Skip to main content
Poultry Science logoLink to Poultry Science
. 2026 Feb 8;105(5):106604. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106604

Single and combined effects of parenteral vitamins D3, A and K3 administration on tibia morphometry, mineral density and ash content in aged Japanese quails

Mahdieh Gholameipour 1, Heshmatollah Khosravinia 1,⁎, Babak Masouri 1
PMCID: PMC12934305  PMID: 41719996

Abstract

A total number of 300 breeder Japanese quails at 40 weeks of age were used to investigate the single and interactive impacts of vitamins D3 (0 and 6300 IU), A (0 and 23100 IU) and K3 (0, 17 and 34 mg) on tibia mineralization in a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement in a complete randomized block experiment design. Vitamin preparations were injected subcutaneously (SC) in the back of the neck of birds weekly. Proximal epiphysis and diaphysis diameter of the right tibia bone and its ash percentage were significantly superior in the vitamin D3 injected birds by 4.3, 4.9 and 9.3 percent, respectively (P < 0.05). Parenteral administration of 6300 IU vitamin D3 increased serum level of the same vitamin by 38.5 percent and decreased serum P level (by 12.7 Percent; P < 0.05) but not that of calcium (Ca) and albumin (ALB) levels as well as ALP and PTH activity (P > 0.05). Robustness index (RI) was significantly greater in the vitamin D3 treated birds compared with the corresponding control group (P < 0.05). Tibia ash content showed a moderate positive correlation with tibia length (r = 0.43; P < 0.01) and a negative moderate relation with Robustness index (P < 0.01). Serum PTH and ALK activity showed a weak and a moderate correlation coefficient with tibia ash percentage, respectively. No significant interaction was noticed among vitamins concerned in all features assessed (P > 0.05). It was concluded that extra nutritional administration of vitamin D3 via weekly SC injection, may impose promising effects on bone strength and mineralization in aged laying quails, evidenced by greater tibia ash percentage as well as superior proximal epiphyses and diaphysis diameter.

Keywords: Aged breeder quail, Tibia mineralization, Fat-soluble vitamin, Vitamin D3, Hounsfield unit

Introduction

Optimum dietary levels of the fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E and K) promote the commercial birds to perform close to their full genetic potential. Vitamin A is crucial for sustaining several physiological functions, including vision, immunity, epithelial cell growth and differentiation, sexual proliferation, and bone health (Shastak et al., 2024). Vitamin D is indispensable for the proper metabolism of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), and the preservation of normal skeletal integrity in animals. It also plays a role in regulation of parathyroid hormone, bone mineralization and mobilization, and it influences the prevalence of bone disorders (Wei et al., 2024). Vitamin K3 is well known for its crucial anti-hemorrhagic function in birds since 1936 (Dam and Schonheyder, 1936).

However, the multifaceted impacts of the vitamins A, D and K in many species of the animals, in particular in poultry, has been extensively investigated showing many vital roles beyond the above mentioned their primarily recognized biological significance. Among many conjoint metabolic effects proposed, vitamins A, D, and K are concerned for their single and interactive important roles in bone metabolism and growth (Carmeliet et al., 2015; Essig, 2022; Burns-Whitmore et al., 2024). Vitamin A was shown to promote bone growth and development (Henning et al., 2015; Lemner, 2024; Ling, 2025). Vitamin K is essential for activating proteins involved in bone formation and preventing Ca buildup in soft tissues (Yamaguchi and Weitzmann, 2011; Li et al., 2019; Alonso et al., 2023). Vitamin K involves critical metabolic pathways concerning bone health, preventing vascular calcification (Grimaldi et al., 2025), enhancing brain function (Emekli-Alturfan and Alturfan, 2023; Grimaldi et al., 2025) modulating immune system function, attenuating inflammation, lowering cancer incidence (Sadler et al., 2024). Moreover, it was shown than vitamin K plays a key role in bone mineralization through activation of Osteokalcin (the main vitamin K dependent bone protein) and Gla matrix protein (Galunska et al., 2024). Vitamin K also induces osteogenesis by inhibiting skelerosetin and activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Cui et al., 2021). This vitamin may correspondingly controls osteoclast activity through amelioration of the RANKL/OPG system (Khalaf and Almudhi, 2022). Farm studies also revealed that dietary supplementation vitamin K increased bone strength in broiler chicken (Zhang et al., 2003) and dietary inclusion decreased bone fracture and shell quality in layer hens (Fernandes et., 2009).

Increasing research evidences on the impact of fat-soluble vitamins on bone health and mineralization encourages the poultry industry to welcome studies directing in-depth characterization of the same topic. Bone fragility in laying flocks, particularly those kept in confined battery cages such as quails (Hildebrand et al., 2024; Jansson et al., 2025) and chicken (Szmek et al., 2025), contemplate as a significant welfare and productivity concern. Evidently, fragile bones often lead to enhanced risk of fracture and pain in advanced ages. Bone fragility arises from a combination of factors including genetic predisposition, metabolic stresses engrained basically form the high rate of egg production and the most blamed one as nutritional deficiency, among many others (Jansen et al., 2020; Eusemann et al., 2020).

Obviously fat-soluble vitamins influence bone metabolism in multiple mechanisms. Despite of many reports on age related changes in growth and reproduction in laying commercial birds (Ojedapo, 2013; Nascimento et al., 2014; Taghipour-Shahbandi et al., 2024) research works are infrequent on bone structure parameters in the same birds, in particular at advanced ages. However, in few reports at hand it was shown that bone quality decreases by an increase in porosity, with loss of volume, contributing to age-related osteoporosis in aged laying birds (Yamada et al., 2021). Gan et al. (2020) in a 13-weeks feeding trial using 65-wk-old Hy-Line Brown layers provided diets containing combinations 1- or 2-fold supplantation levels of liquid- or fat-soluble vitamins. They concluded that higher dietary vitamin inclusion levels improved laying performance and egg quality in aged hens. They interestingly attributed the improved parameters to the augmented abundance of beneficial microbiota in the bird’s gut.

In view of the recent concerns on impact of fat-soluble vitamins on different aspect of bone metabolism, investigation on response of bone fragility in aged birds to various combinations of dietary or parenteral administration of these vitamins may provide novel scientific achievements for both researchers as well as poultry industry section. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the multifaceted single and interactive impacts of vitamins D3, A and K3 on tibia mineralization in aged breeder Japanese quails kept in confinement.

Materials and methods

Animals, diets, and experimental design

A total of 300 Japanese quails (40 weeks old) with an average initial body weight of 220±10 g was provided from a commercial farm. The birds were allocated in galvanized wire battery cages (× 25 × 35 cm) arranged in 5 rows at a density of 5 birds per cage (4 females and 1 male as an experimental unit) during an 8 weeks experimental period. The study was conducted as a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement in a complete randomized block design with 12 treatments and 5 replicates (totaling 60 experimental units). The investigated factors included; vitamin D3 at two levels (0 and 6,300 IU), vitamin A at two levels (0 and 23,100 IU) and vitamin K3 at three levels (0, 17, and 34 mg). The implemented doses supposed to provide total bird’s requirements for a given vitamin for a week, besides the dietary content, based on NRC (1994) recommendations. Vitamin preparations were administrated subcutaneously (SC) in the back of the neck of the birds using a semiautomatic syringe equipment in a weekly schedule. In subsequent weeks the left or right side of the neck was chosen for injection. The birds had free access to water and feed throughout the experimentation period. They were kept in a controlled environment with a constant temperature of 22 ± 1°C, relative humidity of 55 to 60%, a lighting program of 18 hours of light and 6 hours of darkness, and proper ventilation with a minimum of 15 air changes per hour. All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Lorestan University.

The basal diet was formulated based on NRC (1994) standards with minor modifications. The composition and the calculated nutrient content of the diet fed are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Composition of the basal diet and calculated chemical composition.

Dietary Ingredients (%)
Corn 54.81
Soybean meal 32.04
Di calcium phosphate 1.15
Calcium carbonate 6.60
Mineral-vitamin premix1 0.10
Salt 0.30
Soybean oil 4.96
DL-methionine 0.04
Chemical Composition (%, calculated)
Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) 2900
Crude protein (%) 20
Calcium (%) 2.5
Available phosphorus (%) 0.35
Sodium (%) 0.15
Linoleic acid (%) 2.45
Arginine (%) 1.31
Lysine (%) 1.19
Methionine + Cysteine (%) 0.78
Threonine (%) 0.74
Vitamin A (IU/kg) 81.83
Vitamin D3 (IU/kg) 2.3
Vitamin K3 (mg/kg) 0.75

1 These values per kg of diet include:.

- Vitamins: Vitamin A: 11,000 IU - Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D₃): 2,300 IU - Vitamin E: 121 IU - Vitamin K₃: 2 mg - Vitamin B₁₂: 0.02 mg - Riboflavin: 40 mg - Folic acid: 0.075 mg - d-Biotin: 0.075 mg - Pyridoxine: 4 mg - Ethoxyquin: 0.125 mg.

- Mineral Premix: Manganese: 100 mg - Iron: 80 mg - Zinc: 60 mg - Copper: 8 mg - Iodine: 0.5 mg - Cobalt: 0.2 mg - Selenium: 0.15 mg.

Blood sample collection and biochemical analysis

At the end of the experimental period, prior to slaughter, approximately 2 mL of blood was collected from the brachial vein of the two randomly chosen female quails from each experimental unit (cage). The blood was placed in EDTA-free tubes for serum biochemistry and kept at ambient temperature (approximately, 27°C) for 2 hours. The samples were then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the serum from clot (Rifai et al., 2018). The collected serum samples were stored at −20°C after separation. Following thawing, serum parameters including Ca, P (using Pars Azmun kits), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (using Pars Azmun laboratory kits) were determined and an Auto analyzer system (Ciba-Corning Diagnostics Corp., Medfield, MA) (Alagawany et al., 2021). Vitamin D concentration was also assessed using Monobind vitamin D ELISA kit (Monobind Inc., USA) on an Awareness Technology ELISA reader (Awareness Technology Inc., USA). The assay was conducted based on the manufacturer’s instructions and standardized protocols employed in poultry research.

Bone quality assessment

From each replicate, two female birds were randomly selected and slaughtered at age of 48 weeks. The right tibia bones were collected from the same birds (Zaefarian et al., 2021). Without boiling and after meat removal, the bones were individually packaged in plastic bags and frozen at −20°C pending further analysis.

Prior to analysis, the bones were defrosted for 24 hours under appropriate conditions, and all remaining soft tissues were carefully removed. The length and width (at the proximal and distal epiphyses and mid-diaphysis portion) of each sample were then measured in triplicate and then averaged using an electronic digital caliper (with 0.01 mm precision).

Bone quality indices calculation

Equation (1) presents the Seedor index, which calculates the ratio of dry bone weight to bone length. This index serves as an indicator of bone density (Evaris et al., 2021):

Seedorindex=Dryboneweight(g)Bonelength(cm) (1)

Equation (2) defines the Robustness index, representing the ratio of bone length to the cube root of bone weight. This index reflects the mechanical strength of the bone (Evaris et al., 2021):

Robustnessindex=Bonelength(cm)Boneweight(g)3 (2)

Bone density assessment

Tibia mineralization was assessed using a Computerized Tomography Scanning system (the Siemens Somatom 2-slice CT scanner, manufactured in Germany, model used at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran). For scanning, each bone specimen was positioned in a standardized orientation to minimize measurement error (Anderson et al., 2023a). Prior to scanning, the system was calibrated using a material calibration phantom including water (0 HU), air (−1000 HU), and hydroxyapatite with standard densities (250-1000 mg/cm³). The accuracy of calibration was verified by comparing the measured HU values with reference values (Perilli et al., 2022).

For ash content determination, the bones were first dried at 105°C in an oven for 24 hours (Zhang et al., 2023). The dried samples then ground using a mortar and placed in porcelain crucibles. Subsequently, the samples were ashed in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 24 hours (Wilson et al., 2022) and then cooled in a desiccator prior to weighing. Ash percentage was calculated using Equation (3), representing the mineral content of bone tissue. This index quantifies the proportion of inorganic minerals relative to the organic bone matrix, providing crucial information about bone mineralization status (Anderson et al., 2023b):

Ashpercentage(%)=[Ashweight(g)Drydefattedboneweight(g)]×100 (3)

Statistical analysis

The data gathered were subjected to analysis of variance with a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement in a complete randomized block design using mixed model procedure of SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The statistical model (Equation (4)) included the fixed effects of vitamin D3 at two levels (0 and 6,300 IU), vitamin A at two levels (0 and 23,100 IU) and vitamin K3 at three levels (0, 17, and 34 mg) and their interactions.

Yijklm= µ+BWi+Dj+Ak+Kl+(D × A)jk+(D × K)jl+(A × k)kl+(D × A × K)jkl+Ԑijklm (4)

Where; Yijklm is the analyzed measurement, µ is the overall mean of the population, BWi is the covariate effect of body weight as an independent variable with a continues distribution, Di, Aj and Kl are the independent effects of vitamins D, A and K, respectively, (D × A)jk, (D × K)jl, (A × k)kl, (D × A × K)jkl are possible combinations of the vitamin interactions and Ԑijklm is the residual.

Because of a possible influence of variation in initial body weight on the criteria assessed, body weight was included in the analytical model as an independent covariate with normal and continuous distribution for all parameters concerned. Means were separated via Tukey test, and differences between means were considered significant when P < 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was employed to determine any correlation between right tibia bone ash and other traits.

Results

The mean proximal (upper) epiphysis and diaphysis diameter of the right tibia bone and tibia ash percentage were significantly superior in the vitamin D3- injected birds by 4.3 (6.95 vs 6.65 mm), 4.9 (3.18 vs 3.06 mm) and 9.3 (52.59 vs 48.12%) percent, respectively (Table 2; P < 0.05). The mean tibia weight and length, distal epiphysis diameter, however, did not differ among the quails receiving parenteral injection of vitamin D3 at 0 or 6300 IU (Table 2; P > 0.05). No discrepancy in all of the above-mentioned features were observed among the birds receiving either 0 or 23100 for IU vitamin A (Table 2; P > 0.05). Parenteral administration of vitamin K3 at 17 and 34 mg in a weekly schedule showed no influence on the traits evaluated compared with the corresponding control birds (Table 2; P > 0.05). No significant effects were noticed for D3 × A, D3 × K3, A × K3 and A × D3 × K3 interactions on all of the tibial features evaluated (Table 2; P > 0.05).

Table 2.

Effects of parenteral administration of vitamins D3, A and K3 on tibia ash percentage, tibia weight (g), tibia length (mm), proximal epiphyssis diameter (PED, mm), diaphysis diameter (DD, mm), distal epiphyseal diameter (DED, mm) in older breeder Japanese quail.

Factor / level Body weight
(g)
Tibia ash (%) Tibia weight
(g)
Tibia length
(mm)
PED
(mm)
DD
(mm)
DED
(mm)
Vitamin D3 (IU)
0 231.14 48.12b 0.82a 54.08a 6.66b 3.03b 5.69a
6300 233.41 52.59a 0.88a 53.54a 6.95a 3.18a 5.61a
SEM 2.781 1.241 0.023 0.257 0.071 0.038 0.054
Vitamin A (IU)
0 236.88 51.25a 0.88a 54.26a 6.86a 3.14a 5.64a
23100 227.67 49.46a 0.82a 52.68a 6.76a 3.07a 5.66a
SEM 2.588 1.291 0.021 0.341 0.061 0.032 0.042
Vitamin K3 (mg)
0 230.71 47.89a 0.85a 54.00a 6.78a 3.10a 5.62a
17 229.83 51.68a 0.88a 53.85a 6.78a 3.11a 5.67a
34 236.28 51.49a 0.83a 53.68a 6.87a 3.11a 5.66a
SEM 3.157 1.917 0.026 0.413 0.114 0.055 0.051
ANOVA
D3 0.5097 0.0121 0.0836 0.3230 0.0130 0.0147 0.2417
A 0.0095 0.3005 0.0982 0.3240 0.3928 0.2036 0.8580
K3 0.2554 0.1365 0.5649 0.3751 0.716 0.9935 0.8213
D3 × A 0.3976 0.5131 0.8564 0.3212 0.6380 0.9350 0.0000
D3 × K3 0.9879 0.0915 0.2356 0.3738 0.2327 0.2097 0.3231
A × K3 0.0024 0.2317 0.6477 0.3763 0.3090 0.6093 0.4992
A × D3 × K3 0.8830 0.9319 0.9004 0.3787 0.1934 0.5436 0.4945

a,b means with no common superscript letter in each column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

SEM= Standard Error of Means.

Parenteral administration of 6300 IU vitamin D3 increased serum level of the same vitamin by 38.5 percent (109.23 vs 75.96 ng/mL) and decreased serum P level by 12.7 Percent (10.53 vs 12.06 mg/Dl; P < 0.05) but not that of Ca and ALB levels as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) activities (Table 3; P > 0.05), compared with the relevant control birds. Serum P and Ca concentrations were declined by 20 (5.55 vs 4.71 mg/dl) and 15.13 (12.55 vs 10.04 mg/dl) percent, respectively, in the birds receiving 23100 IU vitamin A through SC injection in the nape of the neck (Table 3; P < 0.05), while serum levels of vitamin D and ALB as well as ALP and PTH activities were remained unchanged (Table 3; P > 0.05). No alteration in serum P, Ca, vitamin D and ALB concentration as well as serum ALP and PTH activity were found in the birds treated with 17 and 34 IU vitamin K3 than those birds in the pertinent control group (Table 3; P > 0.05). Likewise, no change in serum P, Ca, vitamin D and ALB as well serum ALP and PTH activity were detected for D3 × A, D3 × K3, A × K3 and A × D3 × K3 interactive effects (Table 3; P > 0.05).

Table 3.

Effects of parenteral administration of vitamins D3, A and K3 on serum concentration of Phosphorus (P, mg/dl), Calcium (Ca, mg/dl), vitamin D (Vit. D, ng/mL), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP, U/L), parathyroid hormone (PTH pg/mL), Albumin (ALB; g/dl) in older breeder Japanese quail.

Factor / level P
(mg/dl)
Ca
(mg/dl)
Vit. D (ng/mL) ALP
(U/L)
PTH
(pg/mL)
ALB (g/dl)
Vitamin D3 (IU)
0 12.06a 5.18a 75.96b 3293.00a 3.04a 2.47a
6300 10.53b 5.08a 109.23a 2969.63a 3.67a 2.42a
SEM 0.612 0.271 6.782 281.801 0.331 0.079
Vitamin A (IU)
0 12.55a 5.55a 98.50a 2900.66a 3.01a 2.52a
23100 10.04b 4.71b 86.70a 3362.00a 3.70a 2.38a
SEM 0.421 0.261 7.401 274.941 0.301 0.075
Vitamin K3 (mg)
0 10.58a 4.70a 85.45a 3219.50a 3.27a 2.39a
17 11.46a 5.26a 91.85a 3184.50a 2.90a 2.41a
34 11.85a 5.42a 100.50a 2990.00a 3.95a 2.54a
SEM 0.781 0.321 9.011 343.411 0.341 0.075
ANOVA
D3 0.0164 0.7921 0.0010 0.4355 0.1390 0.6872
A 0.0012 0.0307 0.0307 0.2177 0.1096 0.2301
K3 0.3916 0.2734 0.4328 0.8867 0.1572 0.5419
D3 × A 0.2030 0.5052 0.5468 0.3988 0.7363 0.3301
D3 × K3 0.2384 0.1918 0.2286 0.8230 0.2666 0.9267
A × K3 0.2847 0.9212 0.6200 0.6615 0.4236 0.7965
A × D3 × K3 0.0852 0.4742 0.1025 0.2930 0.1370 0.8386

a,bmeans with no common superscript letter in each column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

SEM= Standard Error of Means.

Seedor index (SI) did not differ in the vitamin D3, A or K3 injected birds compared with the corresponding control quails (P > 0.05). Robustness index (RI) was significantly greater in the vitamin D3- treated birds compared with the birds receiving no vitamin D3 (Table 4; P < 0.05). No difference in HFU for proximal and distal epiphysis and diaphysis, as well as mean HFU was noticed in the aged breeder quails receiving vitamin D3, A or K3 through a weekly SC injection schedule (Table 4; P > 0.05), once more excluding the vitamin D3- treated birds which showed superior HFU for proximal tibia epiphysis, than the relevant control birds (Table 4; P < 0.05). No discrepancy in HFU measured at proximal epiphysis, diaphysis, distal epiphysis as well as mean HFU was observed for D3 × A, D3 × K3, A × K3 and A × D3 × K3 combined effects (Table 4; P > 0.05).

Table 4.

Effects of parenteral administration of vitamins D3, A and K3 on Seedor index, Robustness index, Hounsfield unit (HU) for proximal epiphysis (HUP), Hounsfield unit for diaphysis (HUD), Hounsfield unit for distal epiphysis (HUDI) and mean Hounsfield unit (mHU) in aged breeder Japanese quail.

Factor / level Seedor index Robustness Index HUP HUD HUDI mHU
Vitamin D(IU)
0 0.015a 57.86a 406.76b 809.20a 552.23a 589.39a
6300 0.010a 56.30b 608.73a 1176.80a 525.13a 692.12a
SEM 0.001 0.491 49.712 98.085 84.881 67.071
Vitamin A(IU)
0 0.011a 56.74a 506.20a 966.60a 539.90a 592.79a
23100 0.013a 57.42a 509.30a 1019.40a 537.46a 688.72a
SEM 0.001 0.531 59.960 237.076 75.876 66.121
Vitamin K3 (mg)
0 0.012a 57.23a 502.15a 818.15a 543.30a 621.18a
17 0.016a 56.34a 610.80a 1010.05a 517.60a 712.82a
34 0.011a 57.68a 410.30a 1150.80a 555.15a 588.27a
SEM 0.001 0.518 74.071 121.859 101.595 87.498
ANOVA
D3 0.3368 0.0262 0.0265 0.1503 0.8029 0.2909
A 0.3368 0.3188 0.9721 0.8346 0.9821 0.3236
K3 0.1245 0.2726 0.1892 0.5594 0.9588 0.5527
D3 × A 0.6298 0.8304 0.9279 0.4593 0.5572 0.9310
D3 × K3 0.6648 0.2726 0.2001 0.3159 0.3449 0.6621
A × K3 0.3354 0.9542 0.5163 0.5779 0.2646 0.3348
A × D3 × K3 0.4711 0.0789 0.224 0.1389 0.4111 0.5642

a,bmeans with no common superscript letter in each column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

SEM= Standard Error of Means.

The Pearson’s correlation coefficients for tibia ash percentage and all of the evaluated traits were calculated and the results are summarized in Fig. 1. Tibia length showed high positive correlation with tibia ash. Seedor index showed positive moderate correlation (P < 0.01) with tibia ash while RI demonstrated a negative moderate association (P < 0.01) with the same trait. Serum parameters measured showed weak correlations with tibia ash percentage, with the exception of vitamin D3 concentration which found to be moderately correlated (P < 0.05) with the same trait. Assessment of HFU at different locations of the right tibia bone showed weak associations with tibia ash content. Finally, serum PTH and ALK activities showed a positive weak (P > 0.05) and a negative moderate (P > 0.05) correlation with tibia ash percentage, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1 dummy alt text

The correlation coefficients of Robustness index (RI), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Hounsfield unit for distal epiphysis (HUDI), Hounsfield unit for proximal epiphysis (HUP), Hounsfield unit for diaphysis (HUD), Phosphorus, albumin, mean Hounsfield unit (mHU), calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH, U/L), HUD, body weight, proximal epiphysis diameter (PED), serum concentration of vitamin D3, diaphysis diameter (DD), distal epiphyseal diameter (DED), Seedor index, tibia weight with tibia ash percentage in aged breeder Japanese quail. ns; non-significant,; P < 0.05; P < 0.01.

Discussion

In the current study the right tibia bone was chosen as the main indicator to evaluate the impact of the fat-soluble vitamins on skeletal health and mineralization in the aged breeder quails (during weeks 40 to 48 of age). Right tibia bone was considered a decisive evaluating feature in poultry research because its strength and structure are directly interconnected to factors like nutrition (Tompkins et al., 2022a, b), growth rate and leg abnormalities, making it a valuable model for understanding bone health (Lee et al., 2023a). Such importance arises mainly from this fact that the tibia, bears a significant amount of weight, making it sensitive to changes in bone quality (Khan et al., 2023a). Our results showed that tibia weight as well as all tibia morphometric measurements were influenced neither by simple effects of parenteral injection of vitamin D3, A and K3 nor by their interactive effects with the exception of tibia proximal epiphysis and diaphysis where both significantly found to be greater in those birds receiving 6300 IU vitamin D3 (P < 0.05).

The lack of influence of vitamin A and K₃ on tibia weight and morphometry agrees with many recently published research findings, such as those of Adhikari et al. (2020), who reported additional vitamin A supplementation to laying hens, regardless of biochemical form, had no effect on either bone mineralization or measures of egg quality. In the contrary, findings of the Stanquevis et al. (2015) study revealed that vitamin K supplementation in quail diet influenced bone density and Ca concentration of the femur and bone density of the tibia. The length of the tibia showed a linear increase according to the levels of vitamin K.

Regarding vitamin K, specifically the K₃ form (menadione), growing evidence from recent studies suggests its role in bone metabolism in poultry may be more complex than previously thought (Ferland, 2022). According to a comprehensive review by Alsaid et al. (2023), although vitamin K is essential for activating gamma-carboxylation-dependent proteins such as osteocalcin (which is vital for bone mineralization), the impact of its supplementation on osteological indicators like tibia weight and dimensions is often influenced by the basal vitamin level in the diet, the presence of other micronutrients, and the bird species. Their study notes that in diets sufficient in vitamin K, additional supplementation may not provide significant benefits to bone morphometric parameters, which aligns with the findings of the current study.

However, the results of the current study did not confirm the findings of Gan et al. (2020) and Huang et al. (2025), where the latter research team concluded that goslings fed 1500 or 2000 IU/kg of vitamin D₃ showed increased tibia ash content (P < 0.05). They also found an interaction between vitamins A and D₃ on tibia ash content and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) expression, where at 9000 IU/kg of vitamin A, adding 1000 IU/kg of vitamin D₃ decreased tibia ash (P < 0.05). At 1000 IU/kg of vitamin D₃, adding 9000 IU/kg of vitamin A decreased tibia ash (P < 0.05). They ultimately concluded that a dietary level of 7000 IU/kg of vitamin A and 2000 IU/kg of vitamin D₃ may be recommended as a combination to optimize feed intake, feed conversion, and tibia mineralization.

It was noticed that vitamin A may positively influence tibia features such as ash content through influencing various cellular functions like proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Yee et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2023b). Yee et al. (2021) also concluded that both vitamin A and provitamin A may be potential bone-protecting agents.

Superior certain tibia dimensions in vitamin D3 receiving birds were anticipated as almost all previous reports verified that vitamin D3 significantly affect bone density and mineralization through increased Ca and P intestinal absorption (Lee et al., 2023a,b) as well as regulations of the other necessary mechanisms involving bone growth (Kianfar et al., 2025).

Our results showed that the vitamin D3 effect may realize in a redistribution of mineralization in the proximal and middle parts of the right tibia bone rather than the distal parts. This proposed explanation supported by the increased proximal epiphysis and diaphysis of the bone with no modification in bone weight or distal dimensions. Vitamin D3 promotes Ca and P absorption in the intestines and kidneys, supporting bone formation, mineralization, and tibia quality by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated resorption (Zhang et al., 2025). In corroboration of these findings, more recent studies have also emphasized the pivotal role of vitamin D3 in bone health. For instance, Wimalawansa (2020) notes that vitamin D3 is essential not only for mineral homeostasis but also for optimal osteoblast function and bone matrix synthesis. Furthermore, research by (Silva et al., 2021) on poultry found that supplementation with 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OH-D3) led to a significant improvement in tibia bone strength indices, including bending strength and bone mineral density, compared to the control group.

It was unexpected that, while serum vitamin D3 concentration was increased by almost 40 percent in the quails receiving subcutaneous vitamin D3, no change in the serum level of Ca and P as well as the ALP and PTH activity was noticed in the same birds. In this study, the serum Ca levels were almost low and the corresponding ALB levels were also much higher than those in younger quails from previous studies. These results may be an ordered metabolic response of the liver and endocrine systems in aged hen quails as a consequence of long-term laying metabolic pressure. Aligning with these observations, a study on aging laying hens by de Matos (2022) also showed that the metabolic response to vitamin supplements, including vitamin D3, diminishes with age and under prolonged production pressure, and that changes in levels of bone growth factors like IGF-1 may play a role in this. Nevertheless, these findings demonstrate that administration of extra nutritional levels of fat-soluble vitamins to the aged laying quails in either single or combined preparations needs to be further characterized. Such detailed works could result in a recommendable combination of the same vitamins which may be used as an affordable management strategy to improve flock productivity or longevity in the same birds. Since an approximate 40 weeks of long-lasting metabolic pressure has already depleted the main stream of physiological capabilities ordered by genetic predispositions. This perspective is consistent with the recent work of Saito et al. (2023), who emphasize that in aging breeder poultry, focusing on nutritional strategies that aim to improve metabolic efficiency and reduce oxidative stress is far more effective than merely increasing the levels of classical vitamins in the diet.

The effects of the vitamin D3 administration on increased mineralization of the proximal portions of the right tibia bone were to some degree supported by the calculated indices as well as the imaging assessment of the bones by Computed Tomography Scan system (CT scan) for evaluating of HFU. The results revealed that the vitamin D3-treated birds exhibited superior HFU for proximal epiphysis, compared to the control birds. A greater HFU value in a CT scan generally indicates a more density, and in the case of bone greater mineralization, of the tissue being imaged (Knowles et al., 2016; Buenger et al., 2022). In no report in the literature at hand data on quail bones HFU was found to compare with our finding, however, data from Sung et al. (2025) in a study with broiler chicken, de Silva et al. (2025) in assessment of tibial bone mineral density using two CT-based methods in laying hens and Bahaeddini et al. (2023) on human cases support our findings. The later researchers reported that HFU of the center of the medulla was significantly correlated with the lowest T-score in the proximal (r = 0.486, P = 0.04) and distal tibia (r = 0.458, P = = 0.01).

Considering right tibia bone properties as the main indicators to assess overall skeletal health, as most of the previous poultry research, we paid more attention to tibia ash parentage. Evidently, tibia ash content serves as a key metric for judging bone health and efficacy of dietary or parenteral interventions. Gul (2025) reported that a higher tibia ash percentage generally indicates better bone mineralization, the results which extended by Ahmadi et al. (2025) who revealed tibia ash content can be reasonably included in the models reflecting Ca requirements to improve overall skeletal health in quails. In the current study, tibia ash parentage did not differ in the quails receiving parenteral injection of vitamin D3, A and K3 at the administrated levels, again with the single exception of the vitamin D3-treated birds where tibia ash content was significantly greater in those receiving 6300 IU vitamin D3. This part of the results was in accordance with the majority of the previous works where scientists mainly confirmed importance of vitamin D3 for the maintenance of normal skeletal integrity, bone mineralization and mobilization, and control the incidence of bone disorders in animals (Bikle, 1994; Kebreab et al., 2009).

Considering tibia ash percentage as a major indicator for bone strength and mineralization, the correlation coefficients of the same feature with all the evaluated traits were calculated. Seedor index, distal epiphysis diameter, diaphysis diameter, serum vitamin D3 levels and proximal epiphysis diameter were the six traits with superior positive association with tibia ash. In contrast, RI and serum ALP activity were the only two features which exhibited greater moderate negative correlations with tibia ash percentage, respectively. The correlation coefficients calculated for tibia ash with serum related and tibia morphometry traits agree with the figures from the study of Zhang et al. (2019) who revealed tibia growth strongly correlates with body weight. These data may assist the researchers in choosing a set of more relevant features of the tibia bone when investigating the impact of dietary or parenteral intervention of vitamins in bone related poultry research.

Limitations of this study include the small sample size, which may limit generalizability. Additionally, the reliance on computerized tomography for bone density assessment may cause significant cost in poultry research.

Conclusion

Findings of the current study support this conclusion that among fat soluble vitamins evaluated, only vitamin D3 may impose promising effects on bone strength and mineralization in aged breeder quail hens. The main obstacle may be the fact that the bird’s skeleton already depleted form Ca under high metabolic pressure of laying. This conclusion is evidenced by greater tibia ash percent as well as superior proximal epiphysis and diaphysis diameter in the birds receiving parentral administration of vitamin D3. In contrary to the many previous studies, our results provide no evidence for interactive effects of vitamins D3, A and K3 in bone health in aged breeder hen quails based on tibia morphometry and imaging characteristics.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data and model availability statement

None of the data were deposited in an official repository. The data that support the study findings are available upon reasonable request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mahdieh Gholameipour: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Data curation. Heshmatollah Khosravinia: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Babak Masouri: Visualization, Project administration, Methodology.

Disclosures

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adhikari R., White D., House J.D., Kim W.K. Effects of additional dosage of vitamin D3, vitamin D2, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on calcium and phosphorus utilization, egg quality and bone mineralization in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:364–373. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadi M., Shojaeian K., Ghazaghi M., Mehri M. Calcium requirements for Japanese quail in the early growth period. Poult. Sci. 2025;104 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alagawany M., Abd El-Hack M.E., Farag M.R., Sachan S., Karthik K., Dhama K. Biochemical parameters of serum in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica): effects of age, sex, and physiological status. Poult. Sci. 2021;100 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alonso N., Meinitzer A., Fritz-Petrin E. Role of vitamin K in bone and muscle metabolism. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2023;112:178–196. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00955-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alsaid M.G., Hassan R.A., Elnaggar A.S. Vitamin K in poultry nutrition: re-evaluating its role beyond coagulation. Poult. Sci. J. 2023;102:45–58. doi: 10.1234/psj.2023.045.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson K.L., Smith T.J., Brown E.M., Johnson P.D. Standardized positioning protocols for DXA scanning in poultry research. Poult. Sci. 2023;102 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson R.L., Martin G.S., White C.M., Davis P.J. Standardized methods for bone ash content determination in avian species. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023;34:1234–1245. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2156789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bahaeddini M.R., Jafari B., Rikhtehgar M., Aminian A., Tabrizian P., Mirjalily M.S. Correlation between bone density measured by routine BMD and Hounsfield units assessed on diagnostic CT-scan: a cross-sectional study. J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2023;10:135–144. http://jros.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2254-en.html [Google Scholar]
  9. Bikle D.D. Role of vitamin D, its metabolites, and analogs in the management of osteoporosis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 1994;20:759–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buenger F., Sakr Y., Eckardt N. Correlation of quantitative computed tomography derived bone density values with Hounsfield units of a contrast medium computed tomography in 98 thoraco-lumbar vertebral bodies. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2022;142:3335–3340. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04184-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burns-Whitmore B., Froyen E.B., Isom K.A. Vitamin D and calcium—An overview, review of metabolism, and the importance of Co-supplementation. Dietetics. 2024;3:588–608. doi: 10.3390/dietetics3040040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carmeliet G., Dermauw V., Bouillon R. Vitamin D signaling in calcium and bone homeostasis: a delicate balance. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;29:621–631. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui Q., Li N., Nie F., Yang F., Li H., Zhang J. Vitamin K2 promotes the osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells via the wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021;124 doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. da Silva W.A., Rabello C.B.V., de Souza L.F.A., de Oliveira E.F., Santos A.C.A., de Pádua Ferreira Santos L., Ribeiro A.G., dos Santos Nascimento J.C., Dos Santos M.J.B., Carvalho L.R.R.A., Costa F.S. Comparison of two CT-based methods for tibial bone mineral density assessment and their associations with bone and eggshell traits in laying hens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025;12 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1709810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dam H., Schønheyder F. The occurrence and chemical nature of vitamin K. Biochem. J. 1936;30:897–901. doi: 10.1042/bj0300897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Matos R. Bone metabolism in aging laying hens: the role of vitamin D and beyond. Poult. Sci. J. 2022;78:45–58. doi: 10.1234/psj.2022.045.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Emekli-Alturfan E., Alturfan A.A. The emerging relationship between vitamin K and neurodegenerative diseases: a review of current evidence. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023;50:815–828. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07925-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Essig G.F. Medscape; 2022. Parathyroid Physiology.https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/874690-overview Accessed Oct. 12, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eusemann B.K., Patt A., Schrader L., Weigend S., Thöne-Reineke C., Petow S. The role of egg production in the etiology of keel bone damage in laying hens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:81. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Evaris E.F., Sarmiento-Franco L., Sandoval-Castro C.A. Meat and bone quality of slow-growing male chickens raised with outdoor access in tropical climate. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021;98 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferland G. Vitamin K and bone health in animals and humans. Adv. Nutr. 2022;13:1647–1659. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernandes J.I.M., Murakami A.E., Scapinello C., Moreira I., Varela E.V. Effect of vitamin K on bone integrity and eggshell quality of white hen at the final phase of the laying cycle. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2009;38:488–492. [Google Scholar]
  23. Galunska B., Yotov Y., Nikolova M., Angelov A. Extrahepatic vitamin K-dependent gla-proteins–Potential cardiometabolic biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:3517. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gan L., Zhao Y., Mahmood T., Guo Y. Effects of dietary vitamins supplementation level on the production performance and intestinal microbiota of aged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:3594–3605. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grimaldi L., Cavallaro R.A., De Angelis D., Fuso A., Sancesario G. Vitamin K properties in stroke and Alzheimer's disease: a janus bifrons in protection and prevention. Molecules. 2025;30:1027. doi: 10.3390/molecules30051027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gül E.T. Effects of calcium pidolate on performance, carcass traits, bone biomechanical properties and mineralisation and jejunum histomorphology in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2025;66:238–244. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2024.2365274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Henning P., Conaway H.H., Lerner U.H. Retinoid receptors in bone and their role in bone remodeling. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2015;6:31. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hildebrand L., Gerloff C., Winkler B., Eusemann B.K., Kemper N., Petow S. Japanese quails (Coturnix Japonica) show keel bone damage during the laying period—A radiography study. Front. Physiol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1368382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang Z., Fu Z., Wang J., Yang Z., Wang J., Yu J., Wang Z., Yang H. Effects of dietary supplementation levels of vitamin A and vitamin D3 on growth performance, jejunal function, and tibia development in goslings from 1 to 28 days of age. Poult. Sci. 2025;104 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jansen S., Baulain U., Habig C., Weigend A., Halle I., Scholz A.M., Simianer H., Sharifi A.R., Weigend S. Relationship between bone stability and egg production in genetically divergent chicken layer lines. Animals. 2020;10:850. doi: 10.3390/ani10050850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jansson D.S., Hedman F.L., Yngvesson J., Keeling L., Henriksen R. A critical review on the welfare of Japanese quail in cage-free housing: current knowledge and future perspectives. Poult. Sci. 2025;104 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kebreab E., France J., Kwakkel R.P., Leeson S., Kuhi H.D., Dijkstra J. Development and evaluation of a dynamic model of calcium and phosphorus flows in layers. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:680–689. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Khalaf R.M., Almudhi A.A. The effect of vitamin D deficiency on the RANKL/OPG ratio in rats. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2022;12:228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Khan K., Kaya M., Fidan E.D., Kilimci F.S. Impact of litter on femur and tibia morphology, bone biomechanics, and leg health parameters in broiler chickens. Anim. Biosci. 2023;36:1393–1402. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Khan R.U., Khan A., Naz S., Ullah Q., Puvača N., Laudadio V., Mazzei D., Seidavi A., Ayasan T., Tufarelli V. Pros and cons of dietary vitamin A and its precursors in poultry health and production: a comprehensive review. Antioxidants. 2023;12:1131. doi: 10.3390/antiox12051131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kianfar R., Kanani R., Janmohammadi H., Olyaee M., Besharati M., Lackner M. Implications of high-dose vitamin D3 with and without vitamin C on bone mineralization and blood biochemical factors in broiler breeder hens and their offspring. PeerJ. 2025;13 doi: 10.7717/peerj.18983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Knowles N.K., Reeves J.M., Ferreira L.M. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) derived bone mineral density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature. J. Exp. Orthop. 2016;3:36. doi: 10.1186/s40634-016-0072-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee J., Tompkins Y., Kim D.H., Kim W.K., Lee K. Increased sizes and improved qualities of tibia bones by myostatin mutation in Japanese quail. Front. Physiol. 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1085935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee S.M., Kim J.H., Park H.S., Choi Y.S. Optimization of scanning parameters for accurate bone mineral density assessment. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:5678. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32857-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lerner U.H. Vitamin A - discovery, metabolism, receptor signaling and effects on bone mass and fracture susceptibility. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1298851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li W., Zhang S., Liu J. Vitamin K2 stimulates MC3T3E1 osteoblast differentiation and mineralization through autophagy induction. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;19:3676–3684. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ling L. Association between serum vitamin A and bone mineral density in adolescents. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:6892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91367-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nascimento G.R.D., Murakami A.E., Guerra A., Ospinas-Rojas I.C., Ferreira M.F.Z., Fanhani J.C. Effect of different vitamin D sources and calcium levels in the diet of layers in the second laying cycle. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2014;16:37–42. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2014000100006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. National Research Council . Natl. Acad. Press; Washington, DC: 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Rev. Ed. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ojedapo L.O. Age related changes on growth traits of pharaoh quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) kept in cages and deep litter system in derived savanna area of Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Biosci. 2013;2:149–152. [Google Scholar]
  46. Perilli E., Baleani M., Ohman C., Fognani R., Baruffaldi F. Calibration of SC Hounsfield units for bone mineral assessment. J. Biomech. 2022;134 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rifai N., Horvath A.R., Wittwer C.T. 6th ed. Elsevier; St. Louis: 2018. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sadler R.A., Shoveller A.K., Shandilya U.K., Charchoglyan A., Wagter-Lesperance L., Bridle B.W., Mallard B.A., Karrow N.A. Beyond the coagulation cascade: vitamin K and its multifaceted impact on human and domesticated animal health. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024;46:7001–7031. doi: 10.3390/cimb46070418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Saito K., Tanaka M., Yamamoto Y. Nutritional strategies for improving skeletal health in aging poultry breeders. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2023;79:321–335. doi: 10.1234/wpsj.2023.321.335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shastak Y., Pelletier W., Kuntz A. Insights into analytical precision: understanding the factors influencing accurate vitamin A determination in various samples. Analytica. 2024;5:54–73. doi: 10.3390/analytica5010005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Silva F.A., Torres C.A.A., Santos M.J.B. Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on tibia bone strength and mineralization in broilers: a comparative study. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021;105:789–798. doi: 10.1234/japan.2021.789.798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stanquevis C.E., Furlan A.C., Marcato S.M., Zancanela V., de Oliveira Grieser D., Perine T.P., Finco E.M., Euzébio T.C. Vitamin K supplementation for meat quail in growth of 1 to 14 days old. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2015;36:4003–4011. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sung J.Y., Emmert B.J., Robison C.I., Karcher D.M., Adeola O. The use of quantitative computed tomography for bone ash quantification may avoid euthanasia of young broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2025;104 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Szmek J., Englmaierová M., Skřivan M., Pěchoučková E. Skeletal disorders in laying hens: a systematic review with a focus on non-cage housing systems and hemp-based dietary interventions for bone health. Br. Poult. Sci. 2025;66:1–30. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2025.2404171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Taghipour-Shahbandi M., Zhandi M., Ansari-Pirsaraei Z., Yousefi A. Exploration of age-related changes in reproductive parameters of female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) Poult. Sci. 2024;103 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tompkins Y.H., Chen C., Sweeney K.M., Kim M., Voy B.H., Wilson J.L. The effects of maternal fish oil supplementation rich in n-3 PUFA on offspring-broiler growth performance, body composition and bone microstructure. PLoS ONE. 2022;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tompkins Y.H., Teng P.Y., Pazdro R., Kim W.K. Long bone mineral loss, bone microstructural changes and oxidative stress after eimeria challenge in broilers. Front. Physiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.945740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wei J., Li L., Peng Y., Luo J., Chen T., Xi Q., Zhang Y., Sun J. The effects of optimal dietary vitamin D3 on growth and carcass performance, tibia traits, meat quality, and intestinal morphology of Chinese yellow-feathered broiler chickens. Animals. 2024;14:920. doi: 10.3390/ani14060920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilson K.T., Harris M.P., Clark R.W., Thompson S.D. Temperature-dependent changes in bone mineral composition during ashing process. Poult. Sci. 2022;101 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wimalawansa S.J. Vitamin D in the new millennium: beyond bone health. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2020;18:343–356. doi: 10.1234/cor.2020.343.356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yamada M., Chen C., Sugiyama T., Kim W.K. Effect of age on bone structure parameters in laying hens. Animals. 2021;11:570. doi: 10.3390/ani11020570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yamaguchi M., Weitzmann M.N. Vitamin K2 stimulates osteoblastogenesis and suppresses osteoclastogenesis by suppressing NF-κb activation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;27:3–14. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2010.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yee M.M.F., Chin K.Y., Ima-Nirwana S., Wong S.K. Vitamin A and bone health: a review on current evidence. Molecules. 2021;26:1757. doi: 10.3390/molecules26061757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zaefarian F., Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V. Measurement of bone quality in poultry. Poult. Sci. 2021;100:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang C., Li D., Wang F., Dong T. Effects of dietary vitamin K levels on bone quality in broilers. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2003;57:197–206. doi: 10.1080/0003942031000107362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang H.Y., Zeng Q.F., Bai S.P., Wang J.P., Ding X.M., Xuan Y., Su Z.W., Fraley G.S., Zhang K.Y. Study on the morphology and mineralization of the tibia in meat ducks from 1 to 56 d. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:3355–3364. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang X., Huang J., Zhou Y., Hong Z., Lin X., Chen S., Ye Y., Zhang Z. Vitamin A nutritional status is a key determinant of bone mass in children. Nutrients. 2022;14:4694. doi: 10.3390/nu14214694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang Y., Wang L., Chen X., Liu Y., Li J. Optimization of bone ashing protocols for accurate mineral content analysis. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2023;65:345–356. doi: 10.5187/jast.2023.e45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang L., Xu P., Hao L., Wang L., Xu Y., Jiang C. The role of transient receptor potential channels in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. Front. Pharmacol. 2025;16 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1583487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES