Skip to main content
Journal of Innate Immunity logoLink to Journal of Innate Immunity
. 2025 Nov 28;18(1):16–34. doi: 10.1159/000549824

Neutrophil Plasticity in Airway Disease: Balancing Damage and Repair

Sabina M Janciauskiene a,b,c,, Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko b, Beata Olejnicka a,c, Sabine Wrenger a
PMCID: PMC12757115  PMID: 41321010

Abstract

Background

Neutrophils, previously viewed as short-lived microbial killers, are now recognized as highly adaptable regulators of innate immunity. Advances in transcriptomic, metabolic, and epigenetic profiling reveal their remarkable heterogeneity and ability to adopt microenvironment-specific phenotypes. In the lung, this plasticity gives neutrophils a double role: they fight infection but can also cause long-lasting inflammation, tissue damage, and scarring.

Summary

We review how neutrophils are activated, move, and act in lung disease, focusing on their release of proteases, production of reactive oxygen species, and formation of extracellular traps. We also describe repair-promoting neutrophil types and treatments that aim to reduce damage while keeping normal neutrophil defense intact.

Key Messages

Learning how neutrophils change within the lung microenvironment will help create better and more precise treatments for lung inflammation and tissue damage.

Keywords: Lung diseases, Injury, Inflammation, Innate immunity, Neutrophil plasticity

Introduction

Neutrophils, the most abundant leukocytes in the circulation of mice and men, comprising 50–70% of all white blood cells, express myeloid surface antigens such as CD13, CD15, CD16 (FcγRIII), and CD89 (FcαR) [1, 2]. Neutrophils carry out their immune functions through multiple mechanisms, including phagocytosis, degranulation, and the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [3]. Neutrophils use oxidative and non-oxidative mechanisms to eliminate pathogens and regulate tissue responses, but the same processes can also damage host tissues. In addition, neutrophils release alarmins (such as S100A8/A9 and S100A12), cytokines, and chemokines that activate surrounding cells and coordinate immune responses [2, 4].

Neutrophils originate in the bone marrow, the primary site of granulopoiesis, and have a short lifespan; therefore, approximately 0.5–1 × 1011 neutrophils are produced daily in humans to maintain steady-state circulating levels [5]. Hematopoietic stem cells first differentiate into granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, which then progress through a proliferative phase (myeloblasts, promyelocytes, myelocytes) followed by a maturation phase (metamyelocytes, band cells, and finally mature neutrophils). Throughout this process, neutrophils sequentially acquire distinct granule subsets – primary (azurophilic), secondary (specific), tertiary (gelatinase), and secretory vesicles – each enriched with specialized antimicrobial and immune-modulatory molecules. These include myeloperoxidase (MPO), defensins, and neutrophil elastase (NE) in primary granules; lactoferrin, lysozyme, and NADPH oxidase components in secondary granules; and gelatinase (MMP-9) and adhesion molecules in tertiary granules. Together, these granule components equip mature neutrophils with a broad repertoire of molecules that enable pathogen killing, tissue repair, and modulation of immune responses [5, 6].

Mature neutrophils are released into the bloodstream under strict chemokine regulation. The CXCR4-CXCL12 axis retains neutrophils within the bone marrow, whereas CXCR2 upregulation facilitates their mobilization into circulation. After a short lifespan in the blood, senescent neutrophils return to the bone marrow, where resident macrophages clear them to maintain homeostasis [3]. In humans, the bone marrow contains a large reserve of mature neutrophils, known as the postmitotic marrow pool, which contains approximately 5.6 × 109 neutrophils per kilogram of body weight. Each day, about 0.9 × 109 neutrophils per kilogram are released from this pool into the bloodstream to replace aged or expended cells [7]. This substantial reservoir allows for a rapid increase in circulating neutrophils during infection or inflammation.

Once considered short-lived and functionally limited, neutrophils are now recognized as highly plastic cells that dynamically adapt their migratory and effector functions in response to temporal and environmental cues, including circadian rhythms, chemokine gradients, and adrenergic signals [8, 9]. Moreover, growing evidence indicates that neutrophils exhibit remarkable phenotypic and functional diversity across tissues (Fig. 1). While some populations persist as long-term tissue residents, others are rapidly recruited during inflammation. Their phenotype and function are continuously shaped by the local microenvironment, underscoring the dynamic adaptability of neutrophils [7, 10, 11]. This spatial heterogeneity highlights the ability of neutrophils to perform tissue-specific roles that extend well beyond their traditional antimicrobial functions [12].

Fig. 1.

The figure shows different subpopulations of neutrophils in homeostasis, tissue injury/damage and tissue repair and resolution. In homeostasis neutrophils reside mostly within the blood vessels where they circulate or crawl in order to patrol for intravasal pathogens. Mature, aged and immature neutrophils have different surface markers and different characteristics. In the case of tissue damage neutrohils are the first responders and invade the affected tissues quickly. Activated neutrophils react dependent on the stimuli and microenvironmental factors like nutrient availability, oxygen tension, and metabolic intermediates by polarization into N1 (pro-inflammatory) or N2 (immunomodulatory) neutrophils. Activated neutrophils degranulate to release ROS, NE, PR3, Cath G and inflammatory cytokines, phagocytose pathogens, produce NETs or activate cells of the adaptive immune system. Under anti-inflammatory conditions, e.g., in the presence of glucocorticoids, IL-4 and TGFβ neutrophils support resolution and tissue repair by releasing pro-resolving factors and anti-inflammatory cytokins.

Neutrophil plasticity and function in homeostasis, inflammation, and tissue repair. Neutrophil lifecycle stages are indicated in red. Mature neutrophils are released from the bone marrow into circulation, characterized by low CXCR4 and high CXCR2 and CD62L expression. Upon activation, they follow chemoattractant gradients and extravasate into affected tissues. Exposure to IFNγ and/or LPS polarizes neutrophils toward a proinflammatory “N1” phenotype, exhibiting high degranulation, phagocytic activity, and NET formation. Hyperactivated or aged neutrophils also display elevated phagocytosis and NET formation. In contrast, exposure to TGFβ, IL-4, or glucocorticoids promotes the development of anti-inflammatory, pro-resolving “N2” neutrophils. Immature or tissue-resident neutrophils similarly contribute to inflammation resolution and tissue repair. This presentation was created in BioRender.

Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and intravital imaging now allow detailed characterization of neutrophils [13, 14]. Multiple subpopulations have been identified, including N1- and N2-like polarized types, low-density, immature, aged, tissue-resident, and circulating subsets (Fig. 1). Those in inflamed or diseased tissues differ from circulating or health neutrophils, reflecting epigenetic and metabolic adaptations to the local microenvironment [1517]. Neutrophil plasticity allows them to adopt pro-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, or pro-repair phenotypes depending on their state. In the lung, hyperactivated or aged neutrophils can worsen tissue injury through proteases, reactive oxygen species, and NETs [18]. In tumors, N1-like neutrophils exhibit antitumor activity through cytotoxicity and pro-inflammatory signaling, whereas N2-like neutrophils promote tumor growth by supporting angiogenesis, suppressing immune responses, and facilitating immune evasion [19, 20]. Overall, these findings highlight how neutrophils integrate environmental signals to fine-tune their functions, acting as central regulators of inflammation and tissue homeostasis.

Lung Neutrophils

The human lung, with an extensive surface area of about 130 m2 in adults, provides a vital interface for gas exchange, allowing oxygen to enter the blood and carbon dioxide to be removed. This surface is formed by roughly 480 million alveoli, each surrounded by a dense capillary network that ensures efficient gas transfer. Alveoli are lined by two types of epithelial cells, squamous alveolar epithelial type 1 (AT1) cells (involved primarily in gas and solute exchange), and cuboidal type 2 (AT2) cells (involved in surfactant synthesis and recycling). Additional cells in the alveolar septal wall during health include endothelial cells, fibroblasts, pericytes, macrophages, and mast cells [21, 22].

Inhaled air delivers oxygen but also exposes the lungs to pathogens and environmental irritants. Data from blood sampling methods in dogs, intravital imaging in mice, an indirect gamma camera method in humans, and stiffness analysis of human neutrophils revealed that the lungs have a major reservoir of neutrophils, which can be rapidly mobilized to sites of injury or infection to maintain homeostasis and defend against pathogens [2325]. In patients requiring lung resection, Hogg et al. [26] found a 60–100-fold increased pulmonary capillary transit time for neutrophils compared to erythrocytes using 99mTc-labeled macroaggregates and 51Cr-labeled erythrocytes to measure regional blood flow and volume in the resected lung.

Their proximity to the airway surface enables a fast and effective innate immune response [24, 25]. Moreover, lung neutrophils display distinct phenotypes compared to those in other tissues, likely to reflect the need for tight inflammatory control in the fragile alveolar environment [27]. Studies in mice have shown that most lung neutrophils are CD62Llo and express high levels of CXCR4, similar to aged neutrophils, suggesting that CXCR4 helps their migration to and retention within the lungs [28, 29]. The CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor induces a massive neutrophil release from the lung into the circulation in mice and macaques indicating the role of CXCR4 for neutrophil margination [30].

Intravital microscopy in mice demonstrate that under homeostatic conditions, most neutrophils reside in the pulmonary vasculature, with only a few in the interstitium or subepithelial space and very few in the alveolar lumen (Fig. 2) [8, 3134]. Within the vasculature, they interact with monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes, forming local networks that coordinate immune surveillance and inflammatory responses [35, 36]. The cytokine production of LPS-stimulated monocytes was reduced in patients with neutropenia compared to non-neutropenic individuals indicating the importance of neutrophils for monocyte/macrophage recruitment and function [37].

Fig. 2.

The figure shows the localization of marginated neutrophils in the lung capillaries of one alveolus. Marginated neutrophils differ from circulating neutrophils by expressing high CXCR4 and low CXCR2 on the surface whereas circulating neutrophils express low CD62L. In healthy lung, interstitial tissues and airspaces are mostly free of neutrophils and epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages are not affected by them.

Schematic representation of marginated neutrophils in the lung. The lung contains a large population of marginated neutrophils characterized by high CXCR4hi and low CXCR2lo differing from circulating neutrophils expressing CD62Llo. These cells are primarily located in alveolar capillaries and pulmonary vessels supplying the airways. Marginated neutrophils adhere to the endothelium without obstructing blood flow, forming a dynamic reservoir that can be rapidly mobilized when needed. Approximately one-third of these cells crawl along endothelial surfaces to patrol for circulating pathogens. In healthy lungs, few extravascular neutrophils are present, and alveolar macrophages as well as epithelial AT1 and AT2 cells are not affected by marginated neutrophils. This presentation was created in BioRender.

Upon activation, pulmonary neutrophils act as frontline defenders, crawling along the capillary endothelium, capturing pathogens, and initiating phagocytose within minutes [32]. Although lung capillaries primarily support gas exchange, they also serve as a key site for neutrophil margination, allowing large numbers to accumulate. This localization enables neutrophils to patrol for circulating pathogens, unlike the mononuclear cell-dominated defenses of the spleen and liver, and provides an efficient environment for cell-cell interactions that promote apoptosis of aged neutrophils [32, 33, 38].

In mice, high-resolution imaging has shown that most pulmonary neutrophils remain intravascular under steady-state conditions, migrating along narrow (<10 µm) capillaries without rolling, while only a small proportion (∼14%) reside the interstitium or subepithelial regions, and very few enter the alveolar space [8, 32]. Neutrophil retention in the lung was thought to be a passive consequence of narrow capillaries, branched vasculature, and low pulmonary blood pressure. Recent studies, however, demonstrate that this process is actively regulated: aged neutrophils are preferentially recruited during inflammation, whereas adrenergic signaling, particularly via β2-adrenergic receptors, can rapidly mobilize them back into circulation [8, 30, 39]. As demonstrated with 111In-labeled neutrophils in sheep, the pulmonary neutrophil reservoir includes both, the capillaries, which support gas exchange, and the bronchial vessels supplying airways, lymph nodes, and nerves, forming a specialized niche that enables rapid immune responses while limiting tissue damage [40]. These latter highlight the lung as a dynamic interface that regulates neutrophil trafficking and retention and contributes to systemic immune homeostasis.

Pulmonary Neutrophil Recruitment

Pulmonary neutrophils exhibit highly dynamic, context-dependent migration in response to infectious and sterile inflammatory stimuli [41, 42]. The degree of infiltration into the lung parenchyma correlates with pathogen burden, virulence, and disease severity. During viral infections such as influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and respiratory syncytial virus, in human and non-human primates neutrophils rapidly accumulate in the airways and alveolar spaces [43, 44]. Cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) enhance neutrophil recruitment by airway epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages to express CXC chemokines, including CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 (IL-8). Experiments using neutrophils from healthy donors, primary human lung cells, and mouse models revealed key regulators of neutrophil migration. Neutrophils respond via chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, which recognize CXC chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8/IL-8) containing ELR motif (Glu-Leu-Arg) ELR+ CXC as well as complement receptors like C5aR1, guiding them to sites of infection or tissue damage [45, 46].

CXCR2 signaling plays a central role in neutrophil mobilization and transmigration across the alveolar-capillary barrier, and CXCR2 antagonists are currently being evaluated clinically for acute lung injury and viral infections [47]. As neutrophils migrate through intrapulmonary compartments (endovascular, interstitial, and intra-alveolar), they adjust adhesion molecule expressions, indicating that specific adhesive interactions regulate compartmental checkpoints. CXCL5 (epithelium-derived neutrophil-activating peptide-78, ENA-78) is expressed in human alveolar type 2 epithelial cells (A549), human lung fibroblast and pulmonary endothelial cells, macrophages, monocytes, and, in contrast to CXCL1 and CXCL8, CXCL5 is stored in cytoplasmic membranous structures [48]. Upon activation, CXCL5 can be released immediately from intracellular stores. In rodents, lung alveolar type 2 cells (AT2) were identified as the primary source of CXCL5. Neutrophil accumulation in the LPS-challenged lung was strongly reduced in mice pretreated with anti-CXCL5 antibodies demonstrating the importance of this chemokine [49].

Recent studies show that circadian fluctuations in club cell-derived CXCL5, controlled by clock gene-dependent glucocorticoid responses, drive diurnal variations in alveolar neutrophilia in response to inhaled LPS in mice [50]. Both CXCL5 and CXCL15, another murine ELR+ CXC chemokine with an as-yet poorly defined receptor, are produced by respiratory epithelial cells, including alveolar type 1 (AT1), type 2 (AT2), and club cells (CXCL5), as well as airway epithelial cells (CXCL15), highlighting the key role of epithelial-immune cross-talk in orchestrating neutrophil recruitment [8].

Beyond chemotaxis, neutrophil recruitment is regulated by metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming. For example, activation of HIF-1α-dependent glycolysis by viral RNA or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) enhances neutrophil longevity and functional activity within hypoxic alveolar regions [51]. In a zebrafish inflammatory model, HIF-1α stimulation reduces neutrophil death, delaying the resolution of inflammation [52]. Neutrophils detect pathogens via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors, NOD-like receptors, and RIG-I-like receptors, which sense viral proteins, double-stranded RNA, and other pathogen-associated molecular patterns [53]. Stimulation of TLR7, TLR8, or TLR9 triggers NF-κB-dependent IL-8 production and NET formation in mammals, mechanisms that can restrict viral dissemination while contributing to lung tissue injury, as seen in diseases such as COVID-19 [54]. Human neutrophils can also directly interact with influenza A virus via surface glycoproteins such as CD43, Siglec-9, and DC-SIGN, facilitating viral recognition and internalization [55, 56]. This interaction triggers ROS generation and NET release but may also support viral persistence through neutrophil-mediated immune evasion.

Pulmonary neutrophil recruitment is regulated by chemokine gradients, complement activation, PRR signaling, and local metabolic factors. Chemokines from epithelial cells and macrophages guide neutrophils via CXCR1 and CXCR2 into the alveolar space, while complement C5a amplifies their migration and responsiveness. PRR signaling through Toll-like receptors and NOD-like receptors senses pathogen-associated molecular patterns and DAMPs, triggering cytokines like TNF, IL-1β, and G-CSF to sustain neutrophil production and recruitment. Local metabolic conditions – such as hypoxia, lactate buildup, and changes in glucose and lipid metabolism – further shape neutrophil activation and survival. High-resolution single-cell analyses reveal that neutrophils recruited to the inflamed lung are highly heterogeneous. Identified subsets include pro-inflammatory neutrophils with high CXCL8 and S100A8/A9, interferon-responsive populations expressing ISGs, and tissue-repairing neutrophils producing VEGFA and MMP9. Single-cell spatial analysis of COVID-19 patient lungs and single-cell transcriptome analysis of a bacterial lung infection mice model show that neutrophil recruitment is not just a quantitative process but a functionally diverse response balancing antimicrobial defense and tissue injury [13, 57, 58].

Pulmonary Neutrophil Plasticity and Functional Roles

Neutrophils show remarkable plasticity, rapidly adapting their migration, phagocytosis, and signaling in response to local and systemic signals [8, 9] (Fig. 3). Upon activation, they initiate diverse effector responses, including ROS generation, degranulation, and the formation of NETs, web-like DNA-histone structures decorated with granule proteins such as NE and MPO, which immobilize pathogens and concentrate antimicrobial activity [59, 60]. During NETosis, human neutrophils decondense chromatin and mix it with granule enzymes before it is released as a three-dimensional network of DNA fibers (∼15–17 nm) coated with protein domains (∼25 nm) [61, 62]. While essential for host defense, excessive NETosis can damage tissue and exacerbate inflammation, contributing to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [63]. Clearance of apoptotic neutrophils and NETs by alveolar macrophages limits secondary injury and promotes repair.

Fig. 3.

The figure shows an inflamed alveolus with edema and lots of epithelia transmigrating, infiltrating, degranulating, NET producing and phygocytosing neutrophils on the left. They react to pathogens like bacteria, viruses and environmental particles introduced together with the airflow. In addition, much of mucus produced by AT2 cells is collected on the left side. On the right side we see only 2 immune cells: a phagocyte clears apoptotic bodies from dead cells and NETs and a neutrophils supports resolution by secreting pro-angiogenic, pro-resolving factors, like lipoxins and resolvins. Here, the epithelial cell layer is closed and doesn't allow edema formation. Both, damage and inflammation on the one side of the seesaw and tissue repair and resolution on another must be balanced carefully in order to prevent serious lung damage leading to different diseases.

Schematic presentation of neutrophil subtypes and functions in alveolar damage, inflammation, and tissue repair. Upon stimulation, large numbers of neutrophils emigrate from the circulation, migrate through the interstitial layer, and transmigrate across the alveolar epithelium to invade alveolar airspaces. Therefore, they degranulate, phagocytose pathogens, and form NETs to combat infections. Granule-derived products can disrupt endothelial and epithelial barrier functions, contributing to edema formation and recruitment of adaptive immune cells. Activated alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells help protect the epithelial lining and support pathogen clearance through enhanced mucus production. Neutrophils also contribute to tissue repair and resolution of inflammation by NET-mediated pathogen trapping, phagocytosis of debris, and secretion of pro-angiogenic and pro-resolving factors. This presentation was created in BioRender.

Neutrophil behavior is highly adaptable and shaped by both external signals and intracellular checkpoints [27, 64, 65]. Activation of the V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) receptor shifts neutrophils toward degranulation instead of phagocytosis, and in mice, Streptococcus pneumoniae infection promotes degranulating neutrophil phenotype, while Escherichia coli infection favors a pro-phagocytic phenotype [66]. Intracellular regulators such as Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP1) limit excessive activation. Loss of SHP1 in inflamed lungs leads to uncontrolled SYK signaling, hyper-inflammation, enhanced degranulation and NET formation, pulmonary hemorrhage, and lethality in mice models of acute lung injury [27, 67].

The local microenvironment further fine-tunes neutrophil responses. Data from healthy donor neutrophils, ARDS patients, and mice models show that neutrophils exhibit increased degranulation and protease release, thereby exacerbating injury in hypoxic regions of inflamed lungs. Hypoxia-inducible factors integrate metabolic and inflammatory signals, promoting degranulation and NETosis while linking oxygen sensing to immune activity [6870]. Collectively, these findings illustrate that pulmonary neutrophils are functionally diverse, with distinct subtypes contributing variably to inflammation, or tissue repair, depending on their transcriptional program and local environmental signals [17, 51, 71, 72].

Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of Neutrophils across Airway Inflammatory Diseases

Airway inflammation involves the infiltration of immune cells and the release of cytokines, chemokines, proteases, and ROS, disrupting epithelial integrity and tissue balance [18, 73]. Across acute and chronic lung diseases like ARDS, COPD, alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD)-related emphysema, asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, neutrophils play a central, often disease-defining role. Data from human cohorts and different animal models show that in ARDS, excessive degranulation and NET formation cause acute alveolar injury; in COPD and AATD-related emphysema, persistent neutrophilic inflammation and protease-antiprotease imbalance drive alveolar destruction; in CF, neutrophil dysfunction contributes to mucus obstruction and chronic infection, and in fibrotic lung diseases, dysregulated neutrophil activity amplifies fibro-proliferative signaling [7476]. During acute respiratory infections such as influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and bacterial pneumonia, neutrophils are rapidly recruited to the airways, where they phagocytose pathogens, release ROS, and form NETs. While these responses aid pathogen clearance, excessive neutrophil activation can damage the alveolar-capillary barrier, causing pulmonary edema, and hypoxemia [7779]. In chronic conditions like COPD, sustained neutrophilic inflammation, driven by cigarette smoke, environmental exposures, or persistent infection, leads to continuous protease release, degrading extracellular matrix and impairing tissue repair [80, 81]. These examples demonstrate the plasticity of neutrophils, whose tightly regulated recruitment, activation, and clearance maintain lung homeostasis. When dysregulated, they shift from protective defenders to drivers of chronic tissue injury and remodeling, reflecting their dual roles in inflammation and repair (Table 1).

Table 1.

Key neutrophil mechanisms and therapeutic targets by disease

Disease Key neutrophil mechanisms (pathogenic) Translational targets/therapies (examples)
COPD CXCR1/2-driven recruitment, NE/MMP release, NETs, PGP generation CXCR2 antagonists; NE inhibitors; macrolides; anti-NET strategies (PAD4 inhibitors, DNase) [8285]
AATD emphysema Unopposed NE/PR3/cathepsin G → elastin degradation; neutrophil priming and NETs AAT augmentation (IV/inhaled); selective NE inhibitors [8689]
Pulmonary fibrosis NETs + proteases → TGF-β activation, fibroblast → myofibroblast transition NET inhibitors (PAD4), DNase, anti-TGF-β adjuncts (preclinical + translational) [90]
PH NETs → endothelial dysfunction, in situ thrombosis, PASMC proliferation Antithrombotic/anti-NET strategies; protease inhibition; prostacyclin analogues; anti-inflammatory modulators [91, 92]
Asthma (neutrophilic) IL-17/CXCR2 axis, steroid resistance, NETs, mucus hypersecretion CXCR2 antagonists; macrolides; IL-17/IL-23 pathway modulators; NET-limiting therapies [93, 94]
Bronchiectasis Chronic infection → persistent NE/NET release, mucus stasis, tissue destruction Long-term macrolides; inhaled/systemic NE, cathepsin C inhibitors; airway clearance; NET clearance strategies [95, 96]
Lung cancer TAN plasticity (N1 vs. N2), NE/NETs promote invasion, immunosuppression and metastasis TAN reprogramming (TGF-β blockade), CXCR2 inhibition, NET/NE neutralization + combination immunotherapy [9799]

NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; PAD4, protein arginine deiminase 4; PASMC, pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells; PGP, proline-glycine-proline; PR3, proteinase-3; TAN, tumor-associated neutrophil.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

In COPD, regardless of clinical phenotype, neutrophils are key drivers of persistent airway inflammation, ECM degradation, and impaired tissue repair [100]. The degree of neutrophilic inflammation correlates with airflow limitation and accelerated decline in lung function, as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) [80]. Cigarette smoke and air pollutants activate epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages to release neutrophil chemoattractants, including CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL1/2, and GM-CSF, thereby sustaining neutrophil recruitment, activation, and delayed apoptosis [100]. Activated neutrophils release proteolytic enzymes such as NE, MPO, and matrix metalloproteinases (notably MMP-9), along with ROS, which collectively degrade elastin, collagen, and other structural components of the lung. This process not only impairs mucociliary clearance but also amplifies inflammation through collagen-derived fragments like proline-glycine-proline (PGP) [81].

In COPD, neutrophils show enhanced sensitivity of danger signals. During acute exacerbations, key innate immune receptors, TLR2, TLR4, and the NLRP3 inflammasome, are upregulated compared with stable disease [101]. This makes neutrophils more responsive to DAMPs such as S100 proteins, defensins, and HMGB1, which are increased in COPD lungs, leading to the release of IL-1β and IL-18 and worsening inflammation [102]. Interestingly, changes in neutrophil precursors can be seen even in peripheral blood from early-stage COPD patients, suggesting that the immune system is primed before symptoms appear [103].

Recent single-cell and functional studies have identified distinct neutrophil subsets in COPD. One subset exhibits hyperinflammatory or proteolytic features, with enhanced degranulation and NETosis, while another shows immunoregulatory or low-activation characteristics [51, 103]. The abundance of these subsets correlates with exacerbation frequency and lung function decline. Both human and mouse studies have shown that senescent neutrophils, characterized by high CXCR4, low CD62L, smaller size, hyper-segmented nuclei, and increased NETosis, accumulate during chronic inflammation and contribute to tissue damage [81, 104]. These CXCR4hi neutrophils are elevated in COPD patients [105]. At the same time, chronic inflammation can trigger emergency granulopoiesis, releasing immature neutrophils with low CD16, CD10, and CXCR2, band-shaped nuclei, and reduced granule content [81]. While these immature populations are observed in COPD, their functional roles remain unclear.

Beyond their antimicrobial and tissue-destructive roles, neutrophils also contribute to tissue repair and resolution of inflammation [51, 106]. During the later stages of inflammation, they help clearing cellular debris and apoptotic cells, remodeling the extracellular matrix, and releasing growth- and repair-promoting mediators. These reparative functions are regulated by lipid mediators, such as resolvins, protectins, and lipoxins, and pro-resolving signaling pathways that help to restore tissue homeostasis and limit chronic inflammation [107]. In COPD, however, these processes are often impaired. Neutrophil-derived NETs and proteases like NE can drive fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation, promoting aberrant remodeling and fibrosis, while excessive NE suppresses epithelial regeneration and compromises host defense [108, 109]. Elevated NET levels in sputum correlate with worse lung function, and reduced neutrophil phagocytic capacity, suggesting that excessive NETosis may impair bacterial clearance [110].

In summary, neutrophils in COPD drive proteolysis, oxidative injury, NET-mediated inflammation, and abnormal tissue remodeling, while their capacity for repair and resolution is limited [100]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that control these divergent neutrophil phenotypes is essential for developing therapies that lower harmful activities while preserving or restoring beneficial functions.

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency-Related Emphysema

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) results from mutations in the SERPINA1 gene, which encodes alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), the main circulating inhibitor of neutrophil proteases [111]. The Z allele (Glu342Lys) is the most clinically studied; homozygous PiZZ individuals have severely reduced functional AAT levels (about 10% of normal, which is in blood 1–2 g/L) and can develop early-onset emphysema, even without smoking [112, 113]. Inadequate AAT allows unopposed proteolysis, driving ECM degradation and tissue injury, a key feature of the pathogenesis of AATD-related lung disease [114]. Excessive NE and proteinase-3 (PR3) degrade elastin, collagen, and the basement membrane, impair mucociliary clearance, and generate collagen-derived chemoattractants such as PGP, which sustain neutrophil recruitment via CXCR1/CXCR2 [115117]. This self-amplifying cycle drives alveolar destruction, loss of elastic recoil, and emphysema [112]. Elevated NE, PR3, and MPO activity in sputum or plasma correlate with lung function decline and CT-quantified emphysema in patients with AATD [118]. Several studies have shown that neutrophils from PiZZ AATD patients exhibit a “primed” phenotype with increased ROS generation, enhanced degranulation, and exaggerated NETosis, contributing to alveolar injury even in the absence of infection [112, 119121]. Heterozygous PiMZ carriers also show increased neutrophil infiltration and worse airflow limitation compared to PiMM (having normal AAT) individuals [122]. A key but often overlooked mechanism in AATD is impaired clearance of apoptotic neutrophils and NET remnants [123].

Proteomic analyses of neutrophils from AATD patients reveal upregulation of integrins (αL, αM, αX, β2) and cytoskeletal regulators such as talin-1, indicating enhanced adhesion and migratory capacity [124]. Hypoxic conditions associated with advanced AATD-related emphysema further activate neutrophils, increasing production of hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrite, and nitric oxide, while also stimulating the release of IL-1β and TNF-α, which amplify inflammation [125, 126]. Hypoxia has been shown to potentiate degranulation and NETosis in AATD neutrophils, highlighting a synergistic effect of inflammatory and hypoxic microenvironments on neutrophil [127, 128]. NETs from AATD neutrophils are abnormally persistent and resistant to DNase [129], likely due to citrullinated histones and oxidative DNA modifications [130]. Components of these NETs, including histones, proteases, and mitochondrial DNA, can activate alveolar macrophages and fibroblasts, promoting airway remodeling and fibrosis [131]. Normally, macrophages remove dying neutrophils through efferocytosis to resolve inflammation. In AATD lungs, persistent protease activity, oxidative stress, and low AAT impair this clearance, leading to secondary necrosis and continuous DAMP release. Accumulated NET debris further activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and sustains IL-1β-driven inflammation, linking neutrophil persistence to ongoing tissue damage [132, 133]. NET-related markers, such as cell-free DNA, citrullinated histone H3, and extracellular vesicle (EV) proteases, are emerging as potential biomarkers for disease progression and exacerbation risk [79].

Neutrophil-derived EVs, enriched in proteases like NE and microRNAs, are detected in plasma and BAL fluid of AATD patients. NE is a major driver of tissue destruction in both COPD and AATD-related emphysema. Endogenous inhibitors such as AAT, secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor (SLPI) [134], and α2-macroglobulin (α2M) [135] tightly regulate NE activity. However, NE is stored at extremely high concentrations within azurophil granules (≈5.33 mm; ∼67,000 molecules per granule). Upon quantal release, this creates a transient pericellular burst in which local NE levels exceed those of available antiproteases – such as α1-antitrypsin (∼30 µm) – by nearly three orders of magnitude, allowing a brief period of essentially unopposed proteolytic activity [117, 136, 137]. Moreover, COPD patient-derived exosomes bound NE resists AAT inhibition, preserving its proteolytic activity and promoting lung matrix degradation, while sustaining systemic inflammation and barrier dysfunction [138140].

Crosstalk between neutrophils, epithelial cells, and macrophages is central to AATD pathology [141]. NE and PR3 activate protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) in human bronchial epithelial cells, causing mucus hypersecretion [142], while ROS and proteases stimulate epithelial CXCL8 and GM-CSF release, further enhancing neutrophil recruitment and survival. Activated macrophages release TNF-α and IL-1β, priming neutrophils, while fibroblasts exposed to neutrophil proteases and EVs acquire a pro-fibrotic phenotype, contributing to airway remodeling and tissue injury [143, 144].

Currently used AAT augmentation therapy restores antiprotease capacity, reduces systemic inflammation, modifies neutrophil membrane proteome, and limits degranulation [145, 146]. Confocal microscopy and mass spectrometry show that PMA-induced NETs of PiZZ AATD patient neutrophils isolated directly after AAT infusion differ in size and shape from NETs of those isolated before AAT infusion [147]. Experimental strategies targeting CXCR2 signaling, NE activity or NET formation have shown promise in preclinical AATD and emphysema models [148150]. Given the heterogeneity of neutrophils, future therapies may aim not only to suppress excessive activation but also to promote resolution and repair-oriented neutrophil functions.

Neutrophils in Other Pulmonary Diseases

Asthma

Neutrophilic asthma accounts for approximately 20%–30% of all asthma cases and represents a severe subtype characterized by excessive neutrophil accumulation and activation in the airways [151, 152]. It is primarily associated with non-type 2 (non-Th2) inflammation and steroid-resistant endotypes, although neutrophils can coexist with eosinophils in mixed granulocytic forms. Unlike eosinophilic (type 2) asthma, which is driven by IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 signaling and typically responds to corticosteroids, neutrophilic asthma is dominated by a Th1/Th17 imbalance and innate immune-driven inflammation, making it less responsive to standard anti-inflammatory therapies [153156].

The role of neutrophils in asthma is complex and not fully understood [157]. Airway neutrophilia is driven by epithelial-derived CXCL8, IL-17 (from Th17 and γδ T cells), and IL-6 and is sustained by microbial colonization or repeated pollutant exposure. Neutrophils in asthmatic airways show increased NETosis, protease release (e.g., NE, MMP-9), and prolonged survival due to GM-CSF and delayed apoptosis, which impair mucociliary clearance, damage epithelium, and enhance airway hyperresponsiveness [158, 159]. NETs and proteases can activate sensory nerves and stimulate mucus production via EGFR signaling, contributing to airflow obstruction [160, 161]. Neutrophil-dominant asthma is often steroid-resistant but may respond to targeted therapies such as CXCR2 antagonists, IL-17/IL-23 inhibitors, macrolides, or NET-limiting strategies (e.g., protein arginine deiminase 4 [PAD4] inhibition, DNase) while preserving host defense [162164].

Importantly, NETs can also be beneficial: they trap and kill bacteria [61], viruses [165], and fungi [166, 167]. NETs can promote the resolution of inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines [168] and inhibit GM-CSF/IL-4-induced dendritic cell differentiation from human peripheral blood monocytes [169]. In a mouse model for colitis-associated cancer, MMP-9 was found to reduce ROS accumulation and DNA damage [170]. Finally, through the release of antimicrobial peptides, growth factors, and pro-resolving mediators, neutrophils can contribute to mucosal barrier integrity and tissue repair. Understanding how epithelial injury, PRR activation, and neutrophil responses interact is essential for developing therapies that target innate immune pathways in severe treatment-resistant asthma.

Cystic Fibrosis

CF is an autosomal recessive disorder that impairs mucus clearance, promoting bacterial colonization and chronic lung infection [171]. From CF airways, neutrophil populations were isolated, which can suppress T-cell function by arginase I upregulation [172, 173], and under certain conditions can acquire features of antigen-presenting cells, including expression of CD80, CD86, and MHC II, potentially influencing adaptive immune responses [174]. Immature neutrophils can also upregulate CXCR4 upon activation, enabling them to migrate from inflamed tissues into lymphatic vessels [105, 174, 175]. This trafficking to lymph nodes has been linked to T-cell proliferation, suggesting that neutrophils in CF may contribute to adaptive immunity [176].

Most CF patients are currently treated with CFTR modulators, such as elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), which effectively increase CFTR function in multiple organs including the lungs. However, single-cell RNAseq studies of CF children’s nasal cells have shown that ETI only partially restored the expression of inflammatory genes in CF immune cells (neutrophils and macrophages) [177]. Consistent with this, ETI reduces the activities of NE, PR3, and cathepsin G and decreases levels of IL-1β and IL-8 but does not fully normalize the inflammatory profile in CF patients [178]. Importantly, CF neutrophils continue to exhibit functional defects, including poorly resolving inflammatory responses, impaired bacterial clearance, excessive degranulation, and elevated store-operated Ca2+ entry [179181].

Several studies have shown reduced CXCR1 expression on neutrophils in airway inflammatory diseases, particularly in CF patients [182]. IL-8 promotes neutrophil bacterial killing via CXCR1 but not CXCR2 [183]. In CF, excessive airway proteases cleave CXCR1, impairing neutrophil bacterial-killing function [183, 184]. This protease-dependent cleavage generates soluble glycosylated CXCR1 fragments that stimulate IL-8 production in bronchial epithelial cells through TLR2 activation. Notably, inhaled AAT can inhibit proteases, restore CXCR1 expression, and improve neutrophil bacterial killing in vivo [185]. Thus, CXCR1 cleavage and the activity of its soluble fragments represent a specific pathogenic mechanism in CF and potentially other chronic neutrophilic lung diseases. New therapeutic strategies beyond long-term NSAID and steroids include anti-cytokine or anti-cytokine receptor strategies to target oxidative stress, cytokine secretion, and other dysregulated pathways to limit CF inflammation [186].

Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is characterized by irreversible airway dilation and chronic neutrophilic inflammation driven by persistent infection, impaired mucociliary clearance, and a self-sustaining protease-antiprotease imbalance [187]. Neutrophils dominate the inflammatory infiltrate, releasing NE, PR3, and MPO, which degrade epithelial junctions and extracellular matrix, promote mucus plugging, and generate collagen fragments (e.g., PGP) that recruit additional neutrophils via CXCR1/CXCR2 [96]. Chronic airway infection with bacteria and, to a lesser extent, infection with fungi or viruses, contributes to the vicious inflammation in bronchiectasis [188]. The most common pathogens isolated from patients with bronchiectasis are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae [189]. These pathogens stimulate mucin overproduction as shown in a human mucoepidermoid carcinoma cell line [190], exacerbate inflammation, and release chemotactic factors that attract neutrophils [187, 189].

Frequent bacterial colonization drives neutrophils into a dysfunctional, hyperactivated state, characterized by impaired bacterial killing but excessive degranulation and NET formation, which contribute to bronchial wall damage and recurrent exacerbations [191]. Sputum and BAL levels of NE activity and NET markers correlate with disease severity, lung function decline, and exacerbation frequency in bronchiectasis [192, 193].

In bronchiectasis, neutrophils are reprogrammed both transcriptionally and functionally, adopting heterogeneous activation states likely driven by chronic infection, epithelial DAMP signaling, and an altered lung microbiome [194, 195]. Compared with healthy individuals, blood neutrophils from stable bronchiectasis patients show prolonged survival, delayed apoptosis, increased CD62L shedding, upregulated CD11b, elevated MPO release, and impaired phagocytosis [196]. Both blood and airway neutrophil phagocytic and bactericidal functions are reduced at the onset of exacerbations but recover after antibiotic treatment. This neutrophil plasticity creates a paradox: neutrophils are hyperactivated, with elevated NE and NET formation correlating with radiological severity, sputum volume, and exacerbation risk, yet they show impaired antimicrobial function, including reduced phagocytosis and bacterial killing. These findings have promoted development of two main therapeutic strategies: limiting protease activity (e.g., cathepsin C or NE inhibitors) and targeting PGP-CXCR signaling or NET formation/clearance (Table 1). Key questions remain about causality, the reversibility of neutrophil dysfunction, and optimal patient stratification for targeted therapies.

Pulmonary Fibrosis (Including Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Secondary Fibroses)

Pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive lung disease characterized by scarring and stiffening of lung tissue, which reduces lung elasticity and impairs respiratory function. Disease progression varies among patients [74]. Although pulmonary fibrosis has traditionally been considered a fibroblast-driven disorder, growing evidence indicates that neutrophils and NETs contribute to fibrotic processes.

Activated neutrophils and NET components, including DNA, histones, NE, MPO, and other proteases, stimulate lung fibroblasts to adopt myofibroblast phenotypes, enhance TGF-β activation, and increase collagen and MMP production [90]. NETs also act as scaffolds that concentrate profibrotic enzymes and cytokines and can polarize macrophages toward profibrotic phenotypes [90]. Neutrophils may also contribute to tissue repair. NETs can localize enzymes and cytokines that support tissue remodeling, while neutrophil-derived EVs can modulate fibroblast activity and promote repair [90, 197]. Clinically, elevated neutrophil counts, NET biomarkers, and neutrophil-associated proteases correlate with disease progression in patient cohorts [198]. These findings support neutrophil-targeted strategies, such as NET inhibitors, DNase, PAD4 inhibitors, and blocking neutrophil-fibroblast crosstalk, as complementary antifibrotic approaches alongside current therapies like nintedanib and pirfenidone.

Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises conditions that elevate blood pressure in the pulmonary arteries [199]. This results from sustained vasoconstriction, abnormal vascular remodeling, and in situ thrombosis, which increase pulmonary vascular resistance [200]. Lung remodeling is driven by factors such as hypoxia, inflammation, shear stress, and genetic predisposition, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of worsening pulmonary hemodynamics and vascular changes [201, 202].

Although studies are limited, neutrophils have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PH. In hypoxia- and monocrotaline-induced PH models in rats, neutrophil numbers are increased [203] and components of NETs, such as MPO and NE, are upregulated in patients with PH [204]. NE has been detected within pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) and in neointimal lesions (areas of abnormal cell proliferation and tissue remodeling) in both PH patients and animal models [205]. NE activates MMPs and drives ECM degradation, disrupting vascular integrity and promoting remodeling. It also suppresses bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) signaling, which is essential for pulmonary vascular homeostasis [206]. These effects result in excessive PASMC proliferation, endothelial apoptosis, and vascular remodeling, ultimately increasing pulmonary vascular resistance. Additionally, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in blood reflects subclinical inflammation and is associated with poor prognosis in PH as in other diseases [207, 208].

NETs contribute to PH by promoting endothelial dysfunction, activating coagulation, and stimulating pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation through NET-derived proteases and receptor-mediated signaling. They also enhance pro-inflammatory responses and angiogenesis, exacerbating PH via the MPO/H2O2/NF-κB/TLR4 signaling pathway [209, 210]. A recent PH trial showed that elafin improved pulmonary artery endothelial cell function and reversed PH [204]. Elevated circulating NET markers and neutrophil-derived proteases seem to worsen hemodynamics and right-heart strain in PH patients [211]. These findings suggest that NET- or protease-targeted therapies could help reduce vascular remodeling and thrombosis in selected PH patients.

Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide [212, 213]. Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are a major component of the tumor microenvironment, promoting cancer cell growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis, with higher TAN levels correlating with poorer clinical outcomes [214216]. However, TANs can exert both pro- and anti-tumor effects, depending on cancer type, stage, and characteristics of the tumor microenvironment [217]. TANs are highly plastic and can be either tumor-suppressive (N1) or tumor-promoting (N2), depending on local cytokines and metabolic signals [218, 219]. N1 neutrophils, activated by inflammatory stimuli such as LPS or IFN-γ, express high levels of activation markers (CD11b, CD66b, CD64) and CXCR2, which promotes recruitment to sites of inflammation [51, 220]. In contrast, N2 neutrophils, induced by anti-inflammatory factors like TGF-β, IL-4, or glucocorticoids, show elevated CD16, CD163, CD206, and CXCR4, allowing them to home to the bone marrow and lymphoid organs where they exert immunomodulatory effects [51, 221, 222]. Distinguishing N1 and N2 neutrophils remains challenging due to the lack of definitive markers, and their phenotypes are highly dynamic. Recent transcriptomic studies from lung cancer patients and lung cancer bearing mice have also identified additional TAN subsets, including immature, low-density, and interferon-responsive neutrophils, highlighting the complexity of neutrophil polarization in the tumor microenvironment [223, 224].

Protumor TAN activities include secretion of NE and matrix-remodeling enzymes that facilitate invasion, production of ROS and arginase that suppress T cells, NET-mediated trapping of circulating tumor cells to promote metastasis, and release of growth factors and EVs that enhance angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation [225, 226]. Conversely, some TAN subsets show antitumor cytotoxicity and antigen-presenting functions, particularly in early lesions. Because TAN phenotype is plastic, therapeutic strategies under investigation aim to reprogram TANs (e.g., block TGF-β, inhibit CXCR2, or enhance IFN signaling), neutralize protumor neutrophil products (NETs, NE), or combine neutrophil-targeted agents with checkpoint inhibitors to improve immunotherapy responses [227, 228].

Conclusion

Neutrophils are versatile regulators of lung immunity, capable of rapid adaptation to local environmental signals. While their plasticity allows effective host defense, dysregulated neutrophil activation drives chronic inflammation, tissue damage, and fibrosis across a range of pulmonary diseases, including COPD, AATD, asthma, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and lung cancer. Emerging evidence from single-cell and multi-omics studies highlights the functional heterogeneity of neutrophils, revealing both pathogenic and reparative subsets. Targeted therapies, such as CXCR2 antagonists, protease inhibitors, and modulators of neutrophil-derived EVs, hold promise for restoring the balance between harmful and beneficial neutrophil functions. Combining mechanistic insights with clinical research will be essential for developing precision therapies that leverage neutrophil plasticity to improve lung health.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

This study was funded by German Centre of Lung Research (Reference No. 82DZL002C1).

Author Contributions

S.M.J.: conceptualization, supervision, and writing – original draft preparation; J.C.-W. and B.O.: conceptualization and writing – reviewing and editing; and S.W.: visualization and writing – original draft preparation.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by German Centre of Lung Research (Reference No. 82DZL002C1).

References

  • 1. Mestas J, Hughes CC. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol. 2004;172(5):2731–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Malengier-Devlies B, Metzemaekers M, Wouters C, Proost P, Matthys P. Neutrophil homeostasis and emergency granulopoiesis: the example of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:766620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nauseef WM, Borregaard N. Neutrophils at work. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(7):602–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guo Q, Zhao Y, Li J, Liu J, Yang X, Guo X, et al. Induction of alarmin S100A8/A9 mediates activation of aberrant neutrophils in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(2):222–35.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dancey JT, Deubelbeiss KA, Harker LA, Finch CA. Neutrophil kinetics in man. J Clin Investig. 1976;58(3):705–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fuchs O. Introductory chapter: development of neutrophils and their role in hematopoietic microenvironment regulation. In: Fuchs O, Athari SS, editors. Cells of the immune System. London: IntechOpen; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Qu J, Jin J, Zhang M, Ng LG. Neutrophil diversity and plasticity: implications for organ transplantation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20(9):993–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lin WC, Fessler MB. Regulatory mechanisms of neutrophil migration from the circulation to the airspace. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(9):4095–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Held J, Sivaraman K, Wrenger S, Si W, Welte T, Immenschuh S, et al. Ex vivo study on the human blood neutrophil circadian features and effects of alpha1-antitrypsin and lipopolysaccharide. Vascul Pharmacol. 2024;156:107396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yang SC, Tsai YF, Pan YL, Hwang TL. Understanding the role of neutrophils in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biomed J. 2021;44(4):439–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shim HB, Deniset JF, Kubes P. Neutrophils in homeostasis and tissue repair. Int Immunol. 2022;34(8):399–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yvan-Charvet L, Ng LG. Granulopoiesis and neutrophil homeostasis: a metabolic, daily balancing act. Trends Immunol. 2019;40(7):598–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Xie X, Shi Q, Wu P, Zhang X, Kambara H, Su J, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(9):1119–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Molla Desta G, Birhanu AG. Advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics: transforming biomedical research. Acta Biochim Pol. 2025;72:13922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Burn GL, Foti A, Marsman G, Patel DF, Zychlinsky A. The neutrophil. Immunity. 2021;54(7):1377–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhou W, Cao X, Xu Q, Qu J, Sun Y. The double-edged role of neutrophil heterogeneity in inflammatory diseases and cancers. MedComm. 2023;4(4):e325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang F, Xia Y, Su J, Quan F, Zhou H, Li Q, et al. Neutrophil diversity and function in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Guo DY, Liu ZY, Xu XC, Yu JK, Zhou JS, Li ZY, et al. Neutrophil heterogeneity in airway inflammatory diseases. Inflammation. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Obeagu EI. The balance between N1 and N2 neutrophils implications for breast cancer immunotherapy: a narrative review. Ann Med Surg. 2025;87(6):3682–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Xu H, Chen X, Lu Y, Sun N, Weisgerber KE, Xu M, et al. Neutrophil dynamics in response to cancer therapies. Cancers. 2025;17(15):2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ochs M, Nyengaard JR, Jung A, Knudsen L, Voigt M, Wahlers T, et al. The number of alveoli in the human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(1):120–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Weibel ER. What makes a good lung? Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139(27–28):375–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Worthen GS, Schwab B 3rd, Elson EL, Downey GP. Mechanics of stimulated neutrophils: cell stiffening induces retention in capillaries. Science. 1989;245(4914):183–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sibille Y, Reynolds HY. Macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophils in lung defense and injury. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141(2):471–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hogg JC, Doerschuk CM, Wiggs B, Minshall D. Neutrophil retention during a single transit through the pulmonary circulation. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73(4):1683–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hogg JC, Coxson HO, Brumwell ML, Beyers N, Doerschuk CM, MacNee W, et al. Erythrocyte and polymorphonuclear cell transit time and concentration in human pulmonary capillaries. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77(4):1795–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ballesteros I, Rubio-Ponce A, Genua M, Lusito E, Kwok I, Fernández-Calvo G, et al. Co-option of neutrophil fates by tissue environments. Cell. 2020;183(5):1282–97.e18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yamada M, Kubo H, Kobayashi S, Ishizawa K, He M, Suzuki T, et al. The increase in surface CXCR4 expression on lung extravascular neutrophils and its effects on neutrophils during endotoxin-induced lung injury. Cel Mol Immunol. 2011;8(4):305–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bae GH, Kim YS, Park JY, Lee M, Lee SK, Kim JC, et al. Unique characteristics of lung-resident neutrophils are maintained by PGE2/PKA/Tgm2-mediated signaling. Blood. 2022;140(8):889–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Devi S, Wang Y, Chew WK, Lima R, A-González N, Mattar CN, et al. Neutrophil mobilization via plerixafor-mediated CXCR4 inhibition arises from lung demargination and blockade of neutrophil homing to the bone marrow. J Exp Med. 2013;210(11):2321–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Burns AR, Smith CW, Walker DC. Unique structural features that influence neutrophil emigration into the lung. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(2):309–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yipp BG, Kim JH, Lima R, Zbytnuik LD, Petri B, Swanlund N, et al. The lung is a host defense niche for immediate neutrophil-mediated vascular protection. Sci Immunol. 2017;2(10):eaam8929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Granton E, Kim JH, Podstawka J, Yipp BG. The lung microvasculature is a functional immune niche. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(11):890–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Xia M, Stegmeyer RI, Shirakura K, Butz S, Thiriot A, von Andrian UH, et al. Conditions that promote transcellular neutrophil migration in vivo. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):14471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Silva MT, Correia-Neves M. Neutrophils and macrophages: the main partners of phagocyte cell systems. Front Immunol. 2012;3:174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Prame Kumar K, Nicholls AJ, Wong CHY. Partners in crime: neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in inflammation and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;371(3):551–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mokart D, Kipnis E, Guerre-Berthelot P, Vey N, Capo C, Sannini A, et al. Monocyte deactivation in neutropenic acute respiratory distress syndrome patients treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Casanova-Acebes M, Nicolás-Ávila JA, Li JL, García-Silva S, Balachander A, Rubio-Ponce A, et al. Neutrophils instruct homeostatic and pathological states in naive tissues. J Exp Med. 2018;215(11):2778–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Podstawka J, Sinha S, Hiroki CH, Sarden N, Granton E, Labit E, et al. Marginating transitional B cells modulate neutrophils in the lung during inflammation and pneumonia. J Exp Med. 2021;218(9):e20210409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Baile EM, Paré PD, Ernest D, Dodek PM. Distribution of blood flow and neutrophil kinetics in bronchial vasculature of sheep. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82(5):1466–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(6):378–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yam AO, Jakovija A, Gatt C, Chtanova T. Neutrophils under the microscope: neutrophil dynamics in infection, inflammation, and cancer revealed using intravital imaging. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1458035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Geerdink RJ, Pillay J, Meyaard L, Bont L. Neutrophils in respiratory syncytial virus infection: a target for asthma prevention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):838–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Baseler LJ, Falzarano D, Scott DP, Rosenke R, Thomas T, Munster VJ, et al. An acute immune response to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication contributes to viral pathogenicity. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(3):630–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ito Y, Correll K, Zemans RL, Leslie CC, Murphy RC, Mason RJ. Influenza induces IL-8 and GM-CSF secretion by human alveolar epithelial cells through HGF/c-Met and TGF-α/EGFR signaling. Am J Physiol Lung Cel Mol Physiol. 2015;308(11):L1178–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Tavares LP, Garcia CC, Machado MG, Queiroz-Junior CM, Barthelemy A, Trottein F, et al. CXCR1/2 antagonism is protective during influenza and post-influenza pneumococcal infection. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lazennec G, Rajarathnam K, Richmond A. CXCR2 chemokine receptor - a master regulator in cancer and physiology. Trends Mol Med. 2024;30(1):37–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Walz A, Schmutz P, Mueller C, Schnyder-Candrian S. Regulation and function of the CXC chemokine ENA-78 in monocytes and its role in disease. J Leukoc Biol. 1997;62(5):604–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jeyaseelan S, Manzer R, Young SK, Yamamoto M, Akira S, Mason RJ, et al. Induction of CXCL5 during inflammation in the rodent lung involves activation of alveolar epithelium. Am J Respir Cel Mol Biol. 2005;32(6):531–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Gibbs J, Ince L, Matthews L, Mei J, Bell T, Yang N, et al. An epithelial circadian clock controls pulmonary inflammation and glucocorticoid action. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):919–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. He W, Yan L, Hu D, Hao J, Liou YC, Luo G. Neutrophil heterogeneity and plasticity: unveiling the multifaceted roles in health and disease. MedComm. 2025;6(2):e70063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Elks PM, van Eeden FJ, Dixon G, Wang X, Reyes-Aldasoro CC, Ingham PW, et al. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (Hif-1α) delays inflammation resolution by reducing neutrophil apoptosis and reverse migration in a zebrafish inflammation model. Blood. 2011;118(3):712–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Wicherska-Pawłowska K, Wróbel T, Rybka J. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-Like receptors (RLRs) in innate immunity. TLRs, NLRs, and RLRs ligands as immunotherapeutic agents for hematopoietic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Mantovani S, Oliviero B, Varchetta S, Renieri A, Mondelli MU. TLRs: innate immune sentries against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):8065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Daigneault DE, Hartshorn KL, Liou LS, Abbruzzi GM, White MR, Oh SK, et al. Influenza A virus binding to human neutrophils and cross-linking requirements for activation. Blood. 1992;80(12):3227–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA, Fitzgerald KA. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses. 2011;3(6):920–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Weeratunga P, Denney L, Bull JA, Repapi E, Sergeant M, Etherington R, et al. Single cell spatial analysis reveals inflammatory foci of immature neutrophil and CD8 T cells in COVID-19 lungs. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Iamsawat S, Yu R, Kim S, Dvorina N, Qiu K, Choi J, et al. Single-cell analysis uncovers striking cellular heterogeneity of lung-infiltrating regulatory T cells during eosinophilic versus neutrophilic allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2024;212(12):1867–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(2):134–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Danne C, Skerniskyte J, Marteyn B, Sokol H. Neutrophils: from IBD to the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21(3):184–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303(5663):1532–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, et al. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cel Biol. 2007;176(2):231–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Obermayer A, Stoiber W, Krautgartner WD, Klappacher M, Kofler B, Steinbacher P, et al. New aspects on the structure of neutrophil extracellular traps from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and in vitro generation. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Khoyratty TE, Ai Z, Ballesteros I, Eames HL, Mathie S, Martín-Salamanca S, et al. Distinct transcription factor networks control neutrophil-driven inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(9):1093–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pihl RMF, Alabdullatif SH, Hiller BE, Armstrong EMR, Martins KR, Dimbo EL, et al. Neutrophil transcriptome diverges into two discrete trajectories in a murine model of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. bioRxiv. 2024:2024.10.29.620672. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Pihl RMF, Martins KR, Lee Y, Patneaude L, Quinton LJ, Mizgerd JP, et al. Neutrophils respond with pathogen-specific defenses during bacterial pneumonia. bioRxiv. 2025:2025.04.17.649365. [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Moussavi-Harami SF, Cleary SJ, Magnen M, Seo Y, Conrad C, English BC, et al. Neutrophil-specific Shp1 loss results in lethal pulmonary hemorrhage in mouse models of acute lung injury. J Clin Investig. 2024;134(24):e183161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ong CWM, Fox K, Ettorre A, Elkington PT, Friedland JS. Hypoxia increases neutrophil-driven matrix destruction after exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lodge KM, Cowburn AS, Li W, Condliffe AM. The impact of hypoxia on neutrophil degranulation and consequences for the host. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Mirchandani AS, Jenkins SJ, Bain CC, Sanchez-Garcia MA, Lawson H, Coelho P, et al. Hypoxia shapes the immune landscape in lung injury and promotes the persistence of inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(6):927–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Xu Y, Zhang Q, Zhao Y. The functional diversity of neutrophils and clustered polarization of immunity. Cel Mol Immunol. 2020;17(11):1212–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Gysemans C, Beya M, Pedace E, Mathieu C. Exploring neutrophil heterogeneity and plasticity in health and disease. Biomedicines. 2025;13(3):597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zheng J, Li Y, Kong X, Guo J. Exploring immune-related pathogenesis in lung injury: providing new insights into ALI/ARDS. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;175:116773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis, etiology and regulation. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(2):103–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Crowley LE, Stockley RA, Thickett DR, Dosanjh D, Scott A, Parekh D. Neutrophil dynamics in pulmonary fibrosis: pathophysiological and therapeutic perspectives. Eur Respir Rev. 2024;33(174):240139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kamiya M, Carter H, Espindola MS, Doyle TJ, Lee JS, Merriam LT, et al. Immune mechanisms in fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Cell. 2024;187(14):3506–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Effah CY, Drokow EK, Agboyibor C, Ding L, He S, Liu S, et al. Neutrophil-dependent immunity during pulmonary infections and inflammations. Front Immunol. 2021;12:689866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Soni S, Antonescu L, Ro K, Horowitz JC, Mebratu YA, Nho RS. Influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and their impact on chronic lung diseases and fibrosis: exploring therapeutic options. Am J Pathol. 2024;194(10):1807–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wang H, Kim SJ, Lei Y, Wang S, Wang H, Huang H, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in homeostasis and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Donaldson GC, Seemungal TA, Patel IS, Bhowmik A, Wilkinson TM, Hurst JR, et al. Airway and systemic inflammation and decline in lung function in patients with COPD. Chest. 2005;128(4):1995–2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Mincham KT, Bruno N, Singanayagam A, Snelgrove RJ. Our evolving view of neutrophils in defining the pathology of chronic lung disease. Immunology. 2021;164(4):701–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Ohbayashi H. Neutrophil elastase inhibitors as treatment for COPD. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11(7):965–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Janjua S, Fortescue R, Poole P. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD002309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Keir HR, Richardson H, Fillmore C, Shoemark A, Lazaar AL, Miller BE, et al. CXCL-8-dependent and -independent neutrophil activation in COPD: experiences from a pilot study of the CXCR2 antagonist danirixin. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(4):00583-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Nakamura K, Fujita Y, Chen H, Somekawa K, Kashizaki F, Koizumi H, et al. The effectiveness and safety of long-term macrolide therapy for COPD in stable status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases. 2023;11(4):152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Brantly ML, Lascano JE, Shahmohammadi A. Intravenous Alpha-1 antitrypsin therapy for Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: the current state of the evidence. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018;6(1):100–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Stolk J, Tov N, Chapman KR, Fernandez P, MacNee W, Hopkinson NS, et al. Efficacy and safety of inhaled α1-antitrypsin in patients with severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency and frequent exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2019;54(5):1900673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Wanner A. Towards new therapeutic solutions for Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: role of the Alpha-1 foundation. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2020;7(3):147–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Wells JM, Titlestad IL, Tanash H, Turner AM, Chapman KR, Hatipoğlu UŞ, et al. Two randomized controlled phase 2 studies of the oral neutrophil elastase inhibitor alvelestat in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J. 2025:2501019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Yan S, Li M, Liu B, Ma Z, Yang Q. Neutrophil extracellular traps and pulmonary fibrosis: an update. J Inflamm. 2023;20(1):2. [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Fuso L, Baldi F, Di Perna A. Therapeutic strategies in pulmonary hypertension. Front Pharmacol. 2011;2:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Sharma M, Paudyal V, Syed SK, Thapa R, Kassam N, Surani S. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: current strategies and future prospects. Life. 2025;15(3):430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. O'Byrne PM, Metev H, Puu M, Richter K, Keen C, Uddin M, et al. Efficacy and safety of a CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069, in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(10):797–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Yamasaki A, Okazaki R, Harada T. Neutrophils and asthma. Diagnostics. 2022;12(5):1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Chalmers JD, Gupta A, Chotirmall SH, Armstrong A, Eickholz P, Hasegawa N, et al. A phase 2 randomised study to establish efficacy, safety and dosing of a novel oral cathepsin C inhibitor, BI 1291583, in adults with bronchiectasis: airleaf. ERJ Open Res. 2023;9(3):00633-2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Chalmers JD, Metersky M, Aliberti S, Morgan L, Fucile S, Lauterio M, et al. Neutrophilic inflammation in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir Rev. 2025;34(176):240179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Cheng Y, Mo F, Li Q, Han X, Shi H, Chen S, et al. Targeting CXCR2 inhibits the progression of lung cancer and promotes therapeutic effect of cisplatin. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Mousset A, Bellone L, Gaggioli C, Albrengues J. NETscape or NEThance: tailoring anti-cancer therapy. Trends Cancer. 2024;10(7):655–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Yao J, Ji L, Wang G, Ding J. Effect of neutrophils on tumor immunity and immunotherapy resistance with underlying mechanisms. Cancer Commun. 2025;45(1):15–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Fricker M, Lokwani R. COPD: the role of neutrophils in inflammation, pathophysiology, and as drug targets. Clin Sci. 2025;139(20):1199–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Pouwels SD, van Geffen WH, Jonker MR, Kerstjens HA, Nawijn MC, Heijink IH. Increased neutrophil expression of pattern recognition receptors during COPD exacerbations. Respirology. 2017;22(2):401–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Pouwels SD, Heijink IH, ten Hacken NH, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Nawijn MC, et al. DAMPs activating innate and adaptive immune responses in COPD. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(2):215–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Kapellos TS, Baßler K, Fujii W, Nalkurthi C, Schaar AC, Bonaguro L, et al. Systemic alterations in neutrophils and their precursors in early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cell Rep. 2023;42(6):112525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Lokwani R, Wark PA, Baines KJ, Fricker M, Barker D, Simpson JL. Blood neutrophils in COPD but not asthma exhibit A primed phenotype with downregulated CD62L expression. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:2517–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Hartl D, Krauss-Etschmann S, Koller B, Hordijk PL, Kuijpers TW, Hoffmann F, et al. Infiltrated neutrophils acquire novel chemokine receptor expression and chemokine responsiveness in chronic inflammatory lung diseases. J Immunol. 2008;181(11):8053–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Tu H, Ren H, Jiang J, Shao C, Shi Y, Li P. Dying to defend: neutrophil death pathways and their implications in immunity. Adv Sci. 2024;11(8):e2306457. [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Rizo-Téllez SA, Filep JG. Beyond host defense and tissue injury: the emerging role of neutrophils in tissue repair. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2024;326(3):C661–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Trivedi A, Khan MA, Bade G, Talwar A. Orchestration of neutrophil extracellular traps (Nets), a unique innate immune function during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) development. Biomedicines. 2021;9(1):53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Wan A, Chen D. The multifaceted roles of neutrophil death in COPD and lung cancer. J Respir Biol Transl Med. 2025;2(1):10022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Keir HR, Chalmers JD. Neutrophil extracellular traps in chronic lung disease: implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31(163):210241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Janciauskiene S, Welte T. Well-known and less well-known functions of Alpha-1 antitrypsin. Its role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other disease developments. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(Suppl 4):S280–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. McCarthy C, Reeves EP, McElvaney NG. The role of neutrophils in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(Suppl 4):S297–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kokturk N, Khodayari N, Lascano J, Riley EL, Brantly ML. Lung inflammation in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficient individuals with normal lung function. Respir Res. 2023;24(1):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Stockley RA, Edgar RG, Pillai A, Turner AM. Individualized lung function trends in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: a need for patience in order to provide patient centered management? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:1745–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Roda MA, Xu X, Abdalla TH, Sadik M, Szul T, Bratcher PE, et al. Proline-glycine-proline peptides are critical in the development of smoke-induced emphysema. Am J Respir Cel Mol Biol. 2019;61(5):560–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Cheetham CJ, McKelvey MC, McAuley DF, Taggart CC. Neutrophil-derived proteases in lung inflammation: old players and new prospects. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(10):5492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Liang CC, Zhao J, Zhang YQ, Chen J, Wang Y. Research progress on the effect of neutrophil elastase and its inhibitors in respiratory diseases. J Int Med Res. 2025;53(6):3000605251352789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Sinden NJ, Stockley RA. Proteinase 3 activity in sputum from subjects with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency and COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(5):1042–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Jasper AE, McIver WJ, Sapey E, Walton GM. Understanding the role of neutrophils in chronic inflammatory airway disease. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000 Faculty Rev–557. [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Sapey E. Neutrophil modulation in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2020;7(3):247–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Oshins R, Patel I, Khartabil L, Katikaneni DS, Scindia Y, Khodayari N. Alpha-1 antitrypsin modulates neutrophil phenotype and function: implications for inflammatory regulation. J Leukoc Biol. 2025;117(6):qiaf091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Ghosh AJ, Hobbs BD, Moll M, Saferali A, Boueiz A, Yun JH, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin MZ heterozygosity is an endotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(3):313–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Mahajan A, Herrmann M, Muñoz LE. Clearance deficiency and cell death pathways: a model for the pathogenesis of SLE. Front Immunol. 2016;7:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Prendecki M, Lodge KM. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: does increased neutrophil adhesion contribute to lung damage? Am J Respir Cel Mol Biol. 2022;67(1):6–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Ertel W, Morrison MH, Ayala A, Chaudry IH. Hypoxemia in the absence of blood loss or significant hypotension causes inflammatory cytokine release. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(1 Pt 2):R160–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Hoenderdos K, Lodge KM, Hirst RA, Chen C, Palazzo SG, Emerenciana A, et al. Hypoxia upregulates neutrophil degranulation and potential for tissue injury. Thorax. 2016;71(11):1030–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Magallón M, Castillo-Corullón S, Bañuls L, Romero T, Pellicer D, Herrejón A, et al. Impact of hypoxia on neutrophil degranulation and inflammatory response in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency patients. Antioxidants. 2024;13(9):1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Magallon M, Banuls L, Castillo-Corullon S, Romero T, Martinez-Ferraro C, Pellicer D, et al. Different regulation of Alpha-1 antitrypsin production in neutrophils of ZZ-AATD patients under hypoxic conditions. Arch Bronconeumol. 2025;61(11):707–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Hudock KM, Collins MS, Imbrogno MA, Kramer EL, Brewington JJ, Ziady A, et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin limits neutrophil extracellular trap disruption of airway epithelial barrier function. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1023553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Zhou Y, Bréchard S. Neutrophil extracellular vesicles: a delicate balance between pro-inflammatory responses and anti-inflammatory therapies. Cells. 2022;11(20):3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Zhou K, Wen Q, Zuo Y, Bai G, Sun R. Pathogenic cell in COPD: mechanisms of airway remodeling, immune dysregulation, and therapeutic implications. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025;20:2925–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Tuder RM, Janciauskiene SM, Petrache I. Lung disease associated with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010;7(6):381–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Jin J, Zhao Y, Fang Y, Pan Y, Wang P, Fan Z, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and PBMCs pyroptosis via the ROS-dependent signaling pathway in Kawasaki disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;145:113783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Zabieglo K, Majewski P, Majchrzak-Gorecka M, Wlodarczyk A, Grygier B, Zegar A, et al. The inhibitory effect of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) on formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Leukoc Biol. 2015;98(1):99–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Vandooren J, Itoh Y. Alpha-2-Macroglobulin in inflammation, immunity and infections. Front Immunol. 2021;12:803244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Liou TG, Campbell EJ. Nonisotropic enzyme: inhibitor interactions: a novel nonoxidative mechanism for quantum proteolysis by human neutrophils. Biochemistry. 1995;34(49):16171–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Campbell EJ, Campbell MA, Boukedes SS, Owen CA. Quantum proteolysis by neutrophils: implications for pulmonary emphysema in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Clin Investig. 1999;104(3):337–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Genschmer KR, Russell DW, Lal C, Szul T, Bratcher PE, Noerager BD, et al. Activated PMN exosomes: pathogenic entities causing matrix destruction and disease in the lung. Cell. 2019;176(1–2):113–26.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Kolonics F, Szeifert V, Timár CI, Ligeti E, Lőrincz ÁM. The functional heterogeneity of neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles reflects the status of the parent cell. Cells. 2020;9(12):2718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Park KS, Lässer C, Lötvall J. Extracellular vesicles and the lung: from disease pathogenesis to biomarkers and treatments. Physiol Rev. 2025;105(3):1733–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. McElvaney OF, Murphy MP, Reeves EP, McElvaney NG. Anti-cytokines as a strategy in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2020;7(3):203–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Park JA, He F, Martin LD, Li Y, Chorley BN, Adler KB. Human neutrophil elastase induces hypersecretion of mucin from well-differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro via a protein kinase C{delta}-mediated mechanism. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(3):651–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Ding L, Yang J, Zhang C, Zhang X, Gao P. Neutrophils modulate fibrogenesis in chronic pulmonary diseases. Front Med. 2021;8:616200. [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Cambier S, Gouwy M, Proost P. The chemokines CXCL8 and CXCL12: molecular and functional properties, role in disease and efforts towards pharmacological intervention. Cel Mol Immunol. 2023;20(3):217–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Hawkins P, Sya J, Hup NK, Murphy MP, McElvaney NG, Reeves EP. Alpha-1 antitrypsin augmentation inhibits proteolysis of neutrophil membrane voltage-gated proton Channel-1 in Alpha-1 deficient individuals. Med Kaunas. 2021;57(8):814. [Google Scholar]
  • 146. O'Brien ME, Murray G, Gogoi D, Yusuf A, McCarthy C, Wormald MR, et al. A review of Alpha-1 antitrypsin binding partners for immune regulation and potential therapeutic application. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Frenzel E, Korenbaum E, Hegermann J, Ochs M, Koepke J, Koczulla AR, et al. Does augmentation with alpha1-antitrypsin affect neutrophil extracellular traps formation? Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(7):1023–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Bakakos A, Sotiropoulou Z, Anagnostopoulos N, Vontetsianos A, Cholidou K, Papaioannou AI, et al. Anti-inflammatory agents for the management of COPD: Quo vadis? Respir Med. 2025;248:108396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Chalmers JD, Mall MA, Chotirmall SH, O’Donnell AE, Flume PA, Hasegawa N, et al. Targeting neutrophil serine proteases in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. 2025;65(1):2401050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Gao F, Peng H, Gou R, Zhou Y, Ren S, Li F. Exploring neutrophil extracellular traps: mechanisms of immune regulation and future therapeutic potential. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025;14(1):80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Green RH, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Parker D, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Analysis of induced sputum in adults with asthma: identification of subgroup with isolated sputum neutrophilia and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids. Thorax. 2002;57(10):875–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Ray A, Kolls JK. Neutrophilic inflammation in asthma and association with disease severity. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(12):942–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Sze E, Bhalla A, Nair P. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for non-T2 asthma. Allergy. 2020;75(2):311–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Crisford H, Sapey E, Rogers GB, Taylor S, Nagakumar P, Lokwani R, et al. Neutrophils in asthma: the good, the bad and the bacteria. Thorax. 2021;76(8):835–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Kermani NZ, Li CX, Versi A, Badi Y, Sun K, Abdel-Aziz MI, et al. Endotypes of severe neutrophilic and eosinophilic asthma from multi-omics integration of U-BIOPRED sputum samples. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14(7):e1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Liu T, Woodruff PG, Zhou X. Advances in non-type 2 severe asthma: from molecular insights to novel treatment strategies. Eur Respir J. 2024;64(2):2300826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Nair P, Surette MG, Virchow JC. Neutrophilic asthma: misconception or misnomer? Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(5):441–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Liu J, Pang Z, Wang G, Guan X, Fang K, Wang Z, et al. Advanced role of neutrophils in common respiratory diseases. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:6710278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Linssen RS, Chai G, Ma J, Kummarapurugu AB, van Woensel JBM, Bem RA, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps increase airway mucus viscoelasticity and slow mucus particle transit. Am J Respir Cel Mol Biol. 2021;64(1):69–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Liu T, Wang FP, Wang G, Mao H. Role of neutrophil extracellular traps in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Med J. 2017;130(6):730–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Ogulur I, Mitamura Y, Yazici D, Pat Y, Ardicli S, Li M, et al. Type 2 immunity in allergic diseases. Cel Mol Immunol. 2025;22(3):211–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 162. An TJ, Rhee CK, Kim JH, Lee YR, Chon JY, Park CK, et al. Effects of macrolide and corticosteroid in neutrophilic asthma mouse model. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2018;81(1):80–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 163. De Volder J, Vereecke L, Joos G, Maes T. Targeting neutrophils in asthma: a therapeutic opportunity? Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;182:114292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Rahmawati SF, Te Velde M, Kerstjens HAM, Dömling ASS, Groves MR, Gosens R. Pharmacological rationale for targeting IL-17 in asthma. Front Allergy. 2021;2:694514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Drescher B, Bai F. Neutrophil in viral infections, friend or foe? Virus Res. 2013;171(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Daigo K, Takamatsu Y, Hamakubo T. The protective effect against extracellular histones afforded by long-pentraxin PTX3 as a regulator of NETs. Front Immunol. 2016;7:344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Schauer C, Janko C, Munoz LE, Zhao Y, Kienhöfer D, Frey B, et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps limit inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):511–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Guimarães-Costa AB, Rochael NC, Oliveira F, Echevarria-Lima J, Saraiva EM. Neutrophil extracellular traps reprogram IL-4/GM-CSF-Induced monocyte differentiation to anti-inflammatory macrophages. Front Immunol. 2017;8:523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Walter L, Canup B, Pujada A, Bui TA, Arbasi B, Laroui H, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) limits reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and DNA damage in colitis-associated cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(9):767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Mall MA, Burgel PR, Castellani C, Davies JC, Salathe M, Taylor-Cousar JL. Cystic fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10(1):53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Ingersoll SA, Laval J, Forrest OA, Preininger M, Brown MR, Arafat D, et al. Mature cystic fibrosis airway neutrophils suppress T cell function: evidence for a role of arginase 1 but not programmed death-ligand 1. J Immunol. 2015;194(11):5520–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Scapini P, Marini O, Tecchio C, Cassatella MA. Human neutrophils in the saga of cellular heterogeneity: insights and open questions. Immunol Rev. 2016;273(1):48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Tirouvanziam R, Gernez Y, Conrad CK, Moss RB, Schrijver I, Dunn CE, et al. Profound functional and signaling changes in viable inflammatory neutrophils homing to cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(11):4335–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Hampton HR, Bailey J, Tomura M, Brink R, Chtanova T. Microbe-dependent lymphatic migration of neutrophils modulates lymphocyte proliferation in lymph nodes. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Duffy D, Perrin H, Abadie V, Benhabiles N, Boissonnas A, Liard C, et al. Neutrophils transport antigen from the dermis to the bone marrow, initiating a source of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2012;37(5):917–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Loske J, Völler M, Lukassen S, Stahl M, Thürmann L, Seegebarth A, et al. Pharmacological improvement of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function rescues airway epithelial homeostasis and host defense in children with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209(11):1338–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Casey M, Gabillard-Lefort C, McElvaney OF, McElvaney OJ, Carroll T, Heeney RC, et al. Effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on airway and systemic inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2023;78(8):835–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Yonker LM, Marand A, Muldur S, Hopke A, Leung HM, De La Flor D, et al. Neutrophil dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2021;20(6):1062–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Jennings S, Hu Y, Wellems D, Luo M, Scull C, Taylor CM, et al. Neutrophil defect and lung pathogen selection in cystic fibrosis. J Leukoc Biol. 2023;113(6):604–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Wrennall JA, Biggart MG, Bengtson CD, Sassano MF, Tarran R. Neutrophil store-operated Ca(2+) entry: a correctable biomarker of cystic fibrosis lung disease progression. J Cyst Fibros. 2025;24(6):1173–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Pignatti P, Moscato G, Casarini S, Delmastro M, Poppa M, Brunetti G, et al. Downmodulation of CXCL8/IL-8 receptors on neutrophils after recruitment in the airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(1):88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Hartl D, Latzin P, Hordijk P, Marcos V, Rudolph C, Woischnik M, et al. Cleavage of CXCR1 on neutrophils disables bacterial killing in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Nat Med. 2007;13(12):1423–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Voynow JA, Fischer BM, Zheng S. Proteases and cystic fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cel Biol. 2008;40(6–7):1238–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Griese M, Kappler M, Gaggar A, Hartl D. Inhibition of airway proteases in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(3):783–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Mitri C, Xu Z, Bardin P, Corvol H, Touqui L, Tabary O. Novel anti-inflammatory approaches for cystic fibrosis lung disease: identification of molecular targets and design of innovative therapies. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Keir HR, Chalmers JD. Pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;42(4):499–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Chalmers JD, Elborn S, Greene CM. Basic, translational and clinical aspects of bronchiectasis in adults. Eur Respir Rev. 2023;32(168):230015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Lucas R, Hadizamani Y, Gonzales J, Gorshkov B, Bodmer T, Berthiaume Y, et al. Impact of bacterial toxins in the lungs. Toxins. 2020;12(4):223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Yan F, Li W, Jono H, Li Q, Zhang S, Li JD, et al. Reactive oxygen species regulate Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide-induced MUC5AC mucin expression via PKC-NADPH oxidase-ROS-TGF-alpha signaling pathways in human airway epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366(2):513–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Baz AA, Hao H, Lan S, Li Z, Liu S, Chen S, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in bacterial infections and evasion strategies. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1357967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Chalmers JD, Moffitt KL, Suarez-Cuartin G, Sibila O, Finch S, Furrie E, et al. Neutrophil elastase activity is associated with exacerbations and lung function decline in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(10):1384–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Nguyen-Ho L, Trinh HKT, Le-Thuong V, Le KM, Vo VTN, Vu DM, et al. Increased neutrophil elastase in affected lobes of bronchiectasis and correlation of its levels between sputum and bronchial lavage fluid. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2025;88(2):399–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Bedi P, Davidson DJ, McHugh BJ, Rossi AG, Hill AT. Blood neutrophils are reprogrammed in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(7):880–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Wang X, Olveira C, Girón R, García-Clemente M, Máiz L, Sibila O, et al. Blood neutrophil counts define specific clusters of bronchiectasis patients: a hint to differential clinical phenotypes. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Schaaf B, Wieghorst A, Aries SP, Dalhoff K, Braun J. Neutrophil inflammation and activation in bronchiectasis: comparison with pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration. 2000;67(1):52–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Ma X, Li J, Li M, Qi G, Wei L, Zhang D. Nets in fibrosis: bridging innate immunity and tissue remodeling. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;137:112516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Achaiah A, Fraser E, Saunders P, Hoyles RK, Benamore R, Ho LP. Neutrophil levels correlate with quantitative extent and progression of fibrosis in IPF: results of a single-centre cohort study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023;10(1):e001801. [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Mocumbi A, Humbert M, Saxena A, Jing ZC, Sliwa K, Thienemann F, et al. Pulmonary hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024;10(1):1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Tuder RM, Archer SL, Dorfmüller P, Erzurum SC, Guignabert C, Michelakis E, et al. Relevant issues in the pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25 Suppl l):D4–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Humbert M, Guignabert C, Bonnet S, Dorfmüller P, Klinger JR, Nicolls MR, et al. Pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: state of the art and research perspectives. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Dai J, Chen H, Fang J, Wu S, Jia Z. Vascular remodeling: the multicellular mechanisms of pulmonary hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(9):4265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Semenkova G, Adzerikho I, Vladimirskaja T, Amaegberi N, Bahdanava A, Navitski I, et al. Essential role of neutrophils in the monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025;785:152643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Sweatt AJ, Miyagawa K, Rhodes CJ, Taylor S, Del Rosario PA, Hsi A, et al. Severe pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterized by increased neutrophil elastase and relative elafin deficiency. Chest. 2021;160(4):1442–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Shimoda LA, Laurie SS. Vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension. J Mol Med Berl. 2013;91(3):297–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Adu-Amankwaah J, Shi Y, Song H, Ma Y, Liu J, Wang H, et al. Signaling pathways and targeted therapy for pulmonary hypertension. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025;10(1):207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Harbaum L, Baaske KM, Simon M, Oqueka T, Sinning C, Glatzel A, et al. Exploratory analysis of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Horckmans M, Ring L, Duchene J, Santovito D, Schloss MJ, Drechsler M, et al. Neutrophils orchestrate post-myocardial infarction healing by polarizing macrophages towards a reparative phenotype. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(3):187–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Wang Q, Papayannopoulos V. Inflammation. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science. 2015;349(6245):316–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Aldabbous L, Abdul-Salam V, McKinnon T, Duluc L, Pepke-Zaba J, Southwood M, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote angiogenesis: evidence from vascular pathology in pulmonary hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(10):2078–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Blasco A, Rosell A, Castejón R, Royuela A, Thålin C, Ramil E, et al. Inflammatory and neutrophil extracellular trap markers to predict cardiac events after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2025;20(4):e0319759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Zhou J, Liu H, Jiang S, Wang W. Role of tumor-associated neutrophils in lung cancer (review). Oncol Lett. 2023;25(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Tang FH, Wong HYT, Tsang PSW, Yau M, Tam SY, Law L, et al. Recent advancements in lung cancer research: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025;14(3):975–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Shoenfeld Y, Tal A, Berliner S, Pinkhas J. Leukocytosis in non hematological malignancies--a possible tumor-associated marker. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1986;111(1):54–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Gregory AD, Houghton AM. Tumor-associated neutrophils: new targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2411–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Tecchio C, Scapini P, Pizzolo G, Cassatella MA. On the cytokines produced by human neutrophils in tumors. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23(3):159–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Wen J, Liu D, Zhu H, Shu K. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor-associated neutrophils in malignant glioma: from mechanism to therapy. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21(1):226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Shaul ME, Levy L, Sun J, Mishalian I, Singhal S, Kapoor V, et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils display a distinct N1 profile following TGFβ modulation: a transcriptomics analysis of pro-vs. antitumor TANs. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(11):e1232221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Que H, Fu Q, Lan T, Tian X, Wei X. Tumor-associated neutrophils and neutrophil-targeted cancer therapies. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022;1877(5):188762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Ohms M, Möller S, Laskay T. An attempt to polarize human neutrophils toward N1 and N2 phenotypes in vitro. Front Immunol. 2020;11:532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Luo H, Ikenaga N, Nakata K, Higashijima N, Zhong P, Kubo A, et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils upregulate Nectin2 expression, creating the immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024;43(1):258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Zhou Y, Shen G, Zhou X, Li J. Therapeutic potential of tumor-associated neutrophils: dual role and phenotypic plasticity. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025;10(1):178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Zilionis R, Engblom C, Pfirschke C, Savova V, Zemmour D, Saatcioglu HD, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of human and mouse lung cancers reveals conserved myeloid populations across individuals and species. Immunity. 2019;50(5):1317–34.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Antuamwine BB, Bosnjakovic R, Hofmann-Vega F, Wang X, Theodosiou T, Iliopoulos I, et al. N1 versus N2 and PMN-MDSC: a critical appraisal of current concepts on tumor-associated neutrophils and new directions for human oncology. Immunol Rev. 2023;314(1):250–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Yan M, Zheng M, Niu R, Yang X, Tian S, Fan L, et al. Roles of tumor-associated neutrophils in tumor metastasis and its clinical applications. Front Cel Dev Biol. 2022;10:938289. [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Zhong J, Zong S, Wang J, Feng M, Wang J, Zhang H, et al. Role of neutrophils on cancer cells and other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cel Res. 2023;1870(7):119493. [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Russo M, Nastasi C. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: a close up of tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils. Front Oncol. 2022;12:871513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Gibellini L, Borella R, Santacroce E, Serattini E, Boraldi F, Quaglino D, et al. Circulating and tumor-associated neutrophils in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: dynamics, phenotypes, metabolism, and functions. Cancers. 2023;15(13):3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Innate Immunity are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES