Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1995 Summer;28(2):155–173. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-155

Effect of response practice variables on learning spelling and sight vocabulary

Anthony J Cuvo 1, Kristin M Ashley 1, Kimberly J Marso 1, Bingju Lucy Zhang 1, Troy A Fry 1
PMCID: PMC1279807  PMID: 16795862

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to examine variables associated with response practice as an instructional technique for individuals with intellectual disabilities. In Experiment 1, the effect of the cover component in the “cover write” method was evaluated, as were the comparative effects of written versus oral practice of spelling words by rehabilitation clients. The results showed that the cover procedure generally did not enhance performance over and above that produced by practice alone, and written practice generally was not superior to oral practice. Experiment 2 demonstrated that less response practice (i.e., five times) was as effective as more practice (i.e., 10 and 15 times) for teaching spelling to adolescents with developmental disabilities. Experiments 3 and 4 also showed that even less response practice (i.e., one time) was as effective as more practice (five times), and irrelevant practice following errors was as effective as relevant practice for teaching spelling and sight vocabulary to adolescents with behavior disorders and developmental disabilities, respectively. The findings suggest that a parsimonious procedure of limited response practice and positive reinforcement may be effective for the tasks and populations studied.

Keywords: response practice, mental retardation, spelling, sight vocabulary, developmental disabilities

Full text

PDF
155

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carey R. G., Bucher B. Positive practice overcorrection: the effects of duration of positive practice on acquisition and response reduction. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;16(1):101–109. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foxx R. M., Azrin N. H. The elimination of autistic self-stimulatory behavior by overcorrection. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):1–14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenwood C. R., Dinwiddie G., Terry B., Wade L., Stanley S. O., Thibadeau S., Delquadri J. C. Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):521–538. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matson J. L., Esveldt-Dawson K., Kazdin A. E. Treatment of spelling deficits in mentally retarded children. Ment Retard. 1982 Apr;20(2):76–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ollendick T. H., Matson J. L. An initial investigation into the parameters of overcorrection. Psychol Rep. 1976 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):1139–1142. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1976.39.3f.1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ollendick T. H., Matson J. L., Esveldt-Dawson K., Shapiro E. S. Increasing spelling achievement: an analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):645–654. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodgers T. A., Iwata B. A. An analysis of error-correction procedures during discrimination training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):775–781. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schumaker J., Sherman J. A. Training generative verb usage by imitation and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):273–287. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Singh N. N., Farquhar S., Hewett A. E. Enhancing the spelling performance of learning disabled students. Task variation does not increase the efficacy of directed rehearsal. Behav Modif. 1991 Apr;15(2):271–282. doi: 10.1177/01454455910152010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh N. N. Overcorrection of oral reading errors. A comparison of individual- and group-training formats. Behav Modif. 1987 Apr;11(2):165–181. doi: 10.1177/01454455870112003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Singh N. N., Singh J. Increasing oral reading proficiency through overcorrection and phonic analysis. Am J Ment Retard. 1988 Nov;93(3):312–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh N. N., Singh J. Increasing oral reading proficiency. A comparative analysis of drill and positive practice overcorrection procedures. Behav Modif. 1986 Jan;10(1):115–130. doi: 10.1177/01454455860101007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stewart C. A., Singh N. N. Overcorrection of spelling deficits in moderately mentally retarded children. Behav Modif. 1986 Jul;10(3):355–365. doi: 10.1177/01454455860103006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sumner J. H., Mueser S. T., Hsu L., Morales R. G. Overcorrection treatment for radical reduction of aggressive-disruptive behavior in institutionalized mental patients. Psychol Rep. 1974 Aug;35(1 Pt 2):655–662. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1974.35.1.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES