Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2026 Jan 29;94(3):e00654-25. doi: 10.1128/iai.00654-25

Differential sensitivity of leukocyte populations to Staphylococcus aureus biofilm

Nichole D Brandquist 1, Tammy Kielian 1,
Editor: Victor J Torres2
PMCID: PMC12974123  PMID: 41609497

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) typified by biofilm formation. Anti-inflammatory granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) represent the main leukocyte population in a mouse model of S. aureus PJI, followed by neutrophils (PMNs), and macrophages (Mφs), which is also seen during human PJI. Defining how each leukocyte population responds to S. aureus biofilm vs planktonic bacteria could have important implications for how S. aureus evades immune detection to facilitate biofilm persistence. This study compared the kinetics of leukocyte death and relationship to mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) production following exposure to planktonic S. aureus or biofilm. Mφs were exquisitely sensitive to S. aureus biofilm with toxicity observed within 15 min following biofilm co-culture, whereas G-MDSCs and PMNs were more resilient, with appreciable survival out to 6 h. In contrast, G-MDSC viability was significantly decreased after extended exposure to planktonic S. aureus compared to PMNs and Mφs. Although leukocyte death coincided with increased mtROS production across all leukocyte populations, inhibiting mtROS had no impact on leukocyte survival following biofilm co-culture, suggesting alternative cell death triggers. Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis was observed in PMNs, whereas Mφs and G-MDSCs were targeted by necrosis since an inhibitor of H2O2-induced necrosis improved cell survival of both populations, whereas programmed cell death inhibitors had no effect. These findings may account, in part, for the abundance of G-MDSCs and PMNs, but not Mφs, during PJI based on differential susceptibility to biofilm-induced cytotoxicity.

KEYWORDS: S. aureus, biofilm, granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell, neutrophil, macrophage, toxins, programmed cell death, necrosis

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common component of the human microbiome, colonizing ~30% of the population asymptomatically (1). However, S. aureus is also an opportunistic pathogen causing a range of diseases, from more moderate skin and soft tissue infection to severe and even life-threatening diseases such as bacteremia and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) (2, 3). PJI is a complication that occurs after arthroplasty, where biofilm forms on the implanted device. While most arthroplasties are successful, ~1%–5% of patients will develop PJI, with more complex surgeries having infection rates approaching 20%–30% (4, 5). S. aureus is a leading causal pathogen, and patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are four times more likely to develop PJI (6). The most common approach for treating these infections is a two-step surgical revision, where the infected device is removed and an antibiotic spacer is implanted, followed by placement of a new prosthesis when evidence of infection is absent (typically around 2–3 months). Multiple surgeries and prolonged antibiotic treatment lead to increased morbidity and mortality in these patients (7, 8).

 Biofilms are heterogeneous communities of bacteria encased in a self-produced matrix consisting of proteins, polysaccharides, and extracellular DNA (9, 10). Biofilm formation leads to antibiotic tolerance and immune evasion that complicates treatment (1113). S. aureus biofilm has several properties that confound immune clearance, including polarizing macrophages (Mφs) toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype (1418) and abundance of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) at sites of infection (1921). G-MDSCs are pathologically activated neutrophils (PMNs) that suppress monocyte/Mφ proinflammatory activity, T cell proliferation, and PMN killing of S. aureus, in large part, by IL-10 production (2224). Furthermore, G-MDSCs have diminished bactericidal activity and represent a major leukocyte population in infected tissues in the mouse model and patients with PJI (19, 21).

 Another mechanism employed by S. aureus biofilm to thwart immune-mediated clearance is toxin production (25). Previous work identified that α-toxin (Hla) and leukocidin AB (LukAB) inhibit Mφ phagocytosis and induce cell death in response to S. aureus biofilm-conditioned medium (26). However, the role of other S. aureus toxins in regulating leukocyte death in the context of biofilm formation remains relatively undefined. This can occur via two general mechanisms, namely, necrosis and programmed cell death (PCD). PCD encompasses a broad range of pathways that are carefully regulated to prevent excessive inflammation. Examples include apoptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and necroptosis (27). Apoptosis is a non-inflammatory form of PCD mediated by effector caspases-3/7 and typified by the formation of apoptotic bodies and membrane blebbing (28). Several S. aureus toxins have been implicated in inducing apoptosis, including α-toxin and LukSF; however, these were studied in the context of planktonic S. aureus or purified toxins (29, 30) and are likely concentration-dependent since these pore-forming toxins can also induce necrosis (29, 31). S. aureus was shown to trigger apoptosis in a Type 1 interferon-dependent manner although this was strain-dependent being observed with S. aureus Newman but not USA300 LAC (32). Pyroptosis is an inflammatory mechanism of PCD that activates the inflammasome to cleave pro-gasdermin D (GSDMD) into its mature form by caspase-1 that oligomerizes at the cell membrane causing lysis (33, 34). Other S. aureus toxins have been shown to activate the inflammasome including LukAB in human monocytes (35) and α-toxin, which induced Mφ pyroptosis (36). The role of ferroptosis, an iron-dependent PCD pathway (37, 38), in regulating the immune response to S. aureus remains relatively unexplored; however, ferroptosis was found to regulate infection outcomes during S. aureus mastitis (39). Finally, necroptosis, a caspase-independent form of lytic PCD, can be induced by S. aureus toxins (40) and S. aureus small colony variants (SCVs) were shown to shift immune cell metabolism toward glycolysis to induce necroptosis (41). On the other hand, necrosis is a highly inflammatory event caused by the release of intracellular contents into the tissue milieu (42). Necrotic tissue damage is a hallmark of S. aureus infection, particularly in the context of abscess formation; however, necrotic changes are not as robust during biofilm infection, suggesting that other modes of cell death may be operative (43, 44).

The objectives of this study were to directly compare Mφ, G-MDSC, and PMN sensitivity to S. aureus biofilm and explore factors responsible for leukocyte death. Differential responses were observed, where Mφs were exquisitely sensitive to biofilm-induced cytotoxicity, whereas G-MDSCs and PMNs were more resilient. The opposite occurred with planktonic bacteria, where G-MDSCs exhibited increased cell death with Mφs and PMNs less affected. In terms of mechanisms, Mφ death in response to intact biofilm was minimally influenced by Hla and LukAB, whereas PMNs exhibited some reliance on caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. Interestingly, leukocyte death induced by S. aureus biofilm required direct contact, since limited cytotoxicity was observed when leukocytes were physically separated from biofilm, suggesting the involvement of virulence factors tethered to extracellular matrix (ECM) components and/or structural signals. Collectively, these findings highlight the diversity in leukocyte responses to S. aureus biofilm, the myriad of cell death pathways the bacteria can elicit, and the importance of direct contact for biofilm-mediated cytotoxicity. The resilience of G-MDSCs to S. aureus biofilm could be one factor to explain their abundance at the site of PJI, both in the mouse model and human infection (1921).

RESULTS

S. aureus biofilm differentially regulates leukocyte death

Although the ability of S. aureus to induce Mφ and PMN death is well-known (28, 31, 45, 46), limited information is available regarding G-MDSC susceptibility, and to the best of our knowledge, studies directly comparing all three leukocyte populations under identical conditions have not yet been performed. In addition, leukocyte survival in response to S. aureus biofilm remains relatively undefined. To explore whether S. aureus biofilm elicits distinct leukocyte responses vs planktonic growth, we began by comparing Mφ, G-MDSC, and PMN viability in response to both growth states. Since phosphatidylserine exposure on the outer cell membrane is a known marker of PCD (47), this was assessed by Apotracker staining to report three states along the cell death continuum, namely, cells that were viable (ZombieApotracker), transitioning toward cell death with an apoptotic signature (ZombieApotracker+), and dead (Zombie+Apotracker+) (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Cell death pathway diagram showing leukocyte progression from viable to late-stage death. Visualization depicts viable cells as the largest population for mtROS measurements, while transitioning cells form a minor component of the CD45+ leukocyte pool.

Tracking stages of leukocyte death. Viable leukocytes were distinguished as ZombieApotracker, which represented the largest population of cells examined for mtROS production. Leukocytes progressing toward cell death were identified as transitioning (early cell death; ZombieApotracker+) and those that were at late stage death were characterized as Zombie+Apotracker+. While mtROS was measured in the transition cell population, this represented a minor component of total CD45+ cells compared to mtROS measured in viable leukocytes. Figure created in BioRender. Brandquist, N. (2025) https://BioRender.com/z1us90c.

Leukocyte viability progressively decreased over time in response to planktonic S. aureus, with significant reductions starting at 2 h (Fig. 2A). By 6 h, most leukocytes were not viable, which was likely explained by the heightened bacterial outgrowth during the incubation period. Of note, G-MDSCs were the most sensitive to planktonic S. aureus, with only ~5% viable cells remaining at 6 h, whereas Mφs had the highest survival at this interval (~30%) (Fig. 2A). Significant changes in phosphatidylserine staining in live cells, reflecting the transition to early cell death, were observed within 30 min after exposure to planktonic bacteria for all cell types (Fig. 2B). However, in instances of substantial cell death (i.e., G-MDSCs and PMNs at 6 h), no discernable increases in phosphatidylserine staining were observed. This led us to explore late-stage apoptosis or necrosis by interrogating Apotracker staining in the Zombie+ population. This revealed increased phosphatidylserine signal in all leukocyte populations with increasing co-culture time, especially at the 6 h timepoint (Fig. 2C). Finally, given the role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) in inducing PCD (48, 49), mtROS production by live (Apotracker) and early apoptotic cells (Apotracker+) was measured using MitoSOX Red. Increases in mtROS coincided with decreased viability, except in instances of severe death as seen in G-MDSCs at 6 h (Fig. 2D and E).

Fig 2.

Bar graphs comparing viability, apoptosis stages, and mtROS levels in macrophages, G-MDSCs, and PMNs exposed to planktonic S. aureus at MOI 10:1. Data show differential leukocyte sensitivity during bacterial challenge.

Differential leukocyte sensitivity to planktonic S. aureus. Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were challenged with planktonic S. aureus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1 (bacteria:leukocyte) for the indicated intervals. Leukocytes were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine exposure), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A) leukocyte viability, (B) early apoptosis, (C) late apoptosis/necrosis, and mtROS levels in (D) live and (E) early apoptotic cells. Unstimulated leukocytes were incubated in medium for 6 h (n = 12 from three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction between cell types).

 We next examined leukocyte responses to S. aureus biofilm to compare profiles with planktonic bacteria. In marked contrast to planktonic S. aureus, Mφ viability was drastically reduced to ~50% within 15 min following biofilm exposure, which further decreased to ~30% by 2 h (Fig. 3A); therefore, the 6 h time point was excluded for this population. In contrast, G-MDSCs and PMNs were more robust, with ~60% and 80% viability, respectively, following a 2 h biofilm co-culture period. PMNs were the most recalcitrant to biofilm-mediated cell death as ~60% remained viable at 6 h (Fig. 3A). Minimal changes in Mφ phosphatidylserine staining were observed over time (Fig. 3B), which was likely explained by the rapid transition to late-stage apoptosis or necrosis as reflected by the large percentage of Zombie+Apotracker+ Mφs at 15 and 30 min (Fig. 3C). Granulocytes had signs of PCD at early time points as revealed by Apotracker staining, although this was decreased in G-MDSCs and PMNs by 6 h (Fig. 3B), which reflected changes to late apoptosis or necrosis (Fig. 3C). While mtROS levels were increased in G-MDSCs and PMNs during biofilm co-culture, Mφs had few changes in mtROS (Fig. 3D and E), which was likely due to the substantial cell death that occurred during acute biofilm exposure (Fig. 3A).

Fig 3.

Bar graphs comparing macrophage, G-MDSC, and PMN responses to Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. Leukocytes show varying viability, apoptosis stages, and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species levels, revealing differential susceptibility to biofilm.

S. aureus biofilm elicits distinct leukocyte responses. Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were exposed to S. aureus biofilm for the indicated intervals. Leukocytes were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A) leukocyte viability, (B) early apoptosis, (C) late apoptosis/necrosis, and mtROS levels in (D) live and (E) early apoptotic cells. Unstimulated leukocytes were incubated in medium for 2 h (n = 12 from three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction between cell types).

To assess the functional importance of mtROS in leukocyte death, cells were treated with the mitochondrial superoxide scavenger MitoTEMPO (Table 1) (50, 51). For these experiments, Mφ death was examined with a S. aureus mutant defective in the pore forming toxins Hla and LukAB (Δhla/ΔlukAB) given their role in promoting Mφ cytotoxicity (26, 40, 52). Furthermore, the dramatic degree of Mφ death in response to WT S. aureus biofilm, which translated into minimal changes in mtROS production, led us to predict that any potential effects of mtROS would not be discernable with WT bacteria. MitoTEMPO had minimal effects on viability (Fig. 4A and F) or the frequency of early cell death (ZombieApotracker+) (Fig. 4B and G) in all leukocyte populations following exposure to biofilm or planktonic bacteria. MitoTEMPO also had limited effects on mtROS production in response to both biofilm and planktonic bacteria across all leukocyte types (Fig. 4D, E, I and J), suggesting alternative modes of ROS production. Collectively, these data demonstrate that sensitivity to S. aureus-induced cell death is unique to each leukocyte population and differentially influenced by planktonic vs biofilm growth independent of mtROS production.

TABLE 1.

Cell death pathway inhibitors

Inhibitora Mechanism Cell death pathway Concentration (μM)
Ac-YVAD-CHO (#10016) Reversible inhibitor of caspase-1 Pyroptosis 100
MCC950 (#17510) NLRP3 inhibitor Pyroptosis 15
Deferasirox (#16753) Iron chelator Ferroptosis 100
Ferrostatin-1 (#17729) Ferroptosis inhibitor Ferroptosis 15
Z-DEVD-FMK (#14414) Irreversible inhibitor of caspase-3 Apoptosis 100
HS-1371 (#31033) Inhibits RIPK3 autophosphorylation Necroptosis 15
Necrostatin-5 (#10527) Inhibits RIPK1 phosphorylation Necroptosis 100
IM-54 (#13323) Inhibits H2O2-induced necrosis Necrosis 10
Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK (#14463) Irreversible pan-caspase inhibitor Caspase-mediated apoptosis and inflammasome activation 100
MitoTEMPO (#16621) Superoxide and alkyl radical scavenging within mitochondria Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species 1
a

All inhibitors obtained from Cayman Chemical.

Fig 4.

Bar charts comparing leukocyte responses to Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic bacteria after MitoTEMPO treatment. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species minimally impact viability and apoptosis in macrophages, G-MDSCs, and PMNs.

Leukocyte mtROS production has minimal impact on cell death. Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were pre-treated with MitoTEMPO for 1 h and co-cultured with the indicated strains of S. aureus biofilm or planktonic bacteria for 2 h. Leukocytes were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A and F) leukocyte viability, (B and G) early apoptosis, (C and H) late apoptosis/necrosis, and mtROS levels in (D and I) live and (E and J) early apoptotic cells. Unstimulated leukocytes were incubated in medium for 2 h (n = 9 from three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction between cell types).

S. aureus toxins have minimal effects on leukocyte survival in the context of direct biofilm exposure

We next attempted to identify S. aureus factors influencing leukocyte death in response to direct biofilm co-culture. Previous work by our group found that increased levels of the pore-forming toxins Hla and LukAB (also known as LukGH) in biofilm-conditioned medium contributed to Mφ death and dysfunction (26). However, whether these toxins influence leukocyte survival in response to intact biofilm remained unknown, which prompted us to examine an ΔhlalukAB biofilm. Phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) and δ-toxin (hld) are pore-forming amphipathic peptides with multiple roles in S. aureus pathogenicity, including phagosomal escape in PMNs (25), which led us to explore a psmα1-4/hld mutant. The agr quorum-sensing system is responsible for regulating many virulence factors, including Hla, leukocidins, and PSMs, among others (25, 26, 53); therefore, an agr mutant (Δagr) was also analyzed. In addition to virulence, both agr and PSMs have been implicated in regulating static biofilm development by increasing biomass and thickness with a decrease in roughness, indicative of a smoother biofilm with fewer tower structures that might be important for influencing leukocyte responses (54, 55). However, these phenotypes were observed with biofilms grown in TSB, whereas major differences in biofilm appearance were not observed when these mutants were grown in RPMI with 10% FBS for leukocyte compatibility (Fig. S1 and S2).

 Surprisingly, none of the mutants had dramatic effects on leukocyte viability or mtROS production (Fig. 5), suggesting that secreted toxins play a minor role in biofilm-induced cell death in a direct co-culture paradigm. G-MDSC viability was slightly increased following exposure to S. aureus Δpsmα1-4/Δhld and Δagr compared to WT biofilm (Fig. 5A), which was attributed to a reduction in late cell death (Zombie+Apotracker+) (Fig. 5C) that coincided with less mtROS production (Fig. 5D). Likewise, PMN viability was modestly improved with Δpsmα1-4/Δhld compared to WT biofilm (Fig. 5A). However, this was not associated with a reduction in a particular cell death state but rather small but not significant decreases in both early (Fig. 5B) and late (Fig. 5C) cell death in the absence of mtROS fluctuations (Fig. 5D and E). Collectively, these results suggest that leukocyte toxicity upon exposure to intact biofilm is likely mediated by the complex action of redundant signals, which is plausible given the extensive arsenal of S. aureus virulence factors (25).

Fig 5.

Bar graphs show minimal effects of S. aureus toxins on leukocyte responses following biofilm co-culture. Data compare viability, apoptosis, and mitochondrial ROS in macrophages, G-MDSCs, and neutrophils across wild-type and mutant strains.

S. aureus toxins elicit minimal effects on leukocytes during biofilm co-culture. Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were co-cultured with WT and various S. aureus mutant biofilms for 2 h. Leukocytes were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A) leukocyte viability, (B) early apoptosis, (C) late apoptosis/necrosis, and mtROS levels in (D) live and (E) early apoptotic cells. Unstimulated leukocytes were incubated in medium for 2 h (WT and Unstim. n = 20; ΔhlalukAB and Δpsmα1-4hld n = 12 from three independent experiments; Δagr n = 8 from two independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction between cell types).

S. aureus biofilm-induced leukocyte toxicity is mediated by direct contact

The inability of Δagr to limit cell death in any of the leukocyte populations was surprising, given that it regulates multiple toxins (53). To investigate whether a secreted factor and/or physical contact with the biofilm was important for cytotoxicity, a Transwell approach was utilized. Surprisingly, physical separation of all leukocyte populations from the biofilm resulted in viability comparable to that of unstimulated cells (Fig. 6A) coinciding with less late stage death (Fig. 6C); however, this did not translate into differences in mtROS production in this population (Fig. 6E). Although no differences in early cell death (i.e., ZombieApotracker+) were observed (Fig. 6B), mtROS production was significantly reduced in all leukocyte populations (Fig. 6D), suggesting that physical separation from the biofilm may delay the progression toward late leukocyte death. Collectively, these data suggest that direct contact with S. aureus biofilm is critical for inducing mtROS production and cytotoxicity across all leukocyte populations examined.

Fig 6.

Bar graphs showing leukocytes directly exposed to S. aureus biofilm have decreased viability and increased apoptosis versus transwell separation. Data reveal that cell contact regulates all readouts in macrophages, G-MDSCs, and PMNs.

Direct contact with S. aureus biofilm is critical to induce leukocyte cytotoxicity. Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were co-cultured with S. aureus biofilm either directly or separated by Transwell inserts for the indicated intervals. Leukocytes were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A) leukocyte viability, (B) early apoptosis, (C) late apoptosis/necrosis, and mtROS levels in (D) live and (E) early apoptotic cells. Unstimulated leukocytes were incubated in medium for 30 min or 2 h, as indicated (n = 9 from three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction between cell types).

Impact of S. aureus Hla and LukAB on biofilm development

In addition to their roles in biofilm-mediated leukocyte death, α-toxin and LukAB have been implicated in S. aureus escape from Mφs (36, 38). This led us to explore how Hla and LukAB impact biofilm development and whether this is altered by Mφs. WT and Δhla/ΔlukAB displayed differences in biofilm morphology in the absence of Mφs, where Δhla/ΔlukAB had fewer tower-like structures throughout the biofilm that was reflected by reduced roughness and thickness measurements (Fig. 7A and C through E). Interestingly, when Mφs were infected with WT or Δhla/ΔlukAB and biofilm formation was assessed 24 h later, the presence of Mφs significantly increased the roughness of both strains compared to biofilm only (without Mφs), indicative of more tower-like structures (Fig. 7A and C). However, there was no difference in biofilm roughness between WT and Δhla/ΔlukAB in the presence of Mφs (Fig. 7C). The average thickness across the entire biofilm decreased in WT and Δhla/ΔlukAB with Mφs compared to biofilm alone, but again, no differences in biofilm thickness between the strains were observed in the presence of Mφs (Fig. 7D and E). Collectively, these data suggest that Hla and LukAB have limited impact on biofilm formation, which is not dramatically impacted by the presence of Mφs.

Fig 7.

Confocal microscopy comparing biofilm formation between wild-type and Δhla/ΔlukAB S. aureus after macrophage infection. Data reveal significant differences in biomass, roughness coefficient, and thickness between strains.

Effects of Hla and LukAB on biofilm development following macrophage infection. (A) Primary Mφs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and challenged with planktonic GFP-expressing WT or ΔhlalukAB S. aureus (green) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1 (bacteria:leukocyte), whereupon biofilm development was imaged at 24 h by confocal laser scanning microscopy. (A) Representative three-dimensional images with quantification in Comstat2 for (B) biomass, (C) roughness coefficient, (D) thickness distribution (entire area), and (E) thickness distribution (biomass) (n = 10 biological replicates from one experiment; Two-way ANOVA *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

S. aureus biofilm induces Mφ necrosis

We next explored potential mechanisms of Mφ death initiated by S. aureus biofilm by screening inhibitors of several PCD pathways, including pyroptosis, ferroptosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, as well as necrosis alone or in combination to interrogate the possibility of multiple cell death pathways acting simultaneously (Table 1). This was assessed using Δhla/ΔlukAB biofilm to circumvent the cytotoxic effects of Hla and LukAB on Mφs (26, 36, 38), which were expected to potentially mask phenotypes given the high degree of Mφ death in response to WT biofilm. PCD inhibitors, either alone or in combination, had no effect on Mφ viability, early or late cell death, or mtROS production in response to Δhla/ΔlukAB biofilm compared to vehicle following a 30 min co-culture period (Fig. S3). Moreover, Mφ viability was not rescued with PCD inhibitors during extended exposure to biofilm (2 h) (Fig. 8A and B). Other attributes measured such as early and late apoptosis (Fig. 8C and E, respectively), and mtROS in these populations (Fig. 8G and H; Fig. S4A and B) remained largely unaltered by PCD inhibitors.

Fig 8.

Bar graphs showing S. aureus biofilm promotes macrophage necrosis. An inhibitor of necrosis significantly alters early and late apoptosis elicited by biofilm.

S. aureus biofilm promotes macrophage necrosis. Primary Mφs were pre-treated with Ac-YVAD-CHO (caspase-1), MCC950 (NLRP3), deferasirox (iron chelator), ferrostatin-1 (ferroptosis), Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3), HS-1371 (RIPK3), Necrostatin-5 (RIPK1), Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK (pan-caspase), or IM-54 (necrosis) alone or in combination (Combo; Ac-YVAD-CHO, ferrostatin-1, Z-DEVD-FMK, and Hs-1371) for 1 h followed by co-culture with ΔhlalukAB biofilm for 2 h. Mφs were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A and B) leukocyte viability, (C and D) early apoptosis, (E and F) late apoptosis/necrosis, and (G and H) mtROS in viable cells. ns, not significant (n = 9 from three independent experiments; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction).

In contrast to PCD inhibitors, treatment with IM-54, which inhibits H2O2-dependent necrosis (56), significantly increased the percentage of Mφs at the early stage of death (ZombieApotracker+) compared to vehicle following co-culture with Δhla/ΔlukAB biofilm at 30 min (Fig. S3D), suggesting a potential delay toward late cell death when this necrosis pathway is blocked. This was corroborated at an extended co-culture interval (i.e., 2 h), where IM-54 significantly increased the frequency of Mφs in early apoptosis (ZombieApotracker+) (Fig. 8D) concomitant with a significant decrease in late stage death (Zombie+Apotracker+) (Fig. 8F) suggesting a delay toward necrosis. The role of necrosis in biofilm-mediated Mφ death was further assessed by monitoring full-length cytokeratin-18 (FK18) release, an intracellular protein shown to be a marker of necrosis (57). These studies were performed with S. aureus Δspa biofilm to avoid background from S. aureus Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) during ELISA detection (58). We first validated that Mφ responses to Δspa and WT biofilm were similar, which was confirmed by no differences in Mφ death, mtROS, early apoptosis, or late apoptosis between Δspa and WT biofilm (Fig. S4A through E). Mφs were co-cultured with Δspa biofilm for 2 h and FK18 release was measured by ELISA. FK18 levels were undetectable in unstimulated Mφs, whereas cells co-cultured with Δspa biofilm released FK18 at levels similar to water-lysed Mφs that was reversed by the necrosis inhibitor IM-54 (Fig. S5). Collectively, these data suggest that biofilm-mediated toxicity of Mφs occurs primarily via necrosis.

Granulocytes exhibit divergent cell death pathways in response to S. aureus biofilm

We next explored the cell death pathways elicited in G-MDSCs following exposure to WT S. aureus biofilm. Similar to Mφs, G-MDSCs had no alterations in viability, phosphatidylserine exposure, or mtROS production when treated with any PCD inhibitor (Fig. 9; Fig. S6C and D). G-MDSCs released FK18 in response to biofilm, which was prevented by the necrosis inhibitor IM-54 (Fig. S5). However, FK18 release from biofilm exposed cells was similar to unstimulated G-MDSCs, suggesting basal levels of necrosis (Fig. S5). Collectively, these results suggest that direct contact with S. aureus biofilm induces G-MDSC necrosis.

Fig 9.

Bar graphs showing necrosis inhibitor IM-54 significantly alters S. aureus biofilm-induced mtROS production while PCD inhibitors have no effect. Data show cell viability, apoptosis markers, and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species.

S. aureus biofilm induces G-MDSC necrosis. G-MDSCs were pre-treated with Ac-YVAD-CHO (caspase-1), MCC950 (NLRP3), deferasirox (iron chelator), ferrostatin-1 (ferroptosis), Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3), HS-1371 (RIPK3), Necrostatin-5 (RIPK1), Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK (pan-caspase), or IM-54 (necrosis) for 1 h and co-cultured with WT S. aureus biofilm for 2 h. G-MDSCs were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A and B) leukocyte viability, (C and D) early apoptosis, (E and F) late apoptosis/necrosis, and (G and H) mtROS in viable cells (n = 9 from three independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction).

Unlike Mφs and G-MDSCs, PMN viability following biofilm exposure was significantly increased with MCC950 (NLRP3) and Ac-YVAD-CHO (caspase-1) inhibitors, suggestive of pyroptosis (Fig. 10A). Interestingly, PMN survival was unaffected by a pan-caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK) (Fig. 10B), suggesting the lack of involvement of other caspases and no effects on Apotracker staining were detected (Fig. 10C through F). None of the inhibitors influenced mtROS production in PMNs (Fig. 10G and H). FK18 release was not detected in PMNs after biofilm co-culture (Fig. S5), which may be explained by the finding that ~80% of PMNs remained viable following a 2 h exposure to biofilm (Fig. 3A). Collectively, these data suggest that pyroptosis is one mechanism of PCD initiated in PMNs following S. aureus biofilm exposure; however, other mechanisms of cell death are also involved since Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK (pan-caspase) did not further alter viability.

Fig 10.

Bar graphs comparing viability, apoptosis markers, and mitochondrial ROS in neutrophils exposed to S. aureus biofilm with various cell death inhibitors. Pyroptosis inhibitors show strongest protective effects against biofilm-induced cytotoxicity.

PMN cytotoxicity in response to S. aureus biofilm is influenced by pyroptosis. PMNs were pre-treated with the PCD inhibitors Ac-YVAD-CHO (caspase-1), MCC950 (NLRP3), deferasirox (iron chelator), ferrostatin-1 (ferroptosis), Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3), HS-1371 (RIPK3), Necrostatin-5 (RIPK1), Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK (pan-caspase), or IM-54 (necrosis) for 1 h and co-cultured with S. aureus biofilm for 2 h. PMNs were stained with anti-CD45, Zombie NIR (viability), Apotracker Green (phosphatidylserine), and MitoSOX Red (mtROS) to quantify (A and B) leukocyte viability, (C and D) early apoptosis, (E and F) late apoptosis/necrosis, and (G and H) mtROS (n = 9 from three independent experiments, except [A, C, E, and G] Unstim. and co-culture, where n = 14 from five independent experiments and Ac-YVAD-CHO and MCC950, where n = 12 from four independent experiments; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction).

DISCUSSION

S. aureus biofilms persist despite the presence of phagocytes at the site of infection, including PMNs and Mφs (20, 21). Although prior work has revealed this results, in part, from aberrant immune programming towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype, other mechanisms are also likely involved (5962). One possibility is that S. aureus biofilm differentially regulates leukocyte survival to increase the half-life of cells that are key for promoting the anti-inflammatory biofilm milieu (i.e., G-MDSCs) while targeting professional phagocytes that are important for pathogen neutralization (i.e., PMNs and Mφs). Indeed, this is supported by our recent findings, where bacterial scRNA-seq identified a more robust transcriptional response in S. aureus biofilm following exposure to PMNs and Mφs, whereas minimal changes were elicited by G-MDSCs (63). Although S. aureus-mediated cell death has been extensively studied, this has primarily been in the context of planktonic or intracellular S. aureus (28). Here, we compared the kinetics of leukocyte death in response to biofilm vs planktonic bacteria, where divergent responses were observed. Specifically, Mφs were extremely sensitive to biofilm but had prolonged viability upon encountering planktonic S. aureus. Conversely, PMNs and G-MDSCs were more recalcitrant to biofilm, whereas G-MDSCs exhibited increased death in response to planktonic bacteria at extended intervals. Another important finding was that biofilm-induced cytotoxicity was contact-dependent (Fig. 11). These findings provide initial insights into how leukocytes are influenced by S. aureus biofilm and that the combined action of soluble factors and physical association is leveraged to regulate leukocyte life or death outcomes.

Fig 11.

Schematic of immune cell interactions with S. aureus in planktonic and biofilm states. Shows differential death rates in G-MDSCs and macrophages based on bacterial contact type, with protection when leukocytes are physically separated from bacteria.

S. aureus-mediated leukocyte death is growth state- and contact-dependent. Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs are the predominant immune cell infiltrates in S. aureus PJI. Planktonically grown S. aureus induced greater cell death in G-MDSCs, whereas Mφs were extremely sensitive to direct biofilm contact. This differential response may account for the large number of granulocytes, most notably anti-inflammatory G-MDSCs, and the minor Mφ infiltrate associated with PJI. Physical separation of all leukocyte populations from the biofilm negated cytotoxicity. Figure created in BioRender. Brandquist, N. (2025) https://BioRender.com/we51cxn.

 The role of toxins in regulating cell death in response to planktonic and intracellular S. aureus has been well-characterized (28); however, less is known in the context of biofilm. Previous work reported a role for Hla and LukAB in promoting Mφ cytotoxicity (26, 36, 45). The current report advances these findings by not only examining how these toxins regulated Mφ survival following direct biofilm co-culture (prior studies examined biofilm-conditioned medium) but also the kinetics of this response. Here, we were unable to identify a dominant toxin responsible for Mφ death, suggesting that multiple toxins and direct biofilm contact work in tandem to initiate biofilm-mediated Mφ cytotoxicity. In terms of granulocytes, biofilm-derived PSMs were a candidate since they have been implicated in mediating PMN death (64). PSMs activate formyl-peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) to induce chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and oxidative burst; however, at high concentrations, PSMs cause cell lysis (65). Indeed, PMN and G-MDSC viability was significantly increased following co-culture with S. aureus Δpsmα1-4hld compared to WT biofilm although these changes were relatively minor, supporting the multi-factorial nature of biofilm-induced cell death. We also identified a possible role for PSMs in promoting oxidative metabolism in G-MDSCs when encountering S. aureus biofilm since mtROS production was decreased in viable (i.e., Apotracker) G-MDSCs co-cultured with Δpsmα1-4hld. ROS production is critical for G-MDSC suppressive activity (66), representing a potential mechanism whereby S. aureus PSMs could augment G-MDSC activity to promote biofilm persistence although this remains speculative.

S. aureus possesses an arsenal of toxins, many of which are regulated by two-component systems like agr that controls both hla and psmα1-4 expression among others (53). Surprisingly, Mφ survival was not improved in response to Δagr biofilm despite the known reduction in Hla as described in the literature (53, 67). However, as previously mentioned, this may result from the extended interval of these experiments (i.e., 2 h) when significant necrosis had already ensued. S. aureus encodes other two-component systems, including SaeRS that can regulate exoprotein production (53), which warrants investigation in future studies. Agr-dependent effects were observed in G-MDSCs, where Δagr recapitulated phenotypes with Δpsmα1-4hld biofilm in terms of regulating mtROS production in viable cells (Apotracker) and late cell death (Zombie+Apotracker+). Nevertheless, our studies indicate that there is redundancy in biofilm virulence and no one toxin is responsible for inducing leukocyte death, which is not unexpected. However, an alternative explanation is that direct contact with the biofilm is the main driver of leukocyte toxicity. This was supported by the finding that physical separation of leukocytes from biofilm using Transwells induced minimal cell death. The reason for this finding is unclear but could result from limited diffusion of solutes across the 0.4 µm Transwell membrane, potential entrapment of soluble factors in the biofilm matrix, cell death pathways induced by structural components of the matrix, and/or other unknown factors, which represents an area of active investigation.

Both mtROS and phosphatidylserine exposure were increased in leukocytes upon direct exposure to S. aureus biofilm and are involved in several PCD pathways (47, 48). However, none of the PCD inhibitors tested rescued Mφ or G-MDSC viability, suggesting that these populations undergo either multiple cell death pathways simultaneously, or necrosis. Indeed, FK18 release from Mφs was increased following biofilm co-culture and reversed when necrosis was inhibited, supporting the latter possibility. In contrast, G-MDSC death in response to S. aureus biofilm appeared to be influenced, in part, by PSMs, which also regulated mtROS production. PSMs are important for biofilm development, structure, and dispersal, and PSM expression is increased in S. aureus biofilm compared to planktonic growth (10, 68). Nevertheless, significant G-MDSC death remained following co-culture with S. aureus Δpsmα1-4hld reflecting the action of other cytotoxic factors that remain to be defined and necrosis since FK18 release was inhibited in G-MDSCs following IM-54 treatment. Unlike Mφs and G-MDSCs, PMN death following S. aureus biofilm exposure was influenced by pyroptosis since both Ac-YVAD-CHO and MCC950 enhanced PMN survival.

This study has several limitations. First, while we aimed to identify S. aureus factors responsible for biofilm-mediated cytotoxicity, our analysis was not comprehensive. The potential involvement of other two-component systems such as SaeRS and SrrAB that are known to regulate additional virulence factors (53, 69) could be examined in future studies. In addition, strains lacking several major toxins and/or two-component systems would be required to interrogate the multifactorial nature of toxin-mediated death. Another limitation was that some experimental readouts displayed variability across independent studies, which was not unexpected given unavoidable differences in biofilm growth despite strict adherence to maintain consistency for experimental conditions. It was unclear why MitoTEMPO had minimal effects on mitochondrial ROS production, which may result from its inability to scavenge other ROS sources including hydrogen peroxide or hydroxyl radicals (70) that may be elicited in leukocytes following biofilm exposure. Another unexpected finding was that treatment of PMNs with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD(OMe)-FMK did not recapitulate findings with NLRP3 and caspase-1 inhibition. The reason for this is not known, but caspases can have complex and opposing actions (71), so it is plausible that inhibition of other caspases may have negated the caspase-1 phenotype. For example, recent work revealed a non-canonical role for NLRP3 in a lytic form of PANoptosis along with caspase-8 and receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) (72), which could be explored in future work. In some instances, IM-54 was found to enhance leukocyte death, which was unexpected. IM-54 inhibits H2O2-induced necrosis, and it is plausible that some amount of H2O2 production may be protective during biofilm exposure although this remains highly speculative. Finally, the prolonged survival of PMNs following biofilm exposure was unexpected since neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation typically ensues in response to bacterial challenge (73, 74). Previously, NET release was characterized as a delayed response (3–4 h) requiring PMN lysis (75, 76); however, a non-lytic form of NET release in response to S. aureus has been identified that is induced within 5 min (77) and S. aureus biofilm aggregates have been shown to inhibit NETosis (78). These mechanisms could account for the prolonged viability observed with PMNs in the current study; however, this remains speculative and warrants further investigation.

 Collectively, these findings establish the differential sensitivity of Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs to S. aureus biofilm-induced toxicity, which is distinct from planktonic growth. Moreover, S. aureus toxins exhibit redundancy in the biofilm state, and the effects vary by cell type. The preferential accumulation of anti-inflammatory G-MDSCs during PJI coincides with their increased recalcitrance to biofilm-mediated cytotoxicity compared to other leukocyte populations. This combined with the increased susceptibility of Mφs to biofilm-induced death and may account, in part, for the inability of the immune system to clear these infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

S. aureus LAC-13C is a USA300 clinical isolate recovered from a skin and soft tissue infection (79) cured of a plasmid conferring erythromycin (erm) resistance (80), which was used as the WT strain throughout this study. The Δhla/ΔlukAB and Δagr strains were generated in the LAC-13C background as previously described (26). Δpsmα 1-4/hld in the LAC background (AH3794) was provided by Dr. Alexander Horswill (University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus). The Δspa::erm transposon mutant was obtained from the Nebraska transposon mutant library (80) and moved to the LAC-13C background by φ11 transduction, where mutants were confirmed using gene- and transposon-specific primers. For confocal studies, the pCM29 plasmid was transduced into the LAC background using φ11 and validated as previously described (26, 81).

Bacterial growth conditions

Glycerol stocks of S. aureus strains were streaked onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) with 5% sheep blood. A single colony was inoculated into tryptic soy broth (TSB) or biofilm medium (RPMI-1640 with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum [FBS], 1% L-glutamine, and 1% HEPES) and grown overnight (16–18 h) at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm.

 For biofilm growth, 96- or 24-well plates were coated with 20% human plasma in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer overnight at 4°C. Overnight bacterial cultures were diluted 1:100 and seeded in plasma-coated plates. Biofilms were grown under static conditions at 37°C in room air for 4 days with approximately half of the medium carefully replenished every 24 h to avoid disturbing the biofilm.

Generation of bone marrow-derived leukocytes

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and was approved by the UNMC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #18-013-03). For generating primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs, C57BL/6J mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664) were euthanized by an overdose of inhaled isoflurane followed by cervical dislocation to collect bone marrow as previously described (14, 26). Briefly, bone marrow was harvested from the long bones by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 min followed by red blood cell lysis. Bone marrow-derived Mφs were cultured for 7 days in the presence of 10% L929 medium (as a source of M-CSF) to drive Mφ maturation. G-MDSCs were cultured for 4 days in the presence of GM-CSF and G-CSF (40 ng/mL each) to drive expansion and stimulated with 40 ng/mL of IL-6 on day 3, whereupon cells were purified using an anti-Ly6G microbead kit (Miltenyi Biotec) on day 4 in vitro. PMNs were isolated directly from bone marrow using an anti-Ly6G microbead kit and used immediately for experiments.

Planktonic co-culture

Overnight bacterial cultures were centrifuged and resuspended in medium (RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS). Planktonic S. aureus was added to Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs in a 96-well U-bottom plate at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1 (bacteria:leukocyte) and cultured at 37°C for 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h, with unstimulated cells incubated for the duration of the experiment (6 h) before analysis. Leukocytes were stained with Apotracker Green (BioLegend #427403) and MitoSOX Red (Invitrogen #M36008) in FACS buffer (1× PBS with 2% FBS) for 30 min followed by a CD45-APC antibody (RRID:AB_312977) and the live/dead dye Zombie NIR (BioLegend #423105). Stained cells were analyzed on an Attune NxT cytometer (ThermoFisher).

Biofilm co-culture

On day 4 of biofilm growth, ~45% of the medium was removed and leukocytes were added at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/well in fresh medium and incubated for 15 min, 30 min, 2 h, and 6 h. For Transwell co-cultures, Transwell inserts (0.4 μm; CELLTREAT #230635) were placed in 24-well plates above the biofilm on day 4 of growth, whereupon 7.5 × 105 leukocytes were added to the upper chamber for 30 min or 2 h. Leukocytes were stained and acquired as described above for planktonic co-culture studies, and unstimulated cells were included for the duration of the co-culture period. Representative data from 2 h are shown since this time point was measured in all leukocyte populations unless otherwise indicated.

Inhibition of PCD or necrosis pathways

Leukocytes were pre-treated for 1 h with various PCD pathway and necrosis inhibitors or MitoTEMPO (all from Cayman Chemical) (Table 1), where working concentrations were identified in pilot studies with Mφs (Fig. S7). Following the 1 h pre-treatment period, leukocytes were co-cultured with biofilms for 30 min (Mφs) or 2 h (Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs). For MitoTEMPO experiments, leukocytes were also exposed to planktonic bacteria at a MOI of 10:1 (bacteria:leukocyte). Following co-culture, leukocytes were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above.

Flow cytometry analysis

Analysis of leukocyte populations was conducted with FlowJo version 10 (RRID: SCR_008520) using the gating strategy in Fig. S8. Viable CD45+ single events were gated by Zombie NIR staining and analyzed for mtROS production (MitoSOX) and induction of apoptosis (Apotracker). Additionally, Zombie+Apotracker+ cells were identified from the CD45+ population to identify late stage cell death.

Confocal microscopy

Primary Mφs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (1 μM; Invitrogen #C34565) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and exposed to S. aureus strains engineered to constitutively express GFP (pCM29) at a MOI of 10:1 (bacteria:leukocyte) in 8-well glass bottom chamber slides (Cellvis #C8-1-N). Samples were imaged at 24 h on a Zeiss 710 META laser scanning confocal microscope with 40× oil magnification. Biomass, roughness coefficient, and average thickness measurements of biofilms were determined using Comstat2 (ImageJ) (82, 83).

FK18 ELISA

Primary Mφs, G-MDSCs, and PMNs were pre-treated with the necrosis inhibitor IM-54 for 1 h followed by a 2 h co-culture with Δspa biofilm. Supernatants were collected and analyzed using a Mouse Cytokeratin 18 ELISA (Abcam #ab243678), where cells lysed with water for 10 min served as a positive control.

Statistics

Significant differences were determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test or a two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism version 10.2.2 (RRID: SCR_002798). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease P01 AI083211 (Project 4 to T.K.) and a UNMC Fellowship to N.D.B. The authors thank the Kielian laboratory members for their assistance and feedback, especially Rachel Fallet for managing the mouse colony and Artha Govind Lotlikar for assistance with the ELISA. We are grateful to Dr. Alexander Horswill for providing the S. aureus LAC Δpsmα1-4hld strain. The UNMC Flow Cytometry Research Facility is supported by state funds from the Nebraska Research Initiative (NRI) and a National Cancer Institute Cancer Support Grant for The Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (P30CA036727).

Contributor Information

Tammy Kielian, Email: tkielian@unmc.edu.

Victor J. Torres, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00654-25.

Supplemental material. iai.00654-25-s0001.pdf.

Fig. S1 to S8.

iai.00654-25-s0001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/iai.00654-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mège J-L, Rolain J-M, Blin O. 2018. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol 9:2419. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Raineri EJM, Altulea D, van Dijl JM. 2022. Staphylococcal trafficking and infection-from “nose to gut” and back. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:fuab041. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Collaborators G. 2024. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 404:1199–1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mruk AL, Record KE. 2012. Antimicrobial options in the treatment of adult staphylococcal bone and joint infections in an era of drug shortages. Orthopedics 35:401–407. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120426-07 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Visperas A, Santana D, Klika AK, Higuera-Rueda CA, Piuzzi NS. 2022. Current treatments for biofilm-associated periprosthetic joint infection and new potential strategies. J Orthop Res 40:1477–1491. doi: 10.1002/jor.25345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. de Buys M, Moodley K, Cakic JN, Pietrzak JRT. 2023. Staphylococcus aureus colonization and periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty: a narrative review. EFORT Open Rev 8:680–689. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Suliman J, Warda H, Samaan M. 2024. Review of recent advances in the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty part 2: single-stage or two-stage surgical technique? J Orthop Surg Res 19:643. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05152-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kristensen NK, Gundtoft PH, Elmengaard B, Pedersen AB, Lange J. 2025. Increased mortality following periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty: a microbiologically verified nationwide cohort of 1,611 PJI revisions. J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Moormeier DE, Bayles KW. 2017. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism. Mol Microbiol 104:365–376. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schilcher K, Horswill AR. 2020. Staphylococcal biofilm development: structure, regulation, and treatment strategies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 84:e00026-19. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00026-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Horn CM, Kielian T. 2020. Crosstalk between Staphylococcus aureus and innate immunity: focus on immunometabolism. Front Immunol 11:621750. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.621750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lewis K. 2001. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:999–1007. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.999-1007.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Otto M. 2013. Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med 64:175–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Heim CE, Bosch ME, Yamada KJ, Aldrich AL, Chaudhari SS, Klinkebiel D, Gries CM, Alqarzaee AA, Li Y, Thomas VC, Seto E, Karpf AR, Kielian T. 2020. Lactate production by Staphylococcus aureus biofilm inhibits HDAC11 to reprogramme the host immune response during persistent infection. Nat Microbiol 5:1271–1284. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0756-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Thurlow LR, Hanke ML, Fritz T, Angle A, Aldrich A, Williams SH, Engebretsen IL, Bayles KW, Horswill AR, Kielian T. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo . J Immunol 186:6585–6596. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yamada KJ, Heim CE, Xi X, Attri KS, Wang D, Zhang W, Singh PK, Bronich TK, Kielian T. 2020. Monocyte metabolic reprogramming promotes pro-inflammatory activity and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm clearance. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008354. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tomlinson KL, Lung TWF, Dach F, Annavajhala MK, Gabryszewski SJ, Groves RA, Drikic M, Francoeur NJ, Sridhar SH, Smith ML, Khanal S, Britto CJ, Sebra R, Lewis I, Uhlemann AC, Kahl BC, Prince AS, Riquelme SA. 2021. Staphylococcus aureus induces an itaconate-dominated immunometabolic response that drives biofilm formation. Nat Commun 12:1399. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21718-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bertrand BP, Shinde D, Thomas VC, Whiteley M, Ibberson CB, Kielian T. 2024. Metabolic diversity of human macrophages: potential influence on Staphylococcus aureus intracellular survival. Infect Immun. doi: 10.1128/iai.00474-23:e0047423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Heim CE, Vidlak D, Odvody J, Hartman CW, Garvin KL, Kielian T. 2018. Human prosthetic joint infections are associated with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs): Implications for infection persistence. J Orthop Res 36:1605–1613. doi: 10.1002/jor.23806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Heim CE, Vidlak D, Scherr TD, Kozel JA, Holzapfel M, Muirhead DE, Kielian T. 2014. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells contribute to Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection. J Immunol 192:3778–3792. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Heim CE, West SC, Ali H, Kielian T. 2018. Heterogeneity of Ly6G(+) Ly6C(+) myeloid-derived suppressor cell infiltrates during Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection. Infect Immun 86. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00684-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Aldrich AL, Horn CM, Heim CE, Korshoj LE, Kielian T. 2021. Transcriptional diversity and niche-specific distribution of leukocyte populations during Staphylococcus aureus craniotomy-associated biofilm infection. J Immunol 206:751–765. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kak G, Van Roy Z, Heim CE, Fallet RW, Shi W, Roers A, Duan B, Kielian T. 2023. IL-10 production by granulocytes promotes Staphylococcus aureus craniotomy infection. J Neuroinflammation 20:114. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02798-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Lamb TJ, Pawelec G. 2023. Here, there, and everywhere: myeloid-derived suppressor cells in immunology. J Immunol 210:1183–1197. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tam K, Torres VJ. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus secreted toxins and extracellular enzymes. Microbiol Spectr 7. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0039-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Scherr TD, Hanke ML, Huang O, James DBA, Horswill AR, Bayles KW, Fey PD, Torres VJ, Kielian T. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms induce macrophage dysfunction through leukocidin AB and alpha-toxin. mBio 6:e01021-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01021-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shen S, Shao Y, Li C. 2023. Different types of cell death and their shift in shaping disease. Cell Death Discov 9:284. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01581-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Missiakas D, Winstel V. 2020. Selective host cell death by Staphylococcus aureus: a strategy for bacterial persistence. Front Immunol 11:621733. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.621733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Genestier A-L, Michallet M-C, Prévost G, Bellot G, Chalabreysse L, Peyrol S, Thivolet F, Etienne J, Lina G, Vallette FM, Vandenesch F, Genestier L. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus panton-valentine leukocidin directly targets mitochondria and induces bax-independent apoptosis of human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 115:3117–3127. doi: 10.1172/JCI22684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bantel H, Sinha B, Domschke W, Peters G, Schulze-Osthoff K, Jänicke RU. 2001. Alpha-toxin is a mediator of Staphylococcus aureus-induced cell death and activates caspases via the intrinsic death pathway independently of death receptor signaling. J Cell Biol 155:637–648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Essmann F, Bantel H, Totzke G, Engels IH, Sinha B, Schulze-Osthoff K, Jänicke RU. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin-induced cell death: predominant necrosis despite apoptotic caspase activation. Cell Death Differ 10:1260–1272. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Vozza EG, Kelly AM, Daly CM, O’Rourke SA, Carlile SR, Morris B, Dunne A, McLoughlin RM. 2024. Type 1 interferons promote Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization by inducing phagocyte apoptosis. Cell Death Discov 10:403. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02173-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yu P, Zhang X, Liu N, Tang L, Peng C, Chen X. 2021. Pyroptosis: mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6:128. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00507-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Broz P. 2025. Pyroptosis: molecular mechanisms and roles in disease. Cell Res 35:334–344. doi: 10.1038/s41422-025-01107-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Melehani JH, James DBA, DuMont AL, Torres VJ, Duncan JA. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus leukocidin A/B (LukAB) kills human monocytes via host NLRP3 and ASC when extracellular, but not intracellular. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004970. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Craven RR, Gao X, Allen IC, Gris D, Bubeck Wardenburg J, McElvania-Tekippe E, Ting JP, Duncan JA. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells. PLoS One 4:e7446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lee YB, Shin HW, Shrestha S, Kim JK, Jung SJ, Shin MS, Hong CW. 2025. Ferroptosis in neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol 117:qiaf039. doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiaf039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Soe YM, Bedoui S, Stinear TP, Hachani A. 2021. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and host cell death pathways. Cell Microbiol 23:e13317. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Dai M, Ouyang W, Yu Y, Wang T, Wang Y, Cen M, Yang L, Han Y, Yao Y, Xu F. 2024. IFP35 aggravates Staphylococcus aureus infection by promoting Nrf2-regulated ferroptosis. J Adv Res 62:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.09.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kitur K, Parker D, Nieto P, Ahn DS, Cohen TS, Chung S, Wachtel S, Bueno S, Prince A. 2015. Toxin-induced necroptosis is a major mechanism of Staphylococcus aureus lung damage. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004820. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wong Fok Lung T, Monk IR, Acker KP, Mu A, Wang N, Riquelme SA, Pires S, Noguera LP, Dach F, Gabryszewski SJ, Howden BP, Prince A. 2020. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants impair host immunity by activating host cell glycolysis and inducing necroptosis. Nat Microbiol 5:141–153. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0597-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rock KL, Kono H. 2008. The inflammatory response to cell death. Annu Rev Pathol 3:99–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Heim CE, Vidlak D, Scherr TD, Hartman CW, Garvin KL, Kielian T. 2015. IL-12 promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment and bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic implant infection. J Immunol 194:3861–3872. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Lehman MK, Nuxoll AS, Yamada KJ, Kielian T, Carson SD, Fey PD. 2019. Protease-mediated growth of Staphylococcus aureus on host proteins is opp3 dependent. MBio 10:e02553-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02553-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cohen TS, Boland ML, Boland BB, Takahashi V, Tovchigrechko A, Lee Y, Wilde AD, Mazaitis MJ, Jones-Nelson O, Tkaczyk C, Raja R, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2018. S. aureus evades macrophage killing through NLRP3-dependent effects on mitochondrial trafficking. Cell Rep 22:2431–2441. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Jin M, Wu X, Hu J, Chen Y, Yang B, Cheng C, Yang M, Zhang X. 2024. EGFR-MEK1/2 cascade negatively regulates bactericidal function of bone marrow macrophages in mice with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. PLoS Pathog 20:e1012437. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shlomovitz I, Speir M, Gerlic M. 2019. Flipping the dogma - phosphatidylserine in non-apoptotic cell death. Cell Commun Signal 17:139. doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0437-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Rius-Pérez S, Pérez S, Toledano MB, Sastre J. 2023. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and lytic programmed cell death in acute inflammation. Antioxid Redox Signal 39:708–727. doi: 10.1089/ars.2022.0209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wang Y, Shi P, Chen Q, Huang Z, Zou D, Zhang J, Gao X, Lin Z. 2019. Mitochondrial ROS promote macrophage pyroptosis by inducing GSDMD oxidation. J Mol Cell Biol 11:1069–1082. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hu H, Li M. 2016. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mitotempo protects mitochondrial function against amyloid beta toxicity in primary cultured mouse neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 478:174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Weidinger A, Birgisdóttir L, Schäffer J, Meszaros AT, Zavadskis S, Müllebner A, Hecker M, Duvigneau JC, Sommer N, Kozlov AV. 2022. Systemic effects of mitoTEMPO upon lipopolysaccharide challenge are due to its antioxidant part, while local effects in the lung are due to triphenylphosphonium. Antioxidants (Basel) 11:323. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Münzenmayer L, Geiger T, Daiber E, Schulte B, Autenrieth SE, Fraunholz M, Wolz C. 2016. Influence of Sae-regulated and Agr-regulated factors on the escape of Staphylococcus aureus from human macrophages. Cell Microbiol 18:1172–1183. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jenul C, Horswill AR. 2019. Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus virulence. Microbiol Spectr 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Periasamy S, Joo H-S, Duong AC, Bach T-HL, Tan VY, Chatterjee SS, Cheung GYC, Otto M. 2012. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1281–1286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115006109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Boles BR, Horswill AR. 2008. Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000052. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sodeoka M, Dodo K. 2010. Development of selective inhibitors of necrosis. Chem Rec 10:308–314. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201000031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yang M, Antoine DJ, Weemhoff JL, Jenkins RE, Farhood A, Park BK, Jaeschke H. 2014. Biomarkers distinguish apoptotic and necrotic cell death during hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Liver Transpl 20:1372–1382. doi: 10.1002/lt.23958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. O’Halloran DP, Wynne K, Geoghegan JA. 2015. Protein A is released into the Staphylococcus aureus culture supernatant with an unprocessed sorting signal. Infect Immun 83:1598–1609. doi: 10.1128/IAI.03122-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Heim CE, Vidlak D, Kielian T. 2015. Interleukin-10 production by myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection. J Leukoc Biol 98:1003–1013. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4VMA0315-125RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hanke ML, Heim CE, Angle A, Sanderson SD, Kielian T. 2013. Targeting macrophage activation for the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infections. J Immunol 190:2159–2168. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Horn CM, Arumugam P, Van Roy Z, Heim CE, Fallet RW, Bertrand BP, Shinde D, Thomas VC, Romanova SG, Bronich TK, Hartman CW, Garvin KL, Kielian T. 2024. Granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity during biofilm infection is regulated by a glycolysis/HIF1a axis. J Clin Invest 134. doi: 10.1172/JCI174051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Brandquist ND, Kielian T. 2025. Immune dysfunction during S. aureus biofilm-associated implant infections: opportunities for novel therapeutic strategies. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11:144. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00782-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Korshoj LE, Kielian T. 2024. Bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing captures biofilm transcriptional heterogeneity and differential responses to immune pressure. Nat Commun 15:10184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54581-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach T-HL, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2007. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med 13:1510–1514. doi: 10.1038/nm1656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sundqvist M, Christenson K, Gabl M, Holdfeldt A, Jennbacken K, Møller TC, Dahlgren C, Forsman H. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus-derived PSMα peptides activate neutrophil FPR2 but lack the ability to mediate β-arrestin recruitment and chemotaxis. J Immunol 203:3349–3360. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Schmielau J, Finn OJ. 2001. Activated granulocytes and granulocyte-derived hydrogen peroxide are the underlying mechanism of suppression of t-cell function in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Res 61:4756–4760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xiong YQ, Willard J, Yeaman MR, Cheung AL, Bayer AS. 2006. Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin gene (hla) expression by agr, sarA, and sae in vitro and in experimental infective endocarditis. J Infect Dis 194:1267–1275. doi: 10.1086/508210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Peschel A, Otto M. 2013. Phenol-soluble modulins and staphylococcal infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:667–673. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Li M, Wang B, Chen J, Jiang L, Zhou Y, Guo G, Jiang F, Hu Y, Wang C, Yang Y, Tang J, Han P, Yu J, Shen H. 2024. Staphylococcus aureus SaeRS impairs macrophage immune functions through bacterial clumps formation in the early stage of infection. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10:102. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00576-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Murphy MP, Bayir H, Belousov V, Chang CJ, Davies KJA, Davies MJ, Dick TP, Finkel T, Forman HJ, Janssen-Heininger Y, Gems D, Kagan VE, Kalyanaraman B, Larsson N-G, Milne GL, Nyström T, Poulsen HE, Radi R, Van Remmen H, Schumacker PT, Thornalley PJ, Toyokuni S, Winterbourn CC, Yin H, Halliwell B. 2022. Guidelines for measuring reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in cells and in vivo. Nat Metab 4:651–662. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00591-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Dho SH, Cho M, Woo W, Jeong S, Kim LK. 2025. Caspases as master regulators of programmed cell death: apoptosis, pyroptosis and beyond. Exp Mol Med 57:1121–1132. doi: 10.1038/s12276-025-01470-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Sharma BR, Choudhury SM, Abdelaal HM, Wang Y, Kanneganti TD. 2025. Innate immune sensor NLRP3 drives PANoptosome formation and PANoptosis. J Immunol 214:1236–1246. doi: 10.1093/jimmun/vkaf042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Meyers S, Crescente M, Verhamme P, Martinod K. 2022. Staphylococcus aureus and neutrophil extracellular traps: the master manipulator meets its match in immunothrombosis. ATVB 42:261–276. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.316930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y, Zychlinsky A. 2004. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303:1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Meyle E, Stroh P, GüNther F, Hoppy-Tichy T, Wagner C, HäNsch GM. 2010. Destruction of bacterial biofilms by polymorphonuclear neutrophils: relative contribution of phagocytosis, DNA release, and degranulation. Int J Artif Organs 33:608–620. doi: 10.1177/039139881003300906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Hoppenbrouwers T, Autar ASA, Sultan AR, Abraham TE, van Cappellen WA, Houtsmuller AB, van Wamel WJB, van Beusekom HMM, van Neck JW, de Maat MPM. 2017. In vitro induction of NETosis: comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review. PLoS One 12:e0176472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Pilsczek FH, Salina D, Poon KKH, Fahey C, Yipp BG, Sibley CD, Robbins SM, Green FHY, Surette MG, Sugai M, Bowden MG, Hussain M, Zhang K, Kubes P. 2010. A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol 185:7413–7425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Pettygrove BA, Kratofil RM, Alhede M, Jensen PØ, Newton M, Qvortrup K, Pallister KB, Bjarnsholt T, Kubes P, Voyich JM, Stewart PS. 2021. Delayed neutrophil recruitment allows nascent Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and immune evasion. Biomaterials 275:120775. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Gardner DJ, Long D, Wardenburg JB, Schneewind O, Otto M, DeLeo FR. 2011. Comparative analysis of USA300 virulence determinants in a rabbit model of skin and soft tissue infection. J Infect Dis 204:937–941. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio 4:e00537–12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Bertrand BP, Heim CE, West SC, Chaudhari SS, Ali H, Thomas VC, Kielian T. 2022. Role of Staphylococcus aureus formate metabolism during prosthetic joint infection. Infect Immun 90:e0042822. doi: 10.1128/iai.00428-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 146:2395–2407. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Vorregaard M. 2008. Comstat2 - a modern 3D image analysis environment for biofilms. Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. iai.00654-25-s0001.pdf.

Fig. S1 to S8.

iai.00654-25-s0001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/iai.00654-25.SuF1

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES