Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2026 Feb 9;70(3):e01302-25. doi: 10.1128/aac.01302-25

Differences in β-lactamase activity and carbapenem resistance among the Bacillus cereus group

Yuji Nishihara 1,2,3, Ryuichi Nakano 2,✉, Akiyo Nakano 2, Yuki Suzuki 2, Miho Ogawa 4, Ryuji Sakata 4, Hisakazu Yano 2, Kei Kasahara 1
Editor: Benjamin P Howden5
PMCID: PMC12959158  PMID: 41660856

ABSTRACT

The Bacillus cereus group causes severe nosocomial infections. This group carries the chromosomal β-lactamases, including bla1 and BcII, which contribute to β-lactam resistance; however, the β-lactam resistance mechanisms are poorly understood. We performed genomic and phenotypic analyses of 48 clinical isolates from blood cultures and the reference strain ATCC14579 to clarify these mechanisms. Genomic analyses included species identification, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and detection of β-lactamase genes using whole-genome sequencing. β-Lactam susceptibility testing, enzyme activity assays, and RT-qPCR of β-lactamases were performed. For this analysis, we developed a method to measure the enzyme activity of B. cereus group. The 48 isolates comprised three species (30 Bacillus mosaicus, 9 Bacillus cereus sensu stricto (s.s.), and 9 Bacillus luti) and 28 sequence types. Although all B. luti isolates lacked carbapenemase genes, they exhibited higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges for ampicillin and meropenem. The enzyme activity patterns were categorized as constitutive, inducible, or silent. All B. luti isolates and some B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. isolates displayed constitutive enzyme activity for penicillin G, whereas most B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. isolates displayed inducible activity, and five displayed silent activity. In the inducible group, the induced activity appeared to be accompanied by elevated penicillinase and carbapenemase expression. This is the first study to demonstrate interspecies variability within the B. cereus group regarding the presence of carbapenemase genes and β-lactam resistance profiles. These findings provide crucial insights into β-lactam resistance mechanisms in this bacterial group and provide a foundation for further research.

KEYWORDS: enzyme activity, metallo-β-lactamase, carbapenemase, Bacillus luti, Bacillus cereus group

INTRODUCTION

The Bacillus cereus group comprises gram-positive, spore-forming rod bacteria that are ubiquitously distributed in natural environments (1, 2). This group includes closely related species with high genetic similarity, such as Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis (3). B. anthracis, harboring virulence plasmids pXO1 and/or pXO2, causes anthrax, which is potentially fatal. B. cereus mainly causes gastrointestinal infections such as food poisoning in humans but can also cause severe, invasive infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and neonates. B. thuringiensis causes lethal infections in insects and is widely used as a biopesticide (4). To date, approximately 20 species have been proposed for inclusion in the B. cereus group (3, 5). Specific species within the B. cereus group cannot be reliably differentiated using the phenotypic identification method or matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with commercially available databases (3, 6). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is required for accurate identification of species within this group (3, 7). Because of the difficulties with identification, detailed species classification is not possible in routine clinical laboratory practice.

Except for B. anthracis, most species within the B. cereus group are resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins (2). Penicillin susceptibility is frequently used to differentiate B. anthracis from other species of the B. cereus group, such as B. cereus and B. thuringiensis (8), but sporadic penicillin resistance of B. anthracis has been reported (9). In the B. cereus group, including B. anthracis, the expression of chromosomal β-lactamase genes is thought to be partially responsible for β-lactam resistance (8, 9). Chromosomally encoded β-lactamases include serine-β-lactamase, bla1, and metallo-β-lactamase, bla2 (9, 10). In penicillin-sensitive B. anthracis strains, both bla1 and bla2 are almost silent transcriptionally, whereas semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that these genes are expressed in penicillin-resistant strains (9, 11).

Previous studies have confirmed that bla1 contributes to penicillin resistance. The deletion of bla1 gene in penicillin-resistant B. anthracis strains results in a dramatic decrease in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ampicillin (12), and B. thuringiensis, a species genetically similar to B. anthracis, also demonstrates a decreased MIC of ampicillin with the elimination of bla1 (13). However, the implications of bla2 for the susceptibility to carbapenems are not well understood. Discovered in 1966, bla2 was the first extracellular metallo-β-lactamase to be discovered (14). Despite the presence of chromosomal carbapenemase, members of the B. cereus group are generally sensitive to carbapenem antibiotics (5, 15), and the production of bla2 is insufficient to confer carbapenem resistance (9, 12).

The regulatory mechanisms underlying β-lactamase expression in the B. cereus group have been gradually elucidated, with recent studies demonstrating that extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors play a key role in this process (8, 13). However, the detailed regulatory mechanisms, especially those for carbapenemase expression, remain poorly understood.

In bacteria, the core RNA polymerase (RNAP) associates with a sigma factor to form the holoenzyme, which enables promoter recognition and transcription initiation. Sigma factors determine promoter specificity, thereby directing RNAP to transcribe distinct sets of genes (16). ECF sigma factors are a subfamily of σ70 sigma factors. They typically regulate cellular processes related to the cell envelope and are, therefore, termed “extracytoplasmic function” sigma factors (16). The general regulatory pathway of ECF sigma factors involves a membrane-bound anti-sigma factor that sequesters the sigma factor on the membrane, thereby suppressing its activity. Upon the detection of an extracytoplasmic signal, the anti-sigma factor is proteolytically degraded, releasing the sigma factor to activate transcription of the target genes (16, 17).

In the B. cereus group, SigP functions as an ECF sigma factor, and its activity is inhibited by its cognate anti-sigma factor, RsiP. These components are thought to participate in the regulation of β-lactamase expression. Penicillin-resistant B. anthracis strains constitutively express β-lactamase activity, whereas the deletion of the sigP–rsiP locus completely abolishes it (8). In B. thuringiensis, SigP regulates multiple β-lactamases and penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), potentially contributing to β-lactam resistance (13). Additionally, ECF sigma factors upregulate β-lactamase activity in response to β-lactam antibiotic exposure (8, 13). However, few studies have investigated the levels of metallo-β-lactamase expression or the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, and the mechanisms of metallo-β-lactamase and its contribution to carbapenem resistance remain unclear. Carbapenems are a crucial therapeutic option for treating infections caused by the B. cereus group (5); therefore, understanding carbapenem resistance mechanisms has important implications for treating clinical infectious diseases.

Measuring enzyme activity is crucial for clarifying the mechanisms of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. However, in Bacillus species, β-lactamase activity has not been accurately quantified. Gram-positive bacteria secrete the β-lactamase enzymes that they produce into the extracellular environment (18, 19). Although previous studies have measured enzyme activity in liquid culture supernatants (11, 20), these measurements have not been normalized to protein content; therefore, enzyme activity assays have not been standardized.

In this study, we used 48 clinical isolates of the B. cereus group from patient blood cultures and conducted detailed species identification based on WGS analysis. We developed a novel method of quantifying enzyme activity toward β-lactam antibiotics and performed quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) on a subset of the isolates to measure the levels of penicillinase and metallo-β-lactamase expression. This revealed that β-lactamase activity manifests in three distinct categories: constitutive, inducible, and silent and that carbapenem resistance levels and the expression of chromosomal β-lactamases vary considerably among species in the B. cereus group.

RESULTS

Species and MLST

Using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) method of the BTyper3 system (21), 48 isolates were taxonomically classified as three different species: 30 Bacillus mosaicus, 9 Bacillus cereus sensu stricto (s.s.), and 9 Bacillus luti (Fig. 1). All B. cereus s.s. isolates were classified as panC group IV, and all B. luti isolates were classified as panC group V. The B. mosaicus were classified as either panC group II or III.

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree of Bacillus cereus group showing B. mosaicus, B. luti, and B. cereus s.s. clustering. Heatmap displays antimicrobial resistance patterns correlated with genetic lineages, beta-lactamase genes, and enzyme activity profiles.

Phylogenetic tree of 48 clinical isolates from the Bacillus cereus group and the reference strain B. cereus ATCC 14579, with associated antimicrobial susceptibility, mCIM results, enzyme activity, and β-lactamase gene profiles. A phylogenetic tree of 48 NR isolates of Bacillus cereus group combined with the reference strain B. cereus ATCC 14579 was constructed using Mashtree (22). All isolates were classified into three species: Bacillus mosaicus, Bacillus luti, and Bacillus cereus sensu stricto (s.s.). A total of 28 distinct sequence types (STs) were identified. B. cereus s.s. isolates belonged to panC group IV, B. luti belonged to group V, and B. mosaicus belonged to groups II or III. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ampicillin and meropenem were represented using a color gradient from white (low MICs) to red (high MICs). Positive results in the mCIM are indicated by red boxes. The enzyme activity categories are shown with colored boxes; red indicates constitutive activity, green indicates inducible activity, and blue indicates a silent phenotype. The genetic structures around bla1 and BcII are shown based on the classifications shown in Fig. 2 and 3, respectively. Abbreviation: mCIM, modified carbapenem inactivation method.

MLST analysis revealed that the 48 isolates were distributed across 28 distinct sequence types (STs). Of the nine B. luti isolates, eight were ST151. Of the 30 B. mosaicus isolates, 5 isolates each were ST167 and ST3341, and 2 isolates each were ST3343, ST1050, ST1420, and ST1425. Of the 30 B. mosaicus isolates analyzed, 15 were classified within clonal complex (CC) 365. The STs of B. cereus s.s. were different for all isolates, but four (44%) belonged to CC142. The species, MLST sequence type, CC, panC phylogenetic group, and other detailed genomic information are shown in Fig. 1 and Table S1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and the modified carbapenem inactivation method

The MICs (µg/mL) for ampicillin and meropenem, and the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) results, are shown in Fig. 1. The MICs of both antibiotics against B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. displayed a broad distribution. In contrast, B. luti exhibited consistently elevated MIC values for both β-lactams.

Notably, despite higher MICs for meropenem, all B. luti isolates tested negative using mCIM. Among the other two species, 7 (23%) B. mosaicus and 2 (22%) B. cereus s.s. isolates showed positive mCIM results. For these two species, all isolates with meropenem MICs >4 µg/mL were mCIM positive. Among the isolates, 4 B. mosaicus isolates and 1 B. cereus s.s. isolate had a meropenem MIC of 2 µg/mL, and 2 of the B. mosaicus isolates were mCIM positive. Importantly, all isolates with an MIC of ≤1 µg/mL were mCIM negative.

Presence of β-lactamase genes among each species

The bla1 gene was found in all 48 isolates. The genetic structure surrounding bla1 was highly conserved, with the sigma factor genes sigP and rsiP arranged sequentially, followed downstream by two types of PBPs and bla1. In contrast, the downstream region of bla1 exhibited strain-specific variability, with diverse genetic elements, such as phosphoesterases, acetyltransferases, and membrane proteins, present in different isolates (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Genetic schematic showing conserved upstream sequence and variable downstream regions of bla1. Four distinct organizational patterns display different genes positioned after bla1, with most isolates following the Group a configuration.

Schematic representation of the genetic context surrounding bla1. The upstream region of bla1 was highly conserved across isolates and consistently contained sigP, rsiP, and two penicillin-binding protein genes. In contrast, the downstream region was classified into four distinct types based on the gene located immediately downstream of bla1. Forty of 48 isolates belonged to Group a; 5 isolates (NR5386, NR5388, NR5391, NR5411, and NR5415) and the reference strain, B. cereus ATCC 14579, belonged to Group b; two isolates (NR5384 and NR5406) belonged to Group c; and NR5368 belonged to Group d. Purple arrows represent sigP; pink, rsiP; yellow, penicillin-binding protein; blue, bla1; green, phosphoesterase; and black patterned arrows represent other genes. Detailed information on the isolates and their corresponding genetic types is provided in Table S2.

The homology levels of bla1 ranged from 85% to 99% at the nucleotide level and from 84% to 99% at the amino acid level. Relative to the ATCC reference strain, nucleotide homology varied among species. The homology ranged from 97% to 99% in B. cereus s.s., 91% to 92% in B. luti, and 85% to 99% in B. mosaicus.

The BcII (bla2) gene was detected in all the B. cereus s.s. and B. mosaicus isolates analyzed. In contrast with the relatively conserved region surrounding bla1, the genetic structure surrounding BcII displayed considerable variability. Notably, sigma factor genes such as sigP and rsiP were absent in the vicinity of BcII. Instead, the genetic region around BcII, and the corresponding genomic locus in B. luti, contained genes encoding lysozymes and hydroxylamine reductases, along with several genes of unknown function.

In B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s., BcII appeared to be inserted between the forward-oriented lysozyme gene and the reverse-oriented hypothetical protein found in B. luti (Fig. 3). The genetic structure of B. luti is shown in Fig. 3a, and the genetic structures of 19 of the 30 B. mosaicus are shown in Fig. 3b. In four B. mosaicus isolates (NR5368, NR5382, NR5409, and NR5410), an IS605 element was present downstream of BcII (Fig. 3c). Additionally, in seven B. mosaicus isolates (NR5373, NR5377, NR5379, 5380, NR5385, NR5393, and NR5398), the lysozyme gene immediately upstream of BcII was absent (Fig. 3d).

Fig 3.

Genetic diagram comparing six arrangements of BcII gene context in Bacillus species. Patterns show varying presence of BcII, lysozyme, IS605 elements across species. Arrows represent genes including hydroxylamine reductase and hypothetical proteins.

Schematic representation of the genetic context surrounding BcII. The genetic structure surrounding BcII varied between species. All nine isolates of B. luti completely lacked the BcII gene (type a). B. mosaicus isolates were classified into three distinct structural types (19 type b, 4 type c, and 7 type d) based on the presence or absence of lysozyme and IS605 family elements. B. cereus s.s. was divided into two types (2 NR isolates and the reference strain B. cereus ATCC 14579 were type e, and 7 isolates were type f), depending on the presence of lysozyme. Green arrows represent lysozyme; blue, BcII; red, IS605 family; light blue, hydroxylamine reductase; gray, uncharacterized protein; black with pattern, hypothetical protein (ORF1–ORF6). Detailed information on the isolates and their corresponding genetic types is provided in Table S2. Abbreviation: ORF, open reading frame.

In B. cereus s.s., two isolates (NR5386 and NR5401) retained the lysozyme gene directly upstream of BcII (Fig. 3e). This lysozyme gene was absent in the remaining seven B. cereus s.s. isolates (NR5369, NR5383, NR5391, NR5394, NR5396, NR5411, and NR5415) (Fig. 3f). None of the bacterial isolates in this study showed evidence of genetic structures, such as homologous recombination or transposons, associated with the transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes.

The homology of BcII among the isolates ranged from 87% to 100% at the nucleotide level and from 86% to 100% at the amino acid level. The nucleotide homology of BcII was high in B. cereus s.s., ranging from 94% to 100%. In B. mosaicus, one isolate (NR5385) showed 99% homology, whereas the other isolates showed homology ranging from 87% to 89%. The detailed data on the homology and structure of each β-lactamase are summarized in Table S2.

Enzyme activity

In this study, we developed a novel method for measuring the enzyme activity of β-lactamases per unit mass of protein in gram-positive bacteria. This method is based on the release of β-lactamases produced by gram-positive bacteria into the extracellular environment (18, 19). The technique involves centrifuging the supernatant of liquid culture media to isolate and quantify enzyme activity against β-lactam antibiotics. In addition to ATCC14579, 35 of the 48 clinical isolates from blood culture were chosen for enzyme activity analysis. The enzyme activity against penicillin G and meropenem was assessed in all 23 isolates, with meropenem MICs ≥0.5 µg/mL. For the remaining 25 isolates with meropenem MICs <0.5 µg/mL, a subset of 12 isolates was selected to ensure a balanced distribution of ampicillin MIC values.

Fig. 1 shows the phylogenetic tree of 49 (48 NR isolates and ATCC14579) B. cereus group isolates with the results of susceptibility testing, mCIM, enzyme activity, and β-lactamase genes.

Penicillin G

The enzyme activity against penicillin G is shown in Fig. 4a. We identified three types of regulation system based on the relationship between enzyme activity levels and cefoxitin induction: constitutive, inducible, and silent. The constitutive group was defined as isolates with enzyme activity against penicillin G >50 U/mg without cefoxitin induction. The enzyme activity of the other two groups was <10 U/mg before induction. Isolates in which cefoxitin induction increased enzyme activity by more than threefold were classified as inducible, whereas isolates with a less than threefold increase were classified as silent.

Fig 4.

Boxplots of enzyme activity against penicillin G and meropenem on logarithmic scale. Connected data points show bacterial responses with and without cefoxitin. Patterns reveal differences between constitutive, inducible, and silent types.

Enzyme activity against penicillin G (a) and meropenem (b). Boxplots were generated using the statistical software R version 4.3.2 (23) and ggplot2 (24) to show the distribution of the enzyme activity. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), the horizontal line indicates the median, and the whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR. Outliers are plotted as individual points. The enzyme activity was plotted for each bacterial isolate. Data points obtained with (+) and without (–) cefoxitin (CFX) induction are connected by a line to illustrate inducibility. The color of each dot represents the mode of penicillin G enzyme activity: red indicates the constitutive type, green the inducible type, and blue the silent type. The enzyme activity values (U/mg) are shown on a logarithmic scale. The β-lactamase activity values are the mean of three measures, with standard deviations within 10%.

In addition to three B. mosaicus isolates (NR5368, NR5385, and NR5388) and one B. cereus s.s. isolate (NR5396), all B. luti isolates were included in the constitutive group. Most B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. isolates were included in the inducible group, and three B. mosaicus isolates (NR5374, NR5375, and NR5408) and two of B. cereus s.s. isolates (NR5415 and ATCC14579) were included in the silent group.

Meropenem

The enzyme activity against meropenem is shown in Fig. 4b. Notably, all B. luti isolates had low activity and were not induced by cefoxitin, consistent with their lack of metallo-β-lactamase. The B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. isolates in the constitutive group also showed high enzyme activity against meropenem and penicillin G.

In the inducible group, 13 of 18 isolates showed induced activity against meropenem and penicillin G. For the remaining five isolates (NR5373, NR5379, NR5383, NR5411, and NR5412) in the inducible group, meropenem enzyme activity was not induced by cefoxitin. Among the 13 isolates with induced β-lactamase activity against meropenem, isolate NR5416 was selected as a representative isolate and was used to assess whether the presence of cefoxitin affects meropenem resistance using the broth-microdilution and disk-diffusion methods. The MIC of meropenem was originally 0.06 µg/mL. In the presence of cefoxitin (1 µg/mL) (the same concentration used in the β-lactamase induction experiment), the MIC of meropenem increased to 1 µg/mL. Subsequently, a disk diffusion test was performed using 10-µg meropenem and 10-µg cefoxitin disks placed 20 mm apart on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate, followed by overnight incubation. After incubation, the inhibition zone around the meropenem disk adjacent to the cefoxitin disk was flattened, forming a characteristic D-shaped zone of inhibition (Fig. 5).

Fig 5.

Mueller-Hinton agar plate displays Bacillus mosaicus growth with a D-shaped inhibition zone around the meropenem disk when placed near cefoxitin. This illustrates inducible antibiotic resistance.

D-shaped zone of inhibition in inducible B. mosaicus. D-shaped zone of inhibition around the meropenem (M) disk adjacent to the cefoxitin (C) disk. Disks containing meropenem (10 µg) and cefoxitin (10 µg) were placed 20 mm apart on a Mueller-Hinton agar that had been inoculated overnight with B. mosaicus NR5416 in The induction group. The double-disk test was conducted in triplicate, and each replicate showed a similar D-shaped zone of inhibition.

Three silent isolates (NR5408, NR5415, and ATCC14579) showed minimal activity against meropenem, but NR5374 and NR5375 showed high levels of enzyme activity against meropenem, comparable with those of the constitutive group.

The detailed data on enzyme activity, antimicrobial susceptibility, and mCIM are summarized in Table S3. Meropenem hydrolytic activity exceeded 0.09 U/mg in all mCIM-positive isolates, suggesting that mCIM accurately reflected the carbapenemase activity in B. cereus group isolates.

RT-qPCR

In addition to the ATCC14579 strain, the expression levels of bla1 and BcII were quantified in 23 of the 35 isolates with data available on enzyme activity using RT-qPCR. Representative isolates from each of the three enzyme activity groups were selected for RT-qPCR analysis.

The RT-qPCR results, β-lactam susceptibility profiles, mCIM outcomes, and enzyme activity measurements are summarized in Table 1. In the constitutive group, all isolates of B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. exhibited constitutive expression of both bla1 and BcII, irrespective of cefoxitin induction. In contrast, all B. luti isolates demonstrated constitutive expression of bla1 but showed no detectable expression of BcII. The fold change in β-lactamase gene expression following cefoxitin induction ranged from 0.8 to 1.6, indicating no significant change.

TABLE 1.

Enzyme activity and category with results of MIC and mCIMa

Enzyme category NR isolate Species MIC (µg/mL) mCIM Enzyme activity (unit/mg)b mRNAc
AMP MEM PCNG PCNG with CFX Fold MEM MEM with CFX Fold bla1 bla1 with CFX Fold BcII BcII with CFX Fold
Constitutive 5368 B. mosaicus >256 8 Positive 60.29 72.76 1.21 1.97 2.80 1.42 0.62 0.86 1.39 8.22 9.08 1.11
5385 B. mosaicus >256 4 Positive 166.23 224.82 1.35 0.49 0.92 1.86 2.98 3.20 1.08 3.00 3.47 1.15
5388 B. mosaicus 64 4 Positive 60.79 97.95 1.61 0.90 1.68 1.87 0.76 1.18 1.56 4.39 4.58 1.04
5396 B. cereus s.s. >256 8 Positive 125.31 159.57 1.27 2.13 3.67 1.73 0.76 0.85 1.13 2.57 2.30 0.90
5372 B. luti >256 8 Negative 113.46 148.25 1.31 0.04 0.03 0.95 1.82 1.55 0.85 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5390 B. luti 256 8 Negative 67.47 88.17 1.31 0.04 0.04 0.94 1.91 1.58 0.83 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5395 B. luti 256 8 Negative 61.70 101.64 1.65 0.04 0.04 1.04 1.88 1.68 0.89 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5400 B. luti 256 8 Negative 50.84 110.93 2.18 0.05 0.04 0.76 1.40 1.70 1.22 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5404 B. luti >256 8 Negative 73.01 85.42 1.17 0.04 0.04 0.98 1.82 1.68 0.92 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Inducible 5386 B. cereus s.s. 256 4 Positive 8.30 60.01 7.23 0.20 1.34 6.55 0.28 1.63 5.86 <0.01 1.28 >100
5402 B. mosaicus 32 ≤0.03 Negative 0.27 5.18 19.20 0.03 0.41 13.87 0.10 2.52 26.47 <0.01 10.39 >100
5405 B. mosaicus 32 2 Negative 0.72 5.62 7.83 0.04 0.54 13.69 1.09 28.89 26.58 <0.01 25.89 >100
5413 B. mosaicus 64 ≤0.03 Negative 0.30 5.96 20.08 0.03 0.42 13.05 0.50 2.86 5.78 3.76 22.19 5.90
5416 B. mosaicus 32 0.06 Negative 0.45 10.16 22.68 0.05 0.79 16.07 0.43 4.45 10.27 <0.01 63.71 >100
5371 B. mosaicus 128 0.06 Negative 0.29 6.69 22.83 0.03 0.26 7.99 2.44 2.63 1.08 0.35 11.06 31.36
5380 B. mosaicus >256 ≤0.03 Negative 0.35 7.89 22.73 0.04 0.16 4.13 1.34 1.03 0.77 <0.01 0.87 >100
5392 B. mosaicus 64 2 Positive 0.35 17.15 48.37 0.10 1.25 12.90 0.87 0.82 0.95 7.03 16.64 2.37
5414 B. mosaicus 16 ≤0.03 Negative 0.22 7.45 34.62 0.02 0.19 8.08 0.73 0.99 1.36 4.58 17.48 3.82
Silent 5374 B. mosaicus 8 4 Positive 5.19 5.39 1.04 1.06 1.27 1.21 1.16 1.14 0.99 1.69 1.07 0.63
5375 B. mosaicus 16 4 Positive 2.43 6.49 2.68 0.71 1.70 2.39 0.91 1.10 1.21 0.91 0.49 0.54
5408 B. mosaicus 8 1 Negative 2.81 2.35 0.84 0.04 0.04 1.12 2.37 2.14 0.90 0.93 <0.01 <0.01
5415 B. cereus s.s. 64 0.06 Negative 0.38 0.36 0.93 0.04 0.04 0.93 1.40 1.21 0.86 1.38 0.93 0.67
ATCC14579 B. cereus s.s. 64 0.06 Negative 2.15 3.61 1.68 0.04 0.04 1.01 1.00 0.89 0.89 1.00 0.51 0.51
a

Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; CFX, cefoxitin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; mCIM, modified carbapenem inactivation method; MEM, meropenem; PCNG, penicillin G.

b

β-lactamase activities are the geometric means for three independent cultures. The standard deviations were within 10%.

c

Relative amount of bla1 or BcII mRNA compared to the ATCC 14579 basal level. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The standard deviations were within 10%.

The inducible isolates were categorized into two distinct groups based on the induction patterns of bla1 and BcII expression. The first group exhibited induced expression of both bla1 and BcII. This group included one B. cereus s.s. isolate (NR5386) and four B. mosaicus isolates (NR5402, NR5405, NR5413, and NR5416). In these isolates, cefoxitin induction led to a more than fivefold increase in bla1 expression. Although BcII was predominantly silent under baseline conditions, its expression surged dramatically on induction. In contrast, the second inducible group consisted of four B. mosaicus isolates (NR5371, NR5380, NR5392, and NR5414) that demonstrated elevated BcII expression levels in response to cefoxitin, whereas bla1 expression remained uninduced.

In the silent group, bla1 and BcII were consistently expressed despite lower enzyme activity against penicillin G and were not induced by cefoxitin. Although NR5374 and NR5375 showed high levels of meropenem activity, their BcII expression levels (NR5374: 1.69, and NR5375: 0.91) were comparable to those of the three silent isolates with minimal meropenem activity (NR5408:0.93, NR5415:1.38, and ATCC 14579:1.00).

DISCUSSION

This study provides a novel perspective on the distribution of species and genotypes within the B. cereus group isolated from clinical specimens. In addition, this is the first study to clarify the difference in β-lactam drug resistance among individual species within the B. cereus group and to identify the presence of three distinct types of regulatory mechanisms for β-lactamase activity: constitutive, inducible, and silent.

Genomic analysis

The 48 isolates used in this study were classified into 28 different STs. Previous studies have demonstrated genetic diversity within the B. cereus group. For example, in studies conducted in the United States, an analysis of 85 environmental isolates identified 62 unique STs (25), and 55 clinical isolates were classified into 38 distinct STs (26). However, the genomic accumulation of specific STs has also been observed. For example, ST1420 is a predominant ST among B. cereus group responsible for recent nosocomial infections in Japan (27). A comprehensive genomic analysis of 191 B. cereus s.s. isolates from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database further revealed that clonal complex (CC) 142 is the most widespread genetic cluster within the global B. cereus group (28).

In our study, eight new STs (ST3341, ST3342, ST3343, ST3344, ST3345, ST3346, ST3348, and ST3350) were submitted to the online MSLT database (29). ST151, belonging to B. luti, was the most frequently identified ST; however, detailed information regarding the source of isolation or geographic distribution is missing in most previous studies. CC142 was the most prevalent cluster among B. cereus s.s., consistent with previous reports (28), and CC365 was the most frequently detected genetic cluster among B. mosaicus. As this study is based on data from a single center in Japan, the findings cannot be directly generalized to other hospitals or regions. Nevertheless, these results suggest the involvement of specific species or STs in human infections.

The genomic analysis revealed a distinct distribution of metallo-β-lactamase among the species. All B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. isolates carried BcII, whereas all B. luti isolates lacked this gene. This complete segregation suggests species-specific differences in BcII distribution.

Fifteen whole-genome assemblies of B. luti have been entered into the NCBI database to date, of which none contain the BcII gene (30). A study conducted in Italy analyzed 17 blood culture isolates, all of which were closely related to either B. cereus s.s. or B. thuringiensis and carried the BcII gene (31). Another study found that 76 of 85 environmental isolates (89%) harbored the BcII gene. Among the nine isolates lacking BcII, five were identified as Bacillus pseudomycoides, three as B. cereus s.s., and one as B. mosaicus (25). Integrating our findings with those of previous reports suggests that B. luti does not inherently possess BcII, whereas the majority of other species within the B. cereus group probably carry BcII.

Considering the genetic characteristics identified in this study, specifically, the species-specific variations in the surrounding structure of BcII suggest that the development of a refined strategy for species differentiation may be possible using methods such as PCR-based assays. Currently, accurate identification of the B. cereus group requires WGS. The development of a simplified species identification method would greatly enhance the efficiency of rapid microbial classification. We plan to conduct further research focusing on expanding the strain collection, refining the data set, and advancing the development of a rapid detection method.

MIC distribution and mCIM

B. cereus group is inherently resistant to penicillins and cephalosporin β-lactam antibiotics due to the presence of chromosomally encoded β-lactamases (9, 32). Carbapenems are essential therapeutic agents for treating infections caused by this species (5); however, limited data are available on carbapenem susceptibility among species within the B. cereus group.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that the carbapenem susceptibility rate and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance vary among species within the B. cereus group and that the presence of BcII alone is not a reliable indicator of carbapenem resistance.

Notably, in this study, the B. luti isolates exhibited the highest meropenem MICs among the three species despite the absence of the BcII gene. All B. luti isolates tested mCIM negative, consistent with the absence of detectable carbapenemase activity. These findings suggest that carbapenem resistance in B. luti is mediated by mechanisms other than carbapenemase production.

To date, no comprehensive studies have been conducted focusing on non-β-lactamase-mediated mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in the B. cereus group. Generally, modified PBPs associated with β-lactam resistance are more common in gram-positive bacteria than in gram-negative bacteria (33). Gram-positive bacteria, including Streptococci pneumoniae, Streptococcus mitis/oralis, and Enterococcus faecium, are resistant to carbapenems because of the reduced affinity of PBPs for these antibiotics (34–36). Alterations in PBPs are responsible for penicillin resistance in Bacillus subtilis, a species closely related to B. cereus group (37). Efflux pumps have been implicated in the resistance of certain isolates within the B. cereus group to β-lactam antibiotics, including ampicillin and cefuroxime (38). Although this remains a subject for future research, it is possible that B. luti-specific mechanisms, such as mutations in PBPs or the involvement of active efflux pumps, may contribute to carbapenem resistance. Further studies, including a larger collection of clinical isolates, are needed to clarify the species-specific mechanisms of carbapenem resistance within the B. cereus group.

The other two species, B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s., all had BcII and displayed a wide range of MICs for meropenem. The isolates with higher MICs for meropenem were mCIM positive, which suggests that carbapenem resistance might be caused by carbapenemase production in these two species. The mCIM was originally developed to detect carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (39, 40), and its applicability to other bacterial species remains unclear. However, our study suggests that in the B. cereus group, mCIM may be a useful tool for predicting carbapenemase production in isolates with elevated meropenem MICs. In carbapenem-resistant isolates, this approach could be used to differentiate B. luti, which lacks BcII, from other species that harbor metallo-β-lactamase.

Enzyme category and RT-qPCR

In this study, the β-lactamase activity in the B. cereus group was successfully measured using a newly developed method. The enzyme activity was able to be accurately assessed by concentrating the crude enzyme extract. Without concentration, the activity values could not be reliably determined, probably due to the low protein concentration (data not shown). In gram-negative bacilli, enzyme activity is typically assessed following sonication; however, in the B. cereus group, sonication did not yield a significant difference compared with that of non-sonicated samples (data not shown). This phenomenon may be attributable to the characteristic secretion of β-lactamase into the extracellular environment in gram-positive bacteria (18, 19). A positive correlation was observed between enzyme activity and β-lactamase gene expression levels in individual inducible isolates before and after cefoxitin induction, which suggests that the enzyme activity assay developed in this study is a reliable method for quantifying β-lactamase activity. Further research is warranted to evaluate the applicability of this assay to other gram-positive bacterial species.

This is the first study to identify three distinct types of β-lactamase activity in species within the B. cereus group: constitutive, inducible, and silent. In the constitutive group, all isolates of B. luti and several isolates of B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. showed the high enzyme activity for penicillin G without cefoxitin induction, which suggested this group constitutively produced β-lactamases. In accordance with the enzyme activity results, the β-lactamase gene was constitutively expressed in this group. In the silent group, all except two isolates of B. mosaicus and B. cereus s.s. demonstrated consistently low enzyme activity, and activity was not induced by cefoxitin exposure.

In the inducible group, baseline β-lactamase activity against penicillin G and meropenem was almost undetectable under baseline conditions, but cefoxitin dramatically induced this activity and upregulated transcription of bla1 and BcII. In NR5416, the meropenem MIC increased from 0.06 µg/mL to 1.0 µg/mL in the presence of cefoxitin, and the meropenem disk produced a D-shaped inhibition zone when placed adjacent to a cefoxitin disk. Similar phenomena have been reported in Enterobacterales, where double-disk synergy tests have shown that certain β-lactam agents can induce β-lactamase expression, resulting in flattening of the inhibition zone surrounding a nearby β-lactam disk (41, 42). The double-disk result observed with NR5416 provides visual evidence of the capacity for metallo-β-lactamase induction.

The tripartite pattern of enzyme activity observed in this study might have arisen from the involvement of an ECF sigma factor. The β-lactamase activity of the B. cereus group is regulated by ECF sigma factors, including SigP and its associated anti-sigma factor, RsiP. Degradation of RsiP triggers SigP activation, which subsequently drives the transcription of bla genes (8). β-Lactam antibiotics such as cefoxitin have been shown to promote RsiP degradation and SigP activation, resulting in increased β-lactamase expression (43). Previous studies have reported that mutations in rsiP can affect β-lactamase activity. In one study, silico substitution of Valine82 or Serine84 of rsiP with tryptophan eliminated the predicted cleavage site and prevented SigP activation, whereas substitution of Serine84 with alanine markedly increased the predicted probability of signal-peptidase cleavage, resulting in constitutive SigP activity (44). Another study found that in a penicillin-resistant B. anthracis isolate, RsiP was truncated due to a genomic mutation that prevented it from sequestering the cognate SigP. Consequently, SigP remained continuously activated, leading to constitutive expression of bla genes (8). These previous findings suggest that the SigP/RsiP regulatory system plays a pivotal role in modulating the enzyme activity of β-lactamases.

In our study, all isolates contained homologs corresponding to sigP/rsiP. However, no specific mutations were identified that could differentiate between constitutive, inducible, or silent β-lactamase activity phenotypes. Specifically, no isolate harbored mutations at Valine82 or Serine84, and none of the isolates in the constitutive group carried the rsiP mutation responsible for truncated RsiP. Genomic analysis of Bacillus anthracis has shown that mutations in the sigP-bla1 region cannot be exclusively used to predict penicillin resistance (11). A more comprehensive genomic analysis of sigma factors and other related elements in a larger sample of isolates could contribute to the elucidation of the regulatory mechanisms underlying β-lactamase production.

Another notable finding from the enzyme activity assay and RT-qPCR analysis is the lack of a consistent correlation between β-lactamase gene expression and enzyme activity. Despite the expression of BcII, isolates NR5392, NR5413, and NR5414 from the inducible group, and NR5408 and NR5415 from the silent group exhibited very low hydrolytic activity against meropenem. These findings indicate that BcII expression does not necessarily confer resistance to carbapenems. This observation is consistent with a previous report describing a penicillin-resistant B. anthracis strain, designated UT223, which expressed BcII but remained susceptible to meropenem, with a MIC of 0.06 µg/mL (12). Previous studies have demonstrated that specific amino acid substitutions within BcII can alter its enzyme activity toward β-lactam antibiotics. For example, individual substitutions such as G262S or N70S are associated with reduced catalytic efficiency against carbapenems, whereas their simultaneous presence results in enhanced catalytic activity against these agents (45). Although none of the isolates in this study harbored these specific mutations, the BcII gene sequences of our isolates showed a wide range of homology, with sequence similarities ranging from 87% to 100%, suggesting potential involvement of other as yet unidentified mutations that may influence catalytic efficacy and substrate specificity.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the analysis was based on a relatively small number of isolates obtained from a single institution. Although B. luti isolates identified in this study demonstrated elevated MICs for carbapenems and lacked the BcII gene, further validation using a more extensive and geographically varied isolate set is necessary to ascertain whether these features are species-specific.

Second, the mechanisms responsible for carbapenem resistance in B. luti have not yet been elucidated. In addition, among non-B. luti species, some isolates, such as NR5405 and NR5408, showed high MICs for meropenem despite exhibiting very low metallo-β-lactamase activity. This phenotypic characteristic is similar to that observed in B. luti, suggesting that B. luti and certain isolates of non-B. luti species may possess an unknown resistance mechanism.

Third, the regulatory systems of β-lactamase gene expression and the consequent effects on both enzyme function and antimicrobial susceptibility have not yet been well characterized. The observation that certain isolates express BcII while displaying minimal enzyme activity raises the possibility that gene expression alone may not lead to phenotypic resistance. This highlights the need for further investigation into regulatory pathways, genomic mutation, and variety, as well as the structural determinants of substrate specificity.

To address these limitations, future studies should incorporate a broader range of clinical isolates and employ integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and functional approaches. Such efforts will be instrumental in advancing our understanding of the molecular basis of β-lactam resistance and may ultimately inform the development of more effective diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies.

Conclusion

In this study, a comprehensive whole-genome analysis provides new insights into the distribution patterns of bacterial species and genotypes of B. cereus group isolated from blood cultures. Although the B. cereus group is generally recognized to harbor chromosomally encoded metallo-β-lactamases, B. luti lacked BcII yet exhibited high MICs for carbapenems. In addition, by developing a novel method for measuring enzyme activity, we identified three distinct types of activity: constitutive, inducible, and silent. Expanding this approach to additional bacterial species and isolates could lead to further facilitation of the understanding of β-lactam resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates

A total of 48 isolates were collected from the blood cultures of different 48 patients between January 2009 and October 2021 at Nara Medical University Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital in Japan with 992 beds. All isolates had already been identified as B. cereus group using MALDI-TOF MS of Vitek MS system (bioMérieux, France). Additionally, we included ATCC14579, a type strain of B. cereus, in our investigation.

WGS and genomic analysis

For WGS analysis, genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAGEN Genomic-tip 500/G (Qiagen, Germany) and sequenced using MiSeq (Illumina, United States). The assembled sequences were annotated using DFAST with default parameters (46). B. cereus isolates were taxonomically classified using BTyper3 based on pairwise genomic similarity, which was calculated using an integrated method, average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIBlast) (21). BTyper3 was used to perform the analysis of the panC gene phylogenetic group. Mashtree was used to cluster the genomes into a phylogenetic tree (22), which was visualized using iTOL v7.0 (47, 48). The presence of β-lactamase genes was determined using ABRicate v1.0.1 (49) based on the NCBI database (50). For β-lactamase genes in the B. cereus group, we adopted the designation “bla1” for penicillinase, and “BcII” for metallo-β-lactamase, according to the terminology used in the NCBI database.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and modified carbapenem inactivation method

Based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M45:ED3 guidelines, broth microdilution tests were conducted on every isolate to determine the MIC for ampicillin and meropenem (51). The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was performed using a 10-µL loop for the detection of carbapenemase production (52). Each isolate was tested by mCIM in duplicate, and the interpretation of the results was concordant in both experiments.

Enzyme activity

β-Lactamase activity was measured using a colorimetric assay (53) based on a modification of a previously described method (54). Bacterial strains were inoculated into Mueller-Hinton broth and incubated for 5 h with shaking at 37℃. For the induction assay, bacterial strains were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth to mid-logarithmic phase and subjected to cefoxitin 1 μg/mL as the inducer for 3 h. After incubation for 5 h, the culture broth was centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 20 min at 4℃. The supernatant was ultrafiltered using a Vivaspin Turbo 15 (Sartorius, Germany) with a 10,000 Da molecular weight cutoff filter. Filtrated supernatants (50 µL) were suspended in 2 mL of 50 mM phosphate buffers (pH 7.0) with 50 µM MgSO4. Enzyme activity was determined at 30℃ using a spectrophotometer (UV-1900i Plus; Shimadzu, Japan) with penicillin G (233 nm) and meropenem (298 nm) as the substrate. The final concentration of penicillin G and meropenem was adjusted to 100 µM. The enzyme activity was measured three times, and the mean value was used. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay (55). One unit of β-lactamase activity is equivalent to the amount of β-lactamase that hydrolyzes 1 μmol of β-lactams in 1 min at 30℃.

RT-qPCR

The expression levels of bla1 and BcII were measured using RT-qPCR. After incubation for 5 h, RNA was extracted from the cell pellet using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR amplification was performed using the Power SYBR Green RNA-to-CT 1-Step kit on a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, the United States). One-step real-time PCR was performed under the following conditions: 48°C for 30 min for cDNA synthesis, 95°C for 10 min for transcriptase inactivation, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Based on a previous study, gatB_Yqey and udp were used as internal reference genes (56). The primers for bla1 and BcII were newly designed in this study. To accommodate sequence variations, two reverse primers targeting BcII were combined in equal proportions. The relative expression levels of bla1 and BcII were determined by 2−ΔΔCt method, using the ATCC14579 strain without cefoxitin induction as a control sample. The primers used in this study are shown in Table 2. Real-time PCR assays were performed in triplicate for each sample, and the mean Ct value was used in the analysis.

TABLE 2.

Primers used for the RT-qPCR assays in this study

Gene Orientation Primer sequence (5' to 3') Product size (bp) Reference
bla1 F GCTATTCCAGGAGAYATTCG 161 This study
R ACRCCTGCACGAATAAGTTT
BcII F AAGCAGTTCCTTCGAACG 99 This study
R1 TCTCTATTAATTCCTTCGTTAAC
R2 TTTCTATTAGTTCCTTCGTTAAT
gatB_Yqey F AGCTGGTCGTGAAGACCTTG 175 (56)
R CGGCATAACAGCAGTCATCA
udp F ACTAGAGAAACTTGGAAATGATCG 101 (56)
R GACGCTTAATTGCACGGAAC

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Tomoko Asada and Noriko Shirae from Nara Medical University for their excellent technical assistance.

Y.N., Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing | R.N., Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing | A.N., Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing—review and editing | Y.S., Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing—review and editing | M.O., Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing—review and editing | R.S., Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing—review and editing | H.Y., Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing | K.K., Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing.

Contributor Information

Ryuichi Nakano, Email: rnakano@naramed-u.ac.jp.

Benjamin P. Howden, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

DATA AVAILABILITY

All sequence data have been deposited at DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under BioProject accession number PRJDB17557. Accession numbers for the Illumina sequence data are listed in Table S1.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01302-25.

Supplemental material. aac.01302-25-s0001.xlsx.

Tables S1 to S3.

aac.01302-25-s0001.xlsx (25.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01302-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Drobniewski FA. 1993. Bacillus cereus and related species. Clin Microbiol Rev 6:324–338. doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.4.324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bottone EJ. 2010. Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:382–398. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Carroll LM, Cheng RA, Wiedmann M, Kovac J. 2022. Keeping up with the Bacillus cereus group: taxonomy through the genomics era and beyond. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62:7677–7702. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1916735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ehling-Schulz M, Lereclus D, Koehler TM. 2019. The Bacillus cereus group: Bacillus species with pathogenic potential. Microbiol Spectr 7. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0032-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lotte R, Chevalier A, Boyer L, Ruimy R. 2022. Bacillus cereus invasive infections in preterm neonates: an up-to-date review of the literature. Clin Microbiol Rev 35:e0008821. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00088-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pauker VI, Thoma BR, Grass G, Bleichert P, Hanczaruk M, Zöller L, Zange S. 2018. Improved discrimination of Bacillus anthracis from closely related species in the Bacillus cereus sensu lato Group based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01900-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01900-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Carroll LM, Wiedmann M, Kovac J. 2020. Proposal of a taxonomic nomenclature for the Bacillus cereus Group which reconciles genomic definitions of bacterial species with clinical and industrial phenotypes. mBio 11:e00034-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00034-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ross CL, Thomason KS, Koehler TM. 2009. An extracytoplasmic function sigma factor controls beta-lactamase gene expression in Bacillus anthracis and other Bacillus cereus group species. J Bacteriol 191:6683–6693. doi: 10.1128/JB.00691-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen Y, Succi J, Tenover FC, Koehler TM. 2003. Beta-lactamase genes of the penicillin-susceptible Bacillus anthracis sterne strain. J Bacteriol 185:823–830. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.3.823-830.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lim HM, Pène JJ, Shaw RW. 1988. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 beta-lactamase II structural gene. J Bacteriol 170:2873–2878. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2873-2878.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gargis AS, McLaughlin HP, Conley AB, Lascols C, Michel PA, Gee JE, Marston CK, Kolton CB, Rodriguez-R LM, Hoffmaster AR, Weigel LM, Sue D. 2018. Analysis of whole-genome sequences for the prediction of penicillin resistance and β-lactamase activity in Bacillus anthracis. mSystems 3:e00154-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00154-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen Y, Tenover FC, Koehler TM. 2004. Beta-lactamase gene expression in a penicillin-resistant Bacillus anthracis strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4873–4877. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4873-4877.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ho TD, Nauta KM, Luhmann EK, Radoshevich L, Ellermeier CD. 2022. Identification of the extracytoplasmic function σ factor σ P regulon in Bacillus thuringiensis. mSphere 7:e0096721. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00967-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sabath LD, Abraham EP. 1966. Zinc as a cofactor for cephalosporinase from Bacillus cereus 569. Biochem J 98:11C–3C. doi: 10.1042/bj0980011c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Torkar KG, Bedenić B. 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of metallo-β-lactamases, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and carbapenemases of Bacillus cereus isolates. Microb Pathog 118:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Woods EC, McBride SM. 2017. Regulation of antimicrobial resistance by extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Microbes Infect 19:238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2017.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kristensen SS, Diep DB, Kjos M, Mathiesen G. 2023. The role of site-2-proteases in bacteria: a review on physiology, virulence, and therapeutic potential. Microlife 4:uqad025. doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqad025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Livermore DM. 1997. Beta-Lactamases: quantity and resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 3 Suppl 4:S10–S19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kaderabkova N, Bharathwaj M, Furniss RCD, Gonzalez D, Palmer T, Mavridou DAI. 2022. The biogenesis of β-lactamase enzymes. Microbiology (Reading) 168:001217. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ozer JH, Lowery DL, Saz AK. 1970. Derepression of β-lactamase (penicillinase) in Bacillus cereus by peptidoglycans. J Bacteriol 102:52–63. doi: 10.1128/jb.102.1.52-63.1970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Carroll LM, Cheng RA, Kovac J. 2020. No assembly required: using BTyper3 to assess the congruency of a proposed taxonomic framework for the Bacillus cereus group with historical typing methods. Front Microbiol 11:580691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Katz LS, Griswold T, Morrison SS, Caravas JA, Zhang S, den Bakker HC, Deng X, Carleton HA. 2019. Mashtree: a rapid comparison of whole genome sequence files. J Open Source Softw 4. doi: 10.21105/joss.01762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. R Core Team . 2023. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mills E, Sullivan E, Kovac J. 2022. Comparative analysis of Bacillus cereus Group isolates’ resistance using disk diffusion and broth microdilution and the correlation between antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0230221. doi: 10.1128/aem.02302-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hoffmaster AR, Novak RT, Marston CK, Gee JE, Helsel L, Pruckler JM, Wilkins PP. 2008. Genetic diversity of clinical isolates of Bacillus cereus using multilocus sequence typing. BMC Microbiol 8:191. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Akamatsu R, Suzuki M, Okinaka K, Sasahara T, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Fujikura D, Furuta Y, Ohnishi N, Esaki M, Shibayama K, Higashi H. 2019. Novel sequence type in Bacillus cereus strains associated with nosocomial infections and bacteremia, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 25:883–890. doi: 10.3201/eid2505.171890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tong C, Xiao D, Li Q, Gou J, Wang S, Zeng Z, Xiong W. 2024. First insights into the prevalence, genetic characteristics, and pathogenicity of Bacillus cereus from generations worldwide. mSphere 9:e0070224. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00702-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pub MLST . 2025. Public databases for molecular typing and microbial genome diversity. Available from: https://pubmlst.org
  • 30. NCBI . 2025. Genome. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=2026191. Retrieved 25 Aug 2025.
  • 31. Bianco A, Capozzi L, Monno MR, Del Sambro L, Manzulli V, Pesole G, Loconsole D, Parisi A. 2020. Characterization of Bacillus cereus group isolates from human bacteremia by whole-genome sequencing. Front Microbiol 11:599524. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.599524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Andrews JM, Wise R. 2002. Susceptibility testing of Bacillus species. J Antimicrob Chemother 49:1040–1042. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Georgopapadakou NH. 1993. Penicillin-binding proteins and bacterial resistance to beta-lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2045–2053. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.10.2045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nakano S, Fujisawa T, Ito Y, Chang B, Matsumura Y, Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Suga S, Ohnishi M, Ichiyama S. 2018. Spread of meropenem-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 15A-ST63 Clone in Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 24:275–283. doi: 10.3201/eid2402.171268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sarangi J, Ido A, Ito M, Iinuma C, Doyama Y, Jin W, Wachino J-I, Suzuki M, Iguchi M, Yagi T, Arakawa Y, Kimura K. 2024. Clinical isolates of Streptococcus mitis/oralis-related species with reduced carbapenem susceptibility, harboring amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding proteins in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 68:e0117923. doi: 10.1128/aac.01179-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. El Amin N, Lund B, Tjernlund A, Lundberg C, Jalakas K, Wretlind B. 2001. Mechanisms of resistance to imipenem in imipenem-resistant, ampicillin-sensitive Enterococcus faecium. APMIS 109:791–796. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2001.d01-148.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Buchanan CE, Strominger JL. 1976. Altered penicillin-binding components in penicillin-resistant mutants of Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73:1816–1820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yenikeyev RR, Tatarinova NY, Zakharchuk LM, Vinogradova EN. 2022. Mechanisms of resistance to clinically significant antibiotics in Bacillus strains isolated from samples obtained from a medical institution. Moscow Univ BiolSci Bull 77:84–91. doi: 10.3103/S009639252202002X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pierce VM, Simner PJ, Lonsway DR, Roe-Carpenter DE, Johnson JK, Brasso WB, Bobenchik AM, Lockett ZC, Charnot-Katsikas A, Ferraro MJ, Thomson RB, Jenkins SG, Limbago BM, Das S. 2017. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 55:2321–2333. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00193-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Simner PJ, Johnson JK, Brasso WB, Anderson K, Lonsway DR, Pierce VM, Bobenchik AM, Lockett ZC, Charnot-Katsikas A, Westblade LF, Yoo BB, Jenkins SG, Limbago BM, Das S, Roe-Carpenter DE. 2018. Multicenter evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method and the Carba NP for detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01369-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01369-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sanders CC, Sanders WE Jr. 1979. Emergence of resistance to cefamandole: possible role of cefoxitin-inducible β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 15:792–797. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.6.792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nakano R, Nakano A, Suzuki Y, Narita K, Sekine T, Yano H. 2025. Development of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the identification of NmcA β-lactamases in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes. Microbiol Spectr 13:e0267524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02675-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Nauta KM, Ho TD, Ellermeier CD. 2021. The penicillin-binding protein PbpP is a sensor of β-lactams and is required for activation of the extracytoplasmic function σ factor σP in Bacillus thuringiensis. mBio 12:e00179-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00179-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Nauta KM, Ho TD, Ellermeier CD. 2022. Signal peptidase-mediated cleavage of the anti-σ factor RsiP at site 1 controls σP activation and β-lactam resistance in Bacillus thuringiensis. mBio 13:e03707–21. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03707-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Tomatis PE, Fabiane SM, Simona F, Carloni P, Sutton BJ, Vila AJ. 2008. Adaptive protein evolution grants organismal fitness by improving catalysis and flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:20605–20610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807989106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. 2018. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 34:1037–1039. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Letunic I, Bork P. 2016. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. iTOL: interactive tree of life. 2025. Available from: https://itol.embl.de. Retrieved 25 Aug 2025.
  • 49. Seemann T. 2025. Tseemann/abricate. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
  • 50. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu CH, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. 2019. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00483-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) . 2016. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria. 3rd ed. CLSI Document M45. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) . 2025. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 35th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Waley SG. 1974. A spectrophotometric assay of β-lactamase action on penicillins. Biochem J 139:789–790. doi: 10.1042/bj1390789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Nakano R, Okamoto R, Nakano Y, Kaneko K, Okitsu N, Hosaka Y, Inoue M. 2004. CFE-1, a novel plasmid-encoded AmpC beta-lactamase with an ampR gene originating from Citrobacter freundii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1151–1158. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1151-1158.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Reiter L, Kolstø AB, Piehler AP. 2011. Reference genes for quantitative, reverse-transcription PCR in Bacillus cereus group strains throughout the bacterial life cycle. J Microbiol Methods 86:210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. aac.01302-25-s0001.xlsx.

Tables S1 to S3.

aac.01302-25-s0001.xlsx (25.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01302-25.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data have been deposited at DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under BioProject accession number PRJDB17557. Accession numbers for the Illumina sequence data are listed in Table S1.


Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES