Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2026 Jan 30;123(5):e2520479123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2520479123

Quantum benchmarking of high-fidelity noise-biased operations on a detuned Kerr-cat qubit

Bingcheng Qing a,1,2, Ahmed Hajr a,1, Ke Wang a,b,2, Gerwin Koolstra a, Long B Nguyen a,b,2, Jordan Hines a, Irwin Huang c, Bibek Bhandari d, Larry Chen a, Ziqi Kang a, Christian Jünger a,b, Noah Goss a, Nikitha Jain a, Hyunseong Kim a, Kan-Heng Lee a,b, Akel Hashim a,b, Nicholas E Frattini e, Zahra Pedramrazi a,b, Justin Dressel d,f, Andrew N Jordan c,d,f,g, David I Santiago a,b, Irfan Siddiqi a,b
PMCID: PMC12867708  PMID: 41615757

Significance

The path to practical quantum computing is hindered by the presence of noise, which disrupts fragile quantum information. Recent advances suggest that tailoring quantum hardware to favor certain types of noise can lead to more efficient error correction strategies. In this study, we develop and rigorously benchmark a scalable control framework for the detuned Kerr-cat qubit, a leading noise-biased platform. Our results set a performance benchmark, demonstrating high noise bias and gate fidelity. Importantly, we reveal that conventional estimates often overstate the noise in these systems, underscoring the need for more precise diagnostic tools. This work brings us closer to fault-tolerant quantum computing by advancing both the hardware and the methodology needed to unlock its full potential.

Keywords: noise-biased qubit, quantum benchmarking, quantum error correction

Abstract

Ubiquitous noise sources in quantum systems remain a key obstacle to building quantum computers, necessitating the use of quantum error correction codes. Recently, error-correcting codes tailored for noise-biased systems have been shown to offer high fault-tolerance thresholds and reduced hardware overhead, positioning noise-biased qubits as promising candidates for building universal quantum computers. However, quantum operations on these platforms remain challenging, and their noise structures have not yet been rigorously benchmarked to the same extent as those of conventional quantum hardware. In this work, we develop a comprehensive quantum control toolbox for a scalable noise-biased qubit, detuned Kerr-cat qubit, including initialization, universal single-qubit gates, and quantum nondemolition readout. We systematically characterize the noise structure of these operations using gate set tomography and dihedral randomized benchmarking, achieving high local gate fidelities, with F[Z(π/2)]=(99.18±0.066)% and F[X(π/2)]=(92.5±0.23)%. Notably, the noise bias of the detuned Kerr-cat qubit approaches 250 with a phase-flip time of 4 μs, which outperforms its resonant-Kerr-cat qubit counterparts as reported previously, representing a state-of-the-art performance benchmark for Kerr-cat qubits. Moreover, our results reveal a critical overestimation of operational noise bias inferred from bit-flip and phase-flip times alone, highlighting the necessity of a precise and direct benchmarking for noise-biased qubit operations. Our work thus establishes a framework for systematically characterizing and validating the performance of quantum operations in structured-noise architectures, which lays the groundwork for implementing efficient quantum error correction in next-generation architectures.


Rapid advancements in building quantum systems with scalable, well-characterized qubits have opened up the potential to solve problems intractable for classical computers (13). However, quantum systems remain fragile, subject to various errors such as decoherence (4), dephasing (5, 6), and stochastic and coherent errors (7). As a result, quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for practical and fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) (8, 9). Most QEC protocols impose stringent performance requirements on the physical device level due to significant hardware overhead and low error thresholds (9, 10). The suppression of qubit errors via the surface code highlights the progress in this direction (10). Alternatively, tailored QEC codes explore the noise structures of quantum systems to achieve higher efficiency and error thresholds, relaxing the requirements for the quantum device performance (1114). QEC codes tailored for noise-biased qubits (1517), with resilience against a subset of Pauli errors, such as the XZZX codes (1820), have gained extensive attention. Recent work on enhancing the phase-flip time of dissipative cat qubits using repetition codes marks an important step toward the extreme limit where physical noises are so strongly biased that only one error channel requires correction (21). Nevertheless, such a method is challenging to scale up because the uncorrected error will still increase exponentially with the system size (21). On the other hand, the exploration of Kerr-cat qubits (KCQs) aims to address stochastic Pauli errors based on the XZZX surface code and relies on noise bias to achieve high error thresholds (22). Importantly, resonant-KCQs have recently been shown to be promising through demonstrations of their universal gate control and quantum nondemolition readout (23, 24).

In terms of implementation, noise bias can be achieved by encoding qubits into bosonic modes of quantum oscillators. Specifically, cat qubits (2233), realized by engineering Schrödinger cat states in quantum oscillators, have attracted considerable attention due to their comparatively high noise bias and low hardware complexity. Leveraging strong nonlinear interactions in superconducting circuits, many theoretical proposals examined cat qubit implementations (19, 34), bias-preserving gates (35, 36), and applications in XZZX surface code for FTQC (22). Furthermore, the successful implementation of cat qubits in superconducting circuits has driven experimental advances (24, 26). The universal quantum operations of a KCQ under a resonant two-photon stabilization drive, or resonant-KCQ, have been demonstrated recently (23, 37, 38). In addition, a significant bit-flip time improvement has been observed on detuned-KCQs through a red-detuned two-photon stabilization drive in a 3D cavity (39). However, noise structure characterization on KCQs has so far been limited to bit-flip and phase-flip time measurements when the qubits are idle, leading to overestimated noise bias in actual gate operations. Furthermore, while detuned-KCQs are predicted to have improved bit-flip times (40), prior investigations have been restricted to spectral and coherence measurements in 3D architectures, leaving their realization in scalable 2D platforms and the implementation of universal quantum operations unexplored (39). The absence of direct noise characterization for KCQ operations and universal gate implementations for detuned-KCQs has limited their further progress. Therefore, the development of a comprehensive quantum control toolbox for detuned-KCQs and a direct, accurate, and thorough characterization of the quantum gate noise structures are crucial for advancing KCQs toward further applications in QEC.

In this work, we develop a comprehensive quantum control toolbox for the detuned-KCQ in planar superconducting circuits, including the high-fidelity initialization, universal single-qubit gates, and quantum nondemolition readout, with a comparison to its resonant counterpart realized in our previous work (23). Moreover, we directly characterize the noise structures of single-qubit operations for both the resonant- and detuned-KCQ, providing a precise and detailed description of the various noises affecting these operations. Using gate set tomography (GST), we achieved SPAM-free gate fidelities over (92.5±0.23)% for the X(π/2) gate and (99.18±0.066)% for the bias-preserving Z(π/2) gate, underscoring the highest performance in a noise-biased platform. Benchmarking with D8 dihedral group randomized benchmarking (DRB) (41, 42) further reveals a noise bias exceeding 100 for the noise-preserving operations of KCQs. Notably, the detuned-KCQ exhibits lower bit-flip errors and similar phase-flip errors compared to the resonant-KCQ, resulting in a noise bias of 250, which indicates the advantage of detuned-KCQ.

Interestingly, the noise bias of short gates extracted using DRB is much lower than that estimated from the bit-flip and phase-flip time measurements, signifying the inaccuracy of noise bias characterization based solely on idling lifetimes. As the first thorough and direct exploration of the noise structures of quantum operations on noise-biased qubits, we provide a framework for benchmarking the performance of quantum systems with structured noises. Moreover, thanks to the development of high-fidelity universal single-qubit operations on the detuned-KCQ, our work also positions detuned-KCQ as a strong candidate for noise-biased QEC.

Noise-Biased Cat Qubit Encoding and Control

We extend the investigation of the resonant-KCQ introduced in our previous work (23) to explore the detuned-KCQ by engineering the effective Hamiltonian of a superconducting nonlinear oscillator under a strong two-photon stabilization drive with various frequencies. The encoding and operations of the detuned-KCQ are illustrated in Fig. 1. The nonlinear oscillator consists of two Superconducting Nonlinear Asymmetric Inductive eLements (SNAILs) shunted by a capacitor shown in Fig. 1A. Each SNAIL consists of three large Josephson junctions with Josephson energy EJ and a small Josephson junction with Josephson energy βEj (SI Appendix, section 1). For a fixed external flux ϕext, the undriven SNAIL nonlinear oscillator offers an anharmonic potential with nonzero third-order g3 and fourth-order g4 nonlinearities shown in Fig. 1A. Using two SNAILs connected in series could increase the g3/g4 ratio by a factor of 2, leading to a more efficient two-photon stabilization process (23, 43).

Fig. 1.

Diagram illustrates Kerr-cat qubit concepts, including SNAIL nonlinear oscillator circuit, energy levels, Bloch sphere, and pseudopotential profiles.

Kerr-cat qubit concepts. (A) SNAIL nonlinear oscillator circuit with frequency ωQ, nonlinear factors g3,g4 and Kerr nonlinearity K, and its energy levels with wave-functions. (B) SNAIL oscillator pumped by a two-photon stabilization drive at ωS=2ωQ, and the engineered pseudopotential profile with its energy levels and wave-functions. (C) Pseudopotential profile and its energy levels engineered by a red-detuned two-photon stabilization drive, where the excited states become degenerate. (D) Bloch sphere defined by the coherent states and their superpositions, where |±Z=|±α, |±X=|Cα±|α±|α, |±Y=|Cα±i|α±i|α. (E) Pseudopotential profile under a single-photon drive Ω at ωS/2 for Z(θ) gates. (F) Pseudopotential profile under a blue-detuned two-photon stabilization drive for the X(π/2) gate. The detuning was chosen to be 5K as an example.

Under a two-photon stabilization drive at frequency ωS, the effective Hamiltonian in the frame rotating at frequency ωS/2 is

H^detuned-KCQ/ħ=Δa^a^+ϵ2a^2+ϵ2a^2Ka^2a^2, [1]

where we applied the rotating wave approximation (Materials and Methods). The nonzero detuning Δ=ωQωS/2 is crucial to encode the detuned-KCQ with enhanced performance. The two-photon stabilization drive ϵ2 is engineered with the third-order nonlinearity, which converts a single photon from the drive at frequency ωS into two photons in the SNAIL oscillator at frequency ωQ, and the Kerr coefficient K originates from the fourth-order nonlinearity.

This Hamiltonian forms a pseudopotential with a double-well structure containing two degenerate ground states at the bottom of the wells, as shown in Fig. 1B for resonant-KCQ with Δ=0 and Fig. 1C for detuned-KCQ with Δ=2K. These states are separated from the excited states |ψe± by an energy gap of 4K|α|2 with |α|2=(|ϵ2|+Δ/2)/K, where |α|2 is often used to indicate the size of the cat in phase space. These ground states approach the coherent states |±α rapidly as |ϵ2|/K increases (Materials and Methods). By encoding these ground states as the Z-axis states on the Bloch sphere, their superposition spans the computational space of KCQs, as shown in Fig. 1D.

As a noise-biased qubit, KCQ has a higher bit-flip time Tz than the phase-flip time Ty. The coherent states on the Z axis, as eigenstates of the bosonic annihilation operator, are immune to photon losses, thus leading to the increased Tz. However, single-photon loss flips the cat states on the equator of the Bloch sphere with a rate enhanced by |α|, leading to the reduced Ty. It is important to note that, as illustrated in Fig. 1C, the excited states of the detuned-KCQ are degenerate when the two-photon stabilization drive is red-detuned by Δ=2K. Such degeneracy can lead to an even higher bit-flip time Tz without further degradation of the phase-flip time Ty (39), providing advantages in quantum information processing (Materials and Methods).

While the quantum operations of a resonant-KCQ have been extensively studied in our previous work and related literature (23, 24, 38), only bit-flip time measurement has been reported for detuned-KCQs with a small two-photon stabilization drive (39), hindering its further development. Here, we demonstrate a complete quantum control toolbox for detuned-KCQ, including the initialization, universal single-qubit gates, and quantum nondemolition readout. The universal single-qubit gates consist of the continuous Z(θ) gates and a discrete X(π/2) gate through pseudopotential deformation. The continuous Z(θ) gates are realized by a single-photon drive Ω to lift the degeneracy between the two coherent states, allowing them to accumulate different dynamical phases, as shown in Fig. 1E. The discrete X(π/2) gate is engineered by blue-detuning the stabilization drive to lower the energy barrier between the two coherent states, allowing them to tunnel between the two wells, as shown in Fig. 1F (Materials and Methods). By manipulating the detuning carefully, a nonzero coupling between the two states in each well can be engineered, which effectively lifts the degeneracy between the even and odd parity eigenstates of the system, leading to coherent state transition between |α and |+α. In contrast to the previously reported method for resonant-KCQs based on the interruption of two-photon stabilization drive with a fidelity of 85.7% (38), our method corresponds to a fidelity over 92%, even for large cat sizes, by keeping the stabilization drive on to mitigate the effects of decays of Fock states.

Qubit Initialization, Readout, and Lifetime Characterization

The KCQ is initialized to the |+Z state by heralding through cat quadrature readout (CQR). CQR is realized by a beam-splitter interaction engineered through the three-wave mixing process (Materials and Methods). Under such a beam-splitter interaction, the readout resonator is populated to a steady state depending on the average value of the KCQ mode a^. Therefore, by detecting the readout resonator state, one can determine in which well the KCQ state resides and collapse it into one of the pseudopotential wells. This process enables the readout of KCQ along the Z axis because the |±Z states of KCQ are coherent states localized in one of the potential wells. This readout method is quantum nondemolition when the mean photon numbers in KCQs are conserved due to the much stronger two-photon stabilization drives than the beam-splitter interactions. The quantum-nondemolition-ness (QNDness), defined as the probability of measuring the same results in two consecutive readouts, is observed to be over 98%. Such high QNDness allows the initialization of qubits through heralding.

While the resonant-KCQ can be initialized from a vacuum state by applying a CQR pulse immediately after ramping up the stabilization drive, a sufficiently long relaxation time before the CQR pulse is necessary to initialize the detuned-KCQ. This is because the vacuum state can be mapped to the excited states with a detuned stabilization drive (Materials and Methods). In the experiments, the initialization sequence is shown in Fig. 2A, along with the corresponding potential profiles and wave-functions in Fig. 2B. By ramping up the two-photon stabilization drive, the potential of the SNAIL oscillator is converted to a double-well pseudopotential. Notably, due to the detuning Δ of the two-photon stabilization drive, the vacuum state is mapped to the even-parity excited state of the pseudopotential, which is out of the computational manifold. Therefore, a 400-μs relaxation time is added to allow this excited state to decay to the ground states in the computational manifold. Finally, the detuned-KCQ state is collapsed onto the |+Z states by a CQR pulse (Materials and Methods).

Fig. 2.

A five-panel figure shows initialization, bit-flip times, and phase-flip times for detuned-K C Q.

Initialization, bit-flip times, and phase-flip times. (A) The sequence for detuned-KCQ initialization. (B) The evolution of the potential profiles and wave-functions during the initialization. (C) The numerical simulation of the detuned-KCQ state population transfer during the initialization. (D) The bit-flip time Tz of resonant-KCQ and detuned-KCQ as a function of mean photon numbers. (E) The phase-flip time Ty of resonant-KCQ and detuned-KCQ. The error bars are from fitting uncertainty, and the theory predictions of the bit-flip times are calculated by master-equation simulations illustrated in refs. 33 and 39 and Materials and Methods.

Fig. 2C shows the simulated overlaps of the detuned-KCQ state |ψ(t) with the computational states |Cα±=|±X and the vacuum state |0 during initialization with Δ=2K. The leakage out of the computational basis is defined as pleakage=1|ψ(t)|Cα+|2|ψ(t)|Cα|2. Another fast initialization method based on a chirp pulse has been reported recently (37, 44), but our method achieves higher initialization fidelity despite the long relaxation times, as indicated by the high QNDness over 98% (Materials and Methods, Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

A multi-part figure shows detuned K C Q readout, initialization, and gate calibration. It includes histograms, graphs, and simulations.

Detuned-KCQ readout, initialization, and gate calibration. (A) The histogram of CQR. (B) The collapse of wave-functions corresponding to CQR. (C) The QNDness optimization of CQR with various readout strengths. (D) The SNAIL nonlinear oscillator spectrum in the rotating frame as a function of detuning. (E) The sequence for calibrating X(π/2) gate with 400-μs relaxation time in the initialization. (F) The tunneling between the ground states when the relaxation time is long enough in the initialization. (G) The measured |±Z population oscillation. (H) The numerical simulation of the results above it. (I) The sequence for observing the excited states tunneling with 5-μs relaxation time in initialization. (J) The tunneling between the excited states when the relaxation time is short. (K) The measured population oscillation between excited states. (L) The numerical simulation of the results above.

We characterize the bit-flip time Tz (phase-flip time Ty) of the KCQ by initializing it along the Z-axis (Y-axis) and measuring the decay of the Pauli operator expectation values Z^ (Y^). As shown in Fig. 2 D and E, Tz increases quasi-exponentially in a staircase-like manner with the mean photon number n^=|α|2, while Ty decreases according to Ty=T1/(2n^) (23, 24, 45, 46), where T140 μs is the relaxation time of the SNAIL oscillator. The apparent fluctuation in Ty for the resonant-KCQ can be largely attributed to limited measurement accuracy and the finite number of averages, rather than to intrinsic dependence on the cat size. A master equation simulation, accounting for both single- and two-photon losses, photon heating, and non-Markovian noise mechanisms, captured the behavior of Tz, with discrepancies at high n^ primarily due to increased thermal population (Materials and Methods).

Due to the degeneracy of higher excited states, we observed increased Tz with detuning Δ=2K,4K... (Materials and Methods). Specifically, Tz is higher for Δ=2K compared to Δ=0 with the same mean photon number, and more importantly, the same Ty, as shown in Fig. 2 D and E. Therefore, a detuned-KCQ with Δ=2K is expected to exhibit greater noise bias without additional phase-flip errors, which motivates the exploration of detuned-KCQ for enhanced performance (39, 47).

In the following sections, we focus on the case where n^=5.2 (dashed lines in Fig. 2 D and E) and fix the detuning of the detuned-KCQ to be 2K. At this operating point, Tz is peaking for detuned-KCQ, while Ty remains sufficiently high for quantum gate control. The bit-flip time Tz of detuned-KCQ reaches up to 1.2 ms, approximately three times the 0.38 ms observed for the resonant-KCQ. Meanwhile, the phase-flip time Ty is around 4 μs for both the resonant-KCQ and detuned-KCQ.

Gate Fidelity Characterization

As mentioned earlier, universal single-qubit control of detuned-KCQs is achieved using discrete X(π/2) gates and continuous Z(θ) rotations. The X(π/2) gate is realized by frequency-modulating the two-photon stabilization drive to transiently lower the pseudopotential barrier, while the Z(θ) rotation is implemented via a single-photon drive (Materials and Methods). To estimate the performance of gate operations and, more importantly, the noise structures on resonant- and detuned-KCQ, we implement GST on X(π/2) and Z(π/2) gates to extract the error rates, gate fidelities, and Pauli transfer matrices (PTMs) without SPAM errors (SI Appendix, section 5). The error channels are considered a combination of coherent and stochastic Pauli errors, described by a PTM E=eL. The error generator L is defined as

L=hxHx+hyHy+hzHz+pxPx+pyPy+pzPz, [2]

where Hx(Px),Hy(Py),Hz(Pz) are the coherent (stochastic) error generators with respect to X, Y, and Z axes and hx(px),hy(py),hz(pz) are the corresponding errors (SI Appendix, section 8).

The model violation of GST under completely positive, trace preserving (CPTP) (48) constraints is Nσ=14.51, indicating some out-of-model effects in our system (SI Appendix, section 6). The SPAM-free estimations of the PTMs, errors, and fidelities for X(π/2) and Z(π/2) gates are shown in Fig. 3. For Z(π/2) gates, the stochastic Pauli X and Y errors are significantly smaller than the stochastic Pauli Z errors, confirming the bias preservation. Our KCQs exhibit low coherent errors, as evidenced by similar diamond distances and process infidelity. In fact, the effects of coherent errors are negligible after Pauli twirling (SI Appendix, section 8). According to the extracted process infidelities of the quantum gates, the process fidelities of Z(π/2) and X(π/2) gates for the resonant-KCQ are (99.25±0.067)% and (94.7±0.18)%, and the detuned-KCQ has similar performance with the fidelities of (99.18±0.066)% and (92.5±0.23)%, respectively, signifying state-of-the-art performance (23, 24). The slightly lower gate fidelity of the X(π/2) for detuned-KCQ is mainly due to the longer gate time.

Fig. 3.

Four panels show Pauli transfer matrices, process infidelities, diamond distances, stochastic Pauli errors, and coherent Pauli errors.

GST results. SPAM-free Pauli transfer matrices, process infidelities, diamond distances, stochastic Pauli errors, and coherent Pauli errors for gates on resonant- and detuned-KCQs. (A) resonant-KCQ X(π/2) gate with 367-ns gate time. (B) resonant-KCQ Z(π/2) gate with 70-ns gate time. (C) detuned-KCQ X(π/2) gate with 418-ns gate time. (D) detuned-KCQ Z(π/2) gate with 70-ns gate time. The uncertainty represents the SD of the model fitting, and each circuit in GST is repeated by 1,024 shots.

Even though GST provides a comprehensive description of the noise structures of quantum operations on KCQs and confirms the noise-bias structure for bias-preserving gates, the uncertainty of extracted stochastic Pauli X and Y errors for bias-preserving gates is so large that a faithful estimation of them is not possible. This is because the Pauli X and Y errors are too small to be measured by GST with a shallow circuit depth of 128 at most. Therefore, we will apply the noise-biased dihedral randomized benchmarking method with significantly deeper circuits to accurately extract the rare Pauli X and Pauli Y errors.

Noise-Biased Dihedral Randomized Benchmarking

Quantum operations usually introduce additional noise, which may degrade the noise bias. Therefore, the naive estimations of noise-bias from bit-flip and phase-flip time measurements (23, 24, 39) are not accurate, and it is essential to benchmark the noise-bias of bias-preserving operations of the KCQ. Based on the stochastic Pauli error channel, we define the bit-flip error as pbit=px+py, the phase-flip error as pph=pz, and the noise bias as η=pph/pbit. The conventional randomized benchmarking method based on Clifford gates will mix the bit-flip and phase-flip errors, thereby preventing the estimation of noise bias (49). Therefore, we present an experimental application of the DRB protocol on the KCQ to extract the noise structure of the Z(θ) gates with high precision (41, 42) by applying a benchmarking circuit with a maximum depth over 2,000. This protocol is also extensible to multiqubit gate benchmarking by a recent protocol on CX dihedral groups (42).

The noise-biased DRB protocol samples random operations from the single-qubit D8 dihedral group, which is generated by X(π) and Z(π/4) gates. The X(π) gate for KCQ is trivially a π phase shift of the reference, which can be applied virtually by adding an extra phase to the following control and readout pulses in a noise-free manner. This noise-free virtual X(π) gate generates a bias-preserving D8 dihedral group with Z(π/4) gates. Therefore, the DRB protocol avoids mixing the bit-flip and phase-flip errors, allowing them to be benchmarked separately. However, the noise-free property of the virtual X(π) gate leads to an underestimation of the extracted errors of Z(θ) rotations because the extracted errors are weighted averages of both the noise-free virtual X(π) gate and noisy Z(θ) rotations. Even though such underestimation is minor due to the low weight of the X(π) gate in D8, we proceed to address this underestimation by introducing a scaling factors of 1.07 for pbit and 1.02 for pph calculated from numerical simulations (SI Appendix, section 7). As a result, by applying the DRB protocol, we can precisely extract the bit-flip errors, phase-flip errors, and noise bias of the bias-preserving gates.

We presently explore the noise structure of the resonant-KCQ and detuned-KCQ as a function of Z(θ) gate times, with results shown in Fig. 4A, where the uncertainty of the extracted errors is significantly smaller than that from GST. We also plot the bit-flip and phase-flip errors as predicted by the bit-flip and phase-flip times based on the stochastic Pauli error model (50). For both the resonant-KCQ and detuned-KCQ, the bit-flip error is much lower than the phase-flip error. Clearly, while the phase-flip errors align with the rates inferred from the phase-flip time (green line), the bit-flip error is typically much higher than predicted by the bit-flip time (red and blue lines for resonant- and detuned-KCQs, respectively). We attribute the high bit-flip error at short gate times to the leakage into higher excited states caused by the strong gate drive, which tunnels between the wells of the pseudopotential. As the gate time increases, the bit-flip error approaches the error set by the bit-flip time. These observations highlight an underestimation of the bit-flip errors, and accordingly, an overestimation of the noise bias, based solely on the bit-flip and phase-flip times, underscoring the need for direct benchmarking of the operational noise characteristics. The additional structure of the bit-flip errors with several local minima is related to the details of the gate pulses and leakage, which may provide insights for improving gate performance through pulse shaping (SI Appendix, section 10).

Fig. 4.

Two-part figure shows bit-flip and phase-flip errors of resonant and detuned K C Q versus gate time and noise bias vs. phase-flip errors.

DRB results. (A) The bit-flip pbit and phase-flip pph errors of resonant- and detuned-KCQ, and corresponding estimation p~ph and p~bit based on the bit-flip and phase-flip times measured in Fig. 2. The error bars are smaller than the marker size and therefore not plotted. (B) The noise bias as a function of phase-flip errors.

As shown in Fig. 4A, for gate times longer than 60 ns, the detuned-KCQ has a lower bit-flip error than the resonant-KCQ while maintaining the same phase-flip error, indicating the advantage of the detuned-KCQ with higher noise bias. Fig. 4B further shows the noise-bias of both resonant- and detuned-KCQs with respect to their phase-flip errors. Using the detuned-KCQ, we can achieve a noise bias as high as 250 with phase-flip error rates below 2% for the bias-preserving gate set. This is over twice as large as that for the resonant-KCQ without increasing the phase-flip error. Such high-fidelity bias-preserving gates with a large noise bias, together with high-fidelity quantum nondemolition readout and state initialization, represent the state-of-the-art performance and position detuned-KCQ as a promising platform for the future implementation of hardware-efficient quantum error correction.

Discussion

In summary, we have developed a complete quantum control toolbox for detuned-KCQs, including initialization, universal single-qubit gates, and quantum nondemolition readout. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive experimental benchmarking of noise-biased qubit operations, confirming their bias-preserving properties and revealing the inaccuracy of noise bias estimation from idling bit-flip and phase-flip times. By introducing a detuned stabilization drive to enhance the bit-flip time, we demonstrate the implementation of high-fidelity single-qubit universal quantum operations on a detuned-KCQ, achieving a bit-flip time of 1.2 ms, which is three times the conventional resonant-KCQ, without further introducing more phase-flip noises. Using GST, we extract the detailed noise structure of the noise-biased qubit operations, and measured SPAM-free gate fidelities of over (92.5±0.23)% for the X(π/2) gate and (99.18±0.066)% for the bias-preserving Z(π/2) gate, representing the highest performance reported for KCQs. The minimal bit-flip error and the high noise bias of the bias-preserving gates are further accurately measured by the DRB protocol. While the resonant-KCQ already shows a large noise bias as high as 100 with a phase-flip error rate below 2%, the detuned-KCQ has an even larger noise bias of 250 with a similar phase-flip error rate. With the DRB protocol, we confirmed the enhanced noise-bias without degraded phase-flip error for bias-preserving gates of detuned-KCQ, demonstrating the advantage of detuned-KCQ.

The decay rate of the SNAIL nonlinear oscillator primarily constrains the performance of the detuned-KCQ. Continued advancements in superconducting circuit materials are expected to reduce this decay rate (51). Further performance enhancement of detuned-KCQs can be achieved by engineering faster gate operations through pulse shaping to reduce leakage error (52, 53), or through optimized circuit designs to increase the excited state energy gap (33). In addition, the model violation observed in GST under the CPTP framework for noise characterization implies some out-of-model effects, such as leakage, but a more direct and precise characterization of these errors would be beneficial for optimizing performance.

Our work exemplifies the characterization and benchmarking of noise-biased qubits, providing a framework that can be extended to other quantum systems with structured noises, such as dissipative cat qubits (21, 26, 54), GKP qubits (5557), and binomial qubits (58). Compared to other bosonic qubit platforms with biased noise, the detuned-KCQ uniquely achieves high-fidelity quantum nondemolition readout and universal gate operations simultaneously with low hardware complexity. It is also compatible with recently demonstrated two-qubit gate operations in experiment (59). Leveraging a scalable planar superconducting architecture, our work is well positioned for extension into multiqubit processors, paving the way for the application of noise-biased qubits in QEC. Moreover, the enhanced bit-flip time of the detuned-KCQ presents it as a promising ancilla for universal control of a quantum cavity, effectively mitigating parasitic error propagation (60, 61). As a Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO) with the double-well potential, the detuned-KCQ also opens possibilities for KPO-network-based Ising machines, fostering advancements in analog quantum computing (6264).

Materials and Methods

Detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian and Eigenstates.

The detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian is engineered through a superconducting nonlinear resonator under a strong two-photon stabilization drive. The SNAILs in the resonator provide the nonlinear potential.

USNAIL(ϕ)=βEJcosϕ3EJcosϕextϕ3, [3]

where EJ/ħ=2π×263.2 GHz is the Josephson energy of the large junction in SNAILs, β=0.1 is Josephson energy ratio between the small and large junctions, ϕext is the scaled external magnetic flux threading the SNAIL loop, and ϕ is the associated superconducting phase across each SNAIL.

For a fixed external flux, by Taylor expanding the potential energy up to the fourth order,

USNAIL(ϕ)USNAIL(ϕmin)+k=24gk(ϕϕmin)k, [4]

one can observe that the SNAIL offers both nonzero third-order and fourth-order nonlinearities necessary for engineering the detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian. Under a two-photon stabilization drive, applying the rotating wave approximation in the rotating frame yields the effective Hamiltonian H^detuned-KCQ shown in the main text. Without loss of generality, the two-photon stabilization drive will be assumed to be in-phase, i.e. ϵ2R.

To analyze the eigenenergy and eigenstates of this Hamiltonian, a displacement transformation D^(α) is introduced to obtain the corresponding Hamiltonian in the displacement frame written as

H^detuned-KCQdisp=E+Λa+Λa+Δ~aa+ϵ~2(a2+a2)+Γa2a+Γaa2Ka2a2, [5a]

where the coefficients are given by

E=Δ|α|2K|α|4+ϵ2(α2+α2), [6a]
Λ=Δα+2K|α|2α2ϵ2α, [6b]
Δ˜=Δ4K|α|2, [6c]
ϵ˜2=Kα2+ϵ2, [6d]
Γ=2Kα. [6e]

With a suitable choice of α=(ϵ2+Δ/2)/K, the single-photon drive terms are canceled out (i.e. Λ=0), and the displaced Hamiltonian can be written as

H^detuned-KCQdisp=H0+H1, [7a]
H0=(Δ/2+ϵ2)2K(4ϵ2+Δ)aa, [7b]
H1=12Δ(a2+a2) [7c]
(2ϵ2+Δ)(a2a+aa2)Ka2a2, [7d]

where the eigenstates and energies of H0 are Fock states |n with energy En(0)=Δ/2+ϵ22/K4ϵ2+Δn, and H1 is treated as a perturbation as long as its energy scale is much smaller than the energy gap of the unperturbed system (|ϵ2||K|,|Δ/2|).

First, the perturbed ground state energy is estimated as

E~0=E0(0)+E0(1)+=(Δ/2+ϵ2)2K+Δ2K(4ϵ2+Δ)2+, [8]

In Fig. 5A, we plot the fractional deviation of the estimated ground state energy (E0~) from the exact ground state energy (E0) given by the numerical diagonalization with various two-photon stabilization drive strengths. In the regime of interest where Δ/K2 and ϵ2/K110, the unperturbed ground state energy E0(0) matches the exact ground state energy with less than 5% deviation, which is further improved slightly by the perturbation theory.

Fig. 5.

Multi-figure shows fractional deviation and difference between coherent state and ground state with numerical diagonalization and perturbation theory.

Detuned-KCQ ground state and its energy with Δ=2K. (A) The fractional deviation of the ground state energy estimated by the unperturbed Hamiltonian and perturbation theory. (B) The difference between the coherent state and the ground state of the detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian calculated by numerical diagonalization (ND) and perturbation theory (PT).

Second, the perturbed ground state (up to the first order) is given by

|ψ0=N|02Δ4(4ϵ2+Δ)|2, [9]

where the perturbation introduces the occupation beyond the unperturbed ground states, and N is the normalization factor. After returning to the undisplaced frame, the ground state ends up approximately as the coherent state,

|ϕ=D^(α)|ψ0=N|α2Δ4(4ϵ2+Δ)D^(α)|2|α. [10]

The difference between the coherent state |α and the ground state |ϕ of the detuned-KCQ when Δ=2K is shown in Fig. 5B. The Wigner functions of the ground states when ϵ2/K=1 and ϵ2/K=4 are also plotted in the Inset indicated by the orange and blue stars. Both results from perturbation theory and numerical diagonalization indicate the rapidly decreasing difference between the coherent state and the detuned-KCQ ground state. At the operating point in this work, such a difference is below 0.3%.

Detuned-KCQ Bit-Flip Time Tz Simulations.

We illustrate the simulation of bit-flip times Tz in this section and emphasize the enhancement of bit-flip times when the two-photon stabilization drive is detuned by 2K,4K... due to the degenerate higher excited states (23, 38, 39).

The Kerr-cat qubit inevitably disperses irretrievable information to the environment, leading to incoherent processes. We model the environment by a chain of harmonic oscillators with infinite modes and temperature TE. While the exact dynamics of arbitrary system–environment interaction and environment evolution are intractable analytically, one can construct the master equation describing various effects of the environment on the system under assumptions that generally hold in the experiments, including weak system–environment coupling and a Markovian thermal environment. For simplicity, we consider an environment with fixed thermal distribution and energy-independent coupling with the system. With the above approximations, the master equation has the following form,

dρ^dt=i[H^,ρ^]+lγlD[O^l]ρ^, [11]

where O^l describe three sets of incoherent processes, including O^1, (O^1,)=a^ (a^) for the single-photon dissipation (excitation) process, O^2, (O^2,)=a^2 (a^2) for the two-photon dissipation (excitation) process, and O^ϕ=a^a^ for the dephasing process. The corresponding coefficients γ1,(γ1,)κ(1), γ2,(γ2,)κ(2), and γϕκϕ are single-photon dissipation (excitation), two-photon dissipation (excitation), and dephasing rates, where κ(1) and κ(2) are the single-photon and two-photon spontaneous decay rates, respectively. A detailed derivation of the master equation along with the expressions for γ1,(γ1,),γ2,(γ2,) and γϕ is presented in refs. 23, 33, and 46. Beyond the three incoherent processes above, we also consider a stochastic process that leads to fluctuations in the SNAIL nonlinear oscillator frequency with a noise strength of ξ (23, 33).

With such four processes in a thermal environment with thermal photon population nth=4%, and fitted parameters κ(2)=7 MHz, κϕ=100 Hz, ξ=40 kHz, the experimental behavior of the bit-flip times Tz is accurately modeled as shown by the agreement between the experiment data and master equation simulation results in Fig. 2. The thermal population corresponds to a temperature of 86.9 mK, which is higher than the base temperature of the dilution fridge due to the strong microwave drives. The pure dephasing rate κϕ is lower than that estimated from the T2 values, which is also observed in all related literature (27, 33, 38), and might be due to the nonuniform power spectrum of the dephasing process under strong drive.

Here, we illustrate the effects of each process in detail. As shown in Fig. 6A, we fit the bit-flip times of a resonant-KCQ as a function of two-photon stabilization drive strength ϵ2. When only considering the single-photon dissipation and excitation, i.e. κ(2)=κϕ=ξ=0, the master equation simulation follows the blue curve, overestimating the bit-flip times Tz. By introducing the stochastic frequency fluctuation of the SNAIL nonlinear, i.e., κ(2)=κϕ=0, the master equation simulation successfully modeled the bit-flip times with small ϵ2 following the yellow curve, but failed to model the strongly driven regime. Finally, only by including all four processes does the master equation simulation accurately model the experimental data, as shown by the red curve.

Fig. 6.

A three-panel figure shows bit-flip times T sub z. A, B, and C show experimental data and master equation simulations with fitting parameters.

Master equation simulation. (A) The bit-flip times Tz with different mean photon number and their master equation simulation with the fitting parameters taking different incoherent processes into account. (B) detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian spectrum with detuned two-photon stabilization drive. (C) The bit-flip times Tz with different detuning and their master equation simulation.

Beyond the influence on bit-flip times Tz by the two-photon stabilization drive strength, the detuning of two-photon stabilization drives, with Δ=2K,4K..., can lead to degenerate higher excited states marked by the stars in Fig. 6B, and increase the bit-flip times. We observe Ndeg degenerate points, corresponding to Ndeg1 higher excited degenerate states, when Δ=2(Ndeg1)K. With a fixed two-photon stabilization drive strength ϵ2=4.2K, we measured the bit-flip times with various detuning Δ, as shown in Fig. 6C. The increase of the bit-flip times when Δ=2K and 4K is observed both in experimental data and predicted in the master equation simulations, demonstrating the validity of the theoretical model. A discussion on the performance of detuned-KCQs with Δ=4K is provided in SI Appendix, section 9.

Quantum Control Toolbox for a Detuned-KCQ.

In order to operate a system as a qubit for quantum computing, it is crucial to have reliable state readout, universal quantum control, and state initialization.

The readout of the detuned-KCQ is enabled by a beam-splitter interaction between the detuned-KCQ mode a^ and the readout resonator mode b^. Due to the detuning of the stabilization drive, the rotating frame frequency is referenced at half of the stabilization drive frequency instead of the qubit frequency. Therefore, by applying a cat-qubit-readout (CQR) drive at frequency ωCQR=ωRωS/2, we can engineer a beam-splitter interaction given as

H^BS=ϵCQRab+ϵCQRab, [12]

where ωR is the readout resonator frequency and ϵCQR is the interaction rate.

Such an interaction will populate the readout resonator mode b^ depending on the expectation value of the detuned-KCQ mode a^ as

b^(t+)=2ϵCQRκRa^, [13]

To calibrate the CQR drive, we apply two consecutive CQR pulses with a duration of 4.5 μs for each, and define the QNDness as (PM|+α|M|+α+PM|α|M|α)/2, where PMA|MB represents the probability of getting result A with the second CQR pulse conditioned on having obtained result B with the first CQR pulse. The QNDness is optimized with respect to the CQR drive strengths shown in Fig. 7C, resulting in good separations shown by the histogram in Fig. 7A. Such a quantum nondemolition readout can be utilized to initialize the qubit through heralding. However, as shown in Fig. 7B and discussed later in this section, the qubit states have to stay in the ground states before heralding because such readout cannot distinguish the excited states and the ground state in the same potential well.

The universal single-qubit control of the detuned-KCQ consists of a discrete X(π/2) gate and continuous Z(θ) rotation gates, both implemented via deformation of the double-well pseudopotential. The Z(θ) gates are realized using a single-photon drive at frequency ωS/2 to engineer a Hamiltonian H^d=a^Ω/2+a^Ω/2. This Hamiltonian induces an energy splitting of 2 Re[Ω]α between the |±Z states, resulting in Rabi oscillations on the equator of the Bloch sphere. Calibration and numerical simulations of the Z(θ) gates are detailed in SI Appendix, section 3. The X(π/2) gate, which corresponds to coherent tunneling between the two pseudopotential wells, is implemented by adiabatically lowering the energy barrier separating them. We implement such gate by phase-modulating the two-photon stabilization drive ϵ2(t)=ϵ2(0)eig(t) with g(t) defined as

g(t)=δ0t×sin3π2t/TgtTg/3f(t)1f(Tg)f(t)f(Tg)t>Tg/3, [14]

where Tg is the gate time, δ0 is the modulation depth, and f(t)= exp8(tTg/3)2Tg2 follows a Gaussian profile. The asymmetric modulation profile is chosen to minimize the gate error. Such phase modulation adiabatically introduces a blue-detuning to the two-photon stabilization drive and correspondingly, lowers the energy barrier of the pseudopotential to allow the interwell tunneling, as shown in Fig. 7F.

We calibrate the X(π/2) gate with the sequence shown in Fig. 7E. A CQR pulse (labeled “Herald”) initializes the qubit into |+Z state through heralding. Then, two X(π/2) gate pulses with various modulation depth δ0 and duration are applied. Finally, another CQR pulse (labeled “Readout”) is applied to read out the qubit state. The measured expectation of the Pauli Z operator Z^ is shown in Fig. 7G, which clearly shows population oscillating coherently between the |±Z states. The numerical simulation, based on solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equations, is shown in Fig. 7H in good agreement with the experimental results. Therefore, we calibrate the X(π/2) gate for a detuned-KCQ by optimizing the gate time and the modulation depth to achieve the largest Z^ conversion. Importantly, a sufficiently long relaxation time (400 μs) is necessary for the initialization as discussed in the following.

The initialization of the detuned-KCQ is implemented through the CQR pulse by heralding. The SNAIL nonlinear oscillator mode predominantly remains in the vacuum state |0 with negligible thermal noise at low temperature. Therefore, the resonant-KCQ can be initialized by adiabatically ramping up the two-photon stabilization drive followed immediately by a CQR drive, which maps the vacuum state to the cat state and then collapses it into |±Z. However, this technique fails for the detuned-KCQ because the finite detuning changes the energies of SNAIL nonlinear oscillator states in the rotating frame. As shown in Fig. 7D, a finite Δ alters the spectrum in the rotating frame, causing |0 to no longer be the ground state, while the cat states remain the ground states of the detuned-KCQ Hamiltonian. Consequently, when the two-photon stabilization drive is ramped up, the |0 state is mapped to the higher excited states instead of the ground states. The subsequent CQR drive will then collapse the qubit into excited states in one of the double wells of the pseudopotential, resulting in a failure to initialize the qubit into |±Z states. To address this, it is crucial to introduce sufficient relaxation time before applying the CQR drive, allowing the system to decay into the degenerate ground states. This ensures the validity of preparing the |±Z=|±α state through heralding.

To observe the effect of higher excited states, we applied a sequence similar to that used for calibrating the X(π/2) gate to a detuned-KCQ system with Δ=2K, but with the relaxation time reduced to 5 μs, as shown in Fig. 7I. Due to this shortened relaxation time, the detuned-KCQ states predominantly occupy the excited states, and the pulse sequence captures the population oscillation between these excited states within each well, as illustrated in Fig. 7J. The experimental results, presented in Fig. 7K, show a reduced contrast and tunneling occurring at a lower modulation depth due to the low lifetime and high energy of the excited states, which is in excellent agreement with the numerical simulation shown in Fig. 7L.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chuanhong Liu, Ravi Naik, and Trevor Chistolini for fruitful discussions on experiments. We thank Shruti Puri and Jahan Claes for insightful suggestions. This work was supported by the U. S. Army Research Office under grant W911NF-22-1-0258.

Author contributions

B.Q., A. Hajr, and G.K. designed research; B.Q., A. Hajr, K.W., L.B.N., J.H., I.H., and B.B. performed research; B.Q. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.Q., A. Hajr, J.H., I.H., B.B., L.C., Z.K., C.J., N.G., N.J., H.K., K.-H.L., A. Hashim, N.E.F., Z.P., J.D., A.N.J., D.I.S., and I.S. analyzed data; and B.Q., K.W., L.N., and I.S. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Contributor Information

Bingcheng Qing, Email: bc.qing@berkeley.edu.

Ke Wang, Email: kywang@berkeley.edu.

Long B. Nguyen, Email: longbnguyen@berkeley.edu.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

ZIP file data have been deposited in data for paper entitled “Quantum Benchmarking of High-Fidelity Noise-Biased Operations on a Detuned-Kerr-Cat Qubit” (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16549003) (65).

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Shor P. W., Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Rev. 41, 303–332 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arute F., et al. , Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhong H. S., et al. , Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martinis J. M., et al. , Decoherence in Josephson qubits from dielectric loss. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210503 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bluvstein D., et al. , Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58–65 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reilly D., et al. , Suppressing spin qubit dephasing by nuclear state preparation. Science 321, 817–821 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hashim A., et al. , Randomized compiling for scalable quantum computing on a noisy superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. X 11, 041039 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fowler A. G., Mariantoni M., Martinis J. M., Cleland A. N., Surface codes towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Google Quantum A. I., Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614, 676–681 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Acharya R., et al. , Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920–926 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Michael M. H., et al. , New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031006 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levine H., et al. , Demonstrating a long-coherence dual-rail erasure qubit using tunable transmons. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011051 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aliferis P., et al. , Fault-tolerant computing with biased-noise superconducting qubits: A case study. New J. Phys. 11, 013061 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Y., Kolkowitz S., Puri S., Thompson J. D., Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays. Nat. Commun. 13, 4657 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tuckett D. K., Bartlett S. D., Flammia S. T., Ultrahigh error threshold for surface codes with biased noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050505 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tuckett D. K., et al. , Tailoring surface codes for highly biased noise. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041031 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tuckett D. K., Bartlett S. D., Flammia S. T., Brown B. J., Fault-tolerant thresholds for the surface code in excess of 5% under biased noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 130501 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bonilla Ataides J. P., Tuckett D. K., Bartlett S. D., Flammia S. T., Brown B. J., The XZZX surface code. Nat. Commun. 12, 2172 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu Q., et al. , Engineering Kerr-cat qubits for hardware efficient quantum error correction. SPIE 12015, 50–63 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu Q., et al. , Tailored XZZX codes for biased noise. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013035 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.H. Putterman et al. , Hardware-efficient quantum error correction using concatenated bosonic qubits. Nature 638, 927-934 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Darmawan A. S., Brown B. J., Grimsmo A. L., Tuckett D. K., Puri S., Practical quantum error correction with the XZZX code and Kerr-cat qubits. PRX Quantum 2, 030345 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hajr A., et al. , High-coherence Kerr-cat qubit in 2D architecture. Phys. Rev. X 14, 041049 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grimm A., et al. , Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit. Nature 584, 205–209 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang C., et al. , A schrödinger cat living in two boxes. Science 352, 1087–1091 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lescanne R., et al. , Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator. Nat. Phys. 16, 509–513 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gautier R., Sarlette A., Mirrahimi M., Combined dissipative and Hamiltonian confinement of cat qubits. PRX Quantum 3, 020339 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bild M., et al. , Schrödinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator. Science 380, 274–278 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chávez-Carlos J., et al. , Spectral kissing and its dynamical consequences in the squeeze-driven Kerr oscillator. NPJ Quantum Inf. 9, 76 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hillmann T., Quijandría F., Quantum error correction with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits. Phys. Rev. A 107, 032423 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nguyen L. B., et al. , Empowering a qudit-based quantum processor by traversing the dual bosonic ladder. Nat. Commun. 15, 7117 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pan X., et al. , Protecting the quantum interference of cat states by phase-space compression. Phys. Rev. X 13, 021004 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.B. Bhandari et al. , Symmetrically threaded squids as next generation kerr-cat qubits. PRX Quantum 6, 030338 (2025).
  • 34.Goto H., Universal quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network. Phys. Rev. A 93, 050301 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guillaud J., Mirrahimi M., Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041053 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Puri S., et al. , Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5901 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iyama D., et al. , Observation and manipulation of quantum interference in a superconducting Kerr parametric oscillator. Nat. Commun. 15, 86 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Frattini N. E., et al. , Observation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the Arrhenius law in a double-well parametric oscillator. Phys. Rev. X 14, 031040 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Venkatraman J., Cortiñas R. G., Frattini N. E., Xiao X., Devoret M. H., A driven Kerr oscillator with two-fold degeneracies for qubit protection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2311241121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ruiz D., Gautier R., Guillaud J., Mirrahimi M., Two-photon driven Kerr quantum oscillator with multiple spectral degeneracies. Phys. Rev. A 107, 042407 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carignan-Dugas A., Wallman J. J., Emerson J., Characterizing universal gate sets via dihedral benchmarking. Phys. Rev. A 92, 060302 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Claes J., Puri S., Estimating the bias of cx gates via character randomized benchmarking. PRX Quantum 4, 010307 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frattini N., Sivak V., Lingenfelter A., Shankar S., Devoret M., Optimizing the nonlinearity and dissipation of a snail parametric amplifier for dynamic range. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054020 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu Y., et al. , Dynamic compensation for pump-induced frequency shift in Kerr-cat qubit initialization. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 034060 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jayashankar A., Mandayam P., Quantum error correction: Noise-adapted techniques and applications. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 103, 497–512 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, R. G. Cortiñas, M. H. Devoret, On the static effective lindbladian of the squeezed Kerr oscillator. arXiv [Preprint] (2022). http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11193 (Accessed 20 January 2024).
  • 47.Gravina L., Minganti F., Savona V., Critical schrödinger cat qubit. PRX Quantum 4, 020337 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nielsen E., et al. , Gate set tomography. Quantum 5, 557 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Knill E., et al. , Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates. Phys. Rev. A 77, 012307 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.A. Hashim et al. , A practical introduction to benchmarking and characterization of quantum computers PRX Quantum 6, 030202 (2025).
  • 51.Place A. P., et al. , New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xu Q., Iverson J. K., Brandão F. G., Jiang L., Engineering fast bias-preserving gates on stabilized cat qubits. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013082 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nguyen L. B., et al. , Programmable Heisenberg interactions between floquet qubits. Nat. Phys. 20, 240–246 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Réglade U., et al. , Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds. Nature 629, 778–783 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hänggli L., Heinze M., König R., Enhanced noise resilience of the surface-Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code via designed bias. Phys. Rev. A 102, 052408 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grimsmo A. L., Puri S., Quantum error correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. PRX Quantum 2, 020101 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lachance-Quirion D., et al. , Autonomous quantum error correction of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 150607 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ni Z., et al. , Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit. Nature 616, 56–60 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoshi D., et al. , Entangling schrödinger’s cat states by bridging discrete-and continuous-variable encoding. Nat. Commun. 16, 1–10 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Puri S., et al. , Stabilized cat in a driven nonlinear cavity: A fault-tolerant error syndrome detector. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041009 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.A. Z. Ding et al. , Quantum control of an oscillator with a Kerr-cat qubit. Nat. Commun. 16, 5279 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Álvarez P., et al. , Biased Ising model using two coupled Kerr parametric oscillators with external force. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 207401 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Goto H., Lin Z., Nakamura Y., Boltzmann sampling from the Ising model using quantum heating of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Sci. Rep. 8, 7154 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yamaji T., et al. , Correlated oscillations in Kerr parametric oscillators with tunable effective coupling. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014057 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.B. Qing, data for paper entitled “Quantum benchmarking of high-fidelity noise-biased operations on a detuned-kerr-Cat Qubit”. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/16549003. Deposited 28 July 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Data Availability Statement

ZIP file data have been deposited in data for paper entitled “Quantum Benchmarking of High-Fidelity Noise-Biased Operations on a Detuned-Kerr-Cat Qubit” (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16549003) (65).


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES