Abstract
Effective immune defence and pathogen clearance requires coordination between innate and adaptive immune responses. However, virulent African swine fever virus (ASFV), which has a high case fatality rate in pigs, causes severe disease by exploiting multiple immune evasion strategies to suppress host responses. The global spread of Georgia 2007/1 and its derivatives poses a significant threat to the pig industry and global food security. Although modified live virus vaccines for ASF exist, multiple safety concerns have restricted their use internationally. Conversely, subunit vaccine candidates have not matched the protective efficacy of modified live virus vaccines. This highlights the need to further investigate ASFV-induced immunopathology to support the development of next-generation ASF vaccines. Immune dynamics in whole blood and lymphoid tissues were examined over time after oronasal infection with Georgia 2007/1. CD4+ T cells, γδ-TCR+ T cells and CD21+ B cells were impacted by lymphopenia, and initial immune activation was detected. However, as the disease progressed, impaired maintenance and depletion of adaptive immune cells, such as CD4+ T cells and professional antigen-presenting dendritic cells and macrophages, important mediators at the innate-adaptive immune interface, was observed. This reduction of cells may have compromised the innate-adaptive immune axis, weakening host ability to mount a robust adaptive immune response and potentially contributing to disease progression. Differential ASFV infection profiles within the spleen were also detected, highlighting the diversity of ASFV cellular tropism. Further investigation into the innate-adaptive immune axis is needed to better understand its role in ASFV infection.
Keywords: African swine fever virus, innate and adaptive immunity, immunopathology, immune dynamics, lymphoid tissues, inbred pigs
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.
Introduction
The global pig industry is threatened by the African swine fever (ASF) panzootic. ASF is a notifiable and contagious haemorrhagic viral disease of suids with case fatality rates approaching 100% and is often devastating for affected regions. Since the outbreak of ASF in Georgia in 2007 (isolate Georgia 2007/1) [1], ASFV has spread worldwide and outbreaks have been reported on five continents [2]. Based on the current global situation, existing control measures, involving the culling of exposed animals and movement control of animals, are inadequate and have serious socio-economic impacts [3]. Safe and effective ASFV vaccines are urgently needed, but development of such vaccines is challenging due to the complexities of the virus and host immune responses.
Infection with virulent ASFV isolates, such as Georgia 2007/1, manifest as an acute disease where pigs suffer high fever, lethargy, and anorexia. Disease progression is rapid: first clinical signs generally manifest between 2 and 7 days post-infection (dpi) and death often within 10 days [4]. These events occur before development of adaptive immune responses. Pathological assessments of the course of ASF infection in controlled laboratory settings are often through intramuscular (IM) injection of virus to ensure reliable infection rates with generally synchronized clinical course, however transmission of ASFV in Eurasia is mostly thought to be through close contact with other pigs or ingestion of infectious material. Alternative infection models have been developed to better mimic natural infection routes. One such method is intranasal (IN) delivery of virus in pigs with the mucosal atomization device (MAD) and assessments with influenza demonstrated that this route was able to deliver virus into the lungs [5]. Another method is oronasal inoculation, which has been utilized in more recent work with virulent ASFV isolates [6–8].
To understand the pathogenesis of virulent ASFV, previous work involving sequential sampling of infected animals have focussed on macroscopic lesions, quantification of virus within blood and tissues, virus shedding and predominantly adaptive immune cell function within the blood and selected tissues [6, 9–11]. Other than Greig and Plowright who investigated viral replication at the early sites of infection using ASFV isolates genetically distinct from Georgia 2007/1 [10, 11], early virus replication and immune cell dynamics within lymphoid tissues draining initial sites of infection have not been examined in detail for Georgia 2007/1. Furthermore, studies on ASFV infection dynamics in vitro have primarily focused on monocytes and macrophages within primary macrophage cultures, despite indications that ASFV may target other myeloid cell types [12, 13]. The rapid progression of virulent ASFV also raises questions about the innate-adaptive interface and the cells, such as γδ-TCR+ T- and dendritic-cells that are involved in crosstalk between these two arms of immunity. Hence, there is a need for further investigations into the full spectrum of cellular targets of ASFV and their relevance in infection and disease.
Here, we first assessed alternative methods of virus inoculation for their reliability and suitability for ASFV challenge experiments in outbred pigs to determine the robustness of these methods across the genetic variability in outbred animals. We then sought to unravel the in vivo early viral- and immune-cell dynamics of both the innate and adaptive immune compartments within secondary lymphoid tissues draining initial infection sites, as well as in visceral lymphoid tissues and blood, after oronasal Georgia 2007/1 inoculation. We used highly inbred Babraham pigs to reduce genetic variation in immune responses [14]; immune responses of Babrahams to infection with influenza have been well characterized and demonstrated to be comparable to outbred animals [15]. Furthermore, we previously demonstrated that Babrahams develop acute ASF after infection with virulent ASFV [16]. Besides investigating infection dynamics at early time points up to 5 days post-inoculation, we performed multi-parameter spectral flow cytometry (FCM) analysis of both the innate and adaptive immune compartments. This was to provide a more holistic view of the immune landscape within secondary lymphoid tissues and blood following virulent ASFV infection, with particular attention on the γδ-TCR+ T- and dendritic-cells that bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems.
Materials and methods
Virus
Spleen tissue was obtained from an animal that was infected with the virulent ASFV isolate Georgia 2007/1 and was then homogenized in RPMI in a Lysing Matrix A 2 ml tube (MP Biomedicals, USA) with the BeadBug microtube homogenizer at full speed for 2 min. Homogenized spleen suspension was titrated using the haemadsorption assay on porcine bone marrow derived macrophages (PBMs) as previously described [17] and virus titres were calculated as the amount of virus causing haemadsorption in 50% of infected cultures (HAD) with the Spearman–Karber method. Spleen suspension was diluted to the desired titre with unsupplemented RPMI (Gibco, USA) before oronasal or MAD inoculations. Georgia 2007/1 for IM inoculations were grown on PBMs.
Animal experiments
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) of The Pirbright institute and were conducted under the auspices of the Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (ASPA, 1986). Female Landrace × large white × Hampshire pigs were sourced from a high health farm in the UK, which has regular inspections, a bespoke herd health management plan and has been free of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome and influenza since 2021. Both female and male Babraham pigs were bred at the Centre for Dairy Research, University of Reading, Reading, UK. Animals were acclimatized for 7 days before any procedures were undertaken. Clinical signs were scored daily, and macroscopic lesions were assessed at post-mortem using previously described methods [18].
Experiment 1
Twelve 16-weeks-old female Landrace × large white × Hampshire pigs, weighing between 61 and 74 kg, were randomly assigned to three groups for inoculation with Georgia 2007/1 using different inoculation methods. Outbred animals were used in this experiment to assess the validity of intranasal and oronasal inoculation routes as a challenge method across the genetic variability inherent in outbred populations. AY100–AY105 (n = 6) were oronasally inoculated with 2 × 105 HAD50/animal Georgia 2007/1 homogenized spleen suspension obtained from an infected animal, AZ01–AZ03 (n = 3) were intramuscularly inoculated with 1 × 103 HAD50/animal Georgia 2007/1 cell culture supernatant and AZ04–AZ06 (n = 3) were intranasally inoculated with 2 × 105 HAD50/animal Georgia 2007/1 homogenized spleen suspension using a MAD (Model: AM501, MedTree, UK). Back-titration of virus inocula revealed virus titres as follows: oronasal inoculation = 5.35 × 104 HAD50/animal, IM inoculation = 3.59 × 102 HAD50/animal, and intranasal inoculation = 1.08 × 105 HAD50/animal. These virus inoculation titres were chosen based on previous studies using oronasal inoculation of ASFV [6, 7] and our previous studies with IM challenge methods [16]. Blinding was not possible during the conduct of the experiment as the virus was administered using different inoculation methods. Whole blood was collected from the animals on −1, 3-, 5-, and 7-days post-inoculation with Georgia 2007/1. Tissue samples from the lungs, selected lymph nodes (LN), tonsils and spleen were collected post-mortem for qPCR analysis.
Experiment 2
Eleven male (AZ31, AZ32, AZ34, AZ35, AZ36, AZ41, AZ42, AZ43, AZ44, AZ45, and AZ47) and seven female (AZ33, AZ37, AZ38, AZ39, AZ40, AZ46, and AZ48) 15- to 16-week-old Babraham pigs, weighing between 20 and 37 kg, were used in this experiment. Animal AZ43 arrived with a missing part of the back-leg hoof and was treated with a single application of Terramycin aerosol spray 3.92% and 0.04 ml/kg meloxicam (Metacam) for 6 days for pain relief. AZ43 and two other animals were randomly assigned to be culled on day 0 of the experiment, and the rest of the animals were oronasally inoculated with homogenized spleen suspension of Georgia 2007/1 at a titre of 2 × 105 HAD50/animal. Back-titration of virus inoculum revealed virus titre to be 2.54 × 105 HAD50/animal. Three animals were selected at random to be killed each day from 0- to 5-dpi (n = 3 each day). Blinding was not possible during the conduct of the experiment due to the sequential cull experimental design. Whole blood was collected each day from all surviving animals. Post-mortem scoring was performed on all animals immediately after death. Tissue samples were also collected from the lungs, selected LN, tonsils, and spleen for qPCR analysis and immuno-phenotyping by FCM.
Quantitative PCR
ASFV genome copies in whole blood and tissue samples were determined using the assay previously published with slight modifications [19]. Briefly, 20 mg of tissue was homogenized in RPMI with the BeadBug homogenizer as described above. The MagMAX Core nucleic acid extraction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and KingFisher Flex (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were used to extract DNA from homogenized tissue or blood samples, according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCRs were performed on a Quantstudio 5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with primers Fwd 5′-CTGCTCATGGTATCAATCTTATCGA-3′, Rev 5′-GATACCACAAGATCRGCCGT-3′ and the probe 5′-(6-carboxyfluorescein[FAM])-CCACGGGAGGAATACCAACCCAGTG-3′-(6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine [TAMRA] from King et al. [19] and the Path-ID qPCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A two-step thermal profile of 95°C for 10 min and then 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s was used.
Haematological measurements
Fresh EDTA blood samples were subjected to whole blood parameter analysis using the ProCyte Dx Haematology Analyser (IDEXX, USA).
FCM staining
50 μl of fresh EDTA blood was stained with the following antibodies listed in Table 1 in a final volume of 60 μl at room temperature for 20 min. For antibodies labelled with Zenon reagents (Invitrogen, USA), antibodies were conjugated to Zenon labels as per manufacturer’s instructions before staining. Thereafter RBCs were lysed with 450 μl of 1x RBC lysis/fixation solution (Biolegend, USA) for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. 250 μl of the cell suspension was acquired on a Cytek Aurora (Cytek Biosciences, USA). Exact cell counts (cells/μl) were determined using the Spectroflo software (Cytek Biosciences, USA).
Table 1.
Antibodies used for volumetric whole blood staining
| Antigen | Clone | Isotype | Conjugate | Dilution used | Source of Ab | Cat. no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | BB23-8E6-8C8 | Mouse IgG2a | PerCP-Cy5.5 | 1:80 | BD Biosciences | 561478 |
| CD4 | 74-12-4 | Mouse IgG2b | PE-Cy7 | 1:300 | BD Biosciences | 561473 |
| CD8a | MIL12 | Mouse IgG2a | SBV515 | 1:50 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1223SBV515 |
| CD14 | TÜK4 | Mouse IgG2a | SBUV400 | 1:200 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1568SBUV400 |
| CD16 | G7 | Mouse IgG1 | SBV610 | 1:100 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1971SBV610 |
| CD21 | BB6-11C9.6 | Mouse IgG1 | Zenon-Alexa Fluor 700 | 1:15 | Arigo Biolaboratories | ARG21137 |
| CD25 | K231.3B2 | Mouse IgG1 | SBV790 | 1:50 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1736SBV790 |
| CD172a | 74-22-15A | Mouse IgG2b | PE | 1:400 | BD Biosciences Cat. No. | 561499 |
| γδ-TCR | PPT16 | Mouse IgG2b | Zenon-Alexa Fluor 647 | 1:15 | In-house | NA |
| SLA Class II DR | 2E9/13 | Mouse IgG2b | FITC | 1:100 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA2314F |
For lymphocyte and mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) FCM analyses, selected tissues, spleen, soft-palate tonsil, submandibular-, cervical-, retropharyngeal-, gastro-hepatic LNs were treated with collagenase D (Merck, USA) (at a final concentration of 2.5 mg/ml in unsupplemented RPMI) at 37°C for 30 min. Collagenase D was inactivated by adding EDTA to a final concentration of 10 mM and tissues were mechanically disrupted to obtain single cell suspensions. Cell suspensions were purified further over a histopaque gradient (Merck, USA). Three million cells per tissue were stained immediately after isolation. Cells were first stained with the fixable viability dye eFluor 455UV (Invitrogen, USA, dilution 1:50), before staining with the antibodies outlined in Tables 2 and 3. Where secondary antibodies were used to detect for antibodies binding to extracellular antigens, an additional blocking step with ChromPure Mouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, USA) at a dilution of 1:200 was used before addition of directly conjugated antibodies of the same isotype. Each antibody incubation step was 15 min at room temperature and Brilliant Stain buffer Plus (BD Biosciences, USA) was used as per manufacturer’s instructions to prevent polymer–polymer interactions. The cells were fixed and permeabilized with the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining kit (Invitrogen, USA) for 30 min in the dark at room temperature as per manufacturer’s instructions. Intracellular staining was performed using overnight staining at 4°C. Hybridoma containing antibodies specific for ASFV p72 antigen [20] was conjugated to Zenon mouse IgG2a Alexa-fluor 647 (Invitrogen, USA) before intracellular staining for 15 min at room temperature. With both the lymphocyte and MPS FCM panels, at least 60 000 live cells were acquired on the Cytek Aurora (Cytek Biosciences, USA).
Table 2.
Antibodies used for lymphocyte FCM staining
| Antigen | Clone | Isotype | Conjugate | Dilution used | Source of Ab | Cat. no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular | ||||||
| CD2 | MSA4 | Mouse IgG2a | NA | 1:200 | Kingfisher | WS0590S-100 |
| Mouse IgG2a | Rat IgG1 | PE-Cy7 | 1:500 | Invitrogen | 25-4210-82 | |
| CD3 | BB23-8E6-8C8 | Mouse IgG2a | PerCP-Cy5.5 | 1:20 | BD Biosciences | 561478 |
| CD4 | 74-12-4 | Mouse IgG2b | Hybridoma | 1:5 | In-house | NA |
| Mouse IgG2b | R12-3 | Rat IgG2a | BV786 | 1:250 | BD Biosciences | 743179 |
| CD8α | MIL12 | Mouse IgG2a | SBV515 | 1:25 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1223SBV515 |
| CD8β | PPT23 | Mouse IgG1 | PE-Cy5 (Lightning-link conjugation) | 1:1600 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA5954GA |
| CD25 | K231.3B2 | Mouse IgG1 | SBV610 | 1:50 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1736SBV610 |
| CD335 | VIV-KM1 | Mouse IgG1 | NA | 1:200 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA5972GA |
| Mouse IgG1 | A85-1 | Rat IgG1 | BUV563 | 1:250 | BD Biosciences | 741254 |
| γδ-TCR | PGBL22A | Mouse IgG1 | PE-Texas Red (Lightning-link conjugation) | 1:50 | Kingfisher | WS0621S-100 |
| Intracellular | ||||||
| CD79a | HM47 | Mouse IgG1 | FITC | 1:20 | Biolegend | 986508 |
| FoxP3 | FJK-16s | Rat IgG2a | PE-Cy5.5 | 1:400 | Invitrogen | 35-5773-82 |
| Ki67 | b56 | Mouse IgG1 | RB780 | 1:2000 | BD Biosciences | 568762 |
| Perforin | δG9 | Mouse IgG2b | Alexa-fluor 647 | 1:50 | BD Biosciences | 563576 |
Table 3.
Antibodies used for mononuclear phagocyte system FCM staining
| Antigen | Clone | Isotype | Conjugate | Dilution used | Source of Ab | Cat. no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular | ||||||
| CD3 | BB23-8E6-8C8 | Mouse IgG2a | PerCP-Cy5.5 | 1:20 | BD Biosciences | 561478 |
| CD4 | 74-12-4 | Mouse IgG2b | Hybridoma | 1:5 | In-house | NA |
| Mouse IgG2b | R12-3 | Rat IgG2a | BV786 | 1:250 | BD Biosciences | 743179 |
| CD8α | MIL12 | Mouse IgG2a | SBV515 | 1:25 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1223SBV515 |
| CD11b | MIL4 | Mouse IgG1 | APC-Cy7 (Lightning-link conjugation) | 1:100 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1220GA |
| CD14 | TÜK4 | Mouse IgG2a | SBUV400 | 1:200 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1568SBUV400 |
| CD16 | G7 | Mouse IgG1 | SBV610 | 1:50 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA1971SBV610 |
| CD163 | 2A10/11 | Mouse IgG1 | PE-Cy7 (Lightning-link conjugation) | 1:400 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA2311GA |
| CD172a | 74-22-15A | Mouse IgG2b | PE | 1:400 | BD Biosciences Cat. No. | 561499 |
| CD335 | VIV-KM1 | Mouse IgG1 | NA | 1:200 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA5972GA |
| Mouse IgG1 | A85-1 | Rat IgG1 | BUV563 | 1:250 | BD Biosciences | 741254 |
| CADM1 | 3E1 | Chicken IgY | Biotin | 1:100 | MBL Life Science | MBL-CM004-6 |
| Streptavidin | NA | NA | BV421 | 1:250 | Biolegend | 405226 |
| PS | 1H6 | Mouse IgG | PE-Cy5.5 (Lightning-link conjugated) | 1:100 | Merck | 05-719 |
| SLA Class II DR | 2E9/13 | Mouse IgG2b | FITC | 1:50 | Bio-Rad Laboratories | MCA2314F |
| Intracellular | ||||||
| CD79a | HM47 | Mouse IgG1 | PerCP-Cy5.5 | 1:100 | Biolegend | 333508 |
| Ki67 | b56 | Mouse IgG1 | RB780 | 1:2000 | BD Biosciences | 568762 |
| ASFV p72 | 4H3 | Mouse IgG2a | Zenon-Alexa fluor 647 | 1:30 | In-house [20] | NA |
FCM analysis
FCM analysis was performed with FlowJo version 10.10 (BD Biosciences, USA). Citation information for the specific packages used are provided in the Supplementary information. For the analysis of tissue samples, samples were first cleaned with PeacocQC FlowJo package. Specific cell populations (CD3, NK, B cell, myeloid cells) were gated from the live cells and downsampled to obtain equivalent numbers of cells per group. After tSNE unsupervised dimensionality reduction, FlowSOM clustering was performed and clusters were characterized with Cluster Explorer in FlowJo. To avoid over-clustering, only major phenotyping markers for major immune cell populations were included in the analysis due to the limitations of unsupervised dimensionality reduction analysis for rare cell populations [21].
Statistical analysis and visual representation
Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.0) and RStudio (version 2023.9.1.494); citation information for the specific packages used are provided in the Supplementary information. One-way ANOVA was preferentially used to investigate the changes in immune cell dynamics and expression of proliferation and cytolytic markers across time, since each animal at each time point was an independent event. Data were transformed as appropriate to fit a normal distribution and diagnostic plots of residuals were checked to ensure that there was constant variance between residuals and model assumptions were met. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used where a model could not be fitted or when model assumptions were not met. Tukey’s honest significant differences test (multcomp package) or Dunn’s test (dunn.test package) was used for post hoc analyses where appropriate. Graphs were plotted using the ggplot2 package in R or with GraphPad Prism 10.1.2. Large language models (LLM), ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4 (OpenAI), were used as tools when generating the code to visualize data in R. LLMs were only used to refine initial R scripts; content was not generated de novo with LLMs. LLM outputs were manually reviewed before sections or none of the outputs were used. Graphs plotted in R were arranged with Illustrator 2024 (Adobe, USA).
Results
Oronasal infection is a suitable method for ASFV challenge
Here, we compared IM to IN and OR inoculation methods (Fig. 1a) to establish if these methods were able to result in reliable infection rates in British domestic pigs. Animals started displaying clinical signs such as lethargy and increased temperatures at 4 dpi and some animals within the IN and OR groups showed a delay in the onset of clinical signs in comparison to the IM group (Fig. 1b and c; Supplementary Fig. S1). Viremia was detected as early as 3 dpi after all methods of inoculation (Fig. 1d) and most OR animals reached their humane end points on the same day or one day delayed from the animals in the other groups. Macroscopic scores and viral load in tissues of OR and IN animals were comparable to those in the IM group (Supplementary Figs S2 and S3). Animals AZ05 (MAD) and AY101 (OR) had to be culled at 7 dpi due to the absence of companion animals within the groups, but these animals were viraemic (Fig. 1d), had detectable levels of virus within the tissues assessed (Supplementary Fig. S3) and AZ05 was displaying clinical signs typical of ASFV (Fig. 1c).
Figure 1.
Temperatures, clinical scores, and viral load after different virus inoculation methods. (a) Schematic outlining the comparison of different virus inoculation methods in outbred animals in experiment 1. Animals were inoculated through IM injection, intranasally with a MAD device (MAD) or oronasally (OR). Temperatures (b), clinical scores (c), and viraemia (d) of animals in experiment 1. (e) Schematic outlining experiment 2 where inbred Babrahams were oronasally inoculated with Georgia 2007/1 and sequentially culled at defined time points. Temperatures (f), clinical scores (g), viraemia (h), and viral load in selected tissues (i–l) of animals in experiment 2. SMLN, submandibular lymph node; TBLN, tracheal-bronchial lymph node. (b–d) Dark grey, yellow, and blue lines indicate the mean of each group. (b, f) Dashed line indicates the temperature at which the animals are considered to have a high fever according to the scoring matrix. Each datapoint denotes a single animal. (f–g) Lines depict the mean. (h–l) Median (centreline), the first and third quartiles (box boundaries), maximum and minimum values within 1.5× the interquartile range (whiskers). Statistical significance determined with (b–d) mixed-effects models, (f, h–l) Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn test, and (g) linear model. * P < 0.05, # P < 0.01.
Early viral replication sites after oronasal inoculation of British inbred Babraham pigs
With the confirmation that the pigs could be reliably infected with the oronasal route, we performed a sequential cull experiment with oronasal inoculation of inbred Babraham animals to study the in vivo effects and replication sites early in infection with Georgia 2007/1. Three animals were culled each day between 0 and 5 dpi (Fig. 1e). Similar to the previous experiment, surviving animals started displaying clinical signs at 4 dpi (Fig. 1g; Supplementary Fig. S4b), a high temperature above 40.5°C was detected in one animal (AZ46) on 5 dpi (Fig. 1f) and viremia was detected as early as 3 dpi (Fig. 1h). Analysis of viral load in draining lymphoid tissues of the infection sites identified that virus could be detected in the pharyngeal tonsil and submandibular LN (SMLN) as early as 1 dpi and levels were sustained between 4 and 5 dpi (Fig. 1i and j). Within the lungs, virus was detected as early as 1 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S5h). Virus was found in the tracheobronchial LN (TBLN) and the spleen from 3 dpi and high viral loads were found in the animals that had higher clinical scores (Fig. 1k and l). High levels of virus could be detected in the gastrohepatic LN (GHLN) and renal LN (RLN) at 4 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S5f and g). AZ42 and AZ35 appeared to have localized infection at the time of cull at 4- and 5 dpi, respectively, but this could be due to a slower course of infection as observed in AY101 (euthanized at 7 dpi) in the previous experiment (Fig. 1d). AZ35 and AZ42 did not have detectable viremia throughout the study (Fig. 1h) but were positive for ASFV in some tissues such as the lungs, TLBN, SMLN, and retropharyngeal LN (RPLN) (Fig. 1j and k; Supplementary Fig. S5e and h). Macroscopic scores for AZ35 at 5 dpi was higher than animals culled at 0 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S6). Macroscopic lesions found in the other animals culled on 4–5 dpi were consistent with ASFV (Supplementary Fig. S6) and comparable to those from the previous experiment (Supplementary Fig. S2). Taken together, our results indicate that infection begins locally within the draining facial LNs and tonsils, and, to a restricted extent, in the lungs after oronasal inoculation. The infection then progresses to systemic dissemination once the virus is detected in the blood and visceral lymphoid tissues.
Depletion of multiple lymphocyte subpopulations in whole blood after high virulent ASFV infection
Given that virulent ASFV induces lymphopenia [22], we first investigated the changes to whole blood cell populations (Supplementary Fig. S7), lymphocyte counts were observed to decrease as the disease progressed in animals that had high viremia (Supplementary Fig. S7a). Mean platelet volume increased in the sickest animals on 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S7c), an indication of increased platelet production in response to the infection, and there was a corresponding decrease in reticulocytes (Supplementary Fig. S7g) suggesting reduced red blood cell release from the bone marrow of these animals.
Next, using volumetric FCM (Fig. 2; Supplementary Figs S8 and S9) we performed more detailed analysis into the affected cell populations. CD3+ T cells (Fig. 2a) and CD21+ B cells (Fig. 2h) were observed to decrease at 4–5 dpi, consistent with previous reports of lymphopenia [6, 8, 16]. γδ-TCR+CD8α− cells (Fig. 2c), CD4+CD8α− naïve T cells (Fig. 2d), CD4−CD8α+ T cells (Fig. 2e), and CD4+CD8α+CD25+ T cells (Fig. 2f) contributed to the overall decrease in CD3+ T cells. In animals with the most severe disease, CD3−CD8α+CD16+ NK cells decreased over time (Fig. 2b) and an increase in CD172a− non-lymphocytes was observed on 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S9k). In the animals with the most severe clinical disease and viremia (AZ39, AZ46, and AZ48), a transient increase in monocytes was observed on 2 dpi, followed by an apparent downward trend (Fig. 2g), similar to IDEXX measurements (Supplementary Fig. S7b). These results suggest a dysregulation of whole blood immune cell homeostasis as ASFV infection progresses.
Figure 2.
Dynamics of immune cells in whole blood determined with volumetric FCM. Each datapoint denotes a single animal. The animal (AZ35) that was not viraemic on 5 dpi is denoted in blue and the animals with the most severe disease (AZ39, AZ46, and AZ48) are denoted in red. Gating strategy can be found in Supplementary Figure S8. Statistical significance determined with mixed-effects model, except for (b), (g), and (h) where linear model was used due to the absence of random effects. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Dysregulated lymphocyte dynamics within lymphoid tissues during early stages of virulent ASFV infection
Dysfunctional adaptive immune responses after virulent ASFV infection have previously been reported [6, 9]. Here, we sought to examine the dynamics of diverse lymphocyte populations within selected lymphoid tissues during the early stages of ASFV infection. Single cell suspensions derived from the soft palate tonsil (SPTonsil) the LN draining the initial sites of contact (SMLN, CLN, RPLN), as well as the GHLN and spleen, indicators of systemic infection, were subjected to FCM analyses at 0- and 3–5 dpi. We employed tSNE for visualization (Supplementary Figs S10 and S11), with the caveat that rarer cell types were excluded due to the necessity of downsampling. Thereafter, we performed conventional gating analysis to confirm our tSNE results and to analyse rarer known cell subsets that high unsupervised dimensionality reduction with tSNE could not resolve (gating strategy Supplementary Fig. S10).
γδ-TCR+ cells
γδ-TCR+ cells are considered rapid responders to infection with multiple protective roles and can be separated into naïve- (CD2−CD8α−, cluster 5), activated- (CD2+CD8α−, cluster 4), and effector- (CD2+CD8α+, cluster 8) γδ-TCR+ cells [23, 24]. Since γδ-TCR+ cells express cytotoxic markers and perforin is exclusive to CD2+γδ-TCR+ [25], we also investigated the expression of perforin.
Within the spleen, CD2+CD8α−γδ-TCR+ frequencies rose at 3 dpi and remained consistently high throughout the study (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Fig. S12a). This increase was accompanied by a transient increase in proliferation on 3 dpi and stable frequencies of perforin (Supplementary Fig. S12a). Expansion of CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ was also detected at 3–5 dpi with a corresponding increase in proliferation at 3- and 5-dpi and increased perforin expression 3 dpi (Figs. 3b and 4a). A transient increase in CD2+CD8α−γδ-TCR+ was found at 3 dpi in SPTonsil (Supplementary Fig. S12b), while CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ steadily increased, reaching the peak at 5 dpi (Fig. 4b).
Figure 3.
High dimensional analysis of live CD3+ T cells in various lymphoid tissues post-inoculation with Georgia 2007/1. (a) tSNE map overlaid with the 11 clusters obtained with FlowSOM. tSNE maps showing T cell clusters at selected time points within the (b) spleen, (c) SPTonsil, (d) SMLN, (e) CLN, (f) RPLN, and (g) GHLN. All tissues have n = 3 samples at each time point except for RPLN 0 dpi (n = 2) and 5 dpi (n = 1), and GHLN 0 dpi (n = 2). CLN, cervical lymph node; GHLN, gastro-hepatic lymph node; RPLN, retropharyngeal lymph node; SMLN, submandibular lymph node; SPTonsil, soft palate tonsil.
Figure 4.
Dynamics, proliferation and perforin expression of CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ cells in selected lymphoid tissues. (tSNE cluster 8) high dimensional analysis and (Conventional) conventional gating of CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ cell dynamics. (Proliferation) Proliferation and (Perforin) perforin expression of CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ cells. Each datapoint denotes a single animal. Median (centreline), the first and third quartiles (box boundaries), maximum and minimum values within 1.5× the interquartile range (whiskers). SMLN, submandibular lymph node; SPTonsil, soft palate tonsil. Statistical significance determined with one way ANOVA except (d, CLN tSNE Cluster 8) where Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn test were used. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
In the LNs (Fig. 3d–g), brief increases in CD2+CD8α−γδ-TCR+ and CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ were observed in the SMLN between 3 and 4 dpi, around the onset of systemic infection (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. S12c). Similar but less pronounced increases were found in the other LNs assessed (Fig. 4d–f; Supplementary Fig. S12d–f). Corresponding increases in proliferation and perforin expression in these cell subsets were detected at 3 dpi, especially within the SMLN (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. S12). However, at 5 dpi where higher viral loads were detected in the LNs (Fig. 1j; Supplementary Fig. S5d–f), increased proliferation in CD2+CD8α−γδ-TCR+ and CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ did not consistently lead to increased frequencies of these subpopulations (Supplementary Fig. S12c–f; Fig. 4c–f). Higher perforin expression was detected for CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ in the SPTonsil and most LNs at 5 dpi (Fig. 4).
Similar to CD2+CD8α−γδ-TCR+, CD2−CD8α−γδ-TCR+ briefly increased at 3 dpi within the LNs and had lower frequencies in the SPTonsil of the sickest animals on 5 dpi, in comparison to the non-viraemic animal, AZ35 (Supplementary Fig. S13b–f). Increased proliferation within CD2−CD8α−γδ-TCR+ was detected in the spleen and SMLN from 3 dpi, and to a lesser degree in the other tissues assessed (Supplementary Fig. S13).
Conventional T cells
Following infection with high virulent ASFV, compromised responses from conventional T cells within lymphoid tissues have been observed [6]. To explore this further, we investigated the changes in dynamics within the conventional T cell subsets. Frequencies of double positive (DP) T cells (CD4+CD8α+β−FoxP3−, cluster 1) were maintained in most tissues (Fig. 3), despite elevated proliferation from 3 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S14). In the SMLN, perforin expression was increased in DP T cells at 3–4 dpi but tapered off at 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S14c). Fluctuations in DP T cell frequencies across the tissues generally corresponded with inverse fluctuations in naïve CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD8α−β−FoxP3−, cluster 11) and expansion of naïve CD4+ T cells was not observed at 5 dpi despite increased proliferation (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S15). At 3 dpi, a transient decrease instead of an expansion of cytotoxic T cells frequencies (CTLs, CD4−CD8α+β+FoxP3−, cluster 10) was observed in the SPTonsil and to a lesser degree in the facial LN (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S16), even though proliferation and perforin expression in the CTLs in all tissues assessed were upregulated (Supplementary Fig. S16).
Overall, the analysis of major CD3+ T cell populations with tSNE was consistent with the results obtained with conventional gating analysis (Figs. 3 and 4; Supplementary Figs. S13–S17, gating strategy Supplementary Fig. S10).
T regulatory cells
In contrast to previous reports of upregulation of FoxP3+ expressing CD4+CD8α− T regulatory cells (Tregs) [6], in our study a rise in DP Tregs frequencies (CD4+CD8α+β−CD25+FoxP3+, cluster 9) instead of the CD4+CD8α− Tregs, was observed (Fig. 3). Expansion of DP Tregs frequencies was evident in the SMLN and SPTonsil, with a similar trend in the spleen, GHLN and RPLN (Supplementary Fig. S17). This was associated with increased proliferation in this Treg subset in the spleen and SMLN, and to a lesser extent in the SPTonsil, GHLN and RPLN (Supplementary Fig. S18). Similarly, a modest increase in the CD4−CD8α+β+ Tregs frequencies (CD4−CD8α+β+CD25+FoxP3+, cluster 7) was observed in the spleen and LNs at 3–4 dpi, and in the SPTonsil at 5 dpi (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S17). Increased proliferation in the CD4−CD8α+β+ Tregs was detected at 3 dpi in the spleen and SMLN and a comparable trend was observed in RPLN and GHLN (Supplementary Fig. S18).
NKT cells
Rarer cell subsets were analysed with conventional gating methods due to the limitations of unsupervised dimensionality reduction analysis [21]. Similar to γδ-TCR+ cells, the much rarer invariant NKT are another subset of unconventional T cells that span both innate and adaptive immunity and can be activated either by antigen-dependent or -independent routes [26]. Frequencies of the invariant NKT cell containing population (NKT, CD4−CD8α+β−) declined in the SMLN at 3–4 dpi, while more subtle reduction was observed in the spleen and other LNs (Supplementary Fig. S19). Increased proliferation was detected from 3 dpi in the SMLN and to a lesser degree in the other tissues. At the same time, higher perforin expression was found in the spleen and SMLN at 3 dpi, with a similar trend in the other LNs. Conversely, NKT cells transiently increased at 4 dpi, and this was accompanied by reduced perforin frequencies (Supplementary Fig. S19b).
NK cells
NK cell subsets with differential expression of CD8α and CD335 (NKp46) have been defined previously [27] and CD8α−CD335+ NK cells were described to be highly activated with high cytokine expression and cytolytic activity [28]. A modest increase in CD8α−CD335+ NK was observed in all tissues at 3 dpi, which corresponded to Ki67+ frequencies detected, but this rise in frequencies was largely reversed to below 0 dpi frequencies by 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S20). Increased perforin expression was observed in splenic CD8α−CD335+ NK cells from 3 dpi, and much later at 5 dpi in the LNs of animals with more severe disease (Supplementary Fig. S20). Perforin expression in this NK cell subset was reduced from 3 dpi in the SPTonsil and did not recover (Supplementary Fig. S20b). CD8α+CD335− NK cells were observed to decline all tissues at 3 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S21), accompanied by a rise in proliferation and perforin levels. Correspondingly, expansion of CD8α+CD335+ NK levels, together with increased proliferation, was found at the same time (3 dpi) in LNs and SPTonsil (Supplementary Fig. S22), which may be attributed to the upregulation of CD335 expression in CD8α+CD335− NK cells [27].
B cells
Proliferation was evident in the B cells in SMLN from 3 dpi with a trend towards increased B cell frequencies at 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S23c). Similar increase in B cell frequencies were observed in the other facial LNs. This increase could be due to the decrease in CD3+ T cells in these LNs (Supplementary Fig. S24c and e). Conversely, while B cell proliferation was detected in the spleen at 3 dpi, this was not accompanied by a rise in B cell frequencies (Supplementary Fig. S23a), even though overall CD3+ T cell frequencies were stable at this time point (Supplementary Fig. S24a). Increased proliferation may have contributed to the rise in B cell frequencies in SPTonsil at 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S23b) due to maintained frequencies of CD3+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. S24b).
Taken together, the alterations of T-, NK-, and B-cell compartments in the early stages of virulent ASFV infection suggest a disruption in the effector cell populations of the adaptive immune system that is characterized by a failure to maintain key immune cell populations and inconsistent proliferative responses.
Disruption and depletion of MPS cells involved in innate-adaptive immune cross talk following virulent ASFV infection
Here, we investigated the impact of infection with virulent ASFV on innate immune cells from the MPS since these are equally as important as mediators of adaptive immunity, especially in the primary immune response. Single cell suspensions subjected to FCM analyses were stained with a separate panel focusing on the MPS. Similar to lymphocyte analyses, samples from tissues were visualized with tSNE (Fig. 5; Supplementary Figs. S25 and S26) and professional antigen presenting cell (APCs) were subjected to conventional gating analysis to analyse rare cell subsets (Supplementary Figs. S25 and S27–S29). In general, unsupervised dimensionality reduction analyses across the tissues aligned with conventional gating analyses except for rarer populations.
Figure 5.
High dimensional analysis of live non-lymphocyte in various lymphoid tissues post-inoculation with Georgia 2007/1. (a) tSNE map overlaid with the 12 clusters obtained with FlowSOM. tSNE maps showing non-lymphocyte clusters at selected time points within the (b) spleen, (c) SPTonsil, (d) SMLN, (e) CLN, (f) RPLN, and (g) GHLN. All tissues have n = 3 samples at each time point except for RPLN 0 dpi (n = 2) and 5 dpi (n = 1), and GHLN 0 dpi (n = 2). CLN, cervical lymph node; GHLN, gastro-hepatic lymph node; RPLN, retropharyngeal lymph node; SMLN, submandibular lymph node; SPTonsil, soft palate tonsil.
Dendritic cells
Frequencies of antigen presenting non-lymphocytes expressing SLA class II DR (SLAII) increased in the spleen between 3 and 4 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S27a) and a similar expansion, but to a lesser extent, were observed in SPTonsil, CLN, and RPLN 3 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S27b, d and e). This increase was largely reversed by 5 dpi. Dendritic cells are key APCs modulating both innate and adaptive immunity [29] and porcine conventional dendritic cells (cDC) have previously been defined as CD14−CD172a−/loCADM1+CD11b+ for cDC1 (Fig. 5 cluster 9) and CD14−CD172a+CADM1+CD11b+ for cDC2 (Fig. 5 cluster 8) [30]. Depletion in frequencies of putative cDC1 cells was observed in all tissues from 3 dpi (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Fig. S28), especially in the SPTonsil and CLN, even though these cells are known to migrate to LNs and proliferate in response to infection [29]. Likewise, reduced frequencies of putative cDC2 were detected in all tissues by 5 dpi (Fig. 6c; Supplementary Fig. S29), although a transient increase in putative cDC2 was evident in the spleen at 4 dpi (Fig. 6c). Increased proliferation was detected in both cDC1 and cDC2 populations in the spleen from 3 dpi (Fig. 6a and c), but this was insufficient to boost frequencies in either subset. Frequencies of both cDC1 and cDC2 subsets were severely depleted in the animals with the most severe clinical signs at 5 dpi (Fig. 6a and c; Supplementary Figs. S28 and S29).
Figure 6.
Dynamics and proliferation of dendritic cell populations in the spleen after inoculation with Georgia 2007/1. (tSNE cluster) high dimensional analysis and (Conventional) manual gating of dendritic cell dynamics within the spleen. (Proliferation) Proliferation of spleen derived dendritic cell subsets. Each data point denotes a single animal. Median (centreline), the first and third quartiles (box boundaries), maximum and minimum values within 1.5× the interquartile range (whiskers). Statistical significance determined with one way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Other CADM1+ cell subsets were also affected as disease progressed. Within the spleen, SLAII+CD172alo/−CADM1+CD11b− frequencies briefly decreased at 3 dpi, and this was accompanied by increased proliferation that was maintained thereafter (Fig. 6b). Conversely, a transient increase in SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b− within the spleen was observed at 4 dpi, despite increased proliferation from 4 dpi (Fig. 6d). A transient increase in SLAII+CD172alo/−CADM1+CD11b− and SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b− frequencies was evident within facial LNs, and SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b− within GHLN, at 4 dpi (Supplementary Figs. S28 and S29).
Monocytes and macrophages
Monocytes and macrophages play central roles in the MPS and are key replication sites for ASFV [31]. Monocyte (tSNE Cluster 10, CD172a+CD14++) frequencies rose in the spleen and SMLN between 3 and 5 dpi (Fig. 5b and d) and to a lesser degree in the SPTonsil and CLN at 3 dpi (Fig. 5c and e), coinciding with the reduction in circulating monocytes in the blood of the most viraemic animals (Fig. 2g). More detailed analysis of SLAII+ monocytes (SLAII+CD172a+CD14++) found a peak increase in monocyte frequencies within the spleen and SMLN at 4 dpi but frequencies were on a downward trend at 5 dpi (Supplementary Figs. S30a and S31b). Similar SLAII+ monocyte dynamics were observed in SPTonsil, CLN and RPLN (Supplementary Fig. S31a, c and d). As expected, CD14−CD163+ macrophage frequencies (tSNE Cluster 12, SLAII+CD172a+CADM1−CD163+) were depleted by 5 dpi in all tissues and was most severe in the spleens of animals with the highest viremia on 5 dpi (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figs. S30b and S31). In stark contrast to the frequency depletion of monocytes and macrophages, proliferation of splenic monocytes and macrophages was upregulated at 3 dpi and peaked at 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S30).
Monocytes are known to replenish macrophages in tissues during inflammation and infection [32], and monocyte derived macrophages (mo-macrophages) within the porcine lung have been previously defined as SLAII++CD11b+CD14+CD163intCADM1lo cells, which appears to consist of CADMlo and CADM− cells [33]. We identified SLAII++CD11b+CD14+CD163+ (defined here as mo-macrophages) in the spleen and subdivided these into CADM1+ (CADM1+ mo-macrophages) and CADM1− (CADM1− mo-macrophages) subsets (Supplementary Figs S32 and S33). Frequencies of mo-macrophages increased between 3–4 dpi but were depleted in the spleens with the highest viral loads (AZ39, AZ46, AZ48) (Supplementary Fig. S33a). The CADM1− subset of mo-macrophages was elevated earlier at 3 dpi than the CADM1+ subset at 4 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S33b and c).
Apoptosis
We detected haemorrhagic lymphadenitis within sites of early replication at 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S6) and depletion in frequencies was evident in some of the major cell populations (Supplementary Figs S24 and S27). Hence, we sought to determine if apoptosis was a contributing factor in lymphoid tissues draining the initial sites of replication. Using the fixed apoptosis necrosis assay (Supplementary Fig. S34) [34], we determined that early apoptosis was evident in the SMLN, SPTonsil, and CLN at 4 dpi and peak frequencies of early apoptosis in the lymphocyte compartment containing both CD3+ T cells and CD79a+ B cells was at this time point (Supplementary Fig. S35). Slightly different trends were observed for antigen presenting non-lymphocytes in these tissues. Steady increase in early apoptosis was observed in the SPTonsil between 3 and 5 dpi (Supplementary Fig. S35a), while apoptosis rates fluctuated around the baseline in the SMLN and CLN (Supplementary Fig. S35b and c).
ASFV positive cells within the MPS
Lastly, we used an antibody specific for the ASFV p72/B646L protein to phenotype infected cells in the spleens of animals with the highest virus titres (AZ39, AZ46, and AZ48, Supplementary Figs. S36 and S37) [20]. Although the titres detected were between 109.02–9.19 genome copies/g spleen, we were only able to detect 0.82 ± 0.51% (mean, SD) of live cells that were infected. The major population of cells infected were non-lymphocytes of the MPS (Supplementary Fig. S36a). AZ48 displayed clinical signs of ASF at 4 dpi and of the non-lymphocyte cells identified to be p72+, antigen presenting CD172a+CD14−CADM1+CD11b− cells were a major subpopulation (Supplementary Fig. S36b). In AZ39 and AZ46, the top three p72+ non-lymphocyte cells were non-antigen presenting SLAII−CD14−CD172a+, non-antigen presenting monocytes (SLAII−CD14++) and antigen presenting monocytes (SLAII+CD14++) (Supplementary Fig. S36b). Of the immunophenotyped cell subsets within the spleens, macrophages (CD172a+CD11b−CADM1−CD163+) had the highest susceptibility, followed by a population of non-antigen presenting SLAII−CD14−CD172a+ cells.
Collectively, these observed dynamics from the MPS indicate that there is an attempt to mount a primary response upon ASFV infection. However, the depletion in frequencies of professional APCs, the inability to sustain the replacement of these cells, and increased apoptosis of APCs in lymphoid tissues likely contribute to a dysfunctional response.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to characterize the in vivo dynamics of primary responses in the blood and lymphoid tissues at the early stages of ASFV infection. We found that despite an initial attempt to mount an immune response, clinical disease was accompanied by a dysregulated maintenance and depletion of immune cell populations, such as the CD4+ T cells, γδ-TCR+ T cells and the cDCs, essential for the primary immune response and for bridging adaptive and innate immune responses.
We first validated the OR and IN infection methods with the conventional IM injection infection route in outbred pigs and both routes were able to induce reliable infection, albeit with a noticeable delay in onset of clinical signs and viremia in some of the animals. Although infections in OR and IN groups were not as synchronized as the IM animals, all animals were infected with ASFV, as detected by qPCR. Previous work into the delivery of virus intranasally with the MAD device demonstrated that this method delivered a high proportion of the virus into a restricted area of the lungs [5]. Our back titrations demonstrated that the animals could be reliably inoculated with lower virus titres derived from infected spleen than previous work with Armenia2008 [6], which is effectively identical to Georgia 2007/1.
Next, we investigated the primary responses and immune cell dynamics in early stages of ASFV infection in inbred Babraham pigs using the OR infection route. Immune responses of Babraham pigs after H1N1 influenza infection have previously been found to be comparable to that of outbred animals [15] and have been used in ASF infection studies [16]. ASF typical clinical signs and macroscopic lesions were observed in animals culled at 4–5 dpi, but qPCR analyses demonstrated that AZ35 and AZ42 had not develop systemic infections at the point they were killed. It is possible that these animals had a delayed infection course and would have developed systemic infections as demonstrated by AY101 in the first experiment at 7 dpi. These results highlight the need for diagnostic qPCR detection of ASFV to determine infection since some of the clinical signs and macroscopic lesions typical of ASFV infection are similar to that of other porcine diseases.
Early detection of ASFV in the pharyngeal tonsils and SMLN in this study were consistent with previous results after intranasal inoculation of the Tengani isolates [11]. In addition, virus was detected in the lungs of two animals (AZ38 and AZ40) culled on 1 dpi. It is possible that these animals inhaled the virus deeper into the lungs during the inoculation as animals were only restrained and not sedated for virus inoculation, which may be similar to intranasal delivery with a MAD device [5]. Detection of virus in the blood, spleen, and other visceral LNs from 3 dpi were indicative of virus dissemination leading to systemic infection and it appears that virus is reintroduced to the facial lymphoid tissues during this phase.
Since systemic infection typically manifests from 3 dpi, we characterized the dynamics of major immune populations of the blood and lymphoid organs that contribute to the primary response post-infection. Our study is limited by a modest sample size (n = 3), and in certain FCM analyses only one or two samples were available, which may influence the generalizability of the findings. Nevertheless, these findings provide useful insights into early host immune responses post-ASFV infection.
Consistent with findings from virulent Armenia2008 and CADC_HN09 infection of outbred pigs [6, 9], we observed lymphopenia, which could be attributed to the loss of CD3+CD4+CD8α− and CD3+CD4+CD8α− T-and CD21+ B cells. Given that immune cells migrate from the bloodstream to lymphoid tissues during infection [35], we investigated whether immune cell migration could contribute to the observed lymphopenia. In general, CD3+ T cell frequencies were decreased while B cell frequencies were maintained across the tissues by 5 dpi, indicating that the loss was not due to migration. This is similar to findings from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of the spleens of infected animals [12]. Literature suggests that apoptosis of lymphocytes may be a contributing factor [36]; similarly, we detected higher frequencies of early apoptosis in the lymphocyte population (comprising of CD3+ T- and CD79a+ B-cells) from 4 dpi in the facial LNs. These findings lead us to speculate that the loss in circulating CD3+ T cells may predominantly be due to apoptosis, as previously shown [37], while loss of B cells may delayed and driven by the depletion of T-helper cells [36, 37]. It is possible that the drastic B cell frequency depletion in tissues observed in other studies was not detected here due to the earlier study termination at 5 dpi. A more detailed analysis into B cell dynamics and B-cell specific apoptosis is necessary to confirm these findings, particularly due to the different B cell antibodies used in whole blood (CD21) and tissue (CD79a) FCM analyses and the inability to differentiate B cells from T cells when assessing apoptosis.
Another important subset of CD3+ T cells that are impacted by virulent ASFV are γδ-TCR+ cells that are known to be cytolytic and are involved in innate-adaptive crosstalk [38]. Similar to findings from Armenia2008 infections [6], we observed a reduction in γδ-TCR+ cells in the blood of animals with more advanced clinical disease, indicative of a dysregulated maintenance of these cells. However, unlike the Armenia2008 results, we detected a transient increase in perforin expression in CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ cells, which are considered to be effector γδ-TCR+ cells, at 3 dpi across the tissues. This observation aligns with in vitro data, where resting γδ-TCR+ cells exhibited little to no perforin expression, but upregulated perforin along with an increase in CD2+CD8α+γδ-TCR+ cells after co-culture and activation with macrophages [25], which may be a contributing factor at 3 dpi. The fluctuating frequencies of perforin in γδ-TCR+ cells between 4 and 5 dpi may reflect perforin consumption, potentially through cytotoxic activity, though this requires confirmation in future studies alongside other killing markers such as Fas/FasL [6, 25]. Besides cytotoxic activity, γδ-TCR+ have been implicated in innate-adaptive crosstalk, including the priming and activation of other immune cells such as DCs and NK cells to boost adaptive immune responses [38–40]. Furthermore, reciprocal enhancement and complementary function between γδ-TCR+ and DCs have been reported [41, 42], but this remains to be explored further in pigs, which have significantly more γδ-TCR+ cells than mice and humans.
In contrast to the increase in iNKT after Armenia2008 infection [6], we detected overall reductions in this population. Notably, our staining only identified the CD4−CD8α+ subpopulation of iNKT that are considered to be naïve iNKT due to the absence of staining with the CD1d tetramer. Previous work with Armenia2008 did not measure iNKT levels in the spleen or facial LN, and no decrease in splenic iNKT was observed with moderately virulent ASFV, Estonia2014. Therefore, further studies are needed to compare the effects of ASFV isolates with varying virulence on iNKT populations.
NK cells are another critical subset of immune cells that bridge the innate-adaptive axis. In this study, we used the MIL2 clone to detect for CD8α, which may account for the lower expression of CD8α we detected on NK cells in comparison to previous work that used the clones 11/295/33 and 76–2-11 [27, 28]. From our results, we speculate that highly activated cytolytic CD8α−CD335+ NK cells were depleted across the tissues, and these were replaced by CD8α+CD335+ NK cells. It has been shown that CD8α+CD335+ NK cells have lower cytokine expression, degranulation and cytolytic capabilities in comparison to CD8α−CD335+ NK cells [28]. It is possible that the loss of CD8α−CD335+ NK cells contributed to a dysfunctional immune response and disease severity.
Tregs, which have been described to contribute to the control of tissue damage in infection [43], were also investigated in infections with Armenia2008, where CD4+CD8α− Tregs were upregulated at 7 dpi in the blood, spleen, and GHLN [6]. Conversely, a decrease in blood CD4+ Tregs, which includes both CD4+CD8α+ and CD4+CD8α− Tregs, was found in infections with CADC_HN09. Our study had a shorter duration than these studies, but similar to Tian et al. [9] we observed reductions in the CD4+ Treg containing populations of the blood (CD4+CD8α−CD25+ and CD4+CD8α−CD25+T cells). Transient increase in frequencies and proliferation in CD8α+ Tregs detected in the tissues we examined could be an attempt to regulate cellular responses after infection as identified in human lymphoid tissues [44], but as suggested previously, the effects of Treg dysregulation in acute ASFV infection require more in-depth exploration.
In some tissues, proliferation without a corresponding net increase in frequencies was observed in lymphocyte subsets, such as CTLs, γδ-TCR+ cells, CD4+ T cells, and B cells. This could potentially be due to apoptosis as early apoptosis was identified in the lymphocyte compartments within the SPTonsil, SMLN and CLN. Apoptosis could also have contributed to the reduction in frequencies of antigen presenting components of the MPS in the facial LNs. T cell responses are crucial for protection against ASFV, and impaired T cell responses have been described after virulent ASFV infection [6, 9, 45]. The reduction in frequencies of SLAII+ APCs by 5 dpi in the animals with more advanced disease may contribute to impaired development of an acquired immune response due to reduced activation of T cells [46].
cDCs are primary APCs that bridge the innate and adaptive immune responses as key mediators of the T cell response, and these are typically recruited into the draining LNs after infection [29]. Across the secondary lymphoid tissues assessed, putative cDC1 and cDC2 populations were generally depleted, especially in animals with the highest viral loads, despite increased proliferation. Interestingly, there was a transient increase in putative cDC2 4 dpi in the spleen. Although cDC2 are conventionally linked to Th2 and Th17 (autoimmunity) immunomodulation, cDC2 have been reported to have the potential to differentiate into inflammatory DCs, which function in a manner similar to cDC1 [47]. Hence, we postulate that the loss of both cDC1 and cDC2 would have hindered the development and maintenance of an adaptive response for protection against virulent ASFV.
Similarly, transient increase in frequencies of CADM1+ subsets, SLAII+CD172alo/−CADM1+CD11b− and SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b−, was detected. The identity of these CADM1+CD11b− cells require further investigation, and one animal (AZ48) had a high proportion of SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b− cells that were infected, which suggests a contribution of infection-induced cell death. In this study, we only investigated the changes in dendritic cell dynamics in early ASFV infection; there is a need to investigate the effects of virulent ASFV on the function of the different dendritic cell subsets further as some dendritic cell subsets have also been implicated in crosstalk with γδ-TCR+ cells [48].
Although both macrophages and monocytes are target cells for ASFV replication [31], macrophages have been found to be more susceptible to ASFV infection than monocytes in vitro [49]. CD14−CD163+ macrophages were broadly depleted across the tissues most likely due to replication of ASFV in these cells early in the infection course. While monocytes have been shown to infiltrate into tissues and replace the loss of macrophages after infection [32], clear expansion of monocytes was only observed in the spleen and SMLN and was reduced in the SMLN at 5 dpi. The cell populations defined as mo-macrophages in this study were also depleted by 5 dpi. Increase in monocytes within the spleen was previously observed using scRNAseq and from the proportions of infected monocytes detected in animals with the highest spleen viral loads, so it is possible that the monocytes were infected after the macrophages and mo-macrophages were depleted [12]. Furthermore, monocytes have been shown to influence the upregulation of effector T cells in response to type I inflammation within LNs [50]. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that the reduction of monocytes in SMLN 5 dpi may have contributed to the lower frequencies of effector CTLs expressing perforin, but this remains to be explored in further detail.
While our p72 detection with antibodies was not as sensitive as qPCR or scRNAseq, the differential infection profiles observed in our inbred model demonstrates the diversity of cellular tropism of ASFV within the spleen, especially at high titres. In contrast to Zhu et al. [12], we identified one animal (AZ48) with a higher proportion of SLAII+CD172a+CADM1+CD11b− infected cells in comparison to the other animals with advanced disease. Although we detected ASFV p72 in lymphocytes, our data (Supplementary Fig. S37) is similar to previous data where between 0.12% and 0.26% of CD3+ and B cells were ASFV+ and these cells were shown to be non-permissive to ASFV infection [12].
Conclusion
In summary, our findings demonstrate a reduction in frequencies of adaptive immune cells within the lymphocyte compartment, as well as a loss of professional APCs within the MPS. Direct infection and subsequent apoptosis are likely contributors to the reduction of MPS cells. This reduction of critical cell subsets, such as CD4+ T cells and cDCs, from both the innate and adaptive immune compartments in the early stages of ASFV infection further disrupts the bridge between these arms of immunity. Consequently, while there are initial attempts to initiate an adaptive immune response, this process is disrupted due to the absence of key immune cell populations required for its maintenance. The inability to generate a sufficiently robust or sustained adaptive immune response not only impairs immune control but may also contribute to accelerated disease progression and, ultimately, death. These findings highlight the need to investigate the innate-adaptive axis further with different ASFV isolates of varying virulence to determine if this immune imbalance is a defining feature of acute ASFV infection.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jake Scales, Ollie Trussler, Zach Skoumbourdis, Louise Carder, Henry Steele, Dave Selby, Luke Fitzpatrick, Billy Matthews, and Michael Collett for the care of the animals during the studies described in this manuscript and the flow cytometry facility for their support in this research. The Editor-in-Chief and handling editor, Simon Milling, would like to thank the reviewer, Ann Chen and an anonymous reviewer, for their contribution to the publication of this article.
Contributor Information
Priscilla Y L Tng, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Vaccinology, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Laila Al-Adwani, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Vaccinology, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Lynnette Goatley, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Vaccinology, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Raquel Portugal, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Vaccinology, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Anusyah Rathakrishnan, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Virus Immune Evasion, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Christopher L Netherton, The Pirbright Institute, African Swine Fever Vaccinology, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Author contributions
Priscilla Y.L. Tng (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Laila Al-Adwani (Methodology, Investigation, Writing—review & editing), Lynnette Goatley (Investigation, Writing—review & editing), Raquel Portugal (Investigation, Writing—review & editing), Anusyah Rathakrishnan (Investigation, Writing—review & editing), Christopher L Netherton (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review & editing).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data is available at Discovery Immunology online.
Funding
The work was funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grants BBS/E/PI/0000230001A, BBS/E/PI/000023NB0004, BB/Y006224/1, BB/Z514457/1 and BB/X511134/1. We would also like to acknowledge the Pirbright Institute’s Bioinformatics and Flow Cytometry Science Technology Platforms support through UKRI grant BBS/E/PI/23NB0004.
Data availability
The data underlying this article are available on FigShare at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7857272.
Ethical approval
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) of The Pirbright institute and were conducted under the auspices of the Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (ASPA, 1986). The animals were housed and cared for in accordance with the Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Bred, Supplied or Used for Scientific Purposes. To ensure high standards of animal welfare, bedding and species-specific enrichment were provided to the pigs throughout the study. Trained and qualified Personal License holders conducted all procedures under the oversight of Project License PPL70/8852. Throughout the studies, the pigs were under close supervision and were euthanized by an overdose of anaesthetic when they reached the scientific or humane endpoints.
References
- 1. Chapman DA, Darby AC, Da Silva M, Upton C, Radford AD, Dixon LK. Genomic analysis of highly virulent Georgia 2007/1 isolate of African swine fever virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2011, 17, 599–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sanchez-Vizcaino JM. African swine fever from Kenya to five continents: the role of wild boar. Rev Sci Tech 2024, Special Edition, 53–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Plavsik B, Rozstalnyy A, Park JY, Guberti V, Depner K, Torres G. Strategic challenges to global control of African swine fever. In: OIE 87th General Session. Paris, France: OIE, 2019, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Blome S, Gabriel C, Beer M. Pathogenesis of African swine fever in domestic pigs and European wild boar. Virus Res 2013, 173, 122–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Martini V, Hinchcliffe M, Blackshaw E, Joyce M, McNee A, Beverley P, et al. Distribution of droplets and immune responses after aerosol and intra-nasal delivery of influenza virus to the respiratory tract of pigs. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 594470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Huhr J, Schafer A, Schwaiger T, Zani L, Sehl J, Mettenleiter TC, et al. Impaired T-cell responses in domestic pigs and wild boar upon infection with a highly virulent African swine fever virus strain. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020, 67, 3016–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Schafer A, Zani L, Pikalo J, Hühr J, Sehl J, Mettenleiter TC, et al. T-cell responses in domestic pigs and wild boar upon infection with the moderately virulent African swine fever virus strain ‘estonia2014’. Transbound Emerg Dis 2021, 68, 2733–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Radulovic E, Mehinagic K, Wuthrich T, Hilty M, Posthaus H, Summerfield A, et al. The baseline immunological and hygienic status of pigs impact disease severity of African swine fever. PLoS Pathog 2022, 18, e1010522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tian Y, Wang D, He S, Cao Z, Li W, Jiang F, et al. Immune cell early activation, apoptotic kinetic, and T-cell functional impairment in domestic pigs after ASFV CADC_HN09 strain infection. Front Microbiol 2024, 15, 1328177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Greig A. Pathogenesis of African swine fever in pigs naturally exposed to the disease. J Comp Pathol 1972, 82, 73–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Plowright W, Parker J, Staple RF. The growth of a virulent strain of African swine fever virus in domestic pigs. J Hyg (Lond) 1968, 66, 117–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhu Z, Mao R, Liu B, Liu H, Shi Z, Zhang K, et al. Single-cell profiling of African swine fever virus disease in the pig spleen reveals viral and host dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024, 121, e2312150121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Franzoni G, Graham SP, Sanna G, Angioi P, Fiori MS, Anfossi A, et al. Interaction of porcine monocyte-derived dendritic cells with African swine fever viruses of diverse virulence. Vet Microbiol 2018, 216, 190–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Schwartz JC, Farrell CP, Freimanis G, Sewell AK, Phillips JD, Hammond JA. A genome assembly and transcriptome atlas of the inbred Babraham pig to illuminate porcine immunogenetic variation. Immunogenetics 2024, 76, 361–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Edmans M, McNee A, Porter E, Vatzia E, Paudyal B, Martini V, et al. Magnitude and kinetics of T cell and antibody responses during H1N1pdm09 infection in inbred Babraham pigs and outbred pigs. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 604913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Goatley LC, Nash RH, Andrews C, Hargreaves Z, Tng P, Reis AL, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses after immunisation with low virulent African swine fever virus in the large white inbred Babraham line and outbred domestic pigs. Viruses 2022, 14, 1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Netherton CL, Goatley LC, Reis AL, Portugal R, Nash RH, Morgan SB, et al. Identification and immunogenicity of African swine fever virus antigens. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Galindo-Cardiel I, Ballester M, Solanes D, Nofrarías M, López-Soria S, Argilaguet JM, et al. Standardization of pathological investigations in the framework of experimental ASFV infections. Virus Res 2013, 173, 180–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. King DP, Reid SM, Hutchings GH, Grierson SS, Wilkinson PJ, Dixon LK, et al. Development of a TaqMan PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J Virol Methods 2003, 107, 53–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cobbold C, Whittle JT, Wileman T. Involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum in the assembly and envelopment of African swine fever virus. J Virol 1996, 70, 8382–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Saeys Y, Van Gassen S, Lambrecht BN. Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data. Nat Rev Immunol 2016, 16, 449–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wardley RC, Wilkinson PJ. Lymphocyte responses to African swine fever virus infection. Res Vet Sci 1980, 28, 185–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Le Page L, Gillespie A, Schwartz JC, Prawits L-M, Schlerka A, Farrell CP, et al. Subpopulations of swine gammadelta T cells defined by TCRgamma and WC1 gene expression. Dev Comp Immunol 2021, 125, 104214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sedlak C, Patzl M, Saalmuller A, Gerner W. CD2 and CD8alpha define porcine gammadelta T cells with distinct cytokine production profiles. Dev Comp Immunol 2014, 45, 97–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bettin L, Darbellay J, van Kessel J, Dhar N, Gerdts V. Porcine gammadelta T cells express cytotoxic cell-associated markers and display killing activity but are not selectively cytotoxic against PRRSV- or swIAV-infected macrophages. Front Immunol 2024, 15, 1434011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Schafer A, Huhr J, Schwaiger T, Dorhoi A, Mettenleiter TC, Blome S, et al. Porcine invariant natural killer T cells: functional profiling and dynamics in steady state and viral infections. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mair KH, Essler SE, Patzl M, Storset AK, Saalmüller A, Gerner W. NKp46 expression discriminates porcine NK cells with different functional properties. Eur J Immunol 2012, 42, 1261–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mair KH, Mullebner A, Essler SE, Duvigneau JC, Storset AK, Saalmüller A, et al. Porcine CD8alphadim/-NKp46high NK cells are in a highly activated state. Vet Res 2013, 44, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Liu J, Zhang X, Cheng Y, Cao X. Dendritic cell migration in inflammation and immunity. Cell Mol Immunol 2021, 18, 2461–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Auray G, Talker SC, Keller I, Python S, Gerber M, Liniger M, et al. High-resolution profiling of innate immune responses by porcine dendritic cell subsets in vitro and in vivo. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dixon LK, Islam M, Nash R, Reis AL. African swine fever virus evasion of host defences. Virus Res 2019, 266, 25–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Vanneste D, Bai Q, Hasan S, Peng W, Pirottin D, Schyns J, et al. MafB-restricted local monocyte proliferation precedes lung interstitial macrophage differentiation. Nat Immunol 2023, 24, 827–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Maisonnasse P, Bouguyon E, Piton G, Ezquerra A, Urien C, Deloizy C, et al. The respiratory DC/macrophage network at steady-state and upon influenza infection in the swine biomedical model. Mucosal Immunol 2016, 9, 835–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Mariotti S, Pardini M, Teloni R, Gagliardi MC, Fraziano M, Nisini R. A method permissive to fixation and permeabilization for the multiparametric analysis of apoptotic and necrotic cell phenotype by flow cytometry. Cytometry A 2017, 91, 1115–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hampton HR, Chtanova T. Lymphatic migration of immune cells. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Takamatsu H, Denyer MS, Oura C, Childerstone A, Andersen JK, Pullen L, et al. African swine fever virus: a B cell-mitogenic virus in vivo and in vitro. J Gen Virol 1999, 80, 1453–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Oura CA, Powell PP, Parkhouse RM. African swine fever: a disease characterized by apoptosis. J Gen Virol 1998, 79, 1427–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Takamatsu HH, Denyer MS, Stirling C, Cox S, Aggarwal N, Dash P, et al. Porcine gammadelta T cells: possible roles on the innate and adaptive immune responses following virus infection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006, 112, 49–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hu Y, Hu Q, Li Y, Lu L, Xiang Z, Yin Z, et al. Gammadelta T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023, 8, 434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Takamatsu HH, Denyer MS, Wileman TE. A sub-population of circulating porcine gammadelta T cells can act as professional antigen presenting cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2002, 87, 223–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Galati D, Zanotta S, Bocchino M, De Filippi R, Pinto A. The subtle interplay between gamma delta T lymphocytes and dendritic cells: is there a role for a therapeutic cancer vaccine in the era of combinatorial strategies? Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021, 70, 1797–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Martino A, Poccia F. Gamma delta t cells and dendritic cells: close partners and biological adjuvants for new therapies. Curr Mol Med 2007, 7, 658–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Maizels RM, Smith KA. Regulatory t cells in infection. Adv Immunol 2011, 112, 73–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chen X, Ghanizada M, Mallajosyula V, Sola E, Capasso R, Kathuria KR, et al. Differential roles of human CD4(+) and CD8(+) regulatory t cells in controlling self-reactive immune responses. Nat Immunol 2025, 26, 230–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Oura CAL, Denyer MS, Takamatsu H, Parkhouse RME. In vivo depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes abrogates protective immunity to African swine fever virus. J Gen Virol 2005, 86, 2445–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Gaudino SJ, Kumar P. Cross-talk between antigen presenting cells and T cells impacts intestinal homeostasis, bacterial infections, and tumorigenesis. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bosteels C, Neyt K, Vanheerswynghels M, van Helden MJ, Sichien D, Debeuf N, et al. Inflammatory type 2 cDCs acquire features of cDC1s and macrophages to orchestrate immunity to respiratory virus infection. Immunity 2020, 52, 1039–56e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ismaili J, Olislagers V, Poupot R, Fournié J-J, Goldman M. Human gamma delta T cells induce dendritic cell maturation. Clin Immunol 2002, 103, 296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. McCullough KC, Basta S, Knotig S, Gerber H, Schaffner R, Kim YB, et al. Intermediate stages in monocyte-macrophage differentiation modulate phenotype and susceptibility to virus infection. Immunology 1999, 98, 203–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Leal JM, Huang JY, Kohli K, Stoltzfus C, Lyons-Cohen MR, Olin BE, et al. Innate cell microenvironments in lymph nodes shape the generation of T cell responses during type I inflammation. Sci Immunol 2021, 6, eabb9435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article are available on FigShare at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7857272.







