Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1980 Sep;306:261–281. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013396

Quinacrine (mepacrine) action at frog end-plate.

P R Adams, A Feltz
PMCID: PMC1283005  PMID: 6257896

Abstract

1. The effects of quinacrine on end-plate currents (e.p.c.s.), miniature end-plate currents (m.e.p.c.s.) and ionophoretic responses at voltage clamped frog end-plates were investigated. 2. A quinacrine concentration (2 microM) that by itself has little effect on m.p.e.c.s. will considerably attenuate responses to bath applied carbachol. The combined effect of the two drugs causes the m.e.p.c.s. to disappear. 3. The depressant effect of quinacrine on ionophoretic responses to carbachol or acetylcholine is increased in acid solutions and decreased in alkaline solutions, suggesting that quinacrine is active as an acridinium ion. 4. Quinacrine (2-10 microM) causes a use-dependent block of end-plate channels which manifests as an inhibitory effect of an ionophoretic prepulse on the response to a test pulse. The inhibitory interaction decays exponentially with a time constant tau s that depends on the nature of the agonist used for the prepulse, on the quinacrine concentration, and on the membrane potential. 5. Quinacrine (5-20 microM) reduces the amplitude of e.p.c.s. and m.e.p.c.s. It also increases the rate of decay of the e.p.c. or m.e.p.c. tails, which remain exponential. The decay rate constant 1/tau f increases linearly with quinacrine concentration both in the presence and absence of 3 microM-neostigmine. The slope of this linear relation increases slightly with membrane hyperpolarization. 6. These data suggest that quinacrine's main action is a slow, voltage dependent blockade of open end-plate channels, though there are probably additional effects on acetylcholinesterase and channel opening. In accordance with the open channel blocking model, 1/tau s and 1/tau f both increase linearly with quinacrine concentration. However, the slopes of these lines lead to rather different estimates of the forward blocking rate constant (8 X 10(7) and 4 X 10(8) M-1 S-1 respectively). 7. The unblocking rate constant is about 5 S-1 at -80 mV. It is much more voltage dependent than the forward rate constant.

Full text

PDF
261

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. A study of desensitization using voltage clamp. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):135–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00580536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R., Cash H. C., Quilliam J. P. Extrinsic and intrinsic acetylcholine and barbiturate effects on frog skeletal muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1970 Nov;40(3):552P–553P. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams P. R. Drug blockade of open end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(3):531–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams P. R., Feltz A. End-plate channel opening and the kinetics of quinacrine (mepacrine) block. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:283–306. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adams P. R., Feltz A. Interaction of a fluorescent probe with acetylcholine-activated synaptic membrane. Nature. 1977 Oct 13;269(5629):609–611. doi: 10.1038/269609a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2994–2998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Adams P. R. Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end-plate. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):291–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Adler M., Albuquerque E. X., Lebeda F. J. Kinetic analysis of end plate currents altered by atropine and scopolamine. Mol Pharmacol. 1978 May;14(3):514–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Albuquerque E. X., Gage P. W. Differential effects of perhydrohistrionicotoxin on neurally and iontophoretically evoked endplate currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Mar;75(3):1596–1599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.3.1596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Albuquerque E. X., Kuba K., Daly J. Effect of histrionicotoxin on the ionic conductance modulator of the cholinergic receptor: a quantitative analysis of the end-plate current. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 May;189(2):513–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Armstrong C. M. Inactivation of the potassium conductance and related phenomena caused by quaternary ammonium ion injection in squid axons. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Nov;54(5):553–575. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.5.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Armstrong C. M. Interaction of tetraethylammonium ion derivatives with the potassium channels of giant axons. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Oct;58(4):413–437. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.4.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ascher P., Large W. A., Rang H. P. Studies on the mechanism of action of acetylcholine antagonists on rat parasympathetic ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1979 Oct;295:139–170. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ascher P., Marty A., Neild T. O. The mode of action of antagonists of the excitatory response to acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:207–235. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Colquhoun D., Dreyer F., Sheridan R. E. The actions of tubocurarine at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:247–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feltz A., Large W. A., Trautmann A. Analysis of atropine action at the frog neutromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(1):109–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gage P. W., McBurney R. N. Effects of membrane potential, temperature and neostigmine on the conductance change caused by a quantum or acetylcholine at the toad neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):385–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grünhagen H. H., Changeux J. P. Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. V. Qualitative correlation between pharmacological effects and equilibration processes of the cholinergic receptor protein as revealed by the structural probe quinacrine. J Mol Biol. 1976 Sep 25;106(3):517–535. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90250-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grünhagen H. H., Iwatsubo M., Changeux J. P. Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of cholinergic agonists with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata as revealed by quinacrine fluorescence. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Oct 17;80(1):225–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hagiwara S., Miyazaki S., Moody W., Patlak J. Blocking effects of barium and hydrogen ions on the potassium current during anomalous rectification in the starfish egg. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:167–185. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katz B., Miledi R. A re-examination of curare action at the motor endplate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 Dec 4;203(1151):119–133. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz B., Miledi R. The characteristics of 'end-plate noise' produced by different depolarizing drugs. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):707–717. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Läuger P. Ion transport through pores: a rate-theory analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Jul 6;311(3):423–441. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90323-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marty A. Noise and relaxation studies of acetylcholine induced currents in the presence of procaine. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:237–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Massari S. The interaction of atebrin with phospholipid vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 14;375(1):22–34. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meves H., Pichon Y. The effect of internal and external 4-aminopyridine on the potassium currents in intracellularly perfused squid giant axons. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):511–532. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:153–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. A new kind of drug antagonism: evidence that agonists cause a molecular change in acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1969 Jul;5(4):394–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1970 Jul;6(4):357–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. The relationship between desensitization and the metaphilic effect at cholinergic receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1970 Jul;6(4):383–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosenberry T. L., Neumann E. Interaction of ligands with acetylcholinesterase. Use of temperature-jump relaxation kinetics in the binding of specific fluorescent ligands. Biochemistry. 1977 Aug 23;16(17):3870–3878. doi: 10.1021/bi00636a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwarz W., Palade P. T., Hille B. Local anesthetics. Effect of pH on use-dependent block of sodium channels in frog muscle. Biophys J. 1977 Dec;20(3):343–368. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85554-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shapiro B. I. Effects of strychnine on the potassium conductance of the frog node of Ranvier. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jun;69(6):897–914. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Terrar D. A. Influence of SKF-525A congeners, strophanthidin and tissue-culture media on desensitization in frog skeletal muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1974 Jun;51(2):259–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1974.tb09656.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsai M. C., Oliveira A. C., Albuquerque E. X., Eldefrawi M. E., Eldefrawi A. T. Mode of action of quinacrine on the acetylcholine receptor ionic channel complex. Mol Pharmacol. 1979 Sep;16(2):382–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wermuth B., Brodbeck U. Interaction of proflavine and acriflavine with acetylcholinesterase. Eur J Biochem. 1973 Aug 17;37(2):377–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Woodhull A. M. Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jun;61(6):687–708. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.6.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yeh J. Z. Dynamics of 9-aminoacridine block of sodium channels in squid axons. J Gen Physiol. 1979 Jan;73(1):1–21. doi: 10.1085/jgp.73.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yeh J. Z., Narahashi T. Kinetic analysis of pancuronium interaction with sodium channels in squid axon membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Mar;69(3):293–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.3.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yeh J. Z., Oxford G. S., Wu C. H., Narahashi T. Interactions of aminopyridines with potassium channels of squid axon membranes. Biophys J. 1976 Jan;16(1):77–81. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85663-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES