Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2025 Dec;206:109946. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109946

Association of in utero exposure to phthalate and DINCH metabolites with placental DNA methylation

Hana Vespalcova a,b,, Bethany Knox a,b,c, Amrit Kaur Sakhi d, Cathrine Thomsen d, Sofía Aguilar-Lacasaña a,b,c, Marta Cosin-Tomas a,b,c, Laura Gómez-Herrera a,c,e, Olga Sánchez García f,g, Elisa Llurba f,g, María Dolores Gómez-Roig h,i,j, Jordi Sunyer a,b,c,k, Payam Dadvand a,b,c, Mariona Bustamante a,b,c,1,⁎⁎, Martine Vrijheid a,b,c,1
PMCID: PMC12696147  PMID: 41275763

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Keywords: Phthalate metabolites, DINCH, Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS), Placental DNA methylation, Pregnancy, Endocrine disruptor, Sex-specific

Highlights

  • In utero exposure to phthalates and DINCH was associated with differential DNA methylation in the placenta.

  • Associations were dependent of sex and in utero exposure window.

  • Identified genes were involved in endocrine disruption, metabolism, and vascular and immune modulation.

Abstract

Phthalates and DINCH are non-persistent chemicals widely used in consumer products. In utero exposure to these compounds has been linked to adverse reproductive and long-term health outcomes, potentially through epigenetic changes in the placenta. This study investigated associations between maternal phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels and placental DNA methylation in 469 mother–child pairs from the Barcelona Life Study Cohort (BiSC). Fifteen phthalate and two DINCH metabolites were measured in pooled maternal urine samples collected at 19 and 35 weeks of gestation using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS. Placental DNA methylation was assessed using the Illumina EPIC array. We applied robust linear regression models to test associations between single exposures at 19 weeks, 35 weeks, and whole pregnancy (average of the two time points), with each CpG site. In secondary analyses, quantile g-computation was used to test associations between exposure mixtures and suggestive CpGs (p-value < 1E-05). We identified 38 Bonferroni significant associations in the single exposure models (p-value < 1E-07)— 24 at 19 weeks, 8 at 35 weeks and 6 for the whole pregnancy period. Suggestive CpGs (p-value < 1E-05) were annotated to genes involved in metabolic, immune and vascular pathways, steroid biosynthesis, and sex hormone signaling. Sex-stratified analyses revealed 49 female-specific and 42 male-specific associations, most of which were identified at a single time point. Mixture analyses revealed 20 significant associations, all consistent in direction with the single-metabolite models. These results suggest that prenatal exposure to phthalates and DINCH may contribute to placental epigenetic alterations supporting a role for endocrine disruption, metabolism, and vascular and immune modulation in mediating their effects.

1. Introduction

Phthalates and 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester (DINCH), non-persistent chemicals, are commonly used plasticizers and stabilizers typically added to plastic materials such as food packaging, cosmetics, toys or drug films and other medical devices (Schettler, 2006, Ao et al., 2024, Genuis et al., 2012). Due to their widespread use, phthalates and DINCH have become ubiquitous in the environment, leading to chronic exposure through ingestion, inhalation, and skin absorption in humans (Schettler, 2006, Diamanti-Kandarakis et al., 2009).

Exposure to phthalates has been linked to a broad range of health disorders (Benjamin et al., 2017, Mariana et al., 2016). In particular, the in utero exposure has been related to an increased risk of pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, preeclampsia, or gestational diabetes (Grindler et al., 2018, Qian et al., 2020, Warner et al., 2021), and also to short and long-term health consequences in the offspring, including intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth, low birth weight, obesity, immune disorders or neurodevelopmental disorders (Almeida-Toledano et al., 2024, Dutta et al., 2020). Some of these associations have been shown to be sex-specific, such as reduced ovarian weight or altered puberty timing in females, and altered testosterone synthesis or increased risk of ADHD in males, among others (Freire et al., 2024, Huang et al., 2024, Jurewicz and Hanke, 2011, Niermann et al., 2015).

The placenta is a central organ for fetal development, responsible for nutrient and oxygen exchange, immune defense, and endocrine regulation (Herrick and Bordoni, 2025). It is permeable to phthalates and DINCH, and several studies have reported comparable levels of these substances in both maternal and cord blood (Chen et al., 2008, Latini et al., 2003, Jensen et al., 2012, Yan et al., 2009, Zhang et al., 2009). These chemicals can disrupt multiple biological processes, particularly through endocrine mechanisms, potentially impairing placental formation and function (Gorini et al., 2025, Saad et al., 2021). As the primary interface between maternal and fetal systems, the placenta integrates exposures and biological signals throughout pregnancy, making it a mechanistically relevant tissue for studying the effects of chemical exposures. Despite this, it remains relatively understudied compared to other perinatal tissues. Importantly, such effects can be captured in the placental epigenome (Nelissen et al., 2011)—the chemical modifications to DNA and associated proteins, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA changes, which influence gene expression without altering the DNA sequence (Gibney and Nolan, 2010, Li, 2021).

Several studies have investigated the association of in utero phthalate and DINCH exposure with epigenetic alterations in the offspring. In cord blood, epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS), ranging from 64 to 336 samples, have reported up to 25 CpGs with differential DNA methylation (Chen et al., 2018, Khodasevich et al., 2024, Lee et al., 2023, Miura et al., 2021, Petroff et al., 2022, Sol et al., 2022, Solomon et al., 2017). In the placenta, two EWAS studies with 202 and 387 samples from two French cohorts have identified 1 and 114 differently methylated CpGs, respectively (Jedynak et al., 2022, Jedynak et al., 2024). However, these studies were relatively small, and some of them did not explore the whole genome, or the effects of the exposure window or fetal sex. Moreover, assessment of in utero phthalate and DINCH exposure was based on one or a few spot urine samples in all but one study (Jedynak et al., 2024), potentially producing high levels of measurement error, since exposure to these short-lived chemicals is known to be highly variable.

In this study we aimed to evaluate the association between phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels measured in pooled maternal urine samples collected at 19 and 35 weeks of gestation, and placental genome-wide DNA methylation in 469 mother–child pairs from the Barcelona Life Study Cohort (BiSC).

2. Material and methods

2.1. Study population

This study was nested in the Barcelona Life Study Cohort (BiSC), a population-based birth cohort in Barcelona, Spain (Dadvand et al., 2024). Pregnant women (n = 1,080) were recruited during the first trimester of pregnancy between 2018 and 2021 in three hospitals in Barcelona (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, and Hospital Clínic de Barcelona). The detailed information about inclusion criteria, follow-up visits and data collected can be seen elsewhere (Dadvand et al., 2024). Briefly, we included pregnant women between 18 and 45 years old, living in the catchment area of recruiting hospitals and being able to communicate in Catalan, Spanish, or English. We excluded women having a fetus with major congenital anomalies (i.e., malformations incompatible with life). In this study we examined 469 BiSC mother–child pairs with available data of urinary phthalate and DINCH levels in 19 weeks of gestation (N = 349) or 35 weeks of gestation (N = 404) of pregnancy (overlap 284), placental DNA methylation, gestational age, and covariates (Fig. S1). The goal of selecting these two time points for urine sampling was to include the early-mid and late stages of pregnancy.

All participants signed an informed consent form prior to their enrolment into the cohort. Ethics approvals were obtained from the corresponding authorities in all the participating institutions and hospitals. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at ISGlobal (Harris et al., 2019, Harris et al., 2009).

2.2. Exposure assessment

Pregnant participants’ first and last voids of the day were collected during six consecutive days at approximately 19 weeks (mean (standard deviation (SD)) = 18.8 (2.9) weeks, N = 695 samples) and 35 weeks (mean (SD) = 34.7 (1), N = 756 samples). The samples were kept in freezers of participants’ home during the sampling week and then transported to the BiSC biobank and kept in −80 °C freezers till the time of the analysis. Urine pools, containing equivalent volumes of each void (with a minimum of 10 voids), were created for each participant at each collection time point.

A total of 15 phthalate metabolites and 2 DINCH metabolites were measured in each urine pool using high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (Sabaredzovic et al., 2015). These included: monoethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-iso-butyl phthalate (MiBP), mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP), mono benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono-n-pentyl phthalate (MnPeP), monocyclohexyl phthalate (MCHP), mono-n-octyl phthalate (MnOP), mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate (MEHHP), mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate (MEOHP), mono-2-ethyl 5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP), mono-4-methyl-7-hydroxyoctyl phthalate (oh-MiNP), mono-4-methyl-7-oxooctyl phthalate (oxo-MiNP), mono-4-methyl-7-carboxyoctyl phthalate (cx-MiNP), 6-hydroxy monopropylheptylphthalate (oh-MPHP), 2-(((hydroxy-4-methyloctyl)oxy)carbonyl)cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (oh-MINCH), 2-(((4-methyl-7-oxyooctyl)oxy)carbonyl)cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (oxo-MINCH). Some of the phthalate metabolites (oh-MiNP, oxo-MiNP, cx-MiNP and oh-MPHP) and DINCH metabolites (oh-MINCH and oxo-MINCH) have multiple isomers. Thus, for these metabolites the sum of the isomers was reported. Three blanks and two in-house control samples were analyzed alongside the urine samples in each laboratory batch (about 50 samples per batch). For MBzP, MEHP, MEHHP and MEOHP, a signal was detected in < 25 % of the analyzed blanks with a minimal signal (<2 times limits of quantification), thus no correction was indicated. For the remaining compounds no blank detection was observed. The coefficient of variation of control samples within batches ranged between 7 % (MEP) to 33 % (MEHP) (Supplementary Table S1). Phthalate and DINCH levels are expressed as ng/mL urine.

oh-MiNP was discarded from the analysis due to co-elution with a metabolite of a terephthalate that has the same mass and retention time (mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl terephthalate, MECPTP). Three phthalate metabolites, MnPeP, MCHP, MnOP were detected in < 5 % of samples and were also excluded from the analysis. The limit of detection (LOD), the lower and upper limit of quantification (LLOQ, ULOQ), and the descriptive of the subset of samples examined in this study (19 weeks: N = 349, 35 weeks: N = 404) are shown in Tables TS1A-B. After testing for normal distribution, phthalate levels were log2-transformed to meet the requirement of Gaussian distribution for analysis. For phthalates where no levels were detected due to signals < LOD, the missing values were imputed using the left-censored ‘fill_in’ imputation method described by Helsel (1990) (Helsel, 1990). Additionally, the weighted sum of metabolites (nmol/L) derived from the same parent compound was calculated by summing the metabolite levels (in original scale and with values < LOD imputed) divided by their molecular weight (sum DEHP: MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP and MECPP, sum DiNP: oxo-MiNP and cx-MiNP, sum DINCH: oh-MINCH and oxo-MINCH). Then, the sums were tested for normal distribution and log2-transformed. For the analysis of whole-pregnancy phthalate exposure in relation to placental DNA methylation, we calculated the average metabolite concentrations when measurements from both trimesters were available, and used trimester-specific concentrations when only one measurement was available (65 unique at 19 weeks and 120 unique at 35 weeks).

The effect of several technical and design variables (laboratory batch, urine time to storage, number of urine samples in the pool), and biological variables (urine creatinine levels and gestational age) on phthalate levels were investigated, and found to be minimal with the exception of creatinine. Creatinine levels (ml/l urine) were measured in the urine pool as described elsewhere (Granerud, 2022). To eliminate this potential noise, we applied a standardization method, based on linear regression that adjust the exposure for creatinine protecting other variables (hospital of delivery, COVID19 confinement, gestational age, maternal smoking, education, BMI and age, child’s ethnicity and sex, and parity) described by Mortamais, et al. (2012) (Mortamais et al., 2012). This second dataset corrected for creatinine has been used in the sensitivity analysis (see section 2.5).

2.3. DNA methylation

2.3.1. Placental biopsy collection

Following a harmonized protocol across hospitals, placental biopsies (2.5 × 1 cm, N = 611) were collected from two opposite quadrants approximately 3–4 cm from the cord insertion site. Biopsies were then halved (2.5 × 0.5 cm). One half was stored in liquid nitrogen, and the other half treated with RNAlater and dissected into four 0.5 × 0.5 cm samples representing the chorionic plate/membranes, upper chorionic villi, lower chorionic villi, and decidua. All biopsies were finally stored at −80 °C until the time of analysis.

2.3.2. Placental DNA extraction

For DNA extraction, we selected 30–40 mg of tissue from the upper chorionic villi to minimize contamination from maternal tissue and to obtain a homogeneous sample composed predominantly of syncytiotrophoblasts—the multinucleated cells forming the outermost layer of the chorionic villi that mediate maternal–fetal exchange and endocrine signaling. Briefly, the dissected samples were homogenized using a bead mill (bead beater) at 4 °C for 26 s. Next, the genomic DNA was isolated using the AllPrep®DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit, (Qiagen, CA, USA). DNA was eluted in 80 and 60 µl and stored in different aliquots at −80 °C. DNA quality was evaluated on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and additionally 500 ng of DNA was run on 1 % agarose gels to confirm that samples did not present visual signs of degradation.

2.3.3. Placental DNA methylation data acquisition

DNA methylation analysis was performed on 624 DNA samples from 589 individuals including 35 duplicates. Seven hundred and fifty ng of DNA were bisulfite-converted using the EZ 96-DNA methylation kit following the manufacturer’s standard protocol. The DNA methylation analysis was conducted using the Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip from Illumina, following manufacturer’s protocol in the Human Genome facility (HUGE-F) at the Erasmus Medical Centre core facility. The samples were randomly distributed into multiple plates, and the random distribution according to main biological and socioeconomic factors was checked. Twenty-six technical control samples were distributed across multiple plates, allowing us to evaluate the consistency of methylation measurements and detect potential batch effects. These control samples were used in quality assessment prior to normalization and contributed to ensuring data comparability between batches.

2.3.4. Placental DNA methylation data quality control and normalization

The DNA methylation data pre-processing was performed using the PACEAnalysis R package (v.0.1.9) (https://www.epicenteredresearch.com/). During the data pre-processing, sample quality control, probe quality control, normalization, batch correction, estimation of cell type proportions, and winsorization of outlier values were conducted. Overall, 59 samples were excluded from the data due to: a) low quality (N = 5), b) sample call rate < 95 % (p-value < 0.05, N = 3), c) sex inconsistencies (N = 9), d) substantial contamination with DNA from other samples (log2 odds < -1) (N = 11) (Heiss and Just, 2018), e) duplicates calculated using the probes to genotype 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) contained in the array (N = 29), and f) siblings (N = 2). The 59 excluded samples correspond to 24 individuals. After sample quality control, 565 unique samples remained. Probes with a call rate < 95 % (p-value < 0.05) were discarded according to the SeSAMe method (Zhou et al., 2018). Moreover, control and non-CpG probes, sex chromosome targeting probes, probes giving inconsistent results between 450 K and EPIC arrays (Fernandez-Jimenez et al., 2019), and problematic probes (probes with hybridizing problems and probes affected by the presence of SNPs: probes containing a SNP at the CpG site itself, probes with a SNP adjacent to the CpG site, probes with a SNP within 5 nucleotides of the CpG site if the minor allele frequency (MAF) was greater than 1 % in global populations) according to Zhou et al. (2017) (Zhou et al., 2018), were excluded. The final dataset consisted of 565 samples (469 with phthalate measurements) and 865,859 probes.

The dye-bias and Noob background correction, and normalization with the functional normalization method were conducted using the minfi R package (Fortin et al., 2017, Triche et al., 2013). Correction for type 2 probe bias was performed applying the beta-mixture quantile normalization (BMIQ) (Teschendorff et al., 2013). Data was explored using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and associations of the first 12 PCs with main variables (hospital of recruitment, hospital of delivery, sex, ethnic, COVID-19 confinement, gestational age, birth weight, maternal smoking) and technical variables (array, working plate, DNA extraction batch, round of extraction, DNA concentration, quality ratio 260/280 and quality ratio 260/230) were examined using linear regression models. The effect of the array batch variable was eliminated using the ComBat method due to its association with most of the PCs, including PC1, which explained 30.36 % of the variance (Johnson et al., 2007). DNA methylation values are expressed as beta values, where 0 indicates no methylation and 1 indicates complete methylation. The beta values were winsorized based on a percentile of 1 % (0.5 % on each side) estimated from the empirical beta-distribution to reduce the influence of outliers.

Cell type proportions for six populations (trophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblast, nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs), Hofbauer cells, endothelial cells, and stromal cells) were estimated from DNA methylation using the placenta reference panel from the 3rd trimester (term) implemented in the planet R package (Yuan et al., 2021).

2.4. Covariates

Based on evidence from previous studies (Solomon et al., 2022, Choudhary et al., 2024, Elliott et al., 2022, Yeung et al., 2024, Ghildayal et al., 2022, Cosin-Tomas et al., 2022, Kashima et al., 2021, Campagna et al., 2023), the following variables were included as covariates in the models. Maternal age (years), maternal education (primary and secondary school/university), maternal tobacco smoking status during pregnancy (non-smoker/smoker), parity (multiparous/nulliparous), and child’s ethnicity (European/other) were obtained from self-reported questionnaires. Maternal body mass index (BMI) at 13 weeks of pregnancy (kg/m2) was obtained through direct measurements. Gestational age at delivery (weeks) was calculated based on the crown-rump-length, measured using ultrasound examination at approximately 12th gestational week obstetric visit (Altman and Chitty, 1997). Placental cell type proportions were estimated from the DNA methylation data (see above). Child’s sex (female/male), and birth weight (grams), the later used in the descriptive of the study, were obtained from medical records. COVID-19 confinement (whether pregnancy took place before confinement/during confinement/after confinement) and hospital of delivery (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, and other) were obtained based on conception and gestational age and the hospital where the delivery took place.

Maternal age, education, smoking status, BMI, parity, and child’s ethnicity were included in the models as potential confounders of the association. Gestational age was considered a potential mediator of the association, and tested in the sensitivity models. Child’s sex and placental cell type proportions were included as precision variables due to their strong effects on epigenetic profiles. COVID-19 confinement and hospital of delivery were added to account for their potential influence on life-style and/or sample handling and processing (indeed both were related to DNA methylation PCs).

2.5. Statistical analyses

Prior to the main analysis, we calculated the Spearman’s correlation between phthalate and DINCH metabolites and the Spearman’s correlation with creatinine in each trimester. To compare the variability of phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels between trimesters, we calculated the intra-class correlation (ICC), which quantifies the consistency of measurements within the same individual over time. Bland–Altman plots were used to illustrate the trimester differences for each individual and each metabolite.

In our main analysis, we tested the association of exposure to each of the single phthalate and DINCH metabolites and the sum of metabolites (sum DiNP, sum DEHP and sum DINCH) at different exposure windows (19 weeks, 35 weeks and whole pregnancy) with each CpG site, using robust linear regression models (PACEanalysis R package). The main model was adjusted for hospital of delivery, COVID19 confinement, maternal smoking, maternal education, maternal BMI at 13 weeks of pregnancy, maternal age at delivery, parity, ethnicity and sex of the offspring, and placental cell composition.

To control for multiple-testing the Bonferroni correction was applied considering the total number of CpGs tested for each metabolite and time point (a p-value < 1E-07 was considered statistically significant). The lambda inflation factor was calculated as a ratio between median of observed distribution of p-values and median of expected distribution of p-values (Guintivano et al., 2020). Effect size was expressed as the change in DNA methylation (from 0 to 1) per doubling in phthalate levels (ng/mL).

As a secondary analysis, we performed the analysis of chemical mixtures using quantile g-computation implemented in qgcomp R package to examine the potential mixture effect of phthalate and DINCH metabolites on DNA methylation (Keil et al., 2020). The quantile g-computation uses a generalized linear model to estimate the overall and partial effects of mixture exposure on the outcome of interest using quantiles of metabolite levels, rather than continuous concentrations, while allowing for covariate adjustment. The overall mixture effect represents the change in the outcome per one quantile increase across all mixture components simultaneously, whereas the partial effects indicate the relative contribution of each individual metabolite to this overall effect. This analysis was restricted to statistically suggestive CpGs (p-value < 1E-05) from the single-metabolite analysis. Bonferroni corrected p-value for the mixture analyses was 0.05/493 CpGs at 19 weeks, 0.05/295 at 35 weeks and 0.05/277 for whole pregnancy.

We further stratified the main analyses by sex. Differences in the effect size of Bonferroni significant CpGs between sexes were compared with the Cochran’s Q test implemented in meta R package (Balduzzi et al., 2019). The p-value of the Q test was adjusted by the number of associations identified in boys and girls (p-value threshold < 7E-04).

Finally, a number of sensitivity analyses were conducted on the main model: a) additionally adjusting for gestational age, which may be a mediator in the associations; b) restricting the analyses to the subset of children of European origin, a more homogeneous population at the genetic level; c) not adjusting for placental cellular composition, to test whether epigenetic associations were driven by true methylation changes rather than shifts in cell proportions; and d) using the phthalate levels corrected for creatinine, in order to account for variability in urine dilution in pools.

2.6. Downstream analyses

The IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno.ilm10b4.hg19 R package (Hansen, 2017) was used to annotate the CpGs to genes (within the gene or at < 1;500  bp upstream of the gene start site) and to CpG islands. In addition, to annotate the CpGs to enhancers and link them to genes in placenta tissue, we used the EPIraction webpage tool (run 14/08/2024) (Nurtdinov and Guigó, 2025). Furthermore, we searched whether identified CpGs overlapped with placental methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs), placental germline differentially methylated regions (gDMRs) (Hamada et al., 2016), placental partially methylated domains (PMDs) and placental chromatin states according to ROADMAP (Schroeder and LaSalle, 2013). Placental fetal cis-mQTLs were identified in BiSC (for more information see Supplementary Methods).

To identify potential biological pathways underlying the effects of identified DNA methylation changes (suggestive CpGs at p-value < 1E-05), we conducted several functional enrichment analyses using the missMethyl R package (Phipson et al., 2016). We tested enrichment for: (i) biological pathways (KEGG and Panther,); (ii) transcription factors (ENCODE, ChEA); and (iii) diseases (OMIM Expanded). A minimum of two genes in the pathway and a False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.2 was needed to report the pathways in the manuscript. Finally, we searched for previous associations with traits and exposures of significant CpGs in the EWAS Atlas (Li et al., 2019), EWAS catalog (Battram et al., 2022), and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) (Davis et al., 2023).

All analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (v4.1.2, v4.2.2, and v4.4.3) (R Core Team, 2021, R Core Team, 2022, R Core Team, 2025).

3. Results

3.1. Study population

Our study sample included 469 pregnant women and their offspring from the BiSC cohort, 349 with phthalate levels measured at 19 weeks (mean: 18.74, SD: 2.86), and 404 at 35 weeks (mean: 34.74, SD: 1.38), with an overlap of 284. The average maternal age at the enrollment was 34.6 years and the average BMI at 12w was 24.5 kg/m2. Overall, most of the women had completed university education (69 %) and did not smoke during pregnancy (92 %). Around 23 % of participants were pregnant during the COVID-19 confinement and half (50 %) delivered in Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and 46 % in Hospital Sant Pau. The participants gave birth at an average gestational age of 39.8 weeks and 55 % of them were nulliparous. Average birth weight was 3287.4 g, the sex of the babies was uniformly distributed and the majority of the babies were of European origin (70 %). Detailed information of the participants is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Descriptives of the study population.


Whole population (N = 469)
Population at 19w (N = 349)
Population at 35w (N = 404)
N % N % N %
Hospital of delivery
Hospital Sant Pau 217 46 158 45 195 48
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu 235 50 182 52 194 48
Other 17 4 9 3 15 4
Covid-19 confinement
Pregnancy before confinement 210 45 130 37 190 47
Pregnancy during confinement 109 23 89 26 82 20
Pregnancy after confinement 150 32 130 37 132 33
Maternal education
Primary or secondary school 143 30 105 30 119 29
University 326 70 244 70 285 71
Maternal smoking during pregnancy
Non-smoker 434 93 323 93 376 93
Smoker 35 7 26 7 28 7
Parity
Multiparous 207 44 161 46 179 44
Nulliparous 262 56 188 54 225 56
Child ethnicity
European 329 70 243 70 292 72
Other 140 30 106 30 112 28
Child sex
Female 238 51 181 52 212 52
Male 231 49 168 48 192 48
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Maternal age (years) 34.55 4.55 34.63 4.5 34.7 4.37
Maternal body mass index (BMI) at 12 weeks of pregnancy (kg/m2) 24.53 4.44 24.51 4.39 24.33 4.31
Gestational age at birth (weeks) 39.75 1.4 39.68 1.42 39.85 1.22
Birth weight (g) 3287.42 465.65 3281.88 492.92 3309.06 429.68
Cell type proportions
Trophoblasts 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07
Stromal 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Hofbauer <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.01
Endothelial 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03
Nucleated red blood cells (nRBC) 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02
Syncytiotrophoblast 0.84 0.1 0.84 0.1 0.84 0.1

N: sample size; SD: standard deviation

3.2. Exposure to phthalates and DINCH

Eleven phthalate and 2 DINCH metabolites with levels > LOD in more than 90 % of the samples were included in the analyses. Median and interquartile range (IQR) levels for each compound and period are presented in Table 2 (see TS2A-C for more details). MEP had the highest levels measured (median 19 weeks: 47.51 ng/mL, 35 weeks: 40.04 ng/mL, whole pregnancy: 45.16 ng/mL). The weighted sums of metabolites of DEHP (4 metabolites), DiNP (2 metabolites), and DINCH (2 metabolites) showed median levels of 67.71, 40.51 and 10.19 nmol/L at 19 weeks, 45.23, 25.56, 6.13 nmol/L at 35 weeks, and 68.57, 40.13, 10.12 nmol/L for whole pregnancy, respectively (Table 2, TS2A-C).

Table 2.

Descriptives of the phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels in maternal urine samples collected at 19 weeks (N = 349) and 35 weeks (N = 404).



19w
35w
Whole pregnancy
Variable Name Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
MEP Monoethyl phthalate 47.51 (22.16–89.09) 40.04 (21.03–92.27) 45.16 (24.16–86.18)
MiBP Mono-iso-butyl phthalate 11.58 (7.50–17.95) 11.38 (7.14–18.15) 11.81 (7.45–17.55)
MnBP Mono-n-butyl phthalate 10.51 (6.73–15.50) 9.81 (6.59–16.91) 10.52 (6.90–16.66)
MBzP Mono benzyl phthalate 1.24 (0.75–2.15) 1.16 (0.59–2.13) 1.19 (0.68–2.05)
MEHP Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate 1.82 (1.05–3.11) 1.38 (0.68–2.71) 1.58 (0.81–2.83)
MEHHP Mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate 5.68 (3.85–8.30) 5.06 (3.54–8.68) 5.63 (3.79–8.30)
MEOHP Mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate 4.71 (3.13–7.00) 4.61 (3.07–7.25) 4.75 (3.17–6.99)
MECPP Mono-2-ethyl 5-carboxypentyl phthalate 8.52 (6.31–12.11) 8.29 (5.79–12.64) 8.38 (6.21–12.59)
oxo-MiNP Mono-4-methyl-7-oxooctyl phthalate 4.31 (2.81–7.32) 4.32 (2.627.333) 4.48 (2.90–7.03)
cx-MiNP Mono-4-methyl-7-carboxyoctyl phthalate 7.97 (5.51–11.76) 7.02 (5.08–11.02) 7.54 (5.50–11.06)
oh-MPHP 6-Hydroxy Monopropylheptylphthalate 1.81 (1.17–2.99) 1.87 (1.13–3.29) 1.90 (1.18–3.02)
oh-MINCH 2-(((Hydroxy-4-methyloctyl)oxy)carbonyl)cyclohexanecarboxylic acid 1.94 (1.33–3.37) 1.71 (1.10–3.13) 1.87 (1.18–3.08)
oxo-MINCH 2-(((4-Methyl-7-oxyooctyl)oxy)carbonyl)cyclohexanecarboxylic acid 1.21 (0.73–2.08) 1.19 (0.71–2.19) 1.17 (0.71–2.10)
sum DEHP molar sum of MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP and MECPP (nmol/L) 67.71 (50.00–99.75) 63.75 (45.23–102.30) 68.57 (48.42–100.35)
sum DiNP molar sum of oxo-MiNP and cx-MiNP (nmol/L) 40.51 (28.22–63.59) 37.59 (25.55–60.12) 40.13 (28.36–59.42)
sum DINCH molar sum of oh-MINCH and oxo-MINCH (nmol/L) 10.19 (6.61–17.78) 9.66 (6.13–17.81) 10.12 (6.55–17.59)

Only the 13 phthalate and DINCH metabolites (and the sums) included in this study are reported.

N: sample size

Units: ng/mL urine

IQR: interquartile range

The metabolites from different parent compounds presented a moderate to weak correlation, with the highest correlation between oh-MPHP and the oxo-MiNP (Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.59 at 19 weeks, 0.61 at 35 weeks, and 64 for whole pregnancy) (Fig. 1, Fig. 1A–C, Fig. S2A–C). The correlation within metabolites from the same parent compound was higher, ranging from 0.73 to 0.95 at 19 weeks, 0.70 to 0.95 at 35 weeks, and 0.72 to 0.97 for whole pregnancy (Fig. 1, Fig. 1, Fig. S2C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Correlation of phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels. The heatmap shows the Pearson’s correlation of the 13 phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels measured at 19w (A), at 35w (B), and in whole pregnancy (C). Positive correlations are indicated in blue and inverse correlations in red. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

The intra-class correlation of 19 weeks and 35 weeks ranged between 0.29 and 0.58 (Fig. S3A), indicating moderate correlation within the same women between trimesters. The differences in phthalate levels between trimesters for each individual and each metabolite are shown in Fig. S3B. Finally, the metabolite levels at 19 weeks and 35 weeks were moderately correlated with creatinine (Spearman’s correlation coefficient at 19 weeks: 0.28–0.43, 35 weeks: 0.30–0.46) (Figs. S4A, S4B).

3.3. Epigenome-wide association study by exposure period

In the main analysis of phthalates and DINCH metabolites and placental DNA methylation, a total of 38 associations were identified after Bonferroni correction (p-value < 1E-07), and 1065 at suggestive statistical significance (p-value < 1E-05) (Fig. 2, Table S3). The genomic inflation factors (λ) ranged from 0.95 to 1.22 at 19 weeks, from 0.84 to 1.27 at 35 weeks, and from 0.89 to 1.32 for whole pregnancy analyses (Table S3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Manhathan plots of the association between genome-wide DNA methylation and phthalate and DINCH metabolite levels, by exposure period. Each dot is the association of the DNA methylation levels at one CpG with the levels of one of the phthalate or DINCH metabolites measured at 19w (A), at 35w (B), and in whole pregnancy (C). The x-axis represents the position of the CpGs and the y-axis the −log10 p value of the association. The horizontal dashed lines are the suggestive (1E-05p value < 1E-05) and Bonferroni (p value < 1E-7) multiple-testing thresholds. Associations surviving Bonferroni correction are coloured according to the legend. For CpGs annotated to a gene, the gene is shown, for the rest, the CpG ID is shown.

In particular, at 19 weeks, 24 Bonferroni-adjusted significant associations were found, which represented 10 unique metabolites and 21 unique CpGs, distributed in 10 loci (defined as a region < 1 Mb) and annotated to 11 unique genes (Table S4). Twelve CpGs from the same locus at chromosome 7 (cg12969170 as the lead CpG) were inversely associated with MEP levels. The rest of CpGs represented different loci and were associated with one or a few metabolites of the same parental compound (Fig. S5A). At 35 weeks, we identified 8 Bonferroni-adjusted significant associations, representing 7 unique metabolites and 6 unique CpGs (6 loci, 5 unique genes) (Table S4). Finally, phthalate levels over the whole pregnancy period were associated with 6 CpGs, representing 6 loci (4 genes) (Table S4C). Statistically suggestive associations (p-value < 1E-05) for each exposure window (N = 493 at 19 weeks, N = 295 at 35 weeks, and N = 277 for whole pregnancy) are shown in Table S5A-C.

The effect sizes of the significant CpGs ranged from −0.047 to 0.019 for a doubling in the exposure levels, with most of them (71 %) showing decreased methylation levels with increasing exposure levels (Table S4). In general, at the same time point, DNA methylation levels at significant CpGs presented consistent directions of effects across compounds with a few exceptions (Fig. S5A–C). For instance, at 19 weeks, the inverse associations between MEP and CpGs at chromosome 7 were in the same direction in most of the compounds, but MiBP, MnBP or MBzP, which showed increased levels of methylation at these CpGs. The overlap of Bonferroni significant CpGs across compounds and the correlation of effect sizes across compounds are shown in Fig. S5A-C.

The overlap of Bonferroni significant CpGs across time periods was limited, with only two phthalate-CpG association pairs shared between 35 weeks and whole pregnancy analyses. Fig. 3 and Fig. S6 show the correlation of the effect size of the Bonferroni significant CpGs across the periods. Effect sizes between 35 weeks and whole pregnancy were quite correlated, reflecting the high correlation of exposure levels across these periods. In contrast, some of significant associations in one exposure period (19 weeks or 35 weeks) showed weak effect sizes in the other, suggesting period-specific effects (Fig. 3). For instance, statistically significant CpGs that were associated with exposure to MEP metabolite at 19 weeks showed a weak effect at 35 weeks, while cg09012471 associated with MEHP metabolite at 35 weeks showed no effect at 19 weeks.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Correlation of the effect sizes of the Bonferroni significant CpGs between exposure periods (19w and 35w) Each symbol is the association of the DNA methylation levels at one CpG with the levels of one of the phthalate or DINCH metabolites. The x-axis represents the effect size of the association with the exposure levels measured at 19w, and the y-axis at 35w.The shape of the symbols represents the period when the association is significant, and the color the phthalate or DINCH metabolite (see legend). Symbols at the diagonal indicate similar effect sizes, while at the axes indicate period-specific effects.

3.4. Sum of metabolites and mixture analyses

The results for the sum of metabolites were consistent with the associations observed for individual compounds at all exposure windows (Tables S6–S8).

We also conducted mixture analyses for the statistically suggestive CpGs (p-value < 1E-05), identifying six Bonferroni-significant associations at 19 weeks, seven at 35 weeks, and also seven associations in the whole pregnancy period (Tables S9A–C). There was no overlap among the CpGs identified in the mixture analyses across time points. Only two CpGs identified surviving the multiple-testing correction in the mixture analyses were also detected in the single-metabolite EWAS at Bonferroni significance: cg05811594 (gene ZIC4) at 19 weeks and cg07964716 (gene SLC36A4) at 35 weeks. The overall effect sizes for the mixture associations for these two CpGs were −0.429 and 0.025, respectively, in the same direction as the effects observed for the corresponding individual metabolites. The partial contributions of the metabolites to the differentially methylated CpGs in the mixture analyses are shown in Fig. S7.

3.5. Epigenome-wide association analysis stratified by sex

Results of the sex-stratified analyses by exposure period are shown in Table S10A and B. After applying the Cochran’s Q heterogeneity test, 43 associations showed evidence of differences in effect sizes between females and males at 19 weeks, 31 associations at 35 weeks, and 17 associations for whole pregnancy (Tables S11, S12, S13). The associations at 19 weeks included 23 unique CpGs (20 loci, 19 unique genes) and 10 unique metabolites in females, and 17 unique CpGs (17 loci, 17 unique genes) and 10 unique metabolites in males The associations at 35 weeks included 14 CpGs (14 loci, 9 unique genes) and 8 metabolites in females, and 16 unique CpGs (13 loci, 10 unique genes) and 7 unique metabolites in males. Finally, the associations for whole pregnancy included 10 CpGs (8 loci, 6 unique genes) and 5 metabolites in females, and 7 unique CpGs (5 loci, 6 unique genes) and 6 unique metabolites in males.

The effect sizes of the sex-specific CpGs across sexes are shown in Fig. 4. No overlap in significant CpG–metabolite pairs was observed between 19 and 35 weeks, or between 19 weeks and the whole pregnancy period, in either females or males. However, in males, two CpG–metabolite pairs were shared between 35 weeks and the whole pregnancy period, as expected given the higher correlation in metabolite levels between these two periods.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Correlation of the effect sizes of the Bonferroni significant CpGs between males and females, by exposure periods. Each symbol is the association of the DNA methylation levels at one CpG with the levels of one of the phthalate or DINCH metabolites measured at 19w (A), at 35w (B), and in whole pregnancy (C). The x-axis represents the effect in males, and the y-axis the effect in females. The shape of the symbols represents the sex for which the CpG is significant, and the color the phthalate or DINCH metabolite (see legend). Symbols at the diagonal indicate similar effect sizes, while at the axes indicate sex-specific effects.

3.6. Sensitivity analyses

To confirm robustness of the findings from the main model, we conducted several sensitivity analyses, which are summarized in Table S14A-D. Although the Bonferroni significant CpGs varied across the sensitivity models, the effects sizes remained very similar to those of the main model with minor fluctuations (Figs. S8-S12). The model adjusted for gestational age showed more similar effect sizes to the main model than the other sensitivity analyses (Fig. S8). On the other hand, the analysis restricting to the participants with European origin presented the largest differences in effect sizes, however, their direction remained the same (Fig. S9). Suggestive CpGs (p-value < 1E-05) of the sensitivity analyses are presented in Tables S15–S18.

3.7. Downstream analyses

The 31 Bonferroni-significant CpGs of the main model as well as the 87 sex-specific CpGs were annotated using different tools (Tables S4 for main model, S7 for sum of metabolites, S11 for sex-specific results). In the main model, we found that 28 out of the 31 CpGs were annotated to genes, 11 to CpG islands, and one (cg04915058 annotated to C3orf51 and ERC2 genes) had mQTLs. None of the CpGs was annotated to placental PMDs or gDMRs. In females and males, 39 and 36 of the CpGs were annotated to genes, ten and five to CpG islands, 20 and eight to placental PMDs, and 14 and four had mQTLs. In males, one CpG (cg01224063 at gene IGF1R) was also annotated to a gDMR.

We, then, took suggestive CpGs from the main model (p-value < 1E-05) and run pathway enrichment analyses for each phthalate and DINCH metabolite and period (going from 10 to 71 CpGs per analysis). The identified pathways included immune and vascular regulation (MiBP), and signaling through growth factors (oh-MPHP) at 19 weeks, steroid biosynthesis (MECPP) (Table S19B), and obesity for whole pregnancy levels (MECPP, MEHHP) (Table S19C). Moreover, enrichment for several transcription factors was identified, including regulation by androgen receptor (AR) (MEHHP) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) (oxo-MINCH) at 19 weeks.

3.8. Comparison with previous studies

We compared our findings with those previously published in the EDEN and SEPAGES cohorts. In EDEN cohort, phthalates were measured in urine samples collected between 22w and 29w of pregnancy (Jedynak et al., 2022). SEPAGES conducted both whole and sex-stratified analyses with whole pregnancy phthalate and DINCH exposures, defined as the median of levels measured at 18w and 34w of gestation (Jedynak et al., 2024). None of our CpGs were among the list of FDR significant signals in any of the cohorts. FDR significant CpGs in EDEN and SEPAGES were not among suggestive CpGs in our results, regardless of the time period, the metabolites, or the main or sex-stratified analysis. A comparison of the FDR significant CpGs observed in EDEN and SEPAGES cohorts with our results is shown in Table S20. Most CpGs did not replicate, but some showed nominal associations in the same direction.

4. Discussion

Our study identified a number of associations between in utero exposure to phthalate and DINCH metabolites measured at 19 weeks, 35 weeks and across the entire pregnancy, and placental DNA methylation at birth. Most of the associations showed decreased DNA methylation with higher exposure levels. A substantial number of sex-specific associations were observed, which also differed across the exposure periods. Furthermore, mixture analyses of statistically suggestive CpGs revealed additional associations. The effect sizes were, in general small, and most of the associations showed decreased DNA methylation with higher exposure levels. Enrichment analysis revealed pathways important for placental function and fetal development.

4.1. Exposure window-specific effects

4.1.1. Week 19 of gestation

At 19 weeks, we identified 21 unique CpGs annotated to 11 genes, six of which (TP53TG1, ERC2, MIPEP, RNPEP, CROT, FXYD2) have been previously reported as differentially expressed following phthalate exposure in animal models according to CTD (Alhasnani et al., 2022, Johnson et al., 2011, Kalo et al., 2019, Labaronne et al., 2017, Mathieu-Denoncourt et al., 2016). Among them, four of these loci are particularly relevant to placental metabolism. For instance, the gene CROT, which regulates fatty acid β-oxidation and supports placental energy supply (Calabuig-Navarro et al., 2017) showed reduced methylation at 12 promoter CpGs with higher MEP levels. These CpGs are also annotated to TP53TG1, a p53-inducible non-coding RNA that may protect the hypoxic early placenta through stress-response pathways (Zhang et al., 2022, Zhang et al., 2021). Moreover, MIPEP exhibited reduced gene body methylation with MEHP and MEOHP exposure. This gene participates in oxidative phosphorylation, a critical energy-generating process in the placenta (Carter, 2000, Chew et al., 1997) In addition, FXYD2 showed lower 3′UTR methylation with MEHP; it encodes a sodium–potassium ATPase subunit, and such ion transporters are known to be essential for placental nutrient exchange (Lee et al., 2019). Lastly, RNPEP showed decreased gene body methylation with cx-MiNP. This gene encodes an arginyl aminopeptidase, and reduced RNPEP expression has been reported in placentas from cases of growth restriction, suggesting a potential link with impaired fetal growth and altered arginine availability (Chen et al., 2015).

Enrichment analyses identified immune-related pathways associated with MiBP exposure at 19 weeks, involving genes such as AKT2, PPP3R1, and GNG12. MiBP has previously been reported to be associated with inflammation during pregnancy (Ferguson et al., 2015, Han et al., 2025). In addition, genes associated with oh-MPHP (SPRY1, HRAS, and ARHGAP26) were enriched for FGF, EGF receptor, and PDGF pathways. These pathways are especially critical for trophoblast proliferation, survival, and migration, ensuring proper villi formation, invasion, and vascular remodeling during early and mid-gestation (Dawid et al., 2021, Holmgren et al., 1991, Liu et al., 2024, Forbes and Westwood, 2010). Several epidemiological and animal studies earlier reported vascular alterations in placenta following exposure to phthalates such as DEHP, DHP or DCHP (Labaronne et al., 2017, Mathieu-Denoncourt et al., 2016), although none have directly linked these effects to oh-MPHP.

We also investigated whether annotated genes were enriched for the regulation by certain transcription factors. CpGs associated with MEHHP were enriched in genes regulated by the androgen receptor (AR). Previous in vitro and in silico studies found no androgenic activity for DEHP, the parental compound of MEHHP, but reported conflicting results regarding its anti-androgenic potential (Beg and Sheikh, 2020, Engel et al., 2017, Kambia et al., 2019, Kim et al., 2019, Sarath Josh et al., 2016). Moreover, CpGs related to oxo-MINCH were enriched for genes regulated by the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1). This finding is consistent with in vitro study, that reported ESR1 activation induced by DINCH metabolites, including oxo-MINCH (Engel et al., 2017). In contrast, another in vitro study found no ESR1 activity in response to DINCH metabolites; however, the use of lower metabolite concentrations in that study may explain the discrepancy (Wenzel et al., 2021).

4.1.2. Week 35 of gestation

At 35 weeks of gestation, six CpGs significantly associated with phthalate levels were annotated to five genes. Four of these genes (NDST1, SLC36A4, ARMC8 and RASSF1) have previously been reported as differentially expressed in phthalate-exposed animal or cell models (Johnson et al., 2011, Kalo et al., 2019, Albert et al., 2018, Gaido et al., 2007). In our study, CpG within the gene body of SLC36A4, an amino acid transporter, presented higher methylation with higher MECPP, MEHHP, and MEOHP levels. In the placenta, both the functional capacity and protein abundance of these transporters are related to fetal growth in human and experimental studies (Kalo et al., 2019, Albert et al., 2018). In late pregnancy, proper transporter function becomes critical, as fetal growth increasingly depends on the placenta’s capacity to supply amino acids and other nutrients (Bell and Ehrhardt, 2002). We also observed reduced methylation at the RASSF1 promoter with higher MBzP levels. RASSF1 regulates cell cycle and apoptosis and has been linked to intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia (Iglesias-Platas et al., 2015, Salvianti et al., 2015). In addition, CpGs in ARMC8 (promoter) and NDST1 (gene body) were differentially methylated in relation to MEHP. ARMC8 belongs to the armadillo superfamily involved in cellular communication, while NDST1 plays a role in heparan sulfate biosynthesis and inflammation (Gul et al., 2019, Vallet et al., 2023, van der Weyden and Adams, 2007). However, their roles in placental development have not been established.

The enrichment analyses at 35 weeks highlighted steroid biosynthesis (MECPP), among other pathways. Several studies have shown the impact of exposure to DEHP or MEHP on steroidogenesis in rat and mouse placentas (Saadeldin et al., 2018, Xu et al., 2021, Zhang et al., 2020). The genes identified in the pathway were CYP24A1, that inactivates vitamin D levels and indirectly could affect other steroid hormones, and FDFT1, that participates in cholesterol biosynthesis, the precursor of steroid hormones (Dinour et al., 2013, Sidhu and Mishra, 2024). Furthermore, regulation by seven transcription factors was found, including YY1, which is known to be important for placentation and several placental functions (Wang et al., 2025).

4.1.3. Whole pregnancy

Six CpGs, annotated to 4 genes (NDST1 also detected at 35 weeks), were associated with whole pregnancy phthalate exposure levels. Two of the other genes, DDC and ST3GAL1, have been reported in response to phthalates in animal or cell models (Johnson et al., 2011, Kalo et al., 2019, Albert et al., 2018, Gaido et al., 2007). Notably, we found an association between cx-MiNP and lower methylation at the DDC promoter. DDC encodes Dopa-decarboxylase, an enzyme expressed in placenta that catalyzes the conversion of L-DOPA to dopamine, a neurotransmitter crucial for fetal brain development (Bertoldi, 2014, Gratz et al., 2018, Rosenfeld, 2021). In utero phthalate exposure has been previously related to neurodevelopmental outcomes and behavior (Sprowles et al., 2022). We also identified lower DNA methylation at the ST3GAL1 promoter with higher MnBP exposure. ST3GAL1 participates in protein glycosylation, a process that, when deregulated, can lead to several pregnancy complications (Yung et al., iScience 2023,, Zhong et al., 2024).

Enrichment analyses revealed genes associated with obesity, including PPARGC1B, FTO, and AIP, for both MECPP and MEHHP. Previous epidemiological studies have linked these chemicals with childhood and adult obesity (Wu et al., 2023). Additionally, enrichment for transcription factors with roles in placental progenitor maintenance, differentiation and function was found: POU5F1 (MEHP), TCF7L2 (oh-MINCH), and TBX3 (oxo-MiNP). Experimental studies have shown both increased and decreased POU5F1 during early embryogenesis in response to MEHP metabolite (Chu et al., 2013, Grossman et al., 2012).

4.2. Sex-specific effects

We identified a substantial number of differentially methylated CpGs associated with phthalate and DINCH metabolites in a sex-specific manner at 19 weeks, 35 weeks, and whole pregnancy. This goes in line with the expected sex-specific endocrine disruptor activity of the phthalate and DINCH metabolites (Ouidir et al., 2024), and with the sex-specific epigenetic pattern of the placenta (Martin et al., 2017, Tekola-Ayele et al., 2019, Tekola-Ayele et al., 2025).

Due to the small number of Bonferroni significant CpGs per chemical metabolite and sex, we did not conduct functional enrichment analyses; however, we have extensively annotated these sex-specific CpGs. Among the 49 female-specific CpGs, we highlight two loci related with placental vascularization: cg00752628 annotated to the RSPO3 gene (associated with MiBP levels), and cg22505312, cg22505312 and cg23710890 annotated to the CTSB gene (associated with cx-MiNP), both at 19 weeks. RSPO3 encodes an evolutionarily conserved angiogenic factor which participates in the formation of the labyrinthine layer of the placenta (Aoki et al., 2007, Kazanskaya et al., 2008), and CTSB encodes the catephsin B enzyme, which participates in the degradation of the extracellular matrix during trophoblast invasion facilitating placental vascularization (Varanou et al., 2006). Altered levels of both genes have been found in preeclamptic placentas (Ueland et al., 2020, Tanrıverdi Kılıç et al., 2024). Moreover, overexpressed levels of CTSB have been shown in frog embryos exposed to DCHP, DMP or MMP (Mathieu-Denoncourt et al., 2016).

Among the 42 male-specific CpGs, we highlight two loci. The first locus involves four CpGs associated with oh-MPHP levels at 35 weeks and located at the IGF1R gene body. One of the CpGs (cg01224063) was located in a maternal gDMR described in the placenta (Hamada et al., 2016). The insulin‐like growth factors are involved in placental and fetal growth, carrying out various functions including trophoblast proliferation, migration, and invasion (Sferruzzi-Perri et al., 2017). Another interesting male-specific CpG was cg23939844 associated with oxo-MINCH at 19 weeks and annotated to LRTM2 and CACNA2D4 genes. CACNA2D4 has been previously reported to be underexpressed in human embryonic stem cells in relation to exposure to DEHP (Fang et al., 2019).

4.3. Mixture analyses

The mixture analysis identified 20 Bonferroni significant associations among the overall suggestive CpGs investigated. Only two of these CpGs were also identified in single-metabolite analyses at the Bonferroni significance, therefore the mixture analyses provide additional insights into the effects of phthalate and DINCH metabolites. Eight of these additional genes (19 weeks: JAG1 and GABPB1; 35 weeks: HOXC9, RPH3AL, INTS3, and ITPKB; whole pregnancy: BBS4 and PHF21B) have previously been related to phthalate exposure in animal or cell studies (Tando et al., 2021, Lahousse et al., 2006, Jahreis et al., 2018, Moral et al., 2011, Alhasnani et al., 2022, Fang et al., 2019, Johnson et al., 2011, Gaido et al., 2007, Zhang et al., 2015, Chen et al., 2022). These genes are involved in diverse and important biological processes, including Notch signaling (JAG1), which regulates cell fate determination, differentiation and development (Hunkapiller et al., 2011, Zhao and Lin, 2012); mitochondrial metabolism (GABPB1) (Liu et al., 2019); pattern formation and cell differentiation during embryonic development (HOXC9) (Morgan, 2006); vesicle trafficking and exocytosis (RPH3AL) (Yuan et al., 2017); RNA processing and DNA repair (INTS3) (Skaar et al., 2009); calcium signaling (ITPKB) (Apicco et al., 2021); ciliary transport (BBS4) (Wingfield et al., 2018); and chromatin regulation (PHF21B) (Chin et al., 2022).

For the two overlapping CpGs between the mixture and the single-metabolite EWAS, the overall effect of the mixture was in the same direction as in the individual analysis for all significant CpG-metabolite pairs, but some of the partial effects within the mixture were in the opposite direction. For instance, at 35 weeks, MEHHP, MEOHP, MECPP were individually significantly associated with higher DNA methylation of cg07964716. However, in the mixture analysis MEHHP showed a negative effect on this CpG. This can be explained by the high correlation among these metabolites, which could lead to reversed partial effects in the mixture model.

Although mixture analyses better reflect the real-life exposure, they also have limitations, including limited generalizability (effects depend on the specific joint distribution of exposures in a given population), or potential issues with exposure scaling, as the method relies on quartiles, rather than actual concentrations. For all these reasons, mixture analyses in this study were considered secondary.

4.4. Differences across gestation

The differences observed between exposure windows, both in the main model and in the sex-stratified model, may have a number of explanations. One possibility is that exposure to phthalate and DINCH metabolites affects distinct genes and pathways at each stage of pregnancy, leaving permanent and specific DNA methylation marks that can be detected at birth. Under this hypothesis, early-mid exposure (19 weeks) appears to impact immune-related pathways and placental vascularization, whereas later exposure may primarily influence steroid hormone production (35 weeks) and fetal growth (whole pregnancy). Consistently, the transcription factors enriched at each window differed: 19 weeks exposures were associated with AR and ESR2, while other periods highlighted factors critical for placental development and function, albeit without a clear temporal pattern (ie. POU5F1 is known to be important in early gestation and we identified it for the whole pregnancy exposure). Alternatively, the observed differences could reflect incomplete overlap in mother–child pairs or variations in metabolite levels across time points, leading to differing lists of significant CpGs and pathways. In addition, the relatively low number of suggestive CpG sites may have limited the ability to detect broader biological pathways. Further research is required to clarify these temporal and exposure-dependent dynamics.

4.5. Comparison with previous studies

The lack of replication of the CpGs observed in EDEN and SEPAGES cohorts could have been resulted due various reasons. First, the exposure assessment was not equivalent in the three cohorts in term of exposure window (22–29 weeks in EDEN, whole pregnancy in SEPAGES and 19 and 35 weeks in BiSC), number of urine voids tested (1 in EDEN, and > 10 in the other two cohorts) and the laboratory performing the analyses (EDEN: National Center for Environmental Health; BiSC, SEPAGES: Norwegian Institute of Public Health). Second, different DNA methylation arrays were used: EDEN used the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, BiSC and SEPAGES Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip. Additionally, differences in population characteristics (ie. ethnicity, socio-economic status, etc.), exposure levels, and statistical modelling may also have contributed to the discrepancies. In future studies, conducting meta-analyses across cohorts will be essential to increase statistical power and validate the observed associations.

Only a few studies have performed mixture analyses relating combined exposure to phthalates with cord blood DNA methylation (Khodasevich et al., 2024, Sol et al., 2022), but none have identified CpGs overlapping with those found in our study.

4.6. Strengths and limitations

Our study has several strengths. First, exposure assessment was based on the first and last voids of the day over six consecutive days (10–12 samples per urine pool) in two different gestational periods, providing a more robust and accurate measure compared to studies relying on a single urine void. Second, with a sample size of 469, this study modestly exceeds the size of previous research. Third, the robustness of our findings was supported by multiple sensitivity analyses, and potential causality was further explored through integration with evidence from experimental studies. Lastly, we conducted mixture analyses of suggestive CpGs offering deeper and more realistic insights into the impact of combined exposures on placental DNA methylation, although the limitations described above.

This study also faced some limitations. First, while we investigated different exposure windows, we could not fully disentangle time-specific effects due to incomplete overlap of participants across windows and differences in overall exposure levels. Second, although we used the EPIC array, which contains > 0.8 M CpG sites, we still did not cover all possible CpG sites across the genome, limiting our ability to detect all potential DNA methylation changes associated with the exposures and outcomes of interest. Third, analyses were based on bulk tissue, preventing assessment of cell type-specific effects and, potentially overlooking distinct roles of different placental cell types. Finally, despite adjusting for a wide range of relevant covariates, residual confounding cannot be completely ruled out, and causal inference requires complementary studies such as interventional studies or in vitro or in vivo models.

5. Conclusion

Our study suggests that in utero exposure to phthalate and DINCH metabolites is associated with differential placental DNA methylation. These CpGs are annotated to genes implicated in endocrine disruption, metabolism, and vascular and immune regulation. Moreover, sex-specific effects were observed, consistent with the known endocrine-disrupting properties of phthalate and DINCH metabolites. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, to investigate the differences across exposure windows, and to determine whether the placental epigenetic signatures linked to in utero exposure have implications for short- and long-term health effects.

6. Ethics

The BiSC study, from pregnancy up to the 18 month-visit, was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar project (2018/8050/I), Medical Research Committee of the Fundació de Gestió Sanitària del Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau de Barcelona (EC/18/206/5272), and Ethics Committee of the Fundació Sant Joan de Déu (PIC-27-18). Before joining the cohort during their regular first trimester hospital visit, participants were informed by a BiSC midwife or nurse about the study’s details, duration, and their option to withdraw without penalty. If they agreed to take part, they signed consent forms permitting the collection of biological samples and genetic studies, receiving a copy for themselves.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hana Vespalcova: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Bethany Knox: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Amrit Kaur Sakhi: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology. Cathrine Thomsen: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology. Sofía Aguilar-Lacasaña: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Marta Cosin-Tomas: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Laura Gómez-Herrera: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Olga Sánchez García: Writing – review & editing, Resources. Elisa Llurba: Writing – review & editing, Resources. María Dolores Gómez-Roig: Writing – review & editing, Resources. Jordi Sunyer: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. Payam Dadvand: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. Mariona Bustamante: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Martine Vrijheid: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Funding

This study was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme-EU.3.1.2. (874583 - ATHLETE project). The BiSC cohort has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (785994 – AirNB project), from the AGAUR-Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris de Recerca (2017 SGR 826 − Population Neuroscience group), from the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) (CB06/02/0041), from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) − Maternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID) (RD16/0022/0014 and RD16/0022/0015), and from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and the European Union Next Generation EU − Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Developmental Origin Network (RICORS-SAMID) (RD21/0012/0001 and RD21/0012/0003). Placental DNA methylation was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by European Union (ERDF) “A way to make Europe” (PI20/00190 – ALMA project), and from the European Joint Programming Initiative “A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life” (JPI HDHL and Instituto de Salud Carlos III) (AC18/00006 − NutriPROGRAM project). ISGlobal acknowledges support from the grant CEX2023-0001290-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants and their families for their generous collaboration. A full list of BiSC researchers can be found at https://projectebisc.org/en/team/.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109946.

Contributor Information

Hana Vespalcova, Email: hana.vespalcova@isglobal.org.

Mariona Bustamante, Email: mariona.bustamante@isglobal.org.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary Data 1
mmc1.docx (5MB, docx)
Supplementary Data 2
mmc2.xlsx (14.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3
mmc3.xlsx (16.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4
mmc4.xlsx (9.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5
mmc5.xlsx (26.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 6
mmc6.xlsx (137.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 7
mmc7.xlsx (9.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 8
mmc8.xlsx (14.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 9
mmc9.xlsx (43.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 10
mmc10.xlsx (204.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 11
mmc11.xlsx (26.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 12
mmc12.xlsx (67.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 13
mmc13.xlsx (447.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 14
mmc14.xlsx (250.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 15
mmc15.xlsx (16.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 16
mmc16.xlsx (139.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 17
mmc17.xlsx (165.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 18
mmc18.xlsx (101.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 19
mmc19.xlsx (150.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 20
mmc20.xlsx (16.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 21
mmc21.xlsx (40.8KB, xlsx)

Data availability

Genome-wide DNA methylation summarized results are uploaded to Zenodo repository (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15746984). Individual level data may be available by contating BiSC (https://projectebisc.org/en/contact/). Code can be shared upon request with the authors.

References

  1. Schettler T. Human exposure to phthalates via consumer products. Int. J. Androl. 2006;29(1):134–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ao J., Zhu W., Jiang W., Zeng X., Qiu W., Yin S., Wang W., Zhang J. The mixture of non-persistent endocrine-disrupting chemicals in relation to endometriosis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024;286 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Genuis S.J., Beesoon S., Lobo R.A., Birkholz D. Human elimination of phthalate compounds: blood, urine, and sweat (BUS) study. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:1–10. doi: 10.1100/2012/615068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diamanti-Kandarakis E., Bourguignon J.-P., Giudice L.C., Hauser R., Prins G.S., Soto A.M., Zoeller R.T., Gore A.C. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr. Rev. 2009;30(4):293–342. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin S., Masai E., Kamimura N., Takahashi K., Anderson R.C., Faisal P.A. Phthalates impact human health: epidemiological evidences and plausible mechanism of action. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017;340:360–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mariana M., Feiteiro J., Verde I., Cairrao E. The effects of phthalates in the cardiovascular and reproductive systems: a review. Environ. Int. 2016;94:758–776. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grindler N.M., Vanderlinden L., Karthikraj R., Kannan K., Teal S., Polotsky A.J., Powell T.L., Yang I.V., Jansson T. Exposure to phthalate, an endocrine disrupting chemical, alters the first trimester placental methylome and transcriptome in women. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):6086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24505-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Qian Y., Shao H., Ying X., Huang W., Hua Y. The endocrine disruption of prenatal phthalate exposure in mother and offspring. Front Public Health. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Warner G.R., Dettogni R.S., Bagchi I.C., Flaws J.A., Graceli J.B. Placental outcomes of phthalate exposure. Reprod. Toxicol. 2021;103:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Almeida-Toledano L., Navarro-Tapia E., Sebastiani G., Ferrero-Martínez S., Ferrer-Aguilar P., García-Algar Ó., Andreu-Fernández V., Gómez-Roig M.D. Effect of prenatal phthalate exposure on fetal development and maternal/neonatal health consequences: a systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;950 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dutta S., Haggerty D.K., Rappolee D.A., Ruden D.M. Phthalate exposure and long-term epigenomic consequences. A Review. Front Genet. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freire C., Castiello F., Babarro I., Anguita-Ruiz A., Casas M., Vrijheid M., Sarzo B., Beneito A., Kadawathagedara M., Philippat C., Thomsen C., Sakhi A.K., Lopez-Espinosa M.-J. Association of prenatal exposure to phthalates and synthetic phenols with pubertal development in three european cohorts. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2024;261 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang Y.-S., Hung P.-L., Wang L.-J., Tsai C.-M., Tsai C.-K., Tiao M.-M., Yu H.-R. Distinct impacts of prenatal and postnatal phthalate exposure on behavioral and emotional development in children aged 1.5 to 3 Years. Toxics. 2024;12(11):795. doi: 10.3390/toxics12110795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jurewicz J., Hanke W. Exposure to phthalates: reproductive outcome and children health. a review of epidemiological studies. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2011;24(2) doi: 10.2478/s13382-011-0022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Niermann S., Rattan S., Brehm E., Flaws J.A. Prenatal exposure to Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) affects reproductive outcomes in female mice. Reprod. Toxicol. 2015;53:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrick E.J., Bordoni B. Embryology. Placenta. 2025 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen J., Liu H., Qiu Z., Shu W. Analysis of di-n-butyl phthalate and other organic pollutants in chongqing women undergoing parturition. Environ. Pollut. 2008;156(3):849–853. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Latini G., De Felice C., Presta G., Del Vecchio A., Paris I., Ruggieri F., Mazzeo P. Exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate in humans during pregnancy. Neonatology. 2003;83(1):22–24. doi: 10.1159/000067012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jensen M.S., Nørgaard-Pedersen B., Toft G., Hougaard D.M., Bonde J.P., Cohen A., Thulstrup A.M., Ivell R., Anand-Ivell R., Lindh C.H., Jönsson B.A.G. Phthalates and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid in human amniotic fluid: temporal trends and timing of amniocentesis in pregnancy. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012;120(6):897–903. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yan X., Calafat A., Lashley S., Smulian J., Ananth C., Barr D., Silva M., Ledoux T., Hore P., Robson M.G. Phthalates biomarker identification and exposure estimates in a population of pregnant women. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2009;15(3):565–578. doi: 10.1080/10807030902892554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Y., Lin L., Cao Y., Chen B., Zheng L., Ge R.-S. Phthalate levels and low birth weight: a nested case-control study of chinese newborns. J. Pediatr. 2009;155(4):500–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorini F., Tonacci A., Sanmartin C., Venturi F. Phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers and thyroid dysfunction: current evidence and novel strategies to reduce their spread in food industry and environment. Toxics. 2025;13(3):222. doi: 10.3390/toxics13030222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Saad, N. Phthalates and Non-Phthalates Plasticizers Disrupt Lipid Metabolism., Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Biology Education Centre., Uppsala, 2021.
  24. Nelissen E.C.M., van Montfoort A.P.A., Dumoulin J.C.M., Evers J.L.H. Epigenetics and the placenta. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2011;17(3):397–417. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibney E.R., Nolan C.M. Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity (edinb) 2010;105(1):4–13. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Y. Modern epigenetics methods in biological research. Methods. 2021;187:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen C.-H., Jiang S.S., Chang I.-S., Wen H.-J., Sun C.-W., Wang S.-L. Association between fetal exposure to phthalate endocrine disruptor and genome-wide DNA methylation at birth. Environ. Res. 2018;162:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Khodasevich D., Holland N., Harley K.G., Eskenazi B., Barcellos L.F., Cardenas A. Prenatal exposure to environmental phenols and phthalates and altered patterns of DNA methylation in childhood. Environ. Int. 2024;190 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee J., Kim J., Zinia S.S., Park J., Won S., Kim W.J. Prenatal phthalate exposure and cord blood DNA methylation. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):7046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33002-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Miura R., Ikeda-Araki A., Ishihara T., Miyake K., Miyashita C., Nakajima T., Kobayashi S., Ishizuka M., Kubota T., Kishi R. Effect of prenatal exposure to phthalates on epigenome-wide DNA methylations in cord blood and implications for fetal growth: the hokkaido study on environment and children’s health. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;783 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Petroff R.L., Padmanabhan V., Dolinoy D.C., Watkins D.J., Ciarelli J., Haggerty D., Ruden D.M., Goodrich J.M. Prenatal Exposures to Common Phthalates and Prevalent Phthalate Alternatives and Infant DNA Methylation at Birth. Front Genet. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.793278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sol C.M., Gaylord A., Santos S., Jaddoe V.W.V., Felix J.F., Trasande L. Fetal exposure to phthalates and bisphenols and DNA methylation at birth: the generation R study. Clin. Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01345-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Solomon O., Yousefi P., Huen K., Gunier R.B., Escudero-Fung M., Barcellos L.F., Eskenazi B., Holland N. Prenatal phthalate exposure and altered patterns of DNA methylation in cord blood. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2017;58(6):398–410. doi: 10.1002/em.22095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jedynak P., Tost J., Calafat A.M., Bourova-Flin E., Broséus L., Busato F., Forhan A., Heude B., Jakobi M., Schwartz J., Slama R., Vaiman D., Lepeule J., Philippat C. Pregnancy exposure to phthalates and DNA methylation in male placenta — an epigenome-wide association study. Environ. Int. 2022;160 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jedynak P., Siroux V., Broséus L., Tost J., Busato F., Gabet S., Thomsen C., Sakhi A.K., Sabaredzovic A., Lyon-Caen S., Bayat S., Slama R., Philippat C., Lepeule J. Epigenetic footprints: investigating placental DNA methylation in the context of prenatal exposure to phenols and phthalates. Environ. Int. 2024;189 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dadvand P., Gascon M., Bustamante M., Rivas I., Foraster M., Basagaña X., Cosín M., Eixarch E., Ferrer M., Gratacós E., Gómez Herrera L., Jimenez-Arenas P., Júlvez J., Morillas À., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Persavento C., Pujol J., Querol X., Sánchez García O., Vrijheid M., Llurba E., Gómez-Roig M.D., Sunyer J., Aguilar-Lacasaña S., Álvarez M., Blanco L., Camprodon-Rosanas E., Carrasco G., Casu G., Cirach M., Contreras O., Crispi F., Cserbick D., Gallardo C.D., Elías M., Esnaola M., de Prado P., Domínguez A., Galmés T., Gago P., García Z., Jedynak P.A., Knox B., Koch S., Llabrés P., Lassale C., Luo Y., Maitre L., Martínez-Vilavella G., Muniesa M., Martí A.P., Pozo Ó., Raimbault B., Ribera I., Rodríguez-Sureda V., Samuelsson K., Tapia C., Torres-Toda M., Valentín A., Vespalcová H., Villanueva C., Zanini M.J., Zhao Y. Cohort profile: barcelona life study cohort (BiSC) Int. J. Epidemiol. 2024;53(3) doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Harris P.A., Taylor R., Minor B.L., Elliott V., Fernandez M., O’Neal L., McLeod L., Delacqua G., Delacqua F., Kirby J., Duda S.N. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J. Biomed. Inform. 2019;95 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Harris P.A., Taylor R., Thielke R., Payne J., Gonzalez N., Conde J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sabaredzovic A., Sakhi A.K., Brantsæter A.L., Thomsen C. Determination of 12 urinary phthalate metabolites in norwegian pregnant women by core–shell high performance liquid chromatography with on-line solid-phase extraction, column switching and tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B. 2015;1002:343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Helsel D.R. Less than obvious - statistical treatment of data below the detection limit. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990;24(12):1766–1774. doi: 10.1021/es00082a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. S.T. Granerud Analyse Glycol Ether and Pesticide Metabolites in Norwegian Children and their potential Determinants 2022 Trondheim.
  42. Mortamais M., Chevrier C., Philippat C., Petit C., Calafat A.M., Ye X., Silva M.J., Brambilla C., Eijkemans M.J., Charles M.-A., Cordier S., Slama R. Correcting for the influence of sampling conditions on biomarkers of exposure to phenols and phthalates: a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals. Environ. Health. 2012;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Heiss J.A., Just A.C. identifying mislabeled and contaminated DNA methylation microarray data: an extended quality control toolset with examples from GEO. Clin. Epigenetics. 2018;10(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0504-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou W., Triche T.J., Laird P.W., Shen H. SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by infinium beadchips in genomic deletions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fernandez-Jimenez N., Allard C., Bouchard L., Perron P., Bustamante M., Bilbao J.R., Hivert M.-F. Comparison of illumina 450K and EPIC arrays in placental DNA methylation. Epigenetics. 2019;14(12):1177–1182. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1634975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fortin J.-P., Triche T.J., Hansen K.D. Preprocessing, normalization and integration of the illumina humanmethylationepic array with minfi. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(4):558–560. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Triche T.J., Weisenberger D.J., Van Den Berg D., Laird P.W., Siegmund K.D. Low-Level Processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(7):e90–e. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Johnson W.E., Li C., Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118–127. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yuan V., Hui D., Yin Y., Peñaherrera M.S., Beristain A.G., Robinson W.P. Cell-specific characterization of the placental methylome. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07186-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Solomon O., Huen K., Yousefi P., Küpers L.K., González J.R., Suderman M., Reese S.E., Page C.M., Gruzieva O., Rzehak P., Gao L., Bakulski K.M., Novoloaca A., Allard C., Pappa I., Llambrich M., Vives M., Jima D.D., Kvist T., Baccarelli A., White C., Rezwan F.I., Sharp G.C., Tindula G., Bergström A., Grote V., Dou J.F., Isaevska E., Magnus M.C., Corpeleijn E., Perron P., Jaddoe V.W.V., Nohr E.A., Maitre L., Foraster M., Hoyo C., Håberg S.E., Lahti J., DeMeo D.L., Zhang H., Karmaus W., Kull I., Koletzko B., Feinberg J.I., Gagliardi L., Bouchard L., Ramlau-Hansen C.H., Tiemeier H., Santorelli G., Maguire R.L., Czamara D., Litonjua A.A., Langhendries J.-P., Plusquin M., Lepeule J., Binder E.B., Verduci E., Dwyer T., Carracedo Á., Ferre N., Eskenazi B., Kogevinas M., Nawrot T.S., Munthe-Kaas M.C., Herceg Z., Relton C., Melén E., Gruszfeld D., Breton C., Fallin M.D., Ghantous A., Nystad W., Heude B., Snieder H., Hivert M.-F., Felix J.F., Sørensen T.I.A., Bustamante M., Murphy S.K., Raikkönen K., Oken E., Holloway J.W., Arshad S.H., London S.J., Holland N. Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in newborns and children show widespread sex differences in blood DNA methylation. Mutation Research/reviews in Mutation Research. 2022;789 doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2022.108415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Choudhary P., Monasso G.S., Karhunen V., Ronkainen J., Mancano G., Howe C.G., Niu Z., Zeng X., Guan W., Dou J., Feinberg J.I., Mordaunt C., Pesce G., Baïz N., Alfano R., Martens D.S., Wang C., Isaevska E., Keikkala E., Mustaniemi S., Thio C.H.L., Fraszczyk E., Tobi E.W., Starling A.P., Cosin-Tomas M., Urquiza J., Röder S., Hoang T.T., Page C., Jima D.D., House J.S., Maguire R.L., Ott R., Pawlow X., Sirignano L., Zillich L., Malmberg A., Rauschert S., Melton P., Gong T., Karlsson R., Fore R., Perng W., Laubach Z.M., Czamara D., Sharp G., Breton C.V., Schisterman E., Yeung E., Mumford S.L., Fallin M.D., LaSalle J.M., Schmidt R.J., Bakulski K.M., Annesi-Maesano I., Heude B., Nawrot T.S., Plusquin M., Ghantous A., Herceg Z., Nisticò L., Vafeiadi M., Kogevinas M., Vääräsmäki M., Kajantie E., Snieder H., Corpeleijn E., Steegers-Theunissen R.P.M., Yang I.V., Dabelea D., Fossati S., Zenclussen A.C., Herberth G., Magnus M., Håberg S.E., London S.J., Munthe-Kaas M.C., Murphy S.K., Hoyo C., Ziegler A.-G., Hummel S., Witt S.H., Streit F., Frank J., Räikkönen K., Lahti J., Huang R., Almqvist C., Hivert M.-F., Jaddoe V.W.V., Järvelin M.-R., Kantomaa M., Felix J.F., Sebert S. Maternal educational attainment in pregnancy and epigenome-wide DNA methylation changes in the offspring from birth until adolescence. Mol. Psychiatry. 2024;29(2):348–358. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02331-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Elliott H.R., Burrows K., Min J.L., Tillin T., Mason D., Wright J., Santorelli G., Davey Smith G., Lawlor D.A., Hughes A.D., Chaturvedi N., Relton C.L. Characterisation of ethnic differences in DNA Methylation between UK-Resident South Asians and Europeans. Clin. Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01351-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yeung E., Biedrzycki R.J., Gómez Herrera L.C., Issarapu P., Dou J., Marques I.F., Mansuri S.R., Page C.M., Harbs J., Khodasevich D., Poisel E., Niu Z., Allard C., Casey E., Berstein F.M., Mancano G., Elliott H.R., Richmond R., He Y., Ronkainen J., Sebert S., Bell E.M., Sharp G., Mumford S.L., Schisterman E.F., Chandak G.R., Fall C.H.D., Sahariah S.A., Silver M.J., Prentice A.M., Bouchard L., Domellof M., West C., Holland N., Cardenas A., Eskenazi B., Zillich L., Witt S.H., Send T., Breton C., Bakulski K.M., Fallin M.D., Schmidt R.J., Stein D.J., Zar H.J., Jaddoe V.W.V., Wright J., Grazuleviciene R., Gutzkow K.B., Sunyer J., Huels A., Vrijheid M., Harlid S., London S., Hivert M., Felix J., Bustamante M., Guan W. Maternal age is related to offspring DNA methylation: a meta‐analysis of results from the PACE consortium. Aging Cell. 2024;23(8) doi: 10.1111/acel.14194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ghildayal N., Fore R., Lutz S.M., Cardenas A., Perron P., Bouchard L., Hivert M.-F. Early-pregnancy maternal body mass index is associated with common DNA methylation markers in cord blood and placenta: a paired-tissue epigenome-wide association study. Epigenetics. 2022;17(7):808–818. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2021.1959975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Cosin-Tomas M., Cilleros-Portet A., Aguilar-Lacasaña S., Fernandez-Jimenez N., Bustamante M. Prenatal maternal smoke, DNA methylation, and multi-omics of tissues and child health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2022;9(3):502–512. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00361-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kashima K., Kawai T., Nishimura R., Shiwa Y., Urayama K.Y., Kamura H., Takeda K., Aoto S., Ito A., Matsubara K., Nagamatsu T., Fujii T., Omori I., Shimizu M., Hyodo H., Kugu K., Matsumoto K., Shimizu A., Oka A., Mizuguchi M., Nakabayashi K., Hata K., Takahashi N. Identification of epigenetic memory candidates associated with gestational age at birth through analysis of methylome and transcriptional data. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):3381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Campagna M.P., Xavier A., Stankovich J., Maltby V.E., Slee M., Yeh W.Z., Kilpatrick T., Scott R.J., Butzkueven H., Lechner-Scott J., Lea R.A., Jokubaitis V.G. Parity is associated with long-term differences in DNA methylation at genes related to neural plasticity in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Epigenetics. 2023;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01438-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Altman D.G., Chitty L.S. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1997;10(3):174–191. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Guintivano J., Shabalin A.A., Chan R.F., Rubinow D.R., Sullivan P.F., Meltzer-Brody S., Aberg K.A., van den Oord E.J.C.G. Test-statistic inflation in methylome-wide association studies. Epigenetics. 2020;15(11):1163–1166. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1758382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Keil A.P., Buckley J.P., O’Brien K.M., Ferguson K.K., Zhao S., White A.J. A quantile-based g-computation approach to addressing the effects of exposure mixtures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020;128(4) doi: 10.1289/EHP5838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Balduzzi S., Rücker G., Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evidence Based Mental Health. 2019;22(4):153–160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hansen K.D. IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno. Ilm10b4.Hg19: Annotation for Illumina’s EPIC Methylation Arrays. R Package Version 0.6.0. 2017 doi: 10.18129/B9.bioc.IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno.ilm10b4.hg19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nurtdinov, R. N.; Guigó, R. EPIraction - an Atlas of Candidate Enhancer-Gene Interactions in Human Tissues and Cell Lines. February 23, 2025. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.18.638885.
  64. Hamada H., Okae H., Toh H., Chiba H., Hiura H., Shirane K., Sato T., Suyama M., Yaegashi N., Sasaki H., Arima T. Allele-specific methylome and transcriptome analysis reveals widespread imprinting in the human placenta. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;99(5):1045–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schroeder D.I., LaSalle J.M. How has the study of the human placenta aided our understanding of partially methylated genes? Epigenomics. 2013;5(6):645–654. doi: 10.2217/epi.13.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Phipson B., Maksimovic J., Oshlack A. MissMethyl: an R Package for Analyzing Data from Illumina’s HumanMethylation450 Platform. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(2):286–288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li M., Zou D., Li Z., Gao R., Sang J., Zhang Y., Li R., Xia L., Zhang T., Niu G., Bao Y., Zhang Z. EWAS atlas: a curated knowledgebase of epigenome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D983. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Battram T., Yousefi P., Crawford G., Prince C., Sheikhali Babaei M., Sharp G., Hatcher C., Vega-Salas M.J., Khodabakhsh S., Whitehurst O., Langdon R., Mahoney L., Elliott H.R., Mancano G., Lee M.A., Watkins S.H., Lay A.C., Hemani G., Gaunt T.R., Relton C.L., Staley J.R., Suderman M. The EWAS catalog: a database of epigenome-wide association studies. Wellcome Open Res. 2022;7:41. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17598.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Davis A.P., Wiegers T.C., Johnson R.J., Sciaky D., Wiegers J., Mattingly C.J. Comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD): update 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D1257. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2021. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 2025-06-01. [Google Scholar]
  71. R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2022. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 2025-06-01. [Google Scholar]
  72. R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2025. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 2025-06-01. [Google Scholar]
  73. Alhasnani M.A., Loeb S., Hall S.J., Caruolo Z., Simmonds F., Solano A.E., Spade D.J. Interaction between mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate and retinoic acid alters sertoli cell development during fetal mouse testis cord morphogenesis. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2022;3 doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Johnson K.J., McDowell E.N., Viereck M.P., Xia J.Q. Species-specific dibutyl phthalate fetal testis endocrine disruption correlates with inhibition of SREBP2-dependent gene expression pathways. Toxicol. Sci. 2011;120(2):460–474. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kalo D., Vitorino Carvalho A., Archilla C., Duranthon V., Moroldo M., Levin Y., Kupervaser M., Smith Y., Roth Z. Mono(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) induces transcriptomic alterations in oocytes and their derived blastocysts. Toxicology. 2019;421:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2019.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Labaronne E., Pinteur C., Vega N., Pesenti S., Julien B., Meugnier-Fouilloux E., Vidal H., Naville D., Le Magueresse-Battistoni B. Low-dose pollutant mixture triggers metabolic disturbances in female mice leading to common and specific features as compared to a high-fat diet. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017;45:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Mathieu-Denoncourt J., Martyniuk C.J., Loughery J.R., Yargeau V., de Solla S.R., Langlois V.S. Lethal and sublethal effects of phthalate diesters in silurana tropicalis larvae. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016;35(10):2511–2522. doi: 10.1002/etc.3413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Calabuig-Navarro V., Haghiac M., Minium J., Glazebrook P., Ranasinghe G.C., Hoppel C., Hauguel de-Mouzon S., Catalano P., O’Tierney-Ginn P. Effect of maternal obesity on placental lipid metabolism. Endocrinology. 2017;158(8):2543–2555. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhang M.-L., Yang Q., Zhu Y.-D., Zhang Y.-D., Zhang R., Liu J., Zhao X.-Y., Dang Q.-Y., Huang D.-X., Zhang M.-Y., Wei Y.-C., Hu Z., Cai X.-X., Gao L.-F., Shan Y., Yu H.-L. Nobiletin inhibits hypoxia-induced placental damage via modulating P53 signaling pathway. Nutrients. 2022;14(11):2332. doi: 10.3390/nu14112332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang C., Liu J., Wang J., Zhang T., Xu D., Hu W., Feng Z. The interplay between tumor suppressor P53 and hypoxia signaling pathways in cancer. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.648808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Carter A.M. Placental oxygen consumption. part i: in vivo studies—a review. Placenta. 2000;21:S31. doi: 10.1053/plac.1999.0513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Chew A., Buck E.A., Peretz S., Sirugo G., Rinaldo P., Isaya G. Cloning, expression, and chromosomal assignment of the human mitochondrial intermediate peptidase gene (MIPEP) Genomics. 1997;40(3):493–496. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.4586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lee B., Koeppel A.F., Wang E.T., Gonzalez T.L., Sun T., Kroener L., Lin Y., Joshi N.V., Ghadiali T., Turner S.D., Rich S.S., Farber C.R., Rotter J.I., Ida Chen Y.-D., Goodarzi M.O., Guller S., Harwood B., Serna T.B., Williams J., Pisarska M.D. Differential gene expression during placentation in pregnancies conceived with different fertility treatments compared with spontaneous pregnancies. Fertil. Steril. 2019;111(3):535–546. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Chen F., Wang T., Feng C., Lin G., Zhu Y., Wu G., Johnson G., Wang J. Proteome differences in placenta and endometrium between normal and intrauterine growth restricted pig fetuses. PLoS One. 2015;10(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ferguson K.K., McElrath T.F., Mukherjee B., Loch-Caruso R., Meeker J.D. Associations between maternal biomarkers of phthalate exposure and inflammation using repeated measurements across pregnancy. PLoS One. 2015;10(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Han H., Grill S., Shen X., Williams P.L., James-Todd T., Ford J.B., Rexrode K.M., Calafat A.M., Chavarro J.E., Hauser R., Mínguez-Alarcón L. Association of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations with inflammatory biomarker levels among pregnant women. Environ. Res. 2025;279 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Dawid M., Mlyczyńska E., Jurek M., Respekta N., Pich K., Kurowska P., Gieras W., Milewicz T., Kotula-Balak M., Rak A. Apelin, APJ, and ELABELA: role in placental function, pregnancy, and foetal development—an overview. Cells. 2021;11(1):99. doi: 10.3390/cells11010099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Holmgren L., Glaser A., Pfeifer-Ohlsson S., Ohlsson R. Angiogenesis during human extraembryonic development involves the spatiotemporal control of PDGF ligand and receptor gene expression. Development. 1991;113(3):749–754. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.3.749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu L., Tang L., Chen S., Zheng L., Ma X. Decoding the molecular pathways governing trophoblast migration and placental development; a literature review. Front Endocrinol (lausanne) 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1486608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Forbes K., Westwood M. Maternal growth factor regulation of human placental development and fetal growth. J. Endocrinol. 2010;207(1):1–16. doi: 10.1677/JOE-10-0174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Beg M.A., Sheikh I.A. Endocrine disruption: structural interactions of androgen receptor against Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate and its metabolites. Toxics. 2020;8(4):115. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Engel A., Buhrke T., Imber F., Jessel S., Seidel A., Völkel W., Lampen A. Agonistic and antagonistic effects of phthalates and their urinary metabolites on the steroid hormone receptors ERα, ERβ, and AR. Toxicol. Lett. 2017;277:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kambia N.K., Séverin I., Farce A., Moreau E., Dahbi L., Duval C., Dine T., Sautou V., Chagnon M. In Vitro and in Silico Hormonal activity Studies of Di‐(2‐ethylhexyl)Terephthalate, a Di‐(2‐ethylhexyl)Phthalate Substitute used in Medical Devices, and its Metabolites. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2019;39(7):1043–1056. doi: 10.1002/jat.3792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kim D.-H., Park C.G., Kim S.H., Kim Y.J. The Effects of Mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (MEHP) on Human Estrogen Receptor (HER) and Androgen Receptor (HAR) by YES/YAS In Vitro Assay. Molecules. 2019;24(8):1558. doi: 10.3390/molecules24081558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sarath Josh M.K., Pradeep S., Vijayalekshmy Amma K.S., Sudha Devi R., Balachandran S., Sreejith M.N., Benjamin S. Human ketosteroid receptors interact with hazardous phthalate plasticizers and their metabolites: an in Silico Study. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2016;36(6):836–843. doi: 10.1002/jat.3221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wenzel A.G., Reiner J.L., Kohno S., Wolf B.J., Brock J.W., Cruze L., Newman R.B., Kucklick J.R. Biomonitoring of emerging DINCH metabolites in pregnant women in charleston, SC: 2011–2014. Chemosphere. 2021;262 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Albert O., Nardelli T.C., Lalancette C., Hales B.F., Robaire B. Effects of In utero and lactational exposure to new generation green plasticizers on adult male rats: a comparative study with Di(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate. Toxicol. Sci. 2018;164(1):129–141. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Gaido K.W., Hensley J.B., Liu D., Wallace D.G., Borghoff S., Johnson K.J., Hall S.J., Boekelheide K. Fetal mouse phthalate exposure shows that gonocyte multinucleation is not associated with decreased testicular testosterone. Toxicol. Sci. 2007;97(2):491–503. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Bell A.W., Ehrhardt R.A. Regulation of placental nutrient transport and implications for fetal growth. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2002;15(2):211–230. doi: 10.1079/NRR200239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Iglesias-Platas I., Martín Trujillo A., Court F., Monk D. Distinct promoter methylation and isoform-specific expression of RASFF1A in placental biopsies from complicated pregnancies. Placenta. 2015;36(4):397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Salvianti F., Inversetti A., Smid M., Valsecchi L., Candiani M., Pazzagli M., Cremonesi L., Ferrari M., Pinzani P., Galbiati S. Prospective Evaluation of RASSF1A cell-Free DNA as a Biomarker of Pre-Eclampsia. Placenta. 2015;36(9):996–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Gul I.S., Hulpiau P., Sanders E., van Roy F., van Hengel J. Armc8 is an evolutionarily conserved armadillo protein involved in cell–cell adhesion complexes through multiple molecular interactions. Biosci. Rep. 2019;39(8) doi: 10.1042/BSR20180604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Vallet S.D., Annaval T., Vives R.R., Richard E., Hénault J., Le Narvor C., Bonnaffé D., Priem B., Wild R., Lortat-Jacob H. Functional and Structural Insights into Human N ‐deacetylase/ N ‐sulfotransferase Activities. Proteoglycan Research. 2023;1(3) doi: 10.1002/pgr2.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. van der Weyden L., Adams D.J. The Ras-Association Domain Family (RASSF) members and their Role in Human Tumourigenesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on. Cancer. 2007;1776(1):58–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Saadeldin I.M., Hussein M.A., Suleiman A.H., Abohassan M.G., Ahmed M.M., Moustafa A.A., Moumen A.F., Abdel-Aziz Swelum A. Ameliorative effect of ginseng extract on phthalate and bisphenol a reprotoxicity during pregnancy in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25(21):21205–21215. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2299-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Xu W., Wu H., Shang L. Gene expression in rat placenta after exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021;40(3):504–514. doi: 10.1177/0960327120954259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhang S., Sun C., Zhao S., Wang B., Wang H., Zhang J., Wang Y., Cheng H., Zhu L., Shen R., Sun M., Xu T., Zhao L. Exposure to DEHP or its metabolite MEHP promotes progesterone secretion and inhibits proliferation in mouse placenta or JEG-3 cells. Environ. Pollut. 2020;257 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Dinour D., Beckerman P., Ganon L., Tordjman K., Eisenstein Z., Holtzman E.J. Loss-of-function mutations of CYP24A1 , the Vitamin D 24-Hydroxylase gene, cause long-standing hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosi. J. Urol. 2013;190(2):552–557. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Sidhu S.K., Mishra S.A. Cholesterol-Centric Outlook on Steroidogenesis. 2024:405–428. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2023.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wang Y., He S., Huang Q., Yang J., Yang C., Ding J. The roles of YY1 in reproductive system: an overview. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2025;417 doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Bertoldi M. Mammalian dopa decarboxylase: structure, catalytic activity and inhibition. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014;546:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Gratz M.J., Stavrou S., Kuhn C., Hofmann S., Hermelink K., Heidegger H., Hutter S., Mayr D., Mahner S., Jeschke U., Vattai A. Dopamine synthesis and dopamine receptor expression are disturbed in recurrent miscarriages. Endocr. Connect. 2018;7(5):727–738. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Rosenfeld C.S. The Placenta‐brain‐axis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2021;99(1):271–283. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sprowles J.L.N., Dzwilewski K.L.C., Merced-Nieves F.M., Musaad S.M.A., Schantz S.L., Geiger S.D. Associations of prenatal phthalate exposure with neurobehavioral outcomes in 4.5- and 7.5-month-old infants. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2022;92 doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2022.107102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Yung H.W., Zhao X., Glover L., Burrin C., Pang P.-C., Jones C.J.P., Gill C., Duhig K., Olovsson M., Chappell L.C., Haslam S.M., Dell A., Burton G.J., Charnock-Jones D.S. Perturbation of placental protein glycosylation by endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes maladaptation of maternal hepatic glucose metabolism. iScience. 2023;26(1) doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhong J., Li J., Burton G.J., Koistinen H., Cheung K.W., Ng E.H.Y., Yao Y., Yeung W.S.B., Lee C.-L., Chiu P.C.N. The functional roles of protein glycosylation in human maternal–fetal crosstalk. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2024;30(1):81–108. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wu Q., Li G., Zhao C.-Y., Na X.-L., Zhang Y.-B. Association between phthalate exposure and obesity risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023;102 doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2023.104240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Chu D., Tian S., Qi L., Hao C., Xia H., Ma X. Abnormality of maternal‐to‐embryonic transition contributes to MEHP‐induced mouse 2‐cell block. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013;228(4):753–763. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Grossman D., Kalo D., Gendelman M., Roth Z. Effect of Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate and mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate on in vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2012;28(6):383–396. doi: 10.1007/s10565-012-9230-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ouidir M., Jedynak P., Rolland M., Lyon-Caen S., Thomsen C., Sakhi A.K., Sabaredzovic A., Bayat S., Slama R., Philippat C. Analyzing the impact of phthalate and DINCH exposure on fetal growth in a cohort with repeated urine collection. Environ. Int. 2024;186 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Martin E., Smeester L., Bommarito P.A., Grace M.R., Boggess K., Kuban K., Karagas M.R., Marsit C.J., O’Shea T.M., Fry R.C. SExual epigenetic dimorphism in the human placenta: implications for susceptibility during the prenatal period. Epigenomics. 2017;9(3):267–278. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Tekola-Ayele F., Workalemahu T., Gorfu G., Shrestha D., Tycko B., Wapner R., Zhang C., Louis G.M.B. Sex differences in the associations of placental epigenetic aging with fetal growth. Aging. 2019;11(15):5412–5432. doi: 10.18632/aging.102124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Tekola-Ayele F., Biedrzycki R.J., Habtewold T.D., Wijesiriwardhana P., Burt A., Marsit C.J., Ouidir M., Wapner R. Sex-differentiated placental methylation and gene expression regulation has implications for neonatal traits and adult diseases. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):4004. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58128-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Aoki M., Mieda M., Ikeda T., Hamada Y., Nakamura H., Okamoto H. R-Spondin3 is required for mouse placental development. Dev. Biol. 2007;301(1):218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Kazanskaya O., Ohkawara B., Heroult M., Wu W., Maltry N., Augustin H.G., Niehrs C. The wnt signaling regulator R-Spondin 3 promotes angioblast and vascular development. Development. 2008;135(22):3655–3664. doi: 10.1242/dev.027284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Varanou A., Withington S.L., Lakasing L., Williamson C., Burton G.J., Hemberger M. The importance of cysteine cathepsin proteases for placental development. J. Mol. Med. 2006;84(4):305–317. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ueland T., Estensen M.-E., Grindheim G., Bollerslev J., Henriksen T., Aukrust P., Aakhus S., Gullestad L., Lekva T. Elevated levels of the secreted wingless agonist R-Spondin 3 in preeclamptic pregnancies. J. Hypertens. 2020;38(7):1347–1354. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Tanrıverdi Kılıç G., Yenigül N.N., Dinçgez B., Yüce Bilgin E., Kılıç Ü.K. The role of pentraxin 3 and cathepsin B levels in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. Biomarkers. 2024;29(8):518–527. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2024.2421884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sferruzzi-Perri A.N., Sandovici I., Constancia M., Fowden A.L. Placental phenotype and the insulin‐like growth factors: resource allocation to fetal growth. J. Physiol. 2017;595(15):5057–5093. doi: 10.1113/JP273330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Fang H., Fang W., Cao H., Luo S., Cong J., Liu S., Pan F., Jia X. Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)-phthalate induces apoptosis via the PPARγ/PTEN/AKT pathway in differentiated human embryonic stem cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;131 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Tando Y., Hiura H., Takehara A., Ito-Matsuoka Y., Arima T., Matsui Y. Epi-mutations for spermatogenic defects by maternal exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate. Elife. 2021;10 doi: 10.7554/eLife.70322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Lahousse S.A., Wallace D.G., Liu D., Gaido K.W., Johnson K.J. Testicular gene expression profiling following prepubertal rat mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure suggests a common initial genetic response at fetal and prepubertal ages. Toxicol. Sci. 2006;93(2):369–381. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Jahreis S., Trump S., Bauer M., Bauer T., Thürmann L., Feltens R., Wang Q., Gu L., Grützmann K., Röder S., Averbeck M., Weichenhan D., Plass C., Sack U., Borte M., Dubourg V., Schüürmann G., Simon J.C., von Bergen M., Hackermüller J., Eils R., Lehmann I., Polte T. Maternal phthalate exposure promotes allergic airway inflammation over 2 generations through epigenetic modifications. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141(2):741–753. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Moral R., Santucci-Pereira J., Wang R., Russo I.H., Lamartiniere C.A., Russo J. In utero exposure to butyl benzyl phthalate induces modifications in the morphology and the gene expression profile of the mammary gland: an experimental study in rats. Environ. Health. 2011;10(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhang J., Ali H.I., Bedi Y.S., Choudhury M. The plasticizer BBP selectively inhibits epigenetic regulator sirtuins. Toxicology. 2015;338:130–141. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Chen W., Liu Y., Chen J., Song Y., You M., Yang G. Long-term co-exposure DBP and BaP causes imbalance in liver macrophages polarization via activation of notch signaling regulated by MiR-34a-5p in rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022;359 doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.109919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Hunkapiller N.M., Gasperowicz M., Kapidzic M., Plaks V., Maltepe E., Kitajewski J., Cross J.C., Fisher S.J. A role for notch signaling in trophoblast endovascular invasion and in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Development. 2011;138(14):2987–2998. doi: 10.1242/dev.066589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhao W.-X., Lin J.-H. Notch signaling pathway and human placenta. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012;9(6):447–452. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Liu C., Dai S.-K., Sun Z., Wang Z., Liu P.-P., Du H.-Z., Yu S., Liu C.-M., Teng Z.-Q. GA-binding protein GABPβ1 is required for the proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. 2019;39 doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Morgan R. Hox genes: a continuation of embryonic patterning? Trends Genet. 2006;22(2):67–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Yuan Q., Ren C., Xu W., Petri B., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Kubes P., Wu D., Tang W. PKN1 directs polarized RAB21 vesicle trafficking via RPH3A and is important for neutrophil adhesion and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Rep. 2017;19(12):2586–2597. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Skaar J.R., Richard D.J., Saraf A., Toschi A., Bolderson E., Florens L., Washburn M.P., Khanna K.K., Pagano M. INTS3 controls the HSSB1-mediated DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 2009;187(1):25–32. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Apicco, D. J.; Shlevkov, E.; Nezich, C. L.; Tran, D. T.; Guilmette, E.; Nicholatos, J. W.; Bantle, C. M.; Chen, Y.; Glajch, K. E.; Abraham, N. A.; Dang, L. T.; Kaynor, G. C.; Tsai, E. A.; Nguyen, K.-D. H.; Groot, J.; Liu, Y.; Weihofen, A.; Hurt, J. A.; Runz, H.; Hirst, W. D. The Parkinson’s Disease-Associated Gene ITPKB Protects against α-Synuclein Aggregation by Regulating ER-to-Mitochondria Calcium Release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2021, 118 (1). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006476118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  144. Wingfield J.L., Lechtreck K.-F., Lorentzen E. Trafficking of ciliary membrane proteins by the intraflagellar transport/bbsome machinery. Essays Biochem. 2018;62(6):753–763. doi: 10.1042/EBC20180030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Chin E.W., Ma Q., Ruan H., Chin C., Somasundaram A., Zhang C., Liu C., Lewis M.D., White M., Smith T.L., Battersby M., Yao W.-D., Lu X.-Y., Arap W., Licinio J., Wong M.-L. The epigenetic reader PHF21B modulates murine social memory and synaptic plasticity-related genes. JCI Insight. 2022;7(14) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.158081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Teschendorff A.E., Marabita F., Lechner M., Bartlett T., Tegner J., Gomez-Cabrero D., Beck S. A Beta-Mixture Quantile Normalization Method for Correcting Probe Design Bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA Methylation Data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(2):189–196. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data 1
mmc1.docx (5MB, docx)
Supplementary Data 2
mmc2.xlsx (14.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3
mmc3.xlsx (16.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4
mmc4.xlsx (9.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5
mmc5.xlsx (26.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 6
mmc6.xlsx (137.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 7
mmc7.xlsx (9.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 8
mmc8.xlsx (14.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 9
mmc9.xlsx (43.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 10
mmc10.xlsx (204.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 11
mmc11.xlsx (26.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 12
mmc12.xlsx (67.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 13
mmc13.xlsx (447.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 14
mmc14.xlsx (250.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 15
mmc15.xlsx (16.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 16
mmc16.xlsx (139.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 17
mmc17.xlsx (165.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 18
mmc18.xlsx (101.6KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 19
mmc19.xlsx (150.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 20
mmc20.xlsx (16.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 21
mmc21.xlsx (40.8KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Genome-wide DNA methylation summarized results are uploaded to Zenodo repository (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15746984). Individual level data may be available by contating BiSC (https://projectebisc.org/en/contact/). Code can be shared upon request with the authors.

RESOURCES