Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2025 Nov 4;91(12):e01403-25. doi: 10.1128/aem.01403-25

Regulation of a nickel tolerance operon conserved in Mesorhizobium strains from serpentine soils

Kyson T Jensen 1, Joel S Griffitts 1,✉
Editor: Isaac Cann2
PMCID: PMC12724321  PMID: 41186405

ABSTRACT

The Mesorhizobium nre (nickel resistance) operon has previously been shown to mediate Ni tolerance in serpentine soils with naturally high concentrations of this transition metal. In most serpentine-derived strains evaluated, the putative efflux genes nreX and nreY are conserved, along with a small gene (nreA) encoding a CsoR/RcnR-family transcriptional regulator. CsoR/RcnR-family regulators are small (around 100 amino acids in length); they bind transition metals; and they use an unconventional and poorly understood DNA-binding mechanism. NreA is 93 amino acids in length and belongs to a poorly characterized clade within the CsoR/RcnR family. This investigation is focused on regulatory DNA elements that functionally interact with Mesorhizobium NreA, as well as amino acid residues in NreA that influence its regulatory activity. We show that NreA is a transcriptional repressor that is responsive to exogenous Ni. The Ni-responsive promoter is immediately upstream of the nreAXY operon, resulting in a leaderless transcript. An operator sequence with dyad symmetry occupies the spacer region between the −35 and −10 promoter elements. Mutational analysis of this operator highlights functionally crucial base pairs occupying opposite ends of the 19 bp element. Changes to conserved residues in the NreA polypeptide result in varying effects, with changes predicted to prevent Ni binding leading to a super-repressor phenotype. Structural modeling of the NreA-operator complex provides a plausible mechanism for DNA binding by a tetrameric form of NreA, with DNA contact sites along a positively charged surface. The modeled contact sites agree well with the mutational analysis.

IMPORTANCE

Bacteria employ diverse mechanisms for maintaining optimal intracellular levels of bioactive metals. Isolates of Mesorhizobium bacteria from Ni-rich serpentine soils possess a small genetic region controlling Ni efflux. This region is subject to transcriptional regulation via the small repressor protein NreA. In this work, the essential components of the NreA protein and the DNA operator with which it interacts are defined, enabling potential adaptation of this system for metal sensing or other technologies requiring a compact inducible gene expression module.

KEYWORDS: metalloregulation, CsoR/RcnR family

INTRODUCTION

Bacteria have evolved diverse mechanisms to cope with metal stress, including efflux, sequestration, and detoxification of toxic metal ions (1–3). The fitness costs associated with these systems, as well as the need to precisely regulate the balance of intracellular metals, require bacteria to maintain precise control of metal stress responses (4). This control is primarily implemented through metal-responsive transcription factors or metalloregulators (5). Metalloregulators, which may be transcriptional activators or repressors, are generally homo-oligomeric proteins that interact with DNA-binding sites in upstream regulatory regions for genes controlling metal homeostasis. Metalloregulators also interact with specific metal ions that modulate binding to cognate DNA-binding sites (1, 2).

Repressors from the CsoR/RcnR metalloregulator family have received attention due to their small size and poorly defined mechanism of DNA binding (6–8). CsoR is a Cu-responsive regulator used by various gram-positive bacteria, and RcnR is a Ni- and Co-responsive regulator found in gram-negative enteric bacteria, including Escherichia coli (9, 10). Crystal structures of CsoR from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Streptococcus lividans reveal a homodimeric or homotetrameric complex of alpha-helical bundles in which metal ions are coordinated in a cysteine- and histidine-containing coordination site formed at an intersubunit bridge (9, 11). A DNA-bound structure for this family has not been reported, though it has been presumed that a face of the tetrameric structure with strong positive electrostatic potential may mediate DNA binding (6, 8, 12, 13). Cu binding drives CsoR disengagement from operator DNA, and alterations to CsoR that prevent metal binding cause constitutive repression of the regulated operon (9, 14, 15). Metal coordination sites in CsoR and RcnR family members appear to be located at analogous intersubunit positions, though copper binding to CsoR is mediated by a Cys2His1 motif, while Ni/Co binding to RcnR is mediated by a Cys1His3 motif (9, 16).

Serpentine soils, defined by their unusual underlying geology, tend to be less hospitable to life because of stressful ionic imbalances and high levels of transition metals such as Cr, Co, and Ni (17). Ni levels in serpentine soils vary somewhat, ranging from 0.05 to 1.5 mM (18). A recent study of Mesorhizobium isolates from Ni-rich serpentine soils pointed us to a conserved Ni resistance operon containing a gene for a CsoR/RcnR-like protein that we termed NreA (18). The nreA gene is the most upstream in an operon that also encodes two independently functioning Ni efflux transporters: NreX and NreY (18). Here we characterize the mechanism by which NreA transcriptionally regulates the nreAXY operon.

RESULTS

Conserved sequences point to a minimal nreAXY promoter/operator

Mesorhizobium strain C089B is derived from a serpentine soil plot at McLaughlin natural reserve (California, USA) and contains an nreAXY operon that has previously been shown to mediate Ni tolerance (Fig. 1A [18]). The NreA polypeptide is similar in sequence to members of the CsoR/RcnR metalloregulator family, though it fits best into a phylogenetic clade with other uncharacterized NreA-like proteins from alpha- and beta-proteobacteria (Fig. 1B). In an initial attempt to discern a cis-acting regulatory region upstream of nreA that may be controlled by NreA, we compared sequences from 21 additional serpentine soil-derived Mesorhizobium strains (Fig. 1C). This DNA sequence alignment encompassed the nreA start codon on the right and approximately 65 bp upstream of the start codon. The sequence logo generated in Fig. 1C highlights a strongly conserved TTG motif most likely constituting the −35 RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding motif. A TAGNAT motif 20 bp to the right of this is likely a corresponding −10 RNAP binding motif. There is a strongly conserved, inverted-repeat sequence positioned between these putative −35 and −10 elements (the spacer region), which we presumed may function as an NreA operator. Notably, these elements occur quite close to the nreA start codon, suggesting they control transcription of an mRNA devoid of any substantial 5′ untranslated sequence.

Fig 1.

The diagram depicts the nre operon arrangement with genes nreA, nreX, and nreY, phylogenetic tree comparing NreA and CsoR homologs across species, and sequence alignment with conserved promoter motifs and putative operator near the nreA start codon.

Comparison of nreA upstream regions points to probable regulatory elements. (A) Map of the nre operon identified in the Ni island of Mesorhizobium strain C089B. (B) Protein phylogenetic tree of members of the CsoR/RcnR family of transcriptional regulators. Support values are in red, and the scale bar indicates substitutions per site; NreA, CsoR, and RcnR clades are represented with blue, orange, and green lines, respectively. (C) Multiple sequence alignment of the nre upstream region from 21 different Mesorhizobium isolates, including C089B. Proposed promoter/operator elements are labeled, with arrows showing inverted repeats.

The conserved upstream sequence elements in the alignment in Fig. 1C set the stage for plasmid-based lacZ reporter analyses. We probed the functionality of a 120 bp upstream region or truncated variants thereof (Fig. 2A). Reporter assays were facilitated by a broad-host range shuttle vector (pKJ138, Fig. 2B) containing lacZ with a synthetic ribosome-binding site (RBS). This vector can accommodate the presence (pKJ140) or absence (pKJ138) of nreA downstream of the constitutively expressed kanamycin (Km) resistance gene. In this context, nreA possesses a strong RBS and is uncoupled from the transcriptional control region under investigation (see Fig. 2B). Most of the reporter gene tests described here were carried out in Agrobacterium fabrum, owing to its faster growth and easier genetic manipulation compared to wild Mesorhizobium strains. Using A. fabrum, we could also more confidently avoid potential cross-talk with co-evolving Mesorhizobium regulatory pathways.

Fig 2.

The diagram depicts promoter sequence with marked regions plasmid construct design, bar graphs comparing lacZ expression in A. fabrum and E. coli under NreA presence and nickel chloride, and alignment of operator mutations influencing promoter activity.

Identification of a minimal nre promoter and its functional elements. (A) Upstream sequence of the nre operon in strain C089B. Underlined sequences indicate 5′-truncated variants −39 and −30. Bolded characters represent a proposed −35 element, −10 element, and the translational start site. (B) Map of the binary reporter plasmid used to test promoter truncations and mutations in either A. fabrum or E. coli. pKJ138 is nreA−, while pKJ140 is nreA+. (C) Reporter gene activity from truncations of the nre promoter region. A. fabrum cells harboring lacZ fusions with or without nreA were grown in the presence or absence of supplemental NiCl2, and β-galactosidase activity was measured in Miller units (MU). Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean (n = 6). P values for t-tests of important comparisons are given. (D) Sequence alignment showing the −39 loss of function (LOF) and −39 gain of function (GOF) mutations (green). Underlined are putative −35 and −10 elements. Red denotes the putative operator sequence, and inverted arrows indicate the inverted repeats within this sequence. (E and F) Functional comparisons of promoter mutants shown in panel D were carried out in both A. fabrum (E) and E. coli (F). Data are formatted as in panel C. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean (n = 6). P values for t-tests of important comparisons are given.

When the full 120 bp region is tested in this system, we observe high-level expression that is repressed by nreA co-expression, and this nreA-dependent repression is alleviated by 1 mM NiCl2 (Fig. 2C). This Ni concentration was chosen because it is the highest concentration that allows both robust reporter gene expression and growth of A. fabrum. It is also within the range of Ni concentrations found in natural serpentine soils. We next tested whether truncation of the promoter region to the −39 position would still support Ni-inducible expression, supposing that maintenance of the core −35 and −10 promoter elements, as well as the putative operator, would allow regulated expression similar to the full-length 120 bp segment. The −39 construct supports reporter gene expression that is repressed by NreA and induced by Ni, but induced expression levels are lower by approximately threefold compared to the full-length construct (Fig. 2C). This may be explained by a positive regulatory element existing somewhere in the −120 to −39 region. However, given the robust inducible response we observed from the −39 construct, we proceeded to characterize the regulatory features within this much shorter sequence. As expected, the −30 construct did not support reporter gene expression under any condition, presumably due to loss of the −35 TTG element (Fig. 2C). In further support of the role of the −35 TTG element as a positive regulatory element, mutation of this sequence to AAC within the context of the −39 construct (−39 loss of function [LOF], Fig. 2D) yielded undetectable expression (Fig. 2E). On the other hand, a 3 bp change to the −39 construct designed to bring both the −35 and −10 elements closer to a prokaryotic promoter consensus sequence (−39 gain of function [GOF], Fig. 2D) led to greatly increased expression while maintaining the NreA-dependent, Ni-inducible property (Fig. 2E). Under inducing conditions, −39GOF supports approximately 16-fold higher expression, more than compensating for loss of the transcriptionally enhancing activity present in the −120 to −39 region. The −39GOF-lacZ construct also supports expression in the more distantly related E. coli, and this expression is also NreA repressed and Ni induced (Fig. 2F). In our attempt to enhance these positive regulatory elements, we intentionally avoided changes to the putative repressor-binding operator comprising the −30 to −12 region (red in Fig. 2D).

The nreAXY operon is expressed as a leaderless mRNA

The close proximity of the proposed promoter elements to the nreA start codon suggests that the transcript may be leaderless or may contain only a few untranslated nucleotides. Sequencing results from 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′-RACE) support production of a leaderless transcript (Fig. 3). This test was carried out using an A. fabrum strain carrying the PnreA-lacZ −120 construct described above. This reporter fusion includes the first two base pairs of the native nreA start codon fused to a synthetic ribosome-binding site for efficient translation of the lacZ coding sequence, as illustrated in Fig. 3. In this context, the mRNA 5′ end mapped to the A nucleotide that corresponds to the native nreA AUG start codon. Unfortunately, difficulty in isolating quality RNA from Mesorhizobium cells prevented this test from being carried out in the strain naturally harboring the nreAXY operon. This finding defines the +1 site of transcription, as well as confirms the locations of the −10 and −35 promoter elements proposed above.

Fig 3.

The diagram depicts a native promoter sequence aligned with a promoter-lacZ fusion containing transcription start site indicators and sequence trace from 5 prime RACE confirming transcription initiation within the fused promoter region.

Identification of the nre transcription start site by 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′-RACE). Analysis was carried out in A. fabrum carrying a promoter-lacZ fusion that includes the first two nucleotides of the native nreA start codon (**). Underlined are the −35 and −10 elements of the nre promoter. The first nucleotide of the detected transcript is shown in green. Bottom, inverted bottom-strand sequence trace acquired after poly-A tailing of the reverse-transcription product and subsequent PCR amplification.

Inverted repeats of the nre operator sequence are vital for repression

We next evaluated the role of the −30 to −12 spacer sequence, which we presumed to be the site of negative regulation by NreA. A set of mutant reporter fusions constituting a “scan” of AAA substitutions was tested (Fig. 4), and expression values indicate that the distal inverted repeats of this spacer (i.e., TCCN9GGA) are particularly crucial for negative regulation: both the TCC→AAA (o_mut1) and the GGA→AAA (o_mut5) substitutions result in fully constitutive reporter gene expression. The three AAA substitutions across the central N9 region (o_mut2 through o_mut4) resulted in more weakly constitutive phenotypes compared to the wild-type operator (owt). In other words, these more central AAA mutants are mostly inducible (see Fig. 4B).

Fig 4.

The diagram depicts the promoter sequence with the proposed operator region containing multiple mutations, and the bar graph compares lacZ expression under different operator variants with and without nickel chloride.

Identification of operator elements essential for NreA-mediated regulation. (A) Mutational analysis of the operator site. Black/bold: −35 and −10 elements; red/bold: mutations; black/underlined: inverted repeats. (B) Reporter gene activity resulting from mutations shown in panel A. A. fabrum cells (nreA+) harboring lacZ fusions were grown in the presence or absence of supplemental NiCl2, and β-galactosidase activity was measured in MU. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean (n = 6). P values are given based on comparisons with o_wt under identical growth conditions.

The TCCN9GGA operator sequence from Mesorhizobium strain C089B (owt) has dyad symmetry, and we know from results just presented that the distal ends of the inverted repeats are particularly crucial for operator function. The consensus sequence derived from an alignment of 22 Mesorhizobium nre promoter/operator regions (Fig. 1C) is more extensively symmetric, with the sequence TATCCYCtccrgGRGGATA, and some strains such as C089B contain a particularly G-rich sequence through the central region. It has been proposed for the metalloregulators RcnR and CsoR that a similar G-rich operator sequence may bring the DNA into an alternative hybrid A/B form to facilitate repressor binding (15, 19). In Fig. 4, operator variants o_mut6 through o_mut10 represent various alternative sequences that either increase the dyad symmetry of the central region or lessen its G-richness. In all cases, the variant operators support robust NreA-dependent repression and Ni inducibility. That one of these variants (o_mut8) has considerably less G-rich content and likely does not take on the alternative A/B hybrid DNA configuration suggests that NreA may be able to function on operators composed of ordinary B-form DNA. We investigated whether operators o_mut6 through o_mut10 might support even stronger repression than the native operator, owt. We explored this low-range (leaky) expression by adding cells cultured overnight in the absence of Ni to our standard Miller assay and incubating the reaction for an extended period. Operators o_mut7 and o_mut10 exhibit three times more repression than owt, with o_mut8 being intermediate in repression (Fig. 5). These three clones share the GG→CA substitution in the middle of the operator, suggesting that this specific change leads to stronger repressor binding. Operator variants o_mut6 and o_mut9, which do not contain the GG→CA substitution, are somewhat weaker in repression than owt.

Fig 5.

The bar graph depicts lacZ expression for wild-type and operator mutants under zero millimolar nickel chloride condition with values and significance levels comparing promoter activity differences among o_wt, o_mut6, o_mut7, o_mut8, o_mut9, and o_mut10.

Comparison of expression levels from operator variants in medium without supplemental Ni. A. fabrum cells (nreA+) with lacZ fusions were measured for β-galactosidase activity (MU) after overnight culture and with an extended incubation time for the enzyme assay. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean (n = 12). P values are given based on comparisons with o_wt under identical conditions.

Potential alternative NreA-responsive operators in the C089B genome

We carried out a search for other sequences in the Mesorhizobium C089B genome (NCBI accession number NZ_CP100469.1) that resemble the operator characterized above. As query sequences, we used both the native C089B nreAXY operator as well as the consensus operator derived from the alignment shown in Fig. 1C. We were able to identify several other candidate operator sequences (Table 3). One of the sequences is remarkably similar to the nreAXY operator and is located 2.07 Mb away, directly upstream of an nreA-like gene, which we named nreA2. For a comparison of these two sequences, see Fig. S1. Interestingly, nreA2 is likely co-transcribed with an adjacent downstream gene encoding an NreX-like transport protein (nreX2) (Fig. S1). Based on amino acid sequence alignments, NreA and NreA2 are 55% identical, and NreX and NreX2 are 68% identical. It is therefore possible that these two operons function with some redundancy, although we have previously shown that the nreXY deletion in C089B confers considerable loss of Ni tolerance (18).

Conserved NreA residues influence either DNA-binding or metal-binding activities

The Mesorhizobium NreA protein bears extensive sequence similarity to CsoR/RcnR family members (Fig. 6A). We generated a structural model of an NreA tetramer (Fig. 6B), and this model corresponds well with a representative crystal structure of CsoR from Thermus thermophilus HB8 (PDB 3AAI, root mean square [RMS] score of 1.443). The amino acids best conserved in the sequence alignment generally correspond either to an intersubunit metal-binding pocket (NreA residues C38, H63, H66, and C67) or to a potential DNA-binding surface (NreA residues R17, R20, Q44, and K91). We performed inducibility tests for strains in which each of these conserved NreA residues was substituted with alanine. In Fig. 6C, we see that alterations across the putative DNA-binding surface yield mostly or completely constitutive phenotypes, consistent with loss of operator binding. Substitutions around the putative Ni-binding pocket, on the other hand, give rise to mostly or completely super-repressing phenotypes; that is, repression persists even in the presence of Ni. The partial functionality of the H66A variant is consistent with the structural model (Fig. 6B), which places this residue at a location peripheral to the binding pocket. On the other hand, the alanine substitutions to more interior Cys/His residues (C38A, H63A, and C67A) result in strong repression that is no longer relieved by exogenous Ni.

Fig 6.

The diagram depicts sequence alignments with conserved residues and molecular model of NreA protein with amino acid positions, and the bar graph compares lacZ expression for DNA and nickel-binding site mutants under different nickel chloride conditions.

Influence of conserved NreA residues on NreA-mediated transcriptional regulation. (A) Protein alignment of NreA and CsoR/RcnR family members from diverse bacteria. Boxes indicate conserved residues that were individually altered in this experiment. Blue asterisks denote residues thought to be involved in DNA binding, and red asterisks denote residues implicated in metal binding. (B) AlphaFold 3 prediction of the metal-bound form of NreA with proposed conserved DNA-interacting residues highlighted in blue. The different subunits of the NreA tetramer are colored (orange, red, green, and cyan). One of the four metal ions in this model is partially visible and indicated with a box. In the close-in view of the modeled metal-binding pocket, the ion has been removed from this rendering for clarity. (C) Reporter gene activity resulting from amino acid substitutions of NreA. A. fabrum cells harboring lacZ fusions to the −39GOF promoter/operator were grown in the presence or absence of supplemental NiCl2. β-Galactosidase activity was measured in MU. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean (n = 6). P values are given based on comparisons with wild-type NreA under identical conditions.

DISCUSSION

We have characterized the transcriptional control of a metal-responsive operon (nreAXY) in Mesorhizobium initially discovered for its role in evolutionary adaptation to Ni-rich serpentine soils (18, 20). Using phylogenetic analysis coupled with a heterologous Agrobacterium-based reporter system, we have identified NreA (a CsoR/RcnR family member) as a Ni-responsive transcriptional repressor, as well as cis-acting DNA sequences crucial to metalloregulation of this operon. We have further implicated specific residues in the NreA repressor as being important for either DNA binding or metal-mediated transcriptional induction.

Naturally diverse alleles of the nre operon in Mesorhizobium allowed us to pinpoint cis-acting regulatory sequences under strong selective pressure, and we mapped this cis-regulatory region to a remarkably compact segment of DNA comprising the 39 bp upstream of the nreA start codon. An operator sequence with dyad symmetry positioned within the −35/−10 spacer segment mediates repression by NreA. Operators interacting with CsoR/RcnR repressors are divided into two general types: type 1 operators consist of a central GC-tract flanked by inverted repeats, while type 2 operators consist of a longer central region with two or more G/C tracts flanked by inverted repeats. In some CsoR/RcnR-controlled promoters, two operator sequences (of either type) may be situated in close proximity with each other (15, 19). The NreA operator (TATCCtctcgggggGGATA) is type 1, with a single G7 tract. The inverted repeats flanking the central G-rich region are critical for NreA-mediated repression (Fig. 4). Mutations to the G-rich central region result in more subtle de-repression phenotypes. However, operator variants designed to increase dyad symmetry or to reduce G-richness while maintaining the consensus sequence retained repression, with some yielding stronger repression than the wild-type operator (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that NreA may function independently of DNA structural features such as A/B-form hybrids, which have been proposed to facilitate RcnR binding to G-rich operators (10, 15, 19). Indeed, NreA-interacting operator variants with a central GG→CA mutation showed enhanced repression, and a more severe GGG→AAA mutation (Fig. 4, o_mut4) retains some operator activity, indicating that specific base pair contacts, rather than overall helical structure, may dominate NreA-DNA interactions (see Fig. S2). Discerning sequence-specific and structure-mediated modes of operator-NreA interaction would require further investigation.

Like other CsoR/RcnR family members, NreA monomers are small (93 aa in length). While proteins in this family form alpha-helical bundles as monomers, they tend to form higher-order tetrameric structures (dimer of dimers) (9, 10, 15, 19, 21, 22). A structural model for NreA in a metal-bound state was generated, and this model places a metal-binding pocket with highly conserved His and Cys residues at intersubunit junctions (Fig. 6C). Alanine substitution of the putative metal-coordinating residues (C38, H63, and C67) resulted in a super-repressed state in our reporter assay system, consistent with failure to respond to the Ni inducer (Fig. 6D). None of these metal-binding pocket substitutions mimicked a metal-bound (promoter-ON) phenotype; this may be attributed to the NreA tetramer being in a relaxed, DNA-binding state in the apo form, with metal binding introducing tension and DNA release. Substitutions containing side chains that are more bulky or positively charged may lead to metal-mimicking, non-repressing NreA variants. Only the tetrameric (or larger) configuration of NreA forms a modeled structure with the potential to bind metals and the operator of the sequence we have determined in this work. Computational docking of the operator to the NreA tetramer confirms a generally good fit to a positively charged surface on the tetramer (Fig. S2). Using structure-guided substitutions, we show that NreA-mediated repression is dependent on a set of conserved residues likely located on this DNA-binding surface (Fig. 6B and C).

While considerable polymorphism exists among nre-containing Mesorhizobium strains—even in the nreAXY promoter region—they appear to uniformly produce a leaderless mRNA transcript devoid of a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) translation initiation enhancer, suggesting an adaptive advantage associated with this unusual mRNA structure. An apparent association between leaderless transcription and stress responses has previously been discussed (23, 24). When leaderless mRNAs engage directly with 70S ribosomes, certain time- and energy-consuming steps associated with conventional SD-mediated translation initiation are bypassed; in stressful circumstances, this enhanced economy may support more rapid stress-response protein expression.

From an applied perspective, the NreA-controlled promoter/operator, with some engineering, is functional in A. fabrum and E. coli, demonstrating its broad portability and independence from species-specific factors. The full regulatory module (promoter/operator and repressor-coding sequence) can be encoded on as little as 330 bp of DNA while enabling strongly inducible transgene expression. This genetic module is amenable to engineering for tuning the strength of repression or induction and possibly shifting metal specificity. Such a module could be adapted for use as a biosensor of various metals of biological and environmental importance. For example, the −39GOF version of the nreA promoter responds to exogenous Ni as low as 0.0625 mM (Fig. S3). Super-repressor variants of NreA may be useful as compact DNA-binding reagents for applications such as in vivo locus tracking or plasmid display.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Strains used were Mesorhizobium C089B (18), Agrobacterium fabrum D224 (a streptomycin [Sm]-resistant variant of UBAPF2) (25), Escherichia coli DH5α (26), and DH5α-based conjugation helper strain B001 (27). Cells were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 5 g/L NaCl2). When appropriate, 12 g/L of agar was added as a solidifying agent. Media supplements and antibiotics were as follows: Sm (200 µg/mL), Km (30 µg/mL), neomycin (Nm, 100 µg/mL), chloramphenicol (30 µg/mL), and nickel(II) chloride (1 mM). Mesorhizobium and Agrobacterium strains were grown at 30°C, and E. coli strains were grown at 37°C. Triparental matings were carried out at 30°C. All engineered strains used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the Supplemental Materials.

Plasmid and strain construction

For testing promoter/operator constructs in A. fabrum, lacZ reporter plasmids pKJ138 (nreA−) and pKJ140 (nreA+) were used (Fig. 2B). These plasmids include a p15A origin for replication in E. coli and a pVS1 ori/sta cassette for replication and stability in A. fabrum. The RK2 oriT is included to make the plasmids mobilizable, and the E. coli lacZ reporter gene is appended with a strong synthetic RBS. For pKJ140, nreA is cloned with a synthetic RBS immediately downstream of the Km/Nm resistance gene, and expression of this bicistronic operon is presumed to be constitutive. Complete annotated sequences for pKJ138 and pKJ140 are given in the Supplemental Materials. Promoter/operator variants (assembled as hybridized oligonucleotides) were ligated upstream of lacZ using BamHI and XbaI sites (Table 1). For creating NreA alanine substitution variants (Table 2), the wild-type nreA gene was first cloned in the small plasmid, pKJ213 (Fig. S4, sequence in the Supplemental Materials), with which mutagenesis oligonucleotides were used to incorporate changes via inverse-PCR followed by circularization with T4 DNA ligase and T4 polynucleotide kinase. The resulting nreA variants were then amplified with primers oKJ614 and oKJ615 and inserted into pKJ227 (pKJ138 with the −39GOF promoter/operator), via a KpnI site. All oligonucleotide sequences used for producing promoter/operator and nreA variants are given in Table S2 in the Supplemental Materials. All plasmids used in this study were verified by Sanger sequencing. Reporter plasmids were transferred to A. fabrum D224 via triparental mating using the helper strain (B001) and donor strain (DH5α) containing the experimental plasmids. For conjugation, strain mixtures were co-cultured on LB agar at 30°C for 4–24 h and plated on LB agar containing Sm and Nm.

TABLE 1.

Variant promoter/operator sequences used in this study

Variant Test plasmid(s)a Sequenceb Oligonucleotides
−120 truncation pKJ217/218 ggatccAATTCGGCATGCTTAACGATTATTCTCTAAAATCCTAACGAATGGTGGCATGCACCAGAATCGAGGCCACTTTGAGGCTTGGAATATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAGCATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ527/564 (PCR)
−39 truncation pKJ219/220 ggatccGGCTTGGAATATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAGCATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ498/499
−30 truncation pKJ221/222 ggatccTATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAGCATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ575/576
−39LOF pKJ225/226 ggatccGGCaacGAATATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAGCATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ502/503
−39GOF pKJ227/228 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ504/505
o_mut1 pKJ238 ggatccGGCTTGaAATAaaaTCTCGGGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ554/555
o_mut2 pKJ240 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCaaaCGGGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ556/557
o_mut3 pKJ242 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTaaaGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ558/559
o_mut4 pKJ244 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCGGaaaGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ560/561
o_mut5 pKJ246 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCGGGGGaaATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ562/563
o_mut6 pKJ231 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCGGGGaGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ565/566
o_mut7 pKJ232 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCcaGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ567/568
o_mut8 pKJ233 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCTCTCcaGGaGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ569/570
o_mut9 pKJ234 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCcCTCGGGGaGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ571/572
o_mut10 pKJ235 ggatccGGCTTGaAATATCCcCTCcaGGGGGATAtaATCAAGGGCAtctaga oKJ573/574
a

Plasmids are compatible for use in A. fabrum or E. coli. Strains harboring these plasmids are listed in Table S1. Where two plasmids are listed, the first is nreA−, and the second is nreA+. If only one plasmid is listed, it is nreA+.

b

Sequence includes the BamHI (GGATCC) and XbaI (TCTAGA) sites used for ligating into pKJ138 (nreA−) and/or pKJ140 (nreA+). Lowercase letters within the sequence represent cloning sites. Bold lowercase letters represent variations compared to the −39 truncation clone. For empty vectors pKJ138 and pKJ140, the BamHI/XbaI region contains the following sequence: ggatccACCtctaga.

TABLE 2.

NreA variants tested in A. fabrum

Variant Mutagenesis plasmid Test plasmid Sequencea Mutagenesis
oligonucleotidesb
C089B NreA (wild type) pKJ213 pKJ257 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ608/609
R17A pKJ216 pKJ260 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKaLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ585/586
R20A pKJ255 pKJ267 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKaADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ610/611
C38A pKJ270 pKJ258 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPaLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ581/582
Q44A pKJ252 pKJ264 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQaLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ604/605
H63A pKJ215 pKJ259 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDaLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ583/584
H66A pKJ247 pKJ261 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNaCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ596/597
C67A pKJ253 pKJ265 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHaLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITKYL oKJ606/607
K91A pKJ256 pKJ268 MNERPHVHETHPAIIKRLKRADGHLRGIVEMIEAGRPCLDIAQQLHAVEKAIAQAKKTLIQDHLNHCLEDVVGPLALEQRRSIDEFKDITaYL oKJ612/613
a

Sequence includes the entire NreA amino acid sequence for NreA variants used. Bold lowercase letters represent alanine substitutions compared to the C089B NreA (wild type).

b

Mutagenesis oligonucleotides were used to incorporate mutations in nreA via inverse-PCR amplification of pKJ213, followed by circularization, followed by transfer of the variant gene to pKJ227, as described in Materials and Methods. A. fabrum strains harboring these plasmids are listed in Table S1.

lacZ expression assays

Modified Miller assays similar to Zhang and Bremer (28) were carried out as follows: bacteria were grown in liquid culture overnight and their absorbance at 600 nm (A600) was measured; culture density was then adjusted to an A600 value of 0.2 using LB broth. These suspensions were diluted 10-fold into 200 μL of LB in 96-well plates and cultured with shaking (~300 rpm) at 30°C for 6 h, with half-strength antibiotics (Sm-100 and Nm-50). From these cultures, 2 μL of suspension was transferred to 23 µL of permeabilization solution (100 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.8 mg/mL hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 0.4 mg/mL sodium deoxycholate, and 5.4 µL/mL beta-mercaptoethanol), incubated at 30°C on a shaker for 5 min, after which 150 µL of substrate solution (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mg/mL o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactoside, and 2.7 µL/mL beta-mercaptoethanol) was added to each well. After sufficient yellowing occurred (around 30 min), 175 µL of stop solution (1 M Na2CO3) was added to each well and their absorbance at 420 nm was measured. Miller units were calculated using the following formula: 1,000 × (OD420 / (OD600) × (time in min) × (volume of cells in mL). For detection of very low lacZ expression (Fig. 5), overnight cultures were normalized to an A600 value of 2.0, and 5 µL of these suspensions was used in Miller assays as described above, with a reaction time of approximately 90 min prior to adding stop buffer.

Transcription start site mapping (5′-RACE)

The A. fabrum strain, harboring pKJ218, was cultured in LB supplemented with half-strength Sm, Nm, and 1 mM NiCl2 to an A600 of ~0.8. A cell pellet was then made from 1.5 mL of culture, and this was placed at −80°C for 15 min. The frozen pellet was thawed and resuspended in 50 µL of cold TED solution (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 10 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], and 40 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) and 50 µL of 1% SDS. The resuspended pellet was vortexed briefly and immediately placed on a 70°C heat block for 3 min. One milliliter of TRI Reagent (Trizol) was added to the suspension, inverting vigorously. After ensuring the solution was thoroughly mixed, 200 µL of chloroform was added and vortexed briefly, and the suspension was centrifuged for 2 min at 15,000 rpm. After centrifugation, the aqueous layer was separated and placed on ice. Six hundred microliters of isopropanol was then added to the aqueous layer to precipitate the RNA. The RNA suspension was kept on ice for 5 min and then centrifuged. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was then resuspended in 40 µL of RNAse-free water and placed in a 70°C heat block. Approximately 1 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using 6 µM gene-specific primer oKJ591, 5× ProtoScript II Buffer, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 10 µM DTT, and 200 U of ProtoScript II Reverse Transcriptase (NEB M0368). The mixture was incubated at 42°C for 1 h. After incubation, the product was purified using a Zymo ZR Plasmid Miniprep-Classic kit (D4016), and the cDNA was eluted in 30 µL of TE (Tris 3 mM and EDTA 0.3 mM). Polyadenylate was added to the 3′ ends of the cDNA molecules using 10× terminal transferase (TdT) buffer, 0.1 mM dATP, 0.25 mM CoCl2, and 15 U of TdT (NEB M0315). This was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The product was placed into a 70°C water bath for 10 min for heat inactivation. The heat-inactivated product was amplified using Taq polymerase (NEB M0267), a gene-specific primer oKJ591, and oKJ595 [this primer consists of a (dT)18 at its 3′-end and a G/C rich adapter sequence at its 5′-end]. The amplification protocol included 94°C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 39°C for 20 s, and 70°C for 45 s; followed by 28 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 20 s, and 70°C for 45 s; and a final extension step at 70°C for 2 min. The product was used in a second round of PCR using a nested primer, oKJ592, along with the (dT)18 primer oKJ595. The amplification protocol included 94°C for 2 min, followed by 36 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 20 s, and 70°C for 45 s, and a final extension step at 70°C for 2 min. The product was used in a third round of PCR using a nested primer, oKJ593, along with the (dT)18 primer oKJ595. The amplification protocol included 94°C for 2 min, followed by 34 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 70°C for 45 s, and a final extension step at 70°C for 2 min. The product was then cleaned up using a Zymo ZR Plasmid Miniprep-Classic kit (D4016) and submitted for Sanger sequencing using the primer oKJ593.

Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analysis

An alignment was performed with nucleotide sequences of the region upstream of the nreAXY operon acquired from various Mesorhizobium strains. Strains and sequences used are listed in Table S3. The sequences were aligned using (ClustalW), and the figure was created in R using ggmsa and WebLogo3 (29, 30). An alignment of NreA/CsoR/RcnR protein sequences (listed in Table S4) was performed using ClustalW, and the figure was created on R using ggmsa (29). A phylogenetic tree reconstruction was built using the Phylogeny.fr analytical server. This online tool used an existing ClustalW-generated multiple sequence alignment of 13 representative amino acid sequences (above) and realigned them using MUSCLE. It then used Gblocks with the highest-stringency settings, which minimizes contiguous strings of non-conserved residues. PhyML (v.3.1/3.0 aLRT) was then used to reconstruct a maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic tree with 100 bootstrap replicates. The WAG substitution model was selected assuming an estimated proportion of invariant sites (of 0.116) and four gamma-distributed rate categories to account for rate heterogeneity across sites. The gamma shape parameter was estimated directly from the data (gamma = 3.991). Reliability for internal branch was assessed using the aLRT test (SH-Like). TreeDyn was used to visualize the tree reconstruction (31–37). An alignment of the NreA/NreA2 protein sequences and the NreX/NreX2 protein sequences (sequences given in the Supplemental Materials) was performed using NCBI BLAST (38).

Genome-wide search for operator sequence motifs in Mesorhizobium C089B

The Mesorhizobium C089B genome (NCBI accession number NZ_CP100469.1) was scanned for motifs similar to the nre operator. The online motif finder, MEME Suite (v.5.5.8), was used for this search, using the Find Individual Motif Occurrences protocol (39). The nre operator sequence (TATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATA) and the degenerate consensus sequence (TATCCYCTCCRGGRGGATA) were each used as input. All matches with a P value greater than 1 × 10−6 were removed. Hits were then individually checked for their position and surroundings within the genome. Matches that were intragenic were removed. The remaining sequences were tabulated with their genomic position and nearby downstream genes (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

NreA operator motifs identified in the mesorhizobium C089B genome

Matched sequence Start Stop Strand Scorea P valueb Q valuec Region Upstream Predicted function
Search with nreA operator sequence TATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATA
 TATCCTCTCGGGGGGGATAd 3,145,188 3,145,206 + 36.6402 2.48E−12 1.31E−5 Intergenic nreA Ni-sensing transcriptional regulator
 CATCCTCCCCGGGGGGATA 1,073,223 1,073,241 + 15.4756 1.50E−7 0.265 Intergenic nreA2 Metal-sensing transcriptional regulator
 TCTCCCCCACGAGGGGAGA 4,657,185 4,657,203 + 15.4756 1.50E−7 0.265 Intergenic glcB Malate synthase G
 TATCCCCTCCTAGAGGTTT 3,437,282 3,437,300 + 15.2561 2.43E−7 0.322 Intergenic KPGJNAOJ_03459 ATP-dependent nuclease
Search with degenerate consensus sequence (Fig. 4A) TATCCYCTCCRGGRGGATA
 CATCCTCCCCGGGGGGATA 1,073,223 1,073,241 + 23.2744 6.29E−9 0.0329 Intergenic nreA2 Metal-sensing transcriptional regulator
 TATCCCCCCCGAGAGGATA 3,145,188 3,145,206 + 23.0244 1.12E−8 0.0329 Intergenic nreA Ni-sensing transcriptional regulator
 TAACCCCTCGGGGAGGAAA 4,855,066 4,855,084 + 17.7195 1.75E7 0.344 Intergenic malK-5 Maltose/maltodextrin import ATP binding
 TATCCCCTCCTAGAGGTTT 3,437,282 3,437,300 + 13.3963 6.33E−7 0.908 Intergenic KPGJNAOJ_03459 ATP-dependent nuclease
a

The score for the match of a position in a sequence to a motif is computed by summing the appropriate entries from each column of the position-dependent scoring matrix that represents the motif.

b

The P value of a motif occurrence is defined as the probability of a random sequence of the same length as the motif matching that position of the sequence with as good or better a score.

c

The Q value of a motif occurrence is defined as the false discovery rate if the occurrence is accepted as significant.

d

The underlined characters match the associated search sequence.

NreA structural modeling

NreA structural models were generated using AlphaFold 3 (40). Four copies of NreA were selected to generate the tetrameric structure. To model the apo form of NreA (Fig. S2A), no ligands or ions were selected. To model the metal-bound form, Co(II) was selected as the best of the available choices in the AlphaFold 3 user interface. The DNA-bound version of NreA (Fig. S2C and D) included the operator sequence TATCCTCTCCAGGAGGATA. For each model, pTM scores (which reflect the likelihood of the protein fold being correct, with scores above 0.5 being of high confidence) were as follows: apo-NreA: 0.71, metal-NreA: 0.79, and DNA-NreA: 0.48. The apo form was aligned with an X-ray crystal structure of CsoR from T. thermophilus HB8 (PDB 3AAI) using PyMOL (v.3.1.3.1 [Schrödinger, LLC]) with an RMS score of 1.443.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF, grant IOS-1755454, awarded to J.S.G.) and by the Brigham Young University Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology.

We are grateful for anonymous reviewer suggestions that have enhanced this investigation.

K.T.J.: experimental design, experimental analysis, and writing; J.S.G.: funding acquisition, project administration, experimental design, and writing.

Contributor Information

Joel S. Griffitts, Email: joelg@byu.edu.

Isaac Cann, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

An annotated GenBank file for reporter plasmid pKJ138 (the starting point for all analyses in this report) may be found under accession number PX233068.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01403-25.

Supplemental material. aem.01403-25-s0001.pdf.

Figures S1 to S4, Tables S1 to S4, and sequences.

aem.01403-25-s0001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01403-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Macomber L, Hausinger RP. 2011. Mechanisms of nickel toxicity in microorganisms. Metallomics 3:1153–1162. doi: 10.1039/c1mt00063b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Nies DH. 2003. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:313–339. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00048-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chandrangsu P, Rensing C, Helmann JD. 2017. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:338–350. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Porter SS, Rice KJ. 2013. Trade-offs, spatial heterogeneity, and the maintenance of microbial diversity. Evolution (N Y) 67:599–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01788.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Giedroc DP, Arunkumar AI. 2007. Metal sensor proteins: nature’s metalloregulated allosteric switches. Dalton Trans 10:3107–3120. doi: 10.1039/b706769k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Baksh KA, Zamble DB. 2020. Allosteric control of metal-responsive transcriptional regulators in bacteria. J Biol Chem 295:1673–1684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.011444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Huang H-T, Bobst CE, Iwig JS, Chivers PT, Kaltashov IA, Maroney MJ. 2018. Co(II) and Ni(II) binding of the Escherichia coli transcriptional repressor RcnR orders its N terminus, alters helix dynamics, and reduces DNA affinity. J Biol Chem 293:324–332. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Higgins KA, Giedroc D. 2014. Insights into protein allostery in the CsoR/RcnR family of transcriptional repressors. Chem Lett 43:20–25. doi: 10.1246/cl.130965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Liu T, Ramesh A, Ma Z, Ward SK, Zhang L, George GN, Talaat AM, Sacchettini JC, Giedroc DP. 2007. CsoR is a novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis copper-sensing transcriptional regulator. Nat Chem Biol 3:60–68. doi: 10.1038/nchembio844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Grossoehme N, Kehl-Fie TE, Ma Z, Adams KW, Cowart DM, Scott RA, Skaar EP, Giedroc DP. 2011. Control of copper resistance and inorganic sulfur metabolism by paralogous regulators in Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 286:13522–13531. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.220012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Porto TV, Hough MA, Worrall JAR. 2015. Structural insights into conformational switching in the copper metalloregulator CsoR from Streptomyces lividans. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 71:1872–1878. doi: 10.1107/S1399004715013012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chang F-M, Coyne HJ, Cubillas C, Vinuesa P, Fang X, Ma Z, Ma D, Helmann JD, García-de los Santos A, Wang Y-X, Dann CE III, Giedroc DP. 2014. Cu(I)-mediated allosteric switching in a copper-sensing operon repressor (CsoR). J Biol Chem 289:19204–19217. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.556704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Higgins KA, Hu HQ, Chivers PT, Maroney MJ. 2013. Effects of select histidine to cysteine mutations on transcriptional regulation by Escherichia coli RcnR. Biochemistry 52:84–97. doi: 10.1021/bi300886q [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ma Z, Jacobsen FE, Giedroc DP. 2009. Coordination chemistry of bacterial metal transport and sensing. Chem Rev 109:4644–4681. doi: 10.1021/cr900077w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tan BG, Vijgenboom E, Worrall JAR. 2014. Conformational and thermodynamic hallmarks of DNA operator site specificity in the copper sensitive operon repressor from Streptomyces lividans. Nucleic Acids Res 42:1326–1340. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Iwig JS, Leitch S, Herbst RW, Maroney MJ, Chivers PT. 2008. Ni(II) and Co(II) sensing by Escherichia coli RcnR. J Am Chem Soc 130:7592–7606. doi: 10.1021/ja710067d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brady KU, Kruckeberg AR, Bradshaw Jr. HD. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:243–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105730 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kehlet-Delgado H, Montoya AP, Jensen KT, Wendlandt CE, Dexheimer C, Roberts M, Torres Martínez L, Friesen ML, Griffitts JS, Porter SS. 2024. The evolutionary genomics of adaptation to stress in wild rhizobium bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121:e2311127121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311127121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Iwig JS, Chivers PT. 2009. DNA recognition and wrapping by Escherichia coli RcnR. J Mol Biol 393:514–526. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Porter SS, Chang PL, Conow CA, Dunham JP, Friesen ML. 2017. Association mapping reveals novel serpentine adaptation gene clusters in a population of symbiotic Mesorhizobium. ISME J 11:248–262. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dwarakanath S, Chaplin AK, Hough MA, Rigali S, Vijgenboom E, Worrall JAR. 2012. Response to copper stress in Streptomyces lividans extends beyond genes under direct control of a copper-sensitive operon repressor protein (CsoR). J Biol Chem 287:17833–17847. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.352740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ma Z, Cowart DM, Scott RA, Giedroc DP. 2009. Molecular insights into the metal selectivity of the copper(I)-sensing repressor CsoR from Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry 48:3325–3334. doi: 10.1021/bi900115w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Grabowska AD, Andreu N, Cortes T. 2021. Translation of a leaderless reporter is robust during exponential growth and well sustained during stress conditions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front Microbiol 12:746320. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.746320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Shell SS, Wang J, Lapierre P, Mir M, Chase MR, Pyle MM, Gawande R, Ahmad R, Sarracino DA, Ioerger TR, Fortune SM, Derbyshire KM, Wade JT, Gray TA. 2015. Leaderless transcripts and small proteins are common features of the mycobacterial translational landscape. PLoS Genet 11:e1005641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hynes MF, Simon R, Pühler A. 1985. The development of plasmid-free strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by using incompatibility with a Rhizobium meliloti plasmid to eliminate pAtC58. Plasmid 13:99–105. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(85)90062-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hanahan D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Griffitts JS, Carlyon RE, Erickson JH, Moulton JL, Barnett MJ, Toman CJ, Long SR. 2008. A Sinorhizobium meliloti osmosensory two-component system required for cyclic glucan export and symbiosis. Mol Microbiol 69:479–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06304.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang X, Bremer H. 1995. Control of the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter strength by ppGpp. J Biol Chem 270:11181–11189. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhou L, Feng T, Xu S, Gao F, Lam TT, Wang Q, Wu T, Huang H, Zhan L, Li L, Guan Y, Dai Z, Yu G. 2022. ggmsa: a visual exploration tool for multiple sequence alignment and associated data. Brief Bioinformatics 23. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard J-F, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie J-M, Gascuel O. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W465–W469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls A-L, Jacq B, Christen R. 2006. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics 7:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Anisimova M, Gascuel O. 2006. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst Biol 55:539–552. doi: 10.1080/10635150600755453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dereeper A, Audic S, Claverie J-M, Blanc G. 2010. BLAST-EXPLORER helps you building datasets for phylogenetic analysis. BMC Evol Biol 10:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. NCBI Resource Coordinators . 2016. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D7–D19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bailey TL, Johnson J, Grant CE, Noble WS. 2015. The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W39–W49. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, Ronneberger O, Willmore L, Ballard AJ, Bambrick J, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. aem.01403-25-s0001.pdf.

Figures S1 to S4, Tables S1 to S4, and sequences.

aem.01403-25-s0001.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01403-25.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

An annotated GenBank file for reporter plasmid pKJ138 (the starting point for all analyses in this report) may be found under accession number PX233068.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES