Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2026 Mar 6;14:RP106720. doi: 10.7554/eLife.106720

Progressive mural cell deficiencies across the lifespan in a foxf2 model of cerebral small vessel disease

Merry Faye E Graff 1,2, Emma EM Heeg 1,2, David A Elliott 3, Sarah J Childs 1,2,
Editors: Stefania Nicoli4, Didier YR Stainier5
PMCID: PMC12965718  PMID: 41789880

Abstract

Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a leading cause of stroke and dementia and yet is often an incidental finding in aged patients due to the inaccessibility of brain vasculature to imaging. Animal models are important for modelling the development and progression of SVD across the lifespan. In humans, reduced FOXF2 is associated with an increased stroke risk and SVD prevalence in humans. In the zebrafish, foxf2 is expressed in pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells and is involved in vascular stability. We use partial foxf2 loss of function (foxf2a-/-) to model the lifespan effect of reduced Foxf2 on small vessel biology. We find that the initial pool of pericytes in developing foxf2a mutants is strongly reduced. The few brain pericytes present in mutants have strikingly longer processes and enlarged soma. foxf2a mutant pericytes can partially repopulate the brain after ablation, suggesting some recovery is possible. Despite this capacity, adult foxf2a mutant brains show regional heterogeneity, with some areas of normality and others with severe pericyte depletion. Taken together, foxf2a mutants fail to generate a sufficient initial population of pericytes. The pericytes that remain have abnormal cell morphology. Over the lifespan, initial pericyte deficits are not repaired and lead to severely abnormal cerebrovasculature in adults. This work opens new avenues for modeling progressive genetic forms of human cerebral small vessel disease.

Research organism: Zebrafish

eLife digest

Every time you pause to think, remember a name, or read a sentence, the blood in your brain is quickly rerouted to the neurons doing the work. This redistribution depends on a vast network of blood vessels, from large arteries to microscopic capillaries, which deliver oxygen and energy directly to active brain cells.

For this system to function properly, the smallest blood vessels, the capillaries, must be able to regulate blood flow precisely. This control is provided by support cells on the outside of the capillary, such as pericytes or smooth muscle cells, which relax to open the vessel. When these cells fail, brain regions may no longer receive enough blood, even if larger vessels remain intact.

A breakdown of these cells is observed in cerebral small vessel disease, a leading cause of stroke and dementia. Unlike other types of strokes, this disease originates in the smallest blood vessels of the brain. However, it remains unclear whether it begins only in old age or much earlier in life. Understanding when and how this disease progresses is important because identifying its earliest mechanisms may offer opportunities to delay damage.

Graff et al. studied a zebrafish model carrying a mutation in foxf2a, which is linked to cerebral small-vessel disease in older humans. They found that the condition may not be exclusively age-related. When zebrafish had foxf2a levels reduced to about 50% of normal - similar to the reduction observed in humans with variants linked to cerebral small vessel disease - the fish developed blood vessel absormalities from the earlierst stages of life that persisted into adulthood. They also had fewer pericytes. Although pericytes could regenerate to some extent, blood vessel damage remained and worsened over the lifespan in this zebrafish model.

More detailed analyses revealed that pericytes showed signs of stress, which caused higher rates of cell death compared to zebrafish with normal foxf2a levels. In other words, although blood vessel damage could be partly repaired, it tended to deteriorate when foxf2a was absent.

These findings suggest that cerebral small vessel disease should may be better understood as a lifelong, progressive condition, where damage accumulates over time. Although approximately 20% of the population may carry genetic risk factors for this kind of disease, ongoing blood vessel damage and repair are common. Population-wide screening for individuals at risk of cerebral small vessel disease early in life, combined with targeted lifestyle and cardiovascular interventions, could greatly reduce the disease burden in the elderly.

Introduction

Brain microvessels supply billions of neurons and other brain cells with the oxygen and nutrients they need. Pathologies affecting brain microvasculature progress slowly and silently over a lifetime but have devastating consequences from decreased perfusion and vascular destabilization. Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) encompasses progressive heterogeneous changes in brain microvessels; it is the most common cause of vascular dementia and a significant contributor to stroke and cognitive decline (Østergaard et al., 2016). 25% of all strokes are the result of CSVD, yet effective targeted treatments remain elusive (Østergaard et al., 2016). This is in part due to the inability to both detect and assess progressive damage in the brain.

While there are several genes implicated in familial CSVD (i.e. NOTCH3, HTRA1, FOXC1, COL4A1, and COL4A2), there is a lack of suitable in vivo models for studying disease development and progression. Research has predominantly focused on NOTCH3, but over the last decade, FOXF2 has emerged as a risk locus for CSVD (Chauhan et al., 2016; Duperron et al., 2023). SNPs in the intergenic region between FOXF2 and FOXQ1 decrease FOXF2 expression and significantly increase stroke risk due to the variant decreasing the efficiency of ETS1 binding to a novel FOXF2 enhancer (Ryu et al., 2022).

Foxf2 promotes mural cell differentiation and vascular stability in the zebrafish brain and is expressed highly in brain pericytes (Ahuja et al., 2024 #1591); (Chauhan et al., 2016 #1403); (Reyahi et al., 2015 #1372); (Ryu et al., 2022 #1590). Brain pericytes interact closely with endothelial cells, contributing to extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and blood-brain barrier (BBB) formation, in addition to providing vasoactivity and stability (Bahrami and Childs, 2020; Daneman et al., 2010; Dave et al., 2018; Stratman et al., 2009). In animal models, an absence of brain pericytes results in hemorrhages and accelerates vascular-mediated neurodegeneration (Bell et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2014). Foxf2 is clearly important for vascular stability across species, as loss of Foxf2 in mice and zebrafish leads to increased brain hemorrhage and alterations in brain pericyte numbers and differentiation (Chauhan et al., 2016; Reyahi et al., 2015; Ryu et al., 2022). Brain tissue from patients with aging-related dementias (i.e. post-stroke dementia, vascular dementia, Alzheimer’s disease) has reduced deep white matter pericytes and associated BBB disruption (Ding et al., 2020), suggesting that pericytes should be examined as mediators of CSVD progression in patients with FOXF2 deficiency.

We previously showed that complete loss of foxf2 in foxf2aca71; foxf2bca21 double-homozygous mutants in late embryogenesis leads to reduced brain pericyte numbers (Ryu et al., 2022). However, stroke susceptibility in humans is associated with reduced, but not absent, FOXF2 expression. Genome-wide association (GWA) indicates that carrying a minor allele of an SNP in a FOXF2 enhancer leads to reduced, but not absent, FOXF2 and is associated with stroke (Ryu et al., 2022). For this reason, we model CSVD using a zebrafish with reduced Foxf2 dosage using single homozygous foxf2a mutants. Zebrafish foxf2a and foxf2b genes are the result of genome duplication in zebrafish ~430 million years ago and have similar gene expression (Arnold et al., 2015; Chauhan et al., 2016). We have detected no difference in function between the two genes and, therefore, foxf2a loss of function may be similar to human heterozygous loss of FOXF2 function, a state that is observed in the population in GnomAD (Chen et al., 2024).

Strikingly, while pericytes in embryonic foxf2 mutants are clearly affected, foxf2 mutants can survive until adulthood, albeit with a reduced lifespan. How pericytes change across the lifespan while CSVD progresses is unknown. Here, we find that foxf2a mutants have significantly reduced brain pericyte numbers as embryos that do not recover over time. Pericytes in mutant embryos and larvae exhibit morphological abnormalities, including increased soma size, longer processes, and degeneration. We show that processes and soma in the adults are also abnormal, though their morphology differs over the lifespan. Although the initial pool of pericytes is smaller, mutants can regenerate pericytes after ablation. Our analysis suggests that foxf2 is required within pericytes to modulate numbers but also has a strong effect on morphology. We show that brain pericytes may contribute to the pathological progression of genetic CSVD, starting in embryonic development and continuing across the lifespan. Understanding the early developmental aspects of late-onset vascular conditions like CSVD will aid in the development of effective therapeutic strategies.

Results

Pericyte number is consistently lower in foxf2 mutant embryos and larvae

Embryonic phenotypes can lead to lifelong consequences. We have previously studied foxf2a;foxf2b double mutants only at a single embryonic stage at 3 days post-fertilization (dpf). To understand how a pericyte and cerebrovascular phenotype evolves and/or resolves over development, we conducted serial imaging of individual brains of foxf2a mutants at embryonic stages (3 and 5 dpf), and at larval stages (7 and 10 dpf). Mutants were live imaged using endothelial (kdrl:mCherry) and pericyte (pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:GFP) transgenic lines.

Embryonically, brain pericytes have a thin-strand morphology and are closely associated with, and extend processes over, the endothelium in the midbrain and hindbrain of zebrafish (Figure 1A–A’’). In wild-type embryos, the number of pericytes increases progressively from 3 through 10 dpf (Figure 1B). However, foxf2a mutants show significantly fewer pericytes on brain vessels at 3 dpf (Figure 1C; mean 21 in wild-type and 10 in mutants), and this pericyte deficiency persists through 5, 7, and 10 dpf (Figure 1C–D). The reduction in pericyte numbers shows variable penetrance, with some foxf2a mutants having pericyte numbers only slightly reduced from wild-type, and others that are severely diminished. The same pattern of pericyte reduction is seen with foxf2a mutants from a homozygous or heterozygous incross, suggesting there is no maternal effect (Figure 1E–F). Serial imaging of mutants with regional absence in earlier stages shows that defects in pericyte coverage persist into later stages, suggesting that the size of the initial pericyte population is a key determinant of later coverage (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Double foxf2a;foxf2b mutants have a fully penetrant phenotype with significantly fewer brain pericytes in mutants than wild-type at every stage (Figure 1—figure supplement 2; mean 19 in the wild-type and 9 in mutants at 3 dpf). Incomplete penetrance in foxf2a single mutants could be due to genetic compensation from foxf2b. While foxf2b is not significantly upregulated in foxf2a mutants on average, individual embryos have highly variable foxf2b expression (Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

Figure 1. Brain pericyte number is consistently lower and does not recover in foxf2a mutant larvae.

(A) Zebrafish brains were imaged using endothelial (red; Tg(kdrl:mCherry)) and pericyte (light blue; Tg(pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:GFP)) transgenic lines (arrows: brain pericytes). (A’-A’’) Brain pericyte soma (white arrows) and processes (yellow arrows) are closely associated with the endothelium. (B) Serially imaged wild-type and foxf2a mutant brains at 3, 5, 7, and 10 dpf. (C) Total brain pericyte numbers at 3, 5, 7, and 10 dpf. (D) Individual brain pericyte trajectories of serially imaged embryos over the same period. (E) Dorsal images of embryos for the indicated genotypes from a foxf2a heterozygous incross at 75 hpf. (F) Total brain pericytes at 75 hpf. Statistical analysis was conducted using multiple Mann-Whitney tests (C) and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (F). Scale bars, 50 µm (A–B, E).

Figure 1—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 1 and supplements.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. foxf2a mutants exhibit regional loss.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Serial imaging of a foxf2a-/- mutant brain at 3, 5, 7, and 10 dpf (arrows: brain pericytes; boxes: regional loss). Scale bars, 50 µm.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. foxf2 knockouts have severe pericyte deficiency during development.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Serial imaging of wild-type and foxf2a-/-;foxf2b-/- double mutant brains at 3, 5, 7, and 10 dpf (arrows: brain pericytes). (B) Scatter plot of total brain pericyte numbers at 3, 5, 7, and 10 dpf. (C) Individual mutant trajectories over the same period. Statistical analysis was conducted using multiple unpaired t-tests with Welch corrections. Scale bars, 50 µm (A).
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. pdgfrβ mRNA and transgene have similar expression in wild-type and foxf2a mutants.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

foxf2b expression is not upregulated in mutants. (A) Integrated intensity of pdgfrβ expression by hybridization chain reaction (HCR). (B) Integrated density of confocal imaged pdgfrβ transgene expression in wild-type, foxf2a heterozygote, and foxf2a homozygote mutants. (C) Integrated density of foxf2b expression in foxf2a mutants by HCR. (D) Relative expression by qPCR of foxf2a and foxf2b expression in foxf2a mutants. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student’s t-test (A, C) and ANOVA with Bartlett’s test (B, D). None of the comparisons are significant (ns).

Since Foxf2 conditional knockout mice show reduced expression of the pericyte marker Pdgfrβ, we tested whether pdgfrβ expression is reduced in foxf2a mutants, as this might introduce inaccuracies in pericyte counting. We used two methods, quantitative hybridization chain reaction (HCR) in situ hybridization and integrated density of the pdgfrβ transgene expression in wild-types and mutants carrying only a single copy of the transgene. We show that pdgfrβ mRNA nor transgene expression is not reduced in foxf2a mutants (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Furthermore, we show that pdgfrβ has complete overlap in expression with other brain pericyte markers, such as ndufa4l2 and foxf2b using HCR (Figure 2A–D). Thus, pdgfrβ transgene or mRNA expression can reliably be used to count zebrafish brain pericytes in foxf2a mutants.

Figure 2. Loss of foxf2 affects embryonic pericyte numbers, but not endothelial cell pattern.

(A) foxf2a expression in wild-type brains at 72 hpf using hybridization chain reaction (HCR) shows co-expression with pericyte marker ndufa4l2a. foxf2a is also lowly co-expressed in the endothelium with kdrl. Arrows show overlapping expression. (B) foxf2b is co-expressed with pericyte marker pdgfrβ, also lowly expressed in the endothelium (kdrl). (C) foxf2b and pdgfrβ are expressed in a similar, overlapping pattern in pericytes of wild-type and foxf2a mutants. (D) Pericyte marker nduf4al2a and pdgfrβ are expressed in a similar, overlapping pattern in pericytes in wild-type and foxf2a mutants. (E) Image of endothelium used to generate the total blood vessel network length. (F) Total vessel network length from Vessel Metrics software. (G) Scatter plot of hindbrain CtA diameters. (H) Scatter plot of pericyte density and pericyte coverage (I). Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Scale bars, 10 µm (A–D), 50 µm (F).

Figure 2—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 2 and supplements.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Expression of foxf2a and foxf2b in single-cell sequencing data from Daniocell.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

foxf2a is expressed strongly in mural cells, pericytes, and smooth muscle (vascular and visceral), with lower expression of foxf2b in the same cell types. Available at: https://daniocell.nichd.nih.gov/.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. foxf2a mutant adult brains have normal size as compared to wild-types.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) 3-month-old and 11-month-old foxf2a-/- mutant and wild-type brains were dissected and imaged dorsally under Brightfield. (B) Standard length measured from snout to base of the tail. (C) Brain length was measured from the tip of the forebrain to the end of the cerebellum. (D) Widest portion of midbrain measured. (E) Ratio of brain length relative to standard length. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way ANOVAs with Šídák’s multiple comparison test. Scale bars, 50 μm (A).

Although we focus on mural cells, Foxf2 is expressed in adult mouse brain endothelium (Vanlandewijck et al., 2018). We assessed foxf2a and foxf2b mRNA expression patterns using HCR in situ hybridization. At 3 dpf, foxf2a is co-localized with the pericyte marker ndufa4l2a in brain pericytes and shows low-level co-localized expression with the blood vessel marker kdrl in brain endothelium (Figure 2A). The expression pattern of foxf2b is similar. It is expressed in pericytes (pdgfrβ) and only weakly in endothelial cells (kdrl) (Figure 2B). This is supported by the DanioCell atlas of single-cell sequencing of multiple embryonic stages that shows expression of both genes is strongest in mural cells, pericytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells and low in endothelial cells (Sur et al., 2023; Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Thus, while foxf2a and foxf2b are principally expressed in pericytes, they are lowly expressed in endothelium during brain development.

Pericyte loss or impairment leads to alterations in vascular patterning in the mouse retina (Eilken et al., 2017). To assess if the endothelial network is affected in foxf2a mutants, we employed a Python workflow using Vessel Metrics (McGarry et al., 2024; Figure 2E). We found no statistical difference in total network length between wild-type and mutants at 3 dpf (Figure 2F) or hindbrain central artery diameter (Figure 2G). However, pericyte density (number of pericytes divided by the total network length) is reduced by 40% in foxf2a mutants (Figure 2H), reflecting the loss of pericytes with no change in vessel network length. Similarly, pericyte coverage of vessels (total process coverage from brain pericytes divided by the total network length) is reduced by 39% in mutants (Figure 2I). Our data suggest that during early development, foxf2a depletion primarily affects pericytes.

Early defects in brain vessel development have lifelong consequences

foxf2 mutant animals can survive to adulthood, albeit with a reduced lifespan (~1 year vs. >2 years). Are early pericyte deficiencies repaired, or is loss of pericytes unimportant to survival to adulthood? To understand how brain pericyte phenotypes evolve over the lifespan, we dissected adult wild-type and foxf2a mutant brains on pericyte and endothelial double transgenic backgrounds and imaged after iDISCO clearing. Gross measurements of standard length of the fish (snout to tail) show no significant differences between wild-type and mutants, except that female mutant brain length and width are significantly smaller at 11 months post fertilization (mpf) (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). However, there is no significant difference in the proportional brain length/standard length ratio in foxf2a mutants vs. wild-type.

Projected 3D views of light sheet images of the whole brain show striking defects in pericyte density, coverage, and vascular pattern in foxf2a mutants vs. wild-type adults (Videos 1 and 2; Figure 3A–B). Pericyte distribution is irregular, and blood vessel density is visibly reduced in mutant brains (Figure 3C–D). Using a machine learning workflow (Figure 3—figure supplement 1, Figure 3—source data 1), we segmented pericyte soma, or the vessel backbone for the entire adult brain, to count the total pericyte number in comparison to the total endothelial network length. We find a significant reduction in pericyte numbers in 3 mpf foxf2a mutant brains, which have only 45% of the pericytes of a wild-type brain (average of 24,567 pericytes/brain vs. wild-type 54,833 pericytes/brain; n=3 of each genotype; Figure 3E). However, at this stage, the vessel network length is not statistically different (Figure 3F). The density of pericytes on vessels is significantly decreased from 0.01 pericyte/µm to 0.006 pericytes/µm in foxf2a mutants showing a clear deficit (Figure 3G). In contrast, the mean vessel diameter across vessel segments is not significantly different at 3 mpf when all diameters are considered, nor when vessel diameters are grouped in 5 µm bins (n=522,037 wild-type and 381,544 foxf2a mutant diameters; Figure 3H–I).

Figure 3. foxf2a mutants show strong brain vascular defects as adults.

(A–B) 3D projections of iDISCO-cleared immunostained whole wild-type and foxf2a-/- brains at 3 mpf, viewed ventrally. (C–D) Wild-type and foxf2a mutant 2 brain regions, viewed dorsally (arrows = defects in coverage). (E) Number of brain pericytes in three individual wild-type and mutant brains at 3 mpf detected using Imaris’ spot tool and machine learning. (F) Total vessel network length in three individual wild-type and mutant brains at 3 mpf using Ilastik and Imaris’ filament tool and machine learning. (G) Brain pericyte density calculated using number of brain pericytes per meter of vessel length. (H) Vessel diameter in three individual wild-type and mutant brains at 3 mpf using Imaris’ filament tool and machine learning. (I) Percentage of vessel segments in wild-type and mutant brains at 3 mpf segregated by vessel diameter (in 5 μm bins). (J) CUBIC-cleared wild-type and foxf2a mutant midbrain at 11 mpf (arrows: individual pericyte soma). C=caudal, D=dorsal, R=rostral, V=ventral. Statistical analysis was conducted using unpaired t-tests (E–H) and ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (I). Scale bars, 500 μm (A–B), 200 μm (C–D), 50 μm (J).

Figure 3—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 3 and supplements.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Workflow of computational analysis of vascular network in adult brains.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Pericyte cell bodies annotated using the spot tool and machine learning in Imaris (green: cell bodies; purple: processes). A mask was created from the annotations, with each cell body annotated in yellow. The total number of cells was exported for statistical analysis. (B) Vessels were annotated in Ilastik to create a vessel probability map (yellow: blood vessels; blue: background). The map was imported as a channel into Imaris, where it would be further annotated with machine learning using the surface tool (green: blood vessels; blue: background). A mask was created from the surface, which was used to create a 3D network using the filament tool. Total network length and segment diameters were exported.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. foxf2a mutants show strong brain vascular defects in adulthood.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A–B) 3D projections of iDISCO-cleared immunostained whole wild-type and foxf2a-/- brains at 3 mpf with Tg(pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:GFP, kdrl:mCherry), viewed ventrally (arrows = defects in coverage). (C–D) 3D projections of iDISCO-cleared immunostained whole wild-type and foxf2a-/- brains at 6 mpf with Tg(acta2:GFP, kdrl:mCherry), viewed ventrally (E–F) 3D projections of CUBIC-cleared whole wild-type and foxf2a-/- brains at 11 mpf with Tg(pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:GFP, kdrl:mCherry) viewed ventrally. R=rostral, C=caudal, D=dorsal, V=ventral. Scale bars, 500 μm (A–D), 700 μm (E–F).
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Pericyte heterogeneity in the adult zebrafish brain.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

Immunolabeling for mural cell transgenes (kdrl:mCherry and pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:GFP) on zebrafish brain vibratome sections. Vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMC) and pericyte (ensheathing, mesh and thin strand) subtypes are present in the adult zebrafish brain. Scale bars, 5 µm.
Figure 3—figure supplement 4. foxf2a mutants show morphologically unusual pdgfrβ-expressing cells and blood vessels in the adult brain.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4.

Immunolabeled sections in equivalent regions of wild-type and foxf2a-/- mutant brains at 11 mpf. (A) Region of the brain with an inset of pdgfrβ-expressing mural cells, likely vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs) (arrows: large calibre vessel). (B) Region of the brain with an inset of pericytes (arrows: individual cell bodies). Scale bars, 50 µm (A–B).
Figure 3—figure supplement 5. Abnormal blood vessels become apparent in adult foxf2a mutant brains.

Figure 3—figure supplement 5.

Immunolabeled sections in equivalent regions of wild-type and foxf2a-/- mutant brains at 11 mpf. Large aneurysm-like structure with downregulated kdrl compared to the matched wild-type region. Scale bars, 50 µm (A–B).

Video 1. Rotating view of a cleared wild-type brain at 3 mpf with pdgfrβ (blue) and kdrl (red).

Download video file (10MB, mp4)

Video 2. Rotating view of a cleared foxf2a mutant brain at 3 mpf with pdgfrβ (blue) and kdrl (red).

Download video file (6.4MB, mp4)

Similarly, cleared dissected brains at 11 mpf were imaged and showed similarly striking vascular defects (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Adult pericytes have a clear, oblong cell body with long, slender primary processes that extend from the cytoplasm and secondary processes that wrap around the circumference of the blood vessel (Figure 3J). These pericytes form a continuous network of processes to cover the blood vessels in the brain. In foxf2a 11 mpf brains, pericyte somas lose their oblong shape, and cell bodies cannot be easily distinguished from processes. Mutant cells also extend thickened linear processes, with no secondary processes encircling the vessels. Mutant pericytes do not form an extensive network with other neighbouring pericytes. We note that there is variable phenotypic penetrance in foxf2a adults at 3 mpf that is reflective of the incomplete penetrance in foxf2a embryos (Figure 3—figure supplement 2).

To view cellular morphology, we sectioned adult brains and immunolabeled pericytes and endothelium. In wild-type adult brains, we identified three subtypes of pericytes: ensheathing, mesh, and thin-strand, previously characterized in murine models (Berthiaume et al., 2018b; Figure 3—figure supplement 3). In comparing brain sections from both wild-type and foxf2a mutants, on smaller vessels, mutant pericytes exhibit more linear processes with barely distinguishable soma, markedly differing from the characteristic appearance of wild-type adult pericytes (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Similarly, pdgfrβ-expressing cells on large-calibre vessels (mural cells, likely vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs)) show alterations in morphology and coverage (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Although mutant embryos do not exhibit apparent abnormalities in their endothelium, large aneurysm-like structures are evident in the adult brain (Figure 3—figure supplement 5). These structures also appear to have decreased kdrl expression. Thus, both whole-mount and sectioned tissue show that brain vascular mural cell number and morphology are severely impacted in adult foxf2a-/- mutant brains, with increasing involvement of the endothelium, suggesting a worsening phenotype throughout life.

As foxf2a is expressed in vSMCs, we tested the effect of loss of foxf2a on vSMCs using confocal imaging of larvae and light sheet microscopy of cleared dissected 6 mpf adult wild-type and foxf2a mutant brains stained for transgenic endothelial (kdrl) and vSMC (acta2) markers. acta2-positive vSMCs are present on brain vessels around the Circle of Willis at embryonic (5 dpf) and larval (10 dpf) stages in both mutant and wild-type (Figure 4A and C). Furthermore, the number of vSMCs does not differ between mutant and wild-type (Figure 4B and D; Figure 4—source data 1). In adult brains, we find no significant difference in the total length of vSMCs in the brain, or in vSMC coverage (proportion of vessels covered by vSMCs) (n=3 of each genotype; Videos 3 and 4; Figure 4E–H). We note that at 6 mpf, there is a significant decrease in vessel network length, however (Figure 4G).

Figure 4. Loss of foxf2a has no impact on acta2-expressing brain vascular smooth muscle cells.

Figure 4.

(A) foxf2a+/++ and foxf2a-/- larvae at 5 dpf showing vSMC coverage in the brain using endothelial (red; Tg(kdrl:mCherry)) and vascular smooth muscle cell (vSMC) (light blue; Tg(acta2:GFP)) transgenic lines. (B) Scatter plot of total vSMCs at 5 dpf. (C) foxf2a+/++and foxf2a-/- larvae at 10 dpf showing vSMC coverage in the brain. (D) Scatter plot of total vSMCs at 10 dpf. (E) 3D projections of iDISCO-cleared immunostained whole wild-type and foxf2a-/- brains at 6 mpf, viewed ventrally. (F) Total vSMC length at 6 mpf using Imaris’ filament tool and machine learning. (G) Total vessel network length at 6 mpf Ilastic and Imaris’ filament tool and machine learning. (H) vSMC coverage per total blood vessel network length at 6 mpf. C=caudal, D=dorsal, R=rostral, V=ventral. Statistical analysis was conducted using unpaired t-tests. Scale bars, 20 µm (A, C), 200 μm (E).

Figure 4—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 4.

Video 3. Rotating view of a cleared wild-type brain at 6 mpf with acta2 (blue) and kdrl (red).

Download video file (17.8MB, mp4)

Video 4. Rotating view of a cleared foxf2a mutant brain at 6 mpf with acta2 (blue) and kdrl (red).

Download video file (27MB, mp4)

Morphological abnormalities emerge in the larval brain of mutants

Considering the altered pericyte morphology of adult mutants, we revisited developmental stages to identify when these abnormalities first arise. We analyzed morphology at 3 and 10 dpf using in vivo confocal imaging to understand defects in the cell body (soma) and processes (Figure 5A). We found no significant difference in the soma area at 3 dpf, but at 10 dpf, there is a significant increase in mutant pericyte soma area compared to wild-type (Figure 5B). In parallel, wild-type pericytes undergo a slight reduction in soma size from 3 to 10 dpf.

Figure 5. foxf2a mutant brain pericytes show increased soma size and process length.

Figure 5.

(A) Wild-type and foxf2a-/- mutant brain pericytes at 3 and 10 dpf with tracings of individual pericytes (indicated by arrows). (B) Brain pericyte soma area at 3 and 10 dpf. (C) Multispectral Zebrabow labelling reveals pericyte-process interactions in the larval brain. (arrows: pericyte interaction points). (D) Total process length per pericyte at 3 and 10 dpf. (E) Varying pericyte-pericyte interactions at 10 dpf (arrows: interaction points). (F) Number of each type of interaction at 10 dpf. (G) Length of overlap when process interaction occurs. Statistical analysis was conducted using multiple Mann-Whitney tests in B, a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test at 3 dpf and a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test at 10 dpf in D. Scale bars, 25 µm (A), 20 µm (C), 5 µm (E).

Figure 5—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 5.

The low number of brain pericytes in foxf2a mutants means that distinct pericyte processes can be distinguished and measured. However, in wild-types, pericyte processes are not easily distinguished. For accurate process length measurements in wild-type, we used multispectral labelling with a pericyte-specific Zebrabow transgenic line (pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:Zebrabow) (Pan et al., 2013; Whitesell et al., 2019). Cre mRNA was injected at the one-cell stage to activate random recombination, allowing us to visualize individual neighbouring pericytes (Figure 5C). Wild-type processes have a mean length of 81.3 µm vs 102.9 in the mutant at 3 dpf and 96.3 µm vs 147.6 in the mutant at 10 dpf (Figure 5D). Thus, the pericyte process lengths are significantly increased in foxf2a mutants at 3 and 10 dpf (Figure 5D).

Through the study of wild-type processes using multispectral labelling, we observed some differences in the behaviour of adjacent pericyte processes from that published in the adult mouse brain (Berthiaume et al., 2018a). While direct contact with no overlap between pericytes is the most common interaction in developing zebrafish, similar to mouse adult brain pericytes (Figure 5F), we also see some overlap (Figure 5E). The average overlap between wild-type pericyte processes at 10 dpf was 5.9 µm (Figure 5G). Together, our data show overlap in brain pericyte processes in wild-type animals.

To further explore mutant pericyte behaviour, we conducted serial imaging during larval development. Over time, some mutant pericyte processes form disconnected bead-like blebs with cell bodies that disappear over time (Figure 6A). This pericyte phenotype can occur on vessels with full patency and is not associated with endothelial regression. The bead-like remnants are highly prevalent during larval development in foxf2a-/- mutants but not present in wild-type (Figure 6B). To visualize process degeneration in real-time, we time-lapse imaged from 4 to 5 dpf (Figure 6C). The pericyte can undergo a process reminiscent of cell death with soma blebbing and process degeneration phenotypically resembling neural dendrite degeneration or pruning (Figure 6D).

Figure 6. foxf2a mutant pericytes degenerate.

Figure 6.

(A) foxf2a-/- mutant pericyte at 10 and 13 dpf with the degenerating process and cell body with a wild-type control from the same brain region (arrows: individual pericyte). (B) Bar graph with process blebbing phenotype penetrance in wild-type and mutant brains (n=total samples examined). (C) Time-lapse of a foxf2a-/- mutant midbrain from 4 to 5 dpf (arrows: individual pericyte). (D) Inset of mutant pericyte undergoing degeneration (arrows: blebbing). Scale bars, 20 µm (A, C).

Figure 6—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 6.

In summary, larval foxf2a mutant pericytes show reduced numbers, increased soma size, and elongated processes with evidence of process degeneration. In addition, we make the novel observation of overlapping pericyte processes during zebrafish development.

Foxf2a mutants do not have an impaired capacity to repopulate brain pericytes

Zebrafish have regenerative capacity in various tissues (Becker et al., 1997; Lepilina et al., 2006; Otteson and Hitchcock, 2003), yet foxf2a mutant embryos that are pericyte-deficient maintain strong brain pericyte defects through aging, which suggests that either they may not be able to replenish absent/damaged pericytes, or that the smaller size of the initial pool in embryogenesis limits repair such that numbers never can catch up to wild-type. To differentiate these hypotheses, we tested whether foxf2a mutants lack the capacity to regenerate pericytes. We reduced pericyte numbers in a foxf2a heterozygous incross using a cell ablation strategy. Zebrafish expressing pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:NTR-mCherry, and flk:GFP transgenes were treated with 5 mM metronidazole (MTZ) at 50 hpf for 1 hr which ablates most pericytes. MTZ is a prodrug substrate that elicits cell death in nitroreductase (NTR)-expressing cells due to its cytotoxic derivatives. We then imaged and counted brain pericytes at 3 dpf (a day after treatment) and 10 dpf (recovery).

At 3 dpf, in the vehicle (DMSO) control group, there is the expected significant difference between wild-type and mutant pericyte numbers (Figure 7A and B; Figure 7—source data 1). When treated with metronidazole, both mutants and wild-types both have a similar, severe reduction in pericytes at 3 dpf post-ablation and are not significantly different from each other (Figure 7B). By 10 dpf, pericytes are partially repopulated in both wild-type and mutant ablated groups (Figure 7C). Surprisingly, given the initial pericyte number defects in foxf2a mutant embryos, we find no significant difference between any groups (Figure 7D; mean 70 in wild-type DMSO treated, 53 in mutant DMSO treated, 43 in wild-type MTZ treated, 33 in mutant MTZ treated). This shows that foxf2a mutants retain their ability to repopulate pericytes following ablation. This data is important to distinguish the timing and mechanism of pericyte reduction in foxf2a mutants. While foxf2a mutant pericytes can regenerate following induced catastrophic loss, it cannot compensate for the initially smaller pool of pericytes during embryogenesis. This data suggests that foxf2a plays a critical role in the establishment of a properly sized initial pericyte pool during early development. Regeneration mechanisms, although intact, cannot fully compensate for this initial reduction in pericytes.

Figure 7. foxf2a mutants regenerate brain pericytes normally after genetic ablation.

Figure 7.

Zebrafish brains were imaged using endothelial (red; Tg(kdrl:GFP)) and pericyte (light blue; Tg(pdgfrβ:Gal4, UAS:NTR-mCherry)) transgenic lines. (A) Wild-type and mutant brains at 3 dpf in control (DMSO) and treated (MTZ) groups. (B) Total brain pericytes at 3 dpf. (C) Wild-type and mutant brains at 10 dpf. (D) Total brain pericytes at 10 dpf. Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way ANOVA (B) or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (D). Scale bars, 50 μm (A, C).

Figure 7—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 7.

Discussion

Our reduced dosage model of Foxf2 demonstrates disease processes at the cellular level in intact animals, giving insight into pathological changes that occur during CSVD that have not been observed in other models or humans. Our data supports a developmental origin for this type of CSVD, which then progresses and evolves across the lifespan (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Model of foxf2a mutant brain pericyte defects over the lifespan.

Figure 8.

Wild-type pericytes develop normally in the embryo and establish extensive, continuous coverage over vessels by adulthood. foxf2a mutant pericytes exhibit abnormal morphology during development that worsens over the lifespan, with mutant vessels developing atypical morphology and discontinuous coverage.

Dosage sensitivity of Foxf2

The logic for using a reduced dosage of Foxf2 in our studies is to better match the effect of common population variants leading to CSVD. We previously modelled the effect of a high-risk CSVD and stroke-associated SNV on the expression of FOXF2 in human cells, showing that it can reduce expression by ~50% (Ryu et al., 2022). Since zebrafish have two FOXF2 orthologs (foxf2a and foxf2b), foxf2a homozygotes have equivalent FOXF2 dosage as human heterozygotes, assuming that foxf2a and foxf2b not only exhibit similar expression but also share similar functions. Foxf2 is a dosage-sensitive gene, as zebrafish foxf2a heterozygotes show a significant reduction in brain pericytes. Similarly, mouse Foxf2 is also dosage sensitive (Reyahi et al., 2015). We find that foxf2a mutants are variably penetrant, while foxf2a;foxf2b double mutants are fully penetrant. Genetic compensation is common with gene duplication (Kok et al., 2015; Rouf et al., 2023) and would explain variability in disease phenotypes in different individuals with the same mutation.

Impaired embryonic pericyte coverage in Foxf2 deficiency

We show that numbers of brain pericytes are reduced at multiple developmental and adult stages when foxf2a and/or foxf2a;foxf2b are lost. The deficiency is significant at every stage, including 3 dpf, the earliest time point that pericytes are robustly observed in development. Deficient numbers could be due to a reduction in the pericyte precursor population (i.e. nkx3.1 positive cells Ahuja et al., 2024), or to an inability of foxf2a-deficient cells to differentiate into pdgfrβ-positive pericytes. Our data does not allow us to distinguish these, although pdgfrβ expression in foxf2a mutants is transcriptionally unchanged, suggesting that pericyte number in early development is the primary phenotype. Additional evidence for pericytes being the primary cells affected is that there is no difference in total vessel network length or hindbrain CtA diameter at 3 dpf in foxf2a heterozygotes or mutants when pericyte numbers are reduced. A reduction in pericytes is expected to have early consequences, as pericytes provide signals to the endothelium for quiescence and arterial-venous identity (Mäe et al., 2021 #1750), as well as allowing contractility of cerebral blood vessels in early development (Bahrami and Childs, 2020). Fewer pericytes distributed on a normal-sized endothelial network length result in reduced vessel coverage. It is intriguing, therefore, that pericyte process length is increased at both 3 and 10 dpf, potentially to compensate for low pericyte density. A similar elongated pericyte phenotype and reduced coverage is seen in mice with constitutive Pdgfβret knockout (Mäe et al., 2021). The convergent phenotypes after manipulation of two genes (foxf2a in fish and Pdgfβ ret in mice) that reduce pericyte number suggest that the intrinsic pericyte response to depletion of pericyte density is to elongate, perhaps to attempt to cover ‘naked’ vessels. We note that previous mouse Foxf2 knockouts using a conditional Wnt1-Cre driver saw contrasting results to ours, with increased pericyte numbers, although a similar loss of vascular stability is seen in both models (Reyahi et al., 2015). The reason for the difference in the direction in pericyte number may be experimental due to the different knockout technique (conditional in mice which only removes neural crest-derived pericytes vs. full knockout which removes mesodermal, neural crest-derived and endothelial foxf2a in fish), or the difference could reflect a species-specific difference.

Insights on fundamental pericyte process properties

The reasons behind the hypergrowth of pericyte processes in foxf2a-/- mutant brains is unclear. Berthiaume et al. (Berthiaume et al., 2018b) propose that repulsive interactions among pericytes in the adult brain establish boundaries between adjacent pericytes, preventing their processes from overlapping. In this case, one might hypothesize that foxf2a mutant pericytes, which are less dense along vessels, would lack feedback from adjacent pericytes, leading to uncontrolled growth.

In mice, adult brain pericytes form a non-overlapping network along capillaries, although their processes occasionally approach each other without overlapping (Berthiaume et al., 2018a; Hill et al., 2015). Overlap between pericyte processes have not been well studied in the developing brain, but pdgfrb+ve cells in developing zebrafish fin also overlap (Leonard et al., 2022). Strikingly, using multispectral (Zebrabow) labeling, we find processes overlap in the developing zebrafish brain. Overlaps occur on capillary segments and at branch points. Previous studies in mice were conducted in the adult brain, and it is possible that overlapping processes in the developing brain are transient, zebrafish-specific, or were potentially overlooked in the mouse experiments.

We have also observed forked extensions at the tips of some pericyte projections at 10 dpf in wild-type embryos, where pericytes are not in contact. Whether these unique structures are involved in attractive/repulsive signals between pericytes or help determine the direction and extent of process growth is unclear, but understanding the fundamental mechanisms governing pericyte-pericyte process interactions would yield valuable insights into development and disease, as well as into how pericyte depletion results in abnormally long processes.

Morphological abnormalities in pericyte soma in foxf2a mutants

A second morphological abnormality of foxf2a-deficient pericytes is that their soma size is increased at 10 dpf, which may also be a compensatory change. Pathological changes in soma size have not been observed in brain pericytes. However, increased neuronal soma size is observed in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or Lhermitte-Duclos (Dukkipati et al., 2018; Kwon et al., 2001) and is linked to mTor signaling (Kwon et al., 2001). In neuronal populations, moderate soma swelling can be an adaptation for survival, while rapid, drastic swelling indicates imminent death (Rousseau et al., 1999). It is, therefore, not surprising that we observe degeneration of pre-existing pericytes in foxf2a mutant but not wild-type animals. This degeneration phenotypically resembles neuronal dendrite remodelling and pruning during development (Fukui et al., 2012; Greenwood et al., 2007). Further work to test whether pericytes share similar mechanisms of degeneration in response to stress or cellular damage may provide further insight into phenotypic progression.

Changes in foxf2a mutants across the lifespan

For the first time, we have examined how vascular phenotypes change in the adult brain using iDISCO clearing. We find that adult soma take on very unusual, ‘stiff’ shapes and become almost indistinguishable from processes. The adult processes are shorter and more linear than the embryonic processes. Hypertrophic embryonic pericytes either do not survive to adulthood or undergo morphological changes over time. Given the limited knowledge in this area, the underlying factors driving this shift in pericyte morphology are unclear. Actin is present near the plasma membrane of cells, where it provides structural and mechanical support, enabling motility and determining cell structure. Given the abnormal shapes of adult pericytes, alterations in actin may contribute to their irregular morphology.

In the adult foxf2a mutant brain, abnormal pdgfrβ-expressing cells are observed on large-calibre vessels and likely represent vSMCs. We observed large-calibre aneurysm-like vessels, suggesting that vSMCs may lose functionality over time, thereby increasing the vulnerability of underlying vessels to dilation and weakening. Loss of acta2 and, subsequently, vSMCs has been associated with conditions, such as thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (Guo et al., 2009). However, we found no significant change in either vSMC cell number in embryonic development or in network length of vSMCs in the adult brain, suggesting that the primary phenotype in foxf2a mutants is in pericyte cells and that any changes to vSMCs are likely secondary.

Similarly, brain vessel diameter and network length are not significantly altered in embryonic foxf2 mutants, but in 6-month-old adults, the vessel network length is significantly decreased. Our data suggest that foxf2 deficiency contributes to cumulative vascular defects. Adult endothelial defects may be secondary to pericyte defects, although foxf2a is expressed in both pericytes and endothelial cells, and both cell types may be affected autonomously.

The initial pericyte pool is critical for lifelong vascular health

To understand the mechanism by which foxf2a influences pericyte numbers, we needed to distinguish between its role in early development and later roles. Our lab recently demonstrated that pericyte precursors express nkx3.1 and foxf2a before pericyte differentiation and prior to expression of canonical markers, such as pdgfrβ (Ahuja et al., 2024). Here, we show that the pericyte pool in foxf2a mutants is reduced at the earliest embryonic stage that it can be measured. Zebrafish are remarkably regenerative and able to repair cardiac, retinal, spinal cord, and pancreatic damage among other tissues (Poss and Tanaka, 2024). We, therefore, anticipated that foxf2a mutants might be able to regenerate new pericytes to replace lost pericytes. This was tested using genetic ablation of pericytes. Ablation is very efficient in mutants and wild-type. Surprisingly, 7 days after ablation, foxf2a mutants show recovery of pericyte numbers. Thus, when placed under extreme stress, embryonic foxf2a mutants can regenerate pericytes; yet, under baseline conditions, foxf2a mutant pericytes do not replenish. This experiment is important to distinguish an underlying mechanism of the foxf2a pericyte phenotype. Our data suggest that the earliest and most important difference in foxf2a mutant pericytes is their low initial number. Even though some repair is possible, it is not enough to compensate. Reduced pericyte density is associated with elongated processes, enlarged soma, and degeneration in mutants, which are likely signs of cellular stress. Over a lifetime, the deficiency leads to progressive damage to the vascular network. Determining that there is a critical embryonic window for developing a robust pericyte precursor pool helps us focus on early interventions to mitigate these deficits before damage over the lifespan worsens. The necessity of Foxf2 during development for the establishment of proper brain vasculature was also seen in a mouse Foxf2 knockout (Reyahi et al., 2015). Further research into the early role of foxf2a in establishing initial pericyte specification/differentiation, and the impact of early vascular defects on disease progression, will be crucial for developing strategies to prevent and treat cerebrovascular conditions.

Materials and methods

Zebrafish husbandry and strains

All procedures were conducted in compliance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and ethics approval was granted by the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee (AC21-0169). Embryos were maintained in E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, pH = 7.2) (Westerfield, 1995) at 28 °C. Larvae up to 10 dpf were maintained in an incubator with a light cycle (14 hr light, 10 hr darkness), with daily water changes and feeding. As zebrafish sex is not determined until 28 dpf, sex is not considered in embryo and larval experiments. For adult experiments, results were compared by sex where sufficient n’s were available. Results from the progeny of het in-crosses were blinded in that they were quantified before genotyping. All reagents and strains are listed in Key resources table. All experiments included wild-type as a comparison group, and developmental stages, n’s, and genotypes are noted for each experiment source data table for each figure.

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) foxf2aca71 Ryu et al., 2022 ZDB-ALT-230214–10
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) foxf2bca22 Chauhan et al., 2016 ZDB-ALT-160809–1
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) Tg(acta2:GFP)ca7 Whitesell et al., 2014 ZDB-ALT-120508–1
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) Tg(4xUAS:Zebrabow-B)a133 Pan et al., 2013 ZFIN: ZDB-ALT-130816–3
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) Tg(flk:GFP)la116 Choi et al., 2007 ZDB-TGCONSTRCT-070529–1
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) Tg(kdrl:mCherry)ci5 Proulx et al., 2010 ZFIN: ZDB-ALT-110131–57
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) Tg(UAS:NTR-mCherry)c264 Davison et al., 2007 ZDB-ALT-070316–1
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) TgBAC(4xUAS:EGFP)mpn100Tg DeMaria et al., 2013 ZFIN: ZDB-TGCONSTRCT-140812–1
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) TgBAC(pdgfrβ:GAL4FF)ca42 Whitesell et al., 2019 ZFIN: ZDB-ALT-200102–2
Strain, strain background (D. rerio) TgBAC(pdgfrβ:EGFP)ca41Tg Whitesell et al., 2019 ZDB-TGCONSTRCT-160609–1
Antibody anti mCherry, rat monoclonal Thermo Fisher, M11217 RRID:AB_2536611 1 in 500
Antibody anti Green Fluorescent Protein, mouse monoclonal Clontech, 3 P 632380 RRID:AB_10013427 1 in 500
Antibody Donkey anti mouse 488 Thermo Fisher, A-21202 RRID:AB_141607 1 in 500
Antibody Goat anti rat 555 Thermo Fisher, A-21434 RRID:AB_2535855 1 in 500
Commercial assay or kit Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium with DAPI Invitrogen E141201
Commercial assay or kit Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium Thermo Fisher 00-4958-02
Commercial assay or kit Taqman SNP genotyping kit for foxf2bca22 Applied Biosystems ANAACEC
Commercial assay or kit KAPA2G Fast Hotstart Genotyping Mix Roche KK5621
Chemical compound, drug Dimethylsulfoxide Sigma D8418
Chemical compound, drug Phenylthiourea Sigma P7629
Chemical compound, drug UltraPure Agarose Invitrogen 16520–050
Chemical compound, drug Metronidazole Sigma M3761
Software, algorithm Imaris 10.3 Oxford Instruments RRID:SCR_007370
Software, algorithm Ilastic https://www.ilastik.org/ RRID:SCR_015246
software, algorithm Fiji (ImageJ) Schindelin et al., 2012 RRID:SCR_002285
Software, algorithm GraphPad Prism 10 Graphpad RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithm Adobe Photoshop Adobe RRID:SCR_014199
Software, algorithm VesselMetrics McGarry et al., 2024 Microvasc Res, 2024
Commercial assay or kit HCR Probe (v3.0) ndu4al2a Molecular Instruments
Commercial assay or kit HCR Probe (v3.0) kdrla Molecular Instruments
Commercial assay or kit HCR Probe (v3.0) pdgfrβ Molecular Instruments
Commercial assay or kit HCR Probe (v3.0) foxf2a Molecular Instruments
Commercial assay or kit HCR Probe (v3.0) foxf2b Molecular Instruments
Sequence-based reagent foxf2a-genotyping-forward IDT ATG CAC TCG GCT CTC CAA AA
Sequence-based reagent foxf2a-genotyping-reverse IDT GAT CGC CAT GAC TAT CGG GG

Genotyping

Adult fish were anesthetized in 0.4% Tricaine (Sigma) and placed on a cutting surface. A small portion of the tip of the fin was clipped using a razor blade, and the fish were returned to the system to recover. For developmental DNA isolation, whole embryos, or larvae (up to 10 dpf) were anesthetized in 0.4% Tricaine prior to sampling.

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the HotSHOT DNA isolation protocol, adapted from Meeker et al., 2007. To isolate gDNA, tissue or embryo was placed in 50 μL of Base Solution and incubated at 95 °C for 30 min. 5 μL of Neutralization Solution was added to neutralize the reaction. Samples were spun down in a mini centrifuge, and DNA was sampled from the top portion of the solution to avoid undigested samples.

Zebrafish were genotyped for target genes or the presence of transgenes using the KAPA2G Fast HotStart Genotyping Mix as per the manufacturer’s instructions. foxf2 mutants were genotyped using foxf2a primers (Key resources table). A custom TaqMan probe for foxf2bca22 (ANAACEC) was obtained from Applied Biosystems. Samples were genotyped using the QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with the wild-type allele reported in FAM and the mutant allele reported in VIC.

In situ hybridization

Custom probes for foxf2a (PRD069), nduf4al2 (RTD146), kdrl (PRI089), pdgfrβ (PRA654), and foxf2b (PRF462) were obtained from Molecular Instruments (Los Angeles, CA) for Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) in situ hybridization. In situ staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were permeabilized with proteinase K (1 mg/mL stock; Invitrogen, 4333793) at various times and concentrations, depending on their age.

Integrated intensity

pdgfrβ and foxf2b intensity was obtained using ImageJ from in-situ stained embryos at 3 dpf. Mean fluorescent intensity was measured using the freehand selection tool to circle each pericyte. The background mean intensity was subtracted from the pericyte mean intensity to standardize each measurement, and the intensities of each fish were averaged. The same protocol was used to measure the intensity of the pdgfrβ transgene in 3 dpf live embryos.

Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using the Research RNA Clean & Concentrator-5 Kit (Zymo Research, R1015) with some modifications. 50 dechorionated embryos were collected at 48 hpf and homogenized in TRIZOL (Ambion, 15596026) reagent with a syringe needle. Briefly, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 2 min to remove pigment. After separating the solution from the precipitate, chloroform was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The aqueous layer containing nucleic acids was removed, and an equal volume of 95–100% ethanol was added, then mixed well. The rest of the protocol followed the manufacturer’s instructions using the Zymo-spin IC column. After eluting RNA with RNase/DNase-free water, samples were quantified using a Nanodrop to evaluate RNA quality. For cDNA synthesis, qSCRIPT cDNA Supermix (QuantaBio, 95048–100) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at –20 °C.

RT-qPCR

To assess relative gene expression, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was carried out using custom-designed primers. PowerUP SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, A25742) was utilized on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Cycle conditions followed the protocol of a PowerUP SYBR Green standard reaction: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 60 s. To calculate the fold change in gene expression, mutants were compared to wild-type using ΔΔCT calculations (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Brain dissection

Zebrafish were first euthanized in Tricaine and mounted on a Sylgard gel plate with dissection pins to stabilize them. Scissors were used to sever the brain stem entirely at the base of the head, posterior to the hindbrain. The eyes were removed with forceps/micro-scissors, and the optic stalks were cut. An incision was then made at the posterior portion of the skull plate anteriorly. Forceps were used to pull back the skull plate and orbital bones. Any nerve connections were severed, and the brains were removed and immediately fixed in ice-cold 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C.

Brain tissue clearing

Whole zebrafish brains were cleared by either CUBIC (Susaki et al., 2015), or a modified iDISCO+ (Renier et al., 2016) protocol. For CUBIC, samples were incubated in a 1:1 ratio of Reagent 1 (25% Quadrol (Sigma, 122262), 25% Urea, and 15% Triton X-100):H2O overnight at 37 °C. Next, brains were incubated in 100% Reagent 1 at 37 °C until the tissue was transparent. Finally, brains were rinsed in PBS, mounted in 2% low melting point agarose and re-placed in 100% Reagent 1 at 37 °C until the tissue was transparent.

For iDISCO, the samples were first dehydrated in methanol:H2O dilution series for 30 min each, then chilled at 4 °C. Next, samples were incubated overnight in a 1:3 ratio of dichloromethane (DCM; Sigma, 270997):methanol at room temperature. The following day, samples were washed in methanol and then chilled at 4 °C before bleaching in fresh 5% H2O2 in methanol overnight at 4 °C. Then, samples were rehydrated in methanol:H2O dilution series for 30 min each, then washed in PTx.2 (0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) twice over 2 hr at room temperature. Next, samples were incubated in permeabilization solution (0.3 M glycine, 20% DMSO in 400 mL PTx.2) at 37 °C for up to two days, after which the samples were rinsed in PBS twice over 1 hr. Samples were then washed three times over 2 hr in 0.5 mM SDS/PBS at 37 °C for three days before being incubated in primary antibody (Key resources table) in 0.5 mM SDS/PBS at 37 °C for two more days. The primary antibodies were refreshed in PTx.2 and left for another 4 days before overnight washing in PTwH (10 μg/ml heparin and 0.2% Tween-20 in PBS) at 37 °C. Samples were left in secondary antibodies (Key resources table) in PTwH/3% NSS at 37 °C for 3 days, refreshed and left for another 3 days before washing overnight in PTwH. After immunolabeling, brains were mounted in 2% low melting agarose (LMA) and dehydrated in methanol:H2O dilution series for 30 min each and left overnight at room temperature. Next, brains were incubated in a 1:3 ratio of DCM: methanol at room temperature for 3 hr before washing in 100% DCM for 15 min twice. Finally, brains were incubated in ethyl cinnamate (Sigma, NSC6773) for 2 hr before replacing the solution and incubating overnight at room temperature.

Tissue sectioning

For vibratome sections, brains were fixed in 4% PFA, washed, and mounted in 4% LMA (Invitrogen, 16520–050) before sectioning with a vibratome (Leica, VT1000S) to obtain a series of transverse sections at 50 µm.

Cre mRNA injections

Wild-type fish on a Zebrabow transgenic background (Pan et al., 2013) were injected with 1 pg of Cre mRNA at the one-cell stage. Embryos were kept in E3 at 28 °C until imaging.

Immunofluorescence

Sections for immunofluorescence were briefly washed in PBS, followed by 2% Triton X-100 in PBS for permeabilization. Sections were moved from the permeabilization solution into blocking buffer (5% goat serum, 3% BSA, 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 hr before incubation in primary antibody. Sections were then washed and left in secondary antibodies for 3 hr at room temperature. After incubation, sections were washed, mounted, and cover-slipped with Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium, with DAPI or without counterstain.

Drug treatments

Embryos were dechorionated prior to treatment, and all drug treatments included DMSO at an equivalent concentration to the drug solution as a control (Sigma, D8418). Treatments were performed in a 24-well plate with approximately 15 embryos per well. For pericyte ablation experiments, 5 mM Metronidazole (MTZ; Sigma, M3761) was applied at 50 hpf for 1 hr with a DMSO control.

Microscopy

Imaging fluorescent transgene expression in live embryos, antibody staining, and fluorescent staining were completed using an inverted laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM900; Zeiss) with a 10 X (0.25 NA), 20 X (0.8 NA), 40 X water (1.1 NA), or 60 X (1.4 NA) oil objectives. Laser wavelengths included blue (405 nm), green (488 nm), red (561 nm), and far red (640 nm). Embryos were maintained in phenylthiourea (PTU) from 24 hpf onwards to prevent pigment development, anesthetized in 0.4% tricaine and mounted in 0.8% LMA dissolved in E3, on a clear imaging dish. In some cases, live samples were retrieved from the agarose following imaging for further imaging at later time points, genotyping, or other data collection. Images were processed using Zen Blue and Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012) software.

Imaging of whole adult brains was completed using the Light-sheet microscope (Ultramicroscope II equipped with a SuperPlan module; Miltenyi Biotec) with a 4 X (0.35 NA) objective at 1.0 zoom. Laser wavelengths included green (488 nm) and red (561 nm). Images were processed using Zen Blue, Fiji, and Imaris software.

Vessel network quantitation

Confocal images from embryos were analyzed using the Python-based software tool Vessel Metrics (McGarry et al., 2024). The total vessel network length was measured starting from below the middle cerebral vein and dorsal longitudinal vein until the emergence of the basal communicating artery. Vessels included in measurements are as follows: middle mesencephalic central arteries, posterior mesencephalic central arteries, the primordial hindbrain channels, and the posterior region of the basilar artery. The forebrain vessels (i.e. anterior cerebral veins) were not included. Blood vessel diameter was restricted to the horizontal hindbrain central arteries, which were comparable between all images.

Adult vessel network length was measured using Ilastik (Berg et al., 2019) and Imaris (version 10.2.0; Bitplane AG, Oxford Instruments) software. Vessels were annotated in Ilastik to obtain a probability map. The probability map was imported into Imaris as a new channel for each image. The surface tool with machine learning was then used to annotate the vessels a second time, using the Ilastik map as the training guide. A mask was created from this surface. The filament tool was then used to create a 3D network of the vessel, using the surface mask as a training guide. The total network length and the diameter of each vessel segment were exported from the filament statistics tab.

Smooth muscle cell coverage was measured using the same pipeline; however, the raw channel was used for the surface tool annotation without using Ilastik. Total network length was exported from the filament statistics tab.

Pericyte quantitation

Embryonic pericytes were manually counted using the Fiji counting or tracing tool on flattened Z-stacks from confocal images of the whole zebrafish head. Pericyte counting and analysis were restricted to the mid and hindbrain regions for all metrics. For pericyte process lengths, individual processes extending from a single soma were measured and summed to determine the total process length per pericyte (µm). In instances where two processes appeared to merge or cover the same blood vessel, half of the total length was added to each pericyte. For Zebrabow images, only pericytes with processes distinguishable from neighbouring pericytes were measured. For soma size, individual cell bodies were traced, and the area was determined by the software in µm2.

Adult pericytes were counted using the spot tool in Imaris. Using the raw channel, the spot tool was trained to identify pericyte cell bodies. The total spot number, equivalent to the number of pericyte cell bodies, was exported from the spot statistics tab. A mask of the spot tool was created to better visualize pericytes.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10, with significance determined by p<0.05. Statistical tests conducted are included in figure captions. If no significance is indicated, it is not significant. The D’Agostino-Pearson test was used to assess the normality of data sets, and in cases where the data did not pass the normality test, non-parametric statistics were used. Experimental N’s are reported in source data accompanying each figure. Results are expressed on graphs as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Only significant p-values are indicated.

Materials availability

All materials used in this study are freely available on request.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research PJT-183631. MFG received a Canada Graduate Scholarship Master’s from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Alberta Graduate Excellence Scholarship (AGES) for Master’s Research from the Province of Alberta, and a Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department scholarship from the University of Calgary. EH received the Alvin Libin Graduate Scholarship in Cardiovascular Research, the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI) Graduate Scholarship for Master’s Research, the ACHRI Graduate Scholarship for Doctoral Research, and the Alberta Graduate Excellence Scholarship (AGES) for Doctoral Research from the Province of Alberta. We acknowledge the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute and Hotchkiss Brain Institute Imaging facilities for microscopes and technical support.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Sarah J Childs, Email: schilds@ucalgary.ca.

Stefania Nicoli, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.

Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grant:

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research PJT-183631 to Sarah J Childs.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Software, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations CCAC guidelines: Zebrafish and other small, warm-water laboratory fish from the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All animals were handled according to the approved institutional University of Calgary Animal Care Committee (AC21-0169).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

Numerical data for all experiments is included for each figure.

References

  1. Ahuja S, Adjekukor C, Li Q, Kocha KM, Rosin N, Labit E, Sinha S, Narang A, Long Q, Biernaskie J, Huang P, Childs SJ. The development of brain pericytes requires expression of the transcription factor nkx3.1 in intermediate precursors. PLOS Biology. 2024;22:e3002590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold CR, Lamont RE, Walker JT, Spice PJ, Chan C-K, Ho C-Y, Childs SJ. Comparative analysis of genes regulated by Dzip1/iguana and hedgehog in zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics. 2015;244:211–223. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahrami N, Childs SJ. Development of vascular regulation in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 2020;147:dev183061. doi: 10.1242/dev.183061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker T, Wullimann MF, Becker CG, Bernhardt RR, Schachner M. Axonal regrowth after spinal cord transection in adult zebrafish. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1997;377:577–595. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970127)377:4&#x0003c;577::aid-cne8&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell RD, Winkler EA, Sagare AP, Singh I, LaRue B, Deane R, Zlokovic BV. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron. 2010;68:409–427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg S, Kutra D, Kroeger T, Straehle CN, Kausler BX, Haubold C, Schiegg M, Ales J, Beier T, Rudy M, Eren K, Cervantes JI, Xu B, Beuttenmueller F, Wolny A, Zhang C, Koethe U, Hamprecht FA, Kreshuk A. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nature Methods. 2019;16:1226–1232. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berthiaume AA, Grant RI, McDowell KP, Underly RG, Hartmann DA, Levy M, Bhat NR, Shih AY. Dynamic remodeling of pericytes in vivo maintains capillary coverage in the adult mouse brain. Cell Reports. 2018a;22:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berthiaume AA, Hartmann DA, Majesky MW, Bhat NR, Shih AY. Pericyte structural remodeling in cerebrovascular health and homeostasis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2018b;10:210. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chauhan G, Arnold CR, Chu AY, Fornage M, Reyahi A, Bis JC, Havulinna AS, Sargurupremraj M, Smith AV, Adams HHH, Choi SH, Pulit SL, Trompet S, Garcia ME, Manichaikul A, Teumer A, Gustafsson S, Bartz TM, Bellenguez C, Vidal JS, Jian X, Kjartansson O, Wiggins KL, Satizabal CL, Xue F, Ripatti S, Liu Y, Deelen J, den Hoed M, Bevan S, Hopewell JC, Malik R, Heckbert SR, Rice K, Smith NL, Levi C, Sharma P, Sudlow CL, Nik AM, Cole JW, Schmidt R, Meschia J, Thijs V, Lindgren A, Melander O, Grewal RP, Sacco RL, Rundek T, Rothwell PM, Arnett DK, Jern C, Johnson JA, Benavente OR, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Lee JM, Wong Q, Aparicio HJ, Engelter ST, Kloss M, Leys D, Pezzini A, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Berr C, Dartigues JF, Hamsten A, Magnusson PK, Traylor M, Pedersen NL, Lannfelt L, Lindgren L, Lindgren CM, Morris AP, Jimenez-Conde J, Montaner J, Radmanesh F, Slowik A, Woo D, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Portegies MLP, Uitterlinden AG, de Craen AJM, Ford I, Jukema JW, Stott DJ, Allen NB, Sale MM, Johnson AD, Bennett DA, De Jager PL, White CC, Grabe HJ, Markus MRP, Schminke U, Boncoraglio GB, Clarke R, Kamatani Y, Dallongeville J, Lopez OL, Rotter JI, Nalls MA, Gottesman RF, Griswold ME, Knopman DS, Windham BG, Beiser A, Markus HS, Vartiainen E, French CR, Dichgans M, Pastinen T, Lathrop M, Gudnason V, Kurth T, Psaty BM, Harris TB, Rich SS, deStefano AL, Schmidt CO, Worrall BB, Rosand J, Salomaa V, Mosley TH, Ingelsson E, van Duijn CM, Tzourio C, Rexrode KM, Lehmann OJ, Launer LJ, Ikram MA, Carlsson P, Chasman DI, Childs SJ, Longstreth WT, Seshadri S, Debette S. Identification of additional risk loci for stroke and small vessel disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. The Lancet Neurology. 2016;15:695–707. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00102-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen S, Francioli LC, Goodrich JK, Collins RL, Kanai M, Wang Q, Alföldi J, Watts NA, Vittal C, Gauthier LD, Poterba T, Wilson MW, Tarasova Y, Phu W, Grant R, Yohannes MT, Koenig Z, Farjoun Y, Banks E, Donnelly S, Gabriel S, Gupta N, Ferriera S, Tolonen C, Novod S, Bergelson L, Roazen D, Ruano-Rubio V, Covarrubias M, Llanwarne C, Petrillo N, Wade G, Jeandet T, Munshi R, Tibbetts K, Abreu M, Aguilar Salinas CA, Ahmad T, Albert CM, Ardissino D, Armean IM, Atkinson EG, Atzmon G, Barnard J, Baxter SM, Beaugerie L, Benjamin EJ, Benjamin D, Boehnke M, Bonnycastle LL, Bottinger EP, Bowden DW, Bown MJ, Brand H, Brant S, Brookings T, Bryant S, Calvo SE, Campos H, Chambers JC, Chan JC, Chao KR, Chapman S, Chasman DI, Chisholm R, Cho J, Chowdhury R, Chung MK, Chung WK, Cibulskis K, Cohen B, Connolly KM, Correa A, Cummings BB, Dabelea D, Danesh J, Darbar D, Darnowsky P, Denny J, Duggirala R, Dupuis J, Ellinor PT, Elosua R, Emery J, England E, Erdmann J, Esko T, Evangelista E, Fatkin D, Florez J, Franke A, Fu J, Färkkilä M, Garimella K, Gentry J, Getz G, Glahn DC, Glaser B, Glatt SJ, Goldstein D, Gonzalez C, Groop L, Gudmundsson S, Haessly A, Haiman C, Hall I, Hanis CL, Harms M, Hiltunen M, Holi MM, Hultman CM, Jalas C, Kallela M, Kaplan D, Kaprio J, Kathiresan S, Kenny EE, Kim BJ, Kim YJ, King D, Kirov G, Kooner J, Koskinen S, Krumholz HM, Kugathasan S, Kwak SH, Laakso M, Lake N, Langsford T, Laricchia KM, Lehtimäki T, Lek M, Lipscomb E, Loos RJF, Lu W, Lubitz SA, Luna TT, Ma RCW, Marcus GM, Marrugat J, Mattila KM, McCarroll S, McCarthy MI, McCauley JL, McGovern D, McPherson R, Meigs JB, Melander O, Metspalu A, Meyers D, Minikel EV, Mitchell BD, Mootha VK, Naheed A, Nazarian S, Nilsson PM, O’Donovan MC, Okada Y, Ongur D, Orozco L, Owen MJ, Palmer C, Palmer ND, Palotie A, Park KS, Pato C, Pulver AE, Rader D, Rahman N, Reiner A, Remes AM, Rhodes D, Rich S, Rioux JD, Ripatti S, Roden DM, Rotter JI, Sahakian N, Saleheen D, Salomaa V, Saltzman A, Samani NJ, Samocha KE, Sanchis-Juan A, Scharf J, Schleicher M, Schunkert H, Schönherr S, Seaby EG, Shah SH, Shand M, Sharpe T, Shoemaker MB, Shyong T, Silverman EK, Singer-Berk M, Sklar P, Smith JT, Smith JG, Soininen H, Sokol H, Son RG, Soto J, Spector T, Stevens C, Stitziel NO, Sullivan PF, Suvisaari J, Tai ES, Taylor KD, Teo YY, Tsuang M, Tuomi T, Turner D, Tusie-Luna T, Vartiainen E, Vawter M, Wang L, Wang A, Ware JS, Watkins H, Weersma RK, Weisburd B, Wessman M, Whiffin N, Wilson JG, Xavier RJ, O’Donnell-Luria A, Solomonson M, Seed C, Martin AR, Talkowski ME, Rehm HL, Daly MJ, Tiao G, Neale BM, MacArthur DG, Karczewski KJ, Genome Aggregation Database Consortium A genomic mutational constraint map using variation in 76,156 human genomes. Nature. 2024;625:92–100. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06045-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi J, Dong L, Ahn J, Dao D, Hammerschmidt M, Chen JN. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Developmental Biology. 2007;304:735–744. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA, Barres BA. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature. 2010;468:562–566. doi: 10.1038/nature09513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dave JM, Mirabella T, Weatherbee SD, Greif DM. Pericyte ALK5/TIMP3 axis contributes to endothelial morphogenesis in the developing brain. Developmental Cell. 2018;44:665–678. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davison JM, Akitake CM, Goll MG, Rhee JM, Gosse N, Baier H, Halpern ME, Leach SD, Parsons MJ. Transactivation from Gal4-VP16 transgenic insertions for tissue-specific cell labeling and ablation in zebrafish. Developmental Biology. 2007;304:811–824. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DeMaria S, Berke AP, Van Name E, Heravian A, Ferreira T, Ngai J. Role of a ubiquitously expressed receptor in the vertebrate olfactory system. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2013;33:15235–15247. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2339-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding R, Hase Y, Ameen-Ali KE, Ndung’u M, Stevenson W, Barsby J, Gourlay R, Akinyemi T, Akinyemi R, Uemura MT, Polvikoski T, Mukaetova-Ladinska E, Ihara M, Kalaria RN. Loss of capillary pericytes and the blood-brain barrier in white matter in poststroke and vascular dementias and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathology. 2020;30:1087–1101. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dukkipati SS, Garrett TL, Elbasiouny SM. The vulnerability of spinal motoneurons and soma size plasticity in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The Journal of Physiology. 2018;596:1723–1745. doi: 10.1113/JP275498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duperron M-G, Knol MJ, Le Grand Q, Evans TE, Mishra A, Tsuchida A, Roshchupkin G, Konuma T, Trégouët D-A, Romero JR, Frenzel S, Luciano M, Hofer E, Bourgey M, Dueker ND, Delgado P, Hilal S, Tankard RM, Dubost F, Shin J, Saba Y, Armstrong NJ, Bordes C, Bastin ME, Beiser A, Brodaty H, Bülow R, Carrera C, Chen C, Cheng C-Y, Deary IJ, Gampawar PG, Himali JJ, Jiang J, Kawaguchi T, Li S, Macalli M, Marquis P, Morris Z, Muñoz Maniega S, Miyamoto S, Okawa M, Paradise M, Parva P, Rundek T, Sargurupremraj M, Schilling S, Setoh K, Soukarieh O, Tabara Y, Teumer A, Thalamuthu A, Trollor JN, Valdés Hernández MC, Vernooij MW, Völker U, Wittfeld K, Wong TY, Wright MJ, Zhang J, Zhao W, Zhu Y-C, Schmidt H, Sachdev PS, Wen W, Yoshida K, Joutel A, Satizabal CL, Sacco RL, Bourque G, CHARGE consortium. Lathrop M, Paus T, Fernandez-Cadenas I, Yang Q, Mazoyer B, Boutinaud P, Okada Y, Grabe HJ, Mather KA, Schmidt R, Joliot M, Ikram MA, Matsuda F, Tzourio C, Wardlaw JM, Seshadri S, Adams HHH, Debette S. Genomics of perivascular space burden unravels early mechanisms of cerebral small vessel disease. Nature Medicine. 2023;29:950–962. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02268-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eilken HM, Diéguez-Hurtado R, Schmidt I, Nakayama M, Jeong HW, Arf H, Adams S, Ferrara N, Adams RH. Pericytes regulate VEGF-induced endothelial sprouting through VEGFR1. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1574. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01738-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fukui K, Ushiki K, Takatsu H, Koike T, Urano S. Tocotrienols prevent hydrogen peroxide-induced axon and dendrite degeneration in cerebellar granule cells. Free Radical Research. 2012;46:184–193. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2011.647689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Greenwood SM, Mizielinska SM, Frenguelli BG, Harvey J, Connolly CN. Mitochondrial dysfunction and dendritic beading during neuronal toxicity. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:26235–26244. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704488200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo D-C, Papke CL, Tran-Fadulu V, Regalado ES, Avidan N, Johnson RJ, Kim DH, Pannu H, Willing MC, Sparks E, Pyeritz RE, Singh MN, Dalman RL, Grotta JC, Marian AJ, Boerwinkle EA, Frazier LQ, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS, Estrera AL, Safi HJ, Veeraraghavan S, Muzny DM, Wheeler DA, Willerson JT, Yu RK, Shete SS, Scherer SE, Raman CS, Buja LM, Milewicz DM. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and Moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2009;84:617–627. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hill RA, Tong L, Yuan P, Murikinati S, Gupta S, Grutzendler J. Regional blood flow in the normal and ischemic brain is controlled by arteriolar smooth muscle cell contractility and not by capillary pericytes. Neuron. 2015;87:95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kok FO, Shin M, Ni CW, Gupta A, Grosse AS, van Impel A, Kirchmaier BC, Peterson-Maduro J, Kourkoulis G, Male I, DeSantis DF, Sheppard-Tindell S, Ebarasi L, Betsholtz C, Schulte-Merker S, Wolfe SA, Lawson ND. Reverse genetic screening reveals poor correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes in zebrafish. Developmental Cell. 2015;32:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kwon CH, Zhu X, Zhang J, Knoop LL, Tharp R, Smeyne RJ, Eberhart CG, Burger PC, Baker SJ. Pten regulates neuronal soma size: a mouse model of Lhermitte-Duclos disease. Nature Genetics. 2001;29:404–411. doi: 10.1038/ng781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leonard EV, Figueroa RJ, Bussmann J, Lawson ND, Amigo JD, Siekmann AF. Regenerating vascular mural cells in zebrafish fin blood vessels are not derived from pre-existing mural cells and differentially require Pdgfrb signalling for their development. Development. 2022;149:dev199640. doi: 10.1242/dev.199640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Roberts RW, Burns CG, Poss KD. A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell. 2006;127:607–619. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mäe MA, He L, Nordling S, Vazquez-Liebanas E, Nahar K, Jung B, Li X, Tan BC, Chin Foo J, Cazenave-Gassiot A, Wenk MR, Zarb Y, Lavina B, Quaggin SE, Jeansson M, Gu C, Silver DL, Vanlandewijck M, Butcher EC, Keller A, Betsholtz C. Single-cell analysis of blood-brain barrier response to pericyte loss. Circulation Research. 2021;128:e46–e62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McGarry SD, Adjekukor C, Ahuja S, Greysson-Wong J, Vien I, Rinker KD, Childs SJ. Vessel metrics: a software tool for automated analysis of vascular structure in confocal imaging. Microvascular Research. 2024;151:104610. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2023.104610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Meeker ND, Hutchinson SA, Ho L, Trede NS. Method for isolation of PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. BioTechniques. 2007;43:610–614. doi: 10.2144/000112619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Østergaard L, Engedal TS, Moreton F, Hansen MB, Wardlaw JM, Dalkara T, Markus HS, Muir KW. Cerebral small vessel disease: capillary pathways to stroke and cognitive decline. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2016;36:302–325. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15606723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Otteson DC, Hitchcock PF. Stem cells in the teleost retina: persistent neurogenesis and injury-induced regeneration. Vision Research. 2003;43:927–936. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00400-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pan YA, Freundlich T, Weissman TA, Schoppik D, Wang XC, Zimmerman S, Ciruna B, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW, Schier AF. Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish. Development. 2013;140:2835–2846. doi: 10.1242/dev.094631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Poss KD, Tanaka EM. Hallmarks of regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31:1244–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Proulx K, Lu A, Sumanas S. Cranial vasculature in zebrafish forms by angioblast cluster-derived angiogenesis. Developmental Biology. 2010;348:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Renier N, Adams EL, Kirst C, Wu Z, Azevedo R, Kohl J, Autry AE, Kadiri L, Umadevi Venkataraju K, Zhou Y, Wang VX, Tang CY, Olsen O, Dulac C, Osten P, Tessier-Lavigne M. Mapping of brain activity by automated volume analysis of immediate early genes. Cell. 2016;165:1789–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reyahi A, Nik AM, Ghiami M, Gritli-Linde A, Pontén F, Johansson BR, Carlsson P. Foxf2 is required for brain pericyte differentiation and development and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier. Developmental Cell. 2015;34:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rouf MA, Wen L, Mahendra Y, Wang J, Zhang K, Liang S, Wang Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Wang G. The recent advances and future perspectives of genetic compensation studies in the zebrafish model. Genes & Diseases. 2023;10:468–479. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rousseau V, Engelmann R, Sabel BA. Restoration of vision III: soma swelling dynamics predicts neuronal death or survival after optic nerve crush in vivo. Neuroreport. 1999;10:3387–3391. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199911080-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ryu JR, Ahuja S, Arnold CR, Potts KG, Mishra A, Yang Q, Sargurupremraj M, Mahoney DJ, Seshadri S, Debette S, Childs SJ. Stroke-associated intergenic variants modulate a human FOXF2 transcriptional enhancer. PNAS. 2022;119:e2121333119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121333119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stratman AN, Malotte KM, Mahan RD, Davis MJ, Davis GE. Pericyte recruitment during vasculogenic tube assembly stimulates endothelial basement membrane matrix formation. Blood. 2009;114:5091–5101. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-222364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sur A, Wang Y, Capar P, Margolin G, Prochaska MK, Farrell JA. Single-cell analysis of shared signatures and transcriptional diversity during zebrafish development. Developmental Cell. 2023;58:3028–3047. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Susaki EA, Tainaka K, Perrin D, Yukinaga H, Kuno A, Ueda HR. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nature Protocols. 2015;10:1709–1727. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vanlandewijck M, He L, Mäe MA, Andrae J, Ando K, Del Gaudio F, Nahar K, Lebouvier T, Laviña B, Gouveia L, Sun Y, Raschperger E, Räsänen M, Zarb Y, Mochizuki N, Keller A, Lendahl U, Betsholtz C. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature. 2018;554:475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature25739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang Y, Pan L, Moens CB, Appel B. Notch3 establishes brain vascular integrity by regulating pericyte number. Development. 2014;141:307–317. doi: 10.1242/dev.096107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) University of Oregon Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  49. Whitesell TR, Kennedy RM, Carter AD, Rollins EL, Georgijevic S, Santoro MM, Childs SJ. An α-smooth muscle actin (acta2/αsma) zebrafish transgenic line marking vascular mural cells and visceral smooth muscle cells. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e90590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Whitesell TR, Chrystal PW, Ryu JR, Munsie N, Grosse A, French CR, Workentine ML, Li R, Zhu LJ, Waskiewicz A, Lehmann OJ, Lawson ND, Childs SJ. foxc1 is required for embryonic head vascular smooth muscle differentiation in zebrafish. Developmental Biology. 2019;453:34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Stefania Nicoli 1

This study provides important insights into mural cell dynamics and vascular pathology using a zebrafish model of cerebral small vessel disease. The authors present convincing evidence that partial loss of foxf2 function results in progressive, cell-autonomous defects in pericytes accompanied by endothelial abnormalities across the lifespan. By leveraging advanced in vivo imaging and genetic approaches, the work establishes zebrafish as a powerful and relevant model for dissecting the cellular mechanisms underlying cerebral small vessel disease.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The paper by Graff et al. investigates the function of foxf2 in zebrafish to understand the progression of cerebral small vessel disease. The authors use a partial loss of foxf2 (zebrafish possess two foxf2 genes, foxf2a and foxf2b, and the authors mainly analyze homozygous mutants in foxf2a) to investigate the role of foxf2 signaling in regulating pericyte biology. The find that the number of pericytes is reduced in foxf2a mutants and that the remaining pericytes display alterations in their morphologies. The authors further find that mutant animals can develop to adulthood but that in adult animals, both endothelial and pericyte morphologies are affected. They also show that mutant pericytes can partially repopulate the brain after genetic ablation.

Strengths:

The paper is well written and easy to follow. The authors now include pericyte marker gene analysis and solid quantifications of the observed phenotypes.

Weaknesses:

None left.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This study investigates the developmental and lifelong consequences of reduced foxf2 dosage in zebrafish, a gene associated with human stroke risk and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). The authors show that a ~50% reduction in foxf2 function through homozygous loss of foxf2a leads to a significant decrease in brain pericyte number, along with striking abnormalities in pericyte morphology-including enlarged soma and extended processes-during larval stages. These defects are not corrected over time but instead persist and worsen with age, ultimately affecting the surrounding endothelium. The study also makes an important contribution by characterizing pericyte behavior in wild-type zebrafish using a clever pericyte-specific Brainbow approach, revealing novel interactions such as pericyte process overlap not previously reported in mammals.

Strengths:

This work provides mechanistic insight into how subtle, developmental changes in mural cell biology and coverage of the vasculature can drive long-term vascular pathology. The authors make strong use of zebrafish imaging tools, including longitudinal analysis in transgenic lines to follow pericyte number and morphology over larval development and then applied tissue clearing and whole brain imaging at 3 and 11 months to further dissect the longitudinal effects of foxf2a loss. The ability to track individual pericytes in vivo reveals cell-intrinsic defects and process degeneration with high spatiotemporal resolution. Their use of a pericyte-specific Zebrabow line also allows, for the first time, detailed visualization of pericyte-pericyte interactions in the developing brain, highlighting structural features and behaviors that challenge existing models based on mouse studies. Together, these findings make the zebrafish a valuable model for studying the cellular dynamics of CSVD.

Weaknesses:

I originally suggested quantifying pericyte coverage across brain regions to address potential lineage-specific effects due to the distinct developmental origins of forebrain (neural crest-derived) and hindbrain (mesoderm-derived) pericytes. However, I appreciate the authors' response referencing recent work from their lab (Ahuja, 2024), which demonstrates that both neural crest and mesoderm contribute to pericyte lineages in the midbrain and hindbrain. The convergence of these lineages into a shared transcriptional state by 30 hpf, as shown by their single-cell RNA-seq data, makes it unlikely that regional quantification would provide meaningful lineage-specific insight. I agree with the authors that lineage tracing experiments often suffer from low sample sizes, and their updated findings challenge earlier compartmental models of pericyte origin. I therefore appreciate their rationale for not pursuing regional quantification and consider this concern addressed. Furthermore, my other two points regarding quantification of foxf2 levels and overall vascular changes have been thoroughly addressed in the revised manuscript. These additions significantly strengthen the paper's conclusions and improve the overall rigor of the study.

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The goal of the work by Graff, et al. is to model CSVD in the zebrafish using foxf2a mutants. The mutants show loss of cerebral pericyte coverage that persists through adulthood, but it seems foxf2a does not regulate the regenerative capacity of these cells. The findings are interesting and build on previous work from the group. Limitations of the work include little mechanistic insight into how foxf2a alters pericyte recruitment/differentiation/survival/proliferation in this context, and the overlap of these studies with previous work in fox2a/b double mutants. However, the data analysis is clean and compelling and the findings will contribute to the field.

Comments on revisions:

The authors have addressed all of my original concerns.

eLife. 2026 Mar 6;14:RP106720. doi: 10.7554/eLife.106720.3.sa4

Author response

Merry Faye Graff 1, Emma EM Heeg 2, David A Elliott 3, Sarah J Childs 4

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

eLife Assessment

This study presents valuable findings that advance our understanding of mural cell dynamics and vascular pathology in a zebrafish model of cerebral small vessel disease. The authors provide compelling evidence that partial loss of foxf2 function leads to progressive, cell-intrinsic defects in pericytes and associated endothelial abnormalities across the lifespan, leveraging powerful in vivo imaging and genetic tools. The strength of evidence could be further improved by additional mechanistic insight and quantitative or lineage-tracing analyses to clarify how pericyte number and identity are affected in the mutant model.

Thank you to the reviewers for insightful comments and for the time spent reviewing the manuscript. We have strengthened the data through responding to the comments.

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

The paper by Graff et al. investigates the function of foxf2 in zebrafish to understand the progression of cerebral small vessel disease. The authors use a partial loss of foxf2 (zebrafish possess two foxf2 genes, foxf2a and foxf2b, and the authors mainly analyze homozygous mutants in foxf2a) to investigate the role of foxf2 signaling in regulating pericyte biology. They find that the number of pericytes is reduced in foxf2a mutants and that the remaining pericytes display alterations in their morphologies. The authors further find that mutant animals can develop to adulthood, but that in adult animals, both endothelial and pericyte morphologies are affected. They also show that mutant pericytes can partially repopulate the brain after genetic ablation.

(1) Weaknesses: The results are mainly descriptive, and it is not clear how they will advance the field at their current state, given that a publication on mice has already examined the loss of foxf2 phenotype on pericyte biology (Reyahi, 2015, Dev. Cell).

The Reyahi paper was the earliest report of foxf2 mutant brain pericytes and remains illuminating. The work was very well technically executed. Our manuscript expands and at times, contradicts, their findings. We realized that we did not fully discuss this in our discussion, and this has now been updated. The biggest difference between the two studies is in the direction of change in pericytes after foxf2 knockout, a major finding in both papers. This is where it is important to understand the differences in methods. Reyahi et al., used a conditional knockout under Wnt1:Cre which will ablate pericytes derived from neural crest, but not those derived from mesoderm, nor will it affect foxf2 expression in endothelial cells. Our model is a full constitutive knockout of the gene in all brain pericytes and endothelial cells. For GOF, Reyahi used a transgenic model with a human FOXF2 BAC integrated into the mouse germline.

Both studies are important. We do not know enough about human phenotypes in patients with strokeassociated human FOXF2 SNVs to know the direction of change in pericyte numbers. We showed that the SNVs reduce FOXF2 gene expression in vitro (Ryu, 2022). Here we demonstrate dosage sensitivity in fish (showing phenotypes when 1 of 4 foxf2a + foxf2b alleles are lost, Figure 1F), supporting that slight reductions of FOXF2 in humans could lead to severe brain vessel phenotypes. For this reason, our work is complementary to the previously published work and suggests that future studies should focus on understanding the role of dosage, cell autonomy, and human pericyte phenotypes with respect to FOXF2. While some experiments are parallel in mouse and fish, we go further to look at cell death and regeneration, and to understand the consequences on the whole brain vasculature.

(2) Reyahi et al. showed that loss of foxf2 in mice leads to a marked downregulation of pdgfrb expression in perivascular cells. In contrast to expectation, perivascular cell numbers were higher in mutant animals, but these cells did not differentiate properly. The authors use a transgenic driver line expressing gal4 under the control of the pdgfrb promoter and observe a reduction in pericyte (pdgfrb-expressing) cells in foxf2a mutants. In light of the mouse data, this result might be due to a similar downregulation of pdgfrb expression in fish, which would lead to a downregulation of gal4 expression and hence reduced labelling of pericytes. The authors show a reduction of pdgfrb expression also in zebrafish in foxf2b mutants (Chauhan et al., The Lancet Neurology 2016).

Reyahi detected more pericytes in the Wnt1:Cre mouse, while we detected fewer in the foxf2a (and foxf2a;foxf2b) mutants. This may be because of different methods. For instance, because the mouse knockout is not a constitutive Foxf2 knockout, the observed increase in pericytes may be because mesodermal-derived pericytes proliferate more highly when the neural crest-derived pericytes are absent. Or does endothelial foxf2 activate pericyte proliferation when foxf2 is lost in some pericytes? It is also possible that mouse foxf2 has a different role from its fish ortholog. Despite these differences, there are common conclusions from both models. For instance, both mouse and fish show foxf2 controls capillary pericyte numbers, albeit in different directions. Both show hemorrhage and loss of vascular stability as a result. Both papers identify the developmental window as critical for setting up the correct numbers of pericytes.

As the reviewer suggested, it was important to test whether pdgfrb is downregulated in fish as it is in mice. To do this, we measured expression of pdgfrb in foxf2 mutants using hybridization chain reaction (HCR) of pdgfrb in foxf2 mutants. The results show no change in pdgfrb mRNA in foxf2a mutants at two independent experiments (Fig S3). Independently, we integrated pdgfrb transgene intensity (using a single allele of the transgene so there are no dose effects) in foxf2a mutants vs. wildtype. We found no difference (Fig S3) suggesting that pdgfrb is a reliable reporter for counting pericytes in the foxf2a knockout. The reviewer is correct that we previously showed downregulation of pdgfrb in foxf2b mutants at 4 dpf using colorimetric ISH. foxf2a and foxf2b are unlinked, independent genes (~400 M years apart in evolution) and may have different regulation.

(3) It would be important to clarify whether, also in zebrafish, foxf2a/foxf2b mutants have reduced or augmented numbers of perivascular cells and how this compares to the data in the mouse.

We discuss methodological differences between Reyahi and our work in point (1) above. The reduction in pericytes in foxf2a;foxf2b mutants has been previously published (Ryu, 2022, Supplemental Figure 1) and shown again here in Supplemental Figure 2. Numbers are reduced in double mutants up to 10 dpf, suggesting no recovery. Further, in response to reviewer comments, we have quantified pericytes in the whole fish brain (Figure 3E-G) and show reduced pericytes in the adult, reduced vessel network length, and importantly that the pericyte density is reduced. In aggregate, our data shows pericyte reduction at 5 developmental stages from embryo through adult. The reason for different results from the mouse is unknown and may reflect a technical difference (constitutive vs Wnt1:Cre) or a species difference.

(4) The authors should perform additional characterization of perivascular cells using marker gene expression (for a list of markers, see e.g., Shih et al. Development 2021) and/or genetic lineage tracing.

This is a good point. We have added HCR analysis of additional markers. Results show co-expression of foxf2a, foxf2b, nduf4la2 and pdgfrb in brain pericytes (Fig 2, Fig S3).

(5) The authors motivate using foxf2a mutants as a model of reduced foxf2 dosage, "similar to human heterozygous loss of FOXF2". However, it is not clear how the different foxf2 genes in zebrafish interact with each other transcriptionally. Is there upregulation of foxf2b in foxf2a mutants and vice versa? This is important to consider, as Reyahi et al. showed that foxf2 gene dosage in mice appears to be important, with an increase in foxf2 gene dosage (through transgene expression) leading to a reduction in perivascular cell numbers.

We agree that dosage is a very important concept and show phenotypes in foxf2a heterozygotes (Fig 1F). To test the potential compensation from foxf2b, we have added qPCR for foxf2b in foxf2a mutants as well as HCR of foxf2b in foxf2a mutants (Fig S3C,D). There is no change in foxf2b expression in foxf2a mutants. We discuss dosage in our discussion.

(6) Figures 3 and 4 lack data quantification. The authors describe the existence of vascular defects in adult fish, but no quantifiable parameters or quantifications are provided. This needs to be added.

This query was technically challenging to address, but very worthwhile. We have not seen published methods for quantifying brain pericytes along with the vascular network (certainly not in zebrafish adults), so we developed new methods of analyzing whole brain vascular parameters of cleared adult brains (Figure S6) using a combination of segmentation methods for pericytes, endothelium and smooth muscle. We have added another author (David Elliott) as he was instrumental in designing methods. We find a significant decrease in vessel network length in foxf2a mutants at 3 month and 6 months (Figures 3F and 4G). Similarly, we show a lower number of brain pericytes in foxf2a mutants (Figure 3E). Finally, we added whole brain analysis of smooth muscle coverage (Figure 4) and show no change in vSMC number or coverage of vessels at 5 and 10 dpf or adult, respectively, pointing to pericytes being the cells most affected. Thank you, this query pushed us in a very productive direction. These methods will be extremely useful in the future!

(7) The analysis of pericyte phenotypes and morphologies is not clear. On page 6, the authors state: "In the wildtype brain, adult pericytes have a clear oblong cell body with long, slender primary processes that extend from the cytoplasm with secondary processes that wrap around the circumference of the blood vessel." Further down on the same page, the authors note: "In wildtype adult brains, we identified three subtypes of pericytes, ensheathing, mesh and thin-strand, previously characterized in murine models." In conclusion, not all pericytes have long, slender primary processes, but there are at least three different sub-types? Did the authors analyze how they might be distributed along different branch orders of the vasculature, as they are in the mouse?

We have reworded the text on page 5/6 to be clearer that embryonic pericytes are thin strand only. Additional pericyte subtypes develop later are seen in the mature vasculature of the adult. We could not find a way to accurately analyze pericyte subtypes in the adult brain. The imaging analysis to count pericytes used soma as machine learning algorithms have been developed to count nuclei but not analyze processes.

(8) Which type of pericyte is affected in foxf2a mutant animals? Can the authors identify the branch order of the vasculature for both wildtype and mutant animals and compare which subtype of pericyte might be most affected? Are all subtypes of pericytes similarly affected in mutant animals? There also seems to be a reduction in smooth muscle cell coverage.

Please see the response to (7) about pericyte subtypes. In response to the reviewer’s query, we have now analyzed vSMCs in the embryonic and adult brain. In the embryonic brain we see no statistical differences in vSMC number at 5 and 10 dpf (Figure 4). In the adult, vSMC length (total length of vSMCs in a brain) and vSMC coverage (proportion of brain vessels with vSMCs) are not significantly different. This data is important because it suggests that foxf2a has a more important role in pericytes than in vSMCs.

(9) Regarding pericyte regeneration data (Figure 7): Are the values in Figure 7D not significantly different from each other (no significance given)?

Any graphs missing bars have no significance and were left off for clarity. We have stated this in the statistical methods.

(10) In the discussion, the authors state that "pericyte processes have not been studied in zebrafish".

Ando et al. (Development 2016) studied pericyte processes in early zebrafish embryos, and Leonard et al. (Development 2022) studied zebrafish pericytes and their processes in the developing fin. We apologize, this was not meant to say that pericyte processes had not been studied before, we have reworded this to make clear the intent of the sentence. We were trying to emphasize that we are the first to quantify processes at different stages, especially in foxf2 mutants. Processes change morphology over development, especially after 5 dpf, something that our data captures. Our images are of stages that have not been previously characterized. We added a reference to Mae et al., who found similar process length changes in a mouse knockout of a different gene, and to Leonard who previously showed overlap of processes in a different context in fish.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Summary:

This study investigates the developmental and lifelong consequences of reduced foxf2 dosage in zebrafish, a gene associated with human stroke risk and cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). The authors show that a ~50% reduction in foxf2 function through homozygous loss of foxf2a leads to a significant decrease in brain pericyte number, along with striking abnormalities in pericyte morphologyincluding enlarged soma and extended processes-during larval stages. These defects are not corrected over time but instead persist and worsen with age, ultimately affecting the surrounding endothelium. The study also makes an important contribution by characterizing pericyte behavior in wild-type zebrafish using a clever pericyte-specific Brainbow approach, revealing novel interactions such as pericyte process overlap not previously reported in mammals.

Strengths:

This work provides mechanistic insight into how subtle, developmental changes in mural cell biology and coverage of the vasculature can drive long-term vascular pathology. The authors make strong use of zebrafish imaging tools, including longitudinal analysis in transgenic lines to follow pericyte number and morphology over larval development, and then applied tissue clearing and whole brain imaging at 3 and 11 months to further dissect the longitudinal effects of foxf2a loss. The ability to track individual pericytes in vivo reveals cell-intrinsic defects and process degeneration with high spatiotemporal resolution. Their use of a pericyte-specific Zebrabow line also allows, for the first time, detailed visualization of pericytepericyte interactions in the developing brain, highlighting structural features and behaviors that challenge existing models based on mouse studies. Together, these findings make the zebrafish a valuable model for studying the cellular dynamics of CSVD.

Weaknesses:

(11) While the findings are compelling, several aspects could be strengthened. First, quantifying pericyte coverage across distinct brain regions (forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain) would clarify whether foxf2a loss differentially impacts specific pericyte lineages, given known regional differences in developmental origin, with forebrain pericytes being neural crest-derived and hindbrain pericytes being mesoderm-derived.

In recently published work from our lab, we published that both neural crest and mesodermal cells contribute to pericytes in both the mid and hindbrain, and could not confirm earlier work suggesting more rigid compartmental origins (Ahuja, 2024). In the Ahuja, 2024 paper we noted that lineage experiments are often limited by n’s which is why this may not have been discovered before. This makes us skeptical that counting different regions will allow us to interpret data about neural crest and mesoderm. Further, Ahuja 2024 shows that pericyte intermediate progenitors from both mesoderm and neural crest are indistinguishable at 30 hpf through single cell sequencing and have converged on a common phenotype.

(12) Second, measuring foxf2b expression in foxf2a mutants would better support the interpretation that total FOXF2 dosage is reduced in a graded fashion in heterozygote and homozygote foxf2a mutants.

We have done both qPCR for foxf2b in foxf2a mutants and HCR (quantitative ISH). This is now reported in Fig S3.

(13) Finally, quantifying vascular density in adult mutants would help determine whether observed endothelial changes are a downstream consequence of prolonged pericyte loss. Correlating these vascular changes with local pericyte depletion would also help clarify causality.

We have added this data to Figure 3 and 4. Please also see response (6).

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Summary:

The goal of the work by Graff et al. is to model CSVD in the zebrafish using foxf2a mutants. The mutants show loss of cerebral pericyte coverage that persists through adulthood, but it seems foxf2a does not regulate the regenerative capacity of these cells. The findings are interesting and build on previous work from the group. Limitations of the work include little mechanistic insight into how foxf2a alters pericyte recruitment/differentiation/survival/proliferation in this context, and the overlap of these studies with previous work in fox2a/b double mutants. However, the data analysis is clean and compelling, and the findings will contribute to the field.

(14) Please make Figures 5C and 5E red-green colorblind friendly.

Thank you. We have changed the colors to light blue and yellow to be colorblind friendly.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

(15) I'm not sure this reviewer totally agrees with the assessment that foxf2a loss of function, while foxf2b remains normal, is the same as FOXF2 heterozygous loss of function in humans. The discussion of the gene dosage needs to be better framed, and the authors should carry out qPCR to show that foxf2b levels are not altered in the foxf2a mutant background.

We have added data on foxf2b expression in foxf2a mutants to Fig S3. We have updated the results.

(16) Figure 4/SF7- is the aneurysm phenotype derived from the ECs or pericytes? Cell-type-specific rescues would be interesting to determine if phenotypes are rescued, especially the developmental phenotypes (it is appreciated that carrying out rescue experiments until adulthood is complex). When is the earliest time point that aneurysm-like structures are seen?

This is a fascinating question, especially as we show that endothelial cells (vessel network length) are affected in the adult mutants. The foxf2a mutants that we work with here are constitutive knockouts. While a strategy to rescue foxf2a in specific lineages is being developed in the laboratory this will require a multi-generation breeding effort to get drivers, transgenes and mutants on the same background, and these fish are not currently available. Thank you for this comment- it is something we want to follow up on.

(17) Figure 5 - This is very nice analysis.

Thank you! We think it is informative too.

(18) Figure 6 - needs to contain control images

We have added wildtype images to figure 6A.

(19) Figure 7- vessel images should be shown to demonstrate the specificity of NTR treatment to the pericytes.

We have added the vessel images to Figure 7. We apologize for the omission.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 1 and supplements.
    Figure 2—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 2 and supplements.
    Figure 3—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 3 and supplements.
    Figure 4—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 4.
    Figure 5—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 5.
    Figure 6—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 6.
    Figure 7—source data 1. All raw quantitative data underlying Figure 7.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    Numerical data for all experiments is included for each figure.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES