Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1993 Spring;26(1):99–110. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-99

Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.

P M Barbetta 1, W L Heward 1, D M Bradley 1
PMCID: PMC1297723  PMID: 8473263

Abstract

We used an alternating treatments design to compare the effects of two procedures for correcting student errors during sight word drills. Each of the 5 participating students with developmental disabilities was provided daily one-to-one instruction on individualized sets of 14 unknown words. Each week's new set of unknown words was divided randomly into two groups of equal size. Student errors during instruction were immediately followed by whole-word error correction (the teacher stated the complete word and the student repeated it) for one group of words and by phonetic-prompt error correction (the teacher provided phonetic prompts) for the other group of words. During instruction, all 5 students read correctly a higher percentage of whole-word corrected words than phonetic-prompt corrected words. Data from same-day tests (immediately following instruction) and next-day tests showed the students learned more words taught with whole-word error correction than they learned with phonetic-prompt error correction.

Full text

PDF
99

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carnine D. W. Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Summer;9(2):199–206. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deshler D. D., Ferrell W. R., Kass C. E. Error monitoring of schoolwork by learning disabled adolescents. J Learn Disabil. 1978 Aug-Sep;11(7):401–414. doi: 10.1177/002221947801100702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenwood C. R., Dinwiddie G., Bailey V., Carta J. J., Dorsey D., Kohler F. W., Nelson C., Rotholz D., Schulte D. Field replication of classwide peer tutoring. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Summer;20(2):151–160. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodgers T. A., Iwata B. A. An analysis of error-correction procedures during discrimination training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):775–781. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES