies have shown that capsule expression and production, or lack thereof, result in fitness trade-offs for the bacterium [143, 164, 176]. Acapsular strains are substantially attenuated, due to the increased susceptibility to immune mechanisms [29, 177]. However, lack of capsule can facilitate biofilm formation [178, 179] and cell adhesion [180]. Different factors have been shown to drive capsule loss or maintenance including nutrient availability [143], oxygen availability [181] and insertion sequence repertoires [164]. Indeed, capsule loss in Klebsiella strains has been demonstrated upon gut colonisation [164] and in urinary tract infections [182]. Thus, both capsule and non-capsule targeting phages are relevant for therapeutic applications, and the preference for the former or the latter might depend on the targeted infection site, emphasising the need to better understand Klebsiella behaviour in different infection sites to improve phage selection for therapeutic purposes.

In this work, we identified a novel gut-associated phage family, Felixviridae, represented by KlebPhaCol phage RothD of the Nakavirus genus. Felixviridae-like phages are largely temperate phages with notable association to Enterobacteriaceae members, which include key human pathogens. With most of these being uncultured phages, we were only able to confirm the ability to lysogenise for RothD. Felixviridae-like phages are geographically widespread and present across human age groups, from pre-term infants to adults, and the presence of these phages in healthy gut microbiomes points to potential roles in the human gut virome. Felixviridae presence in the gut could simply reflect their host ecology particularly given their lysogenic nature. However, detection of homologs of RothD core proteins gp9 and gp15 (shared within Felixviridae phages) only in gut-associated bacterial genomes, suggests potential evolutionary gene acquisitions of this phage family to survive in this niche, requiring further investigation. Other Klebsiella-targeting phage groups, such as weberviruses, have been recently identified in the gut [183]. These findings underscore the importance of exploring the roles of various Klebsiella phage groups within the gut microbiome, now facilitated by the inclusion of Nakavirus RothD and several Webervirus in KlebPhaCol. PCR detection of gut-associated phages has been shown to be a cost-effective method with extensive applications, including evaluation of the prevalence of the most abundant human gut phage group, crAssphage, as proxy for human faecal contamination [184–186]. By establishing PCR detection protocols for Felixviridae, our findings lay the groundwork for future research on these phages, both in clinical and environmental contexts.

Altogether, KlebPhaCol provides an openly accessible resource for studying Klebsiella phage interactions. It offers a uniquely broad scope, spanning critical pathogenic strains, non-capsule-targeting phages with versatile applications, and a newly described gut phage family with potential implications for human health. In addition to these broader features, the collection offers granular experimental and bioinformatic insights, including defined RBP structural clusters, receptor usage patterns, and phenotypic differences among closely related phages, that can drive new mechanistic studies. Recognising the lack of standardised open biosharing regulations and pipelines, we actively participate in discussions to address this crucial need for research progress [187]. We expect that KlebPhaCol will not only facilitate new discoveries in microbiology and therapeutic research but also inspire contributions from the broader scientific community to further expand and improve this evolving resource.

Supplementary Material

gkaf1122_Supplemental_Files

Acknowledgements

Strains used for phage isolation were provided by UKHSA, acknowledging Dr Katie Hopkins of the AMR Reference Laboratory at Colindale and we gratefully acknowledge Dr Daniela Centron for provision of ST258 K. pneumoniae strains from Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Mecanismos de Resistencia a Antibióticos IMPAM (UBA/CONICET), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. We thank Saul Faust from the University Hospital Southampton, for providing strains to the collection. We thank Qiagen for providing a 1-year license of CLC Premium Workbench to D.R.R. We thank Dorah Mbang and Florence Rushton from Peter Symonds College, Thomas C. Todeschini and Robyn Pringle for their laboratory assistance with some of the assays. We thank Matt Irwin, Rachel Buchanan and Sarah Aveline for the processing of the raw effluents collected in Southampton, UK. We gratefully acknowledge IRIDIS infrastructure for high-performance computing and the Biomedical Imaging Unit for the TEM facilities and technical support.

Author contributions: Conceptualisation, F.L.N.; Methodology – strain isolation, M.W., M.S., P.J.H, A.M., E.S., F.D., K.S., S.F.; Methodology – phage isolation and imaging, one-step growth curves, D.R.R.; Methodology – phage host-range, D.R.R., M.A., M.H., M.M., A.R.C.; Methodology – DNA extractions, D.R.R., C.K., F.M., Y.W., M.W.; Methodology – phage genome assembly and annotation, D.R.R., K.L., P.W., Y.L; Methodology – experimental verification of DNA modifying enzymes, P.W., Y.L; Methodology – RBP and depolymerase predictions, A.L., I.D.A., D.B., Y.B.; Methodology – RBP-receptor interaction predictions and structural modelling, M.E., P.B.; Methodology – strain and capsule locus assembly, M.W.; Methodology – 51851 BIM data, M.W.; Methodology – strain genome analyses, S.K.K., K.L., D.R.R.; Methodology – Felixviridae taxonomic classification, S.K.G., K.L., D.R.R.; Methodology – metavirome analysis, S.K.K., D.R.R.; Methodology – BV-BRC and GPD database analyses, K.L., D.R.R; Methodology – strain antibiotic susceptibility tests, P.J.H., M.W.; Data analysis and curation, D.R.R.; Writing – Original Draft, D.R.R, F.L.N.; Writing – Review & Editing, all authors; Supervision, F.L.N.; Funding Acquisition, F.L.N., J.M.S., S.J.J.B., Y.B.

Contributor Information

Daniela Rothschild-Rodriguez, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Kai S Lambon, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Simran Krishnakant Kushwaha, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Sofya K Garushyants, Computational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.

Moritz Ertelt, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology, Infection and Pandemic Research IIP, Munich 60596, Germany; Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich 80802, Germany.

Agnieszka Latka, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Department of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw 51-148, Poland.

Ana Rita Costa, Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.

Anna Mantzouratou, Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.

Claire King, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Dimitri Boeckaerts, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium; KERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Elizabeth Sheridan, Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, United Kingdom; Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

Eugene V Koonin, Computational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States.

Francesca Merrick, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Francis Drobniewski, Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, United Kingdom; Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

Ilaria De Angelis, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Kordo Saeed, Department of Infection, Microbiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.

Macy Martin, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

J Mark Sutton, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.

Matthew E Wand, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom.

Michael Andrew, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Morgen Hedges, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Stan J J Brouns, Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.

Pieter-Jan Haas, Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, Netherlands.

Sophie T Lawson, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.

Stephen M E Fordham, Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.

Yan-Jiun Lee, Research Department, New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, Massachusets 01938, United States.

Yi Wu, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Yves Briers, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Peter Braun, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology, Infection and Pandemic Research IIP, Munich 60596, Germany; Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich 80802, Germany.

Peter R Weigele, Research Department, New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, Massachusets 01938, United States.

Franklin L Nobrega, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at NAR online.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests. UK Health Security Agency affiliated authors declare that opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the agency.

Funding

This work was supported by South Coast Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership (SoCoBio DTP) [BBSRC BB/T008768/1 to D.R.R.]; Bowel Research UK [to F.L.N.]; Wessex Medical Trust Innovation Grant [AB03 to F.L.N.]; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Postdoctoral Bridging Fellowship grant [to S.K.K.]; Open Innovation in AMR platform [111742 and 111743 to J.M.S., M.E.W., and S.T.L.]; European Research Council (ERC) [CoG 10100322 to S.J.J.B.]; Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) [1251224N and 1120125N to A.L. and I.D.A.]; Fullbright postdoctoral fellowship [to D.B.]; Intramural Research Program of the National Library of Institutes of Health (NIH) [S.K.G. and E.V.K.]. The contributions of the NIH authors are considered Works of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Data availability

Phage assemblies from this study are available at GenBank accessions PQ657785-PQ657835, PP934563 and PP934564. Phage raw reads are available at PRJNA1192413, and annotation files at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27794211.v1). Bacteria assemblies can be found under BioProject accessions PRJNA1123654, PRJNA73191, PRJNA1121092, PRJNA1121093, PRJNA31, PRJNA745534, and PRJNA1187231. Bacteria raw reads and annotation files are available at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27759627.v1). Raw reads of the BIMs from strain 51851 are available at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29437796). The KlebPhaCol strain collection in Pathogenwatch can be accessed at https://pathogen.watch/collection/tdtgvdxs4xhw-klebphacol-kp-strains. All other supporting data of this study are available within the article or through the supplementary data files. Bacterial strains and phages from this study are freely available upon request through our website, www.klebphacol.org via a simple online form (subject to verification). Please note that shipping costs and any additional requirements will apply.

References

  • 1. Hoffman  SJ, Caleo  GM, Daulaire  N  et al.  Strategies for achieving global collective action on antimicrobial resistance. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:867. 10.2471/BLT.15.153171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Landers  T, Kavanagh  KT. Is the Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic Resistance missing opportunities?. American Journal of Infection Control. 2016;44:1356–9. 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lin  DM, Koskella  B, Lin  HC. Phage therapy: an alternative to antibiotics in the age of multi-drug resistance. WJGPT. 2017;8:162. 10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i3.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kortright  KE, Chan  BK, Koff  JL  et al.  Phage Therapy: a Renewed Approach to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Cell Host & Microbe. 2019;25:219–32. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Luepke  KH, Mohr  JF. The antibiotic pipeline: reviving research and development and speeding drugs to market. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2017;15:425–33. 10.1080/14787210.2017.1308251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Payne  DJ, Miller  LF, Findlay  D  et al.  Time for a change: addressing R&D and commercialization challenges for antibacterials. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015;370:1–12. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sulakvelidze  A, Alavidze  Z, Morris  J. Bacteriophage Therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:649. 10.1128/AAC.45.3.649-659.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wittebole  X, De Roock  S, Opal  SM. A historical overview of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens. Virulence. 2013;5:226–35. 10.4161/viru.25991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pires  DP, Costa  AR, Pinto  G  et al.  Current challenges and future opportunities of phage therapy. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020;44:684–700. 10.1093/femsre/fuaa017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pirnay  JP, Djebara  S, Steurs  G  et al.  Personalized bacteriophage therapy outcomes for 100 consecutive cases: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective observational study. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:1434–53. 10.1038/s41564-024-01705-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pendleton  JN, Gorman  SP, Gilmore  BF. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2014;11:297–308. 10.1586/eri.13.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wyres  KL, Holt  KE. Klebsiella pneumoniae Population Genomics and Antimicrobial-Resistant Clones. Trends in Microbiology. 2016;24:944–56. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tacconelli  E, Carrara  E, Savoldi  A  et al.  Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18:318–27. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ko  WC, Paterson  DL, Sagnimeni  AJ  et al.  Community-Acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: global Differences in Clinical Patterns. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:160. 10.3201/eid0802.010025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. David  S, Reuter  S, Harris  SR  et al.  Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1919–29. 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shon  AS, Bajwa  RPS, Russo  TA. Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae: a new and dangerous breed. Virulence. 2013;4:107. 10.4161/viru.22718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rupali  P. Extremely high mortality rates in patients with carbapenem-resistant, hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae blood stream infections. J Assoc Phys Ind. 2018;66:13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Choby  JE, Howard-Anderson  J, Weiss  DS. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae – clinical and molecular perspectives. J Intern Med. 2020;287:283–300. 10.1111/joim.13007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wyres  KL, Lam  MMC, Holt  KE. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:344–59. 10.1038/s41579-019-0315-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Podschun  R, Ullmann  U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:589–603. 10.1128/CMR.11.4.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Federici  S, Kredo-Russo  S, Valdés-Mas  R  et al.  Targeted suppression of human IBD-associated gut microbiota commensals by phage consortia for treatment of intestinal inflammation. Cell. 2022;185:2879–98. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Atarashi  K, Suda  W, Luo  C  et al.  Ectopic colonization of oral bacteria in the intestine drives TH1 cell induction and inflammation. Science (1979). 2017;358:359–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ichikawa  M, Nakamoto  N, Kredo-Russo  S  et al.  Bacteriophage therapy against pathological Klebsiella pneumoniae ameliorates the course of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1–13. 10.1038/s41467-023-39029-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pan  YJ, Lin  TL, Chen  CT  et al.  Genetic analysis of capsular polysaccharide synthesis gene clusters in 79 capsular types of Klebsiella spp. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–10. 10.1038/srep15573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lam  MMC, Wick  RR, Watts  SC  et al.  A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–16. 10.1038/s41467-021-24448-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lam  MMC, Wick  RR, Judd  LM  et al.  Kaptive 2.0: updated capsule and lipopolysaccharide locus typing for the Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex. Microb Genom. 2022;8:800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Orskov  I, Fife-Asbury  MA. New Klebsiella capsular antigen, K82, and the deletion of five of those previously assigned. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1977;27:386–7. 10.1099/00207713-27-4-386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lee  IR, Molton  JS, Wyres  KL  et al.  Differential host susceptibility and bacterial virulence factors driving Klebsiella liver abscess in an ethnically diverse population. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Huang  X, Li  X, An  H  et al.  Capsule type defines the capability of Klebsiella pneumoniae in evading Kupffer cell capture in the liver. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18:e1010693. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rieger-Hug  D, Stirm  S. Comparative study of host capsule depolymerases associated with Klebsiella bacteriophages. Virology. 1981;113:363–78. 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90162-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Niemann  H, Kwiatkowski  B, Westphal  U  et al.  Klebsiella serotype 25 capsular polysaccharide: primary structure and depolymerization by a bacteriophage-borne glycanase. J Bacteriol. 1977;130:366–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pan  YJ, Lin  TL, Chen  CC  et al.  Klebsiella Phage ΦK64-1 Encodes Multiple Depolymerases for Multiple Host Capsular Types. J Virol. 2017;91:16. 10.1128/JVI.02457-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lourenço  M, Osbelt  L, Passet  V  et al.  Phages against noncapsulated Klebsiella pneumoniae: broader host range, slower resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Beamud  B, García-González  N, Gómez-Ortega  M  et al.  Genetic determinants of host tropism in Klebsiella phages. Cell Reports. 2023;42:112048. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tesson  F, Hervé  A, Mordret  E  et al.  Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1–10. 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Uskudar-Guclu  A, Unlu  S, Salih-Dogan  H  et al.  Biological and genomic characteristics of three novel bacteriophages and a phage-plasmid of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Can J Microbiol. 2024;70:213–25. 10.1139/cjm-2023-0188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Alqurainy  N, Miguel-Romero  L, Moura de Sousa  J  et al.  A widespread family of phage-inducible chromosomal islands only steals bacteriophage tails to spread in nature. Cell Host & Microbe. 2023;31:69–82. 10.1016/j.chom.2022.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhao  M, Li  H, Gan  D  et al.  Antibacterial effect of phage cocktails and phage-antibiotic synergy against pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae. Msystems. 2024;9:e00607–24. 10.1128/msystems.00607-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ferriol-González  C, Concha-Eloko  R, Bernabéu-Gimeno  M  et al.  Targeted phage hunting to specific Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates is an efficient antibiotic resistance and infection control strategy. Microbiol Spectrum. 2024;12:e0025424. 10.1128/spectrum.00254-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Townsend  EM, Kelly  L, Gannon  L  et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Klebsiella Phages for Phage Therapy. PHAGE. 2021;2:26. 10.1089/phage.2020.0046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Li  M, Guo  M, Chen  L  et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Novel Lytic Bacteriophages Infecting Epidemic Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:522488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rotman  E, McClure  S, Glazier  J  et al.  Rapid design of bacteriophage cocktails to suppress the burden and virulence of gut-resident carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Cell Host & Microbe. 2024;32:1988–2003. 10.1016/j.chom.2024.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Maffei  E, Shaidullina  A, Burkolter  M  et al.  Systematic exploration of Escherichia coli phage–host interactions with the BASEL phage collection. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001424. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Humolli  D, Piel  D, Maffei  E  et al.  Completing the BASEL phage collection to unlock hidden diversity for systematic exploration of phage–host interactions. PLoS Biol. 2025;23:e3003063. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Brauer  A, Rosendahl  S, Kängsep  A  et al.  Isolation and characterization of a phage collection against Pseudomonas putida. Environmental Microbiology. 2024;26:e16671. 10.1111/1462-2920.16671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Bonilla  E, Costa  AR, Van Den Berg  DF  et al.  Genomic characterization of four novel bacteriophages infecting the clinical pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae. DNA Res. 2021;28:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kropinski  AM, Mazzocco  A, Waddell  TE  et al.  2009; Enumeration of Bacteriophages by Double Agar Overlay Plaque Assay BT - Bacteriophages: methods and Protocols, Volume 1: isolation. Characterization, and Interactions. In Clokie  M. R. J., Kropinski  A. M. (eds). Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp.69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ferreira  R, Sousa  C, Gonçalves  RFS  et al.  Characterization and Genomic Analysis of a New Phage Infecting Helicobacter pylori. IJMS. 2022;23:7885. 10.3390/ijms23147885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Chen  S, Zhou  Y, Chen  Y  et al.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chen  Y, Chen  Y, Shi  C  et al.  SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience. 2018;7:1–6. 10.1093/gigascience/gix120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Bankevich  A, Nurk  S, Antipov  D  et al.  SPAdes: a New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Altschul  SF, Madden  TL, Schäffer  AA  et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Okonechnikov  K, Conesa  A, García-Alcalde  F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:292–4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Miller  ES, Kutter  E, Mosig  G  et al.  Bacteriophage T4 Genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:86–156. 10.1128/MMBR.67.1.86-156.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Lanni  YT. First-step-transfer deoxyribonucleic acid of bacteriophage T5. Bacteriol Rev. 1968;32:227. 10.1128/br.32.3.227-242.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Mccorquodale  DJ, Shaw  AR, Shaw  PK  et al.  Pre-early polypeptides of bacteriophages T5 and BF23. J Virol. 1977;22:480. 10.1128/jvi.22.2.480-488.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Roberts  MD, Martin  NL, Kropinski  AM. The genome and proteome of coliphage T1. Virology. 2004;318:245–66. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Garcia  LR, Molineux  IJ. Rate of translocation of bacteriophage T7 DNA across the membranes of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4066–76. 10.1128/jb.177.14.4066-4076.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bouras  G, Nepal  R, Houtak  G  et al.  Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics. 2023;39:btac776. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Rice  P, Longden  L, Bleasby  A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16:276–7. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Garneau  JR, Depardieu  F, Fortier  LC  et al.  PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–10. 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Mcnair  K, Zhou  C, Dinsdale  EA  et al.  PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4537–42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Ecale Zhou  CL, Malfatti  S, Kimbrel  J  et al.  multiPhATE: bioinformatics pipeline for functional annotation of phage isolates. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4402–4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Chan  PP, Lowe  TM. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Laslett  D, Canback  B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:11–6. 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Bouras  G, Grigson  SR, Mirdita  M  et al.  Protein Structure Informed Bacteriophage Genome Annotation with Phold. Biorxiv, 10.1101/2025.08.05.668817, August 06, 2025, preprint: not peer reviewed.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Johnson  SR, Weigele  P, Fomenkov  A  et al.  Domainator, a flexible software suite for domain-based annotation and neighborhood analysis, identifies proteins involved in antiviral systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:gkae1175. 10.1093/nar/gkae1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Turner  D, Adriaenssens  EM, Tolstoy  I  et al.  Phage annotation guide: guidelines for assembly and high-quality annotation. Phage. 2021;2:170. 10.1089/phage.2021.0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Tesson  F, Huiting  E, Wei  L  et al.  Exploring the diversity of anti-defense systems across prokaryotes, phages, and mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53:gkae1171. 10.1093/nar/gkae1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Jia  B, Raphenya  AR, Alcock  B  et al.  CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D566–73. 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Chen  L, Zheng  D, Liu  B  et al.  VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis-10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D694–7. 10.1093/nar/gkv1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Hockenberry  AJ, Wilke  CO. BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ. 2021;9:e11396. 10.7717/peerj.11396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Boeckaerts  D, Stock  M, De Baets  B  et al.  Identification of phage receptor-binding protein sequences with Hidden Markov Models and an extreme gradient boosting classifier. Viruses. 2022;14:1329. 10.3390/v14061329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Concha-Eloko  R, Stock  M, De Baets Id  B  et al.  DepoScope: accurate phage depolymerase annotation and domain delineation using large language models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2024;20:e1011831. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kshirsagar  M, Meller  A, Humphreys  IR  et al.  Rapid and accurate prediction of protein homo-oligomer symmetry using Seq2Symm. Nat Commun. 2025;16:1–11. 10.1038/s41467-025-57148-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kim  G, Lee  S, Levy Karin  E  et al.  Easy and accurate protein structure prediction using ColabFold. Nat Protoc. 2025;20:620–42. 10.1038/s41596-024-01060-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. van Kempen  M, Kim  SS, Tumescheit  C  et al.  Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42:243–6. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Berman  HM, Westbrook  J, Feng  Z  et al.  The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–42. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Varadi  M, Bertoni  D, Magana  P  et al.  AlphaFold Protein Structure Database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:D368–75. 10.1093/nar/gkad1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Latka  A, Leiman  PG, Drulis-Kawa  Z  et al.  Modelling the architecture of depolymerase-containing receptor binding proteins in Klebsiella phages. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2649. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Kelley  LA, Mezulis  S, Yates  CM  et al.  The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Söding  J, Biegert  A, Lupas  AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Shang  J, Jiang  J, Sun  Y. Bacteriophage classification for assembled contigs using graph convolutional network. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:i25–i33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Bin Jang  H, Bolduc  B, Zablocki  O  et al.  Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:632–9. 10.1038/s41587-019-0100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Shannon  P, Markiel  A, Ozier  O  et al.  Cytoscape: a software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–504. 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Moraru  C, Varsani  A, Kropinski  AM. VIRIDIC—A Novel Tool to Calculate the Intergenomic Similarities of Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses. Viruses. 2020;12:1268. 10.3390/v12111268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Kolde  R  Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. 2022. https://github.com/raivokolde/pheatmap  (July 2025, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Meier-Kolthoff  JP, Göker  M. VICTOR: genome-based phylogeny and classification of prokaryotic viruses. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:3396–404. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Letunic  I, Bork  P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–6. 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Gilchrist  CLM, Chooi  YH. clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2473–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Bolger  AM, Lohse  M, Usadel  B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Seemann  T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Stanton  TD, Hetland  MAK, Löhr  IH  et al.  Fast and accurate in silico antigen typing with Kaptive 3. Microb Genom. 2025;11:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Wyres  KL, Wick  RR, Gorrie  C  et al.  Identification of Klebsiella capsule synthesis loci from whole genome data. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. https://pathogen.watch/, January 2024.
  • 96. Hennart  M, Guglielmini  J, Bridel  S  et al.  A dual barcoding approach to bacterial strain nomenclature: genomic taxonomy of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:1–16. 10.1093/molbev/msac135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Lees  JA, Harris  SR, Tonkin-Hill  G  et al.  Fast and flexible bacterial genomic epidemiology with PopPUNK. Genome Res. 2019;29:304–16. 10.1101/gr.241455.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Feldgarden  M, Brover  V, Haft  DH  et al.  Validating the AMRFinder Tool and Resistance Gene Database by Using Antimicrobial Resistance Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in a Collection of Isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:1–19. 10.1128/AAC.00483-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Starikova  EV, Tikhonova  PO, Prianichnikov  NA  et al.  Phigaro: high-throughput prophage sequence annotation. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:3882–4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Payne  LJ, Todeschini  TC, Wu  Y  et al.  Identification and classification of antiviral defence systems in bacteria and archaea with PADLOC reveals new system types. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:10868–78. 10.1093/nar/gkab883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Tesson  F, Hervé  A, Mordret  E  et al.  Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1–10. 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Hadley Wickham ggplot2: elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009;. 174:245–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Wyres  KL, Wick  RR, Gorrie  C  et al.  Identification of Klebsiella capsule synthesis loci from whole genome data. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Feltwell  T, Dorman  MJ, Goulding  DA  et al.  Separating Bacteria by Capsule Amount Using a Discontinuous Density Gradient. J Vis Exp. 2019;2019:e58679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Tisza  MJ, Buck  CB. A catalog of tens of thousands of viruses from human metagenomes reveals hidden associations with chronic diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:1–11. 10.1073/pnas.2023202118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Huttenhower  C, Gevers  D, Knight  R  et al.  Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Methé  BA, Nelson  KE, Pop  M  et al.  A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486:215–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Langmead  B, Salzberg  SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Wood  DE, Lu  J, Langmead  B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–13. 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Li  H, Handsaker  B, Wysoker  A  et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Xu  S, Chen  M, Feng  T  et al.  Use ggbreak to Effectively Utilize Plotting Space to Deal With Large Datasets and Outliers. Front Genet. 2021;12:1–7. 10.3389/fgene.2021.774846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Bikel  S, López-Leal  G, Cornejo-Granados  F  et al.  Gut dsDNA virome shows diversity and richness alterations associated with childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome. iScience. 2021;24:1–23. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Liang  G, Zhao  C, Zhang  H  et al.  The stepwise assembly of the neonatal virome is modulated by breastfeeding. Nature. 2020;581:470–4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2192-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Shkoporov  AN, Clooney  AG, Sutton  TDS  et al.  The human gut virome is highly diverse, stable, and individual specific. Cell Host & Microbe. 2019;26:527–41. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Yachida  S, Mizutani  S, Shiroma  H  et al.  Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2019;25:968–76. 10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Nayfach  S, Camargo  AP, Schulz  F  et al.  CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:578–85. 10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Olm  MR, Brown  CT, Brooks  B  et al.  DRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME Journal. 2017;11:2864–8. 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Bushnell  B. BBMap. 2015.
  • 119. Li  H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–100. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Jain  C, Rodriguez-R  LM, Phillippy  AM  et al.  High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–8. 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Olm  MR, Crits-Christoph  A, Bouma-Gregson  K  et al.  InStrain enables population genomic analysis from metagenomic data and sensitive detection of shared microbial strains. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:727–36. 10.1038/s41587-020-00797-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Arndt  D, Grant  JR, Marcu  A  et al.  PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–21. 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Quinlan  AR, Hall  IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Vasimuddin  MD, Misra  S, Li  H  et al.  2019; Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems. IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041. [DOI]
  • 125. Hahne  F, Ivanek  R. Visualizing genomic data using Gviz and bioconductor. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1418:335–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Turner  D, Adriaenssens  EM, Amann  RI  et al.  Summary of taxonomy changes ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) from the Bacterial Viruses Subcommittee, 2025. J Gen Virol. 2025;106:1–44. 10.1099/jgv.0.002111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Zhou  Y, Wu  C, Wang  B  et al.  Characterization difference of typical KL1, KL2 and ST11-KL64 hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;67:100918. 10.1016/j.drup.2023.100918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Yeh  KM, Kurup  A, Siu  LK  et al.  Capsular serotype K1 or K2, rather than magA and rmpA, is a major virulence determinant for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess in Singapore and Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:466–71. 10.1128/JCM.01150-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Remya  P, Shanthi  M, Sekar  U. Occurrence and characterization of hyperviscous K1 and K2 serotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Lab Phys. 2018;10:283–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Tan  YH, Chen  Y, Chu  WHW  et al.  Cell envelope defects of different capsule-null mutants in K1 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae can affect bacterial pathogenesis. Molecular Microbiology. 2020;113:889–905. 10.1111/mmi.14447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Artyszuk  D, Jachymek  W, Izdebski  R  et al.  The OL101 O antigen locus specifies a novel Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype O13 structure. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2024;326:1–9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Crosa  JH, Walsh  CT. Genetics and Assembly Line Enzymology of Siderophore Biosynthesis in Bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:223–49. 10.1128/MMBR.66.2.223-249.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. March  C, Moranta  D, Regueiro  V  et al.  Klebsiella pneumoniae Outer Membrane Protein A Is Required to Prevent the Activation of Airway Epithelial Cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:9956–67. 10.1074/jbc.M110.181008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Shen  L, Zhang  J, Xue  J  et al.  Regulation of ECP fimbriae-related genes by the transcriptional regulator RcsAB in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044. J Basic Microbiol. 2022;62:593–603. 10.1002/jobm.202100595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Grass  G, Otto  M, Fricke  B  et al.  FieF (YiiP) from Escherichia coli mediates decreased cellular accumulation of iron and relieves iron stress. Arch Microbiol. 2005;183:9–18. 10.1007/s00203-004-0739-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Yang  J, Long  H, Hu  Y  et al.  Klebsiella oxytoca Complex: update on Taxonomy, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Virulence. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022;35:1–39. 10.1128/CMR.00006-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Rodríguez-Medina  N, Barrios-Camacho  H, Duran-Bedolla  J  et al.  Klebsiella variicola: an emerging pathogen in humans. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2019;8:973–88. 10.1080/22221751.2019.1634981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Majkowska-Skrobek  G, Markwitz  P, Sosnowska  E  et al.  The evolutionary trade-offs in phage-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae entail cross-phage sensitization and loss of multidrug resistance. Environmental Microbiology. 2021;23:7723–40. 10.1111/1462-2920.15476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Jumper  J, Evans  R, Pritzel  A  et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. García-Doval  C, Castón  JR, Luque  D  et al.  Structure of the Receptor-Binding Carboxy-Terminal Domain of the Bacteriophage T5 L-Shaped Tail Fibre with and without Its Intra-Molecular Chaperone. Viruses. 2015;7:6424–40. 10.3390/v7122946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Dunne  M, Denyes  JM, Arndt  H  et al.  Salmonella Phage S16 Tail Fiber Adhesin Features a Rare Polyglycine Rich Domain for Host Recognition. Structure. 2018;26:1573–82. 10.1016/j.str.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. van den Berg  B, Silale  A, Baslé  A  et al.  Structural basis for host recognition and superinfection exclusion by bacteriophage T5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:1–9. 10.1073/pnas.2211672119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Buffet  A, Rocha  EPC, Rendueles  O. Nutrient conditions are primary drivers of bacterial capsule maintenance in Klebsiella. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2021;288:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Blundell-Hunter  G, Enright  MC, Negus  D  et al.  Characterisation of Bacteriophage-Encoded Depolymerases Selective for Key Klebsiella pneumoniae Capsular Exopolysaccharides. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:1–16. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.686090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Samson  JE, Magadán  AH, Sabri  M  et al.  Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences. Nat Rev Micro. 2013;11:675–87. 10.1038/nrmicro3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Bikard  D, Marraffini  LA. Innate and adaptive immunity in bacteria: mechanisms of programmed genetic variation to fight bacteriophages. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2012;24:15–20. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Hasan  M, Ahn  J. Evolutionary Dynamics between Phages and Bacteria as a Possible Approach for Designing Effective Phage Therapies against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Antibiotics. 2022;11:915. 10.3390/antibiotics11070915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Boeckaerts  D, Stock  M, Ferriol-González  C  et al.  Prediction of Klebsiella phage-host specificity at the strain level. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1–10. 10.1038/s41467-024-48675-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Gaborieau  B, Vaysset  H, Tesson  F  et al.  Prediction of strain level phage–host interactions across the Escherichia genus using only genomic information. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:2847–61. 10.1038/s41564-024-01832-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Yang  F, Jiang  YL, Zhang  JT  et al.  Fine structure and assembly pattern of a minimal myophage Pam3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2213727120. 10.1073/pnas.2213727120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Guerin  E, Shkoporov  A, Stockdale  SR  et al.  Biology and taxonomy of crAss-like bacteriophages, the most abundant virus in the human gut. Cell Host & Microbe. 2018;24:653–64. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Benler  S, Yutin  N, Antipov  D  et al.  Thousands of previously unknown phages discovered in whole-community human gut metagenomes. Microbiome. 2021;9:1–17. 10.1186/s40168-021-01017-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Camarillo-Guerrero  LF, Almeida  A, Rangel-Pineros  G  et al.  Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell. 2021;184:1098–1109. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Edwards  RA, Vega  AA, Norman  HM  et al.  Global phylogeography and ancient evolution of the widespread human gut virus crAssphage. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1727–36. 10.1038/s41564-019-0494-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Shkoporov  AN, Khokhlova  EV, Stephens  N  et al.  Long-term persistence of crAss-like phage crAss001 is associated with phase variation in Bacteroides intestinalis. BMC Biol. 2021;19:1–16. 10.1186/s12915-021-01084-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Schmidtke  DT, Hickey  AS, Wirbel  J  et al.  The prototypic crAssphage is a linear phage-plasmid. Cell Host & Microbe. 2025;33:1347–62. 10.1016/j.chom.2025.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Turnbaugh  PJ, Ley  RE, Hamady  M  et al.  The Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2007;449:804–10. 10.1038/nature06244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Dong  N, Yang  X, Chan  EWC  et al.  Klebsiella species: taxonomy, hypervirulence and multidrug resistance. EBioMedicine. 2022;79:103998. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Clegg  S, Murphy  CN. Epidemiology and Virulence of Klebsiella pneumonia. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4:1–17. 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0005-2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Vornhagen  J, Rao  K, Bachman  MA. Gut community structure as a risk factor for infection in Klebsiella pneumoniae-colonized patients. Msystems. 2024;9:1–18. 10.1128/msystems.00786-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Le Guern  R, Grandjean  T, Stabler  S  et al.  Gut colonisation with multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae worsens Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1–12. 10.1038/s41467-022-35767-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Jiménez-Rojas  V, Villanueva-García  D, Miranda-Vega  AL  et al.  Gut colonization and subsequent infection of neonates caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1322874. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1322874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. De Maio  F, Bianco  DM, Santarelli  G  et al.  Profiling the gut microbiota to assess infection risk in Klebsiella pneumoniae-colonized patients. Gut Microbes. 2025;17:2468358. 10.1080/19490976.2025.2468358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Unverdorben  LV, Pirani  A, Gontjes  K  et al.  Klebsiella pneumoniae evolution in the gut leads to spontaneous capsule loss and decreased virulence potential. mBio. 2025;16:e02362–24. 10.1128/mbio.02362-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Elek  CKA, Brown  TL, Viet  T  et al.  A hybrid and poly-polish workflow for the complete and accurate assembly of phage genomes: a case study of ten przondoviruses. Microb Genom. 2023;9:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Ferriol-González  C, Concha-Eloko  R, Bernabéu-Gimeno  M  et al.  Targeted phage hunting to specific Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates is an efficient antibiotic resistance and infection control strategy. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e00254–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Thomas  JA, Orwenyo  J, Wang  LX  et al.  The Odd “RB” Phage—Identification of Arabinosylation as a New Epigenetic Modification of DNA in T4-Like Phage RB69. Viruses. 2018;10:313. 10.3390/v10060313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Kortright  KE, Chan  BK, Turner  PE. High-throughput discovery of phage receptors using transposon insertion sequencing of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:18670–9. 10.1073/pnas.2001888117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Pacios  O, Fernández-García  L, Bleriot  I  et al.  Phenotypic and Genomic Comparison of Klebsiella pneumoniae Lytic Phages: vB_KpnM-VAC66 and vB_KpnM-VAC13. Viruses. 2021;14:6. 10.3390/v14010006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Ellis  EL, Delbrück  M. The growth of bacteriophage. J Gen Physiol. 1939;22:365–84. 10.1085/jgp.22.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Luria  SE, Delbrück  M. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics. 1943;28:491–511. 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Hershey  AD, Chase  M. Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage. J Gen Physiol. 1952;36:39–56. 10.1085/jgp.36.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Rohwer  F, Segall  AM. In Retrospect: A Century of Phage Lessons. Nature. 2015;528:46–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Gan  L, Feng  Y, Du  B  et al.  Bacteriophage targeting microbiota alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high alcohol-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1–15. 10.1038/s41467-023-39028-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Tan  YH, Chen  Y, Chu  WHW  et al.  Cell envelope defects of different capsule-null mutants in K1 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae can affect bacterial pathogenesis. Molecular Microbiology. 2020;113:889–905. 10.1111/mmi.14447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Haudiquet  M, Buffet  A, Rendueles  O  et al.  Interplay between the cell envelope and mobile genetic elements shapes gene flow in populations of the nosocomial pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001276. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Short  FL, Di Sario  G, Reichmann  NT  et al.  Genomic profiling reveals distinct routes to complement resistance in klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2020;88:e00043–20. 10.1128/IAI.00043-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Huang  TW, Lam  I, Chang  HY  et al.  Capsule deletion via a λ-Red knockout system perturbs biofilm formation and fimbriae expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae MGH 78578. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:13. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Pal  S, Verma  J, Mallick  S  et al.  Absence of the glycosyltransferase wcaj in klebsiella pneumoniae atcc13883 affects biofilm formation, increases polymyxin resistance and reduces murine macrophage activation. Microbiology. 2019;165:891–904. 10.1099/mic.0.000827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Sahly  H, Podschun  R, Oelschlaeger  TA  et al.  Capsule impedes adhesion to and invasion of epithelial cells by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2000;68:6744–9. 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6744-6749.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Lin  TH, Wu  CC, Kuo  JT  et al.  Fnr-dependent rmpa and rmpa2 regulation of capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1–12. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Ernst  CM, Braxton  JR, Rodriguez-Osorio  CA  et al.  Adaptive evolution of virulence and persistence in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Med. 2020;26:705–11. 10.1038/s41591-020-0825-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Dawson  SJT, Shibu  P, Garnett  S  et al.  Weberviruses are gut-associated phages that infect Klebsiella spp. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2025;101:43. 10.1093/femsec/fiaf043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Lee  SY, Yang  J, Lee  JH. Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1185788. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1185788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Stachler  E, Kelty  C, Sivaganesan  M  et al.  Quantitative CrAssphage PCR Assays for Human Fecal Pollution Measurement. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:9146. 10.1021/acs.est.7b02703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Li  E, Saleem  F, Edge  TA  et al.  Assessment of crAssphage as a human fecal source tracking marker in the lower Great Lakes. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:168840. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Zolnier  C, Molloy  J  2024; Open Biosharing Workshops - Report.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkaf1122_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

Phage assemblies from this study are available at GenBank accessions PQ657785-PQ657835, PP934563 and PP934564. Phage raw reads are available at PRJNA1192413, and annotation files at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27794211.v1). Bacteria assemblies can be found under BioProject accessions PRJNA1123654, PRJNA73191, PRJNA1121092, PRJNA1121093, PRJNA31, PRJNA745534, and PRJNA1187231. Bacteria raw reads and annotation files are available at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27759627.v1). Raw reads of the BIMs from strain 51851 are available at Figshare (DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29437796). The KlebPhaCol strain collection in Pathogenwatch can be accessed at https://pathogen.watch/collection/tdtgvdxs4xhw-klebphacol-kp-strains. All other supporting data of this study are available within the article or through the supplementary data files. Bacterial strains and phages from this study are freely available upon request through our website, www.klebphacol.org via a simple online form (subject to verification). Please note that shipping costs and any additional requirements will apply.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES