Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1979 Jul;292:381–390. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012858

Diaphragmatic and oesophageal activity in regurgitation in sheep: an electromyographic study.

D A Titchen
PMCID: PMC1280865  PMID: 490367

Abstract

1. Electromyographic (e.m.g.) recordings of reactions of the oesophagus, vertebral and costal fibres of the diaphragm and from the reticulum-one of the cranial divisions of the stomach were made during the regurgitation of rumination in sheep. 2. E.m.g.s indicated that a contraction of the caudal thoracic oesophagus developed over a period of about 2 sec before, and ceased at the time of, the more forceful inspiratory effort associated with regurgitation. 3. This contraction was confined to the caudal region of the thoracic oesophagus in which it was characteristically more prolonged and intense in its most caudal part within 15-25 mm of the hiatus oesophageus. It is interpreted to contribute to development or intensification of a caudal thoracic oesophageal sphincter. 4. The more forceful inspiratory effort at the time of regurgitation was due to costal fibres of the diaphragm. Although active normally during inspiration the vertebral fibres of the hiatus oesophageus do not contribute to this more forceful inspiration. This may facilitate regurgitation of digesta. Similarly, inactivity of vertebral but not costal fibres detected during primary oesophageal contractions (of swallowing) may make for easier passage of digesta into the stomach.

Full text

PDF
390

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BELL F. R. The mechanism of regurgitation during the process of rumination in the goat. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 6;142(3):503–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DOUGHERTY R. W., MEREDITH C. D. Cinefluorographic studies of the ruminant stomach and of eructation. Am J Vet Res. 1955 Jan;16(58):96–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards D. A. The oesophagus. Gut. 1971 Nov;12(11):948–956. doi: 10.1136/gut.12.11.948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Falempin M., Mei N., Rousseau J. P. Vagal mechanoreceptors of the inferior thoracic oesophagus, the lower oesophageal sphincter and the stomach in the sheep. Pflugers Arch. 1978 Jan 31;373(1):25–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00581145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harding R., Titchen D. A. Chemosensitive vagal endings in the oesophagus of the cat. J Physiol. 1975 May;247(1):52P–53P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. IGGO A. Gastro-intestinal tension receptors with unmyelinated afferent fibres in the vagus of the cat. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1957 Jan;42(1):130–143. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1957.sp001228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roman C. La commande motrice de l'oesophage au cours de la rumination. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1966;160(3):603–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Titchen D. A., Wheeler J. S. Contractions of the caudal region of the oesophagus of the cat. J Physiol. 1971 May;215(1):119–137. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WINSHIP D. H., ZBORALSKE F. F., WEBER W. N., SOERGEL K. H. ESOPHAGUS IN RUMINATION. Am J Physiol. 1964 Dec;207:1189–1194. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1964.207.6.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES