Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Apr;74(4):1611–1621. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77875-0

Compliant realignment of binding sites in muscle: transient behavior and mechanical tuning.

T L Daniel 1, A C Trimble 1, P B Chase 1
PMCID: PMC1299509  PMID: 9545027

Abstract

The presence of compliance in the lattice of filaments in muscle raises a number of concerns about how one accounts for force generation in the context of the cross-bridge cycle--binding site motions and coupling between cross-bridges confound more traditional analyses. To explore these issues, we developed a spatially explicit, mechanochemical model of skeletal muscle contraction. With a simple three-state model of the cross-bridge cycle, we used a Monte Carlo simulation to compute the instantaneous balance of forces throughout the filament lattice, accounting for both thin and thick filament distortions in response to cross-bridge forces. This approach is compared to more traditional mass action kinetic models (in the form of coupled partial differential equations) that assume filament inextensibility. We also monitored instantaneous force generation, ATP utilization, and the dynamics of the cross-bridge cycle in simulations of step changes in length and variations in shortening velocity. Three critical results emerge from our analyses: 1) there is a significant realignment of actin-binding sites in response to cross-bridge forces, 2) this realignment recruits additional cross-bridge binding, and 3) we predict mechanical behaviors that are consistent with experimental results for velocity and length transients. Binding site realignment depends on the relative compliance of the filament lattice and cross-bridges, and within the measured range of these parameters, gives rise to a sharply tuned peak for force generation. Such mechanical tuning at the molecular level is the result of mechanical coupling between individual cross-bridges, mediated by thick filament deformations, and the resultant realignment of binding sites on the thin filament.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bagni M. A., Cecchi G., Colomo F., Poggesi C. Tension and stiffness of frog muscle fibres at full filament overlap. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1990 Oct;11(5):371–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01739758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chase P. B., Kushmerick M. J. Effect of physiological ADP concentrations on contraction of single skinned fibers from rabbit fast and slow muscles. Am J Physiol. 1995 Feb;268(2 Pt 1):C480–C489. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.268.2.C480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crow M. T., Kushmerick M. J. Chemical energetics of slow- and fast-twitch muscles of the mouse. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Jan;79(1):147–166. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Córdova N. J., Ermentrout B., Oster G. F. Dynamics of single-motor molecules: the thermal ratchet model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):339–343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dantzig J. A., Goldman Y. E., Millar N. C., Lacktis J., Homsher E. Reversal of the cross-bridge force-generating transition by photogeneration of phosphate in rabbit psoas muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1992;451:247–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edman K. A. Double-hyperbolic force-velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1988 Oct;404:301–321. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finer J. T., Simmons R. M., Spudich J. A. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature. 1994 Mar 10;368(6467):113–119. doi: 10.1038/368113a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension responses to sudden length change in stimulated frog muscle fibres near slack length. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(2):441–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:219–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glyn H., Sleep J. Dependence of adenosine triphosphatase activity of rabbit psoas muscle fibres and myofibrils on substrate concentration. J Physiol. 1985 Aug;365:259–276. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldman Y. E., Huxley A. F. Actin compliance: are you pulling my chain? Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2131–2133. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80700-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harry J. D., Ward A. W., Heglund N. C., Morgan D. L., McMahon T. A. Cross-bridge cycling theories cannot explain high-speed lengthening behavior in frog muscle. Biophys J. 1990 Feb;57(2):201–208. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82523-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Higuchi H., Yanagida T., Goldman Y. E. Compliance of thin filaments in skinned fibers of rabbit skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):1000–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79975-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard J. Molecular motors: structural adaptations to cellular functions. Nature. 1997 Oct 9;389(6651):561–567. doi: 10.1038/39247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunt A. J., Gittes F., Howard J. The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load. Biophys J. 1994 Aug;67(2):766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80537-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huxley H. E., Stewart A., Sosa H., Irving T. X-ray diffraction measurements of the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments in contracting muscle. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2411–2421. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80728-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Isambert H., Venier P., Maggs A. C., Fattoum A., Kassab R., Pantaloni D., Carlier M. F. Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 12;270(19):11437–11444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kojima H., Ishijima A., Yanagida T. Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12962–12966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kushmerick M. J., Moerland T. S., Wiseman R. W. Mammalian skeletal muscle fibers distinguished by contents of phosphocreatine, ATP, and Pi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7521–7525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mijailovich S. M., Fredberg J. J., Butler J. P. On the theory of muscle contraction: filament extensibility and the development of isometric force and stiffness. Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1475–1484. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79348-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Molloy J. E., Burns J. E., Kendrick-Jones J., Tregear R. T., White D. C. Movement and force produced by a single myosin head. Nature. 1995 Nov 9;378(6553):209–212. doi: 10.1038/378209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pate E., Cooke R. A model of crossbridge action: the effects of ATP, ADP and Pi. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1989 Jun;10(3):181–196. doi: 10.1007/BF01739809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Piazzesi G., Linari M., Reconditi M., Vanzi F., Lombardi V. Cross-bridge detachment and attachment following a step stretch imposed on active single frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1997 Jan 1;498(Pt 1):3–15. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Piazzesi G., Lombardi V. A cross-bridge model that is able to explain mechanical and energetic properties of shortening muscle. Biophys J. 1995 May;68(5):1966–1979. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80374-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Seow C. Y., Shroff S. G., Ford L. E. Detachment of low-force bridges contributes to the rapid tension transients of skinned rabbit skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1997 May 15;501(Pt 1):149–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.149bo.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wakabayashi K., Sugimoto Y., Tanaka H., Ueno Y., Takezawa Y., Amemiya Y. X-ray diffraction evidence for the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments during muscle contraction. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2422–2435. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80729-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES