Abstract
Siniperca obscura is an economically valuable and ecologically significant species in China, yet the lack of comprehensive genomic resources has hindered genetic studies and breeding efforts. In this study, we present a high-quality, chromosome-level genome assembly for S. obscura, generated by integrating PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing with Hi-C scaffolding. The final assembly spans 734.12 Mb, with 99.85% of the assembled bases anchored and oriented onto 24 chromosomes. It achieves a contig N50 of 24.59 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 30.62 Mb, with high genome completeness further demonstrated by a BUSCO score of 99.37%. We predicted 23,225 protein-coding genes, with a 99.12% BUSCO completeness, and 98.50% of the genes were functionally annotated. Approximately 30.54% of the genome sequences were classified as repeat elements. This high-quality reference genome provides a valuable resource for advancing molecular breeding, comparative genomics, and evolutionary studies of S. obscura and closely related species.
Subject terms: Conservation genomics, Structural variation
Background & Summary
Siniperca obscura is an economically valuable and ecologically significant freshwater species endemic to China, classified within order Perciformes, family Sinipercidae, and genus Siniperca1. This species primarily inhabits the benthic to mid-water layers of freshwater systems and has stringent water quality requirements. As a carnivorous predator, it preys on small fish and shrimp, playing a vital role in maintaining the stability of freshwater ecosystems2. S. obscura has high market demand due to its tender, boneless flesh, demonstrating considerable potential for aquaculture development. Additionally, the distribution of S. obscura across distinct river basins, coupled with the historical classification of different geographic populations as separate species, makes it an ideal subject for comparative genetic studies3. However, wild populations of S. obscura have significantly declined in recent decades due to hydrological engineering, overfishing, and water pollution4. As a result, it has been designated as a protected species by several provincial governments (e.g., Hunan Province). Despite its urgent conservation needs and the growing demand for aquaculture, comprehensive genomic studies on S. obscura remain limited, significantly hindering advancements in conservation strategies, adaptive evolution studies, and molecular breeding research.
Currently, research on S. obscura primarily focuses on mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis5, SSR molecular marker development6,7, and the exploration of its evolutionary relationships2,3,8,9. Despite these advancements, a deeper investigation into its genomic features is essential to enhance our understanding of its biology and improve its applications in aquaculture. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the genomic research of the Sinipercidae family, including species such as the Siniperca chuatsi10–12, Siniperca scherzeri13, Siniperca knerii14 and Siniperca roulei15. These genomic studies have provided a solid foundation for research on adaptive evolution, predatory behaviour, and sensory-related genes. However, S. obscura, a key species in the genus Siniperca, still lacks a high-quality reference genome, which limits further research on its adaptive evolution, population genetics, and comparative genomics with other Sinipercidae species.
In this study, we present the first chromosome-level genome assembly of S. obscura, generated by integrating PacBio long-read sequencing, Hi-C chromatin conformation capture, and high-throughput transcriptomic data. The assembly demonstrates high continuity and completeness and includes annotations for 23,225 protein-coding genes. This dataset not only serves as a valuable resource for evolutionary studies within Sinipercidae but also facilitates applied research in molecular marker development, disease-resistant trait selection, and wild resource conservation.
Methods
Sample collection and DNA extraction
A male S. obscura was collected from a tributary of the Yangtze River in Qimen County, Huangshan City, Anhui Province, China. Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA integrity and purity were assessed through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the concentration was measured using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). All procedures strictly followed the guidelines approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (Approval No. PRFRI-2024-023).
Genome sequencing
For short-read sequencing, a 350 bp insert-size library was prepared from sheared DNA using the MGIEasy PCR-Free DNA library prep set (BGI, China) and sequenced on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (MGI, China), generating 75.26 Gb of PE150 raw reads. For long-read sequencing, high-fidelity (HiFi) libraries were constructed with the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences, USA) and sequenced on the PacBio Sequel II system, producing 35.29 Gb of PacBio HiFi long reads with an average length of 18.21 kb. Additionally, Hi-C libraries were prepared from approximately 1 g of S. obscura muscle tissue using the GrandOmics Hi-C kit (DpnII digestion) and sequenced on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (MGI, China), resulting in 121.48 Gb of Hi-C data (Table 1).
Table 1.
Statistics of sequencing data.
| Types | Method | Raw data (Gb) | Clean data (Gb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA | MGI | 75.26 | 73.74 |
| DNA | PacBio | 35.58 | 35.29 |
| DNA | Hi-C | 121.48 | 117.57 |
| RNA | MGI | 23.22 | 21.76 |
RNA extraction and transcriptome sequencing
For comprehensive genome annotation, RNA was extracted from ten tissues (spleen, kidney, brain, muscle, ovary, liver, intestine, heart, gill, and swim bladder). RNA quality was evaluated using both a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Equal amounts (1 μg per tissue) of RNA were pooled to construct a cDNA library with the MGIEasy PCR-Free DNA library prep set (BGI, China), followed by PE150 sequencing mode on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform (MGI, China). This resulted in 23.22 Gb of transcriptomic data to support genome annotation.
Genome size and heterozygosity estimation
MGI raw reads were quality-filtered and adapter-trimmed using fastp v0.23.416 with the parameter -l 50, yielding a total of 73.74 Gb of clean data. The clean reads were then used for genome size estimation of S. obscura through k-mer analysis. A 21-mer frequency table was generated using Jellyfish v2.3.017 and subsequently analyzed with GenomeScope v2.018. The analysis revealed an estimated genome size of approximately 704.61 Mb, with a heterozygosity rate of 0.42% and repeat content of 15.3% (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Genome survey of S. obscura was conducted using 21-mer analysis with GenomeScope2.
Genome assembly
Raw PacBio HiFi reads were filtered prior to assembly by removing reads shorter than 100 bp, and a total of 35.29 Gb of high-quality HiFi data were retained. The genome of S. obscura was assembled using the filtered HiFi reads with Hifiasm v0.19.919 under default parameters, generating an initial contig-level assembly of 735.19 Mb, with a contig N50 of 24.73 Mb and a maximum contig length of 34.67 Mb. Raw Hi-C reads were filtered using fastp v0.23.416 with the parameter -l 50, yielding 117.57 Gb of clean data. Hi-C–based scaffolding was performed using Juicer v1.620 in combination with the 3D-DNA pipeline v2010082121. Briefly, the contig-level assembly was indexed with BWA v0.7.1722, and clean Hi-C paired-end reads were aligned to the contigs to generate contact maps. This procedure produced 242.51 million uniquely mapped read pairs, corresponding to a unique mapping rate of 59.92%. After stringent filtering, 110,460,838 non-redundant valid interaction pairs were retained, accounting for 45.55% of the uniquely mapped alignments (detailed statistics are provided in Supplementary Table S1). Initial chromosome-level scaffolds were generated using 3D-DNA under default parameters. Chromosome boundaries and misassemblies were subsequently refined through manual curation using Juicebox v1.11.0823. As a result, 99.85% of the assembled sequences were successfully anchored and oriented onto 24 chromosomes (Figs. 2, 3). The final assembly comprised 43 scaffolds, with a maximum scaffold length of 38.30 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 30.62 Mb (Tables 2, 3).
Fig. 2.
Hi-C interactive heatmap of 24 chromosomes in S. obscura genome.
Fig. 3.
Features of the S. obscura genome. From outside to inside: (a) GC content, (b) Gene density, (c) Repeats content, (d) LTR content, (e) LINE content, (f) DNA-TE content.
Table 2.
Summary statistics of S. obscura contig-level and chromosome-level genome assembly.
| Metric | Contig-level | Chromosome-level |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly genome length (Mb) | 735.19 | 734.12 |
| GC (%) | 40.42 | 40.42 |
| contigs number | 132 | 127 |
| contig N50 (Mb) | 24.73 | 24.59 |
| contig N90 (Mb) | 3.89 | 4.20 |
| scaffolds number | 132 | 43 |
| scaffold N50 (Mb) | 24.73 | 30.62 |
| scaffold N90 (Mb) | 3.89 | 27.17 |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 34.67 | 38.30 |
| Number of chromosomes | 24 |
Table 3.
Summary statistics of S. obscura genome assembly.
| Chromosome | Length (bp) | Number of Contigs |
|---|---|---|
| Chr01 | 38,295,284 | 3 |
| Chr02 | 36,747,327 | 5 |
| Chr03 | 35,686,122 | 4 |
| Chr04 | 34,240,585 | 4 |
| Chr05 | 34,171,263 | 6 |
| Chr06 | 33,394,294 | 9 |
| Chr07 | 32,981,857 | 6 |
| Chr08 | 32,369,141 | 10 |
| Chr09 | 31,985,866 | 4 |
| Chr10 | 32,241,401 | 11 |
| Chr11 | 30,471,572 | 1 |
| Chr12 | 30,621,129 | 3 |
| Chr13 | 30,530,749 | 2 |
| Chr14 | 29,727,018 | 6 |
| Chr15 | 29,749,904 | 3 |
| Chr16 | 29,574,930 | 10 |
| Chr17 | 29,860,058 | 3 |
| Chr18 | 28,313,692 | 1 |
| Chr19 | 27,518,391 | 6 |
| Chr20 | 27,167,291 | 3 |
| Chr21 | 28,418,504 | 2 |
| Chr22 | 24,393,381 | 3 |
| Chr23 | 24,053,660 | 2 |
| Chr24 | 20,485,290 | 1 |
| Total | 732,998,709 | 108 |
Repeat annotation
We conducted a comprehensive repeat analysis using multiple computational methods. For tandem repeats, GMATA v2.2.124 and Tandem Repeats Finder v4.10.025 were used to identify Satellite repeats, which covered 0.35% of the genome. Dispersed repeats were characterized using an integrated pipeline. First, MITEs26 were detected with MITE-hunter to create a MITE library. The genome was then hardmasked and analyzed with RepeatModeler v2.0.627 to generate a de novo repeat library (RepMod.lib). TEclass was used to classify unknown repeats in RepMod.lib, which was subsequently combined with MITE.lib and Repbase v19.0628 to construct a combined repeat library. RepeatMasker v4.1.629 applied this library for genome-wide repeat annotation. The analysis revealed that 30.54% of the genome consists of dispersed repeats (Table 4). DNA transposons were the most abundant (11.16%), followed by LINEs (7.95%), LTR retrotransposons (2.43%), and SINEs (0.49%). In total, repetitive sequences accounted for 224,193,574 bp (30.54%) of the genome (Table 4, Fig. 4).
Table 4.
Composition of repetitive elements in the S. obscura genome.
| Repeat class | Total length (bp) | Genome proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| DNA | 81,935,614 | 11.16 |
| LINE | 58,374,657 | 7.95 |
| SINE | 3,571,906 | 0.49 |
| LTR | 17,819,282 | 2.43 |
| Satellite | 2,552,444 | 0.35 |
| Unknown | 71,065,081 | 9.68 |
| Total | 224,193,574 | 30.54 |
Fig. 4.

Four types of TE sequence divergence distribution diagram annotated by RepeatMasker.
Gene prediction and function assignment
Gene prediction was performed through an integrative approach combining transcriptomic evidence, homology-based methods, and ab initio predictions. Raw RNA-seq reads were first quality-filtered and adapter-trimmed using fastp v0.23.4 with the parameter -l 50, yielding a total of 21.76 Gb of clean data. For transcriptome-guided annotation, clean RNA-seq reads were aligned to the genome using HISAT2 v2.2.130, followed by transcript assembly with StringTie v2.2.331. Transcript models were further refined using PASA v2.3.332, and coding sequences were predicted with TransDecoder v5.7.133. Homology-based gene predictions were performed using protein sequences from five evolutionarily related teleost species (Oryzias latipes, Danio rerio, Takifugu rubripes, Siniperca chuatsi, and Micropterus salmoides). All protein sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database and aligned to the S. obscura genome assembly using miniprot v0.1334 with stringent alignment parameters. For ab initio gene prediction, we used BRAKER v2.1.635, integrating Augustus v3.5.036 and GeneMark-ETP v1.3137, trained on reference proteins from the OrthoDB v1238 database. The integrated annotation pipeline yielded 22,333 genes supported by RNA-seq evidence, 23,256 genes via homology-based search, and 25,109 genes through de novo prediction. These three evidence-based gene sets were merged using EVidenceModeler v2.1.039, resulting in a final consensus set of 23,225 high-confidence protein-coding genes. The final gene models featured an average gene length of 15,842.44 bp, an average coding sequence (CDS) length of 1,803.12 bp, and a mean of 10.26 exons per gene (Table 5).
Table 5.
Statistics of gene structure and functional annotation in the S. obscura genome.
| Gene structure statistics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Feature | Count / average | Average length (bp) |
| Gene | 23,225 | 15,842.44 |
| Exon | 10.26 (average) | 175.8 |
| Intron | 9.26 (average) | 1,516.76 |
| Functional annotation summary | ||
| Database | Annotated genes | Proportion (%) |
| Swissprot | 20,242 | 87.16 |
| KEGG | 22,558 | 97.13 |
| KOG | 18,632 | 80.22 |
| GO | 16,546 | 71.24 |
| NR | 22,852 | 98.39 |
| ALL | 22,877 | 98.50 |
Functional annotation of the predicted protein sequences was conducted using Diamond v2.1.1040 against the SwissProt41, KEGG42, KOG43, GO44, and NR45 databases, with an e-value cutoff of 1e-5. A total of 22,877 genes were annotated, representing 98.50% of all inferred genes (Fig. 5 and Table 5).
Fig. 5.
Venn diagram of function annotations from various databases.
Data Records
The raw sequencing reads of all libraries have been deposited into NCBI SRA database via the accession number PRJNA124564946. The assembled genome has been deposited at Genbank under the accession number GCA_049996615.147. Moreover, data of the genome annotations, predicted coding sequences and protein sequences are available at Figshare48.
Technical Validation
Assessment of genome assembly
The completeness of the S. obscura genome was evaluated using BUSCO v5.7.149 against the actinopterygii_odb10 lineage. The assembly exhibited exceptional integrity, with 99.37% of the benchmark genes detected (99.23% single-copy, 0.14% duplicated, 0.52% fragmented, and 0.11% missing; Table 6). Further quality assessment via Merqury v1.350 with HiFi reads yielded a QV of 63.22 (error rate 4.76 × 10−⁷), while CRAQ v1.1051 analysis indicated a scaffold anchoring quality (S-AQI) of 99.05%. Detailed per-chromosome metrics are provided in Supplementary Table S1, confirming high chromosomal accuracy and continuity. Additionally, BUSCO evaluation of the predicted proteome against the same database yielded a completeness score of 99.12% (98.41% single-copy and 0.71% duplicated), further validating the high quality of the gene models (Table 6)
Table 6.
BUSCO analysis of the genome assembly and gene annotation.
| Category | Assembly | Annotation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins | Percentage (%) | Proteins | Percentage (%) | |
| Complete BUSCOs | 3617 | 99.37 | 3608 | 99.12 |
| Complete Single-Copy BUSCOs | 3612 | 99.23 | 3582 | 98.41 |
| Complete Duplicated BUSCOs | 5 | 0.14 | 26 | 0.71 |
| Fragmented BUSCOs | 19 | 0.52 | 9 | 0.25 |
| Missing BUSCOs | 4 | 0.11 | 23 | 0.63 |
| Total BUSCO groups searched | 3640 | 100 | 3640 | 100 |
| Database | actinopterygii_odb10 | actinopterygii_odb10 | ||
To evaluate assembly consistency, mapping rates were determined by aligning PacBio HiFi, Illumina, and RNA-seq reads to the final assembly using Minimap2 v2.2452, BWA v0.7.1722 and HISAT2 v2.2.130, respectively. The mapping rates were 99.78% for PacBio, 99.18% for Illumina, and 97.36% for RNA-seq reads, further validating the high quality and completeness of the genome. Correspondingly, to assess the structural accuracy of gene models, the genomic distribution of RNA-seq alignments was analyzed via Qualimap v2.353. This revealed that 70.41% of the reads mapped to exonic regions, with only 4.68% in introns and 24.91% in intergenic regions, thereby confirming the robust transcriptional support and structural reliability of the predicted gene structures.
Genome synteny analysis
To investigate whole-genome synteny, the chromosome-level genome assembly of S. chuatsi12 was aligned to that of S. obscura using MCscan v0.854, and the syntenic relationships were visualized with JCVI v1.1.1255. The collinearity analysis revealed a high degree of conserved synteny between the two genomes, supporting the high quality and completeness of our genome assembly (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
A synteny analysis of the chromosomes among genomes of S. obscura and S. chuatsi.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from the National Modern Agriculture Industry Technology System Special Project (CARS-46), Monitoring of Aquatic Resources in Key Waters of Anhui Province (2024BFAFZ02936), Special Fund for Anhui Agriculture Research System (2021-711), Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2025XK01, 2025SJHX1, 2023TD37), China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund (CAMC-2018F), Guangdong Province Rural Revitalization Strategy Special Fund (2023-SJS-00-001).
Author contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated in this study have been deposited in public repositories and are freely available. Raw sequencing data, including PacBio HiFi, Hi-C, MGI short-read, and transcriptome datasets, are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA124564946. The chromosome-level genome assembly of Siniperca obscura has been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession GCA_049996615.147. The corresponding genome annotation files have been deposited in the Figshare repository48.
Code availability
No special codes or scripts were used in this work, and data processing was carried out based on the protocols and manuals of the corresponding bioinformatics software.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Haiyang Liu, Email: hyliu@prfri.ac.cn.
Yanfeng Lin, Email: linyf@yeah.net.
Yangyang Liang, Email: liangyy10214@126.com.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41597-026-06678-6.
References
- 1.Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, 2010).
- 2.Lu, L., Jiang, J., Zhao, J. & Li, C. Comparative genomics revealed drastic gene difference in two small Chinese perches, Siniperca undulata and S. obscura. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics13, jkad101 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Song, S., Zhao, J. & Li, C. Species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction of the sinipercids (Perciformes: Sinipercidae) based on target enrichment of thousands of nuclear coding sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol111, 44–55 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Song, Y. et al. Effects of the Three Gorges Dam on the mandarin fish larvae (Siniperca chuatsi) in the middle reach of the Yangtze River: Spatial gradients in abundance, feeding, growth, and survival. Ecology of Freshwater Fish33, e12795 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen, D.-X. et al. The phylogenetic placement of Siniperca obscura base on complete mitochondrial DNA sequence. Mitochondrial DNA25, 218–219 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang, W., Liang, X.-F., Qu, C.-M., Zhao, C. & Cao, L. Isolation and characterization of 31 polymorphic microsatellite markers in Siniperca obscura Nichols. Conserv Genet Resour5, 153–156 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Qu, C., Liang, X., Huang, W. & Cao, L. Isolation and characterization of 46 novel polymorphic EST-simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers in two Sinipercine fishes (Siniperca) and cross-species amplification. Int J Mol Sci13, 9534–9544 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen, D., Guo, X. & Nie, P. Phylogenetic studies of sinipercid fish (Perciformes: Sinipercidae) based on multiple genes, with first application of an immune-related gene, the virus-induced protein (viperin) gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol55, 1167–1176 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li, C., Ortí, G. & Zhao, J. The phylogenetic placement of sinipercid fishes (“Perciformes”) revealed by 11 nuclear loci. Mol Phylogenet Evol56, 1096–1104 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ding, W. et al. A chromosome-level genome assembly of the mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Frontiers in genetics12, 671650 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He, S. et al. Mandarin fish (Sinipercidae) genomes provide insights into innate predatory feeding. Communications Biology3, 361 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang, C. et al. Screening of genes related to sex determination and differentiation in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Int J Mol Sci23, 7692 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tu, G.-X. et al. Long-read genome assemblies reveal a cis-regulatory landscape associated with phenotypic divergence in two sister Siniperca fish species. Zoological Research44, 287 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu, L., Zhao, J. & Li, C. High-quality genome assembly and annotation of the big-eye mandarin fish (Siniperca knerii). G3: Genes, Genomes. Genetics10, 877–880 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiang, M. et al. The telomere-to-telomere gap-free reference genome and taxonomic reassessment of Siniperca roulei. GigaScience14, giaf068 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen, S. Ultrafast one-pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. Imeta2, e107 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics27, 764–770 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S. & Schatz, M. C. GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes. Nat Commun11, 1432 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods18, 170–175 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell systems3, 95–98 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science356, 92–95 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. bioinformatics25, 1754–1760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell systems3, 99–101 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang, X. & Wang, L. GMATA: an integrated software package for genome-scale SSR mining, marker development and viewing. Frontiers in plant science7, 215951 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res27, 573–580 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Han, Y. & Wessler, S. R. MITE-Hunter: a program for discovering miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements from genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res38, e199–e199 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 9451–9457 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenetic and genome research110, 462–467 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hubley, R. et al. The Dfam database of repetitive DNA families. Nucleic Acids Res44, D81–D89 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature biotechnology37, 907–915 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nature biotechnology33, 290–295 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res31, 5654–5666 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature protocols8, 1494–1512 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li, H. Protein-to-genome alignment with miniprot. Bioinformatics39, btad014 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR genomics and bioinformatics3, lqaa108 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res34, W435–W439 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bruna, T., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark-ETP: automatic gene finding in eukaryotic genomes in consistency with extrinsic data. BioRxiv, 2023–2001 (2023).
- 38.Kuznetsov, D. et al. OrthoDB v11: annotation of orthologs in the widest sampling of organismal diversity. Nucleic Acids Res51, D445–D451 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome biology9, 1–22 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods18, 366–368 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bairoch, A. et al. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res33, D154–D159 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res28, 27–30 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tatusov, R. L. et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC bioinformatics4, 1–14 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet25, 25–29 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kanz, C. et al. The EMBL nucleotide sequence database. Nucleic Acids Res33, D29–D33 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.NCBI Sequence Read Archive.https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP598015 (2025).
- 47.NCBI GenBank.https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_049996615.1 (2025).
- 48.Liu, H. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the Siniperca obscura. Figshare.10.6084/m9.figshare.29641379 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics31, 3210–3212 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome biology21, 245 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li, K., Xu, P., Wang, J., Yi, X. & Jiao, Y. Identification of errors in draft genome assemblies at single-nucleotide resolution for quality assessment and improvement. Nat Commun14, 6556 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics34, 3094–3100 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Okonechnikov, K., Conesa, A. & Garcia-Alcalde, F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics.32, 292–294 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tang, H. et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science320, 486–488 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tang, H. et al. JCVI: A versatile toolkit for comparative genomics analysis. iMeta, e211 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Liu, H. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the Siniperca obscura. Figshare.10.6084/m9.figshare.29641379 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated in this study have been deposited in public repositories and are freely available. Raw sequencing data, including PacBio HiFi, Hi-C, MGI short-read, and transcriptome datasets, are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA124564946. The chromosome-level genome assembly of Siniperca obscura has been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession GCA_049996615.147. The corresponding genome annotation files have been deposited in the Figshare repository48.
No special codes or scripts were used in this work, and data processing was carried out based on the protocols and manuals of the corresponding bioinformatics software.





