Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2026 Feb 16;111:101449. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2026.101449

Age-related macular degeneration and cerebral amyloid angiopathy have similar pathologies from cholesterol-APOE-amyloid-β-complement mediated inflammation

Whitney Stuard Sambhariya a, Catherine Bowes Rickman b, Patricia A D’Amore c, Giulia Corradetti d, Gregory S Hageman e, Gareth R Howell f, Olivia J Marola f, Hemali Phatnani g, Nancy J Philp h, Debasish Sinha a, Christopher B Toomey i, Faith Stone a, Charles Eberhart a, James T Handa a,*
PMCID: PMC12949356  NIHMSID: NIHMS2150058  PMID: 41708012

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are neurodegenerative conditions that afflict millions of elderly people around the world. AMD is a progressive retinal disorder that leads to central vision loss whereas AD primarily causes cognitive decline and behavioral changes. While each disease has distinct clinical manifestations, the accumulation of extracellular amyloid-β is a common histopathologic finding. Similarly, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a vascular condition that can exist independent or with AD, is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β in cerebral blood vessels. While significant investigation of the pathophysiologic links between AMD and AD has been conducted, the underlying similarities and differences in the pathobiology of AMD and CAA has not been considered. In this review, we discuss the common pathological features of these two conditions. We then discuss the similar pathobiology that involves cholesterol metabolism, apolipoprotein E, amyloid-β, and complement mediated inflammation. At the same time, we discuss key differences in their pathobiology. This discussion sheds new perspective and insights of their pathobiology.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid-β, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium

1. Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are multifactorial, chronic, progressive neurodegenerative diseases that share pathological and biochemical features (Jabbehdari, Oganov et al. 2024). The accumulation of extracellular amyloid-β, a 38–43 amino acid peptide, in the brain is a defining characteristic of AD. The discovery of amyloid-β in drusen, a hallmark sign of AMD, has prompted significant investigation into common pathogenic pathways with AD. Several studies have shown that the risk of AD is increased among those with AMD and vice versa (Keenan, Goldacre et al. 2014, Lee, Larson et al. 2019, Wen, Wan et al. 2021, Wen, Wan et al. 2021). Over the past decade, AMD and AD researchers have independently identified similar dysregulated pathways involving oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, autophagic/lysosomal function, lipid metabolism, inflammation, and immune activation, including alterations in the complement pathway. Each of these mechanisms can damage their respective tissues, the retina in AMD, and the brain in AD.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a common cause of cortical hemorrhage in older adults, characterized by amyloid-β deposition in small to medium-sized blood vessels (Revesz, Holton et al. 2002). CAA and AD are mechanistically linked by the role of amyloid-β and can exist by itself or coexist in the same patients (Greenberg, Bacskai et al. 2020, Yin, Sun et al. 2025). Despite these discoveries, a deep understanding of the key pathophysiologic events that guides the development of effective treatment for CAA and AD has remained elusive. The clinical evidence for a link between CAA and AMD is limited (Qiu, Ding et al. 2018, Anisetti, Stewart et al. 2023). However, the histopathologic findings in CAA and AMD surrounding amyloid-β deposition is similar in cerebral blood vessels and the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE)-Bruch’s membrane (BrM), respectively. These findings raise the possibility that identifying additional commonalities and differences in the pathobiology of these diseases will enhance our understanding of their pathogenesis. In this review, we describe the similar histopathologic features of AMD and CAA. We then discuss the prominent, linked roles of cholesterol, apolipoprotein E (APOE), amyloid-β, and complement mediated inflammation in the pathobiology of these diseases. By discussing their common and distinct mechanistic differences, we present new insights into the pathobiology of AMD and CAA.

2. Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Nearly 300 million individuals worldwide and 20 million in the United States suffer from AMD, the fourth most common cause of blindness and the leading cause of vision loss worldwide in those older than 55 years old (Wong, Su et al. 2014, Jonas, Cheung et al. 2017). AMD is a chronic progressive retinal disease that affects the macula and is classified into non-neovascular (dry) and neovascular (wet) forms (Fleckenstein, Schmitz-Valckenberg et al. 2024). While central vision loss is the primary clinical manifestation, nonophthalmic manifestations such as impaired cognitive performance, including verbal fluency and memory loss, have been reported, which suggests that AMD extends beyond the retina (Woo, Park et al. 2012, Rozzini, Riva et al. 2014, Zhuang, Madden et al. 2021). The prevalence of AMD increases with age, with a 15% prevalence in those 65–74 years old, 25% if 75–84 years old, and 30% if ≥85 years old (Klein, Peto et al. 2004). A prospective cohort study found that the overall estimated incidence of AMD was 5.3–4.1% in Caucasians, 4.5% −2.2% in Chinese, 3.3%−0.8% in Hispanics, and 1.6%−0.4% in Blacks (Fisher, Klein et al. 2016).

This review will focus on non-neovascular or “dry” AMD given the overlapping pathology with CAA. Dry AMD is characterized by a slow decline in central vision that is preceded by loss of retinal sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and delayed dark adaptation (Eisner, Stoumbos et al. 1991, Chen, Fitzke et al. 1992, Eisner, Klein et al. 1992, Midena, Degli Angeli et al. 1997, Owsley, Huisingh et al. 2015). Clinically, patients with dry AMD present with BrM accumulations called drusen, subretinal deposits called reticular pseudodrusen (RPD), and RPE abnormalities (Figure 1) (Chew, Clemons et al. 2014). The density and/or size of drusen within the macula correlates with disease severity. Histopathologically, drusen are accumulations within the inner collagenous layer of BrM that are composed of a heterogeneous mixture of lipids, minerals, lipoproteins, and proteins (Curcio, Johnson et al. 2009). RPD are subretinal deposits that contain vitronectin, CD59, apolipoprotein E (APOE), unesterified cholesterol, IBA-1 expressing immune cells, and are associated with altered photoreceptor outer segment and RPE morphology (Rudolf, Malek et al. 2008, Ebrahimi, Fijalkowski et al. 2013, Greferath, Guymer et al. 2016). The RPE pigmentary abnormalities reflect its morphologic and functional degeneration. Over time, dry AMD can advance to geographic atrophy (GA) with loss of the functional retinal network (Thomas, Mirza et al. 2021). Histopathologically, photoreceptor remnants are adjacent to BrM due to RPE loss, and the choriocapillaris is atrophic. When GA involves the fovea, visual acuity loss is significant.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A patient with intermediate AMD who progressed to geographic atrophy. Color fundus photo and OCT image of the left eye. (A) Intermediate AMD. showing drusen deposits. (B) Areas of outer retinal and RPE atrophy with hypertransmission defects into the choroid indicating progression. (C) Geographic atrophy with more severe and confluent areas of outer retinal and RPE atrophy with hypertransmission defects, as indicated by red arrowheads. The arrowheads in A and B indicate the region of GA that developed in C. (D) Histopathology of a different patient with geographic atrophy with loss of RPE and outer retina in the central macula (arrowheads). A druse (*) is seen. Bar = 25μm.

Risk factors for AMD include a combination of over 63 genetic loci that include multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as well as environmental and social factors such as smoking, sunlight exposure, hypertension, and a Western or high-glycemic diet (Clemons, Milton et al. 2005, Gorman, Voloudakis et al. 2024). Along with data from epidemiologic studies, pharmacologic and clinical trials, these risk factors provide the rationale for preclinical studies designed to understand AMD pathobiology. At present, pathologic oxidative stress, lipid dysregulation, inflammation, and innate immunity including complement and inflammasome activations, extracellular matrix abnormalities, and mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction, are key pathogenic factors that cause degeneration of the photoreceptors and outer retina, RPE, and choriocapillaris (Campochiaro 2000, Donoso, Kim et al. 2006). While known, the relative pathogenic contribution of these factors at each disease stage is unclear.

3. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA): an amyloid-β angiopathy of cerebral blood vessels

CAA is an age-related angiopathy of small to medium blood vessels of the CNS and leptomeninges due to deposition of amyloid-β (Vonsattel, Myers et al. 1991, Vinters 1992, Revesz, Holton et al. 2002). The amyloid-β deposits induce vessel fragility that can lead to intracerebral hemorrhages (Vinters 1987). In addition, patients with CAA can have cognitive impairment (Vinters 1987). Given the combination of amyloid-β deposition and cognitive impairment, the association with AD, which is characterized by the buildup of amyloid-β in the extracellular space, creating plaques, as well as the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) tangles in the brain (Zhuang, Madden et al. 2021), has been made, especially since CAA can occur simultaneously with AD (Charidimou, Gang et al. 2012). However, CAA can occur independent of AD (Thal, Griffin et al. 2008, Arvanitakis, Leurgans et al. 2011). While the diagnosis of CAA is sometimes made using clinical and radiographic findings, the definitive diagnosis often requires a biopsy or postmortem examination of the brain (Arvanitakis, Leurgans et al. 2011).

4. CAA and AMD share similar histopathology

The accumulation of amyloid-β is a common histopathologic finding in CAA and AMD. In CAA, amyloid-β accumulates in the neurovascular unit, comprised of neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells (Camacho, Moline et al. 2019), and pericytes, while in AMD, the RPE-BrM-choriocapillaris complex is principally involved. In CAA, amyloid-β co-localizes with APOE in blood vessels while in AMD (Okazaki, Reagan et al. 1979, Barelli, Lebeau et al. 1997, Poyuran, Mahadevan et al. 2019), amyloid-β and APOE are concentrated in drusen and BrM (Figure 2) (Johnson, Leitner et al. 2002, Isas, Luibl et al. 2010, Thompson, Reffatto et al. 2015, Ranjan, Kayastha et al. 2021).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Amyloid-β deposition in human AMD and CAA. A 74-year-old man with non-neovascular AMD. (A) Basal deposits within the macular region (arrows) with partial loss of overlying RPE cells (H&E stain, original magnification 400X). (B,C) Patchy Amyloid-β immunoreactivity (brown) in the basal deposits (arrows, original magnification 400X). A surgical specimen from a 69-year-old woman with CAA. (D) Amyloid-β immunoreactivity in leptomeningeal vessels of a surgical CAA biopsy (Arrows). Diffuse amyloid plaques were also present in the cortex (arrowheads, original magnification 100X). (E) Thickened walls of a medium-size vessel in the CAA case (arrows, original magnification 400X). (F) Amyloid-β immunoreactivity in the leptomeningeal vessel (arrows, original magnification 400X).

5. CAA and AMD have similar and key differences in their pathobiology

In both CAA and AMD, alterations in APOE, cholesterol, amyloid-β, and complement mediated inflammation appear to drive their pathobiology. Genetic variations in APOE and complement genes increase the risk of both diseases. As described above, the key difference is that APOE, amyloid-β, and complement mediated inflammation pathobiology affect different cell types in CAA and AMD. The common etiologic mechanisms along with key distinctions are described below and is intended to elucidate new insights into the mechanisms of these two diseases with complex pathobiology.

5.1. Cholesterol and APOE are cornerstone pathogiolobic factors in CAA, AD, and AMD

Lipids are essential for the maintenance, repair, and growth of CNS neurons, a process that depends upon APOE, which binds lipids including cholesterol and cholesterol esters (Adibhatla and Hatcher 2007). In the brain, APOE is expressed mainly by astrocytes and microglia, which transports cholesterol to the extracellular space (Zhang, Mu et al. 2013). Once in the extracellular space, APOE can direct cholesterol in two directions. Cholesterol can be internalized by neurons through APOE receptors, such as the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) and LDL receptor-related proteins (LRP1, LRP2 and LRP8), which are highly expressed by neurons, to maintain cellular homeostasis (Zhang, Mu et al. 2013). With neuronal stress, APOE is induced and binds lipids to facilitate their redistribution during cellular repair (Liao, Yoon et al. 2017, Long and Holtzman 2019, Husain, Laurent et al. 2021, Troutwine, Hamid et al. 2022). APOE is also involved with reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) by interacting with the transmembrane ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1, which promote cholesterol efflux from cells to APOE, and then into HDLs for systemic removal (Hirsch-Reinshagen, Zhou et al. 2004, Wahrle, Jiang et al. 2004, Karten, Campenot et al. 2006).

In addition to its role in RCT, APOE is a component of LDL and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), which both have apolipoprotein B100 (APOB100) as their protein core (Campos, Perlov et al. 2001), and are essential for clearing lipids from the systemic circulation by the liver. Importantly, VLDLs carry more cholesterol than the RCT pathway. For example in response to lipid overload, cardiac myocytes secrete VLDLs to decrease cellular cholesterol and prevent lipoapoptosis (Unger and Orci 2002). In fact, when APOB100 lipoprotein secretion is prevented in cardiac myocytes, lipid accumulation is sufficient to induce lipoapoptosis that leads to death by heart failure in mice (Nielsen, Veniant et al. 1998, Nielsen, Bartels et al. 2002).

In early AMD, it has been hypothesized that the RPE becomes overloaded with cholesterol from the combination of the daily phagocytosis of the nearly 30,000 lipid rich photoreceptor outer segments and the consequences of a high fat western diet (Ershov and Bazan 2000). In response to increased cholesterol, the RPE produces and secretes APOE and cholesterol. To illustrate the importance of APOE in lipid processing, mice deficient of Apoe develop thickened BrM from lipid accumulation that correlates with decreased retinal function, as shown by impaired electroretinography (Dithmar, Curcio et al. 2000, Ong, Zorapapel et al. 2001).

With aging and early AMD, lipoprotein particles the size of VLDLs accumulate in BrM due to interaction with heparan sulfate to form a “lipid wall” (Curcio, Millican et al. 2001, Malek, Li et al. 2003, Curcio, Presley et al. 2005, Curcio, Presley et al. 2005, Li, Clark et al. 2006, Toomey, Pflugmacher et al. 2025). Age-related alterations in BrM such as the accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs), alterations in matrix components such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), CFH, pentraxin-3, and lipoprotein lipase, can impede the removal of lipoproteins that contribute to lipid retention (Handa, Verzijl et al. 1999, Ida, Ishibashi et al. 2004, Tian, Ishibashi et al. 2005, Cano, Fijalkowski et al. 2011, Toomey, Kelly et al. 2015, Wang, Cano et al. 2016, Landowski, Kelly et al. 2019, Toomey, Pflugmacher et al. 2025). Due to the high oxidative stress microenvironment, these retained lipoproteins get oxidized. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) shells form around these lipids, which then become coated with numerous proteins including amyloid-β (Ranjan, Kayastha et al. 2021). Both amyloid-β and oxidized lipids can elicit an inflammatory reaction, and the inflammatory proteins attach to these HAP shells during the growth of drusen (Thompson, Reffatto et al. 2015). Indeed, immunoglobulin light chains, vitronectin, and complement proteins such as CFH, C5, and the C5b-9 complex have been identified in drusen (Mullins, Russell et al. 2000, Malek, Li et al. 2003, Li, Presley et al. 2005, Wu, Fujihara et al. 2010, Fujihara, Cano et al. 2014).

While APOE is a key etiologic factor in both CAA and AMD, the lipid processing role of APOE is different in these diseases, which may explain in part, the pathologic changes specific for each disease. In the CNS, APOE is principally involved in RCT, which transfers lipids and toxins such as amyloid-β from the intra- to the extra-cellular space to prevent harmful cellular cholesterol and amyloid-β accumulation. Besides APOE, the RPE synthesizes and secretes APOB100 and VLDL-like lipoproteins at a level similar to cardiac myocytes (Malek, Li et al. 2003, Li, Clark et al. 2006, Fujihara, Bartels et al. 2009, Fujihara, Cano et al. 2014). In AMD, it is unclear to what extent RCT via HDLs or VLDL-like lipoproteins play a role in BrM lipid accumulation. HDLs in BrM are more pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative than circulating HDLs from the same donor, which suggests a pathogenic role for AMD (Kelly, Grigsby et al. 2020). On the other hand, given that HDLs are small relative to VLDL-like particles, they are more likely, based on size alone without regard to their composition, to pass through BrM into the choriocapillaris. Thus, it is possible that RCT remains a protective response. In contrast, VLDL-like lipoproteins are retained in BrM due to age-related BrM alterations, and eventually trigger a pro-inflammatory response if they get oxidized. While this response is designed to remove these lipoproteins and amyloid-β, their retention promotes sustained inflammation that contributes to further protein and lipid aggregation and drusen growth. While RCT is a key factor in CAA, APOE may have an additional important role in the accumulation of VLDL-like lipoproteins in BrM during drusen biogenesis in AMD.

5.2. Amyloid-β biology in CAA and AMD

In the CNS, neurons, astrocytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells accumulate amyloid-β (Wisniewski and Wegiel 1994, Calhoun, Burgermeister et al. 1999, Frackowiak, Miller et al. 2003, Herzig, Winkler et al. 2004). Because it also binds amyloid-β, APOE regulates in part, amyloid-β abundance. In neurons, the predominant cell type that produces amyloid-β, amyloid-β accumulates through a combination of increased cholesterol from its synthesis and APOE mediated cholesterol import from astrocytes (Wang, Kulas et al. 2021). With increased cellular cholesterol, amyloid precursor protein (APP) associates with β- and γ-secretases in lipid clusters to generate amyloid-β, which either remains associated with lipid rafts in the plasma membrane or is released to the extracellular space (Wang, Kulas et al. 2021). When APOE-mediated cholesterol trafficking is limited in astrocytes, neuronal cholesterol is low, and amyloid-β accumulation is minimal. Thus, excess APOE-mediated cholesterol trafficking could result in the formation of insoluble extracellular plaques.

Amyloid-β accumulation is also influenced by its degree of degradation. Neurons degrade intracellular amyloid-β mainly through lysosomes (Li, Kanekiyo et al. 2012, Kanekiyo, Cirrito et al. 2013). Astrocytes and microglia remove the majority of extracellular amyloid-β by cellular uptake and degradation, a process that is APOE dependent (Koistinaho, Lin et al. 2004). In microglia, soluble amyloid-β is internalized by macropinocytosis while amyloid-β aggregates are internalized through phagocytosis, with subsequent degradation by lysosomes (Bamberger, Harris et al. 2003, Mandrekar, Jiang et al. 2009). In addition, after APOE binds to amyloid-β, the proteases neprilysin (NEP) and insulin-degrading enzyme are activated to degrade amyloid-β, either intracellularly or in the extracellular space after NEP is secreted (Wisniewski and Frangione 1992, Russo, Angelini et al. 1998, Jiang, Lee et al. 2008, Saido and Leissring 2012). Impairment of these degradative processes contribute to amyloid-β accumulation.

Like astrocytes in CAA, the RPE increases the expression of APP, and β- and γ-secretases to produce amyloid-β in response to elevated cholesterol and/or oxidative stress (Ohno-Matsui 2011, Wang, Ohno-Matsui et al. 2012, Guo, Alekseev et al. 2014, Francelin, Mitter et al. 2021). In the RPE, amyloid-β accululates in late endosomes and lysosomes, and is degraded by lysosomes, a process that can be increased experimentally by mTOR inhibitors (Lynn, Johnston et al. 2021, Jo, Lee et al. 2023). With amyloid-β accumulation, the lysosomes become impaired and the RPE cell undergoes functional impairment that includes an inability to process photoreceptor outer segments that have been internalized (Lynn, Johnston et al. 2021). As mentioned above, amyloid-β has been identified in drusen (Johnson, Leitner et al. 2002, Thompson, Reffatto et al. 2015, Ranjan, Kayastha et al. 2021). Dentchev et al. reported that amyloid-β was found in drusen from AMD donors, but not in small drusen from normal retinas (Dentchev, Milam et al. 2003). How the RPE releases amyloid-β is unclear. However, Kurzawa-Akanbi et al found that extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted basally by iPSC-RPE cells derived from donors harboring the Y402H high-risk polymorphism induced amyloid-β fibril formation in the extracellular matrix that had similar morphology to drusen of human specimens (Kurzawa-Akanbi, Whitfield et al. 2022).

5.3. Cholesterol, APOE, and amyloid-β mediated inflammation is a pathobiologic factor in CAA and AMD

Polymorphisms in two regulators of complement activation, complement component (3b/4b) receptor 1 (CR1) and complement factor H (CFH) raise the risk of CAA and AMD, respectively (Edwards, Ritter et al. 2005, Hageman, Anderson et al. 2005, Haines, Hauser et al. 2005, Jakobsdottir, Conley et al. 2005, Klein, Zeiss et al. 2005, Rivera, Fisher et al. 2005). CR1, a negative regulator of both the classic and alternative complement cascade, is cell membrane bound and mediates cellular binding to debris and immune complexes that have activated complement, particularly in astrocytes of the neurovascular system, so that the opsonized immune complexes can be removed by phagocytosis (Crehan, Holton et al. 2012). Polymorphisms in CFH such as the Y402H variant, and other complement components increase AMD risk (Fritsche, Igl et al. 2016). CFH is a secreted protein that binds to cells and regulates the alternative complement pathway by regulating factor I induced C3b cleavage and decay of the C3-convertase (Rodriguez de Cordoba, Lublin et al. 1985).

In CAA, cholesterol, APOE, and amyloid-β induce inflammation to alter the functionally interlinked neurovascular unit that is comprised of neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and pericytes. While the arterial endothelial cell is initially uninvolved, amyloid-β is deposited in the basal lamina and extends to the arterial internal elastic lamina in both human CAA and experimentally in animal models (Figure 3) (Rannikmae, Kalaria et al. 2014). Of note, a mouse genetic context prone to CAA (WSB/EiJ, Figure 3) was also uniquely susceptible to photoreceptor degeneration—suggesting potentially shared biological etiologies of CAA and AMD (Onos, Uyar et al. 2019, Marola, MacLean et al. 2025, Onos, Marola et al. 2025). Histopathologically, astrocytes are seen surrounding amyloid-β plaques that colocalize with APOE (Eikelenboom and Stam 1982, Kalaria and Grahovac 1990, Harr, Uint et al. 1996, Camacho, Moline et al. 2019, Taylor, Cisternas et al. 2020). In CAA mouse models, vascular amyloid-β deposition activates astrocytes. Transport across the blood brain barrier (BBB), phagocytosis, and enzymatic degradation are known clearance mechanisms. Notably, perivascular removal accounts for up to 25% of amyloid-β clearance, and is impaired in CAA, which substantially contributes to amyloid-β accumulation (Tarasoff-Conway, Carare et al. 2015, Xiang, Bu et al. 2015, Yuede, Lee et al. 2016).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in mouse. The WSB/EiJ genetic background is susceptible to age-related cerebral amyloid angiopathy. (A) Brain hemispheres from WSB.APP/PS1 mice with severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy (arrowheads) at 8 and 14 months. Sections are stained with X34 (left: white; right: cyan) and immunoassayed for CD31 (right: red).

In the extracellular space, amyloid-β initially elicits a protective inflammatory response to avoid toxic accumulation (Frost and Li 2017). In response to amyloid-β deposition, astrocytes and microglia express and activate the complement system. For example, the anaphylatoxin C3a is formed, which by interacting with the C3a receptor (C3aR), can induce monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 to recruit microglia that degrade and remove unwanted material, including amyloid-β (Ohno-Matsui 2011, Guo, Alekseev et al. 2014, Lian, Litvinchuk et al. 2016, Lashkari, Teague et al. 2018, Pauly, Agarwal et al. 2019, Francelin, Mitter et al. 2021, Desai and Dugel 2022). With unresolved amyloid-β accumulation, complement activation is prolonged, shifting a protective immune response into a dysregulated one that causes tissue damage. In CAA, amyloid-β colocalizes with APOE, apolipoprotein A-I, complement proteins, and other inflammatory mediators such as serum amyloid P, α1-antichymotrypsin, and clusterin accumulate to cause smooth muscle cell degeneration (Eikelenboom and Stam 1982, Kalaria and Grahovac 1990, Harr, Uint et al. 1996, Camacho, Moline et al. 2019). The severity of vascular amyloid-β lesions is associated with abundant complement levels including formation of terminal C5b-9 complexes (Tanskanen, Lindsberg et al. 2005, Matsuo, Shindo et al. 2017). In addition, an astrogliotic fibrotic response ensues with increased heat shock protein family B (small) member 1 and modulator of VRAC current 1 (Schrader, Xu et al. 2024). Cumulatively, the vessel wall weakens, leading to rupture from C5b-9 complex deposition and vessel fibrosis (Kalaria and Sepulveda-Falla 2021, Kara, Gordon et al. 2023).

In response to amyloid-β, the RPE activates some but not all complement components, including CFH, CFD, and terminal complement components C5b-9. Together with systemically derived complement, the RPE activates complement to degrade and remove amyloid-β (Pauly, Agarwal et al. 2019, Desai and Dugel 2022). In addition, microglia, astrocytes, Müller glia, and vascular cells can express complement in the retina to contribute to complement mediated inflammation (Pauly, Agarwal et al. 2019). Importantly, the RPE expresses complement regulators CFH, CD46, and CD59 to maintain a controlled, protective complement response(Geerlings, de Jong et al. 2017). With aging and AMD, the expression by the RPE of these regulators is decreased (Ebrahimi, Fijalkowski et al. 2013). As a result, and/or due to impaired regulation by the Y402H CFH AMD risk variant, amyloid-β may elicit augmented complement activation that induces RPE injury, secondary photoreceptor degeneration, and deposition of cellular debris into BrM (Mullins, Aptsiauri et al. 2001, Moreira-Neto, Moult et al. 2018). Notably, amyloid-β inhibits complement factor I (CFI), a serine protease that restricts C3 and C5 convertase formation and inhibits the inactivation of C3b, both of which can augment or prolong complement activity (Lashkari, Teague et al. 2018, Papadopoulos 2020).

While complement activation is a common conceptual pathobiologic theme, the different complement components involved in CAA and AMD may influence their pathogenesis. CR1 is predominantly expressed by astrocytes and microglia while CFH is locally produced by the RPE.

For the most part, CFH is secreted while CR1 is membrane bound. These differences concentrate the complement response to the vasculature and RPE-BrM-choriocapillaris complex in CAA and AMD, respectively. Besides regulating complement activation, CR1 mediates endocytosis in phagocytic cells (Funkhouser and Vik 1999). In CAA, complement activation results in C3b binding to both amyloid-β and CR1, which initiates endocytosis of the amyloid-β-C3b-CR1 complex by CR1 for degradation (Rogers, Li et al. 2006, Qi and Ma 2017). Since the CR1 variant may impair the C3b binding sites, amyloid-β removal by CR1 binding cells such as erythrocytes for elimination by the liver or kidney, may be impaired (Rogers, Li et al. 2006, Brouwers, Van Cauwenberghe et al. 2012, Qi and Ma 2017).

Like CR1, CFH has complement independent functions. In BrM, CFH and lipoproteins compete for binding with HSPGs which could contribute to drusen formation. With aging, lipoproteins are retained in BrM by HSPGs, and can result in aggregation and subsequent drusen formation. The CFH Y402H high risk variant has impaired binding to the HSPGs and cell surfaces, and inhibits the binding of thrombospondin-1, a lipoprotein component, to CD47 on mononuclear phagocytes, which prevents their removal (Clark, Perveen et al. 2010, Calippe, Augustin et al. 2017). Furthermore, CFH can bind the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde, which then induces inflammation (Weismann, Hartvigsen et al. 2011, Toomey, Kelly et al. 2015). The CFH Y402H variant has impaired binding of malondialdehyde-modified lipids that triggers inflammation in BrM (Weismann, Hartvigsen et al. 2011, Landowski, Kelly et al. 2019). Thus, amyloid-β works in concert with cholesterol to both activate complement mediated inflammation and complement independent functions that accumulates around cholesterol filled HAP spherules during drusen biogenesis.

Besides RPE injury and deposition of cellular debris into BrM during drusen biogenesis, complement activation may contribute to choriocapillaris loss. In fact, choriocapillaris vascular density is inversely correlated with drusen volume (Edwards and Lutty 2021). Experimentally, amyloid-β is deposited more in choroidal vessels of Cfh deficient mice as compared to Cfh competent mice to the extent that blood flow is impaired (Aboelnour, Kam et al. 2016). A model of choriocapillaris loss due to increased complement activation including C3 and C5 deposition has been described. C5b-9 complexes are deposited in the choriocapillaris endothelial basement membrane prior to choriocapillaris dropout and in the pillars between choroidal vessels where drusen typically form (Mullins, Dewald et al. 2011, Whitmore, Sohn et al. 2015, Chirco, Tucker et al. 2016). Mice that overexpress Aβ42 and Aβ40 develop an AMD-like phenotype that includes drusen-like deposits, RPE hyperpigmentation, and retinal degeneration (Prasad, Zhu et al. 2017). In addition, aged APOE4 targeted replacement mice on a high fat high cholesterol diet develop an AMD-phenotype with amyloid-β and complement accumulation in BrM can be rescued by systemic anti-amyloid immunotherapy (Ding, Johnson et al. 2011). Thus, amyloid-β mediated complement activation may contribute to RPE degeneration, drusen biogenesis, and choriocapillaris loss.

5.4. APOE-related pathways regulate both cholesterol and amyloid-β metabolism

The APOE genetic risk in AMD and CAA/AD provides insights into important differences in their pathobiology. APOE has different isoforms due to two SNPs that cause amino acid substitutions in the APOE protein at positions 112 and 158 (Davignon, Gregg et al. 1988, Thakkinstian, Bowe et al. 2006). The wildtype and most common form, APOE3 (Cys112 Arg158) differs from APOE4 (Arg112 Arg158) and APOE2 (Cys112 Cys158). These SNPs modify risk for both AMD and AD including CAA (Jansen, Savage et al. 2019, Viturino, Neto et al. 2021). APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor associated with AD/CAA and related dementias (Corder, Saunders et al. 1993, Saunders, Strittmatter et al. 1993, Seshadri, Drachman et al. 1995, Slooter, Tang et al. 1997, Liu, Li et al. 2012, Hu, Wan et al. 2025). AD mouse models with the addition of APOE4 had exacerbated CAA and relevant comorbidities, including microhemorrhages, cognitive decline, and neuritic dystrophy (Fitz, Wolfe et al. 2020, Sawmiller, Koyama et al. 2023, Grenon, Papavergi et al. 2024, Hu, Wan et al. 2025, Onos, Marola et al. 2025).

In contrast, APOE4 is mildly protective for AMD—although this protection may be due in part to a drop effect of APOE4 patients with AD—while it raises risk for CAA and AD, and APOE2 increases risk for AMD and decreases risk for CAA and AD (McKay, Silvestri et al. 2011, Liu, Liu et al. 2013, Rebeck 2017, Jansen, Savage et al. 2019, Zhang, Xia et al. 2023). While APOE4 may confer a decreased risk for AMD, smoking may mitigate this effect (Levy, Lavalette et al. 2015, Xiying, Wenbo et al. 2017, Hu, Quinn et al. 2021). Nevertheless, the opposite risk profiles for AMD and CAA of these isoforms provide mechanistic insights into their pathobiology.

The APOE4 isoform increases the risk of CAA/AD relative to APOE2 and APOE3 in part, because the effects of APOE on cholesterol and amyloid-β metabolism are isoform dependent (Rannikmae, Kalaria et al. 2014). In the CNS, neurons, microglia, and astrocytes with the APOE4 isoform accumulate cholesterol ester more than with the APOE3 and APOE2 isoforms due to increased de novo cholesterol synthesis and upregulated cell surface lipid receptors that mediate cholesterol uptake (Tcw, Qian et al. 2022). As a result, cholesterol ester levels in APOE4 microglia are similar to cells with cholesterol ester storage disorders (Chan, Oliveira et al. 2012, van der Kant, Langness et al. 2019, Andreone, Przybyla et al. 2020, Nugent, Lin et al. 2020, Litvinchuk, Suh et al. 2024). At the same time, APOE4 is less efficient than APOE3 at facilitating cholesterol efflux from both astrocytes and neurons, an effect due to both differences in intermolecular dimerization of APOEs and its intramolecular domain interaction that promotes HDL particle generation (Michikawa, Fan et al. 2000, Gong, Kobayashi et al. 2002, Gong, Morita et al. 2007, Minagawa, Gong et al. 2009). As in astrocytes, APOE4 RPE have increased de novo cholesterol synthesis and cell surface lipid receptors to facilitate cholesterol uptake and then secretion to the choriocapillaris for removal, which is higher than patients with APOE2 or APOE3 (Hu, Quinn et al. 2021). Cumulatively, the increased cellular cholesterol from increased synthesis and decreased efflux stimulates amyloid-β production either in astrocytes or the RPE.

Amyloid-β clearance is influenced by APOE in an isoform-dependent manner through several mechanisms. In general, APOE4 is less effective at clearing amyloid-β than APOE3 while APOE2 is more effective. Mechanistically, APOE interacts with and stabilizes amyloid-β fibrils to enhance amyloid aggregation and deposition, a process facilitated by HSPGs (Garai, Verghese et al. 2014, Rauch, Chen et al. 2018, Andreone, Przybyla et al. 2020). The higher affinity of APOE4 for HSPGs promotes amyloid-β aggregation (Yamauchi, Deguchi et al. 2008). On the other hand, APOE4 binds to amyloid-β less efficiently than the other isoforms (Verghese, Castellano et al. 2011, Yamazaki, Zhao et al. 2019, Husain, Laurent et al. 2021, Loch, Wang et al. 2023), which allows APOE4 to compete with amyloid-β for APOE receptors that ultimately decreases amyloid-β clearance through the BBB (Deane, Sagare et al. 2008, Kanekiyo, Cirrito et al. 2013, Kanekiyo, Xu et al. 2014, Yamazaki, Zhao et al. 2019, Ingala, Mazzai et al. 2020). Specifically, APOE4 shifts amyloid-β clearance from the LRP1 to the VLDL receptor pathway, whereas amyloid-β clearance by APOE2 and APOE3 is through both the LRP1 and VLDL receptor pathways (Deane, Sagare et al. 2008). Thus, not only does APOE4 promote amyloid-β production through increased cellular cholesterol, but it impedes amyloid-β degradation and clearance, which increases amyloid-β deposition and risk in CAA.

In AMD, chronic inflammation is a major pathogenic factor. Critically, APOE modulates the immune response that is stratified by the isoform (Liao, Yoon et al. 2017, Long and Holtzman 2019, Husain, Laurent et al. 2021, Troutwine, Hamid et al. 2022). APOE4 is associated with less inflammation and drusen formation than APOE2 or APOE3, which suggests why this isoform is protective in the retina (Abyadeh, Gupta et al. 2023). In AMD, microglia or mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs) accumulate in the subretinal space (Gupta, Brown et al. 2003). In Cx3cr1-deficient mice, which are devoid of the receptor that minimizes microglia activation, Levy et al. found increased APOE expression in microglia drives their migration and accumulation in the subretinal space, which contributes to photoreceptor or RPE degeneration (Levy, Calippe et al. 2015). In mice expressing the different APOE isoforms, APOE2 mice relative to APOE3 and APOE4 mice, accumulate subretinal MNPs with higher APOE and APOE-dependent immune activation that results in photoreceptor or RPE degeneration. Compared with APOE3 mice, APOE4 in Cx3cr1-deficient mice protected against subretinal MNP accumulation through reduced APOE expression.

The APOE effect on microglia/MNPs can be explained in part by their impact on lipid rafts. APOE2 has reduced APOE uptake relative to the other isoforms, which activates microglia after cholesterol is extracted from lipid rafts. In contrast, APOE4 is less efficient at removing lipid raft cholesterol, which keeps microglia quiescent (Levy, Lavalette et al. 2015). Thus, APOE expression in microglia of the neural retina influences the degree of inflammation in the subretinal space. APOE4 by altering lipid raft cholesterol, minimizes subretinal microglia/MNP accumulation and inflammation to mitigate neural retinal or RPE injury. Since inflammation contributes to the growth of drusen, it is possible that APOE4 relative to the other isoforms, mitigates the inflammatory response to decrease the deposition of inflammatory proteins on HAP shells. Despite the lipid wall, the inflammatory phase of drusen biogenesis is minimized.

APOE4 also selectively binds to VLDL rather HDLs, the latter of which are preferred by APOE3 and APOE2 (Phillips 2014). This profile would promote its selective binding of VLDLs, which due to their larger size than HDLs, results in lipid accumulation in BrM. In support of this possibility, Malek et al. showed that APOE4 mice, and less so in APOE3 mice, when aged and given a high-fat cholesterol diet, developed an AMD-like phenotype including BrM deposits and RPE atrophy (Malek, Johnson et al. 2005). Paradoxically, the APOE4 phenotype is opposite of what the genetic risk would predict. Since the APOE4 isoform preferentially bound VLDLs, APOE4 mice had more lipid accumulation that increased amyloid-β dependent or independent inflammation. Critically, while APOE4 promotes cholesterol accumulation through VLDLs, it also minimizes inflammation from either amyloid-β or oxidized lipids that accumulate in BrM during drusen formation, which would be expected to decrease development of AMD-like features. Notably, these mice had targeted replacement of human APOE2, APOE3, or APOE4 (Sullivan, Mezdour et al. 1997). Thus, it is possible that the human APOE protein, independent of the isoform, elicited an inflammatory response sufficient to contribute to the retinal pathology. Alternatively, human APOE proteins may interact differently with mouse proteins such as LDLR, LRP, ABCA1, or HS than their respective human proteins.

Finally, it has been shown with live cell imaging of RPE cells that elevated-risk APOE2 has less effective cholesterol transport than the other isoforms, which caused ceramide accumulation (La Cunza, Tan et al. 2021). The elevated ceramide in turn, impaired autophagy and induced complement-mediated mitochondrial injury, the latter of which drove a redox state-sensitive cysteine-mediated phase separation of APOE2, forming biomolecular condensates that could nucleate as during drusen biogenesis. In contrast, the APOE4 isoform lacks these cysteines and resisted phase separation and condensate formation. Further work is needed to fully understand the mechanistic role of the APOE isoforms with regard to lipid trafficking and deposition in BrM with AMD.

6. Clinical Evidence for CAA and AMD

The evidence for a clinical link between CAA and AMD is limited in study number and the size of the cohorts studied. The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study tested the hypothesis that AMD and retinal microvascular signs are differentially associated with lobar and deep cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) because their prior work showed an association of CMBs with retinal microvascular signs and a suggestive association with geographic atrophy (Qiu, Cotch et al. 2012). 2502 participants were prospectively followed for an average of 5.2 years (Qiu, Ding et al. 2018). Geographic atrophy was associated with lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) typical of CAA (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio 2.59, 95% CI 1.01–6.65) but not with deep CMBs, which are linked with hypertensive small vessel disease. Retinal microvascular changes were not associated with lobar CMBs. Anisetti et al. evaluated 256 age-matched pairs (126 with AMD and 130 without AMD) and found that late AMD was associated with increased odds (OR2.83, 95% CI 1.10–7.27, p=0.031) of CAA (Anisetti, Stewart et al. 2023). With the histopathologic similarities and differences, longitudinal clinical studies tracking AMD and CAA progression is warranted.

7. Future perspectives

While on the face of it, AMD and CAA are distinct diseases, both are induced or strongly influenced by overlapping factors, including cholesterol dysfunction, amyloid-β accumulation, APOE risk genotypes, and complement activation (Figure 4). These similarities lead us to posit that AMD and CAA share common mechanisms that considered together, can accelerate our understanding of both diseases, leading to novel biomarkers and therapeutic approaches.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic of similarities and differences of CAA and AMD due to cholesterol, APOE, amyloid, and complement. (A) In the RPE, cholesterol (Chol) accumulates due to photoreceptor recycling or a consequence of a high-fat cholesterol diet (HFD) to generate amyloid-β and the secretion of lipoproteins that contain apoE and apoB100 (yellow circles). With amyloid-β (black stars), these lipoproteins become a nidus for inflammation (gray circles) during drusen biogenesis in Bruch’s membrane (BrM). The reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) is a mechanism to release cholesterol from the RPE. (B) In the CNS, neurons or astrocytes release cholesterol (chol; yellow circles) and amyloid-β (black stars) by RCT into cerebral blood vessel wall, which accumulates and elicits an immune response that eventually leads to vascular injury. (C) Similarities and differences of AMD and CAA.

To enable future studies, we propose a model that centers on cholesterol metabolism, amyloid-β accumulation, and complement activation. In both CAA and AMD models, cholesterol accumulates due to increased cholesterol synthesis, increased cholesterol uptake, and decreased cholesterol efflux. The enhanced cellular cholesterol stimulates amyloid-β production. With impaired amyloid-β clearance and degradation, amyloid-β accumulates, and if sufficient, activates complement. If sufficiently prolonged or severe, the complement response will induce tissue injury. We focus particularly on CAA, albeit simalities exist with parenchymal amyloid-β (plaque) accumulation, because both CAA and AMD have a vascular component; small vessel disease in the case of CAA, and choriocapillary loss in AMD. That said, given CAA occurs in many cases of AD, understanding the relationship between parenchymal and vascular amyloid-β in AD may inform our understanding of amyloid accumulation in AMD.

APOE appears central to both AMD and CAA. Among many functions, APOE regulates cholesterol synthesis, cholesterol import, and cholesterol efflux. In both AMD and CAA models, cholesterol accumulates due to increased cholesterol synthesis, increased cholesterol uptake, and decreased cholesterol efflux. However, the APOE isoforms have opposite risk for AMD and CAA, which provides valuable insight into how the APOE and cholesterol synthesis and accumulation contribute to the pathobiology of each disease. The APOE4 isoform, relative to APOE2 and APOE3, i) promotes cholesterol accumulation due to cholesterol synthesis and increased cholesterol uptake; ii) decreases cholesterol efflux via reverse cholesterol transport because APOE4 has lower binding with HDLs than APOE2 and APOE3; and iii) induces less inflammation. The key difference in APOE isoforms between AMD and CAA pathobiology appears to be the contribution of amyloid-β and complement mediated inflammation. In CAA, APOE4, relative to APOE2 and APOE3, promotes cholesterol accumulation due to cholesterol synthesis and increased cholesterol uptake. In addition, cholesterol efflux through reverse cholesterol transport, is decreased because APOE4 has lower binding with HDLs than APOE2 and APOE3. The increased cholesterol both augments amyloid-β synthesis and decreases its degradation. With amyloid-β accumulation, complement is activated. In CAA, both amyloid-β and the complement response are concentrated in the neurovascular unit. Despite reduced inflammation with APOE4 relative to APOE2 and APOE3, amyloid-β accumulation is sufficient to activate complement that damages and ultimately ruptures blood vessels. Thus, amyloid-β accumulation is the key pathophysiologic factor in CAA. Despite its overlapping and genetic risk of AMD and CAA, the precise mechanisms of APOE are still be elucidated. Future studies exploring shared and distinct mechansims, including contrasting risk/protective affects of APOE isoforms, across common eye and brain diseases are warranted.

Complement activation is a key component of both AMD and CAA, and likely plays beneficial or damaging roles that is dependent on disease stage. Genetic studies have identified variation in the complement regulators CR1 and CFH with increased risk for CAA and AMD, respectively. These regulators influence the location of complement activity and the cell types involved. CR1 normally protects tissue by binding complement fragments (C3b, C4b) to clear immune complexes and moderate complement activation. In addition, it has a noncanonical role by mediating endocytosis of amyloid-β-C3b-CR1 complexes that are then degraded. Importantly, CR1 is located on astrocyte and microglia cell membranes, which focuses the complement activation to cells in the neurovascular unit, culminating in the injury and rupture of the vessel wall. CFH also modulates the complement response, but instead, regulates the alternative pathway. In contrast to CR1, CFH is secreted by the RPE and can regulate complement activity in BrM. In addition, CFH has noncanonical functions that are relevant to AMD pathobiology, such as its binding with HSPGs, which compete for lipoproteins to regulate lipoprotein accumulation in BrM, and its ability to bind and remove the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde (MDA) on oxidized lipoproteins. In AMD, these impaired noncanical functions due to the CFH risk variant promote oxidized lipoprotein accumulation in BrM. Along with amyloid-β, oxidized lipoproteins trigger an augmented complement immune response to collectively promote drusen formation. Whether the distinct genetic associations (CFH in AMD, CR1 in CAA) are pointing towards distinct mechansims, or shared mechanisms given their overlapping functions, are still be determined. Also, CFH and CR1 regulate central components of the complement cascade, and yet all of the cell types that produce the necessary components to drive complement activation (C1 through C9) and other regulators are not entirely known. Mapping these complement factors to specific cell types will improve provide the basis for understanding coordinated cellular response in AMD and CAA. We recognize that this model has been constructed on studies that relied heavily on in vitro and mouse models that may have limited translation to human disease. Since this pathobiologic comparison is new, direct comparative studies of common and different pathobiologies have not been conducted. By more precisely defining the roles of APOE, amyloid-β, and inflammatory pathways, along with their cell-specific effects, new biomarkers and therapies targeting these shared pathophysiologic mechanisms may be developed to reduce disease.

Highlights.

  • Amyloid-β accumulation has etiologically linked AMD and AD.

  • Amyloid-β accumulates in cerebral vessels in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).

  • CAA exhibits pathological features that remarkably parallel those of AMD.

  • Their pathobiology involves apoE cholesterol metabolism and complement inflammation

  • Pathologic differences are due to the distinct involved cell types

Funding:

PAD (Grimshaw-Gudewicz Charitable Foundation); GH: (Funded in part by VCID CWOW (NS139948), and I am the Diana Davis Spencer Foundation Chair for Glaucoma research); CBR (NIH R01 EY031748, R01 EY037682 (CBR), NIH P30 EY005722 (to Duke University); FFB Free Family AMD Award (CBR); unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (Duke Eye Center)); GSH (funding from the Steele Center for Translational Medicine, unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc; JTH (EY033765, EY031594, EY035805, RPB Stein Award, Robert Bond Welch Professorship); NP (R01EY035772); CBT (NEI EY024225 EY035322 EY037260, RPB Career Development Award, Robert Machemer MD and International Retinal Research Foundation, the UC San Diego Academic Senate, Larry L. Hillblom Foundation, the FFB Career Development Award, the Alcon Research Foundation Young Investigator Award); Research to Prevent Blindness unrestricted grant to UCSD; Research to Prevent Blindness unrestricted grant to Wilmer Eye Institute

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

The authors have the following disclosures: GC (Nidek (speaker fees), Character Bioscience (consultant); PAD (SAB for Ingenia Therapeutics, Novelty Nobility, Inc., Ceramedix Therapeutics); GSH (Co-founder of, CSO for and funding from, Perceive Biotherapeutics Inc.); JTH (SAB for Cirrus Pharmaceuticals, Character Biosciences, Seeing Medicines), CBR (SAB for Character Biosciences), DS (Co-founder, Ikshana Therapeutics, Inc., USA and Ikthera Therapeutics India Private Limited)

CRediT authorship contribution statement:
  • Conceptualization: WSS, CBR, PAD, GC, GSH, GRH, OJM, HP, NJP, DS, CBT, FS, CE, JTH
  • Data curation: WSS, CBR, PAD, GC, GSH, GRH, OJM, HP, NJP, DS, CBT, FS, CE, JTH
  • Project administration: JTH
  • Writing – original draft: WSS, JTH
  • Writing – review and editing: WSS, CBR, PAD, GC, GSH, GRH, OJM, HP, NJP, DS, CBT, FS, CE, JTH

Data availability

No data were used for the research described in the article.

References

  1. Aboelnour A, et al. (2016). “Amyloid beta deposition and phosphorylated tau accumulation are key features in aged choroidal vessels in the complement factor H knock out model of retinal degeneration.” Exp Eye Res 147: 138–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abyadeh M, et al. (2023). “Apolipoprotein epsilon in Brain and Retinal Neurodegenerative Diseases.” Aging Dis 14(4): 1311–1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adibhatla RM and Hatcher JF (2007). “Role of Lipids in Brain Injury and Diseases.” Future Lipidol 2(4): 403–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreone BJ, et al. (2020). “Alzheimer’s-associated PLCgamma2 is a signaling node required for both TREM2 function and the inflammatory response in human microglia.” Nat Neurosci 23(8): 927–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anisetti B, et al. (2023). “Age-related macular degeneration is associated with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy: A case-control study.” J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 32(8): 107244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arvanitakis Z, et al. (2011). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy pathology and cognitive domains in older persons.” Ann Neurol 69(2): 320–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bamberger ME, et al. (2003). “A cell surface receptor complex for fibrillar beta-amyloid mediates microglial activation.” J Neurosci 23(7): 2665–2674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barelli H, et al. (1997). “Characterization of new polyclonal antibodies specific for 40 and 42 amino acid-long amyloid beta peptides: their use to examine the cell biology of presenilins and the immunohistochemistry of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy cases.” Mol Med 3(10): 695–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brouwers N, et al. (2012). “Alzheimer risk associated with a copy number variation in the complement receptor 1 increasing C3b/C4b binding sites.” Mol Psychiatry 17(2): 223–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Calhoun ME, et al. (1999). “Neuronal overexpression of mutant amyloid precursor protein results in prominent deposition of cerebrovascular amyloid.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(24): 14088–14093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Calippe B, et al. (2017). “Complement Factor H Inhibits CD47-Mediated Resolution of Inflammation.” Immunity 46(2): 261–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Camacho J, et al. (2019). “Brain ApoA-I, ApoJ and ApoE Immunodetection in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.” Front Neurol 10: 187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Campochiaro PA (2000). “Retinal and choroidal neovascularization.” J Cell Physiol 184(3): 301–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Campos H, et al. (2001). “Distinct patterns of lipoproteins with apoB defined by presence of apoE or apoC-III in hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia.” J Lipid Res 42(8): 1239–1249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cano M, et al. (2011). “Advanced glycation endproduct changes to Bruch’s membrane promotes lipoprotein retention by lipoprotein lipase.” Am J Pathol 179(2): 850–859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chan RB, et al. (2012). “Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease.” J Biol Chem 287(4): 2678–2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Charidimou A, et al. (2012). “Sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy revisited: recent insights into pathophysiology and clinical spectrum.” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83(2): 124–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen JC, et al. (1992). “Functional loss in age-related Bruch’s membrane change with choroidal perfusion defect.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33(2): 334–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chew EY, et al. (2014). “Ten-year follow-up of age-related macular degeneration in the age-related eye disease study: AREDS report no. 36.” JAMA Ophthalmol 132(3): 272–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chirco KR, et al. (2016). “Selective accumulation of the complement membrane attack complex in aging choriocapillaris.” Exp Eye Res 146: 393–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clark SJ, et al. (2010). “Impaired binding of the age-related macular degeneration-associated complement factor H 402H allotype to Bruch’s membrane in human retina.” J Biol Chem 285(39): 30192–30202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Clemons TE, et al. (2005). “Risk factors for the incidence of Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report no. 19.” Ophthalmology 112(4): 533–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Corder EH, et al. (1993). “Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families.” Science 261(5123): 921–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crehan H, et al. (2012). “Complement receptor 1 (CR1) and Alzheimer’s disease.” Immunobiology 217(2): 244–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Curcio CA, et al. (2009). “Aging, age-related macular degeneration, and the response-to-retention of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins.” Prog Retin Eye Res 28(6): 393–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Curcio CA, et al. (2001). “Accumulation of cholesterol with age in human Bruch’s membrane.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 42(1): 265–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Curcio CA, et al. (2005). “Esterified and unesterified cholesterol in drusen and basal deposits of eyes with age-related maculopathy.” Exp Eye Res 81(6): 731–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Curcio CA, et al. (2005). “Basal deposits and drusen in eyes with age-related maculopathy: evidence for solid lipid particles.” Exp Eye Res 80(6): 761–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davignon J, et al. (1988). “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis.” Arteriosclerosis 8(1): 1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deane R, et al. (2008). “apoE isoform-specific disruption of amyloid beta peptide clearance from mouse brain.” J Clin Invest 118(12): 4002–4013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dentchev T, et al. (2003). “Amyloid-beta is found in drusen from some age-related macular degeneration retinas, but not in drusen from normal retinas.” Mol Vis 9: 184–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Desai D and Dugel PU (2022). “Complement cascade inhibition in geographic atrophy: a review.” Eye (Lond) 36(2): 294–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ding JD, et al. (2011). “Anti-amyloid therapy protects against retinal pigmented epithelium damage and vision loss in a model of age-related macular degeneration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(28): E279–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dithmar S, et al. (2000). “Ultrastructural changes in Bruch’s membrane of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 41(8): 2035–2042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Donoso LA, et al. (2006). “The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration.” Surv Ophthalmol 51(2): 137–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ebrahimi KB, et al. (2013). “Decreased membrane complement regulators in the retinal pigmented epithelium contributes to age-related macular degeneration.” J Pathol 229(5): 729–742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards AO, et al. (2005). “Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration.” Science 308(5720): 421–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Edwards M and Lutty GA (2021). “Bruch’s Membrane and the Choroid in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Adv Exp Med Biol 1256: 89–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Eikelenboom P and Stam FC (1982). “Immunoglobulins and complement factors in senile plaques. An immunoperoxidase study.” Acta Neuropathol 57(2–3): 239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Eisner A, et al. (1992). “Visual function and the subsequent development of exudative age-related macular degeneration.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33(11): 3091–3102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Eisner A, et al. (1991). “Relations between fundus appearance and function. Eyes whose fellow eye has exudative age-related macular degeneration.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32(1): 8–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ershov AV and Bazan NG (2000). “Photoreceptor phagocytosis selectively activates PPARgamma expression in retinal pigment epithelial cells.” J Neurosci Res 60(3): 328–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fisher DE, et al. (2016). “Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Multi-Ethnic United States Population: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.” Ophthalmology 123(6): 1297–1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fitz NF, et al. (2020). “Trem2 deficiency differentially affects phenotype and transcriptome of human APOE3 and APOE4 mice.” Mol Neurodegener 15(1): 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fleckenstein M, et al. (2024). “Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review.” JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 331(2): 147–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Frackowiak J, et al. (2003). “Secretion and accumulation of Abeta by brain vascular smooth muscle cells from AbetaPP-Swedish transgenic mice.” J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62(6): 685–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Francelin C, et al. (2021). “BACE1 Inhibition Increases Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress by Promoting Mitochondrial Damage.” Antioxidants (Basel) 10(10). [Google Scholar]
  48. Fritsche LG, et al. (2016). “A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants.” Nat Genet 48(2): 134–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Frost GR and Li YM (2017). “The role of astrocytes in amyloid production and Alzheimer’s disease.” Open Biol 7(12). [Google Scholar]
  50. Fujihara M, et al. (2009). “A human apoB100 transgenic mouse expresses human apoB100 in the RPE and develops features of early AMD.” Exp Eye Res 88(6): 1115–1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fujihara M, et al. (2014). “Mice that produce ApoB100 lipoproteins in the RPE do not develop drusen yet are still a valuable experimental system.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(11): 7285–7295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Funkhouser TA and Vik DP (1999). “Complement receptor type 1 gene regulation: retinoic acid and cytosine arabinoside increase CR1 expression.” Scand J Immunol 49(1): 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Garai K, et al. (2014). “The binding of apolipoprotein E to oligomers and fibrils of amyloid-beta alters the kinetics of amyloid aggregation.” Biochemistry 53(40): 6323–6331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Geerlings MJ, et al. (2017). “The complement system in age-related macular degeneration: A review of rare genetic variants and implications for personalized treatment.” Mol Immunol 84: 65–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gong JS, et al. (2002). “Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) isoform-dependent lipid release from astrocytes prepared from human ApoE3 and ApoE4 knock-in mice.” J Biol Chem 277(33): 29919–29926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gong JS, et al. (2007). “Novel action of apolipoprotein E (ApoE): ApoE isoform specifically inhibits lipid-particle-mediated cholesterol release from neurons.” Mol Neurodegener 2: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gorman BR, et al. (2024). “Genome-wide association analyses identify distinct genetic architectures for age-related macular degeneration across ancestries.” Nat Genet 56(12): 2659–2671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Greenberg SM, et al. (2020). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease - one peptide, two pathways.” Nat Rev Neurol 16(1): 30–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Greferath U, et al. (2016). “Correlation of Histologic Features with In Vivo Imaging of Reticular Pseudodrusen.” Ophthalmology 123(6): 1320–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Grenon MB, et al. (2024). “Temporal Characterization of the Amyloidogenic APPswe/PS1dE9;hAPOE4 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease.” Int J Mol Sci 25(11). [Google Scholar]
  61. Guo LY, et al. (2014). “Iron increases APP translation and amyloid-beta production in the retina.” Exp Eye Res 129: 31–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gupta N, et al. (2003). “Activated microglia in human retinitis pigmentosa, late-onset retinal degeneration, and age-related macular degeneration.” Exp Eye Res 76(4): 463–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hageman GS, et al. (2005). “A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(20): 7227–7232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Haines JL, et al. (2005). “Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration.” Science 308(5720): 419–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Handa JT, et al. (1999). “Increase in the advanced glycation end product pentosidine in Bruch’s membrane with age.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(3): 775–779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Harr SD, et al. (1996). “Brain expression of apolipoproteins E, J, and A-I in Alzheimer’s disease.” J Neurochem 66(6): 2429–2435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Herzig MC, et al. (2004). “Abeta is targeted to the vasculature in a mouse model of hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis.” Nat Neurosci 7(9): 954–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hirsch-Reinshagen V, et al. (2004). “Deficiency of ABCA1 impairs apolipoprotein E metabolism in brain.” J Biol Chem 279(39): 41197–41207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hu H, et al. (2025). “Deciphering the role of APOE in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: from genetic insights to therapeutic horizons.” Ann Med 57(1): 2445194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hu ML, et al. (2021). “Interactions between Apolipoprotein E Metabolism and Retinal Inflammation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Life (Basel) 11(7). [Google Scholar]
  71. Husain MA, et al. (2021). “APOE and Alzheimer’s Disease: From Lipid Transport to Physiopathology and Therapeutics.” Front Neurosci 15: 630502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ida H, et al. (2004). “Ultrastructural Aging of the RPE-Bruch’s Membrane-Choriocapillaris Complex in the D-Galactose-Treated Mouse.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(7): 2348–2354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ingala S, et al. (2020). “The relation between APOE genotype and cerebral microbleeds in cognitively unimpaired middle- and old-aged individuals.” Neurobiol Aging 95: 104–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Isas JM, et al. (2010). “Soluble and mature amyloid fibrils in drusen deposits.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 51(3): 1304–1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Jabbehdari S, et al. (2024). “Age-related macular degeneration and neurodegenerative disorders: Shared pathways in complex interactions.” Surv Ophthalmol 69(3): 303–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Jakobsdottir J, et al. (2005). “Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26.” Am J Hum Genet 77(3): 389–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Jansen IE, et al. (2019). “Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk.” Nature genetics 51(3): 404–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jiang Q, et al. (2008). “ApoE promotes the proteolytic degradation of Abeta.” Neuron 58(5): 681–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jo DH, et al. (2023). “Activation of Lysosomal Function Ameliorates Amyloid-beta-Induced Tight Junction Disruption in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium.” Mol Cells 46(11): 675–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson LV, et al. (2002). “The Alzheimer’s A beta -peptide is deposited at sites of complement activation in pathologic deposits associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(18): 11830–11835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jonas JB, et al. (2017). “Updates on the Epidemiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 6(6): 493–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kalaria RN and Grahovac I (1990). “Serum amyloid P immunoreactivity in hippocampal tangles, plaques and vessels: implications for leakage across the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease.” Brain Res 516(2): 349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kalaria RN and Sepulveda-Falla D (2021). “Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Sporadic and Familial Alzheimer Disease.” Am J Pathol 191(11): 1888–1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kanekiyo T, et al. (2013). “Neuronal clearance of amyloid-beta by endocytic receptor LRP1.” J Neurosci 33(49): 19276–19283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kanekiyo T, et al. (2014). “ApoE and Abeta in Alzheimer’s disease: accidental encounters or partners?” Neuron 81(4): 740–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kara B, et al. (2023). “Vascular and Nonvascular Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.” Clin Geriatr Med 39(1): 109–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Karten B, et al. (2006). “Expression of ABCG1, but not ABCA1, correlates with cholesterol release by cerebellar astroglia.” J Biol Chem 281(7): 4049–4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Keenan TD, et al. (2014). “Associations between age-related macular degeneration, Alzheimer disease, and dementia: record linkage study of hospital admissions.” JAMA Ophthalmol 132(1): 63–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kelly UL, et al. (2020). “High-density lipoproteins are a potential therapeutic target for age-related macular degeneration.” J Biol Chem 295(39): 13601–13616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Klein R, et al. (2004). “The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration.” Am J Ophthalmol 137(3): 486–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Klein RJ, et al. (2005). “Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration.” Science 308(5720): 385–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Koistinaho M, et al. (2004). “Apolipoprotein E promotes astrocyte colocalization and degradation of deposited amyloid-beta peptides.” Nat Med 10(7): 719–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kurzawa-Akanbi M, et al. (2022). “Retinal pigment epithelium extracellular vesicles are potent inducers of age-related macular degeneration disease phenotype in the outer retina.” J Extracell Vesicles 11(12): e12295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. La Cunza N, et al. (2021). “Mitochondria-dependent phase separation of disease-relevant proteins drives pathological features of age-related macular degeneration.” JCI Insight 6(9). [Google Scholar]
  95. Landowski M, et al. (2019). “Human complement factor H Y402H polymorphism causes an age-related macular degeneration phenotype and lipoprotein dysregulation in mice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(9): 3703–3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Lashkari K, et al. (2018). “A monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid β (Aβ) restores complement factor I bioactivity: Potential implications in age-related macular degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease.” PLoS One 13(5): e0195751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lee CS, et al. (2019). “Associations between recent and established ophthalmic conditions and risk of Alzheimer’s disease.” Alzheimers Dement 15(1): 34–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Levy O, et al. (2015). “Apolipoprotein E promotes subretinal mononuclear phagocyte survival and chronic inflammation in age-related macular degeneration.” EMBO Mol Med 7(2): 211–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Levy O, et al. (2015). “APOE Isoforms Control Pathogenic Subretinal Inflammation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” J Neurosci 35(40): 13568–13576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Li CM, et al. (2006). “Apolipoprotein localization in isolated drusen and retinal apolipoprotein gene expression.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 47(7): 3119–3128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Li CM, et al. (2005). “Retina expresses microsomal triglyceride transfer protein: implications for age-related maculopathy.” J Lipid Res 46(4): 628–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Li J, et al. (2012). “Differential regulation of amyloid-beta endocytic trafficking and lysosomal degradation by apolipoprotein E isoforms.” J Biol Chem 287(53): 44593–44601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lian H, et al. (2016). “Astrocyte-Microglia Cross Talk through Complement Activation Modulates Amyloid Pathology in Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease.” J Neurosci 36(2): 577–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Liao F, et al. (2017). “Apolipoprotein E metabolism and functions in brain and its role in Alzheimer’s disease.” Curr Opin Lipidol 28(1): 60–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Litvinchuk A, et al. (2024). “Amelioration of Tau and ApoE4-linked glial lipid accumulation and neurodegeneration with an LXR agonist.” Neuron 112(3): 384–403 e388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Liu CC, et al. (2013). “Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy.” Nat Rev Neurol 9(2): 106–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Liu X, et al. (2012). “ApoE gene polymorphism and vascular dementia in Chinese population: a meta-analysis.” J Neural Transm (Vienna) 119(3): 387–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Loch RA, et al. (2023). “Cross interactions between Apolipoprotein E and amyloid proteins in neurodegenerative diseases.” Comput Struct Biotechnol J 21: 1189–1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Long JM and Holtzman DM (2019). “Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies.” Cell 179(2): 312–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Lynn SA, et al. (2021). “Oligomeric Abeta(1–42) Induces an AMD-Like Phenotype and Accumulates in Lysosomes to Impair RPE Function.” Cells 10(2). [Google Scholar]
  111. Malek G, et al. (2005). “Apolipoprotein E allele-dependent pathogenesis: a model for age-related retinal degeneration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(33): 11900–11905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Malek G, et al. (2003). “Apolipoprotein B in cholesterol-containing drusen and basal deposits of human eyes with age-related maculopathy.” Am J Pathol 162(2): 413–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mandrekar S, et al. (2009). “Microglia mediate the clearance of soluble Abeta through fluid phase macropinocytosis.” J Neurosci 29(13): 4252–4262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Marola OJ, et al. (2025). “Genetic context modulates aging and degeneration in the murine retina.” Mol Neurodegener 20(1): 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Matsuo K, et al. (2017). “Complement Activation in Capillary Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.” Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 44(5–6): 343–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. McKay GJ, et al. (2011). “Variations in apolipoprotein E frequency with age in a pooled analysis of a large group of older people.” Am J Epidemiol 173(12): 1357–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Michikawa M, et al. (2000). “Apolipoprotein E exhibits isoform-specific promotion of lipid efflux from astrocytes and neurons in culture.” J Neurochem 74(3): 1008–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Midena E, et al. (1997). “Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(2): 469–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Minagawa H, et al. (2009). “Mechanism underlying apolipoprotein E (ApoE) isoform-dependent lipid efflux from neural cells in culture.” J Neurosci Res 87(11): 2498–2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Moreira-Neto CA, et al. (2018). “Choriocapillaris Loss in Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” J Ophthalmol 2018: 8125267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Mullins RF, et al. (2001). “Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis: implications for the role of complement activation in drusen biogenesis.” Eye (Lond) 15(Pt 3): 390–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Mullins RF, et al. (2011). “Elevated membrane attack complex in human choroid with high risk complement factor H genotypes.” Exp Eye Res 93(4): 565–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Mullins RF, et al. (2000). “Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis, elastosis, amyloidosis, and dense deposit disease.” FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 14(7): 835–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Nielsen LB, et al. (2002). “Overexpression of apolipoprotein B in the heart impedes cardiac triglyceride accumulation and development of cardiac dysfunction in diabetic mice.” J Biol Chem 277(30): 27014–27020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Nielsen LB, et al. (1998). “Genes for apolipoprotein B and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein are expressed in the heart: evidence that the heart has the capacity to synthesize and secrete lipoproteins.” Circulation 98(1): 13–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Nugent AA, et al. (2020). “TREM2 Regulates Microglial Cholesterol Metabolism upon Chronic Phagocytic Challenge.” Neuron 105(5): 837–854 e839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ohno-Matsui K (2011). “Parallel findings in age-related macular degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease.” Prog Retin Eye Res 30(4): 217–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Okazaki H, et al. (1979). “Clinicopathologic studies of primary cerebral amyloid angiopathy.” Mayo Clin Proc 54(1): 22–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Ong JM, et al. (2001). “Effects of cholesterol and apolipoprotein E on retinal abnormalities in ApoE-deficient mice.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 42(8): 1891–1900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Onos KD, et al. (2025). “WSB.APP/PS1 mice develop age-dependent cerebral amyloid angiopathy, cerebrovascular deficits, and white matter damage, which are modified by humanized APOE alleles.” bioRxiv. [Google Scholar]
  131. Onos KD, et al. (2019). “Enhancing face validity of mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease with natural genetic variation.” PLoS Genet 15(5): e1008155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Owsley C, et al. (2015). “Comparison of Visual Function in Older Eyes in the Earliest Stages of Age-related Macular Degeneration to Those in Normal Macular Health.” Curr Eye Res: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  133. Papadopoulos Z (2020). “Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and its Association with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Curr Aging Sci 13(2): 102–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Pauly D, et al. (2019). “Cell-Type-Specific Complement Expression in the Healthy and Diseased Retina.” Cell Rep 29(9): 2835–2848 e2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Phillips MC (2014). “Apolipoprotein E isoforms and lipoprotein metabolism.” IUBMB Life 66(9): 616–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Poyuran R, et al. (2019). “Cerebrovascular pathology in cerebral amyloid angiopathy presenting as intracerebral haemorrhage.” Virchows Arch 474(2): 235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Prasad T, et al. (2017). “Amyloid beta peptides overexpression in retinal pigment epithelial cells via AAV-mediated gene transfer mimics AMD-like pathology in mice.” Sci Rep 7(1): 3222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Qi XM and Ma JF (2017). “The role of amyloid beta clearance in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: more potential therapeutic targets.” Transl Neurodegener 6: 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Qiu C, et al. (2012). “Cerebral microbleeds and age-related macular degeneration: the AGES-Reykjavik Study.” Neurobiol Aging 33(12): 2935–2937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Qiu C, et al. (2018). “Differential associations between retinal signs and CMBs by location: The AGES-Reykjavik Study.” Neurology 90(2): e142–e148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Ranjan R, et al. (2021). “Interactions Between Amyloid-beta (1–42) and Hydroxyapatite-Cholesterol Spherules Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Protein J 40(6): 849–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Rannikmae K, et al. (2014). “APOE associations with severe CAA-associated vasculopathic changes: collaborative meta-analysis.” J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(3): 300–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Rauch JN, et al. (2018). “Tau Internalization is Regulated by 6-O Sulfation on Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans (HSPGs).” Sci Rep 8(1): 6382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Rebeck GW (2017). “The role of APOE on lipid homeostasis and inflammation in normal brains.” J Lipid Res 58(8): 1493–1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Revesz T, et al. (2002). “Sporadic and familial cerebral amyloid angiopathies.” Brain Pathol 12(3): 343–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Rivera A, et al. (2005). “Hypothetical LOC387715 is a second major susceptibility gene for age-related macular degeneration, contributing independently of complement factor H to disease risk.” Hum Mol Genet 14(21): 3227–3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Rodriguez de Cordoba S, et al. (1985). “Human genes for three complement components that regulate the activation of C3 are tightly linked.” J Exp Med 161(5): 1189–1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Rogers J, et al. (2006). “Peripheral clearance of amyloid beta peptide by complement C3-dependent adherence to erythrocytes.” Neurobiology of aging 27(12): 1733–1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Rozzini L, et al. (2014). “Cognitive dysfunction and age-related macular degeneration.” Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 29(3): 256–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Rudolf M, et al. (2008). “Sub-retinal drusenoid deposits in human retina: organization and composition.” Exp Eye Res 87(5): 402–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Russo C, et al. (1998). “Opposite roles of apolipoprotein E in normal brains and in Alzheimer’s disease.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(26): 15598–15602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Saido T and Leissring MA (2012). “Proteolytic degradation of amyloid beta-protein.” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(6): a006379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Saunders AM, et al. (1993). “Association of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease.” Neurology 43(8): 1467–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sawmiller D, et al. (2023). “Targeting apolipoprotein E and N-terminal amyloid beta-protein precursor interaction improves cognition and reduces amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s mice.” J Biol Chem 299(7): 104846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Schrader JM, et al. (2024). “Longitudinal markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and related inflammation in rTg-DI rats.” Sci Rep 14(1): 8441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Seshadri S, et al. (1995). “Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele and the lifetime risk of Alzheimer’s disease. What physicians know, and what they should know.” Arch Neurol 52(11): 1074–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Slooter AJ, et al. (1997). “Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 and the risk of dementia with stroke. A population-based investigation.” JAMA 277(10): 818–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Sullivan PM, et al. (1997). “Targeted replacement of the mouse apolipoprotein E gene with the common human APOE3 allele enhances diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis.” J Biol Chem 272(29): 17972–17980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Tanskanen M, et al. (2005). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in a 95+ cohort: complement activation and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype.” Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 31(6): 589–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Tarasoff-Conway JM, et al. (2015). “Clearance systems in the brain-implications for Alzheimer disease.” Nat Rev Neurol 11(8): 457–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Taylor X, et al. (2020). “A1 reactive astrocytes and a loss of TREM2 are associated with an early stage of pathology in a mouse model of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.” J Neuroinflammation 17(1): 223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Tcw J, et al. (2022). “Cholesterol and matrisome pathways dysregulated in astrocytes and microglia.” Cell 185(13): 2213–2233 e2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Thakkinstian A, et al. (2006). “Association between apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and age-related macular degeneration: A HuGE review and meta-analysis.” Am J Epidemiol 164(9): 813–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Thal DR, et al. (2008). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and its relationship to Alzheimer’s disease.” Acta Neuropathol 115(6): 599–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Thomas CJ, et al. (2021). “Age-Related Macular Degeneration.” Med Clin North Am 105(3): 473–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Thompson RB, et al. (2015). “Identification of hydroxyapatite spherules provides new insight into subretinal pigment epithelial deposit formation in the aging eye.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(5): 1565–1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Tian J, et al. (2005). “Advanced glycation endproduct-induced aging of the retinal pigment epithelium and choroid: a comprehensive transcriptional response.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(33): 11846–11851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Toomey CB, et al. (2015). “Regulation of age-related macular degeneration-like pathology by complement factor H.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(23): E3040–3049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Toomey CB, et al. (2025). “Bruch’s membrane heparan sulfate retains lipoproteins in the early stages of age-related macular degeneration.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 122(24): e2500727122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Troutwine BR, et al. (2022). “Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease.” Acta Pharm Sin B 12(2): 496–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Unger RH and Orci L (2002). “Lipoapoptosis: its mechanism and its diseases.” Biochim Biophys Acta 1585(2–3): 202–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. van der Kant R, et al. (2019). “Cholesterol Metabolism Is a Druggable Axis that Independently Regulates Tau and Amyloid-beta in iPSC-Derived Alzheimer’s Disease Neurons.” Cell Stem Cell 24(3): 363–375 e369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Verghese PB, et al. (2011). “Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders.” Lancet Neurol 10(3): 241–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Vinters HV (1987). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy. A critical review.” Stroke 18(2): 311–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Vinters HV (1992). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer’s disease: two entities or one?” J Neurol Sci 112(1–2): 1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Viturino MG, et al. (2021). “Evaluation of APOE polymorphisms and the risk for age-related macular degeneration in a Southeastern Brazilian population.” Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 246(10): 1148–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Vonsattel JP, et al. (1991). “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy without and with cerebral hemorrhages: a comparative histological study.” Ann Neurol 30(5): 637–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Wahrle SE, et al. (2004). “ABCA1 is required for normal central nervous system ApoE levels and for lipidation of astrocyte-secreted apoE.” J Biol Chem 279(39): 40987–40993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wang H, et al. (2021). “Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118(33). [Google Scholar]
  180. Wang J, et al. (2012). “Cholesterol enhances amyloid beta deposition in mouse retina by modulating the activities of Abeta-regulating enzymes in retinal pigment epithelial cells.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 424(4): 704–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang L, et al. (2016). “Pentraxin 3 recruits complement factor H to protect against oxidative stress-induced complement and inflammasome overactivation.” J Pathol 240(4): 495–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Weismann D, et al. (2011). “Complement factor H binds malondialdehyde epitopes and protects from oxidative stress.” Nature 478(7367): 76–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Wen L-Y, et al. (2021). “Increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease among patients with age-related macular degeneration: A nationwide population-based study.” PLoS One 16(5): e0250440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Whitmore SS, et al. (2015). “Complement activation and choriocapillaris loss in early AMD: implications for pathophysiology and therapy.” Prog Retin Eye Res 45: 1–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Wisniewski HM and Wegiel J (1994). “Beta-amyloid formation by myocytes of leptomeningeal vessels.” Acta Neuropathol 87(3): 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Wisniewski T and Frangione B (1992). “Apolipoprotein E: a pathological chaperone protein in patients with cerebral and systemic amyloid.” Neurosci Lett 135(2): 235–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wong WL, et al. (2014). “Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Lancet Glob Health 2(2): e106–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Woo SJ, et al. (2012). “Cognitive impairment in age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy.” Ophthalmology 119(10): 2094–2101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Wu T, et al. (2010). “Apolipoprotein B100 secretion by cultured ARPE-19 cells is modulated by alteration of cholesterol levels.” J Neurochem 114(6): 1734–1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Xiang Y, et al. (2015). “Physiological amyloid-beta clearance in the periphery and its therapeutic potential for Alzheimer’s disease.” Acta Neuropathol 130(4): 487–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Xiying M, et al. (2017). “Association of Apolipoprotein E Polymorphisms with Age-related Macular Degeneration Subtypes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Arch Med Res 48(4): 370–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Yamauchi Y, et al. (2008). “Role of the N- and C-terminal domains in binding of apolipoprotein E isoforms to heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate: a surface plasmon resonance study.” Biochemistry 47(25): 6702–6710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Yamazaki Y, et al. (2019). “Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies.” Nat Rev Neurol 15(9): 501–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Yin XS, et al. (2025). “Prevalence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and its correlation with Alzheimer’s disease and cognition in an autopsy-confirmed cohort from China.” Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 17(2): e70100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Yuede CM, et al. (2016). “Rapid in vivo measurement of beta-amyloid reveals biphasic clearance kinetics in an Alzheimer’s mouse model.” J Exp Med 213(5): 677–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Zhang L, et al. (2023). “Neuronal ApoE4 in Alzheimer’s disease and potential therapeutic targets.” Front Aging Neurosci 15: 1199434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Zhang Z, et al. (2013). “Aberrant apolipoprotein E expression and cognitive dysfunction in patients with poststroke depression.” Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 17(1): 47–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Zhuang J, et al. (2021). “Cerebral white matter connectivity, cognition, and age-related macular degeneration.” Neuroimage Clin 30: 102594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used for the research described in the article.

RESOURCES