Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2025 Dec 17;17:897. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67618-3

Broadband acousto-optic modulators on Silicon Nitride

Scott E Kenning 1, Tzu-Han Chang 1, Alaina G Attanasio 1, Warren Jin 2, Avi Feshali 2, Yu Tian 1, Mario Paniccia 2, Sunil A Bhave 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12830708  PMID: 41407693

Abstract

Thin silicon nitride integrated photonics platforms rely on weakly confining waveguides and thick oxide cladding layers to enable ultra-low-optical losses on chip. Due to these favorable properties, this technology is seeing increased use in chip-scale systems tasked with manipulating and controlling classical and quantum optical systems. Phase-modulators play a crucial role in the low-noise control loops of such systems, but optically broadband phase modulators remain elusive as the same properties used to enable ultra-low-optical losses make interaction with the optical mode difficult. Here we show an unreleased and optically broadband acousto-optic modulator architecture on this platform enabled by long modulation lengths in a compact spiral structure. These devices achieve a Vπ of 8.98 V at a modulation frequency of 704 MHz across an optical bandwidth exceeding 90 nm at telecom wavelengths. We demonstrate their use as part of the control loop in an optomechanical sensing system.

Subject terms: Silicon photonics, Optical physics, Optical sensors


The authors demonstrate thin silicon nitride waveguide spirals that enable release-free phase-modulation. The presented modulators achieve a Vπ of 8.98 V with 1.13 dB of insertion loss at a modulation frequency of 704 MHz over a 90 nm optical bandwidth.

Introduction

Silicon nitride (SiN) photonics has enabled narrow linewidth lasers1–5, record setting high-Q resonators6,7, and sensing systems8,9. With the further inclusion of piezoelectrics alongside SiN photonic integrated circuits (PICs)10, fast tunable lasers11–13, microcomb tuning14,15, optical isolators16, and quantum microwave-to-optical conversion17 have been demonstrated. All of these technologies are building blocks for PIC designers to use for producing mass-manufacturable integrated systems. However, SiN, a material platform noted for its broad optical transparency window18 reaching the visible spectrum19,20, low optical losses6, and CMOS compatibility1 suffers from a lack of optically broadband modulators. Modulators have been demonstrated through heterogeneous integration of electro-optic materials such as lithium niobate with SiN21–24 but require substantial modifications to the cladding layer to bring electro-optic material within proximity to the SiN waveguide core. When broadband modulation frequencies are not necessary, acousto-optic modulators are an attractive choice. Laser locking schemes, such as the Pound-Drever-Hall technique25, require optical modulators to generate the error signal used by the control system. PICs have been proposed26,27 that utilize integrated modulators and lasers to interface with atomic transitions, serving as a necessary next step to developing PICs for light-atom interactions.

Currently, the few existing acousto-optic modulators on thin SiN rely on optical resonant enhancement of the stress optic interaction28–30, limiting the optical bandwidth to that of the ring resonator. Recent thicker SiN work embeds aluminum nitride and air gaps within 710 nm of 300 nm thick SiN waveguides31 to optimize the overlap. However, the entire premise of the thin SiN platform is to drive down optical losses as far as possible by embedding the low-confining waveguide core in a pristine cladding layer. Introducing etched surfaces violates this premise and will drive up scattering losses on our thin SiN platform. Furthermore, avoiding release processes result in a simpler fabrication procedure.

A common technique to boost acousto-optic interactions is to exploit moving boundary effects in released high-contrast waveguide platforms. This technique has seen great success particularly in released silicon-on-insulator waveguide platforms, where it is commonly used to enhance Brillouin interactions32–34 and modulator performance35,36. Without release, waveguide boundaries cannot meaningfully shift in a thin SiN platform — a problem exacerbated by the low index contrast between cladding and core.

The low confinement, low index contrast, and unreleased waveguides culminating in weak acousto-optic modulation on thin SiN are a side effect of engineering a photonics platform with state-of-the-art ultra-low losses. We demonstrate a means to bypass this deficiency by engineering long photon-photon interaction lengths enabled by ultra-low optical losses in the form of a multi-pass, release free, spiral acousto-optic modulator. Our modulators operate up to 706 MHz, representing a 35 × increase in operation frequency over other work on thin SiN30 while achieving a Vπ of 8.98 V with 1.13 dB of insertion loss across a broad optical bandwidth exceeding 90 nm. Trends expected from theory are experimentally measured to confirm the phase-matching physics of the modulators. Finally, we demonstrate an immediate application of the technology to an optomechanical accelerometer based on high-Q ring resonators fabricated at the same commercial foundry.

Results

Spiral design

Our thin SiN platform, illustrated in Fig. 1a, comprises of a 2.4 μm × 96.5 nm waveguide embedded inside a silica cladding layer. The passive waveguides are fabricated at a commercial foundry on 200 mm wafers and cored down to 100 mm. A piezoelectric layer stack comprising of molybdenum (Mo) and aluminum nitride (AlN) is deposited on the cored wafers. This Mo layer incurs metal-induced propagation loss, and the top cladding thickness was selected to ensure it stays below an acceptable threshold. We observe additional losses that occur due to processing of the wafer, likely during the piezoelectric deposition, bringing the total optical losses to 4.31 dB m−1 (Supplementary Note 1).

Fig. 1. Overview of the modulator implementation and design.

Fig. 1

a A illustration of the layer stack. Here, Al is aluminum, AlN is aluminum nitride, Mo is molybdenum, SiN is silicon nitride, SiO2 is silica, and Si is silicon. The silica cladding above the waveguide is rendered transparent in the illustration so the waveguide is visible. b A false colored cross-section scanning electron microscope image of the layer stack illustrated in (a). c An optical mode profile with arrows indicating the electric field of the transverse electric (TE) mode is mostly x^-directed. The z-component of the Poynting vector is shown as Pz. d Simulation of the relevant strain tensor components, Sxx and Syy for the fundamental transducer acoustic mode. e An illustration of the design strategy. A total of C intersection points of the spiral waveguide with the acoustic wave, {xn}, are optimized to maximize phase modulation and obey design rules such as the minimum bending radius, rmin. f The field amplitude within a spiral with C = 38 modulated segments (the largest spiral experimentally measured later in this work) as a function of distance, s, along the waveguide normalized to the coherence length, Lcoh. The modulated segment locations are colored in accordance with the acoustic field phase at each location. g. The acoustic field phase is compared to the optical phase-mismatch, revealing that the spirals are designed to counter the optical phase-mismatch through judicious selection of acoustic phase via placement of the spiral waveguides at locations {xn}.

Achieving long acousto-optic interaction lengths requires careful choice of an acoustic transducer. Interdigited transducers (IDTs), which launch a traveling acoustic wave along the surface of a material, have previously been used in acousto-optic modulators on silicon-on-insulator37, aluminum nitride38,39, and lithium niobate40–43. Importantly, they have been shown to enable multi-pass AOMs where the waveguide can be meandered to pass the light through the same acoustic field many times, driving up modulation efficiency without requiring more driving power44. Our IDTs were selected to have a pitch that is larger than the waveguide width to enable favorable overlap and can be fabricated using aluminum (Al) via a liftoff process. A cross section scanning electron microscope (SEM) image is shown of this layer stack in Fig. 1b.

The dominant mechanism of acousto-optic coupling in our devices is the photoelastic effect. The electric field of the fundamental TE mode, of which we wish to phase modulate, is predominately x^-directed as shown in Fig. 1c. Based off of silica’s photoelastic tensor, the Syy component of the mechanical strain tensor simulated in Fig. 1d contributes the most to the acousto-optic interaction. The optimization of acousto-optic overlap is discussed in Supplementary Note 2.

We select a waveguide spiral geometry because they have been shown to afford long photon-phonon interaction lengths in a compact form factor35,45–48. Our proposed spirals, illustrated in Fig. 1e, are completely distinguished, to the best of our knowledge, from all other devices in literature because they are parameterized by the intersection points (modulated segments) of the light with a traveling acoustic field. These geometric degrees of freedom, denoted by the {xn}’s shown in Fig. 1e, are explicitly calculated to phase-match the acousto-optic interaction via a procedure detailed in Supplementary Note 3. Motivated by ultra-low loss integrated photonics platforms such as thin SiN, our design procedure allows for acousto-optic modulators of large pass count to be designed — bringing optically broadband phase modulation to thin SiN. When spirals are designed in accordance with this procedure, the sideband amplitude grows in successive modulated segments, shown by Fig. 1f. This leads to a multiplicative increase in modulation index with increased modulated segment count under a fixed RF power. For an extended comparison to other spirals in literature and the calculation required to design these devices see Supplementary Note 3.

To understand how the spiral structure achieves a phase-matched acousto-optic interaction, it is helpful to draw an analogy to quasi-phase-matching (QPM)49,50, discussed extensively in Supplementary Note 3.6. In our devices, the phase-mismatch accrued per unit length is given by

Δk=k(ω)−k(ω+Ωm)≈Ωmngc0, 1

where k(ω) is the fundamental TE mode’s dispersion curve, Ωm is the radial modulation frequency, ng the group index, and c0 the speed of light in vacuum. The Δk term gives rise to a coherence length,

Lcoh=2Δk 2

which effectively places an upper length limit on the interaction length. This length is 13 cm for our devices and on the order of microns for nonlinear processes like second harmonic generation (SHG). To break this limit, QPM alternates the nonlinear coefficient via polling to correct for phase-mismatch in SHG and other nonlinear processes. The analog to this in acousto-optics is varying the phase of the acoustic field encountered by the waveguide at different locations. Unlike QPM, we have continuous control over this phase, enabled in our devices by optimizing {xn}. The acoustic phase for each modulated segment is chosen to negate the optical phase-mismatch as shown in Fig. 1g. Using acoustic waves that travel across the spiral are paramount to achieving this. This allows increasingly long spirals to be designed at the cost of additional insertion loss and area (Supplementary Note 3.5 for a discussion of this scaling). Use of other acoustic mode families, such as bulk acoustic waves (BAWs)29, would inherently limit this scaling as they present a uniform phase front to the waveguides. The coherence length for the GHz-regime BAW modes is on the order of a few centimeters — limiting total modulated segment length unless multiple out-of-phase RF drives are used. Our devices only require one RF drive to modulate all waveguide passes.

Acousto-optic modulator

A fully fabricated test chip is shown in Fig. 2a next to a bare photonic chip where the spirals are visible. The number of modulated segments in each spiral, ranging from 6 to 38, was selected to examine modulation performance as the total spiral length grows to twice the coherence length specified by Equation (2). Figure 2b shows an optical microscope image of the transducers annotated with geometric parameters such as aperture and finger count. They were designed using an analytic electrical model detailed in Supplementary Note 4. For the acoustic mode coupled to by the transducers at 468 MHz, 5.02% of incident electrical power is converted into acoustic power as measured by the electrical ∣S11∣2 in Fig. 2c. Sidebands modulated off of the carrier by the acoustic wave can then be detected in light exiting the spiral using an interferometer (Supplementary Note 5). Modulation efficiency, defined as the ratio in optical power between the carrier and first sideband, quantifying modulation strength, is maximized near 468 MHz in Fig. 2d.

Fig. 2. Acousto-optic modulator.

Fig. 2

a A chip without AlN deposited so the waveguides are visible (left) and a completely fabricated chip with AlN and transducers (right). b An optical microscope image of a transducer next to a spiral. There are 19 waveguides visible on the transducer side of the spiral, corresponding to C = 38 modulated segments when counting both sides. Contrast and color has been modified to make the waveguides next to the transducer more visible. c ∣S11∣2 of the transducer reveals electromechanical coupling as the RF drive frequency is swept. d. Modulation efficiency as a function of transducer RF drive frequency for the spiral with C = 38 modulated segments. The RF drive power, PRF, and optical wavelength, λ, are fixed. e Scaling of the waveguide length as a function of modulated segment count. f Scaling of the spiral area as a function of modulated segment count. Note that the spiral area is defined as the area of the smallest rectangle it can fit in. g Multiple spirals of varying modulated segment count are measured with identical transducer designs under the same drive power to ensure the measured modulation index increases multiplicatively with modulated segment count. h Scaling of the modulation efficiency for the first and second sidebands with respect to applied incident RF power following the expected trend for phase-modulation. The negative sidebands track identically to their positive counterparts.

Figure 2d exhibits a fringing pattern due to either constructive or destructive interference of the modulation produced by the near and far side of the spiral relative to the transducer. As the acoustic wave propagates 2.8 mm across the spiral, the relative acoustic phases on the near and far side of the spiral become frequency dependent due to the dispersion of the acoustic wave. The RF bandwidth of 0.57 MHz is therefore set by this phenomenon. In our chips, acoustic losses for the fundamental acoustic mode are small (0.54 dB/mm, Supplementary Note 1) and thus the far side of the spiral substantially contributes to the phase modulation.

The theory for our devices predicts that the measured modulation index is expected to multiplicatively increase with modulated segment count, C, even as the spiral length exceeds the coherence length of 13 cm. Naturally, a tradeoff between spiral length, insertion loss, spiral area, and modulation strength arises. Spiral geometric information is presented in Fig. 2e, f to quantify devices sizes as a function of C. Figure 2e indicates that the coherence length of 13 cm corresponds to a modulated segment count of approximately 18. By measuring multiple spirals on the chip with varying modulated segment count under identical RF drive power, a multiplicative increase in the modulation index is observed in Fig. 2g. The phase modulation index, β, corresponds to the parameter of the Bessel functions that model the amplitude and power of the sidebands. For phase modulation, we therefore expect the power in the first and second sidebands to scale linearly and quadratically, respectively, in response to applied RF power. This characteristic of phase modulation is observed in Fig. 2h.

Higher order acoustic modes

In addition to the fundamental acoustic mode, the transducers couple to three more acoustic modes whose Syy strain tensor is simulated in Fig. 3a. These higher order acoustic modes may be beneficial in photonic integrated circuit design if the layer stack can be tuned to optimize overlap for one of these modes. For these devices, the modulation indices achievable for each mode is experimentally measured in Fig. 3b by an RF drive frequency sweep. A high frequency mode present at 706 MHz achieves the strongest coupling, yet requires tight layer thickness control of the cladding (within 1.5 μm) as shown by the corresponding plot in Fig. 3a, lest the waveguide fall into a strain anti-node. The modulation efficiency of this mode peaks near  − 10 dB (Fig. 3c) under 1 W of driving power — a substantial increase over the modulation efficiency of the fundamental acoustic mode.

Fig. 3. Higher-order acoustic modes.

Fig. 3

a. Syy strain tensor components for three other acoustic modes that can be excited by the transducer. Note that the waveguide location is marked with dashed lines. The frequencies are labeled to be consistent with (f) and (g), but the actual simulated values differ slightly. b A broadband RF drive frequency sweep with incident RF power, PRF, and optical wavelength, λ, fixed reveals higher order acoustic modes coupling to the optical mode in the spiral with C = 38 modulated segments. c Modulation efficiency for the 706 MHz mode. It is the strongest performing acoustic mode due to the favorable overlap of the Syy strain tensor component with the waveguide shown in (a). d Theoretical calculations illustrating relative degradation of modulation efficiency as acoustic mode frequency differs from the spiral’s designed frequency. The shaded blue region shows the 3 dB range, indicating all acoustic modes in (a, b) are still expected to nearly satisfy phase-matching considerations. e. Theoretical calculation showing the range of possible modulation index trends expected across the 3 dB shaded region in (d) as a function of modulated segment count. The 706 MHz mode in (f) exhibits behavior similar to the lower dashed black line. f. Scaling of the modulation index for the 706 MHz mode contrasted against the fundamental mode. The provided frequencies are the average of the measured devices, and there is slight variation from device to device. The agreement between the theory and the data validates the behavior claimed in (d). g Modulation index scaling of the 502 MHz and 639 MHz modes. The modulation index multiplicatively increases, as expected from theory.

The higher order modes provide a mechanism to probe the degradation of phase-matching. As the drive frequency deviates from the spiral’s designed 454 MHz ideal operation frequency, a penalty in modulation efficiency occurs due to phase-mismatch. The largest device presented in this work, with 38 modulated segments, has a phase-matched 3 dB bandwidth of several hundred MHz simulated in Fig. 3d. All higher order modes can therefore be viewed as phase-matched given this 3 dB metric. Note that this does not account for different electromechanical and acousto-optic coupling for each mode. Acoustic modes within the 3 dB range of Fig. 3d will demonstrate a nearly multiplicative increase of the modulation index with modulated segment count as shown by the upper and lower bounds of modulation index curve shapes expected by theory in Fig. 3e. The theoretically calculated curve for modulation index scaling is fit to the measured data for the three additional modes and good agreement can be seen in Fig. 3f, g. The 706 MHz mode exhibits the most roll-off from the trend expected for perfectly phase-matched acoustic modes.

Optimization of electromechanical impedance match

With the spirals obeying the expected theory, the modulation indices of these devices may further be increased through transducer optimization. As speculated by literature44, mm-aperture transducers may hold promise in improving acousto-optic modulation. Spirals presented in this work are uniquely positioned to examine this experimentally as the modulated segments in each spiral can accommodate transducers that have a 1.6 mm aperture. Thickening the bus bars as shown in Fig. 4a improves impedance matching by driving down parasitic resistance and capacitance, in turn allowing for larger aperture transducers. The 500 nm aluminum thickness of the bus bars is selected as it is the maximum thickness allowed for by our deposition tool. A fully fabricated transducer with relevant geometric parameters next to a spiral is shown in Fig. 4b. Geometric parameters for the device shown in Fig. 4b were obtained through optimization of an electrical model (Supplementary Note 4) to improve electromechanical impedance matching for the two lower frequency acoustic modes.

Fig. 4. Optimization of acousto-optic impedance match.

Fig. 4

a An illustration of transducers with thickened bus bars. The layer stack is otherwise identical to Fig. 1a. b An optical microscope image of the new transducer design with relevant geometric parameters denoted. Contrast and color has been modified to make the waveguides below the transducer more visible. c The ∣S11∣2 of these transducers. This subfigure can be directly compared to Fig. 2c to see a greater fraction of incident power being dissipated into the acoustic wave. d The modulation index for all acoustic modes present, showing a substantial performance increase when compared to Fig. 3b. Incident RF power, PRF, and optical wavelength, λ, are fixed while measuring this spiral with C = 38 modulated segments. e Sweep of RF frequency, fRF, over a node of the highest frequency acoustic mode while incident RF power, PRF, is gradually increased after each frequency sweep. The coloring expresses the modulation efficiency. The contours indicate the modulation index, β, achieved. f. The carrier,  ± 1, and  ± 2 sidebands resulting in a β = 0.58π rad modulation index are displayed. The power in the  ± 1 sidebands are maximized near this modulation index. The measurement setup (Supplementary Note 5) manifests the sidebands 100 MHz from harmonics of the RF drive frequency, fRF. The y-axis is normalized such that 0 dB corresponds to the total optical power present in all sidebands. Note that this is the same device as (d), but the RF power has been increased from 30 dBm to 34 dBm. g A measurement of modulation efficiency as a function of wavelength for the four acoustic modes. There are 1000 equally spaced data points for each mode. The RF drive frequency, fRF, is fixed at the fRF value denoted on the plot for the collection of these 1000 data points.

The fraction of incident electrical power launched as an acoustic wave for the fundamental mode can be estimated by examining the ∣S11∣2 measurements of the dual metal thickness transducers (Fig. 4c) and the single metal thickness transducers (Fig. 2c). A marginal increase of 19.1% is observed. More importantly, this power is distributed over a longer length of waveguide by 1.6 mm/378 μm = 4.23. As such, we expect the modulation index achievable for the fundamental acoustic mode to increase by 4.23×1.191=2.25. Measured optically, modulation index increases by a factor of 2.375 for the fundamental transducer mode, indicating good agreement between electrical and optical observations. Large transducers are therefore clearly beneficial for acousto-optic modulation.

The highest frequency mode for the dual metal thickness transducers is at 704 MHz and achieves close to a β = π/2 rad phase shift. Reaching a π/2 peak phase shift is important as it additionally makes these devices candidates for the optically broadband modulators required for optical gyroscope drivers8,51. The incident RF power is increased gradually while sweeping over the maximum of the 704 MHz acoustic mode’s fringing pattern. The phase velocity of the acoustic wave shifts due to thermal effects, as evidenced by the shift in fringing pattern shown in Fig. 4e. At PRF = 34 dBm, a β = 0.58π > π/2 modulation index is achieved, which approximately maximizes the power in the  ± 1 sidebands as shown in Fig. 4f. The interferometry based experimental setup (Supplementary Note 5) manifests the sidebands 100 MHz offset from the RF drive frequency such that positive and negative sidebands can be distinguished.

The thick bus bar devices provide the best modulation performance, yielding Vπ of 8.98 V at 1550 nm. We additionally use them to validate our optically broadband claim. For each acoustic mode, we measure modulation efficiency as a function of wavelength across the 90 nm tuning range of our laser in Fig. 4g. All four acoustic modes exhibit less than 3 dB variation in modulation efficiency across this range, leading to an optical bandwidth of at least 90 nm. This optically broadband operation is expected from the device theory outlined in Supplementary Note 3.4 with additional analysis of experimental results provided in Supplementary Note 6.1.

Use of modulators in a optomechanical sensing system

The modulation indices reported in this work are immediately useful for implementing a Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) lock25 to an optical ring resonator sensitive to acceleration. On a separate chip produced at the same foundry with a similar waveguide layer stack, acceleration-sensitive optical ring resonators are fabricated that feature a released proof mass structure on the interior, as shown in Fig. 5a. Serpentine silica springs connect the proof mass to a location in proximity to the ring resonator waveguide (Fig. 5b) enabling transduction of proof mass displacement into an optical resonance shift as illustrated in Fig. 5c. The experiment in Fig. 5d reads out this shift. An optical resonance is shown in Fig. 5e alongside the corresponding PDH error signal. As the optical resonance frequency shifts in response to an applied acceleration, a nonzero error signal results which is measured by the same LIA to determine the transfer function of the accelerometer and noise equivalent acceleration (Fig. 5f). The fundamental z^ displacement mode arises near 1.8 kHz and corresponds to the lowest noise equivalent acceleration of 6766 ngHz−1/2. A more detailed experimental procedure discussing calibration is available in Supplementary Note 7.

Fig. 5. Application of modulators to optomechanical sensing system.

Fig. 5

a A picture of an optomechanical accelerometer. Four optical ring resonators are accessible via packaging, with two being released and sensitive to acceleration. The chip was produced with a similar layer stack to Fig. 1a (however, no piezoelectric was deposited). b An optical microscope image of the SiO2 serpentine spring structure that allows the ring resonator to be sensitive to acceleration. c A diagram explaining device operation. As the proof mass displaces, the ring resonator is perturbed, shifting the optical resonance frequency. d The experiment used to characterize the optomechanical accelerometer. e Using PRF = 0.25 W of RF power, a PDH error signal can be generated using the modulators. f The transfer function and noise equivalent acceleration (NEA) is measured. The fundamental resonance of the released mechanical structure is near 1.8 kHz.

Optomechanical accelerometers have been demonstrated on various platforms previously9,52–55, but readout schemes rely on side-of-fringe locking schemes and involve a number of components off chip such as photodetectors. PDH locking, enabled on-chip by our modulators, rejects intensity noise to first order. Noting that photodetectors and lasers are possible on-chip with thin SiN platforms2, the addition of a simple modulator architecture shown in this work enables fully integrated thin SiN optomechanical accelerometers.

Discussion

Our spiral structures are designed to trade off insertion loss and device area with Vπ through selection of a modulated segment count. When compared to state-of-the-art SiN acousto-optic modulators in Table 1, our technique enables the only optically broadband, unreleased, and high frequency acousto-optic modulators on thin SiN. We achieve a Vπ of 8.98 V at a wavelength of 1550 nm with an optical bandwidth exceeding 90 nm.

Table 1.

A comparison of technologies for modulating SiN waveguides

Reference Waveguide thickness [nm] Optically broadband Modulation frequency Released Wavelength VπL [V ⋅ cm] Vπ [V] VπLα [V ⋅ dB] Size
Hosseini60 25 Yes DC-629 kHz No 640 nm 12.5 12.5a - 10 mm
Freedman31 300 Yes 2.31 GHz Yes 730 nm 0.26 1.3b - 2 mm
Jin28 175 No DC-300 kHz Yes 1550 nm 3.6 8 1.1 1.2 mm × 1.2 mmc
Wang30 175 No DC-20 MHz No 1550 nm 43 - 1.3 1.2 mm × 1.2 mm
Tian29 810 No ~3 GHz Yes 1550 nm - - - 200 μm × 200 μm
Dong61 300 Yes DC-120 MHz Yes 780 nm 100d 100d 39e 1.3 mm × 0.6 mm
This work 96.5 Yes 704 MHz No 1550 nm 54.7 9 10.17 23 mm2

VπL for our multi-pass devices is defined using the length of waveguide modulated by the acoustic wave (38 × 1.6 mm = 6.08 cm). Thus, our VπL reflects a property of the waveguide cross section and can be used to compare various waveguide platforms. VπLα uses the total spiral length of 26 cm as all 26 cm of the spiral contribute to insertion loss. See Supplementary Note 5 for further comments. Device size is estimated based on information available in the associated reference. Some devices31,60 have negligible width. In this case, size is reported as a length.

aCalculated using an active length of 10 mm.

bCalculated from modulation length and VπL.

cEstimated based on the ring resonator radius using single stripe waveguides.

dPer phase shifter (i.e., it is not configured as push-pull) at room temperature.

eCalculated using VπL and a waveguide propagation loss of 0.39 dB cm−1.

Without increasing spiral size, Vπ and insertion loss may be reduced further through several improvements. Insertion loss can be decreased by removing AlN and Mo everywhere except for underneath the IDT fingers via alternative transducer designs56. Since traveling waves enable modulation at a distance, loss inducing materials can be kept far away from the waveguides. Paired with an investigation of the origin of processing-induced optical losses57, it may be possible to achieve a 16 × decrease in insertion loss. Vπ may simultaneously be improved through transducers with an aperture larger than demonstrated in this work. Alternative piezoelectric materials featuring higher electromechanical coefficients, such as lithium niobate21, lead zirconate titanate (PZT)11, and aluminum scandium nitride (AlScN)37 may be favorable depending on the application, modulation frequency requirements, and fabrication constraints if acoustic impedance matching between the piezoelectric and silica can be achieved. Additionally, the silica cladding thickness and spiral can be engineered to be optimized for the highest frequency acoustic mode of which we determined to perform the best in this work.

The devices presented in this work lend immediate use to applications requiring PDH locking, demonstrated through a prototype optomechanical accelerometer. Our high-frequency modulators enable sideband-resolved PDH locking as the modulation frequency exceeds the cavity decay rate. Use cases extend further to include low-noise microwave oscillators58 and lasers59 implemented on thin SiN. Such technologies are still dependent on external phase modulators and our modulators now provide an on chip solution. The π/2 modulation index achieved at high frequency in our devices certainly exceeds what is required for PDH locking, but was targeted as an important milestone as it is necessary for fully integrated thin SiN optical gyroscopes8,51. Such an exciting development would mean fully integrated optical inertial measurement units, combining optomechanical accelerometer and optical gyroscope technology, is within reach.

Methods

Phase modulator characterization

The performance of the spiral phase modulators are measured using the optical heterodyne technique. Light output from a tunable laser (Toptical CTL 1550) is split into two paths. One path passes through the phase modulator chip while the other passes through a bulk Brimrose acousto-optic frequency shifter to frequency shift the light by 100 MHz. The light is recombined and beat on a high-speed photodetector. An electronic spectrum analyzer measures the response which contains unique frequency components corresponding to the sidebands imparted on the light by the phase modulator (see Fig. 4f). The relative magnitude of these sidebands can be fit to infer quantities such as modulation index.

Accelerometer experiment

A simplified block diagram of this experiment is shown in Fig. 5d. The spiral phase-modulators are used to implement a PDH lock to a released optical ring resonator (pictured in Fig. 5a, b) that is sensitive to acceleration. A Zurich UHFLI lock-in amplifier (LIA) drives the spiral modulator’s 502 MHz acoustic mode through a RF amplifier to generate a PDH error signal via demodulation of the beat signal on the photodetector. This error signal is fed into the laser controller, which implements a proportion-integration-derivative control loop to lock the laser to the minimum of the ring resonator transfer function. The experiment then shakes the optical accelerometer, causing the resonance frequency to shift under the applied acceleration. This shift is also measured by the lock-in-amplifier by demodulating the error signal generated by the control loop at the shake frequency. Simultaneously, a commercial accelerometer (ADXL 354) located next to the optical chip on the shaker table reports the acceleration applied by the shaker table. This system is further calibrated with a bulk acousto-optic frequency shifter through a procedure documented in the Supplementary Information to obtain the transfer function in units of MHz g−1 shown in Fig. 5f. This calibration procedure is not required to measure noise-equivalent acceleration.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory with SEMI-PNT and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number 911NF-22-2-0050 (S.E.K., A.G.A., Y.T., T.H.C., S.A.B., W.J., A.F., M.P.). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government or SEMI. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. The research at Purdue University is also supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science, High Energy Physics, QuantISED program (FWP ERKAP63) (S.E.K., A.G.A., Y.T., T.H.C., S.A.B.) and the U.S. DOE Office of Science, Quantum Science Center. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No 2444108 (S.E.K.). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The AlN transducer film was deposited at AMS Inc. The final fabrication steps defining the piezo actuator and DRIE were performed at the Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University.

Author contributions

S.E.K. and W.J. conceptualized the modulator architecture. S.E.K. designed the spirals, transducers, and experiments with input from all authors. T.H.C. and A.G.A. fabricated the transducers. T.H.C. fabricated the accelerometers. Y.T provided guidance for the accelerometer experiment. A.F., M.P., and S.A.B. supervised the project.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Dawn Tan, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The data generated in this study has been deposited in the repository Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.17409114.

Competing interests

S.E.K., T.H.C., W.J., A.F., and S.A.B. have a patent pending. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-67618-3.

References

  • 1.Jin, W. et al. Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using CMOS-ready ultra-high-Q microresonators. Nat. Photonics15, 346–353 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xiang, C. et al. 3D integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon photonics. Nature620, 78–85 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu, Y. et al. A fully hybrid integrated erbium-based laser. Nat. Photonics18, 829–835 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li, B. et al. High-coherence hybrid-integrated 780 nm source by self-injection-locked second-harmonic generation in a high-Q silicon-nitride resonator. Optica10, 1241–1244 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Isichenko, A. et al. Sub-Hz fundamental, sub-kHz integral linewidth self-injection locked 780 nm hybrid integrated laser. Sci. Rep.14, 27015 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Puckett, M. W. et al. 422 Million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-MHz linewidth. Nat. Commun.12, 934 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu, K. et al. Ultralow 0.034 dB/m loss wafer-scale integrated photonics realizing 720 million Q and 380 μW threshold Brillouin lasing. Opt. Lett.47, 1855–1858 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Srinivasan, S., Moreira, R., Blumenthal, D. & Bowers, J. E. Design of integrated hybrid silicon waveguide optical gyroscope. Opt. Express22, 24988 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tian, H. et al. A High-Resolution Photonic Integrated High Q Microresonator Based Accelerometer. In 2023 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) (2023).
  • 10.Tian, H. et al. Piezoelectric actuation for integrated photonics. Adv. Opt. Photonics16, 749–867 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lihachev, G. et al. Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging. Nat. Commun.13, 3522 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Siddharth, A. et al. Piezoelectrically tunable, narrow linewidth photonic integrated extended-DBR lasers. Optica11, 1062–1069 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lihachev, G. et al. Frequency agile photonic integrated external cavity laser. APL Photonics9, 126102 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu, J. et al. Monolithic piezoelectric control of soliton microcombs. Nature583, 385–390 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu, J.-Y. et al. Separable integrated frequency control of a microcomb. Optica12, 1350–1356 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tian, H. et al. Magnetic-free silicon nitride integrated optical isolator. Nat. Photonics15, 828–836 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blésin, T. et al. Bidirectional microwave-optical transduction based on integration of high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators and photonic circuits. Nat. Commun.15, 6096 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xiang, C., Jin, W. & Bowers, J. E. Silicon nitride passive and active photonic integrated circuits: Trends and prospects. Photonics Res.10, A82–A96 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morin, T. J. et al. CMOS-foundry-based blue and violet photonics. Optica. 8, 755–756 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Corato-Zanarella, M., Ji, X., Mohanty, A. & Lipson, M. Absorption and scattering limits of silicon nitride integrated photonics in the visible spectrum. Opt. Express32, 5718–5728 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghosh, S., Yegnanarayanan, S. & Ricci, M. Acousto-optic modulation in lithium niobate on silicon nitride heterogeneous waveguides. In 2021 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) (2021).
  • 22.Churaev, M. et al. A heterogeneously integrated lithium niobate-on-silicon nitride photonic platform. Nat. Commun.14, 3499 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Badri, S. H. et al. Compact modulators on silicon nitride waveguide platform via micro-transfer printing of thin-film lithium niobate. Sci. Rep.15, 11681 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rahman, M. A. et al. High-Performance Hybrid Lithium Niobate Electro-optic Modulators Integrated with Low-loss Silicon Nitride Waveguides on a Wafer-scale Silicon Photonics Platform. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00311 (2025).
  • 25.Drever, R. W. P. et al. Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator. Appl. Phys. B. 31, 97–105 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Isichenko, A. et al. Photonic integrated beam delivery for a rubidium 3D magneto-optical trap. Nat. Commun.14, 3080 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Blumenthal, D. J., Isichenko, A. & Chauhan, N. Enabling photonic integrated 3D magneto-optical traps for quantum sciences and applications. Opt. Quantum2, 444–457 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jin, W., Polcawich, R. G., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Piezoelectrically tuned silicon nitride ring resonator. Opt. Express26, 3174–3187 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tian, H. et al. Hybrid integrated photonics using bulk acoustic resonators. Nat. Commun.11, 3073 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang, J., Liu, K., Harrington, M. W., Rudy, R. Q. & Blumenthal, D. J. Silicon nitride stress-optic microresonator modulator for optical control applications. Opt. Express30, 31816–31827 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Freedman, J. M. et al. Gigahertz-frequency acousto-optic phase modulation of visible light in a CMOS-fabricated photonic circuit. Nat. Commun.16, 10959 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Rakich, P. T., Davids, P. & Wang, Z. Tailoring optical forces in waveguides through radiation pressure and electrostrictive forces. Opt. Express18, 14439–14453 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rakich, P. T., Reinke, C., Camacho, R., Davids, P. & Wang, Z. Giant Enhancement of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering in the Subwavelength Limit. Phys. Rev. X2, 011008 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shin, H. et al. Tailorable stimulated Brillouin scattering in nanoscale silicon waveguides. Nat. Commun.4, 1944 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou, Y. et al. Nonreciprocal Dissipation Engineering via Strong Coupling with a Continuum of Modes. Phys. Rev. X14, 021002 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheng, H. et al. A terahertz-bandwidth non-magnetic isolator. Nat. Photonics19, 533–539 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Erdil, M. et al. Wideband, Efficient AlScN-Si Acousto-Optic Modulator Integrated on a Commercially Available Silicon Photonics Process. ACS Photonics12, 2356–2363 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tadesse, S. & Li, M. Sub-optical wavelength acoustic wave modulation of integrated photonic resonators at microwave frequencies. Nat. Commun.5, 5402 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Vainsencher, A., Satzinger, K. J., Peairs, G. A. & Cleland, A. N. Bi-directional conversion between microwave and optical frequencies in a piezoelectric optomechanical device. Appl. Phys. Lett.109, 033107 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cai, L. et al. Acousto-optical modulation of thin film lithium niobate waveguide devices. Photonics Res.7, 1003–1013 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang, W. et al. Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency. Nat. Commun.11, 1166 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sarabalis, C. J. et al. Acousto-optic modulation of a wavelength-scale waveguide. Optica8, 477–483 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sohn, D. B., Örsel, O. E. & Bahl, G. Electrically driven optical isolation through phonon-mediated photonic Autler–Townes splitting. Nat. Photonics15, 822–827 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kittlaus, E. A. et al. Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics. Nat. Photonics15, 43–52 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Morrison, B. et al. Compact Brillouin devices through hybrid integration on silicon. Optica4, 847–854 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garrett, M. et al. Integrated microwave photonic notch filter using a heterogeneously integrated Brillouin and active-silicon photonic circuit. Nat. Commun.14, 7544 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ye, K. et al. Integrated Brillouin photonics in thin-film lithium niobate. Sci. Adv.11, eadv4022 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Klaver, Y. et al. Surface Acoustic Waves Brillouin Photonics on a Silicon Nitride Chip. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16263v1 (2024).
  • 49.Armstrong, J. A., Bloembergen, N., Ducuing, J. & Pershan, P. S. Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlinear Dielectric. Phys. Rev.127, 1918–1939 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Elsevier, AP Academic Press, London, 2020), fourth edition edn.
  • 51.Tran, M. A. et al. Integrated optical driver for interferometric optical gyroscopes. Opt. Express25, 3826 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Krause, A. G., Winger, M., Blasius, T. D., Lin, Q. & Painter, O. A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer. Nat. Photonics6, 768–772 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hutchison, D. N. & Bhave, S. A. Z-axis optomechanical accelerometer. In 2012 IEEE 25th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 615–619 (IEEE, Paris, France, 2012).
  • 54.Li, Y. L. & Barker, P. F. Characterization and Testing of a Micro-g Whispering Gallery Mode Optomechanical Accelerometer. J. Lightwave Technol.36, 3919–3926 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhou, F. et al. Broadband thermomechanically limited sensing with an optomechanical accelerometer. Optica8, 350–356 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Plessky, V., Ballandras, S., Grigorievsky, V. & Yantchev, V. 3rd type of FBARs? In 2013 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 239–242 (2013).
  • 57.Guo, J. et al. Investigation of Q degradation in low-loss Si3N4 from heterogeneous laser integration. Opt. Lett.49, 4613–4616 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kudelin, I. et al. Photonic chip-based low-noise microwave oscillator. Nature627, 534–539 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Loh, W. et al. Optical atomic clock interrogation using an integrated spiral cavity laser. Nat. Photonics19, 277–283 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hosseini, N. et al. Stress-optic modulator in TriPleX platform using a piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin film. Opt. Express23, 14018–14026 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dong, M. et al. High-speed programmable photonic circuits in a cryogenically compatible, visible–near-infrared 200 mm CMOS architecture. Nat. Photonics16, 59–65 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study has been deposited in the repository Zenodo at 10.5281/zenodo.17409114.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES