Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Jan;74(1):115–131. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77773-2

Molecular dynamics simulations of individual alpha-helices of bacteriorhodopsin in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine. II. Interaction energy analysis.

T B Woolf 1
PMCID: PMC1299368  PMID: 9449316

Abstract

The concepts of hydrophobicity and hydrophobic moments have been applied in attempts to predict membrane protein secondary and tertiary structure. The current paper uses molecular dynamics computer calculations of individual bacteriorhodopsin helices in explicit dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers to examine the atomic basis of these approaches. The results suggest that the types of interactions between a particular amino acid and the surrounding bilayer depend on the position and type of the amino acid. In particular, aromatic residues are seen to interact favorably at the interface region. Analysis of the trajectories in terms of hydrophobic moments suggests the presence of a particular face that prefers lipid. The results of these simulations may be used to improve secondary structure prediction methods and to provide further insights into the two-stage model of protein folding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (626.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. D., Arkin I. T., Engelman D. M., Brünger A. T. Computational searching and mutagenesis suggest a structure for the pentameric transmembrane domain of phospholamban. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;2(2):154–162. doi: 10.1038/nsb0295-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aqvist J., Medina C., Samuelsson J. E. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Eng. 1994 Mar;7(3):385–391. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.3.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Argos P., Rao J. K., Hargrave P. A. Structural prediction of membrane-bound proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Nov 15;128(2-3):565–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb07002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin J. M. The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1693–1703. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05814.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ben-Tal N., Ben-Shaul A., Nicholls A., Honig B. Free-energy determinants of alpha-helix insertion into lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1803–1812. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79744-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bormann B. J., Engelman D. M. Intramembrane helix-helix association in oligomerization and transmembrane signaling. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:223–242. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiu S. W., Clark M., Balaji V., Subramaniam S., Scott H. L., Jakobsson E. Incorporation of surface tension into molecular dynamics simulation of an interface: a fluid phase lipid bilayer membrane. Biophys J. 1995 Oct;69(4):1230–1245. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80005-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cramer W. A., Engelman D. M., Von Heijne G., Rees D. C. Forces involved in the assembly and stabilization of membrane proteins. FASEB J. 1992 Dec;6(15):3397–3402. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.15.1464373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cronet P., Sander C., Vriend G. Modeling of transmembrane seven helix bundles. Protein Eng. 1993 Jan;6(1):59–64. doi: 10.1093/protein/6.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eisenberg D., Schwarz E., Komaromy M., Wall R. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J Mol Biol. 1984 Oct 15;179(1):125–142. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional structure of membrane and surface proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:595–623. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.003115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:321–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A. The spontaneous insertion of proteins into and across membranes: the helical hairpin hypothesis. Cell. 1981 Feb;23(2):411–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feller S. E., Pastor R. W. On simulating lipid bilayers with an applied surface tension: periodic boundary conditions and undulations. Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1350–1355. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79337-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray T. M., Matthews B. W. Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within alpha-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteins. J Mol Biol. 1984 May 5;175(1):75–81. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90446-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grigorieff N., Ceska T. A., Downing K. H., Baldwin J. M., Henderson R. Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jun 14;259(3):393–421. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Henderson R., Baldwin J. M., Ceska T. A., Zemlin F., Beckmann E., Downing K. H. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):899–929. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Herzyk P., Hubbard R. E. Automated method for modeling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2419–2442. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80112-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jost P. C., Griffith O. H., Capaldi R. A., Vanderkooi G. Evidence for boundary lipid in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):480–484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jähnig F. What is the surface tension of a lipid bilayer membrane? Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1348–1349. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79336-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang S. Y., Gutowsky H. S., Hsung J. C., Jacobs R., King T. E., Rice D., Oldfield E. Nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of the cytochrome oxidase--phospholipid interaction: a new model for boundary lipid. Biochemistry. 1979 Jul 24;18(15):3257–3267. doi: 10.1021/bi00582a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Landolt-Marticorena C., Williams K. A., Deber C. M., Reithmeier R. A. Non-random distribution of amino acids in the transmembrane segments of human type I single span membrane proteins. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 5;229(3):602–608. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lavialle F., Levin I. W., Mollay C. Interaction of melittin with dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine liposomes: evidence for boundary lipid by Raman spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Jul 16;600(1):62–71. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90411-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lemmon M. A., Engelman D. M. Specificity and promiscuity in membrane helix interactions. FEBS Lett. 1994 Jun 6;346(1):17–20. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00467-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Loncharich R. J., Brooks B. R., Pastor R. W. Langevin dynamics of peptides: the frictional dependence of isomerization rates of N-acetylalanyl-N'-methylamide. Biopolymers. 1992 May;32(5):523–535. doi: 10.1002/bip.360320508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Merz K. M., Jr Molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Aug;7(4):511–517. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80115-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nishiya T., Tabushi I., Maeda A. Circular dichroism study of bacteriorhodopsin-lipid interaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987 Apr 29;144(2):836–840. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(87)80040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Novotný J., Bruccoleri R., Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. J Mol Biol. 1984 Aug 25;177(4):787–818. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Owicki J. C., Springgate M. W., McConnell H. M. Theoretical study of protein--lipid interactions in bilayer membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1616–1619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Popot J. L., Engelman D. M. Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: the two-stage model. Biochemistry. 1990 May 1;29(17):4031–4037. doi: 10.1021/bi00469a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Post J. F., Dijkema C. An electron spin resonance spin-label study of lipophilin in oriented phospholipid bilayers. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983 Sep;225(2):795–801. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rost B., Casadio R., Fariselli P., Sander C. Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):521–533. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sansom M. S., Son H. S., Sankararamakrishnan R., Kerr I. D., Breed J. Seven-helix bundles: molecular modeling via restrained molecular dynamics. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1295–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80303-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schiffer M., Chang C. H., Stevens F. J. The functions of tryptophan residues in membrane proteins. Protein Eng. 1992 Apr;5(3):213–214. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.3.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Segrest J. P., Feldmann R. J. Membrane proteins: amino acid sequence and membrane penetration. J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 25;87(4):853–858. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90090-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shen L., Bassolino D., Stouch T. Transmembrane helix structure, dynamics, and interactions: multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 1997 Jul;73(1):3–20. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78042-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Suwa M., Hirokawa T., Mitaku S. A continuum theory for the prediction of lateral and rotational positioning of alpha-helices in membrane proteins: bacteriorhodopsin. Proteins. 1995 Aug;22(4):363–377. doi: 10.1002/prot.340220407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor W. R., Jones D. T., Green N. M. A method for alpha-helical integral membrane protein fold prediction. Proteins. 1994 Mar;18(3):281–294. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomas D. D., Bigelow D. J., Squier T. C., Hidalgo C. Rotational dynamics of protein and boundary lipid in sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane. Biophys J. 1982 Jan;37(1):217–225. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84671-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Treutlein H. R., Lemmon M. A., Engelman D. M., Brünger A. T. The glycophorin A transmembrane domain dimer: sequence-specific propensity for a right-handed supercoil of helices. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 29;31(51):12726–12732. doi: 10.1021/bi00166a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tu K., Tobias D. J., Klein M. L. Constant pressure and temperature molecular dynamics simulation of a fully hydrated liquid crystal phase dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer. Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2558–2562. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tuffery P., Etchebest C., Popot J. L., Lavery R. Prediction of the positioning of the seven transmembrane alpha-helices of bacteriorhodopsin. A molecular simulation study. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 4;236(4):1105–1122. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Gorkom L. C., Horváth L. I., Hemminga M. A., Sternberg B., Watts A. Identification of trapped and boundary lipid binding sites in M13 coat protein/lipid complexes by deuterium NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 24;29(16):3828–3834. doi: 10.1021/bi00468a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Venable R. M., Zhang Y., Hardy B. J., Pastor R. W. Molecular dynamics simulations of a lipid bilayer and of hexadecane: an investigation of membrane fluidity. Science. 1993 Oct 8;262(5131):223–226. doi: 10.1126/science.8211140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wimley W. C., White S. H. Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Oct;3(10):842–848. doi: 10.1038/nsb1096-842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Woolf T. B. Molecular dynamics of individual alpha-helices of bacteriorhodopsin in dimyristol phosphatidylocholine. I. Structure and dynamics. Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2376–2392. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78267-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Woolf T. B., Roux B. Molecular dynamics simulation of the gramicidin channel in a phospholipid bilayer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 22;91(24):11631–11635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Woolf T. B., Roux B. Structure, energetics, and dynamics of lipid-protein interactions: A molecular dynamics study of the gramicidin A channel in a DMPC bilayer. Proteins. 1996 Jan;24(1):92–114. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199601)24:1<92::AID-PROT7>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang D., Weinstein H. Signal transduction by a 5-HT2 receptor: a mechanistic hypothesis from molecular dynamics simulations of the three-dimensional model of the receptor complexed to ligands. J Med Chem. 1993 Apr 2;36(7):934–938. doi: 10.1021/jm00059a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. von Heijne G. On the hydrophobic nature of signal sequences. Eur J Biochem. 1981 May 15;116(2):419–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES