Skip to main content
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review logoLink to Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
. 2025 Dec 24;14:e35. doi: 10.15420/aer.2025.34

Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Substrates, Mechanisms and Treatment

Marine Arnaud 1,2,, Josselin Duchateau 1,2, Mélèze Hocini 1,2
PMCID: PMC12784270  PMID: 41524082

Abstract

Idiopathic VF is a complex clinical entity that is characterised by an evolving scope over time. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and electrical diseases represent a significant proportion of diagnoses attributed during follow-up in patients with an initial diagnosis of idiopathic VF. Stepwise diagnostic workup and management are of paramount importance. We proposed that idiopathic VF can be split into two distinct phenotypes, with potential overlap in an individual patient. In patients with Purkinje-related idiopathic VF, short-coupled ventricular ectopy can be documented, and ablation of the culprit tissue is a reasonable strategy to avoid recurrence. In patients with microstructural idiopathic VF, localised myocardial alterations can be unveiled by thorough electro-anatomical mapping and are amenable to a substrate-elimination strategy. Idiopathic VF is also a dynamic and evolving field, with promising research, new diagnostic tools and ablation techniques being developed in the near future.

Keywords: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, Purkinje, ectopy, microstructural abnormalities

Historical Background

From the First Description to Current Views

The term idiopathic comes from Greek roots idios and pathos, meaning a disease that does not arise from any known cause. The first use of ‘idiopathic ventricular fibrillation’ was made by Ledwich and Fay in 1969 in a report on a patient in whom cardiac examination, 12-lead ECG and chest X-ray were normal (Figure 1).1

Figure 1: Historical Background of Idiopathic VF.

Figure 1:

Over time, the proportion of patients labelled as having idiopathic VF has progressively decreased, due to improvements in the diagnostic workup of patients with resuscitated sudden cardiac death. Coronary catheterisation and echocardiography in the late 1960s were the first important diagnostic tests that markedly improved the definition of ‘apparently normal heart’. More recently, major progress has been made with cardiac MRI and pharmacological challenges. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and electrical diseases represent a significant proportion of diagnoses attributed during follow-up in patients with an initial diagnosis of idiopathic VF. In parallel, genetic testing and improved understanding and recognition of cardiac channelopathies (long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia [CPVT], calcium release deficiency syndrome [CRDS]) and arrhythmic syndromes (Brugada, early repolarisation) have further restricted the span of idiopathic VF.2,3

Therefore, idiopathic VF is a complex clinical entity that is characterised by an evolving scope over time. The main stem is that it is a diagnosis per exclusion: VF occurring in the absence of structural or electrical heart disease, or reversible metabolic and toxicological conditions. Since the 1920s, there have been reports of apparent idiopathic VF, with the first case probably described by William Dock in 1929.4 Next, two patients with apparent idiopathic VF were identified more than 70 years ago and had VF initiated by short-coupled premature ventricular contraction (PVC). Both were male, aged 38 and 37 years and suffered from multiple episodes of palpitations and syncope.5,6 The first case of idiopathic VF storms was reported by Moe in 1948.5 In 1994, Leenhardt et al. described the first series of 14 patients (50% women, mean age 34.6 ± 10 years) with short-coupled torsade de pointes based on the QRS morphology of the arrhythmia.7 The coupling interval of the PVC initiating the arrhythmia was 245 ± 28 ms (range 220–300 ms).

In 2002, we reported mapping and ablation of idiopathic VF related to short-coupled PVCs, demonstrating the involvement of the Purkinje system in this clinical presentation.8 More recently, Steinberg et al. reported the prevalence of short-coupled idiopathic VF in a multicenter study involving 364 patients with idiopathic VF. Selecting a coupling interval <350 ms, they found 24 (6.6%) patients. These patients had a very high risk of sudden cardiac death.9

Even today, patients presenting idiopathic VF are heterogeneous, although subgroups with common features can be determined. We recently proposed that idiopathic VF can be split into two distinct phenotypes, with potential overlap in an individual patient.10 In patients with Purkinje-related idiopathic VF, short-coupled ventricular ectopy can be documented in a significant proportion of patients and ablation of the culprit tissue is a reasonable strategy to avoid recurrence. In patients with microstructural idiopathic VF, localised myocardial alterations can be unveiled by thorough electro-anatomical mapping and are amenable to a substrate-elimination strategy.

From a mechanistic perspective, it is useful to distinguish VF initiation and maintenance. In idiopathic VF, ventricular arrhythmias are frequently polymorphic from the onset, which distinguishes them from VF following ventricular tachycardia (VT). In idiopathic VF patients, the first beat of the arrhythmia originates from the Purkinje system in up to 93% of cases.8 More rarely, initiation may involve the ventricular myocardium, namely the right ventricular outflow tract or the papillary muscles. Purkinje cells are also active during VF maintenance, as shown by Newton et al. and Tabereaux et al.11,12 This could be explained by the resistance of Purkinje cells to prolonged ischaemia.

In our initial report including 27 patients with idiopathic VF, a Purkinje origin was demonstrated in 23 of 27 (93%) patients.8 The culprit tissue was in the left ventricular septum in 10 patients, in the anterior right ventricle in nine patients and in both ventricles in four patients. A second multicenter study including 38 patients showed that the PVC origin was in the Purkinje system in 33 of 38 (87%) patients.13 Purkinje PVCs came from the left, right and both ventricles in 14, 16 and three patients, respectively. A myocardial origin was identified in five patients, the majority being from the right ventricular outflow tract (four of five patients).

Characteristics of arrhythmia recurrences on ICDs provide phenotypic markers of the distinct and hidden substrates underlying idiopathic VF. In a recent study, we reported that among 95 patients with idiopathic VF, microstructural alterations could be identified in 41, and Purkinje-related anomalies in 54.14 A total of 117 arrhythmia recurrences were recorded, 91% of which were VF. Three variables were mostly discriminant. Sinus tachycardia (≤570 ms) was more frequent in microstructural cardiomyopathic alterations (35.9% versus 13.4%, p=0.014) whereas short-coupled (<350 ms) triggers were most frequent in Purkinje-related VF (95.5% versus 23.1%, p=0.001), which also had shorter VF cycle length (182 ± 15 ms versus 215 ± 24 ms, p<0.001). Ectopy was inconsistently present before VF.

Management of idiopathic VF has evolved over time, from the empiric and sometimes successful use of antiarrhythmic drugs to the implantation of automatic defibrillators in the 1980s and ablation in the 2000s, affecting prognosis.

Long-term Prognosis

Since its first description, idiopathic VF remains an uncommon condition as it accounts for <10% of all VF episodes. However, idiopathic VF must be considered after unexplained cardiac arrest in an otherwise healthy individual. It is more frequent in young adults, as up to 35% of cases of sudden death remain unexplained in patients between 18 and 35 years old.15,16

The UCARE registry reported a 30% recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia after 3 years from cardiac arrest in idiopathic VF patients.17 At 10 years of follow-up, a large European registry reported a cumulative event-free survival of 67%.18 In a study by Pannone et al., the authors reported a ventricular arrhythmia-free survival of 65% at 9 years of follow-up.19 The rate of inappropriate shocks is 11.1% (approximately 1.2% per year), which is low.20

Ablation of VF is associated with high rates of acute success and longterm freedom from recurrence. In a multicentric study including 38 idiopathic VF patients who underwent catheter ablation, we reported that 31 of 38 (82%) patients were free from VF recurrence after a mean followup of 63 months.13 VF recurrence occurred in the remaining 7 (18%) patients after a median of 4 months. The presence of bundle branch block before ablation was the only parameter associated with worse outcome and with VF recurrence. There was no difference in outcome between patients with Purkinje triggers and those with muscular triggers.

Current State of the Art and Progress

Idiopathic VF Subtypes

Purkinje-related Idiopathic VF

The mechanisms underlying the arrhythmogenic potential of the Purkinje network are imperfectly understood. Cellular specificities of Purkinje cells and their cable-like configuration favour triggered activity, and the network is prone to developing re-entry. Purkinje ectopy is often polymorphic. There is a predominance of right ventricular Purkinje arrhythmias in male patients, and a predominance of left or biventricular Purkinje arrhythmias in female patients.21 Purkinje premature contractions have a narrower QRS duration than muscular ectopy, particularly when they originate from the left Purkinje system (<120 ms) where they exhibit a right bundle branch block morphology.22 There is a right or left deviation when originating from the anterior or posterior Purkinje fibres respectively. Purkinje premature contractions from the right arborisation have a left bundle branch block morphology and a wider QRS duration (>140 ms) with an initially rapid deflection. Short coupling (R on T) PVCs favour Purkinje origin but are also seen in ventricular origin. In a Dutch registry, 31 of 34 (91%) patients with documented VF onset had short-coupled PVC triggering VF. Patients with short-coupled VF showed a higher shock burden and a higher incidence of electrical storm than patients without short-coupled VF.23

Purkinje ectopy may have a long coupling interval (>350 ms).24 Belhassen et al. found that 17.4% of patients with short, coupled VF also had VF episodes initiated by PVCs with a coupling interval >350 ms.25 In a study by Surget et al., long-coupled PVCs were defined as PVCs occurring after the end of the T wave.24 Seventy-nine patients with idiopathic VF were reviewed, and 12 (15.2%) met this definition. All VF episodes occurred at rest. Invasive mapping showed that all PVCs originated from the distal Purkinje system (92% from the left). The mean coupling interval of long-coupled PVCs was 418 ± 46 ms. Long-coupled PVCs can induce VF by themselves or in association with short-coupled PVCs. When both short-and long-coupled PVCs are recorded in an individual they present different morphologies in most cases.

Microstructural Abnormality-related Idiopathic VF

The most frequent abnormality is the presence of localised areas of slow-conducting myocardium. These areas likely indicate microstructural alterations of the myocardium because of fibrosis, fatty or inflammatory infiltration, or cellular pathologies. The location is more often epicardial than endocardial.10

Stepwise Diagnostic Workup and Management

Detailed History

A detailed family history of clinical circumstances, preceding syncope, is taken (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Stepwise Diagnostic Workup.

Figure 2:

A normal resting ECG is a prerequisite to idiopathic VF. The signalaveraged ECG is also normal. An ECG with high precordial leads should be performed as it may unveil Brugada syndrome.26 The initiation of idiopathic VF recorded on a 12-lead ECG is the cornerstone for the diagnosis and ablation strategy. As described above, the initiation will unveil the mechanism and the idiopathic VF subtype.

The interpretation of spontaneous Purkinje-PVCs occurring without VF is difficult as they are suggestive of the mechanism of sudden cardiac death but are not necessarily causal. Even when Purkinje-related idiopathic VF is confirmed, the culprit PVC(s) may be different from the ones recorded after the event.

An exercise test is useful to unmask subclinical primary electrical disorders (long QT syndrome, CPVT).27

Echocardiography and cardiac MRI are performed to eliminate structural heart disease. Cardiac MRI has been shown to yield 12.5–19% of additional diagnoses (especially arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy) in patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic VF.28 A cardiac tomography scan is useful to exclude a coronary artery disease.

Pharmacological Tests

Ajmaline Test

Ajmaline testing is arguably the most important pharmacological test in patients with suspected idiopathic VF.29 The goals of the ajmaline test are to exclude Brugada syndrome and document potential short-coupled PVCs.

One-third of Brugada syndrome patients with spontaneously documented VF do not exhibit spontaneous type 1 ECG, but only after ajmaline administration.27

In a multicentre retrospective study, we reported the frequent identification of short-coupled PVCs in idiopathic VF patients, during administration of sodium blockers, with a morphology compatible with a Purkinje origin.30 This phenomenon was reproducible in all nine patients who underwent a repeat test. In four patients, the test was the only way to reveal Purkinje ectopy and the patients received an implantable cardiac defibrillator. A spontaneous VF was then observed in three of the patients after a median follow-up of 28 months.

Epinephrine Test

Epinephrine test is performed to rule out a concealed long QT syndrome. However, false-positive tests are common, and QT variations may be difficult to interpret. Mental stress test appears more specific.31,32

Isoprenaline Test

An isoprenaline test may unveil long QT syndrome, CPVT and arrhythmogenicity in relation to a concealed or overt cardiomyopathy.32 An infusion of 3 minutes at a dose of 45 μg/min produces a mean peak sinus rate of 152 ± 18/min. This test has a higher arrhythmogenic power than exercise testing, inducing non-sustained VTs in 74–85% of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and 42% of dilated cardiomyopathies. In contrast, non-sustained VTs are induced in only 2–2.7% of patients with PVCs and normal hearts at echocardiography. In idiopathic VF patients, this test may induce PVCs suggestive of microstructural anomalies.

Genetics and Familial Screening

Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of idiopathic VF are not known; however, genetic testing should be performed systematically. Approximately 20% of patients with idiopathic VF have a positive family history of sudden cardiac death, suggesting a genetic contribution in at least a subset of cases.3335

Genes that have been associated with idiopathic VF are DPP6, CALM1, RYR2, DSP, TTN, FKTN, TRPM4, MYH7, ANK2, CACNA1C, DES and IRX3.

Verheul et al. showed in a retrospective study that genetic testing is performed in 91% of cases, with a 15% yield of likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants. Variants of uncertain significance are found in 30% of cases and 55% of patients do not have any abnormal variants. In total, finding a genetic variant led to a diagnosis in 2% patients.36 Over the years, the use of gene panel testing has increased (62% in idiopathic VF patients before 2010 versus 87% after 2010, p<0.01). In a study by Pannone et al. of a cohort of 45 idiopathic VF probands undergoing genetic analysis with a broad gene panel, the diagnosis yield for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants was 6.7%.19 Patients with no variant or a variant of unknown significance had higher ventricular arrhythmia-free survival during the follow-up compared with patients with a pathogenic variant. Genetic linkage analysis for idiopathic VF patients has exposed a non-monogenic disorder and, often, multiple genetic variants are identified without a link to VF arrhythmogenesis.

It is recommended (class 1) to perform genetic testing in sudden cardiac arrest survivors with a suspected genetic cause, and testing should only include genes with an evident gene disease association.4 VF may be a preclinical phenotypical expression of cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia syndromes.

Dipeptidyl-aminopeptidase-like protein 6 (DPP6)-specific haplotype has been associated with idiopathic VF, mainly in the Netherlands (founder effect).37 It is present in 10% of cases. The prognosis is poor as 50% of carriers experience sudden cardiac death before the age of 58. A study described that in the presence of DPP6-VF haplotype, Ito currents are increased in Purkinje fibres.

Calmodulin1 (CALM1) regulates calcium channels. Carriers of a specific variant (c. 268 T>C) present VF before adulthood.

Ryanodine receptor (RYR2) mutations have been associated with idiopathic VF, CPVT and CRDS.

Familial screening encompasses resting ECG, exercise testing and echocardiography in first-degree relatives.

Invasive Electrophysiology Study

CRDS is due to a loss-of-function variant in the RYR2 gene. It alters the action potential duration and increasesthe riskofearlyafterdepolarisations. All patients have a negative exercise test result. Recent data on 19 patients with CRDS showed that a life-threatening arrhythmia occurred in 50% of patients at 7 years of follow-up. Ni et al. showed a unique repolarisation response on an ECG after provocation with brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause in CRDS cases and mouse models, which is absent from the controls. Brief tachycardia and a subsequent pause (either spontaneous or mediated through cardiac pacing), results in greater changes in QT interval and T-wave amplitude in CRDS. This effective clinical diagnostic test for CRDS has become an important part of the evaluation of cardiac arrest.38

ICD

The insertion of an ICD is the standard treatment for all idiopathic VF patients with an aborted cardiac arrest or documented VF.3 There is a choice to be made between a subcutaneous or transvenous ICD. In a study by Kuschyk et al. of 183 patients, a majority of whom had either cardiac channelopathies or idiopathic VF, the authors showed that adverse defibrillator events, defined as a composite of inappropriate shocks and lead failure requiring surgical revision, were significantly lower in the subcutaneous ICD group compared to the transvenous ICD group (OR 0.55; 95% CI [0.41–0.72]) during a mean follow-up of 4.3 years.39 Programming should aim at avoiding inappropriate shocks with a single therapy zone at a high cutoff rate and long detection intervals. Recurrence of idiopathic VF with appropriate ICD therapies occurs in 18–39% of patients over a median follow-up of 41–63 months, with a median delay to the first recurrence of 4–12 months.13,18

Drug Therapy

Quinidine is indicated in cases of frequent VF recurrence or refusal of ICD implantation. It is a Class IA (INa-blocker) antiarrhythmic drug that also inhibits Ito. In some cases, quinidine is highly efficacious in preventing recurrences. The mean effective dose is 1,500 mg/day, corresponding to a serum quinidine level of 3.4 ± 1.6 mg/l. However, quinidine is not available worldwide.40

When facing an electrical storm defined by ≥3 VF episodes in 24 hours, oral quinidine and/or continuous infusion of isoproterenol can be effective. Electrical storms occur in up to 13% of patients with idiopathic VF. Isoproterenol should be initiated at 1–5 μg/min and titrated according to the clinical response (100–120/min sinus rate target). In a review by Belhassen et al., isoproterenol only had a 36% success rate in arrhythmia control.25

β-blockers, calcium inhibitors, and Class III drugs are usually ineffective in idiopathic VF.

Ablation Strategy

VF ablation is performed in a limited number of centres across the world. It should be proposed to a patient presenting VF recurrences or an electrical storm. It may also be proposed as a first-line treatment, in addition to an ICD, as the recurrence rate in idiopathic VF is high. The main challenge in these procedures is the identification of an adequate ablation target. In all cases, ablation should be extended approximately 1–2 cm² around the target site.41

Ablation of Purkinje Tissue

Purkinje arrhythmias are characterised by random occurrences, which complexifies the catheter ablation procedure. We recently described our approach for the ablation of these patients.41 The ideal configuration is to have PVC documentation and demonstration of causality. Prolonged 12-lead monitoring is of paramount importance. However, spontaneous and isolated Purkinje ectopy occurring after the VF episode are not necessarily causal. During a VF storm or shortly after a VF episode, non-sustained VF may be recorded, and the triggering PVC can be considered as the ablation target (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Ablation of Purkinje Tissue on the Left Ventricular Septum.

Figure 3:

In the absence of PVC documentation, one should consider the usual suspects: moderator band, false tendons and papillary muscles, where Purkinje prepotentials can be identified. Pharmacological challenges, notably ajmaline, may elicit short-coupled PVCs in patients with idiopathic VF. Catecholamine tests have a lower inducibility rate. Isoprenaline induces Purkinje ectopy in 22% of cases, especially in the subgroup of patients presenting PVCs under sympathetic stress.

Intracardiac mapping should strive to identify Purkinje potentials to obtain a complete map of Purkinje tissue. Special care should be taken to avoid inadvertent bumping of the right and left bundles. The distal Purkinje tissue, characterised by a sharp signal with Purkinje-ventricle intervals ≤10 ms in sinus rhythm, can be targeted. During PVCs, Purkinje potentials precede the local electrogram by variable intervals that are usually ≥15 ms. Purkinje signals may present a diseased aspect with multiple fragmented components. When observed, these diseased signals should be targeted by ablation. The occurrence of QRS widening during ablation indicates potential catheter displacement toward the more proximal conduction system and ablation should be stopped. These intraventricular conduction disorders are sometimes difficult to avoid, and we reported the occurrence of transient left bundle branch block in one patient and nonspecific intraventricular conduction defects in six of 38 patients.

Pace-mapping is a useful tool to determine the ablation target as Purkinje ectopy is infrequent. However, the morphology of the Purkinje-triggered PVCs is rarely perfectly reproduced due to simultaneous capture of surrounding myocardium. Thus, pace mapping is ideally performed with a low pacing output (twice the diastolic threshold).

The ablation endpoint is often elusive. PVC suppression is only possible when facing spontaneous PVCs at the beginning of the procedure. The recurrence of PVCs does not necessarily translate into VF as the ablation of surrounding Purkinje fibres can suffice to impede initiation of VF. The ablation of key parts of the arborisation surrounding the PVC focus may minimise or suppress re-entry leading to repetitive beats. Nogami et al. also described the case of a patient with left-sided Purkinje ectopy in whom VF suppression was achieved with catheter ablation of the Purkinje’s network at a site distant from earliest activation.42

Intracardiac echocardiography appears mandatory for mapping and ablation. Indeed, string-like structures such as false tendons or the moderator band are rarely visible on standard electro-anatomic maps.

Microstructural Substrate Ablation

A detailed endocardial and epicardial mapping may reveal microstructural substrate alterations. In a recent report, we showed that areas of altered myocardial conduction are present in up to two-thirds of idiopathic VF patients and prove to be an efficient target for ablation.

The Near Future

Idiopathic VF is an unmet clinical challenge. Despite comprehensive attempts at clinical phenotype–genotype relationships, 50% of patients with primary electrical sudden cardiac arrest do not meet diagnostic criteria for other arrhythmic syndromes and are labelled with a diagnosis of idiopathic VF. Two axes of development are already in progress and should impact the understanding and management of idiopathic VF in the future.

Pathophysiology

Cellular Models and Mechanisms

Recently, Reilly et al. used idiopathic VF patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) and optical mapping to characterise the cellular phenotype. They showed that idiopathic VF iPSC-CMs have abnormal calcium handling and increased proarrhythmic activity.43

iPSC-CMs enable patient-specific functional studies and would help to unveil phenotype-genotype relations. Omics approaches could then be used to broaden our molecular understanding of idiopathic VF.

Tissular Models and Mechanisms

Recent work has shown the implication of intracavitary structures, such as the moderator band, papillary muscles and false tendons, in several idiopathic VF case reports.4449 Their precise role in arrhythmogenesis is not completely understood, and so further studies are needed. In vivo animal models are useful for this task, to study the underlying mechanisms associated with these structures.50 In complement, in silico modelling may help to understand the interplay between these structures and the initiation and maintenance of VF.

Technological Developments

Pulsed-field Ablation

Studies evaluating the impact of electroporation on Purkinje tissue are limited and provide contradictory results. Koruth et al. showed selective sparing of Purkinje’s fibres with pulsed-field myocardial ablation in a swine model.51 The authors performed 26 lesions using a multi-electrode catheter (Faraflex, Farapulse) in swine ventricles. Histology after 4 weeks revealed a single image of viable Purkinje fibres, despite the ablation of adjacent cardiomyocytes. This suggests that Purkinje fibres may have a lower susceptibility than cardiomyocytes to pulsed-field ablation.

These results contradict previous data by Livia et al., who performed pulsed-field ablation in eight canine hearts. They found that Purkinje tissue can be ablated with electroporation, and potentially has a lower threshold for pulsed-field ablation than ventricular myocytes.52 This apparent contradiction could possibly be explained by different ablation configurations.

Photon-counting CT

Photon-counting CT is a new technology enabling a better CT spatial resolution.53 It may allow the distinction of a specific ventricular anatomy related to idiopathic VF. Studies are needed to tackle this question.

Clinical Perspective
  • Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and electrical diseases represent a significant proportion of diagnoses attributed during follow-up in patients with an initial diagnosis of idiopathic VF.

  • Genetic testing should be performed systematically.

  • In addition to an ICD, catheter ablation should be proposed to a patient presenting VF recurrences or an electrical storm, or as a first-line treatment.

  • The main challenge is the identification of the ablation target.

  • The usual suspects are the moderator band, false tendons and papillary muscles.

References

  • 1.Ledwich JR, Fay JE. Idiopathic recurrent ventricular fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1969;24:255–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krahn AD, Healey JS, Chauhan V et al. Systematic assessment of patients with unexplained cardiac arrest: Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER). Circulation. 2009;120:278–85. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.853143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dock W. Transitory ventricular fibrillation as a cause of syncope and its prevention by quinidine sulphate. Am Heart J. 1929;4:709–14. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(29)90552-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moe T. A case of Morgagni-Adams-Stokes attacks caused by transient recurrent ventricular fibrillation without apparent organic heart disease. Acta Med Scand. 1948;130:416–35. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1948.tb10076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Storstein O. Adams-Stokes attacks caused by ventricular fibrillation, in a man with otherwise normal heart. Acta Med Scand. 1949;133:437–41. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1949.tb09547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leenhardt A, Glaser E, Burguera M et al. Short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes. A new electrocardiographic entity in the spectrum of idiopathic ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Circulation. 1994;89:206–15. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.89.1.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haïssaguerre M, Shoda M, Jaïs P et al. Mapping and ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:962–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000027564.55739.B1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Steinberg C, Davies B, Mellor G et al. Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation represents a distinct phenotype among latent causes of unexplained cardiac arrest: a report from the CASPER registry. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2827–38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haïssaguerre M, Duchateau J, Dubois R et al. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: role of Purkinje system and microstructural myocardial abnormalities. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:591–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newton JC, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Estimated global transmural distribution of activation rate and conduction block during porcine and canine ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 2004;94:836–42. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000120860.01645.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabereaux PB, Walcott GP, Rogers JM et al. Activation patterns of Purkinje fibers during long-duration ventricular fibrillation in an isolated canine heart model. Circulation. 2007;116:1113–9. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.699264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knecht S, Sacher F, Wright M et al. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:522–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haïssaguerre M, Sellal JM, Benali K et al. Distinct substrates of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation revealed by arrhythmia characteristics on implantable cardioverterdefibrillator. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024;10:1982–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Zaman L et al. Survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 1982;247:1485–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320350081041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eckart RE, Scoville SL, Campbell CL et al. Sudden death in young adults: a 25-year review of autopsies in military recruits. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:829–34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Priori SG. Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with apparently normal heart. Need for definition and standardized clinical evaluation. Consensus statement of the Joint Steering Committees of the Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Registry of Europe and of the Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Registry of the United States. Circulation. 1997;95:265–72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.1.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Conte G, Belhassen B, Lambiase P et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in patients with normal electrocardiograms: results from a multicentre long-term registry. Europace. 2019;21:1670–7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pannone L, Gauthey A, Conte G et al. Genetics in probands with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: a multicenter study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9:1296–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Auricchio A, Sterns LD, Schloss EJ et al. Performance evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with SmartShock technology in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. Int J Cardiol. 2022;350:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Surget E, Cheniti G, Ramirez FD et al. Sex differences in the origin of Purkinje ectopy-initiated idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:1647–54. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haïssaguerre M, Nademanee W, Hocini M et al. The spectrum of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and J-wave syndromes: novel mapping insights. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2019;11:699–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2019.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Groeneveld SA, van der Ree MH, Mulder BA et al. Prevalence of short-coupled ventricular fibrillation in a large cohort of Dutch patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2022;145:1437–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Surget E, Duchateau J, Marchant J et al. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation associated with long-coupled Purkinje ectopy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34:615–23. doi: 10.1111/jce.15833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Belhassen B, Tovia-Brodie O. Short-coupled idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: a literature review with extended follow-up. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8:918–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arnaud M, Berthome P, Tixier R et al. Number of electrocardiogram leads in the diagnosis of spontaneous Brugada syndrome. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;113:152–8. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M et al. Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Europace. 2013;15:1389–406. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Merghani A, Monkhouse C, Kirkby C et al. Diagnostic impact of repeated expert review & long-term follow-up in determining etiology of idiopathic cardiac arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e019610. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Behr ER, Winkel BG, Ensam B et al. The diagnostic role of pharmacological provocation testing in cardiac electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC, the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), the Paediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). Europace. 2025;27 doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf067. euaf067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Escande W, Gourraud JB, Haissaguerre M et al. Malignant Purkinje ectopy induced by sodium channel blockers. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Etienne P, Huchet F, Gaborit N et al. Mental stress test: a rapid, simple, and efficient test to unmask long QT syndrome. Europace. 2018;20:2014–20. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haissaguerre M, Duchateau J, Laredo M et al. Inducibility of short-coupled Purkinje ectopy by pharmacological tests in patients with spontaneous short-coupled idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2023;148:70–2. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.063578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ. The role of molecular autopsy in unexplained sudden cardiac death. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21:166–72. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000221576.33501.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies: this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace. 2011;13:1077–109. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Klaver EC, Versluijs GM, Wilders R. Cardiac ion channel mutations in the sudden infant death syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2011;152:162–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Verheul LM, van der Ree MH, Groeneveld SA et al. The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: a retrospective overview. Europace. 2023;25 doi: 10.1093/europace/euad336. euad336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bergeman AT, Hoeksema WF, van der Ree MH et al. Outcomes in Dutch DPP6 risk haplotype for familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: a focused update. Neth Heart J. 2023;31:309–14. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01792-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ni M, Dadon Z, Ormerod JOM et al. A clinical diagnostic test for calcium release deficiency syndrome. JAMA. 2024;332:204–13. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.8599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuschyk J, Müller-Leisse J, Duncker D et al. Comparison of transvenous vs subcutaneous defibrillator therapy in patients with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes and genetic cardiomyopathies. Int J Cardiol. 2021;323:100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Viskin S, Wilde AAM, Krahn AD, Zipes DP. Inaccessibility to quinidine therapy is about to get worse. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:355. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duchateau J, Krisai P, Charton J et al. How to perform Purkinje tissue ablation for the treatment of idiopathic VF. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20:1408–13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nogami A, Sugiyasu A, Kubota S, Kato K. Mapping and ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation from the Purkinje system. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:646–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reilly L, Josvai M, Kalluri M et al. Modeling idiopathic ventricular fibrillation using iPSC cardiomyocytes and computational approaches: a proof-of-concept study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024;10:2628–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Anter E, Buxton AE, Silverstein JR, Josephson ME. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation originating from the moderator band. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:97–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ho RT, Frisch DR, Greenspon AJ. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation ablation facilitated by PENTARAY mapping of the moderator band. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:313–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sadek MM, Benhayon D, Sureddi R et al. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the moderator band: electrocardiographic characteristics and treatment by catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hayama Y, Kaitani K, Onishi N et al. Ablation of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation targeting short coupled ventricular premature contractions originating from a right ventricular papillary muscle. J Cardiol Cases. 2014;9:113–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Santoro F, Di Biase L, Hranitzky P et al. Ventricular fibrillation triggered by PVCs from papillary muscles: clinical features and ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:1158–64. doi: 10.1111/jce.12478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hashmath Z, Naniwadekar A. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation triggered by premature ventricular complexes originating from the false tendon of the left ventricle. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2022;8:515–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Walton RD, Pashaei A, Martinez ME et al. Compartmentalized structure of the moderator band provides a unique substrate for macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005913. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Koruth JS, Kawamura I, Reddy VY. Selective sparing of Purkinje fibres with pulsed-field myocardial ablation. Europace. 2023;25:330. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Livia C, Sugrue A, Witt T et al. Elimination of Purkinje fibers by electroporation reduces ventricular fibrillation vulnerability. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009070. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Flohr T, Schmidt B, Ulzheimer S, Alkadhi H. Cardiac imaging with photon counting CT. Br J Radiol. 2023;96:20230407. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review are provided here courtesy of Radcliffe Cardiology

RESOURCES