Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jan 26;69(3):2145–2159. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01797

Design, Synthesis, and Pharmacokinetic Profiling of Fluorinated Reversible N‑Alkyl Carbamate Derivatives of Psilocin for Sub-Hallucinogenic Brain Exposure

Marco Banzato , Martina Colognesi , Lorena Lucatello , Stefano Comai †,§,, Gianfranco Pasut , Francesca Capolongo , Laura Orian , Lucia Biasutto #, Anna Signor , Daniela Gabbia , Paolo L Manfredi ∇,*, Sara De Martin †,*, Andrea Mattarei †,*
PMCID: PMC12910641  PMID: 41586631

Abstract

Psilocybin, the phosphorylated prodrug of psilocin, holds therapeutic promise across a range of neuropsychiatric conditions, yet its clinical utility is constrained by acute psychoactive effects. Here, we report the rational design, synthesis, and evaluation of a focused library of fluorinated reversible N-alkyl carbamate derivatives of psilocin aimed at reducing acute psilocin exposure and thereby limiting hallucinogenic-like effects. Carbamate bond stability was systematically modulated by varying the number and positioning of fluorine atoms on the alkyl promoiety. The resulting compounds exhibited finely tuned hydrolysis under physiological conditions. A selected lead compound (4e) showed favorable oral bioavailability and efficient brain penetration while undergoing partial bioconversion to psilocin. Notably, 4e displayed intrinsic serotonergic activity at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors but induced attenuated psychotropic effects relative to psilocybin. Overall, these findings highlight fluorinated carbamate chemistry as a versatile platform to control psilocin exposure and serotonergic signaling, rather than the development of a classical pharmacologically inert prodrug.


graphic file with name jm5c01797_0013.jpg


graphic file with name jm5c01797_0011.jpg

Introduction

Psychedelic compounds are experiencing renewed interest in biomedical research and drug development. Accumulating evidence highlights a central role of serotonin (5-HT) signaling pathways in modulating neuroplasticity, a process with therapeutic implications for a range of neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, , substance use disorder, , and neurodegenerative diseases. Serotonergic psychedelics such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and psilocin (PSI), have been shown to increase dendritic complexity, promote spine formation, and stimulate synaptogenesis following a single hallucinogenic dose in rodent models. The molecular mechanisms underlying these effects remain a thriving and constantly evolving area of investigation.

Psilocybin (PSY), a naturally occurring tryptamine and the 4-O-phosphate ester prodrug of PSI, has a long but discontinuous history in neuropsychiatric research. PSY and related serotonergic psychedelics were extensively investigated in the 1950s and 1960s; however, by the early 1970s, political and cultural pressures led to the discontinuation of nearly all clinical and preclinical research in this field. Decades later, renewed interest emerged as modern, academically driven research and clinical trials demonstrated the safety and therapeutic potential of PSY in mood and anxiety disorders. , In parallel with this academic renaissance, PSY has become the focus of active clinical development, with multiple ongoing trials and increasing pharmaceutical and biotechnology interest in serotonergic psychedelic therapies. Notably, placebo-controlled phase II trials conducted at New York and Johns Hopkins Universities reported sustained improvements in anxiety and depression up to six months after a single oral hallucinogenic dose of PSY. , Similarly, an open-label study in patients with treatment-resistant depression found that two hallucinogenic doses of PSY administered 1 week apart resulted in rapid and durable symptom relief, lasting at least three months. , However, a subsequent double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing PSY with the SSRI escitalopram found no significant difference in efficacy, raising questions about its advantage over existing antidepressants. Indeed, the acute psychotropic effects of PSY remain a major concern and have historically limited its clinical potential. , Therapeutic discrepancies emerged in the clinical use of PSY can be ascribed to the individual variability in its pharmacokinetic profile after oral administration. PSY is rapidly dephosphorylated in the intestinal lumen and during first-pass metabolism to yield PSI, with no detectable levels of PSY in plasma. PSI can undergo Phase I hepatic metabolism through oxidative pathways involving monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A)-mediated deamination followed by aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-dependent oxidation to the inactive metabolite 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (4-HIAA), , as well as through minor cytochrome P450-mediated routes, including CYP2D6. , However, the predominant metabolic clearance pathway of PSI is Phase II conjugation, namely efficient glucuronidation by the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) family, yielding psilocin-O-glucuronide as the major urinary metabolite. This extensive conjugative metabolism results in a short plasma half-life of approximately 3 h. ,, The phosphate group in PSY protects the 4-hydroxy (4-OH) moiety of PSI from glucuronidation during absorption, enabling systemic delivery of unconjugated PSI and reducing the dose needed to elicit a therapeutic response.

Although previous reports have described serotonergic indole derivatives, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of protecting groups at 4-OH position of PSI on oral pharmacokinetics. A notable early example is a Sandoz patent by Albert Hofmann, claiming O-acetylpsilocin (psilacetin) and other 4-O-alkyl esters. However, these derivatives were not clinically developed, as they do not appear to offer substantial pharmacokinetic or pharmacological advantages over psilocybin, as recently reported for the psilacetin derivative. More recently, a compelling manuscript by Raithatha et al. reported benzyl ester and benzyl thiocarbonate prodrugs of PSI that achieved therapeutically relevant plasma levels, neuroactive responses, and behavioral efficacy in mouse models. Eklund et al. further investigated ester-based PSI prodrugs and PSI salts as scalable and cost-effective alternatives to PSY, with comparable efficacy. Of particular relevance to this study, they were the first to disclose a 4-O-carbamate PSI prodrug; however, the resulting compound exhibited excessive chemical and enzymatic stability, limiting its suitability as a pharmacologically viable prodrug.

Importantly, over the last 20 years, the practice of “microdosing”chronic administration of subhallucinogenic psychedelic doses (typically ≈1/10th of a standard psychoactive dose)has gained widespread attention. , Based on anecdotal reports and uncontrolled observational studies, microdosing has been associated with perceived improvements in energy, mood, cognition, anxiety, and creativity. More recent controlled studies have begun to validate these claims for LSD and PSY in both preclinical and clinical contexts, underscoring a growing interest for the potential clinical applications of serotonergic modulators at nonpsychedelic doses or formulations. However, the current paucity of controlled trials has determined a lack of scientific consensus regarding the efficacy of microdosing strategies.

This emerging paradigm led us to design a new class of PSI derivatives capable of (1) protecting the 4-OH group from Phase II glucuronidation during absorption, (2) facilitating blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, and (3) enabling sustained, subhallucinogenic release of PSI. We hypothesized that low-level, continuous delivery of PSI to the central nervous system (CNS) could enhance its neuroplastic effects while minimizing undesirable psychotropic activity.

Herein, we report the rational design, synthesis, and characterization of a focused library of five 4-O-(N-alkyl carbamate) PSI derivatives. Carbamate esters of phenolic drugs have previously been shown to improve oral absorption, reduce Phase II metabolism, and enable sustained CNS release. , To enhance BBB permeability, we employed small, lipophilic alkyl promoieties and modulated their stability by strategic replacement of hydrogen atoms with fluorine atoms at different positions in the aliphatic promoiety. We assessed the chemical stability of the synthesized compounds in physiologically relevant pH environments, their metabolic stability in human liver microsomes (HLMs) and S9 fractions and their degradation kinetics in human plasma. Based on these findings, a lead compound was selected for further in vivo characterization of its ADME, toxicity, and pharmacodynamic properties.

Results and Discussion

Rational Design and In Silico DFT Studies of Psilocin Reversible Carbamate Derivatives

Electronic and physicochemical parameters were considered in the rational design of reversible 4-O-carbamate PSI derivatives. Lipophilicity and low molecular weightcritical for blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeabilitywere prioritized, in line with extensive literature supporting their importance for CNS-targeting agents. In fact, the BBB is characterized by tight junctions between endothelial cells of brain capillaries, resulting in a semipermeable barrier that prevent paracellular transport but permits passive diffusion of suitably lipophilic, low-molecular-weight compounds, as well as active transport of specific substrates via dedicated transporters.

An optimal reversible PSI derivative must strike a balance between chemical stability and lability: it should resist premature hydrolysis and Phase II conjugation (notably glucuronidation) during absorption and first-pass metabolism, yet it should release PSI at a rate sufficient to produce sustained pharmacological activity before undergoing further systemic and central metabolism. To this end, we designed a series of 4-O-(N-alkyl carbamates) of PSI, varying the degree of electron-withdrawing substitution on the aliphatic chain of the promoiety to fine-tune carbamate hydrolysis kinetics. In fact, base-induced hydrolysis of N-monosubstituted carbamates proceeds via deprotonation of the nitrogen atom, followed by elimination to form an isocyanate intermediate which rapidly adds water and decomposes releasing carbon dioxide and the free amine (Scheme ).

1. Base-Induced Hydrolysis Mechanism of N-Monosubstituted Carbamate Esters.

1

Increasing the electron-withdrawing character around the carbamate nitrogen accelerates this rate-determining deprotonation step, resulting in faster hydrolysis rate. Based on these preliminary considerations, we chose to strategically take advantage of the small and highly electronegative fluorine atom to rationally impart an increasingly strong electron withdrawing effect on the carbamate N-atom of the resulting PSI derivatives (Figure A), while maintaining a 350 Da MW cutoff and suitable lipophilicity for BBB penetration. To confirm the specific destabilizing effect of fluorine atoms on the urethane bond, we included a nonfluorinated isobutyl carbamate as a control.

1.

1

(A) Chemical structures of the designed PSI carbamate derivatives 4a–e. (B) Fully optimized molecular structures of compounds 4a–e; level of theory: BLYP-D3­(BJ)/TZ2P.

To predict stability trends, we performed a DFT-based in silico analysis. Structures of compounds 4a–e were fully optimized at BLYP-D3­(BJ)/TZ2P level of theory (see computational details in Supporting Information S44). Consistent with the reported pK a of PSI, the dimethylamino group of the tryptamine scaffold was modeled in its protonated form. For carbamates 4a and 4b, which bear relatively long and flexible alkyl substituents (trifluoropropyl and isobutyl groups, respectively), greater conformational freedom was expected. However, to enable a meaningful and direct comparison among the synthesized compounds, we selected conformers structurally related to those of compounds 4c–especifically, those in which the alkyl chain extends in the opposite direction relative to the dimethylamino group (Figure B).

The corresponding carbamate N-deprotonated forms were also fully optimized using the same computational protocol. The energy differences (ΔE) between the neutral and anionic forms (Table ) were used as proxies for the thermodynamic tendency toward deprotonation. In fact, while absolute pK a values determination in solution require complex modeling, these ΔE values provided a meaningful comparative measure of carbamate acidity across the series.

1. Energy Difference between the Carbamate N-Atom Deprotonated Species and the Corresponding Parent Compound .

compound ΔE (kcal mol–1)
4a –3.40
4b –7.50
4c –9.29
4d –11.89
4e –18.33
a

Level of theory: BLYP-D3­(BJ)/TZ2P.

A progressive and significant increase in the acidity of the carbamate NH proton (i.e., more negative ΔE) was observed from compound 4a to 4e, consistent with the increasing electron-withdrawing character of the substituents on the carbamate chain. These findings supported a systematic trend in chemical lability across the series and provided a strong rationale for the experimental synthesis of the designed PSI carbamate derivatives.

Chemical Synthesis

PSI was synthesized from commercially available 4-(benzyloxy)-1H-indole (BOI) following the procedure reported by Raithatha et al. with slight modifications. Our optimized route (Scheme ) significantly improved overall yield (68 vs 38%). In particular, formation of an undesired indoline byproduct in the final Pd-catalyzed hydrogenation step was minimized by replacing gaseous H2 with ammonium formate under reflux, enabling more precise reaction control.

2. Reagents and Conditions: (i) (COCl)2, Et2O, 0 °C, 1 h, then Me2NH, 83%; (ii) LiAlH4, THF, 0 °C to rt, 1 h, Then Reflux, 16 h, 88%; (iii) Pd/C, NH4HCO2, MeOH, 20 min, 93%.

2

We then developed a two-step, one-pot method for the synthesis of PSY from PSI (Scheme ) modifying established procedures.

3. Reagents and Conditions: (i) LDA, TBPP, −78 to −10 °C, 2 h; Then Pd/C, H2, MeOH, rt, 2 h, 85%.

3

In detail, the phosphorylation of PSI using tetrabenzylpyrophosphate (TBPP) and lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) typically yields complex mixtures of benzylated intermediates due to intramolecular O-to-N benzyl group migration. , Previous strategies aimed at isolating specific zwitterionic phosphate intermediates were labor-intensive and poorly reproducible. In our streamlined approach, quenching the phosphorylation reaction with a saturated solution of ammonium chloride followed by extraction into ethyl acetate (EtOAc) yielded a crude mixture that, upon Pd-catalyzed hydrogenolysis, cleanly furnished PSY. This one-pot procedure afforded the highest reported yield for PSY synthesis (85%) while significantly simplifying the overall workflow. Importantly, the method proved to be highly reproducible, scalable, and compatible with standard laboratory conditions, thus offering a practical and efficient route to PSY for both research and development purposes.

PSI 4-O-carbamate derivatives were synthesized via a well-established , two-step sequence (Scheme ).

4. Reagents and Conditions: (i) BNPC, DMAP, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 70–93%; (ii) PSI, DMAP, THF, rt, 16 h, 78–88%.

4

First, the primary amine starting material (ASM) of each alkyl promoiety (a–e) was reacted with bis­(4-nitrophenyl) carbonate (BNPC) to generate the corresponding activated urethanes (3a–e). These intermediates were then coupled to PSI under mild transesterification conditions to afford the final PSI 4-O-carbamate derivatives (4a–e) in good overall yield.

In Vitro Evaluation of Psilocin Carbamate Derivatives: Chemical, Plasma, and Metabolic Stability

The stability of PSI 4-O-carbamate derivatives was evaluated in aqueous buffers reproducing the pH conditions of the gastrointestinal tract and compared to that of PSY. All tested compounds remained stable for at least 24 h (see Supporting Information S33) in acidic media (0.1 M HCl, 37 °C), used here as a chemical proxy of the gastric environment. In contrast, hydrolysis to PSI was observed under near-neutral intestinal conditions (pH 6.8 and 7.4, see Supporting Information S35 and S37), with faster hydrolysis rates at pH 7.4 (Table ). Consistent with previous reports, PSY remained stable under all in vitro conditions tested. As anticipated, electron-withdrawing substituents on the carbamate promoiety accelerated hydrolysis, with degradation rates following the order: 4a < 4b < 4c < 4d < 4e. These findings are in strong agreement with the DFT calculations, which predicted increased carbamate acidity and corresponding bond destabilization across the series, resulting in a reduction of the half-life by approximately 1 order of magnitude from the least (4a) to the most (4e) labile compound. Plasma stability was similarly influenced by electron-withdrawing substituents, with degradation rates increasing from compound 4a to 4e, consistent with trends observed in PBS at pH 7.4. Notably, hydrolysis proceeded 5–10 times faster in plasma than in buffer (see Supporting Information S39), suggesting a significant contribution from enzymatic processes. However, since the magnitude of this enzymatic effect was comparable across all the synthesized compoundsas reflected by the consistent ratio between hydrolysis rate constants in PBS (pH 7.4) and in plasmachemical hydrolysis remains the main determinant of relative lability within the series, justifying the comparative use of DFT-derived acidity parameters.

2. Observed Pseudo-First-Order Hydrolysis Rate Constants of Compounds 4a–e Determined in Aqueous PBS at pH 6.8, pH 7.4, and in Human Plasma .

  PBS 0.1 M, pH 6.8, 37 °C
PBS 0.1 M, pH 7.4, 37 °C
plasma, 37 °C
compound k (h –1 ) × 10 3 t 1/2 (h) k (h –1 ) × 10 3 t 1/2 (h) k (h –1 ) × 10 3 t 1/2 (h)
PSY 0 0 0
4a 1.1 ± 0.2 648 5.7 ± 0.2 122 66 ± 2 11
4b 3.0 ± 0.2 232 12.5 ± 0.4 56 98 ± 4 7
4c 4.0 ± 0.2 172 16.6 ± 0.7 42 87 ± 2 8
4d 7.9 ± 0.3 87 33.0 ± 1.0 21 200 ± 7 3
4e 15.1 ± 0.4 46 62.0 ± 2.0 11 297 ± 4 2
a

Rate constants were obtained by best fitting the experimental data to a first-order exponential equation, [C] = [C]0 × ekt . Data are reported as mean ± standard error (see Experimental Data in Supporting Information S33–S41).

Similar conclusions were drawn regarding metabolic stability. As shown in Table , PSY and most of the synthesized compounds remained essentially stable, with concentrations decreasing by less than 30% following 360 min of incubation with human liver microsomes (HLMs) and cytosolic (S9) fractions. A partial exception was compound 4e, which showed a 40 and 24% reduction in concentration upon incubation with HLMs and S9, respectively, in line with its previously determined hydrolysis rate at physiological pH. It should be noted that the chemical, plasma, and metabolic stability evaluations described above were intended as preliminary screening assays to assess the relative stability of the synthesized compounds. We acknowledge that these experiments were conducted with limited replication (n = 3 per condition), which may constrain statistical robustness. Nevertheless, the consistency of the results across conditions provides a degree of confidence that supported downstream lead selection.

3. Metabolic Stability of PSY and Compounds 4a–e Following Incubation with Human Liver Microsomes (HLMs) or Cytosolic (S9) Fractions .

  HLMs
compound 0 min 10 min 20 min 30 min 60 min 120 min 240 min 360 min
PSY 100 ± 41 92 ± 31 98 ± 26 118 ± 20 123 ± 4 116 ± 8 124 ± 21 119 ± 7
4a 100 ± 6 105 ± 4 102 ± 3 98 ± 9 96 ± 4 87 ± 7 81 ± 5 73 ± 3
4b 100 ± 3 92 ± 2 95 ± 2 92 ± 6 90 ± 8 75 ± 3 78 ± 2 64 ± 4
4c 100 ± 3 95 ± 6 96 ± 3 94 ± 4 99 ± 5 94 ± 6 92 ± 3 80 ± 5
4d 100 ± 13 95 ± 5 94 ± 1 85 ± 5 82 ± 5 75 ± 10 83 ± 18 70 ± 8
4e 100 ± 10 95 ± 6 93 ± 5 93 ± 8 80 ± 5 82 ± 2 66 ± 2 60 ± 7
  S9 fraction
compound 0 min 10 min 20 min 30 min 60 min 120 min 240 min 360 min
PSY 100 ± 17 102 ± 8 99 ± 17 100 ± 8 110 ± 19 97 ± 11 95 ± 7 103 ± 13
4a 100 ± 3 99 ± 4 98 ± 1 96 ± 4 93 ± 10 94 ± 3 85 ± 13 86 ± 2
4b 100 ± 3 101 ± 6 98 ± 5 102 ± 4 100 ± 4 89 ± 4 88 ± 1 88 ± 1
4c 100 ± 9 103 ± 8 106 ± 5 106 ± 4 105 ± 8 101 ± 1 95 ± 2 96 ± 1
4d 100 ± 2 96 ± 0 89 ± 4 94 ± 4 88 ± 4 83 ± 2 79 ± 3 76 ± 1
4e 100 ± 4 102 ± 7 98 ± 4 98 ± 7 95 ± 4 87 ± 4 91 ± 7 76 ± 17
a

Data are reported as mean percentage of residual compound ± SD (see Experimental Data in Supporting Information S32).

Based on the in vitro findings, compound 4e was selected as the lead candidate, as it offered the best compromise between chemical stability, metabolic protection, and controlled release. In particular, 4e demonstrated sufficient stability under conditions mimicking gastrointestinal absorption and hepatic first-pass metabolism to protect the phenolic hydroxyl group of psilocin from extensive Phase II glucuronidation  one of its main metabolic pathways. At the same time, its moderate plasma lability is expected to favor PSI release while competing with oxidative metabolic pathways. Such a controlled release profile is expected to mitigate peak plasma concentrations and reduce both the onset and intensity of acute psychedelic effects.

In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Compound 4e

The functional activity of compound 4e was evaluated at the three human 5-HT2 receptor subtypes using in vitro fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) Ca2+-mobilization assays. Notably, 4e produced a clear, concentration-dependent increase in intracellular calcium levels in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells overexpressing 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, consistent with agonist behavior (Figure S11). The compound exhibited mean pEC50 values of 7.79 ± 0.13 at 5-HT2A and 7.10 ± 0.02 at 5-HT2C, with corresponding mean maximal responses (E max) of 33.2 ± 0.9% and 40.9 ± 1.6% relative to the reference agonist serotonin (Table ). In contrast, no measurable agonist response was observed at the 5-HT2B receptor. These results indicate that 4e acts as a selective partial agonist at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, with no intrinsic efficacy at 5-HT2B. Its serotonergic profile closely mirrors that of psilocin (used as a control compound), albeit with slightly lower potency and efficacy at the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C subtypes.

4. Summary of Intracellular Calcium Mobilization Measured at Human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C Receptors Measured Using the FLIPR Assay under Agonist Conditions .

  5-HT2A
5-HT2B
5-HT2C
compound pEC 50 E max % pEC 50 E max % pEC 50 E max %
5-HT 8.61 ± 0.14 98.8 ± 6.0 9.09 ± 0.09 95.3 ± 0.4 9.12 ± 0.01 113.2 ± 3.6
4e 7.79 ± 0.13 33.2 ± 0.9 <4.30   7.10 ± 0.02 40.9 ± 1.6
PSI 7.95 ± 0.07 52.4 ± 4.0 <4.30   7.38 ± 0.35 58.6 ± 38.4
a

Data for 5-HT (positive control), PSI, and compound 4e are reported as pEC50 and E max (%) values (mean ± SD).

In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Compound 4e

The pharmacokinetic profile of compound 4e and its active metabolite PSI was evaluated in mice following oral administration, by measuring their levels in both plasma and brain over a 48 h period (see Analytical Method Validation in Supporting Information S22). Plasma concentration-vs-time curves are presented in Figure A. Compound 4e exhibited rapid systemic absorption, with peak concentrations observed in plasma and brain between 1 and 2 h postadministration. Interestingly, brain levels of 4e exceeded plasma levels across nearly all time points, suggesting efficient central nervous system (CNS) penetration, potentially via passive diffusion across the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as already known for PSI. This observation suggests that the brain retention of compound 4e may, at least in part, result from its engagement with 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, indicating that receptor binding could contribute to its prolonged presence within the CNS, possibly influencing its distribution and duration of action.

2.

2

(A) Concentration–time profile of compound 4e in plasma (blue line) and brain (red line) after oral administration. (B) Comparison of PSI plasma concentration after the administration of PSY (black line) and the equivalent dose of 4e (pink line). (C) Comparison of PSI concentration in brain tissue after the administration of PSY (black line) and the equivalent dose of 4e (pink line).

Figure B depicts plasma concentrations of the active compound PSI following administration of either PSY or 4e. PSY resulted in significantly higher systemic PSI exposure, characterized by both an elevated C max and prolonged plasma concentrations of PSI compared to 4e. These data suggest that 4e may offer a reduced risk of eliciting acute hallucinogenic effects due to lower disposition of PSI in the brain. This interpretation is further supported by the brain concentration profiles depicted in Figure C, where PSI levels were consistently higher following PSY administration. Notably, PSY produced a broader and more sustained brain exposure of PSI, as reflected by a larger area under the curve (AUC), which is consistent with rapid CNS delivery thereby contributing to more pronounced pharmacodynamic effects. In contrast, 4e exhibited efficient brain penetration as the intact derivative and was associated with a delayed and attenuated PSI exposure, as reflected by the pharmacokinetic parameters of 4e-derived PSI (Table ).

5. Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Compound 4e, PSI Derived from 4e, and PSI Derived from PSY in Plasma and Brain .

  4e
PSI (from 4e)
PSI (from PSY)
PK parameter plasma brain plasma brain plasma brain
AUC (ng/mL·h) 8903 ± 799 17816 ± 2103 1019 ± 117 3455 ± 340 3866 ± 625 37049 ± 6270
C max (ng/mL)/(ng/g) 5426 ± 983 5595 ± 653 521 ± 87 1018 ± 272 1775 ± 240 7769 ± 2017
T max (h) 0.25 (0.25) 0.50 (0.25) 0.50 (0.75) 1.00 (0) 0.25 (0.25) 0.25 (0.25)
a

Data are reported as mean ± SD for AUC and C max, and as median (range) for T max.

To gain insight into the mechanisms contributing to the rapid clearance of this PSI derivative, we conducted a preliminary investigation of the possible alternative metabolic pathways of compound 4e. Since glucuronidation was likely prevented by protection of the phenolic hydroxyl group, we hypothesized that its elimination might instead result from oxidative metabolism. To verify this hypothesis, plasma samples from mice treated with 4e were analyzed for the presence of the putative metabolite 4-trifluoroethyl carbamate indoleacetic acid (4-TFEC-IAA), which was qualitatively identified and remained detectable throughout the pharmacokinetic study period (see Figures S12 and S13). This observation supports the hypothesis that oxidative deamination represents a major metabolic pathway for 4e in vivo, contributing to its overall clearance alongside enzymatic and chemical hydrolysis processes.

In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Compound 4e

Figure presents a comparative analysis of the head-twitch response (HTR), a well-established behavioral correlate of psychedelic activity in rodents, following administration of PSY or compound 4e. As shown in Figure A, PSY elicited a significantly higher number of head-twitches relative to the vehicle-treated control group. As expected, this effect was dose-dependent, with mice treated with the higher dose (3 mg/kg) exhibiting significantly more HTRs (p < 0.05) than those receiving the lower dose (1 mg/kg). Treatment with compound 4e (3 mg/kg) resulted in a significantly lower number of HTRs compared to both PSY doses (p < 0.0001).

3.

3

(A) Violin plots reporting the total number of HTRs (#) observed over the entire 45 min period following treatment with vehicle (control), PSY at two doses (1 or 3 mg/kg), or the compound 4e (3 mg/kg). Data are represented as mean and quartiles. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001, One-way Anova analysis followed by the post hoc Newman–Keuls test. (B) Time-course analysis of the number of HTRs divided into four intervals: 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–45 min postadministration for each treatment group. Data are shown for vehicle (black dots), PSY (violet dots when used at 1 mg/kg, blue dots when used at 3 mg/kg), and compound 4e (orange dots).

Figure B illustrates the temporal distribution of HTRs, segmented into four-time intervals (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–45 min). PSY consistently induced the highest HTR counts, particularly during the early time windows (0–10 min at 3 mg/kg and 0–20 min at 1 mg/kg). In contrast, compound 4e did not elicit an early peak response and displayed a delayed and attenuated HTR profile, with a modest increase observed primarily in the intermediate and later time intervals. Vehicle-treated animals showed virtually no response throughout the observation period.

Within the 45 min observation window, these pharmacodynamic findings are consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of the PSI released from 4e, characterized by lower peak brain concentrations and a delayed T max relative to PSI released from PSY. Together, these data indicate that 4e produces a delayed and attenuated behavioral response compared to PSY under the tested conditions. Although an upward trend in HTRs was observed at later time points within this window, HTR events beyond 45 min were sporadic and infrequent in both PSY- and 4e-treated animals, precluding a reliable quantitative analysis at later intervals. For this reason, the observation period was limited to 45 min. This limitation has been taken into account in the interpretation of the data.

In addition, functional assays demonstrated that 4e acts as a partial agonist at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. The combination of intrinsic serotonergic activity, altered pharmacokinetics, and reduced acute behavioral output suggests that the attenuated HTR observed for 4e may arise from a complex interplay between delayed and limited PSI exposure and the pharmacological properties of the parent compound. While speculative at this stage, these observations are consistent with a context-dependent serotonergic signaling profile, reflecting differences in exposure kinetics and receptor engagement relative to PSY. Further studies will be required to clarify the mechanistic basis of these effects.

In Vivo Toxicological Evaluation of Compound 4e

A preliminary toxicological assessment of compound 4e was conducted following a single oral administration at a high dose (100 mg/kg) in rats. Rats were selected due to their established translational relevance for general toxicological studies. The evaluation focused on hematological parameters and standard biochemical markers of liver and kidney function. In addition, histopathological analyses were performed on the liver and kidneys, given their known susceptibility to drug-induced toxicity, choroid plexus, being the most likely target organ of 4e, as well as on the heart and lungs.

No significant alterations were observed in blood cell counts (Table ), or in the histological appearance of liver (Figure ), kidney (Figure ), brain (Figure ), heart and lungs (Figures S14 and S15) tissues. Similarly, liver and renal function markers remained within normal ranges. These findings, although preliminary, suggest that compound 4e is well tolerated at high doses and support its continued development as a CNS-targeted PSI derivative.

6. Hematological Parameters in Rats Treated with Vehicle or Compound 4e .

  vehicle 4e
erythrocytes (×1012/L) 5.98 ± 0.09 5.83 ± 0.35
hemoglobin (g/L) 119 ± 1 119 ± 6
hematocrit (L/L) 0.39 ± 0.05 0.39 ± 0.02
MCV (Fl) 65.4 ± 0.8 67.3 ± 1.6
MCH (pg) 19.9 ± 0.1 20.5 ± 0.4
MCHC (g/L) 305 ± 2 305 ± 4
RDW % 11.2 ± 0.2 11.1 ± 0.1
platelets (×109/L) 861 ± 65 857 ± 70
leukocytes (×109/L) 5.76 ± 2.24 5.92 ± 0.47
neutrophils (×109/L) 0.49 ± 0.12 0.59 ± 0.18
lymphocytes (×109 L) 5.19 ± 2.15 5.22 ± 0.39
monocytes (×109/L) 0.03 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01
eosinophils (×109/L) 0.05 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01
a

Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 per group).

4.

4

In the left panel, representative liver histology (hematoxylin and eosin staining, 20× magnification) of a rat treated with vehicle (A) or with compound 4e (B). In the right panel, plasma concentration of three markers of liver function (ALT, AST, and ALP).

5.

5

In the left panel, representative kidney histology, reporting the cortex (A, D), the medulla (B, E) (hematoxylin and eosin staining, 10× magnification), and glomeruli (C, F) (hematoxylin and eosin staining, 40× magnification) of a rat treated with vehicle (A–C) or with compound 4e (D–F). In the right panel, plasma concentration of three markers of kidney function (urea and creatinine).

6.

6

In the left panel, representative choroid plexi histology (hematoxylin and eosin staining, 10× magnification (A, C) and 40× magnification (B, D) of a rat treated with vehicle (A, B) or with compound 4e (C, D).

Conclusions

In this study, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel series of fluorinated reversible N-alkyl carbamate derivatives of psilocin. Structural diversification of the carbamate promoiety through systematic fluorination enabled fine control over carbamate bond stability without compromising molecular properties relevant to oral absorption and brain distribution. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations supported the experimental findings, showing that increasing fluorination enhances the acidity of the carbamate NH proton and correlates with the observed hydrolysis trends under physiological conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first systematic effort to fine-tune derivative stability within a consistent carbamate scaffold by varying fluorine content and positioning on the promoiety, thereby offering a potentially generalizable strategy for CNS-targeted agents.

As part of the synthetic workflow, we introduced key optimizations to established procedures for psilocin synthesis from 4-(benzyloxy)-1H-indole and for psilocybin phosphorylation using tetrabenzylpyrophosphate. Specifically, we addressed a known issue of intramolecular O-to-N benzyl migration by developing a reproducible and scalable two-step, one-pot protocol, which delivered psilocybin in the highest reported yield (85%) with markedly improved simplicity and efficiency.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies identified compound 4e as a representative lead within the synthesized derivatives. While 4e exhibited favorable oral bioavailability and efficient brain penetration, it underwent partial bioconversion to psilocin in competition with oxidative metabolic pathways. Moreover, functional assays demonstrated that 4e retains intrinsic serotonergic activity at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, indicating that it does not behave as a pharmacologically inert prodrug. Importantly, despite this intrinsic serotonergic activity, compound 4e induced attenuated psychotropic effects in vivo relative to psilocybin, consistent with its reduced acute psilocin exposure and altered pharmacokinetic profile. Taken together, these findings suggest that the behavioral outcome of 4e reflects a context-dependent serotonergic signaling profile arising from the combined effects of intrinsic receptor activity and modified exposure kinetics, an aspect that warrants further investigation.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that fluorinated carbamate chemistry provides a versatile platform for modulating psilocin exposure and serotonergic signaling, rather than a straightforward route to an ideal prodrug, offering a framework for the future design of serotonergic agents with improved pharmacological control and reduced acute psychoactive effects.

Experimental Section

General Chemistry Information

Reagent grade reagents and solvents purchased from commercial suppliers were used without additional purification. Reaction monitoring was performed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using plastic plates (40 × 80 mm) precoated with 200 μm silica gel (60 Å pore size, F254, Merck). Plates were revealed by 254 nm UV light irradiation and/or vanillin staining. Compound purification was performed by silica gel column chromatography (220–440 mesh, 60 Å pore size, Merck, positive nitrogen pressure), or by reverse phase semipreparative HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity II, column Phenomenex Luna C18, 5 μm, 100 Å, 250 × 21.2 mm, elution with water +0.1% TFA/ACN). 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 101 MHz for 13C. 19F NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 spectrometer operating at 376 MHz or a Bruker 200 spectrometer operating at 188 MHz. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm and coupling constants (J) in Hz. MestReNova (v14.2.0-26256) software was used to process NMR spectra, which were calibrated with the residual solvent signal (1H and 13C) or with CFCl3 as reference (19F). Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) was performed on an Agilent 6550 IFunnel Q-TOF with UPLC 1290 Infinity LC/MS system. The purity of the final compounds was assessed by UPLC analysis on an Agilent 1290 Infinity system equipped with DAD detector and a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) column at 25 °C, injecting a 0.1 to 0.5 mM solution in water/acetonitrile or DMSO. Mobile phase A was water +0.1% TFA, while B was ACN + 0.1% TFA. Gradient from 5% B, reaching 100% B in 10 min (for compounds 4a–e and PSI) or initial 1.5 min isocratic 2% B, then reaching 100% B in 10 min (for PSY). Chemical, metabolic, and plasma stability analyses were performed using an UPLC method with an isocratic hold at 2% solvent B for 1.5 min, followed by a linear gradient to 52.5% B over 5.3 min. Detection was carried out at 254 nm, with an injection volume of 5 μL. All tested compounds were >95% pure by UPLC analysis.

2-(4-(Benzyloxy)-1H-indol-3-yl)-N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide (1)

A solution of oxalyl chloride (3.07 mL, 35.8 mmol, 2.0 equiv) in anhydrous diethyl ether (35 mL) was added dropwise over 10 min under nitrogen atmosphere to an ice-cooled solution of 4-(benzyloxy)-1H-indole (BOI, 4.00 g, 17.9 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in anhydrous diethyl ether (45 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h, during which time the evolved HCl gas was continuously purged with a gentle nitrogen flow. When TLC showed the disappearance of the starting material, dimethylamine (2 M in THF) was added dropwise to the mixture until the solution turned basic (this required about 45 mL of dimethylamine, 89.5 mmol, 5.0 equiv). The reaction was stirred for 30 min, until no chloride intermediate was detectable by TLC. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted in EA (300 mL) and washed with a 1:1 solution of brine and saturated NaHCO3 (300 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted 5 times with 100 mL of EA. All the organic fractions were combined, dried over Na2SO4 and then concentrated to dryness. The crude product was purified via flash chromatography using DCM/acetone 8:2 as eluent system, obtaining 1 as a pale-yellow solid (4.780 g, 14.8 mmol, 83% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C19H18N2O3 + H+ [M + H+]: 323.1390 Found: 323.1375. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.23 (s, 1H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.2, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (s, 2H), 2.94 (s, 3H), 2.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 186.67, 169.34, 152.92, 138.99, 137.35, 134.79, 128.71, 127.87, 127.28, 124.64, 115.07, 114.85, 106.05, 105.07, 70.79, 37.53, 34.32.

2-(4-(Benzyloxy)-1H-indol-3-yl)-N,N-dimethylethan-1-amine (2)

To an ice-cooled solution of 1 (4.780 g, 14.8 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in anhydrous THF (70 mL), stirred under nitrogen atmosphere, was dropwise added LiAlH4 (1 M in THF, 30.0 mL, 30.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After that, an additional portion of LiAlH4 (44.0 mL, 44.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv) was added, and the mixture was heated at reflux for 16 h. The reaction was cooled to 0 °C and slowly quenched by dropwise adding a solution of saturated Rochelle’s salt, until no more bubbling was detected. The suspension was then filtered through a Celite pad and the insoluble material was washed with EA. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using CHCl3/MeOH 95:5 + 1% TEA to 9:1 + 1% TEA obtaining 2 as a brown solid (3.862 g, 13.1 mmol, 88% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C19H22N2O + H+ [M + H+]: 295.1805 Found: 295.1803. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.5–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (s, 2H), 3.12–3.06 (m, 2H), 2.73–2.66 (m, 2H), 2.17 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.90, 138.33, 137.55, 128.62, 127.95, 127.93, 122.67, 120.86, 117.52, 114.64, 104.89, 100.42, 70.04, 61.50, 45.07, 25.00.

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-ol (PSI)

A 250 mL round-bottom flask was charged with Pd/C (10% loading, 0.082 g, 15% w/w) and purged with nitrogen. Then, a solution of 2 (0.600 g, 2.04 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in MeOH (28 mL) was added, followed by a solution of ammonium formate (0.579 g, 9.2 mmol, 5.4 equiv) in MeOH (28 mL). The solution was heated to reflux for 20 min, and then quickly cooled to 0 °C. Then, the suspension was filtered over a short Celite pad, which was washed with MeOH. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using CHCl3/MeOH 95:5 + 1% NH3 (7 M in MeOH) to 9:1 + 1% NH3, obtaining PSI as an off-white crystalline solid (0.387 g, 1.9 mmol, 93% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 1.4 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C12H16N2O + H+ [M + H+]: 205.1335 found: 205.1338. 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 12.21 (s, 1H), 9.76 (s, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.34 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 2.95–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.69–2.63 (m, 2H), 2.31 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 153.29, 140.46, 123.32, 122.19, 118.53, 114.71, 106.10, 103.29, 62.70, 45.61, 29.84, 25.97.

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl Dihydrogen Phosphate (PSY)

A solution of PSI (0.100 g, 0.49 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in anhydrous THF (10.0 mL), maintained under nitrogen atmosphere, was cooled to −78 °C and LDA (2 M in THF/heptane/diethylbenzene, 0.304 mL, 0.61 mmol, 1.24 equiv) was added dropwise. After 10 min at −78 °C, tetrabenzyl pyrophosphate (TBPP, 0.328 g, 0.61 mmol, 1.24 equiv) was added, the solution was allowed to warm to −10 °C and stirred for 2 h. At completion, the reaction was quenched with 30 mL of saturated aq. NH4Cl, and extracted with EA (4 × 30 mL). The organic fractions were collected, dehydrated over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained oil was dissolved in MeOH (10.0 mL) and added to Pd/C (10% loading, 0.010 g, 10% w/w), maintained under inert atmosphere. The flask was purged with hydrogen gas and stirred for 2 h at rt. After that, the catalyst was removed by filtration through a short Celite pad, which was washed with MeOH. The solution was evaporated under reduced pressure, the residue dissolved in water/ACN 95:5 and purified via RP semiprep HPLC (ACN gradient 3%/min, RT 5.6 min). After freeze-drying, PSY was obtained as a fluffy white solid (0.119 g, 0.42 mmol, 85% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 1.04 min, isocratic 2% ACN). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C12H17N2O4P + H+ [M + H+]: 285.0999 Found: 285.1004. 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 7.22 (dt, J = 8.2, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.15–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.99 (dt, J = 7.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.37–3.31 (m, 2H), 3.24–3.17 (m, 2H), 2.82 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 145.67 (d, J = 6.8 Hz), 138.68, 124.21, 122.66, 118.42 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 108.93 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 107.99, 107.82, 59.01, 42.78, 21.68.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of 4-Nitrophenyl Activated Carbamates (3a–e)

To an ice-cooled suspension of amine hydrochloride (1.0 equiv) and BNPC (1.0 equiv) in DCM (2.0 mL/mmol), a solution of DMAP (2.0 equiv) in DCM (1 mL/mmol) was added dropwise. The solution was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. At completion, the solution was partitioned between DCM and 0.5 M aq. HCl. The aqueous layer was further extracted 2 times with DCM. The organic fractions were collected, dehydrated over Na2SO4, evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography using DCM as eluent system.

4-Nitrophenyl Isobutylcarbamate (3a)

Obtained from isobutylamine hydrochloride (0.500 g, 6.8 mmol), as a fluffy white solid (1.392 g, 5.88 mmol, 86% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C11H14N2O4 + H+ [M + H+]: 239.1026 found: 239.1023. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.12 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.85 (dh, J = 13.4, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.03–0.93 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.18, 153.38, 144.80, 125.22, 122.03, 48.85, 28.78, 20.02.

4-Nitrophenyl­(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)­carbamate (3b)

Obtained from 2,2,2-trifluoropropylamine hydrochloride (0.100 g, 0.67 mmol), as a fluffy white solid (0.133 g, 0.48 mmol, 72% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C10H9F3N2O4 + H+ [M + H+]: 279.0587 found: 279.0589. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31–8.19 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.27 (m, 2H), 5.53–5.34 (m, 1H), 3.57 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (qt, J = 10.6, 6.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.73, 153.19, 145.10, 126.37 (q, J = 277.4 Hz), 125.31, 122.11, 35.06 (q, J = 4.1 Hz), 33.94 (q, J = 27.9 Hz).

4-Nitrophenyl­(2-fluoroethyl)­carbamate (3c)

Obtained from 2-fluoroethylamine hydrochloride (0.500 g, 5.02 mmol), as a fluffy white solid (0.800 g, 3.51 mmol, 70% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C9H9FN2O4 + H+ [M + H+]: 229.0619 found: 229.0615. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30–8.20 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 2H), 5.50 (s, 1H), 4.67–4.48 (m, 2H), 3.68–3.53 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.83, 153.33, 145.06, 125.31, 122.14, 82.43 (d, J = 167.7 Hz), 41.94 (d, J = 19.8 Hz).

4-Nitrophenyl­(2,2-difluoroethyl)­carbamate (3d)

Obtained from 2,2-difluoroethylamine hydrochloride (0.500 g, 5.02 mmol), as a fluffy white solid (0.976 g, 3.96 mmol, 93% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C9H8F2N2O4 + H+ [M + H+]: 247.0525 found: 247.0523. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30–8.21 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 2H), 6.12–5.72 (m, 1H), 5.43 (s, 1H), 3.75–3.60 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.56, 153.44, 145.24, 125.35, 122.13, 113.41 (t, J = 241.6 Hz), 43.62 (t, J = 26.4 Hz).

4-Nitrophenyl­(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)­carbamate (3e)

Obtained from 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine hydrochloride (1.000 g, 7.38 mmol), as a fluffy white solid (1.687 g, 6.40 mmol, 86% yield). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C9H7F3N2O4 + H+ [M + H+]: 265.0431 found: 265.0430. 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 8.35–8.26 (m, 2H), 7.83 (s, 0H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 1H), 4.10–3.97 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 206.18, 156.93, 156.92, 154.62, 154.62, 145.97, 125.92, 125.63 (q, J = 278.1 Hz), 123.24, 116.57, 43.26 (q, J = 35.0 Hz).

General Procedure for the Synthesis of 4-O-(N-Alkyl carbamate) PSI Derivatives (4a–e)

To an ice-cooled solution of PSI (1.0 equiv) and 3 (2.0 equiv) in THF (7 mL/mmol) was added dropwise a solution of DMAP (1.2 equiv) in THF (3 mL/mmol). The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. At completion, most of the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was partitioned between DCM and sat. aq. NH4Cl/brine (3:2, until pH 7–8). The aqueous phase was extracted 3 more times, until all the product was recovered. The collected organic fractions were dehydrated over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using DCM/MeOH 97:3 to DCM/MeOH 9:1 + 1% NH3 7 M in MeOH. The product was further purified via RP semiprep HPLC (ACN gradient 3.3%/min). Finally, the TFA counterion was exchanged with Cl eluting a 30% ACN solution of the compound through Amberlite IRA 400, followed by freeze-drying.

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl Isobutylcarbamate Hydrochloride (4a)

Obtained from 3a (0.467 g, 1.96 mmol) as a gray solid (0.260 g, 0.76 mmol, 78% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 2.9 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C17H25N3O2 + H+ [M + H+]: 304.2020 found: 304.2022. 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.26 (dd, J = 8.2, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (dd, J = 7.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 3.49–3.41 (m, 2H), 3.25–3.17 (m, 2H), 3.06 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (s, 6H), 1.86 (hept, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 157.92, 145.47, 140.70, 125.57, 123.08, 121.15, 113.30, 110.36, 108.39, 60.03, 49.75, 43.61, 30.03, 23.03, 20.46.

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl­(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)­carbamate Hydrochloride (4b)

Obtained from 3b (0.133 g, 0.48 mmol) as a white solid (0.079 g, 0.21 mmol, 87% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 2.8 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C16H20F3N3O2 + H+ [M + H+]: 344.1580 found: 344.1581. 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 12.43 (s, 1H), 10.26 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 7.24–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.02 (m, 2H), 3.53–3.35 (m, 4H), 3.35–3.20 (m, 2H), 2.90 (s, 3H), 2.89 (s, 3H), 2.75–2.59 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 155.57, 145.53, 139.85, 129.02 (q, J = 276.0 Hz),124.73, 124.56, 122.50, 120.34, 112.94, 109.50, 59.71, 43.20, 35.31, 34.22 (q, J = 27.6 Hz) 22.76. 19F NMR (376 MHz, acetone-d6) δ −64.92.

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl­(2-fluoroethyl)­carbamate Hydrochloride (4c)

Obtained from 3c (0.800 g, 3.51 mmol) as an off-white foam (0.510 g, 1.54 mmol, 88% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 1.9 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C15H20FN3O2 + H+ [M + H+]: 294.1612 found: 294.1619. 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.27 (dd, J = 8.2, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (s, 1H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (dd, J = 7.7, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.50 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 8.6, 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (dd, J = 8.6, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.89 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 157.78, 145.24, 140.64, 125.58, 123.03, 121.13, 113.34, 110.49, 108.45, 83.44 (d, J = 167.0 Hz), 60.05, 43.57, 42.80 (d, J = 20.3 Hz), 22.99. 19F NMR (188 MHz, MeOD) δ −223.87 (tt, J = 47.8, 27.1 Hz).

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl­(2,2-difluoroethyl)­carbamate Hydrochloride (4d)

Obtained from 3d (0.771 g, 3.13 mmol) as an off-white foam (0.476 g, 1.37 mmol, 87% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 2.2 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C15H19F2N3O2 + H+ [M + H+]: 312.1518 found: 312.1514. 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.28 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.20–5.87 (m, 1H), 3.61 (td, J = 15.7, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 3.30–3.20 (m, 2H), 3.14–3.05 (m, 2H), 2.77 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 157.71, 145.03, 140.33, 125.56, 122.90, 120.92, 115.69 (t, J = 240.1 Hz), 113.24, 110.62, 108.46, 59.73, 44.19 (t, J = 25.5 Hz), 43.42, 22.79. 19F NMR (188 MHz, MeOD) δ −123.33 (dt, J = 55.8, 15.6 Hz).

3-(2-(Dimethylamino)­ethyl)-1H-indol-4-yl­(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)­carbamate Hydrochloride (4e)

Obtained from 3e (0.793 g, 3.0 mmol) as an off-white solid (0.479 g, 1.31 mmol, 87% yield). UPLC purity >99% (RT 2.6 min). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for C15H18F3N3O2 + H+ [M + H+]: 330.1424 found: 330.1426. 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 11.67 (s, 1H), 10.35 (s, 1H), 8.20 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.09–3.93 (m, 2H), 3.47–3.37 (m, 2H), 3.37–3.29 (m, 2H), 3.01 (s, 3H), 3.00 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, Acetone-d6) δ 161.89, 155.99, 145.27, 139.90, 127.27 (q, J = 280.3 Hz), 124.50, 122.52, 120.32, 112.94, 109.89, 109.31, 59.64, 43.24 (q, J = 34.7 Hz), 43.16, 22.67. 19F NMR (377 MHz, acetone) δ −72.17.

DFT Calculations

All calculations were performed using the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) software package. , The GGA exchange–correlation functional BLYP was used for the optimizations of all stationary points. , The exchange–correlation functional was used in combination with the TZ2P basis set (triple-ζ quality augmented with two sets of polarization functions on each atom). Grimme dispersion was included. This level of theory is denoted in the text as BLYP-D3­(BJ)/TZ2P and was found to perform well in other studies involving organic molecules and their reactivity. ,

Chemical Stability

Stability of the synthesized compounds was tested in aqueous media at physiologically relevant pH values (1, 6.8, and 7.4) and in human plasma. 100 μM solutions of the compounds in HCl 0.1 M or PBS (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 or 7.4) were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and analyzed by HPLC-UV at different times (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). In the case of plasma stability, plasma was spiked with the compound (300 μM final concentration), and incubated at 37 °C for 6 h; 100 μL aliquots were withdrawn at different time points (15 and 30 min; 1, 2, 4, and 6 h), mixed with 400 μL of MeOH, centrifuged (10,000 × g, 7 min), and analyzed by UPLC/UV. PSY samples were further diluted 1:3 with water prior to injection to minimize peak tailing. The hydrolysis reaction rate constants (k) of the PSI derivatives were calculated through interpolation of experimental data with the equation for pseudo-first order reactions: [C] = [C]0 × ekt , where [C]: concentration of the compound; [C]0: concentration of the compound at the initial time t 0; t: time. Nonlinear curve fitting was performed using Origin 8.0 software.

In Vitro Metabolic Stability

To evaluate the in vitro metabolic stability of compounds 4a–e, human liver microsomal and S9 fractions were used, as previously described. Human pooled liver microsomes (HLMs) and S9 fractions were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Each PSI derivative was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mM. For the assay, 2.5 μM of each compound was incubated at 37 °C for 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360 min in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 50 μg of microsomal or S9 protein and 10 mM NADPH, with the addition of 50 μL NADPH regeneration system (starting solution: 5.2 mM NAD+, 13.2 glucose-6-phosphate, 1.6 UI/mL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase). At the end of the incubation, enzymatic activity was quenched by the addition of cold acetonitrile containing 2% formic acid, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The resulting supernatants were collected and analyzed by means of UPLC-MS, to assess the formation of PSI and evaluate the metabolic stability of the tested compounds.

Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR)/Ca2+ Assay

The FLIPR Ca2+ mobilization assay was conducted at Aptuit, an Evotec Company (Italy), to characterize the agonist activity of the compounds at human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors expressed in CHO-K1 (Chinese Hamster Ovary) cells using a 384-well format, as previously described. Briefly, to assess their agonist activity, PSI, 5-HT, and 4e were tested for the ability to induce intracellular calcium mobilization at 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, or 5-HT2C receptors in recombinant 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C CHO-K1 cell lines using Cal-520, a no-wash calcium-sensitive dye. The response was measured in real time following receptor stimulation. Each compound was profiled in 11-point concentration–response curves, performed in duplicate across two independent experiments following a standardized protocol. Pharmacodynamic parameters (pEC50 and Emax) were determined by fitting the experimental data to a nonlinear regression model.

Head-Twitch Response (HTR) Behavioral Assessment

Male C57BL/6 mice were randomized into four different groups (n = 5), treated by oral gavage either with vehicle (saline), 1 mg/kg PSY, 3 mg/kg PSY, or 4e (PSY equiv dose). Mice were habituated in a transparent container for 10 min prior to treatment. Following administration, they were returned into the transparent container and their behavior was recorded for 45 min using a video camera positioned horizontally, to facilitate HTRs detection. HTRs were manually scored by two investigators (MC and AS), who were blinded to the experimental conditions. The total number and time-course of HTRs during the observation period were quantified. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Newman–Keuls test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Plasma and Brain Pharmacokinetics in C57BL/6J Mice

For the pharmacokinetic analysis, a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg of compound 4e or PSY was administered by gavage. Blood samples (n = 3–6 per time point) were collected from the submandibular plexus at T 0 before gavage and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h after compound administration. Mice brains were collected at each time point after sacrifice. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at −80 °C until analysis. 4e and PSI concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using PKSolver, an add-in for Microsoft Excel, based on noncompartmental analysis. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (version 10.2; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), unless otherwise specified. Statistical comparisons were performed using Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA, where appropriate. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Toxicological Analysis in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight 200 ± 20 g) were treated with either vehicle (saline) or 100 mg/kg 4e via gastric gavage, following anesthesia induced by inhalation of isoflurane (Vetflurane Inhalation Vapor, Liquid, Virbac). 24 h after the administration, the animals were suppressed, blood was collected via intracardiac puncture and placed in appropriate tubes for evaluating blood cell counts and plasma biochemistry (Padova University Hospital). The main organs (kidneys, liver, brain, heart, and lungs) were collected without prior perfusion, washed in PBS and placed in 10% formalin for tissue histology using standard techniques.

Pharmacokinetic LC-MS/MS Analyses

Psilocin (CAS No. 520536) and Psilocin-d10 as internal standard (CAS No. 1435934-64-7) were acquired from Merck Life Science (Germany). In order to assess the PSI, and compound 4e concentration in plasma and whole brain homogenate, after their oral administration in mice, an LC-MS/MS analytical method was developed and validated in accordance with the guidelines of the US FDA. For each analyte the following parameters were evaluated: linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity and sensitivity, matrix effect, extraction recovery and stability (see Supporting Information S22, Tables S3–S7, and Figures S3–S5). The LC separation was conducted with a high-performance liquid chromatography with an Accela 600 pump and an online degasser connected to a CTC automatic injector (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was achieved using an analytical column Hypersil Gold (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm, Thermo Scientific) using a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in methanol (MeOH) (B). Detection was performed using an LTQ XL ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization source, in positive mode. The gradient used and all the analytical parameters are reported in Supporting Information S23 Table S1 and S2.

Plasma Extraction

To an aliquot of 50 μL of plasma was added ascorbic acid and psilocin-d10 internal standard (IS used for PSI) in order to achieve a final concentration of 1 mM and 25 ng/mL respectively. Then 150 μL of dichloromethane was added. The mixture was vortexed for 10 min and centrifuged at 16,060 × g, 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was eliminated, and the solvent was transferred in an Eppendorf tube and evaporated to dryness under a stream of air at 50 °C with a Turbovap evaporator (Zymark, Hopkinton MA, USA). The residue was dissolved in 50 μL of mobile phase (90:10%, v/v, 0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in MeOH) with ascorbic acid 1 mM. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 16,060 × g for 10 min before transferring into the vial.

Brain Extraction

Whole-brain samples were thawed and weighed before being manually ground with 1 mL of deionized water using a small pestle. The brain homogenate was sonicated for 10 min and then vigorously vortexed. To an aliquot of 50 μL of brain homogenate sample, 5 μL Internal standard solution (250 ng/mL psilocin-d10), 5 μL ascorbic acid 0.040 M and 150 μL acetonitrile were added. The mixture was vortexed for 10 min, then centrifuged at 16,060 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The organic supernatant was transferred in an Eppendorf tube and evaporated to complete dryness under a stream of air at 50 °C with a Turbovap evaporator (Zymark, Hopkinton MA, USA). The residue was dissolved in 50 μL of mobile phase (90:10%, v/v, 0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in MeOH) with ascorbic acid 1 mM. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 16,060 × g for 10 min before transferring into the vial.

Animal Housing and Ethics Statement

The animal study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Padova for the welfare of laboratory animals (OPBA) and the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n. 875/2023-PR-PR of 10/10/2023). All procedures involving animals were performed according to the institutional guidelines, complying with European Union Directive 2010/63/UE for experimental design and analysis in pharmacology care, the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and the 3R principle, to minimize animal pain and discomfort. Mice and rats were housed in individually ventilated cages (IVC) or in conditional cages, respectively, under controlled environmental conditions (12/12 h light/dark cycle, controlled temperature and humidity) with ad libitum access to food and water.

Human plasma used for the stability studies was obtained from one of the authors (SDM) as a volunteer, with informed consent. All procedures involving plasma handling were performed in accordance with standard laboratory safety practices.

Human liver microsomes (HLMs) and S9 fractions were purchased from the indicated commercial vendors as pooled, anonymized biological materials. All these samples were obtained in compliance with applicable ethical guidelines and did not require additional institutional review or informed consent.

Supplementary Material

jm5c01797_si_001.pdf (4.6MB, pdf)

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01797.

  • 1H-, 13C, 19F-NMR spectra, and UPLC chromatograms for purity determination of compounds 4a–e; LC-MS/MS analytical method validation; experimental data on the chemical, plasma, and metabolic stability of PSY and compounds 4a–e; concentration–response curves from the FLIPR calcium-flux assay of compound 4e; preliminary qualitative identification of 4e-derived metabolites; Cartesian coordinates and electronic energies of compounds 4a–e and their corresponding anions; and histological evaluation of organ toxicity following administration of compound 4e (PDF)

A.M., S.D.M., and P.L.M. conceived and supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. M.B. carried out the chemical synthesis and chemical stability assays. L.B. analyzed the stability data. L.O. conducted the DFT calculations. L.L. and F.C. performed the LC-MS/MS method validation and analyses. M.C., A.S., and D.G. conducted the pharmacological studies and behavioral assays in mice. S.C. supervised the pharmacological work. G.P. supervised the pharmaceutical aspects of the study. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

This research was sponsored by MGGM LLC.

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): Andrea Mattarei has received grant support from MGGM LLC and consultation fees from Neuroarbor LLC, and is an inventor on patents related to psilocin. Sara De Martin has received grant support from MGGM LLC and consultation fees from Neuroarbor LLC, and is an inventor on patents related to psilocin. Stefano Comai has received grant support from MGGM LLC and consultation fees from Neuroarbor LLC, and is an inventor on patents related to psilocin. Gianfranco Pasut has received consultation fees from MGGM LLC, and is an inventor on patents related to psilocin. Francesca Capolongo has received grant support from MGGM LLC. Paolo L. Manfredi has received compensation from MGGM LLC and from Relmada Therapeutics, is a manager for Neuroarbor LLC, and is an inventor on patents related to psilocin.

Published as part of Journal of Medicinal Chemistry special issue “Psychedelics and Entactogens”.

References

  1. Hadar A., David J., Shalit N., Roseman L., Gross R., Sessa B., Lev-Ran S.. The Psychedelic Renaissance in Clinical Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Three Decades of Human Studies with Psychedelics. J. Psychoactive Drugs. 2023;55(1):1–10. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2021.2022254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kraus C., Castren E., Kasper S., Lanzenberger R.. Serotonin and neuroplasticity - Links between molecular, functional and structural pathophysiology in depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;77:317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu W., Ge T., Leng Y., Pan Z., Fan J., Yang W., Cui R.. The Role of Neural Plasticity in Depression: From Hippocampus to Prefrontal Cortex. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:6871089. doi: 10.1155/2017/6871089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Radulescu I., Dragoi A. M., Trifu S. C., Cristea M. B.. Neuroplasticity and depression: Rewiring the brain’s networks through pharmacological therapy (Review) Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;22(4):1131. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalivas P. W., O’Brien C.. Drug addiction as a pathology of staged neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):166–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. O’Brien C. P.. Neuroplasticity in addictive disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(3):350–3. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.3/cpobrien. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorszewska J., Kozubski W., Waleszczyk W., Zabel M., Ong K.. Neuroplasticity in the Pathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:4245821. doi: 10.1155/2020/4245821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ly C., Greb A. C., Cameron L. P., Wong J. M., Barragan E. V., Wilson P. C., Burbach K. F., Soltanzadeh Zarandi S., Sood A., Paddy M. R., Duim W. C., Dennis M. Y., McAllister A. K., Ori-McKenney K. M., Gray J. A., Olson D. E.. Psychedelics Promote Structural and Functional Neural Plasticity. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3170–3182. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carbonaro T. M., Gatch M. B.. Neuropharmacology of N,N-dimethyltryptamine. Brain Res. Bull. 2016;126(Pt 1):74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrett F. S., Doss M. K., Sepeda N. D., Pekar J. J., Griffiths R. R.. Emotions and brain function are altered up to one month after a single high dose of psilocybin. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):2214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59282-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jefsen O. H., Elfving B., Wegener G., Muller H. K.. Transcriptional regulation in the rat prefrontal cortex and hippocampus after a single administration of psilocybin. J. Psychopharmacol. 2020;35:483–493. doi: 10.1177/0269881120959614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moliner R., Girych M., Brunello C. A., Kovaleva V., Biojone C., Enkavi G., Antenucci L., Kot E. F., Goncharuk S. A., Kaurinkoski K., Kuutti M., Fred S. M., Elsila L. V., Sakson S., Cannarozzo C., Diniz C., Seiffert N., Rubiolo A., Haapaniemi H., Meshi E., Nagaeva E., Ohman T., Rog T., Kankuri E., Vilar M., Varjosalo M., Korpi E. R., Permi P., Mineev K. S., Saarma M., Vattulainen I., Casarotto P. C., Castren E.. Psychedelics promote plasticity by directly binding to BDNF receptor TrkB. Nat. Neurosci. 2023;26(6):1032–1041. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01316-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Calder A. E., Hasler G.. Towards an understanding of psychedelic-induced neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48(1):104–112. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01389-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vargas M. V., Dunlap L. E., Dong C., Carter S. J., Tombari R. J., Jami S. A., Cameron L. P., Patel S. D., Hennessey J. J., Saeger H. N., McCorvy J. D., Gray J. A., Tian L., Olson D. E.. Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors. Science. 2023;379(6633):700–706. doi: 10.1126/science.adf0435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sonda S., Pendin D., Comai S., De Martin S., Manfredi P., Mattarei A.. Emerging mechanisms of psilocybin-induced neuroplasticity. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2025;46(11):1130–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2025.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nichols D. E.. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(2):264–355. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grob C. S., Danforth A. L., Chopra G. S., Hagerty M., McKay C. R., Halberstadt A. L., Greer G. R.. Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(1):71–8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rucker J. J. H., Iliff J., Nutt D. J.. Psychiatry & the psychedelic drugs. Past, present & future. Neuropharmacology. 2018;142:200–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Norring S. A., Spigarelli M. G.. The Promise of Therapeutic Psilocybin: An Evaluation of the 134 Clinical Trials, 54 Potential Indications, and 0 Marketing Approvals on ClinicalTrials.gov. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024;18:1143–1151. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S443177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Griffiths R. R., Johnson M. W., Carducci M. A., Umbricht A., Richards W. A., Richards B. D., Cosimano M. P., Klinedinst M. A.. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 2016;30(12):1181–1197. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ross S., Bossis A., Guss J., Agin-Liebes G., Malone T., Cohen B., Mennenga S. E., Belser A., Kalliontzi K., Babb J., Su Z., Corby P., Schmidt B. L.. Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 2016;30(12):1165–1180. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Carhart-Harris R. L., Bolstridge M., Day C. M. J., Rucker J., Watts R., Erritzoe D. E., Kaelen M., Giribaldi B., Bloomfield M., Pilling S., Rickard J. A., Forbes B., Feilding A., Taylor D., Curran H. V., Nutt D. J.. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2018;235(2):399–408. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stroud J. B., Freeman T. P., Leech R., Hindocha C., Lawn W., Nutt D. J., Curran H. V., Carhart-Harris R. L.. Psilocybin with psychological support improves emotional face recognition in treatment-resistant depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2018;235(2):459–466. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4754-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carhart-Harris R., Giribaldi B., Watts R., Baker-Jones M., Murphy-Beiner A., Murphy R., Martell J., Blemings A., Erritzoe D., Nutt D. J.. Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression. N Engl J. Med. 2021;384(15):1402–1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Elk M., Fried E. I.. History repeating: guidelines to address common problems in psychedelic science. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2023;13:198466. doi: 10.1177/20451253231198466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pilecki B., Luoma J. B., Bathje G. J., Rhea J., Narloch V. F.. Ethical and legal issues in psychedelic harm reduction and integration therapy. Harm Reduct. J. 2021;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00489-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dodd S., Norman T. R., Eyre H. A., Stahl S. M., Phillips A., Carvalho A. F., Berk M.. Psilocybin in neuropsychiatry: a review of its pharmacology, safety, and efficacy. CNS Spectr. 2023;28(4):416–426. doi: 10.1017/S1092852922000888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasler F., Bourquin D., Brenneisen R., Vollenweider F. X.. Renal excretion profiles of psilocin following oral administration of psilocybin: a controlled study in man. J. Pharm. Biomed Anal. 2002;30(2):331–9. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomann J., Kolaczynska K. E., Stoeckmann O. V., Rudin D., Vizeli P., Hoener M. C., Pryce C. R., Vollenweider F. X., Liechti M. E., Duthaler U.. In vitro and in vivo metabolism of psilocybin’s active metabolite psilocin. Front. Pharmacol. 2024;15:1391689. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1391689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Meshkat S., Al-Shamali H., Perivolaris A., Tullu T., Zeifman R. J., Zhang Y., Burback L., Winkler O., Greenshaw A., Husain M. I., A C. R., Vermetten E., Jha M. K., Jetly R., Loebenberg R., Bhat V.. Pharmacokinetics of Psilocybin: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(4):411. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17040411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thaoboonruang N., Lohitnavy O., Ya K., Lohitnavy M.. Development of a PBPK model of psilocybin/psilocin from Psilocybe cubensis (magic mushroom) in mice, rats, and humans. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):13721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98202-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hasler F., Bourquin D., Brenneisen R., Bar T., Vollenweider F. X.. Determination of psilocin and 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid in plasma by HPLC-ECD and pharmacokinetic profiles of oral and intravenous psilocybin in man. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1997;72(3):175–84. doi: 10.1016/S0031-6865(97)00014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Brown R. T., Nicholas C. R., Cozzi N. V., Gassman M. C., Cooper K. M., Muller D., Thomas C. D., Hetzel S. J., Henriquez K. M., Ribaudo A. S., Hutson P. R.. Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Oral Psilocybin in Healthy Adults. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(12):1543–1554. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0540-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chedeayne, A. , Compositions and methods comprising a psilocybin derivative. WO Pat. 2018/148605, 2018.
  35. Sard, H. P. et al. Indole compounds useful as serotonin selective agents. US Pat. 7,655,691, 2010.
  36. Nudelman, A. ; Weinstock-Rosin, M. , Indole, Indoline derivatives, compositions comprising them and uses thereof. WO Pat. 2013/150529, University of Jerusalem Ltd, 2013.
  37. Hofmann, A. ; Troxler, F. . Esters of Indoles. US Pat. 3075992, 1963.
  38. Jones N. T., Wagner L., Hahn M. C. P., Scarlett C. O., Wenthur C. J.. In vivo validation of psilacetin as a prodrug yielding modestly lower peripheral psilocin exposure than psilocybin. Front. Psychiatry. 2023;14:1303365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1303365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Raithatha S. A., Hagel J. M., Matinkhoo K., Yu L., Press D., Cook S. G., Sharma G., Dhananjaya D., Jensen G., Lee J. B., Cai C., Gallant J., Bains J., Tucker J. E., Facchini P. J.. Novel Psilocin Prodrugs with Altered Pharmacological Properties as Candidate Therapies for Treatment-Resistant Anxiety Disorders. J. Med. Chem. 2024;67(2):1024–1043. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Eklund J., Bremberg U., Larsson J., Torkelsson E., Wennerberg J., Zandelin S., Odell L. R.. Synthesis and In Vitro Profiling of Psilocin Derivatives: Improved Stability and Synthetic Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2025;68(7):7153–7165. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Polito V., Liknaitzky P.. The emerging science of microdosing: A systematic review of research on low dose psychedelics (1955–2021) and recommendations for the field. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;139:104706. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Savides I. A., Outhoff K.. Less is more? A review of psilocybin microdosing. J. Psychopharmacol. 2024;38(10):846–860. doi: 10.1177/02698811241278769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kuypers K. P., Ng L., Erritzoe D., Knudsen G. M., Nichols C. D., Nichols D. E., Pani L., Soula A., Nutt D.. Microdosing psychedelics: More questions than answers? An overview and suggestions for future research. J. Psychopharmacol. 2019;33(9):1039–1057. doi: 10.1177/0269881119857204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Feldman G., Hayes A., Kumar S., Greeson J., Laurenceau J. P.. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) J. Psychopathol Behav. 2007;29(3):177–190. doi: 10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Anderson T., Petranker R., Rosenbaum D., Weissman C. R., Dinh-Williams L. A., Hui K., Hapke E., Farb N. A. S.. Microdosing psychedelics: personality, mental health, and creativity differences in microdosers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019;236(2):731–740. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Polito V., Stevenson R. J.. A systematic study of microdosing psychedelics. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Prochazkova L., Lippelt D. P., Colzato L. S., Kuchar M., Sjoerds Z., Hommel B.. Exploring the effect of microdosing psychedelics on creativity in an open-label natural setting. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2018;235(12):3401–3413. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5049-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bershad A. K., Schepers S. T., Bremmer M. P., Lee R., de Wit H.. Acute Subjective and Behavioral Effects of Microdoses of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in Healthy Human Volunteers. Biol. Psychiatry. 2019;86(10):792–800. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bershad A. K., Preller K. H., Lee R., Keedy S., Wren-Jarvis J., Bremmer M. P., de Wit H.. Preliminary Report on the Effects of a Low Dose of LSD on Resting-State Amygdala Functional Connectivity. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020;5(4):461–467. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yanakieva S., Polychroni N., Family N., Williams L. T. J., Luke D. P., Terhune D. B.. The effects of microdose LSD on time perception: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019;236(4):1159–1170. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5119-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Molla H., Lee R., Tare I., de Wit H.. Greater subjective effects of a low dose of LSD in participants with depressed mood. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49(5):774–781. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01772-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Cavanna F., Muller S., de la Fuente L. A., Zamberlan F., Palmucci M., Janeckova L., Kuchar M., Pallavicini C., Tagliazucchi E.. Microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Transl. Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):307. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02039-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lyes M., Yang K. H., Castellanos J., Furnish T.. Microdosing psilocybin for chronic pain: a case series. Pain. 2023;164(4):698–702. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kiilerich K. F., Lorenz J., Scharff M. B., Speth N., Brandt T. G., Czurylo J., Xiong M., Jessen N. S., Casado-Sainz A., Shalgunov V., Kjaerby C., Satala G., Bojarski A. J., Jensen A. A., Herth M. M., Cumming P., Overgaard A., Palner M.. Repeated low doses of psilocybin increase resilience to stress, lower compulsive actions, and strengthen cortical connections to the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in rats. Mol. Psychiatry. 2023;28(9):3829–3841. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02280-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hutten N., Mason N. L., Dolder P. C., Kuypers K. P. C.. Motives and Side-Effects of Microdosing With Psychedelics Among Users. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(7):426–434. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Johnstad P. G.. Powerful substances in tiny amounts: An interview study of psychedelic microdosing. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018;35(1):39–51. doi: 10.1177/1455072517753339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fadiman J., Korb S.. Might Microdosing Psychedelics Be Safe and Beneficial? An Initial Exploration. J. Psychoactive Drugs. 2019;51(2):118–122. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2019.1593561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Azzolini M., Mattarei A., La Spina M., Fanin M., Chiodarelli G., Romio M., Zoratti M., Paradisi C., Biasutto L.. New natural amino acid-bearing prodrugs boost pterostilbene’s oral pharmacokinetic and distribution profile. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017;115:149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Azzolini M., Mattarei A., La Spina M., Marotta E., Zoratti M., Paradisi C., Biasutto L.. Synthesis and Evaluation as Prodrugs of Hydrophilic Carbamate Ester Analogues of Resveratrol. Mol. Pharmaceut. 2015;12(9):3441–3454. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wu D., Chen Q., Chen X., Han F., Chen Z., Wang Y.. The blood-brain barrier: structure, regulation, and drug delivery. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2023;8(1):217. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Crivori P., Cruciani G., Carrupt P. A., Testa B.. Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43(11):2204–16. doi: 10.1021/jm990968+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Adams P., Baron F. A.. Esters of Carbamic Acid. Chem. Rev. 1965;65(5):567–602. doi: 10.1021/cr60237a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Migliaccio G. P., Shieh T. L., Byrn S. R., Hathaway B. A., Nichols D. E.. Comparison of solution conformational preferences for the hallucinogens bufotenin and psilocin using 360-MHz proton NMR spectroscopy. J. Med. Chem. 1981;24(2):206–9. doi: 10.1021/jm00134a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Seybold P. G., Shields G. C.. Computational estimation of pK values. Wires Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015;5(3):290–297. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nichols D. E., Frescas S.. Improvements to the synthesis of psilocybin and a facile method for preparing the -acetyl prodrug of psilocin. Synthesis. 1999;6:935–938. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-3490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shirota O., Hakamata W., Goda Y.. Concise large-scale synthesis of psilocin and psilocybin, principal hallucinogenic constituents of ″magic mushroom″. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66(6):885–887. doi: 10.1021/np030059u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sherwood A. M., Meisenheimer P., Tarpley G., Kargbo R. B.. An Improved, Practical, and Scalable Five-Step Synthesis of Psilocybin. Synthesis-Stuttgart. 2020;52(5):688–694. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mattarei A., Azzolini M., La Spina M., Zoratti M., Paradisi C., Biasutto L.. Amino Acid Carbamates As Prodrugs Of Resveratrol. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15216. doi: 10.1038/srep15216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Colognesi M., Gabbia D., Signor A., Sarill M., Centofanti L., Rinaldi A., Cascione L., Nunziata S., Banzato M., Mattarei A., Finzi G., Sonda S., Pendin D., Zanotto I., Comai S., Pasut G., Alajati A., Saponaro M., Bucciarelli L., Lunati M. E., Guarato G., Goggi I., La Rosa S., Morano C., Paroni R. C., Cas M. D., Daniele G., Gentilucci M., Pappagallo M., Alimonti A., Manfredi P. L., Folli F., De Martin S.. Low, non-psychedelic doses of psilocybin as a novel treatment for MASLD, obesity and Type 2 Diabetes via 5-HT2B receptor-dependent mechanisms. Pharmacol. Res. 2025:108080. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2025.108080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Madsen M. K., Fisher P. M., Burmester D., Dyssegaard A., Stenbaek D. S., Kristiansen S., Johansen S. S., Lehel S., Linnet K., Svarer C., Erritzoe D., Ozenne B., Knudsen G. M.. Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(7):1328–1334. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0324-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Halberstadt A. L., Geyer M. A.. Characterization of the head-twitch response induced by hallucinogens in mice: detection of the behavior based on the dynamics of head movement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013;227(4):727–39. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3006-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Richardson E., Griffiths S., Rowton S., Smith C.. Evaluation of the head twitch response in male C57BL/6J mice as a measure of 5-HT receptor activation. J. Pharmacol. Tox. Met. 2025;133:107622. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. de la Fuente Revenga M., Shin J. M., Vohra H. Z., Hideshima K. S., Schneck M., Poklis J. L., Gonzalez-Maeso J.. Fully automated head-twitch detection system for the study of 5-HT­(2A) receptor pharmacology in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):14247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49913-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Canato E., Grigoletto A., Zanotto I., Tedeschini T., Campara B., Quaglio G., Toffoli G., Mandracchia D., Dinarello A., Tiso N., Argenton F., Sayaf K., Guido M., Gabbia D., De Martin S., Pasut G.. Anti-HER2 Super Stealth Immunoliposomes for Targeted-Chemotherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023;12(29):e2301650. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202301650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. te Velde G., Bickelhaupt F. M., Baerends E. J., Guerra C. F., Van Gisbergen S. J. A., Snijders J. G., Ziegler T.. Chemistry with ADF. J. Comput. Chem. 2001;22(9):931–967. doi: 10.1002/jcc.1056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Guerra C. F., Snijders J. G., te Velde G., Baerends E. J.. Towards an order-N DFT method. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1998;99(6):391–403. doi: 10.1007/s002140050353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee C. T., Yang W. T., Parr R. G.. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron-Density. Phys. Rev. B. 1988;37(2):785–789. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Becke A. D.. Density-Functional Exchange-Energy Approximation with Correct Asymptotic-Behavior. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;38(6):3098–3100. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Grimme S., Ehrlich S., Goerigk L.. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011;32(7):1456–1465. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Becke A. D., Johnson E. R.. A density-functional model of the dispersion interaction. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;123(15):154101. doi: 10.1063/1.2065267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Becke A. D., Johnson E. R.. Exchange-hole dipole moment and the dispersion interaction: High-order dispersion coefficients. J. Chem. Phys. 2006;124(1):014104. doi: 10.1063/1.2139668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Bortoli M., Ahmad S. M., Hamlin T. A., Bickelhaupt F. M., Orian L.. Nature and strength of chalcogen-π bonds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20(43):27592–27599. doi: 10.1039/C8CP05922E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Madabeni A., Orian L.. The Key Role of Chalcogenurane Intermediates in the Reduction Mechanism of Sulfoxides and Selenoxides by Thiols Explored In Silico. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(9):7754. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Salmaso S., Mastrotto F., Roverso M., Gandin V., De Martin S., Gabbia D., De Franco M., Vaccarin C., Verona M., Chilin A., Caliceti P., Bogialli S., Marzaro G.. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor prodrug-loaded liposomes for controlled release at tumor microenvironment. J. Controlled Release. 2021;340:318–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jm5c01797_si_001.pdf (4.6MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES