TO THE EDITOR
This letter is in response to the very informative article by Jaffal “Neuroplasticity in chronic pain: insights into diagnosis and treatment” [1]. The article offers a compelling message of hope: even amid physical and emotional suffering, the human brain retains remarkable adaptive capacity through neuroplasticity [1]. By detailing how chronic pain reshapes critical regions like the anterior cingulate cortex and insula, reducing gray matter and altering connectivity, the study underscores the dynamic interplay between pain and neural reorganization [2]. Neuroplasticity-focused interventions, such as neurofeedback and exercise-based therapies, emerge as transformative tools, particularly when embedded within hospital ecosystems that prioritize social support. Such environments may shield the brain from maladaptive changes while fostering functional recovery, empowering patients to reclaim agency over their pain [1,3].
Yet, the article’s biological framing overlooks a deeper dimension—the role of spiritual consciousness. From this perspective, neuroplasticity is not merely a mechanistic process but a biological mediation of a more fundamental reality: consciousness itself [4,5]. While the brain’s malleability enables adaptation, true healing often hinges on meaning-making, inner stillness, and the transcendent awareness that suffering need not define the self [6]. For instance, practices like contemplative prayer or mindfulness activate neural circuits linked to emotion regulation and self-awareness, suggesting that spiritual engagement may amplify neuroplasticity by aligning cortical rewiring with existential purpose [2,4,7]. This raises a critical question: under what conditions is neuroplasticity most powerfully enhanced?
The answer may lie in recognizing patients not solely as biological entities but as spiritual beings whose consciousness operates ‘through’ and ‘beyond’ the brain [6]. Rituals of hope, compassionate caregiving, and rituals fostering connection to something greater could act as catalysts for neural and emotional reorganization [4]. For example, studies show that over 70% of chronic pain patients desire spiritual integration in treatment, highlighting a gap between biomedical models and holistic needs [3]. Hospitals might evolve into ecosystems where neuroplasticity-focused care coexists with spiritual practices, such as chaplaincy services or contemplative spaces, creating environments where biology and transcendence converge [3,6,8].
In conclusion, while neuroplasticity provides a tangible pathway to alleviate suffering, its full potential may depend on harmonizing biological interventions with the spiritual dimension of healing. By acknowledging that consciousness shapes and is shaped by neural networks, clinicians could design therapies that honor both the brain’s adaptability and the human spirit’s quest for meaning [2,5,9]. As the article notes, “the brain’s plasticity is a target for treatment,” but true healing demands a paradigm that sees beyond neurons to the narratives and faith that give life its coherence [10].
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge De La Salle University for their constant support.
Footnotes
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed for this paper.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
FUNDING
No funding to declare.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Alvenio G. Mozol Jr.: Writing/manuscript preparation, Critical review, Commentary or revision; Alma P. Sabulao: Study conception.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jaffal SM. Neuroplasticity in chronic pain: insights into diagnosis and treatment. Korean J Pain. 2025;38:89–102. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Puretić MB, Demarin V. Neuroplasticity mechanisms in the pathophysiology of chronic pain. Acta Clin Croat. 2012;51:425–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rashid MA, Llanwarne N, Heyns N, Walter F, Mant J. What are the implications for practice that arise from studies of medication taking? A systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kitchener PD, Hales CG. What neuroscientists think, and don't think, about consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:767612. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.767612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McGilchrist I. The matter with things: our brains, our delusions, and the unmaking of the world. Perspectiva Press; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davidson RJ, Lutz A. Buddha's brain: neuroplasticity and meditation. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2008;25:176–74. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.4431873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS, Gagliardi AR. Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study. Implement Sci. 2018;13:55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0745-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cordero D., Jr Leave me alone! When does social support become a menace to pain management? Korean J Pain. 2025;38:207–8. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McGilchrist I. The master and his emissary: the divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale University Press; 2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maria R, Waluyo A, Khamarudin K. Spiritual care in patient with cancer pain: literature review. Indones J Glob Health Res. 2024;6:9–18. doi: 10.37287/ijghr.v6i1.2562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
