Skip to main content
Frontiers in Oral Health logoLink to Frontiers in Oral Health
editorial
. 2026 Jan 28;7:1785571. doi: 10.3389/froh.2026.1785571

Editorial: Strategies for preventing early childhood caries

Moréniké Oluwátóyìn Foláyan 1,2,3,*, Tshepiso Mfolo 1,4,5, Maha El Tantawi 1,2,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC12891213  PMID: 41684723

For decades, Early Childhood Caries (ECC) has been recognized as one of the most common yet preventable chronic diseases of childhood (1), with implications for pain, growth, development, school readiness, and quality of life (2). Evidence shows that ECC is multifactorial, entrenched in a complex web of biological factors (e.g., Streptococcus mutans transmission, dietary sugars), behavioural practices (feeding habits, oral hygiene), and overarching social determinants of health, including socioeconomic status, parental education, and access to care (3) with debilitating effects when left untreated (4). Despite this, global public health and clinical responses have remained disproportionately curative, focusing on restorative treatment after the disease occurs, often under general anaesthesia for severe cases (5, 6). While interventions like silver diamine fluoride (SDF) offer a minimally invasive, cost-effective care (7), and prenatal oral health education is celebrated for offering prevention in a critical window (8), their integration into systemic, cross-disciplinary health strategies has been fragmented and inadequate. A persistent gap exists in translating our understanding of disease aetiology into scalable, equitable, and family-centered preventive frameworks in the first 1,000 days of life from pregnancy to age 2.

This Research Topic of five articles represents a significant stride toward filling this gap, collectively arguing for a foundational reorientation of ECC management. First, two papers leverage digital and communication technologies to expand reach and refine messaging. Lee et al. demonstrate that social media like Instagram have potential as powerful, low-cost platforms to disseminate evidence-based oral health promotion directly to caregivers, addressing the information-access gap. Complementing this, Crystal et al. present a qualitative analysis of parental feedback on SDF therapy that provides crucial insights into the patient-provider encounter. Their work moves beyond clinical efficacy to address communication barriers, parental concerns, and shared decision-making, ensuring that innovative tools are accepted and utilized effectively.

Second, two contributions deepen our understanding of implementation within real-world community and social contexts. Patano et al. analysed the feedback from multiple stakeholders (caregivers, community health workers, dentists) on a behavioural intervention for caregivers of young children undergoing surgery to treat severe ECC. Their analysis underscores the necessity of culturally tailored, feasible, and multi-level interventions. It highlights the indispensable role of community health workers in bridging clinical and home environments. The epidemiological study by Foláyan et al. reinforces the link between parental educational status and ECC, even within a specific local context, reminding us that upstream socioeconomic factors must be explicitly targeted in any comprehensive strategy to prevent ECC.

Finally, the commentary by Foláyan et al. on the first 1,000 days of life and the ECC global data gap serves as a crucial synthesizing and agenda-setting piece. It compellingly argues for positioning oral health as an integral component of early childhood development and maternal-child health programs. By identifying the scarcity of reliable and updated data during this primordial period, the commentary calls for a systemic overhaul of surveillance and research to match the biological and social complexity of ECC.

Together, these papers add dimensions to the field: they validate novel delivery channels (social media, teledentistry), emphasize human-centered design in clinical and behavioural interventions, reaffirm the centrality of social determinants, and issue a clarion call for integrated, data-driven action starting in pregnancy. The evidence is no longer simply calling for a shift toward prevention but mapping the pathway for shifting the paradigm from surgical repair to holistic prevention of ECC.

The next steps are clear. Oral health must be a mandated component of prenatal care packages, well-child visits, and public health nursing programs. Reimbursement models must incentivize preventive counselling and interventions like SDF application. Leveraging non-dental professionals (paediatricians, midwives, community health workers, dietitians) for task sharing (9) requires standardized, interdisciplinary training and clear referral pathways. National and global health tracking systems must integrate core oral health indicators into maternal and child health surveillance systems to close the data gap. Building on the Instagram study, public health agencies must collaborate with communication experts to launch coordinated, evidence-based, and anti-stigma campaigns that reframe ECC as a preventable non-communicable disease. Continuing to pour resources primarily into surgical repair of a preventable disease is ethically and economically unsustainable. These five papers light the way toward a future where every child's right to oral health is secured from the very first days of life, through informed families, supported by integrated healthcare systems, and guided by equitable policies. The paradigm must shift.

Editorial on the Research Topic Strategies for preventing early childhood caries

Footnotes

Edited and Reviewed by: Chun Hung Chu, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. DeepSeek used for creating the outline of the manuscript and for editorial purposes.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Colak H, Dülgergil CT, Dalli M, Hamidi MM. Early childhood caries update: a review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med. (2013) 4(1):29–38. 10.4103/0976-9668.107257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anil S, Anand PS. Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Front Pediatr. (2017) 5:157. 10.3389/fped.2017.00157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jain M, Namdev R, Bodh M, Dutta S, Singhal P, Kumar A. Social and behavioral determinants for early childhood caries among preschool children in India. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. (2015) 9(2):115–20. 10.15171/joddd.2014.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Foláyan MO, Ishola AG, Abodunrin OR, Ndembi N, El Tantawi M. Untreated early childhood caries is a potential disability: policy and programme implications for Africa. Front Oral Health. (2025) 6:1546747. 10.3389/froh.2025.1546747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fineberg HV. The paradox of disease prevention: celebrated in principle, resisted in practice. JAMA. (2013) 310(1):85–90. 10.1001/jama.2013.7518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. (2019) 394(10194):249–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8 Erratum in: The Lancet. 2019 September 21;394(10203):1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Surendranath P, Krishnappa S, Srinath S. Silver diamine fluoride in preventing caries: a review of current trends. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. (2022) 15(Suppl 2):S247–51. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiao J, Alkhers N, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Billings RJ, Wu TT, Castillo DA, et al. Prenatal oral health care and early childhood caries prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Res. (2019) 53(4):411–21. 10.1159/000495187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Foláyan MO, Ahmed B, El Tantawi M. A call for a paradigm shift to community-embedded, home-based primary preventive oral health care in Africa. Frontiers Oral Health. (2026) 6:1751738. 10.3389/froh.2025.1751738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Oral Health are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES