Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Oct 2;12:42. Originally published 2023 Jan 11. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.121696.2

Risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors: An observational study

Ria Maria Theresa 1, Marlina Dewiastuti 2,a, Sri Rahayu Ningsih 3, Lisa Safira 4
PMCID: PMC12853014  PMID: 41626265

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

I have corrected this article according to the input from reviewers. Malnutrition in the elderly will worsen health status in any situation. No studies have assessed malnutrition in elderly covid patients. Subjects were diagnosed covid-19 by hospital data from a Hospital located in Depok Jawa Barat Indonesia, using a total sampling of hospital data. Based on hospital data (BMI and mini nutritional assessment), the subjects were not malnourished.  In this study, inclusion criteria were people over 60 years old and diagnosed for the first time exposure by covid-19.

Abstract

Background: The incidence rate of COVID-19 is around 11-15% in the elderly. The case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19 in the elderly is around 8.9% and increases with age. The risk of mental disorders and malnutrition is increased in COVID-19 survivors. Continuous inflammatory conditions result in a state of hypercatabolism that can disrupt brain neuroendocrine and protein consumption for the formation of acute-phase reactant proteins. Mental disorders and malnutrition can lead to fragility. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly survivors of COVID-19.

Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study. The results of the research on age, disease symptoms, and comorbidities have proven that they are risk factors for mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors. This study used total sampling and included 100 study subjects. The research was conducted in Depok for two months; data was collected directly through shared questionnaires and direct anthropometric measurements. The questionnaires used were the SRQ-20 tool for mental disorder screening and MNA for malnutrition screening.

Results: The risk factors for mental disorders were age over 70 years old OR 3 (CI 1.0-8.8), severe COVID-19 symptoms OR 4.5 (CI 1.2-16.17), and multi-comorbidity OR 2.3 (CI 0.6-8.8). The risk factors for malnutrition were age higher than 70 years old OR 2.5 (CI 0.8-7.9), moderate COVID-19 symptoms OR 6.3 (CI 2.0-19.81), and multi-comorbidity OR 6.6 (CI 1.5-28.5).

Conclusions: Those infected with COVID-19 have a risk of mental disorders and malnutrition, especially in geriatrics, and this risk increases with age.

Keywords: COVID-19, elderly, survivors, mental disorders, malnutrition

Introduction

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a worldwide pandemic. The morbidity and mortality rates are still increasing, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. More than one million Indonesians suffer from COVID-19. Data from several studies indicate high morbidity and mortality rates in the elderly population. The incidence rate of COVID-19 in the population is around 11-17%, while the case fatality rate (CFR) is around 8.9% and increases with age. 1 – 5

The elderly population has an immunosenescence state, which causes disturbances in innate and adaptive immune systems. COVID-19 in the elderly results in a continuous inflammatory response, causing the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 in the elderly to often be more severe and the mortality rate to be high. 6

Survivors of COVID-19 have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders. About 20% of COVID-19 survivors will experience mental disorders. The most common clinical manifestations are depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. 6 – 10

Mental disorders increase along with the increasing age of COVID-19 survivors. The pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders in COVID-19 survivors is a continuous inflammatory state that can result in disturbances in neuroendocrine, neuroimmune, and nervous structures. 11 – 15

A total of 52.7% of the elderly population who were infected by COVID-19 suffers from malnutrition. This is due to the fact that most elderly people who suffer from COVID-19 have multiple comorbidities. In addition, the inflammatory reaction causes high catabolism, causing high protein consumption for the formation of acute phase reactants. The expression of angiotensin-2 receptor (ACE-2) in the gastrointestinal tract is high which causes symptoms of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and reduced appetite to increase in the elderly. The ongoing inflammatory reaction that occurs in the elderly results in a higher risk of malnutrition even when they have survived COVID-19. 16 – 20

Factors that influence mental disorders and malnutrition in COVID-19 survivors will be investigated in this study. Including gender, employment status, inpatient or outpatient care during illness, degree of illness, presence of caregiver, and vaccination status. There is no research was conducted on the factors that influence mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors.

The risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors can lead to fragility. The fragility of elderly COVID-19 survivors increases hospitalization rates and mortality ( Figure 1). 17 , 21 – 25

Figure 1. Risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors.

Figure 1.

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors.

Methods

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the UPN Veteran Jakarta Ethical Clearance Committee (Protocol number: 455/X/2021/KEPK) after due consultation, consent letters had been provided by the researchers to all respondents.

Research methods

This research was a cross-sectional study conducted in Depok, Indonesia. Depok is an urban city that supporting the capital city. The elderly population is 3.77% of the total Depok population. The research sampled 100 people, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 by hospital data from Depok Hospital and willing to take part in the research (male = 52, female = 48) using total sampling. Data were collected by interview and direct data collection within three months of respondents being infected with COVID-19. The data was taken from the elderly population of Depok who had been infected with COVID-19 between May to July 2021. Inclusion criteria were the population of people over 60 years old and first time diagnosed with COVID-19 who were undergoing treatment in a hospital or quarantine at home, while exclusion criteria were the population who had been diagnosed with mental disorders and malnourished. Medical conditions such as dementia or other cognitive disorders were not previously evaluated in the study.

The outcome variables of this study were the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition. Both variables were categorized as having risks and having no risks. The independent variable in the study was age, measured since the respondent's birth. Another variable was the degree of severity of COVID-19; the severity of the disease was characterized as mild, moderate, and severe, and whether there were concomitant diseases or not. 1 The three variables were observed and tested using a logistic regression test. Insignificant variable expenditure causes a change in odds ratio (OR); if the OR change is more than 10% then the variable is a confounder variable and must be included in the model. Other potential confounders not observed in the study were economic status and a history of previous mental disorders.

Data were collected from questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. Questionnaire interviews were conducted by trained interviewers (RM). Interviews and data collection took 20-30 minutes per participant. Responses to questionnaires were inputted into electronic data. Before the data was collected, interrater reliability was carried out.

Sociodemographic information and health conditions obtained in this study included age, occupation, availability of caregivers, already received vaccinations, symptoms of COVID-19, and comorbidities. Data on comorbidities was obtained from self-reports.

Anthropometric measurements included measurements of height, weight, and body mass index. Measurement of body mass index was calculated based on the weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

The data was cleaned after collection. Incomplete questionnaire data at the time of collection was re-confirmed with the study respondents.

The mental disorder questionnaire was based on the SRQ-20 questionnaire. There were 20 questions that were asked by direct interview. Obtaining a value of more than or equal to 8 meant the respondent had a risk of mental disorders. This questionnaire is a screening questionnaire that has been tested for validity and reliability and a diagnostic test with 88% sensitivity for mental disorder screening. 26 – 28

The malnutrition questionnaire used a mini nutritional assessment (MNA) questionnaire, conducted directly with interviews and direct body index measurements. Obtaining a value less than 11 was considered possible malnutrition. The MNA questionnaire is a questionnaire commonly used for malnutrition screening in the elderly. This questionnaire has been conducted with validity and reliability tests and diagnostic tests with a sensitivity of 96%. 29 , 30

Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Significance was determined with an alpha value of <0.05. Descriptive analysis was conducted to look at demographic data such as gender, occupation, care during COVID-19, availability of caregivers, and vaccination status. Variables such as age, the severity of disease, and comorbidities were assessed using a Chi-square test. A logistic regression test was conducted to determine the factors that influence mental disorders and malnutrition with a multivariate model.

Results

This study invited 158 participants; 56 participants refused and did not respond the questionnaire. Two had missing data on the dependent variable and could not be contacted for confirmation of research data. A total of 100 participants were studied ( Figure 2).

Figure 2. Participant inclusion chart.

Figure 2.

A total of 100 respondents were tested based on baseline characteristics; p-values were over 0.05, so it can be concluded that there was no significant differences in the characteristics of respondents. The variable of availability of caregivers or nurses while being infected with COVID-19 for those who have a disorder did not show any significant differences; this is because the number of respondents who were outpatients is small.

As seen in Table 1, there was no difference in the occurrence of mental disorders between sexes; men and women had almost the same percentages. There was no difference in the occurrence of mental disorders between the different professions, nor was there a difference in the occurrence of mental disorders between those with caregivers and those without. Regarding treatment, a difference was observed because most of the elderly population infected with COVID-19 are likely to receive treatment in hospitals.

Table 1. Demographic description of respondents by mental disorder status.

Variable Mental disorders Total (%) P-value
Yes (%) No (%)
Gender
Male 24 (46.20) 28 (53.80) 52 (100.00) 0.423
Female 26 (54.20) 22 (45.80) 48 (100.00)
Profession
Housewife 22 (55.00) 18 (45.00) 40 (100.00) 0.706
Retired 25 (46.30) 29 (53.70) 54 (100.00)
Employee 3 (50.00) 3 (50.00) 6 (100.00)
Inpatient/outpatient
Outpatient 7 (26.90) 19 (73.10) 26 (100.00) 0.016
Inpatient 43 (58.10) 31 (41.90) 74 (100.00)
Caregiver
Yes 47 (49.00) 49 (51.00) 96 (100.00) 0.307
No 3 (75.00) 1 (25.00) 4 (100.00)
Income
<Rp. 5.000.000 35 (50.00) 35 (50.00) 70 (100.00) 0.999
≥ Rp. 5.000.000 15 (50.00) 15 (50.00) 30 (100.00)
Vaccinated status
Done 10 (38.50) 16 (61.50) 26 (100.00) 0.171
None 40 (54.10) 34 (45.90) 74 (100.00)

The characteristics of the malnourished group also showed there was no difference in baseline characteristics (gender, profession, caregiver, income, vaccinated status), where the characteristics of the respondents in patients who had malnutrition and those who did not suffer from malnutrition were homogeneous.

In Table 2 there are no differences between gender, profession, and availability of caregivers’ effect on the risk of malnutrition. However, there was a difference between treatment during COVID-19 infection and the risk of malnutrition; this may be because most elderly people infected with COVID-19 get treatment in hospitals.

Table 2. Demographic description of respondents based on malnutrition disorder status.

Variable Malnutrition Total (%) P-value
Yes (%) No (%)
Gender
Male 25 (48.10) 27 (51.90) 52 (100.00) 0.543
Female 26 (54.20) 22 (45.80) 48 (100.00)
Profession
Housewife 21 (52.50) 19 (47.50) 40 (100.00) 0.970
Retired 27 (50.00) 27 (50.00) 54 (100.00)
Employee 3 (50.00) 3 (50.00) 6 (100.00)
Inpatient/outpatient
Outpatient 6 (23.10) 20 (76.90) 26 (100.00) 0.001
Inpatient 45 (60.80) 29 (39.20) 74 (100.00)
Caregiver
Yes 47 (49.00) 49 (51.00) 96 (100.00) 0.136
No 4 (100.00) 0 (00.00) 4 (100.00)
Income
<Rp. 5.000.000 35 (50.00) 35 (50.00) 70 (100.00) 0.760
≥ Rp. 5.000.000 16 (53.30) 14 (46.70) 30 (100.00)
Vaccinated status
Done 11 (42.30) 15 (57.70) 26 (100.00) 0.171
None 40 (54.10) 34 (45.90) 74 (100.00)

Based on the results in Tables 3 and 4, the variables of age, symptoms, and comorbidities were included in the multivariate analysis, both for mental disorders and malnutrition disorders.

Table 3. Relationship variables age, symptoms, and comorbidities with mental disorders.

Variable Mental disorders Total (%) P-Value
Yes (%) No (%)
Age
60-70 yo 30 (41.10) 43 (58.90) 73 (100.00) 0.003
>70 yo 20 (74.10) 7 (25.90) 27 (100.00)
Symptoms
Mild 12 (30.80) 27 (69.20) 39 (100.00) 0.005
Moderate 25 (58.10) 18 (41.90) 43 (100.00)
Severe 13 (72.20) 5 (27.80) 18 (100.00)
Comorbidities
None 15 (36.60) 26 (63.40) 41 (100.00) 0.042
1 Comorbidity 24 (58.50) 17 (41.50) 41 (100.00)
>1 Comorbidity 11 (61.10) 7 (38.90) 18 (100.00)

Table 4. Relationships between variables of age, symptoms, and comorbidities with malnutrition disorder.

Variable Malnutrition Total (%) P-value
Yes (%) No (%)
Age
60-70 yo 31 (42.50) 42 (57.50) 73 (100.00) 0.005
>70 yo 20 (74.10) 7 (25.90) 27 (100.00)
Symptoms
Mild 11 (28.20) 28 (71.80) 39 (100.00) 0.001
Moderate 27 (62.80) 16 (37.20) 43 (100.00)
Severe 13 (72.20) 5 (27.80) 18 (100.00)
Comorbidities
None 12 (29.30) 29 (70.70) 41 (100.00) 0.001
1 Comorbidity 27 (65.90) 14 (34.10) 41 (100.00)
>1 Comorbidity 12 (66.70) 6 (33.30) 18 (100.00)

Table 3 shows there was a relationship between increased age and the risk of mental disorders. There was also a relationship between the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and the number of comorbidities with the risk of mental disorders.

Table 4 shows a relationship between increasing age and the risk of malnutrition. There was also a relationship between the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and the number of comorbidities with the risk. Comorbidities that affect degree of disease were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease (coronary arterial disease or cerebrovascular disease.

Based on the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis in Table 5, the factors that influenced mental disorders were age and symptoms. People older than 70 years had a three-time greater risk of experiencing mental disorders than the elderly aged between 60-70 years old, after controlling for symptoms and comorbidities variables at a 95% confidence interval (CI) between 1,071 to 8,83. The elderly with severe COVID-19 symptoms were at a 4.5-time greater risk of experiencing mental disorders compared to the elderly with mild symptoms, after controlling for age and comorbidities variables at a 95% confidence level between 1.23 to 16.71.

Table 5. Mental disorder multiple logistic regression model.

Variable P-value OR 95% Confidence interval
Lower Upper
Age
60-70 yo*
>70 yo 0.037 3.085 1.071 8.883
Symptoms
Mild* 0.022
Moderate 0.021 3.219 1.195 8.671
Severe 0.023 4.540 1.23 16.71
Comorbidities
None* 0.335
1 Comorbidity 0.223 1.872 0.684 5.124
>1 Comorbidity 0.202 2.359 0.631 8.812

Key: * reference group.

Based on the results of multivariate analysis in Table 5, malnutrition disorders were influenced by symptom variables and comorbidities. Elderly people with more than one comorbidity had a 6.6-time greater risk of experiencing malnutrition after controlling for symptoms and age variables at a 95% confidence level, between 1.56 to 28.57.

Discussion

One-third of the post-COVID-19 population experience mental disorders; 40% of patients will experience depression, and the rest will experience symptoms such as anxiety, and delirium. 10 , 11 , 23 , 31 - 33 Between 43-70% of COVID-19 survivors experience psychological disorders. Several studies say this is related to the degree of disease, age, and comorbidities. However, several studies have stated that mental disorders are not related to this, especially in the elderly. 5 , 6 , 14 , 15

The older the age, the higher the risk for mental disorders will be. Based on the results of our study, it was found that as age increased, the risk of mental disorders in the elderly after COVID-19 infection increased by 2.5 times according to the results of the study in Tables 3 and 5. 16

COVID-19 infection predisposes to mental disorders, which are induced by cytokine bodies and hyperinflammatory states. 10 , 11 Therefore, it can cause disruption of the blood-brain barrier and ultimately inflammation of the nervous system. In the elderly, there is a susceptibility to inflammation. 17 Hyper-inflammatory conditions affect the severity of COVID-19 disease; the severity of COVID-19 disease will increase the risk of post-infection mental disorders. In addition, comorbidity in the elderly is often multi-comorbid. 17 The number of comorbidities increases the risk of mental disorders. 23 , 32 , 34 Table 3 shows that there is a relationship between age, the degree of disease severity, and comorbidities that increase the risk of mental disorders in the elderly after COVID-19 infection. The degree of severe illness leads to a 4.5 times higher risk of mental disorders and multi comorbidities lead to a 2.3 times higher risk of experiencing mental disorders. 34 Interferon-gamma related to hyperinflammatory condition increase during covid-19 infection can affect brain function. it is well-known that chronic accumulation of cytokines causes neuronal damage. 2 , 3

Malnutrition is a nutritional disorder that has an unfavorable impact, especially on the elderly. The incidence of malnutrition in the elderly infected with COVID-19 is higher than in the general population. The pathomechanism of malnutrition is an acute inflammatory state causing high body protein consumption, and less lean body mass in the elderly, which continues to decrease with increasing age so that elderly people often lose weight due to acute inflammation. The infection of SARS-CoV-2 in the gastrointestinal system of the elderly is greater, so elderly people who are infected with COVID-19 often experience severe gastrointestinal disorders. Other factors can also influence malnutrition: the severity of COVID-19 infection increases the risk of malnutrition as 32.3% of the elderly infected with COVID-19 will continue to be malnourished 30 days after infection. Comorbidity in the elderly is also related to the incidence of malnutrition, which is related to chronic inflammation that leads to acute exacerbations causing a hyperinflammatory state so that catabolism increases and muscle mass is used. 10 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 35 , 36

Based on the results of the study, it was found that older age, degree of disease severity, and comorbidities were associated with the risk of malnutrition in the elderly after COVID-19. Increasing age increased the risk of malnutrition by 2.5 times. The severity of the disease also increased the risk of malnutrition, although in this study it was shown that people with the moderate disease had the highest risk of malnutrition, which was 6.3 times higher, while people with severe degree disease had 4.4 times risk of malnutrition based on data number of participants with moderate symptoms is more than severe symptoms and patients with severe symptoms had died during hospitalization. In some studies, 32.3% of patients suffering from malnutrition during treatment still experienced malnutrition on day 30, meaning about 70% experienced an improvement in their condition. In this study, multi-comorbidities led to 6.6 times higher risk of malnutrition, more comorbidities, and increased susceptibility in the elderly as seen in Table 6. 10 , 19 – 22

Table 6. Malnutrition disorder multiple logistic regression model.

Variable P-Value OR 95% Confidence interval
Lower Upper
Age
60-70 yo*
>70 yo 0.114 2.515 0.800 7.906
Symptoms
Mild* 0.003
Moderate 0.001 6.368 2.047 19.812
Severe 0.029 4.420 1.163 16.802
Comorbidities
None* 0.007
1 Comorbidity 0.005 5.045 1.645 15.472
>1 Comorbidity 0.010 6.685 1.56 28.57

Key: * reference group.

Conclusions

Age, COVID-19 symptoms and the presence of disease comorbidities are risk factors for mental disorders and malnutrition in COVID-19 elderly survivors. The older the age, the more severe the symptoms of COVID-19; the number of comorbidities also increased the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition.

Evaluation of mental health and nutritional status in elderly COVID-19 survivors needs to be carried out regularly to avoid vulnerabilities which will negatively impact the quality of life of elderly people.

The limitations of this study are the total sampling approach. In addition, in this study some variable confounders couldn’t be strictly controlled. Variable confounders that can affect the results include mental disorders that have previously been experienced or have had previous symptoms.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19588519.v2. 37

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • -

    response from 100 respondents in Covid-19 Survivor.csv

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a research grant from the Research and Community Service Institute UPN Veteran Jakarta.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved

References

  • 1. Karyono DR, Wicaksana AL: Current prevalence, characteristics, and comorbidities of patients with COVID-19 in Indonesia. J. Community Empower Heal. 2020;3(2):77. 10.22146/jcoemph.57325 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Azwar MK, Setiati S, Rizka A, et al. : Clinical Profile of Elderly Patients with COVID-19 hospitalised in Indonesia’s National General Hospital. Acta Med. Indones. 2020;52(3):199–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wang L, He W, Yu X, et al. : Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’s public news and information. 2020; (January).
  • 4. Burgaña Agoües A, Serra Gallego M, Hernández Resa R, et al. : Risk Factors for COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality in Institutionalised Elderly People. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(19). 10.3390/IJERPH181910221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Goldstein JR, Lee RD: Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117(36):22035–22041. 10.1073/pnas.2006392117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Trecarichi EM, Mazzitelli M, Serapide F, et al. : Clinical characteristics and predictors of mortality associated with COVID-19 in elderly patients from a long-term care facility. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):20834–20837. 10.1038/s41598-020-77641-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ahmed H, Patel K, Greenwood DC, et al. : Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Rehabil. Med. 2020;52(5):0. 10.2340/16501977-2694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ferreira W, Olegário L, Chaves RM, et al. : Mental Health and COVID-19 Infection: Moara Rodrigues Costa 1, Systematic Review in Human Cross-Michelly Farias Rocha 3, Sectional Studies Gabriela Carvalho Jurema Abstract. iMedPub Journals. Published online2020;1–7. 10.36648/1791-809X.S1.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stein AMB: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Psychiatric illness. Wolters Kluwer. 2020;2019:1–31. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Taquet M, Luciano S, Geddes JR, et al. : Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(2):130–140. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30462-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mo GH, Wang ZX, Chen XS, et al. : The prognosis and prevention measures for mental health in COVID-19 patients: Through the experience of SARS. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2020;14(1):1–6. 10.1186/s13030-020-00196-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Menon V, Padhy SK: Mental health among COVID-19 survivors: Are we overlooking the biological links?. Asian J. Psychiatr. 2020;53:102217. 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Jafri MR, Zaheer A, Fatima S, et al. : Mental health status of COVID-19 survivors: a cross sectional study. Virol. J. 2022;19(1):1–5. 10.1186/s12985-021-01729-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Liu YH, Chen Y, Wang QH, et al. : One-Year Trajectory of Cognitive Changes in Older Survivors of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79;509–517. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu C, Cheng J, Zou J, et al. : Health-related quality of life of hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: An initial exploration in Nanning city, China. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021;274:113748. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li T, Zhang Y, Gong C, et al. : Prevalence of malnutrition and analysis of related factors in elderly patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020;74(6):871–875. 10.1038/s41430-020-0642-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sagarra-Romero L, Viñas-Barros A: COVID-19: Short and long-term effects of hospitalization on muscular weakness in the elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(23):1–12. 10.3390/ijerph17238715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Savage M, Dooley L, Waldron T, et al. : Malnutrition risk post COVID-19 infection on a care of the elderly rehab ward. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020;40(July 2016):610–611. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.09.613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rothenberg E: Coronavirus disease 19 from the perspective of ageing with focus on nutritional status and nutrition management—a narrative review. Nutrients. 2021;13(4). 10.3390/nu13041294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cuerda C, Sánchez López I, Gil Martínez C, et al. : Impact of COVID-19 in nutritional and functional status of survivors admitted in intensive care units during the first outbreak. Preliminary results of the NUTRICOVID study. Clin. Nutr. 2021; (xxxx). 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chang SF, Lin HC, Cheng CL: The Relationship of Frailty and Hospitalization Among Older People: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2018;50(4):383–391. 10.1111/jnu.12397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bergeron CD, Boolani A, Jansen EC, et al. : Practical Solutions to Address COVID-19-Related Mental and Physical Health Challenges Among Low-Income Older Adults. Front Public Heal. 2021;9(July):1–8. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.674847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wahyuhadi J, Efendi F, Al Farabi MJ, et al. : Association of stigma with mental health and quality of life among Indonesian COVID-19 survivors. PLoS One. 2022;17(2 February):e0264218–e0264213. 10.1371/journal.pone.0264218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ali AM, Kunugi H: Approaches to nutritional screening in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(5):1–15. 10.3390/ijerph18052772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Holdoway A: Nutritional management of patients during and after COVID-19 illness. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2020;25:S6–S10. 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.Sup8.S6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Scholte P: Chapter 6 Psychometric properties and longitudinal validation of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) in a Rwandan community setting: a validation study. Ment. Heal. War-Affected Popul. 2013;91–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chipimo PJ, Fylkesnes K: Comparative Validity of Screening Instruments for Mental Distress in Zambia. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health. 2010;6(1):4–15. 10.2174/1745017901006010004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Graaff AM, Cuijpers P, Leeflang M, et al. : A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults. Glob. Ment. Heal. 2021;8:e43. 10.1017/gmh.2021.39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Arulmohi M, Vinayagamoorthy V, Dongre AR: Physical Violence Against Doctors: A Content Analysis from Online Indian Newspapers. Indian J. Community Med. 2017;42(1):147–150. 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Guigoz Y, Vellas B: Nutritional Assessment in Older Adults: MNA® 25 years of a Screening Tool & a Reference Standard for Care and Research; What Next?. J. Nutr. Heal. Aging. 2021;25(4):528–583. 10.1007/s12603-021-1601-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Menges D, Ballouz T, Anagnostopoulos A, et al. : Burden of post-COVID-19 syndrome and implications for healthcare service planning: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(7 July):e0254523. 10.1371/journal.pone.0254523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, et al. : 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416–427. 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Damayanthi HDWT, Prabani KIP: Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’ s public news and information. 2020; (January).
  • 34. Grolli RE, Eduarda M, Mingoti D, et al. : Impact of COVID-19 in the Mental Health in Elderly: Psychological and Biological Updates.Published online2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35. Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, et al. : Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J. Infect. 2020;80(6):e14–e18. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Quilliot D, Gérard M, Bonsack O, et al. : Impact of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection on nutritional status and subjective functional loss in a prospective cohort of COVID-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37. Theresa RM, Dewiastuti M, Ningsih SR, et al. : RISK OF MENTAL DISORDERS AND MALNUTRITION IN ELDERLY COVID-19 SURVIVOR. figshare. Dataset. 2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.19588519.v2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
F1000Res. 2026 Jan 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155800.r449692

Reviewer response for version 2

Yuni Asri 1

1. Clarity of presentation and use of current literature

Assessment: Partly

The manuscript is generally well structured, and the results are presented in a logical sequence. Tables and figures are readable, and the analytical approach is transparent at a basic level. However, there are notable concerns:

  1. The authors repeatedly claim that “there is no research” examining factors associated with mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors. This statement is factually inaccurate. Multiple studies and systematic reviews published between 2021–2023 have already addressed mental health outcomes and malnutrition in older COVID-19 populations.

  2. Although some recent references are cited, the manuscript does not adequately contextualize the study within the existing body of evidence, nor does it clearly articulate what is novel about the present work (e.g., regional context, combined outcomes, or post-acute timeframe).

To ensure the scientific integrity of the work, it is essential to revise the introduction so that it accurately represents the current body of literature, steering clear of making absolute statements. It is also important to clearly identify the specific research gap, such as the joint evaluation of mental and nutritional risks among elderly Indonesian survivors within three months after infection. Additionally, the discussion should be enhanced by directly comparing the results with recent studies conducted both internationally and regionally.

2. Study design and technical soundness

Assessment: Partly

A cross-sectional design is acceptable for exploring associations between risk factors and outcomes. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are stated, and the use of validated screening tools is appropriate for a preliminary risk assessment.

While the study's design does not allow for causal conclusions, causal language is frequently used in the discussion and conclusions. There is a possibility of selection bias because participation was based on individuals' willingness to respond, and those experiencing mental health or nutritional issues might have been more likely to participate. Furthermore, important potential confounding factors, such as socioeconomic status, existing cognitive impairments, and prior subclinical mental health symptoms, were identified but not thoroughly examined in the analysis.

Key issues to address include: reframing interpretations solely as associations rather than causal links, explicitly acknowledging selection bias and residual confounding as significant limitations, and ensuring that conclusions accurately reflect the limitations inherent in a cross-sectional design.

3. Sufficiency of methodological detail for replication

Assessment: Partly

The manuscript describes data collection procedures, instruments used, and general analytical methods. Nonetheless, several elements necessary for full replication are insufficiently detailed:

  1. The rationale for dichotomizing age at 70 years is not justified clinically or statistically.

  2. The variable selection strategy for multivariate logistic regression (e.g., criteria for inclusion, handling of collinearity) is not fully explained.

  3. It is unclear how missing data (if any beyond the two excluded participants) were handled.

Key issues to address include offering a clear rationale for the chosen age categorization or exploring alternative approaches such as continuous age modeling or sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it is important to elaborate on the regression modeling strategy and clarify data management procedures to improve reproducibility.

4. Statistical analysis and interpretation

Assessment: Partly

The choice of chi-square tests and logistic regression for binary outcomes is appropriate. Reporting of odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals is adequate.

Nevertheless: Some confidence intervals are broad, suggesting a lack of statistical power, which should be more clearly acknowledged. Multicomorbidity is considered as a count variable, yet the specific impact of individual comorbidities (such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease) is not examined. The discussion sometimes exaggerates the interpretation of odds ratios in relation to the sample size and the precision of the estimates.

Key considerations include moderating the interpretation of effect sizes, particularly when confidence intervals are broad, and discussing the consequences of limited statistical power. If possible, conduct an exploratory analysis of individual comorbidities or provide a clear rationale for not doing so.

5. Availability of source data

Assessment: Yes

The authors have shared the foundational dataset on Figshare, promoting transparency and reproducibility in accordance with F1000Research guidelines. This aspect enhances the study's credibility.

6. Support of conclusions by results

Assessment: Partly

The conclusions are generally aligned with the reported results. However, they are framed too strongly given the study design and limitations.

  1. Statements implying increased “risk” in a causal sense should be revised to “association.”

  2. Recommendations for clinical practice, while reasonable, should be presented more cautiously and framed as suggestions for screening and further research rather than definitive guidance.

Key issues to address: Revise conclusions to accurately represent associative results. Ensure that recommendations align with the strength of the evidence.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

My research areas include Public Health and Community Health Nursing, with a particular focus on gerontology, mental health, elderly care, and health services research. My work explores population health outcomes, determinants of health among older adults, mental well-being in vulnerable groups, and the development and evaluation of nursing interventions in both community and clinical settings.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Jun 10. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155800.r279772

Reviewer response for version 2

Yan-Jiang Wang 1, Yu-Hui Liu 2

This study aimed to examine the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition among older individuals who survived COVID-19. The findings revealed that older age, severe COVID-19 infection, and the presence of multiple comorbidities were linked to adverse mental health outcomes and malnutrition following the infection. The study was conducted in a meticulous manner; however, a few concerns need to be addressed.

-Introduction

  1. The authors should provide a clear explanation for why they chose to investigate both mental health disorders and malnutrition in a single study, as these two outcomes may not appear to be directly related.

  2. The authors claimed that “There is no research was conducted on the factors that influence mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors”. This should be approached with caution because there is a significant amount of research on this topic.

Tosato M, et.al., 2023 (Ref 1)

Griffiths J et.al., 2023 (Ref 2) 

Boaz M. et.al., 2023 (Ref 3)

Feng X et.al., 2022 (Ref 4) 

- Methods

  1. It is important to acknowledge the potential bias in participant recruitment. Individuals who have experienced mental health complaints and malnutrition may be more inclined to participate, whereas those in good health may have less interest in participation.

  2. Age was considered as a dichotomous variable in the regression models. However, it is important for the authors to provide an explanation for their selection of 70 years as the threshold to differentiate between the older and younger age groups.

  3. Using the SRQ-20 questionnaire for assessment was too simplistic and did not provide a clear indication of the specific type of mental health disorders among older COVID-19 survivors. This limitation should be acknowledged.

- Results

The authors observed that multicomorbidities were linked with both mental health disorders and malnutrition. However, it's crucial to identify the primary contributing comorbidity to these health outcomes. I would recommend the authors to analyze the association between each comorbidity and the outcomes separately

- Discussion

  1. In a cross-sectional investigation, establishing causative associations between age, disease severity, comorbidities, and the health consequences of COVID-19 is challenging. This limitation should be acknowledged, and further longitudinal investigations are necessary to address this gap.

  2. The small sample size should be acknowledged as a limitation of the study.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Neurology; Dementia; Covid-19

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to state that we do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Malnutrition in COVID-19 survivors: prevalence and risk factors. Aging Clin Exp Res .2023;35(10) : 10.1007/s40520-023-02526-4 2257-2265 10.1007/s40520-023-02526-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Malnutrition, Depression, Poor Sleep Quality, and Difficulty Falling Asleep at Night Are Associated with a Higher Risk of Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults during the COVID-19 Restrictions. Nutrients .2023;15(13) : 10.3390/nu15132849 10.3390/nu15132849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Malnutrition and In-Hospital Death in Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19. Nutrients .2023;15(5) : 10.3390/nu15051298 10.3390/nu15051298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. : Risk of Malnutrition in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients .2022;14(24) : 10.3390/nu14245267 10.3390/nu14245267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 17. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155800.r211293

Reviewer response for version 2

Mirasari Putri 1

I think revisions are appropriate.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2023 Jul 31. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.133591.r186579

Reviewer response for version 1

Tusawar Iftikhar Ahmad 1, Amina Alamgir 2

Feedback for improving the quality of the manuscript:

  1. In the abstract, include statistics on the incidence and case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19 in the elderly within the context of Indonesia.

  2. In the abstract, present the findings related to Odds Ratios in the following format: for example, provide the numeric value of the OR (p-value = 0.00; CI = 1.0-8.8).

  3. In Figure 1, the visualization of the sequence depicting the risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors is unclear. Please clarify the directions of the arrows and sequence of the text boxes to provide a more coherent understanding.

  4. Please provide a statistical justification for the adequacy of the sample size (n = 100) and its implications for the generalizability of the findings.

  5. The current study lacks a clear presentation of its theoretical underpinnings. Please include a section to address this aspect.

  6. The research gap is not specifically identified. Consider highlighting the specific gap that this study aims to address.

  7. Provide a brief description of the study area (Depok, Indonesia), including cartographic presentation, demography, socioeconomic dynamics, etc.

  8. The paper mentions the use of the SRQ-20 and the MNA questionnaires to assess mental disorder and malnutrition, respectively. Please add a brief description of the structures of both questionnaires in the paper.

  9. Please specify the sampling technique employed to collect the data.

  10. Include a description, along with a mathematical expression, explaining the relevance of using multiple logistic regression as the estimation technique for this research.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Health Economics

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 May 2. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.133591.r164467

Reviewer response for version 1

Mirasari Putri 1

Abstract

  1. Method: Write the time of this research conducted

  2. Write down the significant comorbidities that play a role in mental disorders and malnutrition based on the findings in this study.

Introduction:

  1. It should provide evidence gaps to highlight unanswered questions in this study and how this study will contribute to filling the gap.

  2. Highlight the originality and novelty of this study.

Method:

  1. Was it true that there were 100 elderly people affected by Covid in May-July 2021 throughout Depok? Explain further what is meant by the total sample in this study.

  2. Why was malnutrition in the elderly before being diagnosed with Covid not excluded in this study? Malnutrition is one risk factor in the elderly with or without Covid. How can authors ensure that the patients' malnutrition is because of Covid, not because they have had it before?

  3. Paragraph 2, line 2 adds a reference for mental disorder categorization.

  4. Paragraph 2, line 4 adds the reference for Covid severity.

  5. Write the number of ethical approval.

  6. Paragraph 1, line 2 add the reference for mental disorder categorized and explain the method briefly

  7. Explain whether the patients who are used as subjects were patients who experienced Covid for the first time, have been exposed to it more than once, or were all taken as subjects.

Result:

  1. Explain further about the comorbidities presented in tables 3 and 4. In more than 1 comorbidity, which comorbidities are the high risk factors for mental disorder and malnutrition in your research?

  2. Paragraph 10: which table represents multivariate analysis? Please write it.

  3. In the table note, write the statistical method used and the total number of respondents.

Discussion:

  1. Paragraph 3: Explain in more detail the mechanism of hyperinflammation and cytokines in infections associated with the nervous system, which are at risk of causing mental disorders

  2. Paragraph  3: Explain in more detail about the multiple comorbidities that can increase the risk of mental disorders concerning the comorbidities found in your research and also the mechanism

  3. Paragraph  4: the authors explained that gastrointestinal factors are one of the causes of malnutrition in the elderly with Covid. Did the authors investigate these gastrointestinal factors? If yes, the results can be written in the results section. Because this is something that can confirm the mechanism of malnutrition in the elderly with Covid

  4. Paragraph 5: Discuss why the risk of malnutrition in Covid patients with moderate symptoms was higher than those with severe ones.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Nutrition-Immunology-Biomolecular

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Jun 21.
Ria Maria Theresa 1

Abstract : There is no cachexia and no cancer 

Introduction:

1. Malnutrition in elderly will worsen health status in any situation.

2. No studies have assesed malnutrition in elderly covid patients.

Method:

1. Pasien was diagnosed covid-19 by hospital data from Depok hospital, using total sampling of hospital data.

2. The malnourished patient was excluded in this study.

We are sure that from this study, the sample was not diagnosed malnourished based on hospital data (BMI and by mini nutritional assessment from hospital data when patients were hospitalized).

3.Paragraph 2, line 2 adds a reference for mental disorder categorization:

Stein AMB: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Psychiatric illness.  Wolters Kluwer. 2020;  2019: 1–31.

4.Paragraph 2, line 4 adds the reference for Covid severity:

Azwar MK, Setiati S, Rizka A,  et al.: Clinical Profile of Elderly Patients with COVID-19 hospitalised in Indonesia’s National General Hospital.  Acta Med. Indones. 2020;  52(3): 199–205

5.Write the number of ethical approval: 455/X/2021/KEPK

6. The sudden changes situation during the covid 19 had an impact on difficulty adapting and this situation had impact on mental health of elderly.

Reference for mental health disorder categorized are DSM V and ICD XI

7. in this study, inclusion criteria were the population og people over 60 years old and diagnosed for the first time exposure by covid 19.

Result:

1. Comorbidity in this study was hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease (coronary arterial disease or cerebrovascular disease). We dont study comordities that lead to mental disorders.

2. Table 5 and 6

Discussion:

1. COVID-19 infection predisposes to mental disorders induced by cytokine bodies and hyperinflammatory states. Therefore, it can cause disruption of the blood-brain barrier and ultimately inflammation of the nervous system. In the elderly, there is a susceptibility to inflammation. Hyper-inflammatory conditions affect the severity of COVID-19; the severity of COVID-19 will increase the risk of post-infection mental disorders. In addition, comorbidity in the elderly is often multi-comorbid. The number of comorbidities increases the risk of mental disorders. Table 3 shows that there is a relationship between age, the degree of disease severity, and comorbidities that increase the risk of mental disorders in the elderly after COVID-19 infection. The degree of severe illness leads to a 4.5 times higher risk of mental disorders and multi-comorbidities lead to a 2.3 times higher risk of experiencing mental disorders.

Interferon-gamma related to hyperinflammatory condition increase during covid-19 infection can affect brain function. it is well-known that chronic accumulation of cytokines causes neuronal damage

2. Other factors like glucose level, hypertension, and other comorbidities increase the severity of the disease. Immune signatures correlated with diseases trajectory to sequalae

3. In this study, there is no evaluation on gastrointestinal symptoms during hospitalization

4. Decrease appetite, digestive disturbances, increased metabolism, longer duration of illness in moderate patients.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Figshare: Risk of mental disorders and malnutrition in elderly COVID-19 survivors, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19588519.v2. 37

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • -

      response from 100 respondents in Covid-19 Survivor.csv

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES