Skip to main content
ACS Polymers Au logoLink to ACS Polymers Au
. 2025 Nov 24;6(1):61–85. doi: 10.1021/acspolymersau.5c00145

Marvelous Characteristics of Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo-Dye Polymers for Electrocatalytic Sensing: An Informative Review

Lokman Liv 1,*
PMCID: PMC12903508  PMID: 41693829

Abstract

Hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye monomers can be electropolymerized onto a supporting electrode surface, providing an electrocatalytic sensing feature due to their unique physicochemical and electrochemical properties. These polymers combine the versatile redox activity of azo groups with the improved conductivity and stability yielded by the conjugation of aromatic functional groups and hydroxyl functionalities. These properties synergistically enable the polymer film platforms to determine target analytes with greater accuracy, selectivity, and sensitivity than bare platforms, thereby facilitating electrocatalytic detection. Moreover, these polymer films have exhibited exceptional stability, consistent reproducibility, and remarkable resistance to fouling, making them well-suited for practical applications. This study evaluated the detection performance of platforms produced by the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-containing azo-dye monomers, and the underlying reasons for the observed electrocatalytic activity of these polymers were discussed using the extended Hückel charge and the Molecular Mechanics Force Field (MM2) calculations. Consequently, this review highlights the potential of hydroxyl-containing azo polymer-based electrodes as advanced electrochemical sensing platforms and provides excellent foresight in their use.

Keywords: hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye, electropolymerization, electrocatalytic determination, electrochemical sensors, electrochemical sensing mechanism, extended Hückel method, molecular mechanics force field method, cyclic voltammetry


graphic file with name lg5c00145_0009.jpg


graphic file with name lg5c00145_0007.jpg

1. Introduction

Azo dyes are synthetic organic compounds characterized by one or more azo (NN) functional groups. These functional groups typically conjugate with aromatic structures, acting as chromophores. Azo dyes are commonly synthesized from phenols and aromatic amines, accounting for nearly 70% of the dyes produced globally. Their extensive functionalization capabilities and a broad spectrum of color diversity have led to widespread use in industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and textiles. The conjugated system formed by the azo bond causes bathochromic shifts, resulting in hues ranging from yellow to red, and even enables blue shifts under specific conditions. Aromatic substitutions influence color properties and allow for extensive structural modifications, providing precise control over the physical and chemical properties. This adaptability contributes to increased thermal and chemical stability.

When hydroxyl groups are used for functionalization, they enhance or introduce properties such as hydrogen bonding, increased electron density, additional resonance structures, reactivity, and improved solubility. These characteristics open new avenues for hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes in various fields including biomedical applications (dyes, drug delivery vehicles, and imaging probes), the textile industry (production of color-stable products), environmental applications (agents for pollutant removal), energy storage (components in batteries and supercapacitors), catalysis (enhancing photocatalytic reactivity) and optical and electrochemical sensing (probes for sensor applications).

Among these applications, using hydroxyl-functionalized azo dye polymers as electrochemical sensor platforms has recently gained significant popularity. ,− Their low cost, pronounced electrocatalytic activity, ease of stable and reproducible electropolymerization, and the inherent advantages of electrochemical methodssuch as simplicity, affordability, portability, high accuracy, sensitivity, and selectivitymake them beneficial materials for sensor development. In addition, it is generally well established that bare electrodes exhibit high impedance and slow redox kinetics. , In contrast, when modified with polymer films, these electrodes demonstrate antifouling properties, particularly beneficial in analyses involving biological matrices such as blood, urine, or saliva. The polymer coating effectively minimizes biofouling caused by lipids, proteins, and cellular materials. Consequently, the signal-to-noise ratio is significantly improved, leading to enhanced analytical sensitivity. Owing to their antifouling characteristics, the stability of these polymer-modified electrodes is also markedly improved. A review of studies on polymer-based electrodes reveals that a poly­(tartrazine)-modified electrode retained 92.8% of its initial response after 12 days for uric acid detection, while a poly­(ponceau)-modified electrode preserved 91.6% stability after 14 days for levodopa determination. Similarly, a poly­(azorubin S)-modified electrode maintained 92.8% of its response after 14 days during nicotine detection. Furthermore, the relative standard deviation values for repeatability were consistently below 5%, and the reproducibility values were below 8% for all these platforms. The results collectively confirm that the developed electrochemical sensing platforms exhibit excellent long-term stability and measurement reliability. Regarding other physicochemical properties of these polymer films, it has been reported that certain specific azo-based polymer films exhibit thicknesses ranging from one to several micrometers after electrodeposition. , The pore sizes of these polymers can vary from a few nanometers to several tens of nanometers, depending primarily on the length and structure of the monomer used. Moreover, the electrical conductivity of these polymers has been shown to depend strongly on their redox state: while the reduced forms typically exhibit conductivities below 100 μS/cm, the oxidized forms display conductivities around 1 mS/cm.

This review explores the conjugation properties of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes, provides an overview of their electropolymerization products as reported in the literature. It also offers suggestions for unreported products, examines their electrocatalytic sensor properties based on the calculations of extended Hückel charges–a semiempirical quantum chemistry method–and the Molecular Mechanics Force Field (MM2) methoda computational model used to describe the forces between atomsfor various analytes in real sample matrices, and evaluates the associated challenges and future perspectives (Figure ). Beyond a mere literature review, this work explains the mechanisms underlying the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye monomers and their electrocatalytic effects.

1.

1

Contributions of this review study to the literature and its key findings (in summary: utilization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes and their application areas, electropolymerization processes and characteristics, computational analyses explaining the electrocatalytic behavior of the polymers, elucidation of sensing mechanisms, and high-accuracy prediction of electropolymerization behavior without experimental procedures).

2. Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo Dyes

Although numerous hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes exist, this section focuses on monomers subjected to electropolymerization and utilized as electrochemical sensors. The structure, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name, common name, the abbreviation of the monomer name and main application fields of these monomers are provided in Table .

1. Monomer Structure, IUPAC and Common Names of the Monomers, and Main Application Fields of the Related Monomers .

2.

2.

2.

2.

3. Electrochemical Sensors Based on Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo-Dye Polymers

It is important to distinguish between mere grafting of dye molecules onto the electrode surface and electropolymerization involving chain growth and electron-delocalized networks. In the reviewed studies, cyclic voltammetry (CV) technique was most commonly employed, typically yielding progressively increasing or decreasing redox peak currents that later stabilized, indicative of film formation on the electrode. The emergence of new redox peaks and potential shifts in several reports further corroborates the occurrence of polymer growth rather than simple dye immobilization. − ,, In one study utilizing chronoamperometry, the electropolymerization potential (1.1 V) corresponding to the monomer oxidation was applied until a steady-state current was achieved. These results provide additional evidence that the resulting coating originated from a chain-growth electropolymerization process rather than mere adsorption or grafting. ,,,,,

In this section, a total of 47 hydroxyl-functionalized azo monomers from the literature, which have been utilized in electropolymerization-based sensors, have been reviewed. This analysis includes details on the monomer’s common name, supporting electrode material, sensor preparation and designation, proposed polymer structure, analyte, and sample application information, as presented in Table .

2. Electrochemical Sensing Applications of the Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo-Dye Polymers (Used Monomer for Electropolymerization, Details of Electropolymerization Process, Proposed Polymer Structure on the Electrode Surface, the Analyzed Substance and Type of Real Sample) .

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

a

Asterisks (*) denote suggested polymer structures. Asterisks (**) denote only the reduced forms of the polymers, as the full structures are not fit within the table.

In the references section of Table , studies marked with (*) did not propose a polymer structure, so we suggested the polymer structures for these studies. While making these suggestions, it is proposed that when the structure contains only a hydroxyl functional group adjacent to the azo group, the azo group converts into imine structures neighboring the rings, while the hydroxyl group transforms into a ketone structure. The resulting polymer film consists of a mixture of structures containing azo-hydroxyl and imine-ketone groups, contributing to the overall enhanced electrocatalytic performance. On the other hand, electropolymerization is suggested to occur through amine groups if the monomer structure contains these groups attached to the aromatic ring(s) in addition to the hydroxyl group. However, it should be noted that the electropolymerization products may not correspond exactly to those presented in Table . The proposed polymeric structures represent the most plausible configurations, selected based on both our experimental findings and consistency with previously reported studies in the literature. ,,,,,,

Therefore, when the related mechanisms are examined in more detail, it can be stated that azo monomers containing hydroxyl functional groupsbeing generally aromatic and π-conjugated in naturetend to adsorb onto carbon-based electrodes. This process is formed through π–π stacking interactions (between the aromatic monomer and the graphitic surface), hydrogen bonding (between the hydroxyl groups of the monomer and surface oxide functionalities), or electrostatic interactions. Subsequently, as illustrated in Figure , the monomer (A) undergoes deprotonation to form structure B, followed by a one-electron oxidation to yield a phenoxy radical (C). The C form can further delocalize its unpaired electron to generate structure D. Ultimately, attachment to the electrode surface may proceed via these C and D radical intermediates, while additional monomer molecules in the medium can also participate in chain propagation through radical coupling. In addition to covalent attachment, weaker physical interactionssuch as π–π stacking, van der Waals forces, or hydrogen bondingmay also contribute to immobilization, albeit to a lesser extent. Because the exact binding site on the electrode surface cannot be definitively determined, the immobilization process is visually represented by thick black lines in Table .

2.

2

Proposed oxidation and radical formation process for hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye monomer.

In cases where the monomer structure contains both amino and hydroxyl functional groups (Figure ), the molecule (I) may lose one proton to form structure II, followed by a one-electron oxidation to generate radical intermediates III or IV. , Under these conditions, in addition to the pathways described in Figure , polymer chain growth through the amino sites is also possible. However, according to previous studies, , polymerization predominantly occurs through the amino termini of such monomers. As a result, the resulting film is typically durable, resistant to washing, and exhibits a semiconducting nature that facilitates efficient electron transfer. ,,

3.

3

Proposed oxidation and radical formation process for amine- and hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye monomer.

We also examined studies in the literature that report an increase in electrocatalytic current for polymer-film modified electrode (PFME) compared to bare electrode (BE), using data of peak potential, analyte type, and limit of detection (LOD) values (Table ). These studies show that polymer structures significantly enhance sensitivity, and this improvement becomes even more pronounced when metal nanoparticles are incorporated into these structures. ,

3. Electrocatalytic Properties of Some Studies Based on Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo-Dye Polymers (Comparison of Peak Potential and Current Responses of the Analyte Obtained at the Polymer Film–Modified Electrode Relative to the Bare Electrode, along with an Evaluation of the Sensitivity of the Analyzed Material).

PFME BE Increase in peak height (%) Peak potential with PFME (mV) Peak potential with BE (mV) Analyte/LOD (nM) ref
Poly(EBT)/CPE CPE 332 675 685 Methdilazine/25.7
Poly(EBT)/PGE PGE 96 550 550 Hydrazine/0.87
AuNPs/oxidized poly(EBT)/GCE AuNPs/GCE 563 118 148 Arsenic(III)/ 77.5
Poly(EBT)/CPE CPE 1700 230 Dopamine/800
Poly(EBT)/GCE GCE 81 1005 1059 3-Aminopyridine/540
Poly(EB)/CPE CPE 176 –485 –475 Riboflavin/210
Poly(TRT)/PGE PGE 130 275 275 Uric acid/100
Poly(AYR)/CPE CPE 500 170 400 Dopamine/600
Poly(AzRS)/PGE PGE 410 700 700 Nicotine/89
Poly(CFB)/PGE PGE 340 118 118 Quercetin/1.9
Poly(PaRe)/MWCNTs-CPE CPE 101 462 455 Acetaminophen/530
Poly(AlR)/PGE PGE 344 190 185 Dopamine, uric acid/10.5, 30.1
792 320 240
Poly(Pon)/PGE PGE 403 180 290 Levodopa/20
AuNPs/poly(Y2G)/PGE PGE 204 140 220 Dopamine, nicotine/58.8, 7.2
526 960 840
Poly(TRT-Pon)/PGE PGE 346 –525 –507 Dipicrylamine/57

In the context of Table , considering three main electrochemical criteriathe lower LOD, the higher increase in peak current relative to the bare electrode, and the shift of the oxidation/reduction potential toward lower/higher valuesthe poly ponceau-film modified electrode (poly­(Pon)/PGE) exhibits the most favorable performance. Structural analysis of the azo-dye monomers reveals that yellow 2g (Y2G) and tartrazine (TRT) have an electron withdrawing pyrazole ring adjacent to the azo linkage, which typically hinders electron delocalization and catalytic activity. In chromotrope fb (CFB) and eriochrome black t (EBT), the presence of strong deactivating sulfonate groups reduces the electron density on the aromatic rings. Moreover, EBT also contains a nitro group, further diminishing its reactivity. Similarly, azorubin s (AzRS) and Patton–Reeder (PaRe) dyes possess sulfonate groups on the hydroxyl-bearing rings, leading to deactivation of the benzene ring. Among the remaining dyesevans blue (EB), allura red (AlR), and ponceau (Pon)although these molecules also contain deactivating sulfonate groups, EB is the most sterically hindered, with bulky substituents that limit the accessibility of its active sites. When comparing AlR and Pon, the latter exhibits a more symmetric and planar molecular structure, allowing better conjugation and more exposed polymerization-active sites. In both molecules, the sulfonate groups are not located on the benzene ring bearing the hydroxyl group. However, the presence of an additional benzene ring in Pon enables a higher degree of electron delocalization. These structural features likely account for the superior electrocatalytic performance of the poly­(Pon) film.

4. Electrocatalytic Sensing Mechanism of Hydroxyl-Functionalized Azo-Dye Polymers

After the electropolymerization of monomers containing hydroxyl and azo functional groups, the resulting polymer structure significantly enhances the reduction or oxidation peak currents of the target analyte. This phenomenon is believed to stem from the ability of the azo and hydroxyl functional groups within the polymer structure to facilitate electron and/or proton transfer efficiently. A review of the studies in Table indicates that proton transfer is generally as crucial as electron transfer for their detection. Consequently, the electrocatalytic effect becomes even more pronounced in electrode reactions where proton transfer is also required. A possible mechanism for this process is illustrated in Figure , which depicts dopamine oxidation on a poly­(EBT) film (containing azo and hydroxyl groups) and a poly­(TrB) film (containing azo, hydroxyl, and amine groups). In this case, the two electrons and two protons released during dopamine oxidation are immediately utilized by the poly­(EBT) and poly­(TrB) films, thereby triggering the electrocatalytic effect. In both cases, electron and proton transfer must occur in the regions where the azo and hydroxyl functional groups are present (red and green regions).

4.

4

(A) Possible polymer film of EBT and (B) TrB, and oxidation mechanism of dopamine along with reduction process of polymer films (electron and proton transfer between polymer fragments and the consequent catalytic enhancement of the redox process).

Apart from dopamine, the electrochemical oxidation or reduction mechanisms of all other analytes reported in the literature using hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye polymers are presented in Figure S1. In addition to these redox mechanisms, the overall reversibility, irreversibility, and quasi-reversibility of the reactions were also evaluated. We proposed novel electrochemical pathways for the detection of analytes such as lansoprazole, 3-aminopyridine, ferulic acid, clenbuterol, dobutamine, and streptomycin whose determination mechanisms were not previously described in the literature (Figure S1).

Accordingly, molecules such as ascorbic acid, acetaminophen, hydroquinone, catechol, chlorogenic acid, rutin, dobutamine, adrenaline, and isoprenaline are presumed to undergo oxidation through their hydroxyl groups, generally exhibiting reversible electrode reactions. In contrast, although levodopa and quercetin share structural similarities and are oxidized via hydroxyl groups, their electrode processes typically proceed in a quasi-reversible manner. It is most likely due to the limited solubility of their oxidation products in the solvent medium. Similarly, molecules such as l-tyrosine, puerarin, ferulic acid, terbutaline, and ractopamine also undergo hydroxyl group oxidation but follow irreversible electrode processes. Compounds such as resorcinol and salbutamol, which can generate radicals during hydroxyl group oxidation and subsequently polymerize, were also investigated for analytical purposes. An another representative example of radical-based oxidation is methdilazine, which undergoes irreversible oxidation through the sulfur atom of its phenothiazine ring to generate a radical species (Figure S1).

Beyond these cases, compounds such as omeprazole, lansoprazole, and 3-aminopyridine undergo hydroxylation in aqueous media, followed by irreversible oxidation to yield ketone functionalities. Adenine and guanine display redox processes similar to prazole derivatives in their initial steps, involving water addition and subsequent irreversible oxidation. However, in their final step, hydrogens bound to the nitrogen atoms of the purine ring are eliminated, leading to a reversible redox reaction (Figure S1).

Apart from the molecules listed above, studies on other compounds reveal distinct redox mechanisms. For instance, isoniazid oxidation proceeds via the loss of two protons and electrons from the carbohydrazide group, forming a double bond between nitrogen atoms, followed by chemical decomposition to release nitrogen gas and produce 4-pyridinecarboxylic acid. In l-cysteine, the presence of thiol groups results in proton loss from these groups during oxidation, forming cystine. Nicotine , oxidation has been explained by several proposed pathways, the most plausible involving the loss of equal numbers of protons and electrons, incorporation of a hydroxyl group, and simultaneous release of methanol. For clenbuterol, the oxidation process likely involves the loss of equal numbers of protons and electrons, with a water molecule binding at the amino terminus, yielding a hydroxylamine derivative. Streptomycin, being protonated at its guanidine groups at physiological pH, is considered to undergo a reversible redox process through the loss of these protons. Riboflavin, in contrast, is reduced via the gain of two protons and two electrons at its benzo­[g]­pteridine moiety. All of the redox reactions described in this section are essentially irreversible except for streptomycin (Figure S1).

Furthermore, hydroxyl-functionalized azo polymer film electrodes can be employed for the determination of transition metals or their different forms by facilitating the oxidation of small organic molecules capable of forming complexes with these metals. For example, molybdate can complex with tiron, followed by oxidation through the hydroxyl terminals of tiron, leading to complex dissociation. Hydrazine undergoes irreversible oxidation by donating four protons and four electrons to release nitrogen gas. Nitrate is irreversibly reduced by two electrons to nitrite, and upon further potential scanning, can accept an additional four electrons to form hydroxylamine. Ethanol oxidation, depending on the alkalinity of the medium, yields acetaldehyde, acetic acid, or carbon dioxide. In addition, due to the electron-mediating capability of these polymer films, anodic stripping voltammetry can be applied for the determination of metal cations (Figure S1).

Taken together, the evaluation of all mechanisms provides clearer evidence that the protons and electrons generated or consumed by the polymer films are responsible for the observed electrocatalytic effect. It should also be noted that an increase in the effective surface area does not occur for each polymer film.

5. The Rationale Behind the Electrocatalytic Effect: Comprehensive Calculations

This section aims to illuminate the underlying truth behind the electrocatalytic effect of platforms created by the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes. To achieve this, the calculation of extended Hückel charges and the MM2 method was used comparatively, both in the presence and absence of hydroxyl groups in the relevant azo dyes, utilizing ChemBio3D Ultra 14.0 software. In the extended Hückel method unlike the conventional Hückel approach, both σ (sigma) and π (pi) orbitals are taken into account. In this study, the standard extended Hückel method was employed, with the Wolfsberg–Helmholz constant set to 1.75. For the MM2 calculations, the following parameters were applied: cubic stretch constant = −2.000, quartic stretch constant = 2.333, X–B, C, N, O–Y stretch–bend interaction force constant = 0.120, X–B, C, N, O–H stretch–bend interaction force constant = 0.090, X–Al, S–Y stretch–bend force constant = 0.250, sextic bending constant = 7 × 10–8, and dielectric constant for charges and dipoles = 1.500. The cutoff distances were defined as follows: 35.000 Å for charge–charge interactions, 25.000 Å for charge–dipole interactions, 18.000 Å for dipole–dipole interactions, and 10.000 Å for van der Waals interactions. Each of these parameters was assigned a quality level of 4, indicating that the corresponding values are experimentally determined and validated.

The extended Hückel charges of the relevant molecules were calculated and are presented in Table . In this table, N1, N2, N3, and N4 represent the azo nitrogen, (N)-C refers to the carbon adjacent to the azo group and the hydroxyl-bearing carbon, while (O)-C denotes the carbon atom bonded to the hydroxyl group. In the notation used, the direct use of the monomer abbreviation refers to the original monomer containing the hydroxyl group, whereas the subscript ‘na’ denotes the corresponding form of that monomer lacking the hydroxyl group. Examining the (O)-C extended Hückel charges, it is observed that higher values are obtained when the hydroxyl group is present. This is due to oxygen withdrawing electron density from the bonded carbon, making that carbon more positively charged. On the other hand, when analyzing (N)-C extended Hückel charges, generally lower values are observed in hydroxyl-containing monomers (Only in the monomers of AzRS and EBT was a minimal decrease observed, while SY showed no change). This can be attributed to the conjugation between the oxygen’s lone pairs, the benzene ring, and the azo group’s π-bond, which increases electron localization in this region. As a result, the carbon bonded to the azo group carries a lower charge in hydroxyl containing monomers (the numbering was assigned according to IUPAC conventions for molecules with two hydroxyl groups, where the first azo group in the structure was considered the reference as shown in the first rows of Table ).

4. Extended Hückel Charge Results for Azo-Dye Monomers with (Denoted as Monomer) and without Hydroxyl Groups (Denoted as Monomerna) (Demonstration of the Active Role of Hydroxyl Groups in the Electrocatalytic Effect through the Analysis of Extended Hückel Charges of Azo Groups and Their Adjacent Carbon and Hydroxyl Atoms).

Monomer N1 N2 N3 N4 (N)-C (O)-C
ACBK 0.848 0.527     0.116 0.389
0.233 0.236
ACBKna 0.816 0.863     0.234 0.074
0.194 0.005
ACR176 0.833 0.730     0.091 0.310
ACR176na 0.018 0.016     0.178 –0.007
AlR 0.727 0.804     0.100 0.250
AlRna 0.761 0.821     0.177 –0.035
AYR 0.850 0.763     0.137 0.304
AYRna 0.831 0.816     0.178 0.010
AzRS 0.772 0.962     0.327 0.431
AzRSna 0.740 0.907     0.303 0.049
CFB 0.743 0.785     0.092 0.278
CFBna 0.738 0.833     0.170 –0.033
DB15 0.729 0.777 0.684 0.791 0.077 0.256
0.069 0.292
DB15na 2.633 2.633 –0.134 0.037 0.141 –0.033
0.034 –0.073
DB71 0.689 0.672     0.066 0.229
DB71na 0.729 0.636     0.130 –0.115
EBT 0.767 0.091     0.021 0.271
–0.002 0.265
EBTna 0.016 0.786     0.018 0.003
–0.032 0.175
EB 0.703 0.932 0.545 0.836 0.132 0.209
0.136 0.198
EBna 0.664 0.943 0.671 0.939 0.151 –0.063
0.038 0.038
HNB 0.916 0.222     0.260 0.415
0.077 0.056
HNBna 0.177 0.081     0.303 0.049
0.060 –0.027
PaRe 0.553 0.658     0.033 0.196
0.037 0.173
PaRena 0.543 0.618     0.085 –0.164
0.085 –0.166
Pon 0.801 0.721     0.089 0.281
Ponna 0.011 0.014     0.170 –0.015
PR 0.798 0.700     0.069 0.305
PRna 0.817 0.735     0.125 –0.016
Sudan III 0.606 –0.098     –0.047 0.088
Sudan IIIna –0.103 0.015     –0.021 –0.241
SY –0.077 –0.191     0.016 0.060
SYna –0.031 0.021     0.016 0.057
TRT 0.824 0.699     0.140 0.372
TRTna 0.829 0.753     0.190 0.046
TrB 0.783 0.726 0.811 0.653 0.071 0.277
0.090 0.291
TrBna 0.765 0.793 0.832 0.735 0.140 –0.026
–0.013 0.195
Y2G 0.390 0.502     –0.046 0.005
Y2Gna 0.380 0.520     0.005 –0.328

The MM2 method represents molecules’ total potential energy, or steric energy. Calculations were performed for all monomers in the literature, both in the presence of hydroxyl groups (denoted as Monomer) and in their absence (denoted as Monomerna), with the results provided in Table . The parameters in this table are defined as follows:

  • “Stretch”: Energy related to deviations of bond lengths from their optimal values.

  • “Bend”: Energy associated with deviations of bond angles from their optimal values.

  • “Stretch–bend”: Energy required to stretch two bonds within a bond angle when the angle is significantly compressed.

  • “Torsion”: Energy related to deviations of torsional angles in the molecule from their ideal values.

  • “Non-1,4 VDW (van der Waals)”: Energy for interactions between atom pairs separated by more than three atoms, mediated by intermolecular magnetic or electronic fields.

  • “1,4 VDW”: Energy for interactions between atoms separated by two atoms, influenced by intermolecular magnetic or electronic fields.

  • “Dipole/dipole”: Steric energy related to interactions between bond dipoles.

  • “Charge/charge”: Steric energy from interactions between charges at two points.

  • “Charge/dipole”: Steric energy based on the combined interaction of partial charges with bond dipoles and charged groups.

5. The Results of the MM2 Method for Azo-Dye Monomers with (Denoted as Monomer) and without Hydroxyl Groups (Denoted as Monomerna) (Demonstration of the Active Role of Hydroxyl Groups in the Electrocatalytic Effect through MM2-Based Analysis of the Various Energy Forms Possessed by the Entire Molecule).

Monomer Stretch Bend Stretch–Bend Torsion Non-1,4 VDW 1,4 VDW Charge/Charge Charge/Dipole Dipole/Dipole Total Energy (kcal/mol)
ACBK
ACBKna 2.676 409.706 –1.270 94.647 –3.162 22.684 51.732 0.549 44.976 622.538
ACR176 2.940 276.848 –0.809 62.086 –4.310 23.018 22.184 –0.774 27.935 409.118
ACR176na 2.157 274.632 –0.798 56.368 –1.056 24.990 22.046 –2.965 30.224 405.598
AlR 3.201 276.319 –0.757 60.899 –2.702 25.307 15.635 –3.660 27.735 401.976
AlRna 2.831 273.495 –0.659 60.818 0.074 25.852 15.452 –1.274 29.842 406.431
AYR 1.119 7.006 0.164 –11.160 2.917 19.088 –2.897 –1.023 0.803 16.018
AYRna 0.986 5.544 0.185 –11.160 2.878 20.531 –2.951 –1.068 0.170 15.115
AzRS 4.320 416.259 –1.175 91.834 0.090 28.248 54.258 –6.326 43.049 630.559
AzRSna 3.839 410.597 –1.026 94.177 0.331 28.643 51.189 –5.981 45.477 627.247
CFB 3.502 280.623 –0.700 53.443 1.660 27.847 16.057 0.197 28.782 411.411
CFBna 3.152 277.939 –0.615 52.470 1.564 28.754 16.050 –0.921 29.972 408.364
DB15 7.888 567.216 –1.349 112.317 –0.224 50.401 104.234 –10.702 58.406 888.188
DB15na 6.707 560.635 –1.247 107.546 2.443 51.737 103.299 –5.489 60.013 885.644
DB71 7.907 563.865 –1.128 106.246 2.151 61.089 106.120 0.763 60.087 907.100
DB71na 7.366 562.442 –1.108 103.942 3.087 62.446 106.217 –4.358 59.261 899.294
EBT 2.719 142.903 –0.322 16.671 1.425 28.484 –1.763 –15.629 15.773 190.261
EBTna 2.226 141.607 –0.312 10.338 2.020 30.778 –2.037 –3.476 16.034 197.179
EB
EBna 6.638 557.416 –1.425 122.193 1.676 43.580 122.450 2.692 61.451 916.671
HNB 4.327 416.898 –1.234 92.896 –6.419 27.012 54.189 –4.317 43.926 627.279
HNBna 3.839 410.560 –1.026 94.204 0.340 28.644 51.202 –6.000 45.478 627.243
PaRe 3.043 143.066 0.155 –24.193 –0.680 28.522 0.000 –4.604 14.708 160.018
PaRena 2.241 138.483 0.304 –25.600 3.846 30.751 0.000 –4.458 15.590 161.336
Pon 3.303 279.530 –0.642 56.771 –0.439 27.922 30.496 –17.455 30.826 410.312
Ponna 3.279 275.652 –0.688 57.945 –0.118 28.826 27.824 –8.974 29.763 413.509
PR 2.854 282.649 –0.533 74.563 –2.612 30.565 28.504 –26.899 33.196 422.287
PRna 2.490 281.012 –0.462 63.829 –2.099 31.437 27.706 –23.150 34.449 415.212
Sudan III 1.940 10.683 0.194 –24.293 1.413 31.447 –2.369 19.015
Sudan IIIna 1.628 8.343 0.248 –24.500 1.308 32.539 –1.018 18.548
SY 2.448 272.307 –0.763 62.122 –0.966 20.995 15.106 –1.251 28.534 398.532
SYna 2.148 270.085 –0.713 61.777 –1.001 22.053 14.949 –1.668 29.648 397.279
TRT 2.687 285.396 –0.874 66.743 –1.702 19.098 55.205 –1.964 35.228 459.817
TRTna 2.415 284.164 –0.877 66.782 –0.354 19.569 55.476 –0.828 33.481 459.829
TrB 6.858 565.540 –1.478 126.835 5.778 45.070 118.638 –28.808 60.555 898.987
TrBna 5.839 554.017 –1.463 111.689 –0.136 48.189 112.867 3.717 59.214 893.931
Y2G 2.646 282.357 –0.244 30.524 0.240 21.901 –8.217 37.743 366.950
Y2Gna 2.389 280.919 –0.244 26.918 2.437 21.911 –7.767 36.091 362.654
a

MM2 terms could not be calculated for ACBK and EB due to high VDW interactions.

When examining the total energy parameter in Table , it can be observed that the steric energies of the natural hydroxyl-containing forms of the monomers are generally higher. Lower steric hindrance is preferred for straightforward electropolymerization. However, by focusing on other energy types, it is evident that the 1,4 VDW interactions show lower energy values for all monomers with hydroxyl groups compared to their hydroxyl-free forms. When analyzing stretch–bend values, a similar trend is observed, except for the Pon and TRT monomers, where the hydroxyl-free forms exhibit slightly lower energy values. However, the percentage differences are minimal compared to their hydroxyl-containing forms. In the case of the Y2G monomer, the energy values are equal. A similar pattern is generally observed for the non-1,4 VDW energy type, with only the AYR and CFB monomers showing slightly higher energy values than their hydroxyl-free forms. The only exception is the TrB molecule, where the hydroxyl-containing monomer exhibits significantly higher energy. This is likely due to long-range interactions between the hydroxyl and methyl groups at distances exceeding three atoms. Nevertheless, when examining all three energy types (stretch–bend, non-1,4 VDW, and 1,4 VDW) are considered collectively, it is generally observed that the nonhydroxylated form of the monomer exhibits a higher steric energy. Therefore, when evaluations are based solely on these three types of energies and their combined effects, the lower steric energy values obtained for the hydroxyl-containing monomers can be regarded as a strong indicator of enhanced electrocatalytic activity.

In conclusion, when conducting electropolymerization experiments with hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes, these parameters can be pre-examined to make highly accurate predictions, ultimately saving time and resources.

6. Conclusion and Future Perspectives

This study reviewed the production and applications of electrochemical sensor platforms based on the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes. Possible polymer structures and electrode reaction mechanisms of the related analytes were proposed for the studies where no information was provided about these characteristics. The mechanisms by which these polymers sense specific analytes were thoroughly explained with detailed insights. The rationale behind the electrocatalytic effects was clarified through comprehensive calculations using the extended Hückel and MM2 methods.

This study is expected to accelerate research on sensor applications involving the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes. More importantly, researchers can perform extended Hückel and MM2 calculations, as outlined in this review, before conducting any experiments for electropolymerization. This might allow for highly accurate predictions and the efficient use of time and resources. Alternatively, researchers may refer to this review and directly utilize the electropolymerization of hydroxyl-functionalized azo dyes for various research applications.

In addition, future studies could explore the integration of hydroxyl-functionalized azo polymers into flexible or miniaturized sensing platforms. Their tunable redox behavior and surface chemistry make them promising candidates for smart or wearable electrochemical sensor systems, particularly where real-time and on-site monitoring are required.

Supplementary Material

lg5c00145_si_001.pdf (170.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The study was performed at Electrochemistry Laboratory, National Metrology Institute of Turkey (TUBITAK UME).

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acspolymersau.5c00145.

  • Electrochemical redox processes of all analytes detected by hydroxyl-functionalized azo-dye polymers (PDF)

The author declares no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ganjoo R., Verma C., Kumar A., Quraishi M. A.. Colloidal and Interface Aqueous Chemistry of Dyes: Past, Present and Future Scenarios in Corrosion Mitigation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;311:102832. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benkhaya S., M’rabet S., El Harfi A.. Classifications, Properties, Recent Synthesis and Applications of Azo Dyes. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e03271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fatima M., Farooq R., Lindström R. W., Saeed M.. A Review on Biocatalytic Decomposition of Azo Dyes and Electrons Recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2017;246:275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu D., Zhu J., Zheng Y., Fu L.. Electrochemical Sensing Strategies for Synthetic Orange Dyes. Molecules. 2024;29:5026. doi: 10.3390/molecules29215026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Özen A. S., Doruker P., Aviyente V.. Effect of Cooperative Hydrogen Bonding in Azo–Hydrazone Tautomerism of Azo Dyes. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007;111(51):13506–13514. doi: 10.1021/jp0755645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kruszewska-Bąk D., Deska R., Matczyszyn K., Szafert S., Pigulski B.. Hybrids of Polyynes and Azo Dyes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Two-Photon Absorption. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127(24):11720–11729. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tkach V. V., de Paiva Martins J. I. F., Ivanushko Y. G., Yagodynets P. I.. Dye Electropolymerization for Electrochemical Analysis. A Brief Review. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022;12:4028–4047. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC123.40284047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sierra-Rosales P., Berríos C., Miranda-Rojas S., Squella J. A.. Experimental and Theoretical Insights into the Electrooxidation Pathway of Azo-Colorants on Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;290:556–567. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liv L.. A Facile Poly­(Allura Red) Film for Signal-Amplified Electrochemical Sensing of Dopamine and Uric Acid in Human Plasma and Urine. Microchem. J. 2023;195:109425. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.109425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liv L., Portakal M., Çukur M. S., Topaçlı B., Uzun B.. Electrocatalytic Determination of Uric Acid with the Poly­(Tartrazine)-Modified Pencil Graphite Electrode in Human Serum and Artificial Urine. ACS Omega. 2023;8(38):34420–34430. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liv L., Demirel Z.. Ponceau Polymer Film for Electrocatalytic Sensing of Levodopa in Human Serum, Urine, and Pharmaceutical Formulation. Microchem. J. 2024;197:109784. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.109784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zahran M.. Conducting Dyes as Electro-Active Monomers and Polymers for Detecting Analytes in Biological and Environmental Samples. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19943. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liv L., Karakuş E.. Signal-Enhanced Electrochemical Determination of Quercetin with Poly­(Chromotrope Fb)-Modified Pencil Graphite Electrode in Vegetables and Fruits. ACS Omega. 2023;8:12522. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liv L.. Catalytic Competence of Gold Clusters Decorated Yellow 2 G Polymer Composite Film for Voltammetric Sensing of Dopamine and Nicotine in Biological Fluids. Synth. Met. 2024;309:117765. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2024.117765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liv L.. Unprecedented and Laborless Polymer Film of Azorubin S for Electrocatalytic Sensing of Nicotine in Human Serum and Saliva. Electroanalysis. 2024;36:e202400014. doi: 10.1002/elan.202400014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bian Y., Pan Q., Zhu Y., Liang J., Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Zhang S., Qian S., Geng Z., You Z., Cieplak M., Sharma P. S., Zhang Y., He Y., Zhu B.. Durable Conducting Polymer Electrodes Pursue Low Impedance, Antifouling, and Electrochemical Stress Tolerance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023;621:156902. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Saxena S., Sen P., Soleymani L., Hoare T.. Anti-Fouling Polymer or Peptide-Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for Improved Biosensing in Complex Media. Adv. Sens. Res. 2024;3(5):2300170. doi: 10.1002/adsr.202300170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou L., Li X., Zhu B., Su B.. An Overview of Antifouling Strategies for Electrochemical Analysis. Electroanalysis. 2022;34(6):966–975. doi: 10.1002/elan.202100406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zinggeler M., Schär S., Kurth F.. Printed Antifouling Electrodes for Biosensing Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(51):56578–56584. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c17557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rehan H. H.. Electrosynthesis of Conducting Polymer Films from the Azo Dye Methoxy Red. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2000;30(8):945–951. doi: 10.1023/A:1004089413266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nattiq M. A., Mohammed M. Q., Ibrahem I. K.. Synthesis and Investigation of Linear Optical Properties of Novel Azo Dye Polymer Films. J. Basrah Res. 2013;39(3):23–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jagadale S. D., Bhosale S. V., Bhosale S. V.. A Novel Benzoquinone-Azo Linked Polymer-Based Active Electrode Material for High-Performance Symmetric Pseudocapacitors. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024;141(43):e56140. doi: 10.1002/app.56140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Watts, B. Azo-Based Porous-Organic Polymers for Energy Storage and Selective Gas Adsorption. Doctoral dissertation, Te Herenga WakaVictoria University of Wellington. November 28, 2024. DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.27926832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pacheco J. C., Olean-Oliveira A., Teixeira M. F. S.. Understanding the Performance of a Nanocomposite Based on a Conjugated Azo-Polymer and Reduced Graphene Oxide with Photoelectrically Switchable Properties by Analyzing the Potential Profile during Photocurrent Generation. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020;221(18):2000225. doi: 10.1002/macp.202000225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gettar R. T., Gautier E. A., Servant R. E., Batistoni D. A.. Eriochrome Black T as a Post-Column Reagent for the Ion Chromatographic Determination of Rare Earths. J. Chromatogr. A. 1999;855(1):111–119. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00694-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rovina K., Prabakaran P. P., Siddiquee S., Shaarani S. M.. Methods for the Analysis of Sunset Yellow FCF (E110) in Food and Beverage Products- a Review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016;85:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yao L., Xue X., Yu P., Ni Y., Chen F.. Evans Blue Dye: A Revisit of Its Applications in Biomedicine. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2018;2018:7628037. doi: 10.1155/2018/7628037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Khayyat L., Essawy A., Sorour J., Soffar A.. Tartrazine Induces Structural and Functional Aberrations and Genotoxic Effects in Vivo. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3041. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dey A. K., Sangal S. P., Sinha S. N., Munshi K. N.. Chromotrope 2B as a Chromogenic Agent for the Photometric Determination of the Rare Earths. Microchem. J. 1965;9(3):282–287. doi: 10.1016/0026-265X(65)90047-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Salem I. A., Shaltout M. H., Zaki A. B.. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalytic Oxidation of Some Azo Dyes Using Copper­(II) Ions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020;227:117618. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou Y., Tang W., Wang J., Zhang G., Chai S., Zhang L., Liu T.. Selective Determination of Dopamine and Uric Acid Using Electrochemical Sensor Based on Poly­(Alizarin Yellow R) Film-Modified Electrode. Anal. Methods. 2014;6(10):3474–3481. doi: 10.1039/C3AY42216J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhenqian Z., Sihler S., Ziener U.. Alizarin Yellow R (AYR) as Compatible Stabilizer for Miniemulsion Polymerization. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;507:337–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ahmed A., Usman M., Yu B., Ding X., Peng Q., Shen Y., Cong H.. Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Toxic Alizarin Yellow R Dye from Industrial Wastewater Using Biosynthesized Fe Nanoparticle and Study of Factors Affecting the Degradation Rate. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020;202:111682. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chailapakul O., Wonsawat W., Siangproh W., Grudpan K., Zhao Y., Zhu Z.. Analysis of Sudan I, Sudan II, Sudan III, and Sudan IV in Food by HPLC with Electrochemical Detection: Comparison of Glassy Carbon Electrode with Carbon Nanotube-Ionic Liquid Gel Modified Electrode. Food Chem. 2008;109(4):876–882. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shevale V. B., Dhodamani A. G., Koli V. B., Barkul R. P., Jadhav J. P., Delekar S. D.. Efficient Degradation of Azorubin S Colourant in the Commercial Jam-Jelly Food Samples Using TiO2-CoFe2O4 Nanocomposites in Visible Light. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017;89:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Palanisamy K., Kannan P., Sekar A.. Evaluation of Chromotrope FB Dye as Corrosion Inhibitor Using Electrochemical and Theoretical Studies for Acid Cleaning Process of Petroleum Pipeline. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2018;12:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2018.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu K., Long H., Xing R., Yin Y., Eremin S. A., Meng M., Xi R.. A Sensitive Chemiluminescent Immunoassay to Detect Chromotrope FB (Chr FB) in Foods. Talanta. 2017;164:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jantorn P., Nualla-ong A., Sotthibandhu D. S.. Novel Hydroxy Naphthol Blue-Based Recombinase Polymerase Amplification for the Rapid Detection of Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius. Res. Vet. Sci. 2025;183:105520. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ukkund S. J., Puthiyillam P., Anqi A. E., Taqui S. N., Ali M. A., Syed U. T., Alghamdi M. N., Siddiqui M. I., Alshehri H. M., Safaei M. R., Mir R. A., Elfasakhany A., Eed E. M., Goodarzi M., Soudagar M. E. M.. A Recent Study on Remediation of Direct Blue 15 Dye Using Halloysite Nanotubes. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:8196. doi: 10.3390/app11178196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hong H.-Y., Yoo G.-S., Choi J.-K.. Direct Blue 71 Staining of Proteins Bound to Blotting Membranes. Electrophoresis. 2000;21(5):841–845. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000301)21:5<841::AID-ELPS841>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Orak C.. Enhanced Degradation of Procion Red MX-5B Using Fe-Doped Corn Cob Ash and Fe-Doped g-C3N4. Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2024;46(1):14244–14258. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2024.2417044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Strober W.. Trypan Blue Exclusion Test of Cell Viability. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 1997;21(1):A.3B.1–A.3B.2. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomas T., Mascarenhas R. J., Cotta F., Guha K. S., Swamy B. E. K., Martis P., Mekhalif Z.. Poly­(Patton and Reeder’s Reagent) Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for the Sensitive Detection of Acetaminophen in Biological Fluid and Pharmaceutical Formulations. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2013;101:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang X., Fu Z., Chen X., Peng C., Xu X., Wei W., Li F., Xu J.. Use of a Novel Metal Indicator to Judge Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Detecting the 35S Promoter. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017;409(4):881–889. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-0084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. El Messaoudi N., Miyah Y., Singh N., Gubernat S., Fatima R., Georgin J., El Mouden A., Saghir S., Knani S., Hwang Y.. A Critical Review of Allura Red Removal from Water: Advancements in Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation Technologies, and Future Perspectives. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024;12(6):114843. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.114843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ahmed S. M., El-Zomrawy A. A., Al-Kamali A. S. N., Ghaleb K. A. S.. Ponceau 6R Dye Decoloration and Chromate Reduction Simultaneously in Acid Medium. Arab. J. Chem. 2015;8(4):500–505. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Dogdu Okcu G., Tunacan T., Dikmen E.. Photocatalytic Degradation of Yellow 2G Dye Using Titanium Dioxide/Ultraviolet A Light through a Box-Behnken Experimental Design: Optimization and Kinetic Study. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A. 2019;54(2):136–145. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2018.1530540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ziyatdinova G. K., Guss E. V., Morozova E. V., Budnikov H. C.. An Electrode Based on Electropolymerized Sunset Yellow for the Simultaneous Voltammetric Determination of Chlorogenic and Ferulic Acids. J. Anal. Chem. 2021;76(3):371–380. doi: 10.1134/S1061934821030163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yao H., Sun Y., Lin X., Tang Y., Huang L.. Electrochemical Characterization of Poly­(Eriochrome Black T) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode and Its Application to Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine, Ascorbic Acid and Uric Acid. Electrochim. Acta. 2007;52(20):6165–6171. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Daneshinejad H., Chamjangali M. A., Goudarzi N., Roudbari A.. Application of a Thin Film of Poly­(Solochrome Black T) as a Redox Mediator for the Electro-Catalytic Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine and Acetaminophen in the Pharmaceutical and Biological Samples. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2016;58:532–540. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shetti N. P., Ilager D., Malode S. J., Monga D., Basu S., Reddy K. R.. Poly­(Eriochrome Black T) Modified Electrode for Electrosensing of Methdilazine. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020;120:105261. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mohammed Modawe Alshik Edris N., Abdullah J., Kamaruzaman S., Saiman M. I., Sulaiman Y.. Electrochemical Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly­(Eriochrome Black T)/Gold Nanoparticles Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Simultaneous Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Uric Acid. Arab. J. Chem. 2018;11(8):1301–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Liv L., Nakiboğlu N.. Highly Sensitive and Selective Voltammetric Method for the Determination of Hydrazine at a Poly­(Eriochrome Black T) Modified Pencil Graphite Electrode (p-EBT/PGE) Anal. Lett. 2022;55(5):688–699. doi: 10.1080/00032719.2021.1960362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liv L., Nakiboğlu N.. Voltammetric Determination of Molybdenum Using Polymer Film Modified Pencil Graphite Electrodes. Anal. Lett. 2020;53(7):1155–1175. doi: 10.1080/00032719.2019.1700268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wei Y., Luo L., Ding Y., Liu X., Chu Y.. A Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Poly­(Eriochrome Black T) for Sensitive Determination of Adenine and Guanine. Microchim. Acta. 2013;180(9):887–893. doi: 10.1007/s00604-013-1007-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Elshafey R., Ashour W. F.-D., Radi A.-E.. Poly-Eriochrome Black T Decorated with Nickel Hydroxide Nanoparticles Modified Electrode for the Electrochemical Detection of Streptomycin and Probing Its Interaction with Double-Stranded DNA. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024;171(7):077518. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad650a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. AFŞAR M., ELÇİ A., Dursun Z.. Gold Nanoparticles/over-Oxidized Poly-Eriochrome Black T Film Modified Electrode for Determination of Arsenic. Turkish J. Chem. 2022;46:2123–2134. doi: 10.55730/1300-0527.3508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Asadpour-Zeynali K., Baghalabadi V.. Electrocatalytic Determination of Isoniazid by a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Poly (Eriochrome Black T) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Res. 2017;4(1):31–40. doi: 10.22036/abcr.2017.40874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu X., Luo L., Ding Y., Kang Z., Ye D.. Simultaneous Determination of L-Cysteine and L-Tyrosine Using Au-Nanoparticles/Poly-Eriochrome Black T Film Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Bioelectrochemistry. 2012;86:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Reddaiah K., Reddy M. M., Raghu P., Reddy T. M.. An Electrochemical Sensor Based on Poly (Solochrome Dark Blue) Film Coated Electrode for the Determination of Dopamine and Simultaneous Separation in the Presence of Uric Acid and Ascorbic Acid: A Voltammetric Method. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2013;106:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mohammed Modawe Alshik Edris N., Abdullah J., Kamaruzaman S., Sulaiman Y.. Voltammetric Determination of Hydroquinone, Catechol, and Resorcinol by Using a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly­(Eriochrome Black T) and Gold Nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta. 2019;186(4):261. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-3376-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mostafiz B., Fotouhi L., Dorraji P. S.. An Electrochemical Sensor Based on an Eriochrome Black T Polymer and Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Simultaneous Determination of Omeprazole and Lansoprazole. Anal. Methods. 2020;12(32):4072–4079. doi: 10.1039/D0AY01078B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Konnur S. B., Naik P. S., Naik P. B., Nandibewoor S. T.. Electro Analysis of 3-Aminopyridine at Poly Eriochrome Black T Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode and Its Oxidation Mechanism. Chem. Data Collect. 2020;25:100336. doi: 10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuskur C. M., Swamy B. E. K., Shivakumar K., Jayadevappa H., Sharma S. C.. Poly (Sunset Yellow) Sensor for Dopamine: A Voltammetric Study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019;840:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.03.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Charithra M. M., Manjunatha J. G.. Fabrication of Poly (Evans Blue) Modified Graphite Paste Electrode as an Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive and Instant Riboflavin Detection. Moroccan J. Chem. 2021;9:J-Chem. doi: 10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v9i1.18239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shaikshavali P., Karimunnisa Begum S., Mahammad Sadik S.. A Novel Electrochemical Sensor Based on Multi Walled Carbon Nano Tubes/Poly (Evans Blue) Composite for the Determination of Dopamine in Presence of 5-HT and FA. J. Propuls. Technol. 2023;44:2043–2050. doi: 10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i3.652. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ge C., Rahman M. M., Li X., Lee J.-J.. Simultaneous and Interference-Free Detection of Hydroquinone and Catechol on Poly (Evans Blue)-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016;163(10):B556. doi: 10.1149/2.0901610jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shaikshavali P., Reddy T. M., Venkataprasad G., Gopal P.. A Highly Selective Electrochemical Sensor Based on Multi Walled Carbon Nano Tubes/Poly (Evans Blue) Composite for the Determination of l-Dopa in Presence of 5-HT and Folic Acid: A Voltammetric Investigation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2018;15(8):1831–1841. doi: 10.1007/s13738-018-1380-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lin L., Chen J., Yao H., Chen Y., Zheng Y., Lin X.. Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine, Ascorbic Acid and Uric Acid at Poly (Evans Blue) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Bioelectrochemistry. 2008;73(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang J., Mu J., Ma J., Yang Y., Wang M., Zhu L., Du X.. Determination of Rutin and Puerarin in Teas and Pharmaceutical Preparations Using Poly (Evans Blue) Film-Modified Electrodes. J. Food Drug Anal. 2012;20:7. doi: 10.6227/jfda.2012200307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuskur C. M., Kumara Swamy B. E., Jayadevappa H.. Poly (Evans Blue) Sensor for Catechol and Hydroquinone: A Voltammetric Study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019;833:512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Teradale A. B., Chadchan K. S., Ganesh P.-S., Das S. N., Ebenso E. E.. Synergetic Effects of a Poly-Tartrazine/CTAB Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Sensor towards Simultaneous and Interference-Free Determination of Benzenediol Isomers. React. Chem. Eng. 2023;8(12):3071–3081. doi: 10.1039/D3RE00318C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Li X., Xu G., Hu R.. Selective Determination of Dopamine and Uric Acid at Poly­(Acid Red 176) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013;8(2):1920–1927. doi: 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)14277-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Amini N., Shamsipur M., Gholivand M. B., Barati A.. A Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Carbon Quantum Dots and Polyalizarin Yellow R Dyes for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxidation and Nanomolar Detection of L-Cysteine. Microchem. J. 2017;131:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sunil Kumar Naik T. S., Mwaurah M. M., Kumara Swamy B. E.. Fabrication of Poly (Sudan III) Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Sensor for Dopamine: A Voltammetric Study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019;834:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Chandra U., Kumara Swamy B. E., Gilbert O., Pandurangachar M., Reddy S., Shankar S. S., Sherigara B. S.. Poly­(Amaranth) Film Based Sensor for Resolution of Dopamine in the Presence of Uric Acid: A Voltammetric Study. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010;21(12):1490–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2010.07.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Daneshinejad H., Chamjangali M. A., Goudarzi N., Amin A. H.. Modification of Glassy Carbon Electrode with Poly­(Hydroxynaphthol Blue)/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite and Construction a New Voltammetric Sensor for the Simultaneous Determination of Hydroquinone, Catechol, and Resorcinol. Mater. Res. Express. 2018;5(3):035307. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/aab28e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Doğan H. Ö., Akbulak T., Nadaroğlu H., Hacımüftüoğlu A.. Electrochemical Determination of Nitrate on Ag Nanoparticles-Decorated Poly (Direct Blue 15) Electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2023;35(9):e202200442. doi: 10.1002/elan.202200442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Kumar S. A., Lo P.-H., Chen S.-M.. Electrochemical Selective Determination of Ascorbic Acid at Redox Active Polymer Modified Electrode Derived from Direct Blue 71. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008;24(4):518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mohammed Modawe Alshik Edris N., Sulaiman Y.. Ultrasensitive Voltammetric Detection of Benzenediol Isomers Using Reduced Graphene Oxide-Azo Dye Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020;203:111026. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Taei M., Hasanpour F., Habibollahi S., Shahidi L.. Simultaneous Electrochemical Sensing of Cysteine, Uric Acid and Tyrosine Using a Novel Au-Nanoparticles/Poly-Trypan Blue Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017;789:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.02.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Yeşilyurt M. K., Kurt Urhan B., Öztürk Doğan H., Çomaklı Ö., Nadaroğlu H.. Construction of Palladium Nanoparticles Supported-Poly­(Trypan Blue) Electro-Catalyst towards Ethanol Oxidation. Synth. Met. 2023;293:117288. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2023.117288. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pandurangachar M., Swamy B. E. K., Gilbert O., Sherigara B. S., Chandra U.. Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine, Ascorbic Acid and Uric Acid at Poly­(Patton and Reeder’s) Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2009;4(5):672–683. doi: 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)15173-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lin X., Ni Y., Kokot S.. A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for the Analysis of β-Agonists: The Poly­(Acid Chrome Blue K)/Graphene Oxide-Nafion/Glassy Carbon Electrode. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;260:508–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Edris N. M. M. A., Abdullah J., Kamaruzaman S., Sulaiman Y.. Ultrasensitive Reduced Graphene Oxide-Poly­(Procion)/Gold Nanoparticles Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Selective and Simultaneous Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine, and Uric Acid. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019;166(8):B664. doi: 10.1149/2.0931908jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Daşdemir E., Aslan N., Şen N., Liv L.. A First in Class Disposable Copolymer-Graphite Platform for Electrocatalytic Detection of Dipicrylamine Explosive in Wastewater and Soil Samples. Microchem. J. 2025;214:113930. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2025.113930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Olgaç N., Karakuş E., Şahin Y., Liv L.. Electrochemical Biosensing of Cortisol in a Hormone Tablet and Artificial Bodily Fluids. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023;132:109622. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yu J., Jia J., Ma Z.. Comparison of Electrochemical Behavior of Hydroxyl-Substituted and Nonhydroxyl-Substituted Azo Dyes at a Glassy Carbon Electrode. J. Chinese Chem. Soc. 2004;51(6):1319–1324. doi: 10.1002/jccs.200400191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Acar E. T., Ortaboy S., Hisarlı G., Atun G.. Sensitive Determination and Electro-Oxidative Polymerization of Azodyes on a Carbon Paste Electrode Modified with Bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015;105–106:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kurutas E. B.. The Importance of Antioxidants Which Play the Role in Cellular Response against Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress: Current State. Nutr. J. 2015;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12937-016-0186-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rodrigues Filho G., Almeida F., Ribeiro S. D., Tormin T. F., Muñoz R. A. A., Assunção R. M. N., Barud H.. Controlled Release of Drugs from Cellulose Acetate Matrices Produced from Sugarcane Bagasse: Monitoring by Square-Wave Voltammetry. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2016;42(7):1066–1072. doi: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1107093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Swamy N. K., Mohana K. N. S., Hegde M. B., Madhusudana A. M., Rajitha K., Nayak S. R.. Fabrication of Graphene Nanoribbon-Based Enzyme-Free Electrochemical Sensor for the Sensitive and Selective Analysis of Rutin in Tablets. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2021;51(7):1047–1057. doi: 10.1007/s10800-021-01557-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Bacil R. P., Garcia P. H. M., Serrano S. H. P.. New Insights on the Electrochemical Mechanism of Epinephrine on Glassy Carbon Electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022;908:116111. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Olmo F., Garoz-Ruiz J., Carazo J., Colina A., Heras A.. Spectroelectrochemical Determination of Isoprenaline in a Pharmaceutical Sample. Sensors. 2020;20:5179. doi: 10.3390/s20185179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Li H., Wang S., Cui F., Zhuo B., Wang S., Zhao C., Liu W.. Sensitive and Selective Detection of Puerarin Based on the Hybrid of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Molecularly Imprinted Polymer. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020;185:113221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Chokkareddy R., Kilele J. C., Redhi G. G.. A Novel Electron Transfer Kinetic for Terbutaline Detection Using Tio2-MWCNTs-IL Modified GCE. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023;307:128104. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Keerthi M., Kumar Panda A., Wang Y.-H., Liu X., He J.-H., Chung R.-J.. Titanium Nanoparticle Anchored Functionalized MWCNTs for Electrochemical Detection of Ractopamine in Porcine Samples with Ultrahigh Sensitivity. Food Chem. 2022;378:132083. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Goyal R. N., Oyama M., Singh S. P.. Fast Determination of Salbutamol, Abused by Athletes for Doping, in Pharmaceuticals and Human Biological Fluids by Square Wave Voltammetry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2007;611(1):140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Shetti N. P., Nayak D. S., Bukkitgar S. D.. Electrooxidation of Antihistamine Drug Methdilazine and Its Analysis in Human Urine and Blood Samples. Cogent Chem. 2016;2(1):1153274. doi: 10.1080/23312009.2016.1153274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Chomisteková Z., Culková E., Bellová R., Melicherčíková D., Durdiak J., Timko J., Rievaj M., Tomčík P.. Oxidation and Reduction of Omeprazole on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode: Mechanistic, Kinetic and Sensing Performance Studies. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2017;241:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Manikandan R., Deepa P. N., Narayanan S. S.. Simultaneous Electrochemical Determination of Adenine and Guanine Using Poly 2-Naphthol Orange Film-Modified Electrode. Ionics (Kiel). 2020;26(3):1475–1482. doi: 10.1007/s11581-019-03279-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Rastogi P. K., Ganesan V., Azad U. P.. Electrochemical Determination of Nanomolar Levels of Isoniazid in Pharmaceutical Formulation Using Silver Nanoparticles Decorated Copolymer. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;188:818–824. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mehmeti E., Kilic T., Laur C., Carrara S.. Electrochemical Determination of Nicotine in Smokers’ Sweat. Microchem. J. 2020;158:105155. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ganesamurthi J., Shanmugam R., Chen S.-M.. Electrochemical Evaluation of Vitamin B2 through a Portable Electrochemical Sensor Based on Binary Transition Metal Oxide in Various Biological and Vegetable Samples. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022;169(9):096505. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac8c01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pérez-Gallent E., Figueiredo M. C., Katsounaros I., Koper M. T. M.. Electrocatalytic Reduction of Nitrate on Copper Single Crystals in Acidic and Alkaline Solutions. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;227:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yu E. H., Krewer U., Scott K.. Principles and Materials Aspects of Direct Alkaline Alcohol Fuel Cells. Energies. 2010;3:1499–1528. doi: 10.3390/en3081499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

lg5c00145_si_001.pdf (170.7KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Polymers Au are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES