Abstract
Purpose:
To enable diffusion weighted imaging in prostate patients with metallic total hip replacements in clinically feasible scan times for prostate cancer screening, and avoid distortion and dropout artifacts present in the conventionally used Echo Planar Imaging (EPI).
Methods:
A reduced FOV diffusion-prepared sequence that is robust to the B0 inhomogeneities produced by total hip replacements was achieved using high RF bandwidth pulses and manipulation for stimulated echo pathways. The reduced FOV along the A/P direction was obtained using slice-select gradient reversal, and the prepared magnetization was imaged with a 3D RF-spoiled gradient echo readout. The sequence was validated in phantom experiments, in vivo in healthy volunteers with and without total hip replacements, and in vivo in patients undergoing a standard MRI prostate exam.
Results:
The proposed sequence is robust to shading and distortion artifacts that are encountered by standard diffusion-weighted EPI in the presence of moderate off-resonance. ADC estimates obtained by the proposed sequence were comparable to those obtained with diffusion-weighted EPI.
Conclusion:
Acquisition of distortionless diffusion weighted images of the prostate is feasible in patients with total hip replacements on conventional, whole-body 3T MRI, using a b-value of 800 s/mm2 and nominal resolution of 1.7 × 1.7 × 4 mm3 in scan times of six minutes.
Keywords: diffusion MRI, prostate DWI, metal artifacts
1 |. INTRODUCTION
Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer, with 1.4 million new cases reported globally in 20201. MRI has become a key element in the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is central to the specificity of these prostate MRI examinations2,3. However, clinical DWI sequences use Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) readouts, which is sensitive to susceptibility artifacts due to magnetic field inhomogeneities from rectal gas or metallic hip implants4. Susceptibility causes significant image artifacts including geometric distortion, signal pileups, and signal loss, potentially leading to non-diagnostic diffusion images. With a 2.3% prevalence of total hip arthroplasty in adults above 50 in the US as of 20105 and predicted to rise continuously6, this issue will become more common.
Off-resonance manifests as geometric distortion in EPI due to its low effective bandwidth in the phase encode direction. Multi-shot DW-EPI7 reduces, but does not eliminate the geometric distortion due to bowel gas. Multiple blip polarity EPI acquisitions can further reduce geometric distortion8, but is still insufficient near hip replacements due to the severity of the signal pileups from metal. EPI also exhibits image shading due to T2* decay, and low RF excitation bandwidth if a water-only excitation is used. In patients with a total hip replacement, it is only the EPI readout that is prone to these artifacts, with other image contrasts mostly unaffected. The prostate is sufficiently distant from the implant that conventional T2-weighted FSE and T1-weighted RF-spoiled gradient echo sequences exhibit little artifact. A comprehensive clinical solution to prostate DWI near hip replacements must address geometric distortion due to off-resonance, image shading due to T2* and low RF bandwidth combined with B0 inhomogeneities, and have clinically feasible scan times.
Diffusion-weighted steady-state sequences9 can achieve high excitation bandwidths with distortionless readouts. However, these sequences have difficulty achieving the relatively high b-values that are desired for prostate imaging2,3, and lose the steady state signal when bulk motion occurs, resulting in signal dropout.
Multispectral imaging (MSI) sequences are used for metal artifact correction10 with the goal of imaging tissues directly adjacent to the implant. DW-MSI sequences11,12 are not required for this application since the prostate is distant enough from the implant that it is feasible for all the spins of interest to be excited in a single RF pulse (only one bin is required).
Prepared sequences that store diffusion-weighted magnetization on the longitudinal axis offer an alternative to achieve diffusion imaging without distortion from off-resonance. This is because the choice of image encoding method is flexible since it is independent from the diffusion preparation. For prostate imaging, Zhang et al. applied a diffusion preparation with a Cartesian, variable flip angle Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) readout13. M1-nulling was used to reduce effects of shot-to-shot motion induced phase but no phase navigator correction was applied.
Instead of using TSE to image the prepared magnetization, we employed a 3D RF-spoiled gradient echo (FLASH, SPGR, T1-FFE) readout. Since the prostate is not directly adjacent to the implant, spin echos are not necessary to counteract T2* dephasing, and a gradient echo readout with a sufficiently short echo time exhibits little T2* shading. A gradient echo readout has more flexibility in choosing a flip angle schedule when compared to pseudo-steady state FSE trains14, and permits more k-space samples to be dedicated to phase navigator sampling without compromising the main echo train. We also describe a novel, high RF bandwidth diffusion preparation that prepares an inner volume, and provides reduced FOV imaging when used in tandem with a stimulated echo readout. An initial version of this work was presented at the 2024 ISMRM annual conference15. A similar scheme for achieving reduced FOV was concurrently and independently developed in16.
A reduced FOV strategy is well-suited for imaging the small volume of the prostate, and reduces the encoding requirement for the phase navigator, as well as residual artifacts from subcutaneous fat and other high-intensity tissues that are outside the prostate region. The proposed sequence was demonstrated in vivo on conventional, whole-body MRI at 3 Tesla using a b-value of 800 s/mm2 and nominal resolution of 1.7 × 1.7 × 4 mm3, with a scan time of 6 minutes. It was validated in phantoms, in vivo with healthy volunteers with and without metallic hip replacements, and patients undergoing a regular prostate exam.
2 |. METHODS
2.1 |. Reduced FOV Diffusion Preparation
The reduced FOV diffusion-prepared sequence with RF-spoiled gradient echo (FLASH) readout is shown in Figure 1. First, y-selective saturation pulses are used to attenuate magnetization outside the y FOV. However, a considerable amount of magnetization will continue to exist due to B1 inhomogeneity. Furthermore, it will have a high signal amplitude relative to the diffusion-prepared magnetization. We alleviate this issue by using the stimulated echo readout to further suppress the outer volume. At the end of the diffusion preparation, diffusion-weighted magnetization is stored in the longitudinal axis. A diffusion-prepared strategy permits a distortionless readout and high RF bandwidth pulses. The twice-refocused preparation comprises an excitation, refocusing, and tipup pulses. The preparation reduces the FOV along y (the in-plane phase encode direction), and the readout is selective along z (the slice select direction).
Figure 1.

Sequence diagram showing the y spatial saturation pulses, reduced FOV diffusion preparation, and RF-spoiled gradient echo (FLASH) stimulated echo readout.
This strategy of using the preparation to reduce the y FOV avoids the use of 2D spatially selective pulses in the readout17, as these have longer durations compared to 1D pulses and result in increased echo times. A 3D readout is well-suited for prostate imaging since the imaging volume is small, and the encoding requirement for shot-to-shot phase correction is relatively little. A spin echo readout is not required for this application because the prostate is sufficiently far enough away from the implant that an RF-spoiled gradient echo readout with a short echo time exhibits little T2* shading.
Stimulated echo diffusion preparations apply a stabilizer gradient prior to the tipup pulse13, which reduces the SNR by a factor of 2×. A stimulated echo is necessary because diffusion gradients impart a random, spatially-dependent phase that changes each shot due to involuntary bulk motion and motion-sensitizing diffusion gradients. The stabilizer before the tipup ensures that the same net signal magnitude is stored in the longitudinal axis regardless of the random phase. The stabilizer must be balanced during the readout, which is a key component of the proposed reduced FOV scheme. Although the stabilizer ensures that the same net signal magnitude is stored, the random phase persists in the readout, meaning shot-to-shot phase correction is still required in the reconstruction.
The reduced y FOV is achieved by employing gradient reversal along the y direction in tandem with a stimulated echo readout. The yf-plot shown in Figure 2 illustrates the prepared volume, which is the overlap of the gray and blue bands from the excitation/tipup and refocusing pulses respectively. Signal from magnetization that is outside the prepared y FOV is suppressed by the stabilizer rephaser, which can be explained by considering the Extended Phase Graph (EPG) states18 for different regions in the yf-plot.
Figure 2.

Diagram showing the spins that are excited in yf space, drawn to scale with the RF pulses used in the final sequence. The prepared FOV is the crossing of the excitation (gray, positive slope), refocusing (blue), and tipup (gray, negative slope) bands. The tapering of the excitation bandwidth at the edge of the y FOV demonstrates the need for high RF bandwidth excitation and tipup pulses. Spatial saturation bands (red) from additional selective pulses before the preparation reduce residual fat outside of the y FOV.
Extended phase graphs represent the magnetization as transverse states (denoted Fk), and longitudinal states (Zk). Suppose that the area of the stabilizer applies 2 cycles per voxel and that the additional y spatial saturation pulses in Figure 1 are neglected. At the end of the preparation, the diffusion-prepared magnetization that should be imaged lies in the Z2 state, and magnetization that is outside both gray bands are in the Z0 state. All low-order F states are assumed to be zero at the end of the preparation due to the spoiler. During the stimulated echo readout, the slice-select axis is z, so all magnetization in the yf-plot undergoes the excitation (assuming the pulse has high RF bandwidth). The Z2 state (which contains the diffusion-weighted magnetization), is partially transferred into F2− by the excitation, and into F0 by the stabilizer rephaser, where it forms a stimulated echo that can be encoded. The Z0 state (which contains magnetization outside the prepared FOV), is transferred into F0 by the excitation, and then into F2+ by the stabilizer rephaser. This dephasing is sufficient to suppress non-fat species. Simultaneous slice time-multiplexing is a related method that manipulates EPG states to simultaneously rephase and dephase different regions of the volume19.
Due to the high proton density of fat, residual fat signal from outside the prepared FOV (shown in the yf-plot as a yellow line) may appear in the final image. If the refocusing pulses provide 180 ° rotations, fat outside the prepared y FOV will have a large residual longitudinal component in Z0 at the end of the preparation. We reduced this artifact by employing multiple y spatial saturation pulses before the preparation, which in combination with the stimulated echo readout, sufficiently suppresses fat that is outside the prepared y FOV.
2.2 |. High RF Bandwidth Preparation
The main consideration for RF pulse design is the RF bandwidth of the preparation, which must be maximized to reduce B0-dependent shading caused by the proximity to the metallic hip replacement. It is also desirable for the pulses to be short in duration to minimize the echo time of the diffusion preparation. The inherent symmetry of the preparation (excitation, refocusing, and tipup) provides considerable flexibility in RF pulse design.
Simulations of the off-resonance at 3T produced by a total hip replacement comprising a cobalt-chromium (CoCr, susceptibility 900 ppm) alloy head, and titanium alloy femoral stem (susceptibility 182 ppm)20, are shown in Figure 3. The off-resonance maps were simulated by convolving the dipole field kernel with the susceptibility map of the implant20,21,22. Assuming that the center of the femoral head is 10 cm from the center of the prostate, and that the centers are aligned in the S/I direction (in practice, the prostate would be slightly inferior), it is reasonable to expect ±500 Hz off-resonance variation after a linear shim correction. This total hip replacement material composition is a “worst case scenario” susceptibility23, since stainless steel is rarely used24. Presently in the United States, procedures are trending towards an increased fraction of ceramic implants24. Metal-on-metal load bearing surfaces are currently unavailable in the United States due to their removal from the market by the FDA in 2014, but metal-on-polyethlyene load bearing surfaces using a CoCr femoral head continue to be available24,25.
Figure 3.

Simulations of the off-resonance profile created by a hip replacement with a CoCr femoral head and titanium femoral stem at 3T. Red lines denote the center of the femoral head, and dashed black lines indicate a 6 cm extent where the prostate would be located. The spatially varying off-resonance, with and without an ideal linear shim correction are shown.
The normal prostate gland has a volume of approximately 3 cm × 3 cm × 5 cm = 30 cubic centimetres26,27, so generally will fit within a 12 cm FOV in the A/P direction. The reduced FOV pulse should therefore be designed to prepare a 12 cm FOV along y with 1 kHz RF bandwidth.
We applied gradient reversal along the y direction to restrict the y FOV of the preparation. However, gradient reversal between the excitation and tipup creates a tapering of the bandwidth at the periphery of the y FOV. It is therefore desirable to maximize the RF bandwidth of the excitation and tipup to reduce the effect of the taper. The RF bandwidth of an SLR excitation pulse28 is limited by the peak RF amplitude. The maximum B1 of a linear phase SLR pulse can be reduced by approximately a factor of 2× using the root-flipping algorithm29. Using a root-flipped pulse creates a non-linear phase slice profile, but the symmetry of the preparation (excitation and tipup) can be used to cancel this non-linear phase. Root-flipping also creates symmetrical pulses, which allows the phases of the slice profile to compensate even after the slice-select gradient is negated. The same root-flipped pulses were also used for spatial saturation outside the prepared FOV.
For refocusing, hard 180° pulses may be used, but these are sensitive to both B1 and B0. A hard 180° refocusing pulse with duration B1max 15 μT, 0.8 ms duration has a 90% bandwidth of 300 Hz, well below the target RF bandwidth of 1 kHz. A twice refocused scheme can be used to benefit from the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) condition30 and reduce the sensitivity to imperfect 180° refocusing pulses or B1 inhomogeneity. However, this dependence on CPMG when using hard pulses may cause non-uniform diffusion weighting that is sensitive to off-resonance due to mixing of stimulated and spin echos with different b-values. Instead of a hard refocusing pulse, we employed Wide, Uniform Rate, Smooth Truncation (WURST)31 refocusing pulses, which exhibit adiabatic behaviour and provided a 90% bandwidth of 1 kHz. Two WURST refocusing pulses were used in the preparation to compensate the non-linear phase imparted by the WURST pulse.
The CPMG condition is not satisfied with root-flipped excitation and WURST refocusing pulses. First, the excitation and tipup are selective along y, whereas the WURST pulses are non-selective. Second, the phase profiles of the excitation/refocusing pair do not have identical phase profiles that satisfy non-linear phase CPMG12. However, the B1 insensitivity provided by non-linear phase CPMG is not necessary since the WURST pulses achieve a refocusing flip angle close to 180°. The yf selection regions of the final pulses are drawn to scale in Figure 2.
2.3 |. RF Pulse Design
The WURST pulse has duration 6 ms, frequency sweep from −2 to 2 kHz, B1max 16 μT, N = 40. The root-flipped SLR 90 excitation pulse had duration 2.1 ms, TBW 10, B1max 15 μT, 90% bandwidth 4000 Hz, passband-ripple 0.01, stopband ripple 0.00128. Root-flipping reduced the maximum B1 30 μT to 15 μT.
The pulses and their simulated magnetization profiles are shown in Figure 4. The saturation pulses were offset in the y direction ± 11 cm from the prescribed FOV, and each pair was repeated three times to reduce sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneity.
Figure 4.

RF pulse profiles and magnetization profiles for root-flipped excitation and WURST refocusing pulses, compared to conventional choices of linear phase SLR excitation and hard refocusing pulses. Root-flipping reduces the peak B1 by a factor of 2×, which enables a 4 kHz bandwidth excitation. For refocusing, a hard 180° refocusing pulse with peak B1 0.16 G and duration 0.8 ms has a 90% bandwidth of 300 Hz, and the flip angle is extremely sensitive to B0. Employing a WURST refocusing pulse with duration 6 ms provides a 90% bandwidth to approximately 1 kHz.
2.4 |. Reconstruction
Coil sensitivities were estimated from the center 16 × 16 × 16 k-space region of the b = 0 s/mm2 images using ESPIRIT32 after geometric coil compression33 to 8 virtual coils. Reconstructions were performed on a workstation with 128 GB RAM, 24 core Intel Xeon Gold 5200R CPU, and a 24 GB NVIDIA Titan RTX GPU. The reconstruction time was approximately 3 minutes.
The reconstruction used a non-linear phase navigated least-squares reconstruction34,35 with l1-wavelet denoising, which was solved with FISTA36. Data were normalized so that the energy in the conjugate phase coil combination of the b = 0 s/mm2 image was 1. The 3D wavelet regularization parameter was empirically tuned to 1 × 10−3.
2.5 |. Phantom Acquisition
Scans were performed on a 3T Signa Premier (GE Healthcare) system using a small anterior AIR coil (GE Healthcare, 21 channels), and spine coil embedded in the table.
A phantom consisting of a cylindrical water container surrounded by vials with varying concentrations of acetone and water to achieve a range of ADCs37 was scanned. The phantom was scanned with and without a hip replacement (cobalt chromium alloy head, titanium stem) placed adjacent to the acetone phantom. The center of the femoral head was placed approximately 8 cm from the center of the water container, in the same orientation relative to the main magnetic field as would occur for an in vivo implant.
DW FLASH scan parameters: 30 cm FOV, matrix size 128 × 128 × 24, slice thickness 4 mm, TE prep 62 ms, b-values 0/800 s/mm2, 1 NEX each, ETL FLASH 64, flip angle 10°, readout bandwidth ±65 kHz, FLASH TE 2 ms, FLASH TR 4 ms, TR 4000 ms, maximum gradient amplitude 70 mT / m.
In the phantom, multi-shot spin-echo EPI was acquired with the same FOV and matrix size, 4 shots, readout R/L, phase encode A/P, and TE 63 ms, to demonstrate geometric distortion and dropout artifacts that would appear with EPI near the hip replacement.
2.6 |. in vivo Acquisitions
To demonstrate the artifact from fat outside the reduced y FOV, b = 0 s/mm2 images were acquired with and without y spatial saturation pulses in a healthy male volunteer (age 30) following IRB approval and informed consent. This volunteer was imaged with the root-flipped excitation and WURST refocusing pulses, with and without additional y spatial saturation pulses. Two different healthy male volunteers (aged 32, 34) were imaged with DW-FLASH and DW-EPI for image quality comparison. The shim volume was set to an 8 × 8 × 8 cm3 region centered on the prostate.
The scan parameters for diffusion-prepared FLASH were: 22 cm FOV, matrix size 128 × 128 × 24, voxel size 1.7 × 1.7 × 4 mm, TE prep 62 ms, b-values 0/800 s/mm2, 1/3 NEX, ETL FLASH 16 + 60 = 76, elliptical ky-kz sampling pattern with corner cutting, phase navigator (first 16 echos) flip angle 4°, readout flip angle readout 12°, 40 shots per NEX, readout bandwidth ±65 kHz, FLASH TE 2 ms, FLASH TR 4.4 ms, TR 2200 ms, FLASH readout duration ~330 ms, diffusion direction L/R (gradient amplitude 70 mT/m), stabilizer area 1.5 cycles / voxel, scan time 6 minutes.
Flow compensated diffusion encoding was employed to reduce the amplitude of the imparted shot-to-shot random phase, and improve consistency in the standard patient population. The first 16 echos of the echo train were used as a phase navigator, which sampled the center 16 × 8 ky-kz lines with Ry = 4 and Rz = 2 each shot (encoding a 5 cm × 3.5 cm FOV in yz and reconstruction to 20 cm × 7 cm). This relatively high acceleration factor can be reconstructed with parallel imaging because of the reduced y FOV. The phase navigator resolution was 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm × 3 cm.
Three patient volunteers undergoing a regular prostate exam were scanned following IRB approval and informed consent. As part of the institutions’ standard clinical practice, patients underwent a micro-enema38 prior to the exam to reduce bowel gas artifacts in DW-EPI. Two other healthy male volunteers (aged 58, 62) with total hip replacements (one unilateral ceramic, one unilateral metallic) were imaged with the same protocol. A vendor-provided multi-shot DW-EPI MUSE7 was acquired in all cases for comparison: 30 cm FOV, matrix size 192 × 192, voxel size 1.6 × 1.6 mm2, slice thickness 4 mm, TE 65 ms, TR 3000 ms, 4 shots, b-values 50/800 s/mm2(1/4 NEX), all diffusion axes enabled simultaneously, frequency encode L/R, water-only excitation (RF bandwidth 50% FWHM 400 Hz), scan time 2:40. Four shots means that each phase encode blip traverses 4 ky lines, and 1 NEX means that each k-space location was sampled once. For the 4-shot, 4 NEX, each k-space location was sampled 4 times, for a total of sixteen 90° excitations.
A T2-weighted product 2D FSE scan was acquired for reference: matrix size 320 × 256, voxel size 0.6 × 0.7 mm2, slice thickness 3 mm, ETL 16, TE 110 ms, TR 5000 ms.
3 |. RESULTS
3.1 |. Phantom Experiments
Figure 5 shows images of the acetone phantom acquired with multiple sequences, with and without the presence of a total hip replacement. The direction of the main magnetic field is perpendicular to the page. The full FOV 2D FSE exhibits little shading when the hip replacement (drawn in red) is introduced. Spin-echo EPI exhibits distortion and signal dropout in the central water container when the hip replacement is introduced. The low excitation bandwidth of spin-echo EPI also causes signal dropout in the agar phantom placed to the right of the acetone vials. The reduced FOV in the PE direction provided by gradient reversal and the stabilizer in the preparation are demonstrated. Since DW-FLASH employs a high RF bandwidth and distortionless readout, the introduction of the total hip replacement introduces some shading in the outer vials, but geometric distortion is absent and the signal level and ADCs in the large central water vial are unaffected. The mean ADC in the water vial acquired with DW-FLASH was 2.2 × 10−3 mm2/s, with and without metal. The ADC correspondence for all vials is shown in Supporting Information Figure S2.
Figure 5.

Demonstration of the distortionless reduced FOV preparation in an acetone phantom and some surrounding agar blocks, with and without the presence of a total hip replacement. The head of the hip replacement (drawn in red) is oriented with the main magnetic field in a configuration that mimics in vivo. A) Full FOV 2D FSE. B) Full FOV Spin-Echo EPI. The agar block to the right of the phantom has low signal due to the low excitation bandwidth and the shim volume being centered on the vials. C-E) Reduced FOV DW-FLASH b = 0, 800 s/mm2 and ADC map.
3.2 |. Acquisitions in Healthy Volunteers
Figure 6 shows the effect of the stabilizer and selective saturation pulses on reduced FOV in b = 0 s/mm2 images acquired in a healthy volunteer. Figure 6 A shows an image acquired with the y-selective T2 preparation without a stabilizer gradient. The inner region is T2-weighted and dark, and the outer region has high signal intensity due to being unaffected by the preparation. Introducing y-selective saturation pulses (Figure 6 B) reduces the signal intensity outside the prepared FOV, but there is still considerable residual signal due to B1 inhomogeneity. Introducing the stabilizer in Figure 6 C suppresses the outer signal, but some residual signal from fat persists. Figure 6 D shows the result of applying of additional spatial saturation pulses on both sides of the y FOV, which reduces the residual fat outside the prepared y FOV.
Figure 6.

Images from a healthy volunteer demonstrating the reduced FOV provided by the stabilizer. Coils were combined with root-sum-of-squares without coil compression. A) T2-prepared image without stabilizer. EPG states of the magnetization at the end of the preparation in different y bands are shown. Since no stabilizer is applied, the magnetization resides in Z0 at the end of the preparation. Only the inner region is T2-weighted. B) With saturation pulses outside the prepared FOV, the dynamic range is improved. A large amount of residual signal remains outside the FOV due to B1 inhomogeneity. C) Image acquired with a stabilizer. SNR is reduced due to the 2× signal loss from the stimulated echo. Magnetization outside the y band remains in Z0, but within the y band magnetization finishes the preparation in Z2. Due to the stabilizer rephaser, the Z0 component is transferred to F2 during the readout and is suppressed. Fat that lies outside the prepared FOV is not completely suppressed by the stabilizer rephaser due to its high proton density. D) The residual fat artifact is reduced using y selective saturation pulses.
Figure 7 shows diffusion-weighted images acquired with DW-EPI and DW-FLASH in two healthy volunteers. The low b-value images acquired with both DW-EPI and DW-FLASH have comparable image contrast. The apparent resolution of DW-FLASH is lower than the reference DW-EPI, but similar image features, such as the urethra (white arrow) of Volunteer 1, are visible in both EPI and DW-FLASH acquisitions.
Figure 7.

Comparison of DW-FLASH and DW-EPI images in two healthy volunteers. The b = 0 s/mm2 image acquired with DW-FLASH has similar T2 and image structures in ADC maps when compared to DW-EPI. A) Volunteer 1. B) Volunteer 2.
3.3 |. Acquisitions in Patient Subjects
Figure 8 shows diffusion-weighted and high-resolution T2-weighted images from three patients undergoing a standard prostate exam. Lesions visible in DW-EPI are also present in DW-FLASH images. For all patients, fat has high signal intensity in the DW-FLASH images and a ADC less than 0.1 × 10−3 mm2/s, which indicates that the shot-to-shot phase correction method is effective.
Figure 8.

Images from patient volunteers without total hip replacements comparing DW multi-shot DW-EPI and DW-FLASH with reduced FOV. The corresponding T2-weighted image is provided for reference. A, B) Two patients with PI-RADS 5 lesions (A) white arrow, (B) yellow arrow. C) Patient with BPH nodule restricting diffusion (red arrow).
Patient 1 was found to have a lesion in the left apical peripheral zone consistent with PI-RADS 5, highly suspicious for clinically significant prostate cancer. The mean ADCs in the lesion for Patient 1 (white arrow) were 0.63 × 10−3 and 0.68 × 10−3 mm2/s with DW-EPI and DW-FLASH respectively. Patient 2 had known biopsy proven prostate cancer presenting after treatment with radiation and androgen deprivation therapy and was found to have a left anterior peripheral zone lesion consistent with residual prostate cancer. The mean ADCs in the lesion for Patient 2 (yellow arrow) were 0.61 and 0.62 × 10−3 mm2/s for DW-EPI and DW-FLASH respectively. Patient 3 had a lesion in the right transition zone consistent with a benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodule, PI-RADS 2, clinically significant cancer unlikely to be present. The mean ADC of the restricting diffusion areas in Patient 3 (red arrow) was 1.0 × 10−3 and 1.1 × 10−3 mm2/s for DW-EPI and DW-FLASH respectively. Multiple factors contribute to the apparent resolution of DW-FLASH being lower than the reference DW-EPI, which are addressed in the Discussion.
Figure 9 shows DW images acquired in two healthy volunteers with total hip replacements with different femoral head materials. In a volunteer with a left ceramic hip replacement (Figure 9 A), EPI exhibits large distortions outside the prostate region, and minor distortions inside the prostate itself since the shim volume is centered on the prostate. DW-FLASH achieves similar image contrast and ADC maps to DW-EPI. The main artifacts caused by the hip replacement is the failure of parallel imaging and shot-to-shot phase correction. The slice shown in Figure 9 A shows a moderate failure where phase correction errors caused a replica of the subcutaneous fat to ghost near the prostate. This artifact is dependent on the number of shots and the degree of involuntary motion in the volunteer. These artifacts are not apparent in the DW-FLASH image due to the reduced FOV suppressing outer signal, and improved robustness to involuntary motion from flow-compensated diffusion encoding.
Figure 9.

Images from volunteers with total hip replacements. A) Volunteer with a left ceramic total hip replacement. Off-resonance causes fat suppression failures, and poor phase correction creates residual ghosts from fat. B) Volunteer with a right metallic total hip replacement. Off-resonance from the implant causes dropout (white arrow) in DW-EPI due to the low excitation bandwidth, and geometric distortion (red arrow). DW-FLASH excites spins closer to the implant and obtains images without geometric distortion (beige arrow). The yellow arrow points to a probable BPH nodule which is visible in both the DW-EPI and DW-FLASH acquisitions.
In the second volunteer, a titanium total hip replacement creates off-resonance that causes signal loss in EPI in the vicinity of the total hip replacement (white arrow). In this scenario, the signal loss infringes slightly on the prostate and the residual off-resonance causes geometric distortion (red arrow). The DW-FLASH image has no geometric distortion and images the entirety of the prostate, including some adipose tissue surrounding the prostate that is closer to the implant. This demonstrates that the high bandwidth reduced FOV preparation is capable of exciting all the spins of interest. In the anterior transition zone a focus of restricted diffusion signal is present corresponding to a probable BPH nodule (yellow arrow).
4 |. DISCUSSION
The presented diffusion weighted imaging method is robust to image shading and off-resonance induced geometric distortions that are present in the widely used DW-EPI. It is capable of imaging spins in the vicinity of, but not adjacent to, a metallic total hip replacement. This sequence may also be applicable for cases with severe bowel gas artifacts when enema is not performed38 or is unsuccessful, or for female pelvis imaging. We presented images acquired in volunteers with and without hip replacements, but only two hip replacements, which caused moderate artifact in DW-EPI were studied. Further assessment of the proposed sequence is required in a wider variety of implant compositions. Patients with bilateral total hip replacements would exhibit greater artifacts.
The proposed sequence enables a tradeoff between robustness to off-resonance and image quality in an ideal scenario. In patients where spins are on-resonant, the diffusion-prepared sequence will have worse SNR efficiency compared to DW-EPI. However, there is a small percentage of patients where DW-EPI fails, and the only available contrasts are T2-weighted and pre/post contrast-enhanced images. DWI is a critical part of a prostate cancer imaging protocol2,3, and it is not suitable that some patients are missing diffusion-weighted images.
A relatively low b-value of 800 s/mm2 was employed to ensure that the images would have sufficient SNR for presentation. While a six-minute scan time is relatively long, it is not atypical for prostate protocols to use 5–10 minutes acquiring DW-EPI39,40,41. If it is known a priori that EPI will fail, then diffusion-prepared FLASH b = 0 / 800 s/mm2 could be acquired in six minutes, and b = 1400 s/mm2 in an additional six minutes.
DW-EPI can employ 2D spatial pulses17 to reduce the FOV in the phase encode direction and shorten the EPI readout echo spacing43. While application of this pulse has been shown to reduce distortion artifacts in the prostate44,45, 2D spatial pulses suffer from a low excitation bandwidth, and similar to the spectral-spatial pulse, do not excite all spins of interest in the presence of off-resonance. Since the 2D spatial excitation employs an EPI trajectory, by duality of excitation and reception17, the excitation profile exhibits warping in the slow, blipped, slice direction. In combination with slice-selective refocusing, the composite profile results in off-resonant spins being suppressed. This suppression of off-resonant spins is shown by simulation in Supporting Information Figure S3, S4 for a realistic pulse design with: blip-direction z, slice FOV 10 cm (permitting 20 slices), slice thickness 5 mm, y FOV 15 cm, 29 subpulses, bipolar trajectory, subpulse duration 0.55 ms, total pulse duration 16 ms, bandwidth 200 Hz / cm. Due to the bipolar design, this 2D pulse is prone to excitation ghosts at z FOV / 2. In the composite profile, spins that have 100 Hz off-resonance (creating a shift of 0.5 cm in the blip direction) will not be refocused, resulting in dropout.
An image acquired in a patient volunteer with a bilateral total hip replacement that created severe dropout and distortion artifacts in DW-EPI is shown in Supporting Information Figure S1. In this patient, DW-FLASH was acquired with a single 0.8 ms hard refocusing pulse in the diffusion preparation. This incurred some shading in the prostate close to the implant due to the low RF bandwidth of the hard pulse. The twice-refocused high RF bandwidth preparation was not acquired due to time constraints.
No fat suppression was employed because inversion recovery (STIR) is required to obtain uniform fat suppression in the magnitude of off-resonance produced by an implant10. STIR reduces the signal by ~30%, which we avoided because the scan time is already extended due to the SNR penalty of the simulated echo.
An FSE readout was not employed because a spin echo is not required to counteract T2* shading due to the prostate being sufficiently distant from the implant. All spins of interest could be prepared and imaged in a single excitation with adequately designed high RF bandwidth pulses while also providing a reduced FOV, which generally suffer from low excitation bandwidth. A benefit of a 3D RF-spoiled gradient echo compared to a 3D FSE readout is that the excitation pulses in the readout have greater RF bandwidths of 5–10 kHz. The high bandwidth of the 3D RF-spoiled readout is possible because the excitation flip angles are low. In contrast, FSE would employ pulses with 50% FWHM bandwidths of ~1 kHz. The moderate RF bandwidth of 3D FSE makes the slab select amplitude small and close to non-selective, which risks exciting signal outside of the volume of interest and introducing cusp artifacts46.
2D-DWFSE PROPELLER is an alternative for distortionless diffusion-weighted imaging. DW-FSE PROPELLER was acquired in two volunteers, shown in Supporting Information Figure S5. The scan times and image quality of DW-FSE PROPELLER were comparable to the proposed diffusion-prepared method, requiring approximately five minutes for full coverage of the prostate. However, DW-FSE PROPELLER does not benefit from reduced FOV, and the vendor’s implementation has high SAR, making it likely for bulk motion to occur during the scan. No fat suppression was employed since an inversion pulse would be required to achieve robust fat suppression near the implants, reducing SNR and further extending the scan time.
Although fat is bright in the DWI image and has a low ADC which can confound lesion identification, the absence of fat suppression may be acceptable for prostate DWI because fat does not overlap with the prostate. The presence of fat can be used to verify that the shot-to-shot phase correction was successful, since the ADC of fat is 50 – 100× lower than that of free water47.
The apparent resolution of the DW-FLASH image is lower than the DW-EPI comparison, for which there are two contributing factors. First, the stabilizer introduces motion sensitivity in the slice direction since it imparts 2 cycles/ 4 mm of dephasing. Sub-mm motion in the slice direction during the 350 ms echo train readout introduces phase offsets between inner and outer k-space and reduces the apparent resolution. Compared to abdominal imaging, respiratory motion causes little displacement in the prostate, approximately 3 mm in the A/P direction over the entire respiratory cycle48. The short duration of the echo train reduces sensitivity to sub-mm motion. This effect limits the lowest practical slice thickness that can be achieved with this sequence, but respiratory triggering may alleviate this.
A second factor that affects apparent resolution is that a B1 transmit inhomogeneity greater than 1.0 will reduce apparent resolution in the y and z directions since the signal modulation from the echo train will decay quicker than what was designed for the flip angle and ETL pair. For a given ETL, the flip angle was chosen to provide a signal at the final echo that is 10% the amplitude of the first echo. For prostate imaging, B1 inhomogeneity is surmountable since the B1 variation across the prostate is relatively little due to the small size of the prostate. With appropriate prescan and rapid B1 mapping, this effect can be mitigated. The signal of the stimulated echo diffusion preparation is also sensitive to B1, since the diffusion-prepared magnetization is measured through three excitation pulses, as opposed to the one excitation pulse used in DW-EPI.
5 |. CONCLUSION
Robust diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with certain metallic total hip replacements can be achieved in clinically feasible scan times of six minutes with a b-value of 800 s/mm2 and nominal resolution of 1.7 × 1.7 × 4 mm3 by employing a reduced FOV, diffusion-prepared sequence.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research support from GE Healthcare. Karolinska Neuro MR Physics group for pulse programming assistance.
Funding Information
GE Healthcare, NIH R01-EB009055, NIH R01-CA249893
Footnotes
Part of this work has been presented at the ISMRM Annual Conference 2024, Abstract No. 4758.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wang L, Lu B, He M, Wang Y, Wang Z, Du L. Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Global Status and Temporal Trends in 89 Countries From 2000 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2022. Feb 16;10:811044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hassanzadeh E, Glazer DI, Dunne RM, Fennessy FM, Harisinghani MG, Tempany CM. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017. Jan;42(1):278–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.?. 2019;76(3):340–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stocker D, Manoliu A, Becker AS, Barth BK, Nanz D, Klarhöfer M, Donati OF. Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Invest Radiol. 2018. Apr;53(4):200–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ. Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015. Sep 2;97(17):1386–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM, Schwarzkopf R. Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040–2060. JB JS Open Access. 2023. Feb 28;8(1):e22.00112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen NK, Guidon A, Chang HC, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage. 2013. May 15;72:41–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Andersson JL, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003. Oct;20(2):870–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McNab JA, Miller KL. Steady-state diffusion-weighted imaging: theory, acquisition and analysis. NMR Biomed. 2010. Aug;23(7):781–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jungmann PM, Agten CA, Pfirrmann CW, Sutter R. Advances in MRI around metal. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. Oct;46(4):972–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Koch KM, Bhave S, Gaddipati A, Hargreaves BA, Gui D, Peters R, Bedi M, Mannem R, Kaushik SS. Multispectral diffusion-weighted imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med. 2018. Feb;79(2):987–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee PK, Yoon D, Sandberg JK, Vasanawala SS, Hargreaves BA. Volumetric and multispectral DWI near metallic implants using a non-linear phase Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill diffusion preparation. Magn Reson Med. 2022. Jun;87(6):2650–2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang Q, Coolen BF, Versluis MJ, Strijkers GJ, Nederveen AJ. Diffusion-prepared stimulated-echo turbo spin echo (DPsti-TSE): An eddy current-insensitive sequence for three-dimensional high-resolution and undistorted diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed. 2017. Jul;30(7). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A, Brittain JH. Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med. 2006. May;55(5):1030–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hess JJ, Lee PK, Gomella AA, Loening AM, Hargreaves BA. 3D Diffusion-Prepared FLASH for Prostate MRI Near Metallic Implants. #4758. 33rd Annual Meeting of the ISMRM; May 2024, Singapore. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McElroy S, Tomi-Tricot R, Jeljeli S, Kinsella S, Goh V, Neji R. 3D High Resolution, Distortion-Free, Reduced Field Of View Diffusion-Prepared MRI At 3T. #4427. 33rd Annual Meeting of the ISMRM; May 2024, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
- 17.John Pauly, Dwight Nishimura, Albert Macovski. A k-space analysis of small tip-angle excitation. J Magn Reson. 1989;81:43–56. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Weigel M Extended phase graphs: dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes - pure and simple. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015. Feb;41(2):266–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barth M, Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser BA. Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(1):63–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shi X, Yoon D, Koch KM, Hargreaves BA. Metallic implant geometry and susceptibility estimation using multispectral B0 field maps. Magn Reson Med. 2017. Jun;77(6):2402–2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996. Jun;23(6):815–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marques JP, Bowtell R. Application of a fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering. 2005;25:65–78. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Koch KM, Hargreaves BA, Pauly KB, Chen W, Gold GE, King KF. Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010. Oct;32(4):773–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hu CY, Yoon TR. Recent updates for biomaterials used in total hip arthroplasty. Biomater Res. 2018. Dec 5;22:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merola M, Affatato S. Materials for Hip Prostheses: A Review of Wear and Loading Considerations. Materials (Basel). 2019. Feb 5;12(3):495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Loeb S, Kettermann A, Carter HB, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, Walsh PC. Prostate volume changes over time: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Urol. 2009. Oct;182(4):1458–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mitterberger M, Horninger W, Aigner F, Pinggera GM, Steppan I, Rehder P, Frauscher F. Ultrasound of the prostate. Cancer Imaging. 2010. Mar 3;10(1):40–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pauly J, Le Roux P, Nishimura D, Macovski A. Parameter relations for the Shinnar-Le Roux selective excitation pulse design algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991;10(1):53–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shinnar M Reduced power selective excitation radio frequency pulses. Magn Reson Med. 1994. Nov;32(5):658–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Meiboom S, Gill D. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1958;29:688–691. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eriks Kupce, Ray Freeman. Stretched Adiabatic Pulses for Broadband Spin Inversion. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A. 1995;117. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, Virtue P, Elad M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS, Lustig M. ESPIRiT–an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2014. Mar;71(3):990–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang T, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS, Lustig M. Coil compression for accelerated imaging with Cartesian sampling. Magn Reson Med. 2013. Feb;69(2):571–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miller KL, Pauly JM. Nonlinear phase correction for navigated diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003. Aug;50(2):343–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu C, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Simultaneous phase correction and SENSE reconstruction for navigated multi-shot DWI with non-cartesian k-space sampling. Magn Reson Med. 2005. Dec;54(6):1412–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Amir Beck, Marc Teboulle. A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal on Imaging Sciences. 2009;2:183–202. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang X, Reeder SB, Hernando D. An acetone-based phantom for quantitative diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. Dec;46(6):1683–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van Griethuysen JJM, Bus EM, Hauptmann M, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Ter Beek LC, Beets GL, Bakers FCH, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the rectum at 1.5T - Effect of applying a micro-enema to improve image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2018. Feb;99:131–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hectors SJ, Said D, Gnerre J, Tewari A, Taouli B. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;52(1):271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klingebiel M, Schimmöller L, Weiland E, et al. Value of T2 Mapping MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection and Classification. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56(2):413–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(4):534–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saritas EU, Cunningham CH, Lee JH, Han ET, Nishimura DG. DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(2):468–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS. Use of Reduced Field-of-View Acquisition to Improve Prostate Cancer Visualization on Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Presence of Hip Implants: Report of 2 Cases. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47(2):125–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lawrence EM, Zhang Y, Starekova J, et al. Reduced field-of-view and multi-shot DWI acquisition techniques: Prospective evaluation of image quality and distortion reduction in prostate cancer imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;93:108–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rangwala N, Zhou XJ. Reduction of fast spin echo cusp artifact using a slice-tilting gradient. Magn Reson Med. 2010. Jul;64(1):220–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wu M, Junker D, Branca RT, Karampinos DC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Brown Adipose Tissue Detection. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020. Aug 7;11:421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dinkel J, Thieke C, Plathow C, Zamecnik P, Prüm H, Huber PE, Kauczor HU, Schlemmer HP, Zechmann CM. Respiratory-induced prostate motion: characterization and quantification in dynamic MRI. Strahlenther Onkol. 2011. Jul;187(7):426–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
