Skip to main content
Communications Chemistry logoLink to Communications Chemistry
. 2025 Nov 27;8:417. doi: 10.1038/s42004-025-01795-6

Fragment-based drug design of a bacterial kinase inhibitor capable of increasing the antibiotic sensitivity of clinical isolates

Julien Kowalewski 1, Robin Deutscher 2, Marion Richardoz 3, Mathilde Tomaszczyk 1, Muriel Gelin 1, Gilles Labesse 1, Felix Hausch 2,4, Gerard D Wright 5, Catherine Dunyach-Remy 3, Jean-François Guichou 1, Corinne Lionne 1,
PMCID: PMC12749166  PMID: 41310159

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), antimicrobial resistance is a serious global health issue. Overcoming antibiotic resistance involves several strategies, including the inhibition of resistance mechanisms. Among the various resistance mechanisms, aminoglycoside phosphotransferases (APHs) catalyze the transfer of the γ-phosphate from a nucleotide donor to various aminoglycosides, leading to their inactivation. In this work, using a fragment-based drug design (FBDD) approach, we have identified and characterized a promising APH inhibitor capable of increasing the sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus resistant to aminoglycosides. It is therefore a good candidate for the future development of APH inhibitors to be prescribed in combination with aminoglycosides. This molecule is a competitive inhibitor of adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP), the phosphate donor of APHs. Further studies are required to optimize this molecule to improve its specificity for APHs and its bioavailability in bacteria.

Subject terms: Drug screening, X-ray crystallography, Transferases, Screening, Kinases


Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant global health challenge, with aminoglycoside phosphotransferases (APHs) contributing to antibiotic inactivation. Here, the authors employ fragment-based drug design to identify a promising APH inhibitor, enhancing bacterial sensitivity to aminoglycosides.

Introduction

The discovery of the first antibiotic in the 1930s revolutionized human health, making it possible to treat bacterial infections, which at the time represented one of the world’s leading causes of death1. Used extensively during World War II, penicillin contributed significantly to the Allied victory and saved the lives of many soldiers. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics has evolved in response to the constant selective pressure exerted by antimicrobial agents, and the overuse of antibiotics has exacerbated this issue2. By 2050, antibiotic multidrug resistance could be responsible for ten million deaths a year3. One success in countering penicillin resistance is the concomitant use of β-lactam and an inhibitor of the bacterial enzymes that degrade the antibiotic, β-lactamases4.

Aminoglycosides are another class of antibiotics which are clinically used to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections57. For example, Gentamicin and Tobramycin are used in the treatment of pneumonia and meningitis caused by Gram-negative bacilli and nosocomial infections by Gram-positive bacteria; Amikacin is used in the treatment of serious nosocomial Gram-negative bacterial infections and mycobacterial infections in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. Like all classes of antibiotics, aminoglycosides are subject to bacterial resistance. General mechanisms of antibiotic resistance can be divided into four groups: (1) poor membrane permeability, which prevents the antibiotic from getting into the bacteria and reaching its target; (2) active efflux pumps that reject the antibiotic from the bacteria; (3) modification of the antibiotic target (mutation or methylation); (4) enzymes inactivating the antibiotics8.

APHs are such enzymes that catalyze the transfer of the γ-phosphate from a nucleotide triphosphate (NTP) to an aminoglycoside molecule9. The phosphorylation of aminoglycosides leads to the addition of a negatively charged group, which interferes with the interaction of the antibiotics with their main target, the ribosome. Despite their low sequence identity, this family of enzymes share a high structural similarity10. These globular enzymes can be divided into three different domains: an amino-terminal domain where the NTP binding site is located, a core domain linking the amino-terminal domain to the carboxy-terminal domain and the carboxy-terminal domain where the aminoglycoside binds.

The N-terminal domain is characterized by a five-stranded β-sheet, which is conserved in many kinases and covers the NTP-binding cavity. The binding and choice of NTP is governed by several amino acids present in the cavity, and even if some of them are not strictly conserved, their properties are preserved. An extended linker constitutes a hinge and interacts with the nucleobase of the NTP. Backbone atoms of one or two residues on this hinge form hydrogen bonds with the nucleobase. Consequently, the side chains of these residues are variable. Hydrophobic residues located in the β-sheet and a loop not very conserved allow the nucleobase to be stabilized in the cavity by van der Waals interactions and/or π-stacking. In addition, a residue known as the gatekeeper is located deep in the binding site, and its nature allows the fixation of ATP, guanosine 5’-triphosphate (GTP), or both to the protein. Finally, three catalytic residues are involved in the transfer of the γ-phosphate from the NTP to the aminoglycoside molecule. The catalytic triad is highly conserved and consists of one positively charged residue and two negatively charged residues: a lysine, a glutamic acid and an aspartic acid. In some cases, the lysine is replaced by an arginine, as in the case of APH(2”)-IIIa from Enterococcus gallinarum. The nucleotide binding site is the most structurally conserved domain between APHs, but also atypical protein kinases11. As a consequence, protein kinase inhibitors can inhibit APHs and restore antibiotic sensitivity1214. This motivated our search for ATP-competitive and APH-specific inhibitors to restore bacterial susceptibility to aminoglycosides, following the example of β-lactamase inhibitors.

For our primary FBDD screening, we chose APH(2”)-IVa from Enterococcus casseliflavus since it confers a high level of resistance in Enterococcus towards various aminoglycosides that are prescribed in clinics15. This APH has the particularity of being able to use ATP or GTP as a phosphate donor16,17. After a structure-activity relationship on catalogue, we finally identified a hit compound which can inhibit in vitro several clinically relevant APHs and increase the sensitivity of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates to aminoglycosides.

Results

Primary fragment screening

We studied the impact of 389 fragments on the thermal stability and in vitro enzymatic activity of APH(2”)-IVa. These fragments come from our own chemical library, which consists of compounds containing nitrogen heterocycles most frequently found in approved drugs18,19. They were chosen to meet most of the classical physicochemical criteria of the fragments20 and to offer a wide chemical diversity, thus covering a large chemical space21.

To perform this primary screening, we tested these molecules at a relatively high concentration of 500 µM, which is standard for screening very small molecules such as fragments22. Results are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1. Not surprisingly, we were not able to demonstrate a strict correlation between the impact of the fragments tested on the melting temperature, ΔTm, measured by Thermal Shift Assay (TSA), and the percentage of enzymatic activity inhibition. Nevertheless, it seems that when a fragment induces a positive ΔTm by more than one degree, it is more likely to induce significant inhibition of the enzyme. From the primary screening of these 389 fragments by TSA, we retained 9 fragments: 5 fragments inducing a ΔTm > 1 °C and 4 fragments inducing a ΔTm < −1 °C. In the screening of the same fragments by activity assay, we retained 39 fragments inhibiting APH(2”)-IVa by at least 25%, 5 of which were in common with selection by TSA. As a result, a total of 43 fragments (Table 1) were selected from the 389 tested, representing a hit rate of approximately 12%, which is typical for the FBDD approach23. The most common motif among the selected hits is azaindole, found in 7 fragments: F382, F381, F352, F340, F385, F337, and F354 (highlighted with a purple background in Table 1).

Table 1.

Fragments selected after the primary screening of 389 fragments at 500 µM on APH(2”)-IVa by TSA and activity assays

graphic file with name 42004_2025_1795_Tab1_HTML.jpg

ΔTm > 1 °C are indicated in green, ΔTm < −1 °C in red and inhibition ≥ 25% in orange. Selected fragments are ranked from highest to lowest inhibition. The gray boxes indicate that the compound absorbs or fluoresces at the measurement wavelengths, which may distort the result. The purple backgrounds highlight the azaindole motifs.

Identification of scaffolds interacting with the hinge

We carried out X-ray crystallography screening of these 43 most promising binders. Determining the structures enabled us to identify their binding sites and obtain precise information on their interactions with protein residues.

The first structures obtained indicate that four fragments interact at the nucleotide interaction site, specifically at the hinge. The ionic interactions between the three catalytic residues, Lys46, Glu60, and Asp217, are preserved in all four complexes (orange dashed lines in Fig. 1ad). There are three types of common interactions involved between the protein and these four fragments. First, Ile44 and Ile216 stack the aromatic heterocycles of the fragments (black dashed lines). Second, the nitrogen of the backbone of Ile98 forms a hydrogen bond with the nitrogen of the pyridine motif found in all four fragments (blue dashed lines). Finally, the carbonyl of Ile98 forms a hydrogen bond with the primary amine of the pyridine of F69 and F245 or the amine in the oxazine of F274 or in the pyrrole of F382. Three of these fragments have a halogen atom that points to the gatekeeper residue Phe95. The fact that F382 strongly stabilizes and inhibits APH, but does not have a halogen, raises questions about the importance of this atom for the interaction. Minimal scaffolds were identified for optimal interaction with the hinge residues of APH(2”)-IVa (Fig. 1e).

Fig. 1. Crystal structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 4 fragments selected during primary screen.

Fig. 1

Crystal structures and corresponding omit maps contoured at a sigma level ± 1 of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with (a) F69 determined at 2.38 Å (PDB 9QNQ), (b) F245 at 2.00 Å (PDB 9QNS), (c) F274 at 1.78 Å (PDB 9QMR) and (d) F382 at 2.65 Å (PDB 9QNN). Inhibitors are represented in gray sticks and residues involved in interactions are shown as yellow lines. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange. e Minimal scaffolds identified for optimal interaction with the hinge of APH(2”)-IVa, where X represents a halogen atom.

We then searched our library of fragments for molecules that possessed these minimum motifs and attempted to crystallize them in complexes with APH. This led to two new structures of APH in complex with fragments F136 and F355, both of which contain an azaindole motif (Supplementary Fig. 2).

The presence of a halogen atom on the minimal scaffolds greatly increases the inhibition

In order to verify whether the presence of a halogen atom in position 5 of the pyridine or of the 7-azaindole is important for APH inhibition, we ordered a series of halogen-containing analogues of these two scaffolds. In the rest of the text, the fragments initially present in our initial library retain their numbering from F1 to F389, whereas analogue molecules purchased subsequently are named by just a number.

We compared the APH inhibition by these different analogues and obtained crystal structures of the corresponding complexes (Fig. 2). The presence of a chlorine atom at position 5 of the minimal fragments, pyridine F68 or 7-azaindole F136, resulted in a significant increase of the inhibition of APH(2”)-IVa. Indeed, at 500 µM, F69 inhibited enzyme activity by 68%, i.e. 6.2 times more than F68 (Fig. 2a). The same applied to 2 with 88% inhibition, i.e. 5.9 times more than F136 (Fig. 2b). Of the various halogens tested, chlorine and bromide appeared to be the most effective in terms of inhibition.

Fig. 2. Characterization of halogen-containing analogues of identified scaffolds interacting with the hinge of APH and potential vectors for hit optimization.

Fig. 2

a, b APH(2”)-IVa enzymatic activity inhibition by 500 µM of fragments and structure of the analogues tested. cg Crystal structures and corresponding omit maps contoured at a sigma level of ± 1 of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 1 at 2.47 Å (PDB 9QNW), 2 at 1.88 Å (PDB 9QOK), 3 at 1.86 Å (PDB 9QPB), 4 at 2.13 Å (PDB 9QOL) and 5 at 2.13 Å (PDB 9QOM). Inhibitors are represented in gray sticks and residues involved in interactions are shown as yellow lines. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange. h Potential vectors, represented as red arrows, for optimization of the most promising hits, F69 and 2.

Crystallographic structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with these new analogues confirmed that these fragments also interact with the hinge residues in the nucleotide binding site, as well as with the hydrophobic residues that usually stack with the nucleobase moiety (Fig. 2c–g). The presence of a halogen atom in the fragments seems to impose a defined orientation in the binding site, with the halogen atom pointing toward the gatekeeper residue Phe95. Indeed, the non-halogenated 7-azaindole, F136, seems to adopt alternating orientations in the active site (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b), and the 3-hydroxymethyl-7-azaindole, F355, is in an inverted position compared with other halogenated azaindole compounds (Supplementary Fig. 2c). The binding mode of all halogenated molecules is similar, and interactions with protein residues are conserved, as shown by the crystallographic structures determined for these compounds in complexes with APH(2”)-IVa (Fig. 2c–g). This is true in the two independent polypeptide chains in the crystal asymmetric unit.

Based on these structures, we identified three potential vectors for optimization of 2-amino-5-(chloro/bromo)pyridine or 5-(chloro/bromo)-7-azaindole (Fig. 2h). We therefore searched and ordered commercial analogues of these motifs bearing one or more substitutions at the positions indicated by the arrows.

Extensions on vector 3 of F69 bring new interactions with APH

We ordered 65 commercially available analogues of 5-(chloro/bromo)pyridine. 31 molecules contained exactly this motif, including 7 compounds with a substitution according to vector 1, 14 compounds according to vector 2, 8 compounds according to vector 3, and 2 compounds modified in two different positions. The other 34 molecules contained a similar, but slightly distinct core, and various substitutions. All were tested at 500 µM by TSA and activity assay. The parent fragments and the selected analogues based on ΔTm and inhibition are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Analogues of 2-amino-5-(chloro/bromo)pyridine selected after assaying at 500 µM on APH(2”)-IVa by TSA and activity assays

graphic file with name 42004_2025_1795_Tab2_HTML.jpg

ΔTm > 1 °C are indicated in green, ΔTm < −1 °C in red and inhibition ≥ 25% in orange. The gray boxes indicate that the compound absorbs or fluoresces at the measurement wavelengths, which may distort the result. Analogues are classified by optimization vector and were selected because they modified the Tm by more than 1 °C and/or inhibited the APH activity by more than 25%.

We soaked these analogues on apo APH crystals to determine the structure of the complexes. We obtained the structure of six additional complexes, APH(2”)-IVa with 11, 17, 22, 24, 36, and 68. The three compounds substituted according to vector 2 and containing a sulfonamide (17, 22, and 24) were found in another binding site, in the C-terminal domain of the protein (not shown) and were set aside for the purpose of this study. The structures with 11 and 36 are shown in Fig. 3. The phenylethyl of 11 on vector 1 of F69 established additional hydrophobic interactions with Pro102 and Leu204 (Fig. 3a), but this did not seem to improve inhibition: 57% for 11 compared with 68% for the parent molecule F69. Similarly, the cyclopropyl of 36 establishes a hydrophobic bond with Leu204. Even more interestingly, the carboxyl of 36 in vector 3 establishes a hydrogen bond with a water molecule, which itself interacts with the catalytic Lys46. This leads to a significant increase in inhibition to 87%. Structure of APH in complex with 68 is discussed later in the context of 7-azaindole optimization.

Fig. 3. Structure of the selected derivatives of F69.

Fig. 3

Crystal structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with (a) 11 determined at 2.41 Å (PDB 9QNY) or (b) 36 determined at 2.30 Å (PDB 9QOE), and corresponding omit maps contoured at a sigma level of ± 1. Inhibitors are represented in gray sticks, residues involved in interactions are shown as yellow lines and the water molecule is represented as a red sphere. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange.

Given the strong inhibition observed with 36 at 500 µM, we decided to determine its affinity for APH(2”)-IVa and its inhibition constant. The affinity for 36 measured by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) was relatively high for such a small molecule, with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 37.8 µM (Fig. 4a). The binding was equally driven by enthalpy and entropy (inset of Fig. 4a), suggesting contributions of hydrogen bonds, van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions, and potentially conformational changes. Inhibition curves show that 36 acts as an ATP-competitive inhibitor of APH(2”)-IVa with an inhibition constant (Ki) of 18.2 ± 1.2 µM (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4. Affinity of APH(2”)-IVa for 36 and its ATP-competitive inhibition.

Fig. 4

a Differential heat released (top panel) and ITC binding curves (bottom panel) of 36 binding to APH(2”)-IVa. b Hyperbolic fitting of raw data (top panel) and Lineweaver-Burk representation (bottom panel) of the ATP competitive inhibition of APH(2”)-IVa by 36. Final concentrations were 0.1 µM APH(2”)-IVa, 0-2 mM MgATP, 100 µM kanamycin A, 2 mM PEP, 140 µM NAD and 0-100 µM 36. The red circles, yellow triangles, blue squares and green stars correspond respectively to 0, 20, 50 and 100 µM of 36.

At this stage, we have ordered 9 analogues of 36 (Fig. 5a) and measured their Ki values (Fig. 5b). We succeeded in determining the structure of APH in complex with 3 analogues of 36 (Fig. 5c-e). The crystallographic structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 36-3, 36-5, and 36-9 determined at 2.11, 2.30, and 2.04 Å, respectively, revealed interesting interactions with APH(2”)-IVa. First, it shows that an elongation of the arm at position 4 of the aminopyridine induces a conformational change of the catalytic aspartic acid 217, as in the case where a nucleotide is present in the binding pocket (PDB 4N57 and Fig. 5c–e). Second, in the case of 36-5 and 36-9, the oxygen of the amide group at position 4 of the pyridine interacts with a water molecule, itself in interaction with Lys46 (Fig. 5d, e). Finally, in the case of 36-9, the extension at position 4 adopts a conformation that brings the cycle closer to the cyclopropyl group, leading to a pseudo-macrocycle (Fig. 5e). This conformation is stabilized by several van der Waals interactions, involving the phenyl and cyclopropyl groups as well as Pro202. It also sequesters an additional water molecule, which interacts with the nitrogen atom of the amide function as well as Ser28.

Fig. 5. Characterization of derivatives of 36.

Fig. 5

a Structure of the derivatives of 36 tested. (b) APH(2”)-IVa inhibition constants of 36 derivatives determined as in Fig. 4b. ce Crystal structures and corresponding omit maps contoured at a sigma level of ± 1 of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 36-3 determined at 2.11 Å (PDB 9QNX), 36-5 at 2.30 Å (PDB 9QP9) and 36-9 at 2.04 Å (PDB 9QPL). Inhibitors are represented in gray sticks, residues involved in interactions are shown as yellow lines and water molecules are represented as red spheres. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange.

However, although these analogues of 36 provide additional interactions with APH, the increase in inhibition is not significant in relation to the increase in size of the starting compound. This may be explained in part by the polarity of their sidechain (e.g.: 36-6 and 36-8) or their intrinsic flexibility. Also, their common amide bond may not mimic well the acidic function of 36.

Extensions on vector 3 of 5-chloro-7-azaindole greatly increase the efficacy of APH inhibition

Based on previous results obtained with 2-amino-5-(chloro/bromo)pyridine, we ordered analogues of 5-chloro-7-azaindole, 2, with substitutions at vectors 2 and 3 because they are expected to extend towards the catalytic residues.

We selected 4 analogues of 2 at vector 2 based on inhibition assays at 500 µM (not shown). The chemical structures of these analogues are shown in Fig. 6a. Their Ki values were measured and are comparable to, or larger than, the Ki value of 2 (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6. Characterization of azaindole derivatives at vector 2.

Fig. 6

a Structure of the more potent analogues of 2 at vector 2. b APH(2”)-IVa inhibition constants of the analogues of 2 determined as in Fig. 4b.

For the optimization of 2 in vector 3, we based our work on the structure of 68. This molecule has, in addition to F68, a pyrazole group, which establishes a hydrogen bond with a water molecule and a direct interaction with the catalytic Lys46 (Fig. 7a, b). Also, despite the small size of 68, it significantly inhibits APH (Fig. 7c). Furthermore, pyrazole stacks perfectly on Ile216. This prompted us to order a custom synthesis of 2 with a pyrazole, a pyrrole or a thiophene group in the corresponding position, i.e. at vector 3.

Fig. 7. Characterization of the inhibitory effect and binding mode of 5-chloro-7-azaindole derivatives at vector 3.

Fig. 7

a Structure of the derivatives of 2-aminopyridine and 5-chloro-7-azaindole tested. b Crystal structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 68 determined at 1.92 Å (PDB 9QOI) and corresponding omit map contoured at a sigma level of ± 1. (c, d) APH(2”)-IVa inhibition constants of analogues of (c) F68 or (d) 2 determined as in Fig. 4b, except for 83-86 where their concentrations were decreased to 0-10 µM. e, f Crystal structures of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 83 determined at 2.29 Å (PDB 9QOD) and 85 at 1.99 Å (PDB 9QOC), and corresponding omit maps. Inhibitors are represented in gray sticks, residues involved in interactions are shown as yellow lines and water molecules are represented as red spheres. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange.

The addition of these groups at vector 3 of the 5-chloro-7-azaindole is highly favorable for APH(2”)-IVa inhibition (Fig. 7a, d). Compounds 83 to 86 exhibited much lower inhibition constant values than the parent compound, 2. Compound 83 had a Ki of 0.39 ± 0.04 µM while 84 had a Ki of 1.58 ± 0.07 µM, suggesting that the position of the nitrogen atoms in the pyrazole group is important.

From a structural point of view, the efficiency of 83 to inhibit APH activity can be explained by the interaction of one nitrogen of the pyrazole group with a sequestered water molecule, which establishes a network of interactions with two residues important for the catalysis, Lys46 and Asp217 (Fig. 7e). Additionally, the other nitrogen of the pyrazole makes a direct interaction with Asp217, which is thus tilted toward the hinge. The single nitrogen atom of the pyrrole group in 85 interacts only with Asp217 and not with the water molecule, as shown by the crystal structures of this compound in APH(2”)-IVa (Fig. 7f).

Characterization of the hit compound 83 on different APHs

At this stage, 83 being the most potent inhibitor identified so far, we decided to characterize its effect in more detail. To do so, we first measured its inhibitory effect on four other APH(3’)s from pathogens of the WHO Priority-1’s list24: APH(3’)-Ib from E. coli and K. pneumoniae, APH(3’)-Ic from A. baumannii, APH(3’)-IIa from K. pneumoniae and APH(3’)-IIb from P. aeruginosa (Fig. 8a). We measured moderate levels of inhibition with APH(3’)-Ib and APH(3’)-Ic (55 and 35%, respectively) and higher levels of inhibition with APH(2”)-IVa, APH(3’)-IIa and APH(3’)-IIb (95, 76 and 91%, respectively). 83 has a relatively low IC50 for APH(3’)-IIb, with a value of IC50 of 1.23 ± 0.04 µM comparable to that of 0.84 ± 0.13 µM for APH(2”)-IVa (Fig. 8b). The crystal structure of APH(2”)-IVa in complex with 83 has been determined and discussed above (Fig. 7e). We were also able to determine the structure of 83 in complex with APH(3’)-IIb. The compound shows a similar binding mode in the nucleotide binding site of the two APHs with the same nature of interactions between the protein and 83 (Fig. 8c). Interestingly, it differs from the binding mode in the mammalian protein kinase Erk-2 (PDB 9QQJ, see accompanying manuscript25).

Fig. 8. Characterization of the effect of 83 on the activity of several APHs.

Fig. 8

a Inhibition of the activity of APH(2”)-IVa, APH(3’)-Ib, APH(3’)-Ic, APH(3’)-IIa and APH(3’)-IIb by 100 µM of 83. b IC50 of 83 with APH(2”)-IVa from E. casseliflavus or APH(3’)-IIb from P. aeruginosa determined by HPLC. c Crystal structure of APH(3’)-IIb in complex with 83 determined at 1.97 Å (PDB 9QOS) and corresponding omit map contoured at a sigma level of ± 1. Inhibitor is represented in gray sticks, residues involved in interactions as beige lines and water molecules are represented as red spheres. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange. df ITC curves and thermodynamic profiles of binding of 83 to APH(2”)-IVa, APH(3’)-IIa and APH(3’)-IIb, respectively.

The affinities of 83 for APH(2”)-IVa, APH(3’)-IIa and APH(3’)-IIb were measured by ITC (Fig. 8d–f). The experiments revealed a similarly high affinity for these enzymes, with Kd values of 1.06 ± 0.17 µM (n = 3) for APH(2”)-IVa, 1.25 µM (n = 1) for APH(3’)-IIa and 0.27 ± 0.05 µM (n = 2) for APH(3’)-IIb. These values are very close to the IC50 values measured (Fig. 8b). All interactions show similar energetically favorable and enthalpy-driven thermodynamic profiles, with ΔH values of -11.0, -13.1, and -13.6 kcal.mol-1 for APH(2”)-IVa, APH(3’)-IIa and APH(3’)-IIb, respectively (Fig. 8d–f). These results suggest that in all these APHs, interactions with 83 are characterized by hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions, as confirmed by our structures.

Hit compound makes clinical bacterial isolates more sensitive to kanamycin A

To test whether 83 is effective in increasing aminoglycoside sensitivity in bacteria, we performed checkerboard assays in the presence of 83 on several isolates from two hospitals (Hamilton General Hospital and Nîmes Hospital). We used isolates of P. aeruginosa or S. aureus expressing different APHs. We began by measuring the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these strains for several aminoglycosides and carbapenems (Supplementary Table 6). We then measured these MICs at different concentrations of 83 from 0 to 128 µg mL−1 (585 µM), in the presence or absence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of imipenem (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3). In all cases, we found that 83 alone, i.e. in the absence of antibiotics, had no impact on bacterial growth.

Table 3.

Effect of 83 on the MIC of kanamycin A on different bacteria

MIC of kanamycin A (µg mL−1)
[83] (µg mL−1) P. aeruginosa C0307 0 µg mL−1 imipenem P. aeruginosa C0307 0.05 µg mL−1 imipenem S. aureus C0032 0.125 µg mL−1 imipenem
0 64 64 4096
2 64 64 4096
4 64 64 4096
8 64 64 4096
16 64 64 4096
32 64 64 2048
64 64 64 2048
128 32 32 2048

MIC of kanamycin A was estimated after 18 h at 37 °C on P. aeruginosa C0307 in the absence or in the presence of 0.05 µg mL−1 of imipenem or on S. aureus C0032 in the presence of 0.125 µg mL−1 of imipenem.

P. aeruginosa strain C0307, expressing APH(3’)-IIb, showed resistance to kanamycin A with an MIC of 64–128 µg mL−1. When this strain was treated with 83 in combination with kanamycin A, the MIC value decreased, demonstrating the compound’s ability to reduce the concentration of kanamycin A required to inhibit the growth of this strain. At a concentration of 128 µg mL−1 of 83, the MIC of kanamycin A was decreased to 32 µg mL−1 (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3a). These results show that 83 is capable of slightly increasing the sensitivity of this resistant clinical isolate of P. aeruginosa to kanamycin A.

We tried using sub-inhibitory concentrations of different carbapenems to weaken the bacterial cell wall, but this did not impact the effect of 83 on P. aeruginosa strain C0307 (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3b).

S. aureus strain C0032 expresses APH(3’)-IIIa and shows a high level of resistance to kanamycin A (MIC of 4096 µg mL−1). It was tested in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of imipenem to weaken the bacterial cell wall, in addition to treatment with 83 and kanamycin A. Under these conditions, the MIC value was also reduced in the presence of 83. At 32 µg mL−1 of 83, the MIC was reduced to 2048 µg mL−1 of kanamycin A (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3c). These results show that 83 is capable of slightly improving the sensitivity of this resistant strain of S. aureus to kanamycin A. However, the MIC values are still very high, and further optimization of this hit compound will be necessary.

We then measured the growth kinetics of these bacteria in the presence of different concentrations of kanamycin A and 83 over 24 h (Fig. 9 and Supplementary Fig. 4). Only the curves at the six most representative kanamycin A concentrations are shown. We have excluded concentrations of kanamycin A where there was no growth, and those where no 83 effect was observed (except the 0 µM kanamycin A). Again, no toxicity of 83 alone was observed on P. aeruginosa or S. aureus up to 500 µM (109 µg mL−1).

Fig. 9. Characterization of the effect of 83 on bacterial growth kinetics.

Fig. 9

Measurement of the 24-h growth kinetics of (a) P. aeruginosa C0307 or (b) S. aureus C0032 in the presence of increasing concentrations of kanamycin A and different concentrations of 83. The characteristics of these strains are shown in the Supplementary Table 6. The symbols circles, squares, triangles and diamonds correspond respectively to 0, 125, 250 and 500 µM of 83. The colors black, yellow, green, cyan, mauve and red correspond respectively to 0, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128 µg mL−1 of Kanamycin A in (a) and 0, 256, 512, 1024, 2048 and 4096 µg mL−1 of Kanamycin A in (b).

In P. aeruginosa strain C0307, a significant 83 concentration-dependent growth retardation was observed (Fig. 9a). At 8 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, 83 at 500 µM delayed the onset of growth by around 6 h, and growth kinetics in the exponential phase were also affected. At 16 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, the effect is even more pronounced, with latency extended by 12 h in the presence of 500 µM 83. At this 83 concentration and at 32 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, growth did not begin after 24 h of incubation. Other P. aeruginosa isolates possessing APH(3’)-IIb showed similar effects (Supplementary Fig. 4).

The same applies to S. aureus C0032 strain, which possesses an APH(3’)-IIIa and is highly resistant to kanamycin A (Fig. 9b). In the absence of imipenem and in the presence of 256 and 512 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, 500 µM 83 slowed growth kinetics and saturation appeared to occur at lower optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm). At 1024 and 2048 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, 500 µM 83 increased latency by 14 and 18 h, respectively. Finally, at 4096 µg mL−1 kanamycin A, while in the absence of 83 the bacteria started to grow at 14 h, no growth was detected at 250 and 500 µM 83 after 24 h.

In conclusion, 83 is capable of slowing the growth of aminoglycoside-resistant bacteria in a dose-dependent manner. The effect on MICs remains low, suggesting that optimization is still needed to compete effectively with ATP, which is present at millimolar concentrations in bacteria.

Discussion

While new APHs are still being discovered regularly (for example, Lund et al.26), the design of specific inhibitors of these enzymes could provide a means of combating bacterial resistance to aminoglycosides. Using an FBDD approach, we identified a hit compound, 83, capable of inhibiting several APHs found in human pathogens, including Gram-negative bacteria of the 2024 WHO bacterial priority pathogens list. In vitro, on purified enzymes, 83 acts as a potent and competitive inhibitor of ATP: the Kd values we measured are 40 to 100-fold lower than the reported Michaelis constant (Km) values for ATP (101 µM for APH(2”)-IVa27, 45 µM for APH(3’)-IIa28 and 24 µM for APH(3’)-IIb29).

The structural similarity of the nucleotide-binding site between APHs and eukaryotic protein kinases (ePKs) had already motivated several research teams to test the effect of ePK inhibitors on APHs. Thus, Daigle et al.12 examined the effect of known ePK inhibitors of the class of indole carbazoles, flavanoids and isoquinoline sulfonamides on two aminoglycoside kinases, APH(3’)-IIIa found in S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. and AAC(6’)-APH(2”) from S. aureus, E. coli and E. faecium. Isoquinoline sulfonamides proved the most effective, with inhibition constants of several tens of micromolar. However, these compounds were unable to reverse antibiotic resistance in bacterial cultures expressing APH.

Fong et al. succeeded in determining the structures of APH(3’)-IIIa (PDB 3Q2J) and of the atypical APH(9)-Ia from L. pneumophila (PDB 3Q2M) in complex with CKI-7, a casein kinase 1 inhibitor, capable of inhibiting these APHs with inhibition constants of 66 and 159 µM, respectively14,30. The position of CKI-7 isoquinoline in the APH(3’)-IIIa and APH(9)-Ia sites is similar to that of 83 in the APH(2”)-IVa and APH(3’)-IIb (Fig. 10a–d). The aromatic ring stacks against hydrophobic residues, and the heterocycle nitrogen makes a hydrogen bond with a backbone atom of a hinge residue. The chlorine is pointing into the pocket facing the gatekeeper residue. The remainder of the CKI-7 molecule, its aminoethylsulfonamide group, adopts a different configuration in the two APHs and does not participate in major interactions with the protein, confirming our observation that the extension at vector 1 of 83 is not advantageous.

Fig. 10. Comparison of the structures of APH-competitive nucleotide inhibitor complexes.

Fig. 10

a, b Structures of 83 in complex with (a) APH(2”)-IVa (PDB 9QOD) and (b) APH(3’)-IIb (PDB 9QOS). c, d Structures of CKI-7 in complex with (c) APH(3’)-IIIa (PDB 3Q2J) and (d) APH(9)-Ia (PDB 3Q2M). e Structure of quercetin in complex with APH(2”)-IVa (PDB 4DFU). f, g Structures of (f) 1-NA-PP1 (PDB 4GKH) and (g) 1-NM-PP (PDB 4GKI) in complex with APH(3’)-Ia. Inhibitors are represented as sticks, residues involved in interactions are shown as lines: yellow for APH(2”)-Iva (a, e), beige for APH(3’)-IIb (b), brown for APH(3’)-IIIa (c), mauve for APH(9)-Ia (d) and red for APH(3’)-Ia (f, g). Water molecules are represented as red spheres. Interactions are shown as dashed lines: van der Waals interactions in gray, hydrogen bonds in blue and ionic bonds in orange.

Following a screening of 80 ePKs on 12 different APHs, Shakya et al. identified the flavonol quercetin as the best candidate for reversing APH-mediated aminoglycoside resistance. Quercetin inhibited all the APHs tested with Ki values ranging from 0.07 to 25 µM31. The crystallographic structure of quercetin in complex with APH(2”)-IVa (PDB 4DFU) reveals a position of the B ring similar to our substituents at vector 3 of 5-chloro-7-azaindole. Interestingly, the 7-hydroxyl of quercetin formed hydrogen bonds to the side chains of two catalytic residues, Lys46 and Asp217 (Fig. 10e). In our structures of APHs in complex with 83, these interactions occur via a water molecule. This suggests that the introduction of a hydroxyl group on the pyrazole could be of interest. This is described in the accompanying manuscript25.

Other ePK inhibitors, such as pyrazolopyrimidines, were co-crystallized with APH(3’)-Ia from E. coli and show interactions similar to the nucleobase31 (PDB 4GKH and 4GKI, Fig. 10f-g). Modifications at position N1, C3 and N4 of pyrazolopyrimidine did not increase the in vitro APH inhibition efficacy, further confirming our observations. However, it is interesting to note that two molecules, 1-NA-PP1 and 1-NM-PP1, substituted in C3 and inhibiting APH(3’)-Ia with an inhibition constant of 21.5 and 34.4 µM, respectively, demonstrated rescue activity of kanamycin A on the resistant hyper-permeable efflux mutant of E. colitolC ΔbamB).

In another study, Boehr et al.32 tested the inhibition of APHs by the lipid kinase inhibitor wortmannin. Wortmannin was able to inhibit APH(2”)-Ib (90% inhibition at 1 mM), but did not affect APH(3’)-IIIa.

Finally, another way of specifically inhibiting APHs would be to find non-competitive ATP inhibitors. Three studies have reported such inhibitors, but none were able to effectively inhibit multiple APHs, thus reducing their therapeutic potential3335.

Compared with all other APH inhibitors reported in the literature, our hit compound is the only one that is ATP-competitive but not a known protein kinase inhibitor. Its specificity toward APHs and not for human kinases is described in the accompanying manuscript25. On the other hand, it is one of the smallest and the most effective, with promising inhibition constants close to 1 µM on several APHs. In addition, our hit compound is capable of slowing the growth of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus expressing one or more APHs. In the accompanying manuscript25, we propose chemical modifications of this hit compound to increase its efficacy and bioavailability in bacteria, while maintaining its low toxicity for human cells.

Methods

Molecular biology

E. coli DH5α and BL21 strains have been used for plasmid production and protein expression, respectively. The aph(2”)-IVa and aph(3’)-IIb genes were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies™. In-fusion cloning was performed to insert the genes into the plasmid pET-15b. The In-Fusion cloning product was used to transform both E. coli DH5α and BL21. Bacterial glycerol stocks were produced after plasmid extraction (Macherey-Nagel Plasmid kit) and sequencing control (Eurofins). Sequencing revealed that, in the case of aph(3’)-IIb, a spontaneous mutation occurred, leading to a M95L mutant which has been characterized elsewhere and shows similar substrate affinities to the wild-type APH(3’)-IIb29.

Protein expression and purification

APHs were produced in E. coli BL21 and purified as already described29,35. Briefly, protein expression was induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) in a 2 L culture in LB at OD600 between 0.6 and 0.8 and incubation overnight at 18 °C. The bacterial pellets were then resuspended in 100 mL of Buffer A (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), pH 8) supplemented with two tablets of cOmplete™ protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 10 µg mL−1 of Lysozyme (Roche) and 1 µg mL−1 of DNase (Roche). The resuspended pellets were pooled and sonicated on ice for 10 min using 2-second pulses. The supernatant was then filtered on 5 µm followed by 0.45 µm filters before the affinity chromatography using two 5 mL HisTrap columns (Cytiva) connected in tandem on an Aktä Pure. Elution of the protein was performed using a linear gradient to 50% of Buffer B (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 500 mM Imidazole, 1 mM DTT, pH 8). The proteins were eluted at approximately 12% of Buffer B and collected in fractions of 2 mL. Fractions of interest were pooled, concentrated, and injected on a 26/60 Superdex™ 75 prep grade (GE Healthcare) size exclusion column. Two buffers were used depending on the experiments performed: Buffer Tris (50 mM Tris, 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5) for enzymatic measurements and TSA or Buffer HEPES (50 mM HEPES, 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5) for ITC experiments. Proteins eluted in a single peak, and the corresponding fractions were pooled and concentrated to 10–20 mg mL−1, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C.

Chemicals

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, BLD Pharm, Enamine or AGV Discovery.

Thermal shift assays

Thermal shift assays were performed using an RTqPCR machine Mx3005P (Stratagene) in 96-well plates (Thermo-Fast low Profile, ThermoScientific) by mixing the protein at 5 µM, SYPRO® Orange (Sigma Aldrich) at 5000×, and fragments at 500 µM. Fluorescence was followed with Cy3 and SYAL filters. Denaturation curves were collected using MxPro-Mx3005P v4.10 software and analyzed using the implemented version of wTSA-CRAFT36.

Kinetic measurements using a coupled enzyme system assay

Enzymatic reactions were carried out as previously described34 at 25 °C in 96 half-well flat-bottom plates (Corning) in a reaction volume of 100 µL in Buffer Tris. In the inhibition assays, final concentrations were 0.1 µM APH(2”)-IVa, 350 µM MgATP, 100 µM kanamycin A, 500 µM fragments, 2 mM phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP), 140 µM reduced β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and 1× lactate dehydrogenase/pyruvate kinase (LDH/PK). For Ki determination, final concentrations are given in the figure captions. Plates were placed in a Clariostar plate reader. Reactions were initiated by the addition of MgATP, and the measured absorbance at 340 nm (CLARIOstar v. 5.40 R2 and MARS v. 3.31, BMG Labtech) was divided by the extinction coefficient of NADH (6.22 mM−1 cm−1). The initial rate constants (kss) were then measured using a linear regression of the absorbance as a function of time using GraFit software (v. 7.0.3, Erithacus software). Inhibition constants were determined by global fittings of the dependences of kss as a function of ATP and inhibitor concentrations, using a competitive inhibition equation and GraFit software. The standard error of the Ki value was determined in the GraFit software based on the global fitting of four experimental series.

IC50 measurements using quantification of ATP and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) by HPLC

This method is a direct measurement of the amount of ADP produced during APH enzymatic reaction, as already described35,37. It is more sensitive than the coupled enzyme system assay, which is worthwhile for experiments with APH(3’)-IIb because of the low concentration of ATP used with this enzyme, close to its Km value. The reaction mixture consists of the APH and its substrates, as well as a potential inhibitor for inhibition measurements. Reactions were initiated by adding the ATP solution supplemented or not with the inhibitor, in a thermostated beaker containing the APH. For experiments with APH(2”)-IVa, final concentrations were 0.1 µM APH, 350 µM MgATP, 100 µM kanamycin A and 0–5 µM inhibitor. For experiments with APH(3’)-IIb, final concentrations were 25 nM APH, 15 µM MgATP, 100 µM kanamycin A and 0–5 µM inhibitor. The reaction was stopped at several time points by adding 80 µL of the enzymatic reaction mixture from the beaker to 40 µL of 10% perchloric acid (PCA) in an Eppendorf tube. Samples were then centrifuged for 30 min at 12750 rpm and 8 °C. 100 µL of the supernatant was then mixed with 900 µL of mobile phase (250 mM NaH2PO4, 50% Acetonitrile, pH 5.5) supplemented with KOH to readjust the pH to 5.5 before injection. Sample vials were loaded into the autosampler of an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system. 100 µL of samples were injected on a SAX PartiSphere column (AIT France) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. ATP and ADP peaks were integrated, and the area under the peaks was calculated using OpenLab CDS software (v. ChemStation, Agilent). The kss values were then measured using linear regression in GraFit software and IC50 determined by fitting with a hyperbola the percentage of inhibition as a function of inhibitor concentration. The standard error of the IC50 value was determined in the GraFit software based on the fitting of the experimental data.

Affinity measurement by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

ITC experiments were performed on three different machines: a MicroCal VP-ITC (GE Healthcare), a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern), or a MicroCal iTC200 (Malvern). The architecture and principles are similar for the three different systems. The experiments were carried out in Buffer HEPES at 25 °C. Titrations consisted of twenty injections of 1.5 µL inhibitors, every 120 seconds, into the measuring cell using the injection syringe rotating at 750 rpm. The data were analyzed using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC software (v. 1.52, Malvern) using the single-site binding model to fit the raw data. The standard error of the Kd value was determined from measurements made on distinct samples (n indicated in the text).

X-ray crystallography and structure refinement

Crystallogenesis of APH(2”)-IVa and APH(3’)-IIb has been carried out as described previously29,35,37. We soaked the crystals of the apo forms by introducing ligands in a clear drop consisting of 2 µL of the reservoir next to the drops containing crystals. This new drop was then merged with the drop containing crystals. The ligands were used at a final concentration of 5 mM by adding 0.2 µL of a 100 mM stock solution. Soaking times varied from a few seconds to 1 h, depending on the behavior of the crystal. The crystals were frozen in liquid nitrogen before being shipped for diffraction at the European synchrotron radiation facility (ESRF, France) or Alba (Spain). Structures were solved by molecular replacement with Phaser-MR, using a previously solved structure of the protein in complex with ADP (PDB 4N57) as a model after removal of ligand and water molecules. The structures were subsequently built and refined using Coot38 (v. 0.9.4) and Phenix39 (v. 1.19.2). X-ray data and refinement statistics are given in the Supplementary Table 1-5.

MIC measurements and checkerboard assays

Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria has been tested for various clinical strains listed in the Supplementary Table 6. These strains are from the microbiological collection of Nîmes University Hospital, France (NH) or Hamilton General Hospital, ON, Canada (HGH). They are available upon direct request from the relevant hospitals for academic research purposes (through an MTA) and are disposed of after use. MICs of several antibiotics were characterized using the broth micro-dilution method in 96-well microtest plates (Starstedt). First, glycerol stocks were scraped and streaked onto Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates for clinical strains. Plates were then incubated overnight in a static incubator at 37 °C. On the second day, several clones were collected and used to prepare an inoculum with an OD600nm of between 0.08 and 0.1 in a saline solution. The inoculum was diluted 1:200 in cation-adjusted Müller-Hinton broth (CAMHB).

The final volume of reaction was 100 µL, and serial dilutions of antibiotics were made from column 1 to 10 for a final concentration of antibiotics from 1 to 512 µg mL−1. Columns 11 and 12 were retained for positive and negative controls, respectively. Inocula were added to columns 1 to 11, and CAMHB was added to the negative control column. The final OD600nm of the inocula in the plates was contained between 0.0008 and 0.001. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16 to 20 h, except for enterococci strains, for which plates were incubated for 24 h. Plates were placed in a plate reader (Tecan) after incubation, and MIC values were determined as the lowest concentration of aminoglycoside resulting in complete inhibition of bacterial growth as assessed by reading OD600nm after 18 h of incubation (Magellan v. 6.2 software, Tecan).

Checkerboard assays were performed in 96-well microtest plates (Starstedt) with CAMHB complemented with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), depending on the percentage of DMSO with the ligand used. Inocula were prepared as described above for MIC measurements. The aminoglycoside concentration was varied from row A to H, and the concentration of the potential inhibitor tested was varied from column 1 to 9. If the test is performed in the presence of imipenem, the latter is present in columns 1 to 9, and an additional column is used to test the condition without imipenem (column 10).

Bacterial growth kinetics

P. aeruginosa was pre-cultured in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth at 37 °C under agitation overnight. The optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm) was then measured to adjust the bacterial concentration. An initial suspension was prepared at an OD600nm of 0.1 (≈1 × 10⁷ colony forming units mL−1) and further diluted to obtain a final working concentration of 5 × 10⁵ colony forming units mL−1.

Test compounds were initially dissolved at 100 mM in 100% DMSO and serially diluted to obtain a 2 mM intermediate stock solution in 4% DMSO. Working concentrations (125, 250, and 500 µM) were then prepared by additional twofold dilutions in the same solvent. Finally, 25 µL of each solution was added to the wells, yielding final concentrations of 0, 125, 250, and 500 µM with a DMSO concentration of 1%. Kanamycin A was prepared as an 8192 µg mL−1 stock solution in sterile water and serially diluted two-fold. For each condition, 50 µL of the diluted solution was added to the wells. Final concentrations ranged from 8 to 4096 µg mL−1.

Bacterial suspensions were added to a 96-well plate in a final volume of 100 µL per well with the following setup. Column 1 was the negative control (MH medium + compound, no bacteria). Column 2 was the positive control (MH medium + compound + bacteria, no antibiotic). Columns 3 to 12 contained antibiotics with decreasing concentrations of kanamycin A (4096 to 8 µg mL−1). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and OD600nm was measured every hour using an Infinite M Nano absorbance reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

Each test compound was evaluated at four concentrations (0, 125, 250, and 500 µM), with experimental duplicates performed across two rows. Analysis and representations were conducted using GraFit.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

42004_2025_1795_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (38.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary data (603.5KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (SIAM, ANR-19-AMRB-0001), the Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose (RF20220503015), the Association Grégory Lemarchal and Canadian Institutes for Health Research Foundation Grant (FDN148463). F.H. thanks the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, SIAM-APH, No. 16GW0235, grant number: 01KI2126B) for funding. J.K. is thankful to Fonds France-Canada pour la Recherche and Mitacs for travel grants. The CBS is part of the ChemBioFrance research infrastructure and is a member of the FranceBioImaging (FBI) and the French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (FRISBI), two national infrastructures supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-0004 and ANR-10-INBS-0005, respectively).

Author contributions

J.K.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Wrote the paper. R.D.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis. M.R.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis. M.T.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Revised the manuscript. M.G.: Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Revised the manuscript. G.L.: Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Revised the manuscript. F.H.: Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Revised the manuscript. G.D.W.: Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Revised the manuscript. C.D.R.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis. J.F.G.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Wrote the paper. C.L.: Conceived and designed the analysis; Collected the data; Contributed data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Wrote the paper.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and in Supplementary Data. Should any raw data files be needed in another format, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All structural data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://rcsb.org), with the accession codes: 9QMR, 9QN6, 9QPD, 9QNS, 9QNN, 9QNQ, 9QNW, 9QOE, 9QNY, 9QNX, 9QP9, 9QOC, 9QOD, 9QOI, 9QPB, 9QOK, 9QPL, 9QOM, and 9QOS.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-025-01795-6.

References

  • 1.Aminov, R. History of antimicrobial drug discovery: major classes and health impact. Biochem. Pharm.133, 4–19 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet399, 629–655 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet404, 1199–1226 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kang, S.-J., Kim, D.-H. & Lee, B.-J. Metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors: a continuing challenge for combating antibiotic resistance. Biophys. Chem.309, 107228 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vakulenko, S. B. & Mobashery, S. Versatility of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.16, 430–450 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Krause, K. M., Serio, A. W., Kane, T. R. & Connolly, L. E. Aminoglycosides: an overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med6, a027029 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Böttger, E. C. & Crich, D. Aminoglycosides: time for the resurrection of a neglected class of antibacterials? ACS Infect. Dis.6, 168–172 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ramirez, M. S. & Tolmasky, M. E. Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Drug Resist. Updat.13, 151–171 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wright, G. D. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.2, 499–503 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wright, G. D. & Thompson, P. R. Aminoglycoside phosphotransferases: proteins, structure, and mechanism. Front. Biosci.4, D9–D21 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scheeff, E. D. & Bourne, P. E. Structural evolution of the protein kinase-like superfamily. PLoS Comput. Biol.1, e49 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daigle, D. M., McKay, G. A. & Wright, G. D. Inhibition of aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance enzymes by protein kinase inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem.272, 24755–24758 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burk, D. L. & Berghuis, A. M. Protein kinase inhibitors and antibiotic resistance. Pharmacol. Therapeutics93, 283–292 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fong, D. H., Xiong, B., Hwang, J. & Berghuis, A. M. Crystal structures of two aminoglycoside kinases bound with a eukaryotic protein kinase inhibitor. PLoS ONE6, e19589 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shi, K., Houston, D. R. & Berghuis, A. M. Crystal structures of antibiotic-bound complexes of aminoglycoside 2”-phosphotransferase IVa highlight the diversity in substrate binding modes among aminoglycoside kinases. Biochemistry50, 6237–6244 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Toth, M., Frase, H., Antunes, N. T., Smith, C. A. & Vakulenko, S. B. Crystal structure and kinetic mechanism of aminoglycoside phosphotransferase-2”-IVa. Protein Sci.19, 1565–1576 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shakya, T. & Wright, G. D. Nucleotide selectivity of antibiotic kinases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.54, 1909–1913 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giordanetto, F., Jin, C., Willmore, L., Feher, M. & Shaw, D. E. Fragment hits: what do they look like and how do they bind? J. Med. Chem.62, 3381–3394 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marshall, C. M., Federice, J. G., Bell, C. N., Cox, P. B. & Njardarson, J. T. An update on the nitrogen heterocycle compositions and properties of U.S. FDA-approved pharmaceuticals (2013–2023). J. Med. Chem.67, 11622–11655 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Osborne, J., Panova, S., Rapti, M., Urushima, T. & Jhoti, H. Fragments: where are we now? Biochem. Soc. Trans.48, 271–280 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bon, M., Bilsland, A., Bower, J. & McAulay, K. Fragment-based drug discovery—the importance of high-quality molecule libraries. Mol. Oncol.16, 3761–3777 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cherry, M. & Mitchell, T. in Fragment-based Drug Discovery: A Practical Approach (eds Zartler, E. R. & Shapiro, M.) (Wiley, 2008).
  • 23.Erlanson, D. A., Fesik, S. W., Hubbard, R. E., Jahnke, W. & Jhoti, H. Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.15, 605–619 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance, to Guide Research, Development, and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance (World Health Organization, 2024).
  • 25.Buffa, V. et al. Targeting bacterial kinases as a strategy to counteract antibiotic resistance. Commun. Chem. 10.1038/s42004-025-01794-7 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Lund, D. et al. Extensive screening reveals previously undiscovered aminoglycoside resistance genes in human pathogens. Commun. Biol.6, 812 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Toth, M., Chow, J. W., Mobashery, S. & Vakulenko, S. B. Source of phosphate in the enzymic reaction as a point of distinction among aminoglycoside 2”-phosphotransferases. J. Biol. Chem.284, 6690–6696 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Siregar, J. J., Lerner, S. A. & Mobasheryi, S. Purification and characterization of aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase type Ila and kinetic comparison with a new mutant enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38, 641–647 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kowalewski, J. et al. Structural and molecular basis of resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics by APH(3’)-IIb from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 10.1101/2025.03.30.646141 (2025).
  • 30.Fong, D. H. & Berghuis, A. M. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of 3’-aminoglycoside kinase type IIIa complexed with a eukaryotic protein kinase inhibitor, CKI-7. Acta Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr.60, 1897–1899 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stogios, P. J. et al. Structure-guided optimization of protein kinase inhibitors reverses aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance. Biochem. J.454, 191–200 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boehr, D. D., Lane, W. S. & Wright, G. D. Active site labeling of the gentamicin resistance enzyme AAC(6’)-APH(2”) by the lipid kinase inhibitor wortmannin. Chem. Biol.8, 791–800 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kohl, A. et al. Allosteric inhibition of aminoglycoside phosphotransferase by a designed ankyrin repeat protein. Structure13, 1131–1141 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leban, N., Kaplan, E., Chaloin, L., Godreuil, S. & Lionne, C. Kinetic characterization and molecular docking of novel allosteric inhibitors of aminoglycoside phosphotransferases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj.1861, 3464–3473 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaplan, E. et al. APH inhibitors that reverse aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus casseliflavus. ChemMedChem20, e202400842 (2025) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Reys, V., Kowalewski, J., Gelin, M. & Lionne, C. wTSA-CRAFT: an open-access web server for rapid analysis of thermal shift assay experiments. Bioinform Adv.3, vbad136 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kaplan, E. et al. Aminoglycoside binding and catalysis specificity of aminoglycoside 2”-phosphotransferase IVa: A thermodynamic, structural and kinetic study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Gen. Subj.1860, 802–813 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr.66, 486–501 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D: Biol. Crystallogr.68, 352–367 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

42004_2025_1795_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (38.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary data (603.5KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and in Supplementary Data. Should any raw data files be needed in another format, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All structural data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://rcsb.org), with the accession codes: 9QMR, 9QN6, 9QPD, 9QNS, 9QNN, 9QNQ, 9QNW, 9QOE, 9QNY, 9QNX, 9QP9, 9QOC, 9QOD, 9QOI, 9QPB, 9QOK, 9QPL, 9QOM, and 9QOS.


Articles from Communications Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES