Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1987 Apr;57(4):313–318. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.4.313

Prognostic stratification of patients after myocardial infarction.

D P Murray, M Salih, L B Tan, R G Murray, W A Littler
PMCID: PMC1277169  PMID: 3580218

Abstract

An attempt was made to stratify risk of subsequent cardiac events in post-infarct patients according to a combination of the results of clinical assessment, routine diagnostic investigations, and pre-discharge exercise testing in 350 consecutive patients who were followed up for one year. Patients were classified prospectively on the basis of the extent of myocardial damage as assessed by peak enzyme release, reciprocal change on the electrocardiogram at the time of myocardial infarction, Norris prognostic index, ability to perform a pre-discharge exercise test (and test result), and ability to tolerate beta adrenergic blockade on discharge. Of the 50 patients with contraindications to pre-discharge exercise testing, 26% died or had reinfarctions compared with 9% of the 300 exercised patients; the 24 non-exercised patients with evidence of extensive myocardial damage or reciprocal changes on the electrocardiogram were particularly at risk. Similarly, among the 300 exercised patients, extensive myocardial damage, reciprocal change on the electrocardiogram, and ST depression on exercise testing were the major risk markers in that each identified at least 75% of the patients who had subsequent cardiac events. The 63 exercised patients who had all three of these major risk markers constituted a high risk group: 18 (29%) died or had reinfarction. Of the remaining 237 patients, only 9 (4%) had cardiac events. The 35 high risk patients with exercise induced angina pectoris or clinical contraindications to beta blockade were particularly at risk; 15 (43%) died or had reinfarction. This approach to risk stratification identified a small cohort of high risk patients in a large population of myocardial infarction survivors; it also identified a large group with a very low risk of subsequent cardiac events.

Full text

PDF
314

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonow R. O., Kent K. M., Rosing D. R., Lan K. K., Lakatos E., Borer J. S., Bacharach S. L., Green M. V., Epstein S. E. Exercise-induced ischemia in mildly symptomatic patients with coronary-artery disease and preserved left ventricular function. Identification of subgroups at risk of death during medical therapy. N Engl J Med. 1984 Nov 22;311(21):1339–1345. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411223112103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Feyter P. J., van Eenige M. J., Dighton D. H., Visser F. C., de Jong J., Roos J. P. Prognostic value of exercise testing, coronary angiography and left ventriculography 6--8 weeks after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1982 Sep;66(3):527–536. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DeBusk R. F., Kraemer H. C., Nash E., Berger W. E., 3rd, Lew H. Stepwise risk stratification soon after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Dec 1;52(10):1161–1166. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90567-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Geltman E. M., Ehsani A. A., Campbell M. K., Schechtman K., Roberts R., Sobel B. E. The influence of location and extent of myocardial infarction on long-term ventricular dysrhythmia and mortality. Circulation. 1979 Oct;60(4):805–814. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.4.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hlatky M. A., Califf R. M., Lee K. L., Pryor D. B., Wagner G. S., Rosati R. A. Prognostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression during inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):325–329. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90369-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jennings K., Reid D. S., Hawkins T., Julian D. J. Role of exercise testing early after myocardial infarction in identifying candidates for coronary surgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jan 21;288(6412):185–187. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6412.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krone R. J., Gillespie J. A., Weld F. M., Miller J. P., Moss A. J. Low-level exercise testing after myocardial infarction: usefulness in enhancing clinical risk stratification. Circulation. 1985 Jan;71(1):80–89. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leppo J. A., O'Brien J., Rothendler J. A., Getchell J. D., Lee V. W. Dipyridamole-thallium-201 scintigraphy in the prediction of future cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1984 Apr 19;310(16):1014–1018. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198404193101603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Madias J. E., Chahine R. A., Gorlin R., Blacklow D. J. A comparison of transmural and nontransmural acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1974 Mar;49(3):498–507. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.49.3.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Norris R. M., Caughey D. E., Deeming L. W., Mercer C. J., Scott P. J. Coronary prognostic index for predicting survival after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1970 Sep 5;2(7671):485–487. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90110-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sami M., Kraemer H., DeBusk R. F. The prognostic significance of serial exercise testing after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1979 Dec;60(6):1238–1246. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.6.1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sobel B. E., Bresnahan G. F., Shell W. E., Yoder R. D. Estimation of infarct size in man and its relation to prognosis. Circulation. 1972 Oct;46(4):640–648. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.46.4.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Théroux P., Waters D. D., Halphen C., Debaisieux J. C., Mizgala H. F. Prognostic value of exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1979 Aug 16;301(7):341–345. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197908163010701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES