Skip to main content
The Company of Biologists Open Access logoLink to The Company of Biologists Open Access
. 2026 Feb 26;153(4):dev204359. doi: 10.1242/dev.204359

Crip2 preserves hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell production through inhibition of Notch signals

Angelika G Aleman 1, Bianca Ulloa 2,3, Rigolin Nayak 4, Caitlin Ford 5, Kathryn S Potts 2,3, Carmen de Sena-Tomás 4,6, Camila Vicioso 4, Uday Rangaswamy 7, Harold K Elias 8, Michael G Kharas 8, Remo Sanges 7,9, Teresa Bowman 2,3,10, Kimara L Targoff 4,11,
PMCID: PMC12967150  PMID: 41601327

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) have multilineage potential and sustain long-term self-renewal. Deriving patient-specific HSPCs has immense therapeutic potential to overcome the shortage of compatible donors for transplantation. In zebrafish, hemogenic endothelium (HE) is a specialized collection of dorsal aortic endothelial cells (ECs) that give rise to HSPCs. Our data reveal that Cysteine rich intestinal protein 2 (Crip2) has a previously unrecognized function in establishing the proper EC environment for HSPC specification. To investigate the requirement of Crip2, we generated loss-of-function alleles in crip2 and crip3, a gene family member with cardiovascular expression. crip2−/−;crip3−/− (cripDM) embryos exhibit decreased HSPC emergence with impaired lineage derivative production. Single cell RNA-sequencing of kdrl:mCherry+ ECs reveals upregulation of vascular development signature and failure to repress Notch signals during the vital transition of HE specification to HSPC emergence. Moreover, our data underscore that inhibition of Notch promotes HSPC generation in cripDM embryos and Crip genes operate through NF-κB to limit Notch. Identification of Crip2 as a novel regulator of Notch repression in HE will enhance our understanding of cues necessary to improve human HSPC production in vitro.

Keywords: Crip2, HSPC, Notch, Hemogenic endothelium, Zebrafish


Summary: The expression of Crip2 is finely tuned to repress Notch signals at the emergence of HSPCs, a discovery that could support the discovery of tools to repopulate fully functional definitive blood precursors in diseased states.

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) establish the blood system and serve as the source of many cell types given their ability for self-renewal and differentiation into mature lineages. Significant advances have been made in identifying transcriptional networks responsible for HSPC ontogeny. Moreover, stem cell-based regenerative and transplantation medicine is a therapeutic necessity for both malignant and non-malignant hematopoietic diseases (Castagnoli et al., 2019; Dazzi et al., 2007; Delaney et al., 2016; Gross et al., 2010; Rao et al., 2022). Yet, scalable production of long-lived multi-lineage hematopoietic cells with engraftment potential remains challenging (Slukvin and Uenishi, 2019; Wang and Sugimura, 2023). Despite the burden of human hematopoietic disorders, the ability to drive patient-specific HSPC production from mesodermal progenitors in vitro continues to be devastatingly inefficient (Ditadi et al., 2015; Doulatov et al., 2013; Sugimura et al., 2017). Recent advances have demonstrated an ability to deliver vector- and stroma-free transplantable HSPCs; however, the requirement of markers for endothelial and hematopoietic enrichment still limits translation to clinical practice (Piau et al., 2023). Therefore, dissecting the molecular cues that are essential in promoting and sustaining the self-renewing HSPC lineage is crucial to improve this therapeutic potential.

HSPCs are first produced along the ventral wall of the dorsal aorta (VDA) in a specialized hemogenic endothelium (HE) in all vertebrates (Bertrand et al., 2010; Dzierzak and Speck, 2008; Kissa and Herbomel, 2010). In the zebrafish aorta, HE is labeled by gata2b expression and subsequent upregulation of runx1 expression by 24 h post fertilization (hpf) (Butko et al., 2015). HSPCs arise from the floor of the dorsal aorta through an ‘endothelial-to-hematopoietic’ transition (EHT) (Bertrand et al., 2010; Kissa and Herbomel, 2010; Lam et al., 2010). This process of ‘budding’ occurs between 30 and 36 hpf, with their emergence into circulation between 40 and 52 hpf (Kissa and Herbomel, 2010). The HSPCs travel to a vascular plexus called the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT), a counterpart to the mammalian fetal liver, where they settle and expand for 3-4 days before migrating to the adult hematopoietic niche in the kidney marrow and thymus (Hagedorn et al., 2023; Li et al., 2018; Murayama et al., 2006; Tamplin et al., 2015). Employing a Brainbow-based multicolor Zebrabow system, in vivo analysis reveals that 20-30 HSPC clones originating from the HE generate the adult blood system (Henninger et al., 2017). Despite this tightly orchestrated process, the regulators of the HE specification are poorly understood (Slukvin and Uenishi, 2019). Further investigation of the mechanisms guiding the transition from arterial endothelial fate to HE identity will augment our ability to produce renewable and engraftable HSPCs in vitro for clinical applications.

We aimed to investigate these mechanisms, and identified cysteine rich intestinal protein 2 (crip2) as a previously unrecognized gene essential for embryonic hematopoiesis. Crip2 is a LIM-domain-only protein that has reported roles in smooth muscle cell differentiation and migration (Chen et al., 2013; Kihara et al., 2011), tumor suppression (Cheung et al., 2011) and apoptosis (Lo et al., 2012). Murine data has illustrated Crip2 expression in cardiomyocytes (CMs) and endothelial cells (ECs) (Wei et al., 2011). In zebrafish embryos, crip2 is maternally expressed and transcripts become localized to the heart tube at 24 hpf and to the atrioventricular canal by 48 hpf (Kim et al., 2014). Furthermore, single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from adult zebrafish delineate crip2 expression at the injury border zone in the regenerating heart (Honkoop et al., 2019). More recently, from a lineage-tracing approach to track HSPCs in vivo using the regulatory elements of the zebrafish draculin (drl) gene, crip2 is identified in the pre-HE (Ulloa et al., 2021), a cell population responsible for initiating an EHT transition (Zovein et al., 2008). Despite these reports hinting at Crip2 function in cellular processes associated with vascular EC function and HE production, a requirement for developmental hematopoiesis has yet to be uncovered.

Although several transcription factors and signaling pathways exhibit notable roles in enabling the shift from arterial program to hematopoietic identity, Notch activity has emerged as a major director of HSPC emergence (Bigas et al., 2013; Gama-Norton et al., 2015; Lomeli and Castillo-Castellanos, 2020). Since Notch signaling molecules and targets have been shown to be expressed in arterial endothelium, HE and HSPCs (Fadlullah et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2020), it has been arduous to uncouple the requirements for this crucial cell fate determination pathway in distinguishing arterial identity from hematopoietic commitment (Thambyrajah and Bigas, 2022). However, evidence points to a temporally-controlled downregulation of Notch following specification of HE to boost HSPC departure (Gama-Norton et al., 2015; Lizama et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017, 2015). Yet, little is known regarding the upstream regulators responsible for delicately titrating Notch signals. How does Notch transition from its key role in establishing the hemogenic capacity to its repressive function in emerging HSPCs? Our studies underline the innovative finding that crip2 operates as a negative regulator of Notch specifically as HSPCs arise from the HE. We extend these investigations to include the previously reported physical interaction of Crip2 with NF-κB to propose a mechanism by which Crip genes restrict Notch signals (Cheung et al., 2011). Extrapolation of these insights to ex vivo HSPC generation techniques offers strategies for modulating Notch in a spatiotemporal fashion and for improving life-saving applications for hematopoietic disorders more broadly.

In the present study, we reveal a previously unknown role for Crip2 in repression of arterial fate to promote HE specification and foster HSPC emergence during the initial phase of definitive hematopoiesis. We designed a novel loss-of-function model for Crip genes, demonstrating the vital role of crip2 in embryonic hematopoiesis. Our studies highlight impaired production of HSPCs in the zebrafish dorsal aorta specifically during the first 3 days of blood development. Augmentation of the arterial signature and enhanced expression of Notch pathway components reveal the requirement for Crip2 in appropriate inhibition of these genetic programs. Through repression of elevated Notch signals during the critical window of HSPC emergence, we observe a rescue of hematopoietic efficiency in the Crip loss-of-function model. Moreover, inhibition of NF-κB similarly abrogates the decrement in HSPCs in the context of Notch suppression. Taken together, our findings uncover Crip2 as a new player contributing to HSPC production, its expression being finely tuned to repress Notch signals at the crucial juncture of HSPC emergence. These results from the zebrafish embryo can inform tactics to heighten the efficiency of HSPC in vitro differentiation for therapies of hematopoietic disease.

RESULTS

Crip loss-of-function embryos serve as a new model to study early hematopoietic development

Through mining an unpublished bulk RNA-seq dataset performed at 26 hpf, we screened for previously unappreciated, critical regulators of hematopoiesis and identified crip2 expression in the somites, dorsal aorta and linear heart tube (Fig. 1A-C; Fig. S1A,C). The Crip family constitutes a subclass of LIM-domain-only proteins that includes Crip1 (Birkenmeier and Gordon, 1986), Crip2 (Yu et al., 2002) and Crip3 (Kirchner et al., 2001). These LIM-domain-only proteins are evolutionarily conserved and resemble another family called cysteine- and glycine-rich proteins (Csrp) that are expressed in differentiated vascular smooth muscle cells (Henderson et al., 2002; Jain et al., 1998). Extensive studies have highlighted the importance of HE in the VDA in producing HSPCs (Bertrand et al., 2010; Dzierzak and Speck, 2008; Kissa and Herbomel, 2010). Moreover, recent studies also examine the somitic origins of stromal cell progenitors required for HSPC production in CHT (Murayama et al., 2015, 2023). Thus, given that we first detected crip2 transcripts in the caudal somites and the dorsal aorta with persistence in the vasculature to 36 hpf (Fig. 1A-C), we conclude that this spatiotemporal configuration suggests potential functions in early hematopoiesis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

crip2 is expressed in the endothelium of the dorsal aorta. (A-F) In situ hybridization for crip2 in wild-type (n=35) (A), (n=15) (B), (n=20) (C) and in cripDM (n=35) (D), (n=15) (E), (n=20) (F) embryos at 26 hpf (A,B,D,E) and 36 hpf (C,F). Lateral views, anterior to the left (A,C,D,F). Transverse views, dorsal to the top (B,E). Scale bars: 100 µm. (G) Schematic depicts the zebrafish crip2 gene in black and the wild-type and predicted crip2 mutant protein products in blue. The five base pair deletion in exon 2 (red bar), generated through CRISPR mutagenesis, results in an early stop codon in exon 3, indicated by the red asterisk. The predicted protein lacks the second half of the first LIM binding domain. (H) Schematic depicts the zebrafish crip3 gene in black and the wild-type and predicted crip3 mutant protein products in blue. The 11 base pair deletion in exon 2 (red bar), generated through CRISPR mutagenesis, results in an early stop codon in exon 3, indicated by the red asterisk. The predicted protein lacks the second half of the first LIM binding domain. (I,J) Representative live images of wild-type (n=10) (I) and cripDM (n=10) (J) embryos at 52 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 250 µm. (K,L) Quantitative PCR analyses of crip2 (K) and crip3 (L) expression in wild-type and cripDM embryos at 26 hpf shows significant reduction in both genes, employing unpaired, two-tailed nonparametric t-tests (**P=0.0067 in K and ****P<0.0001 in L). Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown.

Although crip2 is the only Crip gene family member noted in the caudal somites and dorsal aorta, we observed cardiac expression of both crip2 and crip3 in the developing heart (Fig. S1A-E). crip2 is expressed throughout the myocardium at the linear heart tube stage (26 hpf) and in the atrioventricular canal (AVC) and outflow tract (OFT) following chamber emergence (52 hpf) (Fig. S1C,D). While crip3 transcripts were identified in the cardiac chambers at 52 hpf (Fig. S1E), crip1 was only found in the pronephros and faintly in the pharyngeal arches (Fig. S1I,J). To avoid potential overlapping roles with members of the Crip gene family detected in the cardiovascular structures, we targeted both crip2 and crip3 with CRISPR multiplex RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease genome editing in zebrafish (Blackburn et al., 2013; Cong et al., 2013; Gagnon et al., 2014; Hwang et al., 2013; Jao et al., 2013). Successful recovery of a nonsense allele for crip2fcu2 was identified with a 5 bp deletion in exon 2, yielding a truncated 45 aa protein (Fig. 1G). Similarly, the crip3fcu3 allele was generated through an 11 bp deletion in exon 2, yielding a truncated, 63 aa protein (Fig. 1H). Both crip2fcu2 and crip3fcu3 are predicted to cause truncations in the first LIM domain of each protein, abrogating functional interactions. We benefited from these novel genetic reagents to generate a double mutant, crip2−/−;crip3−/− (hereafter referred to as cripDM), zebrafish line. Our data illuminate significant downregulation of both targeted Crip genes by in situ hybridization (ISH) (Fig. 1D-F; Fig. S1F-H) and qPCR (Fig. 1K,L).

Although cripDM embryos appeared to be normal and were viable (Fig. 1I,J), we scrutinized for potential cardiac development phenotypes that might obfuscate our examination of hematopoiesis in these animals. Surprisingly, we ascertained normal ventricular and atrial morphogenesis and chamber identity maintenance (Fig. S2A-C), cardiomyocyte cell numbers (Fig. S2D-F), and OFT and AVC formation (Fig. S2G-L). These data underscore that crip2 and crip3 expression in the heart does not play a noteworthy role in zebrafish cardiac morphogenesis. Altogether, we conclude that cripDM embryos serve as an excellent model to probe the function of crip2 in early hematopoietic development.

Crip genes are required for HSPC emergence from the dorsal aorta

Definitive hematopoiesis in zebrafish produces HSPCs that have the potential for self-renewal and the ability to differentiate into all blood cell fates (Nik et al., 2017; Orkin and Zon, 2008). To determine whether Crip genes play roles in the establishment of the definitive HSPC pool, we inspected HSPC markers, runx1 at 26 hpf and cmyb (also known as myb) at 32 hpf, and found a statistically significant decrease in expression in cripDM compared with wild-type embryos (Fig. 2A-F). We next evaluated cmyb ISH in crip2−/− and crip3−/− embryos independently to examine for synergistic effects in the cripDM embryos. Our data revealed no statistically significant decrement in cmyb expression when comparing crip2−/− and crip3−/− with wild-type embryos (Fig. S3A-E). These findings indicate that compensation occurs between crip2 and crip3 genes and underscore the benefits of working with the cripDM model.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

crip2 loss-of-function results in decreased HSPCs and lineage derivatives. (A,B) In situ hybridization (ISH) for runx1 in wild-type (n=70) (A) and cripDM (n=71) (B) embryos at 26 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) Quantification of runx1 signal in the dorsal aorta (DA) from A and B in wild-type and cripDM embryos using pixel intensity analysis. Unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test yields a statistically significant difference between wild-type and cripDM (****P<0.0001) embryos. (D,E) ISH for cmyb in wild-type (n=45) (D) and cripDM (n=41) (E) embryos at 32 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 50 µm. (F) Quantification of cmyb signal in the DA from D and E in wild-type and cripDM embryos using pixel intensity analysis shows a statistically significant reduced signal in cripDM embryos employing an unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test (**P=0.0049). (G,H) Live transgenic images of wild-type (n=22) (G) and cripDM (n=36) (H) embryos carrying Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(CD41:GFP) at 40 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 25 µm. (I) Quantification of HSPCs in wild-type and cripDM embryos denoted by kdrl:mCherry+cd41:GFP+ cells in G and H. Unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test yields a statistically significant difference between wild-type and cripDM embryos (****P<0.0001). (J,K) ISH for rag1 in wild-type (n=23) (J) and cripDM (n=19) (K) embryos at 5 dpf. Ventral views, anterior to the top. Dotted triangles indicate rag1 expression. Scale bar: 50 µm. (L) Quantification of the rag1+ area in the thymus of embryos from J and K reveals decreased rag1+ area in cripDM embryos, employing an unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test (***P<0.001). Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown.

We then inspected the developing HSPCs that are derived from the aortic HE in the VDA and emerge through EHT. Employing Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(cd41:GFP) double transgenic embryos at 40 hpf as previously described (Clements et al., 2011), our data illuminate a statistically significant decrease in the number of kdrl:mCherry+cd41:GFP+ cells when comparing wild-type and cripDM embryos (Fig. 2G-I). Taken together, these results implicate a requirement for Crip genes in promoting HSPC emergence in the zebrafish embryo.

Loss of Crip gene function impairs production of hematopoietic derivatives

We sought to explore the origins of this HSPC defect through evaluation of the primitive hematopoietic wave. Early myelopoiesis originates in the anterior lateral plate mesoderm (ALPM) and early erythropoiesis arises from the intermediate cell mass (ICM) (Davidson et al., 2003; Detrich et al., 1995); these two primary embryonic phases of blood production constitute primitive hematopoiesis (Chen and Zon, 2009). Furthermore, fate mapping studies identify a hemangioblast population in zebrafish that give rise to myeloid and endothelial progenitors (Vogeli et al., 2006; Warga et al., 2009). We examined stem cell leukemia factor (tal1) in the posterior mesoderm bilateral strips to detect these hemangioblast precursors in wild-type and cripDM embryos at 14 somites (Gering et al., 1998; Liao et al., 1998). Given normal patterning of tal1 expression in the posterior lateral plate mesoderm (PLPM) (Fig. S4A,B), we evaluated hemangioblast derivatives such as gata1a and spi1b (also known as pu.1) which are expressed in erythroid and myeloid progenitors of the primitive wave of hematopoiesis, respectively (Fig. S4C-F) (Bennett et al., 2001; Davidson and Zon, 2004; Detrich et al., 1995; Lieschke et al., 2002). Our investigation of gata1a and spi1b indicated no evidence of expression domain perturbations in the cripDM compared to wild-type embryos. Altogether, these data document normal progression of the primitive wave of blood development in the cripDM embryos.

Given that the first evidence of aberrant developmental hematopoiesis in the Crip gene loss-of-function model occurred during HSPC production (Fig. 2), we probed the ability of these progenitors to produce lineage derivatives. HSPCs travel and colonize the thymus where T lymphocytes are manufactured (Trede and Zon, 1998). Moreover, thymic seeding reflects the efficiency of definitive HSPC emergence from the dorsal aorta (Jin et al., 2007; Murayama et al., 2006). We observed a smaller field of expression of rag1, a thymocyte marker, in cripDM compared to wild-type embryos at 5 days post fertilization (dpf) (Fig. 2J-L). Thus, our data illuminate that crip2 and crip3 are necessary for HSPC generation and definitive hematopoiesis with persistent requirement through T cell accumulation in the thymus.

cripDM embryos recover from deficits in HSPC production

Given the observed early insufficient definitive hematopoiesis in cripDM embryos, we asked whether there were long term consequences of the depleted HSPC numbers. Thus, we tracked cmyb expression in wild-type compared with cripDM embryos from 32 hpf and detected a recovery of the HSPC deficit in the cripDM embryos by 4 dpf (Fig. 3A-H). Quantification of the cmyb pixel intensity at each timepoint in both genotypes corroborates normalization of expression in the cripDM embryos to the wild-type levels (Fig. 3I-L). To confirm the presence and proportions of multilineage derivatives in the adult, we performed whole kidney marrow dissection with flow cytometric and fluorescence imaging quantification at 3-4 months post fertilization. These data validate no statistically significant differences in the major blood cell populations (erythroid, myeloid, lymphoid and precursors) between the wild-type and cripDM zebrafish (Fig. 3M,N). Aligned with previous results emphasizing the long term viability of runx1−/− embryos (Sood et al., 2010), crip2 and crip3 are dispensable for multilineage hematopoietic potential. Similarly, a missense mutation in nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1 (nr3c1) (Ziv et al., 2013), a glucocorticoid receptor, produces GRs357 embryos with diminished cmyb expression in the CHT and T cell marker expression in the thymus (Kwan et al., 2016). Yet, GRs357 zebrafish survive and are morphologically indistinguishable from their wild-type siblings into adulthood (Ziv et al., 2013). Taken together, we conclude that Crip genes are vital for embryonic HSPC production while compensatory mechanisms override this deficit during expansion and maturation of adult HSPC population.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

cripDM embryos recover from embryonic HSPC defects. (A-H) In situ hybridization for cmyb in wild-type (A-D) and cripDM (E-H) embryos. Wild-type (n=45) (A) and cripDM (n=41) (E) embryos at 32 hpf, wild-type (n=40) (B) and cripDM (n=42) (F) embryos at 52 hpf, wild-type (n=39) (C) and cripDM (n=41) (G) embryos at 72 hpf, and wild-type (n=21) (D) and cripDM (n=21) (F) embryos at 4 dpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bars: 100 µm. (I,J) Quantification of cmyb signal from A, E, B and F using pixel intensity analysis shows a reduced signal in cripDM embryos employing unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-tests (**P=0.0049 in I and ****P<0.0001 in J). (K) Quantification of cmyb signal from C and G using pixel intensity analysis shows a reduced signal in cripDM embryos employing an unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test (****P<0.001). (L) A similar comparison from D and H illustrates no statistically significant difference (ns) between wild-type and cripDM embryos. Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown. (M) Representative flow cytometry analysis of whole kidney marrow (n=15 for wild-type and n=15 for cripDM fish). Forward and side scatter parameters were used to define the major blood cell populations (erythroid, myeloid, lymphoid and precursors). (N) Quantification of the frequency of blood cell populations isolated from whole kidney marrow. Mean of each dataset is shown.

Crip genes are required to repress endothelial cell identity

To explore how Crip genes regulate HSPC generation, we investigated the vascular endothelium given the essential role of arterial specification in HSPC formation (de Bruijn et al., 2000; Garcia-Porrero et al., 1995). We assessed in vivo expression patterns of pan-endothelial markers (cdh5 and fli1) (Fig. 4A,B,D,E) (Lundin et al., 2020) and an arterial marker (efnb2a) (Fig. 4G,H) (Kobayashi et al., 2020) at 26 hpf, because the initiation of crip2 expression occurs in the VDA at this stage. The intensity of expression of these genes was statistically significantly upregulated in cripDM compared with wild-type embryos (Fig. 4C,F,I), with visible enhancement in both the dorsal aorta and the intersegmental vessels. However, the gene expression configuration of cdh5, fli1 and efnb2a was appropriately patterned in cripDM embryos, indicating that vasculogenesis was not disrupted. Together, our data point to a fundamental role for Crip genes in regulating the expression levels of the vascular gene signature.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

cripDM embryos exhibit upregulation of the vascular gene signature. (A-C) In situ hybridization (ISH) for cdh5 in wild-type (n=40) (A) and cripDM (n=41) (B) embryos at 26 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Quantification of cdh5 signal in the dorsal aorta (DA) using pixel intensity analysis (C) shows enhanced signal in cripDM embryos employing an unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test (****P<0.0001). (D-F) ISH for fli1 in wild-type (n=56) (D) and cripDM (n=57) (E) embryos at 26 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Quantification of fli1 signal in the DA using pixel intensity analysis (F). An unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test yields a statistically significant difference between wild-type and cripDM (****P<0.0001) embryos. (G-I) ISH for efnb2a in wild-type (n=54) (G) and cripDM (n=53) (H) embryos at 26 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Quantification of efnb2a signal in the DA using pixel intensity analysis (I). An unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test yields a statistically significant difference between wild-type and cripDM (****P<0.0001) embryos. Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown. Scale bars: 100 µm.

We next probed the molecular processes mediated by Crip genes in establishing the vascular endothelium using 10x Genomics scRNA-seq analysis on sorted mCherry+ cells from Tg(kdrl:mCherry) and cripDM;Tg(kdrl:mCherry) embryos at 30 hpf (Fig. S5A). Using the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline, we identified 7692 and 5232 cells for wild-type and cripDM samples, respectively (Table S3). We annotated cell types based on differentially expressed marker genes and by using cell type markers derived from the literature (Fig. S5B,C; Table S4). From the 32 unsupervised clusters, we classified cells belonging to the nervous system (clusters 22, 24, 25, 29), epithelium (clusters 2, 21, 27, 28, 30), cardiovascular (cluster 8), endothelium (clusters 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19), blood (clusters 10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26), erythroid (cluster 0) and fibroblast (clusters 6, 7, 14, 23, 31).

We then focused our interest exclusively on ECs, identifying five different populations: venous (EC venous) (clusters 1, 3, 8), arterial-venous (clusters 2, 6, 9, 15), arterial (clusters 7, 13), venous proliferating (cluster 4) and arterial-venous proliferating (cluster 14) (Fig. 5A,B; Table S5). The decrease of crip2 gene expression was confirmed in cripDM compared to wild-type ECs (Fig. S5D). We noticed that cripDM ECs, as compared to wild-type, had significant upregulation of vasculature genes such as notch1a, fli1 and flt4, whereas neutrophil (lyz) and erythroid hemoglobin (hbbe1.1, hbbe1.3, hbbe3, hbae1.3, hbae3) genes were significantly downregulated (Fig. 5C; Table S6). Additionally, all endothelial cell types had significantly increased average expression of these vasculature genes, computed as a higher vasculature development score (Fig. 5D; Table S7). Supporting these findings, Gene Ontology analysis showed that blood vessel development pathways, such as blood vessel remodeling, morphogenesis and differentiation, were also enriched in arterial ECs in cripDM compared with wild-type embryos (Fig. 5E). Altogether, the Crip loss-of-function model skews the EC gene expression profile in favor of vasculature development, suggesting a potential disruption in the normal EC formation that is necessary for hematopoietic emergence.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Enriched vascular gene profile emerges in cripDM embryos. (A) Dot plot representation for the cell type identification of endothelial populations using key arterial (dll4, hey2, flt1, notch1b, efnb2a), venous (flt4, mrc1a, dab2, stab2) and cell cycle (kif23, mki67, nusap1, tacc3) marker genes. Cell types include endothelial venous (EC venous), arterial-venous (AV), endothelial arterial (EC arterial), endothelial venous proliferating and endothelial arterial proliferating. Expression bar illustrates scaling performed per gene where the mean is close to 0 and the standard deviation is 1. Only genes with the highest scaled expression value will be dark purple (s.d.>1) and the lowest scaled expression will be light purple (s.d.<−1). Percent of cells expressing gene in the population is depicted by the size of the dot. (B) Cell type classifications of ECs in UMAP space as identified in A. (C) Volcano plot for upregulated (red, right) and downregulated (blue, left) genes between wild-type and cripDM embryos in total EC population. Horizontal red line is at a -log10(P-value adjusted) value of 0.005 and vertical red lines are at a mean log2(fold change) value of −0.15 and 0.15. (D) Violin plots for the vasculature development gene expression score for the endothelial populations in wild-type and cripDM embryos. Pairwise Wilcox test (P<0.0001). (E) Gene Ontology enrichment scores between wild-type and cripDM samples for arterial ECs. (F-K) In situ hybridization for dll4 in wild-type (n=41) (F) and cripDM (n=41) (G) embryos and for notch1b in wild-type (n=38) (I) and cripDM (n=40) (J) embryos at 30 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bars: 50 µm. Violin plots for dll4 (H) and notch1b (K) gene expression in scRNA-seq dataset for endothelial populations in wild-type and cripDM embryos. Pairwise Wilcox test was used for these analyses (H,K) and yields statistically significant differences in noted venous (****P<0.0001), arterial-venous (****P<0.0001) and arterial (*P<0.05) populations. ns, not significant.

Crip-dependent inhibition of Notch is necessary to ensure HSPC generation

To dissect the mechanism underlying the upregulation of vascular signatures in the EC population in cripDM embryos, we queried the molecular pathways that are misregulated in the scRNA-seq data. We directed our attention to the Notch signals, given their essential function in HSPC specification (Butko et al., 2016; Thambyrajah and Bigas, 2022). Previous studies have shown that while Notch signaling regulates HE specification and HSPC emergence, Notch is not continuously expressed (Gama-Norton et al., 2015; Li et al., 2022; Lizama et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017, 2015). Arterial ECs in the dorsal aorta must lose expression of arterial genes and downregulate Notch in order to gain hemogenic identity (Li et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2017). Our findings highlighted in vivo upregulation of the Notch ligand, delta-like 4 (dll4), and receptor, notch1b, in the VDA at this crucial timepoint (30 hpf) (Fig. 5F-K). These data indicate that consistent overexpression of Notch in the arterial endothelial population may result in impaired hemogenic identity establishment in the Crip loss-of-function model.

Given the robust expression of crip2 in the dorsal aorta at the time of HE specification (Fig. 1B,C), we hypothesized that Crip genes are responsible for restricting Notch expression to repress the vascular gene network, a process necessary for EHT and HSPC generation. To confirm this theory, we assessed Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(tp1:EGFP) and cripDM;Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(tp1:EGFP) embryos treated with DMSO and found a statistically significant augmentation of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in the ventral wall of the dorsal aorta in the loss-of-function model (Fig. 6A-C). We then exposed wild-type and cripDM embryos to dibenzazepine (DBZ), a γ-secretase inhibitor that prevents processing of the Notch receptor into an active form, from 24 hpf to 32 hpf (Fig. 6D), as previously described (Li et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2015). We observed a statistically significant rescue of the inappropriately increased number of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in the cripDM embryos following DBZ application, which corroborates effective inhibition of Notch in the HE (Fig. 6G-I). Despite absence of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cellular loss in the DBZ-treated wild-type embryos (Fig. 6E,F,I), we identified a diminution in cmyb pixel intensity in this cohort (Fig. 6J-L). This effect on the cmyb-expressing HSPC population in wild-type embryos most likely represents Notch-independent, γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of off-target proteins, as previously described (Ables et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2011). However, suppression of Notch signals by DBZ administration clearly yielded a concurrent alleviation of cmyb-expressing HSPC knockdown in the DBZ-treated cripDM embryos when compared to the DMSO-treated cripDM embryos (Fig. 6J,M,N). Taken together, these results elucidate that elevated Notch signals in the ECs of the dorsal aorta contribute to a loss of HSPC emergence in the cripDM HE.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Crip2 functions upstream of Notch signaling in the dorsal aorta to safeguard HSPC production. (A,B) Confocal images of wild-type (n=25) (A) and cripDM (n=44) (B) embryos carrying Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(tp1:EGFP) at 28 hpf. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Arrows indicate kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ double positive cells in the floor of the dorsal aorta. Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) Quantification of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in wild-type and cripDM embryos. Unpaired two-tailed nonparametric t-test yields a statistically significant difference between wild-type and cripDM embryos (****P<0.0001). (D) Experimental design schematic depicts the addition of DMSO and DBZ to wild-type and cripDM embryos at 24 hpf with fixation at 28 hpf for confocal microscopy or 32 hpf for cmyb in situ hybridization (ISH). (E-H) Confocal images of DMSO-treated wild-type (n=21) (E) and cripDM (n=24) (G) and DBZ-treated wild-type (n=18) (F) and cripDM (n=15) (H) embryos carrying Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(tp1:EGFP) at 28 hpf reveal normalization of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cell number in DBZ-exposed cripDM embryos. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Arrows indicate kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ double positive cells in the floor of the dorsal aorta. Scale bar: 25 µm. (I) Quantification of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in the dorsal aorta (DA) from E-H shows a statistically significant reduction in the DBZ-exposed compared to the DMSO-exposed cripDM embryos. Unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test yields ****P<0.0001 between DMSO-exposed wild-type and cripDM embryos and ****P<0.0001 between DMSO- and DBZ-exposed cripDM embryos. (J-N) ISH for cmyb at 32 hpf illuminates reappearance of HSPCs in DBZ-exposed cripDM (n=39) (N) compared to DMSO-exposed cripDM (n=41) (M) embryos, delineating a trend towards HSPC numbers in DMSO-exposed wild-type (n=40) (K) embryos. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 100 µm. Quantification of cmyb signals in the DA from K-N using pixel intensity analysis (J) shows a statistically significant elevation in the DBZ-exposed compared to the DMSO-exposed cripDM embryos. Unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test yields ***P=0.0007 between DMSO- and DBZ-exposed wild-type embryos, ****P<0.0001 between DMSO-exposed wild-type and cripDM embryos, *P=0.0111 between DMSO- and DBZ-exposed cripDM embryos, and *P=0.0278 between DMSO-exposed wild-type and DBZ-exposed cripDM embryos. Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown. ns, not significant.

NF-κB downstream of Crip gene function mediates Notch repression

In order to dissect how Crip proteins facilitate restriction of the Notch pathway, we invoked recent studies documenting oscillatory dynamics of NF-κB activity in the dorsal aorta that mirror transitions in Notch signals (Campbell et al., 2024; Cheng et al., 2023). Moreover, employing functional complementation in cancer cells contributing to tumor development, CRIP2 was identified as a tumor suppressor gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in human cell lines (Cheung et al., 2011). Data exhibiting nuclear localization of CRIP2 protein and physical interaction between CRIP2 and NF-κB reinforce the conclusion that CRIP2 functions as a repressor of NF-κB transcriptional activity (Cheung et al., 2011). Further, studies have underscored the requirement of NF-κB transcription factor in maintenance and homeostasis of HSPCs (Espin-Palazon et al., 2014) and stress the intricate crosstalk between NF-κB and Notch networks (Oeckinghaus et al., 2011). Therefore, we evaluated the premise that Crip2 directly inhibits NF-κB to limit Notch in the dorsal aorta during HSPC emergence. Employing a previously validated NF-κB inhibitor, Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) (Natarajan et al., 1996), we showed that CAPE application alleviates the loss of cmyb-expressing HSPCs in DMSO-treated cripDM versus wild-type embryos, highlighting a phenotypic rescue in the Crip loss-of-function model via NF-κB inhibition (Fig. 7A-F). We subsequently tested whether repression of the NF-κB pathway functions through Notch signals given literature illuminating positive regulation of both Notch ligands and targets by NF-κB (Bash et al., 1999; Moran et al., 2007). Our data depicted a statistically significant decrement in kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in CAPE-treated cripDM embryos when compared to those exposed to DMSO alone (Fig. 7G-K). Moreover, Notch signals established wild-type levels in cripDM embryos following CAPE inhibition of NF-κB (Fig. 7G). This result substantiates the ability of NF-κB repression to block transcription of Notch targets. Altogether, our experiments emphasize that Crip proteins function upstream of NF-κB to suppress Notch signals at the crucial window when HSPCs arise from the dorsal aorta.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

NF-κB regulates Notch targets downstream of Crip genes. (A) Experimental design schematic depicts the addition of DMSO and CAPE to wild-type and cripDM embryos at 24 hpf with fixation at 28 hpf for confocal microscopy or at 32 hpf for cmyb in situ hybridization (ISH). (B-E) ISH for cmyb at 32 hpf illuminates reemergence of HSPCs in CAPE-exposed (n=15) (E) compared to DMSO-exposed (n=18) (D)  cripDM embryos. Images from DMSO- (n=16) (B) and CAPE-exposed (n=19) (C) wild-type embryos are also depicted. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Scale bar: 100 µm. (F) Quantification of cmyb signals in the dorsal aorta (DA) from B-E using pixel intensity analysis shows a statistically significant boost in the CAPE-exposed compared to the DMSO-exposed cripDM embryos. Unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test yields ****P<0.0001 between DMSO- and CAPE-exposed wild-type embryos, between DMSO-exposed wild-type and cripDM embryos, and between DMSO- and CAPE-exposed cripDM embryos. (G-K) Confocal images of DMSO-treated wild-type (n=18) (H) and cripDM (n=22) (J) and CAPE-treated wild-type (n=18) (I) and cripDM (n=32) (K) embryos carrying Tg(kdrl:mCherry);Tg(tp1:EGFP) at 28 hpf underscore a rescue of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cell number in CAPE-exposed cripDM embryos. Lateral views, anterior to the left. Arrows indicate kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ double positive cells in the floor of the dorsal aorta. Scale bar: 25 µm. Quantification of kdrl:mCherry+tp1:EGFP+ cells in H-K (G) shows a statistically significant decrease in the CAPE-exposed compared to the DMSO-exposed cripDM embryos. Unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test yields ****P<0.0001 between DMSO-exposed wild-type and cripDM embryos and between DMSO- and CAPE-exposed cripDM embryos. Mean and standard error of each dataset are shown. ns, not significant.

DISCUSSION

Our findings present previously unseen insights into the pivotal role played by the Crip family members in orchestrating HSPC production during the definitive wave of embryonic hematopoiesis. Within the dorsal aorta, crip2 emerges as a crucial mediator, influencing the expression of arterial gene signatures as ECs undergo EHT. Our scRNA-seq data, coupled with in vivo results, reveal upregulated vascular signatures and heightened Notch signaling, suggesting an imbalance between arterial and hemogenic endothelial identities in the VDA as noted in the schematic model (Fig. S6). Notably, hampering Notch signaling in cripDM embryos leads to a significant rescue of the HSPC population and NF-κB inhibition results in a similar restoration of these cmyb-expressing cells. In summary, our analyses establish crip2 as a pivotal regulator of the arterial gene network via the Notch signaling pathway, critically influencing HSPC production within the HE.

Studies in mouse and chick models demonstrate focal downregulation of Notch activity in hematopoietic clusters with persistence of Notch signals in the neighboring aortic endothelium (Del Monte et al., 2007; Richard et al., 2013). Furthermore, diminished VE-Cadherin and Dll4 expression reinforce the conclusion that hematopoietic clusters lose arterial and endothelial identity as they undergo EHT (Richard et al., 2013). While this essential process of Notch inhibition in the HE has been observed, little is known about the upstream regulatory mechanisms. Data suggest that inhibition of Notch activity can be modulated by the strength of receptor-ligand interactions (Gama-Norton et al., 2015) and by degradation of Notch receptors via G-protein coupled receptor 183-induced proteosome pathway (Zhang et al., 2015). More recently, investigation of the DNA methylome landscape transitions exposes essential functions of DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) in repressing Notch genes to promote the transition from EC to HSPC during EHT (Li et al., 2022). These complex and heterogenous Notch regulatory mechanisms suggest that a multi-faceted network is required to titrate pathway activity and generate HSPCs in the HE. Therefore, it is essential to dissect the range of potential inputs that fine tune this cell fate switch. Our data pinpoint Crip2 as a newly identified repressor of arterial fate in the HE that is expressed during a crucial transition of HSPC emergence. These results also delineate a previously unappreciated function of Crip2 as a vital upstream factor in curbing Notch signaling to promote the establishment of the HE at the expense of vascular fate.

Intricate cross talk between the NF-κB and Notch signaling pathways hint at the possibility that Crip2 may regulate Notch inhibition via NF-κB repression (Mishra et al., 2021; Osipo et al., 2008). Specific examples include transcriptional upregulation of Jagged1, a Notch ligand, and stimulation of Hes-5 and Deltex-1, Notch targets, by NF-κB, both occurring in B cells (Bash et al., 1999; Moran et al., 2007). In support of this mechanism, our data encapsulate mitigation of impaired hemogenic endothelial identity following repression of NF-κB along with reestablishment of wild-type kdrl:mCherry+cd41:GFP+ cell number in cripDM embryos. Given the direct repression of NF-κB by CRIP2 (Cheung et al., 2011), we hypothesize that NF-κB-responsive transcriptional activation of the Notch pathway operates downstream of Crip genes to define the HE and foster HSPC emergence.

Ultimately, translating insights and applying innovative techniques generated in animal models to differentiate human pluripotent stem cells into transplantable HSPCs will expedite therapeutic intervention in patients. Despite recent advances, our ability to facilitate maturation of HSPCs beyond embryonic stages in vitro is still lacking (Calvanese and Mikkola, 2023; Ding et al., 2023). Our efforts to characterize the specific, temporally-controlled requirement for Crip2, a novel regulator of HSPC emergence, in Notch repression in the HE represents a step forward in overcoming the impediments to this long-standing, unsolved problem. Although open questions are outstanding regarding the function of Crip2 in hematopoietic disorders, previous reports have shed light on therapeutic strategies delineating the importance of Crip2 recruitment by a novel long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Sarrah (SCOT1-antisense RNA regulated during aging in the heart), in galvanizing cardioprotective gene expression (Trembinski et al., 2020). Furthermore, recent work emphasizes the crucial role of cis inhibition of Notch pathway via Jagged1 to preserve hematopoietic stem cell fate in vertebrates (Thambyrajah et al., 2024), confirming mathematical models and validating the concept of a heterogeneous HE (Dignum et al., 2021; Nandagopal et al., 2019; Uenishi et al., 2018). One can speculate that Crip2 may participate in demarcation of the hemogenic endothelial fate through inhibition of the Notch pathway via NF-κB transcriptional repression. Harnessing insights from our data and these studies will enrich our understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediated by Crip2 and the processes by which Crip2 fine tunes Notch signals in the endothelium, ultimately supporting the discovery of tools to repopulate fully functional definitive blood precursors in diseased states.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Zebrafish transgenes

We used zebrafish carrying the previously described transgenes: Tg(-5.1myl7:nDsRed2)f2 (RRID: ZDB_ALT-060821-6) (Mably et al., 2003), Tg(kdrl:GFP)la116 (RRID: ZFIN_ZDB-ALT-070529-1) (Choi et al., 2007), Tg(kdrl:mCherry)y206 (RRID: ZDB_ALT-111104-1) (Gore et al., 2011), Tg(-6.0itga2b:EGFP)la2 or Tg(cd41:eGFP) (RRID: ZDB_ ALT-190821-1) (Lin et al., 2005), and Tg(tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 or Tg(tp1:EGFP) (RRID: ZDB_ALT-090625-1) (Parsons et al., 2009). All zebrafish experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Columbia University.

Generation of crip2 and crip3 mutant lines

We generated crip2 and crip3 alleles by targeting the first LIM binding domain of each gene. sgRNAs (crip2: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCTGCAGTAAGACCCTGAGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG-3′ and crip3: 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGCTCCTGGAGGACATGCGGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG-3′) were transcribed from PCR-generated templates using the MEGAscript T7 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as previously described (Gagnon et al., 2014). The NotI-digested pCS2-nCas9n plasmid (Addgene plasmid #47929) was used as a template to transcribe Cas9 mRNA with the SP6 mMESSAGE kit (Invitrogen). One-cell-stage embryos were injected with a mixture of 100 ng/µl of each gene-specific sgRNA and 300 ng/µl Cas9 mRNA. CRISPR-Cas9-injected embryos were raised to adulthood and founders (F0) were identified by PCR using the strategy outlined in the Genotyping section of these methods. Stable lines were established at the F2 generation and identified as crip2fcu2 (5 bp deletion in exon 2, yielding a truncated, 45 aa protein, as in Fig. 1G) and crip3fcu3 (11 bp deletion in exon 2, yielding a truncated, 63 aa protein, as in Fig. 1H).

Genotyping

PCR genotyping was performed on genomic DNA extracted from embryos or individual adult tail clips. Detection of crip2 was performed using primers 5′-CTGAGAAAGTGTCATCACTGGG-3′ and 5′-TACTCACCTCGGCATGGCCA-3′ to generate 102 bp wild-type and 97 bp mutant PCR fragments. Detection of crip3 was performed using primers 5′-TCTAAAATGTGAACGATGTA-3′ and 5′-AAACAGAATGATCAGAGAGA-3′ to generate 109 bp wild-type and 98 bp mutant PCR fragments.

Quantitative PCR

For qPCR, total RNA was extracted from 40 pooled embryos per condition using a RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). The purified RNAs were reverse transcribed with the iScript™ cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) using 1 µg of total RNA per reaction. qPCR was performed with iQ™SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and a CFX96 Touch™ RealTime PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). All experiments were completed using three biological replicates. Primer sequences are noted in Table S1.

In situ hybridization

We performed whole-mount ISH as previously described (Yelon et al., 1999). Removal of pigmentation on embryos older than 26 hpf is achieved through a bleaching protocol with 0.8% potassium hydroxide, 0.9% hydrogen peroxide and 0.1% Tween 20. Previously reported probes employed in this study include runx1 (ZDB-GENE-000605-1), cmyb (ZDB-GENE-991110-14), rag1 (ZDB-GENE-990415-234), cdh5 (ZDB-GENE-040816-1), fli1 (ZDB-GENE-980526-426), efnb2a (ZDB-GENE-990415-67), dll4 (ZDB-GENE-041014-73), notch1b (ZDB-GENE-990415-1893), has2 (ZDB-GENE-020828-1), versican a (ZDB-GENE-011023-1), tal1 (ZDB-GENE-980526-501), gata1a (ZDB-GENE-980526-268) and spi1b (ZDB-GENE-980526-164). New probes generated for these experiments include crip1 (ZDB-GENE-041111-1), crip2 (ZDB-GENE-040426-2889) and crip3 (ZDB-GENE-130530-620). Primer sequences are noted in Table S2.

Immunofluorescence

Whole-mount double immunofluorescence was conducted using a protocol described previously (Alexander et al., 1998). Briefly, embryos were dechorionated and fixed in 1% methanol-free formaldehyde (Poly Sciences, 04018) for 1 h at room temperature, then rinsed twice in PBS and blocked with 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, A8022), 10% goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 005000121) and 0.2% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, S4521) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in 0.2% saponin/PBS solution with the following dilutions: mouse anti-S46 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:20), rabbit anti-dsRed (Clonetech, 632496, 1:500), mouse anti-MF20 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:20) or rabbit anti-Elnb (1:200, Song et al., 2019). The next day, embryos were washed twice in 0.2% saponin/PBS solution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies in 0.2% saponin/PBS with the following dilutions: anti-mouse IgG2b Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen, A21144, 1:200), anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A11034, 1:200), anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen, A11011, 1:375) or anti-mouse IgG1 Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A21121, 1:200). DAPI (1:1000) was added as needed during the secondary antibody incubation. Finally, embryos were rinsed three times in 0.2% saponin/PBS before imaging.

Imaging

Images for live embryos, immunofluorescence and ISH experiments were captured using a Zeiss M2Bio microscope and a Zeiss AxioCam digital camera, before processing with Zeiss AxioVision and Adobe Creative Suite software. MF20/Elnb images were acquired on a Zeiss 710 laser scanning confocal microscope with a Zeiss AXIO Observer Z1 inverted microscope stand. Confocal imaging of transgenic embryos was performed on an A1 confocal scanner mounted on a TiE Eclipse stand (Nikon Instruments). Following data acquisition, all z-stacks were analyzed using ImageJ (version 1.53k, National Institutes of Health).

Cardiomyocyte counting

To quantify cardiomyocytes as previously described (Targoff et al., 2008), immunofluorescence was performed to detect DsRed in cardiomyocyte nuclei of Tg(-5.1myl7:nDsRed2)-carrying embryos and S46 in the atrium. Embryos were gently flattened between a slide and a coverslip in preparation for imaging. Individual cardiomyocytes were counted using ImageJ software on reconstructed z-stacks. Student's t-test (homoscedastic, two-tailed distribution) determined statistical significance between the means of cell number datasets.

Adult kidney marrow isolation

For adult kidney marrow analysis, kidneys from zebrafish aged 3-4 months were dissected, resuspended in 500 ml of FACS buffer supplemented with 1 mg/ml DAPI, and filtered through a 40 mm cell strainer (Falcon). Forward and side scatter parameters were used to resolve the major blood cell lineages of erythroid, myeloid, lymphoid and precursors, as previously described (Traver et al., 2003). All samples were analyzed at the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were processed using FlowJo Software (versions 10.6-10.8).

Statistical analysis and quantification

All quantifications were performed on anonymized data. Results represent at least two independent experiments (technical replicates) in which multiple embryos from multiple independent matings are analyzed (biological replicates). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Version 9.5.0. Normal distribution was assessed using a Shapiro-Wilk test. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to determine significance for all continuous variables that were normally distributed. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to determine significance for all continuous variables that were not normally distributed. Fisher's exact test was used when data involved categorical variables. Statistical values are displayed as mean±standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). The following nomenclature was employed to present results: ns, not significant; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. For quantification of the ISH pixel intensity signals, previously reported protocols were executed (Dobrzycki et al., 2018).

Single cell RNA-sequencing

Cellular dissociation was performed on 30 Tg(kdrl:mCherry)y206 and 30 crip2−/−;crip3−/−;Tg(kdrl:mCherry)y206 embryos at 30 hpf with 5 mg/ml liberase (Roche) solution in PBS at 37°C, pipetting every 5 min until adequately homogenized in solution. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) (5% of volume) was then added to each sample to arrest the dissociation followed by centrifugation (500 g for 5 min) at 4°C. The excess supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended in PBS/1% FBS and filtered through a 40 µm cell strainer. Finally, DAPI (1:1000) was added and cells were sorted using a Special Order Research Product FACSAria™ Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences) under gentle conditions with the 130 μm nozzle at 12 PSI. NERL Diluent 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DIL5522) solution was used for sheath fluid. FACSAria was calibrated per the standard protocol in the CSCI Flow Cytometry Core Facility using Cytometer Setup and Tracking Beads (BD Biosciences, 655051) and SPHERO Rainbow Calibration Particles (8 Peaks, 3.0 µm) (Spherotech, RCP-30-5A), followed by optimization of the drop charge delay using BD FACS Accudrop Beads (BD Biosciences, 345249).

Cells were selected to be sorted based on the following scheme: first, forward and side light scatter (488 nm) were used to identify cells and establish an initial gate to remove debris. Following this selection, single cells were identified by plotting forward light scatter pulse area against forward scatter pulse height. Signals from DAPI (measured with 405 nm excitation at 100 mW and a 450/50 bandpass filter), a cell impermeant nuclear dye, were used to select live, nucleated cells based on low DAPI signal. Finally, mCherry signal was collected alongside these other parameters using 561 nm excitation at 100 mW and a 610/20 bandpass filter.

Single cells were captured to prepare the library for the sequencing using the Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kit (10x Genomics, version 3.1) and the 10x Genomics platform according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following assessment of quality and size with the Bioanalyzer, the cDNA libraries were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 at the JP Sulzberger Columbia Genome Center at Columbia University Medical Center.

Mapping and clustering of single cell mRNA data

Fastq files of wild-type and crip2−/−;crip3−/− (hereafter referred to as cripDM) samples were aligned to a custom zebrafish reference genome (Danio rerio GRCz11/danRer11, version 105) which includes the mCherry and GFP sequences built using the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger software (version 3.1.0) (Zheng et al., 2017) with default parameters (Table S3). The output of Cell Ranger was analyzed using Seurat (version 4.1.0) (Butler et al., 2018; Hao et al., 2021; Satija et al., 2015; Stuart et al., 2019). The feature-barcode matrices of the two samples were read into an R environment using the Read10X() function. A Seurat object was created for each sample using the CreateSeuratObject() function and merged. The percentage of mitochondrial gene counts were computed using the PercentageFeatureSet() function. A subset of high-quality cells was selected for analysis, defined as cells expressing greater than 200 genes (nFeature_RNA>200), overall mitochondrial gene count lower than 10% (percent.mt<10), and greater than 50 unique molecular identifiers detected (nCount_RNA>50). This filtering strategy yielded a total of 12,924 cells across both samples.

Wild-type and cripDM sample integration was performed as described in the Seurat vignette (Stuart et al., 2019). Briefly, the standard workflow was completed on the merged Seurat object [NormalizeData(), FindVariableFeatures(), ScaleData(), RunPCA(), etc.] and layers were merged with JoinLayers(). Clustering was completed with the FindNeighbors() and FindClusters() functions using 43 principal components (PCs) and a resolution parameter of 1.1, which resulted in 32 clusters. These results were visualized in a two-dimensional UMAP representation produced using the DimPlot() function.

Cell type identification in single cell mRNA data

We used cell type markers from the literature to determine the identities of cell clusters in wild-type and cripDM samples. The following cell types were identified: nervous system (clusters 22, 24, 25, 29), epithelium (clusters 2, 21, 27, 28, 30), cardiovascular (cluster 8), endothelium (clusters 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19), blood (clusters 10, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26), erythroid (cluster 0) and fibroblast (clusters 6, 7, 14, 23, 31) (Fig. S5B; Table S4). As expected, each cell type cluster expressed known gene markers: neuronal (neurod1, pou3f1, dpysl5a, ank2b); epithelial (epcam, krt92, cyt1l); fibroblast (pdgfra, prrx1a, prrx1b, twist1a); heart (tbx20, gata4, gata5, fn1a); endothelial (kdrl, etv2, cldn5b, fli1); hemoglobin (hbbe1.1, hbbe1.2, hbbe1.3, hbbe2, hbbe3); blood (coro1a, ptprc); neutrophil (mpx, lyz); and macrophage (irf8, mfap4.1, mpeg1.1) (Fig. S5C).

We subset the data to select only endothelial populations for downstream analysis. We reprocessed this new subset data using the following workflow: ScaleData(); RunPCA(); RunUMAP() with reduction ‘pca’ and 45 dimensions; and FindClusters with a resolution of 0.7, which yielded 18 clusters. We used the following gene markers to guide our cell type identification: arterial (dll4, hey2, flt1, notch1b, efnb2a); venous (flt4, mrc1a, dab2, stab2); and cell cycle (kif23, mki67, nusap1, tacc3). The following endothelial cell types were identified: venous (EC venous) (clusters 1, 3, 8); arterial-venous (clusters 2, 6, 9, 15); arterial (clusters 7, 13); venous proliferating (cluster 4); and arterial-venous proliferating (cluster 14) (Table S5).

Differential gene expression analysis and Gene Ontology

FindMarkers() function from Seurat with Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to perform differential gene expression analysis between wild-type and cripDM cells for endothelial cell types. For the Wilcoxon test, an adjusted P-value <0.005 and a log fold change threshold minimum of 0.1 were used to select for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Table S6). The gene ontology annotations for Danio rerio were taken from Biomart and the average expression of genes for each GO term was computed, as previously described (Durinck et al., 2009; Hunter et al., 2021).

Zebrafish chemical treatments

We applied a previously published protocol describing the use of the γ-secretase inhibitor DBZ (Barske et al., 2016) to block processing of the Notch receptor into its active intracellular form (Ichida et al., 2014). Specifically, DBZ (Tocris, 4489) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) creating a 100 mM stock which was diluted to a final concentration of 4 μM in embryo medium. No more than 40 embryos were incubated in a single dish starting at 24 hpf. DBZ was thoroughly rinsed with embryo medium and embryos were fixed at 32 hpf. Finally, paired control wild-type and cripDM embryos were exposed to the same concentration of DMSO for the equivalent developmental windows for each respective experiment.

CAPE, an inhibitor of NF-κB (Natarajan et al., 1996), was used to validate that NF-κB acts downstream of Crip genes, employing a previously published protocol (Campbell et al., 2024). We dissolved 25 mg of CAPE (Sigma-Aldrich, 211200) in 4.4 ml of DMSO to create a 20 mM stock solution. At 24 hpf, 20 to 30 embryos were incubated with 5 mM of CAPE stock diluted in embryo medium. The same concentration of DMSO was applied to paired control wild-type and cripDM embryos. The treatment for all conditions was arrested at 28 hpf by transferring the embryos to fresh medium and thoroughly rinsing twice.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/develop.204359_sup1
Table S3. Summary statistics from 10X Genomics cell ranger for wild-type and cripDM embryos at 30 hpf.
Table S4. Cell types of wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S5. Hematopoietic cell types from integrated wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S6. Differential expression of endothelial cells for wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S7. Vasculature genes incorporated in the calculation of the Vasculature Development Score for Fig. 5D RDS format of the Seurat object which contains the necessary information employed for analysis of the scRNA-sequencing data (for loading in R).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Teresa Bowman for sharing multiple tools (gata2b, flt4 and dlI4 probes) and techniques and for her critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr Wilson Clements for supplying reagents (rag1, cdh5 and efnb2a probes). Dr David Traver was also instrumental in providing additional probes (cmyb, spi1b and fli1). We appreciate the constructive feedback for this manuscript from former members of the Targoff Laboratory, Dr Di Yao, Elizabeth Myrus and Micah Woodard, and also the expert zebrafish care by Joshua Barber. We are thankful to Michael Kissner of the Columbia Stem Cell Initiative Flow Cytometry Core, Dr Peter Sims of the JP Sulzberger Columbia Genome Center, and Drs John Murray and Munemasa Mori of the Columbia Center for Human Development Microscopy Core. We are also grateful to Drs Theresa Swayne and Istvan Boldogh in the Confocal and Specialized Microscopy Shared Resource of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University Medical Center. These imaging studies used resources that are funded in part through National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA013696.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conceptualization: A.G.A., C.d.S.-T.; Data curation: K.L.T., A.G.A., R.N., C.F., K.S.P., C.d.S.-T., C.V., U.R., R.S., T.B.; Formal analysis: K.L.T., A.G.A., B.U., K.S.P., U.R., H.K.E., R.S., T.B.; Funding acquisition: K.L.T., A.G.A.; Investigation: K.L.T., A.G.A., R.N., T.B.; Methodology: K.L.T., A.G.A., B.U., T.B.; Supervision: K.L.T., M.G.K.; Writing – original draft: K.L.T., A.G.A., B.U.; Writing – review & editing: K.L.T., A.G.A., B.U., K.S.P., C.d.S.-T., R.S., T.B.

Funding

This project was supported by grants to K.L.T. from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL13143801A1), to A.G.A. from the National Institutes of Health (T32 HL120826 and F31 HL164101), to C.F. from the National Institutes of Health (F31 DE030385) and a New York State Stem Cell Science training grant, to T.B. from the National Institutes of Health (R01 DK121738 and R01 DK131445) and the Edward P. Evans Foundation, and to B.U. from the National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007288 and F31 HL152562) and the American Society of Hematology. Open Access funding provided by Columbia University. Deposited in PMC for immediate release.

Data and resource availability

The RNA-sequencing data reported in this paper have been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE300243. All relevant data and details of resources can be found within the article and its supplementary information or may be requested from the corresponding author.

Peer review history

The peer review history is available online at https://journals.biologists.com/dev/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.204359.reviewer-comments.pdf

References

  1. Ables, J. L., Breunig, J. J., Eisch, A. J. and Rakic, P. (2011). Not(ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 269-283. 10.1038/nrn3024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, J., Stainier, D. Y. and Yelon, D. (1998). Screening mosaic F1 females for mutations affecting zebrafish heart induction and patterning. Dev. Genet. 22, 288-299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barske, L., Askary, A., Zuniga, E., Balczerski, B., Bump, P., Nichols, J. T. and Crump, J. G. (2016). Competition between Jagged-Notch and Endothelin1 signaling selectively restricts cartilage formation in the zebrafish upper face. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005967. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bash, J., Zong, W.-X., Banga, S., Rivera, A., Ballard, D. W., Ron, Y. and Gélinas, C. (1999). Rel/NF-kappaB can trigger the Notch signaling pathway by inducing the expression of Jagged1, a ligand for Notch receptors. EMBO J. 18, 2803-2811. 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, C. M., Kanki, J. P., Rhodes, J., Liu, T. X., Paw, B. H., Kieran, M. W., Langenau, D. M., Delahaye-Brown, A., Zon, L. I., Fleming, M. D.et al. (2001). Myelopoiesis in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Blood 98, 643-651. 10.1182/blood.V98.3.643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertrand, J. Y., Chi, N. C., Santoso, B., Teng, S., Stainier, D. Y. R. and Traver, D. (2010). Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development. Nature 464, 108-111. 10.1038/nature08738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bigas, A., Guiu, J. and Gama-Norton, L. (2013). Notch and Wnt signaling in the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 51, 264-270. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Birkenmeier, E. H. and Gordon, J. I. (1986). Developmental regulation of a gene that encodes a cysteine-rich intestinal protein and maps near the murine immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2516-2520. 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackburn, P. R., Campbell, J. M., Clark, K. J. and Ekker, S. C. (2013). The CRISPR system—keeping zebrafish gene targeting fresh. Zebrafish 10, 116-118. 10.1089/zeb.2013.9999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Butko, E., Distel, M., Pouget, C., Weijts, B., Kobayashi, I., Ng, K., Mosimann, C., Poulain, F. E., McPherson, A., Ni, C.-W.et al. (2015). Gata2b is a restricted early regulator of hemogenic endothelium in the zebrafish embryo. Development 142, 1050-1061. 10.1242/dev.119180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butko, E., Pouget, C. and Traver, D. (2016). Complex regulation of HSC emergence by the Notch signaling pathway. Dev. Biol. 409, 129-138. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. and Satija, R. (2018). Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411-420. 10.1038/nbt.4096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Calvanese, V. and Mikkola, H. K. A. (2023). The genesis of human hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 142, 519-532. 10.1182/blood.2022017934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell, C. A., Calderon, R., Pavani, G., Cheng, X., Barakat, R., Snella, E., Liu, F., Peng, X., Essner, J. J., Dorman, K. S.et al. (2024). p65 signaling dynamics drive the developmental progression of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells through cell cycle regulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 7787. 10.1038/s41467-024-51922-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Castagnoli, R., Delmonte, O. M., Calzoni, E. and Notarangelo, L. D. (2019). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary immunodeficiency diseases: current status and future perspectives. Front. Pediatr. 7, 295. 10.3389/fped.2019.00295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, A. T. and Zon, L. I. (2009). Zebrafish blood stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 108, 35-42. 10.1002/jcb.22251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, C.-H., Ho, Y.-C., Ho, H.-H., Chang, I.-C., Kirsch, K. H., Chuang, Y.-J., Layne, M. D. and Yet, S.-F. (2013). Cysteine-rich protein 2 alters p130Cas localization and inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Cardiovasc. Res. 100, 461-471. 10.1093/cvr/cvt207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng, X., Barakat, R., Pavani, G., Usha, M. K., Calderon, R., Snella, E., Gorden, A., Zhang, Y., Gadue, P., French, D. L.et al. (2023). Nod1-dependent NF-kB activation initiates hematopoietic stem cell specification in response to small Rho GTPases. Nat. Commun. 14, 7668. 10.1038/s41467-023-43349-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheung, A. K. L., Ko, J. M. Y., Lung, H. L., Chan, K. W., Stanbridge, E. J., Zabarovsky, E., Tokino, T., Kashima, L., Suzuki, T., Kwong, D. L.-W.et al. (2011). Cysteine-rich intestinal protein 2 (CRIP2) acts as a repressor of NF-kappaB-mediated proangiogenic cytokine transcription to suppress tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8390-8395. 10.1073/pnas.1101747108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Choi, J., Dong, L., Ahn, J., Dao, D., Hammerschmidt, M. and Chen, J.-N. (2007). FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 304, 735-744. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clements, W. K., Kim, A. D., Ong, K. G., Moore, J. C., Lawson, N. D. and Traver, D. (2011). A somitic Wnt16/Notch pathway specifies haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 474, 220-224. 10.1038/nature10107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A.et al. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823. 10.1126/science.1231143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Davidson, A. J. and Zon, L. I. (2004). The ‘definitive’ (and ‘primitive’) guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis. Oncogene 23, 7233-7246. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Davidson, A. J., Ernst, P., Wang, Y., Dekens, M. P., Kingsley, P. D., Palis, J., Korsmeyer, S. J., Daley, G. Q. and Zon, L. I. (2003). cdx4 mutants fail to specify blood progenitors and can be rescued by multiple hox genes. Nature 425, 300-306. 10.1038/nature01973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dazzi, F., van Laar, J. M., Cope, A. and Tyndall, A. (2007). Cell therapy for autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Res. Ther. 9, 206. 10.1186/ar2128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Bruijn, M. F. T. R., Speck, N. A., Peeters, M. C. and Dzierzak, E. (2000). Definitive hematopoietic stem cells first develop within the major arterial regions of the mouse embryo. EMBO J. 19, 2465-2474. 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Del Monte, G., Grego-Bessa, J., Gonzalez-Rajal, A., Bolos, V. and De La Pompa, J. L. (2007). Monitoring Notch1 activity in development: evidence for a feedback regulatory loop. Dev. Dyn. 236, 2594-2614. 10.1002/dvdy.21246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Delaney, C., Milano, F., Cicconi, L., Othus, M., Becker, P. S., Sandhu, V., Nicoud, I., Dahlberg, A., Bernstein, I. D., Appelbaum, F. R.et al. (2016). Infusion of a non-HLA-matched ex-vivo expanded cord blood progenitor cell product after intensive acute myeloid leukaemia chemotherapy: a phase 1 trial. Lancet Haematol. 3, e330-e339. 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30023-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Detrich, H. W., III, Kieran, M. W., Chan, F. Y., Barone, L. M., Yee, K., Rundstadler, J. A., Pratt, S., Ransom, D. and Zon, L. I. (1995). Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10713-10717. 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dignum, T., Varnum-Finney, B., Srivatsan, S. R., Dozono, S., Waltner, O., Heck, A. M., Ishida, T., Nourigat-McKay, C., Jackson, D. L., Rafii, S.et al. (2021). Multipotent progenitors and hematopoietic stem cells arise independently from hemogenic endothelium in the mouse embryo. Cell Rep. 36, 109675. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ding, J., Li, Y. and Larochelle, A. (2023). De novo generation of human hematopoietic stem cells from pluripotent stem cells for cellular therapy. Cells 12, 321. 10.3390/cells12020321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ditadi, A., Sturgeon, C. M., Tober, J., Awong, G., Kennedy, M., Yzaguirre, A. D., Azzola, L., Ng, E. S., Stanley, E. G., French, D. L.et al. (2015). Human definitive haemogenic endothelium and arterial vascular endothelium represent distinct lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 580-591. 10.1038/ncb3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dobrzycki, T., Krecsmarik, M., Bonkhofer, F., Patient, R. and Monteiro, R. (2018). An optimised pipeline for parallel image-based quantification of gene expression and genotyping after in situ hybridisation. Biol. Open 7, bio031096. 10.1242/bio.031096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Doulatov, S., Vo, L. T., Chou, S. S., Kim, P. G., Arora, N., Li, H., Hadland, B. K., Bernstein, I. D., Collins, J. J., Zon, L. I.et al. (2013). Induction of multipotential hematopoietic progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells via respecification of lineage-restricted precursors. Cell Stem Cell 13, 459-470. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. and Huber, W. (2009). Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1184-1191. 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dzierzak, E. and Speck, N. A. (2008). Of lineage and legacy: the development of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 129-136. 10.1038/ni1560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Espin-Palazon, R., Stachura, D. L., Campbell, C. A., García-Moreno, D., Del Cid, N., Kim, A. D., Candel, S., Meseguer, J., Mulero, V. and Traver, D. (2014). Proinflammatory signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell emergence. Cell 159, 1070-1085. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fadlullah, M. Z. H., Neo, W. H., Lie-a-ling, M., Thambyrajah, R., Patel, R., Mevel, R., Aksoy, I., Do Khoa, N., Savatier, P., Fontenille, L.et al. (2022). Murine AGM single-cell profiling identifies a continuum of hemogenic endothelium differentiation marked by ACE. Blood 139, 343-356. 10.1182/blood.2020007885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gagnon, J. A., Valen, E., Thyme, S. B., Huang, P., Ahkmetova, L., Pauli, A., Montague, T. G., Zimmerman, S., Richter, C. and Schier, A. F. (2014). Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PloS one 9, e98186. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gama-Norton, L., Ferrando, E., Ruiz-Herguido, C., Liu, Z., Guiu, J., Islam, A. B. M. M. K., Lee, S.-U., Yan, M., Guidos, C. J., López-Bigas, N.et al. (2015). Notch signal strength controls cell fate in the haemogenic endothelium. Nat. Commun. 6, 8510. 10.1038/ncomms9510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Garcia-Porrero, J. A., Godin, I. E. and Dieterlen-Lievre, F. (1995). Potential intraembryonic hemogenic sites at pre-liver stages in the mouse. Anat. Embryol. 192, 425-435. 10.1007/BF00240375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gering, M., Rodaway, A. R. F., Göttgens, B., Patient, R. K. and Green, A. R. (1998). The SCL gene specifies haemangioblast development from early mesoderm. EMBO J. 17, 4029-4045. 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gore, A. V., Swift, M. R., Cha, Y. R., Lo, B., McKinney, M. C., Li, W., Castranova, D., Davis, A., Mukouyama, Y.-S. and Weinstein, B. M. (2011). Rspo1/Wnt signaling promotes angiogenesis via Vegfc/Vegfr3. Development 138, 4875-4886. 10.1242/dev.068460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gross, T. G., Hale, G. A., He, W., Camitta, B. M., Sanders, J. E., Cairo, M. S., Hayashi, R. J., Termuhlen, A. M., Zhang, M.-J., Davies, S. M.et al. (2010). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory or recurrent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 16, 223-230. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.09.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hagedorn, E. J., Perlin, J. R., Freeman, R. J., Wattrus, S. J., Han, T., Mao, C., Kim, J. W., Fernandez-Maestre, I., Daily, M. L., D'amato, C.et al. (2023). Transcription factor induction of vascular blood stem cell niches in vivo. Dev. Cell 58, 1037-1051.e4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hao, Y., Hao, S., Andersen-Nissen, E., Mauck, W. M., III, Zheng, S., Butler, A., Lee, M. J., Wilk, A. J., Darby, C., Zager, M.et al. (2021). Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573-3587.e3529. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Henderson, J. R., Brown, D., Richardson, J. A., Olson, E. N. and Beckerle, M. C. (2002). Expression of the gene encoding the LIM protein CRP2: a developmental profile. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 50, 107-111. 10.1177/002215540205000112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Henninger, J., Santoso, B., Hans, S., Durand, E., Moore, J., Mosimann, C., Brand, M., Traver, D. and Zon, L. (2017). Clonal fate mapping quantifies the number of haematopoietic stem cells that arise during development. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 17-27. 10.1038/ncb3444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Honkoop, H., de Bakker, D. E. M., Aharonov, A., Kruse, F., Shakked, A., Nguyen, P. D., De Heus, C., Garric, L., Muraro, M. J., Shoffner, A.et al. (2019). Single-cell analysis uncovers that metabolic reprogramming by ErbB2 signaling is essential for cardiomyocyte proliferation in the regenerating heart. eLife 8, e50163. 10.7554/eLife.50163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hunter, M. V., Moncada, R., Weiss, J. M., Yanai, I. and White, R. M. (2021). Spatially resolved transcriptomics reveals the architecture of the tumor-microenvironment interface. Nat. Commun. 12, 6278. 10.1038/s41467-021-26614-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J. and Joung, J. K. (2013). Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 227-229. 10.1038/nbt.2501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ichida, J. K., Tcw, J., Williams, L. A., Carter, A. C., Shi, Y., Moura, M. T., Ziller, M., Singh, S., Amabile, G., Bock, C.et al. (2014). Notch inhibition allows oncogene-independent generation of iPS cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 632-639. 10.1038/nchembio.1552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jain, M. K., Kashiki, S., Hsieh, C.-M., Layne, M. D., Yet, S.-F., Sibinga, N. E. S., Chin, M. T., Feinberg, M. W., Woo, I., Maas, R. L.et al. (1998). Embryonic expression suggests an important role for CRP2/SmLIM in the developing cardiovascular system. Circ. Res. 83, 980-985. 10.1161/01.RES.83.10.980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jao, L.-E., Wente, S. R. and Chen, W. (2013). Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13904-13909. 10.1073/pnas.1308335110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jin, H., Xu, J. and Wen, Z. (2007). Migratory path of definitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells during zebrafish development. Blood 109, 5208-5214. 10.1182/blood-2007-01-069005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kihara, T., Shinohara, S., Fujikawa, R., Sugimoto, Y., Murata, M. and Miyake, J. (2011). Regulation of cysteine-rich protein 2 localization by the development of actin fibers during smooth muscle cell differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 411, 96-101. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim, J.-D., Kim, H.-J., Koun, S., Ham, H.-J., Kim, M.-J., Rhee, M. and Huh, T.-L. (2014). Zebrafish Crip2 plays a critical role in atrioventricular valve development by downregulating the expression of ECM genes in the endocardial cushion. Mol. Cells 37, 406-411. 10.14348/molcells.2014.0072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kirchner, J., Forbush, K. A. and Bevan, M. J. (2001). Identification and characterization of thymus LIM protein: targeted disruption reduces thymus cellularity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 8592-8604. 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8592-8604.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kissa, K. and Herbomel, P. (2010). Blood stem cells emerge from aortic endothelium by a novel type of cell transition. Nature 464, 112-115. 10.1038/nature08761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kobayashi, I., Kobayashi-Sun, J., Hirakawa, Y., Ouchi, M., Yasuda, K., Kamei, H., Fukuhara, S. and Yamaguchi, M. (2020). Dual role of Jam3b in early hematopoietic and vascular development. Development 147, de181040. 10.1242/dev.181040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kwan, W., Cortes, M., Frost, I., Esain, V., Theodore, L. N., Liu, S. Y., Budrow, N., Goessling, W. and North, T. E. (2016). The central nervous system regulates embryonic HSPC production via stress-responsive glucocorticoid receptor signaling. Cell Stem Cell 19, 370-382. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lam, E. Y. N., Hall, C. J., Crosier, P. S., Crosier, K. E. and Flores, M. V. (2010). Live imaging of Runx1 expression in the dorsal aorta tracks the emergence of blood progenitors from endothelial cells. Blood 116, 909-914. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Li, D., Xue, W., Li, M., Dong, M., Wang, J., Wang, X., Li, X., Chen, K., Zhang, W., Wu, S.et al. (2018). VCAM-1(+) macrophages guide the homing of HSPCs to a vascular niche. Nature 564, 119-124. 10.1038/s41586-018-0709-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li, Y., Tang, C., Liu, F., Zhu, C., Liu, F., Zhu, P. and Wang, L. (2022). DNA methylation safeguards the generation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by repression of Notch signaling. Development 149, dev200390. 10.1242/dev.200390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Liao, E. C., Paw, B. H., Oates, A. C., Pratt, S. J., Postlethwait, J. H. and Zon, L. I. (1998). SCL/Tal-1 transcription factor acts downstream of cloche to specify hematopoietic and vascular progenitors in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 12, 621-626. 10.1101/gad.12.5.621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lieschke, G. J., Oates, A. C., Paw, B. H., Thompson, M. A., Hall, N. E., Ward, A. C., Ho, R. K., Zon, L. I. and Layton, J. E. (2002). Zebrafish SPI-1 (PU.1) marks a site of myeloid development independent of primitive erythropoiesis: implications for axial patterning. Dev. Biol. 246, 274-295. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lin, H.-F., Traver, D., Zhu, H., Dooley, K., Paw, B. H., Zon, L. I. and Handin, R. I. (2005). Analysis of thrombocyte development in CD41-GFP transgenic zebrafish. Blood 106, 3803-3810. 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lizama, C. O., Hawkins, J. S., Schmitt, C. E., Bos, F. L., Zape, J. P., Cautivo, K. M., Borges Pinto, H., Rhyner, A. M., Yu, H., Donohoe, M. E.et al. (2015). Repression of arterial genes in hemogenic endothelium is sufficient for haematopoietic fate acquisition. Nat. Commun. 6, 7739. 10.1038/ncomms8739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lo, P. H. Y., Ko, J. M. Y., Yu, Z. Y., Law, S., Wang, L. D., Li, J.-L., Srivastava, G., Tsao, S. W., Stanbridge, E. J. and Lung, M. L. (2012). The LIM domain protein, CRIP2, promotes apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 316, 39-45. 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Lomeli, H. and Castillo-Castellanos, F. (2020). Notch signaling and the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells. Dev. Dyn. 249, 1302-1317. 10.1002/dvdy.230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lundin, V., Sugden, W. W., Theodore, L. N., Sousa, P. M., Han, A., Chou, S., Wrighton, P. J., Cox, A. G., Ingber, D. E., Goessling, W.et al. (2020). YAP regulates hematopoietic stem cell formation in response to the biomechanical forces of blood flow. Dev. Cell 52, 446-460.e445. 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mably, J. D., Mohideen, M. A., Burns, C. G., Chen, J.-N. and Fishman, M. C. (2003). heart of glass regulates the concentric growth of the heart in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 13, 2138-2147. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Mishra, A. K., Sharma, V., Mutsuddi, M. and Mukherjee, A. (2021). Signaling cross-talk during development: context-specific networking of Notch, NF-kappaB and JNK signaling pathways in Drosophila. Cell. Signal. 82, 109937. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Moran, S. T., Cariappa, A., Liu, H., Muir, B., Sgroi, D., Boboila, C. and Pillai, S. (2007). Synergism between NF-kappa B1/p50 and Notch2 during the development of marginal zone B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 179, 195-200. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Murayama, E., Kissa, K., Zapata, A., Mordelet, E., Briolat, V., Lin, H.-F., Handin, R. I. and Herbomel, P. (2006). Tracing hematopoietic precursor migration to successive hematopoietic organs during zebrafish development. Immunity 25, 963-975. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Murayama, E., Sarris, M., Redd, M., Le Guyader, D., Vivier, C., Horsley, W., Trede, N. and Herbomel, P. (2015). NACA deficiency reveals the crucial role of somite-derived stromal cells in haematopoietic niche formation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8375. 10.1038/ncomms9375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Murayama, E., Vivier, C., Schmidt, A. and Herbomel, P. (2023). Alcam-a and Pdgfr-alpha are essential for the development of sclerotome-derived stromal cells that support hematopoiesis. Nat. Commun. 14, 1171. 10.1038/s41467-023-36612-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nandagopal, N., Santat, L. A. and Elowitz, M. B. (2019). Cis-activation in the Notch signaling pathway. eLife 8, e37880. 10.7554/eLife.37880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Natarajan, K., Singh, S., Burke, T. R., Jr, Grunberger, D. and Aggarwal, B. B. (1996). Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of activation of nuclear transcription factor NF-kappa B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9090-9095. 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Nik, S., Weinreb, J. T. and Bowman, T. V. (2017). Developmental HSC microenvironments: lessons from zebrafish. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1041, 33-53. 10.1007/978-3-319-69194-7_4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Oeckinghaus, A., Hayden, M. S. and Ghosh, S. (2011). Crosstalk in NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Nat. Immunol. 12, 695-708. 10.1038/ni.2065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Orkin, S. H. and Zon, L. I. (2008). Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132, 631-644. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Osipo, C., Golde, T. E., Osborne, B. A. and Miele, L. A. (2008). Off the beaten pathway: the complex cross talk between Notch and NF-kappaB. Lab. Invest. 88, 11-17. 10.1038/labinvest.3700700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Parsons, M. J., Pisharath, H., Yusuff, S., Moore, J. C., Siekmann, A. F., Lawson, N. and Leach, S. D. (2009). Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech. Dev. 126, 898-912. 10.1016/j.mod.2009.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Piau, O., Brunet-Manquat, M., L'Homme, B., Petit, L., Birebent, B., Linard, C., Moeckes, L., Zuliani, T., Lapillonne, H., Benderitter, M.et al. (2023). Generation of transgene-free hematopoietic stem cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1610-1623.e1617. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Rao, I., Crisafulli, L., Paulis, M. and Ficara, F. (2022). Hematopoietic cells from pluripotent stem cells: hope and promise for the treatment of inherited blood disorders. Cells 11, 557. 10.3390/cells11030557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Richard, C., Drevon, C., Canto, P.-Y., Villain, G., Bollérot, K., Lempereur, A., Teillet, M.-A., Vincent, C., Rossello Castillo, C., Torres, M.et al. (2013). Endothelio-mesenchymal interaction controls runx1 expression and modulates the notch pathway to initiate aortic hematopoiesis. Dev. Cell 24, 600-611. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. and Regev, A. (2015). Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495-502. 10.1038/nbt.3192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Slukvin, I. I. and Uenishi, G. I. (2019). Arterial identity of hemogenic endothelium: a key to unlock definitive hematopoietic commitment in human pluripotent stem cell cultures. Exp. Hematol. 71, 3-12. 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Song, Y. C., Dohn, T. E., Rydeen, A. B., Nechiporuk, A. V. and Waxman, J. S. (2019). HDAC1-mediated repression of the retinoic acid-responsive gene ripply3 promotes second heart field development. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008165. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sood, R., English, M. A., Belele, C. L., Jin, H., Bishop, K., Haskins, R., McKinney, M. C., Chahal, J., Weinstein, B. M., Wen, Z.et al. (2010). Development of multilineage adult hematopoiesis in the zebrafish with a runx1 truncation mutation. Blood 115, 2806-2809. 10.1182/blood-2009-08-236729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Stuart, T., Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Hafemeister, C., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., III, Hao, Y., Stoeckius, M., Smibert, P. and Satija, R. (2019). Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888-1902.e1821. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Sugimura, R., Jha, D. K., Han, A., Soria-Valles, C., Da Rocha, E. L., Lu, Y.-F., Goettel, J. A., Serrao, E., Rowe, R. G., Malleshaiah, M.et al. (2017). Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 545, 432-438. 10.1038/nature22370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Tamplin, O. J., Durand, E. M., Carr, L. A., Childs, S. J., Hagedorn, E. J., Li, P., Yzaguirre, A. D., Speck, N. A. and Zon, L. I. (2015). Hematopoietic stem cell arrival triggers dynamic remodeling of the perivascular niche. Cell 160, 241-252. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Targoff, K. L., Schell, T. and Yelon, D. (2008). Nkx genes regulate heart tube extension and exert differential effects on ventricular and atrial cell number. Dev. Biol. 322, 314-321. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Thambyrajah, R. and Bigas, A. (2022). Notch signaling in HSC emergence: when, why and how. Cells 11, 358. 10.3390/cells11030358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Thambyrajah, R., Maqueda, M., Neo, W. H., Imbach, K., Guillén, Y., Grases, D., Fadlullah, Z., Gambera, S., Matteini, F., Wang, X.et al. (2024). Cis inhibition of NOTCH1 through JAGGED1 sustains embryonic hematopoietic stem cell fate. Nat. Commun. 15, 1604. 10.1038/s41467-024-45716-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Traver, D., Paw, B. H., Poss, K. D., Penberthy, W. T., Lin, S. and Zon, L. I. (2003). Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat. Immunol. 4, 1238-1246. 10.1038/ni1007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Trede, N. S. and Zon, L. I. (1998). Development of T-cells during fish embryogenesis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 22, 253-263. 10.1016/S0145-305X(98)00009-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Trembinski, D. J., Bink, D. I., Theodorou, K., Sommer, J., Fischer, A., Van Bergen, A., Kuo, C.-C., Costa, I. G., Schürmann, C., Leisegang, M. S.et al. (2020). Aging-regulated anti-apoptotic long non-coding RNA Sarrah augments recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Nat. Commun. 11, 2039. 10.1038/s41467-020-15995-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Uenishi, G. I., Jung, H. S., Kumar, A., Park, M. A., Hadland, B. K., McLeod, E., Raymond, M., Moskvin, O., Zimmerman, C. E., Theisen, D. J.et al. (2018). NOTCH signaling specifies arterial-type definitive hemogenic endothelium from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 1828. 10.1038/s41467-018-04134-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Ulloa, B. A., Habbsa, S. S., Potts, K. S., Lewis, A., McKinstry, M., Payne, S. G., Flores, J. C., Nizhnik, A., Feliz Norberto, M., Mosimann, C.et al. (2021). Definitive hematopoietic stem cells minimally contribute to embryonic hematopoiesis. Cell Rep. 36, 109703. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Vogeli, K. M., Jin, S.-W., Martin, G. R. and Stainier, D. Y. R. (2006). A common progenitor for haematopoietic and endothelial lineages in the zebrafish gastrula. Nature 443, 337-339. 10.1038/nature05045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wang, Y. and Sugimura, R. (2023). Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 427, 113599. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Warga, R. M., Kane, D. A. and Ho, R. K. (2009). Fate mapping embryonic blood in zebrafish: multi- and unipotential lineages are segregated at gastrulation. Dev. Cell 16, 744-755. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wei, T.-C., Lin, H.-Y., Lu, C.-C., Chen, C.-M. and You, L.-R. (2011). Expression of Crip2, a LIM-domain-only protein, in the mouse cardiovascular system under physiological and pathological conditions. Gene Expr. Patterns 11, 384-394. 10.1016/j.gep.2011.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yang, M.-S., Hong, J.-S., Kim, S.-T., Lee, K.-Y., Park, K. W., Kwon, S.-T., Kweon, D.-H., Koh, Y. H., Gaiano, N. and Yoon, K. (2011). Among gamma-secretase substrates Notch1 alone is sufficient to block neurogenesis but does not confer self-renewal properties to neural stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 404, 133-138. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.11.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Yelon, D., Horne, S. A. and Stainier, D. Y. R. (1999). Restricted expression of cardiac myosin genes reveals regulated aspects of heart tube assembly in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 214, 23-37. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Yu, T.-S., Moctezuma-Anaya, M., Kubo, A., Keller, G. and Robertson, S. (2002). The heart LIM protein gene (Hlp), expressed in the developing and adult heart, defines a new tissue-specific LIM-only protein family. Mech. Dev. 116, 187-192. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00139-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhang, P., He, Q., Chen, D., Liu, W., Wang, L., Zhang, C., Ma, D., Li, W., Liu, B. and Liu, F. (2015). G protein-coupled receptor 183 facilitates endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition via Notch1 inhibition. Cell Res. 25, 1093-1107. 10.1038/cr.2015.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Sun, B., Wang, L., Yang, Y., Ma, D., Lv, J., Heng, J., Ding, Y., Xue, Y.et al. (2017). m(6)A modulates haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification. Nature 549, 273-276. 10.1038/nature23883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J.et al. (2017). Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049. 10.1038/ncomms14049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhu, Q., Gao, P., Tober, J., Bennett, L., Chen, C., Uzun, Y., Li, Y., Howell, E. D., Mumau, M., Yu, W.et al. (2020). Developmental trajectory of prehematopoietic stem cell formation from endothelium. Blood 136, 845-856. 10.1182/blood.2020004801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Ziv, L., Muto, A., Schoonheim, P. J., Meijsing, S. H., Strasser, D., Ingraham, H. A., Schaaf, M. J. M., Yamamoto, K. R. and Baier, H. (2013). An affective disorder in zebrafish with mutation of the glucocorticoid receptor. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 681-691. 10.1038/mp.2012.64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zovein, A. C., Hofmann, J. J., Lynch, M., French, W. J., Turlo, K. A., Yang, Y., Becker, M. S., Zanetta, L., Dejana, E., Gasson, J. C.et al. (2008). Fate tracing reveals the endothelial origin of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3, 625-636. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/develop.204359_sup1
Table S3. Summary statistics from 10X Genomics cell ranger for wild-type and cripDM embryos at 30 hpf.
Table S4. Cell types of wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S5. Hematopoietic cell types from integrated wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S6. Differential expression of endothelial cells for wild-type and cripDM embryos.
Table S7. Vasculature genes incorporated in the calculation of the Vasculature Development Score for Fig. 5D RDS format of the Seurat object which contains the necessary information employed for analysis of the scRNA-sequencing data (for loading in R).

Articles from Development (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES