Skip to main content
Cells logoLink to Cells
. 2026 Feb 17;15(4):358. doi: 10.3390/cells15040358

Metabolic Syndrome Predisposes Ossabaw Minipig Retina to an Early Neurodegenerative Milieu

Scholastica Go 1,2,, Rayne R Lim 1,3,, Anju E Thomas 1, Paras K Mishra 4, Shyam S Chaurasia 1,5,*
Editors: Ram Prasad, Yvonne Adu-Rutledge
PMCID: PMC12939723  PMID: 41744801

Abstract

The miniature (mini) Ossabaw pigs are proposed as a translational preclinical model for testing and developing novel therapeutics for human diseases, including cystic fibrosis, cancer, and metabolic syndrome (MetS). In recent years, pigs have gained similar attention for studying retinal abnormalities and disorders owing to their close resemblance in size, anatomy, vasculature, and pathology to the human eye compared with their rodent counterparts. In our previous study, Ossabaw minipigs fed a Western diet for 10 weeks and followed for 3.5 months exhibited early signs of retinal degeneration and vascular abnormalities, mimicking the early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). To further evaluate pathomorphological alterations across neuronal and non-neuronal cell types, the present study comprehensively investigated individual retinal layers using cell-type-specific immunostaining. We found that the Western diet-fed mini pigs had reduced rhodopsin and blue opsins, changes in bipolar and ganglion cells, and reduced density of pre- and post-synaptic connections. Moreover, the retinas of obese mini pigs showed evidence of gliosis and microglial activation. Our findings suggest that a Western diet-induced metabolic disorder exhibits an early neurodegenerative milieu and further demonstrate the suitability of Ossabaw mini pigs as a model for human retinal diseases associated with MetS, such as DR and diabetic macular edema (DME).

Keywords: retina, metabolic syndrome, ossabaw minipigs, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macula edema, neurodegeneration

1. Introduction

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a condition characterized by a cluster of risk factors, including obesity (measured by waist circumference), hyperglycemia, hypertension, elevated triglycerides, and low HDL cholesterol [1,2]. MetS is a major public health concern, affecting one-third of the U.S. population [3]. People diagnosed with MetS are at a high risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1,4]. MetS has a detrimental impact on multiple organ systems, including the eyes. Various eye diseases, including dry eye syndrome [5], cataracts [6], diabetic retinopathy (DR) [7], diabetic macular edema (DME) [8], central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) [9], glaucoma [10], and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [11], are associated with vision loss and a poor quality of life in MetS patients. Pathological changes in the retina related to MetS may result from systemic factors, such as chronic inflammation [12] and increased oxidative stress [13]. Other significant effects of MetS, such as retinal microvascular injury, retinal microangiopathy [14], and the increased risk of DR, all contribute to retinal disorders.

In recent years, the One Health concept has set the stage for global initiatives that foster interdisciplinary collaboration to accelerate biomedical discoveries advancing human, animal, and environmental health (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA). For decades, researchers and pharmaceutical companies have predominantly relied on rodent models, which often fail to translate into human outcomes [15,16,17,18]. The “One Health” approach has led to the development of various nonhuman primate models, including novel pig models [19,20,21,22]. While pigs are more expensive to maintain than rodents, their genetic and anatomical similarities, as well as their physiological and pathological responses, have contributed to a better understanding of human disease progression and mechanisms [21,22,23]. Pig models have been used as translational pre-clinical models to test new drugs and repurpose FDA-approved drugs for numerous human diseases [24]. In 2022, a pig heart was successfully transplanted into a human in a landmark case [25]. Hence, there is a strong emphasis on developing pig models that mimic human eye disorders.

Ossabaw minipigs are a breed of wild boar that adopted a “thrifty genotype” to survive in the harsh conditions of Ossabaw Island. When fed a Western diet, these pigs develop classical features of MetS, including hypertension, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and dyslipidemia [26]. Consequently, they serve as a translational model for studying cardiovascular dysfunction [26,27]. In our previous study, we observed ultrastructural neuronal and microvascular changes in the retina that mimicked early signs of DR pathogenesis [28] and compromised corneal collagens [29] in the Ossabaw minipig after 10 weeks on a Western diet. The present study advances our investigation by examining DR- and DME-related changes in the neuronal retina to establish the Western diet-fed Ossabaw pigs as suitable models for mimicking human retinal disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ossabaw Minipigs

Pigs were maintained and tissues collected as described earlier [28]. In brief, Ossabaw minipigs (3.5 months) housed at the Animal Science Research Center at the University of Missouri, Columbia, were fed a Western diet (KT324) containing high-fat/high-fructose corn syrup and a high-calorie content for 10 weeks [30]. Lean pigs consumed a standard commercially available chow 5L80 diet (Lab Diet; 3.03 kcal/kg−1, 71% carbohydrate, 18.5% protein, and 10.5% fat). At six months of age, following a 20 h overnight fast, pigs were anesthetized and euthanized for eye globe collection. To isolate the posterior eye cup, the pig eye was hemi-dissected on ice in a Petri dish with cold PBS to remove the anterior ocular tissues. The vitreous edge of the vitreous body was gently teased away from the retina using forceps until a portion of vitreous detachment was visible. Blunt forceps were then reached into the space between the retina and the vitreous to pull the vitreous body away from the eyecup. An intact vitreous body was extracted from the eyes and dissected within an hour of enucleation.

2.2. Embedding and Immunohistochemistry

The posterior eyecup was submerged in fresh 4% PFA and incubated at room temperature for 24 h. The eyecup was removed and cryopreserved by placing it in 15% sucrose solution for 24 h, followed by 30% sucrose solution for an additional 24 h. To embed, the eyecup was blotted dry, then submerged in Poly Vial (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Washington, PA, USA) containing fresh OCT for 10 min to equilibrate. Markings were made on the OCT mold to ensure accurate orientation during sectioning. Eyes in OCT were placed in 2-methylbutane and kept over liquid nitrogen to ensure even freezing. Eyes were stored at −80 °C freezer for at least 24 h before sectioning. Due to the horizontal band of dense retinal ganglion cells dorsal to the optic disk [31], the eye cup was halved in sagittal to ensure an accurate representation of the entire retina. The 15 µm-thick sections were collected onto coated glass slides. Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the standard procedure described earlier [28]. In brief, slides were washed in PBS for 5 min and blocked with 5% donkey serum. Antibodies (Table 1) were diluted in 5% donkey serum and incubated on tissue sections at 4 °C overnight. Following three PBS washes, retinal sections were stained with Alexa Fluor secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature and mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA).

Table 1.

Primary antibody used for retinal cells and subcellular structures in immunostaining.

Antibody Marker Company Host Primary
Antibody
Secondary
Antibody
NeuN Ganglion cells Thermo Fisher Scientific
(MA5–33103)
MC Mouse
IgG2b
1:100 1:200
GFAP Astrocytes/
Muller gliosis
Novus Biologicals
(NB300-141)
PC Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:500
GS Muller cells MilliporeSigma
(G2781)
PC Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:200
Iba-1 Microglia Wako
(091-19741)
PC Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:200
Parvalbumin Amacrine cells MilliporeSigma
(MAB1572)
MC-Mouse
IgG
1:100 1:200
Calbindin Horizontal cells MilliporeSigma
(C9848)
MC-Mouse
IgG1
1:100 1:200
Protein Kinase C alpha Rod bipolar cells MilliporeSigma
(P5704)
MC-Mouse
IgG2a
1:50 1:50
CRALBP Retinoid binding protein Abcam
(ab1503)
MC-Mouse
IgG1
1:100 1:200
Postsynaptic density protein (PSD95) Post Synapses Thermo Scientific
(MA1046)
MC-Mouse
IgG1 kappa
1:100 1:200
Synaptophysin Presynaptic Vesicle Sigma
(S5768)
MC-Mouse
IgG1
1:100 1:200
Recoverin Phototransduction MilliporeSigma
(AB5585)
PC Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:200
Blue-opsin Cones MilliporeSigma
(AB5407)
PC-Rabbit IgG 1:50 1:200
Red/Green-opsin Cones MilliporeSigma
(AB5405)
PC-Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:500
Rhodopsin Rods ChemiconSigma
(MAB5356)
MC-Mouse
IgG1
1:20 1:200
Ezrin RPE Abcam
(ab41672)
PC-Rabbit IgG 1:100 1:1000

2.3. Imaging and Quantitative Analysis

The retinal sections were imaged using a Keyence BZ-X810, all-in-one Fluorescence microscope, using BZX Analyzer Software (version 10.6.1) BZ-H4Xe (Keyence Corporation of America, Itasca, IL, USA). Imaging settings were kept identical for Lean and MetS retinal sections, and similar areas within the posterior eyecup, peripheral to the visual streak, were imaged to ensure similar neuronal cell distribution. Image quantification was performed using ImageJ macros (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Background subtraction was performed for images, followed by threshold adjustment. The region of interest (ROI) was selected using the rectangular tool, and similar dimensions were applied to both experimental groups. Watershed was enabled, followed by particle analysis. The Percentage Area was obtained from the output [32], and the integrated density was calculated by multiplying the average area by the mean threshold value [33]. For Iba-1-stained images, amoeboid microglia were identified and manually counted to determine the total number of amoeboid microglia (cells/mm2), as described earlier [34].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed and plotted in GraphPad Prism 10.6.1 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A comparison between the two groups was performed using Student’s t-test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Individual data points are plotted and presented as the mean ± SD.

3. Results

Ossabaw minipigs fed a Western diet for ten weeks exhibit pathomorphological and neurodegenerative damage throughout the MetS retina.

3.1. Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE)

To understand the integrity and structure of retinal pigment epithelium in the MetS group, cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP, Figure 1a,b) and ezrin (Figure 1e,e’,f,f’) antibodies were used for immunostaining (Figure 1). CRALBP, a retinoid-binding protein expressed in the RPE and Müller glia [35], showed no differences in the RPE but had reduced intensity in the inner retina. Although there was a downward trend, the overall percentage of stained area and intensity in pigs fed a Western diet did not achieve statistical significance. (Figure 1c,d). Ezrin, a critical polarization marker in vertebrate intraocular neuroepithelial cells [36], was localized to the RPE apical process, which was seen to be noticeably denser in the Western diet-fed pigs (Figure 1f’). However, no significant differences in area percentage or integrated density were observed (Figure 1g,h).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed a Lean or Western diet were immunostained for CRALBP and Ezrin, a marker of RPE. (a): CRALBP in Lean diet displays healthy morphology of retinoid-binding proteins (white arrowhead). (b): The Western diet revealed similar staining in RPE, but reduced retinoid-binding proteins from the outer nuclear layer (ONL) through the nerve fiber layer (NFL) (white arrowhead). (c,d): No significant differences in area percentage or integrated density. (e,f): Ezrin is visible in both groups, as shown by RPE staining. (e’,f’): Thickened RPE apical processes seen in the MetS Western diet group (arrows). (g,h): Increased staining in the Western diet-fed pigs did not reach significance. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3).

3.2. Retinal Photoreceptors: Rods and Cones

To visualize photoreceptors, the retina was stained for rhodopsin [37], blue opsin [38], red/green opsin [39], and recoverin [40] (Figure 2). Rhodopsin, a rod-specific pigment in the outer segment (OS) (Figure 2a,a’,b,b’), showed reduced area percentage (p = 0.0410; Figure 2c) and integrated density (p = 0.0155; Figure 2d) in the retinas of minipigs fed on a Western diet, suggesting Rod degeneration. Notably, increased rhodopsin stain was seen in the nerve fiber layer (NFL) of the MetS pigs (Figure 2b). Next, we investigated various cone opsins, including blue (Figure 2e,e’,f,f’) and red/green opsins (Figure 2i,i’,j,j’). In blue opsin, a reduced expression was observed in area percentage (p = 0.0051; Figure 2g) and integrated density (p = 0.0050; Figure 2h). Likewise, red/green opsins were shown to be less dense in the Western diet-fed pigs, but no significant differences were observed (Figure 2k,l). Finally, recoverin, a calcium-binding protein marker involved in phototransduction, was used to visualize cones and rods from the OS to the outer plexiform layer (OPL). Similar staining patterns were seen in both pigs (Figure 2m,m’,n,n’), though a non-significant increase in percentage and integrated density was seen in the Western diet-fed pigs (Figure 2o,p).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed on Lean or Western diet were immunostained for photoreceptors using rhodopsin, blue opsin, red/green opsin, and recoverin markers. (a,a’): Rhodopsin strongly stained rod outer segments (OS) and the outline of the cell bodies. (white arrowhead). (b,b’): Gaps in staining (arrowhead) suggest rod degeneration and impaired visual function in MetS Ossabaw minipigs. (c,d): Area percentage and integrated density confirmed significant differences between the Lean and the Western diet. (e,e’): Blue cone opsin is sparsely distributed in the pig retina (white arrows). (f,f’): Partial absence and thinning were seen in the MetS minipig group. (g,h): Significant reduction in blue opsin stain between the Lean and the Western diet. (i,i’): Red/green cone opsins are densely distributed in Lean diet minipigs. (j,j’): Similarly, partial absence and thinning of cones were seen in the Western diet pigs (arrows). (j,k,l): Recoverin showed no significant differences between staining in both groups. (m,n,m’,n’): Total cones and rods visualized using anti-recoverin antibody revealed whole photoreceptors from the OS through the outer plexiform layer (OPL). No overt changes in staining distribution were observed. (o,p): Slight increased expression in the MetS model was not statistically significant. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

3.3. Retinal Neurons: Amacrine, Horizontal, Bipolar, and Ganglion Cells

Since we previously found increased degenerating neurons in the Western diet-fed pigs using Fluoro-Jade C staining [28], we wanted to comprehensively examine neuronal changes across retinal layers. Immunostaining was conducted with specific antibodies for parvalbumin [41], calbindin [42], protein kinase C alpha (PKCα) [43], and neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) [44], which are markers for amacrine, horizontal, rod bipolar, and ganglion cells, respectively. Parvalbumin staining (Figure 3a,a’,b,b’) revealed phenotypic disruption of amacrine cells along with an increase in expression in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) of the retinas of Western diet-fed Ossabaw minipigs compared to those on a Lean diet.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed a Lean or Western diet were stained for amacrine, horizontal, bipolar, and ganglion cells. (a,b,a’,b’): Parvalbumin immunostaining shows disruption of amacrine cell organization within the inner nuclear layer (INL) and increased parvalbumin expression in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) (arrowhead) in the Western diet–fed pigs. (c,d): No significant differences in area percentage and integrated density between the two diet groups. (e,f,e’,f’): Calbindin immunostaining of horizontal cells in the OPL (thick arrows) demonstrates reduced calbindin expression in the Western diet-fed pigs. (g,h): Area percentage and integrated density measurements remained comparable between groups. (i,j,i’,j’): Bipolar cells were visualized with monoclonal PKCα antibody. The MetS Ossabaw minipig model exhibits degeneration of bipolar cells in the INL. (k,l): Decreases in area percentage and integrated density in the Western diet pigs confirm overall bipolar cell loss compared to the healthy Lean diet. (m,n,m’,n’): NeuN staining of ganglion cells in the GCL (white boxed regions) highlights histological alterations in the Western diet-fed pigs. (o,p): NeuN area percentage and integrated density were reduced in the MetS pigs. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

However, there are no quantitative differences in the area percentage and integrated density of parvalbumin in response to the Western diet (Figure 3c,d). Calbindin-positive horizontal cell bodies assembled along the OPL and were seen to have reduced neuronal density in the Western diet-fed pigs (Figure 3e,e’,f,f’). However, it did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3g,h). Protein kinase C alpha (PKCα; Figure 3i,i’,j,j’), a specific marker for rod bipolar cells, showed fewer bipolar cells in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) in Western diet mini pigs, which was significantly decreased compared to their Lean counterparts (p = 0.0030; Figure 3k) and integrated density (p = 0.0061; Figure 3l). Additionally, we observed significant histological changes in NeuN, a marker for ganglion cells (Figure 3m,m’,n,n’), consistent with a reduction in the area percentage (p = 0.0355; Figure 3o) and integrated density (p = 0.0355; Figure 3p) of MetS diet Ossabaw minipigs.

3.4. Retinal Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Connections

Synaptophysin, a presynaptic vesicle marker [45], is found in the terminals of both photoreceptors within the OPL and second-order neurons situated in the IPL, thus serving as a crucial indicator of synaptic activity and vesicle release within the retina (Figure 4a,a’,b,b’). Synaptophysin staining showed reduced integrated intensity (p = 0.0277; Figure 4d), reflecting Western diet-induced changes in presynaptic vesicles. Postsynaptic density protein (PSD-95), a molecular scaffold responsible for synaptic function and plasticity [46], was used to visualize postsynaptic densities of excitatory synapses in both experimental groups (Figure 4e,e’,f,f’). PSD-95 depicts significantly less intense immunohistochemical staining in the retinal tissues of the Western diet-fed Ossabaw minipigs compared to the Lean diet. Statistical analyses show both a decrease in PSD-95 area percentage (p = 0.023; Figure 4g) and integrated density (p = 0.0121; Figure 4h).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed a Lean or Western diet were stained for synaptic sites (presynapses and postsynapses) using synaptophysin and PSD95. (a,a’): Synaptophysin exhibited collective alignment throughout the Lean diet group. (b,b’): Limited staining and disrupted thin synaptic sites were exhibited in the Western diet pigs (white arrowhead). (c,d): While area percentage was not significantly reduced, integrated density was significantly decreased in the Western diet groups. (e,e’): Visible signaling displayed in PSD95 staining in Lean diet retina (white arrowhead). (f,f’): Degeneration in post-synaptic processes seen as diffused staining in the MetS minipig group (white arrows). (g,h): PSD95 was reduced in the Western diet MetS minipigs compared to the Lean counterparts. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3), *, p < 0.05.

3.5. Retinal Macroglia: Müller Glial Cells and Astrocytes

Müller cells and astrocytes were assessed using glutamine synthetase (GS) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies. Gliosis in the MetS Ossabaw minipig model is a critical factor in DR pathogenesis. The GS antibody was used to stain Müller cells [47].

While the cellular processes were well distributed in Müller cells of Lean diet pigs, they were disrupted in the Western diet-fed pigs (Figure 5a,a’,b,b’). However, the GS expression showed no discernible differences in staining intensity between the two groups (Figure 5c,d). GFAP is a key marker of astrocytes and is also found in activated Müller cells [48] (Figure 5e,e’,f,f’). GFAP expression was intense in the GCL, showing a significant increase in area percentage (p = 0.0158; Figure 5g) and integrated density (p = 0.027; Figure 5h), indicating gliosis in the Ossabaw pigs after the Western diet.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed a Lean or Western diet were stained with GS for Müller cells and GFAP stain for retinal astrocytes and activated Müller cells. (a,a’): Equally distributed Muller cells can be seen displayed throughout the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and nerve fiber layer (NFL). (b,b’): Müller processes were disrupted in MetS condition minipigs. (c,d): No significant differences in expression were seen between groups. (e,f,e’,f’): MetS pigs showed intense GFAP staining in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), indicative of increased glial activity (white arrowhead). (g,h): Increased area percentage and integrated density confirmed glial activation in Ossabaw minipigs fed a Western diet. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3); *, p < 0.05.

3.6. Retinal Microglia

Retinal microglial cells are the primary responders to retinal stress or injury [49]. Ramified retinal microglia are predominantly localized in the GCL and IPL of the Lean pig retina (Figure 6a,a’). However, microglia in the Western diet-fed mini pigs were morphologically amoeboid and rounded, suggestive of activation. Moreover, elongated microglia were translocating from the INL towards the outer retina (Figure 6b,b’). These changes are not quantitative, as no significant changes are observed in the area percentage and integrated intensity (Figure 6c,d). These MetS-induced changes may indicate cellular stress and inflammation, which play a critical role in the progression of retinal diseases. While area percentage and integrated density did not show significant differences, the total number of activated amoeboid microglia was significantly increased in the Western diet-fed Ossabaw mini pigs.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Retinas of Ossabaw minipigs fed a Lean or Western diet were stained for microglia using Iba-1 (a,b). (a,a’): Healthy homeostatic ramified microglia (white arrowhead) were seen in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of Lean pigs. (b,b’): Microglia were seen to be amoeboid and rounded in the Western diet pigs, and migrating towards the outer retina, indicating activated microglia. (c,d): Area percentage and integrated density for microglia staining in Ossabaw minipigs fed a Western diet. (e): Quantification of total amoeboid microglia representing activated microglia in the Lean vs. Western diet-fed Ossabaw mini pigs. Data represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3); *, p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

Vision loss is one of the most debilitating conditions, exerting a profound adverse effect on the quality of life. It has been associated with depression among adults [48], increases the dependency of affected elderly individuals on their caregivers [49,50,51], and constitutes a substantial economic burden in the United States. According to a consensus from the National Eye Institute and Prevent Blindness America, the leading causes of age-related eye diseases are cataracts, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and DR. Several rodent models are available; however, none accurately recapitulate human retinal disease, as they lack a central cone-rich region and are predominantly chemically induced or possess mutations [50,51]. In contrast, pigs have a cone-rich visual streak extending both nasally and temporally [52], and Ossabaw minipigs in particular have a high propensity for obesity, attributed to their “thrifty genotype,” rendering them appropriate models for MetS research [53]. However, their retinal structure has not yet been extensively studied in MetS. Retinal tissue is considered the most metabolically active tissue in the body and is highly susceptible to metabolic alterations and reprogramming [54]. In this study, we examined retinal pathomorphological alterations in Ossabaw minipigs subjected to a high-fat, high-fructose corn syrup, and high-calorie diet (Western diet, also referred to as MetS diet) for ten consecutive weeks. Our study showed evident retinal damage, along with morphological, histopathological, and neuronal changes across multiple retinal layers, suggesting early signs of MetS-induced retinal damage and providing early pathological indicators of developing DR.

The RPE is crucial for light adaptation in the visual function [55]. The RPE constitutes the outer blood–retina barrier and facilitates epithelial transport, light absorption, visual cycle, phagocytosis, spatial ion buffering, immune modulation, and secretion [56]. CRALBP plays a critical role in the visual cycle by facilitating the transport of retinaldehyde, which is vital for photoreceptor function and the regeneration of visual pigments. Ezrin serves as a marker of RPE polarity and stains the apical surface and microvilli of the RPE [36], indicating cellular integrity. Both CRALBP and Ezrin markers showed no significant quantitative differences among dietary groups, emphasizing the resilience of RPE cells and their related cellular functions despite early diet-induced morphological changes in the inner retina.

Recoverin, a calcium-binding protein with a crucial role in the phototransduction cascade by regulating rhodopsin kinase activity, stained both rod and cone photoreceptors with no difference between the diet groups. Next, the outer segments of rods and cones were analyzed separately. The rod photoreceptors were stained with the Rhodopsin marker, a photosensitive G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) found in the rods that mediates scotopic vision [57]. As rhodopsin is essential for phototransduction [58], a significant decrease in the Western diet pigs suggests that MetS may adversely affect rhodopsin synthesis or stability, potentially impairing rod cell function and overall visual acuity. Blue opsin and red/green opsins are critical for color discrimination and high-resolution vision, contributing to color vision and visual acuity [38,58]. Blue opsin was quantitatively reduced in the Western diet pigs, while red/green opsin had a sparse distribution in the Western diet pigs. Together, these suggest potentially compromised color vision. These findings highlighted early changes to the photoreceptor OS, which are metabolically demanding and require continuous daily renewal supported by the RPE. Since RPE apical processes were thickened in the Western diet-fed pigs, this may indicate early RPE dysfunction and photoreceptor degeneration resulting from MetS.

Photoreceptor-derived neural signals propagate along a vertical pathway through bipolar and ganglion cells, while horizontal and amacrine cells establish a horizontal pathway that refines information by lateral signal integration [59]. The processed data are subsequently transmitted from the retina to the brain via the optic nerve, utilizing ganglion cell axons. MetS Ossabaw minipigs predominantly displayed pathomorphological changes throughout the amacrine, horizontal, bipolar, and retinal ganglion cell layers. Neurotransmitter retinal neurons, such as parvalbumin-positive amacrine cells, play roles in dopamine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) secretion and synaptic release, and modulate retinal neuronal activity during dark- and light-adaptation [60]. Parvalbumin is a key Ca2+ binding protein found in AII amacrine cells, knotty type 2 amacrine cells, starburst amacrine cells, and displaced amacrine cells with cell bodies located in the ganglion cell layer. Paralbumin-immunopositive cells showed irregularities in the INL and an increase in displaced amacrine cell bodies in the GCL in retinas collected from MetS Ossabaw minipigs. Horizontal cells participate in glucose transport, regulate light-dependent phosphoinositide metabolism, and require a stable metabolic input to support the aspartate-malate shuttle, which recycles GABA and provides inhibitory feedback within the outer plexiform layer of the retina. Calbindin stains both the A-type and B-type horizontal cells in the retina. The integrated intensity observed in the retinal tissues of the Western diet-fed Ossabaw mini pigs is reduced compared to those on a Lean diet. There are also fewer horizontal cell nuclei in the MetS pigs than in the Lean group along the OPL.

Bipolar cells are the principal interneurons that function as the primary conduits from photoreceptors to ganglion cells [61]. They rely on glucose to meet their high energy demands and regulate diverse cellular activities, including cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis, thereby rendering them susceptible to metabolic stress [62]. Retinas from MetS Ossabaw minipigs stained for PKCα showed several pathohistological defects, including loss of dendrites and synaptic signals from bipolar cells and degenerative rod bipolar cell axons throughout the INL and IPL, indicating that rod bipolar cells are the early target of MetS.

RGC dendrites receive synaptic inputs from bipolar cells and extend within the inner plexiform layer (IPL) [63]. Despite the distinctive metabolic characteristics of the IPL, RGC dendrites predominantly rely on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for ATP production and are notably vulnerable to metabolic stress or injury [64]. We tested NeuN to assess the structural integrity of retinal ganglion cells in the Lean and Western diet-induced MetS pigs. NeuN-positive RGCs exhibited distortion and mislocalization within the designated GCL, extending into the NFL, with a significant reduction in area percentage in the Western diet group. There were also noticeably fewer ganglion cells in the MetS Ossabaw minipigs than in the Lean pigs, suggesting early signs of neuronal degeneration and increased ganglion cell death [65], seen in patients with diabetes and other related ocular diseases [66,67,68]. These findings provide further insights into the role and structure of retinal neurons, leading to impaired function and increased susceptibility to retinal diseases, including DR and DME.

Next, we investigated presynaptic and postsynaptic morphology in the MetS minipig model. Synaptophysin is crucial for synaptic vesicle trafficking and neurotransmitter release [45], and PSD-95 plays a pivotal role in postsynaptic signaling and plasticity by anchoring synaptic proteins and receptors at the postsynaptic membrane [46]. Both markers were significantly reduced in the Western diet-fed Ossabaw retina. This corroborates the structural changes in bipolar and ganglion cells, suggesting reduced presynaptic vesicle presence or activity, and depletion of synaptic density or alterations in synaptic structure and function in response to MetS stress.

CRALBP in Müller cells is essential for M-cone function [69]. Relatively lower CRALBP was seen in the inner retina of the Western diet-fed pigs, suggestive of gradual Müller dysfunction. In Western diet-fed pigs, glutamine synthetase was unchanged, suggesting that glial function related to glutamate metabolism and detoxification remains unaffected by short-term dietary differences. Conversely, GFAP, a biomarker of activated astrogliosis, was associated with astrocyte pathology and migration in the MetS pigs. The upregulation of GFAP has been associated with DR pathology [70], further corroborating our findings that Ossabaw mini pigs fed a Western diet for 10 weeks exhibit an early indication of retinal degeneration. These observations also align with prior research on streptozotocin (STZ)-induced mice, where retinal astrocytes are prone to early degeneration in diabetes [71,72].

Retinal microglial cells are the primary responders to retinal stress or injury [73]. Although we did not observe differences in Iba-1 staining intensity between the diet groups, we observed noticeable changes in microglial morphology and migration toward the outer retina. Our recent study on the diabetic pig retina indicates that microglia under MetS release damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) proteins, such as S100A9, which are detrimental to retinal cells and play a critically important role in prolonging the sterile inflammatory stages of DR [74].

Recent clinical data indicate that the age at which diabetes onset occurs may worsen the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in youths [75]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rarely seen in prepubertal adolescents; however, post-pubertal adolescents with T2DM have a 4.8-fold increased risk of developing DR, which also tends to progress more rapidly. In our previous study, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), these MetS pigs exhibited early disruption of cellular architecture across neural layers [28]. Specific discrepancies across retinal cell types are quantified in this systematic examination; however, the small sample size limited statistical power. Studies have shown that pigs share genomic similarities with the human immune system [76]. Although pig models were limited in previous studies [77], Ossabaw minipigs, in particular, have emerged as a unique preclinical model for MetS [26]. In summary, this study found subtle changes in the RPE, photoreceptor OS, bipolar and ganglion synaptic connections, and morphological activation of microglial cells post ten weeks on a Western diet in Ossabaw pigs. Our findings suggest a link between diet-induced metabolic changes and neuroretinal disorders and underscore the importance of Ossabaw mini pigs, which are prone to diabetes, exhibit phenotypic traits evident in retinal histology, and are suitable not only for T2DM models but also for studying the long-term pathological progression of DR and DME.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

MetS Metabolic Syndrome
DR Diabetic Retinopathy
DME Diabetic Macular Edema
HDL High-Density Lipoprotein
T2DM Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
CRAO Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
AMD Age-related Macular Degeneration
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration
mm millimeter
PBS Phosphate-Buffered Saline
PFA Paraformaldehyde
OCT Optimal Cutting Temperature
SD Standard Deviation
NIH National Institutes of Health
ROI Region of Interest
MC Monoclonal
PC Polyclonal
RPE Retinal Pigment Epithelium
CRALBP Cellular Retinaldehyde-binding Protein
OPL Outer Plexiform Layer
IPL Inner Plexiform Layer
OS Outer Segments
IS Inner Segments
ONL Outer Nuclear Layer
NFL Nerve Fiber Layer
PKCα Protein Kinase C alpha
NeuN Neuron-Specific Nuclear Protein
GCL Ganglion Cell Layer
PSD-95 Postsynaptic Density Protein
RGC Retinal Ganglion Cells
GS Glutamine Synthetase
GFAP Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
Iba1 Ionized Calcium-binding Adaptor Molecule 1
GPCR G-protein Coupled Receptor
GABA γ-aminobutyric acid
OXPHOS Oxidative Phosphorylation
ATP Adenosine Triphosphate
STZ Streptozotocin
DAMP Damage-associated Molecular Pattern
TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy
MetS Pigs Pigs exhibiting Metabolic Syndrome
DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

Author Contributions

S.S.C. designed the study; S.S.C. and R.R.L. designed the experiments; S.G., A.E.T. and R.R.L. collected the data; S.G., A.E.T., S.S.C., P.K.M. and R.R.L. analyzed and interpreted the data; and S.G., P.K.M., R.R.L. and S.S.C. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All pig tissues were derived from the original study cited in this study and were approved by the institutional review board (University of Missouri, protocol number 7962, and date of approval was 10 July 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

The authors acknowledge funding from the National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute (R01EY029795) to S.S.C. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Alberti K.G., Zimmet P., Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome—A new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet. Med. 2006;23:469–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aguilar M., Bhuket T., Torres S., Liu B., Wong R.J. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome A Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aguilar M., Bhuket T., Torres S., Liu B., Wong R.J. Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in the United States, 2003–2012. JAMA. 2015;313:1973–1974. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chakraborty S., Verma A., Garg R., Singh J., Verma H. Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mechanistic Insight. Clin. Med. Insights Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2023;16:11795514231220780. doi: 10.1177/11795514231220780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Erdur S.K., Aydin R., Ozsutcu M., Olmuscelik O., Eliacik M., Demirci G., Kocabora M.S. The Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome, Its Components, and Dry Eye: A Cross-Sectional Study. Curr. Eye Res. 2017;42:1115–1117. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1280511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu C., Zhang Y., Cao X., Chen Z. Association between metabolic syndrome and cataract: A meta-analysis. Eye. 2025;39:2555–2564. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03910-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yuan Y., Dong M., Wen S., Yuan X., Zhou L. Retinal microcirculation: A window into systemic circulation and metabolic disease. Exp. Eye Res. 2024;242:109885. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.109885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haliyur R., Marwah S., Mittal S., Stein J.D., Shah A.R., Pershing S., Wang S.Y., Amin S., Edwards P.A., Srikumaran D., et al. Demographic and Metabolic Risk Factors Associated with Development of Diabetic Macular Edema among Persons with Diabetes Mellitus. Ophthalmol. Sci. 2024;4:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cekić S.P., Petković T., Stanković-Babić G.L., Mršić J.M. Central retinal artery occlusion in a patient with metabolic syndrome x. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 2010;5:57–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li F., Luo Y., Li X., Dai Y., Xiang Q. Association between metabolic syndrome and the risk of glaucoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2024;16:300. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01532-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang M., Jiang N., Chu Y., Postnikova O., Varghese R., Horvath A., Cheema A.K., Golestaneh N. Dysregulated metabolic pathways in age-related macular degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:2464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59244-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wong T.Y., Duncan B.B., Golden S.H., Klein R., Couper D.J., Klein B.E.K., Hubbard L.D., Sharrett A.R., Schmidt M.I. Associations between the Metabolic Syndrome and Retinal Microvascular Signs: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45:2949. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mbata O., Abo El-Magd N.F., El-Remessy A.B. Obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetic retinopathy: Beyond hyperglycemia. World J. Diabetes. 2017;8:317–329. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i7.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang X., Cui X., Li F., Wang S., Liu X., Hui L., Song N., Li N. Association between diabetes mellitus with metabolic syndrome and diabetic microangiopathy. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014;8:1867–1873. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mak I.W., Evaniew N., Ghert M. Lost in translation: Animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2014;6:114–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hartung T. The (misleading) role of animal models in drug development. Front. Drug Discov. 2024;4:1355044. doi: 10.3389/fddsv.2024.1355044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zushin P.H., Mukherjee S., Wu J.C. FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Transitioning beyond animal models with human cells, organoids, and AI/ML-based approaches. J. Clin. Investig. 2023;133:e175824. doi: 10.1172/JCI175824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martić-Kehl M.I., Schibli R., Schubiger P.A. Can animal data predict human outcome? Problems and pitfalls of translational animal research. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2012;39:1492–1496. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2175-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Woldehanna S., Zimicki S. An expanded One Health model: Integrating social science and One Health to inform study of the human-animal interface. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015;129:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vallender E.J., Hotchkiss C.E., Lewis A.D., Rogers J., Stern J.A., Peterson S.M., Ferguson B., Sayers K. Nonhuman primate genetic models for the study of rare diseases. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2023;18:20. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02619-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lunney J.K., Van Goor A., Walker K.E., Hailstock T., Franklin J., Dai C. Importance of the pig as a human biomedical model. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eabd5758. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd5758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meyerholz D.K., Burrough E.R., Kirchhof N., Anderson D.J., Helke K.L. Swine models in translational research and medicine. Vet. Pathol. 2024;61:512–523. doi: 10.1177/03009858231222235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goutchtat R., Béguier A., Kasal-Hoc N., Guerreschi P., Fayoux P., Rancan L., Pattou F., Hubert T. Pig Models in Translational Surgery. Eur. Surg. Res. 2025;66:50–58. doi: 10.1159/000546168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walters E.M., Wells K.D., Bryda E.C., Schommer S., Prather R.S. Swine models, genomic tools and services to enhance our understanding of human health and diseases. Lab. Anim. 2017;46:167–172. doi: 10.1038/laban.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang W., He W., Ruan Y., Geng Q. First pig-to-human heart transplantation. Innovation. 2022;3:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sturek M., Alloosh M., Sellke F.W. Swine disease models for optimal vascular engineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2020;22:25–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082919-053009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Neeb Z.P., Edwards J.M., Alloosh M., Long X., Mokelke E.A., Sturek M. Metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease in Ossabaw compared with Yucatan swine. Comp. Med. 2010;60:300–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lim R.R., Grant D.G., Olver T.D., Padilla J., Czajkowski A.M., Schnurbusch T.R., Mohan R.R., Hainsworth D.P., Walters E.M., Chaurasia S.S. Young Ossabaw Pigs Fed a Western Diet Exhibit Early Signs of Diabetic Retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:2325–2338. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sinha N.R., Balne P.K., Bunyak F., Hofmann A.C., Lim R.R., Mohan R.R., Chaurasia S.S. Collagen matrix perturbations in corneal stroma of Ossabaw mini pigs with type 2 diabetes. Mol. Vis. 2021;27:666–678. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olver T.D., Grunewald Z.I., Jurrissen T.J., MacPherson R.E.K., LeBlanc P.J., Schnurbusch T.R., Czajkowski A.M., Laughlin M.H., Rector R.S., Bender S.B., et al. Microvascular insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and brain occurs early in the development of juvenile obesity in pigs. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2018;314:R252–R264. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00213.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Garcá M., Ruiz-Ederra J., Hernández-Barbáchano H., Vecino E. Topography of pig retinal ganglion cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005;486:361–372. doi: 10.1002/cne.20516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shihan M.H., Novo S.G., Le Marchand S.J., Wang Y., Duncan M.K. A simple method for quantitating confocal fluorescent images. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021;25:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rachel B. Analysis of Immofluorescence Images in ImageJ. Protocols.io. 2023. [(accessed on 11 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.protocols.io/view/analysis-of-immofluorescence-images-in-imagej-x54v9py4zg3e/v1.
  • 34.Young K., Morrison H. Quantifying microglia morphology from photomicrographs of immunohistochemistry prepared tissue using ImageJ. J. Vis. Exp. 2018;136:57648. doi: 10.3791/57648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saari J.C. Vitamin A metabolism in rod and cone visual cycles. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2012;32:125–145. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kivelä T., Jääskeläinen J., Vaheri A., Carpén O. Ezrin, a membrane-organizing protein, as a polarization marker of the retinal pigment epithelium in vertebrates. Cell Tissue Res. 2000;301:217–223. doi: 10.1007/s004410000225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Filipek S., Stenkamp R.E., Teller D.C., Palczewski K. G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: A prospectus. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2003;65:851–879. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen J., Tucker C.L., Woodford B., Szél A., Lem J., Gianella-Borradori A., Simon M.I., Bogenmann E. The human blue opsin promoter directs transgene expression in short-wave cones and bipolar cells in the mouse retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:2611–2615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jacobs G.H. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1993;68:413–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1993.tb00738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dizhoor A.M., Ray S., Kumar S., Niemi G., Spencer M., Brolley D., Walsh K.A., Philipov P.P., Hurley J.B., Stryer L. Recoverin: A Calcium Sensitive Activator of Retinal Rod Guanylate Cyclase. Science. 1991;251:915–918. doi: 10.1126/science.1672047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sanna P.P., Keyser K.T., Celio M.R., Karten H.J., Bloom F.E. Distribution of parvalbumin immunoreactivity in the vertebrate retina. Brain Res. 1993;600:141–150. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90412-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Poché R.A., Reese B.E. Retinal horizontal cells: Challenging paradigms of neural development and cancer biology. Development. 2009;136:2141–2151. doi: 10.1242/dev.033175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ruether K., Feigenspan A., Pirngruber J., Leitges M., Baehr W., Strauss O. PKCα is essential for the proper activation and termination of rod bipolar cell response. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:6051–6058. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Buckingham B.P., Inman D.M., Lambert W., Oglesby E., Calkins D.J., Steele M.R., Vetter M.L., Marsh-Armstrong N., Horner P.J. Progressive Ganglion Cell Degeneration Precedes Neuronal Loss in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:2735–2744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4443-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wiedenmann B., Franke W.W. Identification and localization of synaptophysin, an integral membrane glycoprotein of Mr 38,000 characteristic of presynaptic vesicles. Cell. 1985;41:1017–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Koulen P., Fletcher E.L., Craven S.E., Bredt D.S., Wässle H. Immunocytochemical localization of the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 in the mammalian retina. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:10136–10149. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10136.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Anlauf E., Derouiche A. Glutamine synthetase as an astrocytic marker: Its cell type and vesicle localization. Front. Endocrinol. 2013;4:144. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Eng L.F., Ghirnikar R.S., Lee Y.L. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: GFAP-Thirty-One Years (1969–2000) Neurochem. Res. 2000;25:1439–1451. doi: 10.1023/A:1007677003387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guo L., Choi S., Bikkannavar P., Cordeiro M.F. Microglia: Key Players in Retinal Ageing and Neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022;16:804782. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.804782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li B., Zhang T., Liu W., Wang Y., Xu R., Zeng S., Zhang R., Zhu S., Gillies M.C., Zhu L., et al. Metabolic Features of Mouse and Human Retinas: Rods versus Cones, Macula versus Periphery, Retina versus RPE. iScience. 2020;23:101672. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Marmorstein A.D., Marmorstein L.Y. The challenge of modeling macular degeneration in mice. Trends Genet. 2007;23:225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chandler M.J., Smith P.J., Samuelson D.A., MacKay E.O. Photoreceptor density of the domestic pig retina. Vet. Ophthalmol. 1999;2:179–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-5224.1999.00077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang Y., Fan G., Liu X., Skovgaard K., Sturek M., Heegaard P.M.H. The genome of the naturally evolved obesity-prone Ossabaw miniature pig. iScience. 2021;24:103081. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pan W.W., Wubben T.J., Besirli C.G. Photoreceptor metabolic reprogramming: Current understanding and therapeutic implications. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:245. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01765-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ayton L. The Retinal Atlas—Second Edition. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2017;100:407. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Klettner A.K., Dithmar S. Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Health and Disease. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2020. pp. V–VIII. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hofmann L., Palczewski K. Rhodopsin. Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 1271. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2015. The G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: A historical perspective; pp. 3–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Leung M., Steinman J., Li D., Lor A., Gruesen A., Sadah A., van Kuijk F.J., Montezuma S.R., Kondkar A.A., Radhakrishnan R., et al. The Logistical Backbone of Photoreceptor Cell Function: Complementary Mechanisms of Dietary Vitamin A Receptors and Rhodopsin Transporters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:4278. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoon M., Okawa H., Della Santina L., Wong R.O. Functional architecture of the retina: Development and disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2014;42:44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Masland R.H. The tasks of amacrine cells. Vis. Neurosci. 2012;29:3–9. doi: 10.1017/S0952523811000344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nelson R., Connaughton V. Bipolar Cell Pathways in the Vertebrate Retina. In: Kolb H., Fernandez E., Jones B., Nelson R., editors. Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. University of Utah Health Sciences Center; Salt Lake City, UT, USA: 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Calbiague-Garcia V., Chen Y., Cádiz B., Tapia F., Paquet-Durand F., Schmachtenberg O. Extracellular lactate as an alternative energy source for retinal bipolar cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2024;300:106794. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.106794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tian N. Development of Retinal Ganglion Cell Dendritic Structure and Synaptic Connections. In: Kolb H., Fernandez E., Jones B., Nelson R., editors. Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. University of Utah Health Sciences Center; Salt Lake City, UT, USA: 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu H., Prokosch V. Energy Metabolism in the Inner Retina in Health and Glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3689. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kern T.S., Barber A.J. Retinal ganglion cells in diabetes. J. Physiol. 2008;586:4401–4408. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.156695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sheng X., Zhang C., Zhao J., Xu J., Zhang P., Ding Q., Zhang J. Microvascular destabilization and intricated network of the cytokines in diabetic retinopathy: From the perspective of cellular and molecular components. Cell Biosci. 2024;14:85. doi: 10.1186/s13578-024-01269-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhou J., Chen B. Retinal Cell Damage in Diabetic Retinopathy. Cells. 2023;12:1342. doi: 10.3390/cells12091342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Morgan J.E., Tribble J., Fergusson J., White N., Erchova I. The optical detection of retinal ganglion cell damage. Eye. 2017;31:199–205. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xue Y., Shen S.Q., Jui J., Rupp A.C., Byrne L.C., Hattar S., Flannery J.G., Corbo J.C., Kefalov V.J. CRALBP supports the mammalian retinal visual cycle and cone vision. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:727–738. doi: 10.1172/JCI79651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Padovani-Claudio D.A., Ramos C.J., Capozzi M.E., Penn J.S. Elucidating glial responses to products of diabetes-associated systemic dyshomeostasis. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2023;94:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Szabó K., Énzsöly A., Dékány B., Szabó A., Hajdú R.I., Radovits T., Mátyás C., Oláh A., Laurik L.K., Somfai G.M., et al. Histological Evaluation of Diabetic Neurodegeneration in the Retina of Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) Rats. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09068-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Muranyi M., Ding C., He Q., Lin Y., Li P.-A. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes causes astrocyte death after ischemia and reperfusion injury. Diabetes. 2006;55:349–355. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-0654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rathnasamy G., Foulds W.S., Ling E.-A., Kaur C. Retinal microglia—A key player in healthy and diseased retina. Prog. Neurobiol. 2019;173:18–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lim R.R., Thomas A. Retinal Microglia-Derived S100A9 Incite NLRP3 Inflammasome in a Western Diet Fed Ossabaw Pig Retina. bioRxiv. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.10.30.621160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Au A., Bajar B.T., Wong B.M., Daskivich L.P., Hosseini H., Prasad P.S. Systemic and ocular outcomes in patients with young-onset type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2024;38:108670. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2023.108670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Johansson U.E., Eftekhari S., Warfvinge K. A Battery of Cell- and Structure-specific Markers for the Adult Porcine Retina. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2010;58:377–389. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2009.954933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Seifalian A., Digesu A., Khullar V. The use of animal models in preclinical investigations for the development of a surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024;35:741–758. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05741-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.


Articles from Cells are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES