Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Reprod Toxicol. 2025 Dec 13;140:109140. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.109140

Persistent impact of in utero nanoparticle exposure on metabolic and endocrine outcomes in adult rats fed a high-fat diet

Russell Hunter 1, Teresa Gluth 1, Kate Seman 1, Travis Goldsmith 1, Riley Nett 1, Victoria Nist 1, Allison Dunn 1, Eric Kelly 1, Elizabeth Bowdridge 1,*
PMCID: PMC12959621  NIHMSID: NIHMS2132187  PMID: 41397529

Abstract

Gestational nano titanium-dioxide (nano-TiO2) exposure causes reduced fetal size and multi-generational reproductive effects in females. The current study utilized a whole-body nano-TiO2 inhalation exposure model in pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats coupled with a high fat diet (HFD) fed to adult offspring to examine lasting effects of in-utero exposures on weight gain, metabolic function, and endocrine perturbations. Sexually dimorphic responses in weight gain were observed whereby exposed HFD males gained less weight than their air HFD counterparts (435 g ± 9.8 vs. 505 g ± 14.5; p < 0.05), but there was no weight difference between air and exposed HFD females. Males and females presented with exposure driven decreases in glucose tolerance, such that HFD exposed animals were significantly more glucose intolerant(−6985AUC±1763). Hypothalamic gene expression of the melanocortin receptor 3 was significantly increased in nano-TiO2 males (1453 %) and significantly decreased in nano-TiO2 females (29.07 %) compared to grain-based diet (GBD) controls. Hepatic mitochondrial activity was affected in sexually dependent manner, with females exhibiting changes in Complexes I, II, III, and V, and males only showing differences in Complex I activity. Finally, exposed males had smaller testicular mass (3.685 mg ± 0.0895 in GBD; 3.358 mg±0.0786 in HFD; (3.480 mg± 0.2023 in GBD, 3.380 mg± 0.0777) and reduced testosterone (7.75 μg/nl ± 1.965 in GBD; 3.62 μg/nl±2.084 in HFD; (9.943 μg/nl±1.97 in GBD, 4.28 μg/nl± 1.6845) compared to air males. Altogether, these data reflect how nanoparticulate driven differences in growth and development at birth can alter weight gain and metabolic function later in life in the face of a dietary challenge.

Keywords: Nanoparticulate; Gestation; Development; Metabolism; Developmental origins of, health and disease; Inhalation; Sexual dimorphism

1. Introduction

Gestation and fetal development represent a particularly vulnerable period of life for both mother and child. Perturbations of the tightly controlled cellular and molecular processes of implantation, placentation, and fetogenesis may result in severe or fatal maternal and fetal consequences. Serious complications such as low birthweight, preterm birth [1,2], intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preeclampsia, and perinatal mortality have toxicant-specific risks with air pollutant exposure [37], which include nano- and ultrafine particulate matter. Additionally, size at birth, which is heavily dependent upon the placenta’s ability to properly deliver nutrients, is a significant predictor of life expectancy [8]. The capability of the placenta to efficiently adapt morphology and functionality when faced with a toxicological insult has lasting adult health outcomes in the offspring.

Of particular concern are the potential adverse effects of nanoparticulate exposure during gestation. Following the industrial revolution, human exposure to nanosized particles (NPs, <100 nm) has increased dramatically. Environmental toxicants such as particulate matter from combustion in traffic and industry, as well as metals can cause direct damage to the placental unit or cross the placenta into the developing fetus. The propensity of a toxicant to traverse the placenta largely favors low molecular weight, however other physiological factors may influence translocation [9]. Due to the heightened size-specific translocation potential of NPs, risks to fetal health are of particular concern. Nanomaterials such as nanoparticulate titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2), gold NPs, and recently nanoplastics have been shown in murine models to pass through the placenta and accumulate in fetal tissue [1014]. However, it should be noted that some NPs, such as cadmium quantum dots, can be blocked at the level of the placenta and still cause fetal malformations through indirect mechanisms such as cell apoptosis and oxidative stress [15].

As a vascular toxicant, pulmonary nano-TiO2 exposure decreases endothelium-dependent relaxation in the thoracic aorta and femoral arteries, and endothelium-independent relaxation impairment in the thoracic aorta [16]. Additionally, maternal nano-TiO2 inhalation exposure during gestation increases placental vascular resistance and impairs umbilical vascular reactivity [17]. Furthermore, in utero exposure to nano-TiO2 results in sexually dimorphic responses in fetoplacental outcomes. Exposed fetal females present with significantly smaller mass compared to their exposed male counterparts. Moreover, fetal females had significantly decreased junctional zone area and increased labyrinth zone area, indicating placental dysfunction [18]. Nano-TiO2 exposure also causes maternal redox dysregulation, leading to increased hepatic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and reduced glutathione. These changes in systemic redox signaling persisted into the F1 and F2 generations, illustrating multi-generational effects derived from maternal gestational nano-TiO2 exposure [19].

The exposure driven diminished fetal size raises questions of nutritional programming and developmental delays potentially stemming from central hypothalamic alterations due to in utero exposure. The hypothalamus is a critical region of the brain that maintains homeostasis through by regulating a variety of inputs including metabolism, behavior, and hormones. Although the blood brain barrier is intact in the hypothalamus, there are areas such as the median eminence and the arcuate nucleus (ARC), which are more permeable than other regions. Therefore, the ARC, which contains several neurons responsible for food intake and regulation, can directly interact with circulating hormones and other systemic signals or toxicants. The increased permeability of the ARC makes it a potential target and accumulation site for nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles alter the feed intake response in murine in vivo models [20] and energy metabolism in in vitro models [21]. In humans, fetal growth trajectories and neurodevelopmental endpoints may be affected in babies that are small for their gestational age [22]. Amongst babies with IUGR, cognitive and motor functions are impaired [23], and 5 month old male F1 nano-TiO2 exposed rat offspring displayed significant impairments in working or short term memory and initial motivation [24]. Again, demonstrating that gestational nano-TiO2 exposure can cause central nervous system disruptions that span the lifetime of an individual.

Maternal inhalation exposure to nanoparticulate matter is a well-established risk factor implicated in vascular, reproductive, behavioral, metabolic and hepatic dysfunction in rodent offspring [18,19,24, 25]. Recently, the concept of initiating a second stressor to make any deficits become more pronounced when a second environmental factor interacts with the initial exposure have been explored. In utero exposure to nanoparticulate matter serves as a “first hit”, priming the developing fetus and increasing susceptibility to subsequent adverse exposure, or “second hit”, such as a high fat diet. Given that over 40 % of the United States population is considered obese, with almost 10 % presenting as severely obese [26], the introduction of a HFD postpubertaly after in utero exposure seems both timely and incredibly relevant to typical human exposure circumstances. Therefore, we hypothesize that postnatal stressors, such as dietary challenges during adulthood, may synergize with the prenatal priming event of gestational maternal exposure to exacerbate metabolic abnormalities. To test this hypothesis, the current study seeks to determine the potential interaction between gestational nano-TiO2 exposure in utero and how an additional insult in adulthood, specifically HFD, affects growth and metabolic function in male and female offspring.

2. Methods

2.1. Animal model

Female, Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Hilltop Laboratories (Scottdale, PA), and housed in an Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) approved facility at West Virginia University (WVU) under a regulated temperature and 12:12 h light–dark cycle. Rats were randomly assigned to either filtered air (n = 6) or nano-TiO2 (n = 6) exposure groups and acclimated for 48–72-h before mating. Rats had ad libitum access to food and water throughout the acclimation period. Vaginal smears were used to confirm estrus prior to pairing, and pregnancy was confirmed via presence of a seminal plug. Weights of pregnant dams were recorded weekly. Pups were housed with dams for 21 days postnatally and weaned based on sex. Weight-matched pups from typical litters were selected for subsequent analysis. Litters with less than five pups were omitted as these are considered atypical and may alter metabolic status of the pups [27].

2.2. Diets

At 12 weeks of age, animals were randomly assigned to receive either a grain-based diet (GBD, 18 % fat, T2918, Teklad INC®), or high fat diet (HFD, 60 % fat, D12492, Research Diets INC®; Supplemental Table 1). A total of 32 (n = 8 per group) animals were selected and divided evenly into 4 filtered air groups (FA GBD Male, FA GBD Female, FA HFD Male, FA HFD Female), while 48 animals (n = 12 per group) were divided evenly amongst the nano-TiO2 exposed group (nano-TiO2 GBD Male, nano-TiO2 GBD Female, nano-TiO2 HFD Male, nano-TiO2 HFD Female). Complete formulations including micronutrient values can be found in Supplemental Table 1. The HFD was refreshed every 2–3 days to limit oxidation and prevent spoiling. Animals were weighed weekly for 12 weeks; at which time final weights were taken and animals were euthanized. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of West Virginia University.

2.3. Inhalation exposure

Nano-TiO2 aerosols were generated using a high-pressure acoustical generator (HPAG, IEStechno, Morgantown, WV). The output of the generator was fed into a Venturi pump (JS-60 M, Vaccon, Medway, MA) which further de-agglomerated the particles. The nano- TiO2 aerosol/air mix then entered the whole-body exposure chamber. A personal DataRAM (pDR-1500; Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc., Franklin, MA) was utilized to sample the exposure chamber air to determine the aerosol mass concentration in real-time. Feedback loops within the software automatically adjusted the acoustic energy to maintain a stable mass concentration during the exposure. Gravimetric measurements were conducted on Teflon filters concurrently with the DataRAM measurements to obtain a calibration factor. The gravimetric measurements were also conducted during each exposure to calculate the mass concentration measurements reported in the study. Bedding material soaked with water was used in the exposure chamber to maintain humidity (30–70 %) during exposures. Filtered air animals were exposed to HEPA filtered air only (25 mL/min) with similar temperature and humidity chamber conditions. Air and nano-TiO2 exposures were conducted simultaneously in the same room, with the only difference between exposures being the presence of the nano-TiO2 nanoparticles.

Inhalation exposures in F0 dams lasted for 6 non-consecutive days after GD 10 to decrease animal stress and possible pregnancy loss. The pregnant rats were exposed to an average target concentration of 12 mg/m3. While trace amounts of TiO2 may be ingested with grooming following exposures, there was no direct exposure of TiO2 to the offspring after birth for the duration of the study. This concentration of 12 mg/m3 was chosen to match our previous late gestation inhalation exposure studies [16,17] with a similar exposure paradigm (12 mg/m3, 6 h/exposure, 6 days) and with the last exposure conducted 24 h prior to sacrifice and experimentation. The particle size distributions of the aerosol were measured with multiple devices including: 1) scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS 3938, TSI Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota), 2) aerodynamic particle sizer (APS 3321, TSI Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota), 3) electrical low-pressure Impactor (ELPI+, Dekati, Tampere, Finland), and 4) Nano Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI 115 R, MSP Corp, Shoreview, MN). Log normal fits of the size distribution were conducted to calculate the count median diameter (CMD), mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the distributions. MPPD Software (v 2.11, Arlington, VA) was used to estimate [28] the alveolar lung dose from the nano-TiO2 exposures based upon the aerosol characteristics and the breathing parameters of the rats.

2.4. Glucose tolerance test

At 20 weeks of age, rats were fasted for 6 h prior to glucose tolerance testing (GTT). Animals had fasting glucose measured via handheld glucose monitoring system (Contour®) before an intraperitoneal injection of filter-sterilized 2 g/kg glucose in 0.9 % NaCl, similar to previous studies [29]. After which, samples were taken every 20 min for 2 h.

2.5. Plasma and tissue collection

At 24 weeks of age, all animals were deeply anesthetized via isoflurane prior to euthanasia via cardiac exsanguination. At euthanasia, blood samples were taken from each animal and collected in a K2 EDTA blood tube (BD 367856) for centrifugation and plasma collection. Tissues were immediately excised, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, weighed and snap frozen for future analysis.

2.6. Testosterone ELISA

Plasma was assayed for testosterone concentration using a commercially available mouse/rat testosterone ELISA (Calbiotech; TE187S-100) according to manufacturer protocol.

2.7. Xanthine oxidase activity assay

Xanthine oxidase (XO) was measured in plasma as previously described [28]. Briefly, plasma samples (10 μL) were diluted 30X in 300 μL of phosphate buffered saline. Potential urate oxidase (uricase) activity was inhibited by the addition of oxonic acid (100 μM) to ensure UA was not metabolized. Total UA production in 60 min at 37 °C in the presence of xanthine (75 μM) served as the basis for quantification of XO activity. Allopurinol (100 μM) was used in parallel samples to inhibit XO to establish base-line UA levels. Following incubation, protein was precipitated with ice cold acetonitrile. The samples were centrifuged for 12 min at 13,200 x g, at 4 °C. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, placed in borosilicate glass tubes, dried (60 min), resuspended in isocratic mobile phase (300 μL), and filtered through 0.20 μm nylon membrane filter unit into 11 mm plastic snap top auto-sample vials. The UA content was measured by electrochemical detection (Vanquish UltiMate 3000 ECD-3000RS) coupled to reverse-phase HPLC using a C18 column (150 ×4.6 mm, 3 μm particle size, Luna Phenomenex) and isocratic mobile phase (50 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 4 mM dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride, 2.5 % methanol, pH 7.0). One unit of activity (U) was defined as 1 μmole/min urate formed at 37°C and pH 7.4.

2.8. Real-time PCR

Hypothalamic tissue was collected immediately following euthanasia, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until processed for mRNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted via the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based on manufacturer’s recommendations. Total RNA was then transcribed to cDNA via the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Using real-time PCR, genes involved in diet and appetite control were assessed. Specifically, Melanocortin Receptors 3 and 4 (Mc3r, Mc4r) [22,23], Pro-opiomelanocortin (Pomc) [24], Agouti-related neuropeptide(Agrp) [30], NeuropeptideY (Npy) [31], Gamma-aminobutyric Acid (Gaba) [32], Leptin (Lep) [33], Ghrelin (Ghrl) [34], Leptin Receptor (Lepr) [35], and nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 1 (Nr5a1) [36]. Genes were tested against ribosomal subunit protein 18 s(Rn18s) [37]. Primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa); primer sequences, and references are listed in Table 1. Samples were analyzed in triplicate using iTAQ Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California). Relative fold changes in expression of candidate genes were obtained using the 2 −ΔΔCt method [38]. Ct values were used to calculate ΔCt values for genes of interest [Ct(test) – Ct(housekeeping)]. The housekeeping gene for normalization was Ribosomal subunit 18S (Rn18s). Statistical representation for each gene is based on fold change with respect to Rn18s.

Table 1.

Primer sequences for rtPCR experiments.

Primer Forward Primer (5′−3′) Reverse Primer (3′−5′) Length (bp) References

MC3R CCA CGT TCA TGC CAT TGC AAC C CGT GAT GTT CAT CGT CTA CTC 1098 26
MC4R ATG AAC TCC ACC CAC CAC CAT AGC ATC CTC CGT CTG 1888 27
POMC TCC GAG AAG AGC CAG ACG GCC TTG GAG TGA GAA GAC CC 1180 28
AgRP GCA AGG ATC AAC AAG CAA GAA CAG GGC CTG GTC AGA 6103 29
NPY GCT TGA AGA CCC TTC CAT GTG GTG GGC GGA GTC CAG CCT AGT GG 567 30
GABA CAC GAA GAA GGA GGA GAA G CAG ATG GCA AGA GTC AGG 4658 31
LEP GTC TGG TCC ATC TTG GAC AAA CTC AGA ATG CAT TCT GAG TTT GTC CAA GAT GGA CCA GAC 3298 32
GHRL GTC ATC TGT CCT CAC CAC CAA GTA GAT GTG GGG GCT TAG GG 6326 33
LepR CAA CAA GCA TGG GCT GCA GTG ACA TTA GAG CTC TAA TGT CAC TGC AGC CCA TGC TTG TTG 7675 34
NR5A1 AGA CAA GTG CAC CCC ATT TC ACC ATC ACC AAC CGC TAA AC 3066 35
Rn18s GTC CCC CAA CTT CTT AGA G CAC CTA CGG AAA CCT TGT TAC 1872 36

2.9. Mitochondrial function assays

Electron transport chain (ETC) Complex activities (I, II, III, IV, and V) were measured in liver and reproductive tissue of adult offspring as previously described [39]. Liver and reproductive tissue was homogenized using the Polytron PowerGen 500 S1 tissue homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) in NP-40 buffer (20 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, 10 % Glycerol, 1 % Triton × 100, 2 mM EDTA) [26]. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 10 000 xg (4 °C) and the supernatant was used for the activity assays. The protein homogenates were used to measure activities of ETC Complexes I, II, III, IV, and V (ATP synthase). ETC Complex I and III activities were determined by measuring the reduction of decylubiquinone (I) and cytochrome c (III) in liver and reproductive tissue protein lysate of adult offspring. ETC Complex II activity was measured using the reduction of dichlorophenolindophenol. ETC Complex IV activity was determined by measuring the oxidation of reduced cytochrome c, while Complex V activity was determined by measuring oligomycin-sensitive ATPase activity through pyruvate kinase and phosphoenolpyruvate in liver and reproductive tissue protein lysate of adult offspring. The Molecular Devices Flex Station 3 Multi-Mode microplate reader (Sunnyvale, CA) was used to measure all assays spectrophotometrically. Protein content was normalized using the Bradford method, with bovine serum albumin protein assay standards. Final values were expressed as Unit/nanogram (I-IV) or milligram (V) of protein, where Unit = nanomoles of substrate oxidized (minute −1).

2.10. Statistical analysis

Weight gain was analyzed via two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures. All other physiological characteristics were assessed by two-way mixed-effects ANOVA. If statistical significance was achieved, a Tukey post hoc test was utilized. All data are reported as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. All data was analyzed in GraphPad Prism 10.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticulate aerosol

Average real-time aerosol mass concentration over the course of exposures was 12.05 mg/m3 with a standard deviation of 1.26 (Fig. 1A). The combined SMPS and APS measurements indicated a CMD of 115 nm with a GSD of 2.07 (Fig. 1B). ELPI assessment of the aerosol aerodynamic diameter showed a CMD of 224 nm with a GSD of 2.00 (Fig. 1C). The MOUDI measurement yielded a MMAD of 1.59 μm and a GSD of 2.65 (Fig. 1D). The size and distribution of these particulates are similar to previous characterizations for this exposure paradigm [18, 40]. The morphology of the nano-TiO2 agglomerates has been previously characterized extensively with electron microscopy [17]. MPPD deposition modeling, based on the aerosol and animal breathing characteristics, indicated a daily alveolar deposition of 31.26 μg with a corresponding 6-day deposition of 187.53 μg.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

3.2. Sexually dimorphic responses in weight gain for in-utero nano-TiO2 exposed animals

Maternal exposure to nano-TiO2 has previously been reported to cause reduced fetal weight [19], with early life weight gain in postnatal pups showing a similar reduction [41]. Weight gain of the animals in the current study was reported in an earlier publication examining cardiovascular development [39]. A summary of those results is provided herein (Table 2). To avoid confounding normal development and puberty onset, all F1 animals were maintained on the GBD until 12 weeks of age. Both males and females exposed to nano-TiO2 in-utero showed significantly reduced body weight compared to sham-exposed controls at 6 weeks of age (p < 0.05). Males and females gained significantly more weight on HFD when compared to matched GBD counterparts, however males on HFD born to nano-TiO2 exposed mothers gained significantly less compared to maternally air-exposed animals on HFD (p < 0.05).

Table 2.

Weight gain statistics for animals on study (summarized from Hunter et al., 2025). Baseline weights (top) and final weights (middle) analyzed by 2-Way ANOVA, reported as Mean (Standard Error). Cumulative Weight gain (bottom) reported as repeated measures ANOVA.

6 Weeks
Filtered Air
Nano-TiO2
P Value
Summary


Filtered Air
Nano-TiO2
P Value
Summary
Male 137 (3.272) 106.4 (1.482) < 0.0001 **** Female 116.1 (1.839) 94 (2.962) < 0.0001 ****

Male Filtered Air Nano-TiO2 P Value Summary Female Filtered Air Nano-TiO2 P Value Summary
24 Weeks GBD 506.7 (16.06) 492.6 (7.978) 0.7462 ns GBD 294.8 (3.238) 268.0 (3.590) 0.1306 ns
HFD 645.0 (18.97) 544.2 (10.18) < 0.0001 **** HFD 342.3 (7.269) 338.2 (8.182) 0.9903 ns
P Value < 0.0001 0.0002 P Value 0.0063 < 0.0001
Summary **** *** Summary ** ****
Male Filtered Air Nano-TiO2 P Value Summary Female Filtered Air Nano-TiO2 P Value Summary
Cumulative Weight Gain GBD 371.5 (12.53) 389.1 (7.393) 0.6372 ns GBD 180.8 (2.988) 178.6 (4.870) 0.9799 ns
HFD 505.8 (16.45) 435.3 (9.805) 0.031 * HFD 222.7 (4.856) 240.5 (5.033) 0.0948 ns
P Value 0.0009 0.0064 P Value 0.0002 < 0.0001
Summary *** ** Summary *** ****

3.3. Increases in glucose tolerance impairment from animals exposed to in-utero nano-TiO2 and high fat diet

At 20 weeks of age and 8 weeks of respective diets, animals were assessed for glucose tolerance. Males showed significant exposure-driven impairment in glucose tolerance in the GBD group (23714 ± 2502 AUC) and HFD group (25079 ± 1858AUC) when compared to nano-TiO2 exposed groups (15741 ± 1229AUC, and 19020 ±1484AUC, respectively; Fig. 2A-B). Females showed a similar pattern in significant exposure driven impairments, with the GBD group (17411 ± 860AUC) and HFD group (20572 ± 935AUC) for the filtered air exposure having significantly greater glucose tolerance compared to their nano-TiO2 exposed counterparts (21430 ± 791AUC, and 28415 ± 1420AUC, respectively). The two-hit interaction produced a profound difference in the females, with the nano-TiO2 HFD (28415 ± 1420.1251) being significantly more glucose intolerant in the nano-TiO2 GBD group (21430AUC± 791.1468; Fig. 2C-D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

3.4. Differential organ weights resulting from diet and in-utero exposure

Following euthanasia via cardiac exsanguination, organs were immediately rinsed in ice-cold PBS and weighed. Heart weights in males (Supplemental Figure 3A-B), were significantly higher for both HFD groups in terms of unweighted mass. Lung weight showed a similar significant increase for males in the nano-TiO2 exposed group, while females showed the greatest increase in lung index in the air-HFD group (Supplemental Figure 3D). Male liver weights were significantly reduced in the nano-TiO2 exposed HFD group, and females had a significantly lower liver weight by diet in the filtered air group (Fig. 3A&E). Kidney weight was significantly decreased in the HFD exposed group compared to filtered air, which was in contrast to female kidney weight that was increased amongst the exposed HFD group compared to air-HFD (Fig. 3B&F). Unweighted renal fat weight and indexed to bodyweight were significant higher in exposed groups for both sex and dietary comparisons (Fig. 3C&G). Epididymal and gonadal fat was significantly elevated in exposed groups for both sexes and diets (Fig. 3D&H).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

3.5. Changes in gene expression of appetite regulatory genes in hypothalamus

Several hypothalamic appetite genes were examined to determine what role they may have played in the differential weight gain between sexes. Mc4r expression among males was significantly increased in the nano-TiO2 GBD group compared to the filtered air group. Mc4r expression in the HFD males was lower in the nano-TiO2 compared to filtered air (Fig. 4A). No significant differences for Mc4r expression were observed in females (Fig. 4E). Males exhibited a similar pattern in Mc3r expression, with a significant increase in the nano-TiO2 exposed GBD group compared to GBD filtered air and HFD nano-TiO2, and no difference between filtered air and nano-TiO2 HFD groups. (Fig. 4B). In females, Mc3r expression was significantly decreased in the GBD group by exposure and significantly increased in the HFD group by exposure resulting in an exposure by diet interaction (Fig. 4F). Npγ expression in filtered air males was significantly increased in the HFD compared to GBD. HFD nano-TiO2 expression was also significantly decreased compared to the HFD filtered air (Fig. 4C). Females showed a significant diet-induced increase in Npγ expression, with HFD nano-TiO2 being increased compared to GBD nano-TiO2 (Fig. 4G). No significant differences in Pomc levels were observed in males (Fig. 4D). Female Pomc expression in the HFD nano-TiO2 group was significantly increased when compared to both GBD nanoTiO2 as well as HFD filtered air (Fig. 4H).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

3.6. Hepatic mitochondrial function and circulating redox factors differentially affects females following in-utero nano-TiO2 exposure

At euthanasia, sections of the right lobe of the liver were excised and frozen for mitochondrial function analysis. In males, Complex I activity was significantly increased in HFD groups, with an exposure interaction whereby nano-TiO2 has increased activity compared to the GBD group (Fig. 5A). There were no significant differences in activity in the remaining mitochondrial complexes in male livers (Fig. 5B-E). In females, significant differences in hepatic mitochondrial function were detected in Complexes I, II, III, and V, but not in Complex IV (Fig. 5I). Female hepatic mitochondrial Complex I activity was significantly increased in HFD groups similarly to the males (Fig. 5F). Female Complex II activity presented with significantly decreased activity in the nano-TiO2 exposed GBD group and HFD filtered air compared to the GBD filtered air group (Fig. 5G). A significant exposure driven change was observed in Complex III, where both nano-TiO2 exposed groups had higher activity compared to filtered air within their respective dietary groups. (Fig. 5H). Complex V activity was significantly decreased in both HFD groups compared to GBD (Fig. 5J). Plasma levels of xanthine oxidase (XO) activity and uric acid (UA) were assayed from plasma samples taken at euthanasia. Males did not exhibit significant differences in XO activity or UA levels across dietary or exposure conditions (Fig. 5K-L). Similarly, there were no significant differences in XO activity in females (Fig. 5M). However, female plasma UA levels were significantly increased in filtered air on the HFD compared to GBD. Nano-TiO2 HFD animals presented with significantly decreased UA levels compared to filtered air HFD counterparts (Fig. 5N).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

3.7. Testis size and testosterone production are reduced following in-utero nano-TiO2 exposure

Testis weight at euthanasia revealed a trending decrease in testis size in the nano-TiO2 exposed group when compared to filtered air (Fig. 6A). When indexed to body weight both GBD and HFD groups had significant decreases in testis size in the nano-TiO2 groups compared to their filtered air counterparts (Fig. 6B). Plasma testosterone at euthanasia was significantly decreased for both GBD nano-TiO2 and HFD filtered air groups when compared to the GBD filtered air group (Fig. 6C). There were no significant differences in mitochondrial activity in the testis between groups, however there were trends for increased activity in Complex I and III in the exposed HFD males compared to filtered air HFD counterparts (Fig. 6D-G).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

3.8. Ovarian mitochondrial energetics are altered following in-utero nano-TiO2 exposure

Ovarian weights were taken at time of euthanasia and showed no significant differences between groups by raw or indexed comparison (Fig. 7A-B). Ovarian mitochondrial activity was not significantly different between groups for Complexes I and II (Fig. 7C-D). However, Complex III activity was significantly increased in nano-TiO2 exposed GBD group. There was a trending increase with nano-TiO2 exposure for Complex III activity within the HFD group as well (Fig. 7E). Complex IV activity was significantly reduced in filtered air HFD compared to filtered air GBD (Fig. 7F).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

4. Discussion

The two-hit hypothesis model employed in this study examines the complex interplay between in-utero exposure as a prenatal programming event, and dietary responsiveness in offspring as a result. As reported previously [41], birth weight for animals born to mothers exposed to nano-TiO2 is significantly reduced. Upon introduction of a HFD at 12 weeks postnatally, in utero exposed males exhibited reduced weight gain whereas females showed increased weight gain compared to air-exposed controls. Gestational exposure resulted in increased renal fat mass for both sexes, and epididymal, and gonadal fat masses respectively. Titanium nanoparticles, via intraperitoneal injections, have previously been shown to infiltrate into fat tissue and induce inflammatory signals [42]. At present, it remains unknown if deposition of particles from the gestational exposure are capable of accounting for these increased in fat pad masses at 24 weeks of age. The characterization of gestational exposure risk, and clinical guidance for early growth and development may be essential in combatting the increasing prevalence of obesity-related, metabolic and other noncommunicable diseases.

Gestational nano-TiO2 exposure produced significant changes to hepatic function and glucose metabolism in adult offspring [19]. Herein, both males and females presented with exposure-driven increases in glucose intolerance, with exposed HFD females showing the greatest glucose intolerance. Additionally, there was an exposure-driven increase in mitochondrial Complex III activity within the liver. Previously, we have shown that directly exposed dams and their F1 progeny at 8 weeks of age presented with upregulated H2O2 production capacity and diminished glutathione antioxidant defense in the liver [19]. Taken together, this illustrates the persistent hepatic and metabolic effects nanoparticulate exposure has across generations. Continued elucidation of mechanisms of maladaptive developmental programming due to prenatal nanoparticulate insult are needed to understand how gestational exposures lead to long-term adult health deficits in offspring.

Several differences in appetite regulatory genes in the hypothalamus were noted in this study. Our data shows sex-dependent differences in hypothalamic expression of Mc3r and Mc4r. Previous reports have demonstrated sex-dependent differences in Mc4r loss-of-function rats [43], and Mc3r in mice [44]. Additionally, intraperitoneal injections of nano-TiO2 caused a loss of appetite in rats [45], however, few studies have examined the interplay between nanoparticle inhalation exposure and appetite. The decrease in Mc3r and Mc4r expression in HFD exposed males may, at least in part, explain the lack of weight gain in this group when compared to filtered air HFD males. Additionally, prenatal nano-TiO2 exposure results in neurobehavioral deficits in locomotor activity, learning, and memory [46], which can culminate in increased depressive-like behaviors in adulthood [47]. The current investigation did not monitor behavior, locomotion, or metabolism, which may provide context to physiological or epigenetic drivers related to these differences in appetite and previously mentioned weight gain. Given the weight differences observed prior to dietary introduction, the role of appetite-modulating factors may provide useful insights for human growth and development for children born underweight. Future studies examining behavioral patterns and neural appetite programming at weaning may prove useful for uncovering adult food intake changes.

Males exposed to nano-TiO2 in utero had reduced testicular size relative to body weight and decreased testosterone production following exposure. Mitochondrial assessment of testicular tissue revealed a dietary driven response amongst the exposed males, where Complexes I and III had increased activity in the testes, similar to other studies of prediabetic Wistar rats [48]. High-energy is required for spermatogenesis, where increased Complex I activity may be required to maintain aerobic metabolism [49]. Previous studies have shown multigenerational effects of nano-TiO2 exposure on reproductive outcomes in females, such as litter size and circulating estrogen concentrations [19]. The current study did not find changes in ovarian size but did see increased Complex III activity in exposed females that was further increased by HFD. Given the hormonal and mitochondrial perturbations seen in the males, future studies evaluating sperm quality, quantity, morphology, and male libido should be undertaken.

Herein, we observed higher weight gain trajectories for males that increased further with the introduction of a HFD. Most likely these changes are due to increased energy intake, as well as reduced locomotor activity in males [50]. Nano-TiO2 exposure in utero reduced HFD-induced weight gain in males, whereas there was no effect of exposure in females. These effects correspond to the impaired glucose tolerance in exposed males, which leads to prolonged glucose in circulation that is converted to fat, and therefore increased fat and body mass. Nano-TiO2 exposure resulted in increased glucose intolerance regardless of sex or diet, however exposed HFD females exhibited increased glucose intolerance compared to sham exposed HFD females, which is of interest considering there was no significant change in body mass. There was however an increase in fat mass deposition in the renal and gonadal fat pads of these exposed females. Female livers presented with more robust mitochondrial differences than males, including exposure driven increases in Complex III activity, and HFD induced reductions in Complex V activity. Complex V activity decline disrupts ATP synthesis, compromising hepatocellular function, and further increasing energy demand [51]. Altogether, these perturbations in metabolic markers indicate a pronounced sexual dimorphism in an adult HFD challenge after in utero exposure to particulate matter.

In summary, data presented herein illustrate clear sex-dependent differences in weight gain and hepatic mitochondrial activity following in-utero nano-TiO2 exposure. Females presented with more robust interactions between diet and exposure, showing altered hepatic metabolism through mitochondrial function and glucose intolerance. More work is needed to define the role of prenatal nanoparticulate exposure on metabolic, endocrine, and hypothalamic development that results in lifelong consequences in the offspring. Future studies focused on epigenetic mechanisms, pre-pubertal dietary challenge introduction, and behavioral changes will help unravel the myriad of adult health deficits observed due to in utero particulate exposure.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Funding

This research was funded through the National Institutes of Health 5K01OH012320–03, 5P20GM121322–08, as well as the American Heart Association, AHA:25POST1372430.

Appendix A. Supporting information

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.109140.

Footnotes

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Russell Hunter: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Teresa Gluth: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Eric E. Kelley: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Elizabeth C Bowdridge: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Allison Dunn: Methodology, Data curation. Riley Nett: Methodology, Data curation. Victoria Nist: Methodology, Data curation. Kate Seman: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Goldsmith William Travis: Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • [1].Fleischer NL, Merialdi M, van Donkelaar A, Vadillo-Ortega F, Martin RV, Betran AP, Souza JP, Outdoor air pollution, preterm birth, and low birth weight: analysis of the world health organization global survey on maternal and perinatal health, Environ. Health Perspect. 122 (4) (2014) 425–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Westergaard N, Gehring U, Slama R, Pedersen M, Ambient air pollution and low birth weight - are some women more vulnerable than others? Environ. Int 104 (2017) 146–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Dutta A, Alexander D, Karrison T, Morhasson-Bello O, Wilson N, Atalabi OM, Adu D, Ibigbami T, Adekunle S, Adepoju D, et al. , Household air pollution, ultrasound measurement, fetal biometric parameters and intrauterine growth restriction, Environ. Health 20 (1) (2021) 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Pereira G, Cook AG, Haggar F, Bower C, Nassar N, Locally derived traffic-related air pollution and fetal growth restriction: a retrospective cohort study, Occup. Environ. Med. 69 (11) (2012) 815–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Bilenko N, Ashin M, Friger M, Fischer L, Sergienko R, Sheiner E, Traffic noise and ambient air pollution are risk factorsfor Preeclampsia, J. Clin. Med 11 (15) (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Goin DE, Sudat S, Riddell C, Morello-Frosch R, Apte JS, Glymour MM, Karasek D, Casey JA, Hyperlocalized measures of air pollution and Preeclampsia in Oakland, California, Environ. Sci. Technol. 55 (21) (2021) 14710–14719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].de Medeiros AP, Gouveia N, Machado RP, de Souza MR, Alencar GP, Novaes HM, de Almeida MF, Traffic-related air pollution and perinatal mortality: a case-control study, Environ. Health Perspect. 117 (1) (2009) 127–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Camm EJ, The programming power of the placenta, Front Physiol. 7 (2016) 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Mathiesen L, Buerki-Thurnherr T, Pastuschek J, Aengenheister L, Knudsen LE, Fetal exposure to environmental chemicals; insights from placental perfusion studies, Placenta 106 (2021) 58–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Hong F, Zhou Y, Zhao X, Sheng L, Wang L, Maternal exposure to nanosized titanium dioxide suppresses embryonic development in mice, Int J. Nanomed. 12 (2017) 6197–6204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].D’Errico JN, Doherty C, Reyes George JJ, Buckley B, Stapleton PA, Maternal, placental, and fetal distribution of titanium after repeated titanium dioxide nanoparticle inhalation through pregnancy, Placenta 121 (2022) 99–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Cary CM, DeLoid GM, Yang Z, Bitounis D, Polunas M, Goedken MJ, Buckley B, Cheatham B, Stapleton PA, Demokritou P, Ingested polystyrene nanospheres translocate to placenta and fetal tissues in pregnant rats: potential health implications, Nanomaterials 13 (4) (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Fournier SB, D’Errico JN, Adler DS, Kollontzi S, Goedken MJ, Fabris L, Yurkow EJ, Stapleton PA, Nanopolystyrene translocation and fetal deposition after acute lung exposure during late-stage pregnancy, Part Fibre Toxicol. 17 (1) (2020) 55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Irvin-Choy NS, Nelson KM, Dang MN, Gleghorn JP, Day ES, Gold nanoparticle biodistribution in pregnant mice following intravenous administration varies with gestational age, Nanomedicine 36 (2021) 102412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Zhang W, Yang L, Kuang H, Yang P, Aguilar ZP, Wang A, Fu F, Xu H, Acute toxicity of quantum dots on late pregnancy mice: Effects of nanoscale size and surface coating, J. Hazard Mater. 318 (2016) 61–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Abukabda AB, Stapleton PA, McBride CR, Yi J, Nurkiewicz TR, Heterogeneous vascular bed responses to pulmonary titanium dioxide nanoparticle exposure, Front Cardiovasc Med 4 (2017) 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Abukabda AB, Bowdridge EC, McBride CR, Batchelor TP, Goldsmith WT, Garner KL, Friend S, Nurkiewicz TR, Maternal titanium dioxide nanomaterial inhalation exposure compromises placental hemodynamics, Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 367 (2019) 51–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Griffith JA, Dunn A, DeVallance E, Schafner KJ, Engles KJ, Batchelor TP, Goldsmith WT, Wix K, Hussain S, Bowdridge EC, et al. , Maternal nano-titanium dioxide inhalation alters fetoplacental outcomes in a sexually dimorphic manner, Front Toxicol. 5 (2023) 1096173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Bowdridge EC, DeVallance E, Garner KL, Griffith JA, Schafner K, Seaman M, Engels KJ, Wix K, Batchelor TP, Goldsmith WT, et al. , Nano-titanium dioxide inhalation exposure during gestation drives redox dysregulation and vascular dysfunction across generations, Part Fibre Toxicol. 19 (1) (2022) 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Chen H, Ng JPM, Tan Y, McGrath K, Bishop DP, Oliver B, Chan YL, Cortie MB, Milthorpe BK, Valenzuela SM, Gold nanoparticles improve metabolic profile of mice fed a high-fat diet, J. Nanobiotechnol. 16 (1) (2018) 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Schilling-Tóth BM, Ondrašovičová S, Vámos E, Radnai B, Alymbaeva D, Bartha T, Tóth I, Kiss DS, Gold nanoparticles disrupt mitochondrial activity in hypothalamic POMC cells: implications for energy homeostasis, Nanomaterials 15 (16) (2025) 1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ferguson KK, Sammallahti S, Rosen E, van den Dries M, Pronk A, Spaan S, Guxens M, Tiemeier H, Gaillard R, Jaddoe VWV, Fetal growth trajectories among small for gestational age babies and child neurodevelopment, Epidemiology 32 (5) (2021) 664–671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Lovato I, Simonelli A, Visentin S, Priante E, Baraldi E, Sacchi C, Prenatal environment and developmental trajectories: the intrauterine growth restriction, Minerva Pedia 75 (1) (2023) 62–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Engler-Chiurazzi EB, Stapleton PA, Stalnaker JJ, Ren X, Hu H, Nurkiewicz TR, McBride CR, Yi J, Engels K, Simpkins JW, Impacts of prenatal nanomaterial exposure on male adult Sprague-Dawley rat behavior and cognition, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 79 (11) (2016) 447–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Williams XM, Bossert AT, Seman M, Lewis SE, McCallen H, Pilkerton J, Bowdridge EC, Paternostro MA, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR, Hussain S, Kelley EE, DeVallance E, Liver-derived, circulating xanthine oxidoreductase drives vascular impairment associated with inhalation of ultrafine particulates, bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. (2025), 2025.05.07.652261. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Emmerich SD, Fryar CD, Stierman B, Ogden CL, Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021-August 2023, NCHS Data Brief. (508) (2024), 10.15620/cdc/159281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Parra-Vargas M, Ramon-Krauel M, Lerin C, Jimenez-Chillaron JC, Size does matter: litter size strongly determines adult metabolism in rodents, Cell Metab. 32 (3) (2020) 334–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Griffith JA, King RD, Dunn AC, Lewis SE, Maxwell BA, Nurkiewicz TR, Goldsmith WT, Kelley EE, Bowdridge EC, Maternal nano-titanium dioxide inhalation exposure alters placental cyclooxygenase and oxidant balance in a sexually dimorphic manner, Adv. Redox Res 10 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Kelley EE, Baust J, Bonacci G, Golin-Bisello F, Devlin JE, St Croix CM, Watkins SC, Gor S, Cantu-Medellin N, Weidert ER, et al. , Fatty acid nitroalkenes ameliorate glucose intolerance and pulmonary hypertension in high-fat diet-induced obesity, Cardiovasc Res. 101 (3) (2014) 352–363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Noguchi T, Makino S, Matsumoto R, Nakayama S, Nishiyama M, Terada Y, Hashimoto K, Regulation of glucocorticoid receptor transcription and nuclear translocation during single and repeated immobilization stress, Endocrinology 151 (9) (2010) 4344–4355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Rapps K, Kisliouk T, Marco A, Weller A, Meiri N, Dieting reverses histone methylation and hypothalamic AgRP regulation in obese rats, Front Endocrinol. 14 (2023) 1121829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Alvaro AR, Martins J, Araujo IM, Rosmaninho-Salgado J, Ambrosio AF, Cavadas C, Neuropeptide Y stimulates retinal neural cell proliferation–involvement of nitric oxide, J. Neurochem. 105 (6) (2008) 2501–2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Germann AL, Pierce SR, Tateiwa H, Sugasawa Y, Reichert DE, Evers AS, Steinbach JH, Akk G, Intrasubunit and intersubunit steroid binding sites independently and additively mediate alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A) receptor potentiation by the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone, Mol. Pharm. 100 (1) (2021) 19–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Krskova-Tybitanclova K, Macejova D, Brtko J, Baculikova M, Krizanova O, Zorad S, Short term 13-cis-retinoic acid treatment at therapeutic doses elevates expression of leptin, GLUT4, PPARgamma and aP2 in rat adipose tissue, J. Physiol. Pharm. 59 (4) (2008) 731–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Bomberg EM, Grace MK, Wirth MM, Levine AS, Olszewski PK, Central ghrelin induces feeding driven by energy needs not by reward, Neuroreport 18 (6) (2007) 591–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Kanoski SE, Zhao S, Guarnieri DJ, DiLeone RJ, Yan J, De Jonghe BC, Bence KK, Hayes MR, Grill HJ, Endogenous leptin receptor signaling in the medial nucleus tractus solitarius affects meal size and potentiates intestinal satiation signals, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 303 (4) (2012) E496–E503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Sapkota S, Roy SC, Shrestha R, Briski KP, Steroidogenic factor-1 regulation of dorsomedial ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus Ghrh neuron transmitter marker and estrogen receptor gene expression in male rat, ASN Neuro 16 (1) (2024) 2368382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Rothblum LI, Reddy R, Cassidy B, Transcription initiation site of rat ribosomal DNA, Nucleic Acids Res 10 (22) (1982) 7345–7362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Hunter R, Gluth T, Meadows E, Nett R, Nist V, Bowdridge E, In utero nano-titanium dioxide exposure results in sexually dimorphic weight gain and cardiovascular function in offspring, Cardiovasc Toxicol. 25 (3) (2025) 354–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Hathaway QA, Nichols CE, Shepherd DL, Stapleton PA, McLaughlin SL, Stricker JC, Rellick SL, Pinti MV, Abukabda AB, McBride CR, et al. , Maternal-engineered nanomaterial exposure disrupts progeny cardiac function and bioenergetics, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 312 (3) (2017) H446–H458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Boulain M, Morin D, Juvin L, Multigenerational inheritance of breathing deficits following perinatal exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the offspring of mice, Discov. Nano 19 (1) (2024) 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Silva AH, Locatelli C, Filho UP, Gomes BF, de Carvalho Junior RM, de Gois JS, Borges DL, Creczynski-Pasa TB, Visceral fat increase and signals of inflammation in adipose tissue after administration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mice, Toxicol. Ind. Health 33 (2) (2017) 147–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Chaffin AT, Fang Y, Larson KR, Mul JD, Ryan KK, Sex-dependent effects of MC4R genotype on HPA axis tone: implications for stress-associated cardiometabolic disease, Stress 22 (5) (2019) 571–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Dunigan AI, Olson DP, Roseberry AG, VTA MC3R neurons control feeding in an activity- and sex-dependent manner in mice, Neuropharmacology 197 (2021) 108746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Chen J, Dong X, Zhao J, Tang G, In vivo acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to mice after intraperitioneal injection, J. Appl. Toxicol. 29 (4) (2009) 330–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Su J, Duan X, Qiu Y, Zhou L, Zhang H, Gao M, Liu Y, Zou Z, Qiu J, Chen C, Pregnancy exposure of titanium dioxide nanoparticles causes intestinal dysbiosis and neurobehavioral impairments that are not significant postnatally but emerge in adulthood of offspring, J. Nanobiotechnol. 19 (1) (2021) 234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Cui Y, Chen X, Zhou Z, Lei Y, Ma M, Cao R, Sun T, Xu J, Huo M, Cao R, et al. , Prenatal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide enhances depressive-like behaviors in adult rats, Chemosphere 96 (2014) 99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Rato L, Duarte AI, Tomás GD, Santos MS, Moreira PI, Socorro S, Cavaco JE, Alves MG, Oliveira PF, Pre-diabetes alters testicular PGC1-α/SIRT3 axis modulating mitochondrial bioenergetics and oxidative stress, Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta 1837 (3) (2014) 335–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Bajpai M, Gupta G, Setty BS, Changes in carbohydrate metabolism of testicular germ cells during meiosis in the rat, Eur. J. Endocrinol. 138 (3) (1998) 322–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Maric I, Krieger JP, van der Velden P, Börchers S, Asker M, Vujicic M, Wernstedt Asterholm I, Skibicka KP, Sex and species differences in the development of diet-induced obesity and metabolic disturbances in rodents, Front. Nutr. 9 (2022) 828522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].An H, The role of mitochondrial complexes in liver diseases, J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 13 (11) (2025) 976–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

RESOURCES