Abstract
The microbiota plays a fundamental role in regulating homeostasis and inflammation across the barrier surfaces of the body. The gut is a unique bioreactor where the high concentration of microbes, microbial and dietary metabolites, microbial PAMPs, immune cells, stroma, and neurons all form a complex, highly interactive, and precisely regulated system. The mucosal immune system in the gut has profound local and systemic effects, influencing both health and disease. A critical period of immune imprinting occurs early in life, shaped by the neonatal microbiota and nutrition, to influence immune development and long-term disease susceptibility. Microbiota-derived metabolites play crucial roles in immune modulation, influencing epithelial integrity, oral tolerance, and inflammatory responses. This review explores the interactions between microbiota and the mucosal immune system from infancy to adulthood, highlighting the impact on health and disease. We also discuss therapeutic interventions, including microbiota-derived molecules, dietary metabolites, and emerging microbiome-based co-therapies.
Introduction
The microbiota serves as a key regulator of homeostasis and inflammation at body barrier surfaces. The gut is a complex bioreactor where microbes, microbial and dietary metabolites, immune cells, and neuronal networks interact dynamically. The gut mucosal immune system influences homeostasis and disease states in multiple organs across the body. The increasing incidence of inflammatory, autoimmune, metabolic, and neoplastic diseases all parallel the change in environmental, dietary, and lifestyle factors that affect the microbiome and host microbiome and host immunity1.
The gastrointestinal barrier composed of epithelial cells and mucus separates microbes from direct contact with the host immune system. This surface acts as a firewall, allowing the assimilation of nutrients and microbial metabolites while preventing the spread of microbes throughout the body. Microbiota-produced metabolites, dietary components, and microbial cell constituents play a myriad of roles in immune regulation and health. The microbiota is crucial for development, immune imprinting, and shaping the immune system early in life. Bacteria, fungi, and viruses can also collectively fuel chronic inflammation and influence the pathophysiology of multiple diseases. Here, we will discuss key components of the mucosal immune system and its interactions with the microbiota early and later in life, that are crucial for maintaining the delicate balance at barrier surfaces in health and disease, along with recent scientific and therapeutic advancements in this field.
Main Text
Neonatal microbiota and immune regulation in early life
The interaction between the immune system and microbiota begins at birth and has a critical role in development. Immune imprinting that has a long-term impact on the immune response to pathogens, microbiota, dietary or self-antigens2–4. After birth, the newborn’s gut is progressively populated by myeloid cells and B cells from the bone marrow and lymphocytes from the thymus 5–7. These newly immigrated immune cells are functionally shaped by the unique gut bacteria and nutrients available in the neonatal gut, which drive the generation and expansion of effector T cells, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), IgA-producing plasma cells, innate lymphoid cells, as well as the formation of isolated lymphoid follicles (ILFs). Transcriptome profiling of human tissue T cells revealed that effector and memory T cells in infants are primarily localized to the gut and lung, suggesting that these mucosal surfaces provide critical initial sources of antigens, some likely from commensal bacteria 8. This highlights the importance of acquiring and developing a diverse and functionally adept gut microbiota during the early neonatal period to facilitate appropriate effector and memory T cells. In support of this, human neonatal antibiotic usage is associated with an increased risk of immune-related diseases in later life, including asthma, allergy, obesity, cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease9–11
Microbiota influence on prenatal immune system development
While maternal health issues may, in rare cases, permit translocation of invasive gut bacteria to the fetus, live bacteria are highly unlikely to be present in the fetus during a normal pregnancy. Indeed, the concept of a placenta/fetal microbiota has been challenged by recent comprehensive studies indicating that prior sequencing-based reports of microbial presence in the human placenta likely resulted from contamination during DNA extraction and sequencing12. However, microbial products from the mother can cross the placenta and may play a role in priming the fetal immune system. For example, in both human and mice, maternal microbiota-derived metabolites, including tryptophan-derivatives, are detected in the fetus intestine and suggested to play a role in facilitating fetal brain and intestinal development13,14. In humans, memory CD4⁺ T cells have been identified in the fetal intestine and shown to respond to bacterial antigens likely originating from maternal microbiota15,16, suggesting that maternal microbial antigens may play a role in the generation of long-term antigen-specific T cells. In mice, transient colonization of pregnant germ-free dams with Escherichia coli resulted in a greater number of intestinal IL-22 producing Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) and a transcriptionally more mature intestinal epithelium in the offspring17. Similarly, mild maternal enteric infection during pregnancy epigenetically imprinted the fetal intestine in an IL-6–dependent manner, enhancing resistance to enteric pathogens but increasing susceptibility to gut inflammation postnatally18.
Development of the neonatal gut microbiota
After birth, the newborn’s gut microenvironment vastly differs from that in adults, with slightly lower acidity, a relatively higher level of oxygen 19, and maternal milk as the main source of nutrients. The acidity, oxygen content, as well as nutrients change as the gut matures, this leads to a dynamic shift in the specific bacterial species that colonize and dominate in the neonatal gut over time 20,21. Immediately after birth, via vaginal delivery, the slightly higher oxygen content in the newborn’s gut favors the colonization of facultative anaerobes, such as Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Streptococceae. Through aerobic respiration, these early colonizers play an important role in purging oxygen from the newborn’s gut, thus allowing subsequent colonization by strict anaerobes, including beneficial Bifidobacteriaceae, which also thrive on maternal milk oligosaccharides20 (Box1). Later, with the introduction of solid foods with more complex carbohydrates and the loss of maternal milk antibodies, weaning induces a significant shift in the microbiota characterized by an overall increase in the abundance of bacteria that are capable of fermenting complex fibers, including Bacteroides and Clostridia21,22. The earliest bacterial colonizers in the intestine, however, are different in newborns who were born via Cesarean section, who acquire microbes from the mother’s skin, including Staphylococcus species, or the hospital environment, leading to lower microbial diversity initially and reduced levels of beneficial Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides23.
BOX 1. Microbial diversity and community stability increase during the post-weaning period, accompanied by shifts in specific bacterial and fungal species, and bacteriophages.
Innate immunity plays a pivotal role in the immune system maturation early in life. In infants, increased abundance of Bacteroides have been associated with a lower risk of autoimmune diseases, possibly due to the presence of structurally distinct LPS, which inhibits innate immune signaling and promotes endotoxin tolerance 24. Microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) such as LPS and peptidoglycans engage pattern recognition receptors like TLRs and NOD-like receptors on innate immune cells driving macrophage maturation and function25–29, while short-chain fatty acids from neonatal Bifidobacteria promote an anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotype via HDAC inhibition and IL-10 upregulation 30, supporting immune tolerance in early life.
Finely orchestrated parallel maturation of the neonatal gut microenvironment and microbiota persists until about three years of age in humans when the balance between microbiota and the host is finally established. This process is disrupted in preterm infants who were born with underdeveloped intestines. The maturation of the gut microbiota in severely preterm infants (less than 25 weeks of gestation) tends to be severely delayed in part due to the relatively higher oxygen content, underdeveloped gut epithelium, and limited nutrients due to difficulties of breastfeeding2. This typically leads to overabundance of opportunistic Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and delayed and/or reduced colonization of beneficial Bifidobacteriaceae and Bacteroidetes. In this case, high concentrations of proinflammatory lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae potentially induces massive inflammation in the premature gut, leading to life-threatening necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)31–33. In addition, over-bloom of E. coli and K. pneumoniae may also increase the risk of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants34.
These findings underscore the critical role of early microbial colonization in shaping gut health and immune development, with disruptions in this process posing significant risks to long-term health outcomes in preterm infants.
The weaning reaction
The neonatal gut microbiota prior to weaning is limited in its diversity, abundance, and colonization resistance to enteric bacterial pathogens (Box1). Gnotobiotic mice with pre-weaning gut microbiota showed poor induction of commensal bacteria-specific IgA antibodies and increased susceptibility to enteric pathogens35,36. Maternal milk antibodies, including IgA and IgG, shape the development of the gut microbiota in part by keeping opportunistic Enterobacteriaceae in check prior to weaning and thereby limit proinflammatory IL-17-producing T cells that would be otherwise induced by Enterobacteriaceae 37–39. Weaning is characterized by a reduction in maternal milk antibodies and introduction of solid foods, and massive influx of dietary antigens and an increasing abundance of a more diverse gut microbiota. This triggers a vigorous but transient immune response known as “weaning reaction”. In mice, the gut microbiota during weaning induces a transient surge of IFNγ and TNFα -producing T cells, which wane within one week; this is coupled with an expansion of RORγt+Tregs22 (Figure 1). Strong systemic effects by both bacterial 40 and fungal 41,42 microbiota have been described to occur during this window affecting metabolism and behavior. The regulation and function of IFNγ and TNFα -producing T cells induced during weaning remain unclear. In mice, IFNγ and TNFα synergistically regulate intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis in part through modulation of β-catenin pathways 43. Thus, the IFNγ and TNFα induced in the intestine during weaning might play a role in the development of the gut epithelium. RORγt+ Tregs promote tolerance to gut bacteria by dampening the development of proinflammatory Th17 helper cells in an antigen-specific manner 44,45. The mechanisms governing the weaning reaction, however, are still not fully understood. RORγt+ antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are a unique cell type that was discovered to be necessary for immune tolerance to gut microbiota through MHCII and prevent spontaneous inflammation46,47. Recent studies highlight an expanded family of RORγt+ APCs, including group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s), Janus cells, extra-thymic AIRE-expressing cells, Thetis cells, DC-like cells, and Prdm16+ APCs, which are essential to instruct the differentiation of microbiota-specific RORγt+ Tregs48–50 51,52 53 54. These cells express MHC class II and are thought to facilitate Treg induction though interactions with commensal microbiota and dietary antigens, contributing to the prevention of spontaneous inflammation. Dietary metabolites, including tryptophan-derivatives and retinoic acid, have also been implicated in influencing the development of gut RORγt+ Tregs22,55. The precise roles and heterogeneity of RORγt+ APC subsets in early-life immune imprinting continue to be explored, with ongoing discussions about their relative contributions to tolerance. The weaning reaction thus represents a pivotal phase in immune development, establishing tolerance to the rapidly diversifying gut microbiota while restraining inflammatory T cell responses to diverse bacteria and fungi.
Figure 1. Regulation of mucosal immunity circuits by gut microbiota and dietary components.

An interplay between diet and gut microbiota profoundly shape mucosal immunity. This occurs through fermentation of fiber or bile acids, which can directly lead to the recruitment or promotion of Tregs while suppressing Th17 cells. These pathways also impact innate lymphocytes, through the induction of IL-33, and subsequent engagement of a feed-forward circuit with IL-25 production by Tuft cells and IL-13 production by ILC2s. Other microbiota byproducts, such as tryptophan engages the aryl hydrocarbon receptor on immune and non-immune cell types, while succinate is directly sensed Tuft cells to engage in the ILC2 circuit. Finally, direct sensing of fungal or bacteria in the gut by myeloid or stromal cell responses engages circuits with innate lymphocytes. This includes production of IL-1b that engages in a circuit with ILC3s, to induce IL-2 and GM-CSF, that supports an optimal Treg response in the gut.
Oral immune tolerance in the neonatal gut
Increasing evidence suggests that colonization by a diverse gut microbiota during the postnatal period is critical for the establishment of a tolerogenic gut microenvironment necessary to promote immune tolerance to dietary antigens and thereby prevent food allergy and gut inflammation56. Recent studies have shed light on the mechanisms of oral tolerance in the neonatal gut. For example, dietary antigens gain access to CD103+ conventional DCs (cDCs) in the lamina propria via goblet cell-associated passages (GAPs) or via microfold (M) cells in the villus epithelium. These CD103+ cDCs, specifically expressing Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), migrate to draining mesenteric lymph nodes to induce antigen-specific Tregs that subsequently circulate systemically or to the gut lamina propria, exerting long-term protection against allergic reaction to the antigen57,58. In addition, a recent mouse study showed that serotonin in the neonatal gut is derived mainly from unique bacteria in the neonatal gut and promotes the differentiation of Tregs in the neonatal gut by inhibition of mTOR activation to facilitate oral tolerance59. Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) also contribute to the tolerogenic microenvironment in the neonatal gut. They are resistant to digestion by human digestive enzymes and favor the expansion of beneficial gut bacteria, including Bifidobacteria. For example, HMOs promote the expansion of Bifidobacterium infantis, an early colonizer of the neonatal gut, which dampens Th2 and Th17 cells by producing indole-3-lactic acid (ILA)60. The tolerance to food antigens is initiated early in life and is dependent on the induction of peripheral regulatory T cells (pTregs) specific for dietary antigens. The induction of these food-specific pTregs has been linked to both classical dendritic cell (DC) subsets, cDC1 and cDC257,61. Using the LIPSTIC proximity labeling method, recent study described a sequence of events in dietary-antigen presentation in which RORγt+ APCs played an earlier role, likely via an early signal that primes naïve T cells toward a regulatory phenotype, followed by later engagement of cDCs62. Indeed, a series of recent studies revealed a non-redundant role of RORγt+ APCs in instructing the differentiation of dietary antigen-specific RORγt+ Tregs, as well as in restraining Th2 cell-mediated allergic inflammation51,54,63–65. Further, in the context of helminth infections, these tolerogenic pathways are disrupted by reducing tolerogenic migratory cDC1s and RORγt+ APCs, while inducing cDC2s, which averted the presentation of dietary antigen. Therefore, the establishment of immune tolerance to dietary antigens involves diverse mechanisms, dependent on the gut microbiota, serotonin, human milk oligosaccharides, sIgA and specific populations of APCs, which promote food-specific regulatory T cells and long-term protection against food allergies and inflammation.
Altogether these studies underscore early life as a critical developmental window in which microbial colonization and immune system education intersect to shape long-term health trajectory.
The intestinal epithelial barrier: mechanism of protection, regeneration and cell death.
The intestinal epithelium is a key barrier responsible for vital processes, including renewal, response to injury, induction of tolerance, absorption of nutrients, and production of antimicrobial peptides and mucus, which regulate microbial access and host-microbial interactions.
Mucus production by goblet cells plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal epithelial integrity and protection creating a dynamic barrier66. MUC2 mucin form a mucus barrier in the small intestine and the colon, with an inner layer that is anchored to goblet cells to protect against bacterial infiltration. The outer colon mucus layer is the habitat for commensal microbiota where they get in contact with the host mucin glycans at the outer surface of the inner mucus layer66. Disruptions in this protective barrier contribute to the pathophysiology of both Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), where bacteria penetrate the normally impenetrable inner mucus layer67 (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Mechanisms of Cell Death.

Homeostatic apoptosis of IEC as part of natural cellular turnover engenders immune tolerance and anti-inflammation in the gut facilitated by CD103+ cDC1 sampling of apoptotic IEC, their migration to mLN and expansion of immunosuppressive FoxP3+ Tregs. Cell death of IECs is dysregulated in IBD due to increased expression of necroptosis mediators (RIPK3, MLK), pyroptosis effectors (GSDMD/GSDMDB/GSDMDE) or defects in cell death/autophagy regulators (XIAP, XBP1, ATG16L1). IBD patients exhibit patient-to-patient heterogeneity, showing either excessive apoptosis or necroptosis in the intestinal epithelium. IBD risk loci also impact repair pathways exacerbating pathology and curtailing mucosal healing (PTGER4, ERRFI1, HNF4A).
Mucus layer maturation is a gradual process, requiring weeks for full development post-colonization68. A recent study has demonstrated that constitutive activation of autophagy via Beclin 1 enables the production of a thicker and less penetrable mucus layer by reducing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. ER-stress-mediated control of mucus secretion is dependent on the microbiota and NOD269. Paneth cells contribute to mucosal defense by secreting antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as defensins and lysozyme 70. AMPs are entrenched within the mucus layer and complement the protective function of the mucus by directly targeting and killing pathogens, preventing the breach of the epithelial barrier. Recent advances in machine learning have enabled large-scale identification of AMPs from microbial genomes, revealing novel candidates with potent antibacterial properties71. These findings not only expand our understanding of gut barrier function but also provide a valuable resource for antibiotic discovery. Finally, SIgA within the enteric mucus layer provide additional protection against enteric bacteria and fungi via high and low affinity binding to these microbes and/or their toxins72 73. All of the above-described mechanisms of protection are synchronized and depend on the key process of epithelial cell renewal and death.
Epithelial death and renewal are in root processes crucial for the maintenance of the intestinal homeostasis. Central modes of programmed cell death, apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis have each been reported to occur in the intestinal epithelium. Apoptosis maintains the function of the intestinal epithelium under steady-state homeostatic conditions and contributes to immune tolerance and suppression of inflammation74,75. Genetic deletion of apoptosis executioner caspases 3 and 7 in mice, however, has highlighted non-apoptotic extrusion of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) to also contribute to normal IEC turnover and intestinal development76 (Figure 2). Compared to apoptosis, both necroptosis and pyroptosis are inherently inflammatory. Necroptosis is orchestrated by the receptor-interacting protein kinase RIPK3, which phosphorylates mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) leading to its plasma membrane translocation and oligomerization to cause cell rupture77. Pyroptosis is an effector response of canonical and noncanonical inflammasomes orchestrated by inflammatory caspase mediated cleavage of the cell death executor gasdermin D (GSDMD), a member of the gasdermin family of six paralogous genes78, and downstream ninjurin 1 (NINJ1), which is ultimately responsible for plasma membrane rupture79. The N-terminal fragment of cleaved GSDMD forms pores in the plasma membrane that mediate the release of inflammatory IL-1b from living cells80,81. Both necroptosis and pyroptosis result in the release of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1), which trigger immune activation and inflammation78,82.
Excessive cell death within the intestinal epithelium is characteristic of IBD where these processes are extensively studied. IEC death in IBD has been regarded as a consequence of the inflammation that furthers epithelial damage and perpetuates a cycle of cell death and immune activation, although recent understanding of the pathways of cell death have illustrated that cell death itself can drive inflammation. The nature of inflammation likely differs depending on the mode of cell death, although this remains to be carefully defined. Patient-to-patient heterogeneity has been reported in the prevailing form of cell death in both UC and Crohn’s CD such that either apoptosis or necroptosis dominates83. Dysregulated cell death in the intestinal epithelium is linked to the severity of inflammation in IBD84. Excessive IEC apoptosis reverses its homeostatic benefits leading to barrier defects, increased intestinal permeability and heightened susceptibility to IBD1. Increased expression of RIPK3 and MLKL has been observed in intestinal tissues from patients with IBD. Dysregulation of necroptosis in IBD is thought to result from aberrant activation of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL, and has been linked to the excessive inflammatory responses in IBD and may underlie the chronic inflammation, epithelial barrier breakdown and immune dysregulation associated with this disease11. Although the contribution of pyroptosis by gasdermin proteins to chronic inflammatory diseases in humans such as IBD has been unclear85,86, polymorphisms in GSDMB and GSDMA are strongly associated with susceptibility to IBD77,87. GSDMD, GSDMB and GSDME expression are also increased in intestinal mucosal biopsies from IBD patients80,88,89. Increased levels of N-terminal GSDME in inflamed colonic mucosa of CD patients has suggested that pyroptosis contributes to the mucosal inflammation in CD89.
Several genetic factors influence susceptibility to cell death in the intestinal epithelium and predispose individuals to IBD. These genetic factors often disrupt the regulation of apoptosis or impair the balance between epithelial cell survival and death, contributing to epithelial barrier dysfunction and inflammation. Mutations in the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing protein 2 (NOD2), which impair bacterial sensing and promote excessive apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells are strongly associated with CD. Variants in ATG16L1 and IRGM, linked to both UC and CD, impair autophagy critical for clearing damaged organelles and controlling bacterial infections and can lead to uncontrolled apoptosis in response to cellular stress or microbial invasion90. Mutations in XBP1, which is involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR) lead to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and increased epithelial cell death, which in turn exacerbate and contribute to IBD pathology91. Mutations in X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) have been associated with very early onset IBD, which can often be more severe compared to typical forms of IBD and typically affects males92.
Wound healing and mucosal restitution are critical processes in maintaining and restoring the integrity of the intestinal epithelium following IEC cell death. Repair of the intestinal epithelium entails multiple processes relying on growth factors and restitutive signals that drive crypt stem cell proliferation and differentiation including WNT-b-catenin signaling, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-b) vital for promoting epithelial cell migration93, restoration of extracellular matrix integrity by supporting fibroblast and myofibroblast activities94, and resolution of inflammation through the actions of anti-inflammatory IL-10 and TFG-βb95,96. Sampling of apoptotic cells by intestinal mononuclear phagocytes orchestrates distinct programs of immune suppression including the induction of negative regulators targeting multiple inflammatory innate immune pathways as well as the induction of FOXP3+ regulatory CD4 T cells2. The secretome of apoptotic cells contains metabolites that induce specific programs of wound healing, cell proliferation and suppression of inflammation97. Supernatants from pyroptotic cells contain signatures of genes involved in migration, cellular proliferation and wound healing, as well as oxylipins and metabolites linked to wound healing98. IEC cell death can thus serve as a messenger signaling repair of the intestinal epithelium. Defects in key healing pathways have been identified in both CD and UC contribute to the chronic and relapsing nature of the condition. Risk loci associated with impaired epithelial repair include the E-type prostaglandin receptor encoding PTGER4 required for restitution, ERRGI1 a negative regulator of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor signaling, and HNF4A which orchestrates intestinal epithelial repair and IEC differentiation99.
In summary, epithelial cell homeostasis, sIgA secretion and transportation across the epithelium, mucus and antimicrobial peptide production, are key for intestinal health. While the precise determinants for cell death heterogeneity in the intestine during diseases are not defined, extensive molecular characterization of the pathways mediating cell death, and the appreciation that cell death itself can elicit inflammation, has shifted focus to defining the potential triggers of cell death and gaining an understanding of the factors that prevent its resolution. The picture that emerges is that a combination of increased susceptibility to cell death and defective repair may thus underlie IBD pathology.
Immune regulation by bacteria-produced and dietary metabolites.
Gut commensal bacteria play a pivotal role in maintenance of the immune homeostasis via direct interaction with host structural and immune cells, or via the production of metabolites with immunomodulatory or other bioactive properties. The decrease in abundance of several bacterial groups such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Christensenellaceae, Collinsella, Akkermansia,Clostridium spp., Roseburia, and Ruminococcus and a concomitant increase in Enterobacteriaceae, Fusobacterium, Ruminococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Campylobacter, Gammaproteobacteria, have been associated with multiple diseases ranging from IBD and colorectal cancer to metabolic and neurological disorders 100–103. F. prausnitzii which is among the most abundant species in the human gut104,105 is a key producer of the SCFA105 106. Butyrate and other SCFAs such as acetic acid, propionate, valerate are synthesized via gut microbial fermentation of dietary fibers and amino acids107, and play a key role in sustaining epithelial homeostasis, regulation innate and adaptive immune responses, and suppressing inflammation107 (Figure 1). Propionate108 and butyrate109,110 influence intestinal and peripheral regulatory T (Treg) cell differentiation via the GPR43 fatty acid receptor, and limit inflammatory responses in the gut111. Extrathymic pathway dependent on CNS1, an intronic enhancer required for extrathymic but not for the thymic differentiation of T regs108 while antibiotics targeting butyrate-producing species suppresses signaling through the butyrate sensor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ(PPAR γ), preventing the expansion of pathogenic Escherichia and Salmonella species112. A reduction in SCFA-producing bacteria such as F. prausnitzii and R. hominis has been observed in IBD113–115 that further leads to reduction in butyrate, propionate, and valerate/isovalerate during IBD dysbiosis114. Several SCFA have direct antibacterial and antifungal properties via intracellular acidification of bacterial and fungal cells116 117.
Bile acids are another group of metabolites shown to exert profound effects on host immunity (Figure 1). Primary bile acids drive the enrichment of bacteria expressing bile acid metabolism genes, which plays a role in bile acid tolerance in newborns118. Primary bile acids such as cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid undergo bacterial modification to give rise to a diverse range of secondary bile acids, that influence metabolism and immune responses119,120. Some secondary bile acids exert their effects on immunity via nuclear receptors such as the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), retinoid acid-related orphan receptor γ (RORγ), vitamin D receptor, Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) and nuclear receptor 4A1 (NR4A1)121 3-oxolithocholic acid (3-oxoLCA), derived from lithocholic acid (LCA), inhibits intestinal T helper 17 (Th17) cell differentiation via binding to RORγ, while isoalloLCA enhances Treg cell differentiation by binding to NR4A1122. A consortia of 238 bacterial isolates (belonging to 12 genera) from the human gut produce 3-oxoLCA and isoLCA to negatively regulate Th17 responses through conversion of LCA into 3-oxoLCA and isoLCA123. These findings indicate that such secondary bile acids can contribute to IBD by altering the Th17—IL-17 signaling axis123.
Alterations in bile acid composition have also been shown to regulate gut RORγ+ Treg cell homeostasis via a vitamin D receptor-dependent mechanism124. In patients with UC, reduced levels of secondary bile acids such as LCA have been described, while LCA supplementation reduced intestinal inflammation in a TGR5-dependent manner125.
New bile-acid conjugations with amino acids (phenylalanocholic acid, tyrosocholic acid, and leucocholic acid) have also been identified through analysis of the metabolome in germ-free and specific pathogen-free mice126. Several additional amino acid-conjugated bile acids have since been discovered using reverse metabolomics approaches127. These metabolites are produced by bacteria belonging to the Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Enterococcus genera and are increased in patients with CD127.
The gut microbiota metabolizes tryptophan to various indole metabolites, including indole propionic acid and indole lactic acid128, which affect intestinal inflammation through aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathways128. A new class of genotoxic metabolites derived from tryptophan was recently discovered, termed indolimines, which can induce DNA damage129, These and other nutrient-derived genotoxic metabolites, such as glucosinolates may feed into this pathway130,131. The presence of a microbiota-encoded decarboxylase gene (aspartate aminotransferase) facilitates the biosynthesis of this class of metabolites. Furthermore, colonization by indolimine-producing gut bacteria, such as Morganella morganii, increased intestinal permeability129. Other bacterial species, including Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium ramosum, also produced small molecules that were able to induce DNA damage in cell-free assays and expression of the double-strand break marker γ-H2AX in epithelial cells129. DNA damage induced by these metabolites was caused by a mechanism that was independent of colibactin-mediated DNA damage driven by selected E. coli strains132, indicating the presence of multiple bacteria-associated genotoxic metabolites. Conversely, a consortia of commensal bacterial strains isolated from healthy human stool was recently developed to counteract potentially harmful microbial species such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, by competitively depleting gluconate133. In mice, this consortia reduced inflammation and restored intestinal colonization resistance without affecting non-Enterobacteriaceae species, highlighting a new mechanism of nutritional competition between beneficial commensals and intestinal pathobionts. Notably, the expansion of gluconate-utilizing Enterobacteriaceae is associated with intestinal inflammation in a cohort of IBD patients while gluconate-metabolizing bacteria correlated with gastrointestinal health133.
CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs) detect bacterial and fungal cells and their metabolites in the gut. Under the steady state, CX3CR1+ MNPs regulate immune balance by restricting T helper cell expansion and supporting Treg cell development, whereas microbiota disruption leads to inflammatory T helper cell responses134. CX3CR1+ MNPs secrete IL-1β in response to propanediol dehydratase (PduC)-mediated propionate produced by adherent-invasive E. coli to aggravate intestinal inflammation135. Furthermore, CX3CR1+ MNPs play a critical role in initiating innate136 and adaptive137 immune responses to intestinal fungi via a Syk-dependent mechanism in the gut. Colonization of mice with bacterial strains from IBD patients aggravates colitis via the induction of Th17 cell and the suppression of protective Treg cell responses138. Conversely, SFB-specific intestinal Th17 cells developed an anti-inflammatory phenotype characterized by IL-10 secretion and driven by the transcription factor c-MAF139. SFB-induced Th17 cells further protected mice from obesity and metabolic syndrome, by regulating lipid absorption across intestinal epithelium140. Dietary sugar led to a loss of these protective Th17 cells fostering the outgrowth of Faecalibaculum rodentium that displaced Th17-inducing SFB140.
In addition to T cells, B cells play a crucial role in maintenance of the gut homeostasis by producing secretory IgA (sIgA), the most abundant immunoglobulin in the gastrointestinal tract (Figure 1). sIgA prevents direct contact between intestinal microbes and intestinal epithelial cells141. Polyreactive sIgA binds with low affinity to a broad range of gut bacteria142 or target fungi with a high affinity for fungal hyphae73,143.
Intestinal ILCs are robustly primed to interface with the external environment prior to or soon after birth, and this is supported with substantive experimental evidence demonstrating key roles for these cell types in shaping the outcomes of host-microbe interactions. ILC2 circuits in the gut are dynamically influenced by diet, and may be further modified by resident microbiota and associated IL-33 responses to shape the magnitude of tissue-protective versus inflammatory type-2 allergic responses144–147. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s), similarly engaged in dynamic cross talk with gut microbiota148,149. Indeed, the study of the latter pathway revealed a non-redundant role for MHCII+ ILC3s, and perhaps other related RORγt+ antigen presenting cells, in the induction of microbiota-specific Tregs that co-express RORγt and are essential to drive immune tolerance in the gut48–50. ILC3s are also critical to preventing the maladaptation of key cytokines networks in the gut.
Altogether these examples underscore the expanding role of various microbial and dietary metabolites in influencing the immunity and states of inflammation in the gut.
Fungi in mucosal immunity and inflammation.
Fungi are ubiquitous in the environment and reside on all body surfaces, including the gastrointestinal tract150–161 162. In the past several years, significant progress has been made in understanding various aspects of antifungal immunity at the mucosal barriers162 163. NETs produced by neutrophils during inflammation are sensed by MICL which acts as a negative regulator of inflammation affecting the outcome of joint inflammation and host response to Aspergillus fumigatus164. Type I and III interferons, and GM-CSF mediate monocyte and neutrophil crosstalk during A. fumigatus infection in the lungs165,166. GI colonization of mice with Candida albicans boosts granulopoiesis via IL-6 dependent mechanism, undermining the outcome of inflammation after SARS-CoV-2 infection and leaving a long-lasting mark on granulocyte myeloid progenitors of patients with severe COVID-19167. Conversely, such innate activation of trained immunity by gut C. albicans colonization, protects against subsequent microbial infections168.169 Altogether, these examples highlight the complexity of antifungal immune mechanisms.
IL-17 and IL-22-dependent170 or independent171 production of antimicrobial peptides limit C. albicans growth or hyphal formation. IL-22 activates regenerative signals on oral epithelial cells trough IL-22RA/IL-10RB to foster the proliferation and repair of IL-17R-expressing epithelial cells that respond to IL17 and mediate antifungal events 172. In the colon, mucosa-associated fungi induce IL-22 and IL-17 production by T helper cells that in protects against fungal dissemination and reinforces intestinal epithelial function to protect mice against intestinal injury41. A consortia of gut mucosa-associated fungal species can influence both intestinal barrier function and social behavior via IL-17R signaling on neurons41. In humans, circulating fungus-reactive memory Th17 cells recognize gastrointestinal C. albicans-derived antigens and cross-react with other fungi in pathologies such as CD or A. fumigatus-triggered allergic airway disease173.
In addition to type 17 responses, enhanced type 1 immunity can also increase susceptibility to mucosal fungal infections. Aberrant T cell-driven type 1 mucosal inflammation in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy–candidiasis–ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) patients increase susceptibility to C. albicans invasion, while inhibition of interferon-γ or JAK-STAT signaling can prevent oral candidiasis in a mouse model of APECED174.Gut C. albicans strains with ability to damage macrophages and gut epithelial cells, fuel pre-existing gut inflammation via IL-1R -dependent mechanisms induced by the toxin candidalysin1. Complement component 5a (C5) ligation of C5aR1 promotes phagocyte effector and metabolic function to mediate fungal clearance during systemic candidiasis in mice, while impaired complement activation correlates with poor outcomes in candidemia patients175. On the protective side, gut fungal symbionts shape the human IgG and IgA antibody repertoire through CARD9-dependent induction of antifungal antibodies that are protective against C. albicans and C. auris systemic infection in mice137. The GI fungal commensal Kazachstania pintolopesii, which resides in the murine stomach, induces type 2 immunity via epithelial cell-produced IL-33 that is activated by the fungus147 (Figure 1). K. weizmannii isolated from IL-23-deficient mice can outcompete C. albicans, protecting mice from systemic infection176. Wild mice residing in suburban and urban areas carry K. pintolopesii, which provides protection against intestinal parasites and maintains its presence in the GI niche against other fungi147. These studies position several intestinal fungi as key inducers of type 17 and type 2 immunity in the gastrointestinal tract. While these responses can be detrimental under certain pathological conditions, they can also be protective under homeostatic conditions, highlighting the dual nature of antifungal immunity at mucosal sites.
Viruses in mucosal immunity and inflammation.
Viruses affect mucosal immunity, inflammation or therapeutic outcomes177–180 in multiple ways. For example, intestinal murine norovirus aggravates intestinal pathology in mice with a mutation in Atg16L1 leading to a Paneth cells defect, linking viral triggers with intestinal inflammation181.
Bacteriophage including dsDNA Caudovirales, ssDNA phage family Microviridae, and Enterovirus B, are present in the gut of patients with UC and CD182. In mice, intestinal bacteriophages can aggravate intestinal inflammation and colitis183. Perturbations in the intestinal virome and an increase in enterovirus B species, exacerbate intestinal inflammation via nucleic acid sensing by RIG-I, MDA5, or cGAS178, altogether demonstrating viral and phage-mediated triggers of intestinal immunity.
Parasites and protozoa in mucosal immunity and inflammation.
In response to intestinal helminths tuft cells engage in a feed-forward activation circuit with ILC2s, where subsequent IL-13 production by ILC2s drives Tuft cell hyperplasia, collectively orchestrate type-2 immunity to helminths in the intestines184–186. This initial activation of Tuft cells can occur through sensing of the metabolite succinate via the succinate receptor, which is produced by intestinal helminths and gut microbiota that encompass both bacteria and protozoa187–189. If chronically activated, this provokes an altered landscape of antimicrobial peptides, substantial tissue remodeling in the small bowel, and in some cases may protect from intestinal inflammation188,190,191. These ILC2 circuits in the gut are also dynamically influenced by diet, and may be further modified by resident microbiota and associated IL-33 responses to shape the magnitude of tissue-protective versus inflammatory type-2 allergic responses144–147. The GI fungal commensal Kazachstania pintolopesii protects mice against intestinal helminths through an IL-33-dependent mechanism147, demonstrating how the immune response activated by one intestinal eukaryote can protect against another and revealing a level of eukaryotic interspecies interaction in the gut (Figure 1).
Microbiota-based therapeutic opportunities.
Insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying host-microbe interactions has paved the way for precision microbiome therapeutics (PMT)(Figure 3). Newly developed approaches that enable proteome-scale assessment of host exoproteome-microbiome interactions will help to expand the identification of targets for selectively blocking gut pathobionts contributing to inflammatory disease192. Unique metabolic pathways utilized by pathobionts including propanediol and ethanolamine utilization by Adherent-Invasive E. Coli (AIEC), which are expanded in Crohn’s disease, may serve as therapeutic targets for small molecules or xenobiotic modulation135,193 194. Recent studies reporting the capability of targeted gene editing of E. coli and K. pneumonia (Kp) strains in the mouse gut in situ add to the arsenal of strategies for strain-specific targeting195. Conversely, new approaches engineering native gut bacteria, which can achieve durable engraftment, enable functional transgenes to serve as therapy targeting inflammatory pathology196. Gut pathobiont-specific bacteriophages also serve as a therapeutic strategy to target and reduce specific strains contributing to inflammatory disease. Pre-clinical studies using AIEC-specific bacteriophages confirming the selective targeting of AIEC in vivo and the subsequent reduction of colitis severity in mice support ongoing clinical studies evaluating the potential efficacy in CD197(and NCT03808103). Similar strategies using Kp-specific phages confirm robust efficacy in reducing intestinal inflammation in pre-clinical models, and first-in-human studies showing efficient phage engraftment highlight the potential for rapid and patient-specific engineering of bacteriophage as PMT in IBD198.
Figure 3. The intestinal microbiota is a critical regulator of inflammation and anti-tumor immunity.

The intestinal microbiota can enhance immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy by translocating to secondary lymphoid organs to enhance T cell activation. Gut microbiota influences inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) severity and treatment response. The microbiota releases an array of metabolites (e.g., SCFA, IPA, inosine, muropeptides, STING agonists) into the circulation to influence inflammation outcomes or to improve T cell activation in lymph nodes and anti-tumor responses in the tumor microenvironment. Beneficial microbial metabolites that promote intestinal healing and impact inflammation outcomes, or promote gut microbiota-dependent enhancement of ICI therapy, can be influenced by dietary interventions (e.g., high-fiber diets) and nutritional supplements/prebiotics (e.g., castalagin).
The intestinal microbiota of patients who respond to ICI therapy can be transplanted via fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) into those previously non-responsive to promote responsiveness and tumor control. High-fiber diets and prebiotics (e.g., castalagin) support beneficial microbes, improving immune regulation. FMT in IBD influences positively dysbiosis, reduce inflammation and has been shown to drive steroid-free remission in UC. Microbiome-targeted interventions offer promising strategies to enhance both cancer immunotherapy and IBD management.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy restores the function of suppressed tumor-specific T cells and is a first-line therapy for many types of cancer199 (Figure 3). However, not all patients respond, and not all responses are durable. The intestinal microbiota is a critical modulator of anti-tumor immunity and ICI responsiveness200. Landmark studies showed that antibiotics use correlated with impaired ICI therapy and that specific gut commensals were associated with improved ICI responsiveness in patients, which was causal in mouse models201–207 201,202,206–209 200. Importantly, the gut microbiota directly promoted ICI therapy in patients in two pilot clinical trials210,211. The microbiota of patients that had a complete response to ICI therapy was administered to advanced cancer patients that were refractory to ICI therapy. Remarkably, approximately 30% became responsive210,211. Preclinical studies have shed light on the mechanisms involved (discussed later). Although ICI therapy has provided great benefit, it can also cause immune-related adverse events (irAE)212. IrAE occur commonly at barrier tissues such as the intestine and skin and can be caused by the microbiota in preclinical models 213–215. Further, a small clinical trial (2 patients) showed that patients with refractory ICI therapy-associated colitis receiving an FMT from a healthy donor had complete resolution of clinical symptoms216. This was associated with an enrichment in Bifidobacteria in patients, consistent with a report using mouse models of ICI therapy and colitis217. These studies demonstrate the importance of the microbiota in modulating the efficacy of ICI therapy and associated irAE, and provide novel targets to improve outcomes for patients.
Microbial and immune mechanisms by which the microbiota promotes therapeutic outcomes.
While FMT is highly effective for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, clinical outcomes in inflammatory diseases such as IBD have been variable218 (Figure 3). In IBD, clinical remission has been linked with the presence of specific taxa—including Odoribacter splanchnicus, Fecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium hallii, and Roseburia inulivorans 219–221—and recent studies show that lyophilized donor product can achieve clinical remission, supporting the sufficiency of specific taxa 222. Strain-specific factors shape metabolic function and immune modulation, yet many of the key enzymes responsible for the metabolic targets remain poorly characterized. Emerging technologies capable of resolving individual genomes within complex microbial community 223 along with activity-based probes 224,225 enable potential strategies for in situ identification of strain-specific enzymes. This functional mapping can uncover metabolic pathways to improve PMT and allow direct isolation of microbes based on enzymatic or metabolic activity 224.
FMT trials indicate that microbiota-mediated responsiveness to ICI therapy in patients correlated with increased DC activation, T cell tumor infiltration and function, and remodeling of the myeloid compartment210,211. This is consistent with preclinical studies, which showed that the microbiota mediated these effects by translocating from the intestine to prime systemic immunity226, and via the production of metabolites by bacteria and fungi208,227–232. Microbiota-derived metabolites can also increase suppressive immune 108, which may play role in negatively regulating the efficacy of ICI therapy233. The microbiota can also express molecules (e.g., bacteriophage peptides) that mimic tumor antigens, thereby promoting cross-reactive anti-tumor T cell responses234–236. In addition, unfavorable commensals can release LPS into the blood to cause chronic, aberrant inflammation that impairs anti-tumor immunity209. These studies provide a foundation to test therapeutic interventions that promote anti-tumor immunity in patients, such as administering commensal-derived metabolites in place of an FMT.
The role of the diet
Both dietary prebiotics and xenobiotics can modulate the therapeutic efficacy of PMT for inflammatory disease. Recent seminal studies demonstrate that fiber type and the host microbiome composition jointly shape distinct immunometabolic response237–239. In subjects with metabolic syndrome, combining low-fermentable fiber with FMT improves insulin sensitivity 240, but the impact of fiber supplementation with FMT in IBD remains under investigation 241,242. Pre-clinical mouse studies reveal that fiber regulates microbiome enzymatic function 243 and that downstream metabolites influence immune cell function 144, helping to guide ongoing clinical trials. Beyond prebiotics, xenobiotics can also enhance the functional impact of microbial-based therapies. For example, sulfonamide-mediated inhibition of microbial folate synthesis promotes production of anti-inflammatory colipterins in E. coli 244, while sulfasalazine boosts butyrate production by F. prausnitzii 245. Clinical validation of xenobiotic-microbiome interventions in diverse inflammatory disease cohorts with varied diets is warranted.
Diet drastically reshape the gut microbiota, which could be used to alter a patient’s baseline microbiota prior to receiving ICI therapy to promote responsiveness144,246–250. Diets high in fiber optimize anti-tumor immunity and ICI responses, which was associated with improved survival in cancer patients and was recapitulated in mouse models230,251,252. Sufficient fiber intake enriches for the Ruminococcaceae family and Faecalibacterium genus and correlates with increased intra-tumoral IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells201,205,209,251. Caloric restriction enriches for acetate-producing Bifidobacteria that enhanced anti-tumor immunity in mice253–255. Omega-3 and a Mediterranean diet correlated with increased ICI responses in cancer patients252,256, and ketogenic and low-protein diets increases anti-tumor immunity and ICI responses in preclinical models, 249,257–259, but the role of the microbiota in mediating these effects is unclear. Prebiotics can enhance anti-tumor immunity and ICI responses in mice, including the polyphenol castalagin and Ginseng extracts260,261. Diet can also promote an unfavorable microbiota that accelerates tumor formation. For example, a ‘Western diet’ can enrich for commensals that promote colorectal cancer262,263. However, a Western diet can counterintuitively promote ICI therapy responsiveness264,265, highlighting the need for further mechanistic studies. Altogether, diet is an accessible approach to modulate the microbiota and anti-tumor immunity. Future research on individual responses to nutritional interventions that are simple to adhere to are required to rationally utilize diet to enrich for commensals that promote anti-tumor immunity247,266.
Concluding remarks
The interactions between the host and its commensal microbiota are fundamental to maintaining and promoting host health. Unraveling these complex relationships will provide valuable insights into how commensal microbes shape immune function and inflammation, both in the intestine and at gut-distal sites. A deeper understanding of microbiota assembly in early life and its role in immune system imprinting could unlock lifelong health benefits. Exploring the functional characteristics of the microbiota and harnessing its vast repertoire of bioactive and immunomodulatory molecules may pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies. Investigating how diet and microbial metabolism influence immunity could lead to less invasive, preventive approaches that, alone or in combination with existing immunomodulatory drugs, would open new avenues to control inflammation and other processes underlying many chronic and neoplastic diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following funding agencies for their support: US National Institutes of (R01DK113136, R01DK121977, R01AI178683; R01CA286920; R01AI163007; R01DK135816, AI172027, DK132244, AT013241; R01HD110118, R01HL169989; R01AI143842, R01AI123368, R01AI145989, U01AI095608, R01AI162936, R01CA274534, R37AI174468, R01DK126871, R01AI151599, R01AI095466, R01AR070116, R01AI182043, R00CA252443, R21AI178327, R01AI170832, R01AI170897), the Cancer Research Institute, the Sanders Family Foundation, the Rosanne H. Silbermann Foundation, Linda and Glenn Greenberg, the Allen Discovery Center Program, a Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group advised program of the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, the Hartwell Foundation and Starr Cancer Consortium, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease (PATH), Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, Kenneth Rainin Foundation, the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), programme Fungal Kingdom: Threats and Opportunities.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Belkaid Y & Hand TW Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell 157, 121–141 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Healy DB Clinical implications of preterm infant gut microbiome development. Nat Microbiol 7, 22–33 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhariwala MO & Scharschmidt TC Baby’s skin bacteria: first impressions are long-lasting. Trends Immunol 42, 1088–1099 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gensollen T How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science 352, 539–44 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bain CC Constant replenishment from circulating monocytes maintains the macrophage pool in the intestine of adult mice. Nat Immunol 15, 929–937 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ennamorati M Intestinal microbes influence development of thymic lymphocytes in early life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 2570–2578 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suo C Mapping the developing human immune system across organs. Science 376, 0510 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Connors TJ Site-specific development and progressive maturation of human tissue-resident memory T cells over infancy and childhood. Immunity 56, 1894–1909 5 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aversa Z Association of Infant Antibiotic Exposure With Childhood Health Outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc 96, 66–77 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kronman MP Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics 130, 794–803 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Azad MB Infant antibiotic exposure and the development of childhood overweight and central adiposity. Int J Obes (Lond 38, 1290–8 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kennedy KM et al. Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. Nature 613, 639–649 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Husso A et al. Impacts of maternal microbiota and microbial metabolites on fetal intestine, brain, and placenta. BMC Biol 21, 207 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pessa-Morikawa T et al. Maternal microbiota-derived metabolic profile in fetal murine intestine, brain and placenta. BMC Microbiol 22, 46 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li N et al. Memory CD4+ T cells are generated in the human fetal intestine. Nat Immunol 20, 301–312 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mishra A et al. Microbial exposure during early human development primes fetal immune cells. Cell 184, 3394–3409.e20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gomez de Agüero M et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science 351, 1296–1302 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lim AI et al. Prenatal maternal infection promotes tissue-specific immunity and inflammation in offspring. Science 373, eabf3002 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Singhal R & Shah YM Oxygen battle in the gut: Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in metabolic and inflammatory responses in the intestine. J Biol Chem 295, 10493–10505 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sanidad KZ & Zeng MY Neonatal gut microbiome and immunity. Curr Opin Microbiol 56, 30–37 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chong CYL, Bloomfield FH & O’Sullivan JM Factors Affecting Gastrointestinal Microbiome Development in Neonates. Nutrients 10, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al Nabhani Z A Weaning Reaction to Microbiota Is Required for Resistance to Immunopathologies in the Adult. Immunity 50, 1276–1288 5 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shao Y et al. Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth. Nature 574, 117–121 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vatanen T et al. Variation in Microbiome LPS Immunogenicity Contributes to Autoimmunity in Humans. Cell 165, 842–853 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL & Blumberg RS How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science 352, 539–544 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Erny D et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci 18, 965–977 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schaupp L et al. Microbiota-Induced Type I Interferons Instruct a Poised Basal State of Dendritic Cells. Cell 181, 1080–1096.e19 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abt MC et al. Commensal bacteria calibrate the activation threshold of innate antiviral immunity. Immunity 37, 158–170 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bain CC & Mowat AM Macrophages in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol Rev 260, 102–117 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chang PV, Hao L, Offermanns S & Medzhitov R The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 2247–2252 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh DK Necrotizing enterocolitis: Bench to bedside approaches and advancing our understanding of disease pathogenesis. Front Pediatr 10, 1107404 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aziz M, Prince JM & Wang P Gut microbiome and necrotizing enterocolitis: Understanding the connection to find a cure. Cell Host Microbe 30, 612–616 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hunter CJ Understanding the susceptibility of the premature infant to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC. Pediatr Res 63, 117–23 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Singer JR Preventing dysbiosis of the neonatal mouse intestinal microbiome protects against late-onset sepsis. Nat Med 25, 1772–1782 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lubin JB Arresting microbiome development limits immune system maturation and resistance to infection in mice. Cell Host Microbe 31, 554–570 7 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim YG Neonatal acquisition of Clostridia species protects against colonization by bacterial pathogens. Science 356, 315–319 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koch MA Maternal IgG and IgA Antibodies Dampen Mucosal T Helper Cell Responses in Early Life. Cell 165, 827–41 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sanidad KZ Maternal gut microbiome-induced IgG regulates neonatal gut microbiome and immunity. Sci Immunol 7, 3816 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Johnson-Hence CB Stability and heterogeneity in the antimicrobiota reactivity of human milk-derived immunoglobulin A. J Exp Med 220, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hild B, Dreier MS & Oh JH Neonatal exposure to a wild-derived microbiome protects mice against diet-induced obesity. Nat Metab 3, 1042–1057 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leonardi I Mucosal fungi promote gut barrier function and social immunity. Cell 185, 831–846 14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hill JH et al. Neonatal fungi promote lifelong metabolic health through macrophage-dependent β cell development. Science 387, eadn0953 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nava P Interferon-gamma regulates intestinal epithelial homeostasis through converging beta-catenin signaling pathways. Immunity 32, 392–402 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sefik E MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY. Individual intestinal symbionts induce a distinct population of RORgamma(+) regulatory T cells. Science 349, 993–7 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xu M c-MAF-dependent regulatory T cells mediate immunological tolerance to a gut pathobiont. Nature 554, 373–377 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hepworth MR Innate lymphoid cells regulate CD4+ T-cell responses to intestinal commensal bacteria. Nature 498, 113–117 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hepworth MR Immune tolerance. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate intestinal selection of commensal bacteria-specific CD4(+) T cells. Science 348, 1031–1035 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lyu M et al. ILC3s select microbiota-specific regulatory T cells to establish tolerance in the gut. Nature 610, 744–751 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kedmi R A RORgammat(+) cell instructs gut microbiota-specific T(reg) cell differentiation. Nature 610, 737–743 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Akagbosu B Novel antigen-presenting cell imparts T(reg)-dependent tolerance to gut microbiota. Nature 610, 752–760 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fu L et al. PRDM16-dependent antigen-presenting cells induce tolerance to gut antigens. Nature 642, 756–765 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou W et al. ILC3s sense gut microbiota through STING to initiate immune tolerance. Immunity S1074–7613(25)00237–7 (2025) doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ulezko Antonova A et al. A distinct human cell type expressing MHCII and RORγt with dual characteristics of dendritic cells and type 3 innate lymphoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120, e2318710120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rodrigues PF et al. Rorγt-positive dendritic cells are required for the induction of peripheral regulatory T cells in response to oral antigens. Cell 188, 2720–2737.e22 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rankin LC Dietary tryptophan deficiency promotes gut RORgammat(+) Treg cells at the expense of Gata3(+) Treg cells and alters commensal microbiota metabolism. Cell Rep 42, 112135 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cerovic V, Pabst O & Mowat AM The renaissance of oral tolerance: merging tradition and new insights. Nat Rev Immunol 25, 42–56 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Matteoli G Gut CD103+ dendritic cells express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase which influences T regulatory/T effector cell balance and oral tolerance induction. Gut 59, 595–604 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kulkarni DH Goblet cell associated antigen passages support the induction and maintenance of oral tolerance. Mucosal Immunol 13, 271–282 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sanidad KZ Gut bacteria-derived serotonin promotes immune tolerance in early life. Sci Immunol 9, 4775 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Henrick BM Bifidobacteria-mediated immune system imprinting early in life. Cell 184, 3884–3898 11 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Veenbergen S Colonic tolerance develops in the iliac lymph nodes and can be established independent of CD103(+) dendritic cells. Mucosal Immunol 9, 894–906 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Canesso MCC Identification of antigen-presenting cell–T cell interactions driving immune responses to food. Science (2024) doi: 10.1126/science.ado5088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sun I-H et al. RORγt eTACs mediate oral tolerance and Treg induction. J Exp Med 222, e20250573 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cabric V et al. A wave of Thetis cells imparts tolerance to food antigens early in life. Science eadp0535 (2025) doi: 10.1126/science.adp0535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Teng F et al. ILC3s control airway inflammation by limiting T cell responses to allergens and microbes. Cell Rep 37, 110051 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hansson GC Mucins and the Microbiome. Annu. Rev. Biochem 89, 769–793 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Paone P & Cani PD Mucus barrier, mucins and gut microbiota: the expected slimy partners? Gut 69, 2232–2243 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Johansson MEV et al. Normalization of Host Intestinal Mucus Layers Requires Long-Term Microbial Colonization. Cell Host & Microbe 18, 582–592 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Naama M et al. Autophagy controls mucus secretion from intestinal goblet cells by alleviating ER stress. Cell Host & Microbe 31, 433–446.e4 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ramanan D & Cadwell K Intrinsic Defense Mechanisms of the Intestinal Epithelium. Cell Host & Microbe 19, 434–441 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Santos-Júnior CD et al. Discovery of antimicrobial peptides in the global microbiome with machine learning. Cell 187, 3761–3778.e16 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Macpherson AJ & McCoy KD Stratification and compartmentalisation of immunoglobulin responses to commensal intestinal microbes. Seminars in Immunology 25, 358–363 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Doron I et al. Mycobiota-induced IgA antibodies regulate fungal commensalism in the gut and are dysregulated in Crohn’s disease. Nat Microbiol 6, 1493–1504 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Blander JM On cell death in the intestinal epithelium and its impact on gut homeostasis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 34, 413–419 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cummings RJ Different tissue phagocytes sample apoptotic cells to direct distinct homeostasis programs. Nature 539, 565–569 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ghazavi F Executioner caspases 3 and 7 are dispensable for intestinal epithelium turnover and homeostasis at steady state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lawlor KE, Murphy JM & Vince JE Gasdermin and MLKL necrotic cell death effectors: Signaling and diseases. Immunity 57, 429–445 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zindel J & Kubes P DAMPs, PAMPs, and LAMPs in Immunity and Sterile Inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol 15, 493–518 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kayagaki N NINJ1 mediates plasma membrane rupture during lytic cell death. Nature 591, 131–136 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bulek K Epithelial-derived gasdermin D mediates nonlytic IL-1beta release during experimental colitis. J Clin Invest 130, 4218–4234 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Evavold CL The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secretion from Living Macrophages. Immunity 48, 35–44 36 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Boyapati RK, Rossi AG, Satsangi J & Ho GT Gut mucosal DAMPs in IBD: from mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Mucosal Immunol 9, 567–582 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chiou S An immunohistochemical atlas of necroptotic pathway expression. EMBO Mol Med 16, 1717–1749 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Patankar JV & Becker C Cell death in the gut epithelium and implications for chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17, 543–556 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ivanov AI, Rana N, Privitera G & Pizarro TT The enigmatic roles of epithelial gasdermin B: Recent discoveries and controversies. Trends Cell Biol 33, 48–59 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Privitera G, Rana N, Armuzzi A & Pizarro TT The gasdermin protein family: emerging roles in gastrointestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 20, 366–387 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Soderman J, Berglind L & Almer S Gene Expression-Genotype Analysis Implicates GSDMA, GSDMB, and LRRC3C as Contributors to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Susceptibility. Biomed Res Int 834805 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rana N GSDMB is increased in IBD and regulates epithelial restitution/repair independent of pyroptosis. Cell 185, 283–298 217 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tan G, Huang C, Chen J, Chen B & Zhi F Gasdermin-E-mediated pyroptosis participates in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease by promoting intestinal inflammation. Cell Rep 35, 109265 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Foerster EG How autophagy controls the intestinal epithelial barrier. Autophagy 18, 86–103 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Eugene SP, Reddy VS & Trinath J Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Intestinal Inflammation: A Perilous Union. Front Immunol 11, 543022 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mudde ACA, Booth C & Marsh RA Evolution of Our Understanding of XIAP Deficiency. Front Pediatr 9, 660520 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gumede DB, Abrahamse H & Houreld NN Targeting Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and its interplay with TGF-beta and Notch signaling pathways for the treatment of chronic wounds. Cell Commun Signal 22, 244 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cialdai F, Risaliti C & Monici M Role of fibroblasts in wound healing and tissue remodeling on Earth and in space. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10, 958381 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Fullerton JN & Gilroy DW Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15, 551–567 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Neurath MF Resolution of inflammation: from basic concepts to clinical application. Semin Immunopathol 41, 627–631 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Medina CB Metabolites released from apoptotic cells act as tissue messengers. Nature 580, 130–135 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mehrotra P Oxylipins and metabolites from pyroptotic cells act as promoters of tissue repair. Nature 631, 207–215 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chang EB Epithelial wound healing in inflammatory bowel diseases: the next therapeutic frontier. Transl Res 236, 35–51 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Metwaly A, Reitmeier S & Haller D Microbiome risk profiles as biomarkers for inflammatory and metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19, 383–397 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pascal V et al. A microbial signature for Crohn’s disease. Gut 66, 813–822 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Vich Vila A et al. Gut microbiota composition and functional changes in inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Sci Transl Med 10, eaap8914 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Franzosa EA et al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Microbiol 4, 293–305 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lopez-Siles M, Duncan SH, Garcia-Gil LJ & Martinez-Medina M Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J 11, 841–852 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lenoir M et al. Butyrate mediates anti-inflammatory effects of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in intestinal epithelial cells through Dact3. Gut Microbes 12, 1–16 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Quévrain E et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut 65, 415–425 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Lange O, Proczko-Stepaniak M & Mika A Short-Chain Fatty Acids-A Product of the Microbiome and Its Participation in Two-Way Communication on the Microbiome-Host Mammal Line. Curr Obes Rep 12, 108–126 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Arpaia N et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature 504, 451–455 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Smith PM et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science 341, 569–573 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Furusawa Y et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 504, 446–450 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Josefowicz SZ et al. Extrathymically generated regulatory T cells control mucosal TH2 inflammation. Nature 482, 395–399 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Byndloss MX et al. Microbiota-activated PPAR-γ signaling inhibits dysbiotic Enterobacteriaceae expansion. Science 357, 570–575 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sokol H et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 16731–16736 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lloyd-Price J et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569, 655–662 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Machiels K et al. A decrease of the butyrate-producing species Roseburia hominis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 63, 1275–1283 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sorbara MT et al. Inhibiting antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by microbiota-mediated intracellular acidification. Journal of Experimental Medicine 216, 84–98 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.McCrory C, Lenardon M & Traven A Bacteria-derived short-chain fatty acids as potential regulators of fungal commensalism and pathogenesis. Trends in Microbiology 32, 1106–1118 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.van Best N et al. Bile acids drive the newborn’s gut microbiota maturation. Nat Commun 11, 3692 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ridlon JM, Kang D-J & Hylemon PB Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J Lipid Res 47, 241–259 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Devlin AS & Fischbach MA A biosynthetic pathway for a prominent class of microbiota-derived bile acids. Nat Chem Biol 11, 685–690 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Thomas JP, Modos D, Rushbrook SM, Powell N & Korcsmaros T The Emerging Role of Bile Acids in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front Immunol 13, 829525 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Hang S et al. Bile acid metabolites control TH17 and Treg cell differentiation. Nature 576, 143–148 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Paik D et al. Human gut bacteria produce ΤΗ17-modulating bile acid metabolites. Nature 603, 907–912 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Song X et al. Microbial bile acid metabolites modulate gut RORγ+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. Nature 577, 410–415 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sinha SR et al. Dysbiosis-Induced Secondary Bile Acid Deficiency Promotes Intestinal Inflammation. Cell Host & Microbe 27, 659–670.e5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Quinn RA et al. Global chemical effects of the microbiome include new bile-acid conjugations. Nature 579, 123–129 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Gentry EC et al. Reverse metabolomics for the discovery of chemical structures from humans. Nature 626, 419–426 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Agus A, Planchais J & Sokol H Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe 23, 716–724 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Cao Y et al. Commensal microbiota from patients with inflammatory bowel disease produce genotoxic metabolites. Science 378, eabm3233 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Schumacher F et al. A secondary metabolite of Brassicales, 1-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate, as well as its degradation product, 1-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl alcohol, forms DNA adducts in the mouse, but in varying tissues and cells. Arch Toxicol 88, 823–836 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Gronke K et al. Interleukin-22 protects intestinal stem cells against genotoxic stress. Nature 566, 249–253 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Nougayrède J-P et al. Escherichia coli induces DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Science 313, 848–851 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Furuichi M et al. Commensal consortia decolonize Enterobacteriaceae via ecological control. Nature 633, 878–886 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kim M et al. Critical Role for the Microbiota in CX3CR1+ Intestinal Mononuclear Phagocyte Regulation of Intestinal T Cell Responses. Immunity 49, 151–163.e5 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Viladomiu M et al. Adherent-invasive E. coli metabolism of propanediol in Crohn’s disease regulates phagocytes to drive intestinal inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 29, 607–619.e8 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Leonardi I et al. CX3CR1 + mononuclear phagocytes control immunity to intestinal fungi. Science 28];359(6372):232.–, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Doron I et al. Human gut mycobiota tune immunity via CARD9-dependent induction of anti-fungal IgG antibodies. Cell 18;184(4), 1017–1031.e14 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Britton GJ et al. Microbiotas from Humans with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Alter the Balance of Gut Th17 and RORγt+ Regulatory T Cells and Exacerbate Colitis in Mice. Immunity 50, 212–224.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Brockmann L et al. Intestinal microbiota-specific Th17 cells possess regulatory properties and suppress effector T cells via c-MAF and IL-10. Immunity 56, 2719–2735.e7 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kawano Y et al. Microbiota imbalance induced by dietary sugar disrupts immune-mediated protection from metabolic syndrome. Cell 185, 3501–3519.e20 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Macpherson AJ et al. A primitive T cell-independent mechanism of intestinal mucosal IgA responses to commensal bacteria. Science 288, 2222–2226 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Bunker JJ et al. Natural polyreactive IgA antibodies coat the intestinal microbiota. Science 358, eaan6619 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Ost KS et al. Adaptive immunity induces mutualism between commensal eukaryotes. Nature 596, 114–118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Arifuzzaman M et al. Inulin fibre promotes microbiota-derived bile acids and type 2 inflammation. Nature 611, 578–584 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Arifuzzaman M Dietary fiber is a critical determinant of pathologic ILC2 responses and intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med 221, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Cui W Diet-mediated constitutive induction of novel IL-4+ ILC2 cells maintains intestinal homeostasis in mice. J Exp Med 220, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Liao Y et al. Fungal symbiont transmitted by free-living mice promotes type 2 immunity. Nature 636, 697–704 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Horn V & Sonnenberg GF Group 3 innate lymphoid cells in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 21, 428–443 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Spits H Innate lymphoid cells–a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 145–149 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Nash AK et al. The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort. Microbiome 5, 153 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains Consortium et al. A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science 328, 994–999 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Auchtung TA et al. Investigating Colonization of the Healthy Adult Gastrointestinal Tract by Fungi. mSphere 3, e00092–18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Sokol H et al. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut 66, 1039–1048 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Chehoud C et al. Fungal Signature in the Gut Microbiota of Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21, 1948–1956 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Hoarau G et al. Bacteriome and Mycobiome Interactions Underscore Microbial Dysbiosis in Familial Crohn’s Disease. mBio 7, e01250–16 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Liguori G et al. Fungal Dysbiosis in Mucosa-associated Microbiota of Crohn’s Disease Patients. J Crohns Colitis 10, 296–305 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Ott SJ et al. Fungi and inflammatory bowel diseases: Alterations of composition and diversity. Scand J Gastroenterol 43, 831–841 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Li XV et al. Immune regulation by fungal strain diversity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 603, 672–678 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Pappas PG, Lionakis MS, Arendrup MC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L & Kullberg BJ Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4, 18026 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Limon JJ et al. Malassezia Is Associated with Crohn’s Disease and Exacerbates Colitis in Mouse Models. Cell Host & Microbe 25, 377–388.e6 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Auchtung TA et al. Temporal changes in gastrointestinal fungi and the risk of autoimmunity during early childhood: the TEDDY study. Nat Commun 13, 3151 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Iliev ID et al. Focus on fungi. Cell 187 (19), 5119–5482 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Lionakis MS, Drummond RA & Hohl TM Immune responses to human fungal pathogens and therapeutic prospects. Nat Rev Immunol 23, 433–452 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Malamud M et al. Recognition and control of neutrophil extracellular trap formation by MICL. Nature 633, 442–450 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Espinosa V et al. Type III interferon is a critical regulator of innate antifungal immunity. Sci. Immunol 2, eaan5357 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Mills KAM et al. GM-CSF–mediated epithelial-immune cell cross-talk orchestrates pulmonary immunity to Aspergillus fumigatus. Sci. Immunol 10, eadr0547 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Kusakabe T et al. Fungal microbiota sustains lasting immune activation of neutrophils and their progenitors in severe COVID-19. Nat Immunol 24, 1879–1889 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Tso GHW et al. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science 362, 589–595 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chen Y-H et al. Rewilding of laboratory mice enhances granulopoiesis and immunity through intestinal fungal colonization. Sci. Immunol 8, eadd6910 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Aggor FEY et al. Combinatorial actions of IL-22 and IL-17 drive optimal immunity to oral candidiasis through SPRRs. PLoS Pathog 20, e1012302 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Pierre JF et al. Peptide YY: A Paneth cell antimicrobial peptide that maintains Candida gut commensalism. Science 381, 502–508 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Aggor FEY et al. Oral epithelial IL-22/STAT3 signaling licenses IL-17–mediated immunity to oral mucosal candidiasis. Sci. Immunol 5, eaba0570 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Bacher P et al. Human Anti-fungal Th17 Immunity and Pathology Rely on Cross-Reactivity against Candida albicans. Cell 1355, (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Break TJ et al. Aberrant type 1 immunity drives susceptibility to mucosal fungal infections. Science 371, eaay5731 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Desai JV et al. C5a-licensed phagocytes drive sterilizing immunity during systemic fungal infection. Cell 186, 2802–2822.e22 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Sekeresova Kralova J et al. Competitive fungal commensalism mitigates candidiasis pathology. Journal of Experimental Medicine 221, e20231686 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Clooney AG et al. Whole-Virome Analysis Sheds Light on Viral Dark Matter in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Host Microbe 26, 764–778.e5 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Adiliaghdam F et al. Human enteric viruses autonomously shape inflammatory bowel disease phenotype through divergent innate immunomodulation. Sci. Immunol 7, eabn6660 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Gogokhia L et al. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe 25, 285–299.e8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ungaro F et al. Metagenomic analysis of intestinal mucosa revealed a specific eukaryotic gut virome signature in early-diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes 10, 149–158 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Cadwell K et al. Virus-Plus-Susceptibility Gene Interaction Determines Crohn’s Disease Gene Atg16L1 Phenotypes in Intestine. Cell 141, 1135–1145 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Norman JM et al. Disease-Specific Alterations in the Enteric Virome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell 160, 447–460 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Gogokhia L et al. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe 299, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Moltke J, Ji M, Liang HE & Locksley RM Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature 529, 221–225 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Howitt MR Tuft cells, taste-chemosensory cells, orchestrate parasite type 2 immunity in the gut. Science 351, 1329–1333 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Gerbe F Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature 529, 226–230 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Nadjsombati MS Detection of Succinate by Intestinal Tuft Cells Triggers a Type 2 Innate Immune Circuit. Immunity 49, 33–41 37 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Schneider C A Metabolite-Triggered Tuft Cell-ILC2 Circuit Drives Small Intestinal Remodeling. Cell 174, 271–284 214 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Lei W Activation of intestinal tuft cell-expressed Sucnr1 triggers type 2 immunity in the mouse small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 5552–5557 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Fung C Tuft cells mediate commensal remodeling of the small intestinal antimicrobial landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120, 2216908120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Banerjee A Succinate Produced by Intestinal Microbes Promotes Specification of Tuft Cells to Suppress Ileal Inflammation. Gastroenterology 159, 2101–2115 2105 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Sonnert ND, Rosen CE & Ghazi AR A host-microbiota interactome reveals extensive transkingdom connectivity. Nature 628, 171–179 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Zhang S, Morgan X & Dogan B Mucosal metabolites fuel the growth and virulence of E. coli linked to Crohn’s disease. JCI Insight 7, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Gogokhia L et al. Donor composition and fiber promote strain engraftment in a randomized controlled trial of fecal microbiota transplant for ulcerative colitis. Med 100707 (2025) doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2025.100707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Brodel AK, Charpenay LH & Galtier M In situ targeted base editing of bacteria in the mouse gut. Nature 632, 877–884 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Russell BJ, Brown SD & Siguenza N Intestinal transgene delivery with native E. coli chassis allows persistent physiological changes. Cell 185, 3263–3277 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Galtier M, Sordi L & Sivignon A Bacteriophages Targeting Adherent Invasive Escherichia coli Strains as a Promising New Treatment for Crohn’s Disease. J Crohns Colitis 11, 840–847 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Federici S, Kredo-Russo S & Valdes-Mas R Targeted suppression of human IBD-associated gut microbiota commensals by phage consortia for treatment of intestinal inflammation. Cell 185, 24 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Sharma P et al. The Next Decade of Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Cancer Discovery 11, 838–857 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Blake SJ, Wolf Y, Boursi B & Lynn DJ Role of the microbiota in response to and recovery from cancer therapy. Nat Rev Immunol 24, 308–325 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Matson V et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti–PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 359, 104–108 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Sivan A et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti–PD-L1 efficacy. Science 350, 1084–1089 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Derosa L et al. Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med 28, 315–324 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Fidelle M et al. A microbiota-modulated checkpoint directs immunosuppressive intestinal T cells into cancers. Science 380, eabo2296 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Gopalakrishnan V et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 359, 97–103 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Vétizou M et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science 350, 1079–1084 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Routy B et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 359, 91–97 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Griffin ME et al. Enterococcus peptidoglycan remodeling promotes checkpoint inhibitor cancer immunotherapy. Science 373, 1040–1046 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.McCulloch JA et al. Intestinal microbiota signatures of clinical response and immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1. Nat Med 28, 545–556 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Baruch EN et al. Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science 371, 602–609 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Davar D et al. Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti–PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients. Science 371, 595–602 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Martins F et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16, 563–580 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Wang Y, Jenq RR, Wargo JA & Watowich SS Microbiome influencers of checkpoint blockade–associated toxicity. J. Exp. Med 220, 20220948 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Lo BC Microbiota-dependent activation of CD4 + T cells induces CTLA-4 blockade–associated colitis via Fcγ receptors. Science 383, 62–70 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Hu ZI Immune checkpoint inhibitors unleash pathogenic immune responses against the microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 119, 2200348119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Wang Y et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis. Nat Med 24, 1804–1808 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Wang F, Yin Q, Chen L & Davis MM Bifidobacterium can mitigate intestinal immunopathology in the context of CTLA-4 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 157–161 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Imdad A, Pandit NG & Zaman M Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD012774, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Paramsothy S, Nielsen S & Kamm MA Specific Bacteria and Metabolites Associated With Response to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 156, 1440–1454 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Lima SF, Gogokhia L & Viladomiu M Transferable Immunoglobulin A-Coated Odoribacter splanchnicus in Responders to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis Limits Colonic Inflammation. Gastroenterology 162, 166–178 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Quevrain E, Maubert MA & Michon C Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut 65, 415–425 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Haifer C, Paramsothy S & Kaakoush NO Lyophilised oral faecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis (LOTUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 141–151 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Zheng W, Zhao S & Yin Y High-throughput, single-microbe genomics with strain resolution, applied to a human gut microbiome. Science 376:eabm1483, (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Reichart NJ, Steiger AK & Fossen EM Selection and enrichment of microbial species with an increased lignocellulolytic phenotype from a native soil microbiome by activity-based probing. ISME Commun 3, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Han L, Pendleton A & Singh A Chemoproteomic profiling of substrate specificity in gut microbiota-associated bile salt hydrolases. Cell Chem Biol (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Choi Y et al. Immune checkpoint blockade induces gut microbiota translocation that augments extraintestinal antitumor immunity. SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Jia D et al. Microbial metabolite enhances immunotherapy efficacy by modulating T cell stemness in pan-cancer. Cell 187, 1651–1665.e21 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.He Y et al. Gut microbial metabolites facilitate anticancer therapy efficacy by modulating cytotoxic CD8+ T cell immunity. Cell Metabolism 33, 988–1000.e7 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Mager LF et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science 369, 1481–1489 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Lam KC et al. Microbiota triggers STING-type I IFN-dependent monocyte reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 184, 5338–5356.e21 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Galloway-Peña J, Iliev ID & McAllister F Fungi in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 24, 295–298 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Dohlman et al. The multi-kingdom cancer microbiome. Nature Microbiol (2025) doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02103-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Coutzac C et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat Commun 11, 2168 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Fluckiger A et al. Cross-reactivity between tumor MHC class I–restricted antigens and an enterococcal bacteriophage. Science 369, 936–942 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Naghavian R et al. Microbial peptides activate tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Nature 617, 807–817 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Kalaora S et al. Identification of bacteria-derived HLA-bound peptides in melanoma. Nature 592, 138–143 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Lancaster SM, Lee-McMullen B & Abbott CW Global, distinctive, and personal changes in molecular and microbial profiles by specific fibers in humans. Cell Host Microbe 30, 7 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Wastyk HC, Fragiadakis GK & Perelman D Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modulate human immune status. Cell 184, 14 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Delannoy-Bruno O, Desai C & Raman AS Evaluating microbiome-directed fibre snacks in gnotobiotic mice and humans. Nature 595, 91–95 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Mocanu V, Zhang Z & Deehan EC Fecal microbial transplantation and fiber supplementation in patients with severe obesity and metabolic syndrome: a randomized double-blind. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Kedia S, Virmani S & KV S Faecal microbiota transplantation with anti-inflammatory diet (FMT-AID) followed by anti-inflammatory diet alone is effective in inducing and maintaining remission over 1 year in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 71, 2401–2413 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Costello SP, Day A & Yao CK Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with dietary therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis. BMJ Case Rep 13, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Killinger BJ, Whidbey C & Sadler NC Activity-based protein profiling identifies alternating activation of enzymes involved in the bifidobacterium shunt pathway or mucin degradation in the gut microbiome response to soluble dietary fiber. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 8, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Park HB, Wei Z & Oh J Sulfamethoxazole drug stress upregulates antioxidant immunomodulatory metabolites in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol 5, 1319–1329 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Lima SF, Pires S & Rupert A The gut microbiome regulates the clinical efficacy of sulfasalazine therapy for IBD-associated spondyloarthritis. Cell Rep Med 2024,. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Turnbaugh PJ et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 1027–1031 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Link VM et al. Differential peripheral immune signatures elicited by vegan versus ketogenic diets in humans. Nat Med 30, 560–572 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Siracusa F et al. Short-term dietary changes can result in mucosal and systemic immune depression. Nat Immunol (2023) doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01587-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Jeong M & Collins N Nutritional modulation of antitumor immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology 87, 102422 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Collins N & Belkaid Y Control of immunity via nutritional interventions. Immunity 55, 210–223 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Spencer CN et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science 374, 1632–1640 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Simpson RC et al. Diet-driven microbial ecology underpins associations between cancer immunotherapy outcomes and the gut microbiome. Nat Med 28, 2344–2352 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Collins N et al. The Bone Marrow Protects and Optimizes Immunological Memory during Dietary Restriction. Cell 178, 1088–1101.e15 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Mao Y-Q et al. The antitumour effects of caloric restriction are mediated by the gut microbiome. Nat Metab 5, 96–110 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Han S-J et al. Microbiota configuration determines nutritional immune optimization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 120, e2304905120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Bolte LA et al. Association of a Mediterranean Diet With Outcomes for Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Advanced Melanoma. JAMA Oncol 9, 705 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Lussier DM et al. Enhanced immunity in a mouse model of malignant glioma is mediated by a therapeutic ketogenic diet. BMC Cancer 16, 310 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Ferrere G et al. Ketogenic diet and ketone bodies enhance the anticancer effects of PD-1 blockade. JCI Insight 6, e145207 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Rubio-Patiño C et al. Low-Protein Diet Induces IRE1α-Dependent Anticancer Immunosurveillance. Cell Metabolism 27, 828–842.e7 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Messaoudene M et al. A Natural Polyphenol Exerts Antitumor Activity and Circumvents Anti–PD-1 Resistance through Effects on the Gut Microbiota. Cancer Discovery 12, 1070–1087 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Huang J et al. Ginseng polysaccharides alter the gut microbiota and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, potentiating the antitumour effect of antiprogrammed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy. Gut 71, 734–745 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Schulz MD et al. High-fat-diet-mediated dysbiosis promotes intestinal carcinogenesis independently of obesity. Nature 514, 508–512 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Nakatsu G, Andreeva N, MacDonald MH & Garrett WS Interactions between diet and gut microbiota in cancer. Nat Microbiol 9, 1644–1654 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Wang Z et al. Paradoxical effects of obesity on T cell function during tumor progression and PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 25, 141–151 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Bader JE et al. Obesity induces PD-1 on macrophages to suppress anti-tumour immunity. Nature (2024) doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07529-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Zeevi D et al. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell 163, 1079–1094 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
