Abstract
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is being increasingly used in general practice. There is at present little published evidence regarding the clinical utility of ABPM in the care of patients with established hypertension in this setting. We examined this issue by undertaking ABPM in a group of patients with established hypertension. 40 patients (aged 33-60 years) currently being treated for hypertension were randomly selected from a general practice list and underwent a single 24-hour ABPM study. ABPM values were compared with clinic blood pressure (CBP) values obtained on the day of monitoring together with previous readings taken by the general practitioner (GP). In the case of mean arterial pressure, 24-hour, awake and asleep ABPM values were found to underestimate CBP values by 14 mmHg (95% confidence interval 11-16 mmHg), 9 mmHg (95% C16-12 mmHg) and 24 mmHg (95% CI 21-27 mmHg), respectively. When used to classify blood pressure control, ABPM values produced equivalent results to CBP except by the criterion of BP load, for which 24-hour ABPM showed a higher rate of unsatisfactory control. 5 patients classified by CBP to have satisfactory BP control according to current international guidelines were found to have unsatisfactory BP control by ABPM. This study demonstrates the potential value of ABPM in patients with essential hypertension in a general practice setting. ABPM provided information over and above that obtained by CBP in a substantial proportion of patients.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beltman F. W., Heesen W. F., Kok R. H., Smit A. J., May J. F., de Graeff P. A., Havinga T. K., Schuurman F. H., van der Veur E., Lie K. I. Predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure shortly after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in primary care patients. BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):404–406. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox J. P., O'Malley K., O'Brien E. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):402–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krakoff L. R. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can improve cost-effective management of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1993 Jun;6(6 Pt 2):220S–224S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.6.220s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickering T. G., James G. D., Boddie C., Harshfield G. A., Blank S., Laragh J. H. How common is white coat hypertension? JAMA. 1988 Jan 8;259(2):225–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sever P., Beevers G., Bulpitt C., Lever A., Ramsay L., Reid J., Swales J. Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society. BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):983–987. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6883.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thijs L., Staessen J., O'Brien E., Amery A., Atkins N., Baumgart P., De Cort P., Degaute J. P., Dolenc P., De Gaudemaris R. The ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects: results from an international database. Neth J Med. 1995 Feb;46(2):106–114. doi: 10.1016/0300-2977(94)00057-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White W. B., Morganroth J. Usefulness of ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in assessing antihypertensive therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):94–98. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)91083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]